Usefulness of Geriatric Parameters in Preoperative Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients operated for endometrial cancer (EMCA) are typically elderly with multiple comorbidities, potentially impacting surgical outcomes and survival. This study evaluated the prognostic value of frailty and frailty-related scores in predicting perioperative morbidity and survival in EMCA patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 289 patients from the Sentinel Database treated for EMCA at Bern University Hospital (2012-2020). Patients underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection (39%) or additional radical lymphadenectomy (61%). Frailty was assessed using the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), modified Frailty Index (mFI), 5-item mFI (mFI-5), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, and independent parameters. Primary outcomes included perioperative complications, hospital stay, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years (range 26-94) and median follow-up was 41 months (0-105). ACCI > 4 (23.2%) was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications (p = 0.025), prolonged hospitalization (p = 0.03), and reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-5.60; p = 0.018). Multivariable analysis confirmed ACCI > 4 (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.02-4.90; p = 0.044), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) risk group (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.24-2.07; p < 0.001), hemoglobin (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p = 0.033), and congestive heart failure (HR 6.29, 95% CI 1.35-29.27; p =0.019) were significant predictors of OS. Radical lymphadenectomy (p < 0.001), ACCI > 4 (p = 0.025), and age > 70 years (p = 0.034) increased complication risks.

CONCLUSIONS

ACCI > 4 is a practical tool for preoperative risk assessment and predicting surgical tolerance and survival, and is therefore applicable for guiding surgical decisions and personalized care in patients with EMCA.

Prevalence of pre-existing cognitive impairment in patients treated for cancer and the impact of cancer treatment on cognitive outcomes: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Pre-existing cognitive impairment (CI) is likely underreported in patients treated for cancer, and its prevalence remains unclear. Older adults with CI may have a greater risk of treatment failure and increased morbidity and mortality than patients with intact cognition. To our knowledge, there has not been a previous review summarizing data on the prevalence of pre-existing CI in patients with cancer. This review addresses: (1) What is the prevalence of pre-existing CI in patients treated for cancer and (2) What is the impact of cancer treatment on cognitive outcomes among patients exhibiting pre-existing CI before planned cancer treatment?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We defined CI as a diagnosis of dementia or mild or unspecified CI before any cancer treatment, including surgery. This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, resolving disagreements with a third reviewer. The reviewers systematically searched MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception until July 15, 2023, including original research focused on participants aged 60 or older reporting the prevalence of pre-existing CI before any cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 10,490 screened citations, 23 manuscripts reporting on 21 studies met the inclusion criteria for both review questions. Pre-existing CI was prevalent at a mean rate of 6 % in administrative database studies, while clinical studies employing pre-treatment cognitive screening tools, primarily the Mini-Mental State Examination and Mini-Cog, reported a higher mean prevalence of 26 % (range 2.6 to 52 %). Only one study reported postoperative delirium in 27.9 % of patients with CI following cancer surgery, suggesting a higher risk of delirium in this population. However, none of the reviewed studies provided data on other cognitive outcomes, such as chemotherapy-related CI or treatment toxicity, in these individuals.

DISCUSSION

Pre-existing CI is common but highly variable. The variability in reported prevalence rates can largely be attributed to significant differences in study inclusion criteria of participants and sample size, with some studies relying on regionally limited datasets.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment and early treatment failure in nonagenarian patients with cancer, a retrospective monocentric study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cancer among patients aged over 90 is increasing, but this population is poorly described in literature. This underrepresentation complicates decision-making for cancer treatments, despite the contribution of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This study aimed to describe early failure of specific anti-cancer treatments in a population of nonagenarians treated in a Comprehensive Cancer Center after undergoing a CGA.

METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric cohort study included patients aged over 90 referred to an oncogeriatric team for CGA between 2019 and 2023, regardless of cancer type or planned treatment. The primary endpoint was the early treatment failure rate within 3 months of the initiation of treatment, defined as unplanned discontinuation, progression, or death.

RESULTS

119 patients were included, with a median age of 91 years (range: 90-99 years), 53 % were men. The most common cancers were skin (30 %), head and neck (24 %), genito-urinary (12 %), and breast cancers (11 %). Most patients were independent for activities of daily living with a median ADL score of 6/6 and IADL score of 3/4. They had an average of 1.3 severe comorbidities. Half of them suffered from undernutrition. The geriatric oncology team recommended 53.8 % treatment modifications (94.5 % de-escalation). The most common treatments received were radiotherapy (27 %), surgery (18 %), hormonal therapy (10 %) and chemotherapy (9 %). A quarter of the patients received exclusive supportive care. Among patients receiving specific treatment, early failure occurred in 22.7 % (20/88). The 6-month survival probability from initiation of treatment was 69.2 % (95 % CI: 60.3 %, 76.8 %), varying significantly by treatment intent: 93.9 % (95 % CI: 80.4 %, 98.3 %) for curative treatments, 77.4 % (95 % CI: 64.5 %, 86.6 %) for palliative treatments, and 26.8 % (95 % CI: 14.3 %, 44.6 %) for exclusive supportive care.

CONCLUSION

In this population of nonagenarians, who benefit from a CGA to identify and manage patient frailties, anti-cancer treatments were carried out with few early treatment failures.

Application of comprehensive geriatric assessment in oncology nursing: A literature review on optimizing treatment decisions and patient outcomes

With the global population aging, the care of elderly cancer patients has become increasingly complex and significant. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a multidimensional evaluation tool, has been widely implemented in oncology nursing to enhance the precision of treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. This review examines the application of CGA in oncology nursing, drawing on literature published between 2010 and 2024 in major databases using keywords such as "Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment" and "Oncology Nursing". It highlights how CGA contributes to optimizing treatment selection, monitoring the treatment process, and improving patients' quality of life and long-term outcomes. CGA provides a comprehensive evaluation of elderly cancer patients, including physical, psychological, and social aspects, enabling the identification of high-risk patients and reducing treatment-related side effects and complications. It also offers a critical foundation for developing personalized care plans. The article discusses various practical examples of CGA implementation across different countries and regions, including multidisciplinary collaborative models in France, the United States, and Australia, demonstrating CGA's flexible application in diverse healthcare settings. Although significant progress has been made in applying CGA in oncology nursing, numerous challenges remain in its implementation, such as resource limitations and insufficient personnel training. Future research will focus on integrating CGA with emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and precision medicine, to further improve the quality of care and treatment outcomes for elderly cancer patients. By summarizing the current status and challenges of CGA in oncology nursing, this review provides guidance for future research and clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of advancing CGA application to meet the growing demands of elderly oncology care.

Hospital care trajectories of older adults with cancer and the associated clinical profiles

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal hospital care experiences of older adults with cancer, from the treatment decision-making process until their end of life, remain unexplored. We examined the hospital care trajectories of these patients and identified associated clinical determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked the ELCAPA multicenter cohort study (patients aged ≥70 with a solid tumor and having been referred for a geriatric assessment between 2012 and 2019) and the Greater Paris University Hospitals' clinical data warehouse. Individual care trajectories, defined as series of consultations, hospital admissions (in day, acute, or rehabilitation units), and emergency room (ER) visits, were clustered using multichannel sequence analysis. Cluster membership determinants were identified among socio-demographic, oncological, and geriatric parameters by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seven hundred seven patients (median age: 82; metastatic cancer: 45.2%; 10 998 care episodes) were included. Four trajectory clusters were identified: cluster A (n = 149, 21.1%) with in-hospital surgical trajectories, cluster B (n = 198, 28.0%) with outpatient care trajectories with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, cluster C (n = 302, 42.7%) without any hospital cancer treatments, and cluster D (n = 58, 8.2%) with mostly chemotherapy and high hospital care consumption. Cluster belonging determinants included metastatic status and cancer site (for cluster A); cognition, mobility, and mood status (unimpaired parameters for cluster B and impaired for cluster C); and younger age (for cluster D).

CONCLUSIONS

While highlighting varied hospital care experiences among older patients with cancer, we found that age remains an independent determinant of chemotherapy-dominant care trajectories.

Frailty in Older Adults with Prostate Cancer

Older adults with all stages of prostate cancer are prone to developing frailty. These patients should have a frailty assessment and be managed by a multidisciplinary team. Lifestyle measures and tailoring of cancer-related treatment to the patient's fitness level can help in mitigating the adverse effects of frailty.

CD57+ EMRA CD8+ T cells in cancer patients over 70: associations with prior chemotherapy and response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune ageing complicates cancer treatment in older individuals. While immunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can reinvigorate T cells, these cells tend to become senescent with age. This study investigates different CD8+ T cell subsets usually associated with senescence, in cancer patients over 70 years old who are undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, and examines the relationship between these senescent cells and prior chemotherapy exposure. We analyzed data from the Elderly Cancer Patient (ELCAPA) cohort, which included 35 patients enrolled between March 2018 and March 2021.

RESULTS

Flow cytometry and unsupervised analysis were employed to characterize Effector Memory CD45RA+ (EMRA) and CD8+ T cell senescence at baseline, before initiating PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. EMRA cells were found to overexpress CD57 and KLRG1 compared to overall CD8+ T cells. Chemotherapy prior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 was associated with an increased proportion of CD57+ EMRA CD8+ T cells (p = 0.009) and its granzyme B (GRZB) subset (p = 0.007). Using a 10% cut-off to define positivity, the six-month non-response tends to be associated with the CD57+ GRZB+ EMRA positivity (p = 0.097). Other CD8+ T cell subsets (EMRA, CD57+, or KLRG1+), usually associated with senescence, showed no significant association with previous chemotherapy or response to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the impact of prior chemotherapy on expanding the pool of senescent T cells, particularly CD57+ EMRA CD8+ T and CD57+ GRZB+ EMRA CD8+ T cells, whose expansion could potentially affect the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in elderly patients. This highlights the need for tailored approaches in this population.

Prediction of moderate and severe toxicities of chemotherapy in older patients with cancer: a propensity weighted analysis of ELCAPA cohort

BACKGROUND

Currently available predictive models for chemotherapy-related toxicity are not sufficiently discriminative in older patients with cancer and do not consider moderate toxicities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with moderate and severe chemotherapy toxicities in older patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70+ recruited in the prospective ELCAPA cohort were analyzed. A total of 837 patients with data on toxicities had received chemotherapy without other systemic treatment and were included between 2015 and 2022. To adjust for any imbalances in the distribution of covariates between patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy vs combination chemotherapy, we applied overlap weighting (a propensity-score-based technique). We used multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) age was 81 (77-84). Forty-one percent experienced moderate toxicity, and 33% experienced severe toxicity. Hematologic toxicities accounted for 53% of severe toxicities and 66% of moderate toxicities. Age <80 years, cancer type, metastatic status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) >1, no cognitive impairment were associated with combination chemotherapy decision. In a univariate analysis with overlap weighting, no factors were associated with moderate toxicity. Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL and a CIRS-G score >12 were associated with severe toxicity. In a multivariate analysis, only hemoglobin < 10 g/dL was independently associated with severe toxicity, adjusted OR 2.96 (95% CI, 1.20-7.29).

CONCLUSION

By addressing indication bias for combination chemotherapy decision, only anemia and not cancer type, combination chemotherapy was predicting for severe chemotherapy-related toxicity in older patients with cancer. We did not find any predictors of moderate chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Physical decline, falls, and hospitalization among vulnerable older patients in the trajectory of colorectal cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Resilience to anticancer treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) among older patients varies. Many experience weight loss, physical decline, falls, and hospitalization during treatment, often leading to early discontinuation of otherwise effective chemotherapy. Screening for vulnerability might help to identify patients at risk of these adverse outcomes in older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a secondary analysis from the GERICO trial. Patients aged ≥70 years assessed for chemotherapy for CRC were screened for eligibility for the GERICO trial with the geriatric-8 (G8) frailty screening tool. The present study population comprised patients who were (1) screened with G8 but for reasons not included in the GERICO study and (2) patients who were randomized to the GERICO control group. We evaluated whether patients identified as vulnerable with G8 (≤14/17) or retrospectively constructed mG8 (≥6/35) had higher risk of experiencing decline in performance status (PS), falls, and unplanned hospitalization during treatment. The association between frailty status and the adverse outcomes was analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The discriminative ability of G8/mG8 to predict outcomes was analyzed using the area under the curve for receiver operating characteristics curves.

RESULTS

In total, 238 patients (median age 74 years [range 70-91]) were included in this analysis. More vulnerable than fit patients experienced decline in PS (G8: 41% vs. 14%, p = 0.006 and mG8: 28% vs. 17%, p = 0.04) during treatment. Furthermore, more vulnerable than fit patients experienced falls (G8 14% vs. 6% p = 0.04) and unplanned hospitalization (G8: 31% vs. 14%, p = 0.009 and mG8: 34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed an association between G8 vulnerability and decline in PS, falls, and hospitalization.

DISCUSSION

Patients with G8 or mG8 vulnerability were more likely to experience decline in PS and unplanned hospitalization during chemotherapy for CRC than fit patients. More G8 vulnerable patients experienced falls compared with fit patients. Appropriate interventions should be offered to older patients with CRC assessed as vulnerable with G8 or mG8 to maintain PS during chemotherapy.

Polypharmacy and drug interactions in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: associated factors

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy leads to increased risks of drug interactions, translating in potential hazardous health outcomes. This study aims to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and severe-drug interactions (SDIs) in older patients with cancer. Antineoplastic agents (ANAs) involvement and possible risk contexts (comorbidities with cardiac risk, and high-risk medications) were also analysed.

METHODS

Observational study with older adults (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with cancer, who were treated with antineoplastic agents (ANAs); it was conducted in three hospitals from the north of Portugal. Data collection was obtained using self-reports and medical records. DDIs were identified and classified using Micromedex® software. Descriptive and association analyze statistics were performed. Statistical hypothesis tests with p value less than 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical procedures and analysis were performed with R version 4.1.3.

RESULTS

We enrolled 552 patients. Polypharmacy prevalence was 88.40%; 76.45% and 56.16% of the patients presented with DDIs and SDIs, respectively. SDIs with ANAs were found in 21.20% of the patients. High-risk medications were associated with a higher risk of polypharmacy, DDIs, and SDIs. Polypharmacy and DDIs were higher in patients with hypertension or diabetes. SDIs were higher in patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy, potential DDIs and SDIs were highly prevalent in older adults with cancer. A careful review of the medication administered is necessary to decrease it. These findings warrant further research to optimize medication in this population and decrease problems related to medication, which may lead to emergency room visits and hospitalisations, compromising patient safety and/or ongoing treatments.

Exploring management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma using data from two randomised trials (GEINO1401/EX-TEM)

PURPOSE

The impact of age on optimal management of glioblastoma remains unclear. A recent combined analysis of two randomised trials, GEINO14-01 and EX-TEM, found no benefit from extending post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Here, we explore the impact of age.

METHODS

Relevant intergroup statistics were used to identify differences in tumour, treatment and outcome characteristics based on age with elderly patients (EP) defined as age 65 years and over. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the combined 205 patients, 57 (28%) were EP. Of these, 95% were ECOG 0-1 and 65% underwent macroscopic resection compared with 97% and 61% of younger patients (YP) respectively. There were numerically less MGMT-methylated (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.4) and IDH-mutated (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.1) tumours in EP vs. YP. Following surgery, EP were more likely to receive short course chemoradiation (17.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.017). At recurrence, EP tended to receive or best supportive care (28.3% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.09) or non-surgical options (96.2% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.06), but were less likely to receive bevacizumab (23.1% vs. 49.5%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was similar at 9.3months in EP and 8.5months in YP, with similar median OS at 20months.

CONCLUSION

In this trial population of predominantly fit EP, survival was similar to YP despite a proportion receiving less aggressive therapy at diagnosis and recurrence. Advancing age does not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor for glioblastoma when patients are fit for treatment, and a less aggressive approach in selected patients may not compromise outcomes.

Prognostic impact of neurocognitive disorders in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of neurocognitive disorder (NCD) for 12 month-overall mortality in patients aged 70 or more with a solid cancer.

DESIGN

prospective, observational, multicenter cohort.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed data from the ELCAPA longitudinal multicenter observational cohort of patients aged 70 or over, referred for a geriatric assessment (GA) before a new cancer treatment modality between January 31st, 2007, and December 29th, 2017. We defined the baseline NCD in four classes: no NCD, mild NCD, moderate NCD, and major NCD, based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, memory complaint, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score.

STATISTICAL METHODS

We compared the baseline characteristics of patients according to NCD classes, globally and by pairs (with Bonferroni' correction). Prognosis value of NCD classes were analysed by using univariable and then multivariable 12 month survival analysis with age as time-variable and with and without adjustement for the treatment strategy (curative, palliative or exclusive supportive care).

RESULTS

2784 patients with solid-cancer were included, with a median [interquartile range] age of 82 [78;86]. 36% of the patients were free of NCD, 34% had a mild NCD, 17% had a moderate NCD, and 13% had a major NCD. We identified the following independent prognostic factors for 12 month-overall mortality: NCD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for a major NCD = 1.54 [1.19-1.98] (p < 0.001), type of cancer, metastatic status, inpatient consultation, poor general health (assessed as the level of fatigue and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG-PS]), greater weight loss, palliative treatment, and exclusive supportive care. Additional adjustment for the treatment strategy did not greatly change the strength of the association of a major NCD with 12 month-overall mortality (HR [95%CI] = 1.78 [1.39-2.29] (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the presence of a major NCD has direct prognostic value (independently of other geriatric factors, the type of cancer and the treatment strategy) in older patients with a solid cancer.

Comparison of the prognostic value of eight nutrition-related tools in older patients with cancer: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the ability of eight nutrition-related tools to predict 1-year mortality in older patients with cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We studied older patients with cancer from the ELCAPA cohort and who had been referred for a geriatric assessment at one of 14 participating geriatric oncology clinics in the greater Paris area of France between 2007 and 2018.

MEASUREMENTS

The studied nutrition-related tools/markers were the body mass index (BMI), weight loss (WL) in the previous 6 months, the Mini Nutritional Assessment, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), the Prognostic Nutritional Index, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), the modified GPS, and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 1361 patients (median age: 81; males: 51%; metastatic cancer: 49%) were included in the analysis. Most of the tools showed a progressively increase in the mortality risk as the nutrition-related risk category worsened (overall p-values <0.02 for all) after adjustment for age, outpatient status, functional status, severe comorbidities, cognition, mood, cancer treatment strategy, tumour site, and tumour metastasis. All the models were discriminant, with a C-index ranging from 0.748 (for the BMI) to 0.762 (for the GPS). The concordance probability estimate ranged from 0.764 (WL) to 0.773 (GNRI and GPS)).

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for relevant prognostic factors, all eight nutrition-related tools/markers were independently associated with 1-year mortality in older patients with cancer. Depending on the time or context of the GA, physicians do not always have the time or means to perform and assess all the tools/markers compared here. However, even when some information is missing, each nutritional tool/marker has prognostic value and can be used in the evaluation.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Oncological Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Among Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the USA, approximately half of newly diagnosed patients with GC are 75 years or older. The objective of the current population-based study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the outcomes of elderly patients with locally advanced GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged > 75 years were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included lymph node (LN) harvest, surgical margin status, and 30-day mortality. To minimize the effect of selection bias on the assessed outcome between the two study groups (NAC versus no NAC), propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

RESULTS

After PSM, a total of 1958 patients were included in both groups. NAC utilization increased from 2013 to 2019 (21% versus 42.7%, ptrend < 0.001). On pathologic analysis, patients who received NAC were more likely to have ≥ 16 LNs evaluated (NAC 60.1% versus no NAC 55.5%, p = 0.044) and negative resection margins (NAC 88.6% versus no NAC 83%, p = 0.001). Patients who received NAC were also less likely to experience 30-day mortality following resection (NAC 4.1% versus no NAC 7.1%). Receipt of NAC was associated with improved 1-year (73.9% versus 68.3%), 3-year (48.2% versus 43.5%), and 5-year OS (36.9% versus 30.5%) compared with patients who underwent upfront surgery (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of NAC was associated with improved oncological outcomes among elderly patients undergoing resection for locally advanced GC.

Defining an Abnormal Geriatric Assessment: Which Deficits Matter Most?

At present, there is no clear definition of what constitutes an abnormal geriatric assessment (GA) in geriatric oncology. Various threshold numbers of abnormal GA domains are often used, but how well these are associated with treatment plan modification (TPM) and whether specific GA domains are more important in this context remains uncertain. A retrospective review of the geriatric oncology clinic database at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, including new patients seen for treatment decision making from May 2015 to June 2022, was conducted. Logistic regression modelling was performed to determine the association between various predictor variables (including the GA domains and numerical thresholds) and TPM. The study cohort (n = 736) had a mean age of 80.7 years, 46.1% was female, and 78.3% had a VES-13 score indicating vulnerability (≥3). In the univariable analysis, the best-performing threshold number of abnormal domains based on area under the curve (AUC) was 4 (AUC 0.628). The best-performing multivariable model (AUC 0.704) included cognition, comorbidities, and falls risk. In comparison, the multivariable model with the sole addition of the threshold of 4 had an AUC of 0.689. Overall, an abnormal GA may be best defined as one with abnormalities in the domains of cognition, comorbidities, and falls risk. The optimal numerical threshold to predict TPM is 4.

Cancer mortality and competing causes of death in older adults with cancer: A prospective, multicentre cohort study (ELCAPA-19)

BACKGROUND

In older patients with cancer, comorbidities compete with cancer for cause of death. The objectives were to evaluate cancer mortality and factors associated, according to metastatic status.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2014, patients with cancer aged ≥70 referred for pre-therapeutic geriatric assessment (GA) were included through the ELCAPA prospective cohort study. The underlying cause of death was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. The World Health Organisation definition was used to categorise the cause of death as cancer versus another disease (e.g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, etc.) Competing risk models were used.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of the 1445 included patients was 80.2 (5.8) and 48% were women. Most common tumour sites were colorectal (19%), breast (17%) and urinary (15%); 773 patients (49%) had metastases. After a 34-month median follow-up, 706 cancer deaths were observed among 843 deaths. The 6-month and 3-year cancer mortality rates (95% CI) were 12% (9-15) and 34% (29-38) for non-metastatic patients and 43% (39-47) and 79% (75-82) for metastatic patients, respectively. Dependency in activities of daily living and comorbidities were associated with 6-month and 3-year cancer mortality in non-metastatic (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] = 1.68 [0.99-2.85] and 1.69 [1.16-2.45]; and 1.98 [1.08-3.63] and 3.38 [1.47-7.76], respectively) and metastatic patients (aSHR = 2.81 [2.01-3.93] and 2.95 [2.14-4.07]; and 1.63 [1.18-2.25] and 2.06 [1.39-3.05], respectively). Impaired Timed-Get-Up-and-Go test was associated with 6-month and 3-year cancer mortality in metastatic patients (aSHR = 1.5 [1.06-2.12] and 1.38 [1.06-1.81], respectively). Obesity was negatively associated with 3-year cancer death in non-metastatic (aSHR = 0.53 [0.29-0.97]) and metastatic patients (aSHR = 0.71 [0.51-1.00]).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of older adults with cancer referred for pre-therapeutic GA die from cancer. Geriatric parameters are independently associated with cancer mortality and should be considered for prognosis assessment, decision-making and care.

An exposed/unexposed cohort study assessing the effectiveness, the safety and the survival of patients established on home non-invasive ventilation after 80 years old

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the elderly. We aimed to assess if the effectiveness of long-term NIV of patients ≥ 80 years (older) was not greatly inferior to that of patients < 75 years (younger).

METHODS

This retrospective exposed/unexposed cohort study included all patients established on long-term NIV treated at Rouen University Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Follow-up data were collected at the first visit following NIV initiation. The primary outcome was daytime PaCO2 with a non-inferiority margin of 50% of the improvement of PaCO2 for older patients compared to younger patients.

RESULTS

We included 55 older patients and 88 younger patients. After adjustment on the baseline PaCO2, the mean daytime PaCO2 was reduced by 0.95 (95% CI: 0.67; 1.23) kPa in older patients compared to1.03 (95% CI: 0.81; 1.24) kPa in younger patients for a ratio of improvements estimated at 0.95/1.03 = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.59; 1.27, one-sided p = 0.007 for non-inferiority to 0.50). Median (interquartile range) daily use was 6 (4; 8.1) hours in older versus 7.3 (5; 8.4) hours in younger patients. No significant differences were seen in the quality of sleep and NIV safety. The 24-months survival was 63.6% in older and 87.2% in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

effectiveness and safety seemed acceptable in older patients, with a life expectancy long enough to expect a mid-term benefit, suggesting that initiation of long-term NIV should not be refused only based on age. Prospective studies are needed.

The effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on care received, treatment completion, toxicity, cancer-related and geriatric assessment outcomes, and quality of life for older adults receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aims to summarise the available literature on the effect of geriatric assessment (multidimensional health assessment across medical, social, and functional domains; "GA") or comprehensive geriatric assessment (geriatric assessment with intervention or management recommendations; "CGA") compared to usual care for older adults with cancer on care received, treatment completion, adverse treatment effects, survival and health-related quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials or prospective cohort comparison studies on the effect of GA/CGA on care received, treatment, and cancer outcomes for older adults with cancer.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included: seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two phase II randomised pilot studies, and one prospective cohort comparison study. All studies included older adults receiving systemic therapy, mostly chemotherapy, for mixed cancer types (eight studies), colorectal cancer (one study), and non-small cell lung cancer (one study). Integrating GA/CGA into oncological care increased treatment completion (three of nine studies), reduced grade 3+ chemotherapy toxicity (two of five studies), and improved quality of life scores (four of five studies). No studies found significant differences in survival between GA/CGA and usual care. GA/CGA incorporated into care decisions prompted less intensive treatment and greater non-oncological interventions, including supportive care strategies.

DISCUSSION

GA/CGA integrated into the care of an older adult with cancer has the potential to optimise care decisions, which may lead to reduced treatment toxicity, increased treatment completion, and improved health-related quality of life scores.

Additional Value of Mini-Cog© in Urogeriatric Patients Concurrently Screened by G8 Scores

Background: Cognitive impairment is poorly addressed in G8 screening. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the additional value of Mini-Cog© in urogeriatric patients concurrently screened by G8 scores. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive urogeriatric patients aged 75 and above were evaluated. All patients underwent G8 and Mini-Cog© screening. Patients with a G8 score above 14 were considered geriatric "healthy or fit". A Mini-Cog© from four to five points was considered inconspicuous in screening for cognitive impairment. The additional information of a Mini-Cog© screening during G8 screening was evaluated by looking at G8 "fit and healthy" patients who had conspicuous Mini-Cog© tests and vice versa. Additionally, the results of the neuropsychological subitem "E" of the G8 score were compared with the results of the Mini-Cog© screening. Results: The mean age of the patients was 83 y (min. 75-max. 102). Sixty-one of the patients were males, and 13 were females. Twenty-nine of the patients had a normal G8 score and were considered "healthy or fit", and 45 were not. Forty-three of the patients had an inconspicuous Mini-Cog©, and 31 had a conspicuous Mini-Cog© of less than four points. The majority of G8 "healthy or fit" patients (n = 24/29) had an inconspicuous Mini-Cog© test. However, of them, five patients had a Mini-Cog© of less than four points, which is suspicious for cognitive disorders. Furthermore, of the 43 patients with a normal G8 subscore in item "E" of two points, 6 patients had a conspicuous Mini-Cog© of less than four points. Conclusions: As shown by the present study, the Mini-Cog© might extend the G8 screening with regard to the detection of cognitive functional impairments that are not detected by the G8 screening alone. It can be easily added to G8 screening.

Enhancing collaboration between geriatricians, oncologists, and pharmacists to optimize medication therapy in older adults with cancer: A position paper from SOFOG-SFPO

Optimizing anticancer treatment and medication therapy in older patients with cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach, with a strong collaboration between geriatricians, oncologists and pharmacists. While all patients can benefit, some clinical situations seem to be high-priority. Careful attention should be given to patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and/or diabetes, which are prone to decompensate during anticancer treatment and often involve multiple medications. Another great concern is the risk of falls, closely related to polypharmacy, hence the need for a comprehensive medication review. Managing the pharmacological treatment of depression is also challenging and require shared expertise. Finally, pharmacists can prove valuable in situations of adherence difficulties or use of complementary medicines. Collaborative practice should begin at initiation of anticancer treatment and continue throughout the care pathway, as continuous reassessment is essential. Although the integration of pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams is often challenged by funding, collaborative should still be strongly encouraged.

Prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based study

Clinical implications of frailty in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF), are unknown. In this population-based study, all incident cases of MPN from the Ontario cancer registry between 2004 and 2019 (N = 10 336; ET = 5108; PV = 3843; MF = 1385) and their matched controls (for age, sex, residence, and income) in a 1:4 ratio were included. Baseline frailty measured using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator and McIsaac frailty index (mFI), categorized as fit, prefrail, or frail if mFI <0.10, 0.11 to 0.20, >0.20), was significantly higher in ET, PV, and MF compared with matched controls (standardized mean difference of 0.27, 0.27, and 0.28). Over 23%, 20%, and 34% of patients with ET, PV, and MF were frail or prefrail despite a younger age (<65 years) or minimal comorbidities. In Cox proportional regression, frailty was independently associated with worse overall survival (OS) after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities compared with mFI-fit patients. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for OS for mFI-prefrail and mFI-frail patients were: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) and 3.6 (2.9-4.4) in ET, 1.3 (1.1-1.5) and 2.7 (2.1-3.4) in PV, and 1.2 (1.0-1.5) and 2.0 (1.5-2.7) in MF. Patients with MPN have a substantially higher prevalence of frailty compared with matched controls, which is associated with reduced OS, independent of age or comorbidities.

Geriatric assessment prior to cancer treatment: A health economic evaluation

INTRODUCTION

To address uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of implementing geriatric assessment (GA) in oncology practice, we undertook a synthetic, model-based economic evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic model with embedded Markov chains was developed to simulate a cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing GA within standard oncological care compared to current practice. This was for patients aged 77 years (the mean age in included trials) receiving chemotherapy or surgery as first-line treatment. Assumptions were made about model parameters, based on available literature, to calculate the incremental net health benefit (INHB) of GA, using a data synthesis.

RESULTS

GA has additional costs over standard care alone of between £390 and £576, depending upon implementation configuration. When major assumptions about the effectiveness of GA were modelled, INHB was marginally positive (0.09-0.12) at all cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs). If no reduction in postoperative complications was assumed, the intervention was shown not to be cost-effective (INHB negative at all CETs). When used before chemotherapy, with minimal healthcare staffing inputs and technological assistance, GA is cost-effective (INHB positive between 0.06 and 0.07 at all CETs).

DISCUSSION

Considering emerging evidence that GA improves outcomes in oncology, GA may not be a cost-effective intervention when used for all older adults with cancer. However, with judicious selection of implementation models, GA has the potential to be cost-effective. Due to significant heterogeneity and centre dependent success in implementation and effectiveness, GA is difficult to study in oncology settings. Stakeholders could take a pragmatic approach towards GA introduction with local evaluation favoured over generalisable research. Because GA tends towards utilitarianism and has no safety issues, it is a suitable intervention for more widespread implementation.

External Validity of Two Scores for Predicting the Risk of Chemotherapy Toxicity Among Older Patients With Solid Tumors: Results From the ELCAPA Prospective Cohort

BACKGROUND

Severe chemotherapy-related toxicities are frequent among older patients. The Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) and the Cancer and Aging Research Group Study (CARG) score were both developed to predict these events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the scores' predictive performance in a prospective cohort, which included patients aged 70 years and older referred for a geriatric assessment prior to chemotherapy for a solid tumor. The main endpoints were grades 3/4/5 toxicities for the CARG score and grades 4/5 hematologic toxicities and grades 3/4/5 non-hematologic toxicities for the CRASH score.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients were included, of which 150 (61%) and 126 (51%) experienced at least one severe adverse event as defined respectively in CARG and CRASH studies. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly greater in the intermediate and high-risk CARG groups than in the low-risk group (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 0.3 [0.1-1.4] (P = .1) and 0.4 [0.1-1.7], respectively). The area under curve (AUC) was 0.55. Similarly, the incidence of severe toxicities was no greater in the intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk CRASH groups than in the low-risk CRASH group (OR [95%CI] = 1 [0.3-3.6], 1 [0.3-3.4], and 1.5 [0.3-8.1], respectively). The AUC was 0.52. The type of cancer, performance status, comorbidities, body mass index, and MAX2 index were independently associated with grades 3/4/5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

In an external cohort of older patients referred for a pretherapeutic GA, the CARG and CRASH scores were poor predictors of the risk of chemotherapy severe toxicities.

Item analysis of G8 screening in uro-oncologic geriatric patients

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The G8 score is a widespread screening tool for geriatric frailty in oncology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scores and relevance of G8 items in a standard screening of geriatric patients with uro-oncologic diseases to better understand the results of the assessment.

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive uro-oncologic geriatric patients aged 75 years and older were evaluated. All patients underwent a G8 screening that consisted of 8 items. Patients with a G8 score above 14 were considered geriatric "fit", while others were considered to be "frail". Overall results and single item scores were evaluated. Clinical data were gathered from patients' charts.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 82 years (min. 75-max. 102). In 36 of the patients, the G8 score indicated "no-frailty", and in 46 patients, the G8 score indicated "frailty". The mean G8 score was 12.9 (min 4-max 17 pts). Item analysis revealed that points were most often lost in items H (polypharmacy), P (comparison of health status to peers) and Age. Fifty-nine, 56 and 52 patients lost points on item Age, item H and item P, respectively. In contrast, the majority of patients reached the maximum score for nutritional items [i.e., items A (food intake), B (weight loss) and F (body mass index (BMI))]. For item A, 73 patients reached the maximum score; for item B, 62 patients reached the maximum score; and for item F, 72 patients reached the maximum score. There were no differences in this distribution pattern when comparing tumour entities, sex, and patients with local vs. metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed a high percentage of suspicious test results. Potential reasons for these findings include the low threshold of the G8 overall score and the fact that in some items, points were easily lost. Modifications of the test should be considered.

Impact of Medical Specialties on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Elderly Cancer Patients

The management (diagnostic and therapeutic) of cancer in the geriatric population involves a number of complex difficulties. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a medical specialty on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of elderly cancer patients. Four clinical scenarios of cancer in the geriatric population, with a dedicated survey to gather information regarding each clinical case's diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, as well as the different criteria influencing physicians' therapeutic decisions, were exposed to geriatricians, oncologists, and radiotherapists in Saint-Etienne. The surveys were filled out by 13 geriatricians, 11 oncologists, and 7 radiotherapists. There was a homogeneity of responses regarding the confirmation of cancer diagnostics in the elderly. There were strong disparities (inter- and intra-specialties) for several clinical situations regarding the therapeutic management of cancer. There were significant disparities in terms of surgical management, the implementation of a chemotherapy protocol, and the adaptation of the chemotherapy dosage. Contrary to oncologists, who primarily consider the G8 and the Karnofsky score, geriatric autonomy scores and frailty with cognitive assessment were the key factors determining diagnostic/therapeutic therapy for geriatricians. These results raise important ethical questions, requiring specific studies in geriatric populations to provide the homogenous management of elderly patients with cancer.

The prognostic value of comprehensive geriatric assessment on the management of older patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The prognostic value of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for the management of older small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients remains to be established.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort enrolled 21 SCLC patients over 65 years from March 2018 to 2019 at the Yonsei Cancer Center. The CGA included the following instruments: frailty, body mass index, sarcopenia (circumference of arm and calf, Timed Up and Go test, grip strength), comorbidity, polypharmacy, activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL, nutrition, depression, and cognitive function. The correlations of oncological and geriatric variables with overall survival (OS) were determined. The log-rank test with Cox model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

The median age was 75 years (range, 67 to 85). All patients had the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. The median survival was 9.93 months (range, 1.53 to 36.30). Among CGA parameters, ADL and nutritional status had significant differences in OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only nutritional status was independently associated with survival (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.57). Median OS for low nutritional status was 5.63 months and the normal nutrition group was 15.5 months (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment nutritional status measured by CGA appears to be a predictor of OS in older SCLC patients. However, for further generalization of the implication of CGA in SCLC, a larger scale study with prospective design is strongly needed.

Treatment decision conversations, symptoms, and functional status in older adults with advanced cancer: An exploratory study utilizing mixed methods

INTRODUCTION

Adults 65 years of age or older with metastatic cancer face complicated treatment decisions. Few studies have explored the process with oncology clinicians during clinic encounters. Our exploratory study evaluated whether symptom burden or functional status impacted treatment decision conversations between older adults, caregivers, and oncology clinicians in a single National Cancer Institute within the Mountain West region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational, convergent mixed methods longitudinal study between November 2019 and January 2021; participants were followed for six months. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were administered prior to clinical encounter. Ambulatory clinic encounters were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Nineteen older adults with a metastatic cancer diagnosis or a relapsed refractory hematologic malignancy were approached to achieve a sample of fifteen participants. The main outcome of interest was the number and quality of treatment decision making conversations, defined broadly and encompassing any interaction between the participant and oncology provider that involved (a) an issue or concern (e.g., symptoms, quality of life) brought up by anyone in the room during the clinical encounter, (b) a clinician addressing the concern, or (c) the patient or caregiver making a decision that involved a discussion of their goals or treatment preferences.

RESULTS

Nine men and six women with a mean age of 71.3 years (6.6; standard deviation [SD]) were enrolled, and four died while on study. Participants were followed from one to ten visits (mean 4.5; SD 2.8) over one to six months. Of the 67 analyzed encounters, seven encounter conversations (10%) were identified as involving any type of treatment decision discussion. The seven treatment decision conversations occurred with five participants, all male (although female participants made up 40% of the sample), and 63% of participants who reported severe symptoms on the MDASI were female. Severe symptoms or functional status did not impact treatment conversations.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that older adults with incurable cancer and their oncology clinicians do not spontaneously engage in an assessment of costs and benefits to the patient, even in the setting of palliative treatment and significant symptom burden.

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in fit older patients compared to a standard population: Clinical characteristics, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

To compare robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in well-selected older patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, compared to a younger population. Primary endpoint was perioperative outcomes comparison and secondary endpoint were oncological and functional outcomes comparison to a younger population.

METHODS

Single tertiary center cohort of consecutive patients treated with RARP (2017-2020) with retrospective analysis. Patients were classified by age in two groups: <75: control group (CG) and ≥75: study group (SG). Patients aged ≥75 had a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and only patients classified Balducci ≤2 were admitted to surgery.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included, 56 in SG and 213 in CG. Median follow-up was 9.8 months. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant (SS) difference between the groups for patients' characteristics (PSA, digital rectal examination -DRE- and biopsy Gleason Score), perioperative data (operative time, hospitalization length, transfusions rate, immediate complications, Clavien-Dindo complications, 30-days re-interventions and 30-days re-hospitalisation), oncological (TNM, margins, extraprostatic extension, postoperative PSA, BCR, metastases, overall survival -OS- and cancer specific survival -CSS-) and functional outcomes. Median perioperative blood loss was lower in the SG: 200.00 cc IQR [100.00, 300.00] vs 200.00cc IQR [100.00, 400.00] in the CG (P<0.05). A multivariate regression considering age>75, DRE, GS, PSA, cardiovascular history and diabetes showed none of variables associated with early BCR. Limitations are retrospective design, small number of patients and short follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

RARP shows similar perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes for older patients selected by a CGA when compared to younger patients. The SG shows a minor perioperative bleeding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Predictive Value of the G8 Questionnaire in Older Patients with Lung Cancer or Mesothelioma before Systemic Treatment

AIMS

The standard evaluation of older lung cancer or mesothelioma patients for systemic anti-cancer treatment, based on performance status, is inaccurate. We used the G8 questionnaire to assess a patient's fitness for chemotherapy and explored the correlations between G8 scores, treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 201 older patients (≥70 years) with advanced lung cancer or mesothelioma were prospectively assessed by standard clinical methods and a G8 questionnaire. Treatment decisions before and after reviewing the G8 score were documented. Patients were divided into low (<11), intermediate (11-14) and high (>14) G8 score groups. Patients' characteristics, treatment plans and clinical outcomes among each G8 score group were compared. Similar analyses were compared between good (<2) and poor (≥2) performance status.

RESULTS

10.1% of patients' treatment plans changed after oncologists reviewed G8 scores. The G8 score correlated inversely with performance status. More patients with low G8 scores (22.5%) were offered the best supportive care compared with 4.5% in intermediate and 1.9% in high G8 score groups. More patients (30.1%) with low G8 scores had treatment changed from chemotherapy to best supportive care on the planned day of their treatment, compared with intermediate (7.5%) and high (6.1%) G8 score groups. High G8 score patients received higher chemotherapy intensity and survived longer than patients with intermediate or low G8 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The G8 score with two cut-off values can predict functional status, chemotherapy tolerability and prognosis in older patients with lung cancer or mesothelioma, thus supporting oncologists on treatment decisions for this population.

A Two-Step Frailty Assessment Strategy in Older Patients With Solid Tumors: A Decision Curve Analysis

PURPOSE

The intended clinical value of frailty screening is to identify unfit patients needing geriatric assessment (GA) and to prevent unnecessary GA in fit patients. These hypotheses rely on the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, but they have not been verified.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of outpatients age ≥ 70 years with prostate, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer included in the ELCAPA cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02884375) between February 2007 and December 2019. The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool (G8) and modified G8 scores for identifying unfit patients was determined on the basis of GA results. We used decision curve analysis to calculate the benefit of frailty screening for detecting unfit patients and avoiding unnecessary GA in fit patients across different threshold probabilities.

RESULTS

We included 1,648 patients (median age, 81 years), and 1,428 (87%) were unfit. The sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 85% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 59% (95% CI, 57 to 61) for G8, and 86% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 60% (95% CI, 58 to 63) for the modified G8 score. For decision curve analysis, the net benefit (NB) for identifying unfit patients were 0.72 for G8, 0.72 for the modified G8, and 0.82 for GA at a threshold probability of 0.25. At a threshold probability of 0.33, the NBs were 0.71, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. At a threshold probability of 0.5, the NBs were 0.68, 0.69, and 0.73, respectively. No screening tool reduced unnecessary GA in fit patients at predefined threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSION

Although frailty screening tests showed good diagnostic accuracy, screening showed no clinical benefits over the GA-for-all strategy. NB approaches, in addition to diagnostic accuracy, are necessary to assess the clinical value of tests.

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, prostate cancer, and older adults: a global Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology drug review

Prostate cancer is a disease of older adults that has undergone a significant therapeutic paradigm shift in the last decade with the emergence of novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis). One of the more commonly used ARPis is enzalutamide. This drug, along with darolutamide and apalutamide, initially received approvals in the metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting but is now utilized frequently in the metastatic castrate-sensitive and non-metastatic castration-resistant settings. Landmark phase III data illustrating ARPi efficacy in older adults are limited to those with excellent performance status. However, its role in unfit older prostate cancer patients remains to be explored in the context of a narrative review. This first-of-its-kind drug review aims to shed light on the most up-to-date evidence behind the unique toxicity profile of ARPis in the context of geriatric vulnerabilities such as cognitive and functional impairment, along with potential solutions and supporting evidence that exists to circumvent these issues in the vulnerable older adult.

Identification of Factors Affecting the Increased Percentage of CGA Recommendations among Patients on Geriatric Ward

In Poland, the elderly population is noticeably increasing every year. Therefore, the current healthcare system has to rise to the challenge of treatment and prevention strategies targeting elderly persons. Based on the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13 scale), consisting of international and validated scales, we put effort into identifying the factors affecting the increased percentage of CGA (Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) recommendations by healthcare system physicians. The study group involved 78 patients from the Department of Geriatrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland, aged 60-91 (median Me = 81 years old). Of the studied patients, 51 were recommended for CGA (51/78; 64.6%). A statistically significant association was observed between CGA recommendation and age (p < 0.001); the likelihood of a CGA recommendation increased with age. Furthermore, the increased CGA recommendation was observed among geriatric patients with: (a) frailty syndrome (OR = 11.2, CI95% 2.88-43.5, p < 0.001), (b) high risk of malnutrition or malnutrition (OR = 3.87; CI95%, 1.00-14.9, p = 0.04), (c) low mental status (OR = 3.32, CI95% 1.22-9.09, p = 0.029), (d) low ability to perform basic daily duties (according to ADL scale-OR = 12.6, CI95% 1.57-101, p = 0.004 and IADL scale-OR = 4.71, CI95% 1.72-12.9, p = 0.003), and (e) fall risk (OR = 15.0, CI95% 4.67-48.3, p < 0.001). Moreover, homocysteine levels increased with age (p = 0.003) and decreased with sleep duration (p = 0.043). Taken together, all these factors seem to be important when implementing treatment programs adjusted to the individual geriatric patient.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment: Valuation and patient preferences in older Japanese adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for the management of older adults with cancer. We evaluated the effect of CGA conducted by a geriatric oncology service (GOS) on the management of older adults with cancer. We also queried patients about their perceptions of the value of this process.

METHODS

This was a prospective quality assessment study of 498 consecutive older adults with cancer who were referred to the GOS from May 2020 through December 2021. Treating physicians requested a consultation and the GOS conducted a CGA and assessed patient preferences. The GOS provided recommendations on cancer treatment and geriatric interventions. Patient perspectives on the consultation were evaluated using collaboRATE and modified Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) subscales.

RESULTS

A 10-item frailty index based on a CGA (FI-CGA-10) [Oncologist, 26, e1751 (2021)] in the 498 patients showed that 19% of patients were fit, 40% pre-frail, and 41% frail. Prior to CGA the intent of the proposed cancer treatment was curative in 56% (n = 280), life-extending in 40% (n = 201), and palliative in 3.4% (n = 17). After a CGA consultation, a cancer treatment decision was changed in 45% of patients. The intent of treatment after the CGA consultation was curative in 45%, life-extending in 34%, and palliative in 21%. At least one referral to relevant disciplines was recommended for 88% of patients and was implemented in 43%. As part of the GOS consultation educational support was provided to 97% of patients. Based on the collaboRATE and PACIC tools, patients perceived the GOS consultation positively and helpful for facilitating shared decision-making and patient-centered care.

CONCLUSION

Our institutional experience demonstrated the valuable effect of the CGA consultation on oncologic decision-making and geriatric interventions in a patient-centered manner.

Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.

[The place of support care]

Supportive care, in the context of breast cancer in the elderly, is part of standard oncogeriatric care. Nevertheless, the multidisciplinary reinforcement of the different transversal teams can support the global approach, that is essential to the quality of care and the life course. Evaluation is the basis of this management. As a result of this evaluation, the approach to sexual health is a novelty that is often insufficiently considered with elderly patients suffering from breast malignancy.

Reliable Prediction of Post-Operative Complications' Rate Using the G8 Screening Tool: A Prospective Study on Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Kidney Cancer

In the last years the incidence of renal neoplasms has been steadily increasing, along with the average age of patients at the time of diagnosis. Surgical management for localized disease is becoming more challenging because of patients’ frailty. We conducted a multi-center prospective study to evaluate the role of the G8 as a screening tool in the assessment of intra and post-operative complications of elderly patients (≥70 y.o.) undergoing surgery for kidney cancer. A total of 162 patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2015 to January 2019 and divided into two study groups (frail vs. not-frail) according to their geriatric risk profile based on G8 score. Several factors (i.e., age, CCI, ASA score, preoperative anemia, RENAL score, surgical procedures, and techniques) were analyzed to identify whether any of them would configure as a statistically significant predictor of surgical complications. According to the G8 Score, 90 patients were included in the frail group. A total of 52 frail patients vs. 4 non-frail patients developed a postoperative complication of any kind (p < 0.001). Of these, 11 were major complications and all occurred in the frail group. Our results suggest that the G8 screening tool is an effective and useful instrument to predict the risk of overall complications in elderly patients prior to renal surgery.

Bladder preservation in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study with concurrent chemotherapy and twice-daily hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer occurs mainly in older adults and surgery is not always possible when there are geriatric conditions and comorbidities. Trimodal treatment (TMT) combining trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) would be a curative alternative in such patients.

METHODS

All consecutive patients 75 years of age and older with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with TMT by Georges Pompidou European Hospital team were retrospectively analysed. Induction CRT combined hypofractionated twice-daily radiotherapy targeting bladder and pelvis to a total dose of 24 Gy (Gy) with concurrent platinum salt and 5-fluorouracil. Consolidation CRT to a total dose of 44 Gy was proposed to patients with biopsy-proven complete response after induction phase and those with persistent tumour underwent salvage cystectomy. We assessed using Kaplan-Meier method overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), invasive recurrence-free survival (IRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), survival with bladder preserved (SBP), and toxicities. With a Cox model for OS and the Fine Gray method of competing risk for secondary endpoints, we analysed in univariate (u) and multivariate (m) analysis the impact of tumour characteristics and patient profiles: gender, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, polypharmacy, and malnutrition.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 2017, 85 patients were included. After induction, complete response rate was 83.5%. With a median follow-up of 63 months, 5 year-OS, CSS, IRFS, MFS and SBP were 61.0%, 77.6%, 71%, 82.9%, and 70.2% respectively. A persistent tumour after induction impacted SBP (SHRm 3.61; p = 0.004), CSS (SHRm 3.27; p = 0.023), and MFS (SHRm 3.68; p = 0.018). Late grade 3 urinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 3.5% and 1.2%.

CONCLUSION

We report here the largest series of bladder preservation over 75 years in a curative intent. Outcomes and tolerance in selected older adults compared favourably with surgical series and with CRT studies using classical fractionation.

"Age is just a number"; frailty as a marker of peri-operative risk in head and neck surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty refers to a patient's reduced capacity to withstand stressors due to a reduction in physiologic reserves. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes following head and neck surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies incorporating 182 059 patients were included in qualitative synthesis with 15 953 (8.8%) of patients deemed as frail. Meta-analysis incorporating nine studies demonstrated that frailty is associated with an increased 30 day postoperative morbidity (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.98-3.80; p < 0.01) and meta-analysis with six studies suggested increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.62-3.31; p < 0.01). Preliminary meta-analyses between two and five studies suggested that frail patients had reduced overall survival and were more likely to be discharged to a nonhome location or readmitted within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty appears to be associated with poor short-term outcomes following head and neck surgery and may improve understanding of an individual patient's peri-operative risk.

The Prognostic Value of Eight Comorbidity Indices in Older Patients with Cancer: The ELCAPA Cohort Study

Background: A prognostic assessment is crucial for making cancer treatment decisions in older patients. We assessed the prognostic performance (relative to one-year mortality) of eight comorbidity indices in a cohort of older patients with cancer. Methods: We studied patients with cancer aged ≥70 included in the Elderly Cancer Patient (ELCAPA) cohort between 2007 and 2010. We assessed seven nonspecific indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), three modified versions of the CCI, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, the Gagne index, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G)) and the National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index. Results: Overall, 510 patients were included. Among patients with nonmetastatic cancer, all the comorbidity indices were independently associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 1.44 to 2.51 for one standard deviation increment; p < 0.05 for all) and had very good discriminant ability (Harrell’s C > 0.8 for the eight indices), but were poorly calibrated. Among patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was independently associated with 1-year mortality (aHR (95% confidence interval): 1.26 [1.06−1.50]). Discriminant ability was moderate (0.61 to 0.70) for the subsets of patients with metastatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Comorbidity indices had strong prognostic value and discriminative ability for one-year mortality in older patients with nonmetastatic cancer, although calibration was poor. In older patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was predictive of one-year mortality.

Impact of Early Supportive Care Assessment on treatment decision in head and neck cancer before concomitant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a global pretherapeutic comprehensive supportive care assessment performed in an outpatient supportive care clinic (OSCC) and early supportive care interventions on oncological treatment choice in patients with chemoradiation (CRT) indication for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

In this monocentric prospective observational study, we included all patients considered for CRT (exclusive or post-operative) for HNC from February 2019 to March 2020. The following frailty indicators were assessed: comorbidities (Charlson index), nutritional status, altered functional ability (ADL and IADL), social precarity (EPICES score), cognitive impairment (MoCA score), addictive habits and pain.

RESULTS

OSCC led to a change in treatment for 13.7% of patients, mainly de-escalations. Ninety-three percent of patients had at least one altered domain, including 50% with three or more altered domains. Cognitive function was the most frequently altered domain (66.7%). Altered functional ability was significantly associated with treatment de-escalation after OSCC. Treatment interruptions were significantly associated with treatment de-escalation and social precarity. De-escalation was also associated with a significantly poorer PFS (median of 23.2 mos. vs 8.8 mos., HR = 2.18 95%IC[1.02-4.63] p = 0.037)) and a non-significant trend towards worse OS (median 23.3mos. vs not reached (HR = 2.16 95%CI[0.88-5.31] p = 0.0836).

CONCLUSION

We strongly encourage the creation of OSCC for patients treated with chemoradiation for HNC. This practice, through an exhaustive assessment, favours therapeutic adaptation, personalized follow-up and optimization of supportive care.

A prospective observational cohort study to screen major depressive disorders in geriatric oncology-Comparison of different scales

Objective

Systematic depression screening is recommended for older patients with cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of three mood disorder screening scales frequently used in geriatric oncology to help in diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods

A prospective multicentre study was conducted in patients 70 years of age and over with cancer, comparing three self‐report questionnaires: the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS‐15), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression (HADS‐D) and the Distress Thermometer (DT). In the event of abnormal scores, a psychologist consultation was suggested and a reassessment of the patient's mood was planned within 3 weeks. Potential differences between initial abnormal screening score and confirmed MDD (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria [DSM‐5]) were assessed using variance analysis for each screening scale.

Results

Ninety‐three patients with a median age of 81 years (70–95) were included. Sixty‐six patients had at least one abnormal score on one of the screening scales. MDD was confirmed in 10 of the 36 reassessed patients. Analysis of ROC curves showed that the HADS‐D significantly predicted MDD (AUC = 0.760, IC_95%: 0.603–0.917; p = 0.017), but not the GDS‐15 or the initial DT.

Conclusion

The HADS‐D could better detect MDD, to confirm in a larger sample.

Exploring Determinants of Interdisciplinary Collaboration within a Geriatric Oncology Setting: A Mixed-Method Study

Simple Summary

Collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians has been shown to improve the quality of elderly cancer patient care. However, previous research has revealed how interpersonal factors might hinder this interdisciplinary work. This study aims to assess sprocessual and contextual determinants of the collaboration between these two disciplines, including shared time and routines, medical decision criteria and perceptions of age and needs of elderly patients. These aspects are important to develop a more efficient patient-centered approach in oncogeriatric care and improve collaboration between the different disciplines involved.

Abstract

Therapeutic challenges regarding the population of elderly cancer patients and their heterogeneity lead to the need to implement person-centered approaches in order to optimize care strategies and adapt oncology treatments to each pattern of aging. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends a multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients and the use of screening tools prior to the initiation of treatments. However, previous research shows a poor implementation of these recommendations in geriatric oncology. Although some studies have identified how different perceptions of geriatric oncology might hinder routine teamwork, little is known about the impact of other factors on promoting the collaboration between the two specialties. This mixed-method exploratory study used an online questionnaire to assess the perception of a group of 22 geriatricians and oncology physicians on different determinants of oncology care and teamwork. In this sample, older oncology patients benefited from geriatric care. However, there was a variability regarding age criteria and a limited use of screening tools. The multidimensional framework for interprofessional teamwork by Reeves has been used to analyze some of the determinants of the collaboration between oncology physicians and geriatricians. This study has identified systematic issues to consider when promoting communication and common values between the two disciplines, including available resources in terms of shared time, space and routine actions.

Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychosocial Distress and Unmet Needs in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common cancer involving the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is associated with a number of etiological factors, including cigarette smoking, alcohol and betel nut consumption and exposure to high-risk human papillomavirus. The risk of HNSCC increases with age, peaking in the seventh and eighth decade, but this varies by anatomical and histological subtype. While several advancements have been made in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) in recent decades, undertaking curative treatment still subjects the majority of HNSCC patients to substantial treatment-related toxicity requiring patients to tolerate a gamut of physical, psychological, and emotional demands on their reserves. In conjunction with other patient-related factors, clinicians involved in treating patients with HNSCC may incorporate advancing chronological age into their decision-making process when determining treatment recommendations. While advancing chronological age may be associated with increased concerns regarding physical treatment tolerability, clinicians may also be concerned about heightened vulnerability in various health and wellbeing outcomes. The available literature, however, does not provide evidence of this vulnerability in patients with advancing age, and, in many instances, older patients self-report greater resilience compared to their younger counterparts. While this data is reassuring it is limited by selection bias and heterogeneity in trial and study design and the absence of a consistent definition of the elderly patient with HNSCC. This narrative review article also includes a review of the measures used to assess HRQL, psychosocial outcomes and unmet needs in elderly or older patients with HNSCC.

[Colorectal cancer and preoperative geriatric assessment]

With the ageing of the population and the increase in the incidence of cancer in the population over 75 years of age, a partnership between geriatricians and oncologists is becoming necessary to optimise the management of these patients. There is great variability in the profiles of elderly patients and age cannot be the only criterion of the decision making. Thus, it is necessary to identify patients who will benefit from an in-depth geriatric assessment (IGA) and the G8 screening tool used in oncology consultations allows to do so. The EGA offers a multidisciplinary approach to functional, psychological, nutritional, cognitive and social status of the person, and has been shown to have prognostic value for survival and relevance in guiding treatment choices.