Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list

Biomarkers in headaches as a potential solution to simplify differential diagnosis of primary headache disorders: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), headache disorders can be divided into two main groups: primary, which are not caused by any other disease, and secondary, which are symptomatic of underlying disease. Differentiating between both groups is crucial for the patient's prognosis. The diagnosis of primary headache disorders relies solely on official clinical criteria, with no additional diagnostic tools available. Therefore, they usually remain underdiagnosed, decreasing the patient's quality of life.

METHODS

This systematic review aimed to analyse the available literature on the topic of biomarkers in the differentiation between different types of headaches. To be included, a primary study had to cover the abovementioned topic. Studies comparing one type of headache to healthy controls were excluded since the review focused on differential diagnosis. Articles to be considered had to describe original research and be written in English or Polish. No publication year limits were applied. A selection process was performed between October 19th, 2024, and January 1st, 2025, through six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, Medline Ultimate), according to the PRISMA 2020. The risk of bias was assessed accordingly using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST), and data synthesis was performed narratively. The review was registered in PROSPERO.

FINDINGS

The findings from 21 included studies (with a wide range of publication years between 1990 and 2023) demonstrated several biomarkers, mainly comparing migraine to other primary headaches, tension-type headaches and cluster headaches, and some secondary headaches: medication-overuse headaches and post-traumatic headaches. The main types of biomarkers were blood biomarkers and imaging biomarkers. Among the former, molecules such as magnesium and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or inflammatory markers could be found. The latter group focused mainly on assessing volumes or functional connections in brain magnetic resonance imaging and seem to have a significant impact in the nearest future. Saliva analyses were covered only by two research groups, showing the putative role of magnesium and CGRP. Similarly, two research groups described evoked potentials' value only in the paediatric population.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear gap in the literature regarding biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of headaches. However, an analysis of the most recent studies suggests that imaging biomarkers are the most promising group since they have gained the most attention in the past few years. Finding high-value biomarkers can simplify differential diagnosis of headaches, especially when clinical presentation is atypical. Nevertheless, more research on biomarkers of all types is highly needed.

PROSPERO

Registration ID: CRD42024603632.

Undiagnosed headaches in the emergency department: clinical characteristics and outcomes

Headaches are a common complaint in the emergency department (ED). Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of headaches, especially in undiagnosed patients, is important for improving headache care in the ED. We conducted a retrospective study of 171 headache patients at the ED of Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, with a follow-up for the primary and undiagnosed headache groups via telephone to assess long-term outcomes. Primary, secondary, and undiagnosed headaches accounted for 15.2%, 58.4%, and 26.3% of cases, respectively. All life-threatening secondary headaches were successfully excluded with imaging tests performed on 73.7% of cases, despite the low rate of treatment in the ED (18.1%). Among the undiagnosed headache cases, the recurrence of severe headaches was low (11.9%), though awareness of chronic headaches was high (47.6%). Emergency physicians should be aware of the possibility that patients at an ED presenting an undiagnosed headache may include chronic headache patients. Seamless collaboration between the ED and headache specialists is needed to manage undiagnosed headaches in the ED.

Acute Headache Diagnosis and Management

A clinician's goal when encountering acute headaches is to distinguish primary and secondary headache disorders. A comprehensive history, screening for warning signs of secondary headache, and a physical examination can help determine if further workup is necessary. While neurodiagnostic testing is not indicated for individuals with a history of primary headache disorders with typical symptoms, individuals with atypical signs or symptoms may warrant brain imaging with MRI brain, CT head, CT angiogram, CTV, MRV, conventional cerebral angiography, spine imaging, and/or lumbar puncture. Secondary headaches should be treated for their underlying cause. Primary headache disorders have specific evidence-based treatments that can help with acute pain relief.

Satisfaction With Teleneurology in Low Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients and Healthcare Providers

Background and Objectives

Teleneurology has become instrumental in extending neurologic care in remote and underserved areas, enhancing access, and potentially improving patient outcomes while reducing costs. This study evaluates the satisfaction of both patients and healthcare providers with teleneurology services for common neurological disorders.

Methods

In this single-center, prospective observational study, 58 patients suffering from headache, epilepsy, stroke, or dementia were recruited through the "Karnataka Brain Health Initiative." Teleconsultations were facilitated via Zoom, incorporating brief neurological examinations. Satisfaction levels were gauged using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) for patients and the Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Monitoring Questionnaire (PPSM) for healthcare providers.

Results

Of the 58 patients enrolled, 18 had headache, 12 epilepsy, 13 stroke, and 15 dementia, with a mean age of 43.7 years. All completed the TSQ, yielding a mean score of 4.47 ± 0.41. The average teleconsultation lasted 21.21 minutes. The PPSM questionnaire, completed by neurologists for all patients, resulted in a mean score of 4.33 ± 0.44. Of these, 36 consultations initiated by primary care physicians had a PPSM mean score of 4.47 ± 0.51. Agreement on quality of care was 60%, time-saving benefit 98%, and willingness for future use 95%.

Discussion

The findings indicate high satisfaction among both patients and providers, underscoring the effectiveness of teleneurology in delivering quality care comparable to in-person consultations. The positive feedback from primary care physicians highlights teleneurology's potential as an integral component of healthcare delivery in low-resource settings.

Misdiagnosis of Acute Headache: Mitigating Medico-legal Risks

Headache is a common complaint of patients in the emergency department. The large majority of them have self-limited causes but some have life, limb, brain, or vision-threatening secondary causes. The job of the emergency physicians is to distinguish the 2 groups. This article focuses on clinical tips to avoid or at least mitigate medico-legal risk in patients with headache. Each process of care-history, physical examination, laboratory testing, brain imaging, spinal fluid analysis, specialist consultation, and documentation-will be considered.

Navigating neurologic post-COVID-19 conditions in adults: Management strategies for cognitive dysfunction, headaches and neuropathies

This review aims to describe the neurologic post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC, also known as "long COVID"), a complex array of diagnoses that can occur following recovery from acute COVID-19. The review also includes clinical considerations for the recognition, diagnosis and management of neurologic manifestations of PCC. Cognitive impairment ("Brain Fog"), headaches, and neuropathies are specifically reviewed.

Emergency Department Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography Expedites Care for Patients Referred for Papilledema

PURPOSE

Emergency department (ED) visits to rule out papilledema or for papilledema workup are increasing. Our goal was to evaluate whether implementation of a hybrid true color nonmydriatic fundus photography and OCT camera in our ED (NMFP-OCT) combined with a "papilledema protocol" could avoid in-person ophthalmology consultations and accelerate the evaluation for papilledema.

DESIGN

Prospective quality improvement study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients who underwent NMFP-OCT camera examination in our ED from June 9, 2023, through June 30, 2024, to rule out papilledema or perform a papilledema workup.

METHODS

We collected final diagnoses, ED lengths of stay, and whether an in-person ophthalmology consultation was performed in addition to remote interpretation of images. We compared ED lengths of stay with previous data prospectively collected in 2022 before installation of the NMFP-OCT camera in the ED.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Median ED length of stay in hours and number of patients in whom papilledema was ruled out remotely.

RESULTS

For patients referred to the ED for papilledema, the ED NMFP-OCT camera reduced the median ED length of stay to 12 hours (interquartile range, 7.5-26.5 hours; 337 patients) compared with 27 hours (interquartile range, 19-33 hours; 85 patients) in 2022 (P < 0.001). For the 199 patients in whom papilledema was ruled out with the NMFP-OCT camera, the ED length of stay decreased from 24.5 hours (interquartile range, 10-29 hours) in 2022 to 9 hours (interquartile range, 6.5-18.5 hours) after installation of the ED NMFP-OCT camera (P = 0.007); papilledema was ruled out remotely without in-person ophthalmology consultation in 185 of 199 patients (93%). For patients with previously known idiopathic intracranial hypertension, ED stay decreased from 24 hours in 2022 (interquartile range, 12-28 hours) to 10 hours after installation of the ED NMFP-OCT camera (interquartile range, 7.5-17 hours; 50 patients; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the NMFP-OCT camera in our general ED reduced the ED length of stay of patients being evaluated for papilledema by 56% and mostly avoided in-person ophthalmology consultations when papilledema was ruled out remotely on ocular imaging, reducing the burden on residents and on-call ophthalmologists.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Headache in infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the phenomenology, pathogenesis, and nosology of headaches associated with infections, an often-overlooked yet clinically significant symptom. With the increasing recognition of secondary headaches in infections, understanding their clinical patterns, mechanisms, and classifications is crucial for accurate diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Headaches in infections are ubiquitous but vary in presentation, severity, and underlying mechanisms depending on the causative pathogen. Elevated intracranial pressure, meningeal irritation, and activation of the trigeminovascular system are key contributors to headache generation, which varies depending on each pathogen. Pathogen-specific predilection for one of these mechanisms may subtly alter the clinical phenotype of the headache, which can be used to guide management. Emerging evidence highlights postinfectious headache syndromes, particularly following bacterial meningitis and SARS-CoV-2 infection, underscoring the need for long-term follow-up in these patients.

SUMMARY

The diverse presentations of infection-related headaches necessitate a systematic approach to evaluation and management. While the pathophysiology is complex and multifaceted, understanding these mechanisms aids in differentiating primary headaches from those secondary to infections.

Comparison of Phenotypes of Headaches After COVID-19 Vaccinations Differentiated According to the Vaccine Used

Background/Objectives: In this ongoing, multicenter, global cohort observational study, phenotypes of headaches after COVID-19 vaccination were directly compared between different vaccines. Methods: Phenotypes of postvaccinal headache were recorded in 18,544 participants. The study was launched immediately after the start of the global COVID-19 vaccination campaign on 12 January 2021 and continued until 1 August 2023. Specific aspects of headaches and related variables were collected via an online questionnaire. The clinical headache characteristics of patients vaccinated with the Comirnaty (BioNTech), Jcovden (Johnson & Johnson), Sputnik V (Gamelaya), Covilo (Sinopharm), Spikevax (Moderna), Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), and Convidecia (CanSino Biologics) vaccines were investigated. Results: Across all vaccines, the median and mean latency of headache onset after vaccine administration were 12 h and 23.3 h, respectively. The median and mean headache duration were 12 h and 23.3 h, respectively. When the nonreplicating viral vector vaccine Sputnik V was used, headaches occurred the fastest, with a latency of 17 h. The latencies for the Vaxzevria and Convidecia nonreplicating viral vector vaccines were 14.9 h and 19.1 h, respectively. The Covilo inactivated whole-virus vaccine had a latency of 20.5 h. The latencies of the mRNA-based Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccines were 26.0 h and 22.02 h, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in the mean duration of postvaccinal headache for the vaccines tested. Compared with the Comirnaty, Covilo, and Vaxzevria vaccines, the Spikevax vaccine induced significantly greater headache intensities. Vaxzevria was associated with a significantly higher frequency of concomitant symptoms than the other vaccines. Conclusions: The phenotype of postvaccinal headache can vary significantly between vaccines. These results have clinical implications for differentiating between postvaccinal headache and other primary and secondary headaches. This knowledge is clinically relevant in differentiating life-threatening vaccination complications, such as thrombotic syndromes, which are also associated with headaches. Based on these results, new diagnostic criteria for postvaccinal headaches can be developed.

Chinese medicine for headaches in emergency department: a retrospective analysis of real-world electronic medical records

Background

Headaches are common complaints in the emergency department (ED) and have raised concern about acute medication overuse. Chinese medicine is a major complementary and alternative medicine in China and effective for headaches. This study aims to summarize characteristics of headache patients at EDs and the utilization of Chinese medicine for headache managements in EDs.

Methods

The study conducted a retrospective analysis based on existing electronic medical records at EDs from four branches of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine. Only complete medical records with a first diagnosis of headache within the specified timeframe were included. Data was extracted, screened and standardized using a structured approach. Descriptive analyses and Apriori algorithm-based association rules were employed for the study.

Results

A total of 3,355 medical records were analyzed, with over 86% of headaches classified as non-urgent. Approximately 97% of the patients received a general diagnosis of headaches without further classification. Hypertension was the most prevalent concomitant diagnosis, affecting 27.42% of the patients. Western medicine was prescribed to 66% of the patients for headaches and co-existing conditions, while each type of acute medication was prescribed to fewer than 10% of the patients. Conversely, over one-third of the patients utilized headache-specific patented Chinese herbal medicine products. Additionally, oral and topical Chinese herbal medicine treatments were also administered for headaches in the emergency departments.

Conclusion

The majority of headaches consulting in the EDs were non-urgent and treated with various forms of Chinese medicine, alone or in conjunction of western medicine. Chinese herbal medicine may be promoted as alternatives to Western acute medications for treating benign headaches.

Headache diagnosis and treatment: A pilot knowledge and needs assessment among physical therapists

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this pilot study was to assess physical therapists' (PTs) knowledge and needs regarding headache diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND

While there is significant research on physical therapy and cervicogenic headache, studies suggest that migraine is often under-recognized, misdiagnosed, and inadequately treated across society despite its high prevalence and burden. Because migraine commonly includes concurrent neck pain and/or vestibular symptoms, patients with migraine may present to PTs for treatment. Very little is known about PTs' headache and migraine education, knowledge, and clinical practices.

METHODS

A team of headache specialists and PTs adapted a previously used headache knowledge and needs assessment survey to help ascertain PTs' knowledge and needs regarding headache treatment. The cross-sectional survey was distributed online via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to PTs within a large healthcare system in Connecticut.

RESULTS

An estimated 50.5% (101/200) of PTs invited to complete the survey did so. Only 37.6% (38/101) of respondents reported receiving any formal headache or migraine education in their professional training, leading to knowledge gaps in differentiating and responding to headache subtypes. Only 45.5% (46/101) were able to identify that migraine is characterized by greater pain intensity than tension-type headache, and 22.8% (23/101) reported not knowing the duration of untreated migraine. When asked about the aspects of care they believe their patients with headache would like to see improved, PTs reported education around prevention and appropriate medication use (61/100 [61.0%]), provider awareness of the degree of disability associated with migraine (51/100 [51.0%]), and diagnostics (47/100 [47.0%]).

CONCLUSION

This sample of PTs from one healthcare system demonstrates knowledge gaps and variations in clinical practice for managing their patients with headache. Future research on integrating additional opportunities for headache education for physical therapists, including evidence-based behavioral therapies, is needed to ascertain whether it is likely to improve patient care.

"Code Headache": Development of a protocol for optimizing headache management in the emergency room

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients presenting at the emergency room (ER) with headache often encounter a hostile atmosphere and experience delays in diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to design a protocol for the ER with the goal of optimizing the care of patients with urgent headache to facilitate diagnosis and expedite treatment.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was conducted via a MEDLINE search in October 2021. The "Code Headache" protocol was then developed considering the available characteristics and resources of the ER at a tertiary care center within the Spanish National Public Health system.

RESULTS

The Code Headache protocol comprises three assessments: two scales and one checklist. The assessments identify known red flags and stratify patients based on suspected primary/secondary headaches and the need for pain treatment. Initial assessments, performed by the triage nurse, aim to first exclude potentially high morbidity and mortality etiologies (HEAD1 scale) and then expedite appropriate pain management (HEAD2 scale) based on scoring criteria. HEAD1 evaluates vital signs and symptoms of secondary serious headache disorders that can most benefit from earlier identification and treatment, while HEAD2 assesses symptoms indicative of status migrainosus, pain intensity, and vital signs. Subsequently, ER physicians employ a third assessment that reviews red flags for secondary headaches (grouped under the acronym 'PEACE') to guide the selection of complementary tests and aid diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The Code Headache protocol is a much needed tool to facilitate quick clinical assessment and improve patient care in the ER. Further validation through comparison with standard clinical practice is warranted.

Validation of a diagnostic support tool for early recognition of cervical arterial dissection in primary care

BACKGROUND

Cervical arterial dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in young adults with an early presentation often mimicking musculoskeletal pain. Currently, no validated tests exist and CAD may be missed. A diagnostic support tool could help guide urgent referral for imaging, when to monitor, or when safe to proceed with treatment, and ultimately help stroke prevention.

OBJECTIVES

To validate a 4-criteria diagnostic support tool for early recognition of CeAD in primary care, to refine tool descriptors as needed, and propose optimal cut-offs for clinical application.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study METHOD: Participants with radiologically confirmed CeAD and controls without CeAD were identified from adults >18 years presenting to a tertiary metropolitan hospital with initial diagnosis of headache or neck pain. All were scored with criteria out of7 (acute onset pain [2], recent trauma/infection [1], neurological features [2], age <55 years [2]). Diagnostic values were calculated to determine cut offs and the tool was refined based on the analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty participants with CeAD and 261 controls with non-CeAD causes of headache and neck pain were included. The diagnostic support tool was an 'excellent' predictor of CeAD (AUC 0.83) but demonstrated poor specificity. Refining the tool to 'acute/sudden onset' [1], 'unusual/unfamiliar headache/neck pain' [1], recent trauma/infection [1] and neurological features ≥2 [1], scored out of 4, showed 100 % sensitivity and 74 % specificity to detect CeAD at a cut-off of 3/4 (AUC 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The refined tool shows acceptable clinical utility at a cut-off ≥3, where referral for vascular imaging is recommended. Further validation in Emergency and primary care is needed.

Clinical and Radiologic Follow-Up in Ecchordosis Physaliphora: A Case Series and Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

This study endeavors to assess the clinical and radiologic findings of ecchordosis physaliphora (EP) in patients under long-term observation at our clinic as well as in cases reviewed from the existing literature.

METHODS

In our study, we evaluated EP lesions in a total of 16 patients who underwent follow-up and treatment in the neurosurgical unit. We conducted a retrospective review using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography studies to confirm the diagnoses as EP. We conducted a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, encompassing a database search from inception to January 2024. We included confirmed cases of EP from both surgically and conservatively reported studies.

RESULTS

Our study included a total of 16 patients, consisting of 9 (56.25%) men and 7 (43.75%) women, with an average age of 45 ± 17.3 years. Among them, 7 (43.75%) patients presented with headaches, while 3 (18.75%) reported hearing loss. Incidental EP was detected in 6 (37.5%) patients in the study during imaging performed for different indications. The key radiological features of EP comprised hypointensity on T1, hyperintensity on T2, and an absence of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement. In 1 out of the 16 cases, we employed an endoscopic endonasal approach for resection, and there was no recurrence observed over an average postoperative follow-up period of 24 months. Among the 15 patients who underwent conservative follow-up, 12 (80%) had the classical type B EP, one (10%) patient exhibited benign notochordal tumor in the C2 vertebra, and another (10%) patient presented with a variant type EP.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a combination of imaging modalities, ensuring a clear radiological distinction between EP and chordoma, can offer substantial advantages in this context. Given that EP might be incidentally discovered and nonresistant symptoms may resolve on their own, considering conservative treatment before surgery may be a viable option in all cases.

Time and headache: Insights into timing processes in primary headache disorders for diagnosis, underlying pathophysiology and treatment implications

BACKGROUND

Time in headache disorders is crucial for diagnosis and gives insight into headache pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize published studies which describe timing processes in both attack presentation (onset, duration) and disease characterization (age of onset, evolution over time) in primary headache disorders and link to pathophysiology.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted through Ovid MEDLINE(R) and PubMed, focusing on English-language articles from 1946 to 2023 to write the review. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition provided the framework for the review of primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache and cluster headache).

RESULTS

Attack presentation: Migraine attacks exhibit significant circadian and infradian rhythms, influenced by hormonal levels, light sensitivity, and hypothalamic activation. Tension-type headache lacks clear chronobiological patterns, with limited understanding of its underlying mechanisms. Cluster headache displays a distinct circannual pattern, with attacks often occurring at night and relevant involvement of the hypothalamus. Disease characterization: Age of onset exhibits the earliest peak in migraine; frequency and typical features of primary headache disorders decrease over time.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis of time patterns in primary headache disorders underscores their role in phenotyping, understanding and treating primary headache disorders, offering promising avenues for advancing and tailoring headache management.

Gliomas in adults: Guidance on investigations, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance

Primary brain tumours are rare but carry a significant morbidity and mortality burden. Malignant gliomas are the most common subtype and their incidence is increasing within our ageing population. The diagnosis and treatment of gliomas involves substantial interplay between multiple specialties, including general medical physicians, radiologists, pathologists, surgeons, oncologists and allied health professionals. At any point along this pathway, patients can present to acute medicine with complications of their cancer or anti-cancer therapy. Increasing the awareness of malignant gliomas among general physicians is paramount to delivering prompt radiological and histopathological diagnoses, facilitating access to earlier and individualised treatment options and allows for effective recognition and management of anticipated complications. This article discusses evidence-based real-world practice for malignant gliomas, encompassing patient presentation, diagnostic pathways, treatments and their complications, and prognosis to guide management outside of specialist centres.

A 36-Year-Old Man with Persistent Headache

AbstractMorning Report is a time-honored tradition where physicians-in-training present cases to their colleagues and clinical experts to collaboratively examine an interesting patient presentation. The Morning Report section seeks to carry on this tradition by presenting a patient's chief concern and story, inviting the reader to develop a differential diagnosis and discover the diagnosis alongside the authors of the case. This report examines the story of a 36-year-old man who sought evaluation for a persistent headache and numbness on the cheek. Using questions, physical examination, and testing, an illness script for the presentation emerges. As the clinical course progresses, the differential is refined until a diagnosis is made.

Challenges to Early Detection of Brain Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

While early diagnosis of brain tumors is essential for improving prognoses, several challenges prevent early diagnosis of these illnesses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The objective of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate the barriers and challenges to early detection of brain tumors in LMICs, as well as to propose potential solutions.

METHODS

A thorough search of the literature was carried out with the aid of multiple databases, including Google Scholar, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. Studies focusing on the early detection of brain tumors in low- and middle-income countries met the inclusion criteria for this review. Articles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia plan framework was used to extract relevant data and develop themes. Microsoft Excel was then used to arrange and analyze these themes.

RESULTS

Out of 21 articles included in the final analysis, notable challenges to early detection of brain tumors included healthcare providers' lack of awareness of early signs and symptoms of brain tumors (21%), limited diagnostic facilities (38%), misdiagnosis by healthcare providers (33%), and financial constraints (46%). Potential strategies for addressing these barriers and challenges include educating healthcare providers on early warning signs (50%), improving the early referral system (25%) and establishing local clinical guidelines (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant barriers to early detection persist in LMICs. Collaboration between stakeholders, legislators, health ministries, and governmental organizations is essential for developing and implementing focused interventions, such as establishment of referral pathways and specialized centers, adapting guidelines to local cultural contexts and raising public and professional awareness.

Recent advances in diagnosing, managing, and understanding the pathophysiology of cluster headache

Cluster headache, characterised by attacks of severe, recurrent, unilateral headache and ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, remains a primary headache with an elusive pathophysiology. Recent advances have introduced effective treatments and broadened understanding of the clinical features of cluster headache. These features are similar in patients globally, but regional differences in prevalence and burden exist. International collaborations have led to identification of eight genetic loci associated with cluster headache. The pathophysiological mechanisms are still not fully understood but recent studies show that targeting the trigeminal autonomic reflex by neurostimulation, or targeting the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), might lessen the attack burden. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CGRP, as the first specific preventive treatment for episodic cluster headache. However, a preventive effect was not replicated in chronic cluster headache, and the European Medicines Agency did not approve galcanezumab, restricting its availability in Europe. Owing to the low prevalence of cluster headache, continued collaboration through multicentre clinical trials and data sharing will be imperative for further breakthroughs in understanding and management.

[Medication overuse headache]

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a globally prevalent and debilitating condition that results from excessive use of acute therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, despite the fact that simple information about the causes and consequences of the condition can help prevent or stop MOH. In recent years, many new insights have been gained into headaches caused by medication overuse. In addition, the diagnostic criteria and guideline recommendations have changed considerably. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the clinic, definition/classification, epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, controversies, prevention, and treatment of MOH.

Persistent headache without neurologic deficit from a spontaneous vertebral artery dissection

INTRODUCTION

Non-traumatic headache is a common complaint seen in the emergency department (ED), accounting for 2.3% of ED visits per year in the United States (Munoz-Ceron et al., 2019). When approaching the workup and management of headache, an emergency medicine physician is tasked with generating a deadly differential by means of a thorough history and physical exam to determine the next best steps.

CASE

A 21-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a debilitating new-onset headache, preceded by an isolated vertiginous event 3 days prior. He was found to have a normal neurologic examination. A non-contrast CT scan of the head revealed a large hypodensity within the left cerebellum with a subsequent MRA of the brain and neck notable for a left vertebral artery dissection, complicated by an ischemic cerebellar stroke.

DISCUSSION

With an estimated incidence of 1-5 per 100,000, vertebral artery dissection is a rare cause of stroke within the general population and carries with it a high degree of morbidity and mortality (Rodallec et al., 2008). Vertebral artery dissection is a result of blood penetrating the intimal wall of the artery to form an intramural hematoma. Diagnosis can be difficult in cases presenting subacutely but a thorough history evaluating for red flags and using simple but highly sensitive exams such as the bedside HINTS exam can increase pretest probability of stroke. Clinical syndromes, red flags, and time from onset of symptoms should guide imaging modalities such as CT, CTA, MRI, and MRA in detection of small ischemic changes, intimal flaps, and luminal thromboses.

CONCLUSION

Vertebral artery dissection should remain high on the differential for an emergency medicine physician when history is suggestive of a new onset headache, preceded by vertiginous symptoms. An absence of recent trauma and a normal neurologic examination does not eliminate the diagnosis.

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of vestibular migraine and the vestibular disorders it mimics

Dizziness is one of the most common chief complaints in both the ambulatory care setting and the emergency department. These symptoms may be representative of a broad range of entities. Therefore, any attempt at treatment must first start with determining the etiology. In this current perspective, we focus specifically on the diagnosis of and treatment of vestibular migraine, which is common and overlaps clinically with a variety of other diagnoses. We discuss the traditional treatments for vestibular migraine in addition to the recent explosion of novel migraine therapeutics. Because vestibular migraine can mimic, or co-exist with, a variety of other vestibular diseases, we discuss several of these disorders including persistent postural-perceptual dizziness, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, post-concussive syndrome, Ménière's disease, and cerebrovascular etiologies. We discuss the diagnosis of each, as well as overlapping and distinguishing clinical features of which the reader should be aware. Finally, we conclude with evidence based as well as expert commentary on management, with a particular emphasis on vestibular migraine.

Preliminary External Validation Results of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Headache Diagnostic Model: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

The misdiagnosis of headache disorders is a serious issue, and AI-based headache model diagnoses with external validation are scarce. We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based headache diagnosis model using a database of 4000 patients' questionnaires in a headache-specializing clinic and herein performed external validation prospectively. The validation cohort of 59 headache patients was prospectively collected from August 2023 to February 2024 at our or collaborating multicenter institutions. The ground truth was specialists' diagnoses based on the initial questionnaire and at least a one-month headache diary after the initial consultation. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. The mean age was 42.55 ± 12.74 years, and 51/59 (86.67%) of the patients were female. No missing values were reported. Of the 59 patients, 56 (89.83%) had migraines or medication-overuse headaches, and 3 (5.08%) had tension-type headaches. No one had trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or other headaches. The models' overall accuracy and kappa for the ground truth were 94.92% and 0.65 (95%CI 0.21-1.00), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F values for migraines were 98.21%, 66.67%, 98.21%, and 98.21%, respectively. There was disagreement between the AI diagnosis and the ground truth by headache specialists in two patients. This is the first external validation of the AI headache diagnosis model. Further data collection and external validation are required to strengthen and improve its performance in real-world settings.

Sleep disorders and orofacial pain: insights for dental practice

In dental sleep medicine several sleep disorders commonly coexist with pain, contributing to complex clinical presentations which might affect the provision of appropriate and timely treatment. There are associations between sleep disorders and pain in general, as well as with specific orofacial pain conditions. As many as five of six patients with orofacial pain can present with sleep problems. The comorbidity of orofacial pain and sleep disorders overlays a complex web of altered neurobiological mechanisms that predispose to the chronification of orofacial pain. This review discusses the relationship between orofacial pain and sleep disorders and highlights their interactions and the neurobiological mechanisms underlying those relationships.

The critical role of neuroimaging in hemicrania continua: A systematic review and case series

BACKGROUND

Hemicrania continua is a primary unilateral headache characterized by ipsilateral parasympathetic and sympathetic autonomic features. A key diagnostic criterion is its dramatic response to indomethacin treatment; however, various vascular or structural abnormalities have been reported to cause secondary hemicrania continua, presenting with clinical features similar to those of the primary headache presentation.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the literature to compile secondary hemicrania continua cases, highlighting the importance of imaging during the evaluation. Additionally, we also contributed our three cases to the existing studies.

METHODS

We conducted a review of articles from the PubMed and EMBASE databases that described reported cases of secondary hemicrania continua, covering the period from 1993 to 2021. Our review included detailed patient information, signs, and symptoms of hemicrania continua, as well as information on indomethacin usage and headache resolution (if pertinent).

RESULTS

Secondary hemicrania continua can result from a remarkably diverse range of structural and vascular lesions, yet clinical reports on long-term follow-up are lacking. Notably, cases may exhibit a classical response to indomethacin, emphasizing the importance of neuroimaging in excluding secondary cases. Our search yielded 41 cases meeting our criteria. We excluded six cases that were not treated with indomethacin or were unresponsive to it. Additionally, we present three cases that highlight the necessity of neuroimaging in evaluating hemicrania continua, along with short- and long-term clinical outcomes following indomethacin and lesion-directed treatments. Case 1 presented with daily right-sided headaches and cranial autonomic symptoms. Her pain completely resolved with indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a laterally directed saccular aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery. Case 2 presented with continuous left-sided unilateral headaches with superimposed exacerbations. She complained of left-sided photophobia with a dull sensation in the left ear. Her symptoms decreased after 2 weeks of indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the head indicated a benign tumor with mass effect into the left lateral medulla and inferior cerebellar peduncle. Case 3 presented with a right side-locked headache with daily, severe superimposed exacerbations. She had photophobia in the right eye and a right-sided Horner's syndrome, along with tearing during her exacerbations. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a pituitary tumor and her pain completely resolved with indomethacin.

CONCLUSION

Hemicrania continua is a rare headache disorder that can be either primary or secondary. Importantly, response to indomethacin can still occur in secondary hemicrania continua. Thus, neuroimaging should be considered to rule out underlying structural etiology in all cases, regardless of their clinical responsiveness to indomethacin therapy.

Predictive performance of the common red flags in emergency department headache patients: a HEAD and HEAD-Colombia study

OBJECTIVES

Only a small proportion of patients presenting to an ED with headache have a serious cause. The SNNOOP10 criteria, which incorporates red and orange flags for serious causes, has been proposed but not well studied. This project aims to compare the proportion of patients with 10 commonly accepted red flag criteria (singly and in combination) between patients with and without a diagnosis of serious secondary headache in a large, multinational cohort of ED patients presenting with headache.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data obtained in the HEAD and HEAD-Colombia studies. The outcome of interest was serious secondary headache. The predictive performance of 10 red flag criteria from the SNNOOP10 criteria list was estimated individually and in combination.

RESULTS

5293 patients were included, of whom 6.1% (95% CI 5.5% to 6.8%) had a defined serious cause identified. New neurological deficit, history of neoplasm, older age (>50 years) and recent head trauma (2-7 days prior) were independent predictors of a serious secondary headache diagnosis. After adjusting for other predictors, sudden onset, onset during exertion, pregnancy and immune suppression were not associated with a serious headache diagnosis. The combined sensitivity of the red flag criteria overall was 96.5% (95% CI 93.2% to 98.3%) but specificity was low, 5.1% (95% CI 4.3% to 6.0%). Positive predictive value was 9.3% (95% CI 8.2% to 10.5%) with negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI 87.6% to 96.8%).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of the red flag criteria in this study were lower than previously reported. Regarding clinical practice, this suggests that red flag criteria may be useful to identify patients at higher risk of a serious secondary headache cause, but their low specificity could result in increased rates of CT scanning.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ANZCTR376695.

A Severe Case of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension in an Adult Asian Male Improved With Trendelenburg Positioning: A Case Report

Non-traumatic bilateral acute subdural hematomas are a rare occurrence. Etiologies typically include, but are not limited to, cortical artery bleeding, vascular lesions, coagulopathies, and spontaneous intracranial hypotension. We report a case of a 45-year-old Korean male with no known co-morbid illnesses nor history of head or neck trauma, who came to the emergency department due to a 10-day history of dizziness and head heaviness, followed by disorientation and drowsiness. The patient was diagnosed with bilateral acute subdural hematoma; hence, a bilateral posterior parietal craniotomy with evacuation of hematoma was performed. Neurologic status initially improved remarkably; however, during rehabilitation, there was recurrence of acute bilateral subdural hematoma requiring repeat surgical evacuation. There was no clinical improvement after the repeat surgery, and his condition further deteriorated in the neurosciences critical care unit showing signs of rostrocaudal deterioration at the level of diencephalon. A plain cranial CT scan was performed, which showed central herniation and "brain sagging." A diagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension was considered; thus, the patient was managed by positioning him in the Trendelenburg position alternating with flat position on the bed. A search for the cerebrospinal fluid leak was commenced by performing a whole spine MRI constructive interference in steady state (CISS) protocol, which showed a longitudinal spinal anterior epidural cerebrospinal fluid leak from spinal level C2 to T1. Radionuclide cisternography did not provide definitive scintigraphic evidence of a leak. The patient gradually improved and was eventually transferred out of the neurosciences critical care unit. After days of rehabilitation in the hospital, the patient was discharged ambulatory with minimal support.

Constructing the brief diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (bDC/TMD) for field testing

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in temporomandibular disorders' (TMDs) diagnosis, the diagnostic process continues to be problematic in non-specialist settings.

OBJECTIVE

To complete a Delphi process to shorten the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) to a brief DC/TMD (bDC/TMD) for expedient clinical diagnosis and initial management.

METHODS

An international Delphi panel was created with 23 clinicians representing major specialities, general dentistry and related fields. The process comprised a full day workshop, seven virtual meetings, six rounds of electronic discussion and finally an open consultation at a virtual international symposium.

RESULTS

Within the physical axis (Axis 1), the self-report Symptom Questionnaire of the DC/TMD did not require shortening from 14 items for the bDC/TMD. The compulsory use of the TMD pain screener was removed reducing the total number of Axis 1 items by 18%. The DC/TMD Axis 1 10-section examination protocol (25 movements, up to 12 sets of bilateral palpations) was reduced to four sections in the bDC/TMD protocol involving three movements and three sets of palpations. Axis I then resulted in two groups of diagnoses: painful TMD (inclusive of secondary headache), and common joint-related TMD with functional implications. The psychosocial axis (Axis 2) was shortened to an ultra-brief 11 item assessment.

CONCLUSION

The bDC/TMD represents a substantially reduced and likely expedited method to establish (grouping) diagnoses in TMDs. This may provide greater utility for settings requiring less granular diagnoses for the implementation of initial treatment, for example non-specialist general dental practice.

New Daily Persistent Headache

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the clinical features, etiology, differential diagnosis, management, and prognosis of new daily persistent headache.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

New daily persistent headache has attracted renewed attention as it may arise in the setting of a COVID-19 infection. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension, particularly from CSF-venous fistulas, remains an important secondary headache disorder to consider before diagnosing new daily persistent headache. Symptomatic treatment for new daily persistent headache may include acute and preventive therapies used for migraine and tension-type headache, such as triptans, oral preventive agents, onabotulinumtoxinA, and agents that target calcitonin gene-related peptide.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

New daily persistent headache is a daily headache syndrome that starts acutely and can only be diagnosed after 3 months have elapsed and other secondary and primary headache diagnoses have been excluded. The clinical manifestations largely resemble either chronic migraine or chronic tension-type headache. The underlying cause is unknown, but it is plausible that multiple etiologies exist and that it is not a single disease entity. The prognosis is variable but often poor, and the treatment approach is largely extrapolated from the management of chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache.

Approach to the Patient With Headache

OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of patients with headache relies heavily on the history. This article reviews key questions for diagnosing primary and secondary headache disorders with a rationale for each and phrasing to optimize the information obtained and the patient's experience.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The availability of online resources for clinicians and patients continues to increase, including sites that use artificial intelligence to generate a diagnosis and report based on patient responses online. Patient-friendly headache apps include calendars that help track treatment response, identify triggers, and provide educational information.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

A structured approach to taking the history, incorporating online resources and other technologies when needed, facilitates making an accurate diagnosis and often eliminates the need for unnecessary testing. A detailed yet empathetic approach incorporating interpersonal skills enhances relationship building and trust, both of which are integral to successful treatment.

[Migraine and pregnancy : Gender-specific aspects and current knowledge]

BACKGROUND

Migraine, a frequent and debilitating neurological disease, shows gender-specific differences in prevalence and severity. Pregnancy is associated with numerous unique features in terms of migraine course, treatment options and differential diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES

How does pregnancy influence the course of migraine? What are the possible treatment options during pregnancy? Which differential diagnoses should be considered?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Narrative review with summary and discussion of relevant studies and guidelines on migraine in pregnancy.

RESULTS

During pregnancy up to three quarters of women experience improvement of their migraine; however, there may be a renewed increase in frequency after childbirth. Choosing an appropriate treatment during pregnancy requires a careful risk-benefit assessment. It is important to consider secondary causes of headache as these can occur more frequently during pregnancy and some can be life-threatening.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of specific aspects of migraine in pregnancy is crucial to be able to develop the best possible treatment strategies for affected patients.

Headache in Children and Adolescents

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the assessment of children and adolescents presenting with headache, provides an overview of primary headache disorders, and reviews evidence-based management of headache in this age group.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

In the last few years, new epidemiological data have shed light on less common pediatric headache disorders (eg, pediatric trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias) and psychosocial risk factors associated with primary headache disorders in children and adolescents. There has also recently been a substantial increase in interventions that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway and that treat primary headache disorders using noninvasive neuromodulation. Although these interventions have primarily been studied in adults, there is emerging evidence of their use in the pediatric population.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Primary headache disorders are very common in youth, and the most commonly encountered headache diagnosis in neurology practice is migraine, which affects approximately 10% of children and adolescents. Diagnosing and effectively treating primary headache disorders before adulthood may have a sustained impact on the patient by improving long-term headache and mental health outcomes, thereby significantly reducing the burden of disability over time. There are several available and emerging acute and preventive interventions for youth with primary headache disorders, and treatment decisions should be made in the context of available evidence using a shared decision-making approach.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy presented as meningitis: A case report

Introduction

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy is a novel autoimmune neurological disorder and is diagnosed by GFAP-IgG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurement.

Case report

Herein, we described a 10-year-old boy with abnormal neurological symptoms and signs. GFAP-IgG was detected in CSF using cell-based assay (CBA), and his CSF showed an increase in lymphocytes, a slight decrease in glucose and an increase in protein level in the early stage. The cranial MRI showed multiple strips of T2-FLAIR hyperintense signal changes on the surface of medulla oblongata, pons, and gyrus in bilateral cerebral hemispheres. He was treated with immunoglobulin (IVIG) and high-dose methylprednisolone pulse treatment, and his clinical presentations gradually improved.

Conclusion

We highlight that patients with normal inflammatory markers in peripheral blood have obvious meningitis-like symptoms, and clinicians need to consider GFAP astrocytopathy. The early diagnosis and treatment of GFAP astrocytopathy are important for improving the prognosis.

Ominous Causes of Headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While primary headaches like migraines or cluster headaches are prevalent and often debilitating, it's the secondary headaches-those resulting from underlying pathologies-that can be particularly ominous. This article delves into the sinister causes of headaches, underscoring the importance of a meticulous clinical approach, especially when presented with red flags.

RECENT FINDINGS

Headaches, one of the most common complaints in clinical practice, span a spectrum from benign tension-type episodes to harbingers of life-threatening conditions. For the seasoned physician, differentiating between these extremes is paramount. Headache etiologies covered in this article will include subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), cervical artery dissection, cerebral venous thrombosis, meningitis, obstructive hydrocephalus, and brain tumor.

Profiling migraine patients according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics: clinical validity of distinct migraine clusters

AIMS

Investigate if different clinical and psychophysical bedside tools can differentiate between district migraine phenotypes in ictal/perictal (cohort 1) and interictal (cohort 2) phases.

METHOD

This observational study included two independent samples in which patients were subgrouped into distinct clusters using standardized bedside assessment tools (headache frequency, disability, cervical active range of motion, pressure pain threshold in different areas): (A) cohort 1-ictal/perictal migraine patients were subgrouped, based on previous studies, into two clusters, i.e., Cluster-1.1 No Psychophysical Impairments (NPI) and Cluster-1.2 Increased Pain Sensitivity and Cervical Musculoskeletal Dysfunction (IPS-CMD); (B) cohort 2-interictal migraine patients were subgrouped into three clusters, i.e., Cluster-2.1 NPI, Cluster-2.2 IPS, and Cluster-2.3 IPS-CMD. Clinical characteristics (multiple questionnaires), somatosensory function (comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST)), and cervical musculoskeletal impairments (cervical musculoskeletal assessment) were assessed and compared across headache clusters and a group of 56 healthy controls matched for sex and age.

RESULTS

Cohort 1: A total of 156 subjects were included. Cluster-1.2 (IPS-CMD) had higher headache intensity (p = 0.048), worse headache-related (p = 0.003) and neck-related disability (p = 0.005), worse quality of life (p = 0.003), and higher symptoms related to sensitization (p = 0.001) and psychological burden (p = 0.005) vs. Cluster-1.1(NPI). Furthermore, Cluster-1.2 (IPS-CMD) had (1) reduced cervical active and passive range of motion (p < 0.023), reduced functionality of deep cervical flexors (p < 0.001), and reduced values in all QST(p < 0.001) vs. controls, and (2) reduced active mobility in flexion, left/right lateral flexion (p < 0.045), and reduced values in QST (p < 0.001) vs. Cluster-1.1 (NPI). Cohort 2: A total of 154 subjects were included. Cluster-2.3 (IPS-CMD) had (1) longer disease duration (p = 0.006), higher headache frequency (p = 0.006), disability (p < 0.001), and psychological burden (p = 0.027) vs. Cluster-2.2 (IPS) and (2) higher headache-related disability (p = 0.010), neck-related disability (p = 0.009), and higher symptoms of sensitization (p = 0.018) vs. Cluster-2.1 (NPI). Cluster-2.3(IPS-CMD) had reduced cervical active and passive range of motion (p < 0.034), and reduced functionality of deep cervical flexors (p < 0.001), vs. controls, Custer-2.1 (NPI), and Cluster-2.2 (IPS). Cluster-2.2 (IPS) and 2.3 (IPS-CMD) had reduced QST values vs. controls (p < 0.001) and Cluster-2.1 (p < 0.039).

CONCLUSION

A battery of patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) and quantitative bedside tools can separate migraine clusters with different clinical characteristics, somatosensory functions, and cervical musculoskeletal impairments. This confirms the existence of distinct migraine phenotypes and emphasizes the importance of migraine phases of which the characteristics are assessed. This may have implications for responders and non-responders to anti-migraine medications.

Primary Stabbing Headache in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Primary Stabbing Headache (PSH) is characterized by brief, focal, and paroxysmal pain ("stab"), occurring sporadically or in clusters. Data on pediatric cases are poor.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review by searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase in order to collect pediatric case reports and case series of PSH.

RESULTS

A total of 12 out of 162 articles assessed for eligibility were finally included. The prevalence of PSH and probable PSH varies from 2.5 to 10% among children with primary headaches and it is higher among children aged less than 6 years old. The mean age of onset is between 7 and 11 years of age. Attack duration greatly varies, ranging from a few seconds to several minutes. The intensity of pain is usually from moderate to severe. Associated symptoms are infrequent but may be observed (mainly photophobia, vertigo, nausea, and vomiting). Neuroradiological findings are usually unremarkable; EEG may show sporadic epileptiform abnormalities (up to 30% of cases). Preventive therapy is anecdotal, including treatment with indomethacin, trazodone, valproate, and amitriptyline.

CONCLUSION

PSH is a common but still underdiagnosed entity among children with primary headaches; further and larger cohort studies are needed to better assess, in particular, prognosis and response to therapy.

Headache Management in Individuals with Brain Tumor

Headache occurs commonly in individuals diagnosed with cerebral neoplasm. Though the features of a brain tumor-associated headache may vary, a progressive nature of headache and a change in headache phenotype from a prior primary headache disorder often are identified. Pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed for headache associated with brain tumor include headache related to traction on pain-sensitive structures, activation of central and peripheral pain processes, and complications from surgical, chemotherapeutic and/or radiotherapy treatment(s). Optimization of headache management is important for an individual's quality of life. Treatments are based upon patient-specific goals of care and may include tumor-targeted medical and surgical interventions, as well as a multimodal headache treatment approach incorporating acute and preventive medications, nutraceuticals, neuromodulation devices, behavioral interventions, anesthetic nerve blocks, and lifestyles changes.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in a Military Recruit Training Center of the Hellenic Navy: A Retrospective Analysis of the Poros Registry Serving as a Quality Improvement Project for Medical Officers

INTRODUCTION

Basic military training (BMT) has been associated with increased morbidity burden. Nevertheless, the exact epidemiology of the encountered cases in the BMT of Greek recruits has never been assessed. The aim of this quality improvement project was to investigate for the first time the clinical patterns, rates, and severity of symptoms leading recruits to visit the infirmary of a recruit training center and use this knowledge to provide a practical guidance for the physicians in charge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All medical cases which were consecutively examined for the time range from November 2021 to September 2022 at the infirmary of the Hellenic Naval recruit training center in Poros, Greece, were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of "severe clinical status" (i.e., overnight sick bay confinement and/or transfer to a tertiary hospital within 24 h) and absence from BMT for at least 1 day.

RESULTS

A total of 2,623 medical cases were examined during four recruit seasons from November 2021 to September 2022. Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and musculoskeletal injuries were the most frequent reasons for a recruit's visit to the infirmary (33.9% and 30.2%, respectively). 6.7% of the total cases were identified as having "severe clinical status." Specifically, in psychiatric, urological, and cardiovascular cases, febrile events were all independently associated with increased risk of "severe clinical status." There was a positive association between training week and absence from BMT, while febrile events and spring recruit season were also independently linked with increased probability of absence from BMT for at least 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

URTIs and musculoskeletal complaints were the primary reasons for recruits' presentation at the infirmary of a Greek recruit training center, leading to severe rates of attrition. Further registries and quality improvement projects are warranted to reach specific conclusions and reduce BMT-related morbidity and its subsequent implications.

[Headache and hypertension as a form of presentation of pheochromocytoma and simulating a post-COVID-19 syndrome]

Post-COVID-19 syndrome is a set of symptoms and signs that persist for more than 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection and currently lacks a standardised clinical definition. Only one case has been reported in which a pheochromocytoma was mistaken for post-COVID-19 syndrome. The symptomatology of this syndrome is variable and ranges from headache and fatigue to persistent dyspnoea and neurocognitive disturbances. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 can affect the autonomic nervous system, contributing to symptoms resembling those of pheochromocytoma. The importance and need to discern between COVID-19-related symptoms and other conditions is emphasised, as the specificity of the clinical manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome is very low and can be confused with other vital pathologies. A case is presented in which a pheochromocytoma was mistaken for post-COVID-19 syndrome in a patient with no medical history.

Epidemiology and clinical features of hypnic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypnic headache is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent headache attacks that occur exclusively during sleep, leading to awakening. Synthesizing the available epidemiological data might inform clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies on hypnic headache published between 1 May 2004, and 22 December 2022. Two investigators independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis with meta-regression to estimate the prevalence of hypnic headache and its clinical features based on epidemiologic data from population-based and clinic-based studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, one population-based and 13 clinic-based, met our eligibility criteria. The population-based study did not identify any people with hypnic headache. From 11 clinic-based studies, the pooled relative frequency of hypnic headache was 0.21% (95%CI, 0.13 to 0.35%; I2 = 87%) in adult patients evaluated for headache. The pooled mean age of onset was 60.5 years, with a slight female predisposition. Hypnic headache was typically bilateral (71%), pressing (73%), of moderate (38%) or severe (44%) pain intensity, and lasted about 115 minutes per attack.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data should be cautiously interpreted due to between-study heterogeneity. The identified clinical presentation of hypnic headache can guide clinical diagnosis, in addition to the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

Managing and Preventing Migraine in the Emergency Department: A Review

Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and acute migraine attacks are a common reason for patients to seek care in the emergency department (ED). There have been recent advancements in the care of patients with migraine, specifically emerging evidence for nerve blocks and new pharmacological classes of medications like gepants and ditans. This article serves as a comprehensive review of migraine in the ED, including diagnosis and management of acute complications of migraine (eg, status migrainosus, migrainous infarct, persistent aura without infarction, and aura-triggered seizure) and use of evidence-based migraine-specific treatments in the ED. It highlights the role of migraine preventive medications and provides a framework for emergency physicians to prescribe them to eligible patients. Finally, it evaluates the evidence for nerve blocks in the treatment of migraine and introduces the possible role of gepants and ditans in the care of patients with migraine in the ED.

New management strategies for primary headache disorders: Insights from P4 medicine

Primary headache disorder is the main cause of headache attacks, leading to significant disability and impaired quality of life. This disorder is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous condition with a complex network of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. However, the timely diagnosis and effective treatment of these headaches remain challenging. Precision medicine is a potential strategy based on P4 (predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory) medicine that may bring new insights for headache care. Recent machine learning advances and widely available molecular biology and imaging data have increased the usefulness of this medical strategy. Precision medicine emphasizes classifying headaches according to their risk factors, clinical presentation, and therapy responsiveness to provide individualized headache management. Furthermore, early preventive strategies, mainly utilizing predictive tools, are critical in reducing headache attacks and improving the quality of life of individuals with headaches. The current review comprehensively discusses the potential application value of P4 medicine in headache management.

Trigeminocervical pain sensitivity during the migraine cycle depends on headache frequency

OBJECTIVE

This experimental study aimed to assess pain sensitivity in low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM), and chronic migraine (CM) patients across the different phases of the migraine cycle.

METHOD

In this observational, experimental study, clinical characteristics (diary and time from the last/next headache attack), and quantitative sensory testing (QST) (wind-up pain ratio (WUR) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) from the trigeminal area and PPT from the cervical spine) was performed. LFEM, HFEM, and CM were assessed in each of the 4 migraine phases (HFEM and LFEM: interictal, preictal, ictal, and postictal; CM: interictal and ictal) and compared vs. each other's (matched for the phase) and controls.

RESULTS

A total of 56 controls, 105 LFEM, 74 HFEM, and 32 CM were included. No differences in QST parameters were observed between LFEM, HFEM, and CM in any of the phases. During the interictal phase and when comparing with controls the following were found: 1) LFEM had lower trigeminal PPT (p = 0.001) and 2) lower cervical PPT (p = 0.001). No differences were observed between HFEM or CM and healthy controls. During the ictal phase and when comparing with controls the following were found: HFEM and CM had 1) lower trigeminal PPTs (HFEM p = 0.001; CM = p < 0.001), 2) lower cervical PPT s (HFEM p = 0.007; CM p < 0.001), and 3) higher trigeminal WUR (HFEM p = 0.001, CM p = 0.006). No differences were observed between LFEM and healthy controls. During the preictal phase and when comparing with controls the following were found: 1) LFEM had lower cervical PPT (p = 0.007), 2) HFEM had lower trigeminal (p = 0.013) and 3) HFEM had lower cervical (p = .006) PPTs. During the postictal phase and when comparing with controls the following were found: 1) LFEM had lower cervical PPT (p = 0.003), 2) HFEM had lower trigeminal PPT (p = 0.005), and 3) and HFEM had lower cervical (p = 0.007) PPTs.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that HFEM patients have a sensory profile matching CM better than LFEM. When assessing pain sensitivity in migraine populations, the phase with respects to headache attacks is of utmost importance and can explain the inconsistency in pain sensitivity data reported in the literature.

InfluenCEF study: Clinical phenotype and duration of headache attributed to influenza infection

INTRODUCTION

Headache is a frequent symptom of infections. We aimed to characterize the clinical phenotype and duration of headache attributed to influenza infection.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study done in 53 primary care centers between January and April 2023. Patients were included if they had a confirmed influenza diagnosis, were older than 15 years and had a new-onset headache. Patients' demographics, prior medical history, headache phenotype and duration, associated symptoms and patients' outcomes were assessed. The International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for headache attributed to a systemic viral infection, migraine and tension-type headache were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 478 patients 75 fulfilled eligibility criteria. The mean age was 43, 56% were men, and 27% had a prior headache history. The headache phenotype was a bilateral headache (52%), with frontal topography (48%), pressing quality (61%), moderate intensity, rhinorrhea (79%), nasal congestion (76%), and photophobia (59%). All patients fulfilled headache attributed to acute systemic viral infection criteria, 43% fulfilled migraine criteria and 31% tension-type headache criteria. The median duration of the headache was four (Inter-quartile range: two-six) days.

CONCLUSION

The clinical phenotype of headache attributed to influenza infection was similar to other infections, with more pronounced cranial autonomic symptoms. The headache was an early symptom and was self-limited within a few days.Trial Registration: The study protocol is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05704335).