1
|
Ozyigit G, Kahvecioglu A, Cengiz M, Yedekci FY, Hurmuz P. The effect of incidental dose to pelvic nodes in bladder-only irradiation in the era of IMRT: a dosimetric study. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:501-506. [PMID: 38888741 PMCID: PMC12014827 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02246-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE While three-dimensional radiotherapy (RT) causes high incidental nodal doses in bladder-only irradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the impact on pelvic lymphatics is unclear in the era of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). This study evaluates incidental doses to pelvic lymphatics in MIBC patients treated with IMRT. METHODS The data of 40 MIBC patients treated with bladder-only IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. The pelvic lymphatics were contoured on initial simulation images and incidental nodal doses were evaluated. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistics. RESULTS Median RT dose to the bladder was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In dosimetric analysis, median values of mean dose (Dmean) of the obturator, presacral, external iliac, internal iliac, and distal common iliac lymphatics were 33 Gy (range 4-50 Gy), 3 Gy (range 1-28 Gy), 9.5 Gy (range 3-41 Gy), 7.5 Gy (range 2-14 Gy), and 1 Gy (range 0-15 Gy), respectively. The Dmean of the obturator lymphatics was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and the Dmean of the distal common iliac lymphatics was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than all remaining lymphatic stations. The Dmean of the external iliac lymphatics was significantly higher than that of the presacral lymphatics (p < 0.001), but the difference with the internal iliac lymphatics was not statistically significant (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION The incidental nodal doses with bladder-only IMRT are heterogeneous and remain below the generally accepted doses for microscopic disease eradication for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokhan Ozyigit
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
- Oncology Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhiye-Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fazli Yagiz Yedekci
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, Choudhury A, Daneshmand S, Faltas BM, Flaig TW, Grass GD, Grivas P, Hansel DE, Hassanzadeh C, Kassouf W, Kukreja J, Mendoza-Valdés A, Moschini M, Mouw KW, Navai N, Necchi A, Rosenberg JE, Ross JS, Siefker-Radtke AO, Taylor J, Willliams SB, Zlotta AR, Buckley R, Kamat AM. Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00189-7. [PMID: 40268594 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patient-centric management necessitates providing care aligned with patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs. Therefore, critical assessment of bladder preservation therapies (BPTs) as alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and practical recommendations on the optimal selection of patients for BPTs are needed urgently. METHODS A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop BPT recommendations for MIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined based on discussions. Final recommendations achieved ≥75% agreement during the meeting, with further refinements through web conferences and e-mail discussions. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Patients with newly diagnosed MIBC should be offered evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting for consideration of BPTs. The main alternative to RC is trimodal therapy (TMT), and favorable prognostic factors for TMT include unifocal cT2 stage, lack of hydronephrosis, and no multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS). Other options should be reserved for very select patients who are ineligible for or who decline TMT or RC after thorough consideration of benefits versus risks. These include partial cystectomy (PC) for urachal adenocarcinoma and PC or radical transurethral resection alone for solitary tumors amenable to resection with adequate margins and without concomitant CIS or histologic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BPTs for MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bishoy M Faltas
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas W Flaig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - G Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Comron Hassanzadeh
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janet Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCC San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Urology and Medicine (Oncology), Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Taylor
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stephen B Willliams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Heath Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roger Buckley
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fong KY, Lim EJ, Wong HC, Tay KJ, Gan VHL, Ho HSS, Yuen JSP, Chen K. Trimodality therapy versus radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2025:S1078-1439(25)00011-0. [PMID: 39986911 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Revised: 12/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) is the guideline-recommended gold standard of curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Trimodality therapy (TMT) has recently emerged as a viable alternative treatment, aiming to improve long term survival and bladder preservation rates. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CENTRAL for randomized trials or covariate-matched studies comparing RC versus TMT for MIBC. A graphical reconstructive algorithm was used to obtain overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of individual patients, which was then pooled under random-effects individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis using Cox-models to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI. RESULTS Altogether, 11 studies, comprising mostly cT2-T4, node-negative, nonmetastatic MIBC, were analyzed. Across 9 studies (6780 patients), TMT was associated with lower OS versus RC (shared-frailty HR = 1.14, 95% CI, 1.08-1.21, P < 0.001). Estimated OS at 1, 5 and 10 years was 86%, 47% and 18% respectively for TMT, and 86%, 57% and 22% for RC. Across 8 studies (4,776 patients), TMT was associated with lower CSS versus RC (shared-frailty HR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.01-1.18, P = 0.024). Estimated CSS at 1, 5 and 10 years was 92%, 62% and 29% respectively for TMT, and 94%, 72% and 29% respectively for RC. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of large trials, our meta-analysis of studies of the next-highest quality of evidence suggests that RC may still confer OS and CSS benefit over TMT in MIBC. RC should remain the standard of care for nonmetastatic MIBC while TMT remains a valid alternative for carefully selected and informed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khi Yung Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore
| | - Ee Jean Lim
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Hung Chew Wong
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mertens LS, Bruins HM, Contieri R, Babjuk M, Rai BP, Puig AC, Escrig JLD, Gontero P, van der Heijden AG, Liedberg F, Martini A, Masson-Lecomte A, Meijer RP, Mostafid H, Neuzillet Y, Pradere B, Redlef J, van Rhijn BWG, Rouanne M, Rouprêt M, Sæbjørnsen S, Seisen T, Shariat SF, Soria F, Soukup V, Thalmann G, Xylinas E, Mariappan P, Alfred Witjes J. Consistencies in Follow-up After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Framework Based on Expert Practices Collaboratively Developed by the European Association of Urology Bladder Cancer Guideline Panels. Eur Urol Oncol 2025; 8:105-110. [PMID: 38906795 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion. METHODS We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Harman Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Albert Carrión Puig
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienca, Torina School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institute of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - John Redlef
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthieu Rouanne
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienca, Torina School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - George Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marcq G, Kool R, Dragomir A, Kulkarni GS, Breau RH, Kim M, Busca I, Abdi H, Dawidek M, Uy M, Fervaha G, Alimohamed N, Izawa J, Jeldres C, Rendon R, Shayegan B, Siemens R, Black PC, Cury FL, Kassouf W. Benefit of Whole-Pelvis Radiation for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:308-317. [PMID: 39361935 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The value of pelvic lymph node irradiation is debated for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing curative-intent radiation therapy (RT). We sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between bladder-only (BO)-RT and whole-pelvis (WP)-RT using a large Canadian multicenter collaborative database. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study cohort consisted of 809 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent curative RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the RT volume: WP-RT versus BO-RT. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Regression models were used to assess the effect of the RT volume on the rates of complete response (CR), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS After exclusion criteria, 599 patients were included, of whom 369 (61.6%) underwent WP-RT. Patients receiving WP-RT were younger (ASD, 0.41) and more likely to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (ASD, 0.21), clinical node-positive disease (ASD, 0.40), and lymphovascular invasion (ASD, 0.25). In addition, WP-RT patients were more commonly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ASD, 0.29) and concurrent chemotherapy (ASD, 0.44). In the IPTW cohort, BO-RT and WP-RT groups were well balanced (all pretreatment parameters with an ASD <0.10). In multivariable analysis, WP-RT was not associated with CR rates post-RT (odds ratio, 1.14 [95 CI, 0.76 to 1.72]; P = .526) but was associated with both CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93]; P = .016) and OS (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87]; P = .002), independent of other prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that WP radiation was associated with better survival compared with bladder radiation alone after adjusted analysis. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Ronald Kool
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Erasto Gaertner Cancer Center, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Alice Dragomir
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ionut Busca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hamidreza Abdi
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Dawidek
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael Uy
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gagan Fervaha
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Claudio Jeldres
- Division of Urology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pfail J, Lichtbroun B, Golombos DM, Jang TL, Packiam VT, Ghodoussipour S. The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement. Curr Opin Urol 2025; 35:115-122. [PMID: 39350629 PMCID: PMC11617270 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages. SUMMARY Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pfail
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin Lichtbroun
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David M. Golombos
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas L. Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vignesh T. Packiam
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feghaly C, Challita R, Hadir HB, Mobayed T, Bitar TA, Harbi M, Ghorayeb H, El-Hassan R, Bodgi L. Bladder Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Radiosensitivity Biomarkers. Biomark Insights 2024; 19:11772719241297168. [PMID: 39512649 PMCID: PMC11542137 DOI: 10.1177/11772719241297168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in men. While cystectomy remains the primary treatment, advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy have highlighted the value of bladder-preserving strategies, which can also enhance patients' quality of life. Despise these advances, around 20% of patients may still require salvage cystectomy due to tumor radioresistance. This underscores the need to develop radiosensitivity predictive assays. Radiotherapy acts by inducing DNA damage, primarily through DNA double-strand breaks, which can significantly affect treatment outcomes if left unrepaired. In addition to activating DNA repair pathways, the response to radiation also involves the tumor microenvironment, cell death pathways, immune responses and different types of cell death and proliferation receptors. In recent years, personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients, has gained increasing attention in cancer care. The development of chemo- and radiosensitivity predictive assays has become a key focus of cancer research. Despite the potential impact of such assays on bladder cancer treatment, there is still no reliable test that can help clinicians and informs patients in choosing the best treatment. This review aims to highlight studies that attempted to characterize bladder cancer radiosensitivity and to discuss the potential biomarkers that could be used to develop bladder cancer radiosensitivity predictive assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Feghaly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rafka Challita
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hanine Bou Hadir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tala Mobayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tarek Al Bitar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mohammad Harbi
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hala Ghorayeb
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rana El-Hassan
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Larry Bodgi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- U1296 Unit, “Radiation: Defense, Health and Environment”, Centre Léon-Bérard, Inserm, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roumiguié M, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Bajeot AS, Allory Y, Sargos P, Leon P, Audenet F, Xylinas E, Pradère B, Prost D, Seisen T, Thibault C, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102741. [PMID: 39581664 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was carried out, taking into account the elements of the diagnosis, the treatment options and the monitoring of NMIBC and MIBC, evaluating the references with their level of evidence. RESULTS MIBC is diagosed after the must complete tumor resection possible . CT-Urography coupled with chest CT scans are used to assess the extent of MIBC. Multiparametric pelvic MRI may be an alternative imaging approach. Cystectomy combined with standard lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for nonmetastatic MIBC. Neoadjuvant cispaltine-based chemotherapy should be used in patients in good general health with satisfactory renal function. Enterocystoplasty is proposed for men and women in the absence of contraindications and when urethral recutting is negative on extemporaneous examination; otherwise, transileal cutaneous ureterostomy is the recommended method of urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an improved recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab is recommended. Second-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended. CONCLUSION Updating the ccAFU recommendations should improve patient management and enhance the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude-Huriez Hospital, CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277, Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER), 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Teoh JYC, Shariat SF. Bladder sparing options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:471-476. [PMID: 39224913 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review critically evaluates the current state of bladder-sparing options in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and provides an overview of future directions in the field. RECENT FINDINGS Bladder-sparing treatments have emerged as viable alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for selected patients with MIBC, especially in those who are unfit for RC or elect bladder preservation. Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of trimodal therapy (TMT), with outcomes comparable to RC in a subgroup of well selected patients. Combining immunotherapy with conventional treatments in bladder-sparing approaches can yield promising outcomes. Current research is making significant progress in optimizing treatment protocols by exploring new combinations of systemic therapy agents, innovative drug delivery methods, and biomarker-based approaches. Furthermore, clinical markers of response are being tested to ensure adequate response assessment. SUMMARY Bladder preservation promise to offer a viable alternative to RC for selected patients with MIBC with the potential to improve patient quality of life. Careful patient selection and ongoing research are essential to optimize patient selection, response assessment, and salvage strategies. As evidence continues to evolve, the role of bladder preservation in MIBC is likely to expand, providing patients with more treatment options tailored to their needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hausmann J, Grunewald CM. [Can muscle invasive bladder cancer be treated without cystectomy in the future? : New data on trimodal therapy and bladder preservation after systemic therapy alone]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:985-993. [PMID: 39143395 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02420-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Muscle invasive bladder cancer is generally an aggressive disease. Radical cystectomy (RC) is traditionally the treatment of choice. Due to possible advantages in morbidity, peri-interventional mortality, and quality of life, bladder-preserving treatment strategies are of interest. Here, trimodal therapy (TMT) consisting of maximum transurethral resection and subsequent radiochemotherapy with subsequent cystoscopic follow-up plays an important role. Current cohort analyses indicate equivalent oncological results of TMT to RC in selected patients. However, the use of systemic therapy alone with combined chemo-/immunotherapy or cytotoxic combination therapy also shows promising efficacy both in early surrogate parameters and in oncological endpoints. Overall, studies to date suggest that bladder preservation is possible without compromising oncologic outcomes. Future developments aim to refine patient selection by combining different risk factors and biomarkers to further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hausmann
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Camilla M Grunewald
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaufmann E, Aeppli S, Arnold W, Balermpas P, Beyer J, Bieri U, Cathomas R, de Bari B, Dressler M, Engeler DS, Erdmann A, Gallina A, Gomez S, Guckenberger M, Herrmann TRW, Hermanns T, Ilaria L, John H, Kessler TM, Klein J, Laouiti M, Lauffer D, Mattei A, Müntener M, Nguyen D, Niederberger P, Papachristofilou A, Prause L, Reinhardt K, Salati E, Sèbe P, Shelan M, Strebel R, Templeton AJ, Vogl U, Wettstein MS, Zihler D, Zilli T, Zwahlen D, Roth B, Fankhauser C. Follow-up strategies after trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 2024; 42:527. [PMID: 39297968 PMCID: PMC11413066 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Optimal follow-up strategies following trimodal treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer play a crucial role in detecting and managing relapse and side-effects. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the patterns and risk factors of relapse, functional outcomes, and follow-up protocols. METHODS A systematic literature search on PubMed and review of current guidelines and institutional follow-up protocols after trimodal therapy were conducted. RESULTS Out of 200 identified publications, 43 studies (28 retrospective, 15 prospective) were selected, encompassing 7447 patients (study sizes from 24 to 728 patients). Recurrence rates in the urinary bladder varied between 14-52%; 3-16% were muscle-invasive while 11-36% were non-muscle invasive. Nodal recurrence occurred at 13-16% and distant metastases at 15-35%. After 5 and 10 years of follow-up, around 60-85% and 45-75% of patients could preserve their bladder, respectively. Various prognostic risk factors associated with relapse and inferior survival were proposed, including higher disease stage (> c/pT2), presence of extensive/multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS), hydronephrosis, multifocality, histological subtypes, incomplete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and incomplete response to radio-chemotherapy. The analyzed follow-up guidelines varied slightly in terms of the number, timing, and types of investigations, but overall, the recommendations were similar. CONCLUSION Randomized prospective studies should focus on evaluating the impact of specific follow-up protocols on oncological and functional outcomes following trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. It is crucial to evaluate personalized adaption of follow-up protocols based on established risk factors, as there is potential for improved patient outcomes and resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest Kaufmann
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Aeppli
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Winfried Arnold
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Universitiy Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Bieri
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Berardino de Bari
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel S Engeler
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Erdmann
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Gomez
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas R W Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape, South Africa
- Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Lucca Ilaria
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kessler
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Klein
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Müsterlingen, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Laouiti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Hôpital Riviera Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - David Lauffer
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel Nguyen
- Department of Urology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Lukas Prause
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Emanuela Salati
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Riviera Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Sèbe
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Räto Strebel
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Chur, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Department of Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel and Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Vogl
- Department of Oncology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Beat Roth
- Department of Urology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Christian Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murthy V, Kashid SR, Pal M, Vadassery A, Maitre P, Arora A, Singh P, Joshi A, Bakshi G, Prakash G. Prospective comparative study of quality of life in patients with bladder cancer undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit or bladder preservation. BMJ ONCOLOGY 2024; 3:e000435. [PMID: 39886177 PMCID: PMC11347679 DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Objective To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (RC) or bladder preservation (BP) with (chemo)radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Methods and analysis Patients with bladder cancer, stage cT1-T4, cN0-N1, M0 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months from curative treatment (RC or BP) and without disease were eligible for inclusion. Two HRQOL instruments were administered: Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) for bladder cancer-specific HRQOL and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The mean QOL scores across various domains and specific questions were compared between the two treatment groups using an independent t-test. Results Out of the 104 enrolled patients, 56 underwent RC and 48 opted for BP, with 95 (91.3%) being male. The median time from treatment completion to QOL assessment was 22 months (IQR 10-56). The median age for the entire cohort was 62 years (IQR 55-68), 65.5 years (IQR 55-71) in BP and 59.5 years (IQR 55-66) in RC. There was no significant difference in mean BCI urinary and bowel scores in function or bother subdomains between the two groups. Overall, BCI sexual scores were low in both groups but significantly better after BP (BPmean 56.9, RCmean 41.5, p=0.01). Mean scores for sexual function subdomain were BPmean 38.4 and RCmean 25 (p=0.07) and for sexual bother were BPmean 81 RCmean 62 (p=0.02). The EORTC QLQ-C30 outcomes did not show a significant difference in either group. Conclusion The BP group showed significantly better results in the sexual domain compared with the RC group. Both groups had good QOL in terms of urinary and bowel functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sheetal R Kashid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mahendra Pal
- Division of Uro Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Alvina Vadassery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amandeep Arora
- Division of Uro Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pallavi Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ganesh Bakshi
- Division of Uro Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gagan Prakash
- Division of Uro Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
He P, Ma L, Xu B, Wang Y, Li X, Chen H, Li Y. Research progress and future directions of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241266156. [PMID: 39091604 PMCID: PMC11292724 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241266156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, with the continuous development of molecular immunology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have also been widely used in the treatment of gastric cancer, but they still face some challenges: The first is that only some people can benefit, the second is the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occur during treatment, and the third is the emergence of varying degrees of drug resistance with long-term use. How to overcome these challenges, combined therapy based on ICIs has become one of the important strategies. This article summarizes the clinical application of ICIs combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, thermotherapy, immune adjuvant, and dual immunotherapy and discusses the mechanism, and also summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the current combination modalities and the potential research value. The aim of this study is to provide more and more optimized combination regimen for ICI combined therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer and to provide reference for clinical and scientific research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puyi He
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, China
| | - Long Ma
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, China
| | - Bo Xu
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, China
| | - Yunpeng Wang
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, China
| | - Xiaomei Li
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, Lanzhou, China
- No. 82, Cuiyingmen, Chengguan, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Yumin Li
- The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, Lanzhou, China
- No. 82, Cuiyingmen, Chengguan, Lanzhou 730030, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
von Deimling M, Mertens LS, Furrer M, Li R, Tendijck GAH, Taylor J, Crocetto F, Maas M, Mari A, Pichler R, Moschini M, Tully KH, D'Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Del Giudice F, Marcq G, Velev M, Gallioli A, Albisinni S, Mori K, Khanna A, Rink M, Fisch M, Minervini A, Black PC, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Kiss B, Shariat SF, Pradere B. The optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 134:119-127. [PMID: 38470089 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Kantonsspital Olten and Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guus A H Tendijck
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Maud Velev
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grobet-Jeandin E, Lenfant L, Pinar U, Parra J, Mozer P, Renard-Penna R, Thibault C, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:339-356. [PMID: 38297079 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00842-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Identification of clinically positive pelvic lymph node metastases (cN+) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is currently challenging, as the diagnostic accuracy of available imaging modalities is limited. Conventional CT is still considered the gold-standard approach to diagnose lymph node metastases in these patients. The development of innovative diagnostic methods including radiomics, artificial intelligence-based models and molecular biomarkers might offer new perspectives for the diagnosis of cN+ disease. With regard to the treatment of these patients, multimodal strategies are likely to provide the best oncological outcomes, especially using induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in responders to chemotherapy. Additionally, the use of adjuvant nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients who still harbour ypT2-T4a and/or ypN+ disease after surgery. Alternatively, the use of avelumab maintenance therapy can be offered to patients with unresectable cN+ tumours who have at least stable disease after induction chemotherapy alone. Lastly, patients with cN+ tumours who are not responding to induction chemotherapy are potential candidates for receiving second-line treatment with pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Radiology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of medical oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP centre, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li DX, Yu QX, Wu RC, Wang J, Feng DC, Deng S. Efficiency of bladder-sparing strategies for bladder cancer: an umbrella review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241249068. [PMID: 38736553 PMCID: PMC11088297 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241249068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder preservation (BP) has emerged as a clinical alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for alleviating the substantial physical and psychological burden imposed on localized bladder cancer patients. Nevertheless, disparities persist in the comparative evaluations of BP and RC. We aimed to address the disparities between BP and RC. An umbrella review and meta-analysis were conducted to explore these disparities. We extracted data from meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected after searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Review Manager 5.4.0 and R x64 4.1.3 were used to evaluate the collected data. Our study included 11 meta-analyses and 3 RCTs. In terms of progression-free survival, all the meta-analyses reported that patients with localized bladder cancer who underwent BP exhibited outcomes comparable to those who underwent RC. Meta-analyses regarding the outcomes of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) are controversial. To solve these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of CSS data, which supported the similarity of CSS between BP and RC with no significant heterogeneity [odds ratio (OR): 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-2.02; I2 = 26%]. Similarly, the pooled OS results extracted from three RCTs indicated the comparability of OS between BP and RC with no significant heterogeneity (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.41-3.07; I2 = 33%). A combination of umbrella review and meta-analysis results suggested that BP had survival rates comparable to those of RC. We suggest that BP may be a more eligible therapy than RC for patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This conclusion warrants further validation through randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deng-xiong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing-xin Yu
- Ningbo Diagnostic Pathology Center, Ningbo City, Zhejiang, China
| | - Rui-cheng Wu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - De-chao Feng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Shi Deng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Calleris G, von Deimling M, Kesch C, Soria F, Gontero P, Ploussard G, Laukhtina E, Pradere B. Definitions, outcomes and perspectives for oligometastatic bladder cancer: towards a standardized terminology. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:217-224. [PMID: 38426242 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic (om) cancer is considered as a transitional state in between locally confined disease and widespread metastases, accessible to a multimodal treatment, combining systemic and local therapy. In urothelial bladder cancer (BCa), the definitions and the approaches to this condition are poorly standardised and mainly based on retrospective data. We aim to portray the framework for uro-oncologic terminology in omBCa and go through the latest evidence and the future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Retrospective and registry data support the potential benefits of multimodality treatment for carefully selected omBCa patients, especially following a good response to systemic treatment. In 2023, a Delphi consensus has defined omBCa, allowing maximum three metastatic lesions, theoretically amenable to radical local treatment. In de-novo omBCa, surgical treatment of primary tumour might improve overall survival (OS), according to a matched registry analysis; also, consolidative radiotherapy was associated with better OS in two recent cohorts. Furthermore, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has shown high local control rates and promising OS (14.9-51 months) in a meta-analysis; benefits might be more pronounced for single-site omBCa and nodal or lung lesions. SUMMARY From a clinical perspective, in de-novo omBCa, the local treatment of primary and metastatic sites might improve disease control and survival, in selected patients; in the oligorecurrent setting, MDT achieves good local symptom control with limited side effects; in selected cases, it could convey a survival benefit, too. From a research perspective, well designed prospective evidence is eagerly awaited, based on recently adopted shared definitions for omBCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Polytechnic and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Swinton M, Devi A, Song YP, Hoskin P, Choudhury A. Beyond surgery: bladder preservation and the role of systemic treatment in localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:210. [PMID: 38573431 PMCID: PMC10994870 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04892-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the last two to three decades the non-surgical curative management of bladder cancer has significantly progressed. Increasing evidence supports the use of bladder preservation as an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Radiosensitisation with chemotherapy or hypoxia modification improves the efficacy of radiotherapy. Systemic treatments play an important role in the management of localised MIBC with the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical treatment well established. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the radical treatment of bladder cancer, their safe combination with radical radiotherapy regimens and whether the addition of ICIs improve rates of cure are outstanding questions beginning to be answered by ongoing clinical trials. In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence for bladder preservation and the role of systemic treatments for localised MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Swinton
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aarani Devi
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Yee Pei Song
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Meagher M, Morgan KM, Deshler L, Puri D, Yuen K, Bagrodia A, Rose B, Stewart T, Salmasi A. The Role of Radical Cystectomy in Clinically Node Positive Bladder Cancer: A US Veterans Health Administration Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102055. [PMID: 38458889 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of local definitive therapy in addition to systemic treatment in clinically positive regional lymph node (cN+) bladder cancer is yet to be determined. Herein, we sought to investigate the role of radical cystectomy (RC) in management of patients with cN+ bladder cancer at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities. METHODS We identified patients diagnosed with cN+ bladder cancer between 2000-2017 using the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI). We employed a combination of database/registry coded values and chart review for data collection. To minimize mortality bias, we excluded patients who died within 90 days of diagnosis. We divided the patients into cystectomy (C) versus "no cystectomy" (NOC) cohorts. Propensity score matching was performed based on predictors of undergoing RC. Multivariable Cox models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CCS). RESULT After matching, 158 patients were included in the C and NOC groups. In the C-group, 85(54%) patients received pre-cystectomy chemotherapy, and 73(46%) patients underwent post-cystectomy chemotherapy. In the C-group, 65(41%) patients and in the NOC-group, 66(42%) patients had clinical N1 disease (P = .77). In multivariable Cox model, undergoing RC was associated with improved OS (HR0.62; 95%CI 0.47-0.81), P < .001) and CSS (HR0.58; 95%CI 0.42-0.80; P < .001). CONCLUSION As part of multimodal treatment, undergoing RC was associated with improved OS and CSS in subset of patients with cN+ bladder cancer. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to further investigate the role of local definitive therapy in this specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kylie M Morgan
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Leah Deshler
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kit Yuen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Swinton M, Hoskin P, Choudhury A. Reply to W. He et al. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:615-616. [PMID: 38051978 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Swinton
- Martin Swinton, MBBChir, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Peter Hoskin, MD, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Ananya Choudhury, PhD, MA, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Martin Swinton, MBBChir, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Peter Hoskin, MD, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Ananya Choudhury, PhD, MA, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Martin Swinton, MBBChir, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Peter Hoskin, MD, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and Ananya Choudhury, PhD, MA, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
He W, Zeng S, Xu C. Controversy Surrounding Bladder-Sparing Radical Dose Radiotherapy as an Alternative to Radical Cystectomy for Clinically Node-Positive Nonmetastatic Bladder Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:614-615. [PMID: 38051990 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuxiong Zeng
- Wei He, MD, Shuxiong Zeng, MD, PhD, and Chuanliang Xu, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Wei He, MD, Shuxiong Zeng, MD, PhD, and Chuanliang Xu, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ashley S, Choudhury A, Hoskin P, Song Y, Maitre P. Radiotherapy in metastatic bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:47. [PMID: 38244091 PMCID: PMC10799782 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review available and emerging evidence of radiotherapy for symptom management and disease control in metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS A literature search and subsequent cross-referencing were carried out for articles in the PubMed and Scopus databases using terms 'radiotherapy' OR 'palliative radiation therapy' with 'metastatic bladder cancer' OR 'advanced bladder cancer' between 1990 and 2023, excluding articles with no English translation. RESULTS Palliative radiotherapy is an effective and accessible treatment for the alleviation of haematuria and pain due to the primary and metastatic disease. With growing recognition of oligometastatic disease state at diagnosis, response, or progression, radiotherapy can consolidate response by ablating residual or resistant lesions. Experience with other primary cancers supports positive impact of radiotherapy on disease control, quality of life, and survival in oligometastatic stage, without significant adverse effects. Alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth receptor inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, the immunomodulatory potential of radiotherapy is being explored in combination with these systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy is an effective, safe, and accessible treatment modality for palliation as well as disease control in various clinical settings of metastatic bladder cancer. Its role in oligometastatic stage in combination with systemic therapy is expected to expand with emerging evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Ashley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - YeePei Song
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tkacz J, Ireland A, Agatep B, Ellis L, Balaji H, Khaki AR. An assessment of the direct and indirect costs of bladder cancer preceding and following a cystectomy: a real-world evidence study. J Med Econ 2024; 27:963-971. [PMID: 39028539 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2382639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To estimate the direct and indirect costs of bladder cancer prior to and following cystectomy in a U.S. sample of patients. METHODS This retrospective, observational analysis of de-identified patients with bladder cancer utilized the MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Health & Productivity Management databases. Adult patients with bladder cancer plus ≥ 1 claim for partial or radical cystectomy between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2020 (date of the cystectomy = index date) and who were continuously enrolled for 6 months pre- (baseline) and post-index (follow-up) were included in the sample. All-cause total healthcare costs and indirect costs associated with short-term and long-term disability (STD and LTD) employer claims were assessed during each of the 6-month baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS The study included N = 142 patients; mean age 56 ± 6 years, 76% (male), and 42% had a baseline Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2. Baseline mean total all-cause direct healthcare costs were $51,473 ± $48,560 (median: $36,202), and $99,524 ± 86,839 (median: $75,444) during follow-up. At baseline, 32% of patients had ≥ 1 STD claim, equating to a mean 134 ± 303 h lost and $2,353 ± $6,445 in total payments per patient. Follow up STD claims increased 23.4% equating to a mean 218 ± 324 h lost and $3,679 ± $7,795 per patient. Patient LTD claims increased from baseline to follow-up (1-3%), with post-cystectomy LTD claims resulting in 574 ± 490 h lost, and $1,636 ± $1,429 in total payments. Over 85% of the population had a cystectomy related complication, the most common were genitourinary-related (47.9%) and infection/sepsis (33.1%). CONCLUSIONS Cystectomy was associated with complications and decreased work productivity post-surgery. Findings may aid to inform decisions regarding cystectomy vs. bladder preservation approaches, and underscores an ongoing need to further develop bladder preservation therapies within the bladder cancer treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Ireland
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | | | - Lorie Ellis
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Hiremagalur Balaji
- Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Seisen T, Rouprêt M, Trinh QD, Bellmunt J. Re: Martin Swinton, Neethu Billy Graham Mariam, Jean Ling Tan, et al. Bladder-Sparing Treatment with Radical Dose Radiotherapy Is an Effective Alternative to Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinically Node-positive Nonmetastatic Bladder Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4406-4415. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e19-e21. [PMID: 37865549 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seisen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Swinton M, Hoskin P, Choudhury A. Reply to Thomas Seisen, Morgan Rouprêt, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Joaquim Bellmunt's Letter to the Editor re: Martin Swinton, Neethu Billy Graham Mariam, Jean Ling Tan, et al. Bladder-Sparing Treatment with Radical Dose Radiotherapy Is an Effective Alternative to Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinically Node-positive Nonmetastatic Bladder Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:4406-15. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e22-e23. [PMID: 37865547 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Swinton
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Ananya Choudhury
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hensley PJ, Choudhury A, Khaki AR, Grivas P, Kamat AM. The 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Critical Appraisal. Eur Urol 2024; 85:32-34. [PMID: 37919189 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Toroń M, Wołoszyn A. [Organ-sparing treatment of node-positive bladder cancer]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:1255-1257. [PMID: 37773268 PMCID: PMC10673725 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02156-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Toroń
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
- Schlesische Medizinische Universität in Katowice, Katowice, Polen.
| | - Antoni Wołoszyn
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
- Schlesische Medizinische Universität in Katowice, Katowice, Polen
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ran S, Yang J, Hu J, Fang L, He W. Identifying Optimal Candidates for Trimodality Therapy among Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10166-10178. [PMID: 38132374 PMCID: PMC10742539 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This research aims to identify candidates for trimodality therapy (TMT) or radical cystectomy (RC) by using a predictive model. (2) Methods: Patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled. The clinical data of 2174 eligible patients were extracted and separated into RC and TMT groups. To control for confounding bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out. A nomogram was established via multivariable logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to assess the nomogram's prediction capacity. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was carried out to determine the nomogram's clinical applicability. (3) Results: After being processed with PSM, the OS of the RC group was significantly longer compared with the TMT group (p < 0.001). This remarkable capacity for discrimination was exhibited in the training (AUC: 0.717) and validation (AUC: 0.774) sets. The calibration curves suggested acceptable uniformity. Excellent clinical utility was shown in the DCA curve. The RC and RC-Beneficial group survived significantly longer than the RC and TMT-Beneficial group (p < 0.001) or the TMT group (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the RC and TMT-Beneficial group and the TMT group (p = 0.321). (4) Conclusions: A predictive model with excellent discrimination and clinical application value was established to identify the optimal patients for TMT among nonmetastatic MIBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengming Ran
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| | - Jingtian Yang
- Department of Urology, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518116, China;
| | - Jintao Hu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| | - Liekui Fang
- Department of Urology, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518116, China;
| | - Wang He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| |
Collapse
|