1
|
Abbasi M, Jahani S, Biroudian S, Boroujeni MA, Maghfoury F, Amini-Zadeh M, Malekyan L, Faramarzpoor HR, Foroughi MM. A nanoscale electrochemical guanine DNA-biosensor based on a flower-like nanocomposite of Tb-doped ZnO for the sensitive determination of pemetrexed. RSC Adv 2023; 13:29450-29462. [PMID: 37818257 PMCID: PMC10561636 DOI: 10.1039/d3ra03983h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pemetrexed is an antineoplastic drug used in chemotherapeutic treatments, especially in malignant mesothelioma and non-small cell lung carcinoma, but can also cause a variety of complications, like stomach pain, nausea, burning, vomiting, numbness, and tingling, emphasizing the need for an approach to quantify the drug in biological matrices. Herein, a DNA-based biosensor was introduced for pemetrexed determination. A hydrothermal approach was used for synthesizing flower-like nanoparticles (NPs) of zinc oxide (ZnO) doped with Tb (FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO). Moreover, energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), zeta potential, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were used for characterizing the as-prepared nanocomposite. According to the impedance analysis, FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO was accompanied by very good electrochemical functions for a simple transfer of electrons. In the case of the immobilization of double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (ds-DNA) on the FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO and polypyrrole (PP)-modified pencil graphite electrode (ds-DNA/PP/FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO/PGE), a considerable enhancement was found in the electrochemical oxidation of guanine in ds-DNA residue bases. Since there was an interaction between ds-DNA and pemetrexed, the voltammetric current of guanine over the ds-DNA/PP/FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO/PGE declined in the presence of pemetrexed in the electrolytic solution. Moreover, under optimum conditions (25 mg L-1 of ds-DNA and 10 min incubation time, in acetate buffer at 25 °C), a linear decrease in the guanine signal was observed on the ds-DNA/PP/FL-NP Tb3+/ZnO/PGE as the pemetrexed concentration increased in the range from 0.001 μM to 175.0 μM with a limit of detection of 0.17 nM. Finally, the new DNA-based biosensor was successfully used for determining pemetrexed in real samples, indicating its application potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Abbasi
- Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran +98 34331321750
| | - Shohreh Jahani
- Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences Bam Iran
| | - Saeed Biroudian
- Department of Medical Ethics, Medical School, Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
| | | | | | | | - Leila Malekyan
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bam University of Medical Sciences Bam Iran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuryk L, Rodella G, Staniszewska M, Pancer KW, Wieczorek M, Salmaso S, Caliceti P, Garofalo M. Novel Insights Into Mesothelioma Therapy: Emerging Avenues and Future Prospects. Front Oncol 2022; 12:916839. [PMID: 35785199 PMCID: PMC9247278 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer that develops in the thin layer surrounding the mesothelium and is mainly caused by asbestos exposure. Despite improvements in patient prognosis with conventional cancer treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, there are still no curative treatment modalities for advanced disease. In recent years, new therapeutic avenues have been explored. Improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying the dynamic tumor interaction with the immune system has led to the development of immunotherapeutic approaches. Numerous recent clinical trials have shown a desire to develop more effective treatments that can be used to fight against the disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic adenoviruses, and their combination represent a promising strategy that can be used to synergistically overcome immunosuppression in the mesothelioma tumor microenvironment. This review provides a synthesized overview of the current state of knowledge on new therapeutic options for mesothelioma with a focus on the results of clinical trials conducted in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Kuryk
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Rodella
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Monika Staniszewska
- Centre for Advanced Materials and Technologies, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Wanda Pancer
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Wieczorek
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Stefano Salmaso
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Caliceti
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mariangela Garofalo
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Novel Multitarget Therapies for Lung Cancer and Respiratory Disease. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25173987. [PMID: 32882995 PMCID: PMC7504797 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25173987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, multitarget drugs for neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease have been developed and well researched. Many studies have revealed that multitarget drugs are also useful for lung cancer and respiratory diseases. Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate with strong antitumor activity against mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Crizotinib is an ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets c-MET, ROS1, and ALK. Alectinib is known as an ALK inhibitor but also targets LTK, CHEK2, FLT3, PHKG2, and RET. Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets RAF kinase, KIT, VEGFR, PDGFR1β, FLT3, and RET. Nintedanib is a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets FGFR, PDGFR, and VEGFR. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of action of multitarget therapies and report the results of the latest clinical trials.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rath EM, Cheng YY, Pinese M, Sarun KH, Hudson AL, Weir C, Wang YD, Håkansson AP, Howell VM, Liu GJ, Reid G, Knott RB, Duff AP, Church WB. BAMLET kills chemotherapy-resistant mesothelioma cells, holding oleic acid in an activated cytotoxic state. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203003. [PMID: 30157247 PMCID: PMC6114908 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Here we have investigated in vitro efficacy of BAMLET and BLAGLET complexes (anti-cancer complexes consisting of oleic acid and bovine α-lactalbumin or β-lactoglobulin respectively) in killing mesothelioma cells, determined BAMLET and BLAGLET structures, and investigated possible biological mechanisms. We performed cell viability assays on 16 mesothelioma cell lines. BAMLET and BLAGLET having increasing oleic acid content inhibited human and rat mesothelioma cell line proliferation at decreasing doses. Most of the non-cancer primary human fibroblasts were more resistant to BAMLET than were human mesothelioma cells. BAMLET showed similar cytotoxicity to cisplatin-resistant, pemetrexed-resistant, vinorelbine-resistant, and parental rat mesothelioma cells, indicating the BAMLET anti-cancer mechanism may be different to drugs currently used to treat mesothelioma. Cisplatin, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and BAMLET, did not demonstrate a therapeutic window for mesothelioma compared with immortalised non-cancer mesothelial cells. We demonstrated by quantitative PCR that ATP synthase is downregulated in mesothelioma cells in response to regular dosing with BAMLET. We sought structural insight for BAMLET and BLAGLET activity by performing small angle X-ray scattering, circular dichroism, and scanning electron microscopy. Our results indicate the structural mechanism by which BAMLET and BLAGLET achieve increased cytotoxicity by holding increasing amounts of oleic acid in an active cytotoxic state encapsulated in increasingly unfolded protein. Our structural studies revealed similarity in the molecular structure of the protein components of these two complexes and in their encapsulation of the fatty acid, and differences in the microscopic structure and structural stability. BAMLET forms rounded aggregates and BLAGLET forms long fibre-like aggregates whose aggregation is more stable than that of BAMLET due to intermolecular disulphide bonds. The results reported here indicate that BAMLET and BLAGLET may be effective second-line treatment options for mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M. Rath
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yuen Yee Cheng
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), Concord, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Pinese
- Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kadir H. Sarun
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda L. Hudson
- Bill Walsh Translational Cancer Research Laboratory, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher Weir
- Northern Blood Research Centre, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yiwei D. Wang
- Burns Research, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Viive M. Howell
- Bill Walsh Translational Cancer Research Laboratory, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Guo Jun Liu
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Glen Reid
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), Concord, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert B. Knott
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony P. Duff
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - W. Bret Church
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janowitz T, Williams EH, Marshall A, Ainsworth N, Thomas PB, Sammut SJ, Shepherd S, White J, Mark PB, Lynch AG, Jodrell DI, Tavaré S, Earl H. New Model for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2798-2805. [PMID: 28686534 PMCID: PMC5562175 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.72.7578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for carboplatin chemotherapy dosing; however, the best method to estimate GFR in patients with cancer is unknown. We identify the most accurate and least biased method. Methods We obtained data on age, sex, height, weight, serum creatinine concentrations, and results for GFR from chromium-51 (51Cr) EDTA excretion measurements (51Cr-EDTA GFR) from white patients ≥ 18 years of age with histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses at the Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom. We developed a new multivariable linear model for GFR using statistical regression analysis. 51Cr-EDTA GFR was compared with the estimated GFR (eGFR) from seven published models and our new model, using the statistics root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) and median residual and on an internal and external validation data set. We performed a comparison of carboplatin dosing accuracy on the basis of an absolute percentage error > 20%. Results Between August 2006 and January 2013, data from 2,471 patients were obtained. The new model improved the eGFR accuracy (RMSE, 15.00 mL/min; 95% CI, 14.12 to 16.00 mL/min) compared with all published models. Body surface area (BSA)-adjusted chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) was the most accurate published model for eGFR (RMSE, 16.30 mL/min; 95% CI, 15.34 to 17.38 mL/min) for the internal validation set. Importantly, the new model reduced the fraction of patients with a carboplatin dose absolute percentage error > 20% to 14.17% in contrast to 18.62% for the BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI and 25.51% for the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The results were externally validated. Conclusion In a large data set from patients with cancer, BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI is the most accurate published model to predict GFR. The new model improves this estimation and may present a new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Janowitz
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Edward H. Williams
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Marshall
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Ainsworth
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Peter B. Thomas
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J. Sammut
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Scott Shepherd
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff White
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick B. Mark
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andy G. Lynch
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan I. Jodrell
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Tavaré
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Helena Earl
- Tobias Janowitz, Edward H. Williams, Stephen J. Sammut, Andy G. Lynch, Duncan I. Jodrell, Simon Tavaré, and Helena Earl, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Tobias Janowitz, Peter B. Thomas, and Duncan I. Jodrell, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge; Andrea Marshall, University of Warwick, Coventry; Nicola Ainsworth, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn; Scott Shepherd, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Jeff White, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and Patrick B. Mark, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mancuso MR, Neal JW. Novel systemic therapy against malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6:295-314. [PMID: 28713675 PMCID: PMC5504105 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.06.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive tumor of the pleura with an overall poor prognosis. Even with surgical resection, for which only a subset of patients are eligible, long term disease free survival is rare. Standard first-line systemic treatment consists of a platinum analog, an anti-metabolite, and sometimes anti-angiogenic therapy, but there is currently no well-established standard therapy for refractory or relapsed disease. This review focuses on efforts to develop improved systemic therapy for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) including cytotoxic systemic therapy, a variety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and their downstream effector pathways, pharmacologic targeting of the epigenome, novel approaches to target proteins expressed on mesothelioma cells (such as mesothelin), arginine depletion therapy, and the emerging role of immunotherapy. Overall, these studies demonstrate the challenges of improving systemic therapy for MPM and highlight the need to develop therapeutic strategies to control this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Mancuso
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joel W Neal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a growing problem with untoward economic and medical consequences. Anticancer drug toxicity remains an important and increasing cause of AKI. Importantly, drug-induced AKI affects all nephron segments—vasculature, glomerulus, tubules, and interstitium. Recent studies have increased insight into the subcellular mechanisms of drug-induced AKI that include direct cellular toxicity and immune-mediated effects. Identification of patients with high-risk cancer before drug exposure may allow prevention or at least a reduction in the development and severity of nephrotoxicity. Recognition of drug-induced AKI and rapid discontinuation (or dose reduction) of the offending agents, when appropriate, are critical to maximizing kidney function recovery. Preventive measures require understanding patient and drug-related risk factors coupled with correcting risk factors, assessing baseline kidney function before initiation of therapy, adjusting the drug dosage and avoiding use of nephrotoxic drug combinations.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuryk L, Haavisto E, Garofalo M, Capasso C, Hirvinen M, Pesonen S, Ranki T, Vassilev L, Cerullo V. Synergistic anti-tumor efficacy of immunogenic adenovirus ONCOS-102 (Ad5/3-D24-GM-CSF) and standard of care chemotherapy in preclinical mesothelioma model. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:1883-93. [PMID: 27287512 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 05/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare cancer type caused mainly by asbestos exposure. The median overall survival time of a mesothelioma cancer patient is less than 1-year from diagnosis. Currently there are no curative treatment modalities for malignant mesothelioma, however treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy can help to improve patient prognosis and increase life expectancy. Pemetrexed-Cisplatin is the only standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy for malignant mesothelioma, but the median PFS/OS (progression-free survival/overall survival) from the initiation of treatment is only up to 12 months. Therefore, new treatment strategies against malignant mesothelioma are in high demand. ONCOS-102 is a dual targeting, chimeric oncolytic adenovirus, coding for human GM-CSF. The safety and immune activating properties of ONCOS-102 have already been assessed in phase 1 study (NCT01598129). In this preclinical study, we evaluated the antineoplastic activity of combination treatment with SoC chemotherapy (Pemetrexed, Cisplatin, Carboplatin) and ONCOS-102 in xenograft BALB/c model of human malignant mesothelioma. We demonstrated that ONCOS-102 is able to induce immunogenic cell death of human mesothelioma cell lines in vitro and showed anti-tumor activity in the treatment of refractory H226 malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) xenograft model. While chemotherapy alone showed no anti-tumor activity in the mesothelioma mouse model, ONCOS-102 was able to slow down tumor growth. Interestingly, a synergistic anti-tumor effect was seen when ONCOS-102 was combined with chemotherapy regimens. These findings give a rationale for the clinical testing of ONCOS-102 in combination with first-line chemotherapy in patients suffering from malignant mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Kuryk
- Targovax Oy, Saukonpaadenranta 2, Helsinki, Finland.,Laboratory of ImmunoViroTherapy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Centre for Drug Research (CDR), University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, 00790, Finland.,Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, Chocimska 24 Str, Warsaw, 00-791, Poland
| | | | - Mariangela Garofalo
- Laboratory of ImmunoViroTherapy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Centre for Drug Research (CDR), University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, 00790, Finland
| | - Cristian Capasso
- Laboratory of ImmunoViroTherapy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Centre for Drug Research (CDR), University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, 00790, Finland
| | - Mari Hirvinen
- Laboratory of ImmunoViroTherapy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Centre for Drug Research (CDR), University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, 00790, Finland
| | - Sari Pesonen
- Targovax Oy, Saukonpaadenranta 2, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuuli Ranki
- Targovax Oy, Saukonpaadenranta 2, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lotta Vassilev
- Oncos Therapeutics Oy, Saukonpaadenranta 2, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vincenzo Cerullo
- Laboratory of ImmunoViroTherapy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Centre for Drug Research (CDR), University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5, Helsinki, 00790, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu N, Li R, Liu Q, Hu B, Xu X, Ji C, Han X, Wang P, Liu B. Antitumor and antimetastatic effects of pemetrexed-loaded targeted nanoparticles in B 16 bearing mice. Drug Deliv 2015; 23:2566-2574. [PMID: 26000825 DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2015.1033794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Using nanoparticle delivery for anticancer therapy is a potential new drug modality. We developed a novel gelatinase-stimuli nanoparticle. In this study, we studied the antitumor and antimetastasis effect of pemetrexed-loaded targeted nanoparticles and evaluated the correlation between E-cadherin expression and lung metastasis in subcutaneous xenograft model. Compared with free pemetrexed, pemetrexed-loaded targeted nanoparticles exhibited the best antitumor and antimetastasis efficacy among the four therapeutic groups. The study also indicated that there was an inverse correlation between lung metastasis and E-cadherin expression. These results showed pemetrexed-loaded targeted nanoparticles may be a potent drug for tumor therapy and our preclinical data could provide new direction for clinical therapy of malignant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nannan Lu
- a Department of Oncology , The Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University , Hefei , PR China
| | - Rutian Li
- b The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Qin Liu
- b The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Bing Hu
- a Department of Oncology , The Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University , Hefei , PR China
| | - Xiaoling Xu
- c Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University , Hefei , PR China , and
| | - Chushu Ji
- a Department of Oncology , The Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University , Hefei , PR China
| | - Xinghua Han
- a Department of Oncology , The Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University , Hefei , PR China
| | - Pin Wang
- d Drum Tower Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , PR China
| | - Baorui Liu
- b The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University and Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University , Nanjing , PR China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
New drug toxicities in the onco-nephrology world. Kidney Int 2015; 87:909-17. [PMID: 25671763 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
New anticancer medications are rapidly entering the clinical arena offering patients with previously resistant cancers the promise of more effective therapies capable of extending their lives. However, adverse renal consequences develop in treated patients with underlying risk factors, requiring the nephrology community to be familiar with the nephrotoxic effects. The most common clinical nephrotoxic manifestations of these drugs include acute kidney injury, varying levels of proteinuria, hypertension, electrolyte disturbances, and at times chronic kidney disease. Thus, to practice competently in the 'onco-nephrology' arena, nephrologists will garner benefit from an update on older drugs with newly recognized nephrotoxic potential as well as newer agents, which may be associated with kidney injury. With that in mind, this brief update is meant to provide clinicians with the currently available evidence on the nephrotoxicity of a group of anticancer medications.
Collapse
|
11
|
Porpodis K, Zarogoulidis P, Boutsikou E, Papaioannou A, Machairiotis N, Tsakiridis K, Katsikogiannis N, Zaric B, Perin B, Huang H, Kougioumtzi I, Spyratos D, Zarogoulidis K. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: current and future perspectives. J Thorac Dis 2014; 5 Suppl 4:S397-406. [PMID: 24102013 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 08/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Mesothelioma still remains an occupational related cancer with severe outcome. It is usually diagnosed at advanced stage since it does not demonstrate early symptoms. Several efforts have been made towards removing all materials inducing mesothelioma in the work setting and new work protection measures have been applied. Although we have new targeted treatments and radical surgery as arrows in the quiver, the type of mesothelioma and early diagnosis still remain the best treatment approach. Novel treatment modalities have been explored and several others are already on the way. In the current review we will present current data for mesothelioma and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Porpodis
- Pulmonary Department-Oncology Unit, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Aristotle Univesrity of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Third-space fluid distribution of pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2014; 74:349-57. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2485-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/10/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
SUMMARY Pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate agent, is currently used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Strong evidence has shown a treatment-by-histology interaction, with pemetrexed acting significantly better in the nonsquamous cell subtype. Therefore, all pemetrexed indications are restricted to this histology. Associated initially with somewhat high toxicity, the use of vitamin supplementation and corticoid premedication turned pemetrexed into one of the most convenient chemotherapy agents. At present pemetrexed is recommended as one of the preferred platinum partners in first line and as a single agent in the second-line setting for nonsquamous histology. The particular efficacy/toxicity profile has confirmed pemetrexed as the only chemotherapy agent approved for both continuation and switch maintenance therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mircea Dediu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology 'Alexandru Trestioreanu' Bucharest, Sos Fundeni 252, 022328, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Aurelia Alexandru
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology 'Alexandru Trestioreanu' Bucharest, Sos Fundeni 252, 022328, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florentina Bratu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology 'Alexandru Trestioreanu' Bucharest, Sos Fundeni 252, 022328, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malignant Mesothelioma, Hypoalbuminaemia and the Effect of Carboplatin/Pemetrexed on Survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 25:713-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
15
|
Ceresoli GL, Zucali PA, Mencoboni M, Botta M, Grossi F, Cortinovis D, Zilembo N, Ripa C, Tiseo M, Favaretto AG, Soto-Parra H, De Vincenzo F, Bruzzone A, Lorenzi E, Gianoncelli L, Ercoli B, Giordano L, Santoro A. Phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:552-8. [PMID: 23860535 PMCID: PMC3738125 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this open label phase II study (NCT00407459) was to assess the activity of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated, unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: Eligible patients received pemetrexed 500 mg m−2, carboplatin area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) 5 mg ml−1 per minute and bevacizumab 15 mg kg−1, administered intravenously every 21 days for six cycles, followed by maintenance bevacizumab. The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). A 50% improvement in median PFS in comparison with standard pemetrexed/platinum combinations (from 6 to 9 months) was postulated. Results: Seventy-six patients were evaluable for analysis. A partial response was achieved in 26 cases (34.2%, 95% CI 23.7–46.0%). Forty-four (57.9%, 95% CI 46.0–69.1%) had stable disease. Median PFS and overall survival were 6.9 and 15.3 months, respectively. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities were generally mild; however, some severe adverse events were reported, including grade 3–4 fatigue in 8% and bowel perforation in 4% of patients. Three toxic deaths occurred. Conclusion: The primary end point of the trial was not reached. However, due to the limitation of a non-randomised phase II design, further data are needed before drawing any definite conclusion on the role of bevacizumab in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G L Ceresoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
AMADORI DINO, CARRASCO EVA, ROESEL SIEGFRIED, LABIANCA ROBERTO, UZIELY BEATRICE, SOLDATENKOVA VICTORIA, MOREAU VALERIE, DESAIAH DURISALA, BAUKNECHT THOMAS, MARTIN MIGUEL. A randomized phase II non-comparative study of pemetrexed-carboplatin and gemcitabine-vinorelbine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol 2013; 42:1778-85. [DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 11/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
17
|
Habib EE, Fahmy ES. Chemotherapy management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II study comparing two popular chemotherapy regimens. Clin Transl Oncol 2013; 15:965-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-013-1015-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 01/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
18
|
Ellis PM, Chu QS, Leighl N, Laurie SA, Fritsch H, Gaschler-Markefski B, Gyorffy S, Munzert G. A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of intravenous BI 2536 together with pemetrexed in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2013; 14:19-27. [PMID: 22658814 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2012] [Revised: 03/29/2012] [Accepted: 04/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION BI 2536 is a potent, highly selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase (Plk) 1. This open-label, phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BI 2536 IV in combination with standard-dose pemetrexed in previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A standard 3 + 3 design was used. The patients received 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and escalating doses of BI 2536 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary objective was the MTD of BI 2536 combined with pemetrexed. Secondary endpoints were response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), overall safety, and PK. RESULTS Forty-one patients received BI 2536 (100-325 mg). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at BI 2536 325 mg (grade 3 pruritus and rash; grade 4 neutropenia). Therefore, the MTD for BI 2536 in combination with pemetrexed was 300 mg. After expanding the MTD dose level, 3 additional patients experienced DLTs, which resulted in expansion of the 250 mg cohort, in which 4 of the 13 additional patients experienced DLTs. Therefore, the recommended dose of BI 2536 was 200 mg. Most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were fatigue (71%), nausea (37%), and rash (34%). Two patients had durable confirmed partial responses; 21 (54%) patients had stable disease after the treatment cycle 2. PK analysis showed that BI 2536 and pemetrexed exposure were not altered when coadministered. CONCLUSION BI 2536 200 mg combined with standard-dose pemetrexed has an acceptable safety profile in relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer. The antitumor activity observed is encouraging and supports further investigation of Plk inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Ellis
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L, Vincent AD, Passalacqua R, Buti S, Amoroso D, Camerini A, Labianca R, Genestreti G, Boni C, Ciuffreda L, Di Costanzo F, de Marinis F, Crinò L, Santo A, Pazzola A, Barbieri F, Zilembo N, Colantonio I, Tibaldi C, Mattioli R, Cafferata MA, Camisa R, Smit EF. Pemetrexed Versus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin As Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the GOIRC 02-2006 Randomized Phase II Study and Pooled Analysis With the NVALT7 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:4501-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.43.6758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare efficacy of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, in progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed (arm A) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A preplanned pooled analysis of the results of this study with those of the NVALT7 study was carried out to assess the impact of carboplatin added to pemetrexed in terms of overall survival (OS). Results From July 2007 to October 2009, 239 patients (arm A, n = 120; arm B, n = 119) were enrolled. Median PFS was 3.6 months for arm A versus 3.5 months for arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.36; P = .706). No statistically significant differences in response rate, OS, or toxicity were observed. A total of 479 patients were included in the pooled analysis. OS was not improved by the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed (HR, 90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .316; P heterogeneity = .495). In the subgroup analyses, the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed in patients with squamous tumors led to a statistically significant improvement in OS from 5.4 to 9 months (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.91; P interaction test = .039). Conclusion Second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with pemetrexed plus carboplatin does not improve survival outcomes as compared with single-agent pemetrexed. The benefit observed with carboplatin addition in squamous tumors may warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ardizzoni
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Luca Boni
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Andrew D. Vincent
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Rodolfo Passalacqua
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Domenico Amoroso
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Andrea Camerini
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Roberto Labianca
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Giovenzio Genestreti
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Corrado Boni
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Libero Ciuffreda
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Francesco Di Costanzo
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Lucio Crinò
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Antonio Santo
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Antonio Pazzola
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Fausto Barbieri
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Nicoletta Zilembo
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Ida Colantonio
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Carmelo Tibaldi
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Rodolfo Mattioli
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Mara A. Cafferata
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Roberta Camisa
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| | - Egbert F. Smit
- Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo, and Roberta Camisa, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma; Luca Boni and Francesco Di Costanzo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Rodolfo Passalacqua and Sebastiano Buti, Ospedale Civile, Cremona; Domenico Amoroso and Andrea Camerini, Ospedale della Versilia, Lido di Camaiore; Roberto Labianca, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo; Giovenzio Genestreti, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Meldola; Corrado Boni, Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Libero
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Superior antimetastatic effect of pemetrexed-loaded gelatinase-responsive nanoparticles in a mouse metastasis model. Anticancer Drugs 2012; 23:1078-88. [DOI: 10.1097/cad.0b013e328356dc11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Asbestos exposure is the cause of significant pleural disease - both benign and malignant. Although there is increased awareness, individuals continue to be exposed, and we will continue to see its sequelae for years to come because of the delay between exposure and disease manifestation. Asbestos-related pleural disease includes pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickening, benign asbestos-related pleural effusions (BAPEs), and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). RECENT FINDINGS Several recent studies are highlighted throughout this review, including a comparative analysis of diagnostic imaging modalities for identifying and characterizing pleural plaques, the effect of pleural plaques on lung volumes and flows, and how pain is a relatively common feature in patients with pleural plaques. Advances in the treatment of MPM are limited, but a recent publication highlights the increased morbidity associated with surgical debulking procedures and questions the benefit of these procedures. SUMMARY Asbestos-related pleural disease will continue to present a significant burden of illness. Recent publications have suggested potential treatment benefit and point to areas that would require further investigation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bearz A, Talamini R, Rossoni G, Santo A, de Pangher V, Fasola G, Rosetti F, Favaretto A, Gregorc V, Berretta M, Santarossa S, Berto E, Tirelli U. Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5:482. [PMID: 22943698 PMCID: PMC3502102 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2011] [Accepted: 08/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. Methods We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment. Results Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. Conclusions In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression.
Collapse
|
23
|
Hochstrasser A, Benz G, Joerger M, Templeton A, Brutsche M, Früh M. Interstitial pneumonitis after treatment with pemetrexed: a rare event? Chemotherapy 2012; 58:84-8. [PMID: 22377772 DOI: 10.1159/000336131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2011] [Accepted: 01/01/2012] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pneumonitis after pemetrexed has been rarely reported in conjunction with radiation therapy. METHODS Two cases of pemetrexed-induced pneumonitis in different clinical settings and with unequal outcomes are discussed with a review of the literature. RESULTS Two patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer developed interstitial lung disease after chemotherapy with pemetrexed. The first patient was previously treated with thoracic radiotherapy, and radiation pneumonitis was initially suspected. He died shortly after pemetrexed reexposition. The second patient developed pemetrexed-induced interstitial lung disease despite no prior radiotherapy. After discontinuation of pemetrexed and administration of steroids, pneumonitis resolved completely. CONCLUSION Interstitial lung disease is a rare but potentially fatal side effect of pemetrexed. It occurs more often after radiotherapy but can also be encountered in the absence of radiotherapy. Reexposition to pemetrexed may lead to severe interstitial lung disease and even death and should be strictly avoided.
Collapse
|
24
|
Morotti M, Valenzano Menada M, Venturini PL, Mammoliti S, Ferrero S. Pemetrexed disodium in ovarian cancer treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2012; 21:437-49. [DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2012.661714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
25
|
A phase II trial of pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124:205-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2011] [Revised: 09/06/2011] [Accepted: 09/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
26
|
Goudar RK. Review of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2011; 4:205-11. [PMID: 18728709 PMCID: PMC2503655 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a resistant form of lung cancer, and its incidence continues to rise in Europe and Australia. Until recently, chemotherapy had not been shown to be effective in the treatment of this slowly progressive disease. In 2004, the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin was shown to induce high response rates in MPM. This article reviews the published literature describing the development and testing of this therapeutic combination in mesothelioma, and examines in detail the key phase III clinical trial that led to the approval of pemetrexed by the US FDA. Ongoing research will further define the role of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in the treatment of MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit K Goudar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chemotherapy and targeted therapies for unresectable malignant mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2011; 73:256-63. [PMID: 21620512 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2010] [Revised: 04/11/2011] [Accepted: 04/25/2011] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The global burden of mesothelioma is expected to increase in the coming decades. As a result the development of more effective therapies with an emphasis on personalized treatments based on validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers is an essential requirement. Progress has been made in the last decade with the development of newer generation anti-folates leading to the current standard of care of pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with unresectable disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with this combination treatment is only 12 months. There is no consensus regarding second line therapy for patients who have progressed or not responded to pemetrexed based therapies although gemcitabine in combination with a platinum compound or single agent vinorelbine is a reasonable option. The development of effective targeted agents that are active in mesothelioma has to date been disappointing. Strategies involving the addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed and cisplatin in the frontline setting, the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat as second line therapy and studies evaluating the utility of maintenance therapy in mesothelioma are all ongoing and appear promising. In addition clinical trials investigating immunotherapy and gene therapy in combination with chemotherapy could potentially improve the prognosis of patients with mesothelioma.
Collapse
|
28
|
Favoni RE, Florio T. Combined chemotherapy with cytotoxic and targeted compounds for the management of human malignant pleural mesothelioma. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2011; 32:463-79. [PMID: 21620489 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2011] [Revised: 03/01/2011] [Accepted: 03/31/2011] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated cancer, the incidence of which is increasing and which, despite progress in diagnosis and therapy, continues to have a poor prognosis. Asbestos fibers induce aberrant cell signaling, leading to proto-oncogene activation and chemoresistance. In this review, we discuss the evolution of pharmacological management of hMPM up to the most recent advances. Monotherapy with single cytotoxic drugs achieves modest objective response rates, seldom reaching 30%. However, combination regimens using novel drugs and standard molecules are showing gradually improving responses and clinical benefits. Phase II/III studies have identified pemetrexed, a multitarget folate pathway inhibitor in combination with platinum derivatives, and the cisplatin/gemcitabine association as front-line chemotherapy for hMPM. Detailed knowledge of molecular mechanisms of signal transduction and neoangiogenesis in hMPM should aid in the design and screening of other promising compounds such as more efficacious receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto E Favoni
- Department of Translational Oncology Research, Gene Transfer Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10 16132 Genoa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
A Case Series of Dose-Limiting Peripheral Edema Observed in Patients Treated with Pemetrexed. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6:624-6. [DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e318207f788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Steer J, Bough G, Razak A, Meachery G, Hughes A. Life after First-line Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: a North-East England Experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010; 22:231-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2009] [Revised: 12/30/2009] [Accepted: 01/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
32
|
Osteopontin-mediated enhanced hyaluronan binding induces multidrug resistance in mesothelioma cells. Oncogene 2010; 29:1941-51. [DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
33
|
Nutt JE, Razak ARA, O'Toole K, Black F, Quinn AE, Calvert AH, Plummer ER, Lunec J. The role of folate receptor alpha (FRalpha) in the response of malignant pleural mesothelioma to pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2010; 102:553-60. [PMID: 20051956 PMCID: PMC2822938 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The standard treatment of choice for malignant pleural mesothelioma is chemotherapy with pemetrexed and platinum, but the clinical outcome is poor. This study investigates the response to pemetrexed in a panel of eight mesothelioma cell lines and the clinical outcome for patients treated with pemetrexed in relation to folate receptor alpha (FRα). Methods: Cell lines were treated with pemetrexed to determine the concentration that reduced growth to 50% (GI50). FRα expression was determined by western blotting and that of FRα, reduced folate carrier (RFC) and proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT) by real-time quantitative RT–PCR. Immunohistochemistry for FRα was carried out on 62 paraffin-embedded samples of mesothelioma from patients who were subsequently treated with pemetrexed. Results: A wide range of GI50 values was obtained for the cell lines, H2452 cells being the most sensitive (GI50 22 nM) and RS5 cells having a GI50 value greater than 10 μM. No FRα protein was detected in any cell line, and there was no relationship between sensitivity and expression of folate transporters. FRα was detected in 39% of tumour samples, generally in a small percentage of cells. There was no correlation between the presence of FRα and the outcome of pemetrexed treatment, and no significant difference between histological subtypes. Conclusion: Response to treatment with pemetrexed does not depend on the presence of FRα.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Nutt
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bobin-Dubigeon C, Amiand M, Herrenknecht C, Bard J. Development and validation of an improved liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of pemetrexed in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2009; 877:2451-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2009] [Revised: 05/26/2009] [Accepted: 06/02/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Miller DS, Blessing JA, Krasner CN, Mannel RS, Hanjani P, Pearl ML, Waggoner SE, Boardman CH. Phase II evaluation of pemetrexed in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2686-91. [PMID: 19332726 PMCID: PMC2690393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.19.2963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2008] [Accepted: 12/16/2008] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with persistent or recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer and to determine the nature and degree of toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS A phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Patients must have had cancer that had progressed on platinum-based primary chemotherapy or recurred within 6 months. Pemetrexed at a dose of 900 mg/m(2) was to be administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes every 21 days. Dose delay and adjustment was permitted for toxicity. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse effects. RESULTS From July 6, 2004, to August 23, 2006, 51 patients were entered. A total of 259 cycles (median, four; range one to 19 cycles) of pemetrexed were administered, with 40% of patients receiving six or more cycles. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. More serious toxicities (grade 3 and 4) included neutropenia in 42%, leukopenia in 25%, anemia in 15%, and constitutional in 15% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. One patient (2%) had a complete and nine patients (19%) had partial responses, with a median duration response of 8.4 months. Seventeen patients (35%) had stable disease for a median of 4.1 months. Eighteen patients (38%) had increasing disease. Three patients (6%) were not assessable. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and overall survival was 11.4 months. CONCLUSION Pemetrexed has sufficient activity in the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer at the dose and schedule tested to warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Miller
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dallas, TX 75390-9032, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Carboplatin and pemetrexed in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: A realistic treatment option? Lung Cancer 2009; 64:207-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2008] [Revised: 07/11/2008] [Accepted: 08/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
37
|
Burgin M, Gairard-Dory AC, Mennecier B, Molard A, Beretz L, Quoix AE. [First-line treatment with pemetrexed in association with cisplatin in patients with non-operable malignant pleural mesothelioma]. REVUE DE PNEUMOLOGIE CLINIQUE 2009; 65:75-83. [PMID: 19375046 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneumo.2008.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2008] [Revised: 12/02/2008] [Accepted: 12/08/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. The optimal treatment of MPM was not clearly defined, until the publication of the multicentre, controlled and randomized phase III trial by Vogelzang et al. in 2003, which made the pemetrexed-cisplatin association the gold standard for the non-operable stages. Eleven patients with histologically proven pleural mesothelioma, not candidates for curative surgery, were assessed for eligibility and treated in our hospital. The response rate was similar to the reference study and the toxicity was acceptable. The median survival time was 12.7 months with an objective response rate of 45.5%. The median time to progression was 7.7 months. Neutropenia (all grades included) was the most common haematological toxicity (42.1%) although only one grade 3/4 was noted. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia were not reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported clinical toxicities with 81.8% reported (all grades included). One cutaneous allergic reaction was reported. The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy provided the best objectives responses, but new therapeutic regimens are still warranted for these patients with a poor prognosis. The results were similar to those obtained in the Vogelzang et al.'s trial despite a selection bias because they correspond to 36.7% of the total recruitment in the unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Burgin
- Service de pharmacie, stérilisation, pôle pharmacie, pharmacologie, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Growth inhibition by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mesothelioma cell lines. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:1684-91. [PMID: 19318229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2008] [Revised: 02/17/2009] [Accepted: 02/23/2009] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Clinical outcome following chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is poor and improvements are needed. This preclinical study investigates the effect of five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (PTK787, ZD6474, ZD1839, SU6668 and SU11248) on the growth of three mesothelioma cell lines (NCI H226, NCI H28 and MSTO 211H), the presence of growth factor receptors and inhibition of their downstream signalling pathways. GI50 values were determined: ZD6474 and SU11248, mainly VEGFR2 inhibitors, gave the lowest GI50 across all cell lines (3.5-6.9 microM) whereas ZD1839 gave a GI50 in this range only in H28 cells. All cell lines were positive for EGFR, but only H226 cells were positive for VEGFR2 by Western blotting. ZD6474 and ZD1839 inhibited EGF-induced phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK, whereas VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGFR2 was completely inhibited with 0.1 microM SU11248. VEGFR2 was detected in tumour samples by immunohistochemistry. VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors warrant further investigation in mesothelioma.
Collapse
|
39
|
Matulonis UA, Horowitz NS, Campos SM, Lee H, Lee J, Krasner CN, Berlin S, Roche MR, Duska LR, Pereira L, Kendall D, Penson RT. Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Pemetrexed for the Treatment of Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:5761-6. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.17.0282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose More efficacious, less toxic combinations are needed to treat platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate with manageable toxicity and has been combined with carboplatin to treat other cancers. Patients and Methods This is a phase II study of carboplatin area under the curve 5 with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for six cycles or for up to eight cycles if clinical benefit occurred. Eligible patients had platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC, peritoneal serous cancer, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to determine response rate defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; other end points included toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Forty-five patients were accrued; 44 patients received treatment. Overall response rate was 51.1%; there were no complete responses (0%), 23 confirmed partial responses (51.1%), two unconfirmed partial responses (4.4%), 14 patients with stable disease (31.1%), and two patients with progressive disease after two cycles (4.4%). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and anemia (9%); there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (11%), nausea (5%), vomiting (5%), diarrhea (5%), syncope (5%), and pulmonary embolism (5%). Median PFS time was 7.57 months (95% CI, 6.44 to 10.18 months), mean OS time was 20.3 months, and median OS has not yet been reached with a mean follow-up time of 15.3 months. Conclusion Carboplatin/pemetrexed is a well-tolerated regimen with activity in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC; further testing of this regimen in platinum-sensitive EOC patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ursula A. Matulonis
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Neil S. Horowitz
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Susana M. Campos
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Hang Lee
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Julie Lee
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Carolyn N. Krasner
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Suzanne Berlin
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Maria R. Roche
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Linda R. Duska
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Lauren Pereira
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Deborah Kendall
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Richard T. Penson
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Biostatistics Center and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee CW, Murray N, Anderson H, Rao SC, Bishop W. Outcomes with first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a review of practice in British Columbia. Lung Cancer 2008; 64:308-13. [PMID: 19004520 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2008] [Revised: 09/15/2008] [Accepted: 09/20/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Cisplatin plus pemetrexed has been standard systemic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) since the landmark randomized trial reported in 2003. However, the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine was incorporated into clinical practice following publication of promising phase II trial results in 1999. The impact of these platinum-based regimens is assessed in this review of practice in the province of British Columbia. All cases of MPM diagnosed from 1999 to 2005 were identified in a provincial registry using ICD-O codes. The clinical records of individuals referred to the BC Cancer Agency were reviewed, and those treated with a platinum analog plus gemcitabine or pemetrexed as first-line therapy were included in survival analyses. During the selected period, 81 patients were treated first-line with a platinum analog plus gemcitabine (n=40) or pemetrexed (n=41). Characteristics of the entire cohort include: age at diagnosis, mean 65 years (median 66, range 43-84); gender, male 70 (86%); laterality of disease, right-sided 51 (63%); histology, epithelioid or not otherwise specified 69 (85%). Median survival was 10 months (95% confidence interval, 7.7-12.3), with 1- and 2-year survival rates 0.42 and 0.21, respectively. Survival did not appear to be influenced by the chemotherapy agent used. Survival outcomes with chemotherapy for MPM in the province are comparable to what is reported in the literature. No difference is seen combining platinum analogs with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Platinum-based doublets might represent a therapeutic ceiling for cytotoxic chemotherapy in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Lee
- BC Cancer Agency - Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3V 1Z2.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hanauske AR, Dumez H, Piccart M, Yilmaz E, Graefe T, Gil T, Simms L, Musib L, Awada A. Pemetrexed combined with paclitaxel: a dose-finding study evaluating three schedules in solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2008; 27:356-65. [DOI: 10.1007/s10637-008-9193-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2008] [Accepted: 10/09/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Liu G, Kolesar J, McNeel DG, Leith C, Schell K, Eickhoff J, Lee F, Traynor A, Marnocha R, Alberti D, Zwiebel J, Wilding G. A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlative study of the antisense Bcl-2 oligonucleotide g3139, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:2732-9. [PMID: 18451239 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase I trial assessed the safety and tolerability of G3139 when given in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. The effect of G3139 treatment on Bcl-2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and paired tumor biopsies was also determined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with advanced solid malignancies received various doses of G3139 (continuous i.v. infusion days 1-7), carboplatin (day 4), and paclitaxel (day 4), repeated in 3-week cycles, in a standard cohort-of-three dose-escalation schema. Changes in Bcl-2/Bax transcription/expression were assessed at baseline and day 4 (prechemotherapy) in both PBMCs and paired tumor biopsies. The pharmacokinetic interactions between G3139 and carboplatin/paclitaxel were measured. RESULTS Forty-two patients were evaluable for safety analysis. Primary toxicities were hematologic (myelosuppression and thrombocytopenia). Dose escalation was stopped with G3139 at 7 mg/kg/d, carboplatin at area under the curve of 6, and paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) due to significant neutropenia seen in cycle 1 and safety concerns in further escalating chemotherapy in this phase I population. With G3139 at 7 mg/kg/d, 13 patients underwent planned tumor biopsies, of which 12 matched pairs were obtained. Quantitative increases in intratumoral G3139 with decreases in intratumoral Bcl-2 gene expression were seen. This paralleled a decrease in Bcl-2 protein expression observed in PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS Although the maximal tolerated dose was not reached, the observed toxicities were consistent with what one would expect from carboplatin and paclitaxel alone. In addition, we show that achievable intratumoral G3139 concentrations can result in Bcl-2 down-regulation in solid tumors and PBMCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Liu
- University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pemetrexed plus cisplatin or pemetrexed plus carboplatin for chemonaïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of the International Expanded Access Program. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3:756-63. [PMID: 18594322 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e31817c73d6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previously published results from a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) demonstrated a significant survival benefit and higher response rate compared with cisplatin. Although pemetrexed was under review by regulatory agencies, an International Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided more than 3000 mesothelioma patients with access to single-agent pemetrexed or pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin in 13 countries. This manuscript reports the safety and efficacy data from the nonrandomized open-label study in chemonaïve patients receiving pemetrexed plus platinum under the EAP. METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed MPM, not amenable to curative surgery, received pemetrexed 500 mg/m in combination with either cisplatin 75 mg/m or carboplatin AUC 5, once every 21 days with standard premedication. Efficacy data were recorded at the end of study participation. RESULTS A total of 1704 chemonaïve patients received pemetrexed plus cisplatin (n = 843) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin (n = 861) and were evaluated for safety. The efficacy evaluable population consisted of 745 patients in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group and 752 patients in the pemetrexed plus carboplatin group for whom physician-reported tumor response was available. The pemetrexed plus cisplatin group demonstrated a response rate of 26.3% compared with 21.7% for the pemetrexed plus carboplatin group, with similar 1-year survival rates (63.1% versus 64.0%) and median time to progressive disease (7 months versus 6.9 months). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia in 23.9% of the pemetrexed plus cisplatin group and 36.1% of the pemetrexed plus carboplatin group. CONCLUSION This large EAP confirmed the activity of pemetrexed plus cisplatin and pemetrexed plus carboplatin in chemonaïve patients with MPM, demonstrating clinically similar time to progressive disease and 1-year survival rates.
Collapse
|
44
|
Baldi A, Mottolese M, Vincenzi B, Campioni M, Mellone P, Di Marino M, di Crescenzo VG, Visca P, Menegozzo S, Spugnini EP, Citro G, Ceribelli A, Mirri A, Chien J, Shridhar V, Ehrmann M, Santini M, Facciolo F. The serine protease HtrA1 is a novel prognostic factor for human mesothelioma. Pharmacogenomics 2008; 9:1069-77. [PMID: 18681782 DOI: 10.2217/14622416.9.8.1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The objective of our study was to analyze the potential prognostic value of the expression of the serine protease HtrA1 and of EGFR in 70 malignant mesotheliomas. MATERIALS & METHODS Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of HtrA1 and EGFR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to correlate expression of these molecular factors in combination with available clinicopathologic data to patient survival. RESULTS A positive, statistically significant relationship has been recorded between HtrA1 expression level and survival (p < 0.0001). By contrast, a negative relationship has been identified between EGFR expression and survival (p = 0.02). Moreover, extension of the tumor (T) and involvement of lymph nodes (N) advanced status (p = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively), as well as the sarcomatoid histotype (p = 0.005), correlated significantly with poor survival. Finally, by a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the only immunohistochemical parameter that resulted to influence overall survival was HtrA1 (p = 0.0001). Interestingly, the prognostic value of HtrA1 expression was completely independent from EGFR expression (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION This is the first study of the relationship between HtrA1 expression and survival of mesothelioma patients. The data obtained strongly indicate the utilization of HtrA1 expression as a prognostic parameter for mesothelioma and suggest this serine protease as a possible molecular target for the treatment of malignant mesotheliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Baldi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Section of Pathology, Second University of Naples, Via L Armanni 5, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ceresoli GL, Castagneto B, Zucali PA, Favaretto A, Mencoboni M, Grossi F, Cortinovis D, Del Conte G, Ceribelli A, Bearz A, Salamina S, De Vincenzo F, Cappuzzo F, Marangolo M, Torri V, Santoro A. Pemetrexed plus carboplatin in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: combined analysis of two phase II trials. Br J Cancer 2008; 99:51-6. [PMID: 18542071 PMCID: PMC2453025 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/15/2008] [Accepted: 04/24/2008] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in elderly patients is increasing. In this study, pooled data from two phase II trials of pemetrexed and carboplatin (PC) as first-line therapy were retrospectively analysed for comparisons between age groups. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg m(-2) and carboplatin AUC 5 mg ml(-1) min(-1) intravenously every 21 days with standard vitamin supplementation. Elderly patients were defined as those >or=70 years old. A total of 178 patients with an ECOG performance status of or=70 years (27%). Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was slightly worse in >or=70 vs <70-year-old patients, with neutropenia observed in 25.0 vs 13.8% (P=0.11), anaemia in 20.8 vs 6.9% (P=0.01) and thrombocytopenia in 14.6 vs 8.5% (P=0.26). Non-haematological toxicity was mild and similar in the two groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of overall disease control (60.4 vs 66.9%, P=0.47), time to progression (7.2 vs 7.5 months, P=0.42) and survival (10.7 vs 13.9 months, P=0.12). Apart from slightly worse haematological toxicity, there was no significant difference in outcome or toxicity between age groups. The PC regimen is effective and well tolerated in selected elderly patients with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G L Ceresoli
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bekaii-Saab TS, Liu J, Chan KK, Balcerzak SP, Ivy PS, Grever MR, Kraut EH. A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Weekly Oxaliplatin Followed by Paclitaxel in Patients with Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:3434-40. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
47
|
Spugnini EP, Crispi S, Scarabello A, Caruso G, Citro G, Baldi A. Piroxicam and intracavitary platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced mesothelioma in pets: preliminary observations. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2008; 27:6. [PMID: 18577247 PMCID: PMC2438333 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2008] [Accepted: 05/19/2008] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Malignant Mesothelioma is an uncommon and very aggressive tumor that accounts for 1% of all the deaths secondary to malignancy in humans. Interestingly, this neoplasm has been occasionally described in companion animals as well. Aim of this study was the preclinical evaluation of the combination of piroxicam with platinum-based intracavitary chemotherapy in pets. Three companion animals have been treated in a three years period with this combination. Diagnosis was obtained by ultrasonographic exam of the body cavities that evidenced thickening of the mesothelium. A surgical biopsy further substantiated the diagnosis. After drainage of the malignant effusion from the affected cavity, the patients received four cycles of intracavitary CDDP at the dose of 50 mg/m2 every three weeks if dogs or four cycles of intracavitary carboplatin at the dose of 180 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) if cats, coupled with daily administration of piroxicam at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg. The therapy was able to arrest the effusion in all patients for variable remission times: one dog is still in remission after 3 years, one dog died of progressive disease after 8 months and one cat died due to progressive neoplastic growth after six months, when the patient developed a mesothelial cuirass. The combination showed remarkable efficacy at controlling the malignant effusion secondary to MM in our patients and warrants further investigations.
Collapse
|
48
|
Razak ARA, Chatten KJ, Hughes AN. Retreatment with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): A second line treatment option. Lung Cancer 2008; 60:294-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2007] [Revised: 08/22/2007] [Accepted: 08/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
49
|
Abstract
The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is increasing worldwide, and is predicted to peak in the next 10-20 years. Difficulties in MPM diagnosis and staging, especially of early disease, have thwarted the development of a universally accepted therapeutic approach. Single modality therapies (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) have generally failed to significantly prolong patient survival. As a result, multimodality treatment regimens have been developed. Radical surgery with extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant treatments has become the preferred option in early disease, but the benefits of such an aggressive approach have been questioned because of significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In the past few years, there have been several major advances in the management of patients with MPM, including more accurate staging and patient selection, improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, novel chemotherapy regimens with definite activity such as antifolate (pemetrexed or raltitrexed)-platinum combinations, and new radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy has shown promising results. A number of molecular alterations occurring in MPM have been reported, providing broader insights into its biology and leading to the identification of new targets for therapy. However, currently available treatments still appear to have modest results. Further studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of early and advanced stages of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica e Ematologia, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Via Manzoni, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Castagneto B, Botta M, Aitini E, Spigno F, Degiovanni D, Alabiso O, Serra M, Muzio A, Carbone R, Buosi R, Galbusera V, Piccolini E, Giaretto L, Rebella L, Mencoboni M. Phase II study of pemetrexed in combination with carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Ann Oncol 2008; 19:370-373. [PMID: 18156144 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of pemetrexed and carboplatin combination as first-line chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable advanced MPM and a zero to two Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) were enrolled. The schedule was pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin area under the curve 5, every 21 days. In all, 76 patients were treated. Median age was 65 years; median ECOG PS was zero. RESULTS Grade 3 hematological toxicity according to World Health Organization criteria was seen in 36 (47.3%) patients; grade 4 hematological toxicity in 5 (6.5%) patients. There were 16 (21%) partial responses and 3 (4%) complete responses, for an overall response rate of 19 (25%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.3-34.7]. In all, 29 (39%) (95% CI 28-48) patients reported stable disease. The median survival was estimated at 14 months. CONCLUSION This combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed is moderately active and the toxicity is acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Castagneto
- Department of Oncology, Novi Ligure Hospital, viale Giolitti, Novi Ligure (AL), Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|