Randomized Phase III Study of Gefitinib Versus Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine for Patients With Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation (IMPACT)

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant icotinib versus chemotherapy for patients with stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in China

OBJECTIVE

Icotinib has been approved for adjuvant treatment of stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in China, yet the long-term costs and outcomes of this strategy are unknown. Thus, we examined the cost effectiveness of adjuvant icotinib, compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, for the treatment of resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

DESIGN

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, comparing 2-year adjuvant icotinib with four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated using a Markov model. Model inputs were obtained from local data and literature. The influence of model parameters and assumptions was explored in sensitivity analyses. All costs are expressed in 2022 US dollars, and costs and QALYs were discounted at a rate of 5% per year. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at three times the per capita gross domestic product.

SETTING

The Chinese healthcare system perspective.

PARTICIPANTS

A hypothetical Chinese cohort of patients with resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

INTERVENTIONS

Icotinib versus chemotherapy.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Costs, QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

The incremental cost per QALY gained with the use of 2-year icotinib, from the Chinese healthcare system perspective, was $3440.66 compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. At a WTP threshold of $40 500, adjuvant icotinib was the optimal treatment in over 99% of replications. The interpretation of the results was insensitive to model and input assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant icotinib may be a cost-effective treatment for resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC as the WTP threshold is set at $40 500 per QALY.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Phase 2 trial interim results (NEOTIDE/CTONG2104)

The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon's two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro. Infiltration and T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Adverse Event Profile of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the frontline standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. An updated toxicity profile of EGFR-TKIs proves valuable in guiding clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVE

This study comprehensively assessed the risk of EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) involving different systems/organs.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with placebo or chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs) including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, and respiratory events was pooled for a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on the control arm (placebo or chemotherapy) and individual EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) were conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-four randomized controlled trials comprising 15,887 patients were included. The pooled OR showed EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade dermatologic AEs including paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, and skin fissures, gastrointestinal AEs including abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, mouth ulceration, and stomatitis, hepatic AEs including elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and respiratory AEs including epistaxis, interstitial lung disease and rhinorrhea. Furthermore, a significantly increased risk of high-grade rash (OR 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.11, 12.00), diarrhea (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.44, 3.05), elevated alanine aminotransferase (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.71, 9.03), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.05, 9.92) and interstitial lung disease (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38, 4.01) was observed in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. When stratified by individual EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib showed a significant association with all-grade and high-grade hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were associated with a significantly increased risk of various types of AEs. Clinicians should be vigilant about the risks of these EGFR-TKI-related AEs, particularly for severe hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease, to facilitate early detection and proper management.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Early Stage Resectable NSCLC: Consensus Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Advances in the multidisciplinary care of early stage resectable NSCLC (rNSCLC) are emerging at an unprecedented pace. Numerous phase 3 trials produced results that have transformed patient outcomes for the better, yet these findings also require important modifications to the patient treatment journey trajectory and reorganization of care pathways. Perhaps, most notably, the need for multispecialty collaboration for this patient population has never been greater. These rapid advances have inevitably left us with important gaps in knowledge for which definitive answers will only become available in several years. To this end, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer commissioned a diverse multidisciplinary international expert panel to evaluate the current landscape and provide diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic recommendations for patients with rNSCLC, with particular emphasis on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control TNM eighth edition stages II and III disease. Using a team-based approach, we generated 19 recommendations, of which all but one achieved greater than 85% consensus among panel members. A public voting process was initiated, which successfully validated and provided qualitative nuance to our recommendations. Highlights include the following: (1) the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of patients with rNSCLC driven by shared clinical decision-making of a multispecialty team of expert providers; (2) biomarker testing for rNSCLC; (3) a preference for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III rNSCLC; (4) equipoise regarding the optimal management of patients with stage II between upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies; and (5) the robust preference for adjuvant targeted therapy for patients with rNSCLC and sensitizing EGFR and ALK tumor alterations. Our primary goals were to provide practical recommendations sensitive to the global differences in biology and resources for patients with rNSCLC and to provide expert consensus guidance tailored to the individualized patient needs, goals, and preferences in their cancer care journey as these are areas where physicians must make daily clinical decisions in the absence of definitive data. These recommendations will continue to evolve as the treatment landscape for rNSCLC expands and more knowledge is acquired on the best therapeutic approach in specific patient and disease subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis based on updated literature and research to compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases to perform a systematic literature search based on random control trials. In these articles, EGFR-TKIs were compared with placebos, chemotherapy, or whole-brain irradiation as treatments for NSCLC. In this research, a meta-analysis of the literature was performed to produce a combined risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The data were synthesized with Review Manager 5.3 software, which was used to manage the process.

RESULTS

There were 15 random control trials included in the study, involving 4249 patients in total. There was evidence that EGFR-TKIs can significantly prolong OS (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1) and PFS (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in NSCLC patients. There was an increase in the incidence of adverse events after treatment with EGFR-TKI, including diarrhea (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26), infection (RR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), and rash (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been shown that EGFR-TKIs prolong OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC. NSCLC patients may benefit from EGFR-TKIs as an important treatment option in order to prolong their survival.

Neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy in Non-Small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III are predominantly treated with surgery and combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy. A majority of these studies excluded patients with EGFR and ALK alterations. There are several completed and ongoing trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatment with EGFR-TKI monotherapy, combination therapy with chemotherapy, and combination therapy with immunotherapy. Here, we review completed clinical trials and discuss current ongoing trials' potential benefits, challenges, and future directions in the field.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Stage I Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to clarify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated stage I lung adenocarcinoma, using EGFR wild-type adenocarcinoma as a comparator, to select optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

Data of patients with pathologic stage I EGFR-mutated (n = 713) and wild-type (n = 673) adenocarcinoma who did not receive adjuvant therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was estimated using Gray's method, and multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models identified independent risk factors associated with recurrence.

RESULTS

The CIR did not differ significantly between patients with EGFR-mutated and wild-type adenocarcinoma (P = .32). Multivariable analysis revealed that greater size (cm) of invasive tumor (hazard ratio 1.539; 95% CI, 1.077-2.201), lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio 5.180; 95% CI, 2.208-12.15), pleural invasion (hazard ratio 3.388; 95% CI, 1.524-7.533), and high-grade histologic subtype (hazard ratio 4.295; 95% CI, 1.539-11.99) were independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma. The 5-year CIR was significantly higher among patients with these factors (tumor size greater than 2 cm, 15.9%; lymphovascular invasion, 26.9%; pleural invasion, 39.3%; and high-grade subtype, 44.4%) than among patients without them (4.4%, 2.2%, 3.9%, and 5%, respectively; P < .001). For patients with EGFR wild-type adenocarcinoma, independent risk factors for recurrence were invasive tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and pleural invasion, but not histologic subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Even for patients with EGFR-mutated stage I lung adenocarcinoma, recurrence risk is stratified. Adjuvant therapy may be considered if they have high-risk factors for recurrence.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Focusing on EGFR-Mutant Tumors

Druggable oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer has led to innovative systemic treatment options, improving patients' outcome. This benefit is not only achieved in the metastatic setting but also in the postsurgical setting, such as in lung cancers harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK-rearrangement. To enhance the outcome of these patients, we need to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance and evaluate the role of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment landscape. In this chapter, we review treatment strategies of EGFR-mutant tumors in all stages, the mechanisms of acquired strategies, and novel therapies in this subset.

Impact of central nervous system metastasis after complete resection of lung adenocarcinomas harboring common EGFR mutation - A real-world database study in Japan: The CReGYT-01 EGFR study

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the impact of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis on performance status (PS) at relapse, on subsequent treatment(s), and on survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.

METHODS

We conducted the multicenter real-world database study for patients with radical resections for lung adenocarcinomas between 2015 and 2018 at 21 centers in Japan. EGFR mutational status was examined at each center.

RESULTS

Of 4181 patients enrolled, 1431 underwent complete anatomical resection for lung adenocarcinoma harboring common EGFR mutations. Three-hundred-and-twenty patients experienced disease relapse, and 78 (24%) had CNS metastasis. CNS metastasis was significantly more frequent in patients with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy than those without (30% vs. 20%, P = 0.036). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve relapse-free survival at any pathological stage (adjusted hazard ratio for stage IA2-3, IB, and II-III was 1.363, 1.287, and 1.004, respectively). CNS metastasis did not affect PS at relapse. Subsequent treatment, mainly consisting of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), could be equally given in patients with or without CNS metastasis (96% vs. 94%). Overall survival after relapse was equivalent between patients with and without CNS metastasis.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy may be limited in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. CNS metastasis is likely to be found in practice before deterioration in PS, and may have little negative impact on compliance with subsequent EGFR-TKIs and survival after relapse. In this era of adjuvant TKI therapy, further prospective observational studies are desirable to elucidate the optimal management of CNS metastasis.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

Prognostic impact of adjuvant therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter analysis

INTRODUCTION

No evidence exists for postoperative adjuvant therapy in elderly or renal dysfunction patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are unfit to receive cisplatin (CDDP). Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy for CDDP-unfit patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We defined CDDP-unfit patients as those aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction based on criteria established by expert panels and from prospective studies. CDDP-fit patients comprised all others. Between 2010 and 2020, among 1,423 patients with pathological stage II-III (8th edition of the AJCC-TNM Classification) NSCLC, 454 were identified as unfit for CDDP. Following propensity score matching in CDDP-unfit patients with and without postoperative adjuvant therapy, we analyzed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of each group and assessed the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival.

RESULTS

OS was significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS rate: 76.1 % vs. 50.0 %, p < 0.01) among 255 propensity score-matched patients. DFS was also significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS: 54.6 % vs. 35.1 %, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy could be beneficial for CDDP-unfit patients aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction. Future studies for CDDP-unfit patients should be designed based on the results of this study to determine the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.

NOTCH1 and CREBBP co-mutations negatively affect the benefit of adjuvant therapy in completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC: translational research of phase III IMPACT study

The phase III IMPACT study (UMIN000044738) compared adjuvant gefitinib with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (cis/vin) in completely resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was not met, we searched for molecular predictors of adjuvant gefitinib efficacy. Of 234 patients enrolled in the IMPACT study, 202 patients were analyzed for 409 cancer-related gene mutations and tumor mutation burden using resected lung cancer specimens. Frequent somatic mutations included tumor protein p53 (TP53; 58.4%), CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3; 11.8%), and NOTCH1 (9.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that NOTCH1 co-mutation was a significant poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in the gefitinib group and cAMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) co-mutation for DFS and OS in the cis/vin group. In patients with NOTCH1 co-mutations, gefitinib group had a shorter OS than cis/vin group (Hazard ratio 5.49, 95% CI 1.07-28.00), with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.039). In patients with CREBBP co-mutations, the gefitinib group had a longer DFS than the cis/vin group, with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.058). In completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, NOTCH1 and CREBBP mutations might predict poor outcome in patients treated with gefitinib and cis/vin, respectively.

Efficacy of Adjuvant First-Generation TKIs versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of adjuvant first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with resected EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the overall survival (OS) in patients with resected NSCLC.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and pooled hazard risks were obtained by random-effects models.

RESULTS

Three prospective phase III and one phase II randomized controlled trials were identified, including a total of 839 patients who had undergone resection of EGFR-sensitive mutation in our analysis, 429 of whom received adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy. For all patients with complete resection, adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0. 82] but not OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48-1.27) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we reconstructed the OS curves of the ADJUVANT and IMPACT studies, and the pooled 3- and 5-year OS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 80% vs. 79% and 66% vs. 64%, respectively. We also reconstructed the DFS curves based on the ADJUVANT, IMPACT, and EVIDENCE studies, and the pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 87% vs. 70%, 49% vs. 37% and 28% vs. 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with completely resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC, adjuvant first-generation TKIs may delay disease progression but still fail to improve long-term survival compared with conventional chemotherapy.

Vinorelbine Alters lncRNA Expression in Association with EGFR Mutational Status and Potentiates Tumor Progression Depending on NSCLC Cell Lines' Genetic Profile

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as the most common type. In addition, NSCLC has a high mortality rate and an overall adverse patient outcome. Although significant improvements have been made in therapeutic options, effectiveness is still limited in late stages, so the need for a better understanding of the genomics events underlying the current therapies is crucial to aid future drug development. Vinorelbine (VRB) is an anti-mitotic chemotherapy drug (third-generation vinca alkaloid) used to treat several malignancies, including NSCLC. However, despite its widespread clinical use, very little is known about VRB-associated genomic alterations in different subtypes of NSCLC. This article is an in vitro investigation of the cytotoxic effects of VRB on three different types of NSCLC cell lines, A549, Calu-6, and H1792, with a closer focus on post-treatment genetic alterations. Based on the obtained results, VRB cytotoxicity produces modifications on a cellular level, altering biological processes such as apoptosis, autophagy, cellular motility, cellular adhesion, and cell cycle, but also at a genomic level, dysregulating the expression of some coding genes, such as EGFR, and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), including CCAT1, CCAT2, GAS5, MALAT1, NEAT1, NORAD, XIST, and HOTAIR, that are implicated in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. Therefore, although extensive validation is required, these results pave the way towards a better understanding of the cellular and genomic alterations underlying the cytotoxicity of VRB.

Waiting for ASCO to "Walk the Walk"

This editorial addresses the magnitude of the challenge of spiraling drug costs, a challenge that affects everyone, everywhere, but may not be adequately addressed even at the ASCO annual meeting.

Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Resectable NSCLC: Current and Future Perspectives

The standard of care (SoC) for medically operable patients with early-stage (stages I-IIIB) NSCLC is surgery combined with (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with stages II to IIIB disease and some stage IB or, rarely, chemoradiation (stage III disease with mediastinal lymph node metastases). Despite these treatments, metastatic recurrence is common and associated with poor survival, highlighting the need for systemic therapies that are more effective than the current SoC. After the success of targeted therapy (TT) in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers, these agents are being investigated for the perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC. Adjuvant osimertinib is the only TT approved for use in the early-stage setting, and there are no approved neoadjuvant TTs. We discuss the importance of comprehensive biomarker testing at diagnosis to identify individuals who may benefit from neoadjuvant targeted treatments and review emerging data from neoadjuvant TT trials. We also address the potential challenges for establishing neoadjuvant TTs as SoC in the early-stage setting, including the identification and validation of early response markers to guide care and accelerate drug development, and discuss safety considerations in the perioperative setting. Initial data indicate that neoadjuvant TTs are effective and well tolerated in patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive early-stage NSCLC. Data from ongoing trials will determine whether neoadjuvant targeted agents will become a new SoC for individuals with oncogene-addicted resectable NSCLC.

Update on the Management of Stage III NSCLC: Navigating a Complex and Heterogeneous Stage of Disease

BACKGROUND

Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of patients. Many patients are treated with curative intent multimodality therapy, either surgical resection plus systemic therapy or chemoradiation plus immunotherapy. However, many patients are not suitable for curative intent therapy and are treated with palliative systemic therapy or best supportive care.

METHODS

This paper is a review of recent advances in the management of patients with curative intent disease.

RESULTS

There have been significant advances in curative intent therapy for patients with stage III NSCLC in recent years. These include both adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapies. For patients with resectable NSCLC, two trials have demonstrated that adjuvant atezolizumab or pembrolizumab, following chemotherapy, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS). In patients with tumours harbouring a common mutation of the EGFR gene, adjuvant osimertinib therapy was associated with a large improvement in both DFS and overall survival (OS). Five randomized trials have evaluated chemotherapy plus nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, or toripalimab, either as neoadjuvant or perioperative (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant) therapy. All five trials show significant improvements in the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS). OS data are currently immature. This would now be considered the standard of care for resectable stage III NSCLC. The addition of durvalumab to chemoradiation has also become the standard of care in unresectable stage III NSCLC. One year of consolidation durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiation has demonstrated significant improvements in both progression-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has become a standard recommendation in curative intent therapy for stage III NSCLC.

The impact of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs and 14-gene molecular assay on stage I non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR mutations

Background

Currently, the role of EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant therapy for stage I, especially IA NSCLC, after surgical resection remains unclear. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs with observation in such patients by incorporating an established 14-gene molecular assay for risk stratification.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Study ID: ChNCRCRD-2022-GZ01). From March 2013 to February 2019, completely resected stage I NSCLC (8th TNM staging) patients with sensitive EGFR mutation were included. Patients with eligible samples for molecular risk stratification were subjected to the 14-gene prognostic assay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize imbalances in baseline characteristics.

Findings

A total of 227 stage I NSCLC patients were enrolled, with 55 in EGFR-TKI group and 172 in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 78.4 months. After IPTW, the 5-year DFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14-0.67; P = 0.003) and OS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.96; P = 0.044) of the EGFR-TKI group were significantly better than the observation group. For subgroup analyses, adjuvant EGFR-TKIs were associated with favorable 5-year DFS rates in both IA (100.0% vs. 84.5%; P = 0.007), and IB group (98.8% vs. 75.3%; P = 0.008). The 14-gene assay was performed in 180 patients. Among intermediate-high-risk patients, EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significant improvement in 5-year DFS rates compared to observation (96.0% vs. 70.5%; P = 0.012), while no difference was found in low-risk patients (100.0% vs. 94.9%; P = 0.360).

Interpretation

Our study suggested that adjuvant EGFR-TKI might improve DFS and OS of stage IA and IB EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and the 14-gene molecular assay could help patients that would benefit the most from treatment.

Funding

This work was supported by China National Science Foundation (82022048, 82373121).

Adjuvant Targeted Therapy in Solid Cancers: Pioneers and New Glories

Targeted therapy (TT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, successfully applied in various settings. Adjuvant TT in resected early-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer has led to practice-changing achievements. In particular, standard treatments include BRAF inhibitors for melanoma, osimertinib for NSCLC, hormone therapy or HER2 TT for breast cancer, and imatinib for GIST. Despite the undeniable benefit derived from adjuvant TT, the optimal duration of TT and the appropriate managing of the relapse remain open questions. Furthermore, neoadjuvant TT is emerging as valuable, particularly in breast cancer, and ongoing studies evaluate TT in the perioperative setting for early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we aim to collect and describe the large amount of data available in the literature about adjuvant TT across different histologies, focusing on epidemiology, major advances, and future directions.

Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Changing Landscape Due to Immunotherapy

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One-third of NSCLC patients present with surgically resectable, non-metastatic disease; however, many of these patients will recur despite curative surgery and adjuvant therapy. The recent publication of randomized trials incorporating immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) to the standard neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment regimens has reported improved survival with manageable toxicity profiles. The IMpower 010 studied the use of adjuvant atezolizumab after standard surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. They demonstrated an improvement in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) prompting a change in treatment guidelines. The Checkmate 816 and NADIM II studies evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, to standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The results from both trials showed an improvement in 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and 2-year PFS (PFS), respectively. In this review, we summarize the prior data regarding adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC and elaborate on results from the newer trials incorporating ICIs. We briefly discuss the pros and cons of each treatment approach along with areas that need further clarity to inform clinical practice and future directions for research in this disease.

Targeted Therapies in Early-Stage Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: New Kids on the Block

PURPOSE

With increased adoption of next-generation sequencing, tailored therapy on the basis of molecular status is being delivered for patients with early-stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this narrative review was to focus on recent developments of targeted therapies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting for early-stage disease.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database was performed, focusing on studies published within the past 10 years. Our search queried "early-stage NSCLC (AND) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; OR) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; OR) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)" and was limited only to prospective and ongoing studies.

RESULTS

Most studies examining the benefit of targeted therapies in early-stage resectable NSCLC have been for EGFR-TKIs in the adjuvant setting. Currently, only one study, the ADAURA trial of adjuvant osimertinib, has demonstrated an overall survival benefit with the use of an EGFR-TKI in the adjuvant setting. Future work to build on the success of the ADAURA trial is focused on determining the optimal duration of targeted therapies and using biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA, to risk-stratify patients and guide maintenance targeted therapy duration.

CONCLUSION

The results of several ongoing studies are eagerly awaited regarding the use of targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting and for more uncommon or rare mutations such as ALK, ROS proto-oncogene 1, rearranged during transfection, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, and B-Raf proto-oncogene V600E. The treatment landscape for early-stage NSCLC harboring actionable mutations is likely to shift dramatically in the upcoming decade.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2023 Expert Consensus Document: Staging and multidisciplinary management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy drugs have recently been approved for use in patients with surgically resectable lung cancer. Accurate staging, early molecular testing, and knowledge of recent trials are critical to optimize oncologic outcomes in these patients.

Three-Year Safety, Tolerability, and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes of Adjuvant Osimertinib in Patients With Resected Stage IB to IIIA EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Updated Analysis From the Phase 3 ADAURA Trial

INTRODUCTION

In ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We report in-depth analyses of three-year safety, tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from ADAURA.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg or placebo once daily for up to 3 years. Safety assessments were performed at baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, and every 12 weeks until treatment completion or discontinuation, and 28 days after treatment was stopped. The SF-36 survey measured HRQoL at baseline, week 12, week 24, and every 24 weeks until recurrence, treatment completion or discontinuation. Data cutoff: April 11, 2022.

RESULTS

Safety and HRQoL analysis sets: osimertinib, n = 337 and n = 339; placebo, n = 343 each. Median (range) total exposure duration was longer with osimertinib versus placebo: 35.8 (0-38) versus 25.1 (0-39) months. Most adverse events (AEs) were first reported within 12 months of starting treatment (osimertinib 97%, placebo 86%). AEs leading to dose reduction, interruption or discontinuation were reported in 12%, 27% and 13% respectively of patients with osimertinib; 1%, 13% and 3% with placebo. Stomatitis and diarrhea were the most common AEs leading to osimertinib dose reduction or interruption; interstitial lung disease was the most common leading to osimertinib discontinuation (per protocol). There were no differences in time to deterioration for SF-36 physical, mental component summaries between osimertinib and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

No new safety signals were reported and HRQoL was maintained with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib treatment. Combined with significant efficacy benefit, these data further support adjuvant osimertinib in stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Rational application of EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To determine the role and rational application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the survival outcomes between adjuvant EGFR-TKIs and adjuvant chemotherapy or a placebo, or between different EGFR-TKI treatment durations for resected NSCLC, were eligible for inclusion. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effective measures using random-effect or fixed-effect models. Subgroup analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs involving 2102 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with or without EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy were included. For all stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, EGFR-TKIs adjuvant therapy could not only significantly improve DFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.63, P < 0.001) and 2- and 3-year DFS rates, but also improve OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54-0.96, P = 0.024), compared with chemotherapy or the placebo. Further subgroup analyses indicated prolonged OS from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in stage III patients, compared with chemotherapy or the placebo (HR for OS, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = 0.001). Of note, osimertinib adjuvant therapy led to the OS benefit expanding from stage III to stage II-III patients, with significantly improved DFS and a lower risk of brain recurrence, compared with the placebo. A 2-year treatment duration with EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy showed a significantly lower recurrence risk than a ≤ 1-year duration.

CONCLUSION

The DFS advantage from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy can translate into an OS benefit in stage III NSCLC patients. Osimertinib might be more suitable for adjuvant therapy than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, because of the lower recurrence rate and the potential OS benefit even in early-stage patients. The optimal treatment duration for EGFR-TKIs at different stages of disease needs to be validated.

Adjuvant Treatments for Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations: A Review

Importance

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB-IIIA resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has limited benefit for improving cure rates. The proportion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations among patients with resected NSCLC is comparable to that observed in patients with advanced disease, and the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated to prolong disease-free survival (DFS). With recent approval of osimertinib in this context, a focus on the rapidly evolving scenario and future perspective in clinical practice is needed and was the aim of the current review.

Observations

Randomized phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated DFS benefit with adjuvant EGFR TKI therapy in patients with resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The most recent trial (ADAURA) assessed 3-year adjuvant osimertinib and showed consistent DFS benefit and a significant role of the intervention in preventing the occurrence of brain metastasis. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, the appropriate duration of treatment, the management of disease relapse, and the effective cure rate remain undetermined. A deeper investigation on molecular biomarkers, covariant patterns, and dynamic monitoring of postsurgical circulating DNA would be helpful for the implementation of future strategies to further improve survival rates after adjuvant therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Conclusions and Relevance

Adjuvant osimertinib revolutionized the treatment algorithm for patients with stage IB-IIIA resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further evidence driven by clinical issues will be key for further optimization of the goals of adjuvant treatment in these patients.

A tumor mutational burden-derived immune computational framework selects sensitive immunotherapy/chemotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma populations with different prognoses

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) kills millions of people every year. Recently, FDA and researchers proved the significance of high tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treating solid tumors. But no scholar has constructed a TMB-derived computing framework to select sensitive immunotherapy/chemotherapy for the LUAD population with different prognoses.

Methods

The datasets were collected from TCGA, GTEx, and GEO. We constructed the TMB-derived immune lncRNA prognostic index (TILPI) computing framework based on TMB-related genes identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), oncogenes, and immune-related genes. Furthermore, we mapped the immune landscape based on eight algorithms. We explored the immunotherapy sensitivity of different prognostic populations based on immunotherapy response, tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE), and tumor inflammation signature (TIS) model. Furthermore, the molecular docking models were constructed for sensitive drugs identified by the pRRophetic package, oncopredict package, and connectivity map (CMap).

Results

The TILPI computing framework was based on the expression of TMB-derived immune lncRNA signature (TILncSig), which consisted of AC091057.1, AC112721.1, AC114763.1, AC129492.1, LINC00592, and TARID. TILPI divided all LUAD patients into two populations with different prognoses. The random grouping verification, survival analysis, 3D PCA, and ROC curve (AUC=0.74) firmly proved the reliability of TILPI. TILPI was associated with clinical characteristics, including smoking and pathological stage. Furthermore, we estimated three types of immune cells threatening the survival of patients based on multiple algorithms. They were macrophage M0, T cell CD4 Th2, and T cell CD4 memory activated. Nevertheless, five immune cells, including B cell, endothelial cell, eosinophil, mast cell, and T cell CD4 memory resting, prolonged the survival. In addition, the immunotherapy response and TIDE model proved the sensitivity of the low-TILPI population to immunotherapy. We also identified seven intersected drugs for the LUAD population with poor prognosis, which included docetaxel, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, palbociclib, pyrimethamine, thapsigargin, and vinorelbine. Their molecular docking models and best binding energy were also constructed and calculated.

Conclusions

We divided all LUAD patients into two populations with different prognoses. The good prognosis population was sensitive to immunotherapy, while the people with poor prognosis benefitted from 7 drugs.

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR TKI alone and in combination with chemotherapy for resected EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Adjuvant therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), alone or with chemotherapy, is used for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. A Bayesian meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR-TKI and adjuvant chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKI to determine whether additional adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial. Randomised controlled trials and retrospective comparative studies examining the efficacy of adjuvant EGFR-TKI were searched from inception to July 2022. Ten studies (1344 patients) were analysed. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were the endpoints. Our network meta-analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI monotherapy is noninferior to chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKI for DFS and OS in the adjuvant setting. However, combination treatment was associated with a higher AE incidence and severity. Adjuvant EGFR-TKI monotherapy seems a viable alternative to chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKI in patients with resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Synergistic anti-cancer and attenuation effects of thymosin on chemotherapeutic drug vinorelbine in tumor-bearing zebrafish

Vinorelbine, the standard chemotherapy drug on advanced lung cancer, causes adverse events such as immunosuppression and bone marrow suppression. Thus, it is necessary to find drugs that could improve immune function and synergistically enhance the anti-tumor effect of vinorelbine. Thymosin is reported to inhibit tumor growth as an immunomodulator. Herein, to study the synergistic anti-cancer and attenuation effects of thymosin on vinorelbine, human lung cancer A549 cells that were labeled with CM-DiI were transplanted into zebrafish to establish the lung cancer xenotransplanted model. After treatment of vinorelbine and different concentrations of thymosin, the fluorescence intensity of CM-DiI-labeled A549 cells and the number of apoptotic muscle cells in the tumor-bearing zebrafish were detected. Besides, effects of thymosin on vinorelbine-reduced macrophages and T cells were identified in the transgenic zebrafish (Tg:zlyz-EGFP and Tg:rag2-DsRed). Then, the qRT-PCR was used to determine the alterations of the immune-related factors at the transcription level. Thymosin showed a marked synergistic anti-cancer effect with vinorelbine for the xenograft human lung cancer A549 cells, and the synergistic effect enhanced in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, thymosin alleviated vinorelbine-induced muscle cell apoptosis, macrophage reduction, and T cell suppression. Compared with the vinorelbine group, co-administration with thymosin raised the mRNA levels of TNF-α, TNF-β, INF-γ, and GM-CSF. Thus, thymosin possesses synergistic anti-cancer effect on vinorelbine, and has protective effect on vinorelbine-induced immunosuppression. Thymosin, as an adjuvant immunomodulatory therapy, has great potential in enhancing the clinical application of vinorelbine.

Clinicopathologic outcomes of preoperative targeted therapy in patients with clinical stage I to III non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Targeted therapy improves outcomes in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in the adjuvant setting, but data on its use before surgery are limited. We sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of preoperative targeted therapy in patients with operable NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients with clinical stage I to III NSCLC who received targeted therapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, before surgical resection with curative intent, treated from 2004 to 2021. The primary outcome was the safety and feasibility of preoperative targeted therapy; secondary outcomes included objective response rate, major pathologic response (defined as ≤10% viable tumor) rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 51 patients included, 46 had an activating epidermal growth factor receptor gene alteration and 5 had an anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion. Overall, 37 of 46 evaluable patients experienced at least 1 adverse event before surgery; however, only 3 patients experienced a grade 3 or 4 event. The objective response rate was 38% (17/45) for all evaluable patients and 44% (14/32) for patients with clinical stage II or III disease. The major pathologic response rate was 20% (9/44); 2 patients had a complete pathologic response. Median RFS was 3.8 years (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached). Targeted therapy alone was associated with better RFS than combination therapy (P = .009) in patients with clinical stage II or III disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative targeted therapy was well tolerated and associated with good outcomes, with or without induction chemotherapy. In addition, radiographic response and pathologic response were strongly correlated.

Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer

Research on biomarker-driven therapy and immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. The width and depth of clinical trials have also dramatically improved in an unprecedented speed. The personalized treatment paradigm evolved every year. In this review, we summarize the promising agents that have shifted the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients across all stages, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors. Based on recent evidence, we propose treatment algorithms for NSCLC and propose several unsolved clinical issues, which are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results of these trials are likely to impact future clinical practice.

The Evolving Role for Systemic Therapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

During the last 2 decades, the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from a purely histologic classification system to a more complex model synthesizing clinical, histologic, and molecular data. Biomarker-driven targeted therapies have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring specific driver alterations in EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK. Novel immuno-oncology agents have contributed to improvements in NSCLC-related survival at the population-level. However, only in recent years has this nuanced understanding of NSCLC permeated into the systemic management of patients with resectable tumors.

Adjuvant Osimertinib for Resected EGFR-Mutated Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Results From the Phase III Randomized ADAURA Trial

PURPOSE

The phase III ADAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02511106) primary analysis demonstrated a clinically significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit with adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo in EGFR-mutated stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete tumor resection (DFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.20 [99.12% CI, 0.14 to 0.30]; P < .001). We report an updated exploratory analysis of final DFS data.

METHODS

Overall, 682 patients with stage IB-IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control, seventh edition) EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion/L858R) NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by stage, mutational status, and race) to receive osimertinib 80 mg once-daily or placebo for 3 years. The primary end point was DFS by investigator assessment in stage II-IIIA disease analyzed by stratified log-rank test; following early reporting of statistical significance in DFS, no further formal statistical testing was planned. Secondary end points included DFS in stage IB-IIIA, overall survival, and safety. Patterns of recurrence and CNS DFS were prespecified exploratory end points.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (April 11, 2022), in stage II-IIIA disease, median follow-up was 44.2 months (osimertinib) and 19.6 months (placebo); the DFS HR was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.30); 4-year DFS rate was 70% (osimertinib) and 29% (placebo). In the overall population, DFS HR was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.34); 4-year DFS rate was 73% (osimertinib) and 38% (placebo). Fewer patients treated with osimertinib had local/regional and distant recurrence versus placebo. CNS DFS HR in stage II-IIIA was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.42). The long-term safety profile of osimertinib was consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSION

These updated data demonstrate prolonged DFS benefit over placebo, reduced risk of local and distant recurrence, improved CNS DFS, and a consistent safety profile, supporting the efficacy of adjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Adjuvant icotinib versus observation in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC (GASTO1003, CORIN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Background

This phase 2 trial aimed to compare adjuvant icotinib with observation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We performed a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial from May 1, 2015 to December 29, 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China. Patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutant, stage IB (the 7th edition of TNM staging) NSCLC without adjuvant chemotherapy were randomised (1:1) to receive adjuvant therapy with icotinib (125 mg, three times daily) for 12 months or to undergo observation until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). CORIN (GASTO1003) was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, with the number NCT02264210.

Findings

A total of 128 patients were randomised, with 63 patients in the icotinib group and 65 patients in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months. The three-year DFS was significantly higher in the icotinib group (96.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3-99.9) than in the observation group (84.0%, 95% CI, 75.1-92.9; P = 0.041). The DFS was significantly longer in the icotinib group than in the observation group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P = 0.013). The OS data were immature, with three deaths in the observation arm. In the icotinib group, adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 49 patients (77.8%), and grade 3 or greater AEs occurred in four patients (6.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that adjuvant icotinib improved the 3-year DFS in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Betta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Primary endpoints to assess the efficacy of novel therapeutic approaches in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated, surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A review

While the discovery of oncogenic driver mutations has personalized the metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment landscape with effective targeted therapies, implementation of new treatments in resectable NSCLC has been limited due to the long follow-up needed for overall survival (OS). Until recently, treatment for patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC has been limited to perioperative chemotherapy, which provides modest benefits. However, the regulatory acceptance of two surrogate endpoints for OS has allowed recent approval of both adjuvant osimertinib and atezolizumab, providing patients with new treatment options to improve outcomes. In phase 3 oncology trials, OS has historically been viewed as the gold-standard efficacy measure, but disease-free survival and event-free survival (EFS) are now validated surrogate endpoints for OS in clinical trials and should be considered when mature OS data is unavailable. Another potential surrogate endpoint in the adjuvant NSCLC setting is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD), although prospective validation is needed. For neoadjuvant targeted therapies, EFS, major pathologic response and ctDNA-based MRD are potential surrogate endpoints. To fully translate the success of the personalized treatment advances in the metastatic setting to earlier-stage disease, prospective validation studies of these potential surrogate endpoints that can accelerate the evaluation of drug efficacy are needed. A collaborative effort is also needed from all clinical and regulatory parties to collate surrogate endpoint data for large-scale validation. In this review we discuss the trends in surrogate endpoints used in oncology trials, with a focus on considerations for selecting appropriate primary endpoints in early-stage resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC, an area of unmet need for novel treatment options.

LncRNA PCAT6 promotes proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung adenocarcinoma cell by targeting miR-545-3p

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a high incidence cancer on a worldwide basis and has become a major public health problem. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) makes up approximately half of all lung cancers and is a threat to human health. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is an important regulator of the development and progression of lung adenocarcinoma. In this manuscript we examined the role and potential mechanism of lncRNA PCAT6 in the development of LUAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Differences in lncRNA PCAT6 levels between LUAD samples and normal samples were first explored in the GEPIA database. We found that lncRNA PCAT6 expression was elevated, which was also validated in lung adenocarcinoma tissues and cell lines. Using western blotting, CCK-8, EdU, wound healing and transwell assays, we found that knockdown of lncRNA PCAT6 inhibited EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion of LUAD cells. We noted a predicted a binding site for lncRNA PCAT6 and miR-545-3p through conducting bioinformatic analyses, and their binding was subsequently verified by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. Rescue experiments confirmed that miR-545-3p inhibitor partially abolished the inhibition function of lncRNA PCAT6 knockdown on LUAD cells. In addition, we predicted the downstream target genes of miR-545-3p and verified them by RT-qPCR. We found that EGFR was reduced in the silence of lncRNA PCAT6 and upregulated after miR-545-3p inhibition.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that lncRNA PCAT6 promotes a more aggressive LUAD phenotype by sponging miR-545-3p. This finding may provide new ideas for the treatment of lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is still under investigation as adjuvant treatment for early-stage disease. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant EGFR-TKI versus non-EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutation.

METHODS

Two investigators independently extracted data from databases. A meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022316481). The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with EGFR mutation, measured as the hazard ratio (HR). Other outcomes (of subgroup analyses) included overall survival (OS) and DFS.

RESULTS

After the systematic screening, eight studies with a total of 3098 patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were included. The results show that in patients with EGFR mutation, the DFS in the adjuvant EGFR-TKI group was significantly superior to that in the control group, with a HR of 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.74; P = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of DFS, the benefit was observed in the EGFR-TKI group versus the chemotherapy group (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.84; P = 0.009), the EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy group (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85; P = 0.02), and in stage IIA-IIIA NSCLC (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.74; P = 0.002). However, the benefit of DFS did not translate into improved OS in the whole population (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.14; P = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

EGFR-TKIs prolonged DFS but not OS in patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation. Longer follow-ups and new clinical trials that can result in changes in clinical practice are needed.

Perioperative systemic therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent advances and future perspectives

The mainstay of treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. Traditionally, chemotherapy has been used perioperatively in locally extensive disease to improve the oncologic outcomes of surgery, with a 5-year absolute survival benefit of approximately 5%. In recent years, immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have shown excellent results in the treatment of locoregionally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, replacing chemotherapy as first-line treatment in certain cases. Consequently, researchers have been increasingly investigating the use of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with surgery for the treatment of early-stage disease. This growing research interest has resulted in several published and ongoing studies of various size and design. In this mini review, we provide a succinct and up-to-date overview of recently published, phase 3 randomized clinical trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy or targeted therapy for NSCLC. We subsequently discuss some important unresolved clinical issues, including the optimal duration of treatment, scheduling with respect to surgery, and potential combinations of different systemic therapies. Finally, we reference large, randomized, phase 3 studies that are currently in progress and may give answers to those and other clinical questions.

Comparing Gefitinib and Traditional Chemotherapy for Better Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Current non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment consists of various combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation, depending on the tumor stage. Individuals with stage II-IIIa NSCLC undergo surgery, followed by combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin, such as vinorelbine + cisplatin. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib, act by inhibiting any signaling pathway containing the EGFR mutation and inhibiting the growth of NSCLC. TKI is a treatment option in advanced NSCLC, resulting in more prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). This manuscript aims to evaluate the influence of utilizing gefitinib - either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic drug regimens upon NSCLC patient profile survival parameters. A systematic literature review was conducted across multiple scientific literature repositories. The review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020. There were six randomized clinical trials (RCT) and five retrospective studies. The overall consensus based on the end outcome of each published journal on the effectiveness of gefitinib as a treatment option for NSCLC indicated that there was a notable difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) datasets. Gefitinib use correlated with increased timeframes for multiple patient survival parameters within articles shortlisted in this investigation. However, more comprehensive investigations are required to validate such correlations. Gefitinib did demonstrate the potential to provide beneficial effects and counteract NSCLC within such patients.

Osimertinib for EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Central Nervous System Metastases: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Strategies

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and associated with poor prognosis and high disease burden. Effective options are needed to treat CNS metastases, and delay or prevent their formation. For epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC and brain metastases, upfront EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended by the joint European Association of Neuro-Oncology-European Society for Medical Oncology and experts. While early-generation EGFR-TKIs have limited CNS efficacy, the third-generation, irreversible, EGFR-TKI osimertinib has potent efficacy in NSCLC CNS metastases. This review discusses the CNS data of osimertinib in the context of therapeutic strategies and future prospects based on expert review of published literature and relevant clinical, real-world, and ongoing studies in this setting. Osimertinib penetrates the blood-brain barrier and achieves greater exposure in the brain compared with other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib has demonstrated CNS efficacy, including in leptomeningeal metastases, in EGFRm advanced disease. In EGFRm stage IB-IIIA NSCLC, adjuvant osimertinib reduced CNS disease recurrence versus placebo. The burden and poor prognosis of CNS metastases necessitate more therapeutic options for their management and reduced risk of recurrence in patients with EGFRm NSCLC. Clinical studies are ongoing in advanced disease to investigate osimertinib combinations with chemotherapy/radiation therapy and optimal treatment post-CNS progression with osimertinib. Further prospective research evaluating treatments using CNS-specific endpoints and evaluating CNS resistance is needed to improve outcomes for patients with CNS metastases.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic impact of atypical EGFR mutations in completely resected lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic impact of atypical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and investigate whether adjuvant chemotherapy could benefit the survival outcomes for these subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed resected LUAD samples from 8437 patients and identified 5358 EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) cases. Of these, 4847 had classical mutations, while 511 had atypical mutations. For further survival analysis, propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 511 patients with atypical EGFRm LUAD, 131 patients had compound mutations. The frequency of exon 20 insertion (20-ins), G719X, L861Q, S768I, and de novo T790M were 30.3%, 32.7%, 21.9%, 9.2%, and 11.4%, respectively. These patients included a higher proportion of males than those with classical EGFRm LUAD. Between the 483 matched pairs of the classical and atypical EGFRm patients, no significant difference emerged in disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.476). Patients with the L861Q mutation had the poorest DFS among those with atypical EGFRm LUAD (p = 0.005). Cox regression analyses revealed that the L861Q mutation was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in 487 patients with solely atypical EGFRm LUAD. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the DFS for those patients, whether in stage IB (p = 0.638) or II-III (p = 0.505) of the disease.

CONCLUSION

The L861Q mutation is an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with atypical EGFRm LUAD after complete resection who would not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of disease stage.

A phase II, multicenter study of lazertinib as consolidation therapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (stage III) who have not progressed following definitive, platinum-based, chemoradiation therapy (PLATINUM trial)

INTRODUCTION

The PACIFIC study demonstrated that durvalumab consolidation therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, there was no clinical benefit in both PFS and OS in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patient groups in a post hoc exploratory analysis. Moreover, the clinical effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in EGFR mutation-positive stage IV NSCLC were demonstrated to be poor. Personalized treatment according to the mutation status is also required in stage III NSCLC. Lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is newly developed and approved for use in Korea.

METHODS

This prospective, open, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lazertinib as a consolidative therapy after CCRT treatment in unresectable, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC stage III patients. The primary endpoint of this study is PFS, and the secondary endpoints are OS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to death or distant metastasis (TTDM), and safety profiles.

DISCUSSION

Our study may extend the indications for third-generation EGFR-TKIs to treat patients with stage III NSCLC. Moreover, using this drug to treat stage III NSCLC would emphasize the value of mutation analysis and personalized medicine.

A meta-analysis of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs for patients with EGFR mutation of resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) in improving the prognostic outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases harboring EGFR mutation following radical surgery is still controversial. This work focused on comparing EGFR-TKIs and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) or placebo in treating NSCLC cases, specifically on those with EGFR-mutant, being in the stage of IB-IIIA and possibly gained benefits from the above treatment after radical resection.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched to identify eligible clinical trials; two authors were responsible for screening the results. The primary outcomes were evaluated by disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on hazard ratios (HRs) and a relevant 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The literature search yielded twelve eligible studies, including four retrospective cohort studies and eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled 1694 cases and were of acceptable quality. In patients receiving adjuvant EGFR-TKIs compared with ACT or placebo treatment, HR regarding DFS was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.55), whereas the OS rate was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.95). For patients who received adjuvant EGFR-TKIs in combination with conventional chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy, the efficiency was significantly enhanced, with the HR for DFS being 0.29 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.58) and that for OS being 0.51 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.04), separately.

CONCLUSION

For NSCLC cases who had EGFR mutations and surgery, adjuvant EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy achieved superior effect over chemotherapy or placebo with reference to DFS and may prolong the OS up to some extent.

Prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status

Background

Pathological stage IB-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (Mt) has a high recurrence rate even after complete resection. However, there have been few reports on the risk factors for Mt recurrence. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological factors related to the relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with pathological stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma with and without an EGFR mutation.

Methods

Patients who underwent curative surgery for Mt (n = 208) harboring the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation or EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation and EGFR mutation wild-type lung adenocarcinoma (Wt, n = 358) between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Patients who received adjuvant EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The prognostic factors for RFS were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

The 5-year RFS rates in the Mt and Wt groups were 43.5 and 52.3%, respectively (p = 0.907). Prognostic factors for RFS in the Mt group included smoking history (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; p = 0.049), blood vessel invasion (HR, 1.84; p = 0.023), and lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.96; p = 0.005). However, adjuvant chemotherapy was not a prognostic factor (HR, 1.02; p = 0.906). In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) max standardized uptake value (SUV) ≥ 6.0 (HR, 1.53; p = 0.042), lymphatic vessel invasion (HR, 1.54; p = 0.036), lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.79; p = 0.002), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.60; p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for RFS in the Wt group.

Conclusions

Prognostic factors for RFS in stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma differ by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS also differed by EGFR mutation status.

Benefits from Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Possibility of Stratification by Gene Amplification of ACTN4 According to Evaluation of Metastatic Ability

Surgical treatment is the best curative treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but some patients have recurrence beyond the surgical margin even after receiving curative surgery. Therefore, therapies with anti-cancer agents also play an important role perioperatively. In this paper, we review the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC and describe promising perioperative therapies, including molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Previously reported biomarkers of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC are discussed along with their limitations. Adjuvant chemotherapy after resective surgery was most effective in patients with metastatic lesions located just outside the surgical margin; in addition, these metastatic lesions were the most sensitive to adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the first step in predicting patients who have sensitivity to adjuvant therapies is to perform a qualified evaluation of metastatic ability using markers such as actinin-4 (ACTN4). In this review, we discuss the potential use of biomarkers in patient stratification for effective adjuvant chemotherapy and, in particular, the use of ACTN4 as a possible biomarker for NSCLC.

Targeted Therapy in Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved tumor response rates and survival benefits in advanced oncogenic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the impressive success, a renewed interest has been raised in the study of these agents in the perioperative setting. Preliminary data have shown dramatic effectiveness compared to conventional chemotherapy. Given the explicit need to induce durable responses and raise cure rates, we summarize the current progression, identify key challenges, and raise potential opportunities for perioperative targeted therapy that range from precise biomarkers to optimal adjuvant regimens for individual patients. As perioperative treatment indeed provides researchers with a unique platform to address the challenges mentioned above, investigators could obtain a comprehensive analysis of genomic profiling and trace resistance mechanisms. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adaptive clinical trial designs are warranted to integrate translational research into personalized perioperative TKI treatment paradigms.

Adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: Eligible phase II/III randomized controlled trials were included for the network meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021275150). Results: Nine records and 831 patients were involved. Adjuvant chemotherapy followed with osimertinib significantly prolonged disease-free survival compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.14-0.29), chemotherapy followed with erlotinib (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18-0.6), chemotherapy followed with gefitinib (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.82), gefitinib (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.17-0.41) and icotinib (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.3-0.98). Icotinib was the least likely to cause grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion: Chemotherapy followed with osimertinib brings about the best disease-free survival. Icotinib monotherapy shows the best safety.

Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Ongoing Trials

The scenario of neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. As already happened for the advanced disease, also early stages have entered the era of precision medicine, with molecular analysis and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) evaluation that by now can be considered a routine assessment. New treatment options have been recently approved, with osimertinib now part of clinical practice for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutated (EGFRm) patients, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) available after FDA approval both in the adjuvant (atezolizumab) and neoadjuvant (nivolumab) setting. No mature data on overall survival benefits are available yet, though. Several clinical trials with specific-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and ICIs are currently ongoing, both with and without concomitant chemotherapy. As therapeutic strategies are rapidly expanding, quite a few questions remain unsettled, such as the optimal duration of adjuvant targeted therapy or the effective benefit of ICIs in early-stage EGFRm or ALK (Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase) rearranged patients, or the possibility to individuate high-risk patients after surgical resection assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) by ctDNA evaluation. We hereby report already available literature data and summarize ongoing trials with targeted therapy and immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC, focusing on practice-changing results and new perspectives for potentially cured patients.