2
|
Los C, Klobuch S, Haanen JBAG. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte and Other Cell Therapies for Metastatic Melanoma. Cancer J 2024; 30:113-119. [PMID: 38527265 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Major progress in prolonging survival of patients with advanced melanoma has been made in the past decade because of the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapies. However, for nonresponding or relapsing patients, their prognosis is still dismal. Based on clinical trial data, treatment with adoptive cell therapies holds great promise. In patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on or nonresponsive to single-agent anti-programmed cell death 1, infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes can produce responses in up to half of patients, with durable complete responses in up to 20%. Genetic modification of peripheral blood T cells with T-cell receptors derived from tumor-specific T cells, or with chimeric antigen receptors, has the potential to further improve treatment outcomes in this refractory population. In this review, we will discuss the historical development, current status, and future perspectives of adoptive T-cell therapies in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Los
- From the Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute
| | - Sebastian Klobuch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chesney J, Lewis KD, Kluger H, Hamid O, Whitman E, Thomas S, Wermke M, Cusnir M, Domingo-Musibay E, Phan GQ, Kirkwood JM, Hassel JC, Orloff M, Larkin J, Weber J, Furness AJS, Khushalani NI, Medina T, Egger ME, Graf Finckenstein F, Jagasia M, Hari P, Sulur G, Shi W, Wu X, Sarnaik A. Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in patients with advanced melanoma after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies: pooled analysis of consecutive cohorts of the C-144-01 study. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005755. [PMID: 36600653 PMCID: PMC9748991 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced melanoma have limited treatment options after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of 36% in 66 patients who progressed after ICI and targeted therapy. Herein, we report independent review committee (IRC)-assessed outcomes of 153 patients treated with lifileucel in a large multicenter Phase 2 cell therapy trial in melanoma. METHODS Eligible patients had advanced melanoma that progressed after ICI and targeted therapy, where appropriate. Melanoma lesions were resected (resected tumor diameter ≥1.5 cm) and shipped to a central good manufacturing practice facility for 22-day lifileucel manufacturing. Patients received a non-myeloablative lymphodepletion regimen, a single lifileucel infusion, and up to six doses of high-dose interleukin-2. The primary endpoint was IRC-assessed ORR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1). RESULTS The Full Analysis Set consisted of 153 patients treated with lifileucel, including longer-term follow-up on the 66 patients previously reported. Patients had received a median of 3.0 lines of prior therapy (81.7% received both anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4) and had high disease burden at baseline (median target lesion sum of diameters (SOD): 97.8 mm; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >upper limit of normal: 54.2%). ORR was 31.4% (95% CI: 24.1% to 39.4%), with 8 complete responses and 40 partial responses. Median duration of response was not reached at a median study follow-up of 27.6 months, with 41.7% of the responses maintained for ≥18 months. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 13.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. Multivariable analyses adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status demonstrated that elevated LDH and target lesion SOD >median were independently correlated with ORR (p=0.008); patients with normal LDH and SOD <median had greater likelihood of response than those with either (OR=2.08) or both (OR=4.42) risk factors. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥30%) were thrombocytopenia (76.9%), anemia (50.0%), and febrile neutropenia (41.7%). CONCLUSIONS Investigational lifileucel demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced melanoma and high tumor burden. Durable responses and a favorable safety profile support the potential benefit of one-time lifileucel TIL cell therapy in patients with limited treatment options in ICI-refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chesney
- Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Karl D Lewis
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Medical Oncology, Hematology & Oncology, Melanoma and Onco-Dermatology, Genitourinary Oncology, Yale New Haven Health Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- Hematology Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eric Whitman
- Atlantic Health System Cancer Care, Morristown, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sajeve Thomas
- Hematology and Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Martin Wermke
- Technische Universität Dresden - NCT/UCC Early Clinical Trial Unit, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Mike Cusnir
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Evidio Domingo-Musibay
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Giao Q Phan
- Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - John M Kirkwood
- Medicine, Dermatology and Translational Science, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Marlana Orloff
- Thomas Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Larkin
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey Weber
- Department of Medicine, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Theresa Medina
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael E Egger
- Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Madan Jagasia
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, California, USA
| | | | - Giri Sulur
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, California, USA
| | - Wen Shi
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, California, USA
| | - Xiao Wu
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, California, USA
| | - Amod Sarnaik
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Switzer B, Puzanov I, Skitzki JJ, Hamad L, Ernstoff MS. Managing Metastatic Melanoma in 2022: A Clinical Review. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:335-351. [PMID: 35133862 PMCID: PMC9810138 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma remains the most lethal of the primary cutaneous neoplasms, and although the incidence of primary melanoma continues to rise, the mortality from metastatic disease remains unchanged, in part through advances in treatment. Major developments in immunomodulatory and targeted therapies have provided robust improvements in response and survival trends that have transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma. Additional advances in immunologic and cancer cell biology have contributed to further optimization in (1) risk stratification, (2) prognostication, (3) treatment, (4) toxicity management, and (5) surveillance approaches for patients with an advanced melanoma diagnosis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the historical and future advances regarding the translational and clinical implications of advanced melanoma and share multidisciplinary recommendations to aid clinicians in the navigation of current treatment approaches for a variety of patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Switzer
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Joseph J. Skitzki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Lamya Hamad
- Department of Pharmacy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Marc S. Ernstoff
- ImmunoOncology Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD,Marc S. Ernstoff, MD, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DePalo DK, Tarhini A, Zager JS. The treatment of advanced melanoma: a review of systemic and local therapies in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2022; 31:95-104. [PMID: 34996314 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2027366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While the incidence of melanoma continues to rise, the mortality of the disease appears to have stabilized. This may, in part, be due to the development and application of immune checkpoint inhibitors as standard of care in advanced melanoma. However, many patients do not respond to these therapies alone. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other classes of therapeutics appears to be a promising direction to improve response and survival in advanced melanoma. AREAS COVERED This review article aims to discuss phase 1 and 2 clinical trials examining immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination therapy for the treatment of advanced, unresectable melanoma. In particular, these regimens include various kinase inhibitors, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, toll-like receptor agonists, cytokines, and oncolytic viral therapies. The combinations under discussion include both systemic and combination systemic/local therapies. EXPERT OPINION Drug combinations discussed here appear to be promising therapeutic regimens for advanced melanoma. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors may guide the development of future combination regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle K DePalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ahmad Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comito F, Pagani R, Grilli G, Sperandi F, Ardizzoni A, Melotti B. Emerging Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Treatment of Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:271. [PMID: 35053435 PMCID: PMC8773625 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma has radically changed in the past decade. Nevertheless, primary or acquired resistance to systemic treatment occurs in many cases, highlighting the need for novel treatment strategies. This review has the purpose of summarizing the current area of interest for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable advanced cutaneous melanoma, including data from recently completed or ongoing clinical trials. The main fields of investigation include the identification of new immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-LAG3, GITR agonist and anti-TIGIT), adoptive cell therapy, vaccines, engineered TCR therapy, IL-2 agonists, novel targets for targeted therapy (new MEK or RAF inhibitors, HDAC, IDO, ERK, Axl, ATR and PARP inhibitors), or combination strategies (antiangiogenetic agents plus immune checkpoint inhibitors, intra-tumoral immunotherapy in combination with systemic therapy). In many cases, only preliminary efficacy data from early phase trials are available, which require confirmation in larger patient cohorts. A more in-depth knowledge of the biological effects of the molecules and identifying predictive biomarkers remain crucial for selecting patient populations most likely to benefit from novel emerging treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Comito
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Rachele Pagani
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giada Grilli
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
| | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni, 15-40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.G.); (F.S.); (A.A.); (B.M.)
| |
Collapse
|