Comparison of apolipoprotein B100 metabolism between continuous subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes

Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The intraperitoneal route of administration accounts for less than 1% of insulin treatment regimes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1). Despite being used for decades, a systematic review of various physiological effects of this route of insulin administration is lacking. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to identify the physiological effects of continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) compared to those of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with DM1. Four databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL) were searched beginning from the inception date of each database to 10^th of July 2020, using search terms related to intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin administration. Only studies comparing CIPII treatment (≥ 1 month) with CSII treatment were included. Primary outcomes were long-term glycaemic control (after ≥ 3 months of CIPII inferred from glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels) and short-term (≥ 1 day for each intervention) measurements of insulin dynamics in the systematic circulation. Secondary outcomes included all reported parameters other than the primary outcomes. The search identified a total of 2242 records; 39 reports from 32 studies met the eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis focused on the most relevant clinical end points; the mean difference (MD) in HbA1c levels during CIPII was significantly lower than during CSII (MD = -6.7 mmol/mol, [95% CI: -10.3 –-3.1]; in percentage: MD = -0.61%, [95% CI: -0.94 –- 0.28], p = 0.0002), whereas fasting blood glucose levels were similar (MD = 0.20 mmol/L, [95% CI: -0.34–0.74], p = 0.47; in mg/dL: MD = 3.6 mg/dL, [95% CI: -6.1–13.3], p = 0.47). The frequencies of severe hypo- and hyper-glycaemia were reduced. The fasting insulin levels were significantly lower during CIPII than during CSII (MD = 16.70 pmol/L, [95% CI: -23.62 –-9.77], p < 0.0001). Compared to CSII treatment, CIPII treatment improved overall glucose control and reduced fasting insulin levels in patients with DM1.

Dyslipidemia in Type 1 Diabetes: AMaskedDanger

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients show lipid disorders which are likely to play a role in their increased cardiovascular (CV) disease risk. Quantitative abnormalities of lipoproteins are noted in T1D with poor glycemic control. In T1D with optimal glycemic control, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol are normal or slightly decreased whereas HDL-cholesterol is normal or slightly increased. T1D patients, even with good glycemic control, show several qualitative and functional abnormalities of lipoproteins that are potentially atherogenic. An association between these abnormalities and CV disease risk has been reported in recent studies. Although the mechanisms underlying T1D dyslipidemia remain unclear, the subcutaneous route of insulin administration, that is responsible for peripheral hyperinsulinemia, is likely to be an important factor.

Finding the right route for insulin delivery - an overview of implantable pump therapy

INTRODUCTION

Implantable pump therapy adopting the intraperitoneal route of insulin delivery has been available for the past three decades. The key rationale for implantable pump therapy is the restoration of the portal-peripheral insulin gradient of the normal physiology. Uptake in clinical practice is limited to specialized centers and selected patient populations. Areas covered: Implantable pump therapy is discussed, including technical aspects, rationale for its use, and glycemic and non-glycemic effects. Target populations, summaries of clinical studies and issues related to implantable pump therapy are highlighted. Limitations of implantable pump therapy and its future outlook in clinical practice are presented. Expert opinion: Although intraperitoneal insulin delivery appears closer to the normal physiology, technical, pharmacological, and costs barriers prevent a wider adoption. Evidence from clinical studies remains scarce and inconclusive. As a consequence, the use of implantable pump therapy will be confined to a small population unless considerable technological progress is made and well-conducted studies can demonstrate glycemic and/or non-glycemic benefits justifying wider application.

A New Optimized Percutaneous Access System for CIPII

In recent years, continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) has become a favored treatment alternative for patients with subcutaneous insulin resistance, mainly due to its ability of mimicking physiological conditions of insulin absorption. CIPII has been shown to improve glycemic control as well as to reduce hypoglycemic events and to lead to increased patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Among CIPII delivery systems, Diaport stands out due to its low side effects, its demonstrated clinical efficacy and the potential for integration into closed-loop systems.

Intraperitoneal insulin infusion: treatment option for type 1 diabetes resulting in beneficial endocrine effects beyond glycaemia

Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) is a treatment option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who fail to reach adequate glycaemic control despite intensive subcutaneous (SC) insulin therapy. CIPII has clear advantages over SC insulin administration in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and has been shown to improve glycaemic regulation. Due to the delivery of insulin predominantly in the portal vein, as opposed to systemically, CIPII offers a unique research model to investigate the effects of insulin on endocrine and metabolic parameters in vivo. The aim of the present article is to provide an overview of the literature with respect to the effects of CIPII on glucose management, quality of life, complications and costs, with additional focus on metabolic and endocrine aspects. Finally, future use and research objectives are discussed.

Lipid disorders in type 1 diabetes

Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) also present with lipid disorders. Quantitative abnormalities of lipoproteins are observed in T1D patients with poor glycaemic control (increased plasma triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol) or nephropathy (increased triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, low level of high density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). In cases of T1D with optimal glycaemic control, plasma triglycerides and LDL cholesterol are normal or slightly decreased, while HDL cholesterol is normal or slightly increased. Several qualitative abnormalities of lipoproteins, which are potentially atherogenic, are observed in patients with T1D, even in those with good metabolic control. These abnormalities include increased cholesterol-to-triglyceride ratios within very low-density lipoprotein (VLDLs), increased triglycerides in LDLs and HDLs, compositional changes in the peripheral layer of lipoproteins, glycation of apolipoproteins, increased oxidation of LDLs and an increase in small, dense LDL particles. These qualitative changes in lipoproteins are likely to impair their function. In vitro, VLDLs and LDLs from patients with T1D induced abnormal responses in the cellular cholesterol metabolism of human macrophages. HDLs from patients with T1D are thought to be less effective in promoting cholesterol efflux from cells, and have been shown to have reduced antioxidative and vasorelaxant properties. These qualitative abnormalities are not fully explained by hyperglycaemia and may be partly due to peripheral hyperinsulinaemia associated with subcutaneous insulin administration. However, the precise consequences of these qualitative lipid changes on the development of cardiovascular disease in T1D are, as yet, unknown.

Distribution of immunochemically defined apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses in T1D

OBJECTIVE

Young women with T1D develop CHD without any apparent lipid related risk factor. To determine whether abnormalities in the five immunochemically defined apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses might influence this risk, we have measured these subclasses in T1D subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ApoA- and B-containing lipoprotein subclasses were isolated immunochemically and quantitated in 37 young (mean age 31.8+/-12.7 years) otherwise healthy subjects (16 males; 21 females) with T1D (HbA1c=8.2+/-1.7%) treated conventionally with subcutaneous insulin.

RESULTS

T1D women had significantly more cholesterol-rich Lp-B particles (T1D: 55.9+/-4.5 vs. control 46.8+/-11.1mg apoB/dL; p<.01) which were over-represented in the apolipoprotein B particle pool (apoB/Lp-B: T1D: 1.49+/-.19 vs. control: 1.67+/-.22; p<.01). HbA1c correlated with Lp-B (r=0.60; p<.001) and the mass of apoB subclasses containing apoC-III (r=0.69; p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with T1D have a disturbance in the transport of Lp-B particles manifested by both an absolute and relative increase in their number that may result from portal hypoinsulinemia and reduced LDL B,E receptor activity. This pathway may enhance CHD risk in T1D women when of LDL and apoB levels are normal.

No change in apolipoprotein AI metabolism when subcutaneous insulin infusion is replaced by intraperitoneal insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic patients

In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion restores the normal physiological gradient between the portal vein and the peripheral circulation, which is likely to modify HDL metabolism. This stable isotope kinetic study was designed to compare HDL apolipoprotein (apo) AI metabolism in seven type 1 diabetic patients first treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion by an external pump and then 3 months after the beginning of intraperitoneal insulin infusion by an implantable pump. Glycaemic control was comparable under subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin infusion (HbA1c=7.34+/-0.94% versus 7.24+/-1.00%, NS). HDL composition was similar under both insulin regimens (esterified cholesterol=20.1+/-2.5% versus 24.0+/-3.0% (NS), free cholesterol=3.4+/-1.1% versus 3.3+/-0.9% (NS), triglycerides=2.4+/-0.9% versus 2.1+/-0.9% (NS), phospholipids=22.7+/-5.3% versus 25.2+/-6.5% (NS) and proteins=51.2+/-6.3% versus 45.5+/-4.7% (NS)). The replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion induced significant changes neither in apoAI fractional catabolic rate, nor in apoAI production rate, nor in apoAI pool size (respectively, 0.199+/-0.051 pool d(-1) versus 0.211+/-0.017 pool d(-1), 12.0+/-3.2 mg kg(-1)d(-1) versus 12.1+/-1.8 mg kg(-1)d(-1), 60.4+/-5.0 mg kg(-1) versus 57.5+/-7.5 mg kg(-1)). In conclusion, HDL metabolism is not modified by the replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion when glycaemia is well controlled under both insulin regimens. As far as HDL metabolism is concerned there is no advantage in favour of one way of insulin administration or another.