Refractory status epilepticus in children with and without prior epilepsy or status epilepticus

Treating seizures faster: The Quality Improvement in Time to Treat Status Epilepticus (QuITT-SE) multicenter randomized stepped wedge clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Acute seizures may evolve into status epilepticus (SE), prolonged and self-sustaining seizures that may result in brain injury or death. Rapid treatment with a benzodiazepine (BZD) is most effective. However, SE treatment remains delayed in many cases. We previously performed a single-center quality improvement study which resulted in more rapid treatment, decreased intensive care utilization, and decreased cost. Now, we are conducting a multicenter trial to test the hypothesis that pragmatic changes in treating acute inpatient seizures reduce time and are implementable across diverse hospital settings.

METHODS/DESIGN

We designed a multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with three unidirectional 12-month steps following one baseline step. After dissemination visits, sites will attempt to implement a standardized bundle consisting of: (1) standardize default BZD to non-IV; (2) target treatment time within 10 min; (3) relocate and bundle items for BZD administration to a single location; (4) prioritize basic seizure first aid as initial assessment; (5) implement SE-specific documentation templates; (6) implement multidisciplinary site QI teams. Our primary outcome is median time from seizure diagnosis to BZD administration. Secondary outcomes are median changes in Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score, ICU transfer rate, and cost of hospitalization. We will study implementation outcomes using mixed methods based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

DISCUSSION

QuITT-SE is designed to test the effect and implementation of a pragmatic set of interventions on treatment times in SE. If successful, results will provide a generalizable roadmap for broad implementation through healthcare systems that should improve outcomes in SE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06194747). Funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS133037).

Tenets of timing: An evidence based comprehensive review on time-lag in the management of pediatric status epilepticus and its effect on clinical outcomes

Pediatric status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening, time-sensitive neurological emergency. The adequate treatment of pediatric patients with SE is challenging, especially when the principles of time are considered. Various clinical trials and studies [especially one of the most important randomized controlled trials of the present time, 'ESETT (Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial)'] compared the effectiveness of 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with SE, providing robust evidence for clinical practice. Meticulous analysis of care delivery is an essential component as far as optimal management of pediatric SE is concerned. We performed an evidence-based comprehensive review on documented non-compliance and deviations from standard-treatment guidelines (STGs), focusing on time-elapsed from pediatric SE onset to ASM administration and escalation to subsequent classes. We have found significant gaps in real-world clinical practice. A literature review and a pooled-analysis of 12 studies on pediatric SE showed prehospital time to SE treatment was 29.5 minutes. Time to EMS arrival and hospital admission was 23 minutes and 48 minutes, respectively. Time-elapsed from SE onset to first-line ASM administration was 25.5 minutes, compared to evidence-based guidelines recommended time of 5-10 minutes. Similar delays were also observed in second- and third-line ASM administration. We have reviewed the factors affecting time-delays and impact on clinical outcomes. This review also highlights quality-improvement avenues that may help in improvising time for SE treatment and associated outcomes in pediatrics.

Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in children and adolescents: A population-based study

PURPOSE

Refractory (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are serious medical emergencies whose long-term outcomes depend on the timeliness of their management. Population-based clinical and epidemiological data on these conditions are sparse. We aimed to provide a detailed description of the epidemiology and clinical course of RSE and SRSE in children and adolescents and identify potential prognostic biomarkers.

METHODS

In this retrospective population-based study, patients aged one month to 18 years who fulfilled the RSE/SRSE diagnostic criteria and were admitted to the intensive care unit of Haukeland University Hospital from 2012 to 2021 were considered eligible. Detailed clinical and laboratory findings along with information on management and outcomes were systematically analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with 52 episodes of RSE/SRSE were identified. The incidence rate was 3.13 per 100,000 per year. The median time from SE onset to the administration of the first rescue drug was 13 min, and from the first rescue drug to second- and third-line treatments, 83 and 66 min, respectively. All patients were alive at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Delays in treatment were observed in various stages of the clinical course of RSE/SRSE. Improvement measures targeting the prompt administration of recuse mediation and subsequent treatment escalation are needed.

Early Clinical Variables Associated With Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine patient-specific factors known proximate to the presentation to emergency care associated with the development of refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RSE) in children.

METHODS

An observational case-control study was conducted comparing pediatric patients (1 month-21 years) with convulsive SE whose seizures stopped after benzodiazepine (BZD) and a single second-line antiseizure medication (ASM) (responsive established status epilepticus [rESE]) with patients requiring more than a BZD and a single second-line ASM to stop their seizures (RSE). These subpopulations were obtained from the pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group study cohort. We explored clinical variables that could be acquired early after presentation to emergency medical services with univariate analysis of the raw data. Variables with p < 0.1 were retained for univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to age-matched and sex-matched data to obtain variables associated with RSE.

RESULTS

We compared data from a total of 595 episodes of pediatric SE. Univariate analysis demonstrated no differences in time to the first BZD (RSE 16 minutes [IQR 5-45]; rESE 18 minutes [IQR 6-44], p = 0.068). Time to second-line ASM was shorter in patients with RSE (RSE 65 minutes; rESE 70 minutes; p = 0.021). Both univariable and multivariable regression analyses revealed a family history of seizures (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.20-0.70, p = 0.0022) or a prescription for rectal diazepam (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.078-0.53, p = 0.0012) was associated with decreased odds of RSE.

DISCUSSION

Time to initial BZD or second-line ASM was not associated with progression to RSE in our cohort of patients with rESE. A family history of seizures and a prescription for rectal diazepam were associated with a decreased likelihood of progression to RSE. Early attainment of these variables may help care for pediatric rESE in a more patient-tailored manner.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that patient and clinical factors may predict RSE in children with convulsive seizures.

Treatment of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is one of the most common life-threatening neurological emergencies in childhood with the highest incidence in the first 5 years of life and high mortality and morbidity rates. Although it is known that a delayed treatment and a prolonged seizure can cause permanent brain damage, there is evidence that current treatments may be delayed and the medication doses administered are insufficient. Here, we summarize current knowledge on treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood and propose a treatment algorithm. We performed a structured literature search via PubMed and ClinicalTrails.org and identified 35 prospective and retrospective studies on children <18 years comparing two and more treatment options for status epilepticus. The studies were divided into the commonly used treatment phases. As a first-line treatment, benzodiazepines buccal/rectal/intramuscular/intravenous are recommended. For status epilepticus treated with benzodiazepine refractory, no superiority of fosphenytoin, levetirazetam, or phenobarbital was identified. There is limited data on third-line treatments for refractory status epilepticus lasting >30 min. Our proposed treatment algorithm, especially for children with SE, is for in and out-of-hospital onset aids to promote the establishment and distribution of guidelines to address the treatment delay aggressively and to reduce putative permanent neuronal damage. Further studies are needed to evaluate if these algorithms decrease long-term damage and how to treat refractory status epilepticus lasting >30 min.

Making SENSE of what we do - How to bring evidence to clinical practice

Status epilepticus is a frequent neurological emergency. Several audits and registries have enhanced our knowledge regarding patient demography, etiology, treatment, and outcome. Several large registries have also contributed significantly to current treatment guidelines that emphasize the importance of instant and effective treatment onset. Large registries also document that deviation from these treatment guidelines is not the exception but the rule. Therefore, careful analysis of the treatment pathways as well as balanced intervention efforts are necessary to overcome the gap between knowledge and action. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

The need for improved management of status epilepticus in children in Australia: Time from seizure onset to treatment is consistently delayed

AIM

To determine if the management of paediatric status epilepticus (SE) follows accepted clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive series of patients with SE who attended the emergency departments from two NSW sites over a 12-month period. SE was defined as a convulsive seizure, 5 min or more in duration. Time to presentation to the ED, time to first- and second-line treatment, number of benzodiazepine (BZD) doses given prior to intubation and adherence to guidelines were evaluated. The outcomes included seizure duration, need for respiratory support, admission to intensive care, morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The time from onset of seizure to ED presentation was a median (p25-p75) time of 22 (15-40) min. Forty-eight of 59 presentations received pre-hospital midazolam. The median (p25-p75) time to first-line treatment was 15 (8-25) min and to second-line treatment was 43.5 (35-59) min. There was no significant difference in the results in the two hospitals. The total number of BZD doses ranged from 1 to 7 (median 3). There was non-adherence to the clinical practice guidelines in 55 (93.2%) of 59 presentations.

CONCLUSIONS

We found excessive benzodiazepine use and delay in both definitive treatment of status epilepticus and in escalation from first- to second-line anticonvulsant treatment. This raises the need for rapid escalation of treatment. We propose a 'status epilepticus code' for emergency departments.

Benzodiazepine administration patterns before escalation to second-line medications in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus

Objective

This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non‐BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE).

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non‐BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non‐BZD ASM.

Results

We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.3) years. Thirty‐six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997–.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out‐of‐hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73–3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40–6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in‐hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01–2.06, p = .04). Forty‐seven percent of patients (n = 94) with out‐of‐hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out‐of‐hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival (n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival.

Significance

Failure to escalate from BZDs to non‐BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out‐of‐hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non‐BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in‐hospital settings.

Factors associated with long-term outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to describe long-term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients.

RESULTS

Follow-up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up duration was 1.6 (.9-2.7) years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty-six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1-134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6-16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008-1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion.

SIGNIFICANCE

About one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow-up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.

Time to Treatment in Pediatric Convulsive Refractory Status Epilepticus: The Weekend Effect

BACKGROUND

Time to treatment in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is delayed. We aimed to evaluate the influence of weekends and holidays on time to treatment of this pediatric emergency.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data of pediatric patients with refractory status epilepticus.

RESULTS

We included 329 patients (56% males) with a median (p25 to p75) age of 3.8 (1.3 to 9) years. The median (p25 to p75) time to first BZD on weekdays and weekends/holidays was 20 (6.8 to 48.3) minutes versus 11 (5 to 35) minutes, P = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.55), P = 0.12. The time to first non-BZD ASM was longer on weekdays than on weekends/holidays (68 [42.8 to 153.5] minutes versus 59 [27 to 120] minutes, P = 0.006; adjusted HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.76], P = 0.009). However, this difference was mainly driven by status epilepticus with in-hospital onset: among 108 patients, the time to first non-BZD ASM was longer during weekdays than during weekends/holidays (55.5 [28.8 to 103.5] minutes versus 28 [15.8 to 66.3] minutes, P = 0.003; adjusted HR = 1.65 [95% CI: 1.08 to 2.51], P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The time to first non-BZD ASM in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is shorter on weekends/holidays than on weekdays, mainly driven by in-hospital onset status epilepticus. Data on what might be causing this difference may help tailor policies to improve medication application timing.

Etiology of Non-Traumatic Seizures in Children Admitted to PICU: An Eight-Year Retrospective Study

Purpose

Seizure is a serious neurological symptom in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), yet data on etiologies of non-traumatic childhood seizures in China are scarce. We aimed to investigate the etiological trends of seizures in children admitted to the PICU in our tertiary center.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients (aged 29 days to 14 years) with non-traumatic seizures, admitted to the PICU of Xiangya Hospital from 2010 to 2017. Etiological analysis was performed to compare data between 2010–2013 and 2014–2017.

Results

The study included 318 patients (male: female = 1.27:1) with mean age of 5.4 ± 4.0 years. The most frequent causes observed were CNS infections (109/318, 34.3%), unknown reason epilepsy (96/318, 30.2%), and immune (56/318, 17.6%). Comparison of the 2010–2013 and 2014–2017 periods revealed a significant decrease in the percentage of CNS infections [48.8% (59/121) vs 25.4% (50/197), p < 0.001] and a significant increase in the incidence of unknown reason epilepsy [(24/121, 19.8%) vs (72/197, 36.5%), p < 0.001] and immune causes [(12/121, 9.9%) vs (44/197, 22.3%), p = 0.005].

Conclusion

CNS infections were the most common cause of seizures during 2010–2013, while non-infectious diseases such as epilepsy and immune disorders represented the leading causes during 2014–2017. Continuous improvement in medical technology and understanding of disease patterns would greatly improve early diagnosis and therapeutic management of such conditions.

Status Epilepticus-Work-Up and Management in Children

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.

Epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency, which is defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) as bilateral tonic-clonic seizure activity lasting longer than 5 min, while absence status epilepticus (SE) and focal SE are specified as exceeding 10 min. Epidemiological evidence on SE is currently lacking, and the incidence is not well-known, especially in light of changes in the ILAE criteria for SE. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to describe the epidemiology of SE in the US population and the associated burden of illness.

METHODS

A systematic review, including literature and pragmatic searches, was conducted. Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception to February 2019. Pragmatic searches of the gray literature were carried out using Google, Google Scholar, conference proceedings, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify additional sources. Only US-based studies or multinational studies reporting US data of interest were included.

RESULTS

In total, 69 sources were identified. The incidence of all SE in patients of all ages in the USA ranged from 18.3 to 41 per 100,000 people per year. Incidence of all-age CSE rose from 3.5 (1979) to 12.5 (2010) per 100,000 people per year. Status epilepticus incidence followed a bimodal (U-shaped) distribution, with the highest estimates in the first years of life (0-4 years) and after 60 years. Mortality associated with SE varied from 21% over 30 days to 31.2% over 10 years. For CSE, two studies reported similar in-hospital mortalities (9.2% and 10.7%). Median healthcare costs related to SE admission were approximately US$14,500 per adult (17-45 years) and US$8000 per child (0-16 years).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of recent data on the epidemiology and healthcare burden associated with SE. Reports of SE incidence in the USA are highly variable and predate the 2015 ILAE definition of SE. However, the available data suggest a high burden of illness.

Association of guideline publication and delays to treatment in pediatric status epilepticus

Objective

To determine whether publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment shortens time to treatment in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE), we compared time to treatment before (2011–2014) and after (2015–2019) publication of evidence of delays in treatment of rSE in the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG) as assessed by patient interviews and record review.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset from June 2011 to September 2019 on pediatric patients (1 month–21 years of age) with rSE.

Results

We studied 328 patients (56% male) with median (25th–75th percentile [p₂₅–p₇₅]) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.4) years. There were no differences in the median (p₂₅–p₇₅) time to first benzodiazepine (BZD) (20 [5–52.5] vs 15 [5–38] minutes, p = 0.3919), time to first non-BZD antiseizure medication (68 [34.5–163.5] vs 65 [33–142] minutes, p = 0.7328), and time to first continuous infusion (186 [124.2–571] vs 160 [89.5–495] minutes, p = 0.2236). Among 157 patients with out-of-hospital onset whose time to hospital arrival was available, the proportion who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival increased after publication of evidence of delays (41 of 81 [50.6%] vs 57 of 76 [75%], p = 0.0018), and the odds ratio (OR) was also increased in multivariable logistic regression (OR 4.35 [95% confidence interval 1.96–10.3], p = 0.0005).

Conclusion

Publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment was not associated with improvements in time to treatment of rSE, although it was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival.

Diagnostic evaluation and management of seizures and status epilepticus in children with known epilepsy or new-onset seizures: A retrospective and comparative analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the initial management, including clinical/biological investigation and treatment, of new-onset seizures and status epilepticus (SE) in children versus seizures and SE in those with known epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study conducted in an urban pediatric hospital in Paris. All patients, aged from 1 month to 18 years, admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, the high-dependency care unit, and those who required hospitalization in the short-term unit of the emergency department between January 1 and December 31, 2014 for seizures and/or SE were included.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 190 children: new-onset seizures (N=118; group A) versus those with known epilepsy (N=72; group B). At least one diagnostic test was performed on 156 patients (82.1%) (group A, N=104, 88.1%; group B, N=52, 72.2%; P=0.05). In group B, blood levels of antiepileptic drugs were measured in 14 of the 38 patients with SE, of whom six were under dosed. Treatments were: first line, diazepam (group A, 80%; group B, 46%; P<0.001); second line, diazepam (group A, 56%; group B, 34%; P=0.02) or clonazepam (group A, 24%; group B, 46%; P=0.001); third line, phenytoin (group A, 54%; group B, 22%; P<0.001) or clonazepam (group A, 18%; group B, 61%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic evaluation and treatment should be individualized for children with known epilepsy.

Management of status epilepticus in children prior to medical retrieval: Deviations from the guidelines

AIM

To evaluate the influence of adherence to treatment guidelines on outcomes in children presenting with status epilepticus (SE) using the Newborn and Paediatric Emergency Transport Service, New South Wales prospective registry.

METHODS

We reviewed the treatment of children with SE, transported by the Newborn And Paediatric Emergency Transport Service to a tertiary paediatric hospital, over 1 year. We evaluated variation in management from the New South Wales clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

There was excessive administration of benzodiazepines (BZD) and a delay in administration of appropriate second-line treatment of status (median 45 min). There was excessive use of BZD, with five or more doses of BZD associated with significantly higher odds for intubation.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable scope to improve clinician compliance with the SE clinical practice guidelines.

Change in Mortality of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in High-Income Countries Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since the late 1990s, a more aggressive management of prolonged convulsive seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes has been advocated.

Objective

To determine if convulsive SE mortality has decreased during a time of increasing advocacy for out-of-hospital treatment and escalating and earlier treatment protocols for prolonged seizures and SE.

Data Source

This systemic review and meta-analysis on studies focused on the mortality of convulsive status epilepticus was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2017.

Study Selection

Studies were excluded if they had fewer than 30 participants (<20 for refractory SE), were limited to SE of single specific etiology or an evaluation of a single treatment modality, or were studies of nonconvulsive SE.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were abstracted and their quality was assessed via a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently by 2 reviewers (A.N. and T.D.G.) using the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality or 30-day case fatality expressed as proportional mortality.

Results

Sixty-one studies were included in the analysis. The pooled mortality ratios were 15.9% (95% CI, 12.7-19.2) for adult studies, 13.0% (95% CI, 7.2-19.0) for all-age population studies, 3.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.2%) for pediatric studies, and 17.3% (95% CI, 9.8-24.7) for refractory SE studies, with very high between-study heterogeneity. We found no evidence of a change in prognosis over time nor by the definition of SE used.

Conclusions and Relevance

The mortality of convulsive SE is higher in adults than in children and there was no evidence for improved survival over time. Although there are many explanations for these findings, they can be explained by aetiology of SE being the major determinant of mortality. However, there are potential confounders, including differences in case ascertainment and study heterogeneity. This meta-analysis highlights the need for strict international guidelines for the study of this condition.

Clinico-Etiological Profile of Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus at a Public Hospital in India

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) has been infrequently studied in Indian children. This research was conducted to study the clinico-etiological profiles and short-term outcomes of children aged 1 month to 12 years with convulsive RSE, at a public hospital.

METHODS

The study was conducted between 1st April 2016 and 28th February 2017 after receiving clearance from an Institutional Ethics Committee. All children (aged 1 month to 12 years) who presented to the pediatrics department of a tertiary-care public hospital with convulsive status epilepticus (SE), or who developed SE during their hospital stay, were enrolled. All patients were investigated and managed according to a standard protocol. Outcomes were assessed based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Details of children who progressed to RSE were compared to those without RSE.

RESULTS

Fifty children (28 males) with CSE were enrolled, of which 20 (40%) progressed to RSE. Central nervous system (CNS) infection was the most common etiology (53% in SE and 55% in RSE, p > 0.05). Non-compliance with anti-epileptic drugs was the second most common etiology. The overall mortality rate was 38%, and although the odds of death in RSE (50%) were higher than in SE (30%), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). The odds of having a poor outcome was six times higher in children with RSE as compared to those with SE (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-22.3; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

When managing CNS infections, pediatricians need to be aware of the high risk of developing RSE. In addition, the possibility of RSE should be considered and managed promptly in an intensive-care setting, to reduce the mortality and morbidity of this severe neurological condition.

Using EHRs to advance epilepsy care

The improved use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Systems provides an opportunity to improve the overall efficiency and quality of care of patients with epilepsy. Tools and strategies that may be incorporated into the use of EHRs include utilizing patient generated data, clinical decision support systems and natural language processing systems. Standardization of data from EHR systems may lead to improvement in clinical research through the creation of data collections and multi-center collaborations. Challenges to collaborative use of EHR Systems across centers include costs and the diversity of EHR systems.

Pathophysiology of convulsive status epilepticus

PURPOSE

To summarize the pathophysiology of convulsive status epilepticus (SE) with a focus on practical implications for treatment.

METHOD

Narrative review of the medical literature on the pathophysiology of convulsive SE. We considered both animal models of SE and clinical studies.

RESULTS

Convulsive SE is an emergency in which prolonged convulsive seizures are associated with cardiorespiratory instability, hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and hyperthermia. Supportive treatment helps correct these physiological imbalances. When treatment is delayed, the ability of first line seizure suppressing medications to terminate the seizure can be reduced. Animal studies have suggested that GABA_A receptor trafficking may contribute to the failure of the first line therapies and that NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine may become more effective as seizures last longer. Potential strategies to take advantage of these changes in pathophysiology include a rapid escalation from benzodiazepines to non-benzodiazepine antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), early polytherapy and use of NMDA antagonists such as ketamine for refractory convulsive SE. Despite the importance of a timely treatment of convulsive SE, major treatment delays are frequent in clinical practice. Policies to improve time to treatment, especially in convulsive SE that starts outside the hospital, may improve response to treatment and convulsive SE outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Convulsive SE is a time-sensitive emergency in which the underlying pathophysiology may provide targets for improving treatment strategies. A timely transition from benzodiazepines to other AEDs may help reduce treatment resistance in convulsive SE.

Factors associated with treatment delays in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with treatment delays in pediatric patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (rSE).

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was performed from June 2011 to March 2017 on pediatric patients (1 month to 21 years of age) with rSE. We evaluated potential factors associated with increased treatment delays in a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We studied 219 patients (53% males) with a median (25th-75th percentiles [p₂₅-p₇₅]) age of 3.9 (1.2-9.5) years in whom rSE started out of hospital (141 [64.4%]) or in hospital (78 [35.6%]). The median (p₂₅-p₇₅) time from seizure onset to treatment was 16 (5-45) minutes to first benzodiazepine (BZD), 63 (33-146) minutes to first non-BZD antiepileptic drug (AED), and 170 (107-539) minutes to first continuous infusion. Factors associated with more delays to administration of the first BZD were intermittent rSE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.09; p = 0.0467) and out-of-hospital rSE onset (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.11-2.04; p = 0.0467). Factors associated with more delays to administration of the first non-BZD AED were intermittent rSE (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.4; p = 0.001) and out-of-hospital rSE onset (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67-3.02; p < 0.0001). None of the studied factors were associated with a delayed administration of continuous infusion.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent rSE and out-of-hospital rSE onset are independently associated with longer delays to administration of the first BZD and the first non-BZD AED in pediatric rSE. These factors identify potential targets for intervention to reduce time to treatment.

Assessment of a renal angina index for prediction of severe acute kidney injury in critically ill children: a multicentre, multinational, prospective observational study

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in one in four children admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and AKI severity is independently associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. Early prediction of AKI has the potential to improve outcomes. In smaller, single center populations, we have previously derived and validated the performance of the renal angina index (RAI), a context driven risk stratification system, to predict severe AKI.

Methods

A prospective, observational study (AWARE¹, January-December 2014) was conducted in intensive care units from 32 centers in 9 countries. The primary outcome was the presence of severe AKI ("AKI_S"; Stage 2-3 AKI KDIGO guidelines) on the third day after ICU admission (). We compared the performance of the RAI to changes in serum creatinine relative to baseline (SCr/Base) for prediction of the primary outcome and secondary outcomes of interest. A RAI ≥ 8 defined fulfillment of renal angina (RA+); RA+ was compared to SCr increased relative to baseline ("SCr>Base"; using maximum SCr in first 12 hours of ICU admission).

Findings

The 1590 patients studied were 55% male and had median age of 54.5 months. 286 patients (17.9%) were RA+. AKI_S occurred in 121 (42.3%) RA+ vs. 247 (18.9%) RA-patients (relative risk (RR) 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.87-2.66, p<0.001). 368 (23.1%) patients with AKI_S had increased renal replacement therapy utilization (10.9% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001) and increased mortality (7.6% vs. 4.3%, p=0.01) compared to patients without AKI_S. RA+ demonstrated better prediction for AKI_S than SCr>Base (RR: 1.61; (1.33-1.93), p<0.001) which was maintained on multivariate regression (independent odds ratio (OR): RA+ 3.21; 95% CI (2.20-4.67) vs. SCr>Base 0.68; 95% CI (0.49-4.94)).

Interpretation

Earlier, better prediction of severe AKI has the potential to improve AKI associated patient outcomes. Compared to isolated, context-free changes in SCr, renal angina risk assessment improved accuracy for prediction of severe AKI in critically ill children and young adults.

Time to continuous electroencephalogram in repeated admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Describe timing from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to initiation of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) in repeated ICU admissions.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective observational study in pediatric patients who underwent repeated ICU admissions with cEEG from 2011 to 2013. The main outcome measure was time from ICU admission to cEEG.

RESULTS

There were 41 patients (54% males) with at least 2 ICU admissions with cEEG (median (p25-p75) age at first admission: 3.3 (0.3-8.4) years, at second admission: 3.9 (1.1-9.4) years), 7 patients (57% males, 9.9 (2.9-11.5) years) with at least 3 ICU admissions, and 5 patients (60% males, 10.1 (4-10.5) years) with at least 4 ICU admissions. One patient had 21 ICU admissions. The median (p25-p75) time from ICU admission to cEEG was not different during the first and second ICU admissions [10.7 (1.9-22.9) hours versus 13 (0.2-36.7) hours; p=0.908]. Among patients with electrographic seizures on first admission, time to cEEG was not different during the first and second admissions [7.9 (0.5-23.4) hours versus 14.5 (-2 to 44.5) hours; p=0.636]. Among patients with status epilepticus during the first admission, time to cEEG was not different between the first and second admissions [15.3 (9-79) hours versus 40.7 (19.3-42.6) hours; p=0.75].

CONCLUSIONS

The time from ICU admission to the initiation of cEEG did not decrease in second or subsequent ICU admissions, even in patients with seizures or status epilepticus on the first admission.