Using the canine microbiome to bridge translation of cancer immunotherapy from pre-clinical murine models to human clinical trials

The microbiome has clearly been established as a cutting-edge field in tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Growing evidence supports the role of the microbiome in immune surveillance, self-tolerance, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade (1-6). Moreover, recent studies including those using fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) have demonstrated that response to checkpoint immunotherapies may be conferred or eliminated through gut microbiome modulation (7, 8). Consequently, studies evaluating microbiota-host immune and metabolic interactions remain an area of high impact research. While observations in murine models have highlighted the importance of the microbiome in response to therapy, we lack sufficient understanding of the exact mechanisms underlying these interactions. Furthermore, mouse and human gut microbiome composition may be too dissimilar for discovery of all relevant gut microbial biomarkers. Multiple cancers in dogs, including lymphoma, high grade gliomas, melanomas and osteosarcoma (OSA) closely resemble their human analogues, particularly in regard to metastasis, disease recurrence and response to treatment. Importantly, dogs with these spontaneous cancers also have intact immune systems, suggesting that microbiome analyses in these subjects may provide high yield information, especially in the setting of novel immunotherapy regimens which are currently expanding rapidly in canine comparative oncology (9, 10). Additionally, as onco-microbiotic therapies are developed to modify gut microbiomes for maximal responsiveness, large animal models with intact immune systems will be useful for trialing interventions and monitoring adverse events. Together, pre-clinical mechanistic studies and large animal trials can help fully unlock the potential of the microbiome as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in cancer.

Development of a fully canine anti-canine CTLA4 monoclonal antibody for comparative translational research in dogs with spontaneous tumors

The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ipilimumab has revolutionized the treatment of patients with different cancer histologies, including melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma. However, only a subset of patients shows dramatic clinical responses to treatment. Despite intense biomarker discovery efforts linked to clinical trials using CTLA4 checkpoint blockade, no single prognostic correlate has emerged as a valid predictor of outcome. Client-owned, immune competent, pet dogs develop spontaneous tumors that exhibit similar features to human cancers, including shared chromosome aberrations, molecular subtypes, immune signatures, tumor heterogeneity, metastatic behavior, and response to chemotherapy. As such, they represent a valuable parallel patient population in which to investigate novel predictive biomarkers and rational therapeutic ICI combinations. However, the lack of validated, non-immunogenic, canine ICIs for preclinical use hinders this comparative approach. To address this, fully canine single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) that bind canine CTLA4 were isolated from a comprehensive canine scFv phage display library. A lead candidate for clinical development was selected based on its subnanomolar binding affinity to canine CTLA4 and its ability to prevent CTLA4 binding to CD80/CD86 and promote T cell proliferation and effector function. In vivo mouse studies revealed pharmacokinetics similar to isotype control IgG with no evidence of short-term adverse effects. This work paves the way for in vivo analysis of the first fully canine, anti-canine CTLA4 antibody to promote anti-tumor immunity in dogs with immune-responsive cancers and provide an important comparative tool to investigate correlative biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to CTLA4 checkpoint inhibition.

Dendritic cell-based vaccination for renal cell carcinoma: challenges in clinical trials

After decades of research, dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines for renal cell carcinoma have progressed from preclinical rodent models and safety assessments to Phase I/II clinical trials. DC vaccines represent a promising therapy that has produced measurable immunological responses and prolonged survival rates. However, there is still much room to improve in terms of therapeutic efficacy. The key issues that affect the efficiency and reliability of DC therapy include the selection of patients who will respond best to treatment, the proper preparation and administration of DC vaccines, and a combination of DC vaccination with other immune-enhancing therapies (e.g., removal of Tregs, CTLA-4 blockade and lymphodepletion). Additional antiangiogenic agents will hopefully lead to greater survival benefits for patients in early disease stages. This review focuses on the different approaches of DC-based vaccination against renal cell carcinoma and potential strategies to enhance the efficacy of DC vaccination.

The expression, function, and clinical relevance of B7 family members in cancer

The modulation and suppression of anti-tumor immune responses is a characteristic feature of tumor cells to escape immune surveillance. Members of the B7 family are involved in this process, since the level of activation of the anti-tumor immune response depends on the balance between co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signals. Some molecules are often overexpressed in tumors, which has been associated with the pathogenesis and progression of malignancies as well as their immunological and non-immunological functions. The B7 homologs play a key role in the maintenance of self-tolerance and the regulation of both innate and adaptive immunity in tumor-bearing hosts. Furthermore, the blockade of negative signals mediated by the interaction of co-inhibitory ligands and counter-receptors of the B7 family is currently being studied as a potential immunotherapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer in humans.

Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy associated autoimmune hypophysitis: serious immune related adverse events across a spectrum of cancer subtypes

Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) therapies represent a novel approach to cancer treatment via disruption of immune tolerance to antigens located on tumor cells. Disruption of immune tolerance, however, may occur at a cost. A host of immune related adverse events (IRAEs) are associated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Autoimmune hypophysitis has been reported in up to 17% of patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma treated with this therapy. Familiarity with the spectrum of IRAEs connected to these therapies is paramount for endocrinologists, oncologists and those involved in the care of these subjects. We review here key aspects of diagnosis and treatment of anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy resultant IRAEs. We describe the first two cases of hypopituitarism in prostate cancer subjects undergoing experimental therapy with ipilimumab. The clinical evidence strongly suggests that the prostate cancer subjects developed autoimmune hypophysitis as a consequence of anti-CTLA-4 treatment. High dose glucocorticoid treatment resulted in markedly improved symptoms, and resolution of focal symptoms and diabetes insipidus. One subject recovered pituitary-thyroid axis function after 9 months; however, both continue to require GC replacement. These cases highlight the importance of early screening and treatment for hypopituitarism in all subjects undergoing treatment with anti-CTLA-4 therapy to prevent a potentially fatal outcome from secondary adrenal insufficiency, a readily treatable disease. We recommend mandatory long term follow-up to monitor the development of other hormonal deficits.

Cryoimmunotherapy in urologic oncology

Cryoablation is gaining acceptance as a primary treatment of localized as well as a salvage therapy of metastatic urologic malignancies. Anecdotal clinical reports suggest cryoablation can induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response; this phenomenon has been confirmed in animal models. To capitalize on this stimulatory effect of cryotherapy for control of advanced malignancies, it must be further intensified. This article reviews the existing evidence regarding cryoimmunology and discusses the mechanisms for generation of an anti-tumor immune response. Several immunotherapy approaches that can be combined with cryoablation to devise a cryoimmunotherapeutic strategy with potential to affect the progression of metastatic disease are described.

Vaccination strategies in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Although new treatment options for patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) have been developed within recent years, vaccination is still a promising emerging treatment option. An increasing number of tumor-associated antigens (TAA) available for RCC are currently used and analyzed for their efficacy for antigen-specific vaccine strategies. Recently, antigen-specific vaccination with dendritic cells in patients with metastatic RCC was shown to induce cytotoxic T cell response associated with objective clinical responses in some of the patients. Furthermore, current studies focus on the development of more effective vaccine regimes, such as the application of polyvalent, HLA-independent RNA coding for multiple TAA and adjuvants. First results demonstrate promising clinical and immunological efficacy. The efficacy of antigen-specific vaccination might be improved by a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, since sunitinib was shown to promote T cell induction following vaccination in a mouse model and elimination of regulatory T cells.

Novel therapeutics for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed dramatically during the past few years. Sunitinib malate, sorafenib tosylate, bevacizumab with interferon alpha, temsirolimus, and everolimus have improved clinical outcomes in randomized phase 3 trials by inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor and related pathways. Combinations and sequences of these agents are being evaluated. Other novel agents are in clinical development, some of which target novel pathways not yet exploited as therapy for RCC. Recently reported and ongoing clinical trials will help further define the role of these agents as therapy for metastatic RCC.

The mechanism of anti-CTLA-4 activity and the negative regulation of T-cell activation

The survival rate of patients diagnosed with late-stage melanoma is poor--only 5%-10%. Enlisting the immune system in the fight against cancers such as melanoma could help improve the prognosis of these patients. Data have shown that melanocyte proteins make good targets for immune system-based therapy in this disease. However, self-tolerance, which develops to inhibit autoimmune attack, makes this strategy difficult. Two proteins on the surface of T cells--CD28 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)--play important roles in the regulation of immune activation and tolerance. CD28 provides positive modulatory signals in the early stages of an immune response, while CTLA-4 signaling inhibits T-cell activation, particularly during strong T-cell responses. CTLA-4 blockade using anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody therapy has great appeal because suppression of inhibitory signals results in the generation of an antitumor T-cell response. Both clinical and preclinical data indicate that CTLA-4 blockade results in direct activation of CD4+ and CD8+ effector cells, and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody therapy has shown promise in a number of cancers, particularly melanoma. Interestingly, the occurrence of adverse events among patients treated with CTLA-4 blockade helps shed light on the mechanism of action of anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Most adverse events involve immune-related toxicity to the skin and gastrointestinal tract. Major gastrointestinal toxicity develops in up to 21% of treated patients, and while an objective response occurs in approximately 36% of melanoma patients who develop enterocolitis with treatment, an objective response is found in only 11% of patients who do not experience this adverse reaction.

Overcoming immunologic tolerance to melanoma: targeting CTLA-4 with ipilimumab (MDX-010)

Targeted biologic therapies such as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or vaccines, have shown great promise in late-stage melanoma, which has a very poor prognosis. Melanoma is relatively resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Blockade of CTLA-4, which inhibits T-cell proliferation, promotes stimulation of adaptive immunity and T-cell activation, resulting in eradication of tumor cells. Two human monoclonal antibodies are under investigation in melanoma. Phase II and III clinical trials are currently evaluating the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab (MDX-010, Medarex, Inc., Princeton, NJ, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) and tremelimumab (CP-675,206; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York) in melanoma. Data are available on ipilimumab, which has been explored as monotherapy and in combination with vaccines, other immunotherapies such as interleukin-2, and chemotherapies such as dacarbazine. Overall response rates range from 13% with ipilimumab plus vaccine in patients with stage IV disease to 17% and 22% with ipilimumab plus dacarbazine or interleukin-2, respectively, in patients with metastatic disease. Responses have been durable, and among those experiencing grade 3 or 4 autoimmune toxicities, even higher response rates have been seen--up to 36%. While the optimal dose of ipilimumab has yet to be established, studies also indicate that higher doses may be more effective. Importantly, the lack of an initial clinical response may not predict ultimate treatment failure, because the onset of a response may follow progressive disease or stable disease. Pending results from registration studies with ipilimumab and lessons learned from registration studies conducted with tremelimumab will help to define the role of anti-CTLA-4 blockade in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

CTLA-4: negative regulator of the immune response and a target for cancer therapy

A novel approach for cancer immunotherapy is to augment T-cell-mediated immunity by blocking inhibitory signals that suppress T-cell function. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is a key negative regulator of T-cell activation. CTLA-4 blockade using anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) potentiates the T-cell response against tumors, and preliminary data on these agents demonstrate good efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma and other cancers. This paper will review data from studies with anti-CTLA-4 mAbs to date, discuss some of the key clinical considerations emerging from early clinical trials with this therapeutic strategy, and provide an overview of ongoing and planned clinical trials for anti-CTLA-4 mAb therapy in metastatic melanoma and other cancers.

The B7 family and cancer therapy: costimulation and coinhibition

The activation and development of an adaptive immune response is initiated by the engagement of a T-cell antigen receptor by an antigenic peptide-MHC complex. The outcome of this engagement is determined by both positive and negative signals, costimulation and coinhibition, generated mainly by the interaction between the B7 family and their receptor CD28 family. The importance of costimulation and coinhibition of T cells in controlling immune responses is exploited by tumors as immune evasion pathways. Absence of the expression of costimulatory B7 molecules renders tumors invisible to the immune system, whereas enhanced expression of inhibitory B7 molecules protects them from effective T cell destruction. Therefore, the manipulation of these pathways is crucial for developing effective tumor immunotherapy. Translation of our basic knowledge of costimulation and coinhibition into early clinical trials has shown considerable promise.

Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer

For eligible patients, the value of immunotherapy for metastatic clear-cell renal cancer is its curative potential, as demonstrated by long-term follow-up after interleukin-2. Advances in cellular therapies, manipulation of activating and inhibitory receptors on T cells and modification of allotransplantation regimens have all produced new tumor regressions in patients who did not respond to conventional interleukin-2 regimens. It is clear that renal cancer remains one of the most immunoresponsive of human malignancies and that advances in immune modulation are again translating into clinical responses for patients with this disease. As the array of biologic therapies for renal cancer expands with the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunotherapy, the only modality that can cure widespread renal cancer, must not be overlooked.

Therapeutic Dendritic Cell Vaccination of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccination against cancer is a new specific immunotherapeutic approach given with either therapeutic or adjuvant intent. We provide a review of DC vaccination as a treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHOD

A total of 197 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with DC vaccination in 14 phase I/II clinical trials. Different vaccine preparations, administration routes, and treatment schedules have been tested in these trials. Clinical response and immune response were analysed.

RESULTS

Seventy-three (37%) patients had clinical response with 4 complete responses, 8 partial responses and 61 disease stabilisations, whereas 4 patients had mixed response, but most of these responses have not been transformed into durable clinical effects. Immune responses were observed in a subset of the treated patients but were not always associated with a clinical response. Only mild toxicity was observed in these trials.

CONCLUSION

DC vaccination therapy in patients with metastatic RCC is currently experimental but the results are encouraging with achievement of tumour regression and induction of antigen-specific immune response combined with minimal toxicity in a subset of the treated patients. Future emphasis should be placed on therapy in the adjuvant setting because patients with minimal residual disease are more likely to benefit from the treatment. Combination approaches with DC vaccination and immune-enhancing therapies or antiangiogenic therapy should be further investigated to develop new and more efficient treatment strategies for patients with RCC.

Principles and use of anti-CTLA4 antibody in human cancer immunotherapy

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 has become recognized as one of the key negative regulators of adaptive immune responses, having a central role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance and in shaping the repertoire of emergent T cell responses. Concurrent recognition of the potential importance of inhibitory immune regulators in limiting antitumor responses, either as a result of chronic antigenic stimulation or the self-nature of many tumor-selective target antigens, has led to the development of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4-blocking antibodies as therapeutic anticancer agents. Following extensive preclinical modeling, these agents have entered clinical trials, where they are showing encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced-stage disease, particularly with melanoma or renal carcinoma. Finding ways to dissociate antitumor activity from adverse immune events should enable actualization of their therapeutic potential in the coming years.