1
|
Borghaei H, O'Byrne KJ, Paz-Ares L, Ciuleanu TE, Yu X, Pluzanski A, Nagrial A, Havel L, Kowalyszyn RD, Valette CA, Brahmer JR, Reck M, Ramalingam SS, Zhang L, Ntambwe I, Rabindran SK, Nathan FE, Balli D, Wu YL. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the phase III CheckMate 227 Part 2 trial. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102065. [PMID: 37988950 PMCID: PMC10774956 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In CheckMate 227 Part 1, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% versus chemotherapy. We report results from CheckMate 227 Part 2, which evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seven hundred and fifty-five patients with systemic therapy-naive, stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR mutations or ALK alterations were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. OS in all randomized patients was a hierarchically tested secondary endpoint. RESULTS At 19.5 months' minimum follow-up, no significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC [median OS 18.8 versus 15.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95.62% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.08, P = 0.1859]. Descriptive analyses showed OS improvement with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in all randomized patients (median OS 18.3 versus 14.7 months, HR 0.81, 95.62% CI 0.67-0.97) and in an exploratory analysis in squamous NSCLC (median OS 18.3 versus 12.0 months, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.97). A trend toward improved OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, regardless of the tumor mutation status of STK11 or TP53, regardless of tumor mutational burden, and in patients with intermediate/poor Lung Immune Prognostic Index scores. Safety with nivolumab plus chemotherapy was consistent with previous reports of first-line settings. CONCLUSIONS CheckMate 227 Part 2 did not meet the primary endpoint of OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Descriptive analyses showed prolonged OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy in all-randomized and squamous NSCLC populations, suggesting that this combination may benefit patients with untreated metastatic NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Borghaei
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - K J O'Byrne
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - L Paz-Ares
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense & CiberOnc, Madrid, Spain
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă and UNF Iuliu Haţieganu University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - X Yu
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - A Pluzanski
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Nagrial
- Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - L Havel
- Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - J R Brahmer
- Johns Hopkins, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - M Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center of Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - S S Ramalingam
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - L Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong, China
| | - I Ntambwe
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - D Balli
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - Y-L Wu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borghaei H, Ciuleanu TE, Lee JS, Pluzanski A, Caro RB, Gutierrez M, Ohe Y, Nishio M, Goldman J, Ready N, Spigel DR, Ramalingam SS, Paz-Ares LG, Gainor JF, Ahmed S, Reck M, Maio M, O'Byrne KJ, Memaj A, Nathan F, Tran P, Hellmann MD, Brahmer JR. Long-term survival with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:173-185. [PMID: 36414192 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolongs survival versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We further characterized clinical benefit with this regimen in a large pooled patient population and assessed the effect of response on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were pooled from four studies of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 227 Part 1, 817 cohort A, 568 Part 1, and 012). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were assessed. Landmark analyses of OS by response status at 6 months and by tumor burden reduction in responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab were also assessed. RESULTS In the pooled population (N = 1332) with a minimum follow-up of 29.1-58.9 months, median OS was 18.6 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 35%; median PFS was 5.4 months (3-year PFS rate, 17%). Objective response rate was 36%; median duration of response was 23.7 months, with 38% of responders having an ongoing response at 3 years. In patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, ≥1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%, 3-year OS rates were 30%, 38%, 30%, and 48%. Three-year OS rates were 30% and 38% in patients with squamous or non-squamous histology. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to the overall pooled population (median OS, 20.1 months; 3-year OS rate, 34%). In the pooled population, responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab at 6 months had longer post-landmark OS than those with stable or progressive disease; 3-year OS rates were 66%, 22%, and 14%, respectively. Greater depth of response was associated with prolonged survival; in patients with tumor burden reduction ≥80%, 50% to <80%, or 30% to <50%, 3-year OS rates were 85%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in the pooled population. CONCLUSION Long-term survival benefit and durable response with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in this large patient population further support this first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Borghaei
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institutul Oncologic Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - J-S Lee
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - A Pluzanski
- Department of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - R Bernabe Caro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - M Gutierrez
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, USA
| | - Y Ohe
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - M Nishio
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Goldman
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles
| | - N Ready
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham
| | - D R Spigel
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology PLCC, Nashville
| | - S S Ramalingam
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - L G Paz-Ares
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - J F Gainor
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - S Ahmed
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - M Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Lung Clinic, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - M Maio
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena and University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - K J O'Byrne
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute and Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - A Memaj
- Global Biometrics and Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton
| | - F Nathan
- OneClinical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton
| | - P Tran
- WW Medical Oncology Department, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton
| | - M D Hellmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - J R Brahmer
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reck M, Ciuleanu TE, Cobo M, Schenker M, Zurawski B, Menezes J, Richardet E, Bennouna J, Felip E, Juan-Vidal O, Alexandru A, Sakai H, Lingua A, Reyes F, Souquet PJ, De Marchi P, Martin C, Pérol M, Scherpereel A, Lu S, Paz-Ares L, Carbone DP, Memaj A, Marimuthu S, Zhang X, Tran P, John T. Corrigendum to 'First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (4 cycles) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year update': [ESMO Open Volume 6, Issue 5, October 2021, 100273]. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100345. [PMID: 34864501 PMCID: PMC8649668 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, LungClinic, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Department of Oncology, Institutul Oncologic Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Cobo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - M Schenker
- Department of Oncology, SF Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania
| | - B Zurawski
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ambulatorium Chemioterapii, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - J Menezes
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - E Richardet
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - J Bennouna
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital of Nantes and INSERM, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | - E Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Juan-Vidal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Alexandru
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Oncology Prof Dr Alexandru Trestioreanu Bucha, Bucharest, Romania
| | - H Sakai
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - A Lingua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Medico Rio Cuarto, SA, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - F Reyes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Metropolitana, Chile
| | - P-J Souquet
- Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - P De Marchi
- Department of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - C Martin
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Pérol
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - A Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | - S Lu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - L Paz-Ares
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO-H12o Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Universidad Complutense & CiberOnc, Madrid, Spain
| | - D P Carbone
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA
| | - A Memaj
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | | | - X Zhang
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - P Tran
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - T John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reck M, Ciuleanu TE, Cobo M, Schenker M, Zurawski B, Menezes J, Richardet E, Bennouna J, Felip E, Juan-Vidal O, Alexandru A, Sakai H, Lingua A, Reyes F, Souquet PJ, De Marchi P, Martin C, Pérol M, Scherpereel A, Lu S, Paz-Ares L, Carbone DP, Memaj A, Marimuthu S, Zhang X, Tran P, John T. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (four cycles) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year update. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100273. [PMID: 34607285 PMCID: PMC8493593 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To further characterize survival benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, we report updated data from the phase III CheckMate 9LA trial with a 2-year minimum follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients were treatment naïve, with stage IV/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer, no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with two cycles of chemotherapy, or four cycles of chemotherapy. Updated efficacy and safety outcomes are reported, along with progression-free survival (PFS) after next line of treatment (PFS2), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) by treatment cycle, and efficacy outcomes in patients who discontinued all treatment components in the experimental arm due to TRAEs. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 30.7 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy. Median OS was 15.8 versus 11.0 months [hazard ratio 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.86)]; 2-year OS rate was 38% versus 26%. Two-year PFS rate was 20% versus 8%. ORR was 38% versus 25%, respectively; 34% versus 12% of all responses were ongoing at 2 years. Median PFS2 was 13.9 versus 8.7 months. Improved efficacy outcomes in the experimental versus control arm were observed across most subgroups, including by programmed death-ligand 1 and histology. No new safety signals were observed; onset of grade 3/4 TRAEs was mostly observed during the first two treatment cycles in the experimental arm. In patients who discontinued all components of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy treatment due to TRAEs (n = 61) median OS was 27.5 months; 56% of responders had an ongoing response ≥1 year after discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS With a 2-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy provided durable efficacy benefits over chemotherapy with a manageable safety profile and remains an efficacious first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, LungClinic, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Department of Oncology, Institutul Oncologic Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Cobo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - M Schenker
- Department of Oncology, SF Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania
| | - B Zurawski
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ambulatorium Chemioterapii, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - J Menezes
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - E Richardet
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - J Bennouna
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital of Nantes and INSERM, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| | - E Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
| | - O Juan-Vidal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Alexandru
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Oncology Prof Dr Alexandru Trestioreanu Bucha, Bucharest, Romania
| | - H Sakai
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - A Lingua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Medico Rio Cuarto, SA, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - F Reyes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Metropolitana, Chile
| | - P-J Souquet
- Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - P De Marchi
- Department of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - C Martin
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Pérol
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - A Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | - S Lu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - L Paz-Ares
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO-H12o Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Universidad Complutense & CiberOnc, Madrid, Spain
| | - D P Carbone
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA
| | - A Memaj
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | | | - X Zhang
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - P Tran
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - T John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Camerini A, Morabito A, Montanino A, Bernabé R, Grossi F, Ramlau R, Ciuleanu TE, Ceresoli GL, Pasello G, de Marinis F, Bosch-Barrera J, Laundreau P, Gautier S, Ta Thanh Minh C, Kowalski D. Metronomic oral vinorelbine in previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy: results of the randomized phase II Tempo Lung trial. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100051. [PMID: 33611164 PMCID: PMC7903063 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Results A total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms. Conclusions Metronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population. First-line oral vinorelbine prolonged PFS without grade 4 toxicity in platinum-unfit patients with advanced NSCLC. Metronomic oral vinorelbine is associated with a clear reduction of grade 3-4 toxicities (mainly hematological ones). Metronomic oral vinorelbine allows home treatment and easy tailoring of the treatment according to patient tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Camerini
- Medical Oncology Department, Versilia Hospital, Lido di Camaiore, Italy.
| | - A Morabito
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - A Montanino
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - R Bernabé
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Institute for Biomedical Research, Seville, Spain
| | - F Grossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - R Ramlau
- Oncology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Oncology Institute "Pr Dr Ion Chiricuta", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - G-L Ceresoli
- Oncology Department, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - G Pasello
- Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - F de Marinis
- Thoracic Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - J Bosch-Barrera
- Lung Cancer Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - P Laundreau
- Medical Affairs Oncology, Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France
| | - S Gautier
- IRPF, Pierre Fabre Médicament, Toulouse, France
| | - C Ta Thanh Minh
- Medical Affairs Oncology, Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France
| | - D Kowalski
- Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spigel DR, Vicente D, Ciuleanu TE, Gettinger S, Peters S, Horn L, Audigier-Valette C, Pardo Aranda N, Juan-Vidal O, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Shi M, Luft A, Wolf J, Antonia S, Nakagawa K, Fairchild J, Baudelet C, Pandya D, Doshi P, Chang H, Reck M. Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331 ☆. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:631-641. [PMID: 33539946 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus <1%. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Objective response rate was 13.7% versus 16.5% (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27); median duration of response was 8.3 versus 4.5 months. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were 13.8% versus 73.2%. CONCLUSION Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R Spigel
- Oncology Department, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, USA.
| | - D Vicente
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - T E Ciuleanu
- Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - S Gettinger
- Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - L Horn
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | | | - N Pardo Aranda
- Thoracic Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona
| | - O Juan-Vidal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Y Cheng
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - H Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - M Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - A Luft
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - J Wolf
- Clinic I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Antonia
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - K Nakagawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - J Fairchild
- Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - C Baudelet
- Global Drug Development, Biometrics & Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - D Pandya
- Translational Pathology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - P Doshi
- Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - H Chang
- Translational Bioinformatics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA
| | - M Reck
- Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center of Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferris RL, Haddad R, Even C, Tahara M, Dvorkin M, Ciuleanu TE, Clement PM, Mesia R, Kutukova S, Zholudeva L, Daste A, Caballero-Daroqui J, Keam B, Vynnychenko I, Lafond C, Shetty J, Mann H, Fan J, Wildsmith S, Morsli N, Fayette J, Licitra L. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:942-950. [PMID: 32294530 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 213] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 : 1 : 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response. RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85-1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9-43.1), 30.4% (24.7-36.3), and 30.5% (24.7-36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. CONCLUSION There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Ferris
- Department of Otolaryngology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
| | - R Haddad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - C Even
- Head and Neck Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - M Dvorkin
- Omsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Omskaya, Russian Federation
| | - T E Ciuleanu
- Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - P M Clement
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Mesia
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Kutukova
- Chemotherapy Department, SPb SBIH City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - L Zholudeva
- Regional Transcarpathian Oncological Dispensary, Uzhgorod, Ukraine
| | - A Daste
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - B Keam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - I Vynnychenko
- Sumy State University, Sumy Regional Oncology Center, Sumy, Ukraine
| | - C Lafond
- Department of Oncology, Clinique Victor Hugo/Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - J Shetty
- Late-stage ImmunoOncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA
| | - H Mann
- Research and Development Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Fan
- Late-stage ImmunoOncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA
| | - S Wildsmith
- Research and Development Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Morsli
- Research and Development Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Fayette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - L Licitra
- Head & Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mullane KM, Morrison VA, Camacho LH, Arvin A, McNeil SA, Durrand J, Campbell B, Su SC, Chan ISF, Parrino J, Kaplan SS, Popmihajlov Z, Annunziato PW, Cerana S, Dictar MO, Bonvehi P, Tregnaghi JP, Fein L, Ashley D, Singh M, Hayes T, Playford G, Morrissey O, Thaler J, Kuehr T, Greil R, Pecherstorfer M, Duck L, Van Eygen K, Aoun M, De Prijck B, Franke FA, Barrios CHE, Mendes AVA, Serrano SV, Garcia RF, Moore F, Camargo JFC, Pires LA, Alves RS, Radinov A, Oreshkov K, Minchev V, Hubenova AI, Koynova T, Ivanov I, Rabotilova B, Minchev V, Petrov PA, Chilingirov P, Karanikolov S, Raynov J, Grimard D, McNeil S, Kumar D, Larratt LM, Weiss K, Delage R, Diaz-Mitoma FJ, Cano PO, Couture F, Carvajal P, Yepes A, Torres Ulloa R, Fardella P, Caglevic C, Rojas C, Orellana E, Gonzalez P, Acevedo A, Galvez KM, Gonzalez ME, Franco S, Restrepo JG, Rojas CA, Bonilla C, Florez LE, Ospina AV, Manneh R, Zorica R, Vrdoljak DV, Samarzija M, Petruzelka L, Vydra J, Mayer J, Cibula D, Prausova J, Paulson G, Ontaneda M, Palk K, Vahlberg A, Rooneem R, Galtier F, Postil D, Lucht F, Laine F, Launay O, Laurichesse H, Duval X, Cornely OA, Camerer B, Panse J, Zaiss M, Derigs HG, Menzel H, Verbeek M, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D, Anagnostopoulos A, Terpos E, Cortes D, Umanzor J, Bejarano S, Galeano RW, Wong RSM, Hui P, Pedrazzoli P, Ruggeri L, Aversa F, Bosi A, Gentile G, Rambaldi A, Contu A, Marei L, Abbadi A, Hayajneh W, Kattan J, Farhat F, Chahine G, Rutkauskiene J, Marfil Rivera LJ, Lopez Chuken YA, Franco Villarreal H, Lopez Hernandez J, Blacklock H, Lopez RI, Alvarez R, Gomez AM, Quintana TS, Moreno Larrea MDC, Zorrilla SJ, Alarcon E, Samanez FCA, Caguioa PB, Tiangco BJ, Mora EM, Betancourt-Garcia RD, Hallman-Navarro D, Feliciano-Lopez LJ, Velez-Cortes HA, Cabanillas F, Ganea DE, Ciuleanu TE, Ghizdavescu DG, Miron L, Cebotaru CL, Cainap CI, Anghel R, Dvorkin MV, Gladkov OA, Fadeeva NV, Kuzmin AA, Lipatov ON, Zbarskaya II, Akhmetzyanov FS, Litvinov IV, Afanasyev BV, Cherenkova M, Lioznov D, Lisukov IA, Smirnova YA, Kolomietz S, Halawani H, Goh YT, Drgona L, Chudej J, Matejkova M, Reckova M, Rapoport BL, Szpak WM, Malan DR, Jonas N, Jung CW, Lee DG, Yoon SS, Lopez Jimenez J, Duran Martinez I, Rodriguez Moreno JF, Solano Vercet C, de la Camara R, Batlle Massana M, Yeh SP, Chen CY, Chou HH, Tsai CM, Chiu CH, Siritanaratkul N, Norasetthada L, Sriuranpong V, Seetalarom K, Akan H, Dane F, Ozcan MA, Ozsan GH, Kalayoglu Besisik SF, Cagatay A, Yalcin S, Peniket A, Mullan SR, Dakhil KM, Sivarajan K, Suh JJG, Sehgal A, Marquez F, Gomez EG, Mullane MR, Skinner WL, Behrens RJ, Trevarthe DR, Mazurczak MA, Lambiase EA, Vidal CA, Anac SY, Rodrigues GA, Baltz B, Boccia R, Wertheim MS, Holladay CS, Zenk D, Fusselman W, Wade III JL, Jaslowsk AJ, Keegan J, Robinson MO, Go RS, Farnen J, Amin B, Jurgens D, Risi GF, Beatty PG, Naqvi T, Parshad S, Hansen VL, Ahmed M, Steen PD, Badarinath S, Dekker A, Scouros MA, Young DE, Graydon Harker W, Kendall SD, Citron ML, Chedid S, Posada JG, Gupta MK, Rafiyath S, Buechler-Price J, Sreenivasappa S, Chay CH, Burke JM, Young SE, Mahmood A, Kugler JW, Gerstner G, Fuloria J, Belman ND, Geller R, Nieva J, Whittenberger BP, Wong BMY, Cescon TP, Abesada-Terk G, Guarino MJ, Zweibach A, Ibrahim EN, Takahashi G, Garrison MA, Mowat RB, Choi BS, Oliff IA, Singh J, Guter KA, Ayrons K, Rowland KM, Noga SJ, Rao SB, Columbie A, Nualart MT, Cecchi GR, Campos LT, Mohebtash M, Flores MR, Rothstein-Rubin R, O'Connor BM, Soori G, Knapp M, Miranda FG, Goodgame BW, Kassem M, Belani R, Sharma S, Ortiz T, Sonneborn HL, Markowitz AB, Wilbur D, Meiri E, Koo VS, Jhangiani HS, Wong L, Sanani S, Lawrence SJ, Jones CM, Murray C, Papageorgiou C, Gurtler JS, Ascensao JL, Seetalarom K, Venigalla ML, D'Andrea M, De Las Casas C, Haile DJ, Qazi FU, Santander JL, Thomas MR, Rao VP, Craig M, Garg RJ, Robles R, Lyons RM, Stegemoller RK, Goel S, Garg S, Lowry P, Lynch C, Lash B, Repka T, Baker J, Goueli BS, Campbell TC, Van Echo DA, Lee YJ, Reyes EA, Senecal FM, Donnelly G, Byeff P, Weiss R, Reid T, Roeland E, Goel A, Prow DM, Brandt DS, Kaplan HG, Payne JE, Boeckh MG, Rosen PJ, Mena RR, Khan R, Betts RF, Sharp SA, Morrison VA, Fitz-Patrick D, Congdon J, Erickson N, Abbasi R, Henderson S, Mehdi A, Wos EJ, Rehmus E, Beltzer L, Tamayo RA, Mahmood T, Reboli AC, Moore A, Brown JM, Cruz J, Quick DP, Potz JL, Kotz KW, Hutchins M, Chowhan NM, Devabhaktuni YD, Braly P, Berenguer RA, Shambaugh SC, O'Rourke TJ, Conkright WA, Winkler CF, Addo FEK, Duic JP, High KP, Kutner ME, Collins R, Carrizosa DR, Perry DJ, Kailath E, Rosen N, Sotolongo R, Shoham S, Chen T. Safety and efficacy of inactivated varicella zoster virus vaccine in immunocompromised patients with malignancies: a two-arm, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2019; 19:1001-1012. [DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30310-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
9
|
Tabernero J, Hozak RR, Yoshino T, Cohn AL, Obermannova R, Bodoky G, Garcia-Carbonero R, Ciuleanu TE, Portnoy DC, Prausová J, Muro K, Siegel RW, Konrad RJ, Ouyang H, Melemed SA, Ferry D, Nasroulah F, Van Cutsem E. Analysis of angiogenesis biomarkers for ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from RAISE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:602-609. [PMID: 29228087 PMCID: PMC5888948 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The phase III RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR)-2 binding monoclonal antibody ramucirumab plus 5-fluororuracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI as second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. To identify patients who benefit the most from VEGFR-2 blockade, the RAISE trial design included a prospective and comprehensive biomarker program that assessed the association of biomarkers with ramucirumab efficacy outcomes. Patients and methods Plasma and tumor tissue collection was mandatory. Overall, 1072 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to the addition of ramucirumab or placebo to FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Patients were then randomized 1 : 2, for the biomarker program, to marker exploratory (ME) and marker confirmatory (MC) groups. Analyses were carried out using exploratory assays to assess the correlations of baseline marker levels [VEGF-C, VEGF-D, sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, sVEGFR-3 (plasma), and VEGFR-2 (tumor tissue)] with clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were carried out for each candidate biomarker with stratification factor adjustment. Results Biomarker results were available from >80% (n = 894) of patients. Analysis of the ME subset determined a VEGF-D level of 115 pg/ml was appropriate for high/low subgroup analyses. Evaluation of the combined ME + MC populations found that the median OS in the ramucirumab + FOLFIRI arm compared with placebo + FOLFIRI showed an improvement of 2.4 months in the high VEGF-D subgroup [13.9 months (95% CI 12.5-15.6) versus 11.5 months (95% CI 10.1-12.4), respectively], and a decrease of 0.5 month in the low VEGF-D subgroup [12.6 months (95% CI 10.7-14.0) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 11.8-17.0), respectively]. PFS results were consistent with OS. No trends were evident with the other antiangiogenic candidate biomarkers. Conclusions The RAISE biomarker program identified VEGF-D as a potential predictive biomarker for ramucirumab efficacy in second-line mCRC. Development of an assay appropriate for testing in clinical practice is currently ongoing. Clinical trials registration NCT01183780.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; CIBERONC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - R R Hozak
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - T Yoshino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology/Digestive Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - A L Cohn
- Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center/US Oncology, Denver, USA
| | - R Obermannova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - G Bodoky
- Oncology, Szent László Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R Garcia-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO; CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - T-E Ciuleanu
- Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuţă Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - J Prausová
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - R W Siegel
- Laboratory for Experimental Medicine, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - R J Konrad
- Laboratory for Experimental Medicine, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - H Ouyang
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S A Melemed
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - D Ferry
- Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reck M, Paz-Ares L, Perol M, Ciuleanu TE, Kowalyszyn RD, Lewanski CR, Syrigos K, Arrieta O, Prabhash K, Park K, Pikiel J, Göksel T, Lee P, Zimmermann A, Treat J, Ferry D, Melemed A, Carter GC, Alexandris E, Garon E. Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der Kombination Ramucirumab (RAM) plus Docetaxel (DOC) versus Placebo (PL) plus DOC bei Patienten mit vorbehandeltem nicht plattenepithelialen nicht kleinzelligen Lungenkarzinom (NSCLC): explorative Analyse der REVEL Studie (RAM plus DOC versus PL plus DOC in der Zweitlinientherapie des NSCLC im Stadium IV). Pneumologie 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
11
|
Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, André T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJA, Strickland AH, Wilson G, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tian Y, Sidhu R. Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/-} panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:107-16. [PMID: 24356622 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study 20050181 demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), objective response, and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall survival (OS) with panitumumab-FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone for second-line wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Updated long-term data from a prespecified descriptive analysis are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving one prior mCRC treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to panitumumab (6.0 mg/kg)-FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Co-primary end points (PFS and OS) were prospectively analyzed by tumor KRAS status. RESULTS One thousand one hundred and eighty-six patients were randomly assigned. In patients with WT KRAS tumors, panitumumab-FOLFIRI significantly improved PFS versus FOLFIRI [median 6.7 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97]; P = 0.023]. A trend toward longer OS was observed (median 14.5 versus 12.5 months; HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.78, 1.10]; P = 0.37). Response rates improved from 10% to 36% (P < 0.0001). From post hoc analyses in patients receiving prior oxaliplatin-bevacizumab, panitumumab-FOLFIRI improved PFS (median 6.4 versus 3.7 months; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.37, 0.90]; P = 0.014). PFS and OS appeared longer for worst-grade skin toxicity of 2-4, versus 0-1 or FOLFIRI. Safety results were as previously reported and consistent with the known toxicities with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. CONCLUSIONS These data confirm the primary efficacy and safety findings of this trial and support panitumumab-FOLFIRI as a second-line treatment of WT KRAS mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Peeters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Radulescu D, Buzdugan E, Ciuleanu TE, Todor N, Stoicescu L. Can the epirubicin cardiotoxicity in cancer patients be prevented by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? J BUON 2013; 18:1052-1057. [PMID: 24344038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess whether treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can prevent the alteration of left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance in cancer patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens containing epirubicin. METHODS In this prospective study , 68 patients with different malignant tumors treated with epirubicin and perindopril in different chemotherapy protocols (study group), and a gender- and age-matched group of 68 patients with different malignant tumors treated with epirubicin without perindopril in different chemotherapy protocols (control group), were assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Left ventricular systolic function was assessed by measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). Left ventricular diastolic function was assessed by Doppler ultrasound by evaluating the transmitral flow. We also assessed the QTc on the 12 lead electrocardiograms. RESULTS At the end of chemotherapy the left ventricular systolic function was less altered in the study group compared to the control group and was superior in the study group (epirubicin+ACEI) compared to the control group (epirubicin alone). We documented a significantly deteriorated left ventricular diastolic function in both groups at the completion of chemotherapy. QTc time in both arms was also significantly prolonged. CONCLUSION In the present echo-Doppler study we documented a preserved left ventricular systolic performance in patients with various malignancies treated with epirubicin plus perindopril. Although co-treatment with ACEI prevented the alteration of systolic performance, it failed to prevent the deterioration of the left ventricular diastolic performance impairment due to poor left ventricular compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Radulescu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", 5th Medical Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brodowicz T, Ciuleanu TE, Radosavljevic D, Shacham-Shmueli E, Vrbanec D, Plate S, Mrsic-Krmpotic Z, Dank M, Purkalne G, Messinger D, Zielinski CC. FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab administered weekly or every second week in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II CECOG study. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1769-1777. [PMID: 23559149 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This randomized phase II study investigated first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab administered every second week in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received FOLFOX4 plus either standard weekly cetuximab (arm 1) or cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) every second week (arm 2), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety were also investigated. The study was not powered to establish non-inferiority, but aimed at the estimation of treatment differences. RESULTS Of 152 randomized eligible patients, 75 were treated in arm 1 and 77 in arm 2; ORRs [53% versus 62%, odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.66], PFS [median 9.5 versus 9.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34], OS (median 25.8 versus 23.0 months, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.30) and DCR (87%) were comparable. HRs adjusted for baseline factors were 1.01 and 0.99 for PFS and OS, respectively. Frequencies of grade 3/4 adverse events in arms 1 versus 2 were similar: most common were neutropenia (28% versus 34%) and rash (15% versus 17%). CONCLUSIONS Activity and safety of FOLFOX4 plus either cetuximab administered weekly or every second week were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Brodowicz
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - E Shacham-Shmueli
- Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Souraski Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - D Vrbanec
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zagreb/Rebro, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - S Plate
- The Latvian Center of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - Z Mrsic-Krmpotic
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - M Dank
- Radiology Clinic, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - G Purkalne
- P Stradins University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - C C Zielinski
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ciuleanu E, Irimie A, Ciuleanu TE, Popita V, Todor N, Ghilezan N. Capecitabine as salvage treatment in relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase II study. J BUON 2008; 13:37-42. [PMID: 18404784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) as rescue treatment (2nd, 3rd and 4th line) in patients with relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 5/2002-11/2005, 23 relapsed NPC patients (17 locoregional relapse, 3 metastatic, 3 locoregional + metastatic) received capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-14 every 3 weeks, until progression or for a maximum of 6 cycles. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS 23 patients (14 men, 9 women) with median age 46 years (range 15-59); ECOG performance status 1 n=21, 2 n=2; histology: undifferentiated carcinoma (WHO type III) n=21, non-keratinizing epidermoid carcinoma (WHO type II), n=2. Capecitabine was given as 2nd--(13 patients), 3rd--(7 patients), and 4th--(3 patients) line chemotherapy. Previous chemotherapy regimes were epirubicin + cisplatin, paclitaxel + carboplatin, paclitaxel + 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) or methotrexate. 104 cycles were given (median 5, range 2-6). Two (9%) patients achieved complete response (CR); 9 (39%) partial response (PR); 9 (39%) stable disease (SD) and 3 (13%) progressed (PD). Toxicity was mild without toxic deaths or grade 4 toxicities. The most frequent toxicities (grades 1-3) were anemia (38%), hand-foot syndrome (23%), leukopenia (13%) and diarrhea (7%). Median follow-up was 10 months (range 2-44). Median overall survival was not reached at 18 months and actuarial one-year survival was 62% (95% confidence interval/CI: 41-80). Median progression-free survival was 14 months. CONCLUSION Capecitabine is active in relapsed NPC patients, achieving 48% objective responses, with mild toxicity. It is an attractive therapy to be administered in an outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ciuleanu
- Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuta, Cluj, Romania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Radulescu D, Pripon S, Parv A, Duncea C, Ciuleanu TE, Radulescu LI. Myocardial function in patients with breast cancer after therapy with anthracyclines and chest irradiation. J BUON 2007; 12:349-352. [PMID: 17918288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compare the left ventricular performance in female patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy (CT) and either left or right thoracic irradiation (RT), using Doppler echocardiography. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-four patients with cancer of the left breast treated with surgical resection, adjuvant EC CT (epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) and conventionally fractionated left thoracic RT (study group) and a gender-and age-matched group of 34 patients with cancer of the right breast also treated with surgical resection, adjuvant EC CT and right thoracic RT (control group), were studied by echocardiography. Assessed were the left ventricular systolic performance by measuring the global ejection fraction (EF) and the shortening fraction (SF). Left ventricular diastolic performance was assessed by measuring the Doppler transmitral flow: the maximal velocity of the E wave (rapid filling/ Emax) and A wave (atrial filling/Emax) were measured. The ratio of Emax/Amax, the pressure half-time (PHT) of the E wave and the isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) were also calculated. RESULTS The left ventricular diastolic performance was altered in the study group which showed a significant decrease (p <0.001) of Emax. A wave was significantly increased in the study group compared with the control group (p <0.001. The mitral E/A ratio was subunitary in both groups but more depressed in the study group. The E wave PHT was more prolonged in the study group compared to the control group (p <0.001). The IVRT was prolonged in the study group compared with the controls (p <0.05). The left ventricular systolic performance was within normal limits in both groups. CONCLUSION Our Doppler echocardiography study documented an impaired left ventricular diastolic performance in patients with cancer of the left breast treated with fractionated thoracic RT and CT. This impairment is due to poor left ventricular compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Radulescu
- Department of Cardiology, 5th Medical Hospital, University of Medicine Cluj, Cluj, Romania.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Radulescu D, Pripon S, Bunea D, Ciuleanu TE, Radulescu LI. Endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes in small cell lung carcinoma. Two case reports. J BUON 2007; 12:411-414. [PMID: 17918299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Paraneoplastic syndromes are frequently detected in many small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. In the present paper we report 2 cases of patients diagnosed with SCLC, in whom 2 distinct endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes were identified during diagnosis. In the first patient, severe hyponatremia and renal sodium loss with inappropriate antidiuresis was found during routine laboratory tests. Serum antidiuretic hormone (ADH) level was within normal limits, but the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) level was elevated. The second case presented with severe hypercalcemia secondary to an excessive parathormone (PTH) secretion. We discuss the 2 cases and review the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Radulescu
- 5th Medical Clinic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rusu P, Ciuleanu TE, Cernea D, Pelau D, Gaal V, Cebotaru C, Guttman T, Todor N, Ghilezan N. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with vinorelbine and a platinum compound followed by consolidation chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results of a phase II study. J BUON 2007; 12:33-9. [PMID: 17436399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the efficacy, toxicity and survival of concurrent therapy with vinorelbine and a platinum compound with radiotherapy (RT), followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs, for locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients with stage III NSCLC were included in this phase II study: median age 56 years (range 44-71), males / females 49/8, ECOG performance status (PS) 1/2=27/30, stage IIIA/ IIIB 11/46, squamous cell carcinoma 44, adenocarcinoma 7, adenoid cystic carcinoma 1 and large cell carcinoma 5. Treatment consisted of 2 cycles of chemotherapy with vinorelbine and cisplatin or carboplatin, given concurrently with RT, followed by 2-4 more cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs. Twenty-two patients received amifostine for radio- and chemoprotection. RESULTS Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and esophagitis in 19% of the patients each, and gastrointestinal toxicity in 17% of the patients. Of the 55 patients evaluable for response, 23.64% achieved complete response (CR) and 40% partial response (PR) (overall response rate 63.64%). Progression-free survival curves showed 1- and 2-year values of 42% and 21%, respectively, and median time to progression 10.5 months. The 1- and 2- year disease-specific survival was 58% and 29%, and the median overall survival 15 months. CONCLUSION Preliminary analysis indicates that concurrent vinorelbine and a platinum compound with RT followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs for advanced stage III NSCLC is well tolerated, has considerable activity and positive impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rusu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Prof. Ion Chiricuta, Cluj - Napoca, Romania.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Radulescu D, Duncea C, Ciuleanu TE, Radulescu LI, Gal T, Cimpean I. Does epirubicin affect left ventricular systolic performance in oncologic patients? J BUON 2005; 10:77-80. [PMID: 17335135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the present study the left ventricular diastolic and systolic functions were evaluated in patients treated with lower total doses of epirubicin using Doppler echocardiography. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventeen patients with different malignant tumors treated with epirubicin up to 450 mg/m(2) (study group), and a gender-and age-matched group of 29 patients diagnosed with tumors, who had not started treatment yet (control group), were assessed by echocardiography. Left ventricular diastolic function was assessed by measuring the Doppler transmitral flow. We measured the maximal velocity of the E wave (rapid filling) and A wave (atrial filling). The ratio of Emax/Amax, the pressure half time (PHT) of the E wave and the iso-volumic relaxation time (IVRT) were also calculated. The left ventricular systolic performance was assessed by measuring the global ejection fraction (EF). RESULTS The left ventricular diastolic performance was altered in the study group. In this group we noticed a significant decrease ( p < 0.001) of Emax. A wave was significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group ( p < 0.001). The mitral E/A ratio was subunitary in the study group. The E wave PHT was prolonged in the epirubicin-treated group in comparison to the controls (p<0.001). The IVRT was prolonged in the study group in comparison to the controls (p<0.05). The left ventricular systolic performance was not significantly altered in the study group compared to the control group. Although the EF was lower in the study group the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Our Doppler echocardiography study documented an impaired left ventricular diastolic performance in patients with various malignancies treated with lower total doses of epirubicin. This impairment is due to poor left ventricular compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Radulescu
- 5th Medical Hospital, Medical University Cluj, Cluj, Romania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ciuleanu TE, Fountzilas G, Ciuleanu E, Plataniotis M, Todor N, Ghilezan N. Paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study. J BUON 2004; 9:161-5. [PMID: 17415808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This multicenter phase II study was conducted to investigate the activity and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin delivered on an outpatient basis in relapsed/ metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged>/= 18 years with histologically proven recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status </=2, and a life expectancy of >/= 12 weeks were eligible. Measurable disease outside prior radiotherapy ports was required, unless a subsequent progression of the lesion was documented. An interval of >/= 12 months was required between the previous chemotherapy (neoadjuvant, concurrent chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant) and study entry. Prior radiotherapy or surgery were allowed. All patients had adequate bone marrow (WBC >4000/mL, platelets >100000/mL), hepatic (bilirubin <1,5 mg/dL, SGPT <1.5xN), and renal function (serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance >60 mL/min). Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), given as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration- time curve (AUC) of 6 mg*min/mL, administered every 21 days. RESULTS 40 patients entered the study. There were 3 complete responders (CR) and 8 partial responders (PR), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 27.5% (95% confidence interval - C.I.: 14.5-44). Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.5 months, and median survival was 11.5 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity included leucopenia (17.5% of the patients), anaemia (17.5%), thrombocytopenia (10%), neutropenia (7.5%), and peripheral neuropathy (2.5%). CONCLUSION These data indicate that the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered on an outpatient basis, but it is only moderately active against relapsed/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ciuleanu TE, Curcă R, Iancu D, Todor N, Cebotaru C, Radulescu I, Banu E, Ghilezan N. First-line chemotherapy with topotecan and etoposide in advanced small cell lung cancer. A phase II study. J BUON 2002; 7:43-6. [PMID: 17577259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Topotecan has recently shown activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The aim of the present phase II study was to assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of the combination of topotecan plus etoposide in chemotherapynaive patients with advanced SCLC on an outpatient basis. PATIENTS AND METHODS From December 1998 to February 2001 24 previously untreated patients with histologically proven advanced (stage IIIB and IV) SCLC received topotecan 1.2 mg/m(2), days 1-5, followed by etoposide 100 mg/m(2), days 8-10, every 3 weeks, up to 6 cycles (less if progressive disease). RESULTS Twenty-two patients were males and 2 females. Their median age was 54 years (range 37-67 years). World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) was 0-1 in 12 patients and 2 in 12. AJCC stage IIIB was found in 6 patients and IV in 18. TOXICITY 76 cycles (median 3.5 cycles) were given with no toxic deaths. Grade 4 toxicity was registered in 10 (13%) cycles for neutropenia, 4 (5%) cycles for anaemia, 1 (1.3%) cycle for thrombocytopenia and 1 (1.3%) cycle for diarrhea. Activity: among 23 evaluable patients, 8 had an objective response to chemotherapy (response rate - RR- 34.7%, 95% confidence interval -CI- 14-55%) with 4 (17.4%) complete remissions (CRs) and 4 (17.4%) partial remissions (PRs). Survival: with a median follow-up of 8 months (range 1.5-25 months), one-year actuarial survival was 48% (95% CI 28-69%) and median survival was 47.8 weeks. CONCLUSION Although the combination of topotecan and etoposide proved easy to administer on an outpatient basis with moderate and manageable toxicity, it showed only moderate activity as first-line chemotherapy in advanced SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E Ciuleanu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "I. Hatieganu" Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ioan A, Ciuleanu TE, Guttman T, Barsan M, Ghilezan N. Noninvasive diagnostic work-up correlated with operative findings in non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) patients. Lung Cancer 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(98)90143-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|