Low sensitivity of the ki-ras polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing pancreatic cancer from pancreatic juice and bile: a multicenter prospective trial

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Mutant KRAS Detection from Pancreatic Secretions for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis aims to identify the diagnostic accuracy of mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) oncogene in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The survival of PDAC remains poor often due to the fact that disease is advanced at diagnosis. We analysed 22 studies, with a total of 2156 patients, to identify if the detection of KRAS mutations from pancreatic exocrine secretions yields sufficient specificity and sensitivity to detect patients with PDAC amongst healthy individuals. The majority of the studies were retrospective, samples were obtained endoscopically or surgically, and included comparator populations of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pre-malignant pancreatic lesions (PanIN) as well as healthy controls. We performed several analyses to identify the diagnostic accuracy for PDAC among these patient populations. Our results highlighted that the diagnostic accuracy of KRAS mutation for PDAC was of variable sensitivity and specificity when compared with PanINs and chronic pancreatitis, but had a higher specificity among healthy individuals. The sensitivity of this test must be improved to prevent missing early PDAC or PanINs. This could be achieved with rigorous prospective cohort studies, in which high-risk patients with normal cross-sectional imaging undergo surveillance following KRAS mutation testing.

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of detecting K-ras mutation in pancreatic juice as a molecular marker for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

K-ras codon 12 mutation is one of the earliest genetic changes in the development of pancreatic cancer (PC) and accurate detection of K-ras mutations is gaining increasing attention in the field of molecular diagnosis.

METHODS

Original research articles which evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of K-ras mutation detection in PC were selected. Data were presented as forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to summarize the overall test performance.

RESULTS

We assessed 16 studies from 15 published articles. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 59% (95%CI: 54%-64%) and 87% (95%CI: 84%-89%), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.13 (95%CI: 2.73-6.25) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.32-0.56), respectively, and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 13.66 (95% CI: 7.25-25.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the analysis of K-ras mutations in pancreatic juice has a considerable diagnostic value in PC. Further studies with rigorous design, large sample size, and multi-regional co-operation are needed.

Telomerase activity in pancreatic juice differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of genetic markers in pancreatic juice (PJ), and the combination of these markers with telomerase activity in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis for the diagnostic utility of the four major altered genes in PDAC (KRAS, CDKN2A/p16, TP53, and SMAD4/DPC4), telomerase activity, and a combination assay using PJ samples. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data were pooled and presented as diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates of KRAS analysis were as follows: sensitivity was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-0.71) and specificity, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85). For telomerase activity analysis, sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87) and specificity, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99). The other three tumor suppressors demonstrated low sensitivity. The data did not suggest any publication bias. A combined analysis of KRAS and telomerase activity showed a higher diagnostic sensitivity (0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99) than KRAS alone. A combined analysis of telomerase activity and cytology revealed more reliable diagnostic accuracy than telomerase activity alone, with high sensitivity (0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96) and specificity (1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The most reliable marker in PJ samples for diagnosis of PDAC was telomerase activity. Telomerase activity can play a central role in diagnostic analysis using PJ samples, and can increase diagnostic accuracy when combined with KRAS mutations or cytological examination.

Diagnostic accuracy of K-ras mutation for pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The conventional tests for the diagnosis of early stage pancreatic carcinoma are not acceptable. This meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of K-ras mutation for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

DATA SOURCES

A systemic search of all relevant literature was performed in Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and MEDLINE (PubMed as the search engine) prior to June 1, 2011. Thirty-four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and data were pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates for K-ras mutation in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma were as follows: sensitivity 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66-0.71), specificity 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.88), positive likelihood ratio 4.54 (95% CI: 3.47-5.94), negative likelihood ratio 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30-0.44) and diagnostic odds ratio 14.90 (95% CI: 10.02-22.15). Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity was 0.79, and the overall area under the curve was 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of K-ras mutation was not superior to that of conventional tests. Therefore, K-ras mutation analysis alone is not recommended for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Significance of Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Improvement in the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer, novel effective screening and diagnostic strategies and treatments are needed. Recent advances in the understanding of pancreatic carcinogenesis and tumor microenvironment have allowed identification of biomarkers for screening, diagnosis and prediction of cancer treatments, including novel therapies targeting specific cancer or stromal cell subpopulations. Personalized therapy in pancreatic cancer is also promising as several drugs such as S1, capecitabine and gemcitabine reportedly have significant therapeutic effects. Predictive markers are thus needed to select patients most likely to benefit from therapies based on gemcitabine or other drugs.

SUMMARY

We review the clinical significance of promising screening, diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers based on genetic and epigenetic alterations and microRNA abnormalities in pancreatic cancer. We also review new types of biomarkers based on stromal cells, such as pancreatic stellate cells, in the microenvironment of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer screening

Accumulating data indicate that clinically available abdominal imaging tests such as EUS and MRI/MRCP can detect asymptomatic precursor benign (IPMN, PanIN) and invasive malignant pancreatic neoplasms, such as ductal adenocarcinoma, in individuals with an inherited predisposition. These asymptomatic FPCs detected have been more likely to be resectable, compared to symptomatic tumors. The most challenging part of screening high-risk individuals is the selection of individuals with high-grade precursor neoplasms for preventive treatment (ie, surgical resection before development of invasive cancer). Ongoing and future research should focus on formulating and validating a model for FPC risk and neoplastic progression using patient characteristics, imaging, and biomarkers. The comparative cost and effectiveness of various approaches for screening and surveillance of high-risk individuals also deserves study. For now, screening is best performed in high-risk individuals within the research protocols in academic centers with multidisciplinary teams with expertise in genetics, gastroenterology, radiology, surgery, and pathology.

Clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a clinically-relevant spectrum of patients

The diagnostic utility of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer (EPC) has not been properly studied, and few reports have analysed a clinically relevant spectrum of patients. The objective was to evaluate the clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations in the diagnosis of EPC in a large sample of clinically relevant patients. We prospectively identified 374 patients in whom one of the following diagnoses was suspected at hospital admission: EPC, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cysts, and cancer of the extrahepatic biliary system. Mutations in the K-ras oncogene were analysed by PCR and artificial RFLP in 212 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the K-ras mutational status for the diagnosis of EPC were 77.7% (95% CI: 69.2-84.8) and 78.0% (68.1-86.0), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was hardly modified by sex and age. In patients with either mutated K-ras or CEA > 5 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.0% (72.9-87.6) and 62.6% (72.9-87.6), respectively. In patients with mutated K-ras and CEA > 5 ng/ml the sensitivity was markedly reduced. In comparisons with a variety of non-EPC patient groups sensitivity and specificity were both always greater than 75%. In this clinically relevant sample of patients the sensitivity and specificity of K-ras mutations were not sufficiently high for independent diagnostic use. However, it seems premature to rule out the utility of K-ras analysis in conjunction with other genetic and 'omics' technologies.

Fluorescence-expressing viruses allow rapid identification and separation of rare tumor cells in spiked samples of human whole blood

BACKGROUND

Finding and isolating rare tumor cells in blood allows for diagnosis of disseminated cancer and for molecular profiling to direct the choice of biologic therapy. We explored whether the candidate gene therapy virus NV1066-designed to specifically infect cancer cells and express green fluorescence protein (GFP)-can be used for rapid infection, identification, and isolation of rare circulating tumor cells (CTC) in human whole blood.

METHODS

Mixtures of human cancer cell lines and human whole blood were exposed to NV1066 or heat-inactivated virus, incubated, and then examined for GFP expression by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Fluorescence-assisted cell sorting (FACS) was used to determine the efficiency of virally assisted tumor cell isolation. Sorted cells were subsequently stained for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to determine if cells isolated in this way would maintain sufficient cellular integrity for molecular characterization.

RESULTS

In our study, there was 100% specificity for detection of cancer cells. Detection was consistent even at the highest dilution tested (10 cancer cells in 10 ml whole blood). The processing involved simple incubation without the technical demands of immunohistochemistry. FACS allowed for rapid isolation of GFP-expressing cells. Cells isolated by this method can subsequently undergo molecular characterization.

CONCLUSION

Oncolytic herpes simplex virus mediated green fluorescence in combination with FACS is a novel technique for the identification and isolation of cancer cells in an experimental model of blood-borne metastases. This procedure is a promising method for improving our diagnosis, staging, and molecular profiling of cancer.

Analysis of K-ras gene codon 12 mutation in pancreatic tissue of patients with pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to analyze K-ras codon 12 mutation in the pancreatic tissue of Serbian patients with pancreatic cancer and assess whether the given mutation can be used as a molecular marker for this disease. The study was performed on pancreatic tissue samples obtained from 40 patients with clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The presence of K-ras codon 12 mutation was analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Our study showed that K-ras mutation is present with a high frequency (66%) in the pancreatic tissue of patients with pancretic cancer.

Molecular markers of pancreatic cancer: development and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains poor, mainly because of its aggressive biological behaviour and late clinical diagnosis, which precludes the application of appropriate curative therapies. Therefore, one of the major goals in clinical pancreatology is to find molecular markers, specific and sensitive enough to make an early and correct diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, before it has disseminated and become untreatable.

OBJECTIVE

This overview article explores the potential utility of current molecular markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

There is a wide array of serum-based and tissue-based markers for pancreatic cancer. Serum-based molecular markers include CA 19-9, CA 125, M2-PK and secreted proteins. A tissue can be used to test genetic mutations such as K-ras, inactivation of tumour suppressor genes (e.g. p16, p53), mucins, telomerase activity, growth factors, DNA methylation, and global gene expression of cDNA microarrays, mitochondrial mutations and proteomics. None of these markers is currently useful for the detection of early pancreatic cancer. In clinical practice, the most commonly accepted use of CA 19-9 is to assess the prognosis and monitor the response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Many molecular markers have been proposed for the early diagnosis of PC, but most are not ready to be included as part of the routine diagnostic algorithm because they still lack sensitivity, specificity or reproducibility. CA 19-9 remains the most useful molecular marker for the diagnosis and follow-up of clinically and radiological evident pancreatic cancer.

A clinical and economic evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound for patients at risk for familial pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Approximately 10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is familial. Approximately 50% of 1st-degree relatives (FDRs) have endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings of chronic pancreatitis. We modeled the natural history of these patients to compare 4 management strategies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review, and created a Markov model for 45-year-old male FDRs, with findings of chronic pancreatitis on screening EUS. We compared 4 strategies: doing nothing, prophylactic total pancreatectomy (PTP), annual surveillance by EUS, and annual surveillance with EUS and fine needle aspiration (EUS/FNA). Outcomes incorporated mortality, quality of life, procedural complications, and costs.

RESULTS

In the Do Nothing strategy, the lifetime risk of cancer was 20%. Doing nothing provided the greatest remaining years of life, the lowest cost, and the greatest remaining quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). PTP provided the fewest remaining years of life, and the fewest remaining QALYs. Screening with EUS provided nearly identical results to PTP, and screening with EUS/FNA provided intermediate results between PTP and doing nothing. PTP provided the longest life expectancy if the lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer was at least 46%, and provided the most QALYs if the risk was at least 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

FDRs from familial pancreatic cancer kindreds, who have EUS findings of chronic pancreatitis, have increased risk for cancer, but their precise risk is unknown. Without the ability to further quantify that risk, the most effective strategy is to do nothing.

Genetics and prevention of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Hereditary factors have been reported in up to 10% of cases of pancreatic cancer. The clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities have been identified for a proportion of this high-risk group, and the development of preventive strategies for these individuals is now a primary goal of cancer clinicians.

METHODS

A review of the current literature regarding the genetics, screening, and prevention of pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions was undertaken.

RESULTS

Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include smoking, chronic pancreatitis, and a genetic predisposition. The role of diabetes or a diet high in fat or meat remains unclear. The genetic mutations that accompany pancreatic cancer appear to occur in a temporal sequence, beginning in the earliest of precursor lesions. These mutations are detectable in pancreatic juice and, in conjunction with imaging, form the basis of screening programs for high-risk individuals. Not all precursor lesions will undergo malignant transformation, and testing is currently limited in its ability to determine which lesions will undergo transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding tobacco smoking and minimizing risk factors associated with chronic pancreatitis are recommended to reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer. Individuals with a high-risk genetic background require counseling, genetic testing if appropriate (BRCA2 mutation or p16INK4A inactivity) and secondary screening for pancreatic cancer in specialist centers. Risk stratification will improve as more genetic abnormalities causing pancreatic cancer are defined.

Strategies for screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in high-risk patients

Identification of high-risk individuals, genetic counseling, and informed consent are important components of a screening program for familial pancreatic cancer. Screening high-risk individuals with imaging tests, such endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT), can lead to the detection and treatment of predominantly asymptomatic early pancreatic neoplasms, as well as extra-pancreatic tumors. These pancreatic neoplasms consist of resectable, mostly branch-type non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). EUS can visualize these very early IPMNs as focal duct ectasias or cysts. EUS features of chronic pancreatitis are highly prevalent in high-risk individuals and these directly correlate with multifocal lobulocentric parenchymal atrophy due to multifocal pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). No one molecular marker is ready for "prime time" screening of high-risk individuals. Translational studies are underway to discover novel biomarkers for IPMNs, PanIN-3 lesions, or microinvasive adenocarcinoma, which are likely to be cured by timely intervention. Long-term, multi-prospective studies are needed to determine if screening for early pancreatic neoplasia and timely intervention results in decreased pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality in high-risk individuals.

Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

AIM: To establish an optimum combination of molecular markers resulting in best overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of suspicious pancreatic mass.

METHODS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) was performed on 101 consecutive patients (63 males, 38 females, 60 ± 12 years; 81 with subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer, 20 with chronic pancreatitis) with focal pancreatic mass. Samples were evaluated on-site by an experienced cytopathologist. DNA was extracted from Giemsa stained cells selected by laser microdissection and the presence of K-ras, p53 and p16 somatic mutations was tested by cycling-gradient capillary electrophoresis (CGCE) and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) techniques. In addition, allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes p16 (INK4, CDKN2A) and DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) were detected by monitoring the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 9p and 18q, respectively.

RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided FNA were 75% and 85%, positive and negative predictive value reached 100%. The remaining 26% samples were assigned as inconclusive. Testing of molecular markers revealed sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 100% for K-ras mutations (P < 0.001), 24% and 90% for p53 mutations (NS), 13% and 100% for p16 mutations (NS), 85% and 64% for allelic losses at 9p (P < 0.001) and 78% and 57% for allelic losses at 18q (P < 0.05). When tests for different molecular markers were combined, the best results were obtained with K-ras + LOH at 9p (92% and 64%, P < 0.001), K-ras + LOH at 18q (92% and 57%, P < 0.001), and K-ras + LOH 9q + LOH 18q (96% and 43%, P < 0.001). When the molecular markers were used as complements to FNA cytology to evaluate inconclusive samples only, the overall sensitivity of cancer detection was 100% in all patients enrolled in the study.

CONCLUSION: EUS-guided FNA cytology combined with screening of K-ras mutations and allelic losses of tumor suppressors p16 and DPC4 represents a very sensitive approach in screening for pancreatic malignancy. Molecular markers may find its use particularly in cases where FNA cytology has been inconclusive.

Quantitative analysis of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic juice is a promising type of diagnostic sample for pancreatic cancer, and members of the mucin (MUC) family are diagnostic candidates. To evaluate the utility of MUC family members as diagnostic markers, we measured MUC mRNA expression in pancreatic tissues and pancreatic juice obtained from patients with different pancreatic diseases as well as in pancreatic cancer cell lines by real-time PCR. Furthermore, to support the possibility of early diagnosis by quantification of MUC1 and MUC5AC, immunohistochemistry and microdissection-based quantitative analysis of mRNA were carried out. There was no significant correlation between MUC1 and MUC5AC expression in cell lines. When beta-actin was used as a reference gene, median MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA expression levels were remarkably greater in tumoral tissues than in non-tumoral tissues, but median MUC4 and MUC6 mRNA expression levels were not. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that quantitative analysis of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice is better diagnostic modality than that of MUC4 and MUC6 mRNA. Immunohistochemistry showed that MUC1 and MUC5AC were highly expressed in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and moderately expressed in high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN); no staining was observed in normal ducts. Analysis of cells isolated by microdissection showed stepwise upregulation of MUC1 and MUC5AC in the development of high-grade PanIN to IDC. Our results suggest that MUC1 and MUC5AC are upregulated stepwise in pancreatic carcinogenesis and that quantitative assessment of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice has high potential for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Molecular analysis to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in high-risk groups

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Screening of high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer has not been adopted because of concerns regarding specificity and sensitivity. Suitability of a combination of 3 novel molecular screening techniques was investigated.

METHODS

Pancreatic juice was extracted from 146 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis, or biliary tract stones. p53 mutations were analyzed by using a modified yeast functional assay, K-ras status was analyzed using mutation-specific real-time PCR and the proportion of p16(INK4a) promoter methylation was estimated using comparative methylation-specific real-time PCR.

RESULTS

p53 mutations were detected in 20 of 48 (42%) cancer cases, none of 49 controls, and 2 of 49 (4%) patients with pancreatitis. K-ras mutations were detected in 31 of 57 (54%) cancer patients, 13 of 61 (21%) controls, and 23 of 67 (34%) patients with pancreatitis. Twenty-six of 42 (62%) cancer patients had promoter methylation levels > 12%, compared with 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 2 of 26 (8%) with pancreatitis. Mutations in p53 or high-level p16(INK4a) promoter methylation occurred in 29 of 36 (80%) patients with cancer, 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 3 of 22 (13%) with pancreatitis. Three patients (8%) of 36 with cancer; 14 of 24 (58%) controls, and 13 of 22 (59%) patients with pancreatitis had no marker. The gallstone disease patients had a high rate of positive K-ras mutations, possibly reflecting the fact that they were not disease free.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination molecular analysis increased the discrimination between patients with malignant and benign disease. This level of discrimination would allow patients in high-risk groups to be stratified from negligible risk to over 50% probability of an early cancer.

Molecular Diagnosis of Solid and Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas

Pancreatic cancer presents at a clinically advanced stage. Diagnosis often is delayed in those who undergo several negative investigations, and at times, the diagnosis ultimately is made at surgery. Tumor suppressor-linked microsatellite allelic loss analysis appears to improve the diagnostic accuracy of inconclusive cytology specimens. Science, however, still suffers from the lack of a reliable biomarker for the purpose of screening and early detection. The continued study of sera and pancreatic juice hopefully will lead to the discovery of molecular biomarkers capable of diagnosing preclinical disease in at-risk groups.The ability to predict the underlying biologic behavior of pancreatic cystic neoplasia is less than ideal. Tumor suppressor-linked microsatellite allelic loss and telomerase analysis show promise, but they have not been studied extensively. Proteomic analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid, although not yet reported, also may prove valuable in guiding clinical management.

Radioiodinated phenylalanine derivatives to image pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in human pancreatic carcinoma xenografts and in inflammation models

This work validated an in vivo model of human pancreatic cancer for preclinical studies and evaluated p-amino-3-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine (AIPA) and p-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine (IPA) as potential imaging agents for pancreatic cancer. The primary human pancreatic adenocarcinoma PaCa44 and PanC1 cells (1.5-2.5x10(6)) were inoculated either subcutaneously into the flank or orthotopically into the pancreas of severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Tumor formation was recorded by palpation and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After intravenous injection, tumor affinity and organ distribution of AIPA and IPA were compared with those of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in tumor-bearing SCID mice and in concanavalin A (ConA)-induced inflammation models. All SCID mice developed a pancreatic tumor 2-4 weeks after cell implantation. All subcutaneously transplanted tumors were detected by MRI and confirmed histologically, whereas 90% and 68% of the histopathologically confirmed orthotopic PaCa44 and PanC1 tumors were accurately demonstrated by MRI. Tumor formation and spread after orthotopic implantation showed invasion into adjacent organs and metastases in different sites of the abdomen. In contrast, no organ invasion or metastases were demonstrated by subcutaneous implantation. In vivo, AIPA and IPA displayed high affinity for pancreatic tumors. Radioactivity uptake into a tumor at 60 and 240 min amounted to 7.2+/-2.1% and 10.7+/-2.5% I.D./g for AIPA and 13.3+/-3.5% and 15.2+/-3.8% I.D./g for IPA in heterotopic tumors as compared with 11.8+/-3.2% and 15.2+/-2.4% I.D./g for AIPA and 16.7+/-3.5% and 22.5+/-4.3% I.D./g for IPA in orthotopically implanted tumors. In comparison, the FDG uptake was 10.8+/-2.9% and 2.5+/-0.6% I.D./g into heterotopic tumors and 12.5+/-3.8% and 3.5+/-1.2% I.D./g into the orthotopic ones at 60 and 240 min postinjection. The FDG uptake markedly increased (>400%) in the area of inflammation, whereas accumulation of AIPA and IPA in inflammation remained moderate and comparable with that determined in muscle. In summary, the orthotopic implantation model, more than the heterotopic one, reflects more closely the clinical course of the disease, thus representing the appropriate in vivo model for preclinical studies. The specific and high-level targeting of AIPA and IPA to human pancreatic tumor xenografts, with marked tumor-to-background ratios, indicate that AIPA and IPA are interesting candidates as radiotracers for noninvasive imaging of pancreatic cancer. IPA has the advantage of relatively low renal uptake and thus presents as the most promising candidate.

Laser capture microdissection, microarrays and the precise definition of a cancer cell

Most expression profiling studies of solid tumors have used biopsy samples containing large numbers of contaminating stromal and other cell types, thereby complicating any precise delineation of gene expression in nontumor versus tumor cell types. Combining laser capture microdissection, RNA amplification protocols, microarray technologies and our knowledge of the human genome sequence, it is possible to isolate pure populations of cells or even a single cell and interrogate the expression of thousands of sequences for the purpose of more precisely defining the biology of the tumor cell. Although many of the studies that currently allow for characterization of small sample preparations and single cells were performed utilizing noncancer cell types, and in some cases isolation protocols other than laser capture microdissection, a list of protocols are described that could be used for the expression analysis of individual tumor cells. Application of these experimental approaches to cancer studies may permit a more accurate definition of the biology of the cancer cell, so that ultimately, more specific targeted therapies can be developed.

Molecular diagnosis of solid and cystic lesions of the pancreas

Pancreatic cancer presents at a clinically advanced stage. Diagnosis often is delayed in those who undergo several negative investigations, and at times, the diagnosis ultimately is made at surgery. Tumor suppressor-linked microsatellite allelic loss analysis appears to improve the diagnostic accuracy of inconclusive cytology specimens. Science, however, still suffers from the lack of a reliable biomarker for the purpose of screening and early detection. The continued study of sera and pancreatic juice hopefully will lead to the discovery of molecular biomarkers capable of diagnosing pre-clinical disease in at-risk groups. The ability to predict the underlying biologic behavior of pancreatic cystic neoplasia is less than ideal. Tumor suppressor-linked microsatellite allelic loss and telomerase analysis show promise, but they have not been studied extensively. Proteomic analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid, although not yet reported, also may prove valuable in guiding clinical management.

Expression of cancer testis antigens in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis

In order to define antigens that might be suitable as vaccines for pancreatic carcinoma, we investigated the composite expression of 10 cancer testis (CT) antigens (SCP-1, NY-ESO-1, SSX-1, SSX-2, SSX-4, GAGE, MAGE-3, MAGE-4, CT-7 and CT-8) by Reverse Transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) in fresh biopsies of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. While all CT genes were frequently expressed in cell lines derived from pancreatic cancer, no expression of MAGE-3, SSX-1, SSX-2, NY-ESO-1 and CT-7 was detected in fresh tumor biopsies, and MAGE-4 (1/52), SSX-4 (1/39) and CT-8 (2/41) were only rarely expressed. In contrast, HOM-TES-14/SCP-1 was expressed in 48% (29/61) and GAGE in 21% (13/61) of cases, respectively. One CT gene was expressed by 59% (75% in male, 46% in female patients; p = 0.05) and 2 or more CT genes by 15% of the samples. SCP-1 protein expression correlated well with mRNA expression. While SCP-1 and GAGE were absent in normal pancreas, they were found in 2/8 (SCP-1) and 1/8 (GAGE) samples of chronic pancreatitis, respectively, supporting the concept of chronic pancreatitis as a premalignant condition. SCP-1 and GAGE represent promising candidates for vaccine development in pancreatic carcinoma. Whether SCP-1 and GAGE expression identify cases of chronic pancreatitis with a high risk of malignant transformation remains to be shown.

p-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine for detection of pancreatic cancer: basic investigations of the uptake characteristics in primary human pancreatic tumour cells and evaluation in in vivo models of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is associated with the worst 5-year survival rate of any human cancer. This high mortality is due, in part, to difficulties in establishing early and accurate diagnosis. Because most tumours share the ability to accumulate amino acids more effectively than normal tissues and any other pathology, assessment of amino acid transport in tumour cells using radiolabelled amino acids has become one of the most promising tools for tumour imaging. This study investigated the potential of p-[(123)I]iodo-L-phenylalanine (IPA) for detection of pancreatic cancer by single-photon emission tomography. IPA affinity for pancreatic tumour was investigated in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma PaCa44 and PanC1 cells, followed by analysis of the underlying mechanisms of tracer accumulation in neoplastic cells. Thereafter, IPA was evaluated for targeting of pancreatic tumours using SCID mice engrafted with primary human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells, as well as in acute inflammation models in immunocompetent mice and rats. IPA accumulated intensively in human pancreatic tumour cells. Radioactivity accumulation in tumour cells following a 30-min incubation at 37 degrees C/pH 7.4 varied from 41% to 58% of the total loaded activity per 10(6) cells. The cellular uptake was temperature and pH dependent and predominantly mediated by specific carriers for neutral amino acids, namely the sodium-independent and L-leucine-preferring (L-system) transporter and the alanine-, serine- and cysteine-preferring (ASC-system) transporter. Protein incorporation was less than 8%. Biodistribution studies showed rapid localization of the tracer to tumours, reaching 10%+/-2.5% to 15%+/-3% of the injected dose per gram (I.D./g) in heterotopic tumours compared with 17%+/-3.5% to 22%+/-4.3% I.D./g in the orthotopic tumours, at 60 and 240 min post injection of IPA, respectively. In contrast, IPA uptake in the gastrointestinal tract and areas of inflammation remained moderate and decreased with time. Excellent tumour detection was obtained by gamma camera imaging. The specific and high-level targeting of IPA to tumour and the negligible uptake in the gastrointestinal tract and areas of inflammation indicate that p-[(123)I]iodo-L-phenylalanine is a promising tracer for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Molecular analysis of pancreatic juice: a helpful tool to differentiate benign and malignant pancreatic tumors?

Chronic pancreatitis is an important predisposing condition leading to pancreatic carcinoma. As the differential diagnosis between these diseases may be difficult in 1 patient, the detection of specific tumor markers in pancreatic juice is an attractive diagnostic tool. Many studies have investigated tumor-mediated molecular alterations of the pancreatic juice, as k-ras mutations, telomerase reactivation, or promoter methylation of the tumor-suppressor genes p16INK4a and p14ARF. In this overview, we summarize these studies and conclude that molecular analysis of pancreatic juice is not useful for everyday care today. The high specificity of molecular alterations in pancreatic cancer in some pilot studies is waiting to be reproduced in large prospective trials, and has the potential to be a strong complementary marker of malignancy in patients with a pancreatic mass of uncertain dignity.

Clinical usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by means of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

AIM

To establish the usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by comparing this technique with conventional cytology in aspirates obtained by endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with pancreatic focal lesions undergoing endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration were included. Samples were obtained with the concurrence of an attendant cytopathologist. Detection of codon-12 KRAS mutations was performed by the restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction method. The effectiveness of conventional cytology, KRAS mutational analysis and their combination was established with respect to the definitive diagnosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 24 patients had other lesions. A total of 136 samples was obtained. In patients in whom specimens were adequate (93% for cytology; 100% for mutational analysis), the specificity of both techniques was 100%, whereas the sensitivity favoured cytology (97% vs. 73%). When inadequate samples were considered as misdiagnosed, a combination of both techniques reached the highest overall accuracy (cytology, 91%; mutational analysis, 84%; combination of both, 98%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cytology from aspirates obtained by endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration is the most precise single technique for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, when adequate specimens are not available to reach a cytological diagnosis, the addition of KRAS mutational analysis represents the best strategy.

Identification of patients with genetic risk factors of pancreatitis: impact on treatment and cancer prevention

Recent data suggest that genetic alterations are relevant risk factors for chronic pancreatitis. The highest risk is associated with autosomal-dominant mutations (N29I, R122H) of the cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1). Further mutations were identified in the genes of the pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (SPINK1) and in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). A remarkable finding was that both molecules were also mutated in patients suffering from alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. According to recent estimations, genetic alterations may be regarded as more severe risk factors than chronic alcohol consumption. To identify patients with mutations, a positive family history could be of help, but mutations were also found in a significant number of those with a negative family history. On the other hand, in approximately 40% of the patients with a positive family history no mutations were found up to now. The age at onset is lower in patients with genetic risk factors; however, no clear limit can be denominated above which a screening is not appropriate. Therefore, in our department genetic screening is offered to all patients with chronic pancreatitis of unclear origin. There is no specific treatment in patients with a genetically based disease. The patients with familial pancreatitis-increased rates of pancreas cancer were described but there is no agreement concerning the prophylactic strategy. Prevention of cancer by routine pancreatectomy, though performed recently, is not justified at the moment. Clinical criteria may be more appropriate to decide the timing and the extent of the operation.