Phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with split-course concomitant twice-daily reirradiation in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 9911

Outcomes and dosimetric analysis of reirradiation of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers with high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study sought to evaluate the outcomes and toxicities from oral cavity (OC) and oropharynx (OP) high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) for re-irradiation (reRT) of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Patients who previously received curative-intent external beam radiotherapy for primary HNSCC and were treated with OC/OP reRT with HDRBT from January 2000 to December 2021 were included. Patients were selected by a multidisciplinary tumor board to be appropriate candidates for HDRBT for one of two reRT indications: (1) definitive reRT or (2) postoperative reRT. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Efficacy and toxicity outcomes were analyzed for the entire cohort and separately based on reRT indication.

RESULTS

27 patients were evaluated with a median follow up of 20 (IQR 12-41) mo. 14 (52%) and 13 (48%) patients were treated for a recurrent or second primary OC and OP HNSCC, respectively. Median dose of prior EBRT was 68.4 (IQR 60-70) Gy. Median interval between completion of EBRT to HDRBT reRT was 42 (IQR 14-85) mo. Median target volume was 16 (IQR 10-29) cc; median D90% was 31 (IQR 30-36) Gy. In cohorts A and B, 2-year LC/late grade ≥3 toxicity were 70%/57% and 60%/15%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HDRBT for reRT of small (<4 cm), recurrent, or second primary OC/OP HNSCC provided LC and late grade ≥3 toxicity rates similar to historical outcomes with EBRT reRT.

Patient Selection and Outcomes in Reirradiation for Head and Neck Cancers: A Prospective Cohort Study

AIMS

Reirradiation (re-RT) in head and neck cancers requires careful patient selection. This study aimed to identify factors influencing re-RT decisions, analyse survival outcomes, and evaluate toxicities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2013 to 2017, 250 patients previously treated with radical RT for head and neck cancers were prospectively included. Exclusions were prior RT dose <50 Gy, distant metastasis or prior RT within six months. The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 45.5 months, with a median follow-up of 52 months. Factors affecting survival were analysed, comparing outcomes between re-RT recipients and non-recipients in a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Among 250 patients, 177 (70.8%) were advised re-RT. Long DFI (67%) was the most common reason for re-RT, while significant late sequelae (49%) often led to denial. Advanced recurrence stage (HR 1.549, p = 0.04), non-surgical intervention (HR 3.455, p < 0.005), non-recipients of re-RT (HR 4.459, p < 0.005) and organ dysfunction (HR 2.187, p < 0.005) predicted worse survival. For 162 re-RT recipients vs. non-recipients, the 3-year locoregional control, event-free survival and OS were 56.1% vs. 39.9% (p = 0.002), 42.1% vs. 26.7% (p = 0.002), and 57.1% vs. 31.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. After propensity matching, the re-RT group showed better 3-year OS (48.8% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.04) despite increased toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Effective patient selection is vital for successful re-RT. Surgery followed by adjuvant RT yields optimal outcomes. Despite technical advancements, managing toxicities remains challenging. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians facing the complex decision of re-RT in head and neck cancer patients.

Early circulating tumor DNA changes predict outcomes in head and neck cancer patients under re-radiotherapy

Local recurrence after radiotherapy is common in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Re-irradiation can improve local disease control, but disease progression remains frequent. Hence, predictive biomarkers are needed to adapt treatment intensity to the patient's individual risk. We quantified circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in sequential plasma samples and correlated ctDNA levels with disease outcome. Ninety four longitudinal plasma samples from 16 locally advanced HNC patients and 57 healthy donors were collected at re-radiotherapy baseline, after 5 and 10 radiation fractions, at irradiation end, and at routine follow-up visits. Plasma DNA was subjected to low coverage whole genome sequencing for copy number variation (CNV) profiling to quantify ctDNA burden. CNV-based ctDNA burden was detected in 8/16 patients and 25/94 plasma samples. Ten additional ctDNA-positive samples were identified by tracking patient-specific CNVs found in earlier sequential plasma samples. ctDNA-positivity after 5 and 10 radiation fractions (both: log-rank, p = .050) as well as at the end of irradiation correlated with short progression-free survival (log-rank, p = .006). Moreover, a pronounced decrease of ctDNA toward re-radiotherapy termination was associated with worse treatment outcome (log-rank, p = .005). Dynamic ctDNA tracking in serial plasma beyond re-radiotherapy reflected treatment response and imminent disease progression. In five patients, molecular progression was detected prior to tumor progression based on clinical imaging. Our findings emphasize that quantifying ctDNA during re-radiotherapy may contribute to disease monitoring and personalization of adjuvant treatment, follow-up intervals, and dose prescription.

A prospective cohort study on stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of dural recurrence of olfactory neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment for dural recurrence of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is not standardized. We assess the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this population.

METHODS

ONB patients with dural recurrences treated between 2013 and 2022 on a prospective registry were included. Tumor control, survival, and patient-reported quality of life were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with 32 dural lesions were evaluated. Time to dural recurrence was 58.3 months. Thirty lesions (94%) were treated with SBRT to a median dose of 27 Gy in three fractions. Two patients (3 of 32 lesions; 9%) developed in-field radiographic progression, five patients (38%) experienced progression in non-contiguous dura. Two-year local control was 85% (95% CI: 51-96%). There were no >grade 3 acute toxicities and 1 case of late grade 3 brain radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

In this largest study of SBRT reirradiation for ONB dural recurrence to date, high local control rates with minimal toxicity were attainable.

Clinical Results and Prognostic Factors in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Under the Japan National Health Insurance System: A Retrospective Study of the Initial 47 Patients

PURPOSE

Recurrent head and neck cancer presents a therapeutic challenge because of cumulative toxicity from initial radiation therapy, limiting reirradiation options. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) offers a promising alternative, selectively delivering a radical dose to tumors while sparing adjacent normal tissue. This study investigates the initial clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with BNCT for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective analysis investigated the initial 47 patients treated with BNCT between May 2020 and February 2021 in Japan. All patients had received radiation therapy with a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 44-176) before BNCT. Median tumor size was 11 cm3 (range, 1-117 cm3), with 23% of tumors larger than 30 cm3, and 87% of patients had prior systemic therapy. The most common prescribed dose to the pharyngeal mucosa was 15 Gy-Eq (36%), followed by 18 Gy-Eq (34%). The minimum dose given to tumor was 27.4 Gy-Eq (range, 13.3-45.2). In 23 patients, 18F-fluoro-borono-phenylalanine positron emission tomography was performed within 1 week before BNCT, and the tumor-to-blood 10B ratio was 3.5 (range, 2.0-8.7).

RESULTS

Efficacy analysis revealed a 51% complete response rate and a 74% overall response rate. Disease-free survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 34.6% and 26.6%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 86.1% and 66.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that, among the patient characteristics, whether the lesion was mucosal had a significant effect on achieving complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided valuable insights into the early integration of BNCT into routine clinical practice, highlighting its efficacy and safety. Technical improvements are needed to ensure precise dose administration. Ongoing prospective studies, such as the phase II REBIVAL study, will further elucidate the role of BNCT in recurrent head and neck cancer.

Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?

With the emergence of high-precision radiotherapy technologies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), MR guided brachytherapy, image guided intensity modulated photon and proton radiotherapy and most recently daily adaptive radiotherapy, reirradiation is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for many patients. This includes those with recurrent, metastatic or new malignancies post initial radiotherapy. The primary challenge in reirradiation lies in balancing tumor control against the risk of severe toxicity from cumulative radiation doses to previously irradiated normal tissue. Although technology for precise delivery has advanced at a fast pace, clinical practice of reirradiation still mostly relies on individual expertise, as prospective evidence is scarce, the level of reporting in clinical studies is not standardized and of low quality - especially with respect to cumulative doses received by organs at risk. A recent ESTRO/EORTC initiative proposed a standardized definition of reirradiation and formulated general requirements for minimal reporting in clinical studies [1]. As a consequence we found it timely to convene for an international and interdisciplinary meeting with experts in the field to summarize the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps and explore which best practices can be derived for safe reirradiation. The meeting was held on 15.06.2023 in Zurich and was endorsed by the scientific societies SASRO, DEGRO and ESTRO. Here, we report on available evidence and research priorities in the field of reirradiation, as discussed during the meeting.

Reirradiation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with external photons: A practical review of the literature

The modalities of management by reirradiation for recurrence or a second localization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in previously irradiated terrain is challenging due to the great heterogeneity of data in the literature, mainly retrospective data reporting non-negligible risks of serious late toxicity events. With the recent development of more precise and conformal radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT), the benefit-to-risk ratio of reirradiation has evolved in recent years with encouraging results, but patient selection is crucial. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of HNSCC reirradiation in terms of patient selection and external photon radiotherapy techniques for definitive tumor reirradiation and postoperative reirradiation.

Reirradiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; prognostic indicators, oncologic and functional outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic alternatives. While reirradiation is feasible, it is usually associated with high treatment toxicity and is not yet considered the standard of care. Based on current NCCN guidelines, in the context of very advanced head and neck cancer (recurrent and/or persistent disease), surgical intervention is explored initially with/without adjuvants while unresectable disease is approached with radiation and/or systemic therapies. Specific and reliable prognostic indicators for both -oncologic and functional outcomes- have yet to be defined for this population.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 54 patients treated with reirradiation at a tertiary academic institution between January of 1998 and January of 2024. Only patients with non-metastatic recurrent, and second primary HNSCC were included in the series. Demographics, staging, radiation dose and technique, additional therapy, histopathologic variables, EORTC toxicity, pre- and post-treatment PEG/tracheotomy dependency and oncologic outcomes were retrieved.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 54 patients (37 males, 17 females) with HNSCC, averaging 62.7 years in age. Initial tumors were locally advanced in over 42 % of cases, with 58 % being node-negative. The head and cutaneous regions (24.5 %) and tongue (20.8 %) were the most common tumor sites. Primary surgical resection and adjuvant radiation were performed in 47.2 % of cases, and concurrent chemotherapy was used in 40.7 %. Reirradiation was mainly for local or regional recurrence (88.9 %), often following salvage surgery (68.5 %), with a mean dose of 5623 Gy over 52.5 fractions. Positive surgical margins were present in 29.4 % of cases, and extracapsular spread in 59.5 %. No significant differences were found between the salvage surgery and definitive reirradiation groups except for tumor site (P = 0.022). Median follow-up was 52.6 months, with 27 deaths reported. Lymphovascular invasion was significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.017), while initial tumor T-stage and neck disease involvement were linked to local-regional control (P = 0.030 and P = 0.033, respectively). Reirradiation increased tracheotomy and PEG-tube dependency by 20 % (P = 0.011) and 23 % (P = 0.003), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation is a feasible therapeutic alternative in recurrent head and neck SCC. Oncologic outcomes observed in this series compare favorably to most published reports. Complete response and perineural invasion were independent prognostic factors for survival and locoregional control. While no mortality directly associated with treatment was observed in this series, reirradiation had a significant impact in functional outcomes in terms of increased risk of tracheotomy and peg tube dependency. Further studies are required to define the role of this treatment in head and neck cancer.

Voxel-Level Dosimetry for Combined Iodine 131 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Paradigms for Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) shows promise as a method to increase tumor control and mitigate potential high-grade toxicities associated with re-treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. This work establishes a patient-specific dosimetry framework that combines Monte Carlo-based dosimetry from the 2 radiation modalities at the voxel level using deformable image registration (DIR) and radiobiological constructs for patients enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial combining EBRT and RPT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Serial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) patient scans were performed at approximately 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours postinjection of 577.2 MBq/m2 (15.6 mCi/m2) CLR 131, an iodine 131-containing RPT agent. Using RayStation, clinical EBRT treatment plans were created with a treatment planning CT (TPCT). SPECT/CT images were deformably registered to the TPCT using the Elastix DIR module in 3D Slicer software and assessed by measuring mean activity concentrations and absorbed doses. Monte Carlo EBRT dosimetry was computed using EGSnrc. RPT dosimetry was conducted using RAPID, a GEANT4-based RPT dosimetry platform. Radiobiological metrics (biologically effective dose and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) were used to combine the 2 radiation modalities.

RESULTS

The DIR method provided good agreement for the activity concentrations and calculated absorbed dose in the tumor volumes for the SPECT/CT and TPCT images, with a maximum mean absorbed dose difference of -11.2%. Based on the RPT absorbed dose calculations, 2 to 4 EBRT fractions were removed from patient EBRT treatments. For the combined treatment, the absorbed dose to target volumes ranged from 57.14 to 75.02 Gy. When partial volume corrections were included, the mean equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions to the planning target volume from EBRT + RPT differed -3.11% to 1.40% compared with EBRT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates the clinical feasibility of performing combined EBRT + RPT dosimetry on TPCT scans. Dosimetry guides treatment decisions for EBRT, and this work provides a bridge for the same paradigm to be implemented within the rapidly emerging clinical RPT space.

Interdisciplinary Approach Toward Reirradiation of Cancer Patients

As systemic therapies, alongside radiation, for cancer treatment continue to evolve, the radiation oncology community is facing an increasing number of reirradiation (re-RT) of tumor sites subject to recurrences. There are multiple factors associated with choosing re-RT as a treatment option for a previously irradiated site. The factors include the site of previous radiotherapy (RT), the current extent of the disease, the nature of recurrence, the technique used for previous irradiation, and the previous RT details including dose and dose fractionation. There is a persistent heterogeneity in the workflow and decision-making in cancer care centers worldwide. The current review is an attempt to dive into the practices of decision-making for re-RT, interdisciplinary attention given to the re-RT patients, and acceptable doses to the organ at risk (OAR) deduced from the understanding of previous RT and radiobiology of the tumor and sites evidence of better techniques for effective execution.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours

The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

This review explores the difficulties encountered in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC), with special attention to the challenges presented by locoregional recurrences, which impact a substantial number of patients. While maximal surgical resection remains the gold standard for treatment, surgery is often not feasible due to various factors. In such cases, reirradiation has emerged as a potential strategy, albeit with a heightened risk of severe toxicity. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is introduced as a promising approach for unresectable recurrent HNC. SBRT offers precise radiation doses and shorter treatment durations, making it a potentially optimal treatment modality. Despite the growing interest in SBRT, there is a lack of consensus guidelines for its use in HNC, particularly in India. Nevertheless, recommendations are provided for the benefit of SBRT in reirradiation settings, considering factors like tumour size, dose, and treatment duration. The article highlights the safety and effectiveness of SBRT-based reirradiation with existing evidence. The literature review discusses various studies and their findings, emphasizing the importance of high-dose SBRT for improved overall survival. The article also explores the combination of SBRT with systemic therapy as a potential synergistic approach to enhance patient outcomes. In conclusion, SBRT shows promise as a valuable therapeutic tool for patients with inoperable recurrent HNC, offering acceptable safety. However, further research and well-designed trials are needed to optimize its use and identify the most suitable patient cohorts. Establishing comprehensive working guidelines and a nationwide prospective database will be crucial in advancing this treatment approach.

Adjuvant Reirradiation With Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

For patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), locoregional failure and second primary tumors are common indications for adjuvant reirradiation (re-RT). Given an absence of clear consensus on the role of adjuvant re-RT, we sought to assess histopathologic risk factors of patients with HNSCC and their resulting outcomes after adjuvant re-RT with proton therapy.

Methods and Materials

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HNSCC who underwent salvage surgery at our institution followed by adjuvant re-RT with proton therapy over 1.5 years. All included patients received prior radiation therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

Results

The cohort included 22 patients, with disease subsites, including oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, and nasopharynx. Depending on adverse pathologic features, adjuvant re-RT to 66 Gy (32% of cohort) or 60 Gy (68%), with (59%) or without (41%) concurrent systemic therapy was administered. The majority (86%) completed re-RT with no reported treatment delay; 3 patients experienced grade ≥3 acute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity and no patient required enteral feeding tube placement during re-RT. Median follow-up was 21.0 months (IQR, 11.7-25.2 months). Five patients had biopsy-proven disease recurrences a median of 5.9 months (IQR, 3.8-9.7 months) after re-RT. Locoregional recurrence-free survival was 95.2%, 70.2%, 64.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS was 100%, 79.2%, and 79.2% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Four patients had osteoradionecrosis on imaging a median of 13.2 months (IQR, 8.7-17.4 months) after re-RT, with 2 requiring surgical intervention.

Conclusions

Adjuvant re-RT for patients with HNSCC was well-tolerated and offered reasonable local control in this high-risk cohort but appears to be associated with a risk of osteoradionecrosis. Additional study and longer follow-up could help define optimal patient management in this patient population.

Palliative Quad Shot Radiation Therapy with or without Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) have limited treatment options. 'QuadShot' (QS), a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen, can provide symptomatic relief and local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared outcomes of QS ± concurrent ICIs in the palliative treatment of HNC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients who received ≥three cycles of QS from 2017 to 2022 and excluded patients without post-treatment clinical evaluation or imaging. Outcomes for patients who received QS alone were compared to those treated with ICI concurrent with QS, defined as receipt of ICI within 4 weeks of QS.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included, of whom 57% received concurrent ICI. Median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.9-77.8), and 50% patients had received prior radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy (IQR: 60-70). Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Local control was significantly higher with concurrent ICIs (12-month: 85% vs. 63%, p = 0.038). Distant control (12-month: 56% vs. 63%, p = 0.629) and median overall survival (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.850) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ICI was a significant predictor of local control (HR for local failure: 0.238; 95% CI: 0.073-0.778; p = 0.018). Overall, 23% patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of QS with concurrent ICIs was well tolerated and significantly improved local control compared to QS alone. The median OS of 9.4 months compares favorably to historical controls for patients with HNC treated with QS. This approach represents a promising treatment option for patients with HNC unsuited for curative-intent treatment and warrants prospective evaluation.

Safety of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy with Borofalan(10B) and Its Efficacy on Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Real-World Outcomes from Nationwide Post-Marketing Surveillance

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) with borofalan(10B) in Japanese patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck cancer (LA/LR-HNC).

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter observational study was initiated in Japan in May 2020 and enrolled all patients who received borofalan(10B) as directed by regulatory authorities. Patient enrollment continued until at least 150 patients were enrolled, and adverse events attributable to drugs, treatment devices, and BNCT were evaluated. The patients with LA/LR-HNC were systematically evaluated to determine efficacy.

RESULTS

The 162 patients enrolled included 144 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), 17 patients with non-SCCHN (NSCCHN), and 1 patient with glioblastoma. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hyperamylasemia (84.0%), stomatitis (51.2%), sialoadenitis (50.6%), and alopecia (49.4%) as acute TRAEs and dysphagia (4.5%), thirst (2.6%), and skin disorder (1.9%) as more common late TRAEs. One- and two-year OS rates in patients with recurrent SCCHN were 78.8% and 60.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This post-marketing surveillance confirmed the safety and efficacy of BNCT with borofalan(10B) in patients with LA/LR-HNC in a real-world setting.

Multimodality treatment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: current therapy, challenges, and future perspectives

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a complex group of diseases that presents a challenge to the clinician. The prognosis in the recurrent/metastatic disease is particularly dismal, with a median survival of approximately 12 months. Recently, the personalized and multimodal approach has increased prognosis by integrating locoregional strategies (salvage surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy) and systemic treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapy). Malnutrition is a significant clinical problem that interferes with dose intensity, and thus, feeding supplementation is critical not only to increase the quality of life but also to improve overall survival. With this review, we want to emphasize the importance of the multidisciplinary approach, quality of life, and nutritional supportive care and to integrate the latest updates of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and future therapeutic strategies.

Stereotactic reirradiation in the treatment of head and neck cancers: A retrospective study on the long-term experience of the Oscar Lambret Center

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy potentially treats unresectable recurrences of previously irradiated head and neck (H&N) cancer. This study aimed to assess its efficacy and safety and evaluate prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a large retrospective series that included 110 patients who had undergone 36-Gy, six-fraction stereotactic reirradiation (CyberKnife®) for recurrent/secondary H&N cancer between 2007 and 2020 at the Oscar Lambret Center. Patient characteristics and toxicities were assessed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 106.3 months. The 2-year OS rate was 43.8 % (95 % confidence interval, 95 % CI, 34.3-52.9) and the median survival was 20.8 months (95 % CI, 16.5-26.3). The cumulative 2-year local-recurrence, regional-recurrence, and distant-metastasis rates were 52.2 % (95 % CI, 42.4-61.1 %), 12.8 % (95 % CI, 7.4-19.8 %), and 11 % (95 % CI, 6.0-17.6 %), respectively. 73 patients received concomitant cetuximab, and it was not significantly beneficial (HR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 0.80-2.26; p = 0.26). The cumulative incidences of grade ≥ 2 late toxicity was 42 % (CI95%: 33-51) at 24 months. Two grade 4 bleedings and no treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

In a large retrospective series of SBRT reirradiation for recurrent or second primary H&N cancers, we observed a median OS of 20.8 months, with a cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late toxicity of 42 % at 24 months. Such a treatment is feasible. However, local recurrence rates remain non-negligible, warranting further research. Radiosensitizer use is currently under study. Therefore, establishing a balance between therapeutic modifications and toxicity is essential.

Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors in head and neck cancers: Recent advances and therapeutic challenges

Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are key cytokines responsible for the production, maturation, and mobilization of the granulocytic and macrophage lineages from the bone marrow, which have been gaining attention for playing pro- and/or anti-tumorigenic roles in cancer. Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a group of heterogeneous neoplasms with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment for HNCs is still limited even with the advancements in cancer immunotherapy. Novel treatments for patients with recurrent and metastatic HNCs are urgently needed. This article provides an in-depth review of the role of hematopoietic cytokines such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and interleukin-3 (IL-3; also known as multi-CSF) in the HNCs tumor microenvironment. We have reviewed current results from clinical trials using CSFs as adjuvant therapy to treat HNCs patients, and also clinical findings reported to date on the therapeutic application of CSFs toxicities arising from chemoradiotherapy.

The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal radiation therapy (RT) that aims to deliver a high dose of radiation to the tumor whilst sparing surrounding normal tissue, making it an attractive option for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are not suitable for the traditional long course of RT with comprehensive RT target volume. Definitive SBRT for HNC has been investigated in different settings, including early stage glottis cancer, and as an alternative to brachytherapy boost after external beam RT. It is also used as a primary treatment option for elderly or medically unfit patients. More recently, an SBRT combination with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HNC showed promising results. Salvage or adjuvant SBRT for HNC can be used in appropriately selected cases. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimum dose and fractionation schedules in any of these indications.

The dogma of cetuximab in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after failure of surgery and radiotherapy: is it true among patients in upper Egypt?

Background and aim

We aimed from the current study to explore the treatment results of cetuximab in combination with a weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) after failure of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Methods

This study was a non-randomised, single arm, phase 2 efficacy study conducted in two oncology centres in upper Egypt, we recruited 31 patients with recurrent HNSCC previously treated with concurrent chemoradiation ± surgery to receive weekly cetuximab, carboplatin and paclitaxel for 18 weeks followed by maintenance cetuximab every 2 weeks for 12 months. All patients underwent intention to treat analysis.

Results

The current study revealed a significant reduction of the size of recurrent primary lesion (p < 0.001), without comparable significant reduction of regional lymph nodes (LNs) (p = 0.06), the current overall response rate (ORR) was 83.9%, ≥1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 58.1%, also surgical intervention was succeeded to salvage 32.3% who did not achieve complete response to the current protocol, the median PFS was 12 months which was significantly affected by tumour site (p = 0.012), programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression (p = 0.01) and overall response rate (ORR) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Based on favourable treatment outcomes, including high ORR and disease control rate, improved median PFS and tolerable toxicity profile, the current weekly cetuximab, carboplatin and paclitaxel with 1 year maintenance cetuximab in responding patients is considered a feasible and effective regimen.

Advancements of radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in modern era

Head and neck cancer is a kind of cancer which can be eradicated from radical radiation therapy. However, with best efforts, nearly 40% patients will experience locoregional recurrence. Locoregional recurrence is the main cause of cancer-related death in head and neck cancers, so local treatments play a key role in improving progression free survival. In the last decades, radiation techniques have been tremendously developed, highly conformal radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy and proton or heavy ion radiation therapy have their unique radiobiological advances. Although reirradiation is widely used in clinical practice, but little is known when comparing the different techniques. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancers including radiation techniques, patient selection, overall clinical benefits, and toxicities.

Phase 1 Dose Escalation of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Cisplatin for Reirradiation of Unresectable, Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

PURPOSE

Patients with locoregional recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have relatively poor outcomes; therefore, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been investigated for this patient population. We performed a phase 1 clinical trial to establish a maximum tolerated dose of SBRT with concurrent cisplatin in previously irradiated locoregional SCCHN.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with recurrent SCCHN who had previously undergone radiation therapy to doses ≥45 Gy to the area of recurrence ≥6 months before enrollment and who were not surgical candidates or refused surgery were eligible. SBRT was delivered every other day for 5 fractions. Starting dose level was 6 Gy × 5 fractions, followed by 7 Gy × 5 fractions and 8 Gy × 5 fractions. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin given before every SBRT fraction at a dose of 15 mg/m2. Patients were monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) that occurred within 3 months from the start of SBRT. Secondary endpoints included locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled, with 18 patients evaluable for endpoints. One patient at dose level 1 (30 Gy) died of unknown causes 2 weeks following completion of treatment. Therefore, an additional 3 patients were accrued to the 30-Gy dose level, with no further DLTs observed. Three patients were then accrued at dose level 2 (35 Gy) and 9 patients at dose level 3 (40 Gy) without DLTs. At a median follow-up of 9.5 months, cumulative incidence of locoregional failure at 2 years was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-66%), cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 11% (95% CI, 74%-100%) at 2 years, and overall survival was 22% (95% CI, 9%-53%) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent cisplatin and reirradiation with an SBRT dose of ≤40 Gy was safe and feasible in patients with locoregionally recurrent or second primary SCCHN.

An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far?

The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.

Prospective randomized clinical studies involving reirradiation: update of a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Reirradiation is a potentially useful option for many patients with recurrent cancer, aiming at cure or symptom palliation, depending on disease/recurrence type and stage. The purpose of this follow-up study to a previous review from 2016 was to summarize all recently published randomized trials. Points of interest again included identifcation of methodological strengths and weaknesses, practice-changing results, and open questions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review of trials published between 2015 and February 2023.

RESULTS

We reviewed 7 additional trials, most of which addressed reirradiation of head and neck or brain tumours. The median number of patients was 60. Mirroring the previous review, trial design, primary endpoints and statistical hypotheses varied widely. The updated results only impact on decision making for reirradiation of nasopharynx cancer and glioma. Patients with one of these diseases, as well as other head and neck cancers, may benefit from reirradiation-induced local control, e.g. in terms of progression-free survival. For the first time, hyperfractionated radiotherapy emerged as preferred option for recurrent, inoperable nasopharynx cancer. Despite better therapeutic ratio with hyperfractionation, serious toxicity remains a concern after high cumulative total doses. Randomized trials are still lacking for prostate cancer and other sites.

CONCLUSION

Multicentric randomized trials on reirradiation are feasible and continue to refine the current standard of care for recurrent disease after previous radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective studies such as the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (ESTRO-EORTC) observational cohort ReCare (NCT: NCT03818503) will further shape the clinical practice of reirradiation.

The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer

Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review in-silico methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach, part II: radiation technique and fractionations

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of local recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck represents a potential curative treatment for patients not candidate to a salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize literature data on modern radiation techniques and fractionations used in this setting of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was conducted on three topics: (1) target volume delineation (2) reRT dose and techniques and (3) ongoing studies. Patients treated with postoperative reRT and palliative intent were not considered for the current analysis.

RESULTS

Recommendations on the target volume contouring have been reported. 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic body Radiotherapy Intraoperative Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy and Charged Particles have been analyzed in terms of indication and fractionation in the field of reRT. Ongoing studies on the topic have been reported for IMRT and Charged Particles. Moreover, according to literature data a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to select patients candidate to a curative reRT in daily clinical practice. Two clinical cases were also provided for its application.

CONCLUSION

Different radiation techniques and fractionations can be used for a second course of radiotherapy in patients with recurrent/second primary tumor of head and neck region. Tumor characteristics as well as radiobiological considerations should be take into account to define the best reRT approach.

Repeat re-irradiation with interstitial HDR-brachytherapy for an in-field isolated nodal recurrence in a patient with HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer is a complex clinical scenario that often requires multimodality treatment. These patients have often previously received definitive treatment with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy, which can make further management difficult. A second isolated locoregional failure is rare and clinicians are faced with a challenge to optimize disease control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this report, we present the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of a patient with an isolated locoregional recurrence who was previously treated with two courses of radiation. The patient was treated with a second course of reirradiation using interstitial brachytherapy as well as a discussion regarding patient selection and optimal management for recurrent head and neck cancer.

RESULTS

Repeat reirradiation using interstitial HDR-brachytherapy with the use of an alloderm spacer was successfully delivered to the patient for an in-field right neck nodal recurrence. He received a total EQD2/BED dose of 127.70/153.24 Gy. At 1-year followup, the patient was without evidence of recurrent disease or new significant side effects.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent head and neck cancer should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach given the complex clinical scenario. Reirradiation is a commonly used salvage measure for recurrent head and neck cancer that requires careful planning and patient selection due to prior treatment-related effects and dose constraints. We reported a case of a second course of reirradiation using interstitial HDR-brachytherapy for locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer and showed no recurrence of disease or worsening long term side effects at 1 year.

Re-irradiation for head and neck cancer: outcome and toxicity analysis using a prospective single institution database

Purpose

Re-irradiation (re-RT) in head and neck cancer is challenging. This study prospectively explored the feasibility of re-RT in patients with loco-regionally recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (LRR/SP HNC).

Methods

From 2004 to 2021, 61 LRR/SP HNC patients were treated with re-RT, defined as having a second course of RT with curative intent resulting in a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in an overlapping volume. Postoperative or definitive dynamic intensity-modulated and/or volumetric modulated re-RT was administered using twice daily hyperfractionation to 60 Gy combined with cisplatin or carboplatin/5-fluorouracil. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis control (DMC) were analyzed and prognostic factors evaluated. Toxicity was prospectively recorded and graded.

Results

The median follow-up was 9.8 months. In 41 patients (67.1%), complete administration of the intended treatment was not feasible. In 9 patients (15%) re-RT was interrupted prematurely and in other 9, the complete re-RT dose was lower than 60 Gy, and 37 patients (61%) could not receive or complete chemotherapy. Two-year OS, PFS and LRC rates were 19%, 18% and 30%, respectively. 20 patients (33%) received the complete intended treatment, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 70% and 47%, respectively. Charlson comorbidity index was an important predictor for treatment completion. Multivariate analysis revealed recurrent N stage 0-1, age, chemotherapy administration and re-RT dose of 60 Gy as prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. No grade 5 re-RT-related toxicity was observed. The most common new grade ≥3 acute toxicities were dysphagia (52%) and mucositis (46%). Late toxicity included grade ≥3 dysphagia in 5% and osteoradionecrosis in 10% of evaluable patients, respectively. 6 patients (10%) were alive after 9 years without progression and no late toxicity grade ≥3, except for 2 patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis.

Conclusion

Hyperfractionated re-RT with 60 Gy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was a curative treatment option with acceptable toxicity in LRR/SP patients. Patients with higher comorbidity had a higher probability of failing to receive and complete the intended therapy. Consequently, they derived unsatisfactory benefits from re-RT, highlighting the importance of patient selection.

Safety and efficacy of CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation as a salvage treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer after two or more courses of radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the past, patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) who had previously received a high dose of radiation and were unable to undergo surgery were mainly treated with palliative chemotherapy due to the high incidence of side effects from re-irradiation. With the development of radiotherapy technology, re-irradiation of recurrent lesions by radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation (RISI) has been proposed as a feasible therapeutic approach. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided RISI in the treatment of rHNC after two or more courses of radiotherapy, and to analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Data of 33 patients with rHNC who received CT-guided RISI after two or more courses of radiotherapy were collected and statistically analyzed. The median cumulative dose of the previous radiotherapy was 110 Gy. Short-term efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) criteria, while adverse events were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) criteria.

RESULTS

The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 29.5 cc, and the postoperative median dose to 90% of target volume (D90) was 136.8 Gy. For adverse reactions, enhanced pain was found in 3 (9.1%) patients, followed by grade 1 to 2 acute skin reactions in 3 (9.1%) patients, grade 2 to 3 late skin reactions in 2 (6.1%) patients, grade 1 to 2 early mucosal reactions in 4 (12.1%) patients, and mandibular osteonecrosis in 1 (3.0%) patient. Regarding the treatment efficacy, the 1- and 2-year local control (LC) rates were 47.8% and 36.4% (median LC time, 10 months), and the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 41.3% and 32.2% (median OS time, 8 months). The absence of adverse events was associated with better LC.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided RISI, as a salvage therapy, demonstrated acceptable safety and efficacy in the treatment of rHNC after two or more courses of radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Register database (Registration No. ChiCTR2200063261 ) in September 2, 2022.

Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Freedom from Cancer Recurrence Rate

Salvage re-irradiation (rRT) for patients with locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) remains challenging. A retrospective analysis was performed on 49 patients who received rRT between 2011 and 2018. The co-primary endpoint of the study was 2-year freedom from cancer recurrence rate (FCRR) and overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastases (DM), and RTOG grade 3 ≥ late toxicities. Adjuvant and definitive rRT were delivered to 22 and 27 patients, respectively. A total of 91% of patients were managed with conventional re-RT and 71% of patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up after rRT was 30 months. The 2-year FCRR, OS, DFS, LF, RF, and DM were 64%, 51%, 28%, 32%, 9%, and 39% respectively. MVA showed that poor performance status (PS: 1-2 vs. 0) and age > 52 years were predictive of worse OS. In comparison, poor PS (1-2 vs. 0) and total dose of rRT < 60 Gy were predictive of worse DFS. Late RTOG toxicity of grade 3 ≥ was reported in nine (18.3%) patients. FCRR at 2 years after salvage rRT for rHNC was higher than other traditional endpoints and could be an important endpoint to be included in future rRT studies. rRT for rHNC at our cohort was relatively successful, with a manageable level of late severe toxicity. Replacing this approach in other developing countries is a viable option.

Proton beam therapy in repeat irradiation of recurrent head and neck tumors: analysis of short-term results

Introduction. Recurrence of head and neck tumors occurs in 50 % of cases and usually has locoregional character. Due to the characteristics of dose distribution, proton beam therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with recurrences of tumors in this location who previously underwent radiation therapy.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of repeat irradiation using active scanning proton beam therapy in patients with recurrent head and neck tumors who previously underwent radiation therapy.

Materials and methods. Between November of 2015 and December of 2020, 40 patients with locoregional recurrence of head and neck tumors underwent treatment using active scanning proton beam therapy at the A. F . Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center. Median cumulative dose of primary irradiation was 64.5 Gy. Median time between primary and repeat irradiation was 35.7 months, mean irradiated volume of the repeat course was 94.5 cm3. Proton beam therapy was performed using standard mode (2 isoGy) and accelerated hypofractionation (2.4 isoGy / 3 isoGy) with mean equivalent cumulative dose of 56.4 Gy (α / β = 10). Radiation toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group European (RTOG) / Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scale.

Results. Treatment response was achieved in 34 (85 %) patients: in 17 (42.5 %) patients, stable disease was observed; in 10 (25 %) patients, partial response was observed; and in 7 (17.5 %) patients, complete response was observed. In 6 (15 %) cases, disease progression was diagnosed at first follow-up examination. One- and two-year locoregional control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 58.4 / 19.8; 44.5 / 19.8 and 82.3 / 38.8 % respectively with median follow-up duration of 14.2 months. Median survival was 19.5 months. Grade III and above early radiation toxicity was observed in 3 (7.5 %) patients. In total, 6 (15 %) cases of grade III complications and 2 (5 %) episodes of carotid artery rupture leading to death were observed. Overall frequency of complications of grade III and higher was 20 %.

Conclusion. Repeat irradiation using proton beam therapy can be considered an effective and safe treatment method for patients with recurrent head and neck tumors. Dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of proton beams allow to achieve balance between high doses and radiation exposure in previously irradiated tissues.

Management of Recurrent HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Contemporary Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the impact of contemporary treatment strategies on salvage outcomes in patients with recurrent human papilloma virus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Secondary to HPV, changes in disease biology have impacted primary treatments and subsequent approaches to patients with recurrence. With treatment strategies more inclusive of upfront surgery, the characteristics of patients with recurrence HPV + OPSCC have been further redefined. Less invasive endoscopic surgical approaches such as transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and the continued refinement of conformal radiotherapy techniques, have improved treatment options for patients with recurrent HPV + OPSCC. Systemic treatment options have continued to expand including potentially effective immune-based therapies. Effective surveillance with systemic and oral biomarkers offers hope of earlier detection of recurrence. Management of patients with recurrent OPSCC remains difficult. Modest improvements in salvage treatment have been observed within the HPV + OPSCC cohort largely reflecting disease biology and improved treatment techniques.

Reirradiation for local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers: a multi-institutional study

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation in patients with locally recurrent oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers. We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 129 patients with previously irradiated cancer. The most frequent primary sites were the nasopharynx (43.4%), oral cavity (24.8%), and oropharynx (18.6%). With a median follow-up duration of 10.6 months, the median overall survival was 14.4 months and the 2-year overall survival rate was 40.6%. For each primary site, the 2-year overall survival rates were 32.1%, 34.6%, 30%, 60.8%, and 5.7% for the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx, nasopharynx, and oropharynx, respectively. Prognostic factors for overall survival were primary site (nasopharynx versus other sites) and gross tumor volume (GTV) (≤ 25 cm³ versus > 25 cm³). The 2-year local control rate was 41.2%. Twenty-four patients (18.6%) presented with grade ≥ 3 toxicities, including nine with hemorrhages that led to grade 5 toxicities in seven patients. All nine tumors that caused hemorrhage showed tumor encasement of the carotid ≥ 180 degrees and eight of nine tumors had larger GTV > 25 cm³. Reirradiation is a feasible treatment option for small local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, with the requirement of a strict eligibility assessment for large tumors with carotid encasement.

Quality of Life in Patients With Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

In the setting of similar outcomes, quality of life (QOL) measures can be utilized to compare treatment modalities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We evaluate QOL and symptoms in patients treated for primary, second primary, and recurrent HNSCC.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Head and neck cancer survivorship clinic.

METHODS

We identified patients seen between 2016 and 2019. QOL and symptoms were assessed with the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire, 10-item Eating Assessment Tool, 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Neck Disability Index. Regression analysis was utilized to explore associations and compare QOL outcomes.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 662 patients: 546 with primary HNSCC, 34 with second primary HNSCC, and 82 with recurrent HNSCC. Multimodality therapy was associated with lower UW-QOL Physical Subscale (UW-QOL-PS) vs single modality: chemoradiation therapy (-12.17 [95% CI, -16.57 to -7.78]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-12.11 [-16.06 to -8.16]). Multimodality therapy was also associated with lower UW-QOL Social-Emotional Subscale (UW-QOL-SS): chemoradiation therapy (-6.70 [-11.41 to -1.99]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-7.41 [-11.63 to -3.19]). Recurrence (-14.42 [-18.80 to -10.04]) and second primary (-11.15 [-17.71 to -4.59]) demonstrated lower UW-QOL-PS vs primary. Radiation for recurrence or second primary had worse UW-QOL-PS (-10.43 [-19.27 to -1.59]) and UW-QOL-SS (-10.58 [-18.76 to -1.54]) and higher Eating Assessment Tool (6.08 [1.39-10.77]) than surgery alone. Surgery + postadjuvant treatment showed worse UW-QOL-PS (-12.65 [-23.76 to -1.54]) and UW-QOL-SS (-12.20 [-22.38 to -2.03]).

CONCLUSION

Multimodality therapy, particularly with recurrent and second primary HNSCC, is more likely to contribute to diminished QOL and symptoms. This important consideration should play a role in framing informed discussions with patients regarding treatment.

Treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrent/ metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCNH) is still a difficult-to-treat disease with poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment choices. In view of locoregional recurrent versus distant metastatic SCCHN, the therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab-containing regimen and relevant prognostic factors for these two groups may be different. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic SCCHN groups, and to identify clinical factors correlated with better survival outcomes.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, patients with R/M SCCHN who received cetuximab-containing regimen in our institute were enrolled in this study. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in both locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis groups. Exploratory analysis were conducted to investigate major clinical features associated with better outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with locoregional recurrent SCCHN (N = 66) and distant metastatic SCCNH (N = 41) who received cetuximab-containing regimen were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with oral cavity cancer and patients with disease recurrence within 6 months after radiation therapy were significantly increased in locoregional recurrence group. The median OS (15.6 vs. 9.7 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (5.8 months vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.008) were longer in locoregional recurrence group than in distant metastasis group. In multivariate analysis of clinical features, locoregional recurrence was still an important risk factor associated with better OS (Hazzard ratio (HR) 0.64, p = 0.06) and PFS (HR 0.67, p = 0.075). In addition, a trend of favorable disease control rate (DCR; 62.5% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.056) was noted in locoregional recurrence group. In locoregional recurrence group, prior salvage surgery was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.24, P = 0.008) and PFS (HR = 0.30, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

SCCHN with locoregional recurrence is associated with better disease control and survival outcomes comparing to distant metastatic SCCHN when treated with cetuximab-containing regimen. Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence may further improves clinical outcome.

Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS

Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT.

RESULTS

The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2-3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes.

Phase I study of nab-paclitaxel-based induction followed by nab-paclitaxel-based concurrent chemotherapy and re-irradiation in previously treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with poor overall survival (OS). Prior studies suggested incorporation of nab-paclitaxel (A) may improve outcomes in recurrent HNSCC.

METHODS

This Phase I study evaluated induction with carboplatin and A followed by concomitant FHX (infusional 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea and twice-daily radiation therapy administered every other week) plus A with cohort dose escalation ranging from 10-100 mg/m2 in recurrent HNSCC. The primary endpoint was maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of A when given in combination with FHX (AFHX).

RESULTS

Forty-eight eligible pts started induction; 28 pts started AFHX and were evaluable for toxicity. Two DLTs occurred (both Grade 4 mucositis) at a dose level 20 mg/m2. No further DLTs were observed with subsequent dose escalation. The MTD and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of A was 100 mg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Phase I study, the RP2D of A with FHX is 100 mg/m2 (AFHX). The role of re-irradiation with immunotherapy warrants further investigation.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

This clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847326.

Using feasibility dose-volume histograms to reduce intercampus plan quality variability for head-and-neck cancer

The purpose of this work is to objectively assess variability of intercampus plan quality for head-and-neck (HN) cancer and to test utility of a priori feasibility dose-volume histograms (FDVHs) as planning dose goals. In this study, 109 plans treated from 2017 to 2019 were selected, with 52 from the main campus and 57 from various regional centers. For each patient, the planning computed tomography images and contours were imported into a commercial program to generate FDVHs with a feasibility value (f-value) ranging from 0.0 to 0.5. For 10 selected organs-at-risk (OARs), we used the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to quantify the overlaps between FDVH and clinically achieved DVH of each OAR and determined the f-value associated with the maximum DSC (labeled as f-max). Subsequently, 10 HN plans from the regional centers were replanned with planning dose goals guided by FDVHs. The clinical and feasibility-guided auto-planning (FgAP) plans were evaluated using our institutional criteria. Among plans from the main campus and regional centers, the median f-max values were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) for all OARs except for the left parotid (p = 0.622), oral cavity (p = 0.057), and mandible (p = 0.237). For the 10 FgAP plans, the median values of f-max were 0.21, compared to 0.37 from the clinical plans. With comparable dose coverage to the tumor volumes, the significant differences (p < 0.05) in the median f-max and corresponding dose reduction (shown in parenthesis) for the spinal cord, larynx, supraglottis, trachea, and esophagus were 0.27 (8.5 Gy), 0.3 (7.6 Gy), 0.19 (5.9 Gy), 0.19 (8.9 Gy), and 0.12 (4.0 Gy), respectively. In conclusion, the FDVH prediction is an objective quality assurance tool to evaluate the intercampus plan variability. This tool can also provide guideline in planning dose goals to further improve plan quality.

Salvage Post-Operative Stereotatic Ablative Radiotherapy for Re-Current Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Background and Objectives: Patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (rHNC) face an aggressive disease. Surgical resection is the gold standard treatment. Immediate adjuvant post-operative stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (PO-SABR) for rHNC is debatable. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who were treated with PO-SABR at the AC Camargo Cancer Center, Brazil. Results: Eleven patients were treated between 2018 and 2021. The median time between salvage surgery and PO-SABR was 31 days (range, 25–42) and the median PO-SABR total dose was 40 Gy (range, 30–48 Gy). The 2-and 4-year actuarial DFS were 62.3% and 41.6%, while the 2-and 4-year OS probabilities were 80.0% and 53.3%, respectively. Eight (72.7%) patients were alive and six (54.5%) were without disease at the last follow-up. Two (18.1%) patients had local failure in the PO-SABR field. Three (27.3%) patients had distant metastasis, diagnosed in a median time of 9 months (range, 4–13) after completion of PO-SABR. On univariate analysis, predictive factors related to worse OS were: interval between previous radiotherapy and PO-SABR ≤ 24 months (p = 0.033) and location of the salvage target in the oral cavity (p = 0.013). The total dose of PO-SABR given in more than three fractions was marginally statistically significant, favoring the OS (p = 0.051). Conclusions: Our results encourage the use of a more aggressive approach in selected patients with rHNC by combining salvage surgery with immediate PO-SABRT, but this association needs to be further explored.

Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial

Background

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) yields biophysical advantages compared to photons but randomized studies for the reirradiation setting are pending. The aim of the current project was to evaluate potential clinical benefits and drawbacks of CIRT compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in recurrent head and neck cancer.

Methods

Dose-volume parameters and local failure patterns of CIRT compared to VMAT were evaluate in 16 patients from the randomized CARE trial on head and neck cancer reirradiation.

Results

Despite an increased target dose, CIRT resulted in significantly reduced organ at risk (OAR) dose across all patients (− 8.7% Dmean). The dose-volume benefits were most pronounced in the brainstem (− 20.7% Dmax) and the optic chiasma (− 13.0% Dmax). The most frequent local failure was type E (extraneous; 50%), followed type B (peripheral; 33%) and type A (central; 17%). In one patient with type A biological and/or dosimetric failure after CIRT, mMKM dose recalculation revealed reduced target coverage.

Conclusions

CIRT resulted in highly improved critical OAR sparing compared to VMAT across all head and neck cancer reirradiation scenarios despite an increased prescription dose. Local failure pattern analysis revealed further potential CIRT specific clinical benefits and potential pitfalls with regard to image-guidance and biological dose-optimization.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4.

Validation of Monte Carlo 131 I radiopharmaceutical dosimetry workflow using a 3D printed anthropomorphic head and neck phantom

Purpose

Approximately 50% of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients will experience loco‐regional disease recurrence following initial courses of therapy. Retreatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is technically challenging and may be associated with a significant risk of irreversible damage to normal tissues. Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is a potential method to treat recurrent HNC in conjunction with EBRT. Phantoms are used to calibrate and add quantification to nuclear medicine images, and anthropomorphic phantoms can account for both the geometrical and material composition of the head and neck. In this study, we present the creation of an anthropomorphic, head and neck, nuclear medicine phantom, and its characterization for the validation of a Monte Carlo, SPECT image‐based, ¹³¹I RPT dosimetry workflow.

Methods

3D‐printing techniques were used to create the anthropomorphic phantom from a patient CT dataset. Three ¹³¹I SPECT/CT imaging studies were performed using a homogeneous, Jaszczak, and an anthropomorphic phantom to quantify the SPECT images using a GE Optima NM/CT 640 with a high energy general purpose collimator. The impact of collimator detector response (CDR) modeling and volume‐based partial volume corrections (PVCs) upon the absorbed dose was calculated using an image‐based, Geant4 Monte Carlo RPT dosimetry workflow and compared against a ground truth scenario. Finally, uncertainties were quantified in accordance with recent EANM guidelines.

Results

The 3D‐printed anthropomorphic phantom was an accurate re‐creation of patient anatomy including bone. The extrapolated Jaszczak recovery coefficients were greater than that of the 3D‐printed insert (∼22.8 ml) for both the CDR and non‐CDR cases (with CDR: 0.536 vs. 0.493, non‐CDR: 0.445 vs. 0.426, respectively). Utilizing Jaszczak phantom PVCs, the absorbed dose was underpredicted by 0.7% and 4.9% without and with CDR, respectively. Utilizing anthropomorphic phantom recovery coefficient overpredicted the absorbed dose by 3% both with and without CDR. All dosimetry scenarios that incorporated PVC were within the calculated uncertainty of the activity. The uncertainties in the cumulative activity ranged from 23.6% to 106.4% for Jaszczak spheres ranging in volume from 0.5 to 16 ml.

Conclusion

The accuracy of Monte Carlo‐based dosimetry for ¹³¹I RPT in HNC was validated with an anthropomorphic phantom. In this study, it was found that Jaszczak‐based PVCs were sufficient. Future applications of the phantom could involve 3D printing and characterizing patient‐specific volumes for more personalized RPT dosimetry estimates.

Emerging Role of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Reirradiation of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancers: What Have We Achieved So Far?

Administering reirradiation for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers is extremely challenging. These tumors are hypoxic and radioresistant and require escalated radiation doses for adequate control. The obstacle to delivering this escalated dose of radiation to the target is its proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs) and possible development of consequent severe late toxicities. With the emergence of highly sophisticated technologies, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy have shown promising outcomes. Proton beam radiotherapy has been used for locally recurrent head and neck cancers because of its excellent physical dose distribution, exploring sharp Bragg peak properties with negligible entrance and exit doses. To further improve these results, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been explored in several countries across Europe and Asia because of its favorable physical properties with minimal entrance and exit doses, sharper lateral penumbra, and much higher and variable relative biological efficacy, which cannot be currently achieved with any other form of radiation. Few studies have described the role of CIRT in recurrent head and neck cancers. In this article, we have discussed the different aspects of carbon ions in reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancers, including European and Asian experiences, different dose schedules, dose constraints of OARs, outcomes, and toxicities, and a brief comparison with proton beam radiotherapy and IMRT.

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice.

METHODS

We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.

Percutaneous Cryoablation for Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors

PURPOSE

To report techniques and results of 16 cryoablation procedures in 11 patients treated for recurrent head and neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study reviewed 11 consecutive patients with head and neck cancer recurrence after primary treatment by surgery and radiotherapy, treated with cryoablation between 2016 and 2020. Efficacy was measured by local control rate evaluated on MRI or/and PET. Tumor characteristics, number of cryoprobes, thermoprotective measures and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Sixteen cryoablation procedures were performed in 11 patients with head and neck cancer recurrence after surgery or radiotherapy, deemed ineligible for classic salvage treatment. Among 11 patients, four were treated for an epidermoid carcinoma, four for an adenocarcinoma and three for other types: 1 muco-epidermoid carcinoma, 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma and 1 esthesioneuroblastoma, 10/11 patients had prior surgery, 7/11 patients had prior chemotherapy and 3/11 patients had prior radiotherapy. Median number of cryoprobes was 4, [IQR, 3-6 cryoprobes], thermoprotective measures to protect surrounding organs were required for 10/16 procedures. After cryoablation, local control rate was 45.4% at a mean follow-up of 11.7 months (range 3-34 months). Among the 16 cryoablation procedures, four resulted in complications, two were considered major complications: one septic shock on inhalation pneumopathy during extubation, requiring intensive care; and one dysphonia due to a recurrent nerve injury.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation as a salvage treatment for recurrence of head and neck tumors after surgery and/or radiotherapy is an effective option, especially for patients that cannot benefit from salvage surgery.

Reirradiation of Recurrent and Second Primary Cancers of the Head and Neck: a Review of the Contemporary Evidence

OPINION STATEMENT

Recurrent and second primary head and neck cancers represent a clinical challenge due to frequently unresectable and/or locally advanced disease. Given that many of these patients have received definitive doses of radiation previously, reirradiation is associated with significant morbidity. Use of modern approaches such as conformal photon-based planning and charged particle therapy using protons or carbon ions allows for greater sparing of normal tissues while maintaining or escalating doses to tumor volumes. While the reirradiation data has consistently shown benefits to local control and even survival from escalation of radiotherapy dose, excessive cumulative doses can result in severe toxicities, including fatal carotid blowout syndrome. For all modalities, appropriate patient selection is of utmost importance. Large-scale trials and multi-institutional registry data are needed to standardize treatment modalities, and to determine optimal doses and volumes for reirradiation.

A Prospective Phase II Study of Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Report of Feasibility, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Simple Summary

The delivery of higher radiation doses has been shown to increase local control, and ultimately survival, for head and neck cancer patients, but highly conformal dose distributions are necessary to minimize normal tissue toxicity. Varian’s HyperArc non-coplanar automated treatment planning and delivery technique has been shown to improve dose conformity for intracranial treatment, but its safety and efficacy for head and neck cancer treatment has yet to be verified. This study evaluates the initial results of a prospective clinical trial using HyperArc for recurrent head and neck cancer patients. We demonstrated that HyperArc can enable significant tumor dose escalation compared to conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning while minimizing the dose to organs at risk. Treatment delivery was feasible and safe, with minimal treatment-related toxicities and positive patient-reported quality of life measures.

Abstract

This study reports the initial results for the first 15 patients on a prospective phase II clinical trial exploring the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the HyperArc technique for recurrent head and neck cancer treatment. Eligible patients were simulated and planned with both conventional VMAT and HyperArc techniques and the plan with superior dosimetry was selected for treatment. Dosimetry, delivery feasibility and safety, treatment-related toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) were all evaluated. HyperArc was chosen over conventional VMAT for all 15 patients and enabled statistically significant increases in dose conformity (R50% reduced by 1.2 ± 2.1, p < 0.05) and mean PTV and GTV doses (by 15.7 ± 4.9 Gy, p < 0.01 and 17.1 ± 6.0 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively). The average HyperArc delivery was 2.8 min longer than conventional VMAT (p < 0.01), and the mean intrafraction motion was ≤ 0.5 ± 0.4 mm and ≤0.3 ± 0.1°. With a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment-related toxicity was minimal (only one grade 3 acute toxicity above baseline) and patient-reported QOL metrics were favorable. HyperArc enabled superior dosimetry and significant target dose escalation compared to conventional VMAT planning, and treatment delivery was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients.

Re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based re-irradiation (reRT) for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent IMRT-based reRT for recurrent or second primary HNC between 2007 and 2019 at two institutions were included. Medical records and dosimetric data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), severe late toxicities, and clinicopathological prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

A total of 42 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.7 to 85.8 months), the median OS was 28.9 months with a 2-year OS rate of 54.6%. The median PFS and 2-year PFS rates were 10.0 months and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that good performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1), a longer time interval (≥24 months) between radiotherapy courses, and higher reRT dose (>60 Gy) were significantly favorable factors for OS (all p < 0.05). Higher reRT dose and salvage surgery were significantly associated with improved PFS (all p < 0.05). Regarding the Multi‐Institution Reirradiation (MIRI) Collaborative RPA classification, the 2-year OS rates of each class were 87.5% in class I, 51.8% in class II, and 0% in class III (p = 0.008). Grade ≥3 late toxicity was reported in 10 (23.8%) patients. There was no significant factor associated with increased late toxicities.

Conclusion

IMRT-based reRT should be considered as a treatment option for patients with recurrent or second primary HNC. Further trials are needed to establish a subset of patients who may benefit from reRT without severe late toxicity.

Reirradiation for Nasal Cavity or Paranasal Sinus Tumor-A Multi-Institutional Study

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation of nasal cavity or paranasal sinus tumors. We collected and analyzed multi-institutional data of reirradiation cases. Seventy-eight patients with nasal or paranasal sinus tumors underwent reirradiation. The median survival time was 20 months with a medial follow-up of 10.7 months. The 2-year local control and overall survival rates were 43% and 44%, respectively. Tumor volume (≤25 cm³), duration between previous radiotherapy and reirradiation (≤12 months), histology (squamous cell carcinoma), male sex, and lymph node involvement were predisposing factors for poor survival. Distant metastasis was observed in 20 patients (25.6%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 22% of the patients, including five grade 4 (8.6%) cases and one grade 5 (1.2%) case. Tumor location adjacent to the optic pathway was a significant predisposing factor for grade ≥3 visual toxicity. Reirradiation of nasal and paranasal sinus tumors is feasible and effective. However, adverse events, including disease-related toxicities, were significant. Prognostic factors emerge from this study to guide multidisciplinary approaches and clinical trial designs.