Deconstructing tolerance with clobazam: Post hoc analyses from an open-label extension study

Antiseizure medications for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Comprehensive review and proposed consensus treatment algorithm

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe, childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by multiple drug-resistant seizure types, specific electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns, and significant cognitive and behavioral impairments. To date, eight anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have been specifically approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of LGS: clonazepam, felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, rufinamide, clobazam, cannabidiol, and fenfluramine. Additionally, several other ASMs, including valproate, are frequently used off-label for LGS management. As the therapeutic landscape for LGS expands, clinicians are increasingly faced with complex decisions regarding optimal ASM selection. This narrative review explores evolving treatment strategies, offering a consensus-based treatment algorithm designed by a panel of U.S.- based experts. We analyze both FDA-approved and off-label ASMs, drawing on data from randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions, and real-world studies to assess each drug's efficacy and safety profile. A key challenge in comparing ASMs lies in the heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. This review addresses these limitations and considers crucial factors influencing ASM selection, such as seizure outcomes, safety profiles, cognitive and behavioral outcomes, drug-drug interactions, and rational polypharmacy. Barriers to access, including economic and regulatory hurdles, are also discussed. The proposed treatment algorithm emphasizes a personalized approach to LGS management, recommending valproate or clobazam as first-line treatments, followed by individualized combinations based on the specific patient profile and associated comorbidities.

Proposed anti-seizure medication combinations with rufinamide in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Narrative review and expert opinion

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe, chronic, complex form of early childhood-onset epilepsy characterized by multiple seizure types, generalized slow (≤2.5 Hz) spike-and-wave activity and other electroencephalography abnormalities, and cognitive impairment. A key treatment goal is early seizure control, and several anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are available. Due to the low success rate in achieving seizure control with monotherapy and an absence of efficacy data supporting any particular combination of ASMs for treating LGS, a rational approach to selection of appropriate polytherapy should be applied to maximize benefit to patients. Such "rational polytherapy" involves consideration of factors including safety (including boxed warnings), potential drug-drug interactions, and complementary mechanisms of action. Based on the authors' clinical experience, rufinamide offers a well-considered first adjunctive therapy for LGS, particularly in combination with clobazam and other newer agents for LGS, and may be particularly useful for reducing the frequency of tonic-atonic seizures associated with LGS.

Rescue therapies for seizure clusters: Pharmacology and target of treatments

The primary goal of treatment for seizure clusters is cessation of the cluster to avoid progression to more severe conditions, such as prolonged seizures and status epilepticus. Rescue therapies are key components of treatment plans for patients with seizure clusters. Three rescue therapies are approved in the United States for the treatment of seizure clusters: diazepam rectal gel, midazolam nasal spray, and diazepam nasal spray. This review characterizes the pharmacological function of rescue therapies for seizure clusters, as well as describing γ‐aminobutyric acid A (GABA_A) receptor functions. GABA_A receptors are heteropentamers, consisting primarily of α1‐6, β1‐3, γ2, and δ subunits in the central nervous system. These subunits can traffic to and from the membrane to regulate membrane potential. Benzodiazepines, such as diazepam and midazolam, are positive allosteric modulators of GABA_A receptors, the activation of which leads to an increase in intracellular chloride, hyperpolarization of the cell membrane, and a reduction in excitation. GABA_A receptor subunit mutations, dysregulation of trafficking, and degradation are associated with epilepsy. Although benzodiazepines are effective GABA_A receptor modulators, individual formulations have unique profiles in practice. Diazepam rectal gel is an effective rescue therapy for seizure clusters; however, adults and adolescents may have social reservations regarding its administration. Intranasal delivery of midazolam or diazepam is a promising alternative to rectal administration because these formulations offer easy, socially acceptable administration and exhibit a rapid onset. Off‐label benzodiazepines, such as orally disintegrating lorazepam and intranasal use of an intravenous formulation of midazolam via nasal atomizer, are less well characterized regarding bioavailability and tolerability compared with approved agents.

CLB add-on treatment in patients with epileptic encephalopathy: a single center experience with long-term follow-up

Clobazam (CLB) is an effective anticonvulsant used as an adjunctive treatment for several seizures and epilepsy syndromes. Data are limited on efficacy and safety of CLB as add-on therapy for epileptic encephalopaties (EEs) other than Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). This retrospective study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of long-term CLB add-on therapy for various EE syndromes. Data on CLB add-on therapy were assessed in 74 children (60.8% male) after 3 months (early) and 12 months (late) follow-up as well as in 57 (77%) patients who had been on CLB therapy longer than 12 months (mean:39.11 ± 30.29; range:12-129 months) (very late) were reported. Data on CLB add-on therapy were assessed in 74 children (60.8% male) after 3 months (early) and 12 months (late) follow-up as well as in 57 (77%) patients who had been on CLB therapy longer than 12 months (mean:39.11 ± 30.29; range:12-129 months) (very late) were reported. Good response rate (> 50%) for seizures was achieved in 24% at early follow-up, 30% at late follow-up, and 35% during very late follow-up. Complete seizure remission was achieved for 15% seizures; 72.7% occurred at very late follow-up. Myoclonic seizures were the most responsive (35%); this response increased during late follow-up (46%), whereas 27.3% of myoclonic-atonic/atonic seizures had good response at early and very late follow-up. At late follow-up, comparison of mean effective doses of CLB did not show significant difference among types of seizures with good response. Adverse effects reported in 15% of patients did not require stopping CLB therapy. Generalized epileptogenic potentials significantly decreased while focal epileptogenic potentials significantly increased at first year of treatment in comparison to basal EEG findings (p < 0.001). CLB should be considered as an optional antiepileptic that is well tolerated, particularly in EEs with myoclonic and myoclonic-atonic/atonic seizures.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobazam in Adults With Drug-Refractory Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of clobazam as an adjunctive treatment for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years with drug-resistant epilepsy who started clobazam between 2010 and 2018. Included patients had outpatient visits both before and ≥1 month after clobazam initiation. Epilepsy classification, seizure frequency before and after clobazam, duration of clobazam treatment, and adverse effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 37.5 years, and 54% of patients were female. Patients were on a mean of 2.4 antiepileptic drugs at the time of initiation of clobazam. Epilepsy types were focal (56.8%), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) (21.1%), generalized (15.1%), and unclassified (7.0%). At the first follow-up visit ≥1 month after clobazam initiation, 50.3% of patients had >50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 20.5% were seizure free. Of the initial cohort, 17.1% were followed >1 year and were seizure free at last follow-up. Response rates did not differ between different epilepsy classifications. Fifty-one percent of patients experienced ≥1 side effect, most commonly lethargy/fatigue (30.7%) or mood changes (10.8%). A total of 178 (42.6%) patients discontinued clobazam, most commonly due to adverse effects (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clobazam is effective and safe as a long-term adjunctive therapy for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy; efficacy in off-label use is similar to that in LGS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that clobazam is an effective treatment for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy, independent of epilepsy classification.

Lack of observed tolerance to diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco®) after long-term rescue therapy in patients with epilepsy: Interim results from a phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose safety study

OBJECTIVE

Tolerance is a known consideration for maintenance use of benzodiazepines and other antiseizure drugs; however, clinical experience suggests that tolerance may not be anticipated with long-term intermittent use of benzodiazepines as rescue therapy. Diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco®) is a proprietary intranasal formulation approved for the acute treatment of intermittent, stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity (ie, seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures) in patients with epilepsy aged ≥6 years. Reported here are exploratory analyses investigating whether there was evidence of development of tolerance in an interim analysis of a long-term, phase 3, open-label safety study of diazepam nasal spray.

METHODS

Patients and care partners were trained to administer 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg of diazepam nasal spray (age- and weight-based dosing), with a second dose administered 4-12 hours later if needed. A series of analyses were performed to assess evidence of tolerance using 2 equal, adjacent time periods and data for each patient to compare the proportion of events for which second doses of diazepam nasal spray (as a proxy for effectiveness) were administered in period 1 compared with period 2.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were enrolled at interim cutoff, and 158 were treated with diazepam nasal spray for 3370 seizure-cluster events. For 73.4% of patients, duration of exposure to diazepam nasal spray was ≥12 months. A total of 191 analyses were conducted; the proportion of analyses in which second doses in period 2 were lower than in period 1 was 72.8%. Only 5 analyses showed nominally statistically significant changes (P < 0.05); this is fewer than expected by chance, and these differences were not directionally consistent. There was no safety signal with continued use.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses found no statistical evidence of tolerance with the use of diazepam nasal spray over time based on use of a second dose in an initial period of the study compared with a subsequent period for each patient. These results are in agreement with prior studies of benzodiazepine rescue therapy.

Management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome beyond childhood: A comprehensive review

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy characterized by multiple types of medically intractable seizures, cognitive impairment, and generalized slow spike-wave discharges in electroencephalography (EEG). Although the onset of this epileptic syndrome occurs typically before eight years of age with a peak age between 3 and 5 years, lifelong persistence of the syndrome is usual. The evolution of clinical features, EEG findings, and paucity of knowledge about LGS among adult health care providers can make LGS significantly underdiagnosed in the adult population. Management of LGS remains problematic beyond childhood due to intractable seizures, the difficult transition from pediatric to adult neurologists, challenging behaviors, impaired cognition, poor quality of life, and disabled social life. In focusing on the management of LGS beyond childhood, this narrative review describes medical and surgical management of epilepsy, the transition from pediatric to adult care, and management of other common comorbidities associated with LGS. Several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as lamotrigine, topiramate, felbamate, rufinamide, clobazam, and Epidiolex (pure pharmaceutical grade cannabidiol (CBD) oil) have been noted to be effective in well-designed, randomized controlled trials. Other non-pharmacological therapies, such as vagus nerve stimulation, ketogenic diet, and epilepsy surgery, have been frequently utilized in the management of intractable seizures associated with LGS. However, effective management of LGS requires a broader perspective to not only control seizures but improve the quality of life by addressing cognitive and behavioral problems, sleep disturbances, physical disability, social disability, and educational and employment challenges.

Functional characterization of the antiepileptic drug candidate, padsevonil, on GABAA receptors

OBJECTIVE

The antiepileptic drug candidate, padsevonil, is the first in a novel class of drugs designed to interact with both presynaptic and postsynaptic therapeutic targets: synaptic vesicle 2 proteins and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_A Rs), respectively. Functional aspects of padsevonil at the postsynaptic target, GABA_A Rs, were characterized in experiments reported here.

METHODS

The effect of padsevonil on GABA-mediated Cl^- currents was determined by patch clamp on recombinant human GABA_A Rs (α1β2γ2) stably expressed in a CHO-K1 cell line and on native GABA_A Rs in cultured rat primary cortical neurons. Padsevonil selectivity for GABA_A R subtypes was evaluated using a two-electrode voltage clamp on recombinant human GABA_A Rs (α1-5/β2/γ2) in Xenopus oocytes.

RESULTS

In recombinant GABA_A Rs, padsevonil did not evoke Cl^- currents in the absence of the agonist GABA. However, when co-administered with GABA at effective concentration (EC)₂₀ , padsevonil potentiated GABA responses by 167% (EC₅₀ 138 nmol/L) and demonstrated a relative efficacy of 41% compared with zolpidem, a reference benzodiazepine site agonist. Similarly, padsevonil demonstrated GABA-potentiating activity at native GABA_A Rs (EC₅₀ 208 nmol/L) in cultured rat cortical neurons. Padsevonil also potentiated GABA (EC₂₀ ) responses in GABA_A Rs expressed in oocytes, with higher potency at α1- and α5-containing receptors (EC₅₀ 295 and 281 nmol/L) than at α2- and α3-containing receptors (EC₅₀ 1737 and 2089 nmol/L). Compared with chlordiazepoxide-a nonselective, full GABA_A R agonist-the relative efficacy of padsevonil was 60% for α1β2γ2, 26% for α2β2γ2, 56% for α3β2γ2, and 41% for α5β2γ2; no activity was observed at benzodiazepine-insensitive α4β2γ2 receptors.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results of functional investigations on recombinant and native neuronal GABA_A Rs show that padsevonil acts as a positive allosteric modulator of these receptors, with a partial agonist profile at the benzodiazepine site. These properties may confer better tolerability and lower potential for tolerance development compared with classic benzodiazepines currently used in the clinic.

Pharmacological Profile of the Novel Antiepileptic Drug Candidate Padsevonil: Characterization in Rodent Seizure and Epilepsy Models

The antiepileptic drug (AED) candidate, (4R)-4-(2-chloro-2,2-difluoroethyl)-1-{[2-(methoxymethyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-5-yl]methyl}pyrrolidin-2-one (padsevonil), is the first in a novel class of drugs that bind to synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) proteins and the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site, allowing for pre- and postsynaptic activity, respectively. In acute seizure models, padsevonil provided potent, dose-dependent protection against seizures induced by administration of pilocarpine or 11-deoxycortisol, and those induced acoustically or through 6 Hz stimulation; it was less potent in the pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, and maximal electroshock models. Padsevonil displayed dose-dependent protective effects in chronic epilepsy models, including the intrahippocampal kainate and Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg models, which represent human mesial temporal lobe and absence epilepsy, respectively. In the amygdala kindling model, which is predictive of efficacy against focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, padsevonil provided significant protection in kindled rodents; in mice specifically, it was the most potent AED compared with nine others with different mechanisms of action. Its therapeutic index was also the highest, potentially translating into a favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in humans. Importantly, in contrast to diazepam, tolerance to padsevonil's antiseizure effects was not observed in the pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic seizure threshold test. Further results in the 6 Hz model showed that padsevonil provided significantly greater protection than the combination of diazepam with either 2S-(2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)butanamide (levetiracetam) or 2S-2-[(4R)-2-oxo-4-propylpyrrolidin-1-yl] butanamide (brivaracetam), both selective SV2A ligands. This observation suggests that padsevonil's unique mechanism of action confers antiseizure properties beyond the combination of compounds targeting SV2A and the benzodiazepine site. Overall, padsevonil displayed robust efficacy across validated seizure and epilepsy models, including those considered to represent drug-resistant epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Padsevonil, a first-in-class antiepileptic drug candidate, targets SV2 proteins and the benzodiazepine site of GABAA receptors. It demonstrated robust efficacy across a broad range of rodent seizure and epilepsy models, several representing drug-resistant epilepsy. Furthermore, in one rodent model, its efficacy extended beyond the combination of drugs interacting separately with SV2 or the benzodiazepine site. Padsevonil displayed a high therapeutic index, potentially translating into a favorable safety profile in humans; tolerance to antiseizure effects was not observed.

Systematic review of clobazam use in patients with status epilepticus

Clobazam (CLB) is a commonly used oral antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been shown to be effective in various forms of epilepsy. Given its distinct 1,5‐benzodiazepine structure, rapid absorption, minimal drug interactions, and favorable safety profile, CLB displays unique properties when compared to other commonly used benzodiazepines. Recent evidence has shown that CLB may demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in status epilepticus (SE). The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence pertaining to the efficacy of CLB use in SE. An electronic literature search of Medline (1946 to November 6, 2017), Embase (1974 to November 6, 2017), and the Cochrane Library (1999 to November 6, 2017) databases was performed to identify reports of CLB use in SE. After screening and full text review, a total of 15 articles were included: 8 retrospective studies, 2 case series, and 5 case reports. Efficacy rates for CLB have varied among reports. Overall, based on the retrospective studies, a total of 76 patients with SE have been reported. CLB was introduced within 2–4 days from SE onset and has been reported to contribute to remission in 36 patients (47%). CLB maintenance dose ranged from 10 to 60 mg/day. However, the results need to be interpreted carefully because SE patients are a heterogeneous group with different etiologies and disease severities, and the response to CLB might vary in different patient population or seizure types. In conclusion, there is not sufficient evidence to determine the safety and efficacy of clobazam in the setting of SE. However, the current limited evidence combined with the unique characteristics of CLB suggest that the drug might be considered as an add‐on option in SE patients, with a suggested dosage range of 10–60 mg/day. Prospective studies are needed to fully establish the role of CLB in the management of SE.

Optimizing clobazam treatment in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Given the complexities managing Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS)-comorbid conditions, multiple associated seizure types that tend to be refractory to treatment-dosage optimization of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment is a challenge. In the absence of clinical trial data on optimization of AED dosage in patients with LGS, dose titration is guided by personal experience, anecdotal evidence, and specific patient factors (age, comorbid conditions and medications, seizure types, etc.). The goal of this study was to determine whether a 20% increase in adjunctive clobazam was a reasonable benchmark for improved seizure response in patients with LGS who had responded to adjunctive clobazam treatment during a 12-week lead-in trial. This was a post hoc analysis of data from a long-term, open-label extension (OLE) study, which comprised patients who completed 1 of 2 pivotal clobazam lead-in studies. During the lead-in studies, patients received either placebo or clobazam (0.25, 0.50, or 1.0mg/kg/d) (maximum 40mg/d); during OLE, patients received clobazam up to 2.0mg/kg/d (maximum 80mg/d). The post hoc analysis population comprised patients who had ≥25%, ≥50%, or ≥75% seizure reduction from baseline during lead-in clobazam treatment and ≥12months of follow-up data during OLE. Successful dosage increase (i.e., dosage optimization) was defined as ≥20% clobazam dosage increase from OLE baseline, and improved seizure control from OLE baseline (improvement in seizure responder status, or >50% reduction in total seizure frequency). Patients were stratified by responder status after lead-in treatment (OLE baseline) and by lead-in clobazam dosage received. The findings of the analysis indicated that clobazam dosage increases of ≥20% during long-term treatment improved seizure control >80% of patients with LGS who responded to clobazam during lead-in treatment. Rates of successful dosage increase during OLE were high regardless of lead-in dosage received, with the highest rate of successful dosage increase among patients who received low-dosage clobazam during lead-in. Similarly, rates of successful dose increase were high regardless of lead-in seizure responder category, with the highest rates occurring in patients with the highest (≥75%) lead-in response.