Randomized, phase III study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus standard every-3-weeks administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Phase II study of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab for non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (Hanshin Cancer Group IP002)

BACKGROUND

There is an increased risk of acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia when treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. There is no standard optimal treatment regimen for patients with lung cancer complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin (CBDCA), bevacizumab (Bmab) and weekly paclitaxel (PXT) in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

METHODS

This phase 2 study involved chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Patients received CBDCA (area under the curve: 5 on day 1), PXT (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) and Bmab (15 mg/kg on day 1) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled between January 2013 and October 2018 and received at least one course of the protocol treatment. The study was terminated before enrolling the planned number of patients because of poor accrual. The median patient age was 69 (range: 62-79) years, and 19 (90.5%) patients were men. The overall response rate was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.4-81.9), meeting the primary endpoint. The median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival were 9.69 (95% CI, 5.78-11.63), 8.21 (95% CI, 3.75-11.63) and 20.93 (95% CI, 13.17-29.83) months, respectively. There was no acute exacerbation or treatment-related death during protocol treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia could be effectively and safely treated using a combination of CBDCA, PXT and Bmab.

Paclitaxel therapeutic drug monitoring - International association of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology recommendations

Paclitaxel, one of the most frequently used anticancer drugs, is dosed by body surface area, which leads to substantial inter-individual variability in systemic drug exposure. We evaluated clinical evidence regarding the scientific rationale and clinical benefit of individualized paclitaxel dosing based on measured systemic concentrations, known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). In retrospective studies, higher systemic exposure is associated with greater toxicity and efficacy of paclitaxel treatment across several disease types and dosing regimens. In prospective trials, TDM reduces variability in systemic exposure, and has been demonstrated to reduce toxicity while retaining treatment efficacy for 3-weekly dosing in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Despite the demonstrated benefits of paclitaxel TDM, clinical adoption has been limited due to the challenges with sample collection and analysis. Based on our review, we strongly recommend TDM for patients receiving every 3-week paclitaxel in combination with a platinum agent for advanced NSCLC, due to the prospectively demonstrated clinical benefits, and find moderate evidence to recommend TDM for paclitaxel 3-hour infusions for other tumor types and preliminary evidence suggesting potential usefulness for paclitaxel administered by 1-hour infusions.

Exploring the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Carboplatin and Weekly Paclitaxel for Frail Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Key Investigative Study

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint blockers have revolutionized the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, is a standard therapy either alone or in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-IO). The current study explores the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in a cohort of frail patients.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study was conducted between 22 September 2020 and 19 January 2023 regarding patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with chemo-IO combination: carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min; Q4W), weekly paclitaxel (90 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15), and pembrolizumab (200 mg Q4W). The primary objective was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), toxicity profile, and outcomes based on histological subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (20 squamous and 14 non-squamous NSCLC) benefited from the chemo-IO regimen for frail patients; 41.9% had an ECOG-PS = 2. The median age was 75.5 years. We observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 55.9%. Notably, squamous NSCLC exhibited a significantly higher ORR (80%) than non-squamous NSCLC (21.4%); p = 0.001. The median rw-PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI [6.0, NA]), with 6- and 12-month rw-PFS rates of 69% and 45.8%, respectively. The median OS was not reached, with 12- and 18-month OS rates of 75.6% and 61.4%, respectively. The median number of maintenance cycles of pembrolizumab was 5 (0; 27). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced a toxicity related to chemotherapy leading to a reduction of the dose administered and, in five patients (14.7%), to the permanent discontinuation of chemotherapy. Six patients (17.6%) had an immune-related adverse event leading to the discontinuation of immunotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in frail patients with metastatic NSCLC, especially for ORR in sq-NSCLC. Prospective studies focusing on frail populations are warranted in order to validate these findings and optimize therapeutic strategies in the first-line setting.

Improving the performance status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy (ImPACt trial): a phase 2 study

PURPOSE

This phase II trial is designed to test whether the performance status (PS) of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients (pts) can improve with chemotherapy if their poor PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of ≥ 2) is due to disease burden rather than comorbidities.

METHODS

Age18-65 years, Charlson's comorbidity index < 9, serum albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl, adequate bone marrow and organ function, & ECOG PS ≥ 2 as judged by the worst score of three independent physicians were administered 3 doses of weekly paclitaxel at 60 mg/m2/dose. The primary endpoint was an improvement in ECOG PS by 1 point at 4 weeks; others: toxicity (CTCAE v 5.0), quality of life (QoL) assessment at baseline and 4 weeks by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13. Optimal Simon's 2-stage design was used.

RESULTS

 Forty-six patients were included with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, IQR 54-59), 12 (26%) had comorbid conditions, and 87% with ECOG PS 3/4. PS improved in 11 pts at 4 weeks and in 7 beyond this time point. Grade 3/4 toxicities are seen in 20% (most common: anemia and diarrhea). At a median follow-up of 4.8 m (95% CI 3.27-14.9), the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.3 months (95% CI 2.36-5.6) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.47-8.8), respectively. QoL improved for global QoL, role functioning, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, pain in the chest, pain in other parts, and worsened for alopecia and sore mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

 Abbreviated chemotherapy is a useful, well-tolerated strategy in carefully selected poor PS mNSCLC patients that can improve PS and QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/01/022617.

The inhibitory receptors PD1, Tim3, and A2aR are highly expressed during mesoCAR T cell manufacturing in advanced human epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy and surgery have been the mainstays of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treatment so far. Cellular immunotherapies such as CAR T cell therapy have recently given hope of a cure for solid tumors like EOC. However, extrinsic factors associated with the CAR T cell manufacturing process and/or intrinsic dysregulation of patient-derived T cells, which could be associated with cancer itself, cancer stage, and treatment regimen, may hamper the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy and promote their exhaustion or dysfunction.

METHODS

To investigate the association of these factors with CAR T cell exhaustion, the frequency of T and CAR T cells expressing three immune inhibitory receptors (i.e., TIM3, PD1, A2aR) generated from T cells of EOC patients and healthy controls was measured during each stage of CAR T cell production.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that primary T cells from EOC patients show significantly elevated expression of immune inhibitory receptors, and this increase was more prominent in patients undergoing chemotherapy and those with advanced cancer. In addition, the CAR T cell manufacturing process itself was found to upregulate the expression of these inhibitory receptors and more importantly increase the population of exhausted mesoCAR T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest that intrinsic characteristics of patient-derived T cells and extrinsic factors in CAR T cell production protocols should be considered and properly counteracted during CAR T cell manufacturing process. In addition, mitigating the signaling of immune inhibitory receptors through pharmacological/genetic perturbation during CAR T cell manufacturing might profoundly improve CAR T cells function and their antitumor activity in EOC and other solid tumors.

A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)

Background

Inhibitors of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins potentiate antitumor activity of platinum chemotherapy. This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitor talazoparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Methods

We conducted a phase I study of talazoparib with carboplatin AUC5‐6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m² days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients enrolled using a 3 + 3 design in two cohorts with talazoparib for 7 (schedule A) or 3 days (schedule B). After induction with 4–6 cycles of triplet therapy, patients received one of three maintenance options: (a) continuation of triplet (b) carboplatin/talazoparib, or (c) talazoparib monotherapy.

Results

Forty‐three patients were treated. The MTD for both schedules was talazoparib 250mcg daily. The main toxicity was myelosuppression including grade 3/4 hematologic treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs). Dose modification occurred in 87% and 100% of patients for schedules A and B, respectively. Discontinuation due to TRAEs was 13% in schedule A and 10% in B. Ten out of 22 evaluable patients in schedule A and 5/16 patients in schedule B had a complete or partial response. Twelve out of 43 patients received ≥6 cycles of talazoparib after induction, with a 13‐month median duration of maintenance.

Conclusion

We have established the recommended phase II dose of Talazoparib at 250mcg on a 3‐ or 7‐day schedule with carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles. This regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and in addition to maximizing supportive care, modification of the chemotherapy component would be a consideration for further development of this combination with the schedules investigated in this study.

Comparison of one-week versus three-week paclitaxel for advanced pan-carcinomas: systematic review and meta-analysis

Paclitaxel remains the first-line chemotherapy regimen for many malignant tumors. However, prognosis and adverse events under different dosing regimens (one-week versus three-week treatment) remain contradictory in many randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to measure the efficacy and toxicities of these two dosing regimens. Four databases were systematically retrieved. RCTs comparing two paclitaxel dosing regimens for advanced malignant tumors with assessable outcomes (e.g., overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicities, response rates) were included. In total, 19 eligible RCTs involving 9 674 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pan-cancers revealed that weekly paclitaxel treatment was more beneficial regarding PFS compared to three-week paclitaxel treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82–0.99, P = 0.02). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in terms of OS between the two dosing regimens (HR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.91–1.06, P = 0.62) or other tested subgroups. In terms of serious adverse events, grade 3 or 4 (G3/4) neutropenia, G3/4 febrile neutropenia, G3/4 arthritis, and G3/4 alopecia occurred less often under weekly paclitaxel treatment. In summary, Weekly paclitaxel treatment demonstrates better PFS and fewer chemotherapy-induced hematological and non-hematological toxicities compared to the three-week paclitaxel regimen.

Dose-dense Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIB/IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer - A Phase II trial

AIMS

The approach to potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. There is a benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), but the ideal regimen is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense NACT in potentially resectable NSCLC in this phase II trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 with AUC-6 carboplatin on day 1, 3 weekly for four cycles was evaluated as NACT. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, stage IIB and IIIA (with only non-bulky N2 nodes) were included. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Secondary end points included toxicity, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, complete resection rate and overall survival. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated to define tolerability (CTRI/2016/05/006916).

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients were enrolled (median age 55 years). Most (78.8%) were smokers. Most patients had adenocarcinoma (57.6%) and stage IIIA disease (81.0%) according to the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Seventy-eight per cent of patients completed four cycles. The objective response rate was 75.6% with a complete response in 10.8%. The mean RDI of paclitaxel was 88.61%, with 68.0% of patients able to maintain an RDI ≥85.0%. In total, 187 toxicity events were recorded (120 grade 1, 64 grade 2 and three grade 3 events). Common toxicities were peripheral neuropathy (20.3%), myalgia (19.8%), nausea (15.7%) and neutropenia (10.2%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Seventeen patients underwent surgery (lobectomy 82.4%). After a median follow-up of 47 months (95% confidence interval 27-50.7 months), the median progression-free survival was 9.6 months (7.4-17.4) and overall survival was 29.2 months (16.0-37.2).

CONCLUSION

Dose-dense paclitaxel-carboplatin is feasible, safe and efficacious and should be evaluated further in potentially resectable NSCLC.

An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pemetrexed-Carboplatin versus (Weekly) Paclitaxel-Carboplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Before the approval of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, platinum doublets were the standard of care in patients with treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. Pemetrexed-platinum combinations are preferred in non-squamous NSCLC. However, there has been no direct comparison to paclitaxel-carboplatin.

METHODS

This open-label randomized trial was designed to compare pemetrexed-carboplatin with (weekly) paclitaxel-carboplatin in treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without driver mutations. Patients received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on day 1, day 8, and day 15 with carboplatin AUC 5 every 4 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients in both arms were allowed to receive pemetrexed maintenance.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The study was terminated early; however, at the time of analysis 75.8% of the required events had occurred. Finally, 164 patients were evaluable, 83 in the pemetrexed arm and 81 in the paclitaxel arm. After a median follow-up of 17 months, progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 months were not different in the two treatment arms (47.45 vs. 48.64%, p = 0.88). The median PFS values were 5.67 months (95% CI 3.73-7.3) and 5.03 months (95% CI 2.63-7.43) in each arm, respectively (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.81-1.59, p = 0.44). The median overall survival was also not different: 14.83 months (95% CI 9.5-18.73) and 11.3 (95% CI 8.3-19.7; HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.8-1.78, p = 0.37). All grade toxicities were similar except for alopecia and peripheral neuropathy, which were higher in the paclitaxel arm.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed-carboplatin is not superior to (weekly) paclitaxel-carboplatin as the first-line regimen in advanced non-squamous NSCLC in terms of PFS.

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Mucosal Melanoma

PURPOSE

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a highly vascularized tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, we characterized the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CPB) in patients with previously untreated advanced MM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) once every 4 weeks in combination with (CPB arm, 5 mg/kg) or without (CP arm) bevacizumab once every 2 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We recruited 114 patients to our study. The median PFS was significantly longer in the CPB arm (4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.0 months) than in the CP arm (3.0 months; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3 months) (hazard ratio, 0.461; 95% CI, 0.306 to 0.695; P < .001). Objective response rates were 19.7% and 13.2%, respectively (P = .384). The median OS was also significantly longer in the CPB arm than in the CP arm (13.6 v 9.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.611; 95% CI, 0.407 to 0.917; P = .017). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with metastatic MM who received bevacizumab in addition to CPB than in those who received CPB alone. A phase III study should be performed to confirm these benefits (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02023710).

Time-to-Event Analysis of Paclitaxel-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Highlighting Key Influential Treatment/Patient Factors

Paclitaxel-associated peripheral neuropathy (PN), a major dose-limiting toxicity, significantly impacts patients' quality of life/treatment outcome. Evaluation of risk factors often ignores time of PN onset, precluding the impact of time-dependent factors, e.g., drug exposure, needed to comprehensively characterize PN. We employed parametric time-to-event (TTE) analysis to describe the time course of risk of first occurrence of clinically relevant PN grades ≥2 (PN2+, n = 105, common terminology criteria v4.0) and associated patient/treatment characteristics, leveraging data from 365 patients (1454 cycles) receiving paclitaxel every 3 weeks (plus carboplatin AUC = 6 or cisplatin 80 mg/m2) for ≤6 cycles. Paclitaxel was intravenously administered (3 hours) as standard 200-mg/m2 doses (n = 182) or as pharmacokinetic-guided dosing (n = 183). A cycle-varying hazard TTE model linking surge in hazard of PN2+ to paclitaxel administration [PN2+ proportions (i.e., cases per 1000 patients), 1st day, cycle 1: 4.87 of 1000; cycle 6: 7.36 of 1000] and linear decline across cycle (last day, cycle 1: 1.64 of 1000; cycle 6: 2.48 of 1000) adequately characterized the time-varying hazard of PN2+. From joint covariate evaluation, PN2+ proportions (1st day, cycle 1) increased by 1.00 per 1000 with 5-μmol·h/l higher paclitaxel exposure per cycle (AUC between the start and end of a cycle, most relevant covariate), 0.429 per 1000 with 5-year higher age, 1.31 per 1000 (smokers vs. nonsmokers), and decreased by 0.670 per 1000 (females vs. males). Compared to 200 mg/m2 dosing every 3 weeks, model-predicted cumulative risk of PN2+ was significantly higher (42%) with 80 mg/m2 weekly dosing but reduced by 11% with 175 mg/m2 dosing every 3 weeks. The established TTE modeling framework enables quantification and comparison of patient's cumulative risks of PN2+ for different clinically relevant paclitaxel dosing schedules, sparing patients PN2+ to improve paclitaxel therapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Characterization of risk factors of paclitaxel-associated peripheral neuropathy (PN) typically involves time-independent comparison of PN odds in patient subpopulations, concealing the impact of time-dependent factors, e.g., changing paclitaxel exposure, required to comprehensively characterize PN. We developed a parametric time-to-event model describing the time course in risk of clinically relevant paclitaxel-associated PN, identifying the highest risk in older male smokers with higher paclitaxel area under the plasma concentration-time curve between the start and end of a cycle. The developed framework enabled quantification of patient's risk of PN for clinically relevant paclitaxel dosing schedules, facilitating future dosing decisions.

The novel proautophagy anticancer drug ABTL0812 potentiates chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma and squamous nonsmall cell lung cancer

Around 40% of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients are Stage IV, where the improvement of survival and reduction of disease-related adverse events is the main goal for oncologists. In this scenario, we present preclinical evidence supporting the use of ABTL0812 in combination with chemotherapy for treating advanced and metastatic Nonsmall cell lung adenocarcinomas (NSCLC) and squamous carcinomas. ABTL0812 is a new chemical entity, currently in Phase 1b/2a clinical trial for advanced squamous NSCLC in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin (P/C), after successfully completing the first-in-human trial where it showed an excellent safety profile and signs of efficacy. We show here that ABTL0812 inhibits Akt/mTOR axis by inducing the overexpression of TRIB3 and activating autophagy in lung squamous carcinoma cell lines. Furthermore, treatment with ABTL0812 also induces AMPK activation and ROS accumulation. Moreover, combination of ABTL0812 with chemotherapy markedly increases the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy without increasing toxicity. We further show that combination of ABTL0812 and chemotherapy induces nonapoptotic cell death mediated by TRIB3 activation and autophagy induction. We also present preliminary clinical data indicating that TRIB3 could serve as a potential novel pharmacodynamic biomarker to monitor ABTL0812 activity administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy in squamous NSCLC patients. The safety profile of ABTL0812 and its good synergy with chemotherapy potentiate the therapeutic potential of current lines of treatment based on chemotherapy regimens, arising as a promising option for improving these patients therapeutic expectancy.

Randomized Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin Versus Biweekly Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin for Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lessons Learned.

This clinical trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of a carboplatin plus paclitaxel regimen in a biweekly or weekly schedule instead of the more toxic 3‐weekly administration, showed that the weekly regimen was better in efficacy than the biweekly regimen, with mild toxicities, for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel regimen could be considered as an alternative to the 3‐weekly regimen in Japanese patients with NSCLC.

Background.

Combination therapy comprising carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) is the most commonly used regimen for the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Common toxicities associated with the regimen, such as neuropathy and myelosuppression, cause its discontinuation. In the present study, we conducted a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of biweekly (B) and weekly (W) PC therapy to identify the appropriate chemotherapy schedule for Asian patients.

Methods.

Chemonaive patients with IIIB/IV NSCLC and a performance status of 0–1 were randomly assigned to a biweekly regimen (paclitaxel 135 mg/m² with carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 3 on days 1 and 15 of every 4 weeks) or to a weekly regimen (paclitaxel 90 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 with carboplatin AUC 6 on day 1 of every 4 weeks).

Results.

A total of 140 patients were enrolled in the study. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 28.1% (B) and 38.0% (W). The most common toxicity was neutropenia, with incidence rates of 62.0% (B) and 57.8% (W). Progression‐free survivals (PFSs) were 4.3 months (B) and 5.1 months (W), and overall survival durations were 14.2 months (B) and 13.3 months (W).

Conclusion.

The ORR and PFS in the weekly regimen were better than those in the biweekly schedule, although a statistical difference was not observed. The toxicity profile was generally mild for both regimens. The weekly CP regimen was suitable to be considered as an alternative to the current 3‐weekly regimen in NSCLC treatment.

P16 Methylation Leads to Paclitaxel Resistance of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is widely used as the first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only 20%-40% of patients have shown sensitivity to paclitaxel. This study aimed to investigate whether P16 methylation could be used to predict paclitaxel chemosensitivity of NSCLC. Advanced NSCLC (N=45) were obtained from patients who were enrolled in a phase-III randomized paclitaxel-based clinical trial. Genomic DNA samples were extracted from the biopsies prior to chemotherapy. P16 methylation was detected using MethyLight. The association between P16 methylation and the sensitivity of paclitaxel in cell lines was determined by in vitro assay using a P16-specific DNA demethylase (P16-TET) and methyltransferase (P16-Dnmt). The total response rate of the low-dose paclitaxel-based chemo-radiotherapy was significantly lower in P16 methylation-positive NSCLCs than that in the P16 methylation-negative NSCLCs (2/15 vs. 16/30: adjusted OR=0.085; 95%CI, 0.012-0.579). Results revealed that P16 demethylation significantly decreased paclitaxel resistance of lung cancer H1299 cells (IC50 values decreased from 2.15 to 1.13 µg/ml, P<0.001). In contrast, P16-specific methylation by P16-Dnmt significantly increased paclitaxel resistance of lung cancer HCC827 cells and gastric cancer BGC823 cells (IC50 values increased from 18.2 to 24.0 ng/ml and 0.18 to 0.81 µg/ml, respectively; P=0.049 and <0.001, respectively). The present results suggest that P16 methylation may lead to paclitaxel resistance and be a predictor of paclitaxel chemosensitivity of NSCLC.

Phase II Study of Weekly Amrubicin for Refractory or Relapsed Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin is usually administered on days 1-3 every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion. However, it causes severe hematological toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia. It was reported that weekly administration confers higher dose intensity, less severe adverse events, and anti-tumor activity that is as effective as that of treatment with a conventional schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Weekly amrubicin was administered at a dose of 60 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 6.1% (95% confidence interval(CI)=0.7-20.2%) and the disease control rate after 2 months was 51.5%. The median progression-free survival was 2.93 months. Febrile neutropenia was observed in only two patients.

CONCLUSION

The primary endpoint was not met in this study. However, weekly amrubicin achieved a high disease control rate and good tolerability.

Safety and efficacy of weekly versus three-weekly paclitaxel plus platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma: A pilot study

Background

Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) is one of the most common cancers seen in India and also the world. Majority of patients present in locally advanced (LA) disease where neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy with a taxane plus platinum with/without 5-Fluorouracil is the standard of care treatment. There are no/few prospective trials of weekly paclitaxel in SCCHN in spite of convincing evidence regarding safety and tolerability in other solid tumors such as breast, ovary, and lung carcinoma. In the present study, we prospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of weekly versus three-weekly paclitaxel plus platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LA-SCCHN.

Materials and Methods

We included 50 newly diagnosed patients of LA-SCCHN in the study and randomized them into two groups to receive either low-dose weekly (80 mg/sq. m) or standard three-weekly (175 mg/sq. m) paclitaxel along with standard dose carboplatin (AUC 5) and assessed response rates and toxicities.

Results

Age and sex were evenly matched in both groups. Oral and oropharyngeal cancers were the most common sites. Hematological toxicities were significantly more in the three-weekly group. Nonhematological toxicities, especially neuropathy, were also more in this group. The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) in the three-weekly arm was 36% versus 52% in the weekly arm.

Conclusion

Data from our small study suggest that weekly paclitaxel plus platinum neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be superior to the standard every 3 weeks' administration in terms of safety as well as efficacy in patients with LA-SCCHN.

Phase II Study of Weekly Amrubicin for Refractory or Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin hydrochloride is administered as second- or third-line therapy for small cell lung cancer, and is known to cause severe myelotoxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly amrubicin for refractory/relapsed small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of weekly amrubicin was performed in 21 patients at seven centers in Japan from 2012 through 2015.

RESULTS

A partial response (PR) was noted in one out of the first 18 patients. The study was terminated early according to the termination criteria in the protocol. In total, the response rate was 19% (no complete responses and four PRs) and the disease control rate was 81% (17/21). Median overall survival was 288 days (95% confidence interval(CI)=208-424 days), while median progression-free survival was 113 days (95% CI=45-202 days).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate any efficacy of weekly amrubicin for refractory/relapsed small cell lung cancer.

A phase I/II study of bexarotene with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Rexinoids demonstrate anti-proliferative differentiation-inducing activity in multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. Prior studies have shown promising results when combining rexinoids with chemotherapy. This phase I/II study evaluates the tolerability and activity of a rexinoid, bexarotene, combined with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed advanced stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and adequate organ function were enrolled. They were scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC =6) and 3 doses of weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. Oral bexarotene was administered daily at two doses: 300 and 400 mg/m2/day.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Fourteen received 300 mg/m2/day and 19 received 400 mg/m2/day of bexarotene. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia in 7 patients. Hyperlipidemia was a major non-hematologic toxicity which was medically managed. The recommended phase II dose of bexarotene was 400 mg/m2/day. Response rate was 35%. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 8.3 months with 1-year survival of 43%. Median OS for the 300 mg/m2 dose of bexarotene was 6.6 versus 9.8 months for the 400 mg/m2 dose (HR, 0.73; Log rank P=0.37). Patients who experienced hypertriglyceridemia had a median OS of 9.8 months compared to 4.9 months for those who did not (HR, 0.69; Log rank P=0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

The 43% 1-year survival for patients receiving bexarotene with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin is encouraging. With the availability of new classes of agents for lung cancer, further evaluation of this regimen in unselected patients is not warranted. Our study confirms prior subgroup analyses showing a significant correlation between bexarotene-induced hypertriglyceridemia and survival. Further research is needed to identify molecular biomarkers to identify this subset of patients and to explore rexinoids in other combinations, especially with immunotherapy.

Chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel after failure of primary chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma. A report of three cases and review of the literature

For patients with inoperable thymic carcinoma, multidrug chemotherapy containing cisplatin and an anthracycline is often used as first-line chemotherapy. A commonly applied regimen is cisplatin + doxorubicin + vincristine + cyclophosphamide (ADOC). There are relatively few reports on the use of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for thymic carcinoma. In addition, little is known about its efficacy as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. We here report on three patients with thymic carcinoma who were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy after failure of ADOC. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, one patient achieved a partial response and two patients achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.7 months and the median overall survival exceeded 3 years. Toxicities were well tolerated. Chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel appears to be effective as second-line chemotherapy for some persons with thymic carcinoma who fail ADOC.

The molecular genetics of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can adversely affect completion of systemic anti-cancer treatment and cause long-term morbidity. Increasingly pharmacogenetic studies have been performed to explore susceptibility to this important adverse effect. A systematic review was conducted to identify pharmacogenetic studies, assess their quality and findings and undertake meta-analysis where possible. 93 studies were included. Notable methodological issues included lack of standardisation and detail in phenotype definition and acknowledgement of potential confounding factors. Insufficient data was presented in many studies meaning only a minority could be included in meta-analysis showing mainly non-significant effects. Nonetheless, SNPs in CYP2C8, CYP3A4, ARHGEF10, EPHA and TUBB2A genes (taxanes), FARS2, ACYP2 and TAC1 (oxaliplatin), and CEP75 and CYP3A5 (vincristine) are of potential interest. These require exploration in large cohort studies with robust methodology and well-defined phenotypes. Seeking standardisation of phenotype, collaboration and subsequently, individual-patient-data meta-analysis may facilitate identifying contributory SNPs which could be combined in a polygenic risk score to predict those most at risk of CIPN.

First-Line Treatment with Carboplatin plus nab-Paclitaxel and Maintenance Monotherapy with nab-Paclitaxel for a Thymic Carcinoma: A Case Report

Thymic carcinomas are rare malignant tumors, located in the anterior mediastinum. For the treatment of these carcinomas, several chemotherapy regimens have been suggested, including carboplatin plus paclitaxel. However, because of the rarity of these tumors, the standard chemotherapy regimen has not yet been established. Here, we report a case of thymic carcinoma that responded to first-line carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) therapy with continuation maintenance nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. A 78-year-old male presented to a hospital with the chief complaint of dyspnea. Cardiomegaly was detected on chest X-ray scans, and marked pericardial effusion was observed by echocardiography. Chest computed tomography scans revealed the presence of a mediastinal mass, pericardial thickening, and pericardial effusion. The serum levels of the tumor marker CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin-19 fragment) were elevated. Eventually, he was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus, which was staged as cT4N3M0 or stage IV (according to the tumor-node-metastasis classification). Chemotherapy with carboplatin on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks was initiated. After the administration of 4 cycles of this regimen, the tumor diameter appeared reduced, and the serum CYFRA 21-1 levels were normalized. After a 1-month interval, the serum CYFRA 21-1 levels increased again; therefore, maintenance nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was initiated. At the end of the treatment, the patient experienced a progression-free survival of 10.3 months. Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel may be an appropriate alternative first-line treatment for thymic carcinomas. Additionally, maintenance nab-paclitaxel monotherapy may prolong the progression-free survivals of patients with thymic carcinomas.

Metformin synergistic pemetrexed suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion in vitro

The aim of this study was to investigate whether metformin in combination with pemetrexed has an effect on the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models and to explore the related molecular mechanism. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and combination index (CI) of metformin and pemetrexed were detected by the CCK8 assay to assess the antiproliferative and therapeutic effects of the two-drug combination. Flow cytometry (FCM) and invasion assays were used to estimate the variation in apoptosis rate and invasion ability of the differently treated NSCLC cell lines. Apoptotic markers were detected by western blotting to validate the data related to the antiproliferation and proapoptosis effects. Metformin monotherapy inhibited the growth of NSCLC cell lines and reduced the invasion ability to different degrees compared with the control groups (P < 0.05). Metformin in combination with pemetrexed produced a synergistic effect (CI < 0.90) compared with the two drugs in monotherapy in the three tested NSCLC cell lines. Metformin in combination with pemetrexed significantly increased the cell numbers of HCC827 cells at S phase (P < 0.001), and the combination therapy had no influence on the A549 and H1975 cell lines. We found that combining metformin with pemetrexed induced more cell apoptosis than metformin or pemetrexed used alone (P < 0.05), which was validated by the apoptotic markers. These results demonstrate that the combination of metformin and pemetrexed has a synergistic effect on the treatment of NSCLC cell lines by inducing apoptosis or blocking the cell cycle. Our data indicate that the combination of metformin and pemetrexed could have beneficial antitumor effects on NSCLC cells in vitro.

Treatment of elderly patients or patients who are performance status 2 (PS2) with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations - Still a daily challenge

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the core treatment strategy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumours that do not have actionable molecular alterations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitising mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations or ROS1 translocations. Age and performance status (PS) are two pivotal factors to guide treatment decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients. Lung cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly, with more than two-thirds of patients aged ≥65 years, the current definition of 'elderly'. The prevalence of poor PS, as estimated by patients themselves, can be as high as 50%. Both the elderly and PS2 patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, optimising treatment strategy for the subgroup of elderly or PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC remains challenging as a result of a paucity of clinical trial data. The current review focusses on the elderly or PS2 patients without actionable oncogenic drivers and attempts to summarise current available data on recent treatments trials including angiogenesis inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Open-label, randomized study of individualized, pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin or cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Variable chemotherapy exposure may cause toxicity or lack of efficacy. This study was initiated to validate pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided paclitaxel dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to avoid supra- or subtherapeutic exposure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed, advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive up to 6 cycles of 3-weekly carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) either with standard paclitaxel at 200 mg/m(2) (arm A) or PK-guided dosing of paclitaxel (arm B). In arm B, initial paclitaxel dose was adjusted to body surface area, age, sex, and subsequent doses were guided by neutropenia and previous-cycle paclitaxel exposure [time above a plasma concentration of 0.05 µM (Tc>0.05)] determined from a single blood sample on day 2. The primary end point was grade 4 neutropenia; secondary end points included neuropathy, radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 365 patients randomly assigned, grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both arms (19% versus 16%; P = 0.10). Neuropathy grade ≥2 (38% versus 23%, P < 0.001) and grade ≥3 (9% versus 2%, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in arm B, independent of the platinum drug used. The median final paclitaxel dose was significantly lower in arm B (199 versus 150 mg/m(2), P < 0.001). Response rate was similar in arms A and B (31% versus 27%, P = 0.405), as was adjusted median PFS [5.5 versus 4.9 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.49, P = 0.228] and OS (10.1 versus 9.5 months, HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.37, P = 0.682).

CONCLUSION

PK-guided dosing of paclitaxel does not improve severe neutropenia, but reduces paclitaxel-associated neuropathy and thereby improves the benefit-risk profile in patients with advanced NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT01326767 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01326767).

Biweekly Carboplatin Plus Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment of Elderly Patients With Advanced Squamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Phase I-II Trial by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

BACKGROUND

The present study was a phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly carboplatin/gemcitabine combination and evaluate its safety and efficacy in patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC received escalated doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 2-2.5 intravenously) and gemcitabine (800-1100 mg/m² intravenously) every 2 weeks (phase I). In the phase II, the drugs were administered at their previously defined MTDs (carboplatin, AUC 2.5; gemcitabine, 1100 mg/m²). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were enrolled (phase I, n = 15). The median age was 76 years (range, 70-84 years); 52 patients had stage IV disease, and 61 and 8 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 and 2, respectively. The MTDs could not be reached at the predefined last dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 5 renal toxicity and grade 3 thrombocytopenia. In the phase II study, the overall response rate was 35.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.0%-48.8%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.8 months), and the median overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI, 7.1-19.6 months). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 7 patients (12.3%), grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (7.1%), and grade 2 or 3 fatigue in 10 patients (17.5%). One toxic death occurred in the phase I of the study.

CONCLUSION

The biweekly regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin showed satisfactory efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile in elderly patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell NSCLC.

Phase II Study of a Non-Platinum-Containing Doublet of Paclitaxel and Pemetrexed with Bevacizumab as Initial Therapy for Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with lung cancers cannot receive platinum-containing regimens owing to comorbid medical conditions. We designed the PPB (paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab) regimen to maintain or improve outcomes while averting the unique toxicities of platinum-based chemotherapies.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with untreated, advanced lung adenocarcinomas with measurable disease and no contraindications to bevacizumab. Participants received paclitaxel, 90 mg/m(2), pemetrexed, 500 mg/m(2), and bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg, every 14 days for 6 months and continued to receive pemetrexed and bevacizumab every 14 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients treated, 50% were women; the median age was 61 years and 89% had a Karnofsky performance status of at least 80%. We genotyped 38 patients with the following results: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS), 16; anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK), three; B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase gene (BRAF) V600E, two; erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (HER2)/phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA), one; epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) exon 20 insertion, one; and driver 15, none. A total of 23 patients achieved a PR (52%, 95% confidence interval: 37-68), including seven of 16 with KRAS-mutant tumors. The overall survival rate at 2 years was 43% with a median of 17 months (95% confidence interval: 10-29). Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included elevated alanine transaminase level (16%), fatigue (16%), leukopenia (9%), anemia (7%), elevated aspartate transaminase level (7%), edema (5%), and pleural effusions (5%). Two patients died of respiratory failure without disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPB regimen produced a high response rate in patients with lung adenocarcinomas regardless of mutational status. Survival and toxicities were comparable to those in the phase II reports testing platinum-containing doublets with bevacizumab. These results justify use of the PPB regimen in fit patients in whom three-drug regimens including bevacizumab are appropriate.

Recent advances of cocktail chemotherapy by combination drug delivery systems

Combination chemotherapy is widely exploited for enhanced cancer treatment in the clinic. However, the traditional cocktail administration of combination regimens often suffers from varying pharmacokinetics among different drugs. The emergence of nanotechnology offers an unparalleled opportunity for developing advanced combination drug delivery strategies with the ability to encapsulate various drugs simultaneously and unify the pharmacokinetics of each drug. This review surveys the most recent advances in combination delivery of multiple small molecule chemotherapeutics using nanocarriers. The mechanisms underlying combination chemotherapy, including the synergistic, additive and potentiation effects, are also discussed with typical examples. We further highlight the sequential and site-specific co-delivery strategies, which provide new guidelines for development of programmable combination drug delivery systems. Clinical outlook and challenges are also discussed in the end.

Is there a role of nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer? The data suggest yes

Nab-paclitaxel is a novel therapeutic agent, which was approved in combination with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regardless of histologic subtype in the United States of America by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012 and by the European Commission in 2015. This approval was based on the results of a phase III clinical trial showing superior response rates compared with solvent-based paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin. This review will focus on the early development and clinical data to date supporting the use of nab-paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC. The clinical question central to this review is whether nab-paclitaxel has a place in the current therapeutic landscape of advanced NSCLC.

Pharmacokinetics of Weekly Paclitaxel and Feasibility of Dexamethasone Taper in Japanese Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Weekly paclitaxel combined with a platinum-based agent has been advocated as an alternative regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limited studies exist on the tolerability of weekly paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the feasibility of dexamethasone taper in the premedication regimen for weekly paclitaxel has not been examined in these patients. To address this issue, we assessed the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC in a dose-escalation Phase I trial and examined the feasibility of dexamethasone taper in these patients.

METHODS

Weekly 1-hour infusions of paclitaxel were administered at doses of 80 to 120 mg/m(2) (dose escalation of 20 mg/m(2)). The 7-week treatment cycle consisted of 6 infusions followed by a 2-week treatment interval. Pharmacokinetics were assessed during the first cycle. Dexamethasone was commenced at 16 mg and doses were successively halved if hypersensitivity reactions were absent.

FINDINGS

A total of 15 patients with either Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Although no dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 120 mg/m(2), 4 of 6 patients with peripheral neuropathy required discontinuation of treatment. The maximum accepted dose and the recommended dose were 120 and 100 mg/m(2), respectively. No grade ≥3 adverse events were observed at 100 mg/m(2). The maximum drug concentration and AUC correlated with dose escalation. The pharmacokinetic parameters after the first and sixth infusions were similar, indicating that repeated administration of paclitaxel did not result in drug accumulation or affect its pharmacokinetic profile. Partial response was observed in 3 of 15 patients. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels decreased during treatment but approached baseline levels after a dexamethasone-free interval.

IMPLICATIONS

Weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour infusion for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week treatment interval was well tolerated by Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Dexamethasone taper was feasible in these patients, and no clear trend in plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone or cortisol levels was observed.

Treatment regimens of classical and newer taxanes

The classical taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), the newer taxane cabazitaxel and the nanoparticle-bound nab-paclitaxel are among the most widely used anticancer drugs. The taxanes share the characteristics of extensive hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion, the need for dose adaptation in patients with liver dysfunction, and a substantial pharmacokinetic variability even after taking into account known covariates. Data from clinical studies suggest that optimal scheduling of the taxanes is dependent not only on the specific taxane compound, but also on the tumor type and line of treatment. Still, the optimal dosing regimen (weekly vs 3 weekly) and optimal dose of the taxanes are controversial, as is the value of pharmacological personalization of taxane dosing. In this article, an overview is given on the pharmacological properties of the taxanes, including metabolism, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and aspects in the clinical use of taxanes. The latter includes the ongoing debate on the most active and safe regimen, the recommended initial dose and the issue of therapeutic drug dosing.

Weekly carboplatin in combination with weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a single center 10-year experience

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this retrospective analysis is to assess efficacy and toxicity of a chemotherapeutic regimen using weekly carboplatin in combination with weekly paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

All patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with weekly carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) 3 days 1, 8, 15, q4w in combination with weekly paclitaxel 75 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, q4w as first-line therapy at the Kantonsspital Graubuenden between August 2004 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed by medical record review.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were treated. Median age was 66 years (range 39-88). A total of 229 chemotherapy cycles were administered. Hematological and non-hematological toxicity were acceptable allowing for a median relative dose intensity for all planned treatment cycles of 76 %. Overall response rate was 34 %. Median overall and progression free survival was 6.3 (95 % CI, 4.9-8.7) and 3.4 (95 % CI, 2.3-5.1) months, respectively. Patients with an ECOG performance score (PS) of 0 or 1 had a significantly better OS compared to patients with a PS of ≥2. No statistically significant difference was observed in patients younger or older than 70 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly carboplatin in combination with weekly paclitaxel results in good response rates and acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC including patients with poor risk features (brain metastases, older age, and impaired PS). Nonetheless, selecting the right patient for a platinum-based combination treatment remains an important task in clinical practice.

Prodrug-based nano-drug delivery system for co-encapsulate paclitaxel and carboplatin for lung cancer treatment

CONTEXT

Paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin (CBP) are widely used for the combined chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the development of multidrug resistance of cancer cells, as well as systemic toxic side effects resulting from nonspecific localization of anticancer drugs to non-tumor areas are major obstacles to the success of chemotherapy in treating cancers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to engineer a prodrug-based nano-drug delivery system for co-encapsulate hydrophilic (CBP) and hydrophobic anti-tumor drugs (PTX). This system was expected to resolve the multidrug resistance cause by single drug, and the dual-drug-loaded liposome was also planned to specifically target the cancer cells without obvious influence on normal cells and tissues.

METHODS

In this paper, PLGA-PEG-CBP was synthesized by the conjugation between the carboxylic group of PLGA-PEG-COOH and the amino group of CBP. Then, self-assembled nanoparticles for combination delivery of PTX and PLGA-PEG-CBP (PTX/CBP NPs) were prepared by solvent displacement technique. The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor efficacy was assessed in NCL-H460 human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line.

RESULTS

PTX/CBP NPs achieved the highest cytotoxic effect among all formulations in vitro, as compared with single drug delivery NPs. In vivo investigation on NSCLC animal models showed that co-delivery of PTX and CBP possessed high tumor-targeting capacity and strong anti-tumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTX/CBP NPs constructed in this research offers an effective strategy for targeted combinational lung cancer therapy.

Specific Safety Profile of Bevacizumab in Asian Patients With Advanced NSCLC: A Meta-Analysis

Randomized studies have obtained varying findings regarding the benefits and toxicities of bevacizumab in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is unclear whether the discrepancies among trials are due to ethnic/racial differences. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of all published, randomized, controlled clinical trials involving bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC to assess its effectiveness and safety in Asian and non-Asian populations. Results from the phase II JO19907 trial, the phase III AVAiL and ECOG 4599 trials, and the phase IV SAiL trials were used to calculate the benefits and toxicities of bevacizumab in Asian and non-Asian patients. Combined statistical estimates, including hazard ratios and odds ratios, were calculated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. A total of 4308 patients were evaluated. Combining bevacizumab with different chemotherapy regimens resulted in similar objective response rates, overall survival, and progression-free survival in Asian and non-Asian populations. Disease control rates, however, were only reported in Asian populations. The rates of severe bleeding (relative risk [RR], 2.17; P = 0.02) and thromboembolism (RR, 3.65; P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while the rate of severe proteinuria was significantly lower (RR, 0.43; P < 0.0001), in non-Asian than in Asian populations. The rates of severe hypertension (P = 0.71) and hemoptysis (P = 0.66) were similar in Asian and non-Asian populations. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for first-line NSCLC treatment showed similar benefits in Asian and non-Asian populations, but had specific safety profiles in each.

[Metronomic Chemotherapy--A New Path to Treat Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

节拍化疗是近年来兴起的一种新的化疗策略。与传统化疗不同，节拍化疗通过相对低剂量的、频繁的应用细胞毒性药物，没有较长的治疗间歇，发挥抗肿瘤作用。最初认为节拍化疗直接作用于肿瘤血管内皮细胞，发挥抗血管生成作用。近年来发现节拍化疗还有调节机体免疫功能，影响肿瘤干细胞，诱导细胞休眠的作用。晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）的治疗已经从彻底的清除肿瘤细胞转向改善疗效、降低毒性和提高生活质量。节拍化疗可以避免传统化疗毒性大，作用不持久的缺点，目前一些临床研究正在探索节拍化疗对晚期NSCLC的作用，并且初见疗效，有望成为晚期NSCLC一种新的治疗模式。

Investigation of Prognostic Factors Affecting Efficacy in Carboplatin- and Paclitaxel-based First-line Chemotherapies for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

First-line chemotherapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are platinum-based regimens. An analysis of efficacy outcomes has not yet been systematically performed and fully evaluated using large patient cohorts in each of the platinum-based chemotherapies. The present meta-analysis aims to investigate prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP), and overall response rate (ORR) in carboplatin and paclitaxel-based first-line chemotherapies for advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We performed a literature search in PubMed for randomized phase II and III clinical trials in patients with NSCLC treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy published from January 2000 to December 2013 to investigate prognostic factors affecting OS, PFS or TTP, and ORR by linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis.

Results

We identified 61 treatment arms in 53 phase II and III clinical trials for the analysis. Asian region was found to be a prognostic factor that affects longer OS in treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy. In addition, we identified weekly administration schedule of paclitaxel, Asian region, and lower percentage of patients with adenocarcinoma as factors affecting higher ORR.

Conclusions

Our findings of prognostic factors affecting ORR and OS in carboplatin and paclitaxel-based chemotherapies as first-line therapy should be considered in the interpretation of efficacy results in global phase II and III clinical trials.

Pharmacotherapy for treatment of lung cancer in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

The chance for elderly patients with NSCLC to receive chemotherapy decreases significantly with age. In addition, older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Consequently, due to the paucity of data, evidence-based decisions with regard to chemotherapy treatment strategies in the elderly are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search to identify mainly randomized trials focusing on treatment of NSCLC in older patients with chemotherapy and targeted therapy, toxicity and quality of life. In conclusion, the efficacy of regular chemotherapy and targeted therapy seems quite similar in older patients compared to their younger counterparts, with increased toxicity, but acceptable. However, these data are mostly derived from subgroup analyses and highly selected fit patients, which may not represent the general older population.

EXPERT OPINION

Further research is necessary to investigate the role of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients, before the start of a chemotherapeutic treatment. Proteomic tests can have potential in the future, if these tests turn out to be able to separate patients with advanced NSCLC into groups with better or worse outcomes. It can be of special interest for the elderly population, to prevent unnecessary side effects of a possible inferior treatment.

Glucocorticoids and Cancer

Unlike other steroid hormone receptors, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is not considered an oncogene. In breast cancer, the estrogen receptor (ER) drives cell growth, proliferation, and metastasis, and the androgen receptor (AR) plays a similar role in prostate cancer. Accordingly, treatment of these diseases has focused on blocking steroid hormone receptor function. In contrast, glucocorticoids (GCs) work through GR to arrest growth and induce apoptosis in lymphoid tissue. Glucocorticoids are amazingly effective in this role, and have been deployed as the cornerstone of lymphoid cancer treatment for decades. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to GCs and dosage is restricted by immediate and long term side effects. In this chapter we review the treatment protocols that employ glucocorticoids as a curative agent, elaborate on what is known about their mechanism of action in these cancers, and also summarize the palliative uses of glucocorticoids for other cancers.

A multicenter phase I study of pazopanib in combination with paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors

This study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of pazopanib combined with paclitaxel to determine the recommended phase II dose in the first-line setting in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR) of once daily pazopanib plus paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks at four dose levels (DL1-4). Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and disease assessments were performed. Twenty-eight patients received treatment. One patient at DL1 had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of elevated hepatic enzymes. After pazopanib discontinuation, liver enzyme concentrations remained high until a concurrent medication, simvastatin, was discontinued. This patient had the defective CYP2C8*3*3 genotype. At DL2, 1 patient had DLT of elevated hepatic enzymes with rash and 1 patient had DLT of rash. The MTR was paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) plus pazopanib 800 mg. The most common toxicities were alopecia, fatigue, hypertension, nausea, diarrhea, dysgeusia, neutropenia, myalgia, hair color changes, and peripheral neuropathy. Coadministration of pazopanib and paclitaxel resulted in a 38% increase in systemic exposure to paclitaxel, relative to administration of paclitaxel alone, at the MTR. Of the 28 patients treated with the combination, 10 achieved a partial response and 10 achieved stable disease of ≥12 weeks. Pazopanib 800 mg daily plus paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was the recommended phase II dose, with a manageable safety profile, and with clinical activity in both melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer that suggest further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Metabolism of the taxanes including nab-paclitaxel

INTRODUCTION

The classical taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), the newer taxane cabazitaxel and the nanoparticle-bound nab-paclitaxel are among the most widely used anticancer drugs. Despite years of research, the optimal dosing regimen (weekly vs 3-weekly) and optimal dose is still controversial, as is the value of pharmacological personalization of taxane dosing.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the pharmacological properties of the taxanes, including metabolism, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and aspects in the clinical use of taxanes. The latter includes the ongoing debate on the most active and safe regimen (paclitaxel, docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel), the recommended initial dose (cabazitaxel) and pharmacological dosing individualization.

EXPERT OPINION

Taxanes share the characteristics of extensive hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion, the need for dose adaptation in patients with liver dysfunction, and substantial pharmacokinetic variability even after taking into account known covariates. Data from clinical studies suggest that optimal scheduling of the taxanes is dependent not only on the specific taxane compound, but also on the tumor type and line of treatment. Finally, treating oncologists should be aware of the substantial risk for drug-drug interactions that is a direct consequence of the complex hepatic metabolism of the taxanes.

Dose-dense paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer

Carboplatin and paclitaxel, delivered on a 3-weekly basis, is the historical standard for the management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Increased dose intensity, the inclusion of additional active cytotoxic agents and lengthening treatment duration have failed to improve the outcomes seen with standard doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of EOC. Dose-dense (i.e. weekly) delivery of paclitaxel may exploit anticancer mechanisms such as anti-angiogenesis and the induction of apoptosis. Tumour regrowth may be more effectively impaired by the dose-dense delivery of paclitaxel. Non-randomised studies of dose-dense chemotherapy in EOC have been promising, particularly in heavily pretreated and platinum-resistant disease, with reported response rates as high as 60%. Dose-dense paclitaxel also seems to be well tolerated. These observations led to a number of comparative trials of dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy, three have been reported and four are ongoing. This review explores the rationale behind dose-dense delivery of paclitaxel and evaluates the results of completed phase III trials.

Update on taxanes in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Based on demonstrated favourable risk-benefit profiles, taxanes remain a key component in the first-line standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) and nsclc subtypes. In 2012, a novel taxane, nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane: Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, U.S.A.), was approved, in combination with carboplatin, for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or meta-static nsclc. The approval was granted because of demonstrated improved antitumour activity and tolerability compared with solvent-based paclitaxel-carboplatin in a phase iii trial. This review focuses on the evolution of first-line taxane therapy for advanced nsclc and the new options and advances in taxane therapy that might address unmet needs in advanced nsclc.

nab-paclitaxel for the management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The 130 nm albumin-bound form of paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane(®)), was recently approved by the US FDA for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with carboplatin in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy. In a Phase III registrational trial, nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin demonstrated a significantly improved overall response rate, the primary endpoint, and a trend toward improved survival compared with solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. Significantly less neutropenia, neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia were observed with the nab-paclitaxel regimen, but the solvent-based paclitaxel regimen produced less thrombocytopenia and anemia. The clinical experience with nab-paclitaxel to date and the role of this newly approved therapy in the management of NSCLC will be summarized in this article.