Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council

Magnitude of advantage in tumor response contributes to a better correlation between treatment effects on overall survival and progression-free survival: a literature-based meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although it is suggested that the endpoints originated from the concept of tumor shrinkage dynamics, such as early tumor shrinkage and depth of response, are strongly associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), they are yet to be validated as a single surrogate endpoint of OS by themselves. This study aimed to investigate the impact of advantage in tumor response on the correlation between treatment effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in mCRC patients.

METHODS

Based on an electronic search, we identified randomized controlled trials of first-line therapy for mCRC. The impact of advantage in objective response rate (ORR) on the correlation between treatment effects on PFS and OS was evaluated based on Spearman correlation coefficients (r_s).

RESULTS

Forty-seven trials with a total of 24,018 patients were identified. The hazard ratio for PFS showed a relatively higher correlation with that for OS (r_s = 0.63) when the trials were limited to those that demonstrated a larger difference in ORR, compared to the case for trials that demonstrated a smaller difference (r_s = 0.32). This tendency was also observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by the types of treatment agents (targeted or non-targeted).

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of advantage in tumor response was suggested to contribute to a better prediction of OS benefit based on PFS in patients with mCRC. The accuracy of OS estimation in mCRC is expected to be improved by considering the degree of tumor shrinkage in conjunction with PFS.

Historical perspective: Two decades of progress in treating metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. While screening methods strive to improve rates of early stage detection, 25% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, with the most common sites being the liver, lung, and peritoneum. While once perceived as hopeless, the last two decades have seen substantial strides in the medical, surgical, and regional therapies to treat metastatic disease offering significant improvements in survival.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.

Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial

BACKGROUND

Elderly and frail patients with cancer, although often treated with chemotherapy, are under-represented in clinical trials. We designed FOCUS2 to investigate reduced-dose chemotherapy options and to seek objective predictors of outcome in frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We undertook an open, 2 × 2 factorial trial in 61 UK centres for patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer who were considered unfit for full-dose chemotherapy. After comprehensive health assessment (CHA), patients were randomly assigned by minimisation to: 48-h intravenous fluorouracil with levofolinate (group A); oxaliplatin and fluorouracil (group B); capecitabine (group C); or oxaliplatin and capecitabine (group D). Treatment allocation was not masked. Starting doses were 80% of standard doses, with discretionary escalation to full dose after 6 weeks. The two primary outcome measures were: addition of oxaliplatin ([A vs B] + [C vs D]), assessed with progression-free survival (PFS); and substitution of fluorouracil with capecitabine ([A vs C] + [B vs D]), assessed by change from baseline to 12 weeks in global quality of life (QoL). Analysis was by intention to treat. Baseline clinical and CHA data were modelled against outcomes with a novel composite measure, overall treatment utility (OTU). This study is registered, number ISRCTN21221452.

FINDINGS

459 patients were randomly assigned (115 to each of groups A-C, 114 to group D). Factorial comparison of addition of oxaliplatin versus no addition suggested some improvement in PFS, but the finding was not significant (median 5·8 months [IQR 3·3-7·5] vs 4·5 months [2·8-6·4]; hazard ratio 0·84, 95% CI 0·69-1·01, p=0·07). Replacement of fluorouracil with capecitabine did not improve global QoL: 69 of 124 (56%) patients receiving fluorouracil reported improvement in global QoL compared with 69 of 123 (56%) receiving capecitabine. The risk of having any grade 3 or worse toxic effect was not significantly increased with oxaliplatin (83/219 [38%] vs 70/221 [32%]; p=0·17), but was higher with capecitabine than with fluorouracil (88/222 [40%] vs 65/218 [30%]; p=0·03). In multivariable analysis, fewer baseline symptoms (odds ratio 1·32, 95% CI 1·14-1·52), less widespread disease (1·51, 1·05-2·19), and use of oxaliplatin (0·57, 0·39-0·82) were predictive of better OTU.

INTERPRETATION

FOCUS2 shows that with an appropriate design, including reduced starting doses of chemotherapy, frail and elderly patients can participate in a randomised controlled trial. On balance, a combination including oxaliplatin was preferable to single-agent fluoropyrimidines, although the primary endpoint of PFS was not met. Capecitabine did not improve QoL compared with fluorouracil. Comprehensive baseline assessment holds promise as an objective predictor of treatment benefit.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK and the Medical Research Council.

Enhanced cytotoxicity of 5-FU by bFGF through up-regulation of uridine phosphorylase 1

Anti cancer agent 5-FU (Fluoro Uracil) is a prodrug that can be metabolized and then activated to interfere with RNA and DNA homeostasis. However, the majority of administered 5-FU is known to be catabolized in vivo in the liver where Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is abundantly expressed to degrade 5-FU. The biological factors that correlate with the response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy have been proposed to include uridine phosphorylase (UPP), thymidine phosphorylase (TPP), p53 and microsatellite instability. Among these, the expression of UPP is known to be controlled by cytokines such as TNF-alpha, IL1 and IFN-gamma. Our preliminary study using a DNA microarray technique showed that basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) markedly induced the expression of UPP1 at the transcription level. In the present study, we investigated whether bFGF could modulate the expression of UPP1 in osteo-lineage cells and examined the sensitivity of these cells to 5-FU mediated apoptosis.

A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems.

CONCLUSION

Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.

Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Our aims were to determine the correlations between progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and response rate (RR) with overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), and to identify a potential surrogate for OS.

METHODS

Randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy in MCRC were identified, and statistical analyses were undertaken to evaluate the correlations between the end points.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials were identified containing a total of 87 treatment arms. Among trials, the nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r(s)) between differences (Delta) in surrogate end points (DeltaPFS, DeltaTTP, and DeltaRR) and DeltaOS were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88), 0.52 (95% CI, 0.004 to 0.81), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.63), respectively. The r(s) for DeltaPFS was not significantly different from the r(s) DeltaTTP (P = .28). Linear regression analysis was performed using hazard ratios for PFS and OS. There was a strong relationship between hazard ratios for PFS and OS; the slope of the regression line was 0.54 +/- 0.10, indicating that a novel therapy producing a 10% risk reduction for PFS will yield an estimated 5.4% +/- 1% risk reduction for OS.

CONCLUSION

In first-line chemotherapy trials for MCRC, improvements in PFS are strongly associated with improvements in OS. In this patient population, PFS may be an appropriate surrogate for OS. As a clinical end point, PFS offers increased statistical power at a given time of analysis and a significant lead time advantage compared with OS.

Folfox4 in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Monoinstitutional Experience

Aims and background

Patients included in clinical trials are “selected”, and they usually differ from those commonly treated. Methods: From 1999 to 2004, in the Medical Oncology Department of Padua (Italy), 70 metastatic colorectal cancers were treated with FOLFOX4.

Results

Our results, compared with those of the registration trial (response rate, duration of response and progression-free survival) appeared lower; overall survival was improved.

Conclusions

The number of therapeutic regimens more than their type influenced the results.

Quality of life versus prolongation of life in patients treated with chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: A review of randomized controlled clinical trials

Oncologists disagree if chemotherapy in advanced cancer can improve quality of life (QoL), to prolong duration of life, or both. The objective of this study was to clarify the main treatment intention of palliative chemotherapy (PCT): the prolongation of life (PoL); or QoL. Randomized controlled clinical trials of PCT in advanced colorectal cancer that included HRQoL assessment were selected from PubMed and reviewed. Authors' conclusions were based on both PoL- and QoL-related outcomes. However, if PoL and QoL outcomes of the experimental arm were opposite, which was the case in 13 out of 28 trials, the authors generally based their conclusion on PoL outcomes. Authors' conclusions focused mainly on PoL-related outcomes, while QoL-related outcomes were of overriding importance in only 1/28 case. QoL can therefore not be considered as the main outcome of PCT. The review shows that in the context of chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer, 'palliative' refers to a life-prolonging intention, whereas within palliative care it refers to an improvement in QoL.

Oncogenic Ras increases sensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-FU-induced apoptosis

Despite the fact that objective response rates to 5-FU are as low as 20%, 5-FU remains the most commonly used drug for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The lack of understanding of resistance to 5-FU, therefore, remains a significant impediment in maximizing its efficacy. We used intestinal epithelial cells with an inducible K-RasV12 to demonstrate that expression of oncogenic Ras promotes cell death upon 5-FU treatment. Accordingly, transient expression of the mutant RasV12, but not the WT Ras, enhanced 5-FU-induced apoptosis in 293T cells. Consistent with these data, we showed that targeted deletion of the mutant Ras allele in the HCT116 colon cancer cell line protected cells from 5-FU-induced apoptosis. Using isogenic colon cancer cell lines that differ only by the presence of the mutant Ras allele, HCT116 and Hke-3 cells, we demonstrated that signaling by oncogenic Ras promotes both accumulation of p53 and its phosphorylation on serine15 in response to 5-FU, a situation that favors apoptosis over growth arrest. However, despite the differential induction of p53 in HCT116 and Hke-3 cells, the expression of Puma, a gene with an important role in p53-dependent apoptosis, was not affected by Ras signaling. In contrast, we showed that Ras interferes with 5-FU-induced expression of gelsolin, a protein with known antiapoptotic activity. We ascertained the role of gelsolin in 5-FU-induced apoptosis by demonstrating that silencing of gelsolin expression through RNAi sensitized cells to 5-FU-induced apoptosis and that re-expression of gelsolin in cells harboring mutant Ras protected cells from 5-FU-induced apoptosis. These data therefore demonstrate that Ras mutations increase sensitivity to 5-FU-induced apoptosis at least in part through the negative regulation of gelsolin expression. Our data indicate that Ras mutations promote apoptosis in response to 5-FU treatment and imply that tumors with Ras mutations and/or reduced expression of gelsolin may show enhanced apoptosis in response to 5-FU also in vivo.

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment: Review of Outcomes Research

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States each year. Screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer mortality; however, compliance with screening is poor, and factors associated with its compliance are poorly understood. The outcomes of treatment of colorectal cancer (surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) may have profound effects on quality of life (QOL). Furthermore, colorectal cancer screening and treatment may be expensive, and the costs are important from a policy perspective. This review examines patient-centered outcomes research related to colorectal cancer screening and treatment and outlines the work that has been done in several areas, including patient preferences, QOL, and economic analysis.

METHODS

The literature on the health outcomes associated with colorectal cancer screening and treatment was reviewed. A MEDLINE search of English language articles published from January 1, 1990 through February 2001, was conducted and was supplemented by a review of references of obtained articles. Criteria for study inclusion were identified a priori. A standardized data abstraction form was developed. Summary statistical analyses were performed on the results.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-six articles were selected for review. In total, 530 articles were excluded because they either did not include patient-centered outcomes, were duplicate articles, or could not be obtained. There were 156 articles included in the analysis; 67 addressed screening, 18 examined surveillance of high-risk groups, 22 concerned treatment of local disease, 10 examined treatment of local and metastatic disease, and 19 considered treatment of metastatic disease only. One study examined end-of-life care. In 19 studies, the phase of care was unspecified.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized, disease-specific QOL instruments should be applied in clinical trials so that the results may be compared across different types of interventions. Valid and reliable methods that accurately capture patient preferences regarding screening and treatment should be developed.

Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials

Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly reported as an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of reporting of HRQOL in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2003 was undertaken on a number of databases. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of HRQOL predetermined criteria by four reviewers. Thirty-one randomised controlled trials involving 9683 colorectal cancer patients were identified. Nearly all studies dealt with metastatic patients and principally compared different chemotherapy regimens. The HRQOL tool most often used was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which was used in 48% of the studies. Some methodological limitations were identified: 39% of the RCTs did not report HRQOL compliance at baseline and 52% did not give details on missing data. A rationale for using a specific HRQOL measure was given in only 10% of the studies. Whilst HRQOL assessment is a potential valuable source of information in understanding the impact of colorectal cancer, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.

Survie à long terme des cancers colorectaux métastatiques sous chimiothérapie par 5-fluoro-uracile

PURPOSE

Median survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) is between 12 and 18 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term survival in this disease.

METHODS

We report here, retrospectively, the survival of 445 patients who entered in first-line prospective studies with LV-5FU-based regimen chemotherapy, between 1985 and 1995.

RESULTS

Median survival was 18 months. The 3, 5 and 10 year survival were respectively 17.9%, 4.5% and 2.4%. Seventy-five patients survived more than 3 years, among them, 10 achieved a complete and 34 a partial response, 12 had curative liver or lung surgery. Fifteen patients lived more than 5 years, 2 achieved a complete and 7 a partial response. Seven had curative surgery. Eleven patients were still alive in 2002, among them 7 in complete remission at 5 years, including 3 who did not have surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that some patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can achieve long survival, especially when secondary curative surgery can be performed. However, 1% of the patients can be cured with LV-5FU chemotherapy alone. These results will be probably improve with the use of the new drugs: oxaliplatin and irinotecan.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 2

The second part of this review examines the use of recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFNalpha) in the following solid tumours: superficial bladder cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, head and neck cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, lung cancer, mesothelioma and ovarian, breast and cervical malignancies. In superficial bladder cancer, intravesical rIFNalpha has a promising role as second-line therapy in patients resistant or intolerant to intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). In HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma, rIFNalpha is active as monotherapy and in combination with antiretroviral agents, especially in patients with CD4 counts >200/mm(3), no prior opportunistic infections and nonvisceral disease. rIFNalpha has shown encouraging results when used in combination with retinoids in the chemoprevention of head and neck squamous cell cancers. It is effective in the chemoprevention of hepatocellular cancer in hepatitis C-seropositive patients. In neuroendocrine tumours, including carcinoid tumour, low-dosage (</=3 MU) or intermediate-dosage (5 to 10 MU) rIFNalpha is indicated as second-line treatment, either with octreotide or alone in patients resistant to somatostatin analogues. Intracavitary IFNalpha may be useful in malignant pleural effusions from mesothelioma. Similarly, intraperitoneal IFNalpha may have a role in the treatment of minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer. In breast cancer, the only possible role for IFNalpha appears to be intralesional administration for resistant disease. IFNalpha may have a role as a radiosensitising agent for the treatment of cervical cancer; however, this requires confirmation in randomised trials. On the basis of current evidence, the routine use of rIFNalpha is not recommended in the therapy of head and neck squamous cell cancers, upper gastrointestinal tract, colorectal and lung cancers, or mesothelioma. Pegylated IFNalpha (peginterferon-alpha) is an exciting development that offers theoretical advantages of increased efficacy, reduced toxicity and improved compliance. Further data from randomised studies in solid tumours are needed where rIFNalpha has activity, such as neuroendocrine tumours, minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. A better understanding of the biological mechanisms that determine response to rIFNalpha is needed. Studies of IFNalpha-stimulated gene expression, which are now feasible, should help to identify molecular predictors of response and allow us to target therapy more selectively to patients with solid tumours responsive to IFNalpha.

5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in the treatment of cancer. Over the past 20 years, increased understanding of the mechanism of action of 5-FU has led to the development of strategies that increase its anticancer activity. Despite these advances, drug resistance remains a significant limitation to the clinical use of 5-FU. Emerging technologies, such as DNA microarray profiling, have the potential to identify novel genes that are involved in mediating resistance to 5-FU. Such target genes might prove to be therapeutically valuable as new targets for chemotherapy, or as predictive biomarkers of response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Policies of UK clinicians regarding the duration of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer are not consistent. We aimed to compare effectiveness of continuous and intermittent chemotherapy in such patients.

METHODS

Patients who responded or had stable disease after receiving 12 weeks of the regimens described by de Gramont and Lokich, or raltitrexed chemotherapy, were randomised to either intermittent (a break in chemotherapy, re-starting on the same drug on progression), or continuous chemotherapy until progression.

FINDINGS

354 patients (178 intermittent, 176 continuous) were enrolled from 42 UK centres. At randomisation, 41% of participants had part or complete response; 59% were stable. Only 66 (37%) patients allocated to intermittent treatment restarted as planned, after a median of 130 days. Median time on treatment after restarting was 84 days. Patients in the continuous group remained on treatment for a median of a further 92 days. Similar proportions of patients in both groups received second-line therapy. Patients on intermittent chemotherapy had significantly fewer toxic effects and serious adverse events than those in the continuous group. There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall survival (hazard ratio 0.87 favouring intermittent, 95% CI 0.69-1.09, p=0.23).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings provided no clear evidence of a benefit in continuing therapy indefinitely until disease progression. They showed that it is safe to stop chemotherapy after 12 weeks and re-start the same treatment on progression in patients with chemosensitive advanced colorectal cancer.

Intrahepatic arterial versus intravenous fluorouracil and folinic acid for colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most frequent site for metastases of colorectal cancer, which is the second largest contributor to cancer deaths in Europe. We did a randomised trial to compare an intrahepatic arterial (IHA) fluorouracil and folinic acid regimen with the standard intravenous de Gramont fluorouracil and folinic acid regimen for patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, with metastases confined to the liver.

METHODS

We randomly allocated 290 patients from 16 centres to receive either intravenous chemotherapy (folinic acid 200 mg/m2, fluorouracil bolus 400 mg2 and 22-h infusion 600 mg/m2, day 1 and 2, repeated every 14 days), or IHA chemotherapy designed to be equitoxic (folinic acid 200 mg/m2, fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 over 15 mins and 22-h infusion 1600 mg/m2, day 1 and 2, repeated every 14 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

50 (37%) patients allocated to IHA did not start their treatment, and another 39 (29%) had to stop before receiving six cycles of treatment because of catheter failure. The IHA group received a median of two cycles (0-6), compared with 8.5 (6-12) for the intravenous group. 45 (51%) IHA patients who did not start or did not receive six cycles switched to intravenous treatment. In both groups, grade 3 or 4 toxicity was uncommon. Median overall survival was 14.7 months for the IHA group and 14.8 months for the intravenous group (hazard ratio 1.04 [95% CI 0.80-1.33], log-rank test p=0.79). Similarly, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival.

INTERPRETATION

Our results showed no evidence of an advantage in progression-free survival or overall survival for the IHA group; thus continued use of this regimen cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.

Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: what has been learnt?

Accurate assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is essential to improve our understanding of how cancer and chemotherapy influence patients' life and to adapt treatment strategies. Specific questionnaires have descriptive and predictive value and can be used to evaluate new therapies. Results from HRQoL assessments in randomised trials help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients treated with palliative chemotherapy have an improvement or at least a preservation of their HRQoL. However, several trials have found small differences in HRQoL between treatment groups. This may be due to the insufficient sensitivity of tools, low numbers of patients or missing data. An international consensus on the methods of measurement of HRQoL in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret results and to optimise the publication of precise HRQoL data.

[Measure of quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: techniques and main results]

PURPOSE

Until the 1990s, the patient's duration of life was the main measure for determining the value of palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Quality of life recently appeared as a main end point. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the instruments used to measure quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, to review the published data and to analyse the bias and methodological problems.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

QoL is a multidimensional subjective concept, which can be measured using psychometric instruments. Quality of life measurement has a descriptive and prognostic value. Results from quality of life assessment in randomized trials have given useful information and help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients with palliative chemotherapy had at least stabilization of quality of life. Response to chemotherapy and side-effects influence quality of life. Quality of life assessment clearly requires methodological improvement. Missing data are a particularly difficult problem, which should be improved by a better organization.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Psychometric properties of EORTC QLQ-CR38 et FACT-C should be checked in French language. An international consensus on methods of measurement of quality of life in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret quality of life results et to optimize publications of precise quality of life data.

Advanced colorectal cancer treatment in Europe: what have we achieved?

The goal of the present paper is to review how treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has evolved during the last 10 years and to make some suggestions on how that disease could be managed today. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with folinic acid (FA) remains the basis for advanced colorectal cancer treatment. In Europe, infusional 5-FU is considered to be more active and better tolerated than bolus 5-FU. New agents including oral 5-FU prodrugs UFT/FA, and capecitabine, tomudex, irinotecan and oxaliplatin have been shown active in advanced colorectal cancer. At presentation the combination of infusional 5-FU/FA with irinotecan or oxaliplatin is considered to be superior to any of these agents used alone, yielding a median survival of up to 16-19 months. Second-line therapy could further prolong survival in selected patient populations. Eventually chemotherapy could allow curative resection of previously unresectable hepatic and pulmonary metastases.

Survival and quality of life in gastrointestinal tumors: two different end points?

BACKGROUND

In gastrointestinal tumors, the traditional end point of medical treatment was represented mainly by survival. In the last few years, however, there has been an increasing awareness about the role of quality of life.

DESIGN

This paper seeks to discuss these two important end points and their relationship in colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and liver cancers.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy has doubled survival in comparison with best supportive care in gastrointestinal tumors. A subjective response, represented by a decrease in cancer-related symptoms is expected in about half of the symptomatic patients in colorectal and gastric cancer. In pancreatic cancer, the positive results in terms of clinical benefit helped define the role of chemotherapy. Although clinical benefit does not represent a validated tool to measure quality of life, it can be a first step in the definition of new, simpler tools to assess this end point. The frequent presence of a serious concomitant disease, liver cirrhosis, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually prevents the use of chemotherapy in these tumors, which are often treated with locoregional treatments. Unfortunately, their impact on the survival and quality of life of these patients has never been adequately assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

In many gastrointestinal cancers, chemotherapy can produce a survival gain and an improvement in the quality of life. Further studies assessing new drugs and/or combinations should focus on these aspects and their relationships. In particular, the impact of treatments of HCC on both survival and quality of life must be investigated by well-designed prospective trials. When assessing the value of a particular anticancer treatment, it is important to consider the impact it may have not only on survival but also on quality of life. This is particularly so for cancer patients, whose life expectancy may be short.

Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

This randomised trial compared three chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, in terms of their effect on overall and progression-free survival; other endpoints included toxicity, symptom palliation, and quality of life.

METHODS

905 patients were randomly assigned the de Gramont regimen (n=303; folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2), and infusion 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, repeated every 14 days), the Lokich regimen (n=301; protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil 300 mg/m(2) daily), or raltitrexed (n=301; 3 mg/m(2) intravenously every 21 days). Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Median follow-up of survivors was 67 weeks. For the de Gramont, Lokich, and raltitrexed groups, respectively, median survival was 294, 302, and 266 days. The hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.88 (95% CI 0.70-1.12, p=0.17) for de Gramont versus Lokich, and 0.99 (0.79-1.25, p=0.94) for de Gramont versus raltitrexed. An increase in treatment-related deaths was seen on raltitrexed (de Gramont one, Lokich two, raltitrexed 18) due to combined gastrointestinal and haematological toxicity. Patients' assessment of quality of life showed that raltitrexed was inferior to the fluorouracil-based regimens, especially in terms of palliation and functioning.

INTERPRETATION

The deGramont and Lokich regimens were similar in terms of survival, quality of life, and response rates. The Lokich regimen was associated with more central line complications and hand-foot syndrome. Raltitrexed showed similar response rates and overall survival to the de Gramont regimen and was easier to administer, but resulted in greater toxicity and inferior quality of life.

A phase III study of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus interferon alpha 2b versus 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study

We conducted a phase III study in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACC). The total number of patients randomized from October 1993 until July 1998 was 192, whereas therapy was started on 179 and 158 (82.3%) have been evaluable. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly bolus administration for 6 weeks of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 (arm I) versus 5-FU (500 mg/m2) intravenous bolus and interferon-alpha, 5 MU subcutaneously, three times a week (arm II) versus leucovorin 200 mg/m2 in 2-hour infusion and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 intravenous bolus at the midtime of leucovorin infusion (arm III) followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for six cycles or until progression. This study failed to show any superiority of the modulated 5-FU versus single administration of 5-FU. There were no significant differences between the three arms in the overall response rate (10.3% versus 11.3% versus 12.9%, p = 0.95), the time to tumor progression (median, 3.9 versus 3.8 versus 6.0 months, p = 0.59), or survival duration (median, 14.7 versus 12.4 versus 16.3 months, p = 0.71). The incidence of severe (grades III and IV) toxicity was significantly higher in patients in arm II and III (24.5% and 18.6%) versus arm I (6.0%) (p = 0.01). Because modulated 5-FU failed to show superiority versus 5-FU, new agents and new strategies are needed for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Alpha-interferon does not increase the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer

Two meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the benefit of combining alpha-IFN to 5FU in advanced colorectal cancer in terms of tumour response and survival. Analyses were based on a total of 3254 individual patient data provided by principal investigators of each trial. The meta-analysis of 5FU +/- LV vs. 5FU +/- LV + alpha-IFN combined 12 trials and 1766 patients. The meta-analysis failed to show any statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of tumour response or survival. Overall tumour response rates were 25% for patients receiving no alpha-IFN vs. 24% for patients receiving alpha-IFN (relative risk, RR = 1.02), and median survivals were 11.4 months for patients receiving no alpha-IFN vs. 11.5 months for patients receiving alpha-IFN (hazard ratio, HR = 0.95). The meta-analysis of 5FU + LV vs. 5FU + alpha-IFN combined 7 trials, and 1488 patients. This meta-analysis showed an advantage for 5FU + LV over 5FU + alpha-IFN which was statistically significant in terms of tumour response (23% vs. 18%; RR = 1.26;P = 0.042), and of a borderline significance for overall survival (HR = 1.11;P = 0.066). Metastases confined to the liver and primary rectal tumours were independent favourable prognostic factors for tumour response, whereas good performance status, metastases confined to the liver or confined to the lung, and primary tumour in the rectum were independent favourable prognostic factors for survival. We conclude that alpha-IFN does not increase the efficacy of 5FU or of 5FU + LV, and that 5FU + alpha-IFN is significantly inferior to 5FU + LV, for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a challenge to clinical trial design

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with about 18 000 deaths in the UK and 56 000 in the USA each year. Despite improvements in surgical technique, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy, 50% of patients apparently 'cured' by surgery subsequently relapse and die of the disease. There is an obvious need to develop novel rational therapies based on understanding the molecular signatures that separate tumour from normal colorectal epithelium.

A clinical nomogram for predicting long-term survival in advanced colorectal cancer

From our prospectively accrued database of patients with gastrointestinal cancer, 1057 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were identified with the aim of determining predictive factors for survival of greater than 2 years and to use this information to develop a predictive nomogram. Patient's baseline characteristics, type and number of chemotherapy regimens received, and response to chemotherapy were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression comparing those who survived greater than or less than 2 years. A total of 161 (15.2%) patients survived more than 2 years, so-called long survivors (LS). In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for LS were: good performance status (PS), normal serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), rectal primary, Dukes' stage A-B, well or moderate differentiation, two or less disease sites, response to chemotherapy and treatment used protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in first-line chemotherapy, and the increasing number of chemotherapy treatments received. From these PS, CEA, number of sites and response to first-line chemotherapy were used to develop a nomogram capable of predicting the probability of survival beyond 2 years for an individual patient. This large study confirmed the relevance of known prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer and demonstrated the importance of response to chemotherapy as an independent factor to predict LS. By combining these, we developed a nomogram which provides information which is likely to prove useful in the management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Progress in colorectal cancer chemotherapy: how far have we come, how far to go?

Fluorouracil has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) for almost 40 years. Various schedules and biochemical modulators have been investigated in an attempt to improve the therapeutic efficacy of fluorouracil. To date, fluorouracil plus folinic acid represents the standard therapy in CRC for the adjuvant treatment of patients at high risk for relapse and for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease. To gain clinical acceptance, however, oral fluoropyrimidines must confer at least the same survival advantages associated with the optimal intravenous fluorouracil regimens. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are 2 other novel agents that have mechanisms of action that are uniquely different from those of fluorouracil, with demonstrated activity in patients with fluorouracil-refractory disease. Recent randomised trials comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid with combinations of either irinotecan or oxaliplatin and fluorouracil plus folinic acid have shown that response rates are improved and time to progression is increased in patients receiving the combination regimens. These regimens are being rapidly introduced in the adjuvant setting, and the role and acceptance of these combination regimens as first-line therapy needs to be defined. Other novel agents being evaluated in the treatment of patients with advanced CRC include oral edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A) and tumour vaccines. Future research is focused on enabling clinicians to individualise treatment strategies in patients with CRC, so as to improve clinical outcomes and reduce drug toxicity.

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004).

CONCLUSION

The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

The use of thymidylate synthase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: current status

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin has been the unofficial "standard" therapy for patients with colorectal cancer for over a decade. Recently, however, a number of new agents targeted against the enzyme thymidylate synthase have been synthesized and are in various stages of development. The currently available thymidylate synthase inhibitors are discussed. Enormous efforts have been made over the years to improve the efficacy of 5-FU, the most popular of these agents. Biochemical modulation by leucovorin has been the most successful so far. Continuous infusion schedules also appear to be advantageous over bolus administration. However, marked intra- and interpatient variability, combined with nonlinear elimination kinetics and erratic oral bioavailability are relative limitations to further development of 5-FU. New oral 5-FU prodrugs such as UFT, S-1, and Capecitabine may help to overcome some of these difficulties. Eniluracil, a potent inhibitor of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, may also help by overcoming potential 5-FU resistance mechanisms, in addition to increasing its bioavailability. Of the antifolate-based inhibitors, Tomudex is in the most advanced stage of development. Similar efficacy with 5-FU and a convenient schedule may suggest a role in future combination regimens. It is quite likely that even the most optimal thymidylate synthase inhibition will have limitations in terms of clinical efficacy. Novel combinations of 5-FU or its analogs with agents that have different mechanisms of action (e.g., oxaliplatin, irinotecan) could provide important new opportunities for improving the outlook of patients with colorectal cancer.

Induction of thymidine phosphorylase as a pharmacodynamic end-point in patients with advanced carcinoma treated with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and interferon alpha

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is an essential enzyme for the biochemical activation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Interferon upregulates TP in vivo, although the dose and schedule of interferon for optimal biomodulation of 5-FU is not known. In this study, TP activity was measured in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from patients with advanced carcinoma receiving treatment with 5-FU and folinic acid. Cohorts of patients were treated with interferon alpha (IFNalpha), immediately prior to 5-FU/folinic acid, at doses of 3 MIU m(-2), 9 MIU m(-2) and 18 MIUm(-2). IFNalpha was administered on day 0 cycle two, day-1 and day 0 cycle three and day-2, day-1 and day 0 cycle four. A fourth cohort was treated with IFNalpha 9 MIU m(-2) three times per week from cycle 2 onwards. Twenty-one patients were entered into the study with 19 evaluable for response. Six patients (32%) had stable disease and 13 (68%) progressive disease. There were no grade-IV toxicities. TP activity was detected in PBLs from all patients with wide interpatient variability in constitutive TP activity prior to chemotherapy, and in response to IFNalpha. 5-FU/folinic acid alone did not induce TP activity but a single dose of IFNalpha led to upregulation of TP within 2 h of administration with a further increase by 24 h (signed rank test, P = 0.006). TP activity remained elevated for at least 13 days (signed rank test, P= 0.02). There were no significant differences in TP activity between schedules or with additional doses of IFNalpha. A single dose of IFNalpha as low as 3 MIU m(-2) can cause sustained elevation of PBL TP activity in vivo indicating that biochemical markers are important pharmacodynamic endpoints for developing optimal schedules of IFNalpha for biomodulation of 5-FU.

Immunomodulation therapy in colorectal carcinoma

There has been much progress in the understanding of the relationship between the immune system and colorectal cancer. This has led to the use of immunomodulatory therapy in the adjuvant and palliative treatment of the condition. Although attempts at the use of non-specific immunomodulation with agents such as levamisole, cimetidine, alpha interferon and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) have not produced significant clinical benefits when tested in randomized trials in both the adjuvant setting and for metastatic disease, promising results are being obtained with more specific therapy. Edrecolomab [corrected], a murine monoclonal antibody targeting the 17-1A antigen on malignant colorectal cells has produced a reduction in relapse and mortality rates when used as adjuvant treatment following surgery for Dukes' C colon cancer. Active specific therapy with autologous tumour vaccine administered with BCG has produced similar benefits in Dukes' B cancer. Both 3H1 anti-idiotypic antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen and 105AD7 antibody to gp72 glycoprotein have demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo immune activation against tumour. Non-randomized studies postulate prolongation of survival using these antibodies in advanced disease. These agents are all currently being tested in randomized studies powered to detect meaningful survival differences and clinical benefit. Immune therapy offers the potential of low toxicity therapy in colorectal cancer and may have a role as an adjunct to conventional chemotherapy.

Summary measures and statistics in the analysis of quality of life data: an example from an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK locally advanced breast cancer study

Quality of Life (QL) is now included as an endpoint in many phase III cancer clinical trials. Numerous statistical techniques have been presented in the literature to analyse QL data but there is still no agreement as to what is the optimal approach of analysis. In this paper we, therefore, present and compare various techniques which have all appeared in the literature and which may be globally described as summary measures and summary statistics. These techniques are illustrated using data from an EORTC clinical trial in locally advanced breast cancer (EORTC trial 10921). It is also explained in this paper how and when these techniques may be used in other cancer settings. For EORTC trial 10921, it is shown that by choosing different techniques different conclusions may be drawn concerning the QL outcome. This highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate primary statistical method and for describing it a priori in the protocol and analysis plan. In this paper, we show the importance of performing sensitivity or supportive analysis to support conclusions drawn from the primary analysis.

What has been learned from measuring health-related quality of life in clinical oncology

The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in oncology clinical trials has come of age. Most cooperative clinical trials groups as well as individual institutions have either been measuring, or are starting to measure, HRQL. Over the past decade, much has been learned about how to incorporate HRQL components into multicentre, randomised controlled (phase III) trials and how to collect the data with reasonably low levels of missing information. A selective review, focused primarily on phase III studies, shows that HRQL data are useful for deciding which treatment is preferable when survival rates are similar and for determining whether changes in HRQL, as compared with baseline levels, are related to a treatment or intervention. HRQL information is improving our knowledge of the effects of diseases and their treatments on the patient's ability to function and sense of well-being, and HRQL status is proving to be a more accurate predictor of survival than is performance status. Much more remains to be done, but it is apparent that the inclusion of HRQL in clinical trials has been informative and useful. The increasing frequency of HRQL assessment in clinical trials is evidence of the emergence of a patient-centred philosophy in clinical medicine which, in time, will modify the disease-oriented paradigm under which medical professionals have functioned for the past century.

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer represents an incurable condition, with the exception of a very select group of patients in whom surgical excision of recurrent disease is possible. Chemotherapy offers a significant palliative benefit and may prolong patient survival. The preferred cytotoxic agent is 5-fluorouracil, through the optimal administration schedule is unknown. Recent evidence also supports the use of second-line chemotherapy for patients who develop progressive disease following 5-fluorouracil treatment. Promising results have been obtained with new drugs, in particular oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Novel therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy and liver directed strategies, are undergoing clinical evaluation. Comprehensive supportive care, with appropriate community and hospital based palliative care, is essential in the management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma

Every year, 31 230 men and women are diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma, and up to 60% of these will ultimately develop advanced disease. However, there is little information to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from palliative chemotherapy. This analysis is unique in evaluating how the site of metastasis influences response and survival. A database of 497 patients treated within randomized clinical trials using 5-Fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital was analysed. The potential for site of metastasis as a predictive variable for response to chemotherapy and survival was examined, in addition to other clinical parameters. The presence of liver metastases was a better predictor for overall response than either performance status or number of metastatic sites on presentation. Probability of response was significantly decreased by a raised serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and presence of peritoneal metastases. In liver metastases, a normal serum albumin was as significant a predictor for response as good performance status. The most important predictor for survival was initial performance status. The number of metastatic sites on presentation had no influence on survival. Site of metastasis can predict for response to 5FU-based chemotherapy and patients should be stratified according to the involved site of metastasis in the future. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma

Every year, 31,230 men and women are diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma, and up to 60% of these will ultimately develop advanced disease. However, there is little information to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from palliative chemotherapy. This analysis is unique in evaluating how the site of metastasis influences response and survival. A database of 497 patients treated within randomized clinical trials using 5-Fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital was analysed. The potential for site of metastasis as a predictive variable for response to chemotherapy and survival was examined, in addition to other clinical parameters. The presence of liver metastases was a better predictor for overall response than either performance status or number of metastatic sites on presentation. Probability of response was significantly decreased by a raised serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and presence of peritoneal metastases. In liver metastases, a normal serum albumin was as significant a predictor for response as good performance status. The most important predictor for survival was initial performance status. The number of metastatic sites on presentation had no influence on survival. Site of metastasis can predict for response to 5FU-based chemotherapy and patients should be stratified according to the involved site of metastasis in the future.

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin with or without interferon-alpha-2c in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: final results of a randomised phase III study

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced colorectal carcinoma, although response rates are generally less than 20%. Improved therapeutic efficacy has been reported using biochemical modulation of 5-FU by leucovorin (LV) or interferon alpha (IFN), the combination of 5-FU/LV frequently considered as standard therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. In an attempt to enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU, a prospective randomised trial was initiated to compare 5-FU/LV with 5-FU/LV plus IFN. Patients were randomised to receive either LV, 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), followed by 5-FU, 500 mg/m2 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, daily for 4 days, followed by weekly infusions until week 8, or the same regimen of 5-FU/LV plus IFN-alpha-2c, 30 micrograms subcutaneously (s.c.), three times weekly. Cycles were repeated after a 2-week rest period. Among 269 enrolled patients, 219 were available for response and 243 for toxicity. An objective tumour response was observed in 38 of 107 (36%) and 28 of 112 (25%) patients in the treatment arms with and without IFN, respectively (difference not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups in response duration (median 8.4 versus 12.1 months), time to treatment failure (median 6.5 versus 4.9 months), or overall survival (median 10.0 versus 12.6 months). However, patients in the IFN arm experienced significantly more haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity and more frequent alopecia. In conclusion, the addition of IFN to 5-FU/LV in the schedules and doses used in the study did not provide any clinical benefit over 5-FU/LV alone and cannot be recommended for routine use in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid with or without recombinant interferon-2b in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a randomized multicenter study with stratification for tumor burden and liver involvement by the Southern Italy Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the current study were: 1) to verify whether the addition of modulating low doses of interferon-2b (IFN) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levofolinic acid (1-FA) could improve clinical results in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma; and 2) to evaluate the role of tumor burden and liver involvement as prognostic factors.

METHODS

A total of 204 untreated patients were randomized to receive 1-FA at 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU at 375 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days with or without IFN every 3 weeks. IFN was given subcutaneously at 3 MU/day for 7 days starting 2 days before chemotherapy administration. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of hepatic disease (H+ or H-) and to total tumor burden defined as "low" or "high" using an area of 10 cm2 as the cutoff value. Thus, four patient categories were obtained: Group 1: H+ > or = 10 cm2; Group 2: H+ < 10 cm2; Group 3: H- > or = 10 cm2; and Group 4: H- < 10 cm2.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the objective response rate (23% for the combination of 1-FA and 5-FU vs. 24% for the 1-FA, 5-FU, and IFN regimen), median duration of response (11 months vs. 10 months), time to progression (5 months in both arms), and median survival (11 months vs. 12 months). A statistically significant improvement in response rate was observed in patients with limited liver involvement versus those with massive involvement independent of the chemotherapy arm (44% vs. 22%; P = 0.02). Overall survival also was improved in patients with limited liver disease (P = 0.0001) and in those without liver involvement (P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed these data and identified response and female gender as positive prognostic factors. Toxic side effects (mainly diarrhea, mucositis, and fever) were statistically more frequent in the IFN arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of low modulating doses of IFN to the regimen of 5-FU and I-FA failed to increase the response rate and survival of patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma and significantly worsened toxicity. High tumor burden and the presence of liver involvement were confirmed prospectively as poor prognostic factors and should be taken in account in designing future Phase II or comparative trials.

A multistep therapy with subcutaneous low dose recombinant interleukin-2, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin prolongs the response of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pilot study

Data from 12 metastatic colorectal cancer patients who were submitted to a pilot study with a multistep subcutaneous (sc) low dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administration were compared with those from 13 historical controls who were comparable for the major prognostic indices. All 12 patients in the pilot study were subjected initially to six to eight courses of 5-FU-LV by endovenous (ev) bolus consistent with the Machover schedule alternating with 6 weeks of rIL-2 cycles. At the progression of metastatic disease, the patients were given 500 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU by continuous infusion (ci) for 5 days every 4 weeks and in case of further progression, 2,600 mg/m2 of 5-FU by 24-h ci once a week for 6 weeks. The control patients were treated with 5-FU-LV by the Machover schedule until progression and then observed. As yet, two patients in the pilot study and three control patients are currently alive. In the pilot study, the patients' response rate (CR + PR) and overall response rate (CR + PR + SD) were much higher than in the controls (50 vs 23% and 92 vs 54%, respectively). Time duration of response and survival from primary surgery were more prolonged in the pilot study than in the historical control, although not significantly (10.5 vs 6 and 41.5 vs 29 months, respectively). Time from starting therapy to progression and survival from relapse were significantly in favour of the pilot study (11.5 vs 4 and 31 vs 13.5 months; P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 unpaired t-test, respectively). Low dose s.c. rIL-2 cycles were well tolerated and no interruption occurred. In the pilot study sporadic grade 3 toxicity (diarrhoea or leucopenia) was responsible for the reduction of 5-FU doses to 80% of the previous infusion, but no treatment was postponed. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest the opportunity to initiate large prospective randomized trials using a multistep therapy with rIL-2, 5-FU ci at conventional and at high dose in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The studies on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life following the treatment of rectal cancer were evaluated; guidelines for future quality of life studies in this field are proposed.

METHODS

Relevant papers in the English language were identified via Medline from January 1970 to November 1997, supplemented by a manual search for similar articles.

RESULTS

Patients suffer various short- and long-term complications after treatment of rectal cancer, although the reported prevalence of such problems varies from study to study. Recent prospective studies have shown that, despite these problems, global quality of life scores as measured by generic questionnaires improve after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The methodological shortcomings of previous work must be rectified if quality of life studies are to have relevance in patient management.

Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?

The aim of this study was to examine whether weight loss at presentation, in patients who were to receive chemotherapy for gastrointestinal carcinomas, influences outcome and whether nutritional intervention would be worthwhile. This study was a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data. The outcomes of patients with or without weight loss and treated for locally advanced or metastatic tumours of the oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, colon or rectum were compared. In 1555 such consecutive patients treated over a 6-year period, weight loss at presentation was reported more commonly by men than women (51 versus 44%, P = 0.01). Although patients with weight loss received lower chemotherapy doses initially, they developed more frequent and more severe dose limiting toxicity--specifically plantar-palmar syndrome (P < 0.0001) and stomatitis (P < 0.0001)--than patients without weight loss. Consequently, patients with weight loss on average received 1 month (18%) less treatment (P < 0.0001). Weight loss correlated with shorter failure-free (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 1.25) and overall survival (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 1.63), decreased response (P = 0.006), quality of life (P < 0.0001) and performance status (P < 0.0001). Patients who stopped losing weight had better overall survival (P = 0.0004). Weight loss at presentation was an independent prognostic variable (hazard ratio = 1.43). The poorer outcome from treatment in patients with weight loss appears to occur because they receive significantly less chemotherapy and develop more toxicity rather than any specifically reduced tumour responsiveness to treatment. These findings provide a rationale for attempting randomised nutritional intervention studies in these patients.

Schedule-selective biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study

We have recently reported high clinical activity against advanced colorectal cancer of a regimen-alternating bolus FUra, modulated by methotrexate (MTX), and continuous infusion FUra, modulated by 6-s-leucovorin (6-s-LV). Considering the low toxicity of the bolus part of this regimen and our recent in vitro finding of a strong synergism between bolus FUra and natural-beta-IFN (n-beta-IFN), this cytokine was incorporated in the bolus part of our treatment programme. Fifty-six patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were treated with two biweekly cycles of FUra bolus (600 mg m(-2)), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg m(-2)), and n-beta-IFN (3 x 10(6) IU i.m. every 12 h, starting at the time of FUra administration for four doses), alternating with a 3-week continuous infusion of FUra (200 mg m(-2) daily), modulated by 6-s-LV (20 mg m(-2) weekly bolus). After a 1-week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated if indicated. A total of 5 complete and 17 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 41%; 95% confidence limits, 28-55%) in 54 assessable patients. After a median follow-up time of 36 months, five patients are still alive. Overall, the median time to treatment failure was 6.4 months. The median duration of survival was 15.0 months. There was one treatment-related death after a course of MTX --> bolus FUra/n-beta-IFN and grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 18% of the patients. As the addition of n-beta-IFN results in high toxicity, whereas the efficacy seems to be similar to that of the same regimen without the cytokine, our groups are currently randomizing the original regimen, without IFN, against standard modulated bolus FUra.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in recurrent adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the response rate and associated toxicity of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS

Between December 1993 and October 1995, 53 patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma of the cervix were entered into a Phase II trial utilizing 200 mg/m2 of intravenous (iv) leucovorin with 370 mg/m2 of i.v. 5-fluorouracil daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for two courses, then every 5 weeks until disease progression. Eligibility criteria were a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status of 0-2, adequate bone marrow reserve, adequate liver function with bilirubin < or = 1.5 x normal and SGOT and alkaline phosphatase < or = 3 x normal, serum creatinine < or = 2 mg%, and signed informed consent. Standard GOG toxicity and response criteria were employed.

RESULTS

Six patients were ineligible because of wrong cell type (N = 3), insufficient pathology materials (N = 2), or a second primary (N = 1); therefore 45 were evaluable for toxicity. Two patients did not have adequate response assessment; thus, 43 were evaluable for response. The median age was 50 (range, 28-79). Prior chemotherapy had been administered to 16 patients and radiotherapy to 40 patients. The median number of courses delivered was three (range, 1-22). The site of evaluable disease was pelvic in 25 patients and extra-pelvic in 18. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 17.8% (8/45) patients and 35.5% (16/45) developed grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 1 patient each (2.1%). Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, or stomatitis was of grade 3 severity in 11.1% (5/45) and grade 4 in 6.7% (3/45). There were four partial responses and two complete responses for an overall response rate of 14%. The duration of the complete responses was 17.3 and 8.8+ months. None of the patients with responses had previously received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin exhibits moderate activity in patients with previously treated adenocarcinoma of the cervix and should be considered for a trial in chemotherapy-naive patients.

[Modulation of 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancers. Groupe d'étude et de recherche sur les cancers de l'ovaire et digestifs (GERCOD)]

The rational of leucovorin modulation of 5-fluorouracil and the clinical results in colorectal cancer are reviewed with special emphasis on the monthly schedule of low dose leucovorin and 5FU bolus for 5 consecutive days (NCCTG-Mayo Clinic regimen) and the bimonthly schedule of high-dose leucovorin and 5FU bolus plus continuous infusion for two consecutive days (LV5FU2) which is now considered as a new standard.

Attitudes and practice in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Britain. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the UK Medical Research Council

Evidence-based medicine is widely held to be the essential basis of modern therapeutics. The principle of adopting into clinical practice those treatments proved to be of value in randomized trials, or in the systematic review of several trials, in encouraging a welcome proliferation of clinical research and meta-analysis. However, many things affect clinical practice; quantifiable therapeutic benefit is only one of them. Furthermore, in many situations, clear evidence of the best treatment is not available. When discussing ideas for a new trial in advanced colorectal cancer that was launched in 1996, the MRC Colorectal Cancer Working Party carried out a survey of the attitudes and practice of surgeons and oncologists who were treating this condition. This revealed substantial diversity of practice amongst experts in the treatment of this common disease, and prompted us to review the factors that affect clinical practice and to discuss the implications.

The need for a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a critical review from a medical oncologist and surgeon

Over the last 10 years important advances have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, particularly with surgery either alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Furthermore, despite early scepticism, several chemotherapy studies have now reported significant clinical benefits with 5-FU-based regimens and promising results have also been reported with newer agents such as raltitrexed and irinotecan. Taken together these advances now enable a significant proportion of patients to undergo treatment which will improve their quality of life, prolong survival and even result in cure in certain cases. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer can only benefit from these important advances, however, if a truly multidisciplinary approach to patient care is adopted which requires integration of the roles of the surgeon, medical oncologist and radiotherapist.

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: present and future perspectives

In recent years, adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer has advanced considerably. This article reviews these advances and provides an update of the most recent and ongoing trials. In 1990, adjuvant therapy became the "standard of care" for patients with Stage III colon cancer (Dukes C) in the United States. Recent clinical trial data indicate that adjuvant treatment may also be effective in patients with Stage II (Dukes B2) colon cancer. The combination of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin may slightly improve survival (5-10 percent) compared with the standard 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole combination. The three-drug regimen (5-fluorouracil plus levamisole plus leucovorin) is more toxic, with no superior effect on survival. Intraportal chemotherapy, although it may significantly improve patient survival, does not decrease the frequency of liver metastases. However, it is still a promising form of adjuvant therapy owing to its short treatment period and relatively equivalent effects in survival compared with that of systemic therapy. For patients with Stage II or Stage III rectal cancer, postoperative systemic 5-fluorouracil plus radiation therapy plus protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion is the most effective postoperative adjuvant regimen. However, results from several studies show that preoperative radiation alone or chemoradiation for advanced local rectal cancers might also be effective while also improving resectability, decreasing morbidity, and increasing the chance that a sphincter-sparing procedure may be performed. The role of leucovorin in rectal cancer remains to be determined. Immune therapies with agents such as interferon-alpha-2a, monoclonal antibody 17-1A, and autologous tumor vaccines are being assessed and could further improve survival.