Glycosylated human growth hormone variant

Human Placental Growth Hormone Variant in Pathological Pregnancies

Growth hormone (GH), an endocrine hormone, primarily secreted from the anterior pituitary, stimulates growth, cell reproduction, and regeneration and is a major regulator of postnatal growth. Humans have two GH genes that encode two versions of GH proteins: a pituitary version (GH-N/GH1) and a placental GH-variant (GH-V/GH2), which are expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast and extravillous trophoblast cells of the placenta. During pregnancy, GH-V replaces GH-N in the maternal circulation at mid-late gestation as the major circulating form of GH. This remarkable change in spatial and temporal GH secretion patterns is proposed to play a role in mediating maternal adaptations to pregnancy. GH-V is associated with fetal growth, and its circulating concentrations have been investigated across a range of pregnancy complications. However, progress in this area has been hindered by a lack of readily accessible and reliable assays for measurement of GH-V. This review will discuss the potential roles of GH-V in normal and pathological pregnancies and will touch on the assays used to quantify this hormone.

Expression of growth hormone gene in the baboon eye

The human growth hormone (GH) locus is comprised by two GH (GH1 and GH2) genes and three chorionic somatomammotropin (CSH1, CSH2 and CSH-L) genes. While GH1 is expressed in the pituitary gland, the rest are expressed in the placenta. However, GH1 is also expressed in several extrapituitary tissues, including the eye. So to understand the role of this hormone in the eye we used the baboon (Papio hamadryas), that like humans has a multigenic GH locus; we set up to investigate the expression and regulation of GH locus in adult and fetal baboon ocular tissues. We searched in baboon ocular tissues the expression of GH1, GH2, CSH1/2, Pit1 (pituitary transcription factor 1), GHR (growth hormone receptor), GHRH (growth hormone releasing hormone), GHRHR (growth hormone releasing hormone receptor), SST (somatostatin), SSTR1 (somatostatin receptor 1), SSTR2 (somatostatin receptor 2), SSTR3 (somatostatin receptor 3), SSTR4 (somatostatin receptor 4), and SSTR5 (somatostatin receptor 5) mRNA transcripts and derived proteins, by qPCR and immunofluorescence assays, respectively. The transcripts found were characterized by cDNA cloning and sequencing, having found only the one belonging to GH1 gene, mainly in the retina/choroid tissues. Through immunofluorescence assays the presence of GH1 and GHR proteins was confirmed in several retinal cell layers. Among the possible neuroendocrine regulators that may control local GH1 expression are GHRH and SST, since their mRNAs and proteins were found mainly in the retina/choroid tissues, as well as their corresponding receptors (GHRH and SSTR1-SSTR5). None of the ocular tissues express Pit1, so gene expression of GH1 in baboon eye could be independent of Pit1. We conclude that to understand the regulation of GH in the human eye, the baboon offers a very good experimental model.

Growth hormone variants: a potential avenue for a better diagnostic characterization of growth hormone deficiency in children

Human GH (hGH) is a heterogeneous protein hormone consisting of several isoforms. This heterogeneity is the consequence of multiple hGH genes, mRNA splicing, post-translational modifications, and peripheral metabolism, and it represents one important reason for the disparity among GH assay results from different laboratories. However, other factors are involved: a) interference from endogenous GH binding proteins; b) different specificities of anti- GH (monoclonal and polyclonal) antibodies; c) different matrix effects among the calibrators; d) the use of different calibrators. The measurement of GH levels in response to provocative testing is an essential part of the diagnosis of GH deficiency. For this purpose, an accurate, reproducible and universally valid GH measurement would be highly desirable, but, despite a huge number of efforts in clinical biochemistry, this goal remains elusive.

N-glycosylation increases the circulatory half-life of human growth hormone

Therapeutic use of recombinant GH typically involves daily sc injections. We examined the possibilities for prolonging the in vivo circulation of GH by introducing N-glycans. Human GH variants with a single potential N-glycosylation site (N-X-S/T) introduced by site-directed mutagenesis were expressed in HEK293 cells. In a scan of 15 different positions for N-glycosylation sites, four positions (amino acids 93, 98, 99, and 101) were efficiently utilized and did not influence GH in vitro activity. A GH variant (3N-GH) with all these sites was produced in CHOK1SV cells and contained up to three N-glycans. Two pools of 3N-GH were purified and separated according to their charge by anion-exchange chromatography. Anion-exchange HPLC revealed that the N-glycans in the two pools were very similar except for the extent of sialylation. Both 3N-GH pools circulated longer in rats than wild-type GH. The terminal half-life of 3N-GH after iv injection was 24-fold prolonged compared with wild-type GH for the pool with the most pronounced sialylation, 13-fold prolonged for the less sialylated pool, and similar to the wild-type for desialylated 3N-GH. The less sialylated 3N-GH pool exhibited a profound pharmacodynamic effect in GH-deficient rats. Over a 4-d period, a single injection of 3N-GH induced a stronger IGF-I response and a larger increase in body weight than daily injections with wild-type GH. Thus, N-glycans can prolong the in vivo circulation and enhance the pharmacodynamic effect of GH. Sialic acids seem to play a pivotal role for the properties of glycosylated GH.

O-Glycosylated 24 kDa human growth hormone has a mucin-like biantennary disialylated tetrasaccharide attached at Thr-60

MS was used to characterize the 24 kDa human growth hormone (hGH) glycoprotein isoform and determine the locus of O-linked oligosaccharide attachment, the oligosaccharide branching topology, and the monosaccharide sequence. MALDI-TOF/MS and ESI-MS/MS analyses of glycosylated 24 kDa hGH tryptic peptides showed that this hGH isoform is a product of the hGH normal gene. Analysis of the glycoprotein hydrolysate by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection and HPLC with fluorescent detection for N-acetyl neuraminic acid (NeuAc) yielded the oligosaccharide composition (NeuAc(2), N-acetyl galactosamine(1), Gal(1)). After beta-elimination to release the oligosaccharide from glycosylated 24 kDa hGH, collision-induced dissociation of tryptic glycopeptide T6 indicated that there had been an O-linked oligosaccharide attached to Thr-60. The sequence and branching structure of the oligosaccharide were determined by ESI-MS/MS analysis of tryptic glycopeptide T6. The mucin-like O-oligosaccharide sequence linked to Thr-60 begins with N-acetyl galactosamine and branches in a bifurcated topology with one appendage consisting of galactose followed by NeuAc and the other consisting of a single NeuAc. The oligosaccharide moiety lies in the high-affinity binding site 1 structural epitope of hGH that interfaces with both the growth hormone and the prolactin receptors and is predicted to sterically affect receptor interactions and alter the biological actions of hGH.

Growth hormone isoforms

Human growth hormone (GH) is a heterogeneous protein hormone consisting of several isoforms. The sources of this heterogeneity reside at the level of the genome, mRNA splicing, post-translational modification and metabolism. The GH gene cluster on chromosome 17q contains 2 GH genes (GH1 or GH-N and GH2 or GH-V) in addition to 2(-3) genes encoding the related chorionic somatomammotropin. Alternative mRNA splicing of the GH1 transcript yields two products: 22K-GH (the principal pituitary GH form) and 20K-GH. Post-translationally modified GH forms include N(alpha)-acylated, deamidated and glycosylated monomeric GH forms, as well as both non-covalent and disulfide-linked oligomers up to at least pentameric GH. GH fragments generated in the course of peripheral metabolism may be measured in immunoassays for GH. The GH-N gene is expressed in the pituitary, the GH-V gene in the placenta. Secretion of pituitary GH forms is pulsatile under control from the hypothalamus, whereas secretion of placental GH-V is tonic and rises progressively in maternal blood during the 2nd and 3rd trimester. Pituitary GH forms are co-secreted during a secretory pulse; no isoform-specific stimuli have been identified. There are minor differences in somatogenic and metabolic bioactivity among the GH isoforms, depending on species and assay system used. Both 20K-GH and GH-V have poor lactogenic activity. Oligomeric GH forms have variably diminished bioactivity compared to monomeric forms. GH isoforms cross-react in most immunoassays, but assays specific for 22K-GH, 20K-GH and GH-V have been developed. The metabolic clearance of 20K-GH and GH oligomers is delayed compared to that of 22K-GH. The heterogeneous mixture of GH isoforms in blood is further complicated by the presence of two GH-binding proteins, which form complexes with GH; isoform proportions also vary depending on the lag time from a secretory pulse because of different half-lives. GH forms excreted in the urine reflect monomeric GH isoforms in blood, but constitute only a minute fraction of the GH production rate. The heterogeneity of GH is one important reason for the notorious disparity among assay results. It also presents an opportunity for distinguishing endogenous from exogenous GH.

Isolation of Atlantic halibut pituitary hormones by continuous-elution electrophoresis followed by fingerprint identification, and assessment of growth hormone content during larval development

Continuous-elution electrophoresis (CEE) has been applied to separate putative hormones from adult Atlantic halibut pituitaries. Soluble proteins were separated by size and charge on Model 491 Prep Cell (Bio-Rad), where the homogenate runs through a cylindrical gel, and protein fractions are collected as they elute from the matrix. Protein fractions were assessed by SDS-PAGE and found to contain purified proteins of molecular size from 10 to 33 kDa. Fractions containing proteins with molecular weights of approximately 21, 24, 28 and 32 kDa, were identified as putative growth hormone (GH), prolactin, somatolactin and gonadotropins, respectively. These were analyzed further by mass spectrometry and identified with peptide mass protein fingerprinting. The CEE technique was used successfully for purification of halibut GH with a 5% yield, and appears generally well suited to purify species-specific proteins often needed for research in comparative endocrinology, including immunoassay work. Thus, the GH obtained was subsequently used as standards and iodination label in a homologous radioimmunoassay, applied to analyze GH content through larval development in normally and abnormally metamorphosing larvae. As GH is mainly found in the pituitary, GH contents were analyzed in tissue extracts from the heads only. The pituitary GH content increases proportionally to increased larval weight from first feeding to metamorphic climax. No difference in relative GH content was found between normal and abnormal larvae and it still remains to be established if GH has a direct role in metamorphosis.

Aspects of placental growth hormone physiology

Placental growth hormone (PGH) has been known for 20 years. Nevertheless, its physiology is far from understood. In this review, basal aspects of PGH physiology are summarised and put in relation to the highly homologous pituitary growth hormone (GH). During normal pregnancy, PGH progressively replaces GH and reach maximum serum concentrations in the third trimester. A close relationship to insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and -II levels is observed. Furthermore, PGH levels are positively associated to fetal growth. The potential importance of growth hormone receptors and binding protein for PGH effects is discussed. Finally, the review outlines current knowledge of PGH in pathological pregnancies.

Kinetics and secretion of placental growth hormone around parturition

OBJECTIVE

During pregnancy, placental growth hormone (PGH) is secreted into the maternal circulation, replacing pituitary GH. It is controversial whether PGH levels decline during vaginal birth. After placental expulsion, PGH is eliminated from the maternal blood. GH binding protein (GHBP) and body mass index (BMI) influence GH kinetics, but their impact on PGH kinetics is unknown. The present study was undertaken to define the kinetics of PGH during vaginal delivery and Caesarian section and to relate these kinetics to GHBP and BMI.

DESIGN

A short term, prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Twelve women had repeated blood samples drawn during vaginal delivery. From 26 women undergoing planned Caesarian delivery (CS) repeated blood samples were withdrawn before, during and after the CS, allowing PGH half-life determination.

RESULTS

During vaginal delivery, median PGH values did not change before expulsion of the placenta, although individual fluctuations were seen. Clearance of PGH from the maternal circulation was best described by a two-compartment model. The initial half-life of serum PGH was (mean +/- s.d.) 5.8 +/- 2.4 min, and the late half-life was (median) 87.0 min (range: 25.1-679.6 min). The late half-life was correlated to the pre-gestational BMI (r = 0.39, P = 0.047), but not to the serum GHBP concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum PGH did not decrease significantly during vaginal delivery. Elimination of PGH fitted a two-compartment model, with an estimated initial half-life of 5.8 min. The late phase serum half-life of PGH was related to BMI, suggesting a role for maternal fat mass in PGH metabolism.

Growth hormone binding protein and maternal body mass index in relation to placental growth hormone and insulin requirements during pregnancy in type 1 diabetic women

In pregnancy, the growth hormone axis is shifted from pituitary growth hormone (GH) to placental growth hormone (PGH). Their common binding protein, GH binding protein (GHBP), displays peak serum levels at mid-gestation in normal individuals. In the non-pregnant state, diabetes is known to be associated with elevated levels of GH and decreased levels of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and GHBP. Diabetes in pregnancy may therefore as well be associated with disturbances in the growth hormone axis. In the present study, we aimed at investigating the impact of GHBP and maternal body mass index (BMI) on levels of PGH, thereby enabling estimation of any association between free PGH and weight adjusted insulin requirements. In 51 type 1 diabetic women, blood samples were collected in gestational week 10+, 16+, 22+, 28+ and 34+, and analysed for their serum content of GHBP, PGH, and GH. Serum GHBP increased from the first weeks of pregnancy to median 2.07 nmol/l (range 1.17-4.26) in week 22+, then declined to median 1.29 nmol/l (range 0.77-2.35) in week 34+ (ANOVA P < 0.001). Serum PGH levels were highest in week 34+ at median 21.3 microg/l (range 5.1-165.4) (P < 0.001), whereas a steady decrease in GH values was observed throughout pregnancy to a median 0.17 microg/l (range 0-5.53). The fraction of calculated free PGH to total PGH increased from mid-gestation onwards to 55.2% (37.0-87.1) in week 34+ at a median level of free PGH of 10.4 microg/l (range 1.9-144.0) (P < 0.001). Similarly, the molar ratio of total PGH to GHBP increased to a maximum of 0.68 (0.12-6.62) in week 34+. As in normal pregnancies, the correlation between BMI and GHBP was lost in late pregnancy. The newborns birth weight z-score correlated with total PGH and derivatives here-of in week 34+. Neither total nor weight adjusted insulin requirements correlated to total PGH, calculated free PGH, nor GHBP. In conclusion, PGH and GHBP display a similar course during pregnancy in type 1 diabetic women as described in normal women. The well-known association between GHBP and BMI was lost in late pregnancy. Calculated levels of free PGH were positively associated to fetal growth, but not to maternal insulin requirements.

Ghrelin and its relationship to growth hormones during normal pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin and GH secretagogue receptors have been found in reproductive organs, including the placenta. The physiology of ghrelin in pregnancy has not been explored. In human pregnancy, pituitary GH is gradually replaced by placental GH (PGH). The present study was undertaken to examine serum ghrelin levels during normal pregnancy and to determine to what extent changes in ghrelin levels coincide with changes in serum levels of free and total GH and PGH. Design Prospective study with blood sampling from pregnant women in gestational weeks 8, 18, 26 and 36 and postpartum.

PATIENTS

Eleven nondiabetic pregnant women with singleton pregnancies.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum ghrelin was determined using an in-house radioimmunoassay. Serum PGH was determined in a solid-phase immunoradiometric assay, serum GH and insulin in a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay, and serum GHBP in an in-house immunofunctional assay.

RESULTS

Serum ghrelin levels peaked in week 18 (1.20 +/- 0.09 microg/l) and the lowest levels were observed in late third trimester (0.87 +/- 0.06 microg/l), corresponding to a mean decrease of 27.7% (P < 0.001) from peak levels. An increase was observed again postpartum. Serum GH diminished throughout pregnancy to low third-trimester values (0.12 +/- 0.03 microg/l; P < 0.001), and PGH increased to 25.7 +/- 2.86 microg/l (P < 0.001) in week 36. Neither total nor calculated free levels of growth hormones correlated to ghrelin levels, and no significant correlations were observed between ghrelin and maternal body mass index (BMI) or fasting insulin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum ghrelin levels peak around mid-gestation in human pregnancy. Ghrelin levels during pregnancy are at their lowest in the third trimester at a time of increased body weight, development of insulin resistance and high serum levels of PGH. However, no associations were observed between ghrelin and the two growth hormones.

Laboratory measurement of growth hormone

Growth hormone (GH) measurements are complicated by the heterogeneous nature of GH, as well as by the presence of the GH binding protein in plasma. Several isoforms of GH exist, and specific assays for each are currently either unavailable, impractical, or not clinically indicated. Bioassays include the in vivo assays based on rat weight gain, tibial line widening, or IGF-I generation. In vitro bioassays, based on the proliferation of cell lines expressing the prolactin receptor or GH receptor, are sensitive but prone to nonspecific interference by factors present in serum. Immunoassays (RIA, IRMA, ELISA, and immunofunctional assay design) are widely used in the clinical laboratory because of speed, sensitivity, and convenience. Discrepancies among results rendered by different immunoassays have become more apparent as monoclonal assays have superseded polyclonal assays, presumably because different antibodies recognize different epitopes among the heterogeneous mixture of GH isoforms in serum. Some assays, especially those with short, nonequilibrium incubation times are vulnerable to interference by the GH binding protein present in serum. Recommendations are given for strategies designed to minimize disparity of results obtained by different GH immunoassays applied to serum. Urinary GH measurements, while technically feasible, are of limited clinical utility because of biological variation in urinary GH excretion.

Chicken growth hormone: further characterization and ontogenic changes of an N-glycosylated isoform in the anterior pituitary gland

Glycosylation is one of the post-translational modifications that growth hormone (GH) can undergo. This has been reported for human, rat, mouse, pig, chicken and buffalo GH. The nature and significance of GH glycosylation remains to be elucidated. This present study further characterizes glycosylated chicken GH (G-cGH) and examines changes in the pituitary concentration of G-cGH during embryonic development and post hatching growth. G-cGH was purified from chicken pituitaries by affinity chromatography (Concanavalin A-Sepharose and monoclonal antibody bound to Sepharose). Immunoreactive G-cGH has a MW of 26 kDa or 29 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE, respectively, under non-reducing and reducing conditions. Evidence that it is N-glycosylated comes from its susceptibility to peptide N-glycosidase F, and its resistance to O-glycosidase. Based on the ability of G-cGH to bind Concanavalin A or wheat germ agglutinin but not other lectins and its susceptibility to peptide N-glycosidase F, a hybrid or biantennary type glycopeptide (GlcNac2, Man) structure is proposed. Some G-cGH can be observed in the pituitary at most ages examined (from 15-day embryo to adult). Moreover, electron microscopy revealed the presence of both immuno-reactive GH and Concanavalin A-reactive sites in the same secretory granules in the somatotrope. There were marked changes in the level and relative proportion of G-cGH in the pituitary gland during development and growth, the proportion of G-cGH rising during late embryonic development (e.g., between 15 and 18 days of development) and with further increases between 9 weeks and 15 weeks old. G-cGH was able to bind to chicken liver membrane preparations with less affinity than non-glycosylated monomer; on the other hand, however, G-cGH stimulated cell proliferation on Nb2 lymphoma bioassay whereas the non-glycosylated monomer was uncapable to do it.

Human placental growth hormone

Placental growth hormone is the product of the GH-V gene specifically expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of the human placenta. Placental growth hormone differs from pituitary growth hormone by 13 amino acids. It has high somatogenic and low lactogenic activities. Assays by specific monoclonal antibodies reveal that in the maternal circulation from 15 to 20 weeks up to term placental growth hormone gradually replaces pituitary growth hormone, which becomes undetectable. It is secreted by the placenta in a nonpulsatile manner. This continuous secretion appears to have important implications for physiologic adjustment to gestation and especially in the control of maternal insulin-like growth factor-I levels. Placental growth hormone secretion is inhibited by glucose in vitro and in vivo and is significantly decreased in the maternal circulation in pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction. Placental growth hormone does not appear to have a direct effect on fetal growth because this hormone is not detectable in the fetal circulation. However, the physiologic role might also include a direct influence on placental development through an autocrine or paracrine mechanism, as suggested by the presence of specific growth hormone receptors in this tissue.

Growth Hormone What is it and what does it do?

The evidence is now irrefutable that growth hormone (GH), long thought to be a single substance, is actually a mixture of several different forms. These multiple forms must be a consideration in any physiologic study if an accurate evaluation of the actions of GH is to be made.

Prolactin and growth hormone: molecular heterogeneity and measurement in serum

The pituitary hormones prolactin and growth hormone are related single-chain polypeptides. Both hormones exist in the circulation in several molecular forms, and this heterogeneity may account for some of the complex and sometimes contradictory actions, in vivo and in vitro, of both hormones. It may also lead to problems with quantitation by immunoassays and discrepancies between the results given by assays using different antibodies. Modified forms of the hormones may have markedly different activity in bioassays from that of the parent hormone, but the clinical significance of this is unclear. In this review we summarize what is known about the molecular heterogeneity of the hormones and briefly discuss the implications for clinical biochemists.

Growth hormone binding proteins and various forms of growth hormone: implications for measurements

GH measurements are complicated by numerous physiologically occurring GH forms, by the lack of availability of completely specific reagents for the various GH isoforms, and by interference of the circulating BP in some assays. The discrepancies between assay results are partly due to these factors, with monoclonal immunoassays or RRAs being more affected than polyclonal immunoassays.