Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer

Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Hormone Therapy and Anti-HER2 Treatment: An Update on Treatment Strategies

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer represents a distinct subtype expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors with an overexpression of HER2. Approximately 14% of female breast cancer cases are HER2-positive, with the majority being HR-positive. These tumors show a cross-talk between the hormonal and HER2 pathways; the interaction has implications for the treatment options for the disease. In this review, we analyze the biology of HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and summarize the evidence concerning the standard of care options both in neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings and in advanced disease. Additionally, we focus on new trials and drugs for HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and the new entity: HER2-low breast cancer.

Neo-Adjuvant Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma

Melanoma treatment is leading the neo-adjuvant systemic (NAS) therapy field. It is hypothesized that having the entire tumor in situ, with all of the heterogeneous tumor antigens, allows the patient's immune system to have a broader response to the tumor in all its shapes and forms. This translates into a higher clinical efficacy. Another benefit of NAS therapy potentially includes identifying patients who have a favorable response, which could offer an opportunity for the de-escalation of the extent of surgery and the need for adjuvant radiotherapy and/or adjuvant systemic therapy, as well as tailoring the follow-up in terms of the frequency of visits and cross-sectional imaging. In this paper, we will review the rationale for NAS therapy in resectable metastatic melanoma and the results obtained so far, both for immunotherapy and for BRAF/MEKi therapy, and discuss the response assessment and interpretation, toxicity and surgical considerations. All the trials that have been reported up to now have been investigator-initiated phase I/II trials with either single-agent anti-PD-1, combination anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 or BRAF/MEK inhibition. The results have been good but are especially encouraging for immunotherapies, showing high durable recurrence-free survival rates. Combination immunotherapy seems superior, with a higher rate of pathologic responses, particularly in patients with a major pathologic response (MPR = pathologic complete response [pCR] + near-pCR [max 10% viable tumor cells]) of 60% vs. 25-30%. The SWOG S1801 trial has recently shown a 23% improvement in event-free survival (EFS) after 2 years for pembrolizumab when giving 3 doses as NAS therapy and 15 as adjuvant versus 18 as adjuvant only. The community is keen to see the first results (expected in 2024) of the phase 3 NADINA trial (NCT04949113), which randomized patients between surgery + adjuvant anti-PD-1 and two NAS therapy courses of a combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab, followed by surgery and a response-driven adjuvant regimen or follow-up. We are on the eve of neo-adjuvant systemic (NAS) therapy, particularly immunotherapy, becoming the novel standard of care for macroscopic stage III melanoma.

Value of Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting the Success of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study

Objectives

This prospective study was planned to compare the predictive value of dynamic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods

Twenty seven patients with LABC [median age: 47, (26-66)] underwent a dynamic 18F-FDG PET study at baseline, and after 2-3 cycles of (NAC) were included (interim). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values and SUV ratios for the 2nd, 5th, 10th, and 30th minutes and dynamic curve slope (SL) values and SL ratios were measured using 18F-FDG dynamic data. In addition, the values of SUVmean (2minSUVmean), SULpeak (2minSULpeak), metabolic volume (2minVol), and total lesion glycolysis (2minTLG) were measured for the first 2 min. Percent changes between baseline and interim studies were calculated and compared with the pathological results as the pathological complete response (PCR) or the pathological non-complete response (non-PCR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to calculate the area under the curve to predict PCR. Optimal threshold values were calculated to discriminate between PCR and non-PCR groups.

Results

Baseline study SUV 30 (p=0.044), SUV 30/2 (p=0.041), SUV 30/5 (p=0.049), SUV 30/10 (p=0.021), SL 30/2 (p=0.029) and SL 30/5 (p=0.027) values were statistically significant different between PCR and non-PCR groups. The percentage changes of 2minVol between PCR and non-PCR groups were statistically significant. For the threshold value of -67.6% change in 2minVol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.2%, 77.8%, 63.6%, 93.3%, and 80.7%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.826, p=0.009).

Conclusion

Semiquantitative parameters for dynamic 18F-FDG PET can predict PCR. % changes in 2minVol can identify non-responding patients better than other parameters.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: Efficacy, Safety and Timing

The introduction of effective systemic therapies has significantly changed the treatment of stage III and IV melanoma. Both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved recurrence-free survival in the adjuvant setting. Recent interest has sparked for neoadjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The intended benefit of pre-operative treatment with immunotherapy is amongst others to enable tailoring of the surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy according to the treatment response. Most importantly, recurrence-free survival might be improved by neoadjuvant systemic therapy over the current standard of care of surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy. The first phase I and II trials investigating anti-PD1 inhibitors, both as a single agent and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors or other therapeutic agents, have shown promising results. Pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy seems a valid surrogate endpoint for relapse-free and overall survival. Pathological complete response rates in these trials vary between 30 and 70%. The optimal dose with respect to efficacy and toxicity and the interval between systemic and surgical treatment remain important issues to address. Accumulating follow-up data and ongoing phase III studies must prove if neoadjuvant systemic therapy is superior to surgery followed by standard-of-care adjuvant therapy.

Change in microcalcifications on mammography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: correlation with tumor response grade and comparison with lesion extent

BACKGROUND

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), persistent microcalcifications are often observed in spite of a decrease in the primary tumor size.

PURPOSE

To analyze the changes in microcalcifications after NAC and to evaluate the accuracy of residual microcalcifications in predicting the extent of residual cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty patients who received NAC and underwent both mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after the completion of NAC were included. The location of microcalcifications was classified into two types: inside the mass and outside the mass.

RESULTS

The extent of the residual calcifications was larger than the pathologic residual lesion in 14 (74%) of 19 patients with complete response (CR) on MRI, but the discrepancy was <1 cm in eight (42%) patients. The median value of the discrepancy was significantly higher in patients showing CR with outside calcifications compared to CR with inside calcifications (2.0 cm vs. 0.7 cm, P = 0.008). After NAC, the decrease of calcifications was more frequently observed in cancers showing CR on MRI or Miller-Payne grade 5 and the increase of calcifications more frequently occurred in cancers showing progress disease on MRI or Miller-Payne grade 1 ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

The change in microcalcifications after NAC was correlated with the tumor response to NAC. The discrepancy was highest in the group showing CR on MRI with outside calcifications. In tumors with inside calcifications, the discrepancy was relatively low within an acceptable range.

Combination of peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

The immune system seems to play a fundamental role in breast cancer responsiveness to chemotherapy. We investigated two peripheral indicators of immunity/inflammation, i.e. neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), in order to reveal a possible relationship with pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with early or locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We retrospectively analyzed 373 consecutive patients affected by breast cancer and candidates to NACT. The complete blood cell count before starting NACT was evaluated to calculate NLR and PLR. ROC curve analysis determined threshold values of 2.42 and 104.47 as best cut-off values for NLR and PLR, respectively. The relationships between NLR/PLR and pCR, along with other clinical-pathological characteristics, were evaluated by Pearson's χ 2 or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model. NLR and PLR were not significantly associated with pCR if analyzed separately. However, when combining NLR and PLR, patients with a NLR^low/PLR^low profile achieved a significantly higher rate of pCR compared to those with NLR^high and/or PLR^high (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.22-4.27, p 0.009). Importantly, the predictive value of NLR^low/PLR^low was independent from common prognostic factors such as grading, Ki67, and molecular subtypes. The combination of NLR and PLR may reflect patients' immunogenic phenotype. Low levels of both NLR and PLR may thus indicate a status of immune system activation that may predict pCR in breast cancer patients treated with NACT.

Oncological outcome of complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With limited sample sizes and single-institution designs, how complete response (CR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) influences breast conserving surgery (BCS) and its value in prognosis are not clear.

METHODS

A systematic research review was conducted using electronic database. The rate of clinical complete response (cCR) in BCS after NAC and these pathological CR (PCR) and non-pCR BCS patients' local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distance recurrence-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were collected. A pooled analysis was performed using a fixed or random effects model and a Q test to determine heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 4639 patients were included. The pooled data revealed that cCR patients compared with non-cCR patients had significantly higher rates of BCS, with a summary estimate odds ratios (OR) of 4.54 (95% CI 2.03-10.17). The pooled data revealed that BCS patients who achieved pCR after NAC had significantly lower rates of LRFS (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.92) and DRFS (RR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.55). Better DFS (RR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.25) and OS (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.03-3.90) were also seen, but OS was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of successful BCS is higher in the cCR group than in the non-cCR group, means cCR after NAC can encourage patients to receive BCS. The achievement of pCR after NAC in BCS patients was associated with a good prognosis in terms of LRFS and DRFS, but its value in DFS and OS requires further investigation.

Value of volume-based metabolic parameters for predicting survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

We evaluated the role of metabolic parameters in the prediction of disease recurrence in operable invasive ductal breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).We retrospectively evaluated 139 female patients (mean age, 46.5 years; range: 27-72 years) with invasive ductal breast cancer, treated with NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and after completion of NAC before surgery. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological and imaging parameters for disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated.Recurrence of cancer was detected in 31 of 139 patients (22.3%; follow-up period: 6-82 months). Baseline maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and reduction rate (RR) of MTV after NAC were significant independent prognostic factors for DFS in a multivariate analysis (all P < 0.05). The survival functions differed significantly between low and high histological grades (P < 0.001). DFS of the patients with high baseline MTV (≥5.23 cm) was significantly poorer than that of low MTV patients (P = 0.019). The survival function of the group with low RR of MTV after NAC (≤90.72%) was poorer than the higher RR of the MTV group (P = 0.008).Our findings suggest that breast cancer patients who have a high histological grade, large baseline MTV, or a small RR of MTV after NAC should receive great attention to check for possible recurrence.

Advances in the Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer

Several advances in the adjuvant systemic therapy of primary breast cancer have occurred in the last decade and contributed to a decline in disease-related mortality. These include the introduction of aromatase inhibitors, new chemotherapy agents, and the novel antibody trastuzumab. New supportive treatments, such as growth factors, have contributed to the optimization of chemotherapy dose and schedule, and have improved the efficacy and safety of the treatment. In this review we will outline some of the recent advances in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. We will also discuss ongoing and proposed clinical trials.

Analysis of functional germline polymorphisms for prediction of response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

To elucidate the role of predictive factors on individual's drug response, based on genetic variation, we examined the association between eight germline polymorphisms in genes involved in protection against oxidative stress, apoptosis, oncogenic transformation, proliferation, immune response and DNA repair (TP53, NQO1, IL6, TLR4 and XRCC1) and the pathological response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 70 patients with breast cancer. The DNA was genotyped for eight polymorphisms in five genes (TP53, NQO1, IL6, TLR4 and XRCC1) by 5'-exonuclease (TaqMan™) technology. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the association between genotype, clinicopathological parameters and pathological response. A good pathological response, defined as a pathological complete response or residual isolated invasive tumor cells, was found significantly more frequently for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative breast carcinomas compared to ER and PR positive and ER or PR positive carcinomas, respectively (43.5 vs. 37.5 and 10.3 %, p = 0.006), and was significantly associated with high tumor grade (G3) (p = 0.002). A non-significant trend towards a good pathological response was shown in patients carrying the Arg/Arg or Arg/Pro TP53 codon 72 gene variant compared to those harboring the Pro/Pro variant (17.6 or 37.9 % vs. 0; p = 0.071). No association was found between NQO1 Pro187Ser, IL6 -174G>C, TLR4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile, and XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Arg399Gln and Arg280His and pathological response. The present study shows hormone receptor status and tumor grade as predictors for pathological response to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Among various functional germline polymorphisms, a potential predictive value was only found for the TP53 Arg72Pro gene variant.

Combinatorial treatment of mammospheres with trastuzumab and salinomycin efficiently targets HER2-positive cancer cells and cancer stem cells

A major obstacle in the successful treatment of cancer is the occurrence of chemoresistance. Cancer cells surviving chemotherapy and giving rise to a recurrence of the tumor are termed cancer stem cells and can be identified by elevated levels of certain stem cell markers. Eradication of this cell population is a priority objective in cancer therapy. Here, we report elevated levels of stem cell markers in MCF-7 mammospheres. Likewise, an upregulation of HER2 and its differential expression within individual cells of mammospheres was observed. Sorting for HER2(high) and HER2(low) cells revealed an upregulation of stem cell markers NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 in the HER2(low) cell fraction. Accordingly, HER2(low) cells also showed reduced proliferation, ductal-like outgrowths and an increased number of colonies in matrigel. Xenografts from subcutaneously injected HER2(low) sorted cells exihibited earlier onset but slower growth of tumors and an increase in stem cell markers compared to tumors developed from the HER2(high) fraction. Treatment of mammospheres with salinomycin reduced the expression of SOX2 indicating a selective targeting of cancer stem cells. Trastuzumab however, did not reduce the expression of SOX2 in mammospheres. Furthermore, a combinatorial treatment of mammospheres with trastuzumab and salinomycin was superior to single treatment with each drug. Thus, targeting HER2 expressing tumors with anti-HER2 therapies will not necessarily eliminate cancer stem cells and may lead to a more aggressive cancer cell phenotype. Our study demonstrates efficient killing of both HER2 positive cells and cancer stem cells, hence opening a possibility for a new combinatorial treatment strategy.

Is 18F-FDG PET accurate to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer? A meta-analysis

Clinical evidence regarding the value of (18)F-FDG PET for therapy responses assessment in breast cancer is increasing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in predicting responses to neoadjuvant therapies with meta-analysis and explore its optimal regimen for clinical use. Articles in English language relating to the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET for this utility were retrieved. Methodological quality was assessed by QUADAS tool. Pooled estimation and subgroup analysis data were obtained by statistical analysis. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and involved 920 pathologically confirmed patients in total (mean age 49.8 years, all female). Methodological quality was relatively high. To predict histopathological response in primary breast lesions by PET, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio were 84% (95% CI, 78-88%), 66% (95% CI, 62-70%), 50% (95% CI, 44-55%), 91% (95% CI, 87-94%), and 11.90 (95% CI, 6.33-22.36), respectively. In regional lymph nodes, sensitivity and NPV of PET were 92% (95% CI, 83-97%) and 88% (95% CI, 76-95%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that performing a post-therapy (18)F-FDG PET early (after the 1st or 2nd cycle of chemotherapy) was significantly better than later (accuracy 76% vs. 65%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, the best correlation with pathology was yielded by employing a reduction rate (RR) cutoff value of standardized uptake value between 55 and 65%. (18)F-FDG PET is useful to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer. However, the relatively low specificity and PPV still call for caution. It is suggested to perform PET in an earlier course of therapy and use RR cutoff value between 55 and 65%, which might potentially identify non-responders early. However, further prospective studies are warranted to assess this regimen and adequately position PET in treatment management.

Treatment options for surgically resectable gastric cancer

Surgery is the only curative therapy for gastric cancer. The standard recommendations for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma are free-margin surgery with at least D1 resection and the removal of a minimum of 15 lymph nodes. The overall 5-year survival rate for resected gastric patients remains poor due to locoregional recurrence. The results of a large North American study (Gastrointestinal Cancer Intergroup Trial INT 0116) reported that postoperative chemoradiotherapy conferred a survival advantage compared with surgery alone, which led to the regimen being adopted as a standard of care. More recently the MAGIC/UK Medical Research Council (MRC) trial demonstrated that perioperative chemotherapy resulted in an improvement in overall survival and progression free survival. Thus, two successful strategies are available to improve outcomes in patients with localized gastric cancer. This article reviews data on adjuvant and perioperative treatment modalities for gastric cancer. The article discusses ongoing randomized adjuvant and perioperative trials that are designed to optimize chemotherapy regimens and also investigate combinations of chemotherapy and biologic agents. It is important to understand the mechanisms or pathways involved in gastric cancer development and metastasis. Identification of novel molecules pivotal to tumor biology may lead to new therapeutic approaches for this malignancy.

Prediction and prognosis: impact of gene expression profiling in personalized treatment of breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is a complex disease, whose heterogeneity is increasingly recognized. Despite considerable improvement in breast cancer treatment and survival, a significant proportion of patients seems to be over- or undertreated. To date, single clinicopathological parameters show limited success in predicting the likelihood of survival or response to endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Consequently, new gene expression based prognostic and predictive tests are emerging that promise an improvement in predicting survival and therapy response. Initial evidence has emerged that this leads to allocation of fewer patients into high-risk groups allowing a reduction of chemotherapy treatment. Moreover, pattern-based approaches have also been developed to predict response to endocrine therapy or particular chemotherapy regimens. Irrespective of current pitfalls such as lack of validation and standardization, these pattern-based biomarkers will prove useful for clinical decision making in the near future, especially if more patients get access to this form of personalized medicine.

Trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Overexpression, or gene amplification, of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is evident in 20% to 25% of breast cancers. The biologic agent trastuzumab is an HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody that inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells and induces tumor cell death through multiple mechanisms of action. Currently, trastuzumab is approved for use in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Trials combining trastuzumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggest that patients with HER2-positive breast cancer also may benefit from preoperative trastuzumab. For this article, the author reviewed efficacy and safety data from key studies of patients who received neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Studies were identified from literature searches of publication and congress databases. The results of 3 large phase 3 trials (the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center neoadjuvant trastuzumab trial, the Neoadjuvant Herceptin [NOAH] trial, and the German Breast Group/Gynecologic Oncology Study Group "GeparQuattro" trial) demonstrated that, compared with chemotherapy alone, neoadjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased pathologic complete response rates to as high as 65%. Improvements in disease-free, overall, and event-free survival also were reported in the NOAH trial. In addition to demonstrated efficacy, a low incidence of cardiac dysfunction suggests that neoadjuvant trastuzumab is both effective and well tolerated. Similar results have been reported in a range of phase 2 studies using different trastuzumab-based regimens. These encouraging data led the National Comprehensive Cancer Network to recommend treating patients who have operable, locally advanced, HER2-positive breast cancer with neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab.

Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces tumor size before surgery in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of mammography and ultrasound to predict residual tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of consecutive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual tumor size estimated by diagnostic imaging was compared with residual tumor size determined by surgical pathology.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two patients with 196 primary breast cancers were studied. Of 104 tumors evaluated by both imaging modalities, ultrasound was able to size 91.3%, and mammography was able to size only 51.9% (chi(2)P < .001). Ultrasound also was more accurate than mammography in estimating residual tumor size (62 of 104 [59.6%] vs 33 of 104 [31.7%], P < .001). There was little difference in the ability of mammography and ultrasound to predict pathologic complete response (receiver operating characteristic, 0.741 vs 0.784).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast ultrasound was more accurate than mammography in predicting residual tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The likelihood of a complete pathologic response was 80% when both imaging modalities demonstrated no residual disease.

Recommendations for research priorities in breast cancer by the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups Scientific Leadership Council: systemic therapy and therapeutic individualization

Over 9,000 women with breast cancer are enrolled annually on clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), accounting for about one-third of all patients enrolled on NCI-sponsored trials. Thousands are also enrolled on pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. Although breast cancer mortality rates have recently declined for the first time in part due to systemic therapeutic advances, coordinated efforts will be necessary to maintain this trend. The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened the Scientific Leadership Council in breast cancer (BC), an expert panel, to identify priorities for future research and current trials with greatest practice-changing potential. Panelists formed a consensus on research priorities for chemoprevention, development and application of molecular markers for predicting therapeutic benefit and toxicity, intermediate markers predictive of therapeutic effect, pathogenesis-based therapeutic approaches, utilization of adaptive designs requiring fewer patients to achieve objectives, special and minority populations, and effects of BC and treatment on patients and families. Panelists identified 13 ongoing studies as High Priority and identified gaps in the current trial portfolio. We propose priorities for current and future clinical breast cancer research evaluating systemic therapies that may serve to improve the efficiency of clinical trials, identify individuals most likely to derive therapeutic benefit, and prioritize therapeutic strategies.

Early breast cancer

Adoption of urbanised lifestyles together with changes in reproductive behaviour might partly underlie the continued rise in worldwide incidence of breast cancer. Widespread mammographic screening and effective systemic therapies have led to a stage shift at presentation and mortality reductions in the past two decades. Loco-regional control of the disease seems to affect long-term survival, and attention to surgical margins together with improved radiotherapy techniques could further contribute to mortality gains. Developments in oncoplastic surgery and partial-breast reconstruction have improved cosmetic outcomes after breast-conservation surgery. Optimum approaches for delivering chest-wall radiotherapy in the context of immediate breast reconstruction present special challenges. Accurate methods for intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes remain a clinical priority. Clinical trials are investigating combinatorial therapies that use novel agents targeting growth factor receptors, signal transduction pathways, and tumour angiogenesis. Gene-expression profiling offers the potential to provide accurate prognostic and predictive information, with selection of best possible therapy for individuals and avoidance of overtreatment and undertreatment of patients with conventional chemotherapy. Short-term presurgical studies in the neoadjuvant setting allow monitoring of proliferative indices, and changes in gene-expression patterns can be predictive of response to therapies and long-term outcome.

Resistance to chemotherapy is associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 up-regulation

PURPOSE

Establishment of antiapoptotic signaling pathways in tumor cells is a major cause for the failure of chemotherapy against cancer. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we developed an experimental approach that is based on the genetic plasticity of cancer cells and the selection for cell survival on treatment with chemotherapeutic agents.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gene expression changes of surviving cell clones were analyzed by macroarrays. Involvement of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) in antiapoptotic pathways was elucidated by apoptosis assays, small interfering RNA experiments, and an antagonistic antibody.

RESULTS

We show that FGFR4 gene expression is up-regulated in doxorubicin-treated, apoptosis-resistant cancer cell clones. Ectopic expression of FGFR4 in cancer cells led to reduced apoptosis sensitivity on treatment with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide, whereas knockdown of endogenous FGFR4 expression in breast cancer cell lines had the opposite effect. FGFR4 overexpression resulted in Bcl-xl up-regulation at both mRNA and protein levels. Knockdown of FGFR4 expression by small interfering RNA caused a decrease in phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 levels and reduced Bcl-xl expression. Moreover, an antagonistic FGFR4 antibody suppressed the resistance of cancer cells with endogenous FGFR4 expression against apoptosis-inducing chemotherapeutic agents.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, we propose an antiapoptotic signaling pathway that is initiated by FGFR4 and regulating the expression of Bcl-xl through the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Our findings are exemplary for a novel strategy toward the elucidation of diverse signaling pathways that define antiapoptotic potential in cancer cells. These observations open new avenues toward the diagnosis of chemoresistant tumors and therapies targeting FGFR4-overexpressing cancers.

Tumor slices as a model to evaluate doxorubicin in vitro treatment and expression of trios of genes PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2 in canine mammary gland cancer

Background

In women with breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based in doxorubicin, tumor expression of groups of three genes (PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2) have classified them as responsive or resistant. We have investigated whether expression of these trios of genes could predict mammary carcinoma response in dogs and whether tumor slices, which maintain epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, could be used to evaluate drug response in vitro.

Methods

Tumors from 38 dogs were sliced and cultured with or without doxorubicin 1 μM for 24 h. Tumor cells were counted by two observers to establish a percentage variation in cell number, between slices. Based on these results, a reduction in cell number between treated and control samples ≥ 21.7%, arbitrarily classified samples, as drug responsive. Tumor expression of PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and SMYD2, was evaluated by real time PCR. Relative expression results were then transformed to their natural logarithm values, which were spatially disposed according to the expression of trios of genes, comprising PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2. Fisher linear discrimination test was used to generate a separation plane between responsive and non-responsive tumors.

Results

Culture of tumor slices for 24 h was feasible. Nine samples were considered responsive and 29 non-responsive to doxorubicin, considering the pre-established cut-off value of cell number reduction ≥ 21.7%, between doxorubicin treated and control samples. Relative gene expression was evaluated and tumor samples were then spatially distributed according to the expression of the trios of genes: PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2. A separation plane was generated. However, no clear separation between responsive and non-responsive samples could be observed.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional distribution of samples according to the expression of the trios of genes PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2 could not predict doxorubicin in vitro responsiveness. Short term culture of mammary gland cancer slices may be an interesting model to evaluate chemotherapy activity.

Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer

Preoperative systemic therapy (PST) in operable breast cancer allows a small increase in breast conservation rates and has significant potential as a research platform. PST offers the ability to discern treatment effect in vivo, and may allow smaller trials targeting specific breast cancer subtypes and making more efficient use of resources. Early observations of a specific outcome of interest in individual patient subgroups may improve the design of larger definitive randomized adjuvant trials using survival as a main outcome. PST offers the potential for therapeutic adjustments midcourse, which assumes the existence of validated intermediate end points and effective alternative therapies. This article reviews critical research issues affecting the design of PST trials, including the appropriate selection of trial end points and markers for long-term outcome, baseline marker expression as a predictor of response, and statistical considerations using novel trial designs. Key issues regarding optimal tumor subtype selection for individual trials, novel approaches using nontherapeutic window trial designs, and ethical and advocacy considerations are also discussed. PST requires an experienced and cohesive multidisciplinary team for it to fulfill its potential in both research and clinical care.

A phase II study of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine and pegfilgrastim support as preoperative therapy for patients with stage II, IIIA breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase II study was conducted to evaluate tumor response rate and safety profile of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine given preoperatively to patients with stage II or IIIA breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients underwent four cycles of dose-dense cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks followed by two cycles of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 5-18 every 4 weeks, with prophylactic pegfilgrastim. The primary objective of the study was to determine the incidence of pathologic complete response defined as the absence of invasive or in situ cancer in the breast and the axillary nodes at definitive surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study and 41 (93%) were assessable for response to chemotherapy. An objective clinical response was observed in 38 (93%) patients. Seven patients (17.1%) exhibited a pathologic complete response. Breast-conserving surgery was carried out in 36 (88%) patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 4.3% of 252 administered chemotherapy cycles. No febrile neutropenia, cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia or other serious adverse event was registered.

CONCLUSION

The sequential combination of dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, IIIA breast cancer.

Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, preoperative chemotherapy is the standard of care in locally advanced breast cancer to achieve local tumour downsizing in order to make surgery possible. Since the early 1980s, the role of preoperative chemotherapy in early stage (or operable) breast cancer has been the subject of study. Potential advantages are early introduction of systemic therapy, determination of chemosensitivity, reduction of tumour volume and downstaging of surgical requirement. Concerns exist about local control after downsized surgery and the delay of local treatment in patients with tumours resistant to chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer when compared to postoperative chemotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Specialised Register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 4th of August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing preoperative chemotherapy with postoperative in women with operable breast cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted by two independent review authors. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes directly or indirectly using the methods described by Parmar. Relative risks were derived for dichotomous outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible studies which randomised a total of 5,500 women. Median follow-up ranged from 18 to 124 months. Eight studies described a satisfactory method of randomisation.Data, based on 1139 estimated deaths in 4620 women available for analysis, show equivalent overall survival rates with a HR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.09; p, 0.67; no heterogeneity). Preoperative chemotherapy increases breast conservation rates, yet at the associated cost of increased loco regional recurrence rates. However, this rate was not increased as long as surgery remains part of the treatment even after complete tumour regression (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.37; p, 0.25; no heterogeneity. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with fewer adverse effects. Pathological complete response is associated with better survival than residual disease (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69; p, < 10-4).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests safe application of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of women with early stage breast cancer in order to down-stage surgical requirement, to evaluate chemosensitivity and to facilitate translational research.

Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant exemestane for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, operable breast cancer: Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-03)

This multicenter phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 4 months of neoadjuvant exemestane in 44 postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive, stage II to IIIB breast cancer measuring >or=3 cm. Pathological response was assessed by a central review board using response criteria proposed by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Clinical response [complete or partial response (PR)] was assessed by caliper, mammography, or ultrasound. Rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adverse events were also evaluated. A pathological response was observed in 13 (43%) of 30 patients who underwent surgery at 4 months. Fourteen patients were excluded from the pathological analysis: eight continued exemestane because of PR or stable disease (SD) at 4 months, three underwent chemotherapy because of progressive disease, and three underwent surgery within 2 months because of adverse events. A clinical response was seen in 27 (66%) of 41 evaluable patients. BCS was performed in 27 (90%) of 30 patients who underwent surgery at 4 months. Of the ten patients eligible for mastectomy at baseline, six chose to continue exemestane treatment without surgery because of a PR or SD at 4 months. Adverse events, most of which were grade 1, occurred in <or=10% of patients. These results suggest that neoadjuvant exemestane treatment is effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Further studies are required to determine the optimal duration of neoadjuvant treatment and to identify response criteria that can more accurately predict long-term outcomes.

Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The molecular classification system categorizes invasive breast carcinomas according to their key driving biomarkers. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the molecular classification groups.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, the molecular classification group (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER-2-variant, HER-2-classic, and basal phenotype) was retrospectively determined in 68 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 28 carcinoma patients (41.2%) achieved a compete pathologic response (CPR), including 2 of 15 patients classified as having luminal-A (13.3%), 4 of 16 patients classified as having luminal-B (25.0%), 10 of 12 patients classified as having HER-2-classic (83.3%), none of the 4 patients classified as having HER-2-variant, and 12 of 21 patients classified as having basal phenotype (57.1%) neoplasms. The CPR rate among patients with the HER-2-classic and basal neoplasms was 67% (22 of 33 neoplasms), compared with 17.1% (6 of 35 neoplasms) in the non-HER-2-classic/basal combined group (P < .001). Eleven carcinomas were initially diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinomas (pleomorphic and classic), 4 of which were luminal-A, 4 of which were luminal-B, 2 of which were HER-2-classic, and 1 of which was basal. On review, only 3 of these 11 cases remained classified as classic lobular carcinoma, all of which were classified as luminal-A, and none of these patients achieved a CPR. Four of the other 8 patients achieved a CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

The molecular classification system is useful for identifying carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a CPR. In the current study, all the morphologically classic lobular carcinomas were classified as luminal-A neoplasms, which may explain the low rate of CPR reported.

Genomic instability in invasive breast carcinoma measured by inter-Simple Sequence Repeat PCR

We have measured genomic instability in invasive breast carcinomas and assessed the relationship of genomic instability to known tumor prognostic factors. DNAs from tumors and adjacent normal tissue of 18 breast cancer patients were subjected to inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (inter-SSR) PCR for quantitation of tumor genomic instability. Associations between genomic instability level and known breast cancer prognostic factors were evaluated using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation, the Kruskal-Wallis test of independent samples and the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. Genomic instability was detected by inter-SSR PCR in over 90% of the breast tumors. The mean instability index was 3.08% (0-7.59%), approximately the same mean value observed in studies of colorectal and thyroid carcinomas. Significantly higher levels of instability were associated with tumors exhibiting necrosis. Genomic instability as measured is detected in the majority of breast cancers at levels comparable to other tumor types. Hypoxia, such as that observed in necrotic regions of tumors, has been associated with elevated genomic damage. We hypothesize that the higher levels of genomic instability detected in necrotic tumors is a consequence of hypoxia-associated DNA damage.

A randomized phase II trial comparing preoperative plus perioperative chemotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate in a randomized trial the activity of perioperative chemotherapy in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer and to compare it with the preoperative chemotherapy alone. Patients with cT2-3 N0-2 M0 histologically proven breast cancer, with estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in less than 20% of cells, or with absence of progesterone receptors, received epirubicin 25 mg/m days 1 and 2, cisplatin 60 mg/m day 1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m daily as continuous infusion. Responding patients were randomized to continue fluorouracil until 2 weeks after surgery (perioperative chemotherapy) or to stop fluorouracil 1 week before surgery. Fifty-eight patients completed six courses of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil, and were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy (29 patients) or to control (29 patients). The median Ki-67 index remained stable (32-27.5%) in the perioperative chemotherapy arm (P=0.3) and decreased from 55 to 22.5% in the control arm (P=0.01). The rate of pathological complete remission was 41% in both arms (P=1.0). No significant difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival was observed between the two arms. Perioperative chemotherapy failed to show an increase in the pathological complete remission rate. A biological effect on Ki-67 expression was demonstrated.

Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine clinical and histopathological characteristics correlated to responsiveness to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied primary tumor specimens with local advanced breast cancer from 40 patients. Patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant regimen consisted in 600 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (FAC). The World Health Organization criteria were used to classify the tumors. We performed immunohistochemical staining for ER, PgR, HER-2, PCNA (proliferation cell nuclear antigen), Ki-67, p53, and Bcl-2. Clinical and histopathological characteristics were associated with clinical response and histopathological changes induced by chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean age was 47 +/- 14 yr. Twenty-three percent of patients were in stage IIB and 77% were in stages IIIA and IIIB. Seven percent of patients had progression of the disease. Stable disease was observed in 42% of patients and 45% had partial response. Only 7% of patients had a complete response. Factors associated with a better and major percentage of clinical response were the administration of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, administration of more than three cycles, clinical N1, atypia, more than 10 mitosis per high-power field, moderate to severe SBR grade, and a major index of cellular proliferation.

CONCLUSION

We found that tumors with large volumes, N2 node status, low cellular proliferation rate, positive immunoreactivity to p53, and low differentiation grade have a lower response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline. These patients could benefit from a different chemotherapy scheme to obtain a better control and resection.

Sequential Addition of an Anthracycline-Based Regimen to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this phase II study was to attempt to maximize response and survival in patients with bulky, operable breast cancer by combining sequential neoadjuvant docetaxel to a semi-intensive anthracycline-based regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients (N = 53) were included to receive 4 cycles of docetaxel, followed by a maximum of 4 cycles of TNCF (THP [theprubican]-doxorubicin/vinorelbine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil) every 21 days before definitive surgery and radiation therapy.

RESULTS

After a median number of 4 cycles of docetaxel and 2 cycles of TNCF, the overall clinical response rate was 81.1%, including a 13.2% complete remission rate and only 2 incidences of progressive disease. Breast conservation was achieved in 87% of patients. According to Chevallier classification, a pathologic complete response in breast and axilla was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) and in 9 patients (17%) using the Sataloff's classification. The important myelosuppression observed in this trial was expected but limited by the prophylactic use of growth factors. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, only 5 recurrences were documented, with a median time to first recurrence of 12.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite disappointing results of this trial for pathologic complete response rate, possibly because of the order of drug administration, clinical response, breast conservation, and survival were optimized.

Controversies in breast cancer: adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy

Initial randomised studies of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy showed that systemic treatments had a substantial impact on the survival of women with early breast cancer. The original assumption was that the efficacy of these treatments was limited to those patients presenting with more adverse prognostic features. Subsequently, meta-analyses of randomised trials revealed that the benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not mutually exclusive and extend to all the prognostic subgroups. However, the absolute benefit varies according to baseline characteristics such as tumour stage and other biological factors. Over the last 10 years, considerable progress has been made with the introduction of new drugs into the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer. Taxanes and third-generation aromatase inhibitors are providing proof of additional benefits compared with standard reference treatments. In parallel, research on the biology of breast cancer is establishing novel prognostic and predictive factors, which may allow better treatment tailoring. Currently, however, women with early breast cancer and their doctors face the difficult task of making therapeutic decisions often based on early results from positive studies. In a disease where follow up is crucial to fully assess the benefit and long-term toxicities of an intervention, current knowledge leaves unanswered questions that generate debate and controversy. This review will summarise recent results from randomised trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in women with early breast cancer and focus on the current controversies.

[Primary systemic therapy in breast cancer: clinical and molecular factors predictors of outcome and response]

PST (primary systemic therapy) represents the standard treatment of care for patients with LABC (locally advanced breast cancer). There is also an emerging role of PST in the treatment of operable breast cancer. In both situations, clinical and pathological responses, in particular when complete, are good predictors of outcome. Identifying the factors predicting response to PST would help clinicians of selecting the most appropriate treatment. There is thus a need for clinical and molecular factors predictive of response. Unfortunately, none of the molecular markers identified in breast tumors is recommended for a use in routine, with the exception of ER and HER2 respectively predictors of response to hormone therapy and Herceptin. New technologies like DNA microarrays are likely to provide in a next future surrogate markers of response to PST in Breast Cancer.

Gene expression profile associated with response to doxorubicin-based therapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify genes that could predict response to doxorubicin-based primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Biopsy samples were obtained before primary treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. RNA was extracted and amplified and gene expression was analyzed using cDNA microarrays.

RESULTS

Response to chemotherapy was evaluated in 51 patients, and based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, 42 patients, who presented at least a partial response (> or =30% reduction in tumor dimension), were classified as responsive. Gene profile of samples, divided into training set (n = 38) and independent validation set (n = 13), were at first analyzed against a cDNA microarray platform containing 692 genes. Unsupervised clustering could not separate responders from nonresponders. A classifier was identified comprising EMILIN1, FAM14B, and PBEF, which however could not correctly classify samples included in the validation set. Our next step was to analyze gene profile in a more comprehensive cDNA microarray platform, containing 4,608 open reading frame expressed sequence tags. Seven samples of the initial training set (all responder patients) could not be analyzed. Unsupervised clustering could correctly group all the resistant samples as well as at least 85% of the sensitive samples. Additionally, a classifier, including PRSS11, MTSS1, and CLPTM1, could correctly distinguish 95.4% of the 44 samples analyzed, with only two misclassifications, one sensitive sample and one resistant tumor. The robustness of this classifier is 2.5 greater than the first one.

CONCLUSION

A trio of genes might potentially distinguish doxorubicin-responsive from nonresponsive tumors, but further validation by a larger number of samples is still needed.

Phase II study of dose-dense sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel for patients with advanced operable and inoperable breast cancer

Rapid sequential delivery of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 q 2 weeksx3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 q 2 weeksx3 cycles, with filgrastim support was evaluated in patients with inoperable and large operable breast cancers who were not initially candidates for breast conservation therapy. Postoperative CMF chemotherapy and/or radiation were administered based on surgical findings. Median age of the 39 enrolled patients was 47 (range 27-59), stage IIA (6 patients), IIB (14 patients), IIIA (10 patients), IIIB (9 patients), and 23 patients (59%) had clinical nodal involvement. The average bidimensional tumor size before treatment was 30 cm2. Clinical responses included 13 (33%) complete responses, 23 (59%) partial responses, 1 stable disease, and 2 progressive disease, for an overall response rate of 92%. Clinical response rate was 11/13(85%) in HER2/neu positive patients compared to 25/26 (96%) in tumors that did not express HER2/neu. Twenty patients (51%) underwent breast conservation surgery. Pathologic tumor response at the time of definitive surgery included 4 pathologic CR (pCR, 10%), 4 microscopic invasion (pINV), and 14 (36%) pathologically negative axillary nodes. pCR was not observed in any HER2/neu positive patients. 5/39 patients were unable to complete all cycles of docetaxel and 8 patients required dose reduction of docetaxel due to development of grade 3-4 mucositis and hand-foot syndrome. This observation prompted a protocol change requiring 3 weeks between doxorubicin and docetaxel. Primary chemotherapy with dose-dense doxorubicin and docetaxel given sequentially is well tolerated and allows a high rate of breast sparing in patients with large breast cancers.

Trastuzumab

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with several clinical and biologic subtypes. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) is overexpressed in approximately 20% of breast cancers. This overexpression is usually due to HER 2 gene amplification, and results in a more aggressive tumor with a worse prognosis. Trastuzumab (Herceptin((R))) is the first humanized monoclonal antibody to be commercially available for the treatment of breast cancer and it is directed against HER 2. Trials have demonstrated trastuzumab's activity in metastatic breast cancer both as a single agent and in combination with a number of chemotherapy agents. Recently, benefits for trastuzumab have also been shown in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.

[Association of taxanes and radiotherapy: preclinical and clinical studies]

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) stabilized microtubules against depolymerization, and inhibit their function. Their radiosensitizing properties have been discovered more than 10 years ago; they synchronized tumor cells in G2/M phase, the most radiosensitive portion of the cell cycle. Other radiosensitizing mechanisms have been also discussed, as reoxygenation, promotion of radio-apoptosis and antiangiogenic cooperation. Many phase I and II studies have been performed, essentially in bronchus and head and neck carcinomas. In lung cancer, paclitaxel was delivered weekly at a dose of 60 mg/m2. Many studies combined cisplatin or carboplatin with paclitaxel, demonstrating that this combination is feasible and efficient. Only one phase III trial was reported; after two cycles of chemotherapy for inoperable lung cancers, radiotherapy was delivered, with or without paclitaxel radiosensitization: a benefit in disease-free survival was observed for the combination arm. In head and neck carcinomas, conomitant association of cisplatin, paclitaxel and radiation was feasible and showed promising results. Clinical trials with docetaxel are in progress.

Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 is overexpressed in approximately 20-25% of human breast cancers and is an independent adverse prognostic factor. Targeted therapy directed against this receptor has been developed in the form of a humanised monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab. This antibody has shown activity as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer both prior to chemotherapy and in heavily pretreated patients. A pivotal Phase III trial has demonstrated that its use in combination with an anthracycline or paclitaxel results in a significant improvement in survival, time to progression, and response. This has recently been reinforced by another trial with docetaxel. The HER2 status of a tumour is a critical determinant of response to trastuzumab-based treatment. Those that express HER2 at the highest level on immunohistochemistry (IHC), 3+, derive more benefit from treatment with trastuzumab than those with overexpression at the 2+ level. Benefit correlates best with tumours that are positive on fluorescence in situ hybridisation for HER2, regardless of IHC status. Treatment with trastuzumab is generally well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events. Some patients may experience fever, chills, dyspnoea and pain, particularly with the first administration. Unexpectedly, cardiac toxicity has developed in some patients treated with trastuzumab, and this has a higher incidence in those treated in combination with an anthracycline. 'Cross-talk' between the oestrogen receptor and HER2 pathway has stimulated interest in using trastuzumab in combination with endocrine therapy. Current clinical trials are investigating the role of this agent in the adjuvant setting.

Future options with trastuzumab for primary systemic and adjuvant therapy

HER2 positivity can be detected early in breast cancer development and is associated with a poor outcome. Primary systemic therapy with trastuzumab (Herceptin; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in combination with taxanes and other cytotoxic agents has been studied in phase II clinical trials in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. These combinations have achieved pathologic complete response rates of 12% to 42% and clinical complete response rates of 30% to 67%. These results compare favorably with those of primary systemic therapy using standard combinations in patients with unselected (HER2-positive or -negative) breast cancer. Consequently, larger studies are in progress in which trastuzumab is administered before surgery in combination with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab is continued as monotherapy afterward to complete 1 year of treatment or until disease progression. These studies aim to provide further proof of the clinical benefits associated with trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy. They will also investigate the molecular determinants of sensitivity and resistance. In addition, four major randomized trials, in more than 13,500 patients, are investigating the impact of adding trastuzumab to standard adjuvant therapy. Planned interim cardiac safety analyses have been passed without concerns. Recruitment to these studies has either recently been completed or continues as planned. Together, this extensive program, which includes analysis of predictive molecular and pathologic makers, will establish the efficacy, safety, and role of trastuzumab in early breast cancer.

Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To define the optimal treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

EVIDENCE

Systematic review of English-language literature retrieved from MEDLINE (1984 to June 2002) and CANCERLIT (1983 to June 2002). A nonsystematic review of the literature was continued through December 2003.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The management of LABC requires a combined modality treatment approach involving surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Systemic therapy: chemotherapy. Operable tumours. Patients with operable stage IIIA disease should be offered chemotherapy. They should receive adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery, or primary chemotherapy followed by locoregional management. Chemotherapy should contain an anthracycline. Acceptable regimens are 6 cycles of FAC, CAF, CEF or FEC. Taxanes are under intense investigation. Inoperable tumours. Patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease, including those with inflammatory breast cancer and those with isolated ipsilateral internal mammary or supraclavicular lymph-node involvement, should be treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Acceptable chemotherapy regimens are FAC, CAF, CEF or FEC. Taxanes are under intense investigation. Patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease who respond to primary chemotherapy should be treated until the response plateaus or to a maximum of 6 cycles (minimum 4 cycles). Patients with stage IIIB disease should then undergo definitive surgery and irradiation. The locoregional management of patients with stage IIIC disease who respond to chemotherapy should be individualized. In patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease who achieve maximum response with fewer than 6 cycles, further adjuvant chemotherapy can be given following surgery and irradiation. Patients whose tumours do not respond to primary chemotherapy can be treated with taxane chemotherapy or can proceed directly to irradiation followed by modified radical mastectomy, if feasible. Systemic therapy: hormonal therapy. Operable and inoperable tumours. Tamoxifen for 5 years should be recommended to pre- and postmenopausal women whose tumours are hormone responsive. Locoregional management. Operable tumours. Patients with stage IIIA disease should receive both modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and locoregional radiotherapy if feasible. They may be managed with MRM followed by chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy, or chemotherapy first followed by MRM and locoregional radiotherapy. Breast-conserving surgery is currently not a standard approach. Locoregional radiotherapy should be delivered to the chest wall and to the supraclavicular and axillary nodes. The role of internal mammary irradiation is unclear. Inoperable tumours. Patients with stage IIIB disease who respond to chemotherapy should receive surgery plus locoregional radiotherapy. The locoregional management of patients with stage IIIC disease who respond to chemotherapy is unclear and should be individualized. Patients whose disease remains inoperable following chemotherapy should receive locoregional radiotherapy with subsequent surgery, if feasible.

VALIDATION

The authors' original text was revised by members of the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Subsequently, feedback was provided by 9 oncologists from across Canada. The final document was approved by the steering committee.

SPONSOR

The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer was convened by Health Canada. Completion date: December 2003.

Inflammatory breast carcinoma: Outcomes with trimodality therapy for nonmetastatic disease

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to summarize a single-institution experience in treating patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) using trimodality therapy and to identify prognostic factors for outcome.

METHODS

Sixty-one women underwent radiation therapy with curative intent for IBC between 1982 and 2001. All but five women received trimodality therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to the majority of women (n = 43 patients), although some received "up-front" surgery as first therapy (n = 18 patients).

RESULTS

With a median potential observation time after diagnosis of 14 years, freedom from locoregional disease progression was 78%, freedom from distant metastasis was 45%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 47% at 5 years. Approximately 40% of the 56 patients who received trimodality therapy remained free of disease. Multivariate analysis demonstrated three factors that were found to be associated significantly with improved cause-specific survival: pathologic tumor size < 4 cm (P = 0.0001), up-front surgery (P = 0.0078), and local disease control (P = 0.0003). Factors that were found to be associated with better freedom from locoregional disease progression were pathologic tumor size (< 4 cm; P = 0.0157), age (> 55 years; P = 0.0596), and radiation dose (> or = 60 grays [Gy]; P = 0.0621).

CONCLUSIONS

IBC is an aggressive disease that is treated effectively in select patients by multimodality therapy. Patient outcomes may be improved with therapies that result in better local and systemic control. Further studies are warranted to address the optimal sequence of trimodality therapy and the optimal administration of each agent.

DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression and the response toprimary chemotherapy in breast cancer

The alpha isoform of Topoisomerase IIalpha (Topo IIalpha) is a proliferation marker as well as a target for several chemotherapeutic agents such as anthracyclines. In vitro studies have demonstrated the relationship between the Topo IIalpha expression level and chemosensitivity of target cancer cells. To verify this effect in vivo, we selected 125 patients presenting with T(2)>3 cm and T(3) N(0-1) M(0) breast tumours who were treated by six cycles of primary chemotherapy, including epirubicin before any surgery. Therapy response was assessed by clinical and X-ray mammogram measurements of tumour shrinkage. The pretherapeutic core biopsies were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody (Ki-S7) against Topo IIalpha. Ki-S7 positivity ranged from 0 to 50% (median, 15%). A high percentage of Ki-S7-positive cells (>15%) was associated with tumour regression under chemotherapy (OR=2.88, CI: 1.3-6.4, P=0.004). Ki-S7 further emerged as an independent predictor of tumour regression (OR=3.34, CI: 1.41-7.93, P=0.006), together with tumour size of less than 40 mm (OR=3.82, CI: 1.58-9.25, P=0.002) and negative oestrogen receptor (ER) status (OR=3.35, CI: 1.43-7.86, P=0.005), in a multivariate analysis including tumour size, SBR grade, ER and PR status, Ki-67, p53 and Her-2/neu. Our clinical results confirm in vitro data on the relationship between Topo IIalpha expression and tumour chemosensitivity and thus may have important practical implications.