1
|
Zhou L, Zhang Y, Zheng J, Ruan M, Zhang J, Li Y, Jin R, Wu D, Sun H, Zhang J, Wang R. Discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 15:1698-1711. [PMID: 39279966 PMCID: PMC11399828 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal timing to discontinue immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with clinical benefits remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of HCC patients after ICI discontinuation. Methods Patients with HCC were retrospectively screened and those discontinued ICI therapy in the absence of progressive disease (PD) were included. Responses at discontinuation were evaluated per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST). Patients were classified into five subgroups according to the cause of discontinuation: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) per RESICT version 1.1, adverse event (AE), or others. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since ICI start or after ICI discontinuation were assessed. Results A total of 66 patients were included. The median follow-up was 29.33 months. The median PFS since ICI start was 30.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.93-36.72], and the median OS was not reached. The median PFS after discontinuation was 20.6 months (95% CI: 7.63-33.56), and the median OS after discontinuation was not reached. Univariate analysis showed that age, treatment after discontinuation, Response (RECIST version 1.1) at discontinuation and modified response (mResponse per mRECIST) at discontinuation were significantly associated with PFS after discontinuation, while age and mResponse at discontinuation were significantly associated with OS after discontinuation. Multivariate analysis further demonstrated that mResponse at discontinuation and treatment after discontinuation were independently associated with PFS after discontinuation, while age was independently associated with OS after discontinuation. Conclusions ICIs might be discontinued in HCC patients with a response of CR per mRECIST. Patients with a response of PR/SD per mRECIST or elder age could continue ICI therapy after achieving clinical benefits. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance therapy might help to prevent progression after ICI discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuyu Zhou
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuhong Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zheng
- Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minghao Ruan
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Zhang
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Li
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Riming Jin
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Wu
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hanyong Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruoyu Wang
- The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gikandi A, Tran D, Mi Z, DeMatt E, Quin JA, Kinlay S, Biswas K, Zenati MA. Superior Outcomes of Dual-Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Are Maintained in the Veterans Health Administration. J Surg Res 2024; 301:240-246. [PMID: 38970871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Controversy surrounds the long-term clinical benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using dual arterial grafts (DAGs) compared to single arterial grafts (SAGs). We investigated outcomes of DAG, using single internal thoracic artery and radial artery (DAG-RA) or bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts (DAG-BITA), compared to SAG, using the left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts, in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA). METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of U.S. Veterans undergoing isolated on-pump CABG between 2005 and 2015 at 44 VA medical centers. The primary composite outcome was first occurrence of a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), comprised of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. RESULTS Among 25,969 Veterans undergoing isolated CABG, 1261 (4.9%) underwent DAG (66.8% DAG-RA and 33.2% DAG-BITA). Over a 5-y follow-up, DAG was associated with lower rates of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.85), MACCE (AHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.91), and stroke (AHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96) versus SAG. DAG-BITA was associated with lower rates of all-cause death (AHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77) and MACCE (AHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84) than SAG, while DAG-RA was associated with lower rates of all-cause death (AHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99). CONCLUSIONS In the VA, DAG was associated with improved long-term MACCE outcomes compared to SAG. These results suggest that the practice of DAG in the VA benefits Veterans and should be promoted further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajami Gikandi
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dinh Tran
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Office of Research and Development, Perry Point, Maryland
| | - Zhibao Mi
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Office of Research and Development, Perry Point, Maryland
| | - Ellen DeMatt
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Office of Research and Development, Perry Point, Maryland
| | - Jacquelyn A Quin
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott Kinlay
- Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kousick Biswas
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Office of Research and Development, Perry Point, Maryland
| | - Marco A Zenati
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Veterans Affairs (VA) Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ballhausen A, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, König AO, von Weikersthal LF, Sommerhäuser G, Jelas I, Alig AHS, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Goekkurt E, Held S, Kasper S, Heinrich K, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Dermatology-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab (Pmab) maintenance after FOLFOX + Pmab induction: a prespecified secondary analysis of the phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212) trial. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103628. [PMID: 38996519 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The key endpoints for the assessment of the effect of maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are survival and quality-of-life outcomes. We aimed to compare dermatology-related quality of life (DRQOL) in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) + panitumumab (Pmab) versus FU/FA alone as maintenance therapy after folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin + Pmab induction. PATIENTS AND METHODS The phase II randomized PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212; NCT01991873) trial included 387 patients at 70 community/academic sites in Germany. For this prespecified secondary analysis, DRQOL outcomes were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (FACT-EGFRI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Skindex-16 questionnaires at every second cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. RESULTS At least one DRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 310/377 (82%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 216/248 (87%) patients who were randomized and received maintenance therapy. Patients who experienced skin toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) during induction therapy had significantly worse DRQOL according to all three measures, compared to those who did not [i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 2 -12.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.01 to -5.73; P < 0.001]. During maintenance therapy, significantly improved recovery was observed in all DRQOL measures for patients receiving FU/FA, compared to those receiving additional Pmab (i.e. Skindex-16, mean difference at cycle 6 -16.53; 95% CI -22.68 to -10.38; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis of a phase II randomized clinical trial, patient-reported DRQOL outcomes correlated with skin toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE during induction therapy. Maintenance therapy with FU/FA + Pmab was associated with deteriorated DRQOL versus FU/FA alone in patients with RAS wt mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ballhausen
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin.
| | - M Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich
| | - S Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade
| | - U Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Mönchengladbach
| | - L Müller
- Oncological Practice UnterEms, Leer
| | - A O König
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology Göttingen, Göttingen
| | | | - G Sommerhäuser
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin
| | - I Jelas
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin
| | - A H S Alig
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin
| | - A Kurreck
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin
| | - A Stahler
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin
| | - E Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen
| | - S Kasper
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen
| | - K Heinrich
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, Munich; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich
| | - V Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, Munich; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - S Stintzing
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - T Trarbach
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou Y, Wu S, Qu FJ. Therapeutic strategies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2362-2379. [PMID: 38994135 PMCID: PMC11236217 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
More than 1.9 million new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 935000 deaths were estimated to occur worldwide in 2020, representing about one in ten cancer cases and deaths. Overall, colorectal ranks third in incidence, but second in mortality. More than half of the patients are in advanced stages at diagnosis. Treatment options are complex because of the heterogeneity of the patient population, including different molecular subtypes. Treatments have included conventional fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. In recent years, with the development of genetic testing technology, more and more targeted drugs have been applied to the treatment of CRC, which has further prolonged the survival of metastatic CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People’s Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Shuang Wu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People’s Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Fan-Jie Qu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People’s Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng E, Włodarczyk M, Węgiel A, Osielczak A, Możdżan M, Biskup L, Grochowska A, Wołyniak M, Gajewski D, Porc M, Maryńczak K, Dziki Ł. Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC. Front Surg 2024; 11:1398289. [PMID: 38948479 PMCID: PMC11211389 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1398289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Zheng
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Marcin Włodarczyk
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Andrzej Węgiel
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Osielczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Możdżan
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Laura Biskup
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agata Grochowska
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Wołyniak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dominik Gajewski
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Mateusz Porc
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Kasper Maryńczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Łukasz Dziki
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pinto C, Orlandi A, Normanno N, Maiello E, Calegari MA, Antonuzzo L, Bordonaro R, Zampino MG, Pini S, Bergamo F, Tonini G, Avallone A, Latiano TP, Rosati G, Cogoni AA, Ballestrero A, Zaniboni A, Roselli M, Tamberi S, Barone C. Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy in First-Line Therapy for RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase III ERMES Study. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1278-1287. [PMID: 38181312 PMCID: PMC11095858 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The intensity of anti-EGFR-based first-line therapy for RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), once disease control is achieved, is controversial. A de-escalation strategy with anti-EGFR monotherapy represents a potential option to maintain efficacy while reducing cytotoxicity. METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, patients with untreated RAS/BRAF wt mCRC were randomly assigned to receive either fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan/cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) until disease progression (arm A) or FOLFIRI/Cet for eight cycles followed by Cet alone (arm B). The coprimary end points were a noninferior progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified per-protocol (mPP) population (>eight cycles) and a lower incidence of grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) for arm B compared with arm A. RESULTS Overall, 606 patients were randomly assigned, with 300 assigned to arm A and 306 to arm B. The median follow-up was 22.3 months. In the mPP population, 291 events occurred with a PFS of 10 versus 12.2 months for arms B and A, respectively (P of noninferiority = .43). In the intention-to-treatment (ITT, ≥one cycle) population, 503 events occurred with a PFS of 9 versus 10.7 months (P = .39). The overall survival was 35.7 versus 30.7 months (P = .119) and 31.0 versus 25.2 months (P = .32) in the mPP and ITT population, respectively. Arm B had lower G3-4 AEs during the maintenance period than arm A (20.2% v 35.1%). CONCLUSION The ERMES study did not demonstrate noninferiority of maintenance with Cet alone. Despite a more favorable safety profile, maintenance with single-agent Cet after induction with FOLFIRI/Cet cannot be recommended for all patients but could represent an option in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Azienda USL—IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Translational Research Departement, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Evaristo Maiello
- Oncology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Maria A. Calegari
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Roberto Bordonaro
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria G. Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Pini
- Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- Dipartimento Oncologia 1, IOV—Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Facoltà di Medicina Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Tiziana P. Latiano
- Oncology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Gerardo Rosati
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Ballestrero
- DiMI Università degli Studi di Genova e Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Mario Roselli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Tamberi
- UO Medical Oncology, Area Vasta Romagna Ausl di Ravenna, Presidio Ospedaliero di Faenza, Ospedale Civile degli Infermi, Faenza, Italy
| | - Carlo Barone
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Johnson D, Chee CE, Wong W, Lam RCT, Tan IBH, Ma BBY. Current advances in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer - Clinical translation and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 125:102700. [PMID: 38422896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed major breakthroughs in the development of targeted therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an achievement which stems largely from advances in translational research. Precision medicine is now widely practiced in routine oncological care, where systemic therapy is individualized based on clinical factors such as primary tumor sidedness, location and number of metastases, as well as molecular factors such as the RAS and BRAF mutation status, mismatch repair / microsatellite status and presence of other actionable genomic alterations in the tumor. The optimal selection of patients with RAS and BRAF-wild type (WT), left-sided primary tumor for treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and chemotherapy (chemo) has markedly improved survival in the first-line setting. The pivotal trials of cetuximab in combination with BRAF/ MEK inhibitor for BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, and panitumumab with KRAS G12C inhibitor in KRAS(G12C)-mutant mCRC have been practice-changing. Anti-HER2 small molecular inhibitor, antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates have significantly improved the treatment outcome of patients with HER2 amplified mCRC. Anti-angiogenesis agents are now used across all lines of treatment and novel combinations with immune-checkpoint inhibitors are under active investigation in MSS mCRC. The non-invasive monitoring of molecular resistance to targeted therapies using Next Generation Sequencing analysis of circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) and captured sequencing of tumors have improved patient selection for targeted therapies. This review will focus on how latest advances, challenges and future directions in the development of targeted therapies in mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Johnson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
| | - Wesley Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Rachel C T Lam
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Iain Bee Huat Tan
- National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke NUS, Graduate Medical School and Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Brigette B Y Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stahler A, Kind AJ, Sers C, Mamlouk S, Müller L, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Sommerhäuser G, Kasper S, Hoppe B, Kurreck A, Held S, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Negative Hyperselection of Resistance Mutations for Panitumumab Maintenance in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PanaMa Phase II Trial, AIO KRK 0212). Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1256-1263. [PMID: 38289994 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated additional mutations in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of added panitumumab to a 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid (FU/FA) maintenance as pre-specified analysis of the randomized PanaMa trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Mutations (MUT) were identified using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; Illumina Cancer Hotspot Panel v2) and IHC. RAS/BRAF V600E/PIK3CA/AKT1/ALK1/ERBB2/PTEN MUT and HER2/neu overexpressions were negatively hyperselected and correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance treatment, and objective response rates (ORR). Univariate/multivariate Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS 202 of 248 patients (81.5%) of the full analysis set (FAS) had available NGS data: hyperselection WT, 162 (80.2%); MUT, 40 (19.8%). From start of maintenance therapy, hyperselection WT tumors were associated with longer median PFS as compared with hyperselection MUT mCRC (7.5 vs. 5.4 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.07; P = 0.11), OS (28.7 vs. 22.2 months; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77; P = 0.001), and higher ORR (35.8% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.26). The addition of panitumumab to maintenance was associated with significant benefit in hyperselection WT tumors for PFS (9.2 vs. 6.0 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P = 0.02) and numerically also for OS (36.9 vs. 24.9 months; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36; P = 0.50), but not in hyperselection MUT tumors. Hyperselection status interacted with maintenance treatment arms in terms of PFS (P = 0.06) and OS (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Extended molecular profiling beyond RAS may have the potential to improve the patient selection for anti-EGFR containing maintenance regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas J Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Soulafa Mamlouk
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site München, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sommerhäuser G, Karthaus M, Kurreck A, Ballhausen A, Meyer-Knees JW, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, Koenig AO, Weikersthal LFV, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Stahler A, Heinemann V, Held S, Alig AHS, Kasper-Virchow S, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Prognostic and predictive impact of metastatic organ involvement on maintenance therapy in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Subgroup analysis of patients treated within the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212). Int J Cancer 2024; 154:863-872. [PMID: 37840339 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Despite molecular selection, patients (pts) with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population including diversity in metastatic spread. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid ± panitumumab. The study population was stratified according to (1) number of involved metastatic sites (single vs multiple organ metastasis), liver-limited disease vs (2) liver metastasis plus one additional site, and (3) vs liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints. Single organ metastasis was observed in 133 pts (53.6%) with 102 pts (41.1%) presenting with liver-limited disease, while multiple organ metastases were reported in 114 pts (46.0). Multiple compared to single organ metastases were associated with less favorable PFS (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P = .004) and OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.98-1.93; P = .068) of maintenance therapy. While metastatic spread involving one additional extrahepatic site was not associated with clearly impaired survival compared to liver-limited disease, pts with liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites demonstrated less favorable PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83; P < .001), and OS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.51-3.76; P < .001) of maintenance therapy. Pmab-containing maintenance therapy appeared active in both pts with multiple (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) as well as to a lesser numerical extent in pts with single organ metastasis (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .332; Interaction P = .183). These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexej Ballhausen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna W Meyer-Knees
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Stade, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Alexander O Koenig
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology Goettingen, University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siegfried Haas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumuenster, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU Klinikum, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Annabel H S Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper-Virchow
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Petrelli F, Cherri S, Ghidini M, Tomasello G, Ghidini A, Zaniboni A. Efficacy of different maintenance strategies for RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:242-247. [PMID: 37369616 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC), induction combination chemotherapy doublets (CT) with an anti-EGFR agent are considered the primary treatment. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different maintenance treatments for advanced RAS wild-type CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane, from database inception until December 2021 were used. Randomized clinical trials enrolling adults with advanced RAS wild-type CRC and providing overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) data PRISMA guidelines for NMA were followed. Between-group comparisons were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). Agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. RESULTS A total of 7 randomized phase 2 trials were included (for a total of 1286 patients). Compared to depotentiation treatments, continuous CT + anti-EGFR was not significantly superior to other maintenance regimens for OS and was ranked as the best option for NMA (SUCRA p-score=0.69). Conversely, in the PFS analysis, single-agent fluoropyrimidines + anti-EGFR was ranked as the best treatment (SUCRA p-score=0.60). CONCLUSIONS Maintaining chemotherapy doublet + anti-EGFR until progression appears to be the best first-line strategy in terms of OS for advanced unresectable RAS wild-type mCRC treatment. However, fluoropyrimidines single-agent + cetuximab or panitumumab represent a reasonable choice regarding PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Cherri
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kong F, Zhao L, Wang N, Zhang D, Wang Z, Mei Q, Yu Y, Jia Y. The FJQR Has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Treatment for HER-2 Negative Gastric Cancer. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2024; 19:165-175. [PMID: 38214356 DOI: 10.2174/1574892818666230522161742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maintenance therapy aimed to strengthen the first-line chemotherapy and improve quality of life is needed for gastric cancer (GC). Currently, many clinical studies have confirmed the important role of fluoropyrimidine in the maintenance stage. Our team has created patented prescriptions "Fuzheng jiedu Quyu Method" recipe (FJQR), which was considered as an adjuvant therapeutic scheme (reduce toxicity and increase the efficacy of chemotherapy). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FJQR combined with fluoropyrimidine as a maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC patients. METHODS We performed the analysis of 129 patients with HER-2 negative GC who entered the maintenance stage in our hospital and Tianjin Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Out of the 129 eligible patients, 64 were categorized into the maintenance treatment group with FJQR+fluoropyrimidine, and 65 patients were assigned to the control group if they received fluoropyrimidine alone. Capecitabine was orally 1000mg/m2, Qd, half an hour after meals, and FGQR was 15g Bid after capecitabine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall remission rate (ORR), quality of Life (QOL), TCM syndrome and safety. RESULTS The mPFS in the treatment group was significantly prolonged compared with the control group (6.3 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.03), while the mOS was not substantially improved (11.4 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.38). Gastrointestinal symptoms and pain became better in the treatment group. The number of distant metastatic organs, first-line chemotherapy cycles, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk predictors for PFS. Blood stasis syndrome may be the protective factor. In terms of safety, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in the treatment group were relatively lighter, and the incidence of grade III-IV AEs could be significantly reduced. CONCLUSION FJQR and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effects as maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC, with good efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanming Kong
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Lu Zhao
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Na Wang
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Dou Zhang
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Ziwei Wang
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingyun Mei
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongchao Yu
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| | - Yingjie Jia
- Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 300193, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thermos G, Kalogirou EM, Tosios KI. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapy-associated ulcerations. Oral Oncol 2024; 148:106660. [PMID: 38086198 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
The well-studied role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has enabled the development of drugs that target this molecule, including panitumumab for the former and osimertinib for the latter. Oral adverse events due to those agents are rarely described in the literature and their exact characterization is hampered by inadequate reporting and/or incorrect terminology used. We report two cases of panitumumab- and osimertinib-associated oral ulcerations with emphasis on their possible pathogenesis and optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleni-Marina Kalogirou
- Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Metropolitan College, 15125 Athens, Greece.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okunaka M, Kotani D, Mishima S, Nakamura M, Kawazoe A, Bando H, Yoshino T, Shitara K. Potential Efficacy of Shiunko for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Monoclonal Antibody-Induced Skin Fissure: A Single Institutional Case Series. Integr Cancer Ther 2024; 23:15347354231225962. [PMID: 38240253 PMCID: PMC10799590 DOI: 10.1177/15347354231225962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) is the key drug for RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissures often affect a patient's quality of life. Shiunko, a traditional Japanese topical herbal medicine, is used for burns and dermatitis and may potentially have wound-healing effects. Herein, we report cases of patients with mCRC who were treated with Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with mCRC who received an anti-EGFR mAb-containing regimen and were treated with Shiunko twice a day for skin fissures at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March 2022 and December 2022. Skin fissures were assessed at baseline and at every visit until 28 days after Shiunko initiation according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS Among the 11 patients, 5 patients were female; the median age was 61 (range, 43-79) years. The median treatment duration with anti-EGFR mAb before Shiunko initiation was 13.1 (range, 6-52) weeks. Skin moisturizer and topical steroids were applied for skin fissures in 11 and 5 patients, respectively. All patients had grade 2 skin fissures at baseline of Shiunko initiation. Two weeks after Shiunko initiation, complete recovery was noted in 4 patients and improvement to grade 1 was noted in 6 patients. There were no Shiunko-related adverse events. Ten patients continued anti-EGFR mAb treatment until disease progression, while 1 patient discontinued anti-EGFR mAb treatment due to severe eruptions. CONCLUSION Shiunko could be a treatment option for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. Further studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety of Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Saori Mishima
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Maho Nakamura
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | - Hideaki Bando
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Shitara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mastrantoni L, Beccia V, Caira G, Trovato G, Calegari MA, Basso M, Salvatore L, Pozzo C, Tortora G, Bria E, Orlandi A. Maintenance strategies after anti-EGFR-based induction in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 191:104106. [PMID: 37659764 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In RAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) maintenance therapy after induction with fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based cytotoxic therapy (CT) plus anti-EGFR agents is controversial. METHODS Phase II-III randomized trials were included. Maintenance strategies considered were: observation, anti-EGFR or FP monotherapy, FP + anti-EGFR, doublet CT + anti-EGFR. RESULTS Maintenance with FP + anti-EGFR (HR 0.56, 95% CrI 0.36-0.89) showed the greatest PFS benefit compared to observation, ranking first on SUCRA analysis (96.4%). Considering OS, doublet CT+ anti-EGFR, FP + anti-EGFR and anti-EGFR monotherapy yielded similar results. For PFS, FP + anti-EGFR confirmed to be valuable in BRAF wt patients and left sided tumors. In left sided tumors, the OS benefit of adding CT was limited. FP plus anti-EGFR showed a favourable safety profile compared to doublet CT + anti-EGFR. CONCLUSIONS FP + anti-EGFR can be considered a valuable maintenance option in RAS wt mCRC. EGFR monotherapy can be considered, especially in left-sided tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Mastrantoni
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Viria Beccia
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giulia Caira
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Trovato
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Michele Basso
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Emilio Bria
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS Rome, Italy.
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cherri S, Oneda E, Zanotti L, Zaniboni A. Optimizing the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1246716. [PMID: 37909027 PMCID: PMC10614157 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1246716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer represents an important oncological challenge both for its incidence, which makes it an important health problem, and for its biological complexity, which has made clinical results very difficult in terms of outcome for this category of patients. To date these diseases should not be treated as a single entity but it is necessary to distinguish colorectal cancers based on characteristics that nowadays are essential to have greater therapeutic benefits. These include the sideness of the disease, the state of microsatellites, the presence of prognostic and predictive mutations of response to treatments currently available in clinical practice, which are associated with new therapeutic targets. The greatest challenge in the future will be to circumvent the resistance mechanisms that make this disease very difficult to treat with good long-term results by studying effective combination treatments with a good toxicity profile. Once such combinations or targeted treatments are consolidated, it will be desirable to shift the best therapies to the first line treatment to make them immediately accessible to the patient. It will also be essential to refine the selection of patients who can benefit from these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cherri
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Morano F, Pietrantonio F. Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-Another Piece to the Puzzle. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2333488. [PMID: 37721757 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Morano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boige V, Blons H, François E, Ben Abdelghani M, Phelip JM, Le Brun-Ly V, Mineur L, Galais MP, Villing AL, Hautefeuille V, Miglianico L, De La Fouchardière C, Genet D, Levasseur N, Levaché CB, Penel N, Mitry E, Jacquot S, Aparicio T, Brument E, Gourgou S, Castan F, Bouché O. Maintenance Therapy With Cetuximab After FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2333533. [PMID: 37721754 PMCID: PMC10507485 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The optimal maintenance strategy after induction chemotherapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains to be debated. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab after FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) plus cetuximab induction therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants The TIME (Treatment After Irinotecan-Based Frontline Therapy: Maintenance With Erbitux]) (PRODIGE 28 [Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive]-UCGI 27 [UniCancer GastroIntestinal Group]) phase 2 noncomparative, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 15, 2014, to November 23, 2018, among 139 patients with unresectable RAS wild-type mCRC. The cutoff date for analysis was July 21, 2022. Interventions After first-line induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, patients without disease progression were randomized (1:1) to biweekly maintenance with cetuximab or observation. On disease progression, the same induction regimen was recommended for 16 weeks followed by further maintenance with cetuximab or observation until disease progression under the full induction regimen. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free rate from randomization. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. An exploratory biomolecular analysis, using next-generation sequencing, investigated the putative prognostic value of the tumor mutation profile. Results Of 214 patients enrolled (141 men [65.9%]; median age, 67 years [range, 23-85 years]), 139 were randomized to receive cetuximab (n = 67; 45 men [67.2%]; median age, 64 years [range, 34-85 years]) or to be observed (n = 72; 50 men [69.4%]; median age, 68 years [23-85 years]). The 6-month progression-free rate was 38.8% ([26 of 67] 95% CI, 27.1%-51.5%) in the cetuximab group and 5.6% ([4 of 72] 95% CI, 1.5%-13.6%) in the observation group. At a median follow-up of 40.5 months (95% CI, 33.6-47.5 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.7 months) in the observation group. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.7-30.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 19.7 months (95% CI, 13.3-24.4 months) in the observation group. In an exploratory multivariate analysis, any tumor-activating mutation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway genes was associated with shorter PFS from randomization regardless of treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.01-2.62]; P = .04). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effect in the cetuximab group during maintenance therapy was rash (8 of 67 [11.9%]). Conclusion and Relevance The randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point but suggests clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefits associated with cetuximab maintenance therapy. However, maintenance cetuximab or treatment breaks after first-line combination FOLFIRI-cetuximab therapy seems inappropriate for patients with MAPK-mutated independently of the side of primary tumor. A more complete assessment of MAPK pathway mutations warrants further investigation to the refine treatment strategy for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02404935.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Boige
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM UMR-S1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers-Sorbonne Université- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Blons
- INSERM UMR-S1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers-Sorbonne Université- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Oncology and Pharmacogenetics, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Eric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Nice, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Departement of Hepato-gastroenterology, Saint Etienne Hospital, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Valerie Le Brun-Ly
- Departement of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Dupuytren Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Laurent Mineur
- Departement of Clinical Research, Sainte Catherine Institute, Avignon, France
| | | | | | | | - Laurent Miglianico
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saint Grégoire Hospital, Saint-Grégoire, France
| | | | - Dominique Genet
- Departement of Oncology and Radiotherapy, François Chénieux Clinic, Limoges, France
| | - Nadia Levasseur
- Department of Oncology, Jean Rougier Hospital, Cahors, France
| | - Charles-Briac Levaché
- Departement of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Francheville Polyclinic, Périgueux, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Pole of Oncology, Oscar Lambret Centre, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Stéphane Jacquot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clementville Clinic, Montpellier, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastro-enterology, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometry Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometry Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Université Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tang C, Ke M, Yu X, Sun S, Luo X, Liu X, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Cui X, Gu C, Yang Y. GART Functions as a Novel Methyltransferase in the RUVBL1/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway to Promote Tumor Stemness in Colorectal Cancer. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 10:e2301264. [PMID: 37439412 PMCID: PMC10477903 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202301264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Tumor stemness is associated with the recurrence and incurability of colorectal cancer (CRC), which lacks effective therapeutic targets and drugs. Glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GART) fulfills an important role in numerous types of malignancies. The present study aims to identify the underlying mechanism through which GART may promote CRC stemness, as to developing novel therapeutic methods. An elevated level of GART is associated with poor outcomes in CRC patients and promotes the proliferation and migration of CRC cells. CD133+ cells with increased GART expression possess higher tumorigenic and proliferative capabilities both in vitro and in vivo. GART is identified to have a novel methyltransferase function, whose enzymatic activity center is located at the E948 site. GART also enhances the stability of RuvB-like AAA ATPase 1 (RUVBL1) through methylating its K7 site, which consequently aberrantly activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to induce tumor stemness. Pemetrexed (PEM), a compound targeting GART, combined with other chemotherapy drugs greatly suppresses tumor growth both in a PDX model and in CRC patients. The present study demonstrates a novel methyltransferase function of GART and the role of the GART/RUVBL1/β-catenin signaling axis in promoting CRC stemness. PEM may be a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Tang
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210008China
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Mengying Ke
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Xichao Yu
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Shanliang Sun
- School of PharmacyNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Xian Luo
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Xin Liu
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Yanyan Zhou
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Ze Wang
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Xing Cui
- Department of Hematology and OncologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese MedicineJinan250001China
| | - Chunyan Gu
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210008China
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| | - Ye Yang
- School of Medicine & Holistic Integrative MedicineNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210046China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Raimondi A, Nichetti F, Stahler A, Wasan HS, Aranda E, Randon G, Kurreck A, Meade AM, Díaz-Rubio E, Niger M, Stintzing S, Palermo F, Trarbach T, Prisciandaro M, Sommerhäuser G, Fisher D, Morano F, Pietrantonio F, Modest DP. Optimal maintenance strategy following FOLFOX plus anti-EGFR induction therapy in patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer: An individual patient data pooled analysis of randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112945. [PMID: 37441940 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-EGFR antibodies plus doublet chemotherapy is the standard of care in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). No phase-3 level of evidence is available to guide treatment de-escalation after anti-EGFR-based first-line. Several randomised clinical trials investigated de-intensification strategies with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and/or anti-EGFR. METHODS We performed an individual patient data pooled analysis of Valentino, Panama, MACRO-2, COIN-B trials including RAS wild-type mCRC patients who received first-line therapy with FOLFOX plus panitumumab or cetuximab followed by pre-specified maintenance strategy. Only patients who started maintenance according to the assigned arm were included. Patients were categorised by type of maintenance (i.e. 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR or 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of maintenance; toxicity was evaluated for the maintenance treatment period. RESULTS A total of 518 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Overall, 123, 185 and 210 patients received maintenance with 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR, 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR, respectively. Median PFS was 5.6, 6.0 and 9.0 (P = 0.009) and OS was 25.7, 24.0 and 28.0 months (P = 0.134) in 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR and 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR arms, respectively. Monotherapy maintenance (either 5-FU/LV or anti-EGFR) was inferior to combination in terms of PFS (hazard ratios [HR] 1.26, P = 0.016) and non-significantly trending also in OS (HR 1.20, P = 0.111). An increase of overall any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs and selected AEs was reported in combination compared to either 5-FU/LV or anti-EGFR arms. CONCLUSIONS This pooled analysis including four randomised phase II supports the use of 5-FU/LV plus anti-EGFR as the preferred maintenance regimen. Data provide rational for a more individualised maintenance treatment approach based on tumour and patients features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Raimondi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Nichetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Enrique Aranda
- IMIBIC, Universidad de Córdoba, CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Angela M Meade
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Redhill, England, London, UK
| | - Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Niger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Federica Palermo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Fisher
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Redhill, England, London, UK
| | - Federica Morano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huang S, Ye J, Gao X, Huang X, Huang J, Lu L, Lu C, Li Y, Luo M, Xie M, Lin Y, Liang R. Progress of research on molecular targeted therapies for colorectal cancer. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1160949. [PMID: 37614311 PMCID: PMC10443711 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1160949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies, accounting for approximately 10% of global cancer incidence and mortality. Approximately 20% of patients with CRC present metastatic disease (mCRC) at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with localized disease eventually metastasize. mCRC encompasses a complex cascade of reactions involving multiple factors and processes, leading to a diverse array of molecular mechanisms. Improved comprehension of the pathways underlying cancer cell development and proliferation, coupled with the accessibility of relevant targeted agents, has propelled advancements in CRC treatment, ultimately leading to enhanced survival rates. Mutations in various pathways and location of the primary tumor in CRC influences the efficacy of targeted agents. This review summarizes available targeted agents for different CRC pathways, with a focus on recent advances in anti-angiogenic and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, BRAF mutations, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-associated targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilin Huang
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Jiazhou Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Xing Gao
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Xi Huang
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Julu Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Lu Lu
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Cheng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Yongqiang Li
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Min Luo
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Mingzhi Xie
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Yan Lin
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Rong Liang
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boccaccino A, Rossini D, Raimondi A, Carullo M, Lonardi S, Morano F, Santini D, Tomasello G, Niger M, Zaniboni A, Daniel F, Bustreo S, Procaccio L, Clavarezza M, Cupini S, Libertini M, Palermo F, Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C. Adverse events during first-line treatments for mCRC: The Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of three randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112910. [PMID: 37301718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical trials, the assessment of safety is traditionally focused on the overall rate of high-grade and serious adverse events (AEs). A new approach to AEs evaluation, taking into account chronic low-grade AEs, single patient's perspective, and time-related information, such as ToxT analysis, should be considered especially for less intense but potentially long-lasting treatments, such as maintenance strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We applied ToxT (Toxicity over Time) evaluation to a large cohort of mCRC patients enroled in randomised TRIBE, TRIBE2, and VALENTINO studies, in order to longitudinally describe AEs throughout the whole treatment duration and to compare AEs evolution over cycles between induction and maintenance strategies, providing numerical and graphical results overall and per single patient. After 4-6 months of combination therapy, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) + bevacizumab or panitumumab was recommended in all studies except for the 50% of patients in the VALENTINO trial who received panitumumab alone. RESULTS Out of 1400 patients included, 42% received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan)/bevacizumab, 18% FOLFIRI/bevacizumab, 24% FOLFOX/bevacizumab, 16% FOLFOX/panitumumab. Mean grade of general and haematological AEs was higher in the first cycles, then progressively decreasing after the end of induction (p < 0.001), and always remaining at the highest levels with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (p < 0.001). Neurotoxicity became more frequent over the cycles with late high-grade episodes (p < 0.001), while the incidence but not the grade of hand-and-foot syndrome gradually increased (p = 0.91). Anti-VEGF-related AEs were more severe in the first cycles, then setting over at low levels (p = 0.03), while anti-EGFR-related AEs still affected patients during maintenance. CONCLUSIONS Most of chemotherapy-related AEs (except for HFS and neuropathy) reach the highest level in the first cycles, then decrease, probably due to their active clinical management. Transition to maintenance allows relief from most AEs, especially with bevacizumab-based regimens, while anti-EGFR-related AEs may persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Boccaccino
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy and Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Rossini
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy and Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Raimondi
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Carullo
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy and Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Medical Oncology 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Oncologia Medica Università Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy and UOC Oncologia Universitaria, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino, Italy
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 28, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Daniel
- Medical Oncology 3, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Sara Bustreo
- S.C. Oncologia 1 U, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Italy
| | - Letizia Procaccio
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy and Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Samanta Cupini
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Toscana Nord Ovest, Livorno, Italy
| | | | - Federica Palermo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Oncology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy and Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kang S, Lee MW, Song IC, Lee HJ, Yun HJ, Jo DY, Kim JS, Kwon JH, Kim JY, Lee KH, Ryu H. Maintenance therapy with Fluoropyrimidine and cetuximab or bevacizumab after first line FOLFOX-chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer according to RAS or BRAF V600E mutation status. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:7819-7829. [PMID: 37031435 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04720-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fluoropyrimidine (FP) with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy critically affects the quality of life of patients. Maintenance strategies with FP plus bevacizumab have been well-established; nonetheless, the real-world outcomes of maintenance therapy with FP and cetuximab are unclear. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent maintenance therapy with cetuximab. METHODS We retrospectively identified and analyzed patients with mCRC who were treated between 2012 and 2021 with first-line oxaliplatin-based induction chemotherapy (IC) plus biologic agents (either cetuximab or bevacizumab), and underwent maintenance therapy (IC regimen without oxaliplatin) after IC. RESULTS In total, 19 patients who were treated with mFOLFOX6 (FP/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) with cetuximab, and 26 patients who were treated with mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab were included. In the cetuximab group, all patients were KRAS-, NRAS-, and BRAF-wild type, whereas most patients in the bevacizumab group harbored KRAS or BRAFV600E or NRAS mutants. During the maintenance treatment, seven patients (four [21%] in the cetuximab group and three [11%] in the bevacizumab group) achieved partial response after achieving nadir during induction chemotherapy. The disease control rates of maintenance therapy were 79% and 74% in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival of maintenance therapy and overall survival was 5.98 months and 32.4 months in the cetuximab group, and 4.83 months and 25.6 months in the bevacizumab group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Maintenance therapy with FP plus biologic agents (either bevacizumab or cetuximab) is a feasible strategy for appropriate mCRC patients according to their RAS/BRAF status. Further large-scale randomized studies are needed to validate the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-based maintenance therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sora Kang
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung-Won Lee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik-Chan Song
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Jin Lee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwan-Jung Yun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Deog-Yeon Jo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Sun Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hye Kwon
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Yeon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Ha Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyewon Ryu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heinrich K, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Mueller L, König AO, von Weikersthal LF, Caca K, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haas S, Alig AHS, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Sommerhäuser G, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212). ESMO Open 2023; 8:101568. [PMID: 37441876 PMCID: PMC10507735 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are usually conducted irrespective of sex. Sex-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, however, are gaining interest. METHODS PanaMa investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. In this post hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for sex. Evaluated efficacy endpoints during maintenance treatment were progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint of the trial), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy. RESULTS In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male and female patients showed numerically better objective response rates with Pmab, without reaching statistical significance. Male patients derived a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006] that was not observed in female patients (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35; P = 0.491). The better PFS for male patients treated with Pmab did not translate into improved OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.55-1.30; P = 0.452). Female patients showed numerically improved OS when treated with Pmab. There was no difference in the total of grade ≥3 adverse events during maintenance regarding sex (P = 0.791). Female patients, however, had a higher rate of any grade nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS In the PanaMa trial, the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC with FU/FA improved the outcome in terms of the primary endpoint (PFS) particularly in male patients. Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events. Our results support the development of sex-specific protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich. https://twitter.com/heinrich_kat
| | - M Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich
| | | | - U Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach
| | | | - A O König
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medicine Göttingen, Goettingen
| | | | - K Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg
| | | | - E Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg; University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg
| | - S Haas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumünster
| | - A H S Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - A Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - A Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen
| | - G Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg
| | - T Trarbach
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn; Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ballhausen A, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Müller L, König AO, von Weikersthal LF, Sommerhäuser G, Alig AHS, Goekkurt E, Meyer-Knees JW, Kurreck A, Stahler A, Held S, Kasper S, Heinrich K, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Health-related quality of life in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without panitumumab as maintenance therapy: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PanaMa (AIO KRK 0212) trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112955. [PMID: 37454537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PanaMa trial demonstrated significant benefit in progression-free survival with the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) as maintenance therapy following first-line induction therapy with FOLFOX/Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) analyses from the PanaMa trial. METHODS HRQOL outcomes were evaluated using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at every cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. HRQOL outcomes were mean and individual changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 from baselines (before induction therapy and before maintenance therapy) to each cycle of treatment. Comparative analyses were performed by randomisation status and treatment arm for induction- and maintenance-therapy, respectively. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS At least one HRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 349/377 (93%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 237/248 (96%) patients who were randomised and received maintenance therapy. During induction therapy, most HRQOL dimensions remained stable or showed improvement, while appetite loss and diarrhoea significantly deteriorated. During maintenance therapy, HRQOL dimensions remained stable, while those that deteriorated during induction therapy showed significant improvement, without significant differences between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION Maintenance therapy improves HRQOL dimensions that initially deteriorated during induction therapy while stabilising HRQOL in other dimensions. The addition of Pmab to FU/FA as maintenance therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs progression-free survival without negative impact on HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexej Ballhausen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Klinikum Neuperlach/Klinikum Harlaching, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Munich, BV, Germany
| | - Stefan Fruehauf
- Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Stade, NI, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Mönchengladbach, NW, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Otto König
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, NI, Germany
| | | | - Greta Sommerhäuser
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, HH, Germany
| | - Johanna Wanda Meyer-Knees
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Kasper
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, NW, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, BY, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, BY, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, NW, Germany; Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, NI, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Berlin, BE, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yoshino T, Cervantes A, Bando H, Martinelli E, Oki E, Xu RH, Mulansari NA, Govind Babu K, Lee MA, Tan CK, Cornelio G, Chong DQ, Chen LT, Tanasanvimon S, Prasongsook N, Yeh KH, Chua C, Sacdalan MD, Sow Jenson WJ, Kim ST, Chacko RT, Syaiful RA, Zhang SZ, Curigliano G, Mishima S, Nakamura Y, Ebi H, Sunakawa Y, Takahashi M, Baba E, Peters S, Ishioka C, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101558. [PMID: 37236086 PMCID: PMC10220270 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), published in late 2022, were adapted in December 2022, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with mCRC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with mCRC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian countries. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with mCRC across the different countries of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation, coupled with a disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Bando
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - E Martinelli
- Oncology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - E Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - R-H Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
| | - N A Mulansari
- Hematology-Medical Oncology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital/Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - K Govind Babu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HCG Hospital and St. John's Medical College, Bengaluru, India
| | - M A Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - C K Tan
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Thomson Hospital Kota Damansara, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - G Cornelio
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of the Philipppines-Philippine General Hospital, St. Lukes Cancer Institute-Global City, The Philippines
| | - D Q Chong
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - L-T Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung; National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - S Tanasanvimon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
| | - N Prasongsook
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - K-H Yeh
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - C Chua
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - M D Sacdalan
- Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines-College of Medicine and University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, The Philippines
| | - W J Sow Jenson
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Aurelius Hospital, Nilai, Malaysia
| | - S T Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Centre, Seoul, South Korea
| | - R T Chacko
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R A Syaiful
- Department of Surgery, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - S Z Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Mishima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Y Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - H Ebi
- Division of Molecular Therapeutics, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya
| | - Y Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki
| | - M Takahashi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - E Baba
- Department of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Ishioka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stahler A, Hoppe B, Na IK, Keilholz L, Müller L, Karthaus M, Fruehauf S, Graeven U, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Goekkurt E, Kasper S, Kind AJ, Kurreck A, Alig AHS, Held S, Reinacher-Schick A, Heinemann V, Horst D, Jarosch A, Stintzing S, Trarbach T, Modest DP. Consensus Molecular Subtypes as Biomarkers of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Maintenance Therapy With or Without Panitumumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PanaMa, AIO KRK 0212). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2975-2987. [PMID: 37018649 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) were evaluated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) with or without panitumumab (Pmab) after Pmab + mFOLFOX6 induction within the randomized phase II PanaMa trial. METHODS CMSs were determined in the safety set (ie, patients that received induction) and full analysis set (FAS; ie, randomly assigned patients who received maintenance) and correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since the start of induction or maintenance treatment and objective response rates (ORRs). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI were calculated by univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 377 patients of the safety set, 296 (78.5%) had available CMS data: CMS1/2/3/4: 29 (9.8%)/122 (41.2%)/33 (11.2%)/112 (37.8%) and unclassifiable: 17 (5.7%). The CMSs were prognostic biomarkers in terms of PFS (P < .0001), OS (P < .0001), and ORR (P = .02) since the start of induction treatment. In FAS patients (n = 196), with CMS2/4 tumors, the addition of Pmab to FU/FA maintenance therapy was associated with longer PFS (CMS2: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.95], P = .03; CMS4: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.38 to 1.03], P = .07) and OS (CMS2: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.52], P = .66; CMS4: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.96], P = .04). The CMS interacted significantly with treatment in terms of PFS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .02; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P = .03) and OS (CMS2 v CMS1/3: P = .03; CMS4 v CMS1/3: P < .001). CONCLUSION The CMS had a prognostic impact on PFS, OS, and ORR in RAS wild-type mCRC. In PanaMa, Pmab + FU/FA maintenance was associated with beneficial outcomes in CMS2/4, whereas no benefit was observed in CMS1/3 tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beeke Hoppe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Il-Kang Na
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, ECRC Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Keilholz
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kasper
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Jay Kind
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Horst
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
- Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Dominik Paul Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK, German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052072. [PMID: 36902858 PMCID: PMC10004676 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Up to 50% of patients with CRC develop metastatic CRC (mCRC). Surgical and systemic therapy advances can now offer significant survival advantages. Understanding the evolving treatment options is essential for decreasing mCRC mortality. We aim to summarize current evidence and guidelines regarding the management of mCRC to provide utility when making a treatment plan for the heterogenous spectrum of mCRC. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and current guidelines written by major cancer and surgical societies were reviewed. The references of the included studies were screened to identify additional studies that were incorporated as appropriate. (3) Results: The standard of care for mCRC primarily consists of surgical resection and systemic therapy. Complete resection of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases is associated with better disease control and survival. Systemic therapy now includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy options that can be tailored by molecular profiling. Differences between colon and rectal metastasis management exist between major guidelines. (4) Conclusions: With the advances in surgical and systemic therapy, as well as a better understanding of tumor biology and the importance of molecular profiling, more patients can anticipate prolonged survival. We provide a summary of available evidence for the management of mCRC, highlighting the similarities and presenting the difference in available literature. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with mCRC is crucial to selecting the appropriate pathway.
Collapse
|
28
|
Cavestro GM, Mannucci A, Balaguer F, Hampel H, Kupfer SS, Repici A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Seppälä TT, Valentini V, Boland CR, Brand RE, Buffart TE, Burke CA, Caccialanza R, Cannizzaro R, Cascinu S, Cercek A, Crosbie EJ, Danese S, Dekker E, Daca-Alvarez M, Deni F, Dominguez-Valentin M, Eng C, Goel A, Guillem JG, Houwen BBSL, Kahi C, Kalady MF, Kastrinos F, Kühn F, Laghi L, Latchford A, Liska D, Lynch P, Malesci A, Mauri G, Meldolesi E, Møller P, Monahan KJ, Möslein G, Murphy CC, Nass K, Ng K, Oliani C, Papaleo E, Patel SG, Puzzono M, Remo A, Ricciardiello L, Ripamonti CI, Siena S, Singh SK, Stadler ZK, Stanich PP, Syngal S, Turi S, Urso ED, Valle L, Vanni VS, Vilar E, Vitellaro M, You YQN, Yurgelun MB, Zuppardo RA, Stoffel EM. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:581-603.e33. [PMID: 36549470 PMCID: PMC11207185 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC. METHODS After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%. RESULTS The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients. CONCLUSIONS The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Martina Cavestro
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Mannucci
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Heather Hampel
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Sonia S Kupfer
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Department of Hematology Oncology, and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Toni T Seppälä
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Technology, University of Tampere and TAYS Cancer Centre, Arvo Ylpön katu, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio, Tampere, Finland; Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program and Department of Surgery, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Clement Richard Boland
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology. Amsterdam UMC, Location de Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carol A Burke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Riccardo Caccialanza
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- SOC Gastroenterologia Oncologica e Sperimentale Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS 33081, Aviano, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Oncology Department, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Daca-Alvarez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Deni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ajay Goel
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics & Experimental Therapeutics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Josè G Guillem
- Department of Surgery and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Britt B S L Houwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charles Kahi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Matthew F Kalady
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Florian Kühn
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luigi Laghi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, and Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Andrew Latchford
- Lynch Syndrome Clinic, Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, United Kingdom
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Edward J. DeBartolo Jr Family Center for Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Patrick Lynch
- Department of Gastroenterology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alberto Malesci
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mauri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Department of Hematology Oncology, and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; IFOM ETS - The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Meldolesi
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- Lynch Syndrome Clinic, Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriela Möslein
- Surgical Center for Hereditary Tumors, Ev. BETHESDA Khs. Duisburg, Academic Hospital University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Karlijn Nass
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina Oliani
- Medical Oncology, AULSS 5 Polesana, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Enrico Papaleo
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Swati G Patel
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center and Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marta Puzzono
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Remo
- Pathology Unit, Mater Salutis Hospital, ULSS9, Legnago, Verona, Italy
| | - Luigi Ricciardiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carla Ida Ripamonti
- Department of Onco-Haematology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siena
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, and Department of Hematology Oncology, and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Satish K Singh
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter P Stanich
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stefano Turi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Damiano Urso
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Valle
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Center (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Valeria Stella Vanni
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marco Vitellaro
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumours, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Yi-Qian Nancy You
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raffaella Alessia Zuppardo
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
De Stefano A, Zanaletti N, Cassata A, Silvestro L, Nappi A, Casaretti R, Romano C, Foschini F, Cardone C, Borrelli M, Petrillo A, Budillon A, Delrio P, Avallone A. Heterogeneous disease and intermittent treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1084681. [PMID: 36814823 PMCID: PMC9939440 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1084681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic colorectal cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide. RAS and BRAF mutational analyses are strongly recommended before beginning chemotherapy in the metastatic setting for their predictive role for the efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. In most of cases, mutational status coincides between primary tumor and metastases. In RAS and BRAF wild-type patients treated with anti-EGFRs, after an induction treatment period, recent evidence supports the role of a maintenance treatment with fluoropyrimidines and anti-EGFRs. However, skin toxicity is the most described and limiting side-effect of maintenance. Moreover, it is described that the continuous administration of these monoclonal antibodies leads to an acquired resistance to anti-EGFRs, with subsequent treatment failure. Intermittent strategy with chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR may help maintain treatment efficacy, delaying resistance. Case presentation In this case report, we describe the case of a RAS-BRAF wild-type elderly patient undergoing first-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX + panitumumab, reporting response of disease on all metastatic sites except for a node. This node, surgically removed, revealed host BRAF V600 mutant clones. After surgery, patient continued chemotherapy with a stop-and-go strategy continuing to benefit from the same drugs after 4 years since diagnosis, and continuing to achieve response when on treatment, avoiding unacceptable anti-EGFR toxicity. This patient, still alive after 6 years since the diagnosis, represents the case of a good synergy between molecular profiling of disease, surgery, and intermittent treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso De Stefano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy,*Correspondence: Alfonso De Stefano,
| | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonino Cassata
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Silvestro
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Anna Nappi
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Rossana Casaretti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesca Foschini
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Claudia Cardone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Marco Borrelli
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alfredo Budillon
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wong AHN, Ma B, Lui RN. New developments in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359221148540. [PMID: 36687386 PMCID: PMC9846305 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221148540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer worldwide and the prognosis of metastatic CRC (mCRC) remains poor. Recent advancements in translational research have led to the identification of several new therapeutic targets and improved the treatment outcome of patients with tumours harbouring BRAF V600E mutation, (HER2) ErBB2 alterations, NTRK gene fusions and KRAS(G12C) mutation. Improved understanding towards the mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and the evolving role of therapeutic monitoring with circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has enabled the longitudinal tracking of clonal evolution during treatment and the individualization of subsequent treatments. To broaden the community-based implementation of precision oncology in directing targeted therapies for patients with gastrointestinal cancers including mCRC, the feasibility of 'Master Protocols' that utilizes ctDNA-based genotyping platforms is currently being evaluated. Such protocols encompass both observational and interventional clinical trials of novel targeted therapies conducted within a large clinical trial network. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in targeted therapies, and therapeutic strategies for overcoming acquired drug resistance in patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambrose H. N. Wong
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Brigette Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology,
Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong
Cancer Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rashid N. Lui
- Department of Clinical Oncology, and Division
of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics,
Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 9/F,
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR,
China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, Arnold D, Normanno N, Taïeb J, Seligmann J, De Baere T, Osterlund P, Yoshino T, Martinelli E. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:10-32. [PMID: 36307056 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 422] [Impact Index Per Article: 422.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Adam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, ER "Chronothérapie, Cancers, Transplantation", Villejuif, France
| | - S Roselló
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Asklepios Tumourzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - N Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, 'Fondazione G. Pascale'-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - J Taïeb
- Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute SIRIC CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - J Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T De Baere
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, UFR Médecine Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, Villejuif, France
| | - P Osterlund
- Tampere University Hospitals and University, Tampere, Finland; Tema Cancer/GI-oncology, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - E Martinelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Oncology Unit, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Depth of response of induction therapy and consecutive maintenance treatment in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212). Eur J Cancer 2023; 178:37-48. [PMID: 36399909 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, depth of response (DpR) has gained importance as a novel end-point in clinical trials. We investigated the overall DpR, as well as the prognostic and predictive impact of DpR to induction therapy (six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [FU/FA], oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] and panitumumab [Pmab]) on consecutive maintenance therapy (FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone) in patients treated within the PanaMa trial. METHODS Central radiological assessment was performed according to RECIST 1.1. DpR was defined as percentage change in tumour diameter within defined time intervals (induction therapy, maintenance therapy, total course of therapy). For prognostic and predictive analyses, median DpR (</≥) served as threshold. RESULTS Out of 248 patients receiving maintenance therapy, 211 were evaluable for DpR analyses (FU/FA + Pmab, n = 106; FU/FA alone, n = 105). The overall DpR in all patients was 56.5%. DpR of induction therapy (42.5%) accounted for the largest proportion (75.2%) of the overall DpR. While greater DpR to induction therapy was significantly associated with prolonged PFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93, p = 0.013) and OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.51, p < 0.001), there was no significant correlation of DpR and maintenance treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS In the PanaMa trial, the overall DpR was similar to DpR achieved by other epidermal growth factor receptor-based regimens. DpR to induction therapy accounted for three quarters of the total tumour shrinkage potentially suggesting that FOLFOX plus Pmab can be de-escalated following induction without substantially compromising efficacy. DpR to induction therapy was prognostic but not predictive for efficacy of consecutive maintenance therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT01991873.
Collapse
|
33
|
Recent and Future Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247523. [PMID: 36556139 PMCID: PMC9783354 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and 20% of patients with CRC present at diagnosis with metastases. The treatment of metastatic CRC is based on a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy plus additional agents such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan. To date, on the basis of the molecular background, targeted therapies (e.g., monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor or inhibiting angiogenesis) are administered to improve the treatment of metastatic CRC. In addition, more recently, immunological agents emerged as effective in patients with a defective mismatch repair system. The administration of targeted therapies and immunotherapy lead to a significant increase in the survival of patients; however these drugs do not always prove effective. In most cases the lack of effectiveness is due to the development of primary resistance, either a resistance-inducing factor is already present before treatment or resistance is acquired when it occurs after treatment initiation. In this review we describe the most relevant targeted therapies and immunotherapies and expand on the reasons for resistance to the different approved or under development targeted drugs. Then we showed the possible mechanisms and drugs that may lead to overcoming the primary or acquired resistance in metastatic CRC.
Collapse
|
34
|
Doleschal B, Petzer A, Rumpold H. Current concepts of anti-EGFR targeting in metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1048166. [PMID: 36465407 PMCID: PMC9714621 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1048166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-EGFR targeting is one of the key strategies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). For almost two decades oncologists have struggled to implement EGFR antibodies in the mCRC continuum of care. Both sidedness and RAS mutational status rank high among the predictive factors for the clinical efficacy of EGFR inhibitors. A prospective phase III trial has recently confirmed that anti-EGFR targeting confers an overall survival benefit only in left sided RAS-wildtype tumors when given in first line. It is a matter of discussion if more clinical benefit can be reached by considering putative primary resistance mechanisms (e.g., HER2, BRAF, PIK3CA, etc.) at this early stage of treatment. The value of this procedure in daily routine clinical utility has not yet been clearly delineated. Re-exposure to EGFR antibodies becomes increasingly crucial in the disease journey of mCRC. Yet re- induction or re-challenge strategies have been problematic as they relied on mathematical models that described the timely decay of EGFR antibody resistant clones. The advent of liquid biopsy and the implementation of more accurate next-generation sequencing (NGS) based high throughput methods allows for tracing of EGFR resistant clones in real time. These displays the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of metastatic disease compared to the former standard radiographic assessment and re-biopsy. These techniques may move EGFR inhibition in mCRC into the area of precision medicine in order to apply EGFR antibodies with the increase or decrease of EGFR resistant clones. This review critically discusses established concepts of tackling the EGFR pathway in mCRC and provides insight into the growing field of liquid biopsy guided personalized approaches of EGFR inhibition in mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Doleschal
- Department of Internal Medicine I for Hematology With Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Andreas Petzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I for Hematology With Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Holger Rumpold
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
- Johannes Kepler University Linz, Medical Faculty, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Meng G, Yang S, Chen F. Survival for patients with metastatic colon cancer underwent cytoreductive colectomy in the era of rapid development of anticancer drugs: A real-world analysis based on updated population dataset of 2004-2018. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:983092. [PMID: 36339570 PMCID: PMC9627288 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.983092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Metastatic colon cancer (mCC) poses a great threat to the survival of patients suffering from it. In the past decade, many clinical trials have been carried out to improve the prognosis of patients with mCC. Numerous treatments have emerged, and satisfactory efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized phase III trials in highly selective patients with mCC. Our present study aims to investigate whether these therapeutic advances can be reflected to the broader mCC patients who performed cytoreductive colectomy. Method: General and prognostic data for patients diagnosed with mCC who underwent cytoreductive colectomy between 2004-2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the influence of risk factors on prognosis. Results: A total of 26,301 patients diagnosed with mCC treated with cytoreductive colectomy were included in this study. The median overall survival was 19 months (range, 17-23). The good prognosis was associated with patients diagnosed at the most recent year, younger age, non-black race, female, married, without previous history of malignancy, no second malignancy onset, descending/sigmoid/splenic flexure colon tumor, normal CEA levels at diagnosis, low primary tumor burden, T1/T2 stage, N0 stage, single organ metastasis, underwent surgical resection of synchronous distant metastatic lymph nodes or organs, a high number of lymph-node examinations, low positive lymph-node ratio and received adjuvant chemotherapy. The proportion of patients surviving for ≥24 months increased from 37% in 2004 to 44.2% in 2016 (p < 0.001), especially in ≤49 years patients [46.8% in 2004 to 57.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001)]. The percentage of patients who died within 3 months decreased between 2004 and 2018 (from 19.6% to 15.7%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Over a span of 15 years, the long-term survival has improved in real-world mCC patients who were treated with cytoreductive colectomy, especially among younger patients. However, the median overall survival remains not substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangran Meng
- Department of General Surgery, The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shengtao Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Feixiang Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Henderson RH, French D, McFerran E, Adams R, Wasan H, Glynne-Jones R, Fisher D, Richman S, Dunne PD, Wilde L, Maughan TS, Sullivan R, Lawler M. Spend less to achieve more: Economic analysis of intermittent versus continuous cetuximab in KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Policy 2022; 33:100342. [PMID: 35718327 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, the COIN-B clinical trial demonstrated that intermittent cetuximab (IC) was a safe alternative to continuous cetuximab (CC), with less cytotoxic chemotherapy, in first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Cetuximab has been available for this indication in England since 2015, but treatment breaks beyond 6 weeks were prohibited, despite real-world evidence that therapy de-escalation maintains equivalent disease control, but with superior Quality-of-Life (QoL). We performed health economic analyses of IC versus CC and used this evidence to help underpin policy change and guide clinical practice through reduction in unnecessary treatment for mCRC patients. METHODS Employing cost-minimization analysis, we conducted partitioned survival modelling (PSM) and Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) simulation to determine costs and quality-adjusted-life-years for IC versus CC. RESULTS IC reduced costs by £ 35,763 (PSM; p < 0.001) or £ 30,189 (MCMC) per patient annually, while preserving treatment efficacy and enhancing QoL. Extrapolating to all mCRC patients eligible for cetuximab therapy would have generated cost savings of ~£ 1.2 billion over this cohort's lifetime. These data helped underpin a request to NHS England to remove treatment break restrictions in first-line mCRC therapy, which has been adopted as an interim treatment option policy in colorectal cancer during the Covid-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight substantial cost savings achievable by treatment de-escalation, while also reinforcing the importance of therapy breaks to potentially increase tumour responsiveness and reduce treatment toxicity. Our study also highlights how health economic evidence can influence health policy, championing reduced treatment intensity approaches without compromising patient outcomes, which is of particular relevance when addressing the reduced capacity and treatment backlogs experienced during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond H Henderson
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, UK; Queen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, UK; Salutem Insights Ltd, Garryduff, Clough, Portlaoise R32 V653, Ireland.
| | - Declan French
- Queen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Ethna McFerran
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | | | - Harpreet Wasan
- Oncology Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust & Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - David Fisher
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - Susan Richman
- Department of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James' University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Philip D Dunne
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Lisa Wilde
- Bowel Cancer UK, Edinburgh House, 170 Kennington Lane, London, UK
| | - Timothy S Maughan
- Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Modest DP, Karthaus M, Kasper S, Moosmann N, Keitel V, Kiani A, Uhlig J, Jacobasch L, Fischer V Weikersthal L, Fuchs M, Kaiser F, Lerchenmüller C, Sent D, Junghanß C, Held S, Lorenzen S, Kaczirek K, Jung A, Stintzing S, Heinemann V. FOLFOX plus panitumumab or FOLFOX alone as additive therapy following R0/1 resection of RAS wild-type colorectal cancer liver metastases - The PARLIM trial (AIO KRK 0314). Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:297-306. [PMID: 35970102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This trial investigates the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy with fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in a 2:1 randomised, controlled, open-label, phase II trial in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients with R0/1-resected liver metastases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) two years after randomisation. The experimental arm (12 weeks of biweekly mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab followed by 12 weeks of panitumumab alone) was considered active if the two-year PFS rate was ≥65%. Based on historical data, a two-year PFS rate of 50% was estimated in the control arm (12 weeks of biweekly FOLFOX). The trial was performed with a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01384994. RESULTS The full analysis set consists of 70 patients (pts) in the experimental arm and 36 pts in the control arm. The primary endpoint was missed with a two-year PFS of 35.7% with FOLFOX plus panitumumab and 30.6% in the control arm. In comparative analyses, trends towards improved PFS (HR 0.83; 95%CI, 0.52-1.33; P = 0.44) and OS (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.46; P = 0.34) were observed in favour of the panitumumab-based study arm. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with FOLFOX plus panitumumab following liver resection. CONCLUSION The PARLIM trial failed to demonstrate a two-year PFS rate of 65% after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The positive trends in survival endpoints may support future trials evaluating treatment with anti-EGFR agents after resection of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Meinolf Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Verena Keitel
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Martin Fuchs
- Department of Gastroenterology, Munich Hospital Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kaiser
- Practice Oncology, Hospital Landshut-Achdorf, Landshut, Germany
| | | | - Dagmar Sent
- Oncological Practice, MVZ Hospital Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | | | | | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine III (Haematology/Medical Oncology), Technical University of Munich Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of Surgery, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Jung
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximillians Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medicine III & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hospital of the University (LMU), München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ciardiello F, Ciardiello D, Martini G, Napolitano S, Tabernero J, Cervantes A. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:372-401. [PMID: 35472088 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents approximately 10% of all cancers and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths. Initial clinical presentation as metastatic CRC (mCRC) occurs in approximately 20% of patients. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with localized disease eventually develop metastases. Appropriate clinical management of these patients is still a challenging medical issue. Major efforts have been made to unveil the molecular landscape of mCRC. This has resulted in the identification of several druggable tumor molecular targets with the aim of developing personalized treatments for each patient. This review summarizes the improvements in the clinical management of patients with mCRC in the emerging era of precision medicine. In fact, molecular stratification, on which the current treatment algorithm for mCRC is based, although it does not completely represent the complexity of this disease, has been the first significant step toward clinically informative genetic profiling for implementing more effective therapeutic approaches. This has resulted in a clinically relevant increase in mCRC disease control and patient survival. The next steps in the clinical management of mCRC will be to integrate the comprehensive knowledge of tumor gene alterations, of tumor and microenvironment gene and protein expression profiling, of host immune competence as well as the application of the resulting dynamic changes to a precision medicine-based continuum of care for each patient. This approach could result in the identification of individual prognostic and predictive parameters, which could help the clinician in choosing the most appropriate therapeutic program(s) throughout the entire disease journey for each patient with mCRC. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:000-000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Davide Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Foundation Home for the Relief of Suffering, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Giulia Martini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Oncology, University of Vic/Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
- Oncology Institute of Barcelona-Quironsalud, Biomedical Research Center in Cancer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andres Cervantes
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valencia Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Carlos III Institute of Health, Biomedical Research Center in Cancer, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Raimondi A, Randon G, Prisciandaro M, Pagani F, Lonardi S, Antoniotti C, Bozzarelli S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tampellini M, Fanchini L, Murialdo R, Clavarezza M, Zaniboni A, Berenato R, Ratti M, Petrelli F, Antonuzzo L, Giordano M, Rossi A, Di Bartolomeo M, Di Maio M, Pietrantonio F, Morano F. Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer in patients receiving panitumumab-based upfront strategy: Overall and sex-specific outcomes in the Valentino trial. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1760-1769. [PMID: 35678328 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Anti-EGFRs plus doublet chemotherapy is considered the optimal upfront option for RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Early-onset (EO) mCRC has an increasing incidence and its prognostic/predictive role and management is debatable. We performed a post hoc analysis of Valentino study, that randomized RAS wild-type mCRC patients to two panitumumab-based maintenance regimens after FOLFOX/panitumumab induction. We assessed the safety and efficacy outcomes in patients stratified for age (<50/≥50 years old). We assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR), rate of treatment-related and panitumumab-related adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QoL). In 229 patients enrolled, 35 (15%) had EO mCRC, with a higher rate of female sex (P = .020) and lower rate of primary tumor resection (P = .001). Median PFS and OS were 10.9 vs 10.8 months (P = .593) and 28.1 vs 27.5 months (P = .865) in patients <50 and ≥50 years old, respectively, with no significant impact of maintenance arm. ORR and disease control rate were 74% vs 65% (P = .337) and 97% vs 81% (P = .013) in patients <50 or ≥50 years old. In younger patients, a trend for increased chemotherapy-related AEs (peculiarly anemia) was shown, while significantly decreased EGFR-related hypomagnesemia and increased skin rash were reported. No significant differences in treatment intensity or QoL were observed. In patients with EO mCRC and RAS wild-type status, we found no differences in terms of survival outcomes based on age when selecting maintenance strategies. Management of treatment-related AEs should consider the differential toxicity profile of age and sex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Raimondi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlotta Antoniotti
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Bozzarelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Division of Oncology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Tampellini
- Department of Oncology, AOU San Luigi di Orbassano, University of Torino, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Laura Fanchini
- SSD ColoRectal Cancer Unit-Dipartimento di Oncologia, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Roberto Murialdo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Clavarezza
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Fausto Petrelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Clinical Oncology Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Giordano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Como, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rossi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Adams R, Wilson R, Brown L, Maughan T. Reply to A. Kurreck et al and M.S. Copur et al. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1263-1264. [PMID: 35192371 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Adams
- Richard Adams, MD, Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University and Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, Wales; Richard Wilson, PhD, Beatson Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland; Louise Brown, PhD, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom; and Timothy Maughan, MD, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Wilson
- Richard Adams, MD, Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University and Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, Wales; Richard Wilson, PhD, Beatson Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland; Louise Brown, PhD, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom; and Timothy Maughan, MD, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Brown
- Richard Adams, MD, Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University and Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, Wales; Richard Wilson, PhD, Beatson Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland; Louise Brown, PhD, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom; and Timothy Maughan, MD, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Maughan
- Richard Adams, MD, Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University and Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, Wales; Richard Wilson, PhD, Beatson Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland; Louise Brown, PhD, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom; and Timothy Maughan, MD, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yuan M, Wang Z, Lv W, Pan H. The Role of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody in mCRC Maintenance Therapy. Front Mol Biosci 2022; 9:870395. [PMID: 35433839 PMCID: PMC9006990 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.870395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) combined with chemotherapy in patients with RAS (rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can alleviate and stabilize the disease, effectively prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and improve the overall response rate (ORR), which is the first-line treatment standard scheme for RAS wild-type mCRC currently. However, whether anti-EGFR mAb can be used for the maintenance treatment after the first-line treatment of mCRC remains controversial. We reviewed the recent studies on anti-EGFR mAb. The contents include five parts, introduction, anti-EGFR mAb in mCRC and its status in first-line therapy, establishment of the maintenance treatment pattern after the standard first-line treatment for mCRC, research progress of anti-EGFR mAb in mCRC maintenance therapy, and conclusion. More studies support the maintenance treatment of anti-EGFR mAb, but some researchers raise the problems about high cost and drug resistance. Despite lack of the maintenance evidence of anti-EGFR mAb, especially lack of large-scale phase III prospective clinical trials, with the emergence of new evidence and more accurate screening of treatment-dominant groups, maintenance therapy with anti-EGFR mAb monotherapy or anti-EGFR mAb combined with fluorouracil-based schemes after first-line chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR mAb therapy might strive for more treatment opportunities, optimize treatment strategies and prolong treatment continuity, and finally, lead to more survival benefit for suitable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiqin Yuan
- The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zeng Wang
- The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wangxia Lv
- The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Hongming Pan,
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Copur MS, Kelly J, Tun SM. Treatment Break Versus Maintenance in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1262-1263. [PMID: 35192401 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Sitki Copur
- Mehmet Sitki Copur, MD, Jacqueline Kelly, MD, MSc, and Soe Min Tun, MD, MSc MBA, Morrison Cancer Center, Mary Lanning Healthcare, Hastings, NE
| | - Jacqueline Kelly
- Mehmet Sitki Copur, MD, Jacqueline Kelly, MD, MSc, and Soe Min Tun, MD, MSc MBA, Morrison Cancer Center, Mary Lanning Healthcare, Hastings, NE
| | - Soe Min Tun
- Mehmet Sitki Copur, MD, Jacqueline Kelly, MD, MSc, and Soe Min Tun, MD, MSc MBA, Morrison Cancer Center, Mary Lanning Healthcare, Hastings, NE
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Parisi A, Ghidini M, Giampieri R, Tomasello G, Luciani A, Ferri C, Berardi R, Petrelli F. Post-induction strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:e162-e170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
44
|
Parisi A, Cortellini A, Venditti O, Filippi R, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Ghidini M, Nigro O, Gelsomino F, Zurlo IV, Fulgenzi C, Lombardi P, Roselló Keränen S, Depetris I, Giampieri R, Morelli C, Di Marino P, Di Pietro FR, Zanaletti N, Vitale P, Garajova I, Spinelli GP, Zoratto F, Roberto M, Petrillo A, Aimar G, Patruno L, D'Orazio C, Ficorella C, Ferri C, Porzio G. Post-Induction Management in Patients With Left-Sided RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With First-Line Anti-EGFR-Based Doublet Regimens: A Multicentre Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:712053. [PMID: 34778029 PMCID: PMC8579084 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.712053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few data regarding post-induction management following first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based doublet regimens in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study aimed at evaluating clinicians’ attitude, and the safety and effectiveness of post-induction strategies in consecutive patients affected by left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR as first-line regimen, who did not experience disease progression within 6 months from induction initiation, at 21 Italian and 1 Spanish Institutions. The measured clinical outcomes were: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and objective response rate (ORR). Results At the data cutoff, among 686 consecutive patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet plus anti-EGFR as first-line regimen from March 2012 to October 2020, 355 eligible patients have been included in the present analysis. Among these, 118 (33.2%), 66 (18.6%), and 11 (3.1%) received a maintenance with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV)+anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR, and 5FU/LV, respectively, while 160 (45.1%) patients continued induction treatment (non-maintenance) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient decision, or completion of planned treatment. The median period of follow-up for the overall population was 33.7 months (95%CI = 28.9–35.6). The median PFS values of the 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR, 5FU/LV, and non-maintenance cohorts were 16.0 (95%CI = 14.3–17.7, 86 events), 13.0 (95%CI = 11.4–14.5, 56 events), 14.0 (95%CI = 8.1–20.0, 8 events), and 10.1 months (95%CI = 9.0–11.2, 136 events), respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS values were 39.6 (95%CI = 31.5–47.7, 43 events), 36.1 (95%CI = 31.6–40.7, 36 events), 39.5 (95%CI = 28.2–50.8, 4 events), and 25.1 months (95%CI = 22.6–27.6, 99 events), respectively (p < 0.001). After adjusting for key covariates, a statistically significant improvement in PFS in favor of 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.44–0.77, p < 0.001) and anti-EGFR (HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.51–0.98, p = 0.039) compared to the non-maintenance cohort was found. Compared to the non-maintenance cohort, OS was improved by 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR (HR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.38–0.81, p = 0.002) and, with marginal significance, by anti-EGFR (HR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.51–0.98, p = 0.051). No difference was found in ORR. Any grade non-hematological and hematological events were generally higher in the non-maintenance compared to the maintenance cohorts. Conclusion Among the treatment strategies following an anti-EGFR-based doublet first-line induction regimen in patients affected by left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated in a “real-life” setting, 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR resulted the most adopted, effective, and relatively safe regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parisi
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Venditti
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy.,Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Nigro
- Medical Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Fulgenzi
- Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy
| | - Susana Roselló Keränen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ilaria Depetris
- Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit and PhD Program in Systems and Experimental Medicine (XXXV cycle), Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Di Marino
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.,Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Vitale
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ingrid Garajova
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- UOC Territorial Oncology-AUSL Latina-CdS Aprilia-University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Aimar
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy
| | - Leonardo Patruno
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carla D'Orazio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudio Ferri
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giampiero Porzio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|