Metastasis of Small Cell Lung Cancer to the External Auditory Canal: A Case Report

Patients with lung cancer often develop distant metastases; however, metastasis to the external auditory canal is rare. We report the case of a 77-year-old man who presented with left-sided hearing loss, otalgia, and a red mass in the left external auditory canal. Computed tomography revealed masses in the left external auditory canal, lung, and pancreas. Histopathological analysis confirmed small cell lung cancer, with thyroid transcription factor 1 positivity in multiple lesions, suggesting a primary tumor in lung. Treatment with carboplatin and etoposide led to a reduction in metastatic lesions, including those in the external auditory canal, and improved hearing impairment. This case highlights a rare instance in which chemotherapy improved ear symptoms in a patient with small cell lung cancer metastasis to the external auditory. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Amrubicin Plus Irinotecan Versus Cisplatin Plus Irinotecan in Chemo-naïve Patients With Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the Japan Multinational Trial Organization (JMTO) LC 08-01

BACKGROUND

We conducted a randomize phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topoisomerase II inhibitor amrubicin plus topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (AI) compared with cisplatin plus irinotecan (PI) as first-line therapy in patients with extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemo-naïve patients with pathologically proven ED-SCLC (including limited disease (LD) SCLC with malignant effusion) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either AI (amrubicin 90mg/m2 on day 1 and irinotecan 50mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or PI (cisplatin 60mg/m2 on day 1 and irinotecan 60mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival proportion at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were randomly assigned to AI (n = 50) or to PI (n = 50). The 1-year overall survival proportions were 68.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 56.2-82.2%) for AI and 59.2% (46.9-74.7%) for PI (1-sided P = .18). Median survival time was 14.8 months for AI and 13.5 months for PI with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.618 (0.398-0.961, stratified log-rank test P = .031). Median progression-free survival time was 4.8 months for AI and 5.4 months for PI (stratified log-rank test, P = .54). Objective response rate was 70.0% (55.4-82.1%) for AI and 55.1% (40.2-69.3%) for PI (Fisher exact test, P = .15). There was no significant difference in hematological toxicity, whereas rates of vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea, and elevated serum creatinine are more frequent in PI. Interstitial lung disease (Grade 2 or 3) developed in 5 patients in AI and in 1 patient in PI. There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, AI showed promising efficacy and good tolerability in chemo-naïve patients with ED-SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of Shengjiang Xiexin decoction on irinotecan-induced diarrhea in small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan is a standard chemotherapeutic agent in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), however, as a common adverse reaction, diarrhea limits the use of irinotecan. Shengjiang Xiexin decoction (SXD) has been used in various gastrointestinal diseases in China two thousand years ago. We designed this clinical trial to supply more evidences on the use of SXD as prophylaxis for irinotecan-induced diarrhea, especially for high-risk population predicted by gene testing of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1).

METHODS

In this clinical trial, 120 patients with SCLC were recruited from six hospitals in China. They received two cycles of chemotherapy, meanwhile they were randomized to receive SXD or placebo for 14 days of oral administration in each cycle of chemotherapy. The primary outcome is the incidence of diarrhea. And secondary outcomes include the the degree of diarrhea and neutropenia, the number of chemotherapy cycles with diarrhea, first occurrence time and duration of diarrhea. To evaluate the effect of SXD on the intestine, a rat model with delayed-onset diarrhea induced by irinotecan was established, and the expression of inflammatory factors including IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, anti-inflammatory factors including IL-10, TGF- β in jejunal tissue was detected by ELISA.

RESULTS

101 patients (53 in SXD group, 48 in placebo group) completed the trial. The incidence of diarrhea in SXD group and placebo group were 26.42% (14/53) and 52.08% (25/48), respectively (P < 0.05), and the degree of diarrhea also had significant differences (P < 0.05). In UGT1A1 high-risk population, the incidence of diarrhea in two groups were 9.09% and 66.67% (P < 0.05), but there was no significant differences in UGT1A1 low-risk population. The incidence of neutropenia with degree 1-3 between two groups was 20.75% vs 20.83%, 13.21% vs 18.57%, 9.43% vs 20.83% (P < 0.05). No severe adverse events were reported in any group. And animal studies had shown SXD reduced content of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, increased content of IL-10, TGF-β in jejunum tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

SXD had a prophylactic effect in the diarrhea induced by irinotecan, especially for UGT1A1 high-risk population, and this effect from SXD appeared to be maintained the completion of chemotherapy schedule. The mechanism of action of SXD was related to the regulation of inflammatory factors. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR1800018490. Registered on 20 September 2018. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=25250 . The preliminary protocol of this clinical study has been published in the journal "Trials" in the form of protocol before this paper (Deng et al. in Trials 21:370, 2020).

Current pharmacotherapies for advanced lung cancer with pre-existing interstitial lung disease : A literature review and future perspectives

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, are at increased risk of developing lung cancer (LC). Pharmacotherapy for advanced LC has dramatically progressed in recent years;however, management of LC with pre-existing ILD (LC-ILD) is challenging due to serious concerns about the risk of acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD). As patients with LC-ILD have been excluded from most prospective clinical trials of advanced LC, optimal pharmacotherapy remains to be elucidated. Although the antitumor activity of first-line platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy appears to be similar in advanced LC patients with or without ILD, its impact on the survival of patients with LC-ILD is limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may hold promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Further understanding the predictive factors for AE-ILD after receiving pharmacotherapy in LC-ILD may lead to appropriate patient selection and lower treatment risk. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence related to pharmacotherapy for advanced LC-ILD and discuss emerging areas of research. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 9-22, February, 2024.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Banxia Xiexin decoction: A review on phytochemical, pharmacological, clinical and pharmacokinetic investigations

Banxia Xiexin decoction (BXD), a famous traditional Chinese prescription constituted by Pinelliae Rhizoma, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Scutellariae Radix, Coptidis Rhizoma, Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma, Jujubae Fructus and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Praeparata Cum Mell, has notable characteristics of acrid-opening, bitter down-bearing and sweet-tonification, interfering with tumors, gastrointestinal diseases, central nervous system diseases and much more. Based on the wide clinical applications, current investigations of BXD focused on several aspects: chemical analysis to explore the underlying substrates responsible for the therapeutic effects; basic studies on pharmacological actions of the whole prescription or of those representative ingredients to demonstrate the intriguing molecular targets for specific pathological processes; pharmacokinetic feature studies of single or all components of BXD to reveal the chemical basis and synergistic actions contributing to the pharmacological and clinically therapeutic effects. In this review, we summarized the main achievements of phytochemical, pharmacological, clinical and pharmacokinetic profiles of BXD and its herbal or pharmacologically active chemicals, as well as discussions of our understanding which further reveals the significance of BXD clinically.

Carboplatin and irinotecan (CI) vs. carboplatin and etoposide (CE) for the treatment of extended-stage small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population: A phase II/III randomized control trial

OBJECTIVES

Cisplatin plus irinotecan has been considered as the standard therapy in younger (<70 years old) patients for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) in Japan. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for the use of irinotecan in elderly patients with ED-SCLC. This study aimed to demonstrate that carboplatin plus irinotecan (CI) improves overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with ED-SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized Phase II/III trial which enrolled elderly patients with ED-SCLC. Patients were randomized to the CI or carboplatin plus etoposide (CE) arm in a 1:1 ratio. The CE group intravenously received carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/ml/min on day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 on days 1-3) every 3 weeks for four cycles. The CI group received carboplatin (AUC 4 mg/ml/min on day 1) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

In total, 258 patients were enrolled and randomized (CE arm, 129 patients; CI arm, 129 patients). The median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate of the CE vs. CI arms were 12.0 (95% CI, 9.3-13.7) vs. 13.2 (95% CI, 11.1-14.6) months (HR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.65-1.11)) (one-sided P = 0.11), 4.4 (95% CI, 4.0-4.7) vs. 4.9 (95% CI, 4.5-5.2) months (HR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66-1.09)), and 59.5% vs. 63.2%, respectively. A higher incidence of myelosuppression was observed in the CE group, whereas a higher incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in the CI group. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (one due to lung infection in the CE arm, and one due to lung infection and sepsis each in the CI arm).

CONCLUSIONS

The CI treatment showed favorable efficacy; however, the difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that CE should remain as the standard chemotherapy regimen for elderly patients with ED-SCLC.

Forthcoming Phase II Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Plus Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with platinum-etoposide (PE) chemotherapy. At initial diagnosis, about 25% of ES-SCLC patients have brain metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis. The decision as to whether to treat brain metastases with local therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy before initiation of systemic chemoimmunotherapy is based on symptoms due to the brain lesions and the general condition of the patient. Subset analysis of the CASPIAN study showed that combination therapy with PE plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) is promising for ES-SCLC with brain metastases. However, data required in daily clinical practice, such as intracranial response rate and duration of intracranial response, are insufficient for such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We have designed a single-arm phase II trial of durvalumab plus PE for patients aged ≥20 years with chemotherapy-naïve ES-SCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥5 mm in size that has not been previously treated. Patients receive durvalumab intravenously combined with four cycles of PE. Enrollment of 50 patients over 2 years at 25 oncology facilities in Japan is planned. The primary endpoint is intracranial response rate.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the effects of an ICI with PE specifically in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastases. If it demonstrates intracranial efficacy, this regimen will be a potential treatment option for such individuals, and radiation therapy or surgery for brain metastases can be avoided or postponed.

Phase I study of amrubicin plus cisplatin and concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer: protocol of ACIST study

Background

Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard treatment strategy for unresectable limited‐disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has remained unchanged for over two decades. Based on a previous study that confirmed the non‐inferiority of amrubicin (AMR) plus cisplatin (AP) when compared with EP for extensive‐disease (ED) SCLC, we have previously conducted a phase I study assessing AP with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/time, once daily, 50 Gy in total) for LD‐SCLC therapy. Our findings revealed that AP with concurrent TRT could prolong overall survival to 39.5 months with manageable toxicities. Therefore, we plan to conduct a phase I study to investigate and determine the effect of AP combined with AHTRT, recommended dose (RD), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) of AP in patients with LD‐SCLC.

Methods

Treatment‐naive patients with LD‐SCLC, age between 20 and 75 years, who had a performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ functions will be enrolled. For chemotherapy, cisplatin 60 mg/m²/day (day 1) and AMR (day 1 to 3) will be administered with AHTRT (1.5 Gy/time, twice daily, 45 Gy in total). The initial AMR dose is set to 25 mg/m²/day. RD and MTD will be determined by evaluating toxicities.

Discussion

Based on our previous study, the initial dose of AMR 25 mg/m² is expected to be tolerated and acceptable. Here, we aim to determine whether treatment with AP and concurrent AHTRT would be an optimal choice with manageable toxicities for LD‐SCLC.

Treatment Sequencing Strategies in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The advances in the lung cancer screening methods and therapeutics, together with awareness towards deleterious habits, such as smoking, is increasing the overall survival with better quality of life for the patients. However, lung cancer is still one of the most common and fatal neoplasm with a high incidence and consequently burden to public health worldwide. Thus, based on guidelines and recent phases II and III clinical trials studies, this manuscript summarizes the current treatment sequencing strategies in lung cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of related articles was performed focused on phases II and III clinical trials studies.

RESULTS

The lung cancer management should take into consideration the tumor characteristics, histology, molecular pathology and be discussed in a multidisciplinary team. Lung cancer treatment options comprises surgery whenever possible, radiotherapy associate with/or chemotherapy and immunotherapy as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy and best palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening predictability in more patients, smoking reduction, early diagnosis, better disease understanding and individualized, more effective and tolerable therapeutics are related to an increasing in overall survival and quality of life. In the near future improvement of personalized therapy in precision medicine is expected, enhancing new predictive biomarkers, optimal doses and optimal treatment sequencing as well as anti-cancer vaccines development.

Creation of an Integrated Clinical Trial Database and Data Sharing for Conducting New Research by the Japan Lung Cancer Society

Introduction

Although data accumulated in clinical trials have higher accuracy compared with real-world data and are irreplaceably valuable, most previous clinical trial data have been left unused.

Methods

The Japan Lung Cancer Society (JLCS) asked six clinical trial groups that conducted randomized clinical trials on curative chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC to provide data. After obtaining consent from all six groups, data were collected from August 2019 to June 2021.

Results

A total of eight trials, JCOG9812, JCOG0301, NJLCG0601, OLCSG0007, WJTOG0105, WJOG5008L, SPECTRA, and TORG1018, were included. More than 3000 data items were integrated into 408 items by adjusting their definitions and units. The total number of collected cases was 1288: median age (range), 66 (30-93) years; sex (male/female) 1064/224; pathological type (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, other NSCLC, and unknown) 517, 629, 138, and 4; and stage IIIA and B, 536 and 752. The median overall survival was 26.0 months, with 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 53.7%, 24.8%, and 15.2%, respectively, in all enrollments. The median progression-free survival was 9.6 months, with 2-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival rates of 23.6%, 14.0%, and 9.4%, respectively. Part of the information in the database has been made available on the JLCS web page, and the JLCS members were provided the right to propose research using the database.

Conclusions

The integration and sharing of clinical trial data for research purposes was made real by the nonprofit, academic organization, the JLCS. This database will lead to innovative researches and contribute to the improvement of lung cancer treatment and future research.

Phase 1b study of ramucirumab in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown the potentials of anti-angiogenesis inhibitors in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This single-institutional phase 1b study aimed to determine the recommended dose of ramucirumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody) in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin for extensive-stage SCLC.

METHODS

Chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled and received ramucirumab (day 1 and 15) with irinotecan (60 mg/m2, day 1, 8, and 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks for four cycles, followed by biweekly maintenance ramucirumab. The recommended ramucirumab dose (10 or 8 mg/kg) was determined using a traditional 3 + 3 design, and the number of patients treated at the recommended dose was set at 10 to evaluate drug efficacy and tolerability (UMIN000032671).

RESULTS

The first 3 patients that received irinotecan plus cisplatin with ramucirumab 10 mg/kg did not experience dose-limiting toxicities. Thus, the recommended dose of ramucirumab was set at 10 mg/kg, and 10 patients received this dose. The objective response rate was 100% (95% CI, 69-100%), with a median progression-free survival of 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.3-9.0) and median overall survival of 22.4 months (95% CI, 12.1-not reached). Grade 3 neutropenia and hypertension were observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively. No ramucirumab-related deaths were noted; hypertension and bleeding events were observed in 5 and 6 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the satisfactory tolerability and efficacy of ramucirumab at 10 mg/kg in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer; recent advances of its biology and therapeutic perspective

Lung cancer is historically divided into two major categories: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the therapeutic efficacy of NSCLC has improved due to the development of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment, there has been very slow progress in the therapeutic advances of SCLC. Since SCLC is a deadly disease with rapid progression and early metastasis and comprises approximately 10% of lung cancer cases, more attention should be given to the therapeutic strategy for SCLC. Most SCLC cases respond to cytotoxic drugs, cisplatin, and etoposide. The objective response rate to the standard regimen is reported to be approximately 70% that is sufficient as standard therapy. However, almost all tumors recur and become refractory to chemotherapy which is the most important problem of this deadly disease. Recently, for the first time in several decades, ICIs have changed the standard therapy for SCLC. It must be emphasized that although ICIs paved the new way for SCLC therapy, more precise and effective therapy for SCLC is desired. Unfortunately, precise molecular mechanisms of SCLC are yet to be understood. Recent elaborate studies on the cell biology of SCLC uncovered several important aspects of molecular mechanisms. Gene profiling of cancer cells can be done using modern technology like next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this minireview, we describe the advances of modern technology in SCLC research and consider future therapeutic strategies based on the molecular mechanisms of SCLC.

Randomized phase 2 study comparing irinotecan versus amrubicin as maintenance therapy after first-line induction therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (HOT1401/NJLCG1401)

Background

A cisplatin plus irinotecan (CPT‐11) regimen is used for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED‐SCLC). Amrubicin (AMR) is primarily used for relapsed SCLC. The HOT1401/NJLCG1401 trial, an open‐label randomized phase II trial, was designed to assess the benefit of maintenance therapy in patients with ED‐SCLC who responded to induction therapy.

Methods

Patients with histologically‐ or cytologically‐confirmed ED‐SCLC were included and were treated with an induction therapy of four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m² on day 1) plus CPT‐11 (60 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15) every four weeks. After induction therapy, patients who had nonprogressive disease were randomized to receive either maintenance CPT‐11 (60 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) every three weeks, or AMR (35 mg/m² on days 1–3) every three weeks.

Results

A total of 34 patients were enrolled; 20 patients had progressive disease or received incomplete induction chemotherapy. Finally, 14 patients were randomly assigned to receive CPT‐11 (n = 7) or AMR (n = 7). This study was terminated prematurely because of low patient accrual. The overall objective response rate was 73%, the median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6–11.8), and the median overall survival was 20.1 months (95% CI: 13.7–not reached). No statistically significant difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) were noted between patients treated with CPT‐11 and those treated with AMR. There were no treatment‐related deaths in this study.

Conclusions

Maintenance therapy with CPT‐11 or AMR after induction therapy might be effective in some patients.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapeutic Regimens with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Previously Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Improving therapeutic strategies for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains a challenge. To date, no reports have directly compared the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum–etoposide (ICIs+EP) with platinum–irinotecan (IP) or directly compared different ICIs+EP for previously untreated ES-SCLC. This study used a Bayesian approach for network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety between ICIs+EP and IP and between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The six treatment arms were: pembrolizumab plus platinum–etoposide (Pem+EP), durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide (Dur+EP), atezolizumab plus platinum–etoposide (Atz+EP), platinum–amrubicin (AP), IP, and platinum–etoposide (EP). No significant differences in overall survival were observed between ICIs+EP and IP and between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse events (G3-AEs) was significantly higher in ICIs+EP than IP, whereas no significant difference was found in G3-AEs between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The incidence of ≥grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in ICIs+EP than IP, whereas the incidence of ≥grade 3 diarrhea was significantly lower in ICIs+EP than IP. These findings will help clinicians better select treatment strategies for ES-SCLC.

History of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Lung Cancer Study Group

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Lung Cancer Study Group has been carrying out clinical studies, exploring new strategies of treatment, supportive therapies (antiemetics, etc.), etc., for a variety of cancers, including not only small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer but also rare chest tumours (represented by thymoma) and cancer-associated conditions (cancerous pericarditis, cancerous pleuritis, etc.). In this review, an overview of all studies conducted from 1985 to 2019 is provided.

Efficacy and safety of Shengjiang Xiexin decoction in prophylaxis of chemotherapy-related diarrhea in small cell lung cancer patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

Diarrhea is a common adverse reaction in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, for which there is currently no effective method of treatment. Shengjiang Xiexin decoction (SXD), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, has shown efficacy in alleviating irinotecan-induced diarrhea in preliminary clinical studies. The current study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of SXD for prophylaxis against irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Additionally, we employ a new approach to analyze and evaluate the data based on the patients’ uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genotype, which predicts the risk of diarrhea.

Methods and design

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial will be conducted in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from five hospitals in China. For this study, 100 irinotecan-naïve patients will be randomly allocated to either the SXD or placebo arms in a 1:1 ratio. Stratified randomization will be used to divide subjects by UGT1A1 genotype into groups with differing risk of diarrhea. The trial will consist of two cycles of chemotherapy with 14 days of oral administration of SXD or placebo administered beginning between 3 days before and up to 11 days after initiation of each chemotherapy cycle. The primary study outcome is the incidence of diarrhea. Secondary outcomes include the degree of diarrhea, the degree of neutropenia, the rate of alterations in chemotherapy regimens, the amount of antidiarrheal drug taken, the rate of hospitalization, and evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy.

Discussion

This study is the first to use the UGT1A1 genotype to stratify patients into groups based on their risk of diarrhea, and to provide a complete assessment of chemotherapy-related diarrhea (CRD), including records of diarrhea duration, grading the severity of diarrhea, and evaluating concomitant symptoms. Study results will provide high-level clinical evidence on the use of SXD as prophylaxis for CRD.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR1800018490. Registered on 20 September 2018. Retrospectively registered. http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=25250&htm=4c

A novel, more reliable approach to use of progression-free survival as a predictor of gain in overall survival: The Ottawa PFS Predictive Model

Progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios and gain in median PFS are suggested predictors of overall survival (OS) gain (with gain defined as experimental arm minus control arm values). We assessed use of half-lives (time to progression/death of half remaining patients). We reviewed randomized trials from Journal of Clinical Oncology and New England Journal of Medicine, 01/2012-06/12/2017 (discovery series) and 01/01/2007-12/31/2011 (first validation series). If PFS or OS gains were significant, we used PFS/OS curve nonlinear regression analysis to estimate half-lives and defined "half-life gain" as experimental minus control arm half-life. With low crossover and significant PFS differences, PFS half-life gains ≥1.5 months had positive-predictive-values for OS gains ≥2 months of 79 % and 86 % and PFS half-life gains <1.5 months had negative-predictive-values for OS gains <2 months of 95 % and 75 %, in discovery and validation series, respectively. PFS half-life gains more reliably predicted OS gains than PFS hazard ratios or gains in median PFS. Findings were confirmed in a second validation series.

Dashing Decades of Defeat: Long Anticipated Advances in the First-line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an exceptionally lethal subtype of lung cancer. For patients with extensive-stage (ES) disease, which is the majority of patients, platinum-doublet chemotherapy has been the standard of care for decades. Dozens of phase III trials have failed to improve survival over standard platinum plus etoposide. Recent results, however, have met with long-overdue success. This manuscript reviews the new standards of care for ES-SCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two recent phase III trials have shown an improvement in overall survival with concurrent immunotherapy and chemotherapy. In IMpower 133, the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab to carboplatin plus etoposide significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This was the first trial in over 30 years to improve survival. In CASPIAN, concurrent durvalumab, another anti-PD-L1 antibody, also led to an improvement in survival. While there is clearly a need to further improve outcomes, the improvement in survival with the addition of atezolizumab or durvalumab to platinum-doublet chemotherapy is a major advance. We now have new standards of care and the potential of a more meaningful benefit for patients with advanced SCLC.

Dose escalation study of amrubicin and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin and cisplatin is one of the active regimens used to treat patients with extensive-disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC), whereas combined therapy involving chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for limited-disease (LD)-SCLC.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of amrubicin and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for LD-SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients that fulfilled the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: being aged ≤ 75 years and chemotherapy-naïve and having a performance status (PS) of 0-1, LD-SCLC, and adequate organ function. The patients received escalating doses of amrubicin on days 1, 2, and 3, and a fixed 60-mg/m² dose of cisplatin on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were administered, with each cycle lasting 4 weeks. TRT involving 2 Gy/day, once daily, commenced on day 2 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. The initial dose of amrubicin was 20 mg/m² (level 1), and the dose was escalated to 25 mg/m² (level 2) and then 30 mg/m² (level 3).

RESULTS

Eight patients from three institutions were enrolled at three dose levels. The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female: 3/5; median age (range): 68.5 (60-73); PS 0/1: 4/4; stage IIIA/IIIB disease: 3/5. Both level 3 patients experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia and/or leukopenia lasting > 4 days). Level 3 was defined as the MTD, and level 2 was recommended as the dose for this regimen. Seven patients exhibited partial responses, and 1 displayed progressive disease (response rate: 88%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 11.1 and 39.5 months, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

When this regimen was combined with TRT for LD-SCLC, the MTD was 30 mg/m² for amrubicin and 60 mg/m² for cisplatin. In addition, neutropenia and leukopenia were DLT, and doses of 25 mg/m² for amrubicin and 60 mg/m² for cisplatin are recommended for this regimen.

Assessing the Justification, Funding, Success, and Survival Outcomes of Randomized Noninferiority Trials of Cancer Drugs: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Importance

Noninferiority trials test whether a new intervention is not worse than the comparator by a given margin.

Objectives

To study the characteristics of published randomized noninferiority trials in oncology with overall survival as an end point, to assess the association of justification and success in achieving noninferiority with the funding of these trials, and to evaluate the association of such trials with patient survival.

Data Sources

A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted in March 2018, with no date restrictions.

Study Selection

Randomized noninferiority trials of cancer drug therapies with overall survival as an end point were included. Trials of decision support, supportive care, and nondrug treatment in both arms were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for meta-epidemiological studies. Studies were screened for eligibility criteria, and data on criteria for noninferiority, funding, success (achieving noninferiority), and hazard ratios with confidence intervals for overall survival were extracted. Hazard ratios for overall survival were pooled across trials using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Associations of the justification for using a noninferiority design and success in achieving noninferiority with the source of funding were assessed. Overall pooled hazard ratios and confidence intervals for overall survival were calculated.

Results

Among 74 noninferiority trials of cancer drug therapies, 23 (31%; enrolling 21 437 patients) used overall survival as the primary end point. The noninferiority margins for the hazard ratio of overall survival ranged from 1.08 to 1.33. Noninferiority design was justified in 14 trials (61%) but not in 9 (39%). Overall, 18 trials (78%) concluded with a finding of noninferiority. Industry funding was associated with lack of justification for noninferiority design (P = .02, assessed using the Fisher exact test) but not with success in proving noninferiority (P = .80, assessed using the Fisher exact test). When the hazard ratios across the trials were pooled, there was no beneficial or detrimental association with overall survival, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.02).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that a substantial fraction of noninferiority trials in oncology, most of which are industry funded, lack justification for such a design. Greater attention to the use of noninferiority designs in randomized clinical trials of cancer drugs from local and national regulators is warranted.

Summary of the Japanese Respiratory Society statement for the treatment of lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia

Dramatic progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy has been changing clinical practices in lung cancer. With the accumulation of clinical practice, it has become clear that pre-existing interstitial pneumonia (IP) could be a risk factor for drug-induced lung injury, which has enhanced awareness regarding the difficulty in treating lung cancer with comorbid IP. Unfortunately, there is only low-grade evidence in the field of lung cancer with comorbid IP, because almost all clinical trials exclude such patients. There have been very few specialized clinical trials for patients with lung cancer and underlying IPs thus far. Therefore, it is necessary to treat such cases empirically or to give up on the treatment itself. Considering these circumstances, establishing how to treat lung cancer with comorbid IP is an urgent issue. This paper is a summary of the official statement reported by the Diffuse Lung Disease/Thoracic Oncology Assembly and the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) in 2017, which attempts to approach lung cancer with comorbid IP systematically.

The safety and efficacy of amrubicin in the treatment of previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: Extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) has been known to be rapid progression and relapse, despite highly sensitive to chemotherapy. Amrubicin (AMR), a third-generation synthetic anthracycline, was accepted as a feasible alternative compared with the standard first-line chemotherapy for previously untreated ED-SCLC. While, the efficacies of these amrubicin-based regimens are unsatisfactory.

Aim: Our meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of first-line therapy comparing AMR and chemotherapy in patients with ED-SCLC.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible trials updated on November 2018. Randomized-controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of AMR in ED-SCLC were included, of which the interested results were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).

Results: A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. There are no significant differences in OS (OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.66–1.60, P=0.91), PFS (OR=1.2, 95% CI=10.77–1.88, P=0.41) or ORR (OR=1.31, 95% CI=0.90–1.92, P=0.16) with AMR (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.76–1.05, P=0.17). The most common treatment-related AEs in the AMR group are leukopenia (OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.22–7.99, P=0.02) and neutropenia (OR=3.25, 95% CI=1.38–7.65, P=0.007). Fatigue, anemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance.

Conclusion: The results of our analysis indicated that AMR therapy demonstrated non-inferiority to the standard first-line chemotherapy for previously untreated ED-SCLC. Whether it can be accepted as an alternative regimen to the standard first-line chemotherapy is still warranted.

Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review

Background

Patients with limited-stage (ls) or extensive-stage (es) small-cell lung cancer (sclc) are commonly given platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Standard chemotherapy for patients with ls sclc includes a platinum agent such as cisplatin combined with the non-platinum agent etoposide. The objective of the present systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with es sclc and to determine the appropriate timing, dose, and schedule of chemotherapy or radiation for patients with sclc.

Methods

The medline and embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy against treatment with chemotherapy alone in patients with es sclc. Identified rcts were also included if they compared various timings, doses, and schedules of treatment for patients with es sclc or ls sclc.

Results

Sixty-four rcts were included. In patients with ls sclc, overall survival was greatest with platinum-etoposide compared with other chemotherapy regimens. In patients with es sclc, overall survival was greatest with chemotherapy containing platinum-irinotecan than with chemotherapy containing platinum-etoposide (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 0.95; p = 0.006). The addition of radiation to chemotherapy for patients with es sclc showed mixed results. There was no conclusive evidence that the timing, dose, or schedule of thoracic radiation affected treatment outcomes in sclc.

Conclusions

In patients with ls sclc, cisplatin-etoposide plus radiotherapy should remain the standard therapy. In patients with es sclc, the evidence is insufficient to recommend the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy as standard practice to improve overall survival. However, on a case-by-case basis, radiotherapy might be added to reduce local recurrence. The most commonly used chemotherapy is platinum-etoposide; however, platinum-irinotecan can be considered.

A three microRNA-based prognostic signature for small cell lung cancer overall survival

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with mechanisms far from understood.

OBJECTIVE

We proposed to identify valuable prognostic signature for SCLC prognosis prediction.

METHODS

microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of 42 SCLC patients were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus. miRNAs that significantly associated with SCLC overall survival (OS-relevant) were identified through univariate Cox regression analysis followed by random survival forest analysis for identification of more reliable miRNA signature.

RESULTS

Eleven OS-relevant miRNAs were obtained, and hsa-miR-194, hsa-miR-608, and hsa-miR-9 were further refined through RFS. A formula composed of the three miRNAs' expression values weighted by their multivariate Cox regression coefficients was constructed, and based on which, SCLC patients with longer OS could be well distinguished from those with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study should provide a valuable clue for SCLC prognosis evaluation.

Herbal Medicines for Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea

Irinotecan (CPT-11), a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, belongs to the class of DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors and has been approved worldwide for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and malignant lymphoma. Although CPT-11-based chemotherapy is widely used, severe gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, especially late-onset diarrhea, is a common adverse reaction, limiting clinical application of the drug. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea is high, with 20-40% of CPT-11-treated patients experiencing this adverse effect. High-dose loperamide and octreotide are generally recommended for treatment of CPT-11-induced diarrhea. However, in clinical practice, loperamide is associated with a significant failure rate and the beneficial effects of octreotide are controversial. An accumulating number of recent studies have suggested that medicinal herbs and their derived phytocompounds may be effective complementary treatments for CPT-11-induced diarrhea. In this mini-review, we briefly summarize currently available literatures regarding the formulae and herbs/natural products used as adjuvants in animal and clinical studies for the treatment of diarrhea caused by CPT-11.

Randomized controlled trial of lobaplatin plus etoposide vs. cisplatin plus etoposide as first-line therapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

The majority of previous studies of lobaplatin in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are small phase I-II studies. The present study aimed to verify the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy) of lobaplatin plus etoposide (EL) vs. cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). This phase III non-inferiority randomized clinical trial enrolled patients at 17 sites between September 2010 and May 2013. Patients were randomized to EL (30 mg/m² lobaplatin on day 1 and 100 mg/m² etoposide on days 1-3, for 21-day cycles) or EP (80 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 and 100 mg/m² etoposide on days 1-3, for 21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). A total of 234 patients were randomized to the EL (n=122) and EP (n=112) treatment groups. The median PFS, median OS and DCR were 5.1 vs. 5.3 months (P=0.786), 10.6 vs. 9.7 months (P=0.701) and 85.5 vs. 86.7% (P=0.848) in the EL vs. EP groups, respectively. Patients in the EL group had significantly lower frequencies of nephrotoxicity (2.5 vs. 11.7%; P=0.008), nausea (22.3 vs. 40.5%; P=0.003) and vomiting (14.1 vs. 35.1%; P<0.001) than those in the EP group. Overall, EL was not inferior to EP in terms of PFS and OS. The tolerance and QoL of the EL regimen were better than those of the EP regimen. EL is thus an alternative choice for the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.

Comparison of quick recovery outcome of inhalable doxorubicin and cisplatin in lung cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind, single-center trial

Systematic chemotherapy has required high time span for recovery in cancer patients, serious toxic effects, and increased the time of cancer-free survival of patient but decreased the overall survival time of patients irrespective of diseased condition(s). To compare the quick recovery of inhalable doxorubicin and cisplatin in the lung cancer patients. A total of 240 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomly divided into two groups of 120 each. Patients had inhaled 25 mg/m² doxorubicin (DON group) or 10 mg/m² cisplatin (CPN group) once in a day for 21 days. Volume, diameter, type, and a number of lung nodes, pulmonary function, and 21-day lung cancer risk assessment were evaluated. One-way ANOVA following Bonferroni multiple comparison tests was performed at 95% of confidence level. DON and CPN both groups had shrunken the lung cancer nodule, decreased solid nodules and non-solid nodules, and increased partially solid nodules. The DON group (5.88 ± 3.98%) had strongly decreased nodule size than the CPN group (4.15 ± 2.92%; p < 0.0001, q = 3.721). The incidence of nodular size reduction was 9.47 ± 1.13% higher for doxorubicin than cisplatin. The CPN group had 36.53 ± 0.66% and the DON group had 34.65 ± 0.7% lung cancer risk assessment after 21 days (p < 0.0001, q = 3.785). Inhalable doxorubicin might be an effective therapy in NSCLC patients with acceptable hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects.

TRIAL REGISTRY

researchregistry3382, dated 28 December 2014 ( www.researchregistry.com ).

Banxia Xiexin Decoction Is Effective to Prevent and Control Irinotecan-Induced Delayed Diarrhea in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) can be used as a first-line therapeutic drug against extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC); it can also be used in second-line treatment for SCLC. CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea restricts its clinical application. This study aimed to confirm whether Banxia Xiexin decoction was effective in preventing and controlling CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea. Methods: A total of 27 patients with recurrent SCLC undergoing chemotherapy regimens including CPT-11 were enrolled for the study. UGT1A1*28, UGTlAl*6, ABCB1*2, and SLCO1B1*15 gene polymorphisms were detected. If delayed diarrhea occurred in the first cycle of chemotherapy, Banxia Xiexin decoction was orally administered for 5 consecutive days starting 1 day before the second cycle of chemotherapy to prevent and control the delayed diarrhea. The objective response, overall survival, and toxicity were recorded. Results: Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were observed in none, 6, and 10 patients, respectively. Delayed diarrhea occurred in 6 patients, and 4 of 5 patients were relieved or controlled using Banxia Xiexin decoction. The median overall survival was 6 months. Conclusion: Banxia Xiexin decoction appeared to prevent and control delayed diarrhea induced by CPT-11 in this small observational study, and further study with a larger sample size, including potentially randomized trials, is suggested.

[Medical treatment of small cell lung cancer: Can we leave the area of cisplatin-etoposide?]

Small cell lung cancer accounts for 14% of all lung cancers. It remains a major challenge for oncology as the progresses made in the past three decades are modest. After a rapid overview of current knowledge regarding somatic genomic alterations, this state-of-art addresses pathways to improve small-cell lung cancer outcome such as the targeting of DNA damage repair mechanisms firstly anti-PARPs, inhibitory molecules of EZH2, derepression of the NOTCH pathway, rovalbituzumab-tesirine, inhibition of serine/threonine Aurora A kinase, temozolomide and its dependence on methylation of the MGMT promoter. This first chapter suggests the beginning of precision medicine in small cell lung cancer. The last section focuses on the development of immuno-oncological agents and the information collected from phase 1 and 2 studies: the low intensity of PD-L1 tissue expression and the possible relationship of the activity of these agents as a function of tumor mutational burden are pointed out.

Efficacy and safety of amrubicin-based regimen used as first-line for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Currently, amrubicin is used as first-line in the treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the effect of amrubicin-based treatment in extensive-disease (ED) SCLC remains controversial. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of amrubicin-based regimen in the treatment of patients with ED-SCLC.

METHODS

RCTs published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed. Eligible studies were these that evaluated the efficacy and safety profiles of amrubicin-based regimen in ED-SCLC. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events. Results were expressed with hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving a total of 740 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Amrubicin-based regimen was not associated with significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90-1.30; P = 0.463) and OS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.89-1.29; P = 0.443) in patients with ED-SCLC. However, it significantly improved ORR (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25; P = 0.008). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that neither amrubicin alone nor in combination with cisplatin prolonged the PFS and OS, and only the combination therapy significantly increased ORR. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was comparable between amrubicin-containing and other treatment groups (RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.78-2.58; P = 0.248). However, amrubicin-based treatment induced a significantly higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (RR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.04-5.41; P < 0.001), anemia (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.06-1.97; P = 0.022), leukopenia (RR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.41-3.33; P < 0.001), neutropenia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70; P = 0.021), and interstitial lung disease (RR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.21-1.98; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin-based regimen used as first-line had no survival benefits in patients with ED-SCLC. But it significantly improved ORR. Further well-conducted, large-scale trials are needed to validate these findings.

Amrubicin and carboplatin with pegfilgrastim in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium

PURPOSE

First-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) includes treatment with platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Amrubicin is a synthetic anthracycline with single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory SCLC. In an attempt to improve treatment efficacy, we evaluated amrubicin/carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter phase II trial, patients received amrubicin (30 mg/m² daily on Days 1, 2, and 3) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 on Day 1); cycles were repeated every 21 days for 4 cycles. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg subcutaneously) was administered on Day 4 of all cycles. Overall survival (OS) proportion at 1 year was the primary endpoint. The target 1-year OS rate was 47%, an improvement of 35% from historical results with carboplatin/etoposide.

RESULTS

Eighty patients received study treatment, and 62% completed the planned 4 courses. The overall response rate was 74% (13% complete responses). The 1-year survival rate was 38% (95% CI: 25, 50). The median survival was 10 months. Myelosuppression was severe but manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of amrubicin/carboplatin was an active first-line treatment for extensive stage SCLC, but showed no indication of increased efficacy compared to standard treatments. Severe myelosuppression was common with this regimen, in spite of prophylactic pegfilgrastim. These results are consistent with those of other trials in showing no role for amrubicin in the first-line treatment of SCLC.

An integrated analysis of hyponatremia in cancer patients receiving platinum-based or nonplatinum-based chemotherapy in clinical trials (JCOG1405-A)

Background

Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte abnormality in cancer patients who receive chemotherapy. Among anticancer agents, platinum-based agents are reported to cause chemotherapy-induced hyponatremia. However, the actual incidence and risk factors remain unknown.

Results

The reports of 29 trials were analyzed. The incidence of grade 3/4 hyponatremia was 11.9% in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and 3.8% in those treated with nonplatinum-based regimens (P < 0.01). Univariable analysis revealed a high incidence of hyponatremia in patients receiving cisplatin, three-drug combination regimen, two-drug combination regimen with amrubicin or irinotecan, or high-dose cisplatin (weekly equivalent cisplatin dose ≥20 mg/m²), and in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Conclusion

This is the first report of the actual incidence and the potential risk factors of chemotherapy-induced hyponatremia. Careful monitoring of serum sodium level is needed when platinum-based chemotherapy is administered.

Methods

This study included all clinical trials of systemic chemotherapies for solid cancers that were conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) after January 2000 and of which the patient enrolment was completed by January 2014. The latest reports of each trial were used for analysis. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced grade 3/4 hyponatremia and the potential risk factors were investigated with univariable analysis.

Current Treatments for Surgically Resectable, Limited-Stage, and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The prevalence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has declined in the U.S. as the prevalence of tobacco use has declined. However, a significant number of people in the U.S. are current or former smokers and are at risk of developing SCLC. Routine histological or cytological evaluation can reliably make the diagnosis of SCLC, and immunohistochemistry stains (thyroid transcription factor-1, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56) can be used if there is uncertainty about the diagnosis. Rarely do patients present with SCLC amendable to surgical resection, and evaluation requires a meticulous workup for extra-thoracic metastases and invasive staging of the mediastinum. Resected patients require adjuvant chemotherapy and/or thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), and prophylactic cranial radiation (PCI) should be considered depending on the stage. For limited-stage disease, concurrent platinum-etoposide and TRT followed by PCI is the standard. Thoracic radiation therapy should be started early in treatment, and can be given twice daily to 45 Gy or once daily to 60-70 Gy. For extensive-stage disease, platinum-etoposide remains the standard first-line therapy, and the standard second-line therapy is topotecan. Preliminary studies have demonstrated the activity of immunotherapy, and the response rate is approximately 10-30% with some durable responses observed. Rovalpituzumab tesirine, an antibody drug conjugate, has shown promising activity in patients with high delta-like protein 3 tumor expression (approximately 70% of patients with SCLC). The emergence of these and other promising agents has rekindled interest in drug development in SCLC. Several ongoing trials are investigating novel agents in the first-line, maintenance, and second-line settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This review will provide an update on the standard therapies for surgically resected limited-stage small cell lung cancer and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer that have been investigated in recent clinical trials.

Randomized phase II study of carboplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus amrubicin in patients with chemo-naïve extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group (NJLCG) 0901

OBJECTIVE

Carboplatin-based regimens are the standard regimens for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the efficacies of these regimens are unsatisfactory. We previously identified carboplatin plus irinotecan (CI) and carboplatin plus amrubicin (CA) as promising new carboplatin-based regimens. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized phase II study to identify the appropriate regimen for future phase III trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomly assigned to receive 4-6 cycles of carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5.0, day 1] plus irinotecan (70mg/m², days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks (CI arm) or carboplatin (AUC 4.0, day 1) plus amrubicin (35mg/m², days 1-3) every 3 weeks (CA arm). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between December 2009 and March 2013, 71 patients were enrolled. One patient in each arm did not receive any protocol treatment due to rapid disease progression. The characteristics of the treated patients were as follows: median age, 70 years (range 51-84 years); proportion of males, 84%. The ORRs were 79% and 89% in the CI and CA arms, respectively. The median PFS values were 5.1 and 6.2 months in the CI and CA arms, respectively [CA; hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.98, P=0.042]. The grade 3 or higher toxicity severities were neutropenia (CI, 53% and CA, 89%), anemia (CI, 26% and CA, 20%), thrombocytopenia (CI, 18% and CA, 14%), and febrile neutropenia (CI, 12% and CA, 29%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

CA was numerically more effective than CI, with acceptable toxicity, in chemo-naïve ES-SCLC patients. CA could be selected for future phase III trials.

Phase I Study of Amrubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Advanced Solid Organ Malignancies: HOG LUN 07-130

OBJECTIVES

Relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has limited treatment options. Anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide have shown synergy in many tumors. Amrubicin (AMR) and cyclophosphamide both have single-agent activity in SCLC. This phase I trial evaluated the combination of AMR and cyclophosphamide in refractory solid organ malignancies and in relapsed SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was to determine maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of the combination. Eligible patients were enrolled in sequential dose escalation cohorts in a standard 3+3 design. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide IV at 500 mg/m on day 1 with escalating doses of AMR IV on days 1 to 3 (25 to 40 mg/m with increments of 5 mg/m per cohort). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Exploratory objectives analyzed the presence of NQO1 polymorphisms and topoisomerase IIA amplification and correlation with response.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 18 patients had SCLC (50%). Maximum-tolerated dose was determined to be dose level 2 (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m, AMR 30 mg/m) due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The main grade 3 to 4 toxicities were hematologic. Efficacy results are available for 34 patients. Partial responses, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the overall study population were 20.6% (n=7), 38.2% (n=13), and 41.2% (n=14), respectively. Partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the SCLC patients and 1 patient with extrathoracic small cell were 36.8% (n=7), 26.3% (n=5), and 36.8% (n=7), respectively. There was no correlation between topoisomerase IIA amplification or NQO1 polymorphisms and response.

CONCLUSIONS

AMR and cyclophosphamide can be safely combined with little activity observed in heavily pretreated SCLC patients.

The Humanistic Burden of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Literature

Background: Little is known about the humanistic burden of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), specifically the impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this systematic literature review was to explore the impact of SCLC on HRQoL and the patient reported outcomes (PROs) used to capture this impact.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of Medline®, Embase, and PsycINFO, oncology organization websites and conference proceedings within the past 10 years. Articles reporting HRQoL outcomes of SCLC patients were selected.

Results: Twenty-seven eligible publications were identified. Global or overall impact on HRQoL (n = 21) was reported most often, with considerably fewer reporting individual domains that comprise HRQoL. Results indicated that HRQoL was negatively impacted in SCLC patients in comparison to the normal population in most domains. Overall, the domains measuring physical functioning and activities of daily living were most impacted. However, results on cognitive and emotional functioning were inconclusive. The impact on HRQoL may be least in both limited disease and extensive disease (ED) SCLC patients who have responded to treatment, and greatest in ED patients who were treatment naïve. The most frequently used PROs were the EORTC QLQ-C30 core cancer instruments, the lung cancer specific module the EORTC QLQ-LC13, LCSS, and EQ-5D.

Conclusion: There exists a paucity of reporting on SCLC HRQoL outcomes. This extends to the reporting of domain level scores and by patient sub-group. Greater reporting at a granular level is recommended to allow for more robust conclusions to be made.

Advances in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor characterized by early metastatic spread and responsiveness to initial therapy. The incidence of SCLC has been declining in the United States in parallel with the decreasing prevalence of cigarette smoking. Limited stage disease is potentially curable with chemoradiotherapy followed by cranial irradiation. Extensive stage disease is incurable, but systemic chemotherapy can improve quality of life and prolong survival. Nearly all patients relapse with chemoresistant disease. Molecularly targeted therapy has failed to yield convincing clinical benefits. Nevertheless, many biologically rational strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, show promise in ongoing clinical trials.

Study of small-cell lung cancer cell-based sensor and its applications in chemotherapy effects rapid evaluation for anticancer drugs

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a smoking-related cancer disease. Despite improvement in clinical survival, SCLC outcome remains extremely poor. Cisplatin (DDP) is the first-line chemotherapy drug for SCLC, but the choice of second-line chemotherapy drugs is not clear. In this paper, a SCLC cell-based sensor was proposed, and its applications in chemotherapy effects rapid evaluation for anticancer drugs were investigated. SCLC cell lines lung adenocarcinoma cell (LTEP-P) and DDP-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell (LTEP-P/DDP-1.0) are cultured on carbon screen-printed electrode (CSPE) to fabricate integrated cell-based sensor. Several chemotherapy anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, ifosmamide, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, etoposide, camptothecin, and topotecan, are selected as experimental chemicals. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) tests are conducted to evaluate chemotherapy drug effects on LTEP-P and LTEP-P/DDP-1.0 cell lines. Electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) responses to anti-tumor chemicals are measured and processed by double-layered cascaded stochastic resonance (DCSR). Cisplatin solutions in different concentrations measurement results demonstrate that LTEP-P cell-based sensor presents quantitative analysis abilities for cisplatin and topotecan. Cisplatin and its mixtures can also be discriminated. Results demonstrate that LTEP-P cell-based sensor sensitively evaluates chemotherapy drugs' apoptosis function to SCLC cells. LTEP-P/DDP-1.0 cell-based sensor responses demonstrate that gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and camptothecin are ideal second-line drugs for clinical post-cisplatin therapy than other drugs according to MTT test results. This work provides a novel way for SCLC second-line clinical chemotherapy drug screening.

Second-line pazopanib in patients with relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

Background:

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is increased in SCLC and is correlated with poor prognosis. The efficacy and tolerance of second-line pazopanib in SCLC was evaluated.

Patients and methods:

Patients with platinum-sensitive (cohort A; n=39) and -resistant/refractory (cohort B; n=19) SCLC were enrolled in a multicentre phase II study. The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate (PFS-R) at week 8 in each cohort. Pazopanib (800 mg per day per os) was administered until progressive disease (PD). Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were enumerated using the Cellsearch assay.

Results:

All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, eight (13.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0–22.7), 20 (34.5%) stable disease (SD) and 30 (51.7%) PD. Accrual in cohort B was halted because the hard-stop rule was met; in cohort A, the PFS-R was 59% (95% CI: 43.5–74.4; PR=7, SD=16). Nine (23.1%) patients received pazopanib for >6 months and 3 of them for >12 months. One pazopanib cycle resulted to a significant decrease to the number of patients with ⩾5 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood (20%) compared with baseline (50%). The median PFS and OS for all patients was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.9–3.1 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.8–8.2 months), respectively (cohort A: PFS=3.7 months and OS=8.0 months). No unexpected toxicity was observed.

Conclusions:

Second-line treatment with pazopanib in platinum-sensitive SCLC is well tolerated and resulted in promising objective responses and disease control; CTC enumeration might serve as a reliable surrogate biomarker of response.

Preventive Effects of a Chinese Herbal Formula, Shengjiang Xiexin Decoction, on Irinotecan-Induced Delayed-Onset Diarrhea in Rats

Irinotecan is a well-known chemotherapy drug for the treatment of various cancers. However, delayed-onset diarrhea is a common adverse reaction, limiting the application of the drug. The study presented was designed to evaluate the preventive effects of Shengjiang Xiexin decoction (SXD) on irinotecan-induced diarrhea and to explore the possible mechanisms of this action. We established a diarrhea rat model. The condition of the rats was observed. The proliferation and apoptosis of intestinal cells were measured using immunohistochemical assays and a caspase-3 activity assay, respectively. The expression of Lgr5 and CD44 staining were used to observe intestinal stem cells (ISCs). In addition, the activity of β-glucuronidase in the rats' feces was measured. Our results showed that the number of proliferating intestinal cells in the SXD groups was obviously higher, while the activity of caspase-3 was lower. The expression of Lgr5 and the integrated option density (IOD) of CD44 stain were increased significantly by SXD. Additionally, SXD decreased the activity of β-glucuronidase after irinotecan administration. In conclusion, SXD exhibited preventive effects on irinotecan-induced diarrhea, and this action was associated with an inhibitory effect on intestinal apoptosis and β-glucuronidase and a promotive effect on intestinal cell proliferation due to increased maintenance of ISCs.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study in 148 patients

To better understand the outcomes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), we examined the clinical features and prognostic factors of SCLC in this study. A total of 148 patients who were diagnosed as having SCLC between January 2009 and December 2013 in Cancer Center of Union Hospital, Wuhan, China, were enrolled and their clinical features and prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were employed for analysis of prognostic factors. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 59.7% and 25.7%, respectively, for limited disease (LD) patients whose median survival time (MST) was 16 months. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 29.5% and 5.3%, respectively, for extensive disease (ED) patients whose MST was 10 months. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor stage, serum CEA and Ki-67 antigen were significantly correlated to the outcomes of SCLC, and they were significant prognostic factors for SCLC.

Bayesian survival analysis in clinical trials: What methods are used in practice?

Background

Bayesian statistics are an appealing alternative to the traditional frequentist approach to designing, analysing, and reporting of clinical trials, especially in rare diseases. Time-to-event endpoints are widely used in many medical fields. There are additional complexities to designing Bayesian survival trials which arise from the need to specify a model for the survival distribution. The objective of this article was to critically review the use and reporting of Bayesian methods in survival trials.

Methods

A systematic review of clinical trials using Bayesian survival analyses was performed through PubMed and Web of Science databases. This was complemented by a full text search of the online repositories of pre-selected journals. Cost-effectiveness, dose-finding studies, meta-analyses, and methodological papers using clinical trials were excluded.

Results

In total, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria, 25 were original reports of clinical trials and 3 were re-analyses of a clinical trial. Most trials were in oncology (n = 25), were randomised controlled (n = 21) phase III trials (n = 13), and half considered a rare disease (n = 13). Bayesian approaches were used for monitoring in 14 trials and for the final analysis only in 14 trials. In the latter case, Bayesian survival analyses were used for the primary analysis in four cases, for the secondary analysis in seven cases, and for the trial re-analysis in three cases. Overall, 12 articles reported fitting Bayesian regression models (semi-parametric, n = 3; parametric, n = 9). Prior distributions were often incompletely reported: 20 articles did not define the prior distribution used for the parameter of interest. Over half of the trials used only non-informative priors for monitoring and the final analysis (n = 12) when it was specified. Indeed, no articles fitting Bayesian regression models placed informative priors on the parameter of interest. The prior for the treatment effect was based on historical data in only four trials. Decision rules were pre-defined in eight cases when trials used Bayesian monitoring, and in only one case when trials adopted a Bayesian approach to the final analysis.

Conclusion

Few trials implemented a Bayesian survival analysis and few incorporated external data into priors. There is scope to improve the quality of reporting of Bayesian methods in survival trials. Extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for reporting Bayesian clinical trials is recommended.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: From Epidemiology to Therapy

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers representing approximately 20% of all lung cancers, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The frequency appears to be approximately 3% for LCNEC. Diagnosis of LCNEC requires attention to neuroendocrine features by light microscopy and confirmation by immunohistochemical staining for neuroendocrine markers. Both SCLC and pulmonary LCNEC are high-grade and poor-prognosis tumors, with higher incidence in males and smokers and peripheral localization. LCNEC is very rare, and the precise diagnosis on small specimens is very difficult, so we have still too few data to define a standard of treatment for pulmonary LCNECs. Data of literature, most based on retrospective analysis, indicated a poor 5-year overall survival, with a high incidence of recurrence after surgery, even in stage I disease. Primary surgery should be the first option in all operable patients because there is no validate therapeutic approach for LCNEC due to lack of clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens remain only an option for potentially resectable tumors. In advanced stages, SCLC-like chemotherapy seems the best option of treatment, with a good response rate but a poor overall survival (from 8 to 16 months in different case series). New agents are under clinical investigation to improve LCNEC patients' outcome. We reviewed all data on treatment options feasible for pulmonary LCNEC, both for localized and extensive disease.