Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with pretreated metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a phase 2 randomized trial with Simon's optimal two-stage design requiring 36 evaluable patients per group after second stage. Sixty-one patients were included from September 2018 to January 2022 and randomized (1:1) to receive SBRT (15 Gy × 1 on day 1 to a primary or metastatic lesion) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 2 weeks) with/without ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Decision to continue accrual into the second stage depended on the CBR from the first stage.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab with a CBR of 31.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.6-47.1]. Five patients (11.9%) achieved partial response with median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.1-21.5). Nineteen patients received SBRT/nivolumab. This group was closed after the initial stage based on a CBR of 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3-33.1). Adverse events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (31%) and 3 (16%) patients in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab and SBRT/nivolumab groups, respectively. One patient died from immune-related hepatitis in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining SBRT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab is well tolerated, feasible, and shows response in a subgroup of patients with mBTC.

Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) represents a challenging malignancy characterized by aggressive behavior, high relapse rates, and poor prognosis. In recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various cancers, but its efficacy in BTC remains limited. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the advances in preclinical and clinical studies of immunotherapy for BTC. We explore the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in reshaping the management of BTC. Despite disappointing results thus far, ongoing clinical trials are investigating the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modalities. Furthermore, research on the tumor microenvironment has unveiled novel targets for immunotherapeutic interventions. By understanding the current state of immunotherapy in BTC and highlighting future directions, this article aims to fuel further exploration and ultimately improve patient outcomes in this challenging disease.

Bortezomib in previously treated phosphatase and tension homology-deficient patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An open-label, prospective and single-centre phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is characterized by a dismal prognosis with limited therapeutic alternatives. To explore phosphatase and tension homolog (PTEN) as a biomarker for proteasome inhibition in ICC, we conducted a phase II trial to assess the second-line efficacy of bortezomib in PTEN-deficient advanced ICC patients.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients with advanced ICC in our centre were screened by PTEN immunohistochemical staining between 1 July 2017, and 31 December 2021, and 16 patients were ultimately enrolled and treated with single-agent bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.55 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-19.9 months). Among the 16 enrolled patients, the ORR was 18.75% (3/16) and the disease control rate was 43.75% (7/16). The median progress-free survival was 2.95 months (95% CI: 2.1-5.1 months) and the median overall survival (mOS) was 7.2 months (95% CI: 0.7-21.6 months) in the intent-to-treat-patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 16 patients, with thrombopenia being the most common toxicity. Patients with PTEN staining scores of 0 were more likely to benefit from bortezomib than those with staining scores > 0.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib yielded an encouraging objective response and a favourable OS as a second-line agent in PTEN-deficient ICC patients. Our findings suggest bortezomib as a promising therapeutic option for patients with PTEN-deficient ICC.

HIGHLIGHTS

There is a limited strategy for the second-line option of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This investigator-initiated phase 2 study evaluated bortezomib in ICC patients with phosphatase and tension homology deficiency. The overall response rate was 18.75% and the overall survival was 7.2 months in the intent-to-treat cohort. These results justify further developing bortezomib in ICC patients with PTEN deficiency.

Current and Future Therapeutic Targets for Directed Molecular Therapies in Cholangiocarcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data, clinical trials (MEDLINE; ncbi.pubmed.com), congress contributions (asco.org; esmo.org), and active recruiting clinical trains (clinicaltrial.gov) on targeted therapies in cholangiocarcinoma. Palliative treatment regimens were analyzed as well as preoperative and perioperative treatment options. We summarized the current knowledge for each mutation and molecular pathway that is or has been under clinical evaluation and discussed the results on the background of current treatment guidelines. We established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for second-line settings, including IDH-, BRAF-, and NTRK-mutated tumors, as well as for FGFR2 fusion, HER2/neu-overexpression, and microsatellite instable tumors. Other options for targeted treatment include EGFR- or VEGF-dependent pathways, which are known to be overexpressed or dysregulated in this cancer type and are currently under clinical investigation. Targeted therapy in CCA is a hallmark of individualized medicine as these therapies aim to specifically block pathways that promote cancer cell growth and survival, leading to tumor shrinkage and improved patient outcomes based on the molecular profile of the tumor.

Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

Perioperative and palliative systemic treatments for biliary tract cancer

Due to the fact biliary tract cancer (BTC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thus, not eligible for resection, and due to the aggressive tumor biology, it is considered as one of the cancer types with the worst prognosis. Advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques, and molecular characterization have led to an improvement of the prognosis of BTC patients, recently. Although neoadjuvant therapy is expected to improve surgical outcomes by reducing tumor size, its routine is not well established. The application of neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced disease may be indicated, the routine use of systemic therapy prior to surgery for cholangiocarcinoma patients with an upfront resectable disease is less well established, but discussed and performed in selected cases. In advanced disease, only combination chemotherapy regimens have been demonstrated to achieve disease control in untreated patients. Molecular profiling of the tumor has demonstrated that many BTC might bear actionable targets, which might be addressed by biological treatments, thus improving the prognosis of the patients. Furthermore, the addition of the immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy might improve the prognosis in a subset of patients. This review seeks to give a comprehensive overview about the role of neoadjuvant as well as palliative systemic treatment approaches and an outlook about novel systemic treatment concept in BTC.

Gastric cancer with brain metastasis: from molecular characteristics and treatment

Gastric cancer is one of the cancers with increasing incidence and ranks fourth globally among the most frequent causes of cancer-related mortality. Early gastric cancer is often asymptomatic or presents with atypical symptoms, and the majority of patients present with advanced disease upon diagnosis. Brain metastases are present in approximately 1% of gastric cancer patients at the time of diagnosis, which significantly contributed to the overall mortality of the disease worldwide. Conventional therapies for patients with brain metastases remain limited and the median overall survival of patients is only 8 months in advanced cases. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying gastric cancer brain metastases, and immunotherapy has become an important treatment option in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and surgery. This review aims to provide insight into the cellular processes involved in gastric cancer brain metastases, discuss diagnostic approaches, evaluate the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors into treatment and prognosis, and explore the predictive value of biomarkers in immunotherapy.

Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor plus Gemox chemotherapy versus plus HAIC for advanced biliary tract cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin plus gemcitabine (Gemox) chemotherapy or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHOD

This study involved 86 patients with advanced BTC receiving PD-1 inhibitor and lenvatinib combined with HAIC (P-L-H group) or Gemox chemothrapy (P-L-G group). Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) analysis was used to balance potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULT

After PSM, a total of 60 patients were enrolled with 30 in the P-L-G group and 30 in the P-L-H group. The median PFS was significantly longer with P-L-G group (13.7 versus 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) than with the P-L-H group. The median OS was 23.8 months in the P-L-G group versus 11.6 months in the P-L-H group (p < 0.0001). Patients in the P-L-G group exhibited a better ORR (73.3 % vs 30 %, p = 0.002) compared to the P-L-H group. The DCR was the same in both groups, 96.7 %, respectively. The P-L-G group had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 AEs than the P-L-H group. However, there was no significant difference in the any grade or grade 3-4 of AEs between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PD-1 inhibitor plus lenvatinib and Gemox are promising first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced BTC in the multicenter retrospective real-world study.

Real-world cohort study of PD-1 blockade plus lenvatinib for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, some patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) cannot tolerate or refuse chemotherapy due to the toxicity, necessitating alternative treatments. PD-1 blockade combined with lenvatinib showed promising results in phase II studies with small sample size, but there is a lack of data on the routine use with this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the regimen in patients with advanced ICC, and to identify predictors for treatment response and prognosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib for advanced ICC between July 2017 and August 2022. The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Biomarker analysis for CA19-9 and PD-L1 expression was performed. Exploratory analysis for genetic alternation was conducted.

RESULTS

The study included 103 patients. It demonstrated a median PFS of 5.9 months and a median OS of 11.4 months. ORR was 18.4% and DCR was 80.6%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 50.5%. Positive PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) was associated with higher ORR (P = 0.013) and prolonged PFS (P = 0.023). Elevated CA19-9 (> 37 U/ml) was associated with decreased ORR (P = 0.019), poorer PFS (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.034). Patients with IDH1 mutations exhibited a favorable response to the treatment (P = 0.011), and patients with TP53 mutations tended to have worse OS (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1 blockade plus lenvatinib is effective and safe in routine practice. PD-L1 expression and CA19-9 level appear to predict the treatment efficacy. IDH1 mutations might indicate a better treatment response.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03892577.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib with or without a PD-1 inhibitor for advanced and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. We report the combined potency of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with advanced and metastatic ICC.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 32 patients with advanced or metastatic ICC between January 2017 and August 2021. Eligible patients had received gemcitabine-based TACE combined with lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitor in any line of treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors associated with OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received a combination of TACE and lenvatinib (TL group) and 14 patients received TACE and lenvatinib plus aPD-1 inhibitor (TLP group). The median follow-up time was 19.8 months (range 1.8-37.8). The median OS was 25.3 months (95% CI 18.5-32.1) and the median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7). Partial response was achieved in 10 patients (31.3%), and stable disease in 13 (40.6 %) with disease control rate of 71.9%. The median OS was comparable in the TL and TLP groups (22.4 vs 27.3 months, respectively; hazard ratio: 1.245, 95% CI 0.4245-3.653; p = 0.687). The regression analysis revealed that, regardless of treatment group, a favorable independent prognostic factor for OS was HBV/HCV infection (HR: 0.063, 95% CI 0.009-0.463; p = 0.007). There were no treatment-related deaths and 81.3% of study participants experienced adverse events (AEs), the majority of which were of moderate severity (71.8% Grade 1-2).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine-based TACE plus lenvatinib with or without aPD-1 inhibitor was well tolerated and provided promising therapeutic outcomes for patients with advanced and metastatic ICC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Monotherapy with TACE, or Lenvatinib, or PD-1 inhibitors has shown limited efficacy over standard first-line chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic ICC. This work suggested the combined potency of these treatments and well-tolerance.

Systemic treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma - an Austrian expert consensus statement

Locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive carcinoma with a dismal prognosis. For the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, cisplatin/gemcitabine has been the standard of care for more than 10 years. Its combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab resulted in an efficiency improvement in the phase III setting. Regarding the use of chemotherapy in the second line, positive phase III data could only be generated for FOLFOX. The evidence base for nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is contradictory. After the failure of first-line treatment, targeted therapies can be offered if the molecular targets microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), IDH1, FGFR2, BRAF V600E, and NTRK are detected. These targeted agents are generally preferable to second-line chemotherapy. Broad molecular testing should be performed, preferably from tumor tissue, at the initiation of first-line therapy to timely identify potential molecular targets.

Cholangiocarcinoma - novel biological insights and therapeutic strategies

In the past 5 years, important advances have been made in the scientific understanding and clinical management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The cellular immune landscape of CCA has been characterized and tumour subsets with distinct immune microenvironments have been defined using molecular approaches. Among these subsets, the identification of 'immune-desert' tumours that are relatively devoid of immune cells emphasizes the need to consider the tumour immune microenvironment in the development of immunotherapy approaches. Progress has also made in identifying the complex heterogeneity and diverse functions of cancer-associated fibroblasts in this desmoplastic cancer. Assays measuring circulating cell-free DNA and cell-free tumour DNA are emerging as clinical tools for detection and monitoring of the disease. Molecularly targeted therapy for CCA has now become a reality, with three drugs targeting oncogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions and one targeting neomorphic, gain-of-function variants of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) obtaining regulatory approval. By contrast, immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors has produced disappointing results in patients with CCA, underscoring the requirement for novel immune-based treatment strategies. Finally, liver transplantation for early stage intrahepatic CCA under research protocols is emerging as a viable therapeutic option in selected patients. This Review highlights and provides in-depth information on these advances.

Immunotherapies in non-metastatic gastrointestinal cancers

PURPOSE

Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as cornerstone in the treatment of many metastatic tumour types, including gastrointestinal cancers. In many solid tumours, the effective therapies in the metastatic field are progressively brought into the curative setting. Consequently, earlier tumoural settings have become a field of experiment for immunotherapies. In melanoma, lung, and bladder cancers, excellent results were recorded, possibly explained by differences in the tumour microenvironment between metastatic and non-metastatic settings. In gastrointestinal (GI) Oncology, nivolumab is the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to become a standard-of-care adjuvant treatment after curative surgery for oesophagal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

We herein discuss the results of a selection of the most relevant studies presented/published over the last 18 months testing immunotherapies in non-metastatic GI cancers. Among immunotherapies, ICI have been investigated in pre-, peri- and postoperative setting across tumour types, alone or in combination with chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Vaccines are also a new field of investigation.

SUMMARY

Promising results from two studies (NCT04165772 and NICHE-2 study) demonstrating never-seen-before responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in MMR deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers raise hope for improving the patients' outcome and developing organ-sparing strategies in this situation.

Immunotherapy in Biliary Tract Cancers: Current Standard-of-Care and Emerging Strategies

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), comprising intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma as well as gallbladder adenocarcinoma, continue to be challenging to manage. Conventional chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease are limited in both options and benefits, and more effective perioperative regimens are also needed. Over the last decade, immunotherapy has had a profound impact on the management of many solid tumor types, particularly in using immune checkpoint inhibition to enable a tumor-directed T cell response. Immunotherapy administered on its own has had limited utility in BTCs, in part due to a hostile immune microenvironment and the relative infrequency of biomarker-based tumor-agnostic indications for immunotherapy. However, immunotherapy in conjunction with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapies, and/or anti-angiogenic therapies has gained traction, supported by evidence that these agents can impart favorable immunomodulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment. The TOPAZ-1 trial led to the first BTC-specific immunotherapy approval, establishing the combination of durvalumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as the preferred first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic disease. Recently, the KEYNOTE-966 trial showed positive results for the combination of pembrolizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the same setting, adding further evidence for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to the standard chemotherapy backbone. Meanwhile, advances in the molecular profiling of BTCs has contributed to the recent proliferation of molecularly targeted therapeutics for the subset of BTCs harboring alterations in IDH1, FGFR2, MAP kinase signaling, HER2, and beyond, and there has been great interest in investigating combinations of these agents with immunotherapy. Emerging immunotherapy strategies beyond immune checkpoint inhibition are also being studied in BTCs, and these include immunostimulatory receptor agonists, Wnt signaling modulators, adoptive cell therapy, and cancer vaccines. A large number of trials are underway to explore promising new combinations and immune-targeted strategies, offering opportunities to expand the role of immunotherapy in BTC management in the near future.

Cholangiocarcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract, with aggressive behavior, and portends a poor prognosis. Traditionally, it is classified according to its site of involvement as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. A host of genetic and epigenetic factors have been involved in its pathogenesis. Chemotherapy has remained the standard first-line treatment over the last decade, with a disappointing median overall survival of 11 months for locally advanced and metastatic CCA. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many pancreaticobiliary malignancies, offering durable responses with a safe therapeutic profile. To date, there have been no significant advances in the management of CCA. Novel immunotherapeutic methods, such as cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents, are currently under investigation and may improve prognosis with overall survival. Efforts to find robust biomarkers for response to treatment along with multiple clinical trials are also ongoing in this regard. In this review, we present an overview of the current advances and the future perspectives of immunotherapy in the management of CCA.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, gastric, duodenal and distal small bowel, biliary tract, pancreatic, colon, rectal, and anal cancer, comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies that impose a significant global burden. Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for several GI cancers, offering some patients durable responses and prolonged survival. Specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), either as monotherapies or in combination regimens, have gained tissue site-specific regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic disease and in the resectable setting. Indications for ICIs in GI cancer, however, have differing biomarker and histology requirements depending on the anatomic site of origin. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles compared with other systemic treatments that have long been the mainstay for GI cancer, such as chemotherapy. With the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancer. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the expert panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using ICIs to treat GI cancers, with topics including biomarker testing, therapy selection, and patient education and quality of life considerations, among others.

Case Report: Persistent response to combination therapy of pemigatinib, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) often have a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in targeted molecular therapy and immunotherapy have been made. Herein, we report a case of advanced iCCA treated with a combination of pemigatinib (a selective FGFR inhibitor), chemotherapy, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. A 34-year-old female was diagnosed with advanced iCCA with multiple liver masses and metastases in the peritoneum and lymph nodes. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified the genetic mutations. An FGFR2-BICC1 gene fusion was found in this patient. The patient was treated with pemigatinib in combination with pembrolizumab plus systemic gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. After 9 cycles of the combination therapy, the patient achieved a partial response, complete metabolic response, and normalization of tumor markers. Sequentially, the patient received pemigatinib and pembrolizumab for 3 months. Due to the elevated tumor biomarker, she is currently receiving chemotherapy, pemigatinib, and pembrolizumab treatment again. She regained an excellent physical status after 16 months of treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first reported case of advanced iCCA successfully treated with a combination of pemigatinib, chemotherapy, and ICIs as a first-line regimen. This treatment combination may be effective and safe in the advanced iCCA.

Gallbladder cancer: current and future treatment options

Surgery remains the preferred treatment option for early-stage gallbladder cancer (GBC). According to the anatomical position of the primary tumor, accurate preoperative stage and strict control of surgical indications, appropriate surgical strategies are selected to achieve the optimal surgical effect. However, most patients have already been at the locally advanced stage or the tumor has metastasized at the initial diagnosis. The postoperative recurrence rate and 5-year survival rate remain unsatisfactory even after radical resection for gallbladder cancer. Hence, there is an urgent need for more treatment options, such as neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy and first-line and second-line treatments of local progression and metastasis, in the whole-course treatment management of gallbladder cancer patients. In recent years, the application of molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapy has brought greater hope and broader prospects for the treatment of gallbladder cancer, but their effects in improving the prognosis of patients still lack sufficient evidence-based medicine evidence, so many problems should be addressed by further research. Based on the latest progress in gallbladder cancer research, this review systematically analyzes the treatment trends of gallbladder cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is an epithelial malignancy originating in the biliary tracts and frequently recurs even with surgical resection. Unresectable disease has a 5-year overall survival of less than 10%. Given this poor prognosis, additional therapies are urgently needed. Chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for many years. However, with the incorporation of immunotherapy into the treatment of other malignancies, there has been a great deal of interest in immunotherapy for biliary cancers. Recently, durvalumab was approved in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma in the first-line setting. However, predicting which patients may respond to immunotherapy remains a challenge due to the lack of a reliable biomarker.

Integrating cytotoxic, targeted and immune therapies for cholangiocarcinoma

Management of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is rapidly evolving. The majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. In this setting, chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine (with durvalumab) followed by second-line FOLFOX is the cornerstone of treatment. Targeted therapies for tumours harbouring FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations, BRAF V600E mutations, NTRK fusions and/or HER2 (ERBB2) amplifications, among others, have brought precision medicine to the forefront of management of advanced BTC. This holds especially true for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Recently, immunotherapy, especially combined with chemoterapy, has also shown promising activity. The field is now moving forward - management is no longer limited to chemotherapy or targeted therapies alone, with increasing research focused on how combination strategies could enhance therapeutic responses. We are therefore facing a change of paradigm, where immunotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapies will be administered concomitantly with the aim of harnessing potential synergies. This review will focus on the rationale behind these combinations and summarise current clinical trial data.

Immunotherapy in biliary tract cancers: Current evidence and future perspectives

Bile duct tumors are comprised of tumors that originate from both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder tumors. These are aggressive tumors and chemotherapy is still the main treatment for advanced-stage disease and most of these cases have a poor overall survival. Strategies are aimed at treatments with better outcomes and less toxicity which makes immunotherapy an area of ​​significant importance. Recent Food and Drug Administration approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for agnostic tumors based on biomarkers such as microsatellite instability-high and tumor mutation burden-high are important steps in the treatment of patients with advanced bile duct tumors. Despite limited responses with isolated checkpoint inhibitors in later lines of systemic treatment in advanced disease, drug combination strategies have been demonstrating encouraging results to enhance ICI efficacy.

Aktuelle Studien und Evidenz zum Cholangiokarzinom

Cholangiokarzinome (CCA) stellen die zweithäufigsten primären Leberkarzinome dar und umfassen eine heterogene Gruppe aus intra- und extrahepatischen Gallenwegstumoren. Die Prognose der Patienten ist sowohl aufgrund einer hohen Rezidivrate als auch häufig später Diagnosestellung in fortgeschrittenen Stadien eingeschränkt. Den Goldstandard der kurativen Therapie bildet die komplette Resektion; sie erfordert komplex-onkologische Eingriffe mit ggf. vorgeschalteten Hypertrophieinduktionen der Restleber zur Sicherung einer postoperativ ausreichenden Leberfunktion. Als adjuvante Therapie ist eine 6-monatige Therapie mit Capecitabin etabliert. Die Therapielandschaft im fortgeschrittenen Stadium der Erkrankung befindet sich aufgrund neuer Daten aus klinischen Phase-II/III-Studien stetig im Wandel. Einerseits ebneten molekulare Analysen den Weg hin zu effektiven zielgerichteten Behandlungen von selektionierten CCA-Patienten mit u. a. Alterationen in FGFR2- oder IDH1-Signalwegen; andererseits erwiesen sich in aktuellen klinischen Studien immunonkologische Kombinationsansätze als effektive und sichere All-Comer-Therapien für die Behandlung eines unselektionierten Patientenkollektivs. Weitere Studien evaluieren sowohl Kombinationsbehandlungen als auch molekulare Stratifikation als neue Therapiekonzepte auch in früheren Erkrankungsstadien und werden die Therapielandschaft und Prognose der Patienten in Zukunft verbessern.

Translational Value of Tumor-Associated Lymphangiogenesis in Cholangiocarcinoma

The prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma remains poor in spite of the advances in immunotherapy and molecular profiling, which has led to the identification of several targetable genetic alterations. Surgical procedures, including both liver resection and liver transplantation, still represent the treatment with the best curative potential, though the outcomes are significantly compromised by the early development of lymph node metastases. Progression of lymphatic metastasis from the primary tumor to tumor-draining lymph nodes is mediated by tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis, a topic largely overlooked until recently. Recent findings highlight tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis as paradigmatic of the role played by the tumor microenvironment in sustaining cholangiocarcinoma invasiveness and progression. This study reviews the current knowledge about the intercellular signaling and molecular mechanism of tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in cholangiocarcinoma in the hope of identifying novel therapeutic targets to halt a process that often limits the success of the few available treatments.

Advances in the systemic treatment of therapeutic approaches in biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a rare and heterogenous group with an increasing incidence and high mortality rate. The estimated new cases and deaths of BTC worldwide are increasing, but the incidence and mortality rates in South East Asia are the highest worldwide, representing a real public health problem in these regions. BTC has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival <12 months. Thus, an urgent unmet clinical need for BTC patients exists and must be addressed.

RESULTS

The backbone treatment of these malignancies is chemotherapy in first- and second-line setting, but in the last decade a rich molecular landscape has been discovered, expanding conceivable treatment options. Some druggable molecular aberrations can be treated with new targeted therapies and have already demonstrated efficacy in patients with BTC, improving clinical outcomes, such as the FGFR2 or IDH1 inhibitors. Many other molecular alterations are being discovered and the treatment of BTC will change in the near future from our current clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review we discuss the epidemiology, molecular characteristics, present treatment approaches, review the recent therapeutic advances, and explore future directions for patients with BTC. Due to the rich molecular landscape of BTC, molecular profiling should be carried out early. Ongoing research will bring new targeted treatments and immunotherapy in the near future.

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a rare and diverse group of malignancies that involve the gallbladder and biliary tree. These cancers typically present in later stages because they are aggressive in nature and affected patients are often asymptomatic in earlier stages of disease. Moreover, BTCs are generally refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy, which further contributes to their associated poor survival outcomes. Novel therapy approaches are clearly needed. Molecular targeted agents have been developed based on our expanding knowledge of the genetic mutations underlying BTCs and represent a promising treatment strategy in molecularly selected subgroups of patients. In addition, the advent of immunotherapy over recent years has dramatically changed the bleak outcomes observed in malignancies such as melanoma. Our growing understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment in BTC has identified mechanisms of tumor immune evasion that could potentially be targeted with immunotherapy. As a result, different immunotherapeutic approaches including immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy, have been investigated. The use of immunotherapeutic agents is currently only approved for a small subset of treatment-refractory BTCs based on microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutational burden (TMB), but this will likely change with the potential approval of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a result of the TOPAZ-1 trial.

Molecular Targets and Emerging Therapies for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), for their low incidence, have been often considered together. Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy, characterized by late diagnosis and poor prognosis, and although it is considered a rare tumor in western countries, other areas of the world show considerable incidence rates. In 2010, results from the large phase III ABC-02 clinical trial on GBC identified the gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as the most effective first-line regimen for both GBC and other BTCs. Since then, various systemic therapies have proven active in BTCs in both first- and second-line settings. Molecular profiling has highlighted important genetic differences between GBC and other BTCs, opening new ways for targeted therapy in advanced disease where standard chemotherapies show marginal benefit. Genome-wide data analysis have shown that GBC molecular landscape offer possible strategies for precision medicine approaches, and a better molecular understanding of the GBC is needed to better stratify patients for treatment. In this review, we discuss the molecular targetable agents for GBC, including the results that emerged by clinical trials exploring new treatment strategies.

Current options and future directions of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive tumors arising from different portions of the biliary tree and classified according to the anatomical location in intrahepatic (i) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA (dCCA), gallbladder cancer (GBC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC). Due to their silent behavior, BTCs are frequently diagnosed at advanced stages when the prognosis is poor. The available chemotherapeutic options are palliative and unfortunately, most patients will die from their disease between 6 and 18 months from diagnosis. However, over the last decade, amounting interest has been posed on the genomic landscape of BTCs and deep-sequencing studies have identified different potentially actionable driver mutations. Hence, the promising results of the early phase clinical studies with targeted agents against isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutation or fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) 2 aberrations inintrahepatic tumors, and other agents against humanepidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 overexpression/mutations, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions or B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) mutations across different subtypes of BTCs, have paved the way for a "precision medicine" strategy for BTCs. Moreover, despite the modest results when used as monotherapy, beyond microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, possibly further expanding the therapeutic landscape of advanced BTCs. This review aims to provide an overview of the approved systemic therapies, the promising results, and the ongoing studies to explore the current and future directions of advanced BTC systemic treatment.

Current State of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its incidence seems to be increasing over the last years. Given the high rate of irresectability at the time of initial diagnosis, new treatment approaches are important to achieve better patient outcomes. Our review provides an overview of current multimodal therapy options across different specialties of gastroenterology/oncology, surgery, and interventional radiology.

SUMMARY

CCA is subdivided into clinically and molecularly distinct phenotypes. Surgical treatment currently is the only potentially curative therapy, but unfortunately, the majority of all patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, metastatic disease, or limiting comorbidities. However, multimodal treatment options are available to prolong survival, relieve symptoms, and maintain life quality.

KEY MESSAGES

The treatment of CCA is complex and requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to ensure optimal patient care at specialized centers. Molecular profiling of patients and inclusion into clinical trials is highly recommended.

Current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancers) are increasing in incidence and have a poor prognosis. Most patients present with advanced disease, for which the treatment is palliative chemotherapy. Over the past few years, the genomic landscape of biliary tract cancers has been examined and several targeted therapies have been developed. Molecular targets with clinically meaningful activity include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), RAS-RAF-MEK (MAP2K1)-ERK (MAPK3), HER2 (also known as ERBB2), DNA mismatch repair, and NTRK. Pemigatinib, a FGFR1-3 inhibitor, showed encouraging response rates and survival data as second-line treatment and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in April, 2020, for previously treated advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangements. Ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, showed improved progression-free survival versus placebo in second-line treatment in the phase 3 ClarIDHy trial. Early phase trials of dabrafenib plus trametinib (BRAF and MEK inhibition) and zanidatamab (a bispecific HER2-antibody) have yielded encouraging response rates. Immunotherapy has mainly produced responses in tumours with deficient mismatch repair or high microsatellite instability (also known as dMMR or MSI-H) or higher PD-L1 score, or both. However, early phase trials of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in unselected patient populations appear promising. NTRK inhibitors have also shown promise in early phase trials of NTRK-fusion positive solid tumours, including cholangiocarcinoma. In this Review, we discuss current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers, with a focus on molecularly targeted therapy.

Multi-Omics Analysis of the Anti-tumor Synergistic Mechanism and Potential Application of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Combined With Lenvatinib

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) and lenvatinib has demonstrated robust clinical effects that are superior to those of monotherapies, but the synergistic anti-tumor mechanisms remain unclear. Exploring the synergistic molecular mechanisms and early identifying potential application have key importance for clinical therapeutics. We firstly systematically reviewed published data of ICB in combination with lenvatinib for the treatment of cancer by meta-analysis. A subsequent bioinformatics analysis explored the mechanism of combined ICB and lenvatinib therapy in 33 cancer types. Transcriptomic analysis was conducted by RNA-seq, and genomic analysis was performed on gene mutations and copy-number alteration data. Tumor-related pathways and tumor immune micro-environment (TIME) were also investigated. The meta-analysis showed a 38.0% objective response rate (ORR) and 79% disease control rate (DCR) for ICB combined with lenvatinib. Multi-omics analysis revealed that ICB and lenvatinib target genes were highly expressed and showed driving alterations in six specific malignancies. Pathway-enrichment analysis found target genes were implicated in tumor development, angiogenesis, and immunoregulatory associated pathways. This study verified the potential synergistic mechanisms of ICB combined with lenvatinib at transcriptomics, genomics, protein, and cellular levels and recognized nine tumor types had ≥ 2 positive treatment-related molecular characteristics, which might benefit particularly from this combined strategy. The findings would help to provide clinical insights and theoretical basis for optimizing of targeted therapy-immunotherapy combinations, and for guiding individualized precision-medicine approaches for cancer treatment.

Atezolizumab: an investigational agent for the treatment of biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. The role of immunotherapy in BTC is unclear. BTCs respond poorly to PD-(L)1 blockade, highlighting the need for combination regimens to augment antitumor immunity. Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with other therapies is under investigation in advanced BTC.

AREAS COVERED

This paper provides an overview of the recent progress and future applications of immunotherapy for BTCs and sheds light on the status and therapeutic potential of atezolizumab. We discuss published data for atezolizumab and an examine the rationale and design of ongoing clinical studies. We offer insights and opinions on the future applications and challenges of immunotherapy in BTC.

EXPERT OPINION

Atezolizumab monotherapy has demonstrated limited antitumor activity in BTC, indicating the need for combination regimens to unlock effective anticancer immunity, and the development of predictive biomarkers to enrich the population. Data for atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy, anti-VEGF agents and other targeted drugs in solid tumors justifies their evaluation in BTC. Several novel atezolizumab-based combinations have been or are currently under investigation in Phase II studies. It is hoped that data from these studies, along with other immunotherapy trials, will provide more effective treatments for patients with BTC.

Horizons on the Therapy of Biliary Tract Cancers: A State-of-the-art Review

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) comprise a group of heterogeneous poor prognosis cancers with increasing incidence recent years. The combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine is the first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There remains no accepted standard treatment in the second-line setting. Nowadays, more and more novel treatment strategies have entered development, with some encouraging results being seen. Here, we review the current treatment status and clinical characteristics of BTC, the role of immunotherapy in BTC as well as the design of clinical trials for oncology drugs for BTC which aim to focus on the future profiles of clinical care and resolution of BTC.

Advances in clinical immunotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most malignant human cancers with increasing incidence worldwide, ranking among the top five malignant tumors worldwide in terms of incidence and mortality. The clinical efficacy of conventional therapies is limited, and the median overall survival (mOS) for advanced-stage gastric cancer is only about 8 months. Emerging as one of breakthroughs for cancer therapy, immunotherapy has become an effective treatment modality after surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. In this review, we have summarized the progresses of clinical development of immunotherapies for gastric cancer. Major advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have started to change the clinical practice for gastric cancer treatment and prognosis. Additionally, combination therapies with other modalities, such as targeted therapies, are expected to push immunotherapies to front-line. In this review, the efficacy of ICIs and targeted therapy alone or combination with existing therapies gastric cancer treatment was described and the predictive value of biomarkers for immunotherapies in gastric cancer treatment is also discussed.

IMbrave 151: a randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Background:

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are heterogenous, highly aggressive tumors that harbor a dismal prognosis for which more effective treatments are needed. The role of cancer immunotherapy in BTC remains to be characterized. The tumor microenvironment (TME) of BTC is highly immunosuppressed and combination treatments are needed to promote effective anticancer immunity. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drives immunosuppression in the TME by disrupting antigen presentation, limiting T-cell infiltration, or potentiating immune-suppressive cells. Many VEGF-regulated mechanisms are thought to be relevant to repressed antitumor immunity in BTC, making dual targeting of VEGF and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathways a rational approach. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin (Gem/Cis) can also modulate anticancer immunity through overlapping and complementary mechanisms to those regulated by VEGF. Anti-PD-L1/VEGF inhibition, coupled with chemotherapy, may potentiate antitumor immunity leading to enhanced clinical benefit.

Methods:

IMbrave 151 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international phase II study to evaluate atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in combination with chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) and bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) as a first-line treatment for advanced BTC. Approximately 150 patients with previously untreated, advanced BTC will be randomized to either Arm A (atezolizumab + bevacizumab + Gem/Cis) or Arm B (atezolizumab + placebo + Gem/Cis). Randomization is stratified by the presence of metastatic disease, primary tumor location, and geographic region. The primary efficacy endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Tissue, blood, and stool samples will be collected at baseline and on-treatment in order to perform correlative biomarker analyses.

Discussion:

IMbrave 151 represents the first randomized study to evaluate combined PD-L1/VEGF blockade on a chemotherapy backbone in BTC.

Trial registration:

NCT identifier: NCT04677504; EUDRACT number: 2020-003759-14