Chemotherapeutic and targeted biological agents for metastatic bladder cancer: a comprehensive review

The American Cancer Society estimates that 73 510 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and 15 000 deaths will result this year. The paper summarizes the clinical evidence for the use of platinum-based, non-platinum-based and new targeted biological agents, while reporting the future directions in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. For cisplatin-base regimens, the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC) has been the mainstream treatment for both advanced and metastatic bladder cancers. It showed significant improvement in the complete response rate and overall survival time in comparison with single-agent cisplatin. For cisplatin-ineligible patients, namely patients with renal impairment, symptomatic cardiac disease and poor performance status, alternative therapies consisting of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin were shown to be of benefit. Pemetrexed and vinflunine have also shown effectiveness, with small but demonstrable overall survival benefits. Gemcitabine-based doublet therapies (combined with paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, oxaliplatin or epirubicin) have all been shown to be effective and well-tolerated. Several new targeted therapies, such as gefetinib, sorafenib and lapatinib, have received attention in recent years; however, their effectiveness as single agents in a relapse setting have not been optimal and more studies are warranted.

Bladder carcinoma: understanding advanced and metastatic disease with potential molecular therapeutic targets

This article is an expert review of bladder cancer genetics focusing on genetic changes and their significance in the pathogenesis and progression of bladder transitional cell carcinoma, in particular, muscle-invasive disease. Alongside the relevant genetic markers and their products, new therapeutic targets and agents that are being developed are presented.

Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract

PURPOSE

Vinflunine (VFL) is a new microtubule inhibitor that has activity against transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract (TCCU). We conducted a randomized phase III study of VFL and best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in the treatment of patients with advanced TCCU who had experienced progression after a first-line platinum-containing regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed to compare overall survival (OS) between patients receiving VFL + BSC (performance status [PS] = 0: 320 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks; PS = 0 with previous pelvic radiation and PS = 1: 280 mg/m(2) subsequently escalated to 320 mg/m(2)) or BSC.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned (VFL + BSC, n =253; BSC, n = 117). Both arms were well balanced except there were more patients with PS more than 1 (10% difference) in the BSC arm. Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities for VFL + BSC were neutropenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (6%), anemia (19%), fatigue (19%), and constipation (16%). In the intent-to-treat population, the objective of a median 2-month survival advantage (6.9 months for VFL + BSC v 4.6 months for BSC) was achieved (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.12) but was not statistically significant (P = .287). Multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for prognostic factors showed statistically significant effect of VFL on OS (P = .036), reducing the death risk by 23% (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.98). In the eligible population (n = 357), the median OS was significantly longer for VFL + BSC than BSC (6.9 v 4.3 months, respectively), with the difference being statistically significant (P = .040). Overall response rate, disease control, and progression-free survival were all statistically significant favoring VFL + BSC (P = .006, P = .002, and P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

VFL demonstrates a survival advantage in second-line treatment for advanced TCCU. Consistency of results exists with significant and meaningful benefit over all efficacy parameters. Safety profile is acceptable, and therefore, VFL seems to be a reasonable option for TCCU progressing after first-line platinum-based therapy.

New developments in first- and second-line chemotherapy for transitional cell, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the systemic treatment, patient selection and treatment outcome of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, focusing on advances and findings within the last year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for transitional cell carcinoma. In recent updates of randomized trials, patients with favorable prognostic factors were shown to have a chance of long-term disease-free survival even after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patient selection for cisplatin, newer drugs or alternative combinations is crucial. New genetic markers like excision repair cross-complementing 1 expression were developed and tested for this purpose. Adequate evaluation of renal function plays an important role for treatment selection, especially in the elderly population. Newer chemotherapeutics like oxaliplatin, vinflunine and pemetrexed have been studied in the first- or second-line settings. Their efficacy is promising, but there is still a need for further testing. Only few data are available on the systemic treatment of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Complete resection seems to be more important than chemotherapy in the rare cases of adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract.

SUMMARY

In locally advanced and metastatic disease patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors and predictive factors for response to treatment will guide treatment decisions in the future.

Gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for cisplatin-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

Few treatment options are available for cisplatin-refractory urothelial carcinoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new regimen composed of gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line salvage chemotherapy for the disease. The gemcitabine and ifosfamide regimen consists of gemcitabine 800 mg/m/day intravenously for 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15; ifosfamide 1500 mg/m/day intravenously for 24 h on days 8-10; and mesna 800 mg intravenously bolus before ifosfamide and 1500 mg/m/day intravenously for 24 h on days 8-11. Cycles are repeated every 28 days. Between 1998 and 2005, 23 patients (median age 66) unresponsive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n=10) or who had tumor progression within 6 months of a previous response to cisplatin-based therapy (n=13) were enrolled. The median interval between the two chemotherapy regimens was 1.8 months (range 0.9-5.6). In total, 82 treatment cycles (median 3, range 1-8) were given. The overall response rate was 22% (95% confidence interval 5-39) with one complete response and four partial responses. Twenty-one patients succumbed to the disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 and 4.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 and eight patients, respectively. One, two and two patients complicated with grade 3 vomiting, diarrhea and stomatitis were present, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was seen in these patients. The gemcitabine and ifosfamide regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile, but shows insufficient clinical activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory urothelial carcinoma to warrant further testing.

Systemic chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer: update and controversies

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and outcomes, 5-year survival rates for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer remain suboptimal. Almost 50% of patients will eventually progress and develop systemic disease. Although various single agents have shown activity in patients with advanced or metastatic disease, randomized trials have demonstrated the utility of cisplatin-based combinations regimens. Despite relatively high objective response rates, the impact on survival in patients with advanced disease has been quite limited. Surgical resection in selected patients achieving significant objective response to cytotoxic therapy can contribute to long-term survival rates. The role of salvage therapy in advanced disease remains undefined. Evaluation of several active compounds has yielded unimpressive results with low objective response rates and overlapping CIs. Recognition that the maximum benefit from conventional cytotoxics has been achieved has led to the recent initiation of a number of clinical trials evaluating targeted agents in the management of advanced urothelial cancer.