Four-year clinical update and treatment switching-adjusted outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the CheckMate 9LA randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In CheckMate 9LA, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology. We report updated efficacy and safety in all randomized patients with a minimum 4-year follow-up and an exploratory treatment-switching adjustment analysis in all treated patients who received chemotherapy and subsequent immunotherapy.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, and ECOG performance status ≤1 were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with chemotherapy (two cycles) or chemotherapy (four cycles, with optional maintenance pemetrexed for the nonsquamous population). Assessments included OS, progression-free survival, and objective response rate. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by tumor PD-L1 expression and histology and in patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and a treatment-switching adjustment analysis using inverse probability of censoring weighting.

RESULTS

With a 47.9-month minimum follow-up for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong OS over chemotherapy in all randomized patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87; 4-year OS rate: 21% versus 16%), regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression (HR (95% CI): PD-L1<1%, 0.66 (0.50 to 0.86) and ≥1%, 0.74 (0.60 to 0.92)) or histology (squamous, 0.64 (0.48 to 0.84) and non-squamous, 0.80 (0.66 to 0.97)). In patients who discontinued all components of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to TRAEs (n=61), the 4-year OS rate was 41%. With treatment-switching adjustment for the 36% of patients receiving subsequent immunotherapy in the chemotherapy arm, the estimated HR of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was 0.66 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.80). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 4-year update, patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to have long-term, durable efficacy benefit over chemotherapy regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and/or histology. A greater estimated relative OS benefit was observed after adjustment for subsequent immunotherapy use in the chemotherapy arm. These results further support nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic/recurrent NSCLC, including those with tumor PD-L1<1% or squamous histology, populations with high unmet needs.

Systemic and intracranial outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and baseline brain metastases from CheckMate 227 Part 1

INTRODUCTION

In CheckMate 227 Part 1, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Here, we report post hoc exploratory systemic/intracranial efficacy outcomes and safety by baseline brain metastasis status at 5 years' minimum follow-up.

METHODS

Treatment-naive adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations, including asymptomatic patients with treated brain metastases, were enrolled. Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy; patients with tumor PD-L1 <1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Assessments included OS, systemic/intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review, new brain lesion development, and safety. Brain imaging was performed at baseline (all randomized patients) and approximately every 12 weeks thereafter (patients with baseline brain metastases only).

RESULTS

Overall, 202/1739 randomized patients had baseline brain metastases (nivolumab plus ipilimumab: 68; chemotherapy: 66). At 61.3 months' minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in patients with baseline brain metastases (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.92) and in those without (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.87). In patients with baseline brain metastases, 5-year systemic and intracranial PFS rates were higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (12% and 16%, respectively) than chemotherapy (0% and 6%). Fewer patients with baseline brain metastases developed new brain lesions with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (4%) versus chemotherapy (20%). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

With all patients off immunotherapy for ≥3 years, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to provide long-term, durable survival benefit in patients with or without brain metastases. Intracranial efficacy outcomes favored nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. These results further support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an efficacious first-line treatment for patients with mNSCLC, regardless of baseline brain metastasis status.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (four cycles) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

In CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (2 cycles) significantly improved overall survival versus chemotherapy (4 cycles) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and no known sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase alterations. We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs; minimum follow-up, 2 years).

METHODS

In patients (N = 719) randomised 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L). Treatment-phase changes in LCSS average symptom burden index (ASBI), LCSS three-item global index (3-IGI) and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) and utility index (UI) over time were analysed descriptively and using mixed-effect model repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration/improvement analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Treatment-phase PRO questionnaire completion rates were >80%. Mean treatment-phase changes showed no deterioration from baseline in both arms for LCSS ASBI/3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI; however, minimally important differences were not met. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses showed overall reduction in symptom burden from baseline for both arms; changes from baseline for LCSS 3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI were numerically improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, but minimally important differences were not met. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy delayed time-to-definitive-deterioration versus chemotherapy (LCSS ASBI: hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.87]); results were similar across PRO measures.

CONCLUSIONS

At 2-year minimum follow-up, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy reduced the risk of definitive deterioration in disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy and maintained QoL in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03215706.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced NSCLC: 4-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CheckMate 227 Part 1 Trial

INTRODUCTION

In CheckMate 227, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) greater than or equal to 1% (primary end point) or less than 1% (prespecified descriptive analysis). We report results with minimum 4 years' follow-up.

METHODS

Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥1%); or to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Efficacy included OS and other measures. Safety included timing and management of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs). A post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy in patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).

RESULTS

After 54.8 months' median follow-up, OS remained longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90) and PD-L1 less than 1% (0.64; 0.51-0.81); 4-year OS rate with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was 29% versus 18% (PD-L1 ≥1%); and 24% versus 10% (PD-L1 <1%). Benefits were observed in both squamous and nonsquamous histologies. In a descriptive analysis, efficacy was improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab relative to nivolumab (PD-L1 ≥1%) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common immune-mediated AE with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab plus chemotherapy was rash; most immune-mediated AEs (except endocrine events) occurred within 6 months from start of treatment and resolved within 3 months after, mainly with systemic corticosteroids. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs had long-term OS benefits, as seen in the all randomized population.

CONCLUSIONS

At more than 4 years' minimum follow-up, with all patients off immunotherapy treatment for at least 2 years, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate durable long-term efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No new safety signals were identified. Immune-mediated AEs occurred early and resolved quickly with guideline-based management. Discontinuation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs did not have a negative impact on the long-term benefits seen in all randomized patients.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (four cycles) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year update

BACKGROUND

To further characterize survival benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, we report updated data from the phase III CheckMate 9LA trial with a 2-year minimum follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients were treatment naïve, with stage IV/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer, no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with two cycles of chemotherapy, or four cycles of chemotherapy. Updated efficacy and safety outcomes are reported, along with progression-free survival (PFS) after next line of treatment (PFS2), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) by treatment cycle, and efficacy outcomes in patients who discontinued all treatment components in the experimental arm due to TRAEs.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 30.7 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy. Median OS was 15.8 versus 11.0 months [hazard ratio 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.86)]; 2-year OS rate was 38% versus 26%. Two-year PFS rate was 20% versus 8%. ORR was 38% versus 25%, respectively; 34% versus 12% of all responses were ongoing at 2 years. Median PFS2 was 13.9 versus 8.7 months. Improved efficacy outcomes in the experimental versus control arm were observed across most subgroups, including by programmed death-ligand 1 and histology. No new safety signals were observed; onset of grade 3/4 TRAEs was mostly observed during the first two treatment cycles in the experimental arm. In patients who discontinued all components of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy treatment due to TRAEs (n = 61) median OS was 27.5 months; 56% of responders had an ongoing response ≥1 year after discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

With a 2-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy provided durable efficacy benefits over chemotherapy with a manageable safety profile and remains an efficacious first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab has shown improved overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate whether the addition of a limited course (two cycles) of chemotherapy to this combination would further enhance the clinical benefit.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 103 hospitals in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with treatment-naive, histologically confirmed stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive web response system via permuted blocks (block size of four) to nivolumab (360 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) combined with histology-based, platinum doublet chemotherapy (intravenously every 3 weeks for two cycles; experimental group), or chemotherapy alone (every 3 weeks for four cycles; control group). Randomisation was stratified by tumour histology, sex, and PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoint was overall survival in all randomly assigned patients. Safety was analysed in all treated patients. Results reported here are from a pre-planned interim analysis (when the study met its primary endpoint) and an exploratory longer-term follow-up analysis. This study is active but no longer recruiting patients, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03215706.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 24, 2017, and Jan 30, 2019, 1150 patients were enrolled and 719 (62·5%) randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy (n=361 [50%]) or four cycles of chemotherapy alone (n=358 [50%]). At the pre-planned interim analysis (median follow-up 9·7 months [IQR 6·4-12·8]), overall survival in all randomly assigned patients was significantly longer in the experimental group than in the control group (median 14·1 months [95% CI 13·2-16·2] vs 10·7 months [9·5-12·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [96·71% CI 0·55-0·87]; p=0·00065). With 3·5 months longer median follow-up (median 13·2 months [IQR 6·4-17·0]), median overall survival was 15·6 months (95% CI 13·9-20·0) in the experimental group versus 10·9 months (9·5-12·6) in the control group (HR 0·66 [95% CI 0·55-0·80]). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (in 24 [7%] patients in the experimental group vs 32 [9%] in the control group), anaemia (21 [6%] vs 50 [14%]), diarrhoea (14 [4%] vs two [1%]), increased lipase (22 [6%] vs three [1%]), and asthenia (tjree [1%] vs eight [2%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 106 (30%) patients in the experimental group and 62 (18%) in the control group. Seven (2%) deaths in the experimental group (acute kidney failure, diarrhoea, hepatotoxicity, hepatitis, pneumonitis, sepsis with acute renal insufficiency, and thrombocytopenia; one patient each) and six (2%) deaths in the control group (anaemia, febrile neutropenia, pancytopenia, pulmonary sepsis, respiratory failure, and sepsis; one patient each) were treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy provided a significant improvement in overall survival versus chemotherapy alone and had a favourable risk-benefit profile. These data support this regimen as a new first-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

In an early-phase study involving patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the response rate was better with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with nivolumab monotherapy, particularly among patients with tumors that expressed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Data are needed to assess the long-term benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy. The patients who had a PD-L1 expression level of less than 1% were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. All the patients had received no previous chemotherapy. The primary end point reported here was overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more.

RESULTS

Among the patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the median duration of overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.0 to 20.1) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 14.9 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 16.7) with chemotherapy (P = 0.007), with 2-year overall survival rates of 40.0% and 32.8%, respectively. The median duration of response was 23.2 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 6.2 months with chemotherapy. The overall survival benefit was also observed in patients with a PD-L1 expression level of less than 1%, with a median duration of 17.2 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 22.0) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.3) with chemotherapy. Among all the patients in the trial, the median duration of overall survival was 17.1 months (95% CI, 15.2 to 19.9) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 13.9 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 15.1) with chemotherapy. The percentage of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in the overall population was 32.8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.0% with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in a longer duration of overall survival than did chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC, independent of the PD-L1 expression level. No new safety concerns emerged with longer follow-up. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 227 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477826.).

Afatinib in locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations, after chemotherapy: a Phase IV study

Aim

The current study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line afatinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following chemotherapy.

Patients & methods

In this open-label, single-arm Phase IV study, patients with EGFRm+ (Del19/L858R) NSCLC who had progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy received afatinib (starting dose 40 mg/day). The primary end point was confirmed objective response.

Results

60 patients received afatinib for a median duration of 11.5 months. 50% of patients had a confirmed objective response, of median duration 13.8 months. Median progression-free survival was 10.9 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (72%), rash (28%) and paronychia (23%).

Conclusion

Our data support the use of afatinib (40 mg/day) as an effective and well-tolerated second-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Chiral Extrapolations of the ρ(770) Meson in Nf = 2 + 1 Lattice QCD Simulations

Several lattice QCD simulations of meson-meson scattering in p-wave and Isospin = 1 in Nf = 2 + 1 flavours have been carried out recently. Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory is used to perform extrapolations to the physical point. In contrast to previous findings on the analyses of Nf = 2 lattice data, where most of the data seems to be in agreement, some discrepancies are detected in the Nf = 2 + 1 lattice data analyses, which could be due to different masses of the strange quark, meson decay constants, initial constraints in the simulation, or other lattice artifacts. In addition, the low-energy constants are compared to the ones from a recent analysis of Nf = 2 lattice data.

Two-Flavor Simulations of ρ(770) and the Role of the KK[over ¯] Channel

The ρ(770) meson is the most extensively studied resonance in lattice QCD simulations in two (N_{f}=2) and three (N_{f}=2+1) flavor formulations. We analyze N_{f}=2 lattice scattering data using unitarized chiral perturbation theory, allowing not only for the extrapolation in mass but also in flavor, N_{f}=2→N_{f}=2+1. The flavor extrapolation requires information from a global fit to ππ and πK phase shifts from experiment. While the chiral extrapolation of N_{f}=2 lattice data leads to masses of the ρ(770) meson far below the experimental one, we find that the missing KK[over ¯] channel is able to explain this discrepancy.

Pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY 

Pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate agent, is currently used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Strong evidence has shown a treatment-by-histology interaction, with pemetrexed acting significantly better in the nonsquamous cell subtype. Therefore, all pemetrexed indications are restricted to this histology. Associated initially with somewhat high toxicity, the use of vitamin supplementation and corticoid premedication turned pemetrexed into one of the most convenient chemotherapy agents. At present pemetrexed is recommended as one of the preferred platinum partners in first line and as a single agent in the second-line setting for nonsquamous histology. The particular efficacy/toxicity profile has confirmed pemetrexed as the only chemotherapy agent approved for both continuation and switch maintenance therapy.

Combining tangential hydrodissection, panniculectomy, and negative pressure wound therapy in treating extensive degloving injury of the leg

Major degloving injuries of the lower limb are daunting lesions because they are relatively rare and always produce larger soft tissue defects than direct visual inspection that could be predicted in the emergency room. Enough body of the medical literature supports the excision of the avulsed tissue and replaces it as a full-thickness skin graft. However, almost paradoxically, there is little support for the use of pristine large full-thickness skin graft in the treatment of these lesions. This article focuses on the use of tangential hydrodissection (VERSAJET Hydrosurgery System, Smith & Nephew) in preparing the avulsed wound and defatting of a large piece of full thickness skin graft taken from the abdomen by using a standard panniculectomy excision pattern and securing survival and integration of the graft with negative pressure wound therapy. The patient, a 60-year-old obese and diabetic woman, suffered a roadside accident producing a degloving injury of her leg and was treated with the presented method; the final result was excellent and the reduction of the abdominal panniculus was a bonus.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 112 consecutively treated patients

PURPOSE

The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in the management of radically resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of this category of patients treated at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the survival data of patients with pathologic stage IB NSCLC, who received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant CT. CT was planned to be platinum based and to be delivered for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve consecutively treated patients were evaluated.

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS

median age 60 years, median tumor diameter 4 cm, 87% underwent lobectomy and 13% pneumonectomy, 58% had visceral pleural involvement (VPI). After a median follow up of 46 months, the estimated 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 77%, respectively. The mean number of CT cycles was 5.2 (range 3-6), with 82% of patients receiving ≥ 5 cycles. The median cisplatin dose intensity (DI) was 22 mg/m(2)/week, and the relative DI was 85%. Median total cisplatin (CDDP) dose/patient was 416 mg/m(2). A total of 31 (27.6%) relapses were recorded, of which 81% were distant. Multivariate analysis showed no significant interaction between overall survival and the following variables: gender, type of surgery, histology, tumor volume, VPI.

CONCLUSION

Our results compare favorably with the historical data evaluating the outcome of stage IB patients treated by surgery alone in a customary medical setting. Overall, our data support the use of adjuvant CT in stage IB NSCLC patients.

Diagnosis and treatment protocols of cutaneous melanoma: latest approach 2010

Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive skin malignancies with increasing rate of incidence in the latest decades. New imaging technique plays an important role in melanoma management: dermoscopy and computer dermoscopy, ultrasound, MRI, CT, PET and PET/CT. Due to the dermoscopy and lesion diagnosis in early stages the increasing number of curative melanoma are registered. Sentinel lymph node biopsy became a compulsory phase for patients with tumor thickness > 1 mm. Serological biomarkers proved to be a necessary investigation for melanoma diagnosis, follow-up and treatment response. Current TNM melanoma staging is based on AJCC classification since 2001 witch includes new elements like histopathologic ulceration in stage I and II and lymph node micro- and macrometastases in stage III. Treatment protocols include surgical tumor excision with only 1-2 cm safety margins and radical lymphadenectomy is performed after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. The adjuvant treatment in advanced stages including chemotherapy, unspecific immunotherapy and interferon offers poor results regarding free disease terms rate of survival. The advanced therapeutic procedure like golden nanospheres and gene therapy are recently studied and represent an alternative for future treatment of melanoma. Follow-up protocols have a great importance for detection of the melanoma recurrences and include clinical, serological and imaging evaluation. Despite all new knowledge and technological support the advanced stage melanoma management still remain an unsolved problem.

Adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal, estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer patients: upfront or sequential?

For decades tamoxifen (TAM) has been the mainstay hormonal treatment for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, during the last years, for postmenopausal women particularly, the third generation aromatase inhibitors (AI) became the preferred alternative. The results of the randomized trials showed that AI were superior to TAM in terms of efficacy, and were accompanied by a different but fairly convenient side effects profile. Subsequently, all updated guidelines recommend the use of AI in the adjuvant setting for this category of patients, either upfront, following 2-3 years of TAM or as extended adjuvant therapy, after 5 years of TAM. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the best strategy to be used, and the expert opinion is divided, based on the available evidence. The controversial aspect of whether AI should be used upfront or following 2-3 years of TAM is further detailed in this manuscript, and some useful recommendations are provided in order to facilitate the decision-making process during the current clinical practice.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer: the emerging role of erlotinib

During the last years, molecular targeted agents generated a small revolution within the various treatment options for malignant tumors. Preclinical data showed that activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-depending downstream pathways, plays a major role in tumor growth and development. Small molecules, like the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), proved their capacity to inhibit the trigger event of this oncogenic activation. Of paramount importance was the fact that this effect has been efficiently translated from preclinical models into clinical practice. Erlotinib is a major representative of this category of drugs. This review will address the current status of the treatment with erlotinib and other TKIs in pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), along with the most debated issues regarding the clinical and molecular criteria for patient selection for this kind of targeted therapy.

Compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. The experience of a single institution evaluating a cohort of 356 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patient compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) following radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to identify the potential confounding factors affecting this particular aspect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 356 consecutively treated NSCLC patients at a single institution during 1994-2003. All patients had macroscopic and microscopic radical resection of the primary tumor, with or without mediastinal node dissection or sampling, had received at least one adjuvant CT cycle, with or without postoperative irradiation (RT). CT was planned to be believed for 6 cycles. The following schedules were used: cisplatin (CDDP) 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (16%);etoposide 120 mg/m(2) and CDDP 30 mg/m(2), on days 1-3, every 21 days (68%); other platinum-based doublets (16%). A multivariate analysis, for a target of 4 and 6 cycles was performed in order to evaluate the potential impact on the patient compliance of the following categories: age, sex (male vs. female), extent of surgery (pneumectomy vs. lesser resection), stage (I,II vs. III), RT(delivered or not) and patient residence (local vs. remote).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine (50%) patients completed all 6 cycles, while 299 (84%) received at least 4 cycles. The median number of administered cycles was 5. For a target of 4 cycles none of the investigated variables had any significant impact. A significant impact on compliance for 6 cycles was recorded for age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p=0.01) and extent of surgery (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.87, p=0.01)

CONCLUSION

Using the above mentioned combinations, the patient compliance with adjuvant CT was good, with 84% receiving at least 4 and 50% all 6 cycles. The median number of cycles was 5. For a target of 4 cycles none of the investigated variables had a significant impact. For a longer CT duration, age and extent of surgery were correlated with a lower compliance.

Anthracycline pretreated patients: who is who in the chemotherapy choice of relapsed breast cancer?

During the last years, a strong trend towards excluding anthracyclines from the first-line chemotherapy (CT) of relapsed breast cancer (RBC) has been noticed. This trend is based on the concept of previous exposure of the tumor on the same drugs in the adjuvant setting. Consequently, some guidelines and experts recommend the avoidance of using these compounds for RBC under those circumstances, while the taxanes became the first treatment option. This article gives detailed references about the lack of correlation between the type of adjuvant chemotherapy (including anthracyclines), and the clinical outcome of patients treated with front-line anthracyclines for RBC. It also addresses the weakness of this rationale based on recent translational research data and comments on the fact that anthracyclines could represent the best treatment option for some subcategories of patients with RBC. Concluding, this new trend seems more empirical than evidence-based, and clarification of this issue is warranted.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for radically resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly debated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of this category of patients, treated at the Military Hospital Bucharest (surgery) and Institute of Oncology Bucharest (CT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the survival data according to various patients' characteristics, the corresponding pattern of relapses, along with the data concerning the CT program.

RESULTS

A number of 311 consecutively treated patients (pts.), between January 1994 and October 2002, were evaluated. All patients were radically resected and received adjuvant CT. Chemotherapy was planned to be cisplatin-based and to be delivered for six cycles. In addition, 141 pts. (45%) received post-operative irradiation (RT). demographics: sex, M 252 (81%)/F 59 (19%) and median age: 58 (range 31-75). Stage: I 55 (17%), II 71 (23%), III A 140 (45%) and III B 45 (15%). After a median follow-up of 46 months, the overall median survival (MS), considering all the patients, was 42 months and the 5-year survival rate (5-year SR) was 44%. According to stage, MS and 5-year SR were as follows: Stage I = not reached/94%; Stage II = 54 months/59%; Stage III A = 28 months/37% and Stage III B= 18 months/27%. According to lymph node status, the MS was not reached for pN-negative pts. and 26 months for pN-positive pts. (P = 0.0002), while the 5-year SR was 75% versus 35%, respectively. Platinum-based CT was delivered in 295 pts. (95%). The medium number of cycles was five. A number of 86 (28%) relapses were recorded, of which 50 (16%) were distant, 25 (8%) local and 11 (4%) distant and local. The sites of the 50 distant relapses were BRA 24 (48%), OSS 10 (20%), PUL 6 (12%) and OTH 10 (20%).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows good long-term survival data for adjuvant CT following surgery in NSCLC, which looks comparatively superior to those communicated for surgery-only series. Pathologic invasion of the lymph nodes has a strong adverse effect on patients' outcome. The positive impact of CT in this setting is indirectly sustained by the pattern of relapses, which place the brain sanctuary on the first rank. Overall, the patients' compliance was good and we delivered a medium of five cycles of adjuvant platinum-based CT.

Split course radiation with concurrent vinorelbine and cisplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A phase II study

PURPOSE

Recent results coming from large randomized trials suggest that for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), integration of chemotherapy (CT) with irradiation (RT) should be concurrent rather than sequential. This study aimed at evaluating the actually delivered RT and CT dose intensities (DI), along with the toxicity and efficacy of a split course RT program with concurrent CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 2000 to September 2002, 24 patients with histologically or cytologically documented NSCLC were included. Patients' characteristics were as follows: males/females=22/2, median age=59 years, stage IIIB/IIIA=22/2 patients, ECOG PS 0-1=15 (62%) and PS 2=9 (38%).

HISTOLOGY

adenocarcinoma/ squamous cell/large cell/unclassified 10/6/1/7, respectively. Four cycles of vinorelbine (VNB) 25 mg/m(2) and cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/m(2) on days 1+8 were administered (days 1,8,22,29,57,64,78,85). Concurrent with the second CT cycle, RT (2 courses of 30 Gy separated by a 2-week break) was delivered, with a plan to achieve a total dose of 60 Gy, with a fractionation schedule of 2 Gy/day/5 days weekly.

RESULTS

The intended RT dose was delivered to 21 (88%) patients with a relative DI of 0.93. Nineteen (79%) patients received more than 3 CT cycles. The relative DI for VNB and CDDP were 0.88 and 0.83, respectively. During treatment 3 (13%) patients experienced WHO grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity while ECOG grade 3 esophagitis was recorded also in 3 patients. At the end of treatment 14 (58%) patients achieved an objective response (2 complete - CR and 12 partial response - PR), while 8 (33%) patients had stable disease (SD) and 2 (8%) progressive disease (PD). After a median follow up of 15 months (range 3-26), 15 (62%) patients relapsed. There were 8 (33%) patients with local relapse and 7 (29%) with distant metastases. The median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10 (range 2-24) and 15 (range 5-24) months, respectively, with an estimated 1 and 2-year survival rates of 55% and 10%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our concurrent schedule allows for good CT and RT DI, with low associated toxicities. The efficacy data are considered promising, taking into account the high proportion of stage IIIB patients evaluated.