Antibodies against nodo-paranodal proteins are not present in genetic neuropathies

Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2-Related Peripheral Nerve Hyperexcitability Associated With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 4F

Contactin-associated protein-like 2 autoimmunity is an uncommon disorder resulting in peripheral nerve hyperexcitability or encephalitis. In a fifth of cases, onset may be provoked by thymoma, but other associations are largely unknown. We report a patient with anti-contactin-associated protein-like 2-related peripheral nerve hyperexcitability arising in the setting of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4F and discuss potential mechanisms underlying the association.

Value of Antibody Determinations in Chronic Dysimmune Neuropathies

Chronic dysimmune neuropathies encompass a group of neuropathies that share immune-mediated pathomechanism. Chronic dysimmune antibody-related neuropathies include anti-MAG neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and neuropathies related to immune attack against paranodal antigens. Such neuropathies exhibit distinguishing pathomechanism, clinical and response to therapy features with respect to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and its variants, which represent the most frequent form of chronic dysimmune neuropathy. This narrative review provides an overview of pathomechanism; clinical, electrophysiological, and biochemical features; and treatment response of the antibody-mediated neuropathies, aiming to establish when and why to look for antibodies in chronic dysimmune neuropathies.

Autoimmune nodopathies, an emerging diagnostic category

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, antibodies targeting cell adhesion molecules of the node of Ranvier were described in patients with autoimmune neuropathies. These nodal/paranodal antibodies associate with specific clinicopathological features that are different from classical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In this review, we will summarize recent findings establishing autoimmune nodopathies (AN) as a new category of autoimmune neuropathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

AN include anti-contactin 1, anti-contactin-associated protein 1, anti-neurofascin 155 and anti-pan-neurofascin antibody-mediated neuropathies. Their clinical spectrum includes acute, subacute or chronic onset sensory-motor neuropathies mimicking Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and CIDP, although they differ in their response to standard therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Neurophysiologically they overlap with acquired demyelinating neuropathies, but ultrastructural studies and animal models demonstrated antibody-mediated pathology restricted to the node of Ranvier. Anti-contactin1 and anti-pan-neurofascin also associate with nephrotic syndrome. Nodal/paranodal antibodies are predominantly of the immunoglobulin (IgG)4 subclass during the chronic phase of the disease, but complement-fixing IgG3 antibodies are detected during the early phase and associate with aggressive onset and IVIG response. Nodal/paranodal antibodies testing is key in the diagnosis of AN.

SUMMARY

AN have emerged as a new diagnostic category pathologically different from acquired demyelinating neuropathies. Clinically they overlap with GBS and CIDP although they associate with specific clinical features that should lead to clinical suspicion. Nodal/paranodal antibodies are key effector mechanisms of disease and good diagnostic and disease-monitoring biomarkers in AN.

Clinical and diagnostic features of anti-neurofascin-155 antibody-positive neuropathy in Han Chinese

Objective

To investigate the clinical features of Han Chinese patients with anti‐neurofascin‐155 (NF155) antibody‐positive neuropathy.

Methods

We screened 194 patients with peripheral neuropathy for NF155 antibodies using a cell‐based assay (CBA) and teased‐fiber immunofluorescence assay. We summarized the clinical findings of seropositive patients.

Results

The sera from 17 patients reacted to human embryonic kidney 293 cells transfected with NF155. Eleven of these patients had the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 4 isotype, a younger onset age, tremor, higher levels of cerebrospinal fluid protein, a larger diameter of the lumbosacral nerve root on magnetic resonance imaging, and the distal demyelinating symmetric phenotype. Most patients responded to steroids and rituximab. For the remaining six seropositive patients in CBA, the predominant antibody isotype was IgG3, IgG1, or undetectable, and only one patient with IgG3 showed a positive result in the teased‐fiber immunofluorescence assay. These patients did not share the typical features displayed by patients with the IgG4 isotype.

Interpretation

In the Han Chinese population, a significant proportion of patients who fulfilled the criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy diagnosis had anti‐NF155 IgG4 antibody‐positive neuropathy and displayed specific phenotypes. Ambiguous staining patterns may appear, and the potential for false positivity should be considered. For patients who presented with specific phenotypes, identifying antibodies and subtypes involved a significant laboratory workup.

Clinical and Laboratory Features in Anti-NF155 Autoimmune Nodopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To study the clinical and laboratory features of antineurofascin-155 (NF155)-positive autoimmune nodopathy (AN).

METHODS

Patients with anti-NF155 antibodies detected on routine immunologic testing were included. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, and functional scales (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale [I-RODS]) were retrospectively collected at baseline and at the follow-up. Autoantibody and neurofilament light (NfL) chain levels were analyzed at baseline and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty NF155+ patients with AN were included. Mean age at onset was 42.4 years. Patients presented with a progressive (75%), sensory motor (87.5%), and symmetric distal-predominant weakness in upper (97.2%) and lower extremities (94.5%), with tremor and ataxia (75%). Patients received a median of 3 (2-4) different treatments in 46 months of median follow-up. Response to IV immunoglobulin (86.8%) or steroids (72.2%) was poor in most patients, whereas 77.3% responded to rituximab. HLA-DRB1*15 was detected in 91.3% of patients. IgG4 anti-NF155 antibodies were predominant in all patients; anti-NF155 titers correlated with mRS within the same patient (r = 0.41, p = 0.004). Serum NfL (sNfL) levels were higher in anti-NF155+ AN than in healthy controls (36.47 vs 7.56 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and correlated with anti-NF155 titers (r = 0.43, p = 0.001), with I-RODS at baseline (r = -0.88, p < 0.001) and with maximum I-RODS achieved (r = -0.58, p = 0.01). Anti-NF155 titers and sNfL levels decreased in all rituximab-treated patients.

DISCUSSION

Anti-NF155 AN presents a distinct clinical profile and good response to rituximab. Autoantibody titers and sNfL are useful to monitor disease status in these patients. The use of untagged-NF155 plasmids minimizes the detection of false anti-NF155+ cases.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that anti-NF155 antibodies associate with a specific phenotype and response to rituximab.

Serum Contactin-1 in CIDP: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

To investigate whether serum levels of contactin-1, a paranodal protein, correlate with paranodal injury as seen in patients with CIDP with antibodies targeting the paranodal region.

Methods

Serum contactin-1 levels were measured in 187 patients with CIDP and 222 healthy controls. Paranodal antibodies were investigated in all patients.

Results

Serum contactin-1 levels were lower in patients (N = 41) with paranodal antibodies compared with patients (N = 146) without paranodal antibodies (p < 0.01) and showed good discrimination between these groups (area under the curve 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76–0.93).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that serum contactin-1 levels have the potential to serve as a possible diagnostic biomarker of paranodal injury in CIDP.

Classification of Evidence

This study provides class II evidence that serum contactin-1 levels can discriminate between patients with CIDP with or without paranodal antibodies with a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 56%–85%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 83%–100%).

Diagnostic challenges in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerves, causing weakness and sensory symptoms. Diagnosis often is challenging, because of the heterogeneous presentation and both mis- and underdiagnosis are common. Nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormalities suggestive of demyelination are mandatory to fulfil the diagnostic criteria. On the one hand, performance and interpretation of NCS can be difficult and none of these demyelinating findings are specific for CIDP. On the other hand, not all patients will be detected despite the relatively high sensitivity of NCS abnormalities. The electrodiagnostic criteria can be supplemented with additional diagnostic tests such as CSF examination, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials. However, the evidence for each of these additional diagnostic tests is limited. Studies are often small without the use of a clinically relevant control group. None of the findings are specific for CIDP, meaning that the results of the diagnostic tests should be carefully interpreted. In this update we will discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing CIDP and the value of newly introduced diagnostic tests such as nerve ultrasound and testing for autoantibodies, which are not yet part of the guidelines.