Phase I/II study of preoperative oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 89901

Additional Chemotherapy with 5-FU plus Leucovorin between Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Improved Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose: The aim of the preliminary study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-week chemotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2) during the resting periods between preoperative CRT and surgery in patients with LARC. Materials and Methods: Standard preoperative CRT was delivered to the entire pelvis at a total dose of 5040 Gy of radiation with concurrent 5-FU or capecitabine for 6 weeks. Twenty-three patients received additional preoperative chemotherapy with two cycles of 5-FU and LV (LV 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hrs, every 2 weeks) after preoperative CRT. Surgery was performed at 2-4 weeks following the completion of preoperative chemotherapy. Results: Between May 2013 and January 2015, 23 patients underwent preoperative CRT, with additional chemotherapy and surgery, and 23 patients completed the scheduled treatment. The median follow-up duration was 42.0 months. The tumor down-staging rate was observed in 65.2%, and pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 5 patients (21.7%). T and N down-staging were observed in 16 (69.6%) and 14 (60.9%) patients, respectively. The four-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 73.9% and the four-year overall survival (OS) rate was 90.9% in patients who received additional chemotherapy. The four-year DFS rate was 100% in the tumor down-staging group vs. 25.0% in the non-down staging group treated with additional chemotherapy (P <0.001). There was also a significant difference of the four-year OS rate 100% in the tumor down-staging group compared with 71.4% in the non-down staging group (P = 0.031). Conclusions: This preliminary study showed that additional preoperative chemotherapy with LV5FU2 was well tolerable and had an improvement in the downstaging rate and survival. Randomized controlled trial of this strategy is encouraged for definitive conclusions.

Comparison between Intensified Neoadjuvant Treatment and Standard Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer

Objectives

The aim of the current study was to compare a neoadjuvant regimen containing oxaliplatin with standard preoperative treatment for rectal cancer.

Methods

From December 2006 to December 2007, 20 patients with rectal cancer were treated at our Institution with the weekly addition of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2) to radiotherapy (50.4–54.0 Gy in 28–30 daily fractions) and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2). The results of the regimen were compared with a historical control group including 21 consecutive patients previously treated with standard 5-fluorouracil treatment from December 2004 to October 2006.

Results

Both the rate of sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer (91.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.009) and the rate of downstaging (84.2% vs 47.6%, P = 0.023) were higher in the oxaliplatin group than in the control group. Pathological complete response was achieved in 8 patients (42.1%) in the oxaliplatin group and in 4 patients (19.0%) in the control group (P = 0.172). When ypT0-pT1 stages were analyzed together, the P value was 0.051. Acute toxicity was increased in the oxaliplatin group, with a higher incidence of G3 diarrhea and pelvic pain than in the control group (30.0% vs 14.3%, P = NS).

Conclusions

Our data seem to correlate the addition of oxaliplatin to the standard treatment for rectal cancer with higher rates of sphincter preservation, down-staging and complete response. Toxicity is increased and requires careful monitoring. However, our results refer to a retrospective comparison of a small series of patients and need to be validated by the large, phase III randomized trial currently ongoing.

The potential usefulness of the Response Index in positron emission tomography assessing the therapeutic effect of pre-operative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pre-operative chemotherapy is an option for patients with local advanced rectal cancer, but the response rate to pre-operative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is still low. If the therapeutic effect of pre-operative chemotherapy could be assessed, we may be able to convert to surgery early. The purpose of the present study was to validate the correlation between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) of the primary tumor and the therapeutic effect of pre-operative chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study from January 2011 to October 2015. We examined 28 patients with pathologically confirmed sigmoid or rectal cancer that underwent pre-operative chemotherapy and surgery. The correlation between Response Index (RI), calculated as (SUV_max after chemotherapy)/(SUV_max before chemotherapy), and the therapeutic effect on the primary tumor in advanced colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

The degree of differentiation (p = 0.04), SUV_max in the primary tumor after chemotherapy (p = 0.02), and RI (p = 0.008) were significant predictors of the therapeutic effect in univariate analysis. The areas under the ROC curve constructed with RI and therapeutic effect was 0.77. The optimal cut-off values for the RI in the responder group was < 0.32.

CONCLUSION

RI calculated as (SUV_max after chemotherapy)/(SUV_max before chemotherapy) in the primary tumor significantly correlated with the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy on advanced colorectal cancer. Thus, RI is potentially useful for predicting the therapeutic effect in advanced colorectal cancer.

Treatment outcomes regarding the addition of targeted agents in the therapeutic portfolio for stage II-III rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Background

To evaluate the impact of targeted agents in stage II-III rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT).

Method

A retrospective study was performed in 124 consecutive patients with clinically T₃N_0-2M₀-staged rectal cancer incorporating targeted agents in CCRT.

Results

Pathologic complete response was detected in 34.2% (n=26) of bevacizumab+FOLFOX-treated patients (n=76), which was significantly higher (p=0.019, post-hoc statistical power =35.87%) than that (n=10, 20.8%) of the cetuximab+FOLFOX-treated patients (n=48). Patients receiving cetuximab+FOLFOX therapy tended to develop severe liver toxicity (91.7%, n=44 versus 17.1%, n=13, p<0.0001), as evaluated by morphologic grading of hepatic steatosis and sinusoidal dilatation in laparoscopy. In the 57 patients with morphologically severe liver toxicity, 36 (63.2%) retained a normal liver function; for the remaining 21 patients with an abnormal liver function, the abnormality was self-limited in 19 patients, whereas 2 cetuximab–treated patients progressed to hepatic failure and mortality. A subset analysis within bevacizumab+FOLFOX-treated patients with either wild-type (n=36) or mutant (n=40) K-ras status indicated K-ras status did not significantly influence the treatment outcomes.

Conclusions

The addition of bevacizumab instead of cetuximab to FOLFOX in the neoadjuvant settings for T₃N_0-2M₀-staged rectal cancer could induce a promising rate of pathologic complete response and lesser hepatotoxicity.

Evaluating the addition of oxaliplatin to single agent fluoropyrimidine in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Multimodality treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has significantly improved local disease control, however the unaltered overall survival (OS) implicates an inability to further control micrometastases, providing rationale for intensified systemic treatment. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (intervention) compared with fluoropyrimidine alone (control) in the treatment of LARC.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Medline Ovid, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Randomised trials comparing the intervention and control delivered either pre- or post-operatively were included.

RESULTS

Seven trials involving 4444 patients were identified; five studies evaluated the intervention vs control preoperatively; one study peri-operatively; and one, post-operatively. There was no significant difference in OS with oxaliplatin addition, HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.06. There was however an improvement in disease free survival, 3-year local and distant recurrence rates (RR) favouring oxaliplatin. Preoperative oxaliplatin improved pathological complete response (pCR), but with a greater toxicity and reduced compliance with radiation.

CONCLUSION

There is no OS benefit with oxaliplatin, despite improved pCR, local and distant RR. Before drawing definitive conclusions, longer follow-up in included trials and availability of published data from other eligible studies, including the induction setting, are needed.

CRLX101, a Nanoparticle-Drug Conjugate Containing Camptothecin, Improves Rectal Cancer Chemoradiotherapy by Inhibiting DNA Repair and HIF1α

Novel agents are needed to improve chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. In this study, we assessed the ability of CRLX101, an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate containing the payload camptothecin (CPT), to improve therapeutic responses as compared with standard chemotherapy. CRLX101 was evaluated as a radiosensitizer in colorectal cancer cell lines and murine xenograft models. CRLX101 was as potent as CPT in vitro in its ability to radiosensitize cancer cells. Evaluations in vivo demonstrated that the addition of CRLX101 to standard chemoradiotherapy significantly increased therapeutic efficacy by inhibiting DNA repair and HIF1α pathway activation in tumor cells. Notably, CRLX101 was more effective than oxaliplatin at enhancing the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy, with CRLX101 and 5-fluorouracil producing the highest therapeutic efficacy. Gastrointestinal toxicity was also significantly lower for CRLX101 compared with CPT when combined with radiotherapy. Our results offer a preclinical proof of concept for CRLX101 as a modality to improve the outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer treatment, in support of ongoing clinical evaluation of this agent (LCC1315 NCT02010567). Cancer Res; 77(1); 112-22. ©2016 AACR.

Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer represents 10% of all cancers and is the third most common cause of death in women and men. Almost two-thirds of all bowel cancers are cancers of the colon and over one-third (34%) are cancers of the rectum, including the anus. Surgery is the cornerstone for curative treatment of rectal cancer. Mesorectal excision decreases the rate of local recurrences; however, it does not improve the overall survival of people with locally advanced rectal cancer. There have been significant research efforts since the mid-1990s to optimise the treatment of rectal cancer. Based on the findings of clinical trials, people with T3/T4 or N+ rectal tumours are now being treated preoperatively with radiation and chemotherapy, mainly fluoropyrimidine. However, the incidence of distant metastases remains as high as 30%. Combination chemotherapy regimens, similar to those used in metastatic disease with the addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, have been tested to improve the prognosis of people with rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes (including overall survival, disease-free survival and toxicity) between two 5-fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy regimens in people with stage II and III rectal cancer who are receiving preoperative chemoradiation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Specialised Register (January 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2015, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to January 2015), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to January 2015) and LILACS (1982 to January 2015). We reviewed the reference lists of included studies, checked clinical trials registers and handsearched relevant journal proceedings. We applied no language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-agent chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine) versus combination chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine plus another agent including, but not limited to, oxaliplatin) during preoperative radiochemotherapy in people with resectable rectal cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (HMR, EMKS) independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. When necessary, we requested additional information and clarification of published data from the authors of individual trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs involving 3875 people with resectable rectal cancer. In the preoperative period, the participants of these studies were randomised to receive chemoradiation either with a single fluoropyrimidine agent (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) or with a combination of drugs (fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin). The only study that reported overall survival and disease-free survival found no significant differences between the intervention and control groups; we considered this evidence very low quality. For pathological complete response after preoperative treatment (ypCR) there was high quality evidence favouring the intervention group (odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.46), but there was also moderate quality evidence suggesting a higher risk for early toxicity in the intervention group (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.27). Moderate to high quality evidence suggested that the control group had better compliance to radiotherapy (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.75). There were no significant differences between groups in postoperative mortality within 60 days, postoperative morbidity, resection margins, abdominoperineal resection and Hartmann procedures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was very low quality evidence that people with resectable rectal cancer who receive combination preoperative chemotherapy have no improvements in overall survival or disease-free survival. There was high quality evidence that suggested that combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin may improve local tumour control in people with resectable rectal cancer, but this regimen also caused more toxicity. The review included four RCTs but only one reported survival; therefore, we cannot make robust conclusions or useful clinical recommendations. The publication of more survival data from these studies will contribute to future analyses.

Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Multimodality therapy, including preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), has effectively reduced local recurrence rates of rectal cancer over the past decade. However, the benefits and risks of the addition of neoadjuvant CRT to surgery need to be evaluated. This study was to compare the efficacy of TME with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) involving XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin plus capecitabine) in Chinese patients with stages II and III mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients to the TME group (TME without preoperative CCRT) or CCRT + TME group (TME with preoperative CCRT). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local and distant recurrence, tumor response to CRT, toxicity, sphincter preservation, and surgical complications. An interim analysis of the potential inferiority of DFS in the CCRT + TME group was planned when the first 180 patients had been followed up for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients in the TME group and 90 patients in the CCRT + TME group were able to be evaluated. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 86.3 % and 91.5 % in the whole cohort, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 85.7% and 87.9 % (P = 0.766), respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 90.7 % and 92.3 % (P = 0.855), respectively. The functional sphincter preservation rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 71.3 % and 70.0 % (P = 0.849), respectively. In the TME group, 16 (17.0 %) patients were proven to have pTNM stage I disease after surgery. In the CCRT + TME group, 32 (35.6 %) patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results indicated no significant differences in the DFS, OS, or functional sphincter preservation rates between the TME and CCRT + TME groups. However, preoperative CCRT with XELOX yielded a high pCR rate. Newer techniques are needed to improve the staging accuracy, and further investigation is warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chi CTR-TRC-08000122.

Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Radical Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective pilot study was to determine the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with six cycles of FOLFOX 6 (without radiation therapy) followed by radical surgery followed by six additional cycles of FOLFOX 6 for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to January 2014, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in this study. Patients received FOLFOX 6 chemotherapy comprising oxaliplatin and leucovorin calcium i.v. over 2 hours on day 1, then bolus, and then continuous fluorouracil i.v. over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 14 days for 6 courses followed by radical surgery followed by additional 6 cycles of FOLFOX 6.

RESULTS

In total, 45 patients were enrolled in this study. In the preoperative re-evaluation, the overall response rate was 68.8% (clinical complete response was 4.4%, and the partial response was 64.4%). There were 14 cases (31.2%) of stable disease. No patients had progressive disease. Postoperatively, the pathologic complete response rate was 8 of 45 (17.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9%-28.9%). The median follow-up was 29 months (range 9-54 months). The actuarial 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates for all patients were 80.8% (standard error, 1.877; 95% CI: 69.3%-92.3%) and 67.9% (standard error, 2.319; 95% CI: 54.3%-81.5%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) without radiotherapy is active and safe but cannot be considered a standard of care until the results of prospective randomized phase III trials are available.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy of rectal cancer represents the current standard of care. However, its use is also associated with short-term toxicity and long-term morbidity. With the increasing use of total mesorectal resection resulting in better local control and advances in systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, this study highlights the question of whether radiation is a necessary component of neoadjuvant therapy for all patients with rectal cancer or whether select patients could be spared the additional toxicities and inconvenience of radiotherapy. This study suggests that neoadjuvant FOLFOX without radiotherapy is active and safe, but it could not be considered a standard of care till now.

Prospective phase II trial of nimotuzumab in combination with radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding concurrent nimotuzumab to preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with rectal cancer (clinical stage T3/4 or N+) were scheduled to receive weekly nimotuzumab (400 mg; days -6, 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2)) was delivered orally twice daily for the duration of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered at 50.4 Gy (45 + 5.4 Gy). The main endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with T3 or T4 disease were enrolled; 66.7 % were nodal-positive; the median distance from the anal verge was 5.5 cm. A pCR was achieved in four patients (19.0 %); 71.4 % patients obtained moderate or good tumor regression (Grade 2 and 3). Downstaging occurred in 15/21 (71.4 %) patients by T stage and 11/14 (78.6 %) by N stage. The actual dose intensities (median/mean, %) were nimotuzumab (100, 100) and capecitabine (100, 99.5). The most frequent Grade 1/2 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (57.1 %), nausea/vomiting (52.4 %), leukocytopenia (47.6 %), diarrhea (47.6 %), and proctitis (38.1 %). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 9.5 % of patients and Grade 3 leukocytopenia in 4.8 %.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results indicate that nimotuzumab can be safely combined with radiotherapy plus concurrent capecitabine. The efficacy of this regimen (pCR = 19.0 %) was significantly higher than that observed in previous phase II trials of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and cetuximab in rectal cancer. Further investigation of concurrent nimotuzumab with radiotherapy plus capecitabine is warranted.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Efficacy endpoints of radiation therapy group protocol 0247: a randomized, phase 2 study of neoadjuvant radiation therapy plus concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan or capecitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To report secondary efficacy endpoints of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 0247, primary endpoint analysis of which demonstrated that preoperative radiation therapy (RT) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin achieved a pathologic complete remission prespecified threshold (21%) to merit further study, whereas RT with capecitabine plus irinotecan did not (10%).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A randomized, phase 2 trial evaluated preoperative RT (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) with 2 concurrent chemotherapy regimens: (1) capecitabine (1200 mg/m(2)/d Monday-Friday) plus irinotecan (50 mg/m(2)/wk × 4); and (2) capecitabine (1650 mg/m(2)/d Monday-Friday) plus oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2)/wk × 5) for clinical T3 or T4 rectal cancer. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after chemoradiation, then 4 to 6 weeks later, adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2); leucovorin 400 mg/m(2); 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2); 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks × 9. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated univariately by the Kaplan-Meier method. Local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure (DF), and second primary failure (SP) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. No statistical comparisons were made between arms because each was evaluated individually.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients (median age, 57 years) were treated; characteristics were similar for both arms. Median follow-up for RT with capecitabine/irinotecan arm was 3.77 years and for RT with capecitabine/oxaliplatin arm was 3.97 years. Four-year DFS, OS, LRF, DF, and SP estimates for capecitabine/irinotecan arm were 68%, 85%, 16%, 24%, and 2%, respectively. The 4-year DFS, OS, LRF, DF, and SP failure estimates for capecitabine/oxaliplatin arm were 62%, 75%, 18%, 30%, and 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy results for both arms are similar to other reported studies but suggest that pathologic complete remission is an unsuitable surrogate for traditional survival metrics of clinical outcome. Although it remains uncertain whether the addition of a second cytotoxic agent enhances the effectiveness of fluorouracil plus RT, these results suggest that further study of irinotecan may be warranted.

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and bevacizumab in combination with radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

A phase I clinical study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the standard treatment of 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with bevacizumab, in combination with radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Eligible patients had previously untreated stage T3 or T4 locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients received radiotherapy to the pelvis, at a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. During radiotherapy, patients received three courses of a simplified LV and 5-FU regimen (sLV5FU2), in combination with bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was infused at a fixed dose of 5 mg/kg on Days 1, 15 and 29. The sLV5FU2 regimen consisted of 200 mg/m² of LV administered by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 2 h, followed by 400 mg/m² of 5-FU administered by i.v. bolus injection, delivered at an initial loading dose of 2,000 mg/m² over 46 h. The dose was gradually increased to determine the MTD and RD of this regimen. Of the patients enrolled in the study, two developed Grade 3 diarrhea and one developed Grade 3 neutropenia. Since dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in two out of the six patients, 5-FU at a dose of 2,000 mg/m² over 46 h was determined as the MTD and designated as the RD, taking into consideration the toxicities in matched patients who received standard preoperative chemoradiotherapy with sLV5FU2 during the same period. The combination of 5-FU, LV, bevacizumab and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was found to be tolerable, with encouraging response rates. Further investigation is required in a phase II setting.

Mortality risk after preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in lymph node-positive rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Persistent lymph node-positive disease after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with adverse outcomes. We quantified mortality risks of persistent pathologic lymph nodes in lymph node-positive rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based analysis of 2,038 patients with stage III rectal cancer diagnosed 1994-2005 with follow-up through 2007 using data from the California Cancer Registry. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate cancer-specific and overall mortality analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard ratios with adjustment for age, gender, race/ethnicity, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, socioeconomic status, and time period (1994-1997, 1998-2001, and 2002-2005).

RESULTS

Overall survival was higher among lymph node-positive patients receiving postoperative chemoradiation compared to lymph node-positive patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation (median overall survival = 87 versus 62 months, P = 0.0002). In adjusted analyses, patients with persistent lymph node-positive disease after preoperative chemoradiation treatment had increased overall (HR = 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.42-2.01) and CRC-specific (HR = 1.78; 95 % CI, 1.44-2.19) mortality risk compared to lymph node-positive disease after postoperative chemoradiation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage III rectal cancer patients with persistent pathologic lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiation represent a high-risk group, with higher mortality than those treated with postoperative chemoradiation.

Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in a decision analysis and outcome prediction model

PURPOSE

Reduction of local recurrences has been achieved by radiotherapy, but also by improved surgical technique (total mesorectal excision). Radiotherapy has adverse effects and cannot exceed local dose limits. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy may result in overtreatment. We aimed to define the minimum local benefit that would have to be postulated for radiotherapy in order to bring a benefit to the overall cohort. We hypothesized that saving radiotherapy as treatment for a subset of patients with high-risk tumors and local recurrences improves the outcome of the overall cohort. We sought to simulate preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in theoretical decision analysis model based on published recurrence rates, with overall survival being the primary end point.

METHODS

Computerized literature search for studies published between 1996 and 2011, supplemented by manual review of the retrieved reference lists.

RESULTS

Postoperative radiotherapy evolved as preferred strategy with cure rates of 65.6 % vs. 63.7 % for postoperative and neoadjuvant radiotherapy, respectively, and a decrease of radiation exposure to 42.9 % of the cohort. The system was sensitive to (1) the fraction of stage I cancers included in the cohort, (2) the difference between local recurrence rates (LRR) for neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, or surgery-only approach, and (3) the compliance with the postoperative radiotherapy. If the surgery-only recurrence was set to the published 10 %, 13 %, and 27 %, respectively, adjuvant radiotherapy had to achieve LRR below the threshold values of 6.3 %, 8.5 %, and 18.3 % to reverse the impact of compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy only improves cancer-specific survival of the cohort if there is a large difference in LRR with versus without it. Routine treatment may therefore be inferior to a tailored radiotherapy regimen.

Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

A phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was conducted. The total radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 and S-1 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-14 and 22-35. The tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) before and after CRT. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. The primary end-point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The pCR rate was 22.9% (8/35; 95% CI, 10.9-42.1), and 10 (28.6%) patients showed near-total tumor regression. There was no grade 4 adverse event, and grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia (5.4%), diarrhea (5.4%), anorexia (2.7%) and nausea (2.7%). The tumor ADC was calculated in 38 patients (including those who participated in the phase I study). The post-CRT ADC (P = 0.037) and the percentage change in ADC (P = 0.026) were significantly correlated with pathological response. In conclusion, preoperative CRT with S-1 plus oxaliplatin showed promising results in pathological responses and favorable toxicity profiles.

High-dose radiotherapy (60 Gy) with oral UFT/folinic acid and escalating doses of oxaliplatin in patients with non-resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): a phase I trial

BACKGROUND

Consensus is that patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) should receive long-term chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before surgery. With the intent to offer the patients intensified concomitant chemotherapy (CT) to improve outcome and to assess tolerability and toxicity of oxaliplatin (Ox) a phase I trial of high dose pelvic radiotherapy (RT), fixed dose of oral UFT/l-leucovorin and increasing doses of weekly Ox were performed.

METHODS

Pelvic RT with 48.6 Gy/27 fractions was given to the primary tumour and the regional lymph nodes and a concurrent boost of 5.4 Gy/27 fractions with a final boost of 6 Gy/3 fractions was given to the gross tumour volume (GTV) (60 Gy/30 fractions). Concurrent with RT patients received a daily dose of UFT 300 mg/m(2) plus fixed dose l-leucovorin 22.5 mg 5/7 days and increasing weekly doses of Ox with 10 mg/m(2)/week from a start dose of 30 mg/m(2)/week to a maximum of 60 mg/m(2)/week. In addition, before and after CRT the patients received one course of TEGAFOX (UFT 300 mg/m(2) with l/leucovorin 22.5 mg Days 1-14 and Ox 130 mg/m(2) given on Day 1). Surgery was planned at least six weeks after the completion of the CRT.

RESULTS

From May 2005 to March 2009, 18 patients with LARC (16 primary, two recurrent) were included in this phase I trial. Toxicity was low with only 5-17% grade 3-4 toxicity. Fifteen patients (83%) were operated (14 R0 resection and 1 R1 resection) after completion of CRT. Five (33%) patients had a pathological complete response (ypCR). When ypCR was combined with yp few residual cells, the rate was 60%. Thirteen patients are still alive December 2011.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative high-dose RT and concomitant UFT with increasing doses of Ox up to 60 mg/m(2)/week was feasible with low toxicity, high ypCR rates and promising OS in patients with non-resectable LARC.

Neoadjuvant treatment of mid-to-lower rectal cancer with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in combination with radiotherapy: a Korean single center phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced mid-to-lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label phase II study conducted between August 2008 and August 2010. Thirty-one patients (n = 31) with clinical stage T3/T4 or lymph node positive rectal adenocarcinoma located in the middle or lower rectum without metastasis were enrolled onto the study. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled into the study. Six patients (19.4%) experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 2 nausea and vomiting occurred in 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Severe neurotoxicity was not observed. Grade 1 sensory neuropathy occurred in 10 patients (32.3%). Sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 29 patients (93.5%). The mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 4.9 cm. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 4 of 29 (13.8%) patients. The circumferential resection margin was involved in 2 patients (6.5%). Overall, 23 patients (77.4%) responded to treatment. The complete pathologic response (ypCR) rate was 12.9%. There was no death secondary to toxicity, and the mean follow-up time was 12.3 months.

CONCLUSION

The overall toxicity of oxaliplatin and continuous 5-FU/leucovorin infusion in combination with radiation was well tolerated. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with higher rates of sphincter preservation and downstaging, but did not significantly increase ypCR. The impact of this neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimen on survival will be determined by longer follow-up studies.

Oxaliplatin as a radiosensitiser for upper and lower gastrointestinal tract malignancies: what have we learned from a decade of translational research?

Some of the greatest advances in the treatment of solid malignancies have resulted from the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments. This article comprehensively reviews the current clinical evidence for oxaliplatin-based chemo-radiotherapy that may improve local control and survival. In order to understand how clinical studies should be designed, the pre-clinical evidence for the use of oxaliplatin chemotherapy as a radiosensitising agent is appraised. Particular focus is placed on oxaliplatin's biological mechanisms of action, including cell cycle effects, the formation of DNA adducts and interstrand cross-links and the role of DNA repair proteins. At a clinical level, there is currently no evidence to suggest that oxaliplatin provides an additional benefit to concurrent chemo-radiation regimes that utilise fluoropyrimidines; we evaluate the reasons for this observation, the limitations of clinical trial design and the opportunities that currently exist to design clinical trials which are underpinned by an understanding of the basic biology.

A case of marked response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis

A 67-year-old man had rectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Prior to surgical resection, tegafur-uracil and leucovorin had been administered orally as chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was applied for the rectum and para-aortic lymph nodes. Low anterior resection was then performed, followed by 45 cycles of chemotherapy in total. Enlargement of the left axillary lymph nodes was noted during treatment, but nodes shrank in response to treatment with bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (i.e., irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin). As of the time of writing, 36 months after diagnosis, no swelling of the para-aortic lymph nodes was evident and chemotherapy was being continued. This patient was alive after achieving response to neoadjuvant therapy comprising chemotherapy and irradiation of the para-aortic lymph nodes, along with postoperative chemotherapy. This therapeutic approach of preoperative chemotherapy plus irradiation of the primary lesion and para-aortic lymph nodes has potential as an effective treatment.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid and concomitant radiotherapy as a preoperative treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the activity and safety of adding oxaliplatin to a standard chemoradiotherapy schema, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in locally-advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Two cycles of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) plus FA 20 mg/m(2) bolus for 5 days and 5-FU 350 mg/m(2) continuous infusion for 5 days were given during week 1 and 4 of pelvic radiotherapy 46 Gy. Patients with a T3/4 and/or node-positive rectal tumour were eligible. Surgery was performed 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the rate of pathological response. Secondary endpoints were to assess the rate of clinical response and the safety profile.

RESULTS

Between March 2005 and January 2009, a total of 35 patients were enrolled. The pathological down-staging rate was 79% with a pathological complete response rate of 17%. The overall clinical response rate (assessed by computed tomography or transrectal ultrasound) was 77%. Grade 3 diarrhoea and Grade 3 neutropaenia were reported in 14% and 11% of the patients, respectively. Eleven patients did not undergo surgery: four of them refused the operation, and seven patients were inoperable due to disease progression. In 24 patients who had surgery, a sphincter-preserving procedure could be performed in 29%. At the median follow-up time of 28.1 months, 25 patients (71%) survived with no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

The promising results in terms of pathological response, and the associated good safety profile of a regimen of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/FA with concomitant radiotherapy, suggest that the regimen could be used in LARC.

Preoperative radiotherapy combined with capecitabine chemotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase II study is performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in Chinese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Between February 2007 and December 2008, 62 patients with LARC were treated with capecitabine (825 mg/m(2), twice daily) and concurrent RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Patients underwent surgery after 6-8 weeks of combined therapy, followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (93.5%) completed the preoperative chemoradiation course as initially planned. The most severe hematologic adverse event was leucopenia, which occurred with grade 2 intensity in 12 (19.7%) patients and grade 3 in 2 (3.3%) patients. Grade 3 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) were observed in one (1.6%) and two (3.3%) patients, respectively. However, no grade 4 toxicity was observed. There were no treatment-related deaths during this study. Of the 59 patients treated with surgery, all had radial margins (R0 resections). Among the 29 patients with the primary tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge, 18 (62.1%) underwent sphincter-preserving surgical resections. pCR was found in eight patients (13.6%). The pathologic stage was lower than the initial clinical stage in 57.6% (34/59), 63.4% (26/41), and 81.4% (48/59) of the resected tumors for the primary tumor (T), lymph node (N), and combined TN categories, respectively. The estimate of disease-free survival and overall survival at 24 months were 80.6% (95% CI, 70.8-90.4%) and 92.5% (95% CI, 85.9-99.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and RT appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective neoadjuvant treatment modality for LARC.

Unique considerations in the patient with rectal cancer

In the past two decades, substantial progress has been made in the adjuvant management of colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy has improved overall survival in patients with node-positive (N+) disease. In contrast with colon cancer, which has a low incidence of local recurrence, patients with rectal cancer have a higher incidence requiring the addition of pelvic radiation therapy (chemoradiation). Patients with rectal cancer have a number of unique management considerations: for example, the role of short-course radiation, whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for all patients, and if the type of surgery following chemoradiation should be based on the response rate. More accurate imaging techniques and/or molecular markers may help identify patients with positive pelvic nodes to reduce the chance of overtreatment with preoperative therapy. Will more effective systemic agents both improve the results of radiation as well as modify the need for pelvic radiation? This review will address these and other controversies specific to patients with rectal cancer.

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0247: a randomized Phase II study of neoadjuvant capecitabine and irinotecan or capecitabine and oxaliplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) and the toxicity of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) regimens for Stage T3-T4 rectal cancer in a randomized Phase II study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage T3 or T4 rectal cancer of <12 cm from the anal verge were randomized to preoperative RT (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) with concurrent capecitabine (1,200 mg/m(2)/d Mondays through Friday) and irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) weekly in four doses) (Arm 1) or concurrent capecitabine (1,650 mg/m(2)/d Monday through Friday) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) weekly in five doses) (Arm 2). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after chemoRT, and adjuvant chemotherapy 4-6 weeks after surgery. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate, requiring 48 evaluable patients per arm.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were enrolled. The protocol chemotherapy was modified because of excessive gastrointestinal toxicity after treatment of 35 patients; 96 were assessed for the primary endpoint-the final regimen described above. The patient characteristics were similar for both arms. After chemoRT, the rate of tumor downstaging was 52% and 60% and the rate of nodal downstaging (excluding N0 patients) was 46% and 40%, for Arms 1 and 2, respectively. The pCR rate for Arm 1 was 10% and for Arm 2 was 21%. For Arm 1 and 2, the preoperative chemoRT rate of Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity was 9% and 4% and the rate of Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was 26% and 27%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoRT with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for distal rectal cancer has significant clinical activity (10 of 48 pCRs) and acceptable toxicity. This regimen is currently being evaluated in a Phase III randomized trial (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R04).

Pre-operative bevacizumab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin and radiation among patients with locally advanced or low rectal cancer: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiation, using capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with standard doses of radiation, in patients with high-risk rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or low rectal cancer were treated with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 22-35, oxaliplatin 50mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29, bevacizumab 5mg/kg on days 14, 1, 15 and 29, and radiation 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions including boost. Total mesorectal excision was performed 7-9 weeks after chemoradiation. The primary end-point was complete tumour regression (ypT0NX) by central review.

FINDINGS

Forty-two evaluable patients were enrolled, and 38 proceeded to definitive surgery. Eighteen patients (43%) had clinical T4 tumours and/or N2 tumours. Mean relative dose intensity was >90% for all systemic agents, and 97% for radiation. Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 10 patients (24%) and pain in 4 patients (10%) pre-operatively, while grade 3/4 pain, fatigue and infection were each reported among 5 patients (13%) post-operatively. Re-operation due to complications occurred in 4 patients (11%). Complete tumour regression (ypT0) was seen in 9 patients (23.7%) of which two had N1 disease and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0N0) was 18.4%. Central review changed pathologic stage in six cases (16%).

INTERPRETATION

In this study, pre-operative bevacizumab added to oxaliplatin, capecitabine and radiation was safe and resulted in a promising tumour regression rate. Surgical complications were closely monitored and occurred with the expected frequency. Central pathology review should be considered for trials with pathologic response as the primary end-point.

FUNDING

British Columbia Cancer Agency, Hoffmann-La Roche Canada and Sanofi-Aventis.

Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial

PURPOSE

To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m(2)/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m(2) weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here.

RESULTS

Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

Phase II study of preoperative radiation plus concurrent daily tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Considerable variation in intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism can occur due to the wide range of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity, which can affect both tolerability and efficacy. The oral fluoropyrimidine tegafur-uracil (UFT) is an effective, well-tolerated and convenient alternative to intravenous 5-FU. We undertook this study in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of UFT with leucovorin (LV) and preoperative radiotherapy and to evaluate the utility and limitations of multicenter staging using pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy ultrasound. We also performed a validated pretherapy assessment of DPD activity and assessed its potential influence on the tolerability of UFT treatment.

Methods

This phase II study assessed preoperative UFT with LV and radiotherapy in 85 patients with locally advanced T3 rectal cancer. Patients with potentially resectable tumors received UFT (300 mg/m/²/day), LV (75 mg/day), and pelvic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, 45 Gy total) 5 days/week for 5 weeks then surgery 4-6 weeks later. The primary endpoints included tumor downstaging and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

Most adverse events were mild to moderate in nature. Preoperative grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 18, 21%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 5, 6%). Two patients heterozygous for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) experienced early grade 4 neutropenia (variant IVS14+1G > A) and diarrhea (variant 2846A > T). Pretreatment ultrasound TNM staging was compared with postchemoradiotherapy pathology TN staging and a significant shift towards earlier TNM stages was observed (p < 0.001). The overall downstaging rate was 42% for primary tumors and 44% for lymph nodes. The pCR rate was 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for staging was poor. Anal sphincter function was preserved in 55 patients (65%). Overall and recurrence-free survival at 3 years was 86.1% and 66.7%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 36 node-positive patients (mean duration 118 days).

Conclusion

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using UFT with LV plus radiotherapy was well tolerated and effective and represents a convenient alternative to 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Pretreatment detection of DPD deficiency should be performed to avoid severe adverse events.

Preoperative intensified radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: experience of a single institution

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of an intensified neoadjuvant protocol with the addition of weekly oxaliplatin in the preoperative strategy of rectal cancer treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received continous infusion 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg/m(2)/day in combination with weekly oxaliplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m(2). Doses of radiotherapy were 45 Gy to the whole pelvis plus 5.4-9 Gy to the tumour mass. The primary end-points of the study were evaluation of toxicity, compliance with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, downstaging, pathological complete response (pCR) and the rate of sphincter preservation for distal cancers. Secondary end-points were relapse-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

From November 2006 to June 2009, 51 patients were enrolled into the study. Compliance with chemotherapy was 80%. The incidence of G3 diarrhoea and proctitis were 17.6% and 21.5%, respectively. Surgery was performed in 48 patients with 100% R0 resection. 76.4% of low-lying tumours underwent conservative treatment. Seventy-nine percent of patients were downstaged: T and N downstaging were observed in 71% and 75% of patients, respectively. A pCR was obtained in 11 (22.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensification of neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer with the addition of weekly oxaliplatin is feasible, with remarkable rates of downstaging and pathological complete response. Data on sphincter preservation for distal cancers were excellent. Phase III trials with a longer follow-up will establish whether this good outcome in terms of surrogate end-points will translate into better rates of disease-free and overall survival.

Chemoradiation for rectal cancer: rationale, approaches, and controversies

The standard adjuvant treatment of cT3 and/or N+ rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiation. However, there are many controversies regarding this approach. These controversies include the role of short course radiation, whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for all patients, and if the type of surgery following chemoradiation should be based on the response rate. More accurate imaging techniques and/or molecular markers may help identify patients with positive pelvic nodes to reduce the chance of overtreatment with preoperative therapy. Will more effective systemic agents both improve the results of radiation, as well as modify the need for pelvic radiation? These questions and others remain active areas of clinical investigation.

A Phase II trial of neoadjuvant preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus irinotecan and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: clinical feasibility and response rate

PURPOSE

We aimed to validate our hypothesis that a preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen with S-1 plus irinotecan is feasible, safe, and active for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer in a single-arm Phase II setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients had previously untreated, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Radiotherapy was administered in fractions of 1.8 Gy/d for 25 days. S-1 was administered orally in a fixed daily dose of 80 mg/m2 on Days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, 22 to 26, and 29 to 33. Irinotecan (80 mg/m2) was infused on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Four or more weeks after the completion of the treatment, total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of completing treatment in terms of feasibility. The secondary endpoints were the response rate and safety.

RESULTS

We enrolled 43 men and 24 women in the study. The number of patients who completed treatment was 58 (86.6%). Overall, 46 patients (68.7%) responded to treatment and 24 (34.7%) had a complete histopathologic response. Three patients had Grade 3 leukopenia, and another three patients had Grade 3 neutropenia. Diarrhea was the most common type of nonhematologic toxicity: 3 patients had Grade 3 diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative regimen of S-1, irinotecan, and radiotherapy to the rectum was feasible, and it appeared safe and effective in this nonrandomized Phase II setting. It exhibited a low incidence of adverse events, a high rate of completion of treatment, and an extremely high rate of pathologic complete response.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and pathologic complete response rate of induction bevacizumab + modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 regimen followed by concurrent bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and radiation for patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients received 1 month of induction bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6. Patients then received 50.4 Gy of radiation and concurrent bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on Days 1, 15, and 29), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2)/week for 6 weeks), and continuous infusion 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/day). Because of gastrointestinal toxicity, the oxaliplatin dose was reduced to 40 mg/m(2)/week. Resection was performed 4-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early because of toxicity after 26 eligible patients were treated. Only 1 patient had significant toxicity (arrhythmia) during induction treatment and was removed from the study. During chemoradiation, Grade 3/4 toxicity was experienced by 19 of 25 patients (76%). The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea, neutropenia, and pain. Five of 25 patients (20%) had a complete pathologic response. Nine of 25 patients (36%) developed postoperative complications including infection (n = 4), delayed healing (n = 3), leak/abscess (n = 2), sterile fluid collection (n = 2), ischemic colonic reservoir (n = 1), and fistula (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, continuous infusion 5-FU, and radiation causes significant gastrointestinal toxicity. The pathologic complete response rate of this regimen was similar to other fluorouracil chemoradiation regimens. The high incidence of postoperative wound complications is concerning and consistent with other reports utilizing bevacizumab with chemoradiation before major surgical resections.

Combined modality therapy for rectal cancer

The standard adjuvant treatment for cT3 and/or N+ rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiation. However, there are many controversies regarding this approach. These include the role of short course radiation, whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for all patients and whether the type of surgery after chemoradiation should be based on the response rate. More accurate imaging techniques and/or molecular markers may help identify patients with positive pelvic nodes to reduce the chance of overtreatment with preoperative therapy. Will more effective systemic agents both improve the results of radiation as well as modify the need for pelvic radiation? These questions and others remain active areas of clinical investigation.

Preoperative Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy with Bolus 5-Fluorouracil for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of 98 Patients

Aims and background

Surgical resection of rectal cancer is associated with a high pelvic recurrence rate. Preoperative large-fraction radiotherapy (RT) with a short interval after local excision has been associated with a significant improvement in locoregional recurrence rates and overall survival, but with high rates of toxicity. We here present the results of our combined-modality treatment protocol for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

Between September 1999 and June 2005, 98 patients were prospectively entered into the protocol. Eligibility criteria included any of the following: cT3-4 disease, clinically positive lymph nodes, or tumor located less than 6 cm from the anal verge. RT was delivered with a three-field technique to a dose of 45 Gy, plus an optional 5.4–9 Gy boost. Chemotherapy, administered concomitantly with RT, consisted of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg days 1–5 followed by 5-FU 600 mg/m2 and leucovorin 50 mg on days 16, 23, 30 and 37. Surgery was performed 6–8 weeks after RT completion and was followed by 8 courses of 5-FU 900 mg/m2 and leucovorin 100 mg/m2 every 14 days.

Results

Low anterior resection was performed in 64.5% of the patients and in 38.8% of those with tumors located less than 6 cm from the anal verge. All patients except one had clear pathological margins, 68.8% had negative nodes, and pathological complete response was seen in 13.5%. With a median follow-up of 31.5 months, 3 patients (3.0%) had locoregional recurrence, 19 (19.3%) developed distant metastasis, and 10 patients (10.1%) died. The estimated median disease-free survival was 70.6 months. Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 24.5% of the patients and 3.0% had neutropenic fever. One fatal toxicity occurred during treatment.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that our combined-modality treatment protocol is well tolerated and achieves high locoregional control in this unselected population. The overall survival results are also encouraging. Further studies are required to confirm the toxicity profile and survival results of this regimen. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Radiation, chemotherapy and biological therapy in the curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review the published evidence relating to the use of radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy and biological therapy as adjuncts to surgery in the curative treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Searches were carried out of the MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases together with conference abstracts from key meetings including the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium and the ECCO/ESMO Multidisciplinary Congress.

RESULTS

RT reduces local pelvic recurrence when used as an adjunct to surgery, even when this is performed optimally by total mesorectal excision (TME). RT is usually given as short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) followed by immediate surgery which produces no or very little downstaging or long-course concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by a 6-8 week gap prior to surgery which produces significant downstaging. The prognostic importance of achieving a clear histological circumferential resection margin is now well recognised and pathological assessment of the quality of surgery can predict long-term outcomes. Internationally there is considerable heterogeneity in the staging modalities and criteria used in deciding which approach might be used, in the reporting of histological results and in RT parameters (time/dose/fractionation/volume). Attempts to increase the potency of CRT have included the addition of concurrent chemotherapeutic and biological agents to the standard fluoropyrimidine although there is little randomised data and none with regard to long-term survival outcomes. Neither SCPRT nor downstaging CRT have been shown to reduce the rate of subsequent distant metastatic relapse which remains a significant clinical problem. The potential additional benefit of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to SCPRT or long-course CRT remains ill-defined. Late morbidity can include bowel and sexual dysfunction, pelvic fractures and second malignancies with considerably more being known in relation to SCPRT than long-course CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in imaging, pathology and surgical technique combined with multimodality treatment using RT and chemotherapy are leading to continuing improvements in the long term outcome for patients with rectal cancer although much remains to be learnt regarding the optimum strategy for use of these in different clinical contexts and their relationship to long-term morbidity.

Medium-term results of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, which was a powerful ploychemotherapy in those days in Japan.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2004, 26 patients with T3 or T4 and N0-2 non-metastatic resectable rectal cancer were selectively enrolled in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of irinotecan (80 mg/m²), 5-FU (500 mg/m²), and LV (250 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 for 4 weeks. Surgical resection was performed in all the patients 2-4 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall down-staging was observed in 15 patients. T level and N level down-staging were observed in 12 and 13 patients, respectively. A pathological complete response was observed in one patients. The median follow-up period was 75 months (range, 8-97 months). Recurrences occurred in 5 patients including pelvic relapses in 3 and distant metastases in 2. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 74% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy comprised of a combination of multi-drugs as irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV may be beneficial to the prognoses of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Preoperative decision making for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer treatment has become multimodal as a result of significant advances in imaging, staging, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Multidisciplinary teams can incorporate these developments into tailor-made treatment plans and offer state-of-the-art services for rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and PubMed databases using the following keywords: "rectal cancer," "total mesorectal excision," "multidisciplinary treatment/team," "radiotherapy," "chemotherapy," and their combinations. There were no language or publication year restrictions. References in published articles also were reviewed.

RESULTS

Total mesorectal excision surgery, high-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and pathologic reports according to Quirke protocol are preconditions for the initiation of an effective multidisciplinary team. Common topics for discussion are the status of the circumferential margin, the type of radiotherapy and surgery required, and the chemotherapeutic agent to be used.

CONCLUSIONS

This review focuses on this issue based on two main principles. First, the status of the circumferential margin dictates the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Second, preoperative chemoradiotherapy is superior in terms of free circumferential resection margin rate, local recurrence rate, and toxicity.