1
|
Kotecha R, Schiff D, Chakravarti A, Fleming JL, Brown PD, Puduvalli VK, Vogelbaum MA, Gondi V, Gallus M, Okada H, Mehta MP. Multidisciplinary Management of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutated Gliomas in a Contemporary Molecularly Defined Era. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302195. [PMID: 38833641 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes, an early step in the ontogeny of lower-grade gliomas, induce global epigenetic changes characterized by a hypermethylation phenotype and are critical to tumor classification, treatment decision making, and estimation of patient prognosis. The introduction of IDH inhibitors to block the oncogenic neomorphic function of the mutated protein has resulted in new therapeutic options for these patients. To appreciate the implications of these recent IDH inhibitor results, it is important to juxtapose historical outcomes with chemoradiotherapy. Herein, we rationally evaluate recent IDH inhibitor data within historical precedents to guide contemporary decisions regarding the role of observation, maximal safe resection, adjuvant therapies, and the import of patient and tumor variables. The biological underpinnings of the IDH pathway and the mechanisms, impact, and limitations of IDH inhibitors, the actual magnitude of tumor regression and patient benefit, and emergence of resistance pathways are presented to guide future trial development. Management in the current, molecularly defined era will require careful patient selection and risk factor assessment, followed by an open dialog about the results of studies such as INDIGO, as well as mature data from legacy trials, and a discussion about risk-versus-benefit for the choice of treatment, with multidisciplinary decision making as an absolute prerequisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Jessica L Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine West Region, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Warrenville, IL
| | - Marco Gallus
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
You A, Gu J, Wang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Rao G, Ge X, Zhang K, Gao X, Wang D. Value of long non-coding RNA HAS2-AS1 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of glioma. Neurologia 2024; 39:353-360. [PMID: 38616063 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioma presents high incidence and poor prognosis, and therefore more effective treatments are needed. Studies have confirmed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) basically regulate various human diseases including glioma. It has been theorized that HAS2-AS1 serves as an lncRNA to exert an oncogenic role in varying cancers. This study aimed to assess the value of lncRNA HAS2-AS1 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for glioma. METHODS The miRNA expression data and clinical data of glioma were downloaded from the TCGA database for differential analysis and survival analysis. In addition, pathological specimens and specimens of adjacent normal tissue from 80 patients with glioma were used to observe the expression of HAS2-AS1. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic ability and prognostic value of HAS2-AS1 in glioma. Meanwhile, a Kaplan-Meier survival curve was plotted to evaluate the survival of glioma patients with different HAS2-AS1 expression levels. RESULTS HAS2-AS1 was significantly upregulated in glioma tissues compared with normal tissue. The survival curves showed that overexpression of HAS2-AS1 was associated with poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Several clinicopathological factors of glioma patients, including tumor size and WHO grade, were significantly correlated with HAS2-AS1 expression in tissues. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.863, indicating that HAS2-AS1 had good diagnostic value. The ROC curve for the predicted OS showed an AUC of 0.906, while the ROC curve for predicted PFS showed an AUC of 0.88. Both suggested that overexpression of HAS2-AS1 was associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Normal tissues could be clearly distinguished from glioma tissues based on HAS2-AS1 expression. Moreover, overexpression of HAS2-AS1 indicated poor prognosis in glioma patients. Therefore, HAS2-AS1 could be used as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A You
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - J Gu
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - J Wang
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - J Li
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - Y Zhang
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - G Rao
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - X Ge
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - K Zhang
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - X Gao
- Operating Theatre, Tangshan Central Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China
| | - D Wang
- The Fourth Department of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, 063000 Tangshan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaz-Salgado MÁ, García BC, Pérez IF, Munárriz BJ, Domarco PS, González AH, Villar MV, Caro RL, Delgado MLV, Sánchez JMS. SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for grade 2 gliomas (2023). Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03456-x. [PMID: 38662171 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03456-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification has updated the definition of grade 2 gliomas and the presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has been deemed the cornerstone of diagnosis. Though slow-growing and having a low proliferative index, grade 2 gliomas are incurable by surgery and complementary treatments are vital to improving prognosis. This guideline provides recommendations on the multidisciplinary treatment of grade 2 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas based on the best evidence available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Ángeles Vaz-Salgado
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (Irycis) CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Belén Cigarral García
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Isaura Fernández Pérez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro-Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
| | | | - Paula Sampedro Domarco
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense (CHUO), Orense, Spain
| | - Ainhoa Hernández González
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol(ICO)-Badalona, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Vieito Villar
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Luque Caro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Juan Manuel Sepúlveda Sánchez
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, HM Universitario Sanchinarro-CIOCC, Madrid, Spain.
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación 12 de Octubre (I+12), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Breen WG, Aryal MP, Cao Y, Kim MM. Integrating multi-modal imaging in radiation treatments for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S17-S25. [PMID: 38437666 PMCID: PMC10911793 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in diagnostic and treatment technology along with rapid developments in translational research may now allow the realization of precision radiotherapy. Integration of biologically informed multimodality imaging to address the spatial and temporal heterogeneity underlying treatment resistance in glioblastoma is now possible for patient care, with evidence of safety and potential benefit. Beyond their diagnostic utility, several candidate imaging biomarkers have emerged in recent early-phase clinical trials of biologically based radiotherapy, and their definitive assessment in multicenter prospective trials is already in development. In this review, the rationale for clinical implementation of candidate advanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers to guide personalized radiotherapy, the current landscape, and future directions for integrating imaging biomarkers into radiotherapy for glioblastoma are summarized. Moving forward, response-adaptive radiotherapy using biologically informed imaging biomarkers to address emerging treatment resistance in rational combination with novel systemic therapies may ultimately permit improvements in glioblastoma outcomes and true individualization of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Madhava P Aryal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohamed AA, Alshaibi R, Faragalla S, Mohamed Y, Lucke-Wold B. Updates on management of gliomas in the molecular age. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:178-194. [PMID: 38455131 PMCID: PMC10915945 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i2.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are primary brain tumors derived from glial cells of the central nervous system, afflicting both adults and children with distinct characteristics and therapeutic challenges. Recent developments have ushered in novel clinical and molecular prognostic factors, reshaping treatment paradigms based on classification and grading, determined by histological attributes and cellular lineage. This review article delves into the diverse treatment modalities tailored to the specific grades and molecular classifications of gliomas that are currently being discussed and used clinically in the year 2023. For adults, the therapeutic triad typically consists of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In contrast, pediatric gliomas, due to their diversity, require a more tailored approach. Although complete tumor excision can be curative based on the location and grade of the glioma, certain non-resectable cases demand a chemotherapy approach usually involving, vincristine and carboplatin. Additionally, if surgery or chemotherapy strategies are unsuccessful, Vinblastine can be used. Despite recent advancements in treatment methodologies, there remains a need of exploration in the literature, particularly concerning the efficacy of treatment regimens for isocitrate dehydrogenase type mutant astrocytomas and fine-tuned therapeutic approaches tailored for pediatric cohorts. This review article explores into the therapeutic modalities employed for both adult and pediatric gliomas in the context of their molecular classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ahmed Mohamed
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
| | - Rakan Alshaibi
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, United States
| | - Steven Faragalla
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
| | - Youssef Mohamed
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, MO 64804, United States
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim TH, Cho J, Kang SG, Moon JH, Suh CO, Park YW, Chang JH, Yoon HI. High Radiation Dose to the Fornix Causes Symptomatic Radiation Necrosis in Patients with Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma. Yonsei Med J 2024; 65:1-9. [PMID: 38154474 PMCID: PMC10774647 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy have prolonged the survival of patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma. However, whether RT induces long-term toxicity remains unknown. We analyzed the relationship between the RT dose to the fornix and symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 67 patients treated between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed. SRN was defined according to the following three criteria: 1) radiographic findings, 2) symptoms attributable to the lesion, and 3) treatment resulting in symptom improvement. Various contours, including the fornix, were delineated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the relationship between RT dose and SRN, as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for cut-off values, were performed. RESULTS The most common location was the frontal lobe (n=40, 60%). Gross total resection was performed in 38 patients (57%), and 42 patients (63%) received procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 42 months, the median overall and progression-free survival was 74 months. Sixteen patients (24%) developed SRN. In multivariate analysis, age and maximum dose to the fornix were associated with the development of SRN. The cut-off values for the maximum dose to the fornix and age were 59 Gy (equivalent dose delivered in 2 Gy fractions) and 46 years, respectively. The rate of SRN was higher in patients whose maximum dose to the fornix was >59 Gy (13% vs. 43%, p=0.005). CONCLUSION The maximum dose to the fornix was a significant factor for SRN development. While fornix sparing may help maintain neurocognitive function, additional studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyung Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yae Won Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hong In Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kinslow CJ, Garton ALA, Rae AI, Kocakavuk E, McKhann GM, Cheng SK, Sisti MB, Bruce JN, Wang TJC. Extent of resection for low-grade gliomas - Prognostic or therapeutic? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 236:108117. [PMID: 38219356 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Connor J Kinslow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY 10032, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Andrew L A Garton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Ali I Rae
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pkwy, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Emre Kocakavuk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Guy M McKhann
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Simon K Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY 10032, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael B Sisti
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Bruce
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY 10032, USA; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Santos-Pinheiro F, Graber JJ. Neuro-oncology Treatment Strategies for Primary Glial Tumors. Semin Neurol 2023; 43:889-896. [PMID: 38096849 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Primary brain tumors underwent reclassification in the 2021 World Health Organization update, relying on molecular findings (especially isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations and chromosomal changes in 1p, 19q, gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10). Newer entities have also been described including histone 3 mutant midline gliomas. These updated pathologic classifications improve prognostication and reliable diagnosis, but may confuse interpretation of prior clinical trials and require reclassification of patients diagnosed in the past. For patients over seventy, multiple studies have now confirmed the utility of shorter courses of radiation, and the risk of post-operative delirium. Ongoing studies are comparing proton to photon radiation. Long term follow up of prior clinical trials have confirmed the roles and length of chemotherapy (mainly temozolomide) in different tumors, as well as the wearable novottf device. New oral isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors have also shown efficacy in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jerome J Graber
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Alvord Brain Tumor Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dongpo S, Xiaozhuo L, Xin L, Zhengyao Z, Qing W, Fameng Z, Mingming F, Qian H, Mei L, Tong C. Effectiveness and Safety of Different Postoperative Adjuvant Regimens in Patients with Low-Grade Gliomas: A Network Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 179:e474-e491. [PMID: 37673325 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of various adjuvant regimens in patients with low-grade gliomas and to further explore the optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with low-grade gliomas and the differences in the efficacy of each treatment regimens in different tumor types. METHODS A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to screen randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials related to adjuvant therapy in patients with low-grade gliomas. The Cochrane quality assessment method and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the quality of the included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, respectively. The data from previous studies were extracted using Excel and GetData Graph Digitizer 2.26 software, and network meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0 statistical software. RESULTS The specific ranking of 5-year progression-free survival (5-year PFS) for each treatment regimen from the best to the worst in patients with low-grade gliomas was surgery (S) combined with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (S + PCV); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy and PCV multidrug chemotherapy (S + RT + PCV); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide monotherapy (S + RT + TMZ); surgery combined with enhanced radiotherapy (S + H-RT); surgery combined with standard radiotherapy (S + RT); surgery combined with TMZ (S + TMZ); and S. The 5-year overall survival (OS) ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, surgery combined with enhanced radiotherapy and TMZ monotherapy (S + H-RT + TMZ), S + H-RT, S + RT, and S. The 2-year progression-free survival ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + PCV, S + RT, S + RT + PCV, S + TMZ, S + H-RT, and S. The 2-year overall survival ranking was S + RT + TMZ, S + H-RT + TMZ, S + RT, S + RT + PCV, S + H-RT, and S. The incidence of adverse events (≥3) was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: S + RT + PCV, S + RT + TMZ, S + PCV, S + H-RT, S + TMZ, and S + RT. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation nonchromosome 1p and 19q chromosome whole arm codeletion (IDHmt/noncoder) group, the S + RT + PCV and S + H-RT regimens had better 5-year PFS and 5-year OS. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation and chromosome 1p and 19q chromosome whole arm codeletion (IDHmt/coder) group, the 5-year PFS of each treatment regimen ranked from the best to the worst was S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, S + H-RT, S + RT, S + TMZ, and S. The order of 5-year OS from the best to the worst was S + H-RT, S + RT + TMZ, S + RT + PCV, S + RT, and S. In the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 wild-type (IDHwt) group, the S + H-RT and S + TMZ regimens had better 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that both the S + RT + TMZ and S + RT + PCV regimens might be effective therapies for treating patients with low-grade gliomas. Among these, the S + RT + TMZ regimen seemed to be safer but might lead to tumor deterioration. In the IDHmt/coder type, the S + RT + TMZ scheme might have a significant advantage. In the IDHmt/noncoder type, the S + RT + PCV scheme might be more dominant, while in the IDHwt type, the S + H-RT and S + TMZ schemes also might be good treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Dongpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Liu Xiaozhuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Li Xin
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Zuo Zhengyao
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Wang Qing
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Zhen Fameng
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Fan Mingming
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Han Qian
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Li Mei
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Chen Tong
- Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhong Q, Luo D, Chen D, Li X, Du Q, Liang Q, Li J, Zhu X. The prognosis of gliomas with different molecular subtypes in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Aging (Albany NY) 2023; 15:7781-7793. [PMID: 37556350 PMCID: PMC10457046 DOI: 10.18632/aging.204942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of glioma patients with different molecular subtypes of who treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS We collected 45 glioma patients treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. All enrolled patients received postoperative IMRT and were divided into two groups based on the Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH status). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated retrospectively. RESULTS The median follow-up was 22 months (range 2-108.5 months). The 1-year OS of IDH-mut group and ΙDH-wild group was similar (77.3% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.16). While the 1-year PFS of IDH-mut group was significantly higher than that in ΙDH-wild group (90.4% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.0051). Subgroup analysis revealed that the 1-year PFS of IDH-mut/1p/19q codeletion group and IDH-mut/1p/19q noncodeletion group was significantly higher than in IDH-wild type patients. For patients with IDH-mut/MGMT-methylation, the outcome was no significant difference in OS, but PFS was longer than other subtypes. CONCLUSION This retrospective study showed that 1-year PFS of patients with IDH mutated was better than IDH-wild type patients. In subgroups analysis, the outcomes were shown that patients with IDH-mut/ 1p/19q codeletion and patients with IDH-mut/1p/19q noncodeletion had longer 1-year PFS than IDH-wild type patients, but the OS was similar between the subgroups. Patients with IDH-mut/MGMT-methylation had the best prognosis in the whole subgroups. However, these results still need further confirmation of large sample size, prospectively, randomized controlled trails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiulu Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Danjing Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Da Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Xiangde Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Qinghua Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Qianfu Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaodong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
- Department of Oncology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tejada Solís S, González Sánchez J, Iglesias Lozano I, Plans Ahicart G, Pérez Núñez A, Meana Carballo L, Gil Salú JL, Fernández Coello A, García Romero JC, Rodríguez de Lope Llorca A, García Duque S, Díez Valle R, Narros Giménez JL, Prat Acín R. Low grade gliomas guide-lines elaborated by the tumor section of Spanish Society of Neurosurgery. NEUROCIRUGIA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2023; 34:139-152. [PMID: 36446721 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Adult low-grade gliomas (Low Grade Gliomas, LGG) are tumors that originate from the glial cells of the brain and whose management involves great controversy, starting from the diagnosis, to the treatment and subsequent follow-up. For this reason, the Tumor Group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) has held a consensus meeting, in which the most relevant neurosurgical issues have been discussed, reaching recommendations based on the best scientific evidence. In order to obtain the maximum benefit from these treatments, an individualised assessment of each patient should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Experts in each LGG treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. Each area has been summarized and focused on the best published evidence. LGG have been surrounded by treatment controversy, although during the last years more accurate data has been published in order to reach treatment consensus. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Tejada Solís
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Josep González Sánchez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Iglesias Lozano
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gerard Plans Ahicart
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Pérez Núñez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leonor Meana Carballo
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Centro Médico de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Gil Salú
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Fernández Coello
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos García Romero
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Rodríguez de Lope Llorca
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara García Duque
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Díez Valle
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Narros Giménez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Prat Acín
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hervey-Jumper SL, Zhang Y, Phillips JJ, Morshed RA, Young JS, McCoy L, Lafontaine M, Luks T, Ammanuel S, Kakaizada S, Egladyous A, Gogos A, Villanueva-Meyer J, Shai A, Warrier G, Rice T, Crane J, Wrensch M, Wiencke JK, Daras M, Oberheim Bush NA, Taylor JW, Butowski N, Clarke J, Chang S, Chang E, Aghi M, Theodosopoulos P, McDermott M, Jakola AS, Kavouridis VK, Nawabi N, Solheim O, Smith T, Berger MS, Molinaro AM. Interactive Effects of Molecular, Therapeutic, and Patient Factors on Outcome of Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2029-2042. [PMID: 36599113 PMCID: PMC10082290 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG), the extent of surgical tumor resection (EOR) has a controversial role, in part because a randomized clinical trial with different levels of EOR is not feasible. METHODS In a 20-year retrospective cohort of 392 patients with IDH-mutant grade 2 glioma, we analyzed the combined effects of volumetric EOR and molecular and clinical factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival by recursive partitioning analysis. The OS results were validated in two external cohorts (n = 365). Propensity score analysis of the combined cohorts (n = 757) was used to mimic a randomized clinical trial with varying levels of EOR. RESULTS Recursive partitioning analysis identified three survival risk groups. Median OS was shortest in two subsets of patients with astrocytoma: those with postoperative tumor volume (TV) > 4.6 mL and those with preoperative TV > 43.1 mL and postoperative TV ≤ 4.6 mL. Intermediate OS was seen in patients with astrocytoma who had chemotherapy with preoperative TV ≤ 43.1 mL and postoperative TV ≤ 4.6 mL in addition to oligodendroglioma patients with either preoperative TV > 43.1 mL and residual TV ≤ 4.6 mL or postoperative residual volume > 4.6 mL. Longest OS was seen in astrocytoma patients with preoperative TV ≤ 43.1 mL and postoperative TV ≤ 4.6 mL who received no chemotherapy and oligodendroglioma patients with preoperative TV ≤ 43.1 mL and postoperative TV ≤ 4.6 mL. EOR ≥ 75% improved survival outcomes, as shown by propensity score analysis. CONCLUSION Across both subtypes of LGG, EOR beginning at 75% improves OS while beginning at 80% improves progression-free survival. Nonetheless, maximal resection with preservation of neurological function remains the treatment goal. Our findings have implications for surgical strategies for LGGs, particularly oligodendroglioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Yalan Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joanna J. Phillips
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ramin A. Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lucie McCoy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marisa Lafontaine
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tracy Luks
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Simon Ammanuel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sofia Kakaizada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Andrew Egladyous
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Andrew Gogos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Javier Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anny Shai
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gayathri Warrier
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Terri Rice
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jason Crane
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Margaret Wrensch
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - John K. Wiencke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennie W. Taylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nicholas Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Edward Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Manish Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Philip Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Asgeir S. Jakola
- Department of Neurological Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Noah Nawabi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Timothy Smith
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Annette M. Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van den Bent MJ. Thirty years of progress in the management of low-grade gliomas. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:425-429. [PMID: 37029057 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
This paper reviews 30 years of developments in the area of low-grade gliomas. This includes the changes in diagnostics with the incorporation of 1p/19q and IDH mutations in the diagnostic classifier, the improved surgical techniques, improved delivery of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. More recently, the better understanding of the altered cellular processes has lead to the development of novel drugs that may alter completely alter the management of patients early in the course of their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, ErasmusMC University Medical Center, Doctor Molenwaterplein, 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fong CH, Heaton R, Liu ZA, Li K, van Prooijen M, Cho Y, Shultz DB, Tsang DS. Dosimetric evaluation of adult and paediatric brain tumours planned using mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to linear accelerator-based volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70:64-71. [PMID: 36181359 PMCID: PMC9977670 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (mcfSRT) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device. METHODS Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), were re-planned using mcfSRT. Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans. RESULTS The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT (P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10, V25 and V50 compared with VMAT (P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0.1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT. Median beam-on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Heng Fong
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Robert Heaton
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of BiostatisticsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Kecheng Li
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Monique van Prooijen
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Young‐Bin Cho
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - David B. Shultz
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine ProgramPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Miller JJ, Gonzalez Castro LN, McBrayer S, Weller M, Cloughesy T, Portnow J, Andronesi O, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Baumert BG, Berger MS, Bi WL, Bindra R, Cahill DP, Chang SM, Costello JF, Horbinski C, Huang RY, Jenkins RB, Ligon KL, Mellinghoff IK, Nabors LB, Platten M, Reardon DA, Shi DD, Schiff D, Wick W, Yan H, von Deimling A, van den Bent M, Kaelin WG, Wen PY. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on diagnosis, management, and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:4-25. [PMID: 36239925 PMCID: PMC9825337 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie J Miller
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel McBrayer
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75235, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jana Portnow
- Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ovidiu Andronesi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Informatics and Data Science (IDS), Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT), Trans-Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Cantonal Hospital Graubunden, Institute of Radiation-Oncology, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Mitchell S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ranjit Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Brain Tumor Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert B Jenkins
- Individualized Medicine Research, Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Evnin Family Chair in Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - L Burt Nabors
- Department of Neurology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michael Platten
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David A Reardon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana D Shi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neuro-Oncology at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Program Chair of Neuro-Oncology at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), and Neurology and Chairman at the Neurology Clinic in Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hai Yan
- Genetron Health Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and, Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and, DKTK, INF 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William G Kaelin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu PB, Filley AC, Miller ML, Bruce JN. Benign Glioma. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1405:31-71. [PMID: 37452934 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23705-8_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Benign glioma broadly refers to a heterogeneous group of slow-growing glial tumors with low proliferative rates and a more indolent clinical course. These tumors may also be described as "low-grade" glioma (LGG) and are classified as WHO grade I or II lesions according to the Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) (Louis et al. in Acta Neuropathol 114:97-109, 2007). Advances in molecular genetics have improved understanding of glioma tumorigenesis, leading to the identification of common mutation profiles with significant treatment and prognostic implications. The most recent WHO 2016 classification system has introduced several notable changes in the way that gliomas are diagnosed, with a new emphasis on molecular features as key factors in differentiation (Wesseling and Capper in Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 44:139-150, 2018). Benign gliomas have a predilection for younger patients and are among the most frequently diagnosed tumors in children and young adults (Ostrom et al. in Neuro Oncol 22:iv1-iv96, 2020). These tumors can be separated into two clinically distinct subgroups. The first group is of focal, well-circumscribed lesions that notably are not associated with an increased risk of malignant transformation. Primarily diagnosed in pediatric patients, these WHO grade I tumors may be cured with surgical resection alone (Sturm et al. in J Clin Oncol 35:2370-2377, 2017). Recurrence rates are low, and the prognosis for these patients is excellent (Ostrom et al. in Neuro Oncol 22:iv1-iv96, 2020). Diffuse gliomas are WHO grade II lesions with a more infiltrative pattern of growth and high propensity for recurrence. These tumors are primarily diagnosed in young adult patients, and classically present with seizures (Pallud et al. Brain 137:449-462, 2014). The term "benign" is a misnomer in many cases, as the natural history of these tumors is with malignant transformation and recurrence as grade III or grade IV tumors (Jooma et al. in J Neurosurg 14:356-363, 2019). For all LGG, surgery with maximal safe resection is the treatment of choice for both primary and recurrent tumors. The goal of surgery should be for gross total resection (GTR), as complete tumor removal is associated with higher rates of tumor control and seizure freedom. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), while not typically a component of first-line treatment in most cases, may be employed as adjunctive therapy in high-risk or recurrent tumors and in some select cases. The prognosis of benign gliomas varies widely; non-infiltrative tumor subtypes generally have an excellent prognosis, while diffusely infiltrative tumors, although slow-growing, are eventually fatal (Sturm et al. in J Clin Oncol 35:2370-2377, 2017). This chapter reviews the shared and unique individual features of the benign glioma including diffuse glioma, pilocytic astrocytoma and pilomyxoid astrocytoma (PMA), subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA), subependymoma (SE), angiocentric glioma (AG), and chordoid glioma (CG). Also discussed is ganglioglioma (GG), a mixed neuronal-glial tumor that represents a notable diagnosis in the differential for other LGG (Wesseling and Capper 2018). Ependymomas of the brain and spinal cord, including major histologic subtypes, are discussed in other chapters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter B Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Anna C Filley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Michael L Miller
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Bruce
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
MRI features predict tumor grade in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:121-129. [PMID: 35953567 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03038-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly all literature for predicting tumor grade in astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma pre-dates the molecular classification system. We investigated the association between contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV with tumor grade separately for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and molecularly-defined oligodendrogliomas. METHODS For this retrospective study, 44 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas (WHO grades II, III, or IV) and 39 patients with oligodendrogliomas (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) (WHO grade II or III) were enrolled. Two readers independently assessed preoperative MRI for contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV. Inter-reader agreement was calculated, and statistical associations between MRI metrics and WHO grade were determined per reader. RESULTS For IDH-mutant astrocytomas, both readers found a stepwise positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 7.79 [1.97, 30.80], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 6.62 [1.70, 25.82], p = 0.006); both readers found that ADC was negatively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 0.74 [0.61, 0.90], p = 0.002); Reader B: OR 0.80 [0.66, 0.96], p = 0.017), and both readers found that rCBV was positively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 2.33 [1.35, 4.00], p = 0.002; Reader B: OR 2.13 [1.30, 3.57], p = 0.003). For oligodendrogliomas, both readers found a positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 15.33 [2.56, 91.95], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 20.00 [2.19, 182.45], p = 0.008), but neither reader found an association between ADC or rCBV and WHO grade. CONCLUSIONS Contrast enhancement predicts WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. ADC and rCBV predict WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas, but not for oligodendrogliomas.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee JH, Wee CW. Treatment of Adult Gliomas: A Current Update. BRAIN & NEUROREHABILITATION 2022; 15:e24. [PMID: 36742086 PMCID: PMC9833488 DOI: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common type of primary brain tumor in adults. Glioma treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach involving surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Multiple trials have been conducted to establish the appropriate choice of treatment to achieve long-term survival and better quality of life. This review provides up-to-date evidence regarding treatment strategies for gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Woo Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scherschinski L, Jubran JH, Shaftel KA, Furey CG, Farhadi DS, Benner D, Hendricks BK, Smith KA. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Management of Low-Grade Gliomas and Radiation Necrosis: A Single-Institution Case Series. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12121627. [PMID: 36552087 PMCID: PMC9775146 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment modality for ablation of low-grade glioma (LGG) and radiation necrosis (RN). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of patients with radiographically presumed recurrent or newly diagnosed LGG and RN treated with LITT. METHODS The neuro-oncological database of a quaternary center was reviewed for all patients who underwent LITT for management of LGG between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2020. Clinical data including demographics, lesion characteristics, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier analyses comprised overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Nine patients (7 men, 2 women; mean [SD] age 50 [16] years) were included. Patients underwent LITT at a mean (SD) of 11.6 (8.5) years after diagnosis. Two (22%) patients had new lesions on radiographic imaging without prior treatment. In the other 7 patients, all (78%) had surgical resection, 6 (67%) had intensity-modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy, respectively, and 4 (44%) had stereotactic radiosurgery. Two (22%) patients had lesions that were wild-type IDH1 status. Volumetric assessment of preoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhancing and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences yielded mean (SD) lesion volumes of 4.1 (6.5) cm3 and 26.7 (27.9) cm3, respectively. Three (33%) patients had evidence of radiographic progression after LITT. The pooled median (IQR) PFS for the cohort was 52 (56) months, median (IQR) OS after diagnosis was 183 (72) months, and median (IQR) OS after LITT was 52 (60) months. At the time of the study, 2 (22%) patients were deceased. CONCLUSIONS LITT is a safe and effective treatment option for management of LGG and RN, however, there may be increased risk of permanent complications with treatment of deep-seated subcortical lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Scherschinski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-602-693-5883
| | - Jubran H. Jubran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Kelly A. Shaftel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Charuta G. Furey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Dara S. Farhadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Dimitri Benner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Benjamin K. Hendricks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Kris A. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Berger TR, Wen PY, Lang-Orsini M, Chukwueke UN. World Health Organization 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and Implications for Therapy for Adult-Type Gliomas: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1493-1501. [PMID: 36006639 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Previous histologic classifications of brain tumors have been limited by discrepancies in diagnoses reported by neuropathologists and variability in outcomes and response to therapies. Such diagnostic discrepancies have impaired clinicians' ability to select the most appropriate therapies for patients and have allowed heterogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, hindering the development of more effective therapies. In adult-type diffuse gliomas, histologic classification has a particularly important effect on clinical care. Observations In 2021, the World Health Organization published the fifth edition of the Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. This classification incorporates advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of brain tumors with histopathology in order to group tumors into more biologically and molecularly defined entities. As such, tumor classification is significantly improved through better characterized natural histories. These changes have particularly important implications for gliomas. For the first time, adult- and pediatric-type gliomas are classified separately on the basis of differences in molecular pathogenesis and prognosis. Furthermore, the previous broad category of adult-type diffuse gliomas has been consolidated into 3 types: astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant; oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted; and glioblastoma, IDH wild type. These major changes are driven by IDH mutation status and include the restriction of the diagnosis of glioblastoma to tumors that are IDH wild type; the reclassification of tumors previously diagnosed as IDH-mutated glioblastomas as astrocytomas IDH mutated, grade 4; and the requirement for the presence of IDH mutations to classify tumors as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas. Conclusions and Relevance The 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor classification is a major advance toward improving the diagnosis of brain tumors. It will provide clinicians with more accurate guidance on prognosis and optimal therapy for patients and ensure that more homogenous patient populations are enrolled in clinical trials, potentially facilitating the development of more effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar R Berger
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melanie Lang-Orsini
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hsu EJ, Thomas J, Maher EA, Youssef M, Timmerman RD, Wardak Z, Lee M, Dan TD, Patel TR, Vo DT. Neutrophilia and post-radiation thrombocytopenia predict for poor prognosis in radiation-treated glioma patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1000280. [PMID: 36158642 PMCID: PMC9501690 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1000280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Poor outcomes in glioma patients indicate a need to determine prognostic indicators of survival to better guide patient specific treatment options. While preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have been suggested as prognostic systemic inflammation markers, the impact of post-radiation changes in these cell types is unclear. We sought to identify which hematologic cell measurements before, during, or after radiation predicted for patient survival. Methods A cohort of 182 patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas treated at our institution was retrospectively reviewed. Patient blood samples were collected within one month before, during, or within 3 months after radiation for quantification of hematologic cell counts, for which failure patterns were evaluated. Multivariable cox proportional hazards analysis for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed to control for patient variables. Results Multivariable analysis identified pre-radiation NLR > 4.0 (Hazard ratio = 1.847, p = 0.0039) and neutrophilia prior to (Hazard ratio = 1.706, p = 0.0185), during (Hazard ratio = 1.641, p = 0.0277), or after (Hazard ratio = 1.517, p = 0.0879) radiation as significant predictors of worse OS, with similar results for PFS. Post-radiation PLR > 200 (Hazard ratio = 0.587, p = 0.0062) and a percent increase in platelets after radiation (Hazard ratio = 0.387, p = 0.0077) were also associated with improved OS. Patients receiving more than 15 fractions of radiation exhibited greater post-radiation decreases in neutrophil and platelet counts than those receiving fewer. Patients receiving dexamethasone during radiation exhibited greater increases in neutrophil counts than those not receiving steroids. Lymphopenia, changes in lymphocyte counts, monocytosis, MLR, and changes in monocyte counts did not impact patient survival. Conclusion Neutrophilia at any time interval surrounding radiotherapy, pre-radiation NLR, and post-radiation thrombocytopenia, but not lymphocytes or monocytes, are predictors of poor patient survival in glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Eric J. Hsu,
| | - Jamie Thomas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Elizabeth A. Maher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Michael Youssef
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Robert D. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Zabi Wardak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Minjae Lee
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Tu D. Dan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Toral R. Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Dat T. Vo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Śledzińska P, Bebyn M, Furtak J, Koper A, Koper K. Current and promising treatment strategies in glioma. Rev Neurosci 2022:revneuro-2022-0060. [PMID: 36062548 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2022-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors; despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, glioma patients generally have a poor prognosis. Hence there is a clear need for improved therapeutic options. In recent years, significant effort has been made to investigate immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. The review covers well-established strategies such as surgery, temozolomide, PCV, and mTOR inhibitors. Furthermore, it summarizes promising therapies: tumor treating fields, immune therapies, tyrosine kinases inhibitors, IDH(Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-targeted approaches, and others. While there are many promising treatment strategies, none fundamentally changed the management of glioma patients. However, we are still awaiting the outcome of ongoing trials, which have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Śledzińska
- Molecular Oncology and Genetics Department, Innovative Medical Forum, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marek Bebyn
- Molecular Oncology and Genetics Department, Innovative Medical Forum, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jacek Furtak
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Neurooncology and Radiosurgery, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Koper
- Department of Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Koper
- Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Clinical Oncology, and Nursing, Departament of Oncological Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Halasz LM, Attia A, Bradfield L, Brat DJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Laack NN, Lalani N, Lebow ES, Liu AK, Niemeier HM, Palmer JD, Peters KB, Sheehan J, Thomas RP, Vora SA, Wahl DR, Weiss SE, Yeboa DN, Zhong J, Shih HA. Radiation Therapy for IDH-Mutant Grade 2 and Grade 3 Diffuse Glioma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:370-386. [PMID: 35902341 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma, as classified in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. It includes indications for radiation therapy (RT), advanced RT techniques, and clinical management of adverse effects. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a multidisciplinary task force to address 4 key questions focused on the RT management of patients with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS A strong recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for patients with oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. For oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 2 with any high-risk features, adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended. However, adjuvant RT was strongly recommended for oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3. A conditional recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. Adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 2, with any high-risk features and strongly recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 3. Dose recommendations varied based on histology and grade. Given known adverse long-term effects of RT, consideration for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy or proton therapy were given as strong and conditional recommendations, respectively. Finally, based on expert opinion, the guideline recommends assessment, surveillance, and management for toxicity management. CONCLUSIONS Based on published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed recommendations to inform the management of adults with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma as defined by WHO 2021 classification, based on the highest quality published data, and best translated by our task force of subject matter experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Daniel J Brat
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nafisha Lalani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Health, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | | | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Stephanie E Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pradhan A, Mozaffari K, Ghodrati F, Everson RG, Yang I. Modern surgical management of incidental gliomas. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:81-94. [PMID: 35704158 PMCID: PMC9325816 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Gliomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system and are categorized by the World Health Organization into either low-grade (grades 1 and 2) or high-grade (grades 3 and 4) gliomas. A subset of patients with glioma may experience no tumor-related symptoms and be incidentally diagnosed. These incidental low-grade gliomas (iLGG) maintain controversial treatment course despite scientific advancements. Here we highlight the recent advancements in classification, neuroimaging, and surgical management of these tumors. Methods A review of the literature was performed. The authors created five subtopics of focus: histological criteria, diagnostic imaging, surgical advancements, correlation of surgical resection and survival outcomes, and clinical implications. Conclusions Alternating studies suggest that these tumors may experience higher mutational rates than their counterparts. Significant progress in management of gliomas, regardless of the grade, has been made through modern neurosurgical treatment modalities, diagnostic neuroimaging, and a better understanding of the genetic composition of these tumors. An optimal treatment approach for patients with newly diagnosed iLGG remains ill-defined despite multiple studies arguing in favor of safe maximal resection. Our review emphasizes the not so benign nature of incidental low grade glioma and further supports the need for future studies to evaluate survival outcomes following surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Pradhan
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Khashayar Mozaffari
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Farinaz Ghodrati
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard G Everson
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,The Lundquist Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Isaac Yang
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,The Lundquist Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. .,David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tewari S, Tom MC, Park DYJ, Wei W, Chao ST, Yu JS, Suh JH, Kilic S, Peereboom DM, Stevens GHJ, Lathia JD, Prayson R, Barnett GH, Angelov L, Mohammadi AM, Ahluwalia MS, Murphy ES. Sex-Specific Differences in Low Grade Glioma Presentation and Outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:283-292. [PMID: 35667529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In addition to established prognostic factors in low-grade glioma (LGG), studies suggest a sexual dimorphism with male sex portending worse prognosis. Our objective was to identify the impact of sex on presentation and outcomes in LGG. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with LGG (WHO 2016 grade 2 glioma). Patients with IDH wildtype tumors were excluded. Patients were matched between male and female sex by age, treatment, and surgery via propensity score matching. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed by sex. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), next intervention free survival (NIFS), progression free survival (PFS), and malignant transformation free survival (MTFS). Kaplan Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis (MVA) with backwards elimination was completed. RESULTS Of the 532 patients identified, 258 (48%) were male. Males were more likely to present with seizure (69.38% vs. 56.57%, p = 0.002), but no other statistically significant differences between sexes at presentation were identified. 5-year OS was higher in females at 87% (95% CI 83%-91%) versus 78% (95% CI 73-84%) in males (p=0.0045). NIFS was significantly higher in female patients at 68% (95% CI 62-74%) versus 57% (95% CI 51%-64%) in males (p = 0.009). On MVA, female sex was independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.05; p= 0.002), NIFS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.42; p= 0.004), and MTFS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.12; p= 0.0004). In patients with molecularly defined LGG (IDH and 1p19q status) (n = 291), female sex remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16-2.77; p = 0.008) and NIFS (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.96; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS In this study, female sex was independently associated with improved outcomes. These findings support intrinsic sex-specific differences in LGG behavior, justifying further studies to optimize management and therapeutics based on sex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surabhi Tewari
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - Deborah Y J Park
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - John H Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sarah Kilic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - David M Peereboom
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Richard Prayson
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Radiation-induced contrast enhancement following proton radiotherapy for low-grade glioma depends on tumor characteristics and is rarer in children than adults. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:54-64. [PMID: 35568281 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) is used in the treatment of low-grade glioma (LGG) to mitigate long-term sequelae. Following PRT, increased rates of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) are suspected but poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed consecutive 227 patients (42 children and 185 adults) treated with PRT (54Gy RBE) for LGG from 2010 to 2020 and followed with serial clinical exams and magnetic resonance imaging for in median 5.6 years. RESULTS Tumors were graded WHO 1 in a minority (n = 22, 12%) of adults, but a majority of children (n = 29, 69%). In contrast, tumors were graded WHO 2 in the majority (n = 160, 87%) of adults and a minority of children (n = 10, 24%). Five-year overall survival following PRT was 81% in adults and 91% in children. The risk of RICE was 5-fold more frequent in adults (25%) versus children (5%) (p = 0.0043). In children and adults, RICE were symptomatic in 50% and 55% (n=1 and 26) of cases with CTCAE grade 0 in 47% (n=23), grade 1 in 25% (n=12), 0% grade 2 (n=0) and 29% grade 3 (n=14), respectively. In adults, RICE risk was associated to WHO grading (8% in WHO grade 1 vs. 24% in WHO grade 2, p = 0.026), independent of age (p=0.44) and irradiation dose (p=0.005), but not independent of IDH mutational status. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate effectiveness of PRT for LGG in both children and adults. The RICE risk is lower in children which are a main target group for PRT and differs with WHO grading.
Collapse
|
28
|
Nardone V, Desideri I, D’Ambrosio L, Morelli I, Visani L, Di Giorgio E, Guida C, Clemente A, Belfiore MP, Cioce F, Spadafora M, Vinciguerra C, Mansi L, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S. Nuclear medicine and radiotherapy in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00495-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of the narrative review was to analyse the applications of nuclear medicine (NM) techniques such as PET/CT with different tracers in combination with radiotherapy for the clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
Materials and methods
Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.
Results
This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of NM approaches in combination with radiotherapy in glioma patients.
Conclusions
NM can provide the Radiation Oncologist several aids that can be useful in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. At the same, these results need to be validated in prospective and multicenter trials.
Collapse
|
29
|
Blonski M, Obara T, Brzenczek C, Pouget C, Dillier C, Meyer M, Lavigne L, Forthoffer N, Broussois A, Gauchotte G, Baron MH, Rech F, Mézières S, Gaudeau Y, Verger A, Vogin G, Anxionnat R, Moureaux JM, Taillandier L. Initial PCV Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy Is Associated With a Prolonged Response But Late Neurotoxicity in 20 Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:827897. [PMID: 35311144 PMCID: PMC8931287 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundStudy RTOG 9802 in high-risk diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGGs) showed the potential synergistic effect on survival of the procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV) radiotherapy (RT) combination. Limited data on long-term neurocognitive impact and quality of life (QoL) have yet been reported.Patients and MethodsWe described a monocentric series of patients treated at first line by the combination of PCV immediately followed by RT between January 01, 1982 and January 01, 2017. Radiological data were collected and included volume, velocity of diametric expansion (VDE), and MRI aspects. Long-term neurocognitive and QoL were analyzed.ResultsTwenty patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The median response rate was 65.1% (range, 9.6%–99%) at the time of maximal VDE decrease corresponding to a median volume reduction of 79.7 cm3 (range, 3.1 to 174.2 cm3), which occurred after a median period of 7.2 years (range, 0.3–21.9) after the end of RT. An ongoing negative VDE was measured in 13/16 patients after the end of RT, with a median duration of 6.7 years (range, 9 months–21.9 years). The median follow-up since radiological diagnosis was 17.5 years (range, 4.8 to 29.5). Estimated median survival was 17.4 years (95% CI: 12; NR). After a long-term follow-up, substantial neurotoxicity was noticed with dementia in six progression-free patients (30%), leading to ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures in three, and premature death in five. Thirteen patients (65%) were unable to work with disability status. Successive longitudinal neurocognitive assessments for living patients showed verbal episodic memory deterioration.ConclusionsPCV-RT combination seems to have not only an oncological synergy but also a long-term neurotoxic synergy to consider before initial therapeutic decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Blonski
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
- *Correspondence: Marie Blonski,
| | - Tiphaine Obara
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Cyril Brzenczek
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Celso Pouget
- Department of Pathology, CHRU, Nancy, France
- Centre de ressources Biologiques, BB-0033-00035, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Céline Dillier
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Mylène Meyer
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Laura Lavigne
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Guillaume Gauchotte
- Department of Pathology, CHRU, Nancy, France
- Centre de ressources Biologiques, BB-0033-00035, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | | | - Fabien Rech
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Mézières
- Department of Mathematics, Elie Cartan Institute, Nancy, France
- INRIA Biology, Genetics and Statistics, Nancy, France
| | - Yann Gaudeau
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU, Nancy, France
- IADI, INSERM U1254, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Vogin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Baclesse Radiation Therapy Center, Esch/Alzette, Luxembourg
- UMR 7635 CNRS, IMoPA Biopole Lorraine University Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Jean-Marie Moureaux
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| | - Luc Taillandier
- Department of Neurology, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tom MC, Milano MT, Chao ST, Soltys SG, Knisely JP, Sahgal A, Nagpal S, Lo SS, Jabbari S, Wang TJ, Ahluwalia MS, Simonson M, Palmer JD, Gephart MH, Halasz LM, Garg AK, Chiang VL, Chang EL. Executive summary of american radium society’s appropriate use criteria for the postoperative management of lower grade gliomas. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:79-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
31
|
Byrne E, Abel S, Yu A, Shepard M, Karlovits SM, Wegner RE. Trends in radiation dose for low grade gliomas across the United States. J Neurooncol 2022; 157:197-205. [PMID: 35199246 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-03962-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant radiation is often used in patients with low grade gliomas with high-risk characteristics with a recommended dose of 45-54 Gy. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to see which doses were being used, and if any difference was seen in outcome. METHODS We queried the NCDB for patients with WHO Grade 2 primary brain tumors treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. We divided the cohort into dose groups: 45-50 Gy, 50.4-54 Gy, and > 54 Gy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of low and high dose radiation. Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS We identified 1437 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Median age was 45 years and 62% of patients were > 40 years old. Nearly half of patients (48%) had astrocytoma subtype and 70% had subtotal resection. The majority of patients (69%) were treated to doses between 50.4 and 54 Gy. Predictors of high dose radiation (> 54 Gy) were increased income, astrocytoma subtype, chemotherapy receipt, and treatment in later year (2014). The main predictors of survival were age > 40, astrocytoma subtype, and insurance type. Patients treated to a dose of > 54 Gy had a median survival of 73.5 months and was not reached in those treated to a lower dose (p = 0.0041). CONCLUSIONS This analysis shows that 50.4-54 Gy is the most widely used radiation regimen for the adjuvant treatment of low-grade gliomas. There appeared to be no benefit to higher doses, although unreported factors may impact interpretation of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Byrne
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Abel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stephen M Karlovits
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mohile NA, Messersmith H, Gatson NTN, Hottinger AF, Lassman AB, Morton J, Ney D, Nghiemphu PL, Olar A, Olson J, Perry J, Portnow J, Schiff D, Shannon A, Shih HA, Strowd R, van den Bent M, Ziu M, Blakeley J. Therapy for Diffuse Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors in Adults: ASCO-SNO Guideline. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults.
Methods
ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.
Results
Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified.
Recommendations
Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMTpromoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimish A Mohile
- Department of Neurology and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Na Tosha N Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Geisinger Neuroscience Institute, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jordan Morton
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Douglas Ney
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffery Olson
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Perry
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jana Portnow
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Roy Strowd
- Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mateo Ziu
- INOVA Neurosciences and Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mohile NA, Messersmith H, Gatson NT, Hottinger AF, Lassman A, Morton J, Ney D, Nghiemphu PL, Olar A, Olson J, Perry J, Portnow J, Schiff D, Shannon A, Shih HA, Strowd R, van den Bent M, Ziu M, Blakeley J. Therapy for Diffuse Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors in Adults: ASCO-SNO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:403-426. [PMID: 34898238 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults. METHODS ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified. RECOMMENDATIONS Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimish A Mohile
- Department of Neurology and Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Na Tosha Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,Geisinger Neuroscience Institute. Danville, PA
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jordan Morton
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Douglas Ney
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | - James Perry
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jana Portnow
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - Roy Strowd
- Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Martin van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mateo Ziu
- INOVA Neurosciences and Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, VA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Antoni D, Feuvret L, Biau J, Robert C, Mazeron JJ, Noël G. Radiation guidelines for gliomas. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:116-128. [PMID: 34953698 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Antoni
- Service de radiothérapie, institut cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - L Feuvret
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J Biau
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, Unicancer, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 392, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 01, France
| | - C Robert
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 39, rue Camille-Desmoulin, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - J-J Mazeron
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Noël
- Service de radiothérapie, institut cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu Y, Liu S, Li G, Li Y, Chen L, Feng J, Yang Y, Jiang T, Qiu X. Association of high-dose radiotherapy with improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas. Cancer 2021; 128:1085-1092. [PMID: 34780673 PMCID: PMC9299029 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The radiation dose for patients with low-grade gliomas (LGGs) is controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the radiation dose on survival for patients with LGGs and especially for molecularly defined subgroups. METHODS Three hundred fifty-one patients with newly diagnosed LGGs from the multicenter Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in 2005-2018. The RT dose, as a continuous variable, was entered into a Cox regression model using penalized spline regression to allow for a nonlinear relationship between the RT dose and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted propensity scores were used to correct for potential confounders. Dose effects on survival within IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion defined subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS The risk of mortality and disease progression decreased sharply until 54 Gy. High-dose RT (≥54 Gy) was associated with significantly better 5-year OS (81.7% vs 64.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; P < .001) and PFS (77.4% vs 54.5%; HR, 0.46; P < .001) than low-dose RT (<54 Gy). IPTW correction confirmed the associations (HR for OS, 0.44; P = .001; HR for PFS, 0.48; P = .003). High-dose RT was associated with longer PFS (HR, 0.25; P = .002; HR, 0.21; P = .039) and OS (HR, 0.27; P = .006; HR, 0.07; P = .017) in IDH-mutant/1p/19q noncodeleted and IDH wild-type subgroups, respectively. No significant difference in survival was observed with high-dose RT in the IDH-mutant/1p/19q codeleted subgroup. CONCLUSIONS High-dose RT (≥54 Gy) was effective in LGGs. Patients with an IDH mutation/1p/19q noncodeletion or IDH wild-type may need to be considered for high-dose RT. LAY SUMMARY The radiotherapy dose-response was observed in patients with low-grade gliomas, and high-dose radiotherapy (≥54 Gy) was associated with improved survival. Patients with an IDH mutation/1p/19q noncodeletion or wild-type IDH may have improved survival with the administration of high-dose radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanwei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Molecular Neuropathology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Molecular Neuropathology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guanzhang Li
- Department of Molecular Neuropathology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Molecular Neuropathology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mellinghoff IK, Chang SM, Jaeckle KA, van den Bent M. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutant Grade II and III Glial Neoplasms. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 36:95-111. [PMID: 34711457 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or IDH2 occur in most of the adult low-grade gliomas and, less commonly, in cholangiocarcinoma, chondrosarcoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and other human malignancies. Cancer-associated mutations alter the function of the enzyme, resulting in production of R(-)-2-hydroxyglutarate and broad epigenetic dysregulation. Small molecule IDH inhibitors have received regulatory approval for the treatment of IDH mutant (mIDH) leukemia and are under development for the treatment of mIDH solid tumors. This article provides a current view of mIDH adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors, including their clinical presentation and treatment, and discusses novel approaches and challenges toward improving the treatment of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Room M 774SF, San Francisco, CA 94142-0112, USA
| | - Kurt A Jaeckle
- Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Mangurian 4415, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-onoclogy, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Nt-542, Dr Molenwaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rahman R, Sulman E, Haas-Kogan D, Cagney DN. Update on Radiation Therapy for Central Nervous System Tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 36:77-93. [PMID: 34711456 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy has long been a critical modality of treatment of patients with central nervous system tumors, including primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and meningiomas. Advances in radiation technology and delivery have allowed for more precise treatment to optimize patient outcomes and minimize toxicities. Improved understanding of the molecular underpinnings of brain tumors and normal brain tissue response to radiation will allow for continued refinement of radiation treatment approaches to improve clinical outcomes for brain tumor patients. With continued advances in precision and delivery, radiation therapy will continue to be an important modality to achieve optimal outcomes of brain tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, ASB1-L2, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Erik Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, ASB1-L2, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Daniel N Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, ASB1-L2, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gagliardi F, De Domenico P, Snider S, Pompeo E, Roncelli F, Barzaghi LR, Bailo M, Piloni M, Spina A, Fodor A, Berzero G, Di Muzio N, Filippi M, Finocchiaro G, Mortini P. Gamma Knife radiosurgery as primary treatment of low-grade brainstem gliomas: A systematic review and metanalysis of current evidence and predictive factors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 168:103508. [PMID: 34678323 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The current standard of care for surgically inaccessible low-grade brainstem gliomas (BS-LLGs) is external-beam radiotherapy (RT). Developments toward more innovative conformal techniques have focused on decreasing morbidity, by limiting radiation to surrounding tissues. Among these Gamma Knife radiosurgery (SRS-GK) has recently gained an increasingly important role in the treatment of these tumors. Although SRS-GK has not yet been compared with conventional RT in patients harboring focal BS-LGGs, clinical practice has been deeply influenced by trials performed on other tumors. This is the first meta-analysis on the topic, systematically reviewing the most relevant available evidence, comparing RT and SRS-GK as primary treatments of BS-LGGs, focusing on survival, clinical outcome, oncological control, and complications. Predictive factors have been systematically evaluated and analyzed according to statistical significance and clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pierfrancesco De Domenico
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Snider
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pompeo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Roncelli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lina Raffaella Barzaghi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Piloni
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfio Spina
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Berzero
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Finocchiaro
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Manzanedo‐Delgado A, Mason S, Pumarola M, Stabile F. Diagnostic imaging, treatment and outcome in a 14‐month‐old Dobermann with brainstem gemistocytic astrocytoma. VETERINARY RECORD CASE REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Mason
- Department of Oncology and Radiology Southfields Veterinary Specialists Basildon UK
| | - Marti Pumarola
- Faculty of Veterinary Unit of Murine and Comparative Pathology (UPMiC) Autonomous University of Barcelona Bellaterra Barcelona Spain
| | - Fabio Stabile
- Department of Neurology/Neurosurgery Southfields Veterinary Specialists Basildon UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shen CJ, Terezakis SA. The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Cancers With Advancements in Molecular Tumor Characterization and Targeted Therapies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:679701. [PMID: 34604027 PMCID: PMC8481883 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ongoing rapid advances in molecular diagnostics, precision imaging, and development of targeted therapies have resulted in a constantly evolving landscape for treatment of pediatric cancers. Radiotherapy remains a critical element of the therapeutic toolbox, and its role in the era of precision medicine continues to adapt and undergo re-evaluation. Here, we review emerging strategies for combining radiotherapy with novel targeted systemic therapies (for example, for pediatric gliomas or soft tissue sarcomas), modifying use or intensity of radiotherapy when appropriate via molecular diagnostics that allow better characterization and individualization of each patient’s treatments (for example, de-intensification of radiotherapy in WNT subgroup medulloblastoma), as well as exploring more effective targeted systemic therapies that may allow omission or delay of radiotherapy. Many of these strategies are still under investigation but highlight the importance of continued pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluating the role of radiotherapy in this era of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang ZH, Xiao XL, Zhang ZT, He K, Hu F. A Radiomics Model for Predicting Early Recurrence in Grade II Gliomas Based on Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Oncol 2021; 11:684996. [PMID: 34540662 PMCID: PMC8443788 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to develop a radiomics model to predict early recurrence (<1 year) in grade II glioma after the first resection. Methods The pathological, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of patients diagnosed with grade II glioma who underwent surgery and had a recurrence between 2017 and 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. After a rigorous selection, 64 patients were eligible and enrolled in the study. Twenty-two cases had a pathologically confirmed recurrent glioma. The cases were randomly assigned using a ratio of 7:3 to either the training set or validation set. T1-weighted image (T1WI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (T1CE) were acquired. The minimum-redundancy-maximum-relevancy (mRMR) method alone or in combination with univariate logistic analysis were used to identify the most optimal predictive feature from the three image sequences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to develop a predictive model using the screened features. The performance of each model in both training and validation datasets was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results A total of 396 radiomics features were initially extracted from each image sequence. After running the mRMR and univariate logistic analysis, nine predictive features were identified and used to build the multiparametric radiomics model. The model had a higher AUC when compared with the univariate models in both training and validation data sets with an AUC of 0.966 (95% confidence interval: 0.949–0.99) and 0.930 (95% confidence interval: 0.905–0.973), respectively. The calibration curves indicated a good agreement between the predictable and the actual probability of developing recurrence. The DCA demonstrated that the predictive value of the model improved when combining the three MRI sequences. Conclusion Our multiparametric radiomics model could be used as an efficient and accurate tool for predicting the recurrence of grade II glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Hua Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xin-Lan Xiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhao-Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Keng He
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Feng Hu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
You A, Gu J, Wang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Rao G, Ge X, Zhang K, Gao X, Wang D. Value of long non-coding RNA HAS2-AS1 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of glioma. Neurologia 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
43
|
Taillandier L, Obara T, Duffau H. What Does Quality of Care Mean in Lower-Grade Glioma Patients: A Precision Molecular-Based Management of the Tumor or an Individualized Medicine Centered on Patient's Choices? Front Oncol 2021; 11:719014. [PMID: 34354956 PMCID: PMC8329449 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.719014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Taillandier
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Neurology Departement, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Tiphaine Obara
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique Nancy France - UMR 7039 - BioSiS Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Neurology Departement, Neurooncology Unit, CHRU, Nancy, France
| | - Hugues Duffau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, Montpellier, France
- Team “Plasticity of Central Nervous System, Stem Cells and Glial Tumors”, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), U1191 Laboratory, Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Anand S, Chatterjee A, Gupta T, Panda P, Moiyadi A, Epari S, Patil V, Krishnatry R, Goda JS, Jalali R. Upfront Therapy of Aggressive/High-Risk Low-Grade Glioma: Single-Institution Outcome Analysis of Temozolomide-Based Radio-Chemotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy. World Neurosurg 2021; 154:e176-e184. [PMID: 34245877 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report clinical outcomes of temozolomide (TMZ)-based radio-chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with aggressive/high-risk low-grade glioma (LGG). METHODS Medical records of patients defined as aggressive/high-risk LGG based on clinicoradiologic and/or histomorphologic features treated between 2009 and 2016 in an academic neuro-oncology unit with upfront postoperative radiotherapy at time of initial diagnosis with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ were reviewed, retrospectively. RESULTS In total, 64 patients with median age of 38 years at initial diagnosis were included. Histomorphologically, patients were classified into oligodendroglioma, mixed oligoastrocytoma, and astrocytoma. Molecular markers such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q codeletion were used to classify 37 of 64 (58%) patients into molecularly defined entities comprising oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant with 1p/19q codeletion), IDH-mutant astrocytoma (immunohistochemistry or gene sequencing), and IDH-wild-type astrocytoma (gene sequencing). All 64 patients completed planned conventionally fractionated focal conformal radiotherapy (median dose 55.8 Gy) with concurrent TMZ. Fifty-nine patients received further adjuvant TMZ for a median of 12 cycles. Adjuvant TMZ was stopped prematurely in 6 (9%) patients due to toxicity or early disease progression. At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival for the study cohort were 74.6% and 84.3%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 87.5%, 90.4%, and 71.9% for oligodendroglioma, mixed oligoastrocytoma, and astrocytoma, respectively (P = 0.42) Similar estimates for molecularly defined oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and IDH-wild-type astrocytoma were 85.8%, 90%, and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Upfront TMZ-based concurrent radio-chemotherapy and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy provides acceptable survival outcomes in aggressive/high-risk LGG with modest toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachith Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Abhishek Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
| | - Pankaj Panda
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Department of Neuro-surgical Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Department of Pathology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Jayant Sastri Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TMH/ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Keshri V, Deshpande RP, Chandrasekhar YBVK, Panigrahi M, Rao IS, Babu PP. Risk Stratification in Low Grade Glioma: A Single Institutional Experience. Neurol India 2021; 68:803-812. [PMID: 32859817 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.293441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Low grade gliomas (LGG) are most often noted with the unpredictable overall survival and progression to higher grades. Objective: In the present study, we analyze the clinicopathological features influencing the prognostic outcomes and compared the features with criteria developed by EORTC. Materials and Methods We observed the 130 LGG clinical cases in single institute and maintained the follow-up for more than 5 years. In addition, the molecular details were confirmed with markers as IDH, 1p/19q codeletion, p53 and ATRX mutations. Results The mean age of patients as 37.67 years and male population contributing to 70%. We observed biased incidence among the male population with dominating occurrence at frontal and parietal lobes in the brain. 40.8% patients had oligodendroglioma, 33.8% astrocytoma, 19.2% oligoastrocytoma and 2.3% gemistocytic astrocytoma pathology. Patients who were subjected to chemotherapy and radiotherapy were noted with average survival of 29 months. Oligodendroglial tumors were found with progression free survival (PFS) of 25 months, oligoastrocytoma cases with 32 months, diffuse astrocytoma cases with 23 months while the gemistocytic astrocytoma cases had 22 months. The PFS for LGG cases was 4.7 years while the overall survival was 4.9 years. Mean survival of patients with KPS score <70 and >70 was 1.5 & 4.9 years respectively. 64 patients were observed with the tumor size >5 cm. In total, 72.3% of the patients were underwent GTR, 23.3% STR and 3.8% underwent biopsy. Conclusion Taken together, the clinical symptoms, expression of molecular markers and the prognosis details provided by our results can help for better management of LGG cases. We further propose to use following five factors to accurately describe the prognosis and tumor recurrence: 1) Age >50 years, 2) tumor size >5 cm, 3) MIB index >5%, 4) KPS score < 70 and 5) gemistocytic pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikrant Keshri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, India
| | - Ravindra P Deshpande
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Y B V K Chandrasekhar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, India
| | - Manas Panigrahi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, India
| | - I Satish Rao
- Department of Pathology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, India
| | - Phanithi P Babu
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
IDH Inhibitors and Beyond: The Cornerstone of Targeted Glioma Treatment. Mol Diagn Ther 2021; 25:457-473. [PMID: 34095989 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00537-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Diffuse low-grade gliomas account for approximately 20% of all primary brain tumors, they arise from glial cells and show infiltrative growth without histological features of malignancy. Mutations of the IDH1 and IDH2 genes constitute a reliable molecular signature of low-grade gliomas and are the earliest driver mutations occurring during gliomagenesis, representing a relevant biomarker with diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value. IDH mutations induce a neomorphic enzyme that converts α-ketoglutarate to the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which leads to widespread effects on cellular epigenetics and metabolism. Currently, there are no approved molecularly targeted therapies and the standard treatment for low-grade gliomas consists of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, with rising concern about treatment-related toxicities. Targeting D-2-hydroxyglutarate is considered a novel attractive therapeutic approach for low-grade gliomas and the insights from clinical trials suggest that mutant-selective IDH inhibitors are the ideal candidates, with a favorable benefit/risk ratio. A pivotal question is whether blocking IDH neomorphic activity may activate alternative oncogenetic pathways, inducing acquired resistance to IDH inhibitors. Based on this rationale, combination therapies to enhance the antitumor activity of IDH inhibitors and approaches aimed at exploiting, rather than inhibiting, the metabolism of IDH-mutant cancer cells, such as poly (adenosine 5'-diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are emerging from preclinical research and clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the pivotal role of IDH mutations in gliomagenesis and the complex interactions between the genomic and epigenetic landscapes, providing an overview of how, in the last decade, therapeutic approaches for low-grade gliomas have evolved.
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhong J, Huang V, Gurbani SS, Ramesh K, Scott Cordova J, Schreibmann E, Shu HKG, Olson J, Han H, Giuffrida A, Shim H, Weinberg BD. 3D whole-brain metabolite imaging to improve characterization of low-to-intermediate grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:303-311. [PMID: 33983570 PMCID: PMC8237861 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03770-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE MRI is the standard imaging modality used for diagnosis, treatment planning, and post-treatment management of gliomas. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1w) MRI is used to plan biopsy and radiation for grade IV gliomas but is less effective for grade II and III gliomas (i.e., low-to-intermediate grade gliomas) which may have minimal or no enhancement. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is an advanced MRI technique that has been shown, to improve diagnostic yield of biopsy and target delineation for grade IV glioma. The purpose of this study is to determine if MRSI can improve characterization and tissue sampling of low-to-intermediate grade gliomas. METHODS Prospective grade II and grade III glioma patients were enrolled to undergo whole brain high-resolution MRSI prior to tissue sampling. Choline/N-acetyl-aspartate (Cho/NAA) maps were overlaid on anatomic imaging and imported into stereotactic biopsy software. Patients were treated with standard-of-care surgery and radiation. Volumes of spectroscopically abnormal tissue were generated and compared with anatomic imaging and areas of enhancing recurrence on follow-up imaging. RESULTS Ten patients had pathologic diagnosis of grade II (n = 4) or grade III (n = 6) with a median follow-up of 27.3 months. Five patients had recurrence, and regions of recurrence were found to overlap with metabolically abnormal regions on MRSI at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION MRSI in low-to-intermediate grade glioma patients is predictive of areas of subsequent recurrence. Larger studies are needed to determine if MRSI can be used to guide surgical and radiation treatment planning in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Vicki Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Saumya S Gurbani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Karthik Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - J Scott Cordova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Eduard Schreibmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Hui-Kuo G Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Jeffrey Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Hui Han
- Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Alexander Giuffrida
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Brent D Weinberg
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, 1701 Uppergate Drive, C5018, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tuohy K, Fernandez A, Hamidi N, Padmanaban V, Mansouri A. Current State of Health Economic Analyses for Low-Grade Glioma Management: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:189-197.e1. [PMID: 34087462 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health economic analyses help determine the value of a medical intervention by assessing the costs and outcomes associated with it. The objective of this study was to assess the level of evidence in economic evaluations for low-grade glioma (LGG) management. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of English articles in Medline, Embase, The Central Registration Depository, EconPapers, and EconLit. The results were screened, and data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers for studies reporting economic evaluations for LGG. The quality of each study was evaluated using the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) checklist, the hierarchy scale developed by Cooper et al. (2005), and the Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. RESULTS Three studies met our inclusion criteria. The adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values for the included studies ranged from $3934 to $9936, but each evaluated a different aspect of LGG management. All had a good quality of reporting per the CHEERS checklist. Based on the Cooper et al. hierarchy scale, the quality of data use was lacking most for utilities. The quality of study design was scored as 82, 92, and 100 for each study using the Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. CONCLUSIONS Although a limited number of economic evaluations were identified, the studies evaluated here were well designed. The interventions assessed were all considered cost-effective, but pooled analysis was not possible because of heterogeneity in the interventions assessed. Given the importance of value and cost-effectiveness in medical care, more evidence is needed in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Tuohy
- Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Ajay Fernandez
- Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Program, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, Arizona, USA
| | - Nima Hamidi
- Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Program, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, Arizona, USA
| | - Varun Padmanaban
- Penn State Department of Neurosurgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alireza Mansouri
- Penn State Department of Neurosurgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA; Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hong CS, Beckta JM, Kundishora AJ, Elsamadicy AA, Chiang VL. Laser interstitial thermal therapy for treatment of cerebral radiation necrosis. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 37:68-76. [PMID: 32672119 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1760362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis is a well described complication after radiosurgical treatment of intracranial pathologies - best recognized after the treatment of patients with arteriovenous malformations and brain metastases but possibly also affecting patients treated with radiosurgery for meningioma. The pathophysiology of radiation necrosis is still not well understood but is most likely a secondary local tissue inflammatory response to brain tissue injured by radiation. Radiation necrosis in brain metastases patients may present radiographically and behave clinically like recurrent tumor. Differentiation between radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor has been difficult based on radiographic changes alone. Biopsy or craniotomy therefore remains the gold standard method of diagnosis. For symptomatic patients, corticosteroids are first-line therapy, but patients may fail medical management due to intolerance of chronic steroids or persistence of symptoms. In these cases, open surgical resection has been shown to be successful in management of surgically amenable lesions but may be suboptimal in patients with deep-seated lesions or extensive prior cranial surgical history, both carrying high risk for peri-operative morbidity. Laser interstitial thermal therapy has emerged as a viable, alternative surgical option. In addition to allowing access to tissue for diagnosis, thermal treatment of the lesion can also be delivered precisely and accurately under real-time imaging guidance. This review highlights the pertinent studies that have shaped the impetus for use of laser interstitial thermal therapy in the treatment of radiation necrosis, reviewing indications, outcomes, and nuances toward successful application of this technology in patients with suspected radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jason M Beckta
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Adam J Kundishora
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Aladine A Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Effects of brain radiotherapy on cognitive performance in adult low-grade glioma patients: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:202-211. [PMID: 33964327 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Grade II gliomas are slow growing tumours that usually affect younger patients. The mainstream treatment modality at present is surgical. The role of radiation therapy in the management of grade II gliomas has been the subject of considerable debate. Radiation therapy has a proven potential to prolong progression free and overall survival in high-risk patients, but may also produce long-term cognitive deficits. Since grade II glioma patients are expected to live several years, retention of cognitive capacity and quality of life is an equally important endpoint as prolonging progression free survival. Our overarching goal is to critically review the available evidence on the possible neuropsychological effects of postoperative radiotherapy in adult grade II glioma patients. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases up to 1st of May 2020 for studies assessing the cognitive effects of radiation therapy on grade II glioma patients. Eleven studies meeting our inclusion criteria provide either negative or contradictory data regarding the cognitive domains affected, while major confounding variables remain incompletely addressed. The available evidence does not adequately support the notion that current radiation therapy protocols independently produce substantial cognitive decline in grade II glioma patients and therefore it would be premature to argue that radiation associated cognitive morbidity outweighs the benefit of prolonged survival. A large prospective study incorporating a full battery of neuropsychological testing, sufficiently long-term follow-up period and tight control of confounders is due to provide high quality data.
Collapse
|