Phase III Randomized, Intergroup Trial Assessing Imatinib Mesylate At Two Dose Levels in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing the Kit Receptor Tyrosine Kinase: S0033

Effects of first‑line therapies in patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors with KIT and PDGFRα gene mutations: A single‑center study

Curative resection is typically recommended for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Exceptions are made for locally advanced GISTs (LAGISTs) where radical resection may be impossible. First-line imatinib therapy can be employed to treat GISTs harboring mutations in the tyrosine-protein kinase KIT (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) genes to reduce the tumor size to resectable levels and minimize surgical risks. The present study investigated the treatment outcomes of patients with LAGISTs with different KIT and PDGFRα gene mutations who received first-line imatinib therapy. A total of 37 patients with LAGISTs who underwent first-line imatinib treatment were included, and the median follow-up period was 41 months. Treatment regimens included imatinib, with subsequent therapies, such as sunitinib and regorafenib, administered upon imatinib failure. The genetic profiles of KIT and PDGFRα were analyzed. Of the 37 patients, 24 (64.9%) successfully underwent curative resection. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 41 months. Patients presented with tumors with various genetic mutations, which differentially affected their PFS and OS and adverse events were typically manageable. However, the gene mutation status was not significantly associated with treatment response or surgical resectability (both P>0.05). The present study elucidated the effects of first-line therapy on LAGISTs with genetic mutations, underscoring the effectiveness of imatinib treatment and the value of continual patient monitoring. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are required to evaluate treatment outcomes.

Using body composition to predict treatment-related adverse events and disease-free survival in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Imatinib (IM) is the primary treatment for Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but it faces significant challenges with resistance and a high incidence of adverse events. This study aims to assess the predictive value of baseline body composition parameters on treatment-related adverse events and disease-free survival (DFS) in GIST patients treated with imatinib.

Materials and Methods

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on 107 moderate or high-risk stratification GIST patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Body composition parameters, including skeletal muscle index (SMI), myosteatosis, cachexia index (CXI), and Fat-Free Mass (FFM), etc. were obtained using abdominal CT images and clinical data. Logistic and COX regression models were used to analyze the relationship between these indicators and treatment-related adverse events and DFS.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that myosteatosis (OR=7.640, P<0.001) and drug dose (OR=1.349, P=0.010) were independent risk factors for adverse events, while a higher CXI (OR=0.983, P=0.017) was protective. Additionally, LAMA/SMA% (OR=1.072, P=0.028) was identified as an independent risk factor for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Independent predictors of DFS included sarcopenia (HR=3.067, P=0.013), myosteatosis (HR=6.985, P=0.024), risk stratification (HR=9.562, high-risk vs. moderate-risk, P=0.003), and C-KIT mutation (HR=3.615, C-KIT exon 9 mutation vs. 11, P=0.013).

Conclusions

Baseline body composition parameters, particularly myosteatosis, effectively predict the adverse events and DFS in patients taking imatinib. Personalized treatment, such as targeted nutritional and exercise interventions, and close monitoring of patients with myosteatosis or sarcopenia can enhance compliance and improve survival rates.

Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Proportions

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) present challenging clinical management. Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy, improving survival and reducing tumor burden in the neoadjuvant use, facilitating surgical intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in metastatic/recurrent GISTs, highlighting its potential to enhance surgical outcomes and overall patient management.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Scopus (end-of-search: February 13, 2025) for records on neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in recurrent/metastatic GISTs. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with common-effect and random-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis were performed, addressing heterogeneity and examining any potential association between the factors that varied and the outcomes reported. The present meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

The search identified 957 articles, and 14 were analyzed. The meta-analysis of proportions indicated that 2-year and 5-year PFS were 76% (95% CI 58-88%) and 43% (95% CI 17-74%), respectively, while 2-year and 5-year OS were 84% (95% CI 78-89%) and 60% (95% CI 51-68%), respectively. The pooled R0 resection rate was 82% (95% CI 64-92%), associated positively with that of radiological partial response (PR) (β = 3.92, p < 0.001). Further meta-regression analysis yielded no significant association with preoperative imatinib duration.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis of trials and studies on metastatic or recurrent GISTs highlights key insights into post-surgery patient outcomes following neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib. Pooled effect estimates revealed promising 2-year and 5-year PFS rates of 76% and 43%, respectively, and 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 84% and 60%, respectively. Furthermore, the high pooled R0 resection rate of 82% emphasizes a substantial surgical efficacy in this population, while it was significantly correlated with successful R0 resections in patients with favorable outcomes.

Imatinib alternating with regorafenib compared to imatinib alone for the first-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: The AGITG ALT-GIST intergroup randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

To determine if an alternating regimen of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and regorafenib improved outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

METHODS

ALTGIST (NCT02365441) was a randomized phase II study of standard treatment of imatinib (Arm A) compared with an experimental alternating regimen of imatinib and regorafenib (Arm B). Primary outcome was best objective tumor response (OTR) at nine months.

RESULTS

Seventy-six eligible patients (Arm A 36, Arm B 40) enrolled were evaluable. Median follow-up was 46.0 months (range 6.5-64.6). Best responses and OTR were similar at 9 months. Eighteen (50.0%) Arm A patients and twelve (30.0%) Arm B patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. No Arm A patients stopped protocol therapy due to unacceptable toxicity, with 12 (30.0%) stopping in Arm B. Twelve (33.2%) Arm A patients and 12 (30.0%) Arm B patients experienced at least one serious adverse event, mostly grade 3. Secondary endpoints of PFS at 1 and OS at 1 year were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternation of imatinib and regorafenib did not impact on 9 months objective response nor on the secondary objectives of PFS and OS. Patients in the alternating arm experienced more toxicity and protocol discontinuations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02365441.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of ripretinib data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred targeted therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Ripretinib, the first tyrosine kinase switch control inhibitor, has not yet been extensively studied for long-term safety in large populations. This study evaluates Ripretinib-related adverse events (AEs) in real-world applications by analyzing data from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

To quantify signals of AEs, we employed several disproportionality analyses: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).

Results

In the FAERS database, out of 7,064,646 reports, 3,161 were identified as related to Ripretinib AEs, with 438 significant disproportionality in preferred terms. The most common adverse reactions were tiredness, hair loss, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, loss of appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, and vomiting. These reactions align with the medication instructions and reports from corresponding clinical trials. Notably, the label includes unexpected and significant AEs such as "hepatic neoplasm", "hair texture abnormal", "metastases to liver" and "red blood cell count decreased". The median onset time for Ripretinib-related AEs was 99 days, with an interquartile range of 27-245 days. Most cases (26.74%, n = 165) occurred within the first month of Ripretinib administration.

Conclusion

Our findings align with clinical observations. We identified novel and unexpected AEs signatures of Ripretinib, indicating that prospective clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify their implications. These results could provide valuable evidence to guide further safety studies on Ripretinib.

Low-dose Imatinib Efficacy in a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patient With KIT Exon 11 W557_K558 Deletion

BACKGROUND/AIM

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare cancers originating from Cajal's stromal cells in the gastrointestinal tract. The most common driver mutation in these cancers is the KIT mutation. This report presents a case of response to low-dose imatinib in a patient with GIST harboring KIT exon 11 W557_K558 deletion.

CASE REPORT

In June 2023, an 82-year-old male developed perineal pain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed a mass measuring >9 cm, extending from the rectum to the prostate. Submucosal tumor biopsy revealed a tumor with CD117-positive and DOG1-positive spindle-shaped cells leading to a diagnosis of GIST. c-Kit gene mutation analysis detected a W557_K558 deletion in exon 11. Treatment with imatinib (400 mg/day) was initiated in late October 2023 to preserve organ function; the dose was reduced to 300 mg/day after 5 days of treatment and further reduced to 200 mg/day after 10 days, with continued treatment at this dose. The CT performed in January, April, and June 2024 showed that the rectal GIST had shrunk. The blood imatinib concentration remained at approximately 650 ng/ml from January to March 2024 and decreased to 391 ng/ml in May 2024.

CONCLUSION

The response rate of GISTs to imatinib is influenced by genetic mutations. GIST with KIT exon 11 W557_K558 deletion is associated with a high risk of recurrence. In vitro data showed that low-dose imatinib was effective in such cases. Low-dose imatinib is a treatment option for patients with GIST harboring KIT exon 11 W557_K558 deletion who are intolerant to high-dose imatinib.

Identification of D842V mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT radiomics: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Recent advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the prognosis of GIST patients. However, responses to TKI therapy can vary depending on the specific gene mutation. D842V, which is the most common mutation in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha exon 18, shows no response to imatinib and sunitinib. Radiomics features based on venous-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) have shown potential in non-invasive prediction of GIST genotypes. This study sought to determine whether radiomics features could help distinguish GISTs with D842V mutations.

METHODS

A total of 872 pathologically confirmed GIST patients with CECT data available from three independent centers were included and divided into the training cohort ( n = 487 ) and the external validation cohort ( n = 385 ). Clinical features including age, sex, tumor size and location were collected. Radiomics features on the largest axial image of venous-phase CECT were analyzed and a total of two radiomics features were selected after feature selection. Random forest models trained on non-radiomics features only (the non-radiomics model) and on both non-radiomics and radiomics features (the combined model) were compared.

RESULTS

The combined model showed better average precision (0.250 vs. 0.102, p = 0.039) and F1 score (0.253 vs. 0.155, p = 0.012) than the non-radiomics model. There was no significant difference in ROC-AUC (0.728 vs. 0.737, p = 0.836) and geometric mean (0.737 vs. 0.681, p = 0.352).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the potential of radiomics features based on venous-phase CECT images to identify D842V mutation in GISTs. Our model may provide an alternative approach to guide TKI therapy for patients inaccessible to sequence variant testing, potentially improving treatment outcomes for GIST patients especially in resource-limited settings.

FBXW7 in gastrointestinal cancers: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic prospects

F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7 (FBXW7), formerly known as hCdc4, hAGO Fbw7, or SEL10, plays a specific recognition function in SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligases. FBXW7 is a well-established cancer suppressor gene that specifically controls proteasomal degradation and destruction of many key oncogenic substrates. The FBXW7 gene is frequently abnormal in human malignancies especially in gastrointestinal cancers. Accumulating evidence reveals that mutations and deletions of FBXW7 are participating in the occurrence, progression and treatment resistance of human gastrointestinal cancers. Considering the current therapeutic challenges faced by gastrointestinal cancers, elucidating the biological function and molecular mechanism of FBXW7 can provide new perspectives and references for future personalized treatment strategies. In this review, we elucidate the key molecular mechanisms by which FBXW7 and its substrates are involved in gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, we discuss the consequences of FBXW7 loss or dysfunction in tumor progression and underscore its potential as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker. Lastly, we propose potential therapeutic strategies targeting FBXW7 to guide the precision treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

Prospective evaluation of quantitative response parameter in patients with Gastrointestinal Stroma Tumor undergoing tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy-Impact on clinical outcome

The purpose of this study was to determine if dual-energy CT (DECT) vital iodine tumor burden (ViTB), a direct assessment of tumor vascularity, allows reliable response assessment in patients with GIST compared to established CT criteria such as RECIST1.1 and modified Choi (mChoi). From 03/2014 to 12/2019, 138 patients (64 years [32-94 years]) with biopsy proven GIST were entered in this prospective, multi-center trial. All patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and underwent pre-treatment and follow-up DECT examinations for a minimum of 24 months. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST1.1, mChoi, vascular tumor burden (VTB) and DECT ViTB. A change in therapy management could be because of imaging (RECIST1.1 or mChoi) and/or clinical progression. The DECT ViTB criteria had the highest discrimination ability for progression-free survival (PFS) of all criteria in both first line and second line and thereafter treatment, and was significantly superior to RECIST1.1 and mChoi (p < .034). Both, the mChoi and DECT ViTB criteria demonstrated a significantly early median time-to-progression (both delta 2.5 months; both p < .036). Multivariable analysis revealed 6 variables associated with shorter overall survival: secondary mutation (HR = 4.62), polymetastatic disease (HR = 3.02), metastatic second line and thereafter treatment (HR = 2.33), shorter PFS determined by the DECT ViTB criteria (HR = 1.72), multiple organ metastases (HR = 1.51) and lower age (HR = 1.04). DECT ViTB is a reliable response criteria and provides additional value for assessing TKI treatment in GIST patients. A significant superior response discrimination ability for median PFS was observed, including non-responders at first follow-up and patients developing resistance while on therapy.

Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been reported in patients of all ages, its diagnosis is more common in elders. The two most common types of mutation, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) mutations, hold about 75 and 15% of GISTs cases, respectively. Tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are known as wild type (WT)-GISTs, which takes up for 15% of all cases. WT-GISTs have other genetic alterations, including mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase and serine-threonine protein kinase BRAF and neurofibromatosis type 1. Other GISTs without any of the above genetic mutations are named "quadruple WT" GISTs. More types of rare mutations are being reported. These mutations or gene fusions were initially thought to be mutually exclusive in primary GISTs, but recently it has been reported that some of these rare mutations coexist with KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The treatment and management differ according to molecular subtypes of GISTs. Especially for patients with late-stage tumors, developing a personalized chemotherapy regimen based on mutation status is of great help to improve patient survival and quality of life. At present, imatinib mesylate is an effective first-line drug for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs, but how to overcome drug resistance is still an important clinical problem. The effectiveness of other drugs is being further evaluated. The progress in the study of relevant mechanisms also provides the possibility to develop new targets or new drugs.

Case report: Male genital system, soft tissue and myocardial metastases in a patient with exon 11-mutated GIST of unknown origin

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, usually arising in the stomach or in the small bowel. Most GISTs are diagnosed early due to the presence of symptoms (e.g., abdominal discomfort/pain, anemia, etc.); at times, diagnosis could be incidental (e.g., ultrasound or endoscopic examinations performed for other reasons, surgical intervention for a different disease, etc.). Diagnosis occurs when the tumor is already metastatic in 10-20% of cases. The most common metastatic sites are liver, peritoneum, and loco-regional lymph nodes. Here, we present the case of a male patient with an atypical presentation of disease: as a matter of fact, during his oncological history, he developed metastases in unlikely sites, such as penis, scrotum, myocardium, and soft tissues.

Glycolysis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a brief overview

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most prevalent mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract. Its growth is primarily influenced by mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Surgery is the primary treatment option for GIST; however, KIT inhibitors, such as imatinib, are used for inoperable cases. Resistance to imatinib is an upcoming challenge, especially because the effectiveness of alternative drugs is limited. Enhancement of the glycolysis pathway in cancer cells has been identified as a key feature in cancer. This unique metabolic activity has implications on tumor growth, prognosis, and resistance to therapy, even in GIST. Members of the glucose transporter (GLUT) family (particularly GLUT-1) play a significant role in GIST progression and response to treatment. Diagnostic imaging using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, which enables visualization of glucose metabolism, can aid in GIST diagnosis and risk assessment. The interplay between glycolysis and GIST can lead to the development of various therapeutic strategies, especially those involving glycolysis-related molecules, such as hexokinase and lactate dehydrogenase. However, further research is required to understand the full spectrum of glycolysis in GIST and its therapeutic potential. Herein, we present an exhaustive overview and analysis of the role of glycolysis in GIST, especially as a therapeutic target.

Effect and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA via a dual mechanism of action.

AIM

To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.

METHODS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg's funnel plot in all studies.

CONCLUSION

RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.

Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours that originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs are mainly driven by gain-of-function mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for localized tumours and all currently approved medical GIST treatments are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent discoveries in the molecular and clinical features of GISTs have greatly impacted GIST management. Due to the provincially rather than nationally administered Canadian healthcare system, there have been inconsistencies in the treatment of GISTs across the country. Therefore, guidance on the latest knowledge, clinical management and treatment of GIST is needed to standardize the approach to GIST management nationwide. To establish pan-Canadian guidance, provide up-to-date data and harmonize the clinical practice of GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada; a panel of 20 physicians with extensive clinical experience in GIST management reviewed relevant literature. This included radiologists, pathologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and medical oncologists across Canada. The structured literature focused on seven key domains: molecular profiling, radiological techniques/reporting, targeted localized therapy, intricacies of systemic treatments, emerging tests, multidisciplinary care and patient advocacy. This literature review, along with clinical expertise and opinion, was used to develop this concise and clinically relevant consensus paper to harmonize the knowledge and clinical practice on GIST management across Canada. The content presented here will help guide healthcare providers, especially in Canada, in terms of approaching and managing GIST.

Survival of advanced/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Taiwan: a nationwide registry study

BACKGROUND

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor c-KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the survival of patients with GISTs. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of advanced or recurrent GIST patients in Taiwan.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled. The collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment pattern, treatment outcome, genetic aberrations and survival status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic factors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients with advanced or recurrent GISTs treated with TKIs were enrolled. All patients received imatinib treatment. Ninety-three and 42 patients received sunitinib and regorafenib treatment, respectively. The 48-month PFS and OS rates for patients treated with imatinib were 50.5% and 79.5%, respectively. c-KIT exon 9 and PDGFRA mutations were prognostic factors for a poor PFS and PDGFRA mutation was a prognostic factor for a poor OS in patients treated with imatinib in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median PFS of patients who received sunitinib treatment was 12.76 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.01-14.52). Patients with c-KIT exon 9 mutations had a longer PFS than those with other genetic aberrations. The median PFS of patients treated with regorafenib was 7.14 months (95% CI, 3.39-10.89).

CONCLUSIONS

We present real-world clinical outcomes for advanced GIST patients treated with TKIs and identify mutational status as an independent prognostic factor for patient survival.

Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Imatinib in a Recurrent Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Although surgery is the treatment of choice in resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy is indicated in advanced, metastatic, and recurrent tumors. Decreasing tumor burden may facilitate resection and reduce surgical morbidity. We describe a case of a 66-year-old male with a recurrent duodenal GIST, after surgery and adjuvant imatinib five years before. Following neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib for 12 months, the patient underwent a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy, without complications. The final histopathology showed a pathological complete response (pCR) with no residual neoplasm. A pathological complete response to imatinib in a recurrent disease is extremely rare. Molecular testing should be performed before neoadjuvant therapy to identify response-predictive mutations. In recurrent/metastatic disease, systemic therapy is the standard treatment for all patients. Surgery should be considered in a tailored approach in patients with good responses to systemic therapy before developing therapeutic resistance.

A case-matched study of imatinib mesylate between different formulations on plasma trough concentration, adverse events, quality of life and outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients

Genike, the imatinib (IM)-alpha form is widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in China. We wanted to investigate whether there are differences in IM plasma concentrations, adverse events, health-related quality of life (QOL) and outcomes between patients treated with Genike and Glivec. Thirty included GIST patients receiving IM treatment were matched to either Genike or Glivec according to gastrectomy, body weight, body surface area and sex. There was no statistically significant difference in IM trough plasma levels between the two groups. There were no significant differences in very common adverse events of IM between the Genike and Glivec groups. IM was well tolerated, although it was associated with a significant change in cognitive function (P < 0.001), fatigue (P = 0.015), pain (P = 0.015), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.029), insomnia (P = 0.019), diarrhea (P = 0.003) and financial difficulties (P < 0.001). Physical functioning, financial burden and insomnia were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.026). Until Aug. 2022, there was no significant difference in time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in IM plasma concentration and adverse events between Genike and Glivec. Both Genike and Glivec could partially decrease the QOL of GIST patients. Physical functioning was worse in Genike group than in Glivec group, while the economic burden and symptoms of insomnia in Glivec patients were worse. There was no significant difference in TTF between the two groups.

Hemodialysis and imatinib: Plasma levels, efficacy and tolerability in a patient with metastatic GIST - Case report

Purpose

To study plasma levels, efficacy and tolerability of imatinib in a patient affected by metastatic GIST treated with oral Imatinib and undergoing hemodialysis.

Patients and methods

The patient suffered from metastatic GIST to the liver having a mutation of exon 9 of KIT. He was on hemodialysis and received first-line treatment with imatinib 400 mg/day.

Results

The overall mean plasma level of imatinib was 1875,4 ng/ml pre-dialysis, 1553,0 ng/ml post-dialysis and 1998,1 ng/ml post-24h. In red blood cells the overall mean level of imatinib was 619,5 ng/ml pre-dialysis, 484,9 ng/ml post-dialysis and 663,1 ng/ml post-24h. The plasma level of nor-imatinib/imatinib was 16,2% pre-dialysis, 15,6% post-dialysis and 16,4% post-24h. Comparing our findings regarding levels of imatinib in plasma and RBC, we found a statistically significant difference between pre-dialysis and post-dialysis (respectively p < 0,001 and p = 0,002), post-dialysis and post-24h (both p < 0,001), pre-dialysis and post-24h (respectively p = 0.035 and p = 0,042). Ultimately, regarding nor-imatinib/imatinib in plasma, we did not find any statistically significant difference between pre-dialysis and post-dialysis (p = 0,091), post-dialysis and post-24h (p = 0,091), pre-dialysis and post-24h (p = 0.903). Currently the patient is receiving oral imatinib 400 mg/day with radiological evidence of response.

Conclusion

In this case, hemodialysis did not affect significantly imatinib plasma levels. The statistically significant difference between pre- and post-dialysis can be explained by the fact that dialysis may likely contribute to a small portion of the normal metabolism of imatinib. The evaluation of imatinib levels in RBC and of its main metabolite in plasma also suggests that hemodialysis did not affect other aspects of the elimination of the drug.

Targeted Therapies, Biologics, and Immunotherapy in the Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Settings: Perioperative Risks

Cancer therapeutics has been revolutionized by the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The paradigm of neoadjuvant therapy is commonly employed across multiple solid tumors, exhibiting significant clinical benefit as exemplified with ICIs in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. However, neoadjuvant therapy can be associated with treatment-related adverse events. As the incorporation of these novel therapies in the preoperative space expands, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to understand the potential perioperative implications of these treatments. This article focuses on surgical considerations tied to these treatments, highlighting potential drug-surgery interactions and complications.

Treatment Access for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in Predominantly Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Importance

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib mesylate or sunitinib malate. In general, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to these treatments is limited.

Objective

To describe the demographic characteristics, treatment duration, and survival of patients with GIST in LMICs treated with imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective database cohort analysis included patients in 2 access programs administered by The Max Foundation: the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, and the Max Access Solutions (MAS) program, January 1, 2017, to October 12, 2020. Sixty-six countries in which The Max Foundation facilitates access to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Participants consisted of patients with approved indications for imatinib, including adjuvant therapy in high-risk GIST by pathologic evaluation of resected tumor or biopsy-proven unresectable or metastatic GIST. All patients were reported to have tumors positive for CD117(c-kit) by treating physicians. A total of 9866 patients received treatment for metastatic and/or unresectable disease; 2100 received adjuvant imatinib; 49 received imatinib from another source and were only included in the sunitinib analysis; and 53 received both imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Data were analyzed from October 13, 2020, to January 30, 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Demographic and clinical information was reported by treating physicians. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). An imputation-based informed censoring model estimated events for patients lost to follow-up after treatment with adjuvant imatinib. Patients who were lost to follow-up with metastatic or unresectable disease were presumed deceased.

Results

A total of 12 015 unique patients were included in the analysis (6890 male [57.6%]; median age, 54 [range, 0-100] years). Of these, 2100 patients were treated with imatinib in the adjuvant setting (median age, 54 [range 8-88] years) and 9866 were treated with imatinib for metastatic or unresectable disease (median age, 55 [range, 0-100] years). Male patients comprised 5867 of 9866 patients (59.5%) with metastatic or unresectable disease and 1023 of 2100 patients (48.7%) receiving adjuvant therapy. The median OS with imatinib for unresectable or metastatic disease was 5.8 (95% CI, 5.6-6.1) years, and the median TTD was 4.2 (95% CI, 4.1-4.4) years. The median OS with sunitinib for patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.5) years; the median TTD was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) years. The 10-year OS rate in the adjuvant setting was 73.8% (95% CI, 67.2%-81.1%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with GIST who were predominantly from LMICs and received orally administered therapy through the GIPAP or MAS programs, outcomes were similar to those observed in high-resource countries. These findings underscore the feasibility and relevance of administering oral anticancer therapy to a molecularly defined population in LMICs, addressing a critical gap in cancer care.

TRIM21/USP15 balances ACSL4 stability and the imatinib resistance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has become an exceptionally effective targeted drug for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Despite its efficacy, the resistance to imatinib is common in GIST patients, posing a significant challenge to the effective treatment.

METHODS

The expression profiling of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 in GIST patients was evaluated using Western blot and immunohistochemistry. To silence gene expression, shRNA was utilized. Biological function of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 was examined through various methods, including resistance index calculation, colony formation, shRNA interference, and xenograft mouse model. The molecular mechanism of TRIM21 and USP15 in GIST was determined by conducting Western blot, co-immunoprecipitation, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses.

RESULTS

Here we demonstrated that downregulation of ACSL4 is associated with imatinib (IM) resistance in GIST. Moreover, clinical data showed that higher levels of ACSL4 expression are positively correlated with favorable clinical outcomes. Mechanistic investigations further indicated that the reduced expression of ACSL4 in GIST is attributed to excessive protein degradation mediated by the E3 ligase TRIM21 and the deubiquitinase USP15.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the TRIM21 and USP15 control ACSL4 stability to maintain the IM sensitive/resistant status of GIST.

KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: getting to the gist of the problem

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by activating mutations in receptor tyrosine-kinases KIT or PDGFRA. Despite the outstanding results of first-line imatinib in advanced GIST, resistance ultimately occurs mainly through secondary mutations in KIT/PDGFRA. Other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with a broader spectrum of activity against these mutations are approved after imatinib failure. However, response rates and progression-free survival are drastically lower compared to imatinib. Notably, imatinib also triggers early tolerance adaptation mechanisms, which precede the occurrence of secondary mutations.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we outline the current landscape of KIT inhibitors, discuss the novel agents, and present additional biological pathways that may be therapeutically exploitable.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of broad-spectrum and highly selective TKIs able to induce a sustained KIT/PDGFRA inhibition is the pillar of preclinical and clinical investigation in GIST. However, it is now recognized that the situation is more intricate, with various factors interacting with KIT and PDGFRA, playing a crucial role in the response and resistance to treatments. Future strategies in the management of advanced GIST should integrate driver inhibition with the blockade of other molecules to enhance cell death and establish enduring responses in patients.

Radiofrequency ablation vs. hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors

For patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and liver metastases, there is still debate about whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or hepatectomy is preferable. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of RFA with hepatectomy in patients with GISTs and liver metastases. The present retrospective study consisted of a cohort of 43 patients who had been diagnosed with liver metastases from GISTs between January 2010 and December 2022. The study included 18 patients who received RFA combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (RFA group) and 25 patients who underwent hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy (hepatectomy group). For the patients with liver metastases, the progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 66.5, 38.2 and 33.9%, respectively. Notably, patients in the hepatectomy group exhibited significantly improved PFS times compared with those in the RFA group (median PFS, 42.7 months vs. 14.3 months; P=0.034). Furthermore, the time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) was notably improved in the hepatectomy group compared with that in the RFA group, and this difference was statistically significant (median TTF, 71.1 vs. 38.0 months; P=0.041). However, the overall survival (OS) times of patients who received RFA and those who had hepatectomy did not differ significantly (median OS, not reached vs. not reached, P=0.120). There was no statistically significant distinction in PFS and TTF between patients who underwent hepatectomy combined with postoperative TKI and those who underwent hepatectomy combined with perioperative TKI (median PFS, 29.5 vs. not reached; P=0.520; median TTF, 66.4 months vs. 71.1 months; P=0.430). The univariate and multivariate analyses consistently identified the sole prognostic factor affecting PFS as hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy (hazard ratio, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.159-0.899; P=0.028). In conclusion, hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy improved prognosis for patients with liver metastases to a greater extent than RFA combined with TKI therapy. For this type of patient, hepatectomy may be a preferable option.

Advancing the Management of Skull Base Chondrosarcomas: A Systematic Review of Targeted Therapies

BACKGROUND

Chondrosarcomas rank as the second most common primary bone malignancy. Characterized by the production of a cartilaginous matrix, these tumors typically exhibit resistance to both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT), resulting in overall poor outcomes: a high rate of mortality, especially among children and adolescents. Due to the considerable resistance to current conventional therapies such as surgery, CT, and RT, there is an urgent need to identify factors contributing to resistance and discover new strategies for optimal treatment. Over the past decade, researchers have delved into the dysregulation of genes associated with tumor development and therapy resistance to identify potential therapeutic targets for overcoming resistance. Recent studies have suggested several promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for chondrosarcoma, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) and COL2A1. Molecule-targeting agents and immunotherapies have demonstrated favorable antitumor activity in clinical studies involving patients with advanced chondrosarcomas. In this systematic review, we delineate the clinical features of chondrosarcoma and provide a summary of gene dysregulation and mutation associated with tumor development, as well as targeted therapies as a promising molecular approach. Finally, we analyze the probable role of the tumor microenvironment in chondrosarcoma drug resistance.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) up to 10 November 2023. The search strategy utilized relevant Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords related to "chondrosarcomas", "target therapies", "immunotherapies", and "outcomes". The studies included in this review consist of randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies reporting on the use of target therapies for the treatment of chondrosarcoma in human subjects.

RESULTS

Of the initial 279 articles identified, 40 articles were included in the article. The exclusion of 140 articles was due to reasons such as irrelevance, non-reporting of selected results, systematic literature review or meta-analysis, and lack of details on the method/results. Three tables highlighted clinical studies, preclinical studies, and ongoing clinical trials, encompassing 13, 7, and 20 studies, respectively. For the clinical study, a range of molecular targets, such as death receptors 4/5 (DR4 and DR5) (15%), platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha or -beta (PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β) (31%), were investigated. Adverse events were mainly constitutional symptoms emphasizing that to improve therapy tolerance, careful observation and tailored management are essential. Preclinical studies analyzed various molecular targets such as DR4/5 (28.6%) and COX-2 (28.6%). The prevalent indicator of antitumoral activity was the apoptotic rate of both a single agent (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand: TRAIL) and double agents (TRAIL-DOX, TRAIL-MG132). Ongoing clinical trials, the majority in Phase II (53.9%), highlighted possible therapeutic strategies such as IDH1 inhibitors and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (30.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present review offers a comprehensive analysis of targeted therapeutics for skull base chondrosarcomas, highlighting a complex landscape characterized by a range of treatment approaches and new opportunities for tailored interventions. The combination of results from molecular research and clinical trials emphasizes the necessity for specialized treatment strategies and the complexity of chondrosarcoma biology.

Clinical Benefit of Avapritinib in KIT-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase I NAVIGATOR and Phase I/II CS3007-001 Studies

PURPOSE

The efficacy of the selective KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor avapritinib (300 mg once daily) was explored in patients with non-PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from the phase I NAVIGATOR and phase I/II CS3007-001 trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with unresectable/metastatic, KIT-only-mutant GISTs and progression following ≥1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were included in this post hoc analysis. Baseline mutational status was identified in tumor and plasma. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiology review per modified RECIST v1.1 in patients harboring KIT activation-loop mutations (KIT exons 17 or 18) without ATP binding-pocket mutations (KIT exons 13 or 14; ALposABPneg), and other KIT mutations (OTHERS).

RESULTS

Sixty KIT ALposABPneg and 100 KIT OTHERS predominantly heavily pretreated patients (61.3% with ≥3 prior TKIs) were included. ORR was significantly higher in KIT ALposABPneg than KIT OTHERS patients (unadjusted: 26.7% vs. 12.0%; P = 0.0852; adjusted: 31.4% vs. 12.1%; P = 0.0047). Median PFS (mPFS) was significantly longer in KIT ALposABPneg patients compared with KIT OTHERS patients (unadjusted: 9.1 vs. 3.5 months; P = 0.0002; adjusted: 9.1 vs. 3.4 months; P < 0.0001), and longer in second- versus later-line settings (19.3 vs. 5.6-10.6 months). Benefit with avapritinib was observed in patients with KIT exon 9 mutations in the ≥4 line settings (mPFS: 5.6 and 3.7 months for 4 line and >4 line, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Avapritinib showed greater antitumor activity in patients with GISTs harboring KIT ALposABPneg mutations versus KIT OTHERS, and may be considered in the former subpopulation. Patients with KIT exon 9 mutations may also benefit in ≥4 line settings.

Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial

INTRIGUE was an open-label, phase 3 study in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib and who were randomized to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or sunitinib 50 mg. In the primary analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) with ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib. In clinical and nonclinical studies, ripretinib and sunitinib have demonstrated differential activity based on the exon location of KIT mutations. Therefore, we hypothesized that mutational analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might provide further insight. In this exploratory analysis (N = 362), baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by a 74-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing-based assay. ctDNA was detected in 280/362 (77%) samples with KIT mutations in 213/362 patients (59%). Imatinib-resistant mutations were found in the KIT ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and activation loop (exons 17/18). Mutational subgroup assessment showed 2 mutually exclusive populations with differential treatment effects. Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 13/14 mutations (ripretinib, n = 21; sunitinib, n = 20) had better PFS with sunitinib versus ripretinib (median, 15.0 versus 4.0 months). Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations (ripretinib, n = 27; sunitinib, n = 25) had better PFS with ripretinib versus sunitinib (median, 14.2 versus 1.5 months). The results of this exploratory analysis suggest ctDNA sequencing may improve the prediction of the efficacy of single-drug therapies and support further evaluation of ripretinib in patients with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501.

Recent advances for treatment of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

Recent prospective trials for esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are encouraging. This manuscript reviews selected recently published studies. Not surprisingly, immunotherapy dominates the current clinical trial landscape. However, targeted biologic therapies and standard chemotherapy remain critical to the treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer while imatinib remains the backbone for advanced or metastatic GISTs. For all three cancers, surgical resection remains important when intent of treatment is potential cure.

Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications

Advances in molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic options for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of GI cancers, focusing on key genetic alterations implicated in tumorigenesis across various anatomical sites including GIST, colon and rectum, and pancreas. Emphasis is placed on critical oncogenic pathways, such as mutations in tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic modifications. The role of molecular biomarkers in predicting prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring therapeutic response is discussed, highlighting the integration of genomic profiling into clinical practice. Finally, we address the evolving landscape of precision oncology in GI cancers, considering targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Premalignant Lesions in the Kidney Transplant Candidate

End-stage kidney disease patients who are referred for transplant undergo an extensive evaluation process to ensure their health prior to transplant due in part to the shortage of available organs. Although management and surveillance guidelines exist for malignancies identified in the transplant and waitlist populations, less is written about the management of premalignant lesions in this population. This review covers the less common premalignant lesions (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, thymoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor) that can be found in the transplant candidate population. High-level evidence for the management of these rarer premalignant lesions in the transplant population is lacking, and this review extrapolates evidence from the general population and should not be a substitute for a multidisciplinary discussion with medical and surgical oncologists.

Immune Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a rare heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms characterized by their aggressive course and poor response to treatment. This determines the relevance of research aimed at studying the pathogenesis of STSs. By now, it is known that STSs is characterized by complex relationships between the tumor cells and immune cells of the microenvironment. Dynamic interactions between tumor cells and components of the microenvironment enhance adaptation to changing environmental conditions, which provides the high aggressive potential of STSs and resistance to antitumor therapy. Today, active research is being conducted to find effective antitumor drugs and to evaluate the possibility of using therapy with immune cells of STS. The difficulty in assessing the efficacy of new antitumor options is primarily due to the high heterogeneity of this group of malignant neoplasms. Studying the role of immune cells in the microenvironment in the progression STSs and resistance to antitumor therapies will provide the discovery of new biomarkers of the disease and the prediction of response to immunotherapy. In addition, it will help to initially divide patients into subgroups of good and poor response to immunotherapy, thus avoiding wasting precious time in selecting the appropriate antitumor agent.

Sarcoma care in the era of precision medicine

Sarcoma subtype classification is currently mainly based upon histopathological morphology. Molecular analyses have emerged as an efficient addition to the diagnostic workup and sarcoma care. Knowledge about the sarcoma genome increases, and genetic events that can either support a histopathological diagnosis or suggest a differential diagnosis are identified, as well as novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we present diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic molecular markers that are, or might soon be, used clinically. For sarcoma diagnostics, there are specific fusions highly supportive or pathognomonic for a diagnostic entity-for instance, SYT::SSX in synovial sarcoma. Complex karyotypes also give diagnostic information-for example, supporting dedifferentiation rather than low-grade central osteosarcoma or well-differentiated liposarcoma when detected in combination with MDM2/CDK4 amplification. Molecular treatment predictive sarcoma markers are available for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and locally aggressive benign mesenchymal tumors. The molecular prognostic markers for sarcomas in clinical practice are few. For solitary fibrous tumor, the type of NAB2::STAT6 fusion is associated with the outcome, and the KIT/PDGFRA pathogenic variant in GISTs can give prognostic information. With the exploding availability of sequencing technologies, it becomes increasingly important to understand the strengths and limitations of those methods and their context in sarcoma diagnostics. It is reasonable to believe that most sarcoma treatment centers will increase the use of massive-parallel sequencing soon. We conclude that the context in which the genetic findings are interpreted is of importance, and the interpretation of genomic findings requires considering tumor histomorphology.

Reply to Chen, A.; Zhang, X. Comment on "Golčić et al. Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours. Cancers 2023, 15, 4081"

We appreciate the comment made by Chen et al. on our manuscript evaluating the systemic treatment options for gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) [...].

Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study

PURPOSE

In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Questionnaire completion at baseline was 88.1% (199/226) for ripretinib and 87.7% (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.

A Phase I, Multicenter, Open-Label, First-in-Human Study of DS-6157a in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

PURPOSE

To evaluate DS-6157a, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting G protein-coupled receptor 20 (GPR20), in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase I multicenter, open-label, multiple-dose study, patients with previously treated advanced GIST received intravenous DS-6157a on Day 1 of 21-day cycles, with a starting dose of 1.6 mg/kg. The primary objective evaluated the safety and tolerability of DS-6157a, while determining dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the MTD. Secondary objectives included plasma pharmacokinetics parameters, plasma antidrug antibodies (ADA), and efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients enrolled. DS-6157a was well tolerated, with DLTs in 4 patients (11.8%) at doses of 6.4 mg/kg, 9.6 mg/kg, and 12.8 mg/kg; the MTD was determined to be 6.4 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) grade ≥3 occurred in 17 patients (50.0%), including decreased platelet count (23.5%), anemia (20.6%), decreased neutrophil count (14.7%), and decreased white blood cell count (11.8%). Four patients (11.8%) experienced serious adverse events related to DS-6157a. Six patients died with 5 due to disease progression and 1 due to DS-6157a-related TEAE. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 7 patients (20.6%), and 1 patient (2.9%) achieved a partial response. Plasma concentrations and exposure of intact DS-6157a, DXd, and total anti-GPR20 antibody all demonstrated a dose-dependent profile. No treatment-emergent ADAs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting GPR20 with DS-6157a was tolerated in patients with advanced GIST with tumor shrinkage demonstrated in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST. However, the study did not proceed further due to lower efficacy outcomes than anticipated.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Masquerading As Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Challenging Diagnosis

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare lesions of the gastrointestinal tract that have a strong predisposition to the stomach and small intestine. We present a case of an 89-year-old female who initially presented to the emergency room with signs and symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and was later discovered to have a 23-centimeter GIST in her abdominal cavity. This case emphasizes the implications of large intraperitoneal neoplasms and the unique constellation of symptoms they may present with.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Fluid retention-associated adverse events in patients treated with BCR::ABL1 inhibitors based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): a retrospective pharmacovigilance study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a thorough analysis of fluid retention-associated adverse events (AEs) associated with BCR::ABL inhibitors.

DESIGN

A retrospective pharmacovigilance study.

SETTING

Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for BCR::ABL inhibitors was searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reporting OR (ROR) and 95% CI were used to detect the signals. ROR was calculated by dividing the odds of fluid retention event reporting for the target drug by the odds of fluid retention event reporting for all other drugs. The signal was considered positive if the lower limit of 95% CI of ROR was >1. The analysis was run only considering coupled fluid retention events/BCR::ABL inhibitors with at least three cases.

RESULTS

A total of 97 823 reports were identified in FAERS. Imatinib had the most fluid retention signals, followed by dasatinib and nilotinib, while bosutinib and ponatinib had fewer signals. Periorbital oedema (ROR=24.931, 95% CI 22.404 to 27.743), chylothorax (ROR=161.427, 95% CI 125.835 to 207.085), nipple swelling (ROR=48.796, 95% CI 26.270 to 90.636), chylothorax (ROR=35.798, 95% CI 14.791 to 86.642) and gallbladder oedema (ROR=77.996, 95% CI 38.286 to 158.893) were the strongest signals detected for imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib, respectively. Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema were detected for all BCR::ABL inhibitors, with dasatinib having the highest RORs for pleural effusion (ROR=37.424, 95% CI 35.715 to 39.216), pericardial effusion (ROR=14.146, 95% CI 12.649 to 15.819) and pulmonary oedema (ROR=11.217, 95% CI 10.303 to 12.213). Patients aged ≥65 years using dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib had higher RORs for pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema. Patients aged ≥65 years and females using imatinib had higher RORs for periorbital oedema, generalised oedema and face oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacovigilance study serves as a clinical reminder to physicians to be more vigilant for fluid retention-associated AEs with BCR::ABL inhibitors.

A randomised phase 2 study of continuous or intermittent dosing schedule of imatinib re-challenge in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Imatinib re-challenge is one of the available therapeutic options for patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Intermittent dosing of imatinib was suggested to delay outgrow of the imatinib-resistant clones in a preclinical study, and it could potentially reduce the adverse events.

METHODS

A randomised phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a continuous or intermittent imatinib schedule in GIST patients whose disease had progressed to at least imatinib and sunitinib.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the full analysis set. The disease control rate at 12 weeks was 34.8% and 43.5%, and median progression-free survival was 1.68 and 1.57 months in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively. The frequency of diarrhoea, anorexia, decreased neutrophil, or dysphagia was lower in the intermittent group. The scores for global health status/quality of life was not significantly deteriorated over the 8 weeks in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The intermittent dosage did not improve the efficacy outcomes as compared to the continuous dosage, but showed slightly better safety profiles. Given the limited efficacy of imatinib re-challenge, intermittent dosage may also be considered in clinical circumstances where standard fourth-line agent is unavailable or all other viable treatments failed.

Antitumor Efficacy of the Novel KIT Inhibitor IDRX-42 (Formerly M4205) in Patient- and Cell Line-Derived Xenograft Models of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

PURPOSE

The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by constitutively activated KIT/PDGFRA kinases and are susceptible to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. During treatment, most of these tumors will develop secondary mutations in KIT or PDGFRA inducing drug resistance, so there is an unmet need for novel therapies. We tested the efficacy of IDRX-42, a novel selective KIT inhibitor with high activity toward the most relevant KIT mutations, in 4 GIST xenograft models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

NMRI nu/nu mice were transplanted with patient-derived GIST xenograft models UZLX-GIST9 (KIT:p.P577del;W557LfsX5;D820G), UZLX-GIST2B (KIT:p.A502_Y503dup), UZLX-GIST25 (KIT:p.K642E), and the cell line-derived model GIST882 (KIT:p.K642E). Mice were treated daily with vehicle (control), imatinib (100 mg/kg), sunitinib (20 mg/kg), avapritinib (5 mg/kg), or IDRX-42 (10 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg). Efficacy was assessed by tumor volume evolution, histopathology, grading of histologic response, and IHC. The Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 considered as significant.

RESULTS

IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg) caused tumor volume shrinkage in UZLX-GIST25, GIST882, and UZLX-GIST2B, with a relative decrease to 45.6%, 57.3%, and 35.1% on the last day as compared with baseline, and tumor growth delay (160.9%) compared with control in UZLX-GIST9. Compared with controls, IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg) induced a significant decrease in mitosis. In UZLX-GIST25 and GIST882 grade 2-4 histologic response with myxoid degeneration was observed in all IDRX-42 (25 mg/kg)-treated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

IDRX-42 showed significant antitumor activity in patient- and cell line-derived GIST xenograft models. The novel kinase inhibitor induced volumetric responses, decreased mitotic activity, and had antiproliferative effects. In models with KIT exon 13 mutation IDRX-42 induced characteristic myxoid degeneration.

Telemedicine in Care of Sarcoma Patients beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a challenging environment for sarcoma patients. Most oncology societies published guidelines or recommendations prioritizing sarcoma patients and established telehealth as an efficient method of approaching them. The aim of this review is the assessment of current evidence regarding the utilization of telemedicine in diagnosis, treatment modalities, telerehabilitation and satisfaction among sarcoma patients and healthcare providers (HP).

METHODS

This systematic review was carried out using the databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

RESULTS

The application of telemedicine to the management of sarcoma has yielded improved clinical and psychological outcomes. Specifically, significant progress has been demonstrated in the areas of tele-oncology and telerehabilitation during the last decade, and the COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated this transition toward them. Telehealth has been proven efficient in a wide spectrum of applications from consultations on physical therapy and psychological support to virtual care symptom management. Both HP and patients reported satisfaction with telehealth services at levels comparable to in-person visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth has already unveiled many opportunities in tailoring individualized care, and its role in the management of sarcoma patients has been established in the post-COVID-19 era, as well.

Interruption of imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after prolonged imatinib maintenance in the absence of gross tumor lesions

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend indefinite imatinib treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Imatinib-refractory progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were previously reported not to differ between GIST patients who interrupted imatinib and those who did not.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic GIST who interrupted imatinib treatment after maintaining years of imatinib treatment in the absence of gross tumor lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between clinical factors and progression-free survival (PFS) following imatinib interruption were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median time from the absence of gross tumor lesions to imatinib interruption was 61.5 months. Since imatinib interruption, the median PFS was 19.6 months, and 4 patients (26.3%) remained progression-free for longer than 5 years. Among the patients who had progressive disease following the interruption, imatinib re-introduction led to an 88.6% objective response rate and a 100% disease control rate. Complete removal of the initial gross tumor lesion(s) and complete removal of the residual gross tumor lesion(s) by local treatment (vs. no local treatment or residual lesions after local treatment) were independently associated with favorable PFS.

CONCLUSION

Interruption of imatinib following prolonged maintenance in the absence of gross tumor lesions led to disease progression in the majority of cases. However, re-introduction of imatinib resulted in effective tumor control. Unmaintained remission seems to be possible in some patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST after a prolonged remission with imatinib if there is complete removal of any gross tumor lesions.

A New Online Dynamic Nomogram: Construction and Validation of a Predictive Model for Distant Metastasis Risk and Prognosis in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the digestive tract, among which patients with distant metastases tend to have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting distant metastasis in GIST patients and to develop two models for monitoring overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in GIST patients with metastasis. This would allow us to develop an optimal, individualized treatment strategy.

METHODS

We reviewed demographic and clinicopathological characteristics data from 2010 to 2017 of patients diagnosed with GIST in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The data of the external validation group was reviewed from the Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to confirm the independent risk factors for distant metastasis in the GIST patients, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in the GIST patients with distant metastasis. Subsequently, three web-based novel nomograms were developed, which were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Of the 3639 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 418 (11.4%) had distant metastases. The risk factors for distant metastasis in GIST patients included sex, primary site, grade, N stage, tumor size, and mitotic count. For OS, the independent prognosis factors for GIST patients with metastasis included age, race, marital, primary site, chemotherapy, mitotic count, and metastasis at the lung, and for CSS, age, race, marital, primary site, and metastasis at the lung were the independent prognosis factors. Three web-based nomograms were constructed based on these independent factors, respectively. The ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA were performed in the training, testing, and validation sets which confirmed the high accuracy and strong clinical practice power for the nomograms.

CONCLUSION

Population-based nomograms can help clinicians predict the occurrence and prognosis of distant metastases in patients with GIST, which may be helpful for clinicians to formulate clinical management and appropriate treatment strategies.

Molecular Advances in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by activating mutations in Proto-oncogene c-KIT (KIT) or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK). The emergence of effective therapies targeting these mutations has revolutionized the management of advanced GIST. However, following initiation of first-line imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), nearly all patients will develop resistance within 2 years through the emergence of secondary resistance mutations in KIT, typically in the Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)-binding site or activation loop of the kinase domain. Moreover, some patients have de novo resistance to imatinib, such as those with mutations in PDGFRA exon 18 or those without KIT or PDGFRA mutation. To target resistance, research efforts are primarily focused on developing next-generation inhibitors of KIT and/or PDGFRA, which can inhibit alternate receptor conformations or unique mutations, and compounds that impact complimentary pathogenic processes or epigenetic events. Here, we review the literature on the medical management of high-risk localized and advanced GIST and provide an update on clinical trial approaches to this disease.

Efficacy and safety of ripretinib in Chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a real-world, multicenter, observational study

Introduction

Mutations in KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRA) render the available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) ineffective in treating advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Ripretinib, a broad-spectrum switch-control kinase inhibitor, has shown increased efficacy and manageable safety, but real-world evidence remains scarce. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ripretinib among Chinese patients in a real-world setting.

Methods

Advanced GIST patients (N=23) receiving ripretinib following progression on previous lines of TKI treatment were enrolled to determine the efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The median PFS (mPFS) of efficacy analysis set (EAS) (N=21) was 7.1 months. mPFS of patients receiving ripretinib following ≤2 lines of previous TKI treatment and ≥3 prior lines of therapy were 7.1 and 9.2 months, respectively. The median OS (mOS) was 12.0 months and shorter interval between the end of the latest TKI and ripretinib therapy was correlated with longer median PFS and OS (p=0.054 and p=0.046), respectively. Alopecia and asthenia were the most common AEs observed.

Conclusion

Compared to previous lines of TKI in advanced GIST patients, ripretinib showed superior efficacy with clinically manageable AEs. Real-world results are comparable to that of phase III INVICTUS study and its Chinese bridging study. Hence, ripretinib can be used for the clinical management of advanced GIST patients.

Current status of and future prospects for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are soft-tissue sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery is the standard treatment for localised disease, but the risk of relapse and progression to more advanced disease is substantial. Following the discovery of the molecular mechanisms underlying GISTs, targeted therapies for advanced GIST were developed, with the first being the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib. Imatinib is recommended in international guidelines as first-line therapy to reduce the risk of GIST relapse in high-risk patients, and for locally advanced, inoperable and metastatic disease. Unfortunately, imatinib resistance frequently occurs and, therefore, second-line (sunitinib) and third-line (regorafenib) TKIs have been developed. Treatment options are limited for patients with GIST that has progressed despite these therapies. A number of other TKIs for advanced/metastatic GIST have been approved in some countries. Ripretinib is approved as fourth-line treatment of GIST and avapritinib is approved for GIST harbouring specific genetic mutations, while larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved for solid tumours (including GIST) with specific genetic mutations. In Japan, pimitespib, a heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, is now available as a fourth-line therapy for GIST. Clinical studies of pimitespib have indicated that it has good efficacy and tolerability, importantly not displaying the ocular toxicity of previously developed HSP90 inhibitors. Additional approaches for advanced GIST have been investigated, including alternative uses of currently available TKIs (such as combination therapy), novel TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, and immunotherapies. Given the poor prognosis of advanced GIST, the development of new therapies remains an important goal.

Precision Oncology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) represent 20% of sarcomatous tumors and 1-2% of primary gastrointestinal cancers. They have an excellent prognosis when localized and resectable, though their prognosis is poor in the metastatic setting, with limited options after the second line until recently. Four lines are now standard in KIT-mutated GIST and one in PDGFRA-mutated GIST. An exponential growth of new treatments is expected in this era of molecular diagnostic techniques and systematic sequencing. Currently, the main challenge remains the emergence of resistance linked to secondary mutations caused by selective pressure induced by TKIs. Repeating biopsies to tailor treatments might be a step in the right direction, and liquid biopsies at progression may offer a non-invasive alternative. New molecules with wider KIT inhibition are under investigation and could change the catalog and the sequence of existing treatments. Combination therapies may also be an approach to overcome current resistance mechanisms. Here, we review the current epidemiology and biology of GIST and discuss future management options, with an emphasis on genome-oriented therapies.

Improved Efficacy of First-Line Imatinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): The Dutch GIST Registry Data

BACKGROUND

Patients with unresectable and metastasized gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) experienced a remarkable improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the introduction of imatinib. Our hypothesis is that the outcomes of treatment with imatinib are even better nowadays compared with the registration trials that were performed two decades ago. To study this, we used real-life data from a contemporary registry.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study was performed by exploring clinical data from a prospective real-life clinical database, the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR). Patients with advanced GIST treated with first-line imatinib were included and PFS (primary outcome) and OS (secondary outcome) were analyzed. Results of our study were compared with published results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 62005 trial, which marked the first era of imatinib in the treatment of GIST.

RESULTS

Overall, 420 of the 435 patients treated with imatinib in the DGR had recorded response evaluation and were included in the analysis. During a median follow-up of 35.0 months (range 2.0-136.0), progression of GIST was eventually observed in 217 patients (51.2%). The DGR cohort showed a longer median PFS (33.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.4-37.6) compared with the EORTC 62005 trial (an estimated PFS of 19.5 months). Additionally, the median OS of 68.0 months (95% CI 56.1-80.0) was longer than the exposed median OS (46.8 months) published in the long-term follow-up results of the EORTC 62005 trial (median follow-up duration 10.9 years).

CONCLUSION

This study provides an update on outcomes of imatinib in the treatment of advanced GIST patients and demonstrates improved clinical outcomes since the first randomized studies of imatinib 2 decades ago. Furthermore, these results represent outcomes in real-world clinical practice and can serve as a reference when evaluating effectiveness of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST.

Advances in immunology and immunotherapy for mesenchymal gastrointestinal cancers

Mesenchymal gastrointestinal cancers are represented by the gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) which occur throughout the whole gastrointestinal tract, and affect human health and economy globally. Curative surgical resections and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the main managements for localized GISTs and recurrent/metastatic GISTs, respectively. Despite multi-lines of TKIs treatments prolonged the survival time of recurrent/metastatic GISTs by delaying the relapse and metastasis of the tumor, drug resistance developed quickly and inevitably, and became the huge obstacle for stopping disease progression. Immunotherapy, which is typically represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has achieved great success in several solid tumors by reactivating the host immune system, and been proposed as an alternative choice for GIST treatment. Substantial efforts have been devoted to the research of immunology and immunotherapy for GIST, and great achievements have been made. Generally, the intratumoral immune cell level and the immune-related gene expressions are influenced by metastasis status, anatomical locations, driver gene mutations of the tumor, and modulated by imatinib therapy. Systemic inflammatory biomarkers are regarded as prognostic indicators of GIST and closely associated with its clinicopathological features. The efficacy of immunotherapy strategies for GIST has been widely explored in pre-clinical cell and mouse models and clinical experiments in human, and some patients did benefit from ICIs. This review comprehensively summarizes the up-to-date advancements of immunology, immunotherapy and research models for GIST, and provides new insights and perspectives for future studies.