American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment working group update: use of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting

Accurate Prediction and Validation of Response to Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have an established role in the treatment of breast cancer. Response rates are only 50% to 70% in the neoadjuvant setting and lower in advanced disease. Accurate biomarkers are urgently needed to predict response in these settings and to determine which individuals will benefit from adjuvant AI therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pretreatment and on-treatment (after 2 weeks and 3 months) biopsies were obtained from 89 postmenopausal women who had estrogen receptor-alpha positive breast cancer and were receiving neoadjuvant letrozole for transcript profiling. Dynamic clinical response was assessed with use of three-dimensional ultrasound measurements.

RESULTS

The molecular response to letrozole was characterized and a four-gene classifier of clinical response was established (accuracy of 96%) on the basis of the level of two genes before treatment (one gene [IL6ST] was associated with immune signaling, and the other [NGFRAP1] was associated with apoptosis) and the level of two proliferation genes (ASPM, MCM4) after 2 weeks of therapy. The four-gene signature was found to be 91% accurate in a blinded, completely independent validation data set of patients treated with anastrozole. Matched 2-week on-treatment biopsies were associated with improved predictive power as compared with pretreatment biopsies alone. This signature also significantly predicted recurrence-free survival (P = .029) and breast cancer -specific survival (P = .009). We demonstrate that the test can also be performed with use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSION

A four-gene predictive model of clinical response to AIs by 2 weeks has been generated and validated. Deregulated immune and apoptotic responses before treatment and cell proliferation that is not reduced 2 weeks after initiation of treatment are functional characteristics of breast tumors that do not respond to AIs.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline focused update

PURPOSE

To update the ASCO clinical practice guideline on adjuvant endocrine therapy on the basis of emerging data on the optimal duration of treatment, particularly adjuvant tamoxifen.

METHODS

ASCO convened the Update Committee and conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials from January 2009 to June 2013 and analyzed three historical trials. Guideline recommendations were based on the Update Committee's review of the evidence. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease recurrence, and adverse events.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects emerging data on duration of tamoxifen treatment. There have been five studies of tamoxifen treatment beyond 5 years of therapy. The two largest studies with longest reported follow-up show a breast cancer survival advantage with 10-year durations of tamoxifen use. In addition to modest gains in survival, extended therapy with tamoxifen for 10 years compared with 5 years was associated with lower risks of breast cancer recurrence and contralateral breast cancer.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Previous ASCO guidelines recommended treatment of women who have hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are premenopausal with 5 years of tamoxifen, and those who are postmenopausal a minimum of 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (in sequence). If women are pre- or perimenopausal and have received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, they should be offered 10 years total duration of tamoxifen. If women are postmenopausal and have received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, they should be offered the choice of continuing tamoxifen or switching to an aromatase inhibitor for 10 years total adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in reducing subsequent breast cancer

Tamoxifen (TAM) has been prescribed for decades and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been used since the early 2000s in preventing subsequent breast cancer. However, outside of clinical trials, the effectiveness of AIs is not established. We examined the long-term risk of subsequent breast cancer among survivors treated with TAM and AIs in a large health plan. The study included 22,850 survivors, diagnosed with initial breast cancer (stages 0-IV) from 1996 to 2006, and followed 13 years maximum. We compared the risk of subsequent breast cancer in those who used TAM and/or AIs versus nonusers (the reference group). Hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for patient, tumor, treatment, and health-care characteristics were estimated using Cox models with time-dependent drug use status. Women who used TAM/AIs had a large reduction in risk of subsequent breast cancer compared with nonusers. While confidence intervals (CI) for all hormone treatment groups overlapped, women with high adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%) who used AIs exclusively and had positive ER or PR receptor status had the greatest risk reduction (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.41), followed by those who switched from TAM to AIs (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.30-0.49), and those who used TAM exclusively (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36-0.47). Women with high adherence had the greatest risk reduction in subsequent breast cancer, but the results were not substantially different from women who took the drugs less regularly. Compared with nonusers, the reduction in subsequent breast cancer risk ranged from 58% to 66% across the hormone treatment groups and degree of adherence.

Molecular endocrinology and breast cancer--a reed before the wind lives on (a tribute to Professor Mike Reed)

Oestrogens in breast cancers are derived from both uptake from the circulation and in situ synthesis. Third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) effectively block aromatase activity within the breast. The effects of AIs on the molecular biology of breast cancers may be monitored in patients given neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in tumour gene expression associated with AIs is influenced by time of drug exposure and gene expression profiles may provide important information on tumour response/ resistance to AIs.

Comparing guidelines for adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a coming of age

Following surgery for early breast cancer, the standard of care for postmenopausal women is adjuvant therapy with any combination of radiation therapy, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Clinicians rely on many tools, including guidelines, to make these treatment decisions. Such guidelines include the St Gallen consensus statement, the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, as well as various regional and national guidelines. Recommendations may vary, because different methods and criteria were used to assess the strength of supporting data. This article provides an overview of global guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and points out the major differences. Ongoing changes are highlighted, particularly those regarding the adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. While previous guidelines recommended tamoxifen alone, all major guidelines now recommend using third-generation aromatase inhibitors either in sequence with tamoxifen or as upfront treatment.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based guidelines, based on a systematic review, for endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

A literature search identified relevant randomized trials. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and those for the Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS). The primary outcomes of interest were disease-free survival, overall survival, and time to contralateral breast cancer. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and quality of life. An expert panel reviewed the literature, especially 12 major trials, and developed updated recommendations.

RESULTS

An adjuvant treatment strategy incorporating an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as primary (initial endocrine therapy), sequential (using both tamoxifen and an AI in either order), or extended (AI after 5 years of tamoxifen) therapy reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence compared with 5 years of tamoxifen alone. Data suggest that including an AI as primary monotherapy or as sequential treatment after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen yields similar outcomes. Tamoxifen and AIs differ in their adverse effect profiles, and these differences may inform treatment preferences.

CONCLUSION

The Update Committee recommends that postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer consider incorporating AI therapy at some point during adjuvant treatment, either as up-front therapy or as sequential treatment after tamoxifen. The optimal timing and duration of endocrine treatment remain unresolved. The Update Committee supports careful consideration of adverse effect profiles and patient preferences in deciding whether and when to incorporate AI therapy.

Data from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trial

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have improved efficacy and safety versus tamoxifen for treatment of advanced breast cancer. Currently, anastrozole is the only third-generation AI with adjuvant therapy data in postmenopausal women. Initial and updated results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial (median follow-up, 47 months) confirm it to be more effective than tamoxifen for disease-free survival with several important tolerability benefits. As a result, there has been much debate about whether or not anastrozole should be used routinely to treat postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. In its review, the American Society of Clinical Oncology Health Services Research Committee agreed that the updated ATAC analyses provided a greater level of assurance, in terms of both toxicity and efficacy, for use of anastrozole in the adjuvant setting. However, pending 5-year data from ATAC and other trials of adjuvant AI use, adjuvant anastrozole was recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology Health Research Committee for use only under certain circumstances, with 5 years of tamoxifen remaining the standard. Anastrozole should be the preferred AI in this setting; data from the ATAC trial should not be extrapolated to other members of the class. Despite this conservative recommendation, the overall risk:benefit profile from the ATAC trial favors anastrozole, and it is expected that a more favorable efficacy and adverse effect profile will be maintained. Anastrozole should, therefore, now be considered a valid alternative option to tamoxifen for adjuvant hormonal treatment in all postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Sequencing of Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

The introduction of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NS-AI) anastrozole as an alternative to tamoxifen for adjuvant therapy of women with resected hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has added a management category into which patients presenting with metastatic disease can be placed. There are now essentially three such categories: (a) tamoxifen sensitive (no prior AI); (b) tamoxifen resistant (no prior AI); and (c) NS-AI resistant (no prior tamoxifen). Well-conducted Phase III trials provide evidence for choosing first-line therapy for advanced disease in categories a and b. In tamoxifen-sensitive patients, one can choose either NS-AI, anastrozole, or letrozole. In tamoxifen-resistant patients, one can choose either of the NS-AIs, the steroidal AI exemestane, or the estrogen receptor down-regulator fulvestrant. The situation is quite different for patients in category c. There are no Phase III trials of agents in patients who have experienced disease progression on a NS-AI. Phase II data are available for exemestane and high-dose estrogens, and retrospective data are available for tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Additional clinical trials are needed to determine an optimal sequencing strategy.

Adverse bone effects during pharmacological breast cancer therapy

The improved survival and cure rate of breast cancer patients leads to increased diagnosis of later occurring side effects to therapy such as osteoporosis. Conventional chemotherapies such as CMF and CEF are known to induce premature menopause, which increases bone loss but these therapies have additional detrimental effects on bone. The loss in bone mass during chemotherapy is substantial and may lead to increased fracture risk. The influence of taxanes on bone is less well known. Whereas tamoxifen has a slight protective effect on bone loss the opposite is true for aromatase inhibitors. Adverse effect reportings show, that adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women increases the risk of clinical fractures as compared to tamoxifen. The Danish Bone Society suggests that all women with operable breast cancer have their fracture risk evaluated including a BMD measurement prior to initiation of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy as a part of the standard examination program. If osteoporosis is diagnosed, anti-osteoporosis therapies should be considered. Moreover, all women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy should be informed of the risk of bone loss and should receive life style advice of how to preserve bone. Adjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients improve survival and cure rates. Therefore it is preferable to use such therapies although they increase risk of side effects such as osteoporosis.

Gene expression profiles differentiating between breast cancers clinically responsive or resistant to letrozole

PURPOSE

Endocrine agents, such as letrozole, are established in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. However, response rates are only 50% to 70% in the neoadjuvant setting and lower in advanced disease. Thus there is a need to identify novel markers predicting for response and to understand molecular mechanisms of resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sequential tumor biopsies were taken before and after 10 to 14 days of neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-rich breast cancer. Expression profiles on high-density microarray chips were then related to clinical responses as assessed from tumor volume measurements after 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Of 52 patients, 37 (71%) were classified as having a clinical response to letrozole and 15 being clinically resistant. Bioinformatic analysis identified 205 covariables (69 baseline expression, 45 day 14 expression, and 91 change in expression with treatment) which differentiated between clinical responders and nonresponders. Hierarchical clustering using the variables separated responders and nonresponders into two distinct groups. Ontological assessment indicated that discriminating genes were enriched toward cellular biosynthetic processes. In particular, functional gene assessment showed ribosomal protein probes to have higher baseline expression in tumors responsive to letrozole and increased expression with treatment in nonresponding cases.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe genetic covariables and molecular processes discriminating between tumors clinically responsive and resistant to an aromatase inhibitor. The understanding of such molecular phenotypes will be important in optimizing the clinical use of aromatase inhibitors, both in terms of identifying responsive breast cancers and developing new agents to target resistance pathways.

Late extended adjuvant treatment with letrozole improves outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer who complete 5 years of tamoxifen

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group MA.17 trial examined the efficacy of letrozole (LET) started within 3 months of 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. When the trial was unblinded, patients who received placebo (PLAC) were offered LET.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cohort analysis describes the outcomes of women assigned PLAC at the initial random assignment after unblinding. Efficacy outcomes of women who chose LET (PLAC-LET group) were compared with those who did not (PLAC-PLAC group) by the hazard ratios and by P values calculated from Cox models that adjusted for imbalances between the groups. Toxicity analyses included only events that occurred after unblinding.

RESULTS

There were 1,579 women in the PLAC-LET group (median time from tamoxifen, 2.8 years) and 804 in the PLAC-PLAC group. Patients in the PLAC-LET group were younger; had a better performance status; and were more likely to have had node-positive disease, axillary dissection, and adjuvant chemotherapy than those in the PLAC-PLAC group. At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, disease-free survival (DFS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.61; P < .0001) and distant DFS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.74; P = .004) were superior in the PLAC-LET group. More self-reported new diagnoses of osteoporosis and significantly more clinical fractures occurred in the women who took LET (5.2% v 3.1%, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Interpretation of this cohort analysis suggests that LET improves DFS and distant DFS even when there has been a substantial period of time since the discontinuation of prior adjuvant tamoxifen.

Changes in breast cancer transcriptional profiles after treatment with the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify changes in tumour expression profiling associated with short-term therapy of breast cancer patients with letrozole.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Microarray analysis was performed on RNA extracted from paired tumour core biopsies taken before and after 14 days of treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/daily) in 58 patients. Changes in expression profile were identified by three different approaches on the basis of frequency of changes, magnitude of changes and significance analysis of microarray.

RESULTS

No single gene was consistently changed by therapy in all cases. Fifty-two genes, however, were downregulated and 36 upregulated in at least 45 of the 58 cases. In terms of quantitative change, 46 genes showed at least a median 1.5-fold change in expression. Significance analysis of microarray identified 62 genes that were significantly changed by therapy (P<0.0001, 56 downregulated and six upregulated). All three approaches showed that greater numbers of genes were downregulated rather than upregulated. Merging data produced a total of 143 genes, which were subject to gene ontology and cluster analysis. The ontology of the 91 downregulated genes showed that they were functionally associated with cell cycle progression, particularly mitosis. In contrast, upregulated genes were associated with organ development, connective tissue extracellular matrix regulation and inflammatory response. Cluster analysis segregated the patients into four groups differing in patterns of gene expression.

CONCLUSION

Genes have been identified which either change markedly or consistently in breast cancer after 14 days treatment with letrozole. These are new important data in understanding letrozole's molecular mechanism of action in breast cancers.

Aromatase inhibitors--gene discovery

Microarray analysis of tumour RNA is an extremely powerful tool which allows global gene expression to be measured. When used in combination with neoadjuvant treatment protocols in which therapy is given with the primary tumour within the breast, sequential biopsies may be analysed and results correlated with clinical and pathological response. In the present study, a neoadjuvant protocol has been used, administering the third generation inhibitor, letrozole, for 3 months and subjecting RNA extracted from biopsies taken before and after 10-14 days of treatment to microarray analysis. The objectives were to discover: (i) genes that change with estrogen deprivation (the only known biological effect of letrozole is to inhibit aromatase activity and reduce endogenous estrogens in postmenopausal women) and (ii) genes whose basal, on treatment or change in expression differ between tumours which are either responsive or resistant to treatment (so that predictive indices of response/resistance may be developed). Early changes in gene expression were identified by comparing paired tumour core biopsies taken before and after 14 days treatment in 58 patients using three different approaches based on frequency of changes, magnitude of changes and SAM analysis. All three approaches showed a greater number of genes were down-regulated than up-regulated. Merging of the data produced a total of 143 genes which were subject to gene ontology and cluster analysis. The ontology of the 91 down-regulated genes showed that they were functionally associated with cell cycle progression, particularly mitosis. In contrast, up-regulated genes were associated with organ development and extra-cellular matrix turnover and regulation. Clinical response was assessable in 52 patients; 37 (71%) tumours were classified as clinical responders (>50% reduction in volume at 3 months). Microarray analysis of pre- and 14-day biopsies identified 291 covariates (84 baselines, 72 14-day and 135 changes) highly predictive of response status. A similarity matrix using the covariates showed responding tumours have a similar genetic profile which was dissimilar to non-responding cancers whereas non-responsive cases were distinctive from each other. Changed genes predicting for response showed no concordance with those changed significantly by treatment in the overall group.

Overview of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer

The benefits of adjuvant systemic therapy in reducing risk of distant relapse from breast cancer have been recognized for several decades. The intent of adjuvant therapy is to eliminate the occult micrometastatic breast cancer burden before it progresses into clinically apparent disease. Successful delivery of effective adjuvant systemic therapy as a complement to surgical management of breast cancer has contributed to the steady declines in breast cancer mortality observed internationally over the past 2 decades. Ongoing clinical and translational research in breast cancer seeks to improve the efficacy of systemic agents for use in the conventional postoperative (adjuvant) setting.

Diffusion of aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer therapy between 1996 and 2003 in the Cancer Research Network

PURPOSE

Clinical trials demonstrated adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment is superior for decreasing breast cancer recurrence risk over adjuvant tamoxifen treatment as early as 2001. Yet clinical use for adjuvant treatment was not recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology until 2004. Aromatase inhibitor uptake after the first public presentation of randomized trial results but before the release of national guidelines is unclear. We evaluated diffusion of aromatase inhibitor dispensings for breast cancer treatment in integrated healthcare delivery systems across the United States.

METHODS

We collected automated data for 13,245 women enrolled at seven integrated healthcare delivery systems in the Cancer Research Network. All women were aged >55 and diagnosed with estrogen receptor positive, invasive breast cancer between 1996 and 2003. We used electronic pharmacy data to identify aromatase inhibitor and tamoxifen dispensings through 2004. We evaluated the proportions of women who received hormone dispensings in two ways: (1) at any point after diagnosis to capture all use, and (2) in the two-year period following diagnosis to approximate adjuvant use.

RESULTS

Over time, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use increased whereas tamoxifen use decreased. Aromatase inhibitor dispensings within 2 years of diagnosis increased from 4.1% among women diagnosed in 2000 to 13% in 2001, 24% in 2002, and 40% in 2003. Tamoxifen use declined starting in 2001 at every system.

CONCLUSION

Aromatase inhibitor use rose dramatically after 2001 while tamoxifen use decreased. It appears results from early clinical trials changed practice in these integrated healthcare systems before formal changes in national guidelines.

Aromatase Inhibitor Agents in Breast Cancer: Evolving Practices in Hormonal Therapy Treatment

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To review the role of aromatase inhibitor agents with regard to current treatment strategies with hormonal therapy for women with breast cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles and books.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Hormonal therapy is an essential component of the treatment of most women with breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitor agents are becoming an integral part of treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer and recently have become much more prominent in the treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer. The exact role of these agents in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer, either sequentially with the "gold standard" tamoxifen or for the duration of therapy, has yet to be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent studies with aromatase inhibitor agents are intriguing and suggest an improved side-effect profile and efficacy. The approval of these agents for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has led to a significant change in practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Breast cancer is an extremely common cancer in women, and oncology nurses take care of large numbers of patients with this disease. Oncology nurses need the most recent information so they can discuss aromatase inhibitor agents and therapy with their patients.

Endocrine Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To discuss long-term physical effects of treatment for breast cancer including effects on reproductive, bone, sexual health, and related women's issues.

DATA SOURCES

Research articles, abstracts, literature reviews.

CONCLUSION

Long-term effects of treatment have become increasingly prevalent in breast cancer survivors. The most common are effects on reproductive, bone, and sexual health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Long-term effects of treatment can have a significant negative impact on the long-term health and QOL of women with breast cancer. Oncology nurses are well-positioned to anticipate and address the reproductive and endocrine consequences of breast cancer treatment.

Guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: Past, present and future recommendations

Treatment guidelines are useful tools that enable physicians to integrate the latest clinical research into their practices. The large volume of rapidly evolving clinical data in breast cancer has been summarised and incorporated into treatment recommendations by well-known and reliable institutions, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology and the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel. Adjuvant therapy is a key component of breast cancer treatment, and many of the current consensus guidelines now recognise the important role of the aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to or in sequence after tamoxifen, hitherto the standard adjuvant treatment of choice for receptor-positive women. Data from ongoing trials such as the Breast International Group 1-98 trial and those still in the accrual phase will be forthcoming and will likely result in a further refinement of treatment recommendations over the course of the next few years. Despite the availability of such guidelines, however, there is evidence that adherence to and implementation of treatment recommendations is less than optimal. Further research is needed to determine more effective means of disseminating those clinical recommendations that can have a significant impact on treatment strategies and ultimately improve outcomes in breast cancer.

Uterine effects of tamoxifen: a prospective study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate tamoxifen-associated changes in the vagina and uterus in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Between June 1994 and December 1998, 45 patients enrolled in a prospective study before commencing tamoxifen therapy. Patients with endometrial thickness >5 mm or neoplasia were excluded. Transvaginal ultrasonography, vaginal maturation indexes (VMI), and endometrial biopsy were performed at baseline and repeated at 6 months (n= 42), 1 year (n= 39), 2 years (n= 32), 3 years (n= 26), 4 years (n= 19), and 5 years (n= 15). For the 39 patients followed for 1 year, VMI (% parabasal/intermediate/superficial) was 21/71/8 at baseline compared with 1/90/9 at 1 year (P value = 0.0008/0.001/0.78). At baseline, mean endometrial thickness and uterine volume were 2.6 mm and 64 cm(3), respectively, compared with 5.8 mm and 84 cm(3) at 1 year (P= 0.0002, 0.002). At baseline, 80% of patients had atrophic endometrium and 9% proliferative endometrium compared with 61% and 26% at 1 year, respectively (P= 0.04). No cases of endometrial hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma were detected. Findings observed at 6 months persisted through 5 years of follow-up. Tamoxifen exerts a weak estrogenic effect on the vagina and uterus in highly prescreened postmenopausal women without preexisting endometrial pathology.

[Role for aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in menopaused women: facts and questions in 2005]

After a dominant role for more than 30 years, tamoxifen has been progressively replaced by aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in the menopaused woman. We present here a recall of the mechanisms of action involved together with a review of clinical trials leading to the current situation. Giving trial results in detail, we discuss the current evidence as well as open questions. The populations concerned and trial methodologies are analyzed. Comparative tolerance is detailed. Several questions remain open, either due to the lack of evidence to be obtained from ongoing trials or sufficient follow-up. The evidence presented is commented in light of the American (ASCO) and European (Saint-Gallen) or French (Saint-Paul) guidelines.

Controversies in the therapy of early stage breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among U.S. women, with more than 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. In the U.S., mortality from breast cancer has declined in recent years as a result of more widespread screening, leading to earlier detection, as well as advances in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage disease. It is widely accepted that the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy improves the disease-free and overall survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer. It is, therefore, standard clinical practice to administer adjuvant systemic therapy to patients with node-positive and high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. There remain, however, many controversies in the primary systemic therapy of breast cancer, which are discussed in this review.

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

The treatment of early-stage breast cancer includes the use of chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents. Both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have been shown by large, randomized trials to offer a survival advantage. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents used in the United States are doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, 3 studies have suggested that there may be an advantage in the use of taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore the use of dose dense chemotherapy, incorporating AC and paclitaxel, has shown very promising results. It is well established that tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), improves overall survival (OS) in women with hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer. However, the results from large multicenter, randomized trials, suggest the potential superiority of aromatase inhibitors, compared to tamoxifen or an advantage of sequencing tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (AI). The role of ovarian suppression is still being investigated in patients who have received prior chemotherapy. Newer agents, such as the monoclonal antibody against the HER2/neu receptor, trastuzumab, are now being studied as adjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer. In the next few years, with the completion of several large randomized trials, we will be able to answer several questions, including the optimal way of incorporating AIs into adjuvant therapy, the long-term sequella of using trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and the role of ovarian suppression combined with an aromatse inhibitor in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Prognosis Determined by Gene Expression Profiling: A Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Study

Purpose

We sought to reproduce with quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) the results obtained with a 70-gene expression profile that has been described previously in breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Frozen breast cancer samples from patients who were operated on were used to isolate tumor RNA. Ninety-six patients with stage I to II disease were included. Median age was 57 years (range, 27 to 80 years). Forty-eight patients had lymph node–negative and 48 lymph node–positive disease. qRT-PCR amplifications were performed and the results were correlated with clinical data.

Results

After a minimum follow-up of 5 years, 25 patients had a relapse. The gene profile divided patients into two groups with poor and good prognosis. Significant differences with regard to grade of differentiation, size and hormone receptors were seen between the two groups. The gene profile was significantly associated with relapse-free survival and overall survival in the whole group of 96 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that only lymph node status and gene profile were significantly correlated to overall survival.

Conclusion

qRT-PCR reproduced the results obtained with microarrays for a prognostic gene profile in women with early-stage breast cancer.

Letrozole in the Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with History of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Who Have Completed 5 Years of Adjuvant Tamoxifen

PURPOSE

To present the basis of the decision of the Food and Drug Administration to grant accelerated approval for letrozole for extended adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women after completion of adjuvant tamoxifen.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The Food and Drug Administration reviewed the data from the MA17 trial, a single, multinational, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial, submitted by the applicant to support the proposed new indication.

RESULTS

MA17 consisted of a core study and Lipid and Bone Mineral Density safety substudies. It enrolled 5,187 patients. In the core study, median treatment duration was 24 months and median follow-up duration was 27.4 months. Using a conventional definition of disease-free survival, 122 events on letrozole and 193 events on placebo were observed (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.78; P = 0.00003). Distant disease-free survival also improved with letrozole, 55 versus 92 events (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.84; P = 0.003). No statistically significant improvement in overall survival was observed. Hot flushes, arthralgia/arthritis, myalgia, and new diagnosis of osteoporosis were more common on letrozole. Frequency of fractures and cardiovascular ischemic events was not significantly different. A statistically significant mean decrease in bone mineral density in the hip occurred at 24 months on letrozole.

CONCLUSIONS

Letrozole administration led to a statistically significant prolongation in disease-free survival. Fractures and cardiovascular events were similar to placebo; however, new diagnoses of osteoporosis were more frequent. Short duration of treatment and follow-up precluded assessment of long-term safety and efficacy. Thus, accelerated approval was granted instead of regular approval.

The role of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer in postmenopausal women

For endocrine therapy of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, are effective both as alternatives to tamoxifen in first-line treatment and following first-line tamoxifen failure. These three agents are currently being evaluated as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, again relative to the standard, tamoxifen. Three treatment strategies are under investigation: replacement of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 5 years (early adjuvant therapy); sequencing of tamoxifen before or after an aromatase inhibitor during the first 5 years (early sequential adjuvant therapy); or following 5 years of tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy). Results of the first early adjuvant trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination [ATAC]) demonstrated that anastrozole was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing the risk of disease recurrence. Two trials sequencing 2-3 years of an aromatase inhibitor after 2-3 years of tamoxifen have also reported results. A large trial (International Collaborative Cancer Group [ICCG] trial 96) found switching to exemestane to be significantly superior to continuing on tamoxifen in disease-free survival, and in a small study (Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex [ITA] trial), similarly sequencing anastrozole after tamoxifen significantly reduced the hazard of recurrence compared with remaining on tamoxifen. Extended adjuvant therapy with 5 years of letrozole versus placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen was evaluated in the MA.17 trial. Compared with placebo, letrozole resulted in a significant improvement in disease-free survival that was irrespective of whether patients had lymph node-positive or -negative tumours. Results of these four trials emphasise the important role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting, yet the optimal approach still needs to be defined. A number of trials further evaluating the three adjuvant treatment strategies are ongoing.

Role of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer

Primarily, the role of the aromatase inhibitors has been investigated in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, although it is also now being assessed in premenopausal patients following ovarian ablation/suppression. Aromatase inhibitors markedly suppress endogenous oestrogens without directly interacting with oestrogen receptors, and thus have a different mechanism of action to the antioestrogen, tamoxifen. The inhibitors may be divided into subgroups according to their structure (steroidal and nonsteroidal), and there appears to be a lack of cross-resistance between the classes of aromatase inhibitors enabling them to be used sequentially and potentially to prolong endocrine hormone therapy. In addition, with increased efficacy and favourable safety and tolerability profiles, the aromatase inhibitors are starting to challenge tamoxifen as first choice endocrine treatment in a number of settings. Potential differences in side-effect profiles may appear between the steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors when used in long-term settings. Thus, it has been suggested that the steroidal agents have favourable end organ effects; for example, the steroidal inhibitor, exemestane, has minimal negative effects on bone and lipid metabolism in animal and clinical studies. This paper provides an overview of the current and future roles of aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer treatment.

Safety considerations of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Because of its proven efficacy profile based on long-term data, tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer for the past 30 years. However, there is well-established evidence that long-term use of tamoxifen is associated with serious side effects. As adjuvant endocrine therapy is generally administered for long periods of time, the safety and tolerability of agents used in this setting are of particular importance. Due to their superior efficacy over tamoxifen, newer agents, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are already established therapies for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. In addition, recent trials indicate that the AI anastrozole ('Arimidex') has improved efficacy compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal women. The other third-generation AIs have reported disease-free survival benefits but not in the absence of prior treatment with tamoxifen; letrozole ('Femara') has been compared with placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen therapy and exemestane ('Aromasin') has been compared with tamoxifen following 2-3 years of prior treatment with tamoxifen. Long-term safety data show that anastrozole also has a more favorable overall safety profile compared with tamoxifen, particularly in terms of life-threatening events such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. Anastrozole alone, therefore, provides a new option for adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. The AIs have differing pharmacological profiles, which may translate into dissimilar adverse event profiles in the adjuvant treatment setting, but patient follow-up in most trials is relatively short to make a valid comparison. It cannot, therefore, be assumed that all AIs will be equally well tolerated in the adjuvant setting. Further data on the long-term safety of AIs other than anastrozole are therefore required to allow overall risk:benefit assessments on these agents to be made.

Long-term risk of breast cancer recurrence: the need for extended adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

All women with early breast cancer, even those with small tumors and negative nodes, remain at appreciable risk of recurrence after surgery over the subsequent 10-15 years. In women with tumors expressing estrogen receptors and/or progesterone receptors, standard systemic adjuvant therapy is 5 years of tamoxifen, which substantially reduces the risk of recurrence and breast cancer-related death. Tamoxifen efficacy benefits are limited to 5 years of treatment, presumably a consequence of acquired tamoxifen resistance. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, which are highly selective and potent in suppressing whole-body estrogen synthesis in postmenopausal women, are being investigated as alternative or complementary treatments to tamoxifen. For treatment beyond adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years, letrozole is the only aromatase inhibitor for which clinical trial data were reported. That trial, MA.17, evaluated letrozole as extended adjuvant treatment following standard adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with predominantly estrogen receptor--and/or progesterone receptor--positive early breast cancer.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, letrozole markedly reduced the residual risk of recurrence, by 42%, and the improvement in disease-free survival was irrespective of patient nodal status. A significant improvement in overall survival has already been seen in the patients at highest risk, those with positive nodes.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these results, extended adjuvant letrozole is recommended for all patients completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, including women generally considered at minimal risk.

How rapidly do oncologists respond to clinical trial data?

In the era of evidence-based medicine, convincing clinical trial data should influence clinical practice if disseminated in an appropriate manner. Here we discuss the influence of clinical trial results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial on the usage of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Data were derived from structured interviews with practicing medical oncologists over a period of 28 months. The overall use of hormonal therapy was high and increasing over the period studied. Significant increases in the use of anastrozole as adjuvant hormonal therapy were accompanied by significant decreases in the use of tamoxifen. This culminated in the use of anastrozole surpassing tamoxifen use by the end of the study period, accounting for over 50% of hormonal therapy use for postmenopausal early breast cancer. This study suggests that the dissemination of key clinical data, accompanied by professional commentary and regulatory actions, can rapidly influence the clinical practice of medical oncologists.

Bisphosphonate therapy in the oncology setting

Patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement are at chronic risk of skeletal complications, including bone pain, fractures, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Therapies targeting the primary malignancy are often unable to prevent skeletal complications, which often require orthopaedic surgery, radiation therapy and analgesics. Intravenous bisphosphonates can reduce the risk of skeletal complications and the requirement for palliative radiation therapy. Since its broad regulatory approval, zoledronic acid (ZOMETA, Novartis Pharma AG/Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation) 4 mg by 15-minute intravenous infusion has become widely used to treat bone metastases from all solid tumours and is becoming the standard of care for advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Additionally, cancer treatment-induced bone loss is an emerging problem in clinical oncology, and bisphosphonates -- particularly intravenous bisphosphonates -- may provide benefits even before bone lesions develop. Further investigations of bisphosphonates in these and other indications are ongoing.

Adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Emerging data from clinical trials on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Aromatase is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of androgens to estrogens and the only source of estrogens in postmenopausal women. Clinical trials using aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer are few but significant because of their comparative design with tamoxifen given for five years, long regarded as the gold standard for breast cancer treatment. Data from the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen and Combination trial, the MA-17 trial (letrozole compared with placebo), the Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex trial (anastrozole following tamoxifen), and the Intergroup Exemestane Study have shown promising efficacy and safety in the use of these agents. While the optimal aromatase inhibitor for use in the adjuvant setting has not been elucidated, current evidence-based recommendations include using (1) anastrozole as the first adjuvant therapy for five years, (2) tamoxifen for two to three years, then exemestane or anastrozole for the remainder of the five years, and (3) tamoxifen for five years, then letrozole for another five years.

CONCLUSION

While their impact on survival has not been determined, aromatase inhibitors are slowly changing the management of early-stage, hormone-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal women because of improved disease-free survival rates. Their ultimate role in therapy is unknown, but educating patients about the potential risks and benefits will allow them to make informed decisions regarding these data and their breast cancer care.

Are aromatase inhibitors superior to antiestrogens?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been in use to treat metastatic breast cancer for over 25 years. Recently potent and specific AIs have been introduced, which, because of their low toxicity profile, are being used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant situation and also for the prevention of breast cancer. The two non-steroidal AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal AI, exemestane, have all shown superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Interestingly, the oestrogen receptor downregulator, fulvestrant, was shown to be equivalent to anastrozole when compared as second-line therapy after the failure of tamoxifen. The first adjuvant AI trial began in 1996 and recruited over 9000 patients (ATAC trial). Anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen and a combination of the two drugs. There were no significant differences between tamoxifen and the combination. However, anastrozole showed about a 20% improvement in disease-free survival in ER+ disease compared with the other treatments. An overall survival analysis will be reported later this year. Two trials have compared 5 years of tamoxifen with 2-3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2-3 years of AI (one trial (ITA) used anastrozole and another (intergroup) exemestane). Both trials show a disease-free advantage for the switch to AI. In another study (MA17) 5 years of tamoxifen was followed by a randomisation to letrozole or placebo and showed a significant disease-free advantage to the AI. Both letrozole and anastrozole show superiority to tamoxifen when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. Anastrozole significantly reduced contralateral breast cancer compared with tamoxifen, and this has led to two prevention trials: one in women at risk comparing anastrozole with placebo and the other after excision of DCIS comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (IBIS II). The NCI Canada has also just initiated a trial of exemestane for prevention. Nearly all data available indicate that AIs are superior to tamoxifen. The important question is whether survival is improved when they are used as adjuvant therapy?

CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of tamoxifen therapy for the treatment of breast cancer varies widely among individuals. Plasma concentrations of the active tamoxifen metabolite endoxifen are associated with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype. We examined the effects of concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, which are CYP2D6 enzyme inhibitors commonly prescribed to treat hot flashes in women who take tamoxifen, and genotypes for genes that encode tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes on plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites.

METHODS

Eighty patients with newly diagnosed with breast cancer who were beginning tamoxifen therapy (20 mg/day orally), 24 of whom were taking CYP2D6 inhibitors, were genotyped for common alleles of the CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, and sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 genes. Plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites were measured after 1 and 4 months of tamoxifen therapy. Differences in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites between genotype groups were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Among all women, plasma endoxifen concentrations after 4 months of tamoxifen therapy were statistically significantly lower in subjects with a CYP2D6 homozygous variant genotype (20.0 nM, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.1 to 28.9 nM) or a heterozygous genotype (43.1 nM, 95% CI = 33.3 to 52.9 nM) than in those with a homozygous wild-type genotype (78.0 nM, 95%CI = 65.9 to 90.1 nM) (both P = .003). Among subjects who carried a homozygous wild-type genotype, the mean plasma endoxifen concentration for those who were using CYP2D6 inhibitors was 58% lower than that for those who were not (38.6 nM versus 91.4 nM, difference = -52.8 nM, 95% CI = -86.1 to -19.5 nM, P = .0025). The plasma endoxifen concentration was slightly reduced in women taking venlafaxine, a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6, whereas the plasma endoxifen concentration was reduced substantially in subjects who took paroxetine (a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6). Genetic variations of CYP2C9, CYP3A5, or SULT1A1 had no statistically significant associations with plasma concentrations of tamoxifen or its metabolites.

CONCLUSION

Interactions between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and coadministered antidepressants and other drugs that are CYP2D6 inhibitors may be associated with altered tamoxifen activity.

Endocrine Therapy Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors for Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Prevention Settings

The recent past has witnessed the appearance of substantial data relating to endocrine therapy of breast cancer. In the adjuvant therapy setting in early breast cancer, several large, well-conducted, randomized, double-blind clinical trials have provided evidence for the value of the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AI) anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole. The three major studies to date [i.e., Arimidex, tamoxifen alone, or in combination (ATAC), International Exemestane Study (IES), and letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen (MA.17)] evaluated three different populations of women from the standpoints of duration of prior tamoxifen and thus time since the treatment of the primary breast cancer. A consistent pattern of improvement in disease-free survival was seen whether the control arm was tamoxifen (ATAC and IES) or placebo following tamoxifen (MA.17). From a toxicity standpoint, the major findings with the AIs were a decreased incidence of thromboembolic events and endometrial cancers but an increase in musculoskeletal complaints and potential for decreasing bone density. The last issue should be clarified with ongoing studies addressing the impact of the three AIs on bone density and fractures. In summary, based on ATAC, IES, and MA.17, respectively, the following conclusions can be drawn relating to postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer: anastrozole is a reasonable choice for initial endocrine adjuvant therapy, exemestane should be considered for women who have received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, and letrozole should be considered for those who have completed about 5 years of tamoxifen.

In the prevention setting, tamoxifen has been evaluated in multiple trials involving &gt;28,000 women and, despite clear evidence of benefit, the level of acceptance of this agent by women seems to be low. Two recently developed prevention trials, IBIS 2 and MAP.3, involve the study of aromatase inhibitors against a placebo control rather than tamoxifen. Whereas the recent adjuvant trials have established the value of the third-generation aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer, the marked reductions in contralateral breast cancers seen in these trials suggest they will be of value in the prevention setting in women at increased risk of developing the disease.

Prevention of Hormone-Related Cancers: Breast Cancer

Carcinogenesis in the breast is a hormonally dependent process. Evidence implicating estrogen as a key breast carcinogen comes from various lines of investigation. Traditional epidemiologic studies demonstrate associations between estrogen exposure, both exogenous and endogenous, and increased breast cancer risk. Ongoing genetic epidemiologic studies also show associations between specific polymorphisms in estrogen-metabolizing genes and risk, albeit inconsistently. The application of these findings to the treatment and, more recently, the prevention of breast cancer has led to the development of agents that either (1) inhibit estrogen action at the estrogen receptor (selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs]); or (2) inhibit estrogen-synthesizing enzymes, thereby abrogating synthesis of this hormone (aromatase inhibitors). Large phase III trials have evaluated the ability of such agents to reduce the incidence of breast cancer in women at increased risk of the disease. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) P-1: Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) demonstrated the superiority of the SERM tamoxifen to placebo in reducing breast cancer risk, leading to the Food and Drug Administration approval of tamoxifen for risk reduction. The implementation of tamoxifen for this indication has not become widespread in clinical practice, however, for a variety of reasons that we discuss. Results from the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene, which compares the risk-reducing efficacy as well as toxicity of these two SERMs in a similar high-risk population, will be available in the near future. Based on promising data involving reduction of contralateral breast cancer risk in adjuvant studies, several aromatase inhibitors, including letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, are being incorporated into trials evaluating their efficacy as preventive agents in women at increased risk.

Aromatase inhibitors—extending the benefits of adjuvant therapy beyond tamoxifen

Adjuvant tamoxifen is still considered standard care for postmenopausal women with early stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, efficacy and safety of tamoxifen are limited by its partially estrogenic properties. Aromatase inhibitors have proven highly effective in advanced breast cancer and are currently being investigated in the adjuvant setting, either as an alternative to or in sequence with tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following tamoxifen. Results of several adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials have been published and strongly indicate that efficacy may be increased compared with tamoxifen alone. This review will examine the published data, discuss ongoing trials, and address the question of how to best integrate the aromatase inhibitors into adjuvant treatment.

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004

PURPOSE

To update the 2003 American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on results from multiple large randomized trials, adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should include an aromatase inhibitor in order to lower the risk of tumor recurrence. Neither the optimal timing nor duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy is established. Aromatase inhibitors are appropriate as initial treatment for women with contraindications to tamoxifen. For all other postmenopausal women, treatment options include 5 years of aromatase inhibitors treatment or sequential therapy consisting of tamoxifen (for either 2 to 3 years or 5 years) followed by aromatase inhibitors for 2 to 3, or 5 years. Patients intolerant of aromatase inhibitors should receive tamoxifen. There are no data on the use of tamoxifen after an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. Women with hormone receptor-negative tumors should not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. The role of other biomarkers such as progesterone receptor and HER2 status in selecting optimal endocrine therapy remains controversial. Aromatase inhibitors are contraindicated in premenopausal women; there are limited data concerning their role in women with treatment-related amenorrhea. The side effect profiles of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors differ. The late consequences of aromatase inhibitor therapy, including osteoporosis, are not well characterized.

CONCLUSION

The Panel believes that optimal adjuvant hormonal therapy for a postmenopausal woman with receptor-positive breast cancer includes an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy or after treatment with tamoxifen. Women with breast cancer and their physicians must weigh the risks and benefits of all therapeutic options.

The role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of breast carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center evidence-based approach

BACKGROUND

The authors examined the published evidence on the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive patients, and they provide recommendations for clinical management in 3 different situations: newly diagnosed women, women who have already received tamoxifen for 2-3 years, and women who have completed 5-years of tamoxifen and are disease free.

METHODS

All double-blind, randomized, prospective studies were reviewed. Data sources included the MEDLINE data base, reviews, editorials, and experts.

RESULTS

The Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), and the MA-17 trial confirmed the superiority of AIs over tamoxifen in women with early-stage breast carcinoma, improving disease-free survival (DFS) considerably. In the ATAC trial, the 4-year DFS rate was 86.9% on anastrozole and 84.5% on tamoxifen (P = 0.03); in the IES, the 3-year DFS rate was 91.5% on exemestane and 86.8% on tamoxifen (P = 0.00005); and, in MA-17, the 4-year estimated DFS rate was 93% on letrozole and 87% on placebo (P < or = 0.001). All studies were limited because of the immaturity of data, particularly concerning long-term safety. A negative impact on bone health was observed in all three trials. However short-term side effects were acceptable. In addition, the studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the frequency of new primary tumors in the contralateral breast.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data support anastrozole as first-line adjuvant hormonal therapy, or a change to AIs after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or the use of letrozole at the end of a 5-year course of tamoxifen as first-choice treatment options for the management of hormone receptor-positive breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women. Ongoing clinical trials should help to define the precise timing, duration, and sequencing of AI therapy, in addition to the long-term tolerability profile and potential differences between anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane.

Aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer therapy

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, are active and well tolerated in postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as either first- or second-line therapy. These agents are being investigated as neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced breast cancer and as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer. In a large neoadjuvant study, letrozole resulted in significantly more responses than tamoxifen, with significantly more patients becoming eligible for breast-conserving surgery. Greater letrozole responses were associated with high and low levels of estrogen receptor expression and with coexpression of ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2. Neoadjuvant anastrozole, in two studies, was also significantly superior to tamoxifen in rendering patients eligible for breast-conserving surgery. In the adjuvant setting, the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial compared 5 years of anastrozole versus tamoxifen versus the combination. At 47 months' median follow-up, disease-free survival was significantly improved with anastrozole compared with the other arms. In the Intergroup Exemestane Study, switching to exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen significantly improved disease-free survival compared with remaining on tamoxifen for 5 years. The MA.17 trial evaluated switching to letrozole versus placebo following 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, and letrozole was significantly superior to placebo in disease-free survival. While all three aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy were well tolerated, long-term effects on bone health and lipids are being monitored. Ongoing trials will better define the optimum use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy.

Implications of first-line adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in recurrent metastatic breast cancer

The role of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy has gone unchallenged until recently. With the introduction of the selective aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the paradigm for treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women is changing. New data from randomized clinical trials have shown the impact of the use of an AI compared with tamoxifen or in sequence with tamoxifen. This review will emphasize some of the highlights from these data sets and the limitations of our current knowledge. Finally, we will discuss the implications of the use of nonselective AIs in the adjuvant setting for the patient who develops recurrent metastatic disease.

Role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Estrogens play a pivotal role in the development of breast cancer. Endocrine therapy based on estrogen blockade is a well-established treatment in hormone-dependent breast cancer. Tamoxifen citrate has long been considered the "gold standard" due to its relative safety and efficacy. Aromatase inhibitors are anti-estrogen agents that target specifically the aromatase enzyme, which is the final step in the estrogen production. The first use of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer was associated with adverse effects such as rash, drowsiness, and adrenal-gland suppression. Newer third-generation agents are emerging as potential alternatives to tamoxifen, associating clinical efficacy with a more favorable safety profile.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to review the mechanisms of actions pharmacology, adverse effects, and clinical applications of the aromatase inhibitors available in the United States.

METHODS

The terms breast cancer or neoplasia, aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, third-generation, endocrine therapy, and antiestrogens were used to search MEDLINE for English-language studies published between 1966 and April 2004. A parallel search was performed at the corresponding Web site of each of the aromatase inhibitors available in the United States. Identified publications relevant to the article objectives were selected.

RESULTS

Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane are the 3 commercially available aromatase inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. They have been used in several clinical scenarios, including advanced and early disease and chemoprevention, and in the neoadjuvant setting. There is evidence that aromatase inhibitors are more effective and tolerable than tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer and in the neoadjuvant setting. Based on the results of a large, randomized trial, their use in early disease and in chemoprevention is also promising. Aromatase inhibitors appear safe; however, the long-term safety profile is still unknown, especially concerning bone metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors are a new treatment modality in estrogen and/or progesterone-receptor positive breast cancer. Although they are replacing the "classic" antiestrogen agents used in metastatic breast cancer, their benefit in early disease and as chemopreventive agents is not completely clear. Ongoing clinical studies should become available within the next few years and will provide additional recommendations for their use in patients with breast cancer.

Aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting: bringing the gold to a standard?

The death rate from breast cancer is falling rapidly in most developed countries due, at least in part, to the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with endocrine responsive disease. In post-menopausal women tamoxifen has been the gold standard for nearly 20 years. More recently the aromatase inhibitors (AI) have become established in the management of advanced breast cancer and are being evaluated in the adjuvant setting in trials that include tens of thousands of women. Recently, data have emerged that provide increasingly strong evidence supporting the use of AI in the adjuvant setting. Anastrozole as initial adjuvant endocrine treatment has shown superiority over tamoxifen in terms of disease free survival, and impressive reductions in the risk of recurrence have been demonstrated in trials evaluating the switch from tamoxifen to an AI, either letrozole after 5 or exemestane after 2-3 years of tamoxifen respectively. The data from these recent publications, and the potential impact on routine care of women with post-menopausal breast cancer is discussed.