Multidisciplinary Management of Cancer During Pregnancy

Women's perspectives on communication following the diagnosis of gestational or postpartum cancer: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Cancer during pregnancy or the postpartum period is rare, and the clinical management of cancer during this period is complex due to a lack of evidence-based approaches and logistical challenges. Effective communication between women and healthcare providers (HCPs) is critical in navigating these challenges, and communication gaps may contribute to unmet informational and emotional needs, affecting decision-making and overall care experiences.

AIM

This study aimed to understand women's perspectives on communication with their healthcare providers (HCPs) following a gestational cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with women who experienced cancer during pregnancy or the postpartum period (12 months after giving birth). Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

17 women participated in this study. Participants varied in age, timing, and cancer diagnosis. Seven women were diagnosed with breast cancer, while the remaining were diagnosed with a variety of cancers, including melanoma, lymphoma, thyroid, ovarian, uterine, bowel, and oropharyngeal cancer. Notably, 10 participants were diagnosed with cancer in the postpartum period, whereas seven were diagnosed during pregnancy. Three overarching themes emerged from the thematic analysis: 1) "Scarcity of information," 2) "Not involved in treatment decisions," and 3) "Centralised resources and advocacy."

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides crucial insights into the challenges faced by women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy and the postpartum period, particularly regarding communication with HCPs. This highlights the urgent need for enhanced communication, education, and support for HCPs along with tailored resources for women with gestational cancer. Coordinated multidisciplinary care and dedicated advocacy by nurses or midwives are essential to address these challenges and improve health care outcomes for women and their families.

Colon Cancer and Pregnancy

As the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the younger population increases and women start their childbearing journey at later ages, CRC in pregnancy will become an increasingly relevant and decreasingly rare occurrence. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of data on this subject given its historical rarity. CRC is often diagnosed at a late stage in pregnancy because of the conflation of symptoms of pregnancy with symptoms of CRC. A major branch point for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC in pregnancy is whether it is diagnosed early or late in pregnancy. The workup for cancer is similar for pregnant and nonpregnant populations and includes endoscopy and staging computed tomography. Treatment is dependent on the stage of cancer and term of pregnancy. This review summarizes the current evidence for diagnosis, workup, and treatment of CRC during pregnancy and explores issues of fertility after a diagnosis of CRC.

[Haematological malignancies in pregnancy]

The management of haematological malignancies in pregnancy represents a complex medical challenge. These rare conditions require multidisciplinary collaboration to address both the maternal risks associated with physiological changes and the foetal risks, such as malformations or prematurity associated with treatment. However, data to guide the care of these patients are still limited. Comprehensive research is needed to better understand these diseases, assess the impact of treatments and optimise care, including the involvement of pregnant patients in clinical trials to improve their access to innovative therapies. This article provides an overview of the issues involved in the management of haematological malignancies during pregnancy, highlighting the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic challenges.

Haematological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review of necessary services in the Australian context

BACKGROUND

Haematological malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy are rare, with increasing incidence, presenting unique therapeutic, social and ethical challenges for treating teams, patients and their family. There are no national guidelines regarding appropriate referral pathways, resources and services for the management of these patients.

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the multidisciplinary team members required for optimal care of pregnant patients with haematological malignancies. These data will be used to evaluate the capabilities of Australian health networks to provide coordinated care.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases was conducted. Eligible studies focused on pregnant Australian patients with haematological malignancies, exploring care models, specialist teams and services utilised. This was then used to generate a map of Australian hospitals that can service this patient demographic.

RESULTS

Essential team members include haematologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, anaesthetists, midwives, intensive care specialists, psychologists and social workers. Services utilised include haematology, maternity, intensive care, tertiary imaging, operating theatre, pharmacy and perinatal mental health services. Utilising these data, 25 hospitals can manage these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the necessary healthcare practitioners, services and hospitals available that can manage this patient cohort. Future research should focus on determining ideal treatment regimens, timing of therapy throughout gestation, establishing a national patient registry and implementing a cancer care plan and frameworks for best practice care. A centralised referral pathway leveraging telehealth will allow expedient, multidisciplinary action and equity in access to all women across Australia.

Obstetric and perinatal management in the setting of cancer

Obstetric care for patients with cancer diagnoses during pregnancy is medically and ethically complex, and limited prospective data and national guidelines are available to guide care. Guiding principles for treatment are to optimize maternal outcomes while minimizing neonatal morbidity. Oncologic work- up and management are dependent on the trimester of diagnosis, and are specific to the type, stage, and grade of the oncologic diagnosis. Obstetric care should occur within a multidisciplinary setting, with involvement of maternal fetal medicine, oncologic specialists, and mental health support.

Diagnosis and Management of Cancers in Pregnancy: The Results of a Dual Battle Between Oncological Condition and Maternal Environment-Literature Review

Cancer during pregnancy presents considerable challenges that arise from various factors, including the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications of managing cancer in this unique patient population. There is a crucial need for an integrated approach that aligns medical interventions for both the pregnant patient and the developing embryo or fetus. Furthermore, the distinct characteristics associated with each stage of gestation may significantly influence the treatment protocols that can be proposed. Due to all of these factors, the importance of collaboration among healthcare professionals from different specialties (to ensure that both mother and child receive optimal care throughout the pregnancy) is often neglected. This review is designed to provide a thorough overview of the current standard procedures regarding the diagnosis and treatment options for cancer in pregnant patients in order to ensure the safety of mother and child. Furthermore, the review describes the feasibility of current fertility preservation methods, highlights the psychological effects of cancer during pregnancy and examines the risks and benefits of breastfeeding.

Incidence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following pregnancy-associated colorectal cancer: A population-based linked data study

AIM

The study aimed to describe the incidence of pregnancy-associated colorectal cancer (PACRC) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to examine the perinatal outcomes of women with PACRC and their babies.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study was conducted using linked data from NSW. The study group comprised all women diagnosed with colorectal cancer during pregnancy (gestational CRC) or postpartum (postpartum CRC). Women who gave birth without cancer during pregnancy or postpartum formed the comparison group (no-cancer group).

RESULTS

A total of 123 women were diagnosed with PACRC (22 gestational, 101 postpartum), and 1 786 078 women were in the no-cancer group. The incidence of PACRC was 6.9/100 000 women giving birth. From 1994 to 2013, the incidence significantly increased even when adjusting for maternal age (adjusted increase of 5.8% per year). Women with gestational CRC had significantly higher odds of severe maternal complications (AOR 29.27, 95% CI: 11.18-76.63) and were more likely to give birth by labor induction or no-labor caesarean section (AOR 4.39, 95% CI: 1.50-12.84) than women in the no-cancer group. Although babies born to women with gestational CRC did not experience congenital anomalies, they had higher odds of planned preterm birth (AOR 9.91, 95% CI: 1.99-49.21) and severe neonatal adverse outcomes (AOR 8.65, CI: 3.65-20.5) than babies of women without cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found a significant increase in PACRC incidence in NSW over the study period, independent of maternal age. Increased interventions during gestational CRC births reflect management challenges with higher maternal and neonatal morbidities.

Out-of-field dose assessment for pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy versus photon radiotherapy for breast cancer in pregnant women

Background and purpose

Cancer affects 1 in 1000-2000 pregnancies annually worldwide, creating challenges in balancing cancer treatment and fetal safety. This study compares out-of-field radiation doses between two treatment modalities: 6MV external photon radiotherapy (XRT) and pencil beam scanning proton-therapy (PBS-PRT) for breast cancer, including imaging, to evaluate PBS-PRT as a potential new treatment option.

Materials and methods

For breast cancer involving lymph node levels 1-4 and the intramammary lymph nodes, treatment plans were created for XRT (with Flattening Filter (FF) and FF-Free (FFF)) and PBS-PRT, prescribing 15 × 2.67 Gy(RBE). Measurements were conducted using an adapted anthropomorphic phantom representing 20- and 30-week pregnancy. Bubble detectors placed in the phantom's abdomen assessed neutron dose from PBS-PRT, while a Farmer ion chamber was used for imaging and XRT dose.

Results

At 20 weeks, PBS-PRT including imaging delivered 22.4 mSv, reducing dose 3.4-fold versus 6FF XRT and 2.5-fold versus 6FFF XRT. At 30 weeks, the PBS-PRT dose was 25.4 mSv, resulting in 7.6-fold and 6.3-fold reductions compared to 6FF and 6FFF XRT, respectively.

Conclusions

This study presents the first one-by-one comparison between PBS-PRT and different XRT modalities for pregnant breast cancer patients with an adapted anthropomorphic phantom. PBS-PRT measurements showed that the total equivalent dose was below the 100 mSv threshold outlined in AAPM Task Group Report No. 36 for a 30-week pregnancy, even under a worst-case scenario, maintaining treatment goals. These findings support the adoption of PBS-PRT as the preferred approach for treating pregnant breast cancer patients, should radiotherapy be required.

Neuroendocrine tumours and pregnancy: Real-world data from an European Neuroendocrine Tumour Centre of Excellence

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from the diffuse endocrine system and have been considered to be rare. However, the incidence and prevalence of these tumours have increased in recent years, and they are being seen in younger patients including women in the reproductive age group. Due to the paucity of data, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in managing such tumours during pregnancy can be challenging to both treating physicians and patients. This article describes the experience and outcomes of managing pregnant women with NEN at a European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated a total of 22 pregnancies in 18 pregnant women with concurrent diagnoses of NENs who were managed at Royal Free Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence throughout their pregnancy. These were identified from our tumour registry of 3500 NEN patients between 2015 and 2023. Cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), pre- and post-pregnancy, for each patient was reviewed by an experienced radiologist. Tumour growth rate (TGR) was calculated using the formula: TGR = 100 × [exp (TG) - 1]; TG. [3 × log (D2/D1)]/time (months), where D1 is the tumour size at date 1; D2 is the tumour size at date 2; and time (months) = (Date 2 - Date 1 + 1)/30.44. Tumour growth rate pre-conception (TGRpc) and tumour growth rate post-partum (TGRpp) were calculated for each patient. In a sub-group of patients, positivity for oestrogen and progesterone receptors were analysed on the tumour tissue to evaluate whether the presence of these receptors affected tumour progression during the pregnancy. We also reviewed the pregnancy outcome in patients treated with somatostatin analogues during pregnancy. We analysed the data of a total 22 pregnancy encounters in 18 women: 15 pregnancies (68%) preceded the diagnosis of the NEN, whereas the diagnosis of NEN was made during pregnancy or in the post-partum period in 5 (23%) and 2 (9%) pregnancies respectively. Eight patients (44%) had a diagnosis of a pancreatic NEN, whereas 5 (28%) were diagnosed with mid-gut NENs, and a further 5 at other sites. The majority of the patients (n = 12, 67%) had evidence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Most pregnancies had a successful outcome (n = 19, 86%), whereas 3 patients (14%) had miscarriages in the 1st trimester. Five patients in total of 6 pregnancies were treated with somatostatin analogues as monotherapy during the pregnancy, and all of them had stable disease after pregnancy. All of them delivered healthy babies without any side effects or complications due to therapy. The average TGRpc was -0.8% (n = 5) and the average TGRpp was +0.96% (n = 6); 2 patients who did not have suitable targets for calculation of TGRpc developed new lesions suggesting disease progression. Moreover, 2 of the 4 patients who have had both pre-conception and post-pregnancy scans showed an increase in TGRpp compared to TGRpc. The management of NENs during pregnancy should be multidisciplinary with an individualised approach to each patient. Somatostatin analogues appear to be safe during pregnancy, though further robust studies are needed. Pregnancy per se may accelerate tumour progression, and patients should be counselled regarding this possibility.

Maternal and obstetric outcomes in women with pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies: an observational nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy-associated haematological malignancy is a rare event; therefore, data available to guide the treatment are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, overall survival, and maternal morbidity and mortality of women with pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide observational cohort study using the French National Healthcare Data System (SNDS), a health-care administrative database covering up to 99% of the French population. We included all pregnancies in France ending between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2022. Pregnancies with terminations or miscarriages managed on an outpatient basis, and women with a history of haematological malignancies before pregnancy were excluded. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess overall survival, defined as the date of haematological malignancy diagnosis to either death or the end of the study follow-up, in the haematological malignancy during pregnancy group (pregnancies with a diagnosis of haematological malignancy during pregnancy) compared with the haematological malignancy post-pregnancy group (pregnancies with a diagnosis of haematological malignancy in the year following pregnancy). Severe maternal morbidity was compared in the haematological malignancy during pregnancy group versus the reference group (pregnancies without a history of haematological malignancy or a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated haematological malignancy). Births were classified as very preterm (<32 weeks of pregnancy), preterm (32-36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks) and compared in the haematological malignancy during pregnancy group versus the reference group. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used for confounder adjustment, using maternal age (categorised), comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and year of delivery (as a category).

FINDINGS

Of 9 996 523 pregnancies in 5 995 235 women, 1366 pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies were identified: 413 during pregnancy (4·13 per 100 000 pregnancies) and 953 (9·53 per 100 000 pregnancies) within 12 months of the end of pregnancy (post-pregnancy). No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the haematological malignancy during and post-pregnancy groups across all types of haematological malignancy (IPW-adjusted hazard ratio 0·91 [95% CI 0·62-1·34], p=0·63), specifically for Hodgkin lymphoma (0·56 [0·07-4·53], p=0·59), aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (0·52 [0·12-2·38], p=0·40), and acute leukaemia alone (0·84 [0·50-1·41], p=0·51). Severe maternal morbidity was more frequent in the haematological malignancy during pregnancy group than in the reference group (86 [26·2%] of 328 completed pregnancies vs 120 335 [1·5%] of 7 945 909 completed pregnancies; IPW-adjusted odds ratio 22·71 [95% CI 17·72-29·10], p<0·0001). We observed an increase in very preterm birth (32 [9·8%] vs 92 712 [1·2%]; IPW-adjusted odds ratio 11·90 [95% CI 7·91-17·91], p<0·0001) and preterm birth (116 [35·4%] vs 430 472 [5·4%]; 11·76 [9·34-14·81], p<0·0001) in the haematological malignancy during pregnancy group compared with the reference group.

INTERPRETATION

This nationwide observational study examines pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies in France, revealing no significant difference in overall survival between women diagnosed during pregnancy and post-pregnancy. Our data highlight an increased frequency of severe maternal morbidity and obstetric complications among women diagnosed during pregnancy. Notably, the study underscores the necessity for specialised care to manage these complex cases effectively.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

An audit of the maternal medicine clinic: Cancer and pregnancy

AIMS

To explore the incidence and complexity of women presenting for maternity care who require concurrent cancer care, and to report the birth outcomes of these women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective audit of women attending a 'high risk' maternal medicine clinic at an Australian tertiary maternity hospital between 1 October 2021 and 30 April 2023 was conducted. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of cancer and a concurrent pregnancy, or a diagnosis of cancer prior to the current pregnancy. Clinic lists and coding data were screened via the electronic medical record to identify potential subjects. Data were collected from the individual maternity and neonatal records.

RESULTS

Forty of 705 (5.7%) women attending the maternal medicine clinic met the inclusion criteria, of which ten had a new diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy and 30 presented for maternity care after a previous diagnosis of cancer. Cancer therapy during pregnancy included surgery and chemotherapy. Most pregnancies (92.5%) resulted in term deliveries (≥37 weeks gestation). Four neonates were preterm, and one was small-for-gestational-age. Caesarean section delivery and post-partum haemorrhage were more common than expected, but the rate of other adverse pregnancy outcomes was consistent with the background population. Over half of neonates required neonatal intensive care unit / special care nursery admission but the indications for admission were common, self-limiting conditions, and the length of stay was short (mean <5.0 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 6% of women attending the maternal medicine clinic had a current or previous diagnosis of cancer. Most pregnancies resulted in term deliveries and neonatal outcomes were excellent.

Assessing teratogenic risks of gadolinium in freshwater environments: Implications for environmental health

Gadolinium (Gd) is among the rare earth elements extensively utilized in both industrial and medical applications. The latter application appears to contribute to the rise in Gd levels in aquatic ecosystems, as it is excreted via urine from patients undergoing MRI scans and often not captured by wastewater treatment systems. The potential environmental and biological hazards posed by gadolinium exposure are still under investigation. This study aimed to assess the teratogenic risk posed by a gadolinium chelate on the freshwater cnidarian Hydra vulgaris. The experimental design evaluated the impact of pure Gadodiamide (25 μg/l, 50 μg/l, 100 μg/l, 500 μg/l) and its commercial counterpart compound (Omniscan®; 100 μg/l, 500 μg/l, 782.7 mg/l) at varying concentrations using the Teratogenic Risk Index (TRI). Here we showed a moderate risk (Class III of TRI) following exposure to both tested formulations at concentrations ≥ 100 μg/l. Given the potential for similar concentrations in aquatic environments, particularly near wastewater discharge points, a teratogenic risk assessment using the Hydra regeneration assay was conducted on environmental samples collected from three rivers (Tiber, Almone, and Sacco) in Central Italy. Additionally, chemical analysis of field samples was performed using ICP-MS. Analysis of freshwater samples revealed low Gd concentrations (≤ 0.1 μg/l), despite localized increases near domestic and/or industrial wastewater discharge sites. Although teratogenic risk in environmental samples ranged from high (Class IV of TRI) to negligible (Class I of TRI), the low Gd concentrations, particularly when compared to higher levels of other contaminants like arsenic and heavy metals, preclude establishing a direct cause-effect relationship between Gd and observed teratogenic risks in environmental samples. Nevertheless, the teratogenic risks observed in laboratory tests warrant further investigation.

Effects of maternal taxane chemotherapy exposure on daughters' ovarian reserve and fertility potential

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term effects of in utero taxane exposure on exposed daughters' ovarian reserve and reproductive potential.

DESIGN

Pregnant dams were treated with a single, human-relevant animal-equivalent dose of saline, docetaxel, or paclitaxel at embryonic day 16.5. In utero-exposed daughters were aged to multiple postnatal time points for ovarian and endocrine analysis or were bred to assess fertility and fecundity. Granddaughters of treated dams were assessed also for ovarian follicle composition and atresia.

SETTING

Laboratory study.

ANIMALS

C57BL/6 mice.

INTERVENTION(S)

In utero exposure to saline, docetaxel, or paclitaxel.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ovarian follicle composition, rates of follicle atresia, and rates of multioocyte follicles were analyzed in all exposure groups. Serum hormone levels and oocyte retrieval outcomes following ovarian hyperstimulation were also assessed. Finally, animals from all exposure groups were bred with the number of litters, pups per litter, live births, interlitter time interval, and age at the last litter analyzed.

RESULT(S)

We found that docetaxel and paclitaxel exposure in utero results in ovarian toxicity later in life, significantly affecting folliculogenesis as well as increasing the rate of follicular abnormalities, including follicle atresia and multioocyte follicles. Furthermore, viability staining indicates that the ovaries of daughters exposed to taxanes in utero demonstrate a significantly higher number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling-positive follicles. Hormone measurements also revealed that serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentration was significantly altered in taxane-exposed daughters, with the ratio of luteinizing hormone to follicle-stimulating hormone significantly elevated, specifically after paclitaxel exposure, coincident with the inability of these animals to properly respond to ovarian stimulation. Breeding studies over the course of a year also suggest that these taxane-exposed mice are fertile, although the duration of their fertility is shortened and they produce significantly fewer litters. Finally, ovarian effects are apparent in granddaughters of mice treated with docetaxel, suggesting persistent and multigenerational effects of taxane exposure.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our studies demonstrate that in utero exposure to taxane-based therapy during late gestation has a significant effect on the long-term reproductive health of exposed daughters (as well as their daughters) and will be instrumental in helping clinicians better understand which chemotherapies for maternal malignancy are least detrimental to a developing fetus.

Pregnancy-Associated Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to systematically evaluate and quantify the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC). This study was conducted from February 13, 2021, through July 24, 2023. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes for patients with PAC. The study was registered on PROSPERO. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. The associations were quantified using random-effects meta-analysis. The initial search produced 29,401 titles and abstracts, after which 147 unique full-text articles were screened, of which 22 articles with 59,190 pregnancies with PAC from 70,097,167 births were included in the meta-analysis. Women with PAC were at significantly increased risk of cesarean deliveries (risk ratio [RR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.31-1.89), preterm birth (RR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.37-3.98), venous thromboembolism (RR, 6.76; 95% CI, 5.08-8.99), and maternal death (RR, 41.58; 95% CI, 20.38-84.83). The only outcome with reduced risk was instrumental mode of delivery (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87). Pregnancy-associated cancer increases risk of adverse outcomes, including a 7-fold risk of venous thromboembolism and a 42-fold risk of maternal death. Further research is required to better understand the mechanisms leading to these adverse outcomes, especially for women who are not diagnosed until the postpartum period. Affected women should have counseling regarding their increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Survival in pregnancy-associated breast cancer patients compared to non-pregnant controls

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a rare entity whose prognosis has previously been studied and is subject to controversy.

METHODS

Survival of patients with PABC diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 with breast cancer during pregnancy or until 1 year after childbirth was compared with non-pregnant patients with breast cancer from the same period at La Paz University Hospital. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival between the groups, adjusting for grade and pathologic stage.

RESULTS

Among the 89 included patients with breast cancer, 34 were diagnosed during pregnancy, and 55 were not pregnant. The pregnant patients were more likely to have grade 3 tumors (61.3% vs 37%, p = 0.023) and an advanced stage (pathologic stage III-IV: 44.1% vs 17.6%, p = 0.008). Median follow-up was 47 months for the pregnant group and 46 months for the control group. After adjustments for tumor grade and pathologic stage, OS was comparable between the groups (HR 2.03; 95% CI 0.61 to 6.79; P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of women diagnosed with PABC is comparable to young non-pregnant controls. However, it should be taken into account that PABC has a more aggressive phenotype.

Treating anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-driven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with alectinib through pregnancy

Management of cancer during pregnancy requires careful consideration of risks and benefits from maternal and fetal perspectives. For advanced lung adenocarcinomas, with no targetable driver mutations, there is evidence-based guidance on the use of carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy after first trimester. In contrast, for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged metastatic lung adenocarcinomas, there is a paucity of clinical data on the safety of EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors to mother and fetus for official guidelines to recommend the use of these otherwise-first-line therapies in pregnancy. Considering this knowledge gap, we present a case of a young gravida 1 para 0 (G1P0) woman who continued alectinib 300 mg oral two times per day for ALK-rearranged metastatic lung adenocarcinoma throughout all 36 weeks of her pregnancy and delivered a healthy baby at term via caesarean section (C-section).

Treatment of metastatic rectal squamous cell carcinoma in a pregnant patient

Rectal squamous cell carcinoma is an exceedingly rare form of rectal cancer, with limited data available regarding its presentation and effective treatment. Rectal cancer occurring during pregnancy is uncommon as well. This is a case of metastatic rectal squamous cell carcinoma presenting in a 22-week pregnant, female patient in her early 30s. The patient was treated with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin and delivered a healthy male child born via uncomplicated vaginal delivery at 35 weeks. This article demonstrates that despite the rare nature of this cancer, in the already rare context of pregnancy, effective and safe treatment is possible with a multidisciplinary team.

Caring for Pregnant Patients with Cancer: A Framework for Ethical and Patient-Centred Care

(1) Background: Caring for pregnant cancer patients is clinically and ethically complex. There is no structured ethical guidance for healthcare professionals caring for these patients. (2) Objective: This concept paper proposes a theoretically grounded framework to support ethical and patient-centred care of pregnant cancer patients. (3) Methodological approach: The framework development was based on ethical models applicable to cancer care during pregnancy-namely principle-based approaches (biomedical ethics principles developed by Beauchamp and Childress and the European principles in bioethics and biolaw) and relational, patient-focused approaches (relational ethics, ethics of care and medical maternalism)-and informed by a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. (4) Results: Five foundational discussion themes, summarising the key ethical considerations that should be taken into account by healthcare professionals while discussing treatment and care options with these patients, were identified. This was further developed into a comprehensive ethics checklist that can be used during clinical appointments and highlights the need for a holistic view to patient treatment, care and counselling while providing ethical, patient-centric care. (5) Conclusion: The proposed framework was further operationalised into an ethics checklist for healthcare professionals that aims to help them anticipate and address ethical concerns that may arise when attending to pregnant cancer patients. Further studies exploring clinicians' attitudes towards cancer treatment in the course of pregnancy and patient experiences when diagnosed with cancer while pregnant and wider stakeholder engagement are needed to inform the development of further ethical, patient-centred guidance.

Clinical Features and Management of Lung Cancer During Pregnancy: A Narrative Review Based on Reported Cases

This review aims to provide a summary of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer during pregnancy. A comprehensive literature search yielded 93 cases of lung cancer during pregnancy from 1953 to 2022, with an average maternal age of ∼34 years old. The initial symptoms reported were often nonspecific, such as cough, dyspnea, and chest pain. Cancer-related treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown beneficial effects on maternal outcomes. A majority of the newborns were born without malformation or diseases, but extended follow-up remains necessary. Early diagnosis of lung cancer is imperative for reducing the risks of placental and fetal metastasis and enhancing overall survival.

Cancer and Pregnancy in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer during pregnancy, affecting 1 in 1000 pregnancies, is rising in incidence due to delayed childbearing and improved detection. Common types include breast cancer, melanoma and cervical cancer and Hodgkin's Lymphoma. There are several physiological changes that occur during pregnancy that make its management a challenge to clinicians. Managing it requires multidisciplinary approaches and cautious test interpretation due to overlapping symptoms. To minimize fetal radiation exposure, non-ionizing imaging is preferred, and the interpretation of tumor markers is challenging due to inflammation and pregnancy effects. In terms of treatment, chemotherapy is avoided in the first trimester but may be considered later. Immunotherapy's safety is under investigation, and surgery depends on gestational age and cancer type. Ethical and legal concerns are growing, especially with changes in U.S. abortion laws. Access to abortion for medical reasons is vital for pregnant cancer patients needing urgent treatment. Maternal outcomes may depend on the type of cancer as well as chemotherapy received but, in general, they are similar to the non-pregnant population. Fetal outcomes are usually the same as the general population with treatment exposure from the second trimester onwards. Fertility preservation may be an important component of the treatment discussion depending on the patient's wishes, age and type of treatment. This article addresses the complicated nature of a diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy, touching upon the known medical literature as well as the ethical-legal implications of such a diagnosis, whose importance has increased in the light of recent judicial developments.

Breast Cancer in Pregnant Young Women: Clinicopathological Profile, Survival, and Pregnancy Outcomes

Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer types diagnosed during pregnancy; the presence of any neoplasm in pregnant women faces clinical dilemmas and challenges in cancer and pregnancy management. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within one year after delivery. The aim of this study was to describe tumor clinicopathological characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in PABC patients. Materials and methods This is a retrospective cohort assessing PABC patients. Qualitative variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. Cox regression and logistic regression methods were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. Results We assessed 16 PABC patients. Women ≤ 35 years of age were mainly diagnosed at advanced stage (88.8%) with ER-negative disease (77.8%). Patients with >4 pathological lymph nodes (25%; p = 0.001) and ER-negative disease (50%; p = 0.646) showed poor five-year overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, nodal involvement was the main predictor associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.4, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14 to 1.8). The following risk factors might influence the risk of preterm delivery: maternal older age, gestational age at diagnosis, and intrauterine exposure to chemotherapy, but an adjusted OR of 0.61 (90% CI: 0.34 to 1), 0.80 (90% CI: 0.66 to 0.9), and 0.013 (90% CI: 0.00 to 0.9), respectively, did not statistically support such an effect. Conclusions Younger women with PABC had a more aggressive pathological profile that might partly explain the poor OS. Obstetrical adverse events related to preterm delivery should be avoided with better planning of specialized strategies.

Choosing the appropriate pharmacotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy: what needs to be considered?

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy. Breast cancer during pregnancy is a challenging clinical condition requiring proper and timely multidisciplinary management.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy with a focus about the current state-of-the-art on the feasibility and safety of pharmacotherapy approaches in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Multidisciplinary care is key for a proper diagnostic-therapeutic management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Engaging patients and their caregivers in the decision-making process is essential and psychological support should be provided. The treatment of patients with breast cancer during pregnancy should follow the same recommendations as those for breast cancer in young women outside pregnancy but taking into account the gestational age at the time of treatment.Anthracycline-, cyclophosphamide-, and taxane-based regimens can be safely administered during the second and third trimesters with standard protocols, preferring weekly regimens whenever possible. Endocrine therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents are contraindicated throughout pregnancy, also due to the very limited data available to guide their administration in this setting. During treatment, careful fetal growth monitoring is mandatory, and even after delivery proper health monitoring for the children exposed in utero to chemotherapy should be continued.

Adverse birth outcomes of adolescent and young adult women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

We examined adverse birth outcomes among adolescent and young adult women diagnosed with cancer (AYA women, ages 15-39 years) during pregnancy.

METHODS

We linked data from the Texas Cancer Registry, vital records, and Texas Birth Defects Registry to identify all singleton births to AYA women diagnosed during pregnancy from January 1999 to December 2016. We compared prevalence of adverse live birth outcomes between AYA women and women without cancer (matched 1:4 on age, race and ethnicity, and year). Among AYA women, we used log-binomial regression to identify factors associated with these outcomes. Statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

AYA women had 1271 singleton live births and 20 stillbirths. AYA women (n = 1291) were 33.3% Hispanic and 9.8% non-Hispanic Black and most commonly had breast (22.5%), thyroid (19.8%), and gynecologic (13.3%) cancers. Among live births, AYA women had a higher prevalence of low birth weight offspring (30.1% vs 9.0%), very preterm (5.7% vs 1.2%), and preterm birth (25.1% vs 7.2%); cesarean delivery (44.3% vs 35.2%); and low Apgar score (2.7% vs 1.5%), compared with women without cancer (n = 5084) (all P < .05). Prevalence of any birth defect by age 12 months did not statistically differ (5.2% vs 4.7%; P = .48), but live births to AYA women more often had heart and circulatory system defects (2.2% vs 1.3%; P = .01). In adjusted models, cancer type and chemotherapy were associated with adverse live birth outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

AYA women diagnosed during pregnancy have higher prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and face difficult decisions in balancing treatment risks and benefits.

Landscape and Regulatory Perspective on Oncology Drugs in Pregnancy

Cancers affecting pregnant women include breast cancer, melanoma, thyroid cancer, cervical cancer, lymphomas, and leukemias. The medical management of cancer during pregnancy with molecularly targeted oncology drugs remains quite challenging, with knowledge gaps about the drugs' safety and efficacy due to exclusion of pregnant women from cancer clinical trials, discontinuation of individuals who become pregnant during clinical trials, and limited information on appropriate dosing of molecularly targeted oncology drugs during pregnancy. Physiological changes occur during pregnancy and may result in alterations in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs used in pregnant women. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling that incorporates physiological changes induced by both the cancer disease state and pregnancy has the potential to inform dosing of molecularly targeted oncology drugs for pregnant women, improve our understanding of the pharmacokinetic changes associated with pregnancy in patients with cancer, facilitate the design of potential studies of molecularly targeted oncology drugs in pregnant women to support dosing recommendations, and provide model-informed pharmacokinetic data to support regulatory decision making.

Pregnancy and Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review

Cases of digestive cancers diagnosed during pregnancy are rare. The increasing prevalence of pregnancy in women aged 30-39 years (and not exceptionally 40-49 years) could explain the frequent co-occurrence of cancers and pregnancy. The diagnosis of digestive cancers in pregnancy is difficult due to the overlap between neoplasm symptomatology and the clinical picture of pregnancy. A paraclinical evaluation may also be difficult depending on the trimester of the pregnancy. Diagnosis is also delayed by practitioners' hesitation to use invasive investigations (imaging, endoscopy, etc.) due to fetal safety concerns. Therefore, digestive cancers are often diagnosed during pregnancy in advanced stages, where complications such as occlusions, perforations, and cachexia have already arisen. In this review, we highlight the epidemiology, clinical aspects, paraclinical evaluation, and particularities of the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer during pregnancy.

Diagnosis and management of high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor in first trimester pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature

Objective

There are less than 20 reported cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in pregnancy. Of these reported cases, there are only two that detail GIST in the first trimester. We report our experience with the third known GIST diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy. Notably, our case report highlights the earliest known gestational age at time of GIST diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a literature review of GIST diagnosis in pregnancy via PUBMED, using a combination of the following terms: (pregnancy or gestation) and (GIST). We utilized Epic for chart review of our patient's case report.

Results

A 24 year old G3P1011 presented to the Emergency Department at 4w6d by last menstrual period (LMP) with worsening abdominal cramping, bloating, and associated nausea. Physical exam revealed a large, mobile, nontender mass palpated in the right lower abdomen. Transvagianl ultrasound noted the presence of a large pelvic mass of unknown etiology. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for further characterization, revealing a 7.3× 12.4 × 12.2 cm mass with multiple fluid levels, centered in the anterior mesentery. Exploratory laparotomy was performed with en bloc resection of small bowel and pelvic mass, with pathology demonstrating a 12.8 cm spindle cell neoplasm compatible with GIST and notable for a mitotic rate of 40 mitoses/50 high power field (HPF). Next generation sequencing (NGS) was pursued in order to predict tumor responsiveness to Imatinib, which revealed a mutation at KIT exon 11, suggesting a response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The patient's multidisciplinary treatment team, consisting of medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, and maternal fetal medicine specialists, made the recommendation for adjuvant Imatinib therapy. The patient was offered termination of pregnancy with immediate initiation of Imatinib, as well as continuation of pregnancy with either immediate or delayed treatment. Interdisciplinary counseling focused on both the maternal and fetal implications of each proposed management plan. She ultimately elected termination of pregnancy, and underwent an uncomplicated dilation and evacuation.

Conclusions

GIST diagnosis in pregnancy is exceedingly rare. Patients with high-grade disease encounter a multitude of decision-making dilemmas, often with competing maternal and fetal interests. As additional cases of GIST in pregnancy are added to the literature, clinicians will be able to implement evidence-based options counseling for their patients. Shared decision-making is contingent upon patient understanding of diagnosis, risk of recurrence, available treatment options, and the treatment-related implications on maternal and fetal outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for optimization of patient-centered care.

Delayed cancer diagnosis in the pregnant patient: navigating a complex medical and ethical dilemma

Prompt diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy is necessary to ensure timely management and improve outcomes. However, there are a several reasons why diagnosis may be delayed in pregnancy. Three major contributors to delayed diagnosis and treatment are patient delay, provider delay, and referral delay. This article aims to (1) increase physician awareness of this problem by providing a detailed review of the main culprits of delayed diagnosis and treatment of cancer in the pregnant patient, (2) discuss the complex ethical issues at hand in these cases, and (3) provide suggestions on how to better address such cases with the goal of improving patient outcomes.

The radiologist's role in a multidisciplinary approach to cancer in pregnancy

Pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 pregnancies, and the incidence is expected to rise due to delayed childbearing (Silverstein et al. in JCO Oncol Pract 16:545-557, 2020; Woitek et al. in ESMO Open 1:e000017, 2016). Diagnosis and management of PACs are challenging and diagnosis is often delayed as symptoms may overlap with physiologic changes of pregnancy (Jha et al. in RadioGraphics 42:220005, 2022). These patients are best cared for by a multidisciplinary healthcare team composed of experts (Silverstein et al. in JCO Oncol Pract 16:545-557, 2020). Management of these patients must balance optimal maternal care with potentially harmful fetal effects. This involves honest, forthright, and sometimes difficult discussions between the care team and the patient throughout the entirety of care. Radiologists play a significant role in timely cancer diagnosis, staging and follow-up during and after pregnancy, accurate determination of gestational age, and in assessing fetal growth and well-being throughout pregnancy.

Cancer in pregnancy: treatment effects

PURPOSE

Pregnant patients present a unique challenge to cancer therapy. Due to the potential catastrophic implications related to teratogenic effects or pregnancy loss, oncologic management of this vulnerable patient group must be strategic and personalized.

METHODS

This article will discuss the unique treatment approach to the pregnant cancer patient. This includes discussion of the role of imaging during staging, treatment, and follow-up with an emphasis on avoiding ionizing radiation when possible.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Specific considerations and modifications to standard cancer treatments, including surgery and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapies are crucial components of providing oncologic care to minimize negative effects to the mother and developing fetus. Radiation and proton therapy are also options that may be employed in specific circumstances. Finally, this article will address the long-term treatment effects of these therapies on future fertility.

Breastfeeding and the patient's perspective

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to summarize available data on breastfeeding in patients with a cancer diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of available literature in the MEDLINE database was performed and the data summarized. In addition, two patient interviews were conducted to gain insight into the patient perspective.

RESULTS

Breastmilk is the nutritional standard for human infants and understanding the implications of a cancer diagnosis on lactation is important in optimizing maternal and infant outcomes. Though limited, available data suggest that breastfeeding may be a safe and appropriate option for some patients undergoing treatment of a malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient experiences with breastfeeding in the setting of a cancer diagnosis vary widely, and depend on the type of malignancy, the timing of the diagnosis, and the indicated treatment. Breastfeeding may be an appropriate option for certain patients after multidisciplinary counseling. Alternatives to breastfeeding exist for patients who are unable to or do not desire to breastfeed.

Gastrointestinal malignancies in pregnancy

Gastrointestinal malignancies, though uncommon in pregnancy, present several unique challenges with regards to diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Imaging the pregnant patient with a suspected or confirmed GI malignancy requires modifications to the radiologic modality of choice and protocol in order to minimize harm to the fetus, ensure accuracy in diagnosis and staging and guide treatment decisions. In this review article, we discuss the imaging approach to the pregnant patient with GI cancer, including safe radiologic modalities and modifications to imaging protocols. We also review the most common GI cancers encountered in pregnancy, including colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, and small bowel tumors, with emphasis to imaging findings, staging, and treatment considerations.

Prognosis, counseling, and indications for termination of pregnancy

As the coincidence of pregnancy and cancer rise, clinicians must be prepared to counsel their patients on the complex relationship between maternal and fetal health. In most types of cancer, maternal prognosis mirrors that of non-pregnant women. However, challenges associated with the timing of diagnosis and treatment can present additional risks. Consequently, pregnant cancer patients must be counseled early and effectively with regard to how their pregnancy status affects treatment options and the range of expected outcomes for both mother and fetus. Some patients choose to terminate pregnancy after such counseling, though the specific course of action depends on the cancer in question, the stage at diagnosis, and the personal priorities and values of the patient.

Perinatal outcomes of women with gestational breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand: A prospective population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the epidemiology, clinical management, and outcomes of women with gestational breast cancer (GBC).

METHODS

A population-based prospective cohort study was conducted in Australia and New Zealand between 2013 and 2014 using the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System (AMOSS). Women who gave birth with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy were included. Data were collected on demographic and pregnancy factors, GBC diagnosis, obstetric and cancer management, and perinatal outcomes. The main outcome measures were preterm birth, maternal complications, breastfeeding, and death.

RESULTS

Forty women with GBC (incidence 7.5/100 000 women giving birth) gave birth to 40 live-born babies. Thirty-three (82.5%) women had breast symptoms at diagnosis. Of 27 women diagnosed before 30 weeks' gestation, 85% had breast surgery and 67% had systemic therapy during pregnancy. In contrast, all 13 women diagnosed from 30 weeks had their cancer management delayed until postdelivery. There were 17 preterm deliveries; 15 were planned. Postpartum complications included the following: hemorrhage (n = 4), laparotomy (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). There was one late maternal death. Eighteen (45.0%) women initiated breastfeeding, including 12 of 23 women who had antenatal breast surgery. There were no perinatal deaths or congenital malformations, but 42.5% of babies were preterm, and 32.5% were admitted for higher-level neonatal care.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational breast cancer diagnosed before 30 weeks' gestation was associated with surgical and systemic cancer care during pregnancy and planned preterm birth. In contrast, cancer treatment was deferred to postdelivery for women diagnosed from 30 weeks, reflecting the complexity of managing expectant mothers with GBC in multidisciplinary care settings.

Management of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: global perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) encompasses breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP) or postpartum (PPBC). BCP is especially challenging with concerns regarding maternal and fetal safety synchronously. This review provides a comprehensive global view to optimize care of this unique entity. Areas covered Published literature and practices across the globe including real world published data from the first Indian registry are thoroughly reviewed to derive inferences. Diagnostic delays are common with resultant upstaging and inferior outcomes. Sonography-mammography and a biopsy with immunohistochemistry for estrogen, progesterone and HER-2neu receptors is mandatory. Multidisciplinary specialist teams are critical for trimester dependent management. Stage-wise surgical and systemic treatment remains largely similar to that of the nonpregnant women. Anthracyclines- and taxane-based chemotherapy is found to be safe after the 1st trimester. Frequent fetal and maternal monitoring is required to minimize complications. Chemotherapy should stop three weeks prior to the delivery to prevent peripartum infection/bleeding. Anti- Her-2 targeted therapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy are administered post-delivery. Iatrogenic premature delivery leads to poor neurocognition and should be avoided. Expert opinion Stage-wise outcomes are similar to that of non-pregnant patients with breast cancer, and underscores the importance of early detection especially in low- and middle-income countries. Global collaborations are warranted.

AREAS COVERED

Published literature and practices across the globe including real world published data from the first Indian registry are thoroughly reviewed to derive inferences. Diagnostic delays are common with resultant upstaging and inferior outcomes. Sonography-mammography and a biopsy with immunohistochemistry for estrogen, progesterone and HER-2neu receptors is mandatory. Multidisciplinary specialist teams are critical for trimester dependent management. Stage-wise surgical and systemic treatment remains largely similar to that of the nonpregnant women. Anthracyclines- and taxane-based chemotherapy is found to be safe after the 1st trimester. Frequent fetal and maternal monitoring is required to minimize complications. Chemotherapy should stop three weeks prior to the delivery to prevent peripartum infection/bleeding. Anti- Her-2 targeted therapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy are administered post-delivery. Iatrogenic premature delivery leads to poor neurocognition and should be avoided.

EXPERT OPINION

Stage-wise outcomes are similar to that of non-pregnant patients with breast cancer, and underscores the importance of early detection especially in low- and middle-income countries. Global collaborations are warranted.

Cancer Treatment and Immunotherapy during Pregnancy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Immunotherapy has, in recent years, witnessed an expansion in its indications for the treatment of cancer. Coupled with the fact that, nowadays, even more women choose to postpone parenthood, thus increasing their chances of having some kind of malignancy during pregnancy, more and more women are eligible for receiving immunotherapy during this period of their lives. The cases of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is an ever-increasing trend nowadays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The oncologists and clinicians treating women often face a range of ethical and therapeutic dilemmas due to the particularity of the patient's conditions. The primary concern is the protection of the mother, firstly, and then the fetus (through adjustments to the various treatment regimens) if possible.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Oncological drugs, radiation therapy, surgery, or a combination of all the above methods are selected, depending on the case. In this project, we studied the oncology drugs used for various types of gestational cancer, their appropriateness and timing, as well as their possible effects on the parent and embryo upon their administration. Various studies have shown that the administration of oncological drugs should be postponed until at least after the first trimester of pregnancy.

Guidelines for Cancer Treatment during Pregnancy: Ethics-Related Content Evolution and Implications for Clinicians

(1) Background: Current scientific evidence suggests that most cancers, including breast cancer, can be treated during pregnancy without compromising maternal and fetal outcomes. This, however, raises questions regarding the ethical implications of clinical care. (2) Methods: Using a systematic literature search, 32 clinical practice guidelines for cancer treatment during pregnancy published between 2002 and 2021 were selected for analysis and 25 of them mentioned or made references to medical ethics when offering clinical management guidance for clinicians. (3) Results: Four bioethical themes were identified: respect for patient's autonomy, balanced approach to maternal and fetal beneficence, protection of the vulnerable and justice in resource allocation. Most guidelines recommended informing the pregnant patient about available evidence-based treatment options, offering counselling and support in the process of decision making. The relational aspect of a pregnant patient's autonomy was also recognized and endorsed in a significant number of available guidelines. (4) Conclusions: Recognition and support of a patient's autonomy and its relational aspects should remain an integral part of future clinical practice guidelines. Nevertheless, a more structured approach is needed when addressing existing and potential ethical issues in clinical practice guidelines for cancer treatment during pregnancy.

Cancer and Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer diagnosis and treatment in pregnant women is a challenging situation. A multidisciplinary network of specialists is required to guide both, the expecting mother and the unborn child through the diagnostic workup and the cytotoxic therapy, by balancing the respective risks and benefits. Tumor entity, stage, biology and gestational week at diagnosis determine the appropriate approach. As premature delivery emerged as one of the main risk factors for adverse long-term outcome of the progeny, it should be avoided, if reasonable from the oncological perspective. This article offers a comprehensive review with respect to the various aspects of cancer in pregnancy.

Complete remission of choriocarcinoma with pulmonary vein thrombosis in the third trimester of pregnancy treated with systemic chemotherapy and anticoagulation: A case report

RATIONALE

Choriocarcinoma is a highly aggressive tumor. It occurs infrequently during pregnancy. The management of choriocarcinoma during pregnancy poses several challenges.

PATIENT CONCERNS

At 34 weeks of gestation, a 21-year-old primigravida was transferred to the emergency room for cephalgia, reduced fetal movements, and left intra-atrial intracavitary thrombus.

DIAGNOSIS

Choriocarcinoma in the third trimester with lung and brain metastases, pulmonary vein thrombosis (PVT), and systemic thrombosis.

INTERVENTION

An emergency cesarean section was performed. Subsequently, low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation combined with multiagent chemotherapy was administered.

OUTCOME

A 1.59 kg live female was born. Multiagent chemotherapy combined with anticoagulation led to complete regression of the cerebral and pulmonary lesions and the dissolution of pulmonary vein thrombus. At the 11-month follow-up, the patient remained in complete remission without complications, and her child was disease-free.

LESSONS

This is the first case of gestational choriocarcinoma with PVT. Our case suggests that conservative therapy can be the first choice for small, asymptomatic PVT secondary to choriocarcinoma.

Novel agents for the treatment of lymphomas during pregnancy: A comprehensive literature review

Lymphoproliferative diseases occurring during pregnancy present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges aiming to achieve maternal cure without impairing fetal health, growth, and survival. These goals are further complicated by the fast-paced emergence of novel therapies and their introduction as standard of care, even in newly diagnosed patients. Due to the rarity of hematological malignancies in pregnancy and the exclusion of pregnancy in almost all clinical trials, available data on the fetal effects of novel drugs are limited to animal models and case reports. The current review addresses the entire multidisciplinary team involved in treating pregnant patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. We describe novel agents according to their mechanism of action, and summarize our knowledge of their effects during the gestational period, particularly those associated with fetotoxicity. Therapeutic dilemmas associated with the employment of these new agents are also discussed.

Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Children after in Utero Exposure to Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

Facing cancer diagnosis during pregnancy constitutes a truly complex and challenging situation for both the patients and the physicians. Cancer diagnosis in a period of hope and joy is an unendurable situation that may affect the psychosocial functioning of the mother, causing depression, anxiety, self-blame, and social isolation. At the same time, a moral dilemma evolves among medical professionals; what is best for the mother in terms of immediate chemotherapy may have detrimental effects on the fetus, and conversely, delaying therapy and protecting the fetus may have a negative impact on the mother as the tumor progresses. Solid data on the safety profile or risks of anti-cancer agents and on the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of children after in utero exposure to chemotherapy may provide both the patients and the physicians the information necessary for shared decision making when cancer is diagnosed during pregnancy.

Abstract

Pregnancy-related cancer management represents a real challenge for both the patients and the physicians. The long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of children in utero exposed to chemotherapeutic agents has only recently been addressed. This review aims to systematically integrate and highlight all existing data from the literature regarding the effect of prenatal exposure to chemotherapy on fetal brain growth and child development. All eligible studies are based on validated neurodevelopmental testing scales (e.g., Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence) and/or well-defined questionnaires. Our systematic review including 17 studies demonstrates that no major consequences on the neurodevelopment of children after in utero exposure to anti-cancer drugs have been reported; nevertheless, longer and more thorough follow-up with large-scale multicenter prospective studies is certainly required in order to draw firm conclusions.

Update on the Management of Breast Cancer during Pregnancy

The diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy represents a challenging situation for the patient, her caregivers and physicians. Pregnancy adds complexity to oncological treatment planning, as many therapies can be potentially dangerous to the fetus. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to offer a proper care for obtaining the best possible outcomes for the mother and the future child. Breast surgery is feasible throughout the pregnancy while radiotherapy should be postponed after delivery. Administration of chemotherapy is considered safe and can be given during the second and third trimesters, while it is contraindicated in the first trimester due to the high risk of fetal malformations. Endocrine therapy and targeted agents are not recommended during the whole pregnancy period; however, limited data are available on the use of the majority of new anticancer drugs in this context. The aim of the current review is to provide an update on the current state of art about the management of women diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy.