Statins and risk of poststroke hemorrhagic complications

The pleiotropic effects of statins: a comprehensive exploration of neurovascular unit modulation and blood-brain barrier protection

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the most central component of the neurovascular unit (NVU) and is crucial for the maintenance of the internal environment of the central nervous system and the regulation of homeostasis. A multitude of neuroprotective agents have been developed to exert neuroprotective effects and improve the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke. These agents have been designed to maintain integrity and promote BBB repair. Statins are widely used as pharmacological agents for the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke, making them a cornerstone in the pharmacological armamentarium for this condition. The primary mechanism of action is the reduction of serum cholesterol through the inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which results in a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and an increase in cholesterol clearance. Nevertheless, basic and clinical research has indicated that statins may exert additional pleiotropic effects beyond LDL-C reduction. Previous studies on ischemic stroke have demonstrated that statins can enhance neurological function, reduce inflammation, and promote angiogenic and synaptic processes following ischemic stroke. The BBB has been increasingly recognized for its role in the development and progression of ischemic stroke. Statins have also been found to play a potential BBB protective role by affecting members of the NVU. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive theoretical basis for the clinical application of statins by systematically detailing how statins influence the BBB, particularly focusing on the regulation of the function of each member of the NVU.

Immediate- or Delayed-Intensive Statin in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Comparisons are limited for immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin for secondary stroke prevention and neuroprotection in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from atherosclerosis.

Objective

To estimate whether immediate-intensive statin therapy is safe and can lower the risk of recurrent stroke compared with delayed-intensive statin in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from atherosclerosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from September 2018 to October 2022. The trial was conducted at 222 hospitals in China. Patients aged 35 to 80 years with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerosis within 72 hours of symptom onset were assessed.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive immediate-intensive atorvastatin (80 mg daily on days 1-21; 40 mg daily on days 22-90) or 3-day delayed treatment (placebo for days 1-3, followed by placebo and atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 4-21, and then atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 22-90).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke within 90 days, and a secondary efficacy outcome was poor functional outcome. Moderate to severe bleeding was the primary safety outcome.

Results

A total of 11 431 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 6100 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-71] years; 3915 men [64.2%]) were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each treatment group. Within 90 days, new stroke occurred in 245 patients (8.1%) in the immediate-intensive statin group and 256 patients (8.4%) in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.13). Poor functional outcome occurred in 299 patients (9.8%) and 348 patients (11.4%) in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98). Moderate to severe bleeding occurred in 23 of 3050 patients (0.8%) and 17 of 3050 patients (0.6%), in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Immediate-intensive statin initiated within 72 hours did not reduce the risk of stroke within 90 days and may be associated with improved functional outcomes without significant difference in moderate to severe bleeding, compared with 3-day delayed-intensive statin in Chinese patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or TIA from atherosclerosis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749.

Nationwide Big Data Analysis of Statin Use and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Taiwan

Background and Objectives: Although statins are recommended for secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke, some population-based studies and clinical evidence suggest that they might be used with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In this nested case-control study, we used Taiwan's nationwide universal health insurance database to investigate the possible association between statin therapy prescribed to acute ischemic stroke patients and their risk of subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage and all-cause mortality in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: All data were retrospectively obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Acute ischemic stroke patients were divided into a cohort receiving statin pharmacotherapy and a control cohort not receiving statin pharmacotherapy. A 1:1 matching for age, gender, and index day, and propensity score matching was conducted, producing 39,366 cases and 39,366 controls. The primary outcomes were long-term subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage and all-cause mortality. The competing risk between subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage and all-cause mortality was estimated using the Fine and Gray regression hazards model. Results: Patients receiving statin pharmacotherapy after an acute ischemic stroke had a significantly lower risk of subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage (p < 0.0001) and lower all-cause mortality rates (p < 0.0001). Low, moderate, and high dosages of statin were associated with significantly decreased risks for subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted sHRs 0.82, 0.74, 0.53) and all-cause mortality (adjusted sHRs 0.75, 0.74, 0.74), respectively. Conclusions: Statin pharmacotherapy was found to safely and effectively reduce the risk of subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage and all-cause mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients in Taiwan.

Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Increase the Risk of Post-Thrombectomy Delayed Parenchymal Hematoma

PURPOSE

Low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) have been suggested to increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) following acute ischemic stroke. However, the literature on the relationship between LDL-C levels and post-thrombectomy HT is sparse. The aim of our study is to investigate the association between LDL-C and delayed parenchymal hematoma (PH) that was not seen on immediate post-thrombectomy dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent thrombectomy at a comprehensive stroke center from 2018-2021. Per institutional protocol, all patients received DECT immediately post-thrombectomy and magnetic resonance imaging or CT at 24 hours. The presence of immediate hemorrhage was assessed by DECT, while delayed PH was assessed by 24-hour imaging. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of delayed PH. Patients with hemorrhage on immediate post-thrombectomy DECT were excluded to select only those with delayed PH.

RESULTS

Of 159 patients without hemorrhage on immediate post-thrombectomy DECT, 18 (11%) developed delayed PH on 24-hour imaging. In multivariable analysis, LDL-C (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; P=0.038; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.99; per 10 mg/dL increase) independently predicted delayed PH. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and statin use were not associated. After adjusting for potential confounders, LDL-C ≤50 mg/dL was associated with an increased risk of delayed PH (OR, 5.38; P=0.004; 95% CI, 1.70-17.04), while LDL-C >100 mg/dL was protective (OR, 0.26; P=0.041; 95% CI, 0.07-0.96).

CONCLUSION

LDL-C ≤50 mg/dL independently predicted delayed PH following thrombectomy and LDL-C >100 mg/dL was protective, irrespective of statin. Thus, patients with low LDL-C levels may warrant vigilant monitoring and necessary interventions, such as blood pressure control or anticoagulation management, following thrombectomy even in the absence of hemorrhage on immediate post-thrombectomy DECT.

Cardiovascular medications and long-term mortality among stroke survivors in the Brazilian Study of Stroke Mortality and Morbidity (EMMA)

AIM

To investigate the association between medication use and long-term all-cause mortality in a Brazilian stroke cohort.

METHODS

Both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were evaluated. Medication use was assessed as: never, only pre-stroke, only post-stroke, and continuous use. We evaluated anti-hypertensives, anti-diabetics, lipid-lowering drugs, anti-platelets, and anti-coagulants. Cox regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1173 incident stroke cases (median age: 68; 86.8% were ischemic, 70% first-ever stroke), medication use was low (overall: 17.5% pre-stroke, 26.4% post-stroke, and 40% were under continuous use). Anti-hypertensives and anti-platelets (aspirin) were the continuous cardiovascular medications used most often, at 83.5% and 72%, respectively, while statins (39.7%) and anti-diabetics (31.3%) were the least used. Medication use (pre-stroke, post-stroke and continuous use) was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality risk, particularly among those under continuous use (multivariable hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.66) compared with never-users. Among ischemic stroke patients, this effect was similar (multivariable hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.68). No significant associations were evident among hemorrhagic stroke patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of all-cause mortality was reduced by 48% among those with ischemic stroke under continuous use of medications. Secondary prevention should be emphasized more strongly in clinical practice. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; ••: ••-••.

Statin pretreatment combined with intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke patients: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

For ischemic stroke patients, thrombolysis therapy combined statins might have a better benefit. But difference studies had a debate. The meta-analysis wants to make clear about whether statins could increase effect of therapy or decrease side effect for these patients.

METHODS OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect and safety about using statins in ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis.

DATA SOURCES

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library. Eligibility criteria: original observational cohort studies.

PARTICIPANTS

ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis.

INTERVENTIONS

pretreatment statins. Appraisal and synthesis methods: forest plot to show pooled results; I-squared test to evaluate the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 87 selected, 8 were eligible. The 8 studies included 10,344 patients (with statins: 2048; without statins: 8296). For clinical recovery at 24 h, pooled OR (odds ratios) was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.49-2.21). For excellent outcome, pooled OR was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.80-1.12). For favorable outcome, pooled OR was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.85-1.16). For ICH (intracranial hemorrhage), pooled OR was 1.16 (95% CI: 0.97-1.40). For sICH (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage), pooled OR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02-1.91). For mortality, overall pooled OR was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.74-1.25).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the meta-analysis found that for ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis, pretreatment statins were related to a better clinical recovery and a lower short-term mortality. Pretreatment statins had no significant relationship with mRS at 90 days and ICH. Pretreatment high dose statins may be related to the occurrence of sICH.

Statin Use and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The data on the relationship between statin use and clinical outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are in controversy.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of statins administered prior to onset and during hospitalization in patients with AIS treated with IVT.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until June 8, 2021. Comparative studies investigating statin effect on intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), functional outcomes, and mortality in adults with AIS treated with IVT were screened. Random-effect meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021254919).

Results: Twenty-two observational studies were included, which involved 17,554 patients. The pooled estimates showed that pre-stroke statin use was associated with a higher likelihood of symptomatic ICH (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.07–1.59; p = 0.008) and any ICH (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03–1.43; p = 0.02). However, the pre-stroke statin use was not significantly associated with the 3-month mortality, 3-month favorable functional outcome (FFO, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0–1), and 3-month functional independence (FI; mRS score 0–2). However, in-hospital statin use was associated with a reduced risk of symptomatic ICH (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21–1.00; p = 0.045), any ICH (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27–0.98; p = 0.04), and 3-month mortality (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29–0.62; p < 0.001) and an increased probability of 3-month FFO (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.02–1.744; p = 0.04) and 3-month FI (OR 1.41; 95% C, 1.11–1.80; p = 0.005).

Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that in-hospital statin use after IVT may be safe and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes, a finding not observed in studies restricted to patients with pre-stroke statin use.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Statins in Animal Models of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with limited treatment options. Statins have shown promise as a therapy for ICH in animal and human studies. We systematically reviewed and assessed the quality of preclinical studies exploring statin-use after ICH to guide clinical trial decision-making and design.

METHODS

We identified preclinical trials assessing the efficacy of statins in ICH via a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. In total, 16 studies were identified that described statin use in an animal model of ICH and assessed histological outcomes, behavioral scores, or both. Design characteristics were analyzed using Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria modified for ICH. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Behavioral outcomes were assessed in 12 of the studies with 100% (n = 12) reporting that statins significantly improved ICH recovery. Histologic hematoma volume and brain water content outcomes were analyzed in 10 of the studies, with 50% (n = 5) reporting significant improvement. The ratio of means between experimental and control cases for modified Neurological Severity Score was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.49-0.82). The ratio of means between experimental and control cases for hemorrhagic volume was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.03). There was heterogeneity between studies (P < 0.0001) but no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.89, P = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral outcomes in ICH were found to consistently improve with administration of statins in preclinical studies suggesting that statin therapy may be suitable for randomized clinical trials in humans. In addition, the STAIR criteria can be modified to effectively evaluate preclinical studies in ICH.

Adjunctive Statin Therapy Reduces Mortality After Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke

Background

Statin treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic strokes, although there is no evidence regarding the safety of statin therapy in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed at evaluating the effects of continuing statin treatment after ICH.

Methods

Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We retrospectively compared the data of patients with and without statin exposure after ICH. The outcomes of interest were recurrence of hemorrhagic stroke and mortality during a follow-up period of 10 years.

Results

During the 10-year follow-up period, the mortality rate was 32.73% in the statin group and 42.77% in the non-statin group. Statin therapy in patients with acute ICH with dyslipidemia can decrease mortality.

Conclusion

Statin therapy reduced the risk of 10-year mortality in patients who experienced acute hemorrhagic stroke.

Isoflurane post-conditioning attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by reducing apoptotic through activating the BMP7/SMAD signaling pathway in rats

The expressions of different temporal patterns of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have changed after ischemic strokes, and ischemic preconditioning-induced neuroprotection was attenuated when BMP7 was inhibited. In the previous study, the neuroprotection of isoflurane postconditioning (ISPOC) against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury has been addressed, with particular relevance to the role of BMP7. Consequently, in the present study, we continued to explore the mechanisms involved in the BMP7 signal mediated the neuroprotection of ISPOC. A rat model of the middle cerebral artery occlusion was used in this study. Rats were administered 1.5 % isoflurane, 60 min after 90 min of ischemia, followed by a 24 h reperfusion period. The 1.5 % ISPOC significantly ameliorated the cerebral infarct volumes, neurologic deficit scores, damaged neurons, and apoptotic neurons. Moreover, ISPOC unregulated the expressions of BMP7, p-Smad1/5/9, and p-p38. Whereas, the neuroprotective effect was weakened by LDN-193189 and SB203580, respectively, a BMP7/Smad1/5/9 and p38MAPK signaling pathway inhibitor. Furthermore, LDN-193189 downregulated the expression of p-p38. The present results of this study indicated that the neuroprotection of 1.5 % isoflurane postconditioning to cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury is related to the activating of BMP7/Smad1/5/9 and p38MAPK signal pathway.

Premorbid Use of Statin and Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The association between the premorbid use of statin and the early outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the influence of the premorbid use of statin on functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SIH) in AIS after IVT. Methods: Relevant studies were identified by search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. Only studies with multivariate analyses were included. A random-effect model, incorporating inter-study heterogeneity, was used to pool the results. Results: Twenty observational studies with 20,752 AIS patients who were treated with IVT were included. The pooled results showed that the premorbid use of statin was not associated with improved 3-month favorable functional outcome [odds ratio (OR): 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.26, p = 0.60, I ² = 52%), 3-month functional independence (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96-1.33, p = 0.15, I ² = 52%), or 3-month mortality (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.94-1.34, p = 0.20, I ² = 20%). Moreover, the premorbid use of statin was associated with an increased risk of SIH in AIS after IVT (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.12-1.95, p = 0.006, I ² = 60%). Subgroup analyses according to study design, adjustment of baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and definitions of SIH showed consistent results (p-values for subgroup difference all >0.05). Conclusions: The premorbid use of statin is not associated with improved functional outcomes or mortality but is associated with a higher risk of SIH in AIS patients after IVT.

Delayed (21 Days) Post Stroke Treatment With RPh201, a Botany-Derived Compound, Improves Neurological Functional Recovery in a Rat Model of Embolic Stroke

Background

Despite the recent advances in the acute stroke care, treatment options for long-term disability are limited. RPh201 is a botany-derived bioactive compound that has been shown to exert beneficial effects in various experimental models of neural injury. The present study evaluated the effect of delayed RPh201 treatment on long term functional recovery after stroke.

Methods

Adult male Wistar rats subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) were randomized into the following experimental groups (n = 20/group): (1) RPh201 treatment, and (2) Vehicle (cottonseed oil). RPh201 (20 μl) or Vehicle were subcutaneously administered twice a week for 16 consecutive weeks starting at 21 days after MCAO. An array of behavioral tests was performed up to120 days after MCAO.

Results

Ischemic rats treated with RPh201 exhibited significant (p < 0.05) improvement of neurological function measured by adhesive removal test, foot-fault test, and modified neurological severity score at 90 and 120 days after MCAO. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that RPh201 treatment robustly increased neurofilament heavy chain positive axons and myelin basic protein densities in the peri-infarct area by 61% and 31%, respectively, when compared to the Vehicle treatment, which were further confirmed by Western blot analysis. The RPh201 treatment did not reduce infarct volume.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated that RPh201 has a therapeutic effect on improvement of functional recovery in male ischemic rats even when the treatment was initiated 21 days post stroke. Enhanced axonal and myelination densities by RPh201 in ischemic brain may contribute to improved stroke recovery.

Early ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications after atrial fibrillation-related ischaemic stroke: analysis of the IAC study

INTRODUCTION

Predictors of long-term ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) have been studied, but there are limited data on predictors of early ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications after AF-associated ischaemic stroke. We sought to determine these predictors.

METHODS

The Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke study is a multicentre retrospective study across that pooled data from consecutive patients with ischaemic stroke in the setting of AF from stroke registries across eight comprehensive stroke centres in the USA. The coprimary outcomes were recurrent ischaemic event (stroke/TIA/systemic arterial embolism) and delayed symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (d-sICH) within 90 days. We performed univariate analyses and Cox regression analyses including important predictors on univariate analyses to determine independent predictors of early ischaemic events (stroke/TIA/systemic embolism) and d-sICH.

RESULTS

Out of 2084 patients, 1520 patients qualified; 104 patients (6.8%) had recurrent ischaemic events and 23 patients (1.5%) had d-sICH within 90 days from the index event. In Cox regression models, factors associated with a trend for recurrent ischaemic events were prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.10) and ipsilateral arterial stenosis with 50%-99% narrowing (HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.43). Those associated with sICH were male sex (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.06 to 6.83), history of hyperlipidaemia (HR 2.91, 95% CI 1.08 to 7.84) and early haemorrhagic transformation (HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.22 to 12.92).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ischaemic stroke and AF, predictors of d-sICH are different than those of recurrent ischaemic events; therefore, recognising these predictors may help inform early stroke versus d-sICH prevention strategies.

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on thrombolysis-induced haemorrhagic transformation

Thrombolysis-induced haemorrhagic transformation is the most challenging preventable complication in thrombolytic therapy. This condition is often associated with poor functional outcome and long-term disease burden. Statins, or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, are controversially suggested to either increase or decrease the odds of better primary outcomes compared to treatment without statins after thrombolysis in patients or animals; statins are thought to act by influencing lipid levels, the inflammatory response, blood brain barrier permeability and cell apoptosis. Statins are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, the role of statins in acute phase stroke, and the necessity of their use, remains unclear. Currently, whether statins can increase the risk of haemorrhagic transformation is of great concern for patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Herein, we thoroughly summarize the recent advances that address whether the administration of statins in ischaemic stroke increases haemorrhagic transformation in patients or animals who received thrombolysis at an early stage and the related mechanisms. This review will provide more clinical and preclinical evidence to address questions regarding the exercise of caution in the use of high dose statins in patients who received thrombolysis and if low dose statins may be beneficial in decreasing thrombolysis-induced haemorrhagic transformation.

Statin, cholesterol, and sICH after acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conflicts exist regarding relationship between prior/new statin use, cholesterol, and early poststroke intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. This meta-analysis is aimed at evaluating the safety of prior/new statin use, cholesterol level and risk of ICH in AIS patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for studies examining relation between statin use, cholesterol level, and early poststroke ICH in AIS. Included studies should report risk of early poststroke symptomatic ICH (sICH) or overall ICH. A random-effects model was used to pool the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles involving 26,327 participants were included, among whom 925 had sICH. Prior statin use was not associated with overall ICH (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.478; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.924-2.362; p = 0.103) and sICH in patients who received thrombolysis (adjusted OR, 1.567; 95% CI, 0.994-2.471; p = 0.053) or overall ICH in patients, most of whom had not received recanalization therapy (crude OR, 1.342; 95% CI, 0.872-2.065; p = 0.181). New statin use was associated with decreased sICH after recanalization therapy (crude OR, 0.292; 95% CI, 0.168-0.507; p < 0.001).Cholesterol level was not associated with overall ICH.

CONCLUSION

Prior/new statin use and lower cholesterol level are not risk factors for sICH and overall ICH in AIS patients, whether or not the patient has received recanalization therapy. New statin use is likely associated with decreased sICH.

Statins and perihemorrhagic edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), perihemorrhagic edema to hematoma ratio (rPHE) on admission CT scan (aCT) is unaffected by home statin use when time from symptom onset to aCT is controlled for.

METHODS

In a single-center prospective cohort of 176 consecutive ICH patients, 2 investigators independently determined hematoma and perihemorrhagic edema (PHE) volumes by using semiautomated validated software. rPHE were dichotomized at the median ratio (>0.75 vs ≤0.75). We used binary logistic regression to test for associations with rPHE.

RESULTS

In patients using statins as home medication before hospital admission (n = 38) compared to patients without prior statin use (n = 138), median PHE volumes were 15.8 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5-39.4) vs 10.8 mL (IQR 5.1-26.8), p = 0.2. rPHE was 0.71 (IQR 0.56-1.0) vs 0.74 (IQR 0.52-1.0), p = 0.79. In a binary logistic regression model, time of aCT relative to symptom onset (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.12, p = 0.016) and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage on aCT (OR 0.40, CI 0.20-0.78, p = 0.007) were but prior statin use was not (OR 1.17, CI 0.55-2.52, p = 0.68) associated with rPHE.

CONCLUSION

Use of statins before hospital admission for ICH is not associated with reduced rPHE on admission CT. In future studies, imaging timing relative to ICH onset needs to be controlled for in order to avoid confounding.

Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate promotes endothelial integrity via regulating VE-cadherin dynamics and RhoA/ROCK-mediated cellular contractility and prevents atorvastatin-induced intracerebral hemorrhage in zebrafish

Impaired vascular integrity leads to serious cerebral vascular diseases such as intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In addition, high-dose statin therapy is suggested to cause increased ICH risk due to unclear effects of general inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) on the vascular system. Here we evaluated the protective effects of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS), which has high efficacy and safety in clinical studies of ischemic stroke, by using atorvastatin (Ator) induced ICH zebrafish embryos and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). By using double transgenic Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1 & Tg(gata1a:dsRed)sd2 zebrafish, we demonstrated that STS effectively reduced the occurrence and area of hemorrhage induced by Ator in zebrafish and restored impairment in motor function. We further demonstrated that Ator-induced disruption in VE-cadherin (VEC)-containing cell-cell adherens junctions (AJs) in HUVECs by enhancing Src-induced VEC internalization and RhoA/ROCK-mediated cellular contraction. STS inhibited Ator-induced Src activation and subsequent VEC internalization and actin depolymerization near cell borders, reducing lesions between neighboring cells and increasing barrier functions. STS also inhibited the Ator-induced RhoA/ROCK-mediated cellular contraction by regulating downstream LIMK/cofilin and MYPT1/MLC phosphatase signaling. These results showed that STS significantly promoted the stability of cell junctions and vascular integrity. Moreover, we observed that regulations of both Src and RhoA/ROCK are required for the maintenance of vascular integrity, and Src inhibitor (PP2) or ROCK inhibitors (fasudil and H1152) alone could not reduce the occurrence Ator-induced ICH. Taken together, we investigated the underlying mechanisms of Ator-induced endothelial instability, and provided scientific evidences of STS as potential ICH therapeutics by promoting vascular integrity.

The efficacy and safety of high-dose statins in acute phase of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: a systematic review

Inconsistent findings in the studies have been observed concerning the higher dose of statins use in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess this issue. A computerized literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. The efficacy outcome indicators were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, infarct volume, and recurrence of stroke; the safety outcome indicators were intracranial hemorrhage events, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and all-cause death. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were carried out. A total of seven RCTs with 1089 patients were included. Six studies reported the results of the NHISS score. A great reduction was found in NIHSS score in the statins group, and the difference is statistically significant [mean difference (MD) -1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.64 to -0.66, P < 0.00001]. However, no significant differences in the effect on recurrence of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.65-1.69, P = 0.85] (available in 3 studies), infarct volume [std. mean difference (SMD) 0.04, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.63, P = 0.89] (available in 2 studies), intracerebral hemorrhage events (OR 3.25, 95% CI 0.34-31.52, P = 0.31) (available in 2 studies), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35-1.43, P = 0.33) (available in 2 studies), and all-cause death (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.60-2.35, P = 0.63) (available in 2 studies) were found. High-dose statin therapy in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and TIA significantly reduce the NIHSS score and improve short-term functional outcome without increasing related adverse events.

Hypercholesterolaemia and vascular dementia

Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second commonest cause of dementia. Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults in developed countries, the second major cause of dementia and the third commonest cause of death. Traditional vascular risk factors-diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension and smoking-are implicated as risk factors for VaD. The associations between cholesterol and small vessel disease (SVD), stroke, cognitive impairment and subsequent dementia are complex and as yet not fully understood. Similarly, the effects of lipids and lipid-lowering therapy on preventing or treating dementia remain unclear; the few trials that have assessed lipid-lowering therapy for preventing (two trials) or treating (four trials) dementia found no evidence to support the use of lipid-lowering therapy for these indications. It is appropriate to treat those patients with vascular risk factors that meet criteria for lipid-lowering therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and in line with current guidelines. Managing the individual patient in a holistic manner according to his or her own vascular risk profile is recommended. Although the paucity of randomized controlled evidence makes for challenging clinical decision making, it provides multiple opportunities for on-going and future research, as discussed here.