1
|
Witt JA, Moskau-Hartmann S, Olaciregui Dague K, Surges R, Helmstaedter C. Severe memory decline along with unaffected executive functions under 400 mg/day of cenobamate leading to a collapse in school performance. Neurocase 2024:1-6. [PMID: 38869048 DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2024.2366472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Cenobamate (CNB) is one of the newer antiseizure medications for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. The cognitive profile of CNB is not yet known in detail. Here we present the case of an 18-year-old male high school student with epilepsy who received adjunctive CNB. Under 400 mg/d of CNB in combination with lamotrigine, a neuropsychological reassessment revealed a severe deterioration of the formerly normal episodic memory functions, while executive functions remained unaffected. The de novo memory deficit had already led to a collapse in school performance and he unexpectedly failed to obtain the general qualification for university entrance. Given the beneficial effect of CNB on seizure control, a dose reduction of CNB to 200 mg/d and introduction of valproic acid was performed. This led to a full recovery of objective memory performance. To our knowledge this is the very first report of a dose-dependent, selective and severe decline in episodic memory performance under CNB, potentially impeding academic achievement. The findings call for a cognitive monitoring of CNB which also addresses episodic memory in addition to executive functions. Systematic studies on episodic memory upon CNB treatment would help to appreciate the scope of this apparently reversible adverse effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rainer Surges
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steinhoff BJ, Georgiou D, Intravooth T. The cenobamate KORK study-A prospective monocenter observational study investigating cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy, with comparisons to historical cohorts treated with add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam. Epilepsia Open 2024. [PMID: 38861254 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Europe, cenobamate has been approved for use as an adjunctive therapy in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE) with focal-onset seizures (FOS) who have not responded satisfactorily to treatment with at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Pivotal trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated a high efficacy of cenobamate, even in very difficult-to-treat epilepsies. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of add-on cenobamate in adult PWE who were prospectively monitored. We compared these results with those previously obtained for add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam therapy. METHODS Patients were enrolled from the CENKORK study, which is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, monocenter cohort study of adult PWE experiencing FOS. The titration of cenobamate was performed according to the guidelines outlined in the summary of product characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the retention rate at 6 months and 1 year. In addition, we assessed seizure-free rates, the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% seizure reduction, adverse events, and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. These outcome measures were compared with historical controls treated with adjunctive lacosamide, perampanel, or brivaracetam at our center. RESULTS Between June 2021 and 2022, 172 PWE with ongoing FOS were included. 22 cases were lost to follow-up, leaving 150 cases for the 1-year assessment. The retention rates at 6 months and 1 year were 88.7% and 80%, respectively. Seizure freedom was achieved in 14% of patients at both the 6-month and 1-year marks, while the ≥50% responder rates were 50% and 61%, respectively. The 6-month retention rate was significantly higher in cenobamate than in other ASMs (p < 0.001 for each comparator). Adverse events were significantly more common with perampanel (p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE Add-on cenobamate proved to be particularly efficacious compared to our experience with other recently introduced ASMs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This observational study was carried out in 172 adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy who were treated with adjunctive cenobamate. After 1 year, the data of 150 patients could be analyzed. Seizure freedom, in the preceding 3 months, was achieved in 14%. The rate of PWE continuing cenobamate was 80%. In our hands, cenobamate showed promising efficacy and tolerability even when compared to other recently introduced antiseizure medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lattanzi S, Ranzato F, Di Bonaventura C, Bonanni P, Gambardella A, Tartara E, Assenza G, Procaccini M, Falsetto N, Villano V, Camattari G, Ori A, Di Gennaro G. Effectiveness and Safety of Adjunctive Cenobamate in People with Focal-Onset Epilepsy: Evidence from the First Interim Analysis of the BLESS Study. Neurol Ther 2024:10.1007/s40120-024-00634-5. [PMID: 38850402 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00634-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite new anti-seizure medications (ASMs) being introduced into clinical practice, about one-third of people with epilepsy do not reach seizure control. Cenobamate is a novel tetrazole-derived carbamate compound with a dual mechanism of action. In randomized controlled trials, adjunctive cenobamate reduced the frequency of focal seizures in people with uncontrolled epilepsy. Studies performed in real-world settings are useful to complement this evidence and better characterize the drug profile. METHODS The Italian BLESS ("Cenobamate in Adults With Focal-Onset Seizures") study is an observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy in the context of real-world clinical practice. The study is ongoing and conducted at 50 centers in Italy. This first interim analysis includes participants enrolled until June 2023 and with 12-week outcome data available. RESULTS Forty participants with a median age of 36.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 26.0-47.5) years were included. The median monthly seizure frequency at baseline was 6.0 (IQR 2.5-17.3) seizures and 31 (77.5%) participants had failed four or more ASMs before cenobamate. At 12 weeks from starting cenobamate, the median reduction in monthly seizure frequency was 52.8% (IQR 27.1-80.3%); 22 (55.0%) participants had a ≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency and six (15.0%) reached seizure freedom. The median number of concomitant ASMs decreased from 3 (IQR 2-3) at baseline to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 12 weeks and the proportion of patients treated with > 2 concomitant ASMs decreased from 52.5% to 40.0%. Seven (17.5%) patients reported a total of 12 adverse events, 11 of which were considered adverse drug reactions to cenobamate. CONCLUSION In adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, the treatment with adjunctive cenobamate was well tolerated and was associated with improved seizure control and a reduction of the burden of concomitant ASMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05859854 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Federica Ranzato
- Regional Adult Epilepsy Center, Neurology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Scientific Institute, Conegliano, TV, Italy
| | | | - Elena Tartara
- Epilepsy Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, ERN EpiCare Full Member, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Assenza
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carreño M, Gil‐Nagel A, Serratosa JM, Toledo M, Rodriguez‐Uranga JJ, Villanueva V. Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:1051-1058. [PMID: 38573131 PMCID: PMC11145622 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mar Carreño
- Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Epilepsy UnitBarcelonaSpain
| | - Antonio Gil‐Nagel
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy ProgramRuber International HospitalMadridSpain
| | - José M. Serratosa
- Department of NeurologyHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
| | - Manuel Toledo
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Epilepsy UnitBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Refractory Epilepsy UnitValenciaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Gennaro G, Lattanzi S, Mecarelli O, Saverio Mennini F, Vigevano F. Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 155:109796. [PMID: 38643659 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality. METHODS Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices. RESULTS The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches. CONCLUSION The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome (Retired) and Past President of LICE, Italian League Against Epilepsy, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Saverio Mennini
- Faculty of Economics, Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), CEIS, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy; Institute for Leadership and Management in Health, Kingston University London, London, UK.
| | - Federico Vigevano
- Head of Paediatric Neurorehabilitation Department, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steinhoff BJ, Georgiou D, Dietmann D, Intravooth T. Cenobamate Plasma Levels in Patients with Epilepsy: Correlation with Efficacy and Tolerability? J Clin Med 2024; 13:2757. [PMID: 38792299 PMCID: PMC11122064 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Cenobamate is approved by the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of adult patients with epilepsy (PWEs) with ongoing focal-onset seizures despite appropriate treatment with at least two established antiseizure medications. Pivotal trials and post-marketing real-world observational studies suggest high efficacy with unusually high seizure-free rates. The authors sought to investigate the plasma levels of cenobamate under steady-state conditions in seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs, and in PWEs who experienced adverse events versus those who did not. Methods: Blood samples were collected from adult PWEs who were treated with adjunct cenobamate under steady-state conditions. Daily doses, concomitant medications, efficacy, and tolerability were assessed. The plasma cenobamate levels of seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs and between PWEs with and those without clinical adverse events were compared. Results: Samples from 101 PWEs were included. Thirty-six PWEs were seizure-free and 65 were non-responders. In 31 PWEs, adverse events were apparent, whereas in the remaining 70, no tolerability issues were reported. A linear correlation was found between the daily doses (range: 100 mg-400 mg) and the plasma levels (3.8 mg/L-54.6 mg/L). Neither the daily doses nor the plasma levels differed significantly between the investigated subgroups. The main reason for this result was that the individual therapeutic ranges varied widely: seizure freedom and adverse effects were observed alongside low doses and plasma levels in some PWEs. Conversely, there were examples of PWEs who did not respond or who reported no tolerability issues at high doses or plasma levels. Conclusions: To evaluate the individual therapeutic range and to better understand the influence of other drugs in cases where concomitant medications are used, the therapeutic drug monitoring of cenobamate may be useful. A general therapeutic range cannot be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J. Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Dimitra Georgiou
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| | - Daniel Dietmann
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| | - Tassanai Intravooth
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, 77694 Kehl, Germany; (D.G.); (D.D.); (T.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu J, Wei W, Liu Y, Ye H, Liu X. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate based on patient etiology: Post-hoc analysis of YKP3089C017 randomized clinical trial. Seizure 2024; 118:95-102. [PMID: 38652999 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjunctive cenobamate was effective and safe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal onset seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (YKP3089C017; NCT01866111). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in the treatment of patients with different epileptic etiologies during the study. METHODS Adult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who previously received 1 to 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or cenobamate 100, 200 or 400 mg/day. Patients were further stratified based on their etiologic causes as genetic/presumed genetic, unknown cause, structural cause, and not reported (NR) groups. The frequency per 28 days for an 18-week double-blind treatment period, responder rates (≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 %) during the maintenance phase (12 weeks), and safety were assessed. RESULTS A total of 394 patients were categorized into the genetic/presumed genetic (n = 9; 2.28 %), unknown cause (n = 199; 50.51 %), structural cause (n = 177; 44.92 %), and NR (n = 13; 3.30 %) groups, with 4 patients were classified into either of the two etiological causes each. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The percentage of reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was significantly higher in the cenobamate-treated structural (p = 0.01) and unknown cause (p = 0.0003) groups compared with the placebo group. Responder rates of ≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 % were also higher with cenobamate therapy. Notably, no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in the genetic/presumed genetic group treated with cenobamate. The most common TEAEs (≥10 %) occurring in patients treated with cenobamate were nervous system disorders by system organ class, and somnolence was the most commonly reported TEAE. CONCLUSION Cenobamate reduces seizures in adult patients previously treated with ASMs, with high responder rates and acceptable safety, regardless of underlying causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
| | - Yutong Liu
- Ignis Therapeutics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Hui Ye
- Ignis Therapeutics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Xiaorong Liu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mulheron S, Leahy TP, McStravick M, Doran R, Delanty N. A comparison of cenobamate with other newer antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Seizure 2024; 118:80-90. [PMID: 38643679 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cenobamate with other newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide, approved for adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adults with epilepsy. METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain relevant efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for ASMs for the treatment of drug-resistant FOS. All studies were thoroughly assessed for potential sources of heterogeneity and analysed via Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs). Efficacy outcomes were ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom during the maintenance period, which were modelled simultaneously using a multinomial Bayesian NMA. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the proportion who experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. RESULTS The SLR identified 76 studies, of which 23 were included in the Bayesian NMAs. Cenobamate was associated with statistically significant higher rates for the ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom outcomes compared with all ASMs analysed. The point estimates indicated that cenobamate was associated with higher rates of experiencing at least one TEAE and at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation compared with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and zonisamide; however, no results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Cenobamate was associated with increased efficacy compared with all ASMs analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety and tolerability outcomes. The results presented corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous published NMAs, which also highlight the notable efficacy of cenobamate in comparison with other ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Mulheron
- Angelini Pharma UK-I, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London WC1V 6AZ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vashi V, Laramy J, Kamin M, Ferrari L, Hand A. Relative Bioavailability of Cenobamate Administered as a Crushed Tablet, Either Orally or via Nasogastric Tube, versus an Intact Whole Tablet. J Clin Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38683027 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Cenobamate is approved for the treatment of focal seizures in adults and is currently available as an oral tablet. Alternative methods of drug administration are needed for patients who are unable to swallow whole intact tablets. This phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-way crossover (3-period, 3-treatment, 6-sequence) study (NCT05572255), conducted in healthy volunteers, assessed the relative bioavailability of a crushed 200-mg cenobamate tablet administered orally or via nasogastric (NG) tube compared with an intact 200-mg tablet. Each treatment was separated by a 13-day washout period. Plasma samples for cenobamate concentration analysis were collected pre-dose and at multiple time points up to 264 h post-dose. Standard bioequivalence study criteria were applied to the relative bioavailability assessments. All 90% confidence intervals of test-to-reference geometric mean ratios for cenobamate pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf) were within 85-110% (predefined limit, 80-125%), suggesting no difference in cenobamate exposures following administration of an intact tablet orally or a crushed tablet orally or via NG tube. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were classified as mild and resolved. There were no deaths or other serious AEs (SAEs), and no TEAEs led to discontinuation. Our results indicate that the administration of cenobamate as a crushed tablet taken orally or via an NG tube can provide additional flexibility when patients cannot swallow intact tablets. Based on the results of this study, cenobamate is now approved by FDA to be taken whole or the tablets can be crushed. The crushed tablet can be mixed with water and either administered by mouth as an oral suspension or administered via a nasogastric tube.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Alan Hand
- Worldwide Clinical Trials, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen Y, Li W, Lu C, Gao X, Song H, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Cai G, Guo Q, Zhou D, Chen Y. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of add-on third-generation antiseizure medications in treating focal seizures worldwide: a network meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102513. [PMID: 38449838 PMCID: PMC10915785 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Adjunctive newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) are being used in patients with treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS). An updated network meta-analysis (NMA) was necessary to compile evidence in this critical area. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until 17 January 2024, evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rufinamide (RUF), brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), retigabine (RTG), and perampanel (PER) as adjunctive treatments for FOS. Efficacy outcomes included seizure response and seizure freedom. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients experiencing at least one AE and serious adverse events (SAEs). This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485130). Findings A total of 29 studies involving 11,750 participants were included. For seizure response, all ASMs were significantly superior to placebo, with RTG ranking highest, followed by CNB. Considering dosage, CNB 400 mg/d was top-ranked, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d. For seizure freedom, BRV was highest-ranked, followed by CNB, with BRV 100 mg/d leading, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding tolerability, LCM 600 mg/d had the lowest ranking, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. For the safety outcome of AEs, ESL 1200 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding SAEs, LCM 400 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d. Interpretation ASMs at different dosages have varying efficacy and tolerability profiles. We have provided hierarchical rankings of ASMs for efficacy and safety outcomes. Our findings offer the most comprehensive evidence available to inform patients, families, physicians, guideline developers, and policymakers about the choice of ASMs in patients with treatment-resistant FOS. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yankun Chen
- Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Wenze Li
- Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Chenfei Lu
- Department of Respiratory, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China
| | - Xinxia Gao
- Department of Medical Records, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze, 274000, China
| | - Huizhen Song
- Department of Neurology, Heze Third People's Hospital, Heze, 274000, China
| | - Yanli Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Heze Branch, Heze, 274000, China
| | - Sihao Zhao
- Department of Neurology, Heze Mudan District People's Hospital, Heze, 274000, China
| | - Gaoang Cai
- Department of Neurology, Juancheng County People's Hospital, Juancheng, 274600, China
| | - Qing Guo
- Department of Neurology, Heze Municipal Hospital Brain Hospital, Heze, 274000, China
| | - Dongdong Zhou
- Mental Health Center, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401331, China
| | - Yangmei Chen
- Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen S, Fang W, Zhao L, Xu H. Safety assessment of cenobamate: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1369384. [PMID: 38560357 PMCID: PMC10978795 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to analyze adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with cenobamate from the FAERS database, covering the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023. Methods Data related to cenobamate-associated ADEs from the third quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2023 were collected. After standardizing the data, various signal quantification techniques, including ROR, MHRA, BCPNN, and MGPS, were employed for analysis. Results Among 2535 ADE reports where cenobamate was the primary suspected drug, 94 adverse reactions involving 11 different System Organ Class (SOC) categories were identified through the application of four signal quantification techniques. More specifically, neurological disorders and injuries resultant from complications are frequent adverse reactions associated with cenobamate. Conclusion Our research findings align with established results, affirming the favorable safety profile of cenobamate. Effective prevention of adverse reactions induced by cenobamate can be achieved through the establishment of efficient blood concentration monitoring and dose adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shihao Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wenqiang Fang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Linqian Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Huiqin Xu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sanchez M, Marone A, Silva WH, Marrodan M, Correale J. Clinical characteristics, course and prognosis of Multiple Sclerosis patients with epilepsy. A case control study: MS and epilepsy. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 83:105422. [PMID: 38219299 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although more common than in the general population, seizures are an atypical manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS) and their pathophysiology is not well understood. This study aims to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, brain imaging findings and course of epilepsy, presenting in patients with MS. METHODS Observational retrospective study of MS patients evaluated at a single MS reference center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, between 2011 and 2022, focusing on those who developed epilepsy (EMS). Clinical, demographic, and prognostic factors were evaluated and compared to a control group of non-epileptic MS patients (NEMS). To analyze specific epilepsy characteristics, a second control group of patients with non-lesional focal epilepsy (FNLE) was also included. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (18 women), were diagnosed with epilepsy, corresponding to a prevalence of 1.95%. Comparison of brain imaging characteristics between EMS and NEMS patients showed brain atrophy (32% vs 6.1%, p<0.01), as well as cortical (26% vs 4%, p=0.03) and juxtacortical lesions (84% vs 55%, p=0.05), were more frequent in EMS patients. However, after multivariate analysis, cortical atrophy was the only variable linked to a significant increase in risk of epilepsy (OR 24, 95%CI=2.3-200, p<0.01). No significant differences in clinical characteristics, disease activity, disability levels, response to disease modified treatment (DMT) or lack of DMT efficacy were observed between MS patients with or without epilepsy. Most patients received anti-seizure medication (ASM), and seizure control was better in EMS than in FNLE patients (92% vs 58%, p=0.022) with no differences found in drug resistance. We did not find predictors of seizure recurrence in the population studied. CONCLUSION We observed a lower prevalence of epilepsy in this group of MS patients, compared to other reported cohorts. Although epilepsy seems to have a benign course in MS patients, cortical atrophy appears to be an important contributor to the development of secondary epilepsy in MS patients. Further investigations will be necessary to identify risk factors or biomarkers predicting increased epilepsy risk in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abril Marone
- Departamento de Neurología, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Walter H Silva
- Departamento de Neurología, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jorge Correale
- Departamento de Neurología, Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Química y Fisicoquímica Biológicas (IQUIFIB), Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
O'Dwyer R, Stern S, Wade CT, Guggilam A, Rosenfeld WE. Safety and Efficacy of Cenobamate for the Treatment of Focal Seizures in Older Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label Study. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:251-260. [PMID: 38446341 PMCID: PMC10925560 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01102-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures. OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis of a phase III, open-label safety study assessed the safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in older adults versus the overall study population. METHODS Adults aged 18-70 years with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of one to three ASMs were enrolled in the phase III, open-label safety study; adults aged 65-70 years from that study were included in our safety analysis. Discontinuations due to adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed throughout the study in all patients who received one or more doses of cenobamate (safety study population). Efficacy was assessed post hoc in patients who had adequate seizure data available (post hoc efficacy population); we assessed patients aged 65-70 years from that population. Overall, 100% responder rates were assessed in the post hoc efficacy maintenance-phase population in 3-month intervals. Concomitant ASM drug load changes were also measured. For each ASM, drug load was defined as the ratio of actual drug dose/day to the World Health Organization defined daily dose (DDD). RESULTS Of 1340 patients (mean age 39.7 years) in the safety study population, 42 were ≥ 65 years of age (mean age 67.0 years, 52.4% female). Median duration of exposure was 36.1 and 36.9 months for overall patients and older patients, respectively, and mean epilepsy duration was 22.9 and 38.5 years, respectively. At 1, 2, and 3 years, 80%, 72%, and 68% of patients overall, and 76%, 71%, and 69% of older patients, respectively, remained on cenobamate. Common TEAEs (≥ 20%) were somnolence and dizziness in overall patients, and somnolence, dizziness, fall, fatigue, balance disorder, and upper respiratory tract infection in older patients. Falls in older patients occurred after a mean 452.1 days of adjunctive cenobamate treatment (mean dose 262.5 mg/day; mean concomitant ASM drug load 2.46). Of 240 patients in the post hoc efficacy population, 18 were ≥ 65 years of age. Mean seizure frequency at baseline was 18.1 seizures/28 days for the efficacy population and 3.1 seizures/28 days for older patients. Rates of 100% seizure reduction within 3-month intervals during the maintenance phase increased over time for the overall population (n = 214) and older adults (n = 15), reaching 51.9% and 78.6%, respectively, by 24 months. Mean percentage change in concomitant ASM drug load, not including cenobamate, was reduced in the overall efficacy population (31.8%) and older patients (36.3%) after 24 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Results from this post hoc analysis showed notable rates of efficacy in older patients taking adjunctive cenobamate. Rates of several individual TEAEs occurred more frequently in older patients. Further reductions in concomitant ASMs may be needed in older patients when starting cenobamate to avoid adverse effects such as somnolence, dizziness, and falls. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535091.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca O'Dwyer
- Epilepsy Section, Department of Neurological Sciences, Comprehensive Epilepsy Clinic for Elderly, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 885, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | | | | | | | - William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kan-Tor Y, Ness L, Szlak L, Benninger F, Ravid S, Chorev M, Rosen-Zvi M, Shimoni Y, Fisher RS. Comparing the efficacy of anti-seizure medications using matched cohorts on a large insurance claims database. Epilepsy Res 2024; 201:107313. [PMID: 38417192 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Epilepsy is a severe chronic neurological disease affecting 60 million people worldwide. Primary treatment is with anti-seizure medicines (ASMs), but many patients continue to experience seizures. We used retrospective insurance claims data on 280,587 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy (UE), defined as status epilepticus, need for a rescue medicine, or admission or emergency visit for an epilepsy code. We conducted a computational risk ratio analysis between pairs of ASMs using a causal inference method, in order to match 1034 clinical factors and simulate randomization. Data was extracted from the MarketScan insurance claims Research Database records from 2011 to 2015. The cohort consisted of individuals over 18 years old with a diagnosis of epilepsy who took one of eight ASMs and had more than a year of history prior to the filling of the drug prescription. Seven ASM exposures were analyzed: topiramate, phenytoin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, valproate, and carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (treated as the same exposure). We calculated the risk ratio of UE between pairs of ASM after controlling for bias with inverse propensity weighting applied to 1034 factors, such as demographics, confounding illnesses, non-epileptic conditions treated by ASMs, etc. All ASMs exhibited a significant reduction in the prevalence of UE, but three drugs showed pair-wise differences compared to other ASMs. Topiramate consistently was associated with a lower risk of UE, with a mean risk ratio range of 0.68-0.93 (average 0.82, CI: 0.56-1.08). Phenytoin and levetiracetam were consistently associated with a higher risk of UE with mean risk ratio ranges of 1.11 to 1.47 (average 1.13, CI 0.98-1.65) and 1.15 to 1.43 (average 1.2, CI 0.72-1.69), respectively. Large-scale retrospective insurance claims data - combined with causal inference analysis - provides an opportunity to compare the effect of treatments in real-world data in populations 1,000-fold larger than those in typical randomized trials. Our causal analysis identified the clinically unexpected finding of topiramate as being associated with a lower risk of UE; and phenytoin and levetiracetam as associated with a higher risk of UE (compared to other studied drugs, not to baseline). However, we note that our data set for this study only used insurance claims events, which does not comprise actual seizure frequencies, nor a clear picture of side effects. Our results do not advocate for any change in practice but demonstrate that conclusions from large databases may differ from and supplement those of randomized trials and clinical practice and therefore may guide further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Kan-Tor
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel
| | - Lior Ness
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel
| | - Liran Szlak
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel
| | - Felix Benninger
- Department of Neurology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sivan Ravid
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel
| | - Michal Chorev
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel; Centre for Applied Research, IBM Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michal Rosen-Zvi
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yishai Shimoni
- AI for Healthcare and Life Sciences Department, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Novitskaya Y, Schütz E, Metternich B, Schulze-Bonhage A, Hirsch M. Add-on treatment with cenobamate is already effective at low doses in refractory focal epilepsy: A prospective observational study. Epilepsia 2024; 65:630-640. [PMID: 38135903 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cenobamate, a novel antiseizure medication with a dual mechanism of action, has been shown in pivotal trials to significantly improve seizure control in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate whether these promising results could be confirmed in a real-world setting with a follow-up period of up to 12 months. METHODS Patients from a tertiary epilepsy center who received cenobamate add-on between June 2021 and October 2023 were followed up prospectively at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation for assessment of seizure outcomes and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS The clinical cohort included 112 adult patients with 30% nonlesional cases and a wide spectrum of epileptogenic lesions underlying refractory focal epilepsy. We observed a significant reduction in monthly seizure frequency of all seizure types already after 3 months of treatment at a median cenobamate dose of 100 mg/day. Forty-six percent of patients were responders with a ≥50% seizure reduction, 26% had a ≥75% seizure reduction, and 9% became seizure-free. Among the 74 patients with available follow-up of 12 months, the responder rates reached 55%, 35%, and 19% for ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% seizure reduction, respectively. After 3 months of treatment, 38% of patients reported adverse effects, mainly (84%) mild to moderate in intensity. Adjustment of comedication allowed successful management of adverse effects in 32% of patients. At a group level, there was no correlation between the cenobamate daily dose and the incidence of adverse events. SIGNIFICANCE We found a clinically relevant response to cenobamate already at a low daily dose of 100 mg also in a patient cohort with a higher degree of drug resistance than in pivotal trials. Our prospectively collected data provide real-world evidence for high efficacy and good tolerability of the drug, although no standardized treatment protocol or comparison with a control group was applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Novitskaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elisa Schütz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Birgitta Metternich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Hirsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tong J, Ji T, Liu T, Liu J, Chen Y, Li Z, Lu N, Li Q. Efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy and epileptic syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 152:109653. [PMID: 38277848 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications (ASMs) for adjunctive treatment in adult patients with focal epilepsy and adolescents with Dravet syndrome (DS), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), or tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from inception to October 13, 2023. We included published studies for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis (NMA). The efficacy and safety were reported in terms of a 50% response rate and dropout rate along with serious adverse events (SAEs). The outcomes were ranked with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS Twenty eligible trials with 5516 patients and 21 interventions, including placebo, contributed to the analysis. Included ASMs were brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CBM), cannabidiol (CBD), fenfluramine (FFM), everolimus (ELM), and soticlestat (SLT). The six new ASMs were compared in four different epilepsy subtypes. In focal epilepsy treatment, BRV seemed to be safe [vs placebo, risk ratio (RR) = 0.69, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.25-1.91] and effective (vs placebo, RR = 2.18, 95 % CI: 1.25-3.81). In treating focal epilepsy, CBM 300 mg was more effective at a 50 % response rate (SUCRA 91.8 %) compared with BRV and CBD. However, with the increase in dosage, more SAEs (SUCRA 85.6 %) appeared compared with other ASMs. CBD had good efficacy on LGS (SUCRA 88.4) and DS (SUCRA 66.2), but the effect on adult focal epilepsy was not better than that of placebo [vs placebo, RR = 0.83 (0.36-1.93)]. The NMA indicated that the likelihood of the most appropriate intervention (SUCRA 91.2 %) with minimum side effects(SUCRA 12.5 %)for the DS was FFM. Compared with CBD, high exposure to ELM demonstrated a more effective treatment of TSC (SUCRA 89.7 %). More high-quality SLT studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots of annualized relapse rate and side effects in the included studies revealed no significant funnel plot asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS This NMA indicated that the most effective treatment strategy for focal epilepsy, DS, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and TSC, respectively, included CBM 300 mg, FFM, CBD, and ELM. However, the aforementioned findings need further confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Tong
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Tingting Ji
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Jiaqi Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Yibin Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Zongjun Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Na Lu
- Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China.
| | - Qifu Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China; Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Richardson RJ, Petrou S, Bryson A. Established and emerging GABA A receptor pharmacotherapy for epilepsy. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1341472. [PMID: 38449810 PMCID: PMC10915249 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1341472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Drugs that modulate the GABAA receptor are widely used in clinical practice for both the long-term management of epilepsy and emergency seizure control. In addition to older medications that have well-defined roles for the treatment of epilepsy, recent discoveries into the structure and function of the GABAA receptor have led to the development of newer compounds designed to maximise therapeutic benefit whilst minimising adverse effects, and whose position within the epilepsy pharmacologic armamentarium is still emerging. Drugs that modulate the GABAA receptor will remain a cornerstone of epilepsy management for the foreseeable future and, in this article, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and clinical efficacy of both established and emerging pharmacotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Richardson
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Steven Petrou
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Praxis Precision Medicines, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexander Bryson
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Molteni L, Charlier B, Coglianese A, Izzo V, Assenza G, Menna P, de Grazia U, D’Urso A. Quantitative Analysis of Cenobamate and Concomitant Anti-Seizure Medications in Human Plasma via Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2024; 29:884. [PMID: 38398636 PMCID: PMC10892084 DOI: 10.3390/molecules29040884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Cenobamate (CNB) is a new anti-seizure medication (ASM) recently introduced in clinical practice after approval by the FDA and EMA for the add-on treatment of focal onset seizures in adult patients. Although its mechanism of action has not been fully understood, CNB showed promising clinical efficacy in patients treated with concomitant ASMs. The accessibility of CNB could pave a way for the treatment of refractory or drug-resistant epilepsies, which still affect at least one-third of the patients under pharmacological treatment. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers a massive opportunity for better management of epileptic patients, especially those undergoing combined therapy. Here, we describe the first fully validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of CNB and concomitant ASMs in human plasma, with samples extracted either manually or by means of a liquid handler. Our method was validated according to the most recent ICH International Guideline M10 for Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis. The method proved to be selective for CNB and displayed a linear range from 0.8 to 80 mg/L; no matrix effect was found (98.2 ± 4.1%), while intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision were within the acceptance range. Also, CNB short- and long-term stability in plasma under different conditions was assessed. Leftover human plasma samples were employed as study samples for method validation. Our method proved to be highly sensitive and selective to quantify CNB and concomitant ASMs in human plasma; therefore, this method can be employed for a routinely TDM-based approach to support physicians in the management of an epileptic patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Molteni
- SSD Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta”, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Bruno Charlier
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081 Salerno, Italy; (B.C.); (A.C.); (V.I.)
- University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona”, 84131 Salerno, Italy
| | - Albino Coglianese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081 Salerno, Italy; (B.C.); (A.C.); (V.I.)
- Graduate School in Clinical Pathology and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081 Salerno, Italy
| | - Viviana Izzo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081 Salerno, Italy; (B.C.); (A.C.); (V.I.)
- University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona”, 84131 Salerno, Italy
| | - Giovanni Assenza
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (P.M.)
| | - Pierantonio Menna
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (P.M.)
- Department of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, University Campus Biomedico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Ugo de Grazia
- SSD Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta”, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Annachiara D’Urso
- SSD Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta”, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aboumatar S, Ferrari L, Stern S, Wade CT, Weingarten M, Connor GS, Rosenfeld WE. Reductions in concomitant antiseizure medication drug load during adjunctive cenobamate therapy: Post-hoc analysis of a subset of patients from a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study. Epilepsy Res 2024; 200:107306. [PMID: 38340681 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many patients with epilepsy require polytherapy, which increases their antiseizure medication (ASM) drug load, a measure that considers the doses of all ASMs a patient is taking. Changes in concomitant ASM drug load after adding cenobamate were evaluated post-hoc in a subset of the open-label, phase 3 study. METHODS Patients 18-70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures taking 1-3 ASMs were enrolled. Total concomitant ASM drug load (not including cenobamate) was calculated by dividing the patient's prescribed dose for each ASM by its defined daily dose, per the World Health Organization, then summing the ratios. Changes in concomitant ASM drug load were measured from baseline in 3-month intervals up to 24 months by both total and class-specific ASM drug load. Subgroups of interest included: older adults (65-70 years), prior epilepsy-related surgery vs none, and baseline seizure frequency < 3 vs ≥ 3 seizures/28 days. RESULTS Data from 240 patients were available (mean age 41.8 years, mean baseline drug load 3.57). Following cenobamate initiation, the mean concomitant ASM drug load was reduced by 29.4 % at Month 12 % and 31.8 % at Month 24. Reductions occurred in all assessed ASM drug classes, with the largest reduction in benzodiazepines (55.2 % at Month 24). Each assessed subgroup exceeded a 30 % reduction in concomitant ASM drug load at Month 24. Over 24 months, maintenance of ≥ 50 % response occurred in 89.3 %, 86.4 %, and 90.6 % of patients with low (-0.25 to <0), moderate (-0.59 to -0.25), or high (-3.3 to -0.59) numerical reductions in concomitant ASM drug load from baseline, respectively, compared with 86.0 % in patients with no change in drug load; maintenance of 100 % response occurred in 80.7 %, 84.3 %, and 70.0 % of patients with low, moderate, or high numerical reductions in concomitant ASM drug load, compared with 82.0 % in patients with no change. CONCLUSIONS Adding cenobamate led to reduced mean concomitant ASM drug loads during 1 and 2 years of treatment. Reductions occurred regardless of ASM drug class, patient age, or epilepsy disease characteristics and did not impact maintenance of response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Aboumatar
- Austin Epilepsy Care Center, 2200 Park Bend Drive, Building 2, Suite 203, Austin, TX 78758, USA.
| | - Louis Ferrari
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA
| | - Sean Stern
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA
| | - Clarence T Wade
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA
| | - Mindl Weingarten
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA
| | - Gregory S Connor
- Neurological Center of Oklahoma, 6585 South Yale Avenue, Suite 620, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA
| | - William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, 11134 Conway Road, St. Louis, MO 63131, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krauss GL, Chung SS, Ferrari L, Stern S, Rosenfeld WE. Cognitive and psychiatric adverse events during adjunctive cenobamate treatment in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 151:109605. [PMID: 38184949 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cognitive and psychiatric adverse events in patients with epilepsy are important determinants of therapeutic outcomes and patient quality of life. We assessed the relationship between adjunctive cenobamate treatment and selected cognitive and psychiatric treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of pooled populations of patients with focal epilepsy from two phase 2, randomized, double-blind clinical trials; two open-label extensions (OLEs) of those trials; and a long-term, open-label, phase 3 safety study. Occurrence of cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs in patients treated with adjunctive cenobamate or placebo during double-blind treatment were evaluated. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of the cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs, defined as the number of TEAEs per patient-year of treatment, during up to 7 years of long-term adjunctive cenobamate treatment, were determined in the pooled OLE and phase 3 patient populations. RESULTS The pooled randomized trials resulted in a population of 442 patients treated with cenobamate (100 mg/day: n = 108; 200 mg/day: n = 223; 400 mg/day: n = 111) and 216 placebo-treated patients. The combined open-label studies resulted in pooled populations of cenobamate-treated patients ranging from n = 1690 during Year 1 to n = 103 during Year 7. Among cenobamate-treated (all doses) and placebo-treated patients during double-blind treatment, cognitive TEAEs were reported by ≤ 1.9 % (range, 0 %-1.9 %) and ≤ 0.5 % (range, 0 %-0.5 %), respectively, and psychiatric TEAEs by ≤ 3.6 % (range, 0 %-3.6 %) and ≤ 3.2 % (range, 0 %-3.2 %), respectively. During up to 7 years of open-label adjunctive cenobamate treatment, exposure-adjusted incidence rates of cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs were < 0.018 and < 0.038 events per patient-year, respectively. Discontinuation of adjunctive cenobamate due to cognitive or psychiatric TEAEs assessed in this study during double-blind or open-label treatment occurred in ≤ 0.3 % and ≤ 1.7 % of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs were reported by similar numbers of cenobamate- and placebo-treated patients during double-blind adjunctive cenobamate treatment (< 4 % of patients), and exposure-adjusted incidence rates of these TEAEs remained low during open-label cenobamate treatment for up to 7 years. Treatment discontinuations due to these TEAEs were rare. The results of this post-hoc analysis indicate that adjunctive cenobamate treatment exhibits a low incidence of cognitive or psychiatric TEAEs in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Krauss
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Steve S Chung
- Neuroscience Institute, Banner-University Medical Center, 755 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006.
| | - Louis Ferrari
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA.
| | - Sean Stern
- SK Life Science, Inc., 461 From Road, Fifth Floor, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA.
| | - William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, 11134 Conway Road, St. Louis, MO 63131, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Catalán‐Aguilar J, Hampel KG, Cano‐López I, Garcés M, Lozano‐García A, Tormos‐Pons P, González‐Bono E, Villanueva V. Prospective study of cenobamate on cognition, affectivity, and quality of life in focal epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:223-235. [PMID: 37920923 PMCID: PMC10839366 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cenobamate is a recently approved antiseizure medication that proved to be safe and effective in randomized controlled trials. However, little is known about its impact on some areas frequently affected by epilepsy. For this reason, we explored the effects of cenobamate on cognitive performance, as well as on negative affectivity and quality of life in a sample of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS Two prospective cohort studies were carried out. In Study 1, 32 patients (22 men and 10 women) underwent a baseline (T0) and a short-term (T1) neuropsychological assessment after 3 months of cenobamate administration. In Study 2, 22 patients (16 men and 6 women) from the T1 sample also underwent a baseline and a follow-up evaluation (T2) 6 months after T0. RESULTS No significant differences were found in cognitive variables, negative affectivity, and quality of life either in Study 1 or Study 2. Similarly, based on the reliable change index, it was found that most patients showed no changes in these variables. SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest that cenobamate is a safe antiseizure medication in terms of cognition, negative affectivity, or quality of life since no adverse events have been found after 3 and 6 months of treatment. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Cenobamate is a new antiseizure medication. In patients with epilepsy, cenobamate seems to not affect cognition, anxiety, depression, or quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Catalán‐Aguilar
- Institut d'Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (Idocal)/Department of Psychobiology, Psychology CenterUniversitat de València. Av. Blasco IbáñezValenciaSpain
| | - Kevin G. Hampel
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Member of ERN EPICAREHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. Av. Fernando Abril MartorellValenciaSpain
| | - Irene Cano‐López
- Institut d'Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (Idocal)/Department of Psychobiology, Psychology CenterUniversitat de València. Av. Blasco IbáñezValenciaSpain
| | - Mercedes Garcés
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Member of ERN EPICAREHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. Av. Fernando Abril MartorellValenciaSpain
| | - Alejandro Lozano‐García
- Faculty of Health SciencesValencian International UniversityValenciaSpain
- Department of PsychologyUniversidad Europea de ValenciaValenciaSpain
- Faculty of Health SciencesUniversidad Isabel IBurgosSpain
| | - Paula Tormos‐Pons
- Institut d'Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (Idocal)/Department of Psychobiology, Psychology CenterUniversitat de València. Av. Blasco IbáñezValenciaSpain
| | - Esperanza González‐Bono
- Institut d'Investigació en Psicologia dels Recursos Humans, del Desenvolupament Organitzacional i de la Qualitat de Vida Laboral (Idocal)/Department of Psychobiology, Psychology CenterUniversitat de València. Av. Blasco IbáñezValenciaSpain
| | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Member of ERN EPICAREHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. Av. Fernando Abril MartorellValenciaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Serrano-Castro PJ, Ramírez-García T, Cabezudo-Garcia P, Garcia-Martin G, De La Parra J. Effect of Cenobamate on Cognition in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy with Focal Onset Seizures: An Exploratory Study. CNS Drugs 2024; 38:141-151. [PMID: 38265735 PMCID: PMC10881647 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01063-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Most second and third generation antiseizure medications (ASMs) are associated with cognitive adverse events, which are a major concern for patients. However, the profile of cognitive adverse events differs between ASMs. This study investigated the effects of cenobamate on cognition in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) within the Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP). METHODS This was a retrospective, observational study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, DRE with focal seizures, and availability of cognition assessments and EAP authorization. Data were sourced from the clinical records of patients who took part in the Spanish cenobamate EAP. Primary endpoints included cognition (based on 20 neuropsychological outcomes, including verbal and visuospatial episodic memory, verbal fluency, executive function, working memory, attention, and speed of processing), seizure frequency, and concomitant antiseizure medication (ASM) usage at 6 months. RESULTS The study included 20 patients; 10 patients (50%) had daily seizures, 7 (35%) had weekly seizures and 3 (15%) had monthly seizures. The median number of prior antiseizure medications (ASMs) and concomitant ASMs were 10 and 3, respectively. Mean cenobamate doses were 12.5 mg/day at baseline and 191.2 mg/day at 6 months. There was a statistically significant improvement in cognitive scores between baseline and 6 months for two measures of verbal episodic memory (p = 0.0056 and p = 0.0013) and one measure of visuospatial episodic memory (p = 0.011), and a significant worsening in cognitive score for attention (p = 0.030). At 6 months, 14 patients (70%) had a ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency, 3 patients (15%) had a ≥ 90% reduction, and 1 patient (5%) was seizure free. There were significant decreases in the mean number of concomitant ASMs (p = 0.0009), the sum of the ratios of prescribing daily dose/daily defined dose (total ratio of DDD) for concomitant ASMs (p < 0.0001), and concomitant ASM drug load (p = 0.038) between baseline and 6 months. Total ratio of DDD was significantly lower at 6 months for perampanel (p = 0.0016), benzodiazepines (p = 0.035), and sodium channel blockers (p = 0.0005) compared with baseline. Based on analysis of covariance, cognitive tests related to verbal or visuospatial episodic memory (e.g., RT of FCSRT, or ROCFT), executive functions (e.g., TMT-B), and processing speed (some 5-Digit Test subtests) appeared to be closely related to the reduction in pharmacological burden rather than the improvement in seizure control. CONCLUSIONS Significant improvements in cognition, seizure frequency, and concomitant ASM usage were observed after the introduction of cenobamate in patients with DRE in a real-world setting. Covariance analysis supports the reduction in concomitant ASMs as the most important factor driving cognitive improvements with cenobamate. As this was an exploratory study with an uncontrolled, retrospective design and a low number of patients, further studies are required to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro J Serrano-Castro
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA-Plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain.
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Avenida Carlos Haya, S/N, Pabellon B, 4º Planta, CP: 24010, Málaga, Spain.
- Departamento de Medicina y Dermatología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
- Red Andaluza de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional (Neuro-RECA), Málaga, Spain.
| | - Teresa Ramírez-García
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA-Plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain
- Red Andaluza de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional (Neuro-RECA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Pablo Cabezudo-Garcia
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA-Plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Avenida Carlos Haya, S/N, Pabellon B, 4º Planta, CP: 24010, Málaga, Spain
- Red Andaluza de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional (Neuro-RECA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Guillermina Garcia-Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA-Plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Avenida Carlos Haya, S/N, Pabellon B, 4º Planta, CP: 24010, Málaga, Spain
- Red Andaluza de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional (Neuro-RECA), Málaga, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Leo A, Bosco F, Guarnieri L, De Sarro C, Rania V, Gallelli L, Citraro R, De Sarro G. Cenobamate enhances the anticonvulsant effect of other antiseizure medications in the DBA/2 mouse model of reflex epilepsy. Eur J Pharmacol 2024; 962:176222. [PMID: 38029871 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Clinical studies documented that cenobamate (CNB) has a marked efficacy compared to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) in reducing focal seizures. To date, different aspects of CNB need to be clarified, including its efficacy against generalized seizures. Similarly, the pattern of drug-drug interactions between CNB and other ASMs also compels further investigation. This study aimed to detect the role of CNB on generalized seizures using the DBA/2 mouse model. We have also studied the effects of an adjunctive CNB treatment on the antiseizure properties of some ASMs against reflex seizures. The effects of this adjunctive treatment on motor performance, body temperature, and brain levels of ASMs were also evaluated. CNB was able to antagonize seizures in DBA/2 mice. CNB, at 5 mg/kg, enhanced the antiseizure activity of ASMs, such as diazepam, clobazam, levetiracetam, perampanel, phenobarbital, topiramate, and valproate. No synergistic effects were observed when CNB was co-administered with some Na+ channel blockers. The increase in antiseizure activity was associated with a comparable intensification in motor impairment; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of ASMs with CNB was more favorable than the combination with vehicle except for carbamazepine, phenytoin, and oxcarbazepine. Since CNB did not significantly influence the brain levels of the ASMs studied, we suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions seem not probable. Overall, this study shows the ability of CNB to counteract generalized reflex seizures in mice. Moreover, our data documented an evident synergistic antiseizure effect for the combination of CNB with ASMs including phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, valproate, perampanel, topiramate, and levetiracetam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Leo
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; System and Applied Pharmacology@University Magna Grecia, Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesca Bosco
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Lorenza Guarnieri
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Caterina De Sarro
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Rania
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Luca Gallelli
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; System and Applied Pharmacology@University Magna Grecia, Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rita Citraro
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; System and Applied Pharmacology@University Magna Grecia, Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Giovambattista De Sarro
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; System and Applied Pharmacology@University Magna Grecia, Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hullett PW, Lowenstein DH. Major advances in epilepsy research in 2023. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:19-20. [PMID: 38101887 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00457-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick W Hullett
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Daniel H Lowenstein
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pietrafusa N, Falcicchio G, Russo E, Lattanzi S, Goffredo B, Simeoli R, Cairoli S, Corsetti T, Roberti R, De Tommaso M, Vigevano F, La Neve A, Specchio N. Cenobamate as add-on therapy for drug resistant epilepsies: effectiveness, drug to drug interactions and neuropsychological impact. What have we learned from real word evidence? Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1239152. [PMID: 38186643 PMCID: PMC10768012 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1239152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Cenobamate (CNB) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved in 2021 in Europe for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults who were not adequately controlled with at least two previous ASMs. Methods: seizure outcome, treatment-emergent adverse events, neuropsychological profile, and blood levels of CNB and concomitant ASM were analyzed in a real world setting in two different Italian epilepsy centers in the context of CNB early access program. All patients performed a general cognitive evaluation, while 32 patients underwent the administration of a battery of neuropsychological tests at baseline and 6 months after CNB treatment. We performed CNB quantification in plasma in 31 patients at different doses in the range of 100-400 mg/day (65 measures). Results: we enrolled 54 patients with a median age of 27.9 years. The mean follow-up was 10.7 months. Most (91%) completed the efficacy analysis. At last follow-up visit, a 69.5% median seizure reduction was registered. Thirty-two patients (59.2%) had a ≥50% reduction of seizures that was ≥75% in 20 (42.0%) cases, whilst 10 (20.2%) patients were seizure-free. The most common adverse events were somnolence (53.1%), dizziness (28.1%) and diplopia (12.5%). The correlation between CNB dose and plasma concentration, revealed a significant linear correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001), and there was a significant difference in mean plasma concentration/dose administered ratio (C/D ratio) between patients taking or not at least one inducer (0.10 ± 0.04 [(μg/mL)/(mg/day)]; n = 47 vs. 0.13 ± 0.05 [(μg/mL)/(mg/day)]; n = 18, p = 0.04). CNB dose was inversely correlated (r = -0.31, p = 0.02) to the C/D ratio of Carbamazepine blood levels. and positively correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) with an increased plasma concentration of the active Clobazam metabolite N-desmethylclobazam. General Anxiety Disorder-7 showed a significant improvement of score from baseline evaluation of 6.82 to follow-up 6 months evaluation of 4.53 (p = 0.03). Conclusion: In this real-world study, we registered a clinically meaningful reduction in seizure frequency after CNB administration in most patients along with a good tolerability profile. CNB treatment is correlate to a reduction in symptom severity of anxiety score. Plasma levels measurements confirm that CNB acts both as "victim" and as "perpetrator" of drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Pietrafusa
- Clinical and Experimental Neurology, Full Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Falcicchio
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Emilio Russo
- Science of Health Department, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Bianca Goffredo
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Simeoli
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Cairoli
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Drug Biology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Corsetti
- Hospital Pharmacy Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Roberti
- Science of Health Department, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marina De Tommaso
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Federico Vigevano
- Head of Neurological Sciences and Rehabilitation Medicine Scientific Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Specchio
- Clinical and Experimental Neurology, Full Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schmitz B, Lattanzi S, Vonck K, Kälviäinen R, Nashef L, Ben‐Menachem E. Cenobamate in refractory epilepsy: Overview of treatment options and practical considerations. Epilepsia Open 2023; 8:1241-1255. [PMID: 37743544 PMCID: PMC10690671 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Management of drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) represents a challenge to the treating clinician. This manuscript addresses DRE and provides an overview of treatment options, medical, surgical, and dietary. It addresses treatment strategies in polytherapy, then focuses on the role cenobamate (CNB) may play in reducing the burden of DRE while providing practical advice for its introduction. CNB is a recently approved, third generation, anti-seizure medication (ASM), a tetrazole-derived carbamate, thought to have a dual mechanism of action, through its effect on sodium channels as well as on GABAA receptors at a non-benzodiazepine site. CNB, having a long half-life, is an effective add-on ASM in refractory focal epilepsy with a higher response rate and a higher seizure-freedom rate than is usually seen in regulatory clinical trials. Experience post-licensing, though still limited, supports the findings of clinical trials and is encouraging. Its spectrum of action in relation to generalized epilepsies and seizures remains to be established, and there are no data on its efficacy in monotherapy. At the time of writing, CNB has been prescribed for some 50 000 individuals with DRE and focal epilepsy. A larger number is needed to fully establish its safety profile. It should at all times be introduced slowly to minimize the risk of serious allergic drug reactions. It has clinically meaningful interactions which must be anticipated and managed to maximize tolerability and likelihood of successful treatment. Despite the above, it may well prove to be of major benefit in the treatment of many patients with drug resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Schmitz
- Center for Epilepsy, Department for NeurologyVivantes Humboldt‐KlinikumBerlinGermany
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineMarche Polytechnic UniversityAnconaItaly
| | - Kristl Vonck
- Department of Neurology, 4BrainGhent University HospitalGentBelgium
| | - Reetta Kälviäinen
- Kuopio Epilepsy Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Member of ERN EpiCARE, and Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Lina Nashef
- Neurology DepartmentKing's College HospitalLondonUK
| | - Elinor Ben‐Menachem
- Institution for Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GoteborgGoteborgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stern S, Weingarten M, Mandapati S, Ferrari L, Wade CT. Real-world analysis of retention on cenobamate in patients with epilepsy in the United States. Epilepsy Res 2023; 197:107207. [PMID: 37741165 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective, observational study used US claims data to assess retention rates on cenobamate compared with four branded antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS Adults (≥18 years) with prevalent epilepsy (ICD-10 code G40.xx) and ≥ 1 prescription for cenobamate or any of the newer branded ASMs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, or perampanel) between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were identified from the HealthVerity Marketplace database. At least 360 days of continuous enrollment was required before and after the index date (Day 1 of initiating cenobamate or branded ASM). Patients were followed until cessation of cenobamate or branded ASM or the end of data collection using Kaplan-Meier methods. Retention was compared between cenobamate and the branded ASMs (both as a group and individually) using Chi-square tests. RESULTS In total, 4109 patients were included (195 cenobamate; 3914 branded ASMs). A higher proportion of patients in the cenobamate group compared with the branded ASMs group had concurrent focal and generalized epilepsy (65.6% vs 40.0%) and were on ≥ 3 concomitant ASMs (48.2% vs 12.8%) at the index date. Median time to discontinuation (i.e., the time that half the patients discontinued) was not quite reached after 12 months in the cenobamate group (50.3% of patients remained on cenobamate) and was 7.7 months in the branded ASMs group. Retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs the branded ASMs group (p = 0.04545) and vs the individual ASMs lacosamide (p = 0.03044) and perampanel (p = 0.01558). Twelve-month retention rates (95% confidence intervals) were 50.3% (43.1%-57.0%) for cenobamate, 40.5% (38.9%-42.0%) for branded ASMs overall, 42.3% (38.6%-46.0%) for brivaracetam, 44.1% (39.2%-49.0%) for eslicarbazepine, 39.9% (38.0%-41.8%) for lacosamide, and 36.8% (31.9%-41.8%) for perampanel. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world analysis, retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs a pooled group of four branded ASMs despite a greater frequency of patients in the cenobamate group having characteristics of more difficult-to-treat epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Stern
- SK Life Science, Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aungaroon G. Cenobamate: Real-World Experience Matches Clinical Trials. Epilepsy Curr 2023; 23:348-350. [PMID: 38269341 PMCID: PMC10805087 DOI: 10.1177/15357597231197105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Adjunctive Cenobamate in Highly Active and Ultra-Refractory Focal Epilepsy: A “Real-World” Retrospective Study Pena-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Munteanu T, Doyle M, Colleran N, Liggan B, Breen A, Murphy S, El-Naggar H, Widdess-Walsh P, Delanty N. Epilepsia . 2023;64(5):1225-1235. doi:10.1111/epi.17549 Objective: Recent clinical trials have shown that cenobamate substantially improves seizure control in focal-onset drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, little is known about cenobamate’s performance in highly active (≥20 seizures/month) and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy (≥6 failed epilepsy treatments, including antiseizure medications [ASMs], epilepsy surgery, and vagus nerve stimulation). Here, we studied cenobamate’s efficacy and tolerability in a “real-world” severe DRE cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adults treated with cenobamate between October 2020 and September 2022. All patients received cenobamate through an Early Access Program. Cenobamate retention, seizure outcomes, treatment-emergent adverse events, and adjustments to concomitant ASMs were analyzed. Results: Fifty-seven patients received cenobamate for at least 3 months (median duration, 11 months). The median cenobamate dose was 250 mg/day (range 75–350 mg). Baseline demographics were consistent with highly active (median seizure frequency, 60/month) and ultra-refractory epilepsy (median previously failed ASMs, nine). Most (87.8%) had prior epilepsy surgery and/or vagus nerve stimulation. Six patients stopped cenobamate due to lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. One patient died from factors unrelated to cenobamate. Among patients who continued cenobamate, three achieved seizure freedom (5.3% of cohort), 24 had a 75%–99% reduction in seizures (42.1% of cohort), and 16 had a 50%–74% reduction (28.1% of cohort). Cenobamate led to abolition of focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures in 55.6% (20/36) of patients. Among treatment responders, 67.4% (29/43) were treated with cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Three-fourths of patients reported at least one side-effect, most commonly fatigue and somnolence. Adverse events most commonly emerged at cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Side-effects were partially manageable by reducing the overall ASM burden, most often clobazam, eslicarbazepine, and perampanel. Significance: Patients with highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy experienced meaningful seizure outcomes on cenobamate. Emergence of adverse events at doses above 250 mg/day may limit the potential for further improvements in seizure control at higher cenobamate doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gewalin Aungaroon
- Department of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Makridis KL, Kaindl AM. Real-world experience with cenobamate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Seizure 2023; 112:1-10. [PMID: 37713961 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite many new ASM, the rate of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has not changed. Cenobamate (CNB) is a novel ASM for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults with high seizure freedom rates in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Although CNB appears to be effective, it is not commonly prescribed to patients with DRE, resulting in a lack of "real-world data". METHODS To evaluate the real-world effect of CNB and to assess the generalizability of RCT data, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random intercept logistic regression model. RESULTS The analysis included seven studies with a total of 229 patients with DRE, 77.3 % of whom were adults and 91.5 % had focal-onset seizures. Seizure reduction >50 % was achieved in 68 % of patients [54.54; 79.07], with seizure freedom in 16.2 % [8.38; 28.97]. There was no difference between pediatric and adult patients. CNB was discontinued in 10 % [6.74; 14.6] of patients, mostly due to lack of efficacy (39 %) or adverse effects (AE, 43 %). AE, observed in 57.3 % [39.7; 73.2] of patients, included fatigue and vertigo. A comparison of the rates calculated in this meta-analysis to the active arm of equivalent RCTs revealed no significant difference. CONCLUSION CNB achieves a good treatment response in patients with DRE in real-world settings, like the effect reported in RCTs. The high heterogeneity between studies calls for studies focusing on specific DRE subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin L Makridis
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Epilepsy Center for Children and Adolescents, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Angela M Kaindl
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Epilepsy Center for Children and Adolescents, Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ben-Menachem E, Schmitz B, Kälviäinen R, Thomas RH, Klein P. The burden of chronic drug-refractory focal onset epilepsy: Can it be prevented? Epilepsy Behav 2023; 148:109435. [PMID: 37748414 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Despite the many therapeutic options for epilepsy available today, a third of patients still have poorly controlled epilepsy. Over the years, their transition through lines of treatment exposes them to increased risk of disease progression, mortality, morbidity, mental distress, and not least significantly impaired quality of life (QoL). The present review explores the multiple factors contributing to the impairment of health-related QoL in PWE-including both seizure-related and non seizure-related. The analysis aims to identify potential areas of intervention and strategies for a more holistic approach to epilepsy care and inform policy-makers and healthcare providers in their approach to this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bettina Schmitz
- Neurology/Center for Epilepsy, Stroke Unit and Neurological Rehabilitation, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Rhys H Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, United Kingdom; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
| | - Pavel Klein
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Boston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Becker DA, Demko SA. Dose reduction and discontinuation of concomitant antiseizure medications after initiating cenobamate: A retrospective review. Epilepsy Res 2023; 197:107242. [PMID: 37871541 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
This retrospective chart review examined dose reductions and discontinuations of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) following cenobamate initiation and maintenance in patients with epilepsy treated at MetroHealth (Cleveland, OH) between 9/1/2020-9/26/2022. Concomitant ASM dose adjustments and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Efficacy (100 % seizure reduction) was examined among patients who received cenobamate for ≥ 3 months at data cutoff (including titration). As of 9/26/2022, 95 patients received cenobamate (mean age, 45.9 years; 48.4 % female, median exposure 7.5 months). Five patients (5.3 %) discontinued (n = 1 withdrawal by patient; n = 1 noncompliance; n = 3 adverse event). Among the 90 patients taking cenobamate at data cutoff, 50 % (45/90) discontinued ≥ 1 concomitant ASM, most commonly clobazam (n = 18), levetiracetam (n = 10), and phenytoin (n = 7); 21 patients (23.3 %) had additional concomitant ASM dose reductions, most commonly phenytoin (n = 6) and clobazam (n = 4). Sixteen patients received cenobamate monotherapy. Among 79 patients who received cenobamate for ≥ 3 months at data cutoff, 51.9 % (41/79) were seizure-free for ≥ 3 months. Of the 41 seizure-free patients, 58.5 % (24/41) were taking 100 mg/day of cenobamate. Sixteen of the 95 cenobamate-treated patients (16.8 %) reported 22 TEAEs. The most common TEAE was fatigue (n = 7). These data suggest that cenobamate therapy may allow reduction or elimination of polytherapy in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle A Becker
- MetroHealth, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA; Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Sarah A Demko
- MetroHealth, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vossler DG, Rosenfeld WE, Stern S, Wade CT, Ferrari L, Kerr WT, Wechsler R. Sustainability of seizure reduction and seizure control with adjunctive cenobamate: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3, open-label study. Epilepsia 2023; 64:2644-2652. [PMID: 37497579 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this post hoc analysis of a subset of patients from a long-term, open-label phase 3 study, we assessed ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure reduction and sustainability of these responses with cenobamate using a time-to-event analytical approach. METHODS Of 240 patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who had adequate seizure data available, 214 completed the 12-week titration phase and received ≥1 dose of cenobamate in the maintenance phase (max dose 400 mg/day) and were included in this post hoc analysis. Among patients who met an initial given seizure-reduction level (≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100%), sustainability of that response was measured using a time-to-event methodology. An event was defined as the occurrence of a study visit at which the seizure frequency during the interval since the prior study visit exceeded the initially attained reduction level. Study visits during the maintenance phase occurred at 3-month intervals. RESULTS Of the 214 patients analyzed, 188 (88%), 177 (83%), 160 (75%), and 145 (68%) met ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure-reduction responses, respectively, for at least one study visit interval during the maintenance phase. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to first visit without a ≥50% seizure reduction was not reached by 30 months of follow-up (53% of patients maintained their initial ≥50% seizure reduction). Median (95% CI) time to first visit without sustaining the initial ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% seizure reduction was 13.0 (7.5-21.9) months, 7.5 (5.4-11.6) months, and 7.0 (5.3-10.4) months, respectively. Among the 145 patients who had 100% seizure reduction during at least one study visit, 22% remained seizure-free for at least 30 months and 63% had ≤3 study visits with seizures. SIGNIFICANCE Adjunctive treatment with cenobamate led to sustained seizure reductions during the maintenance phase of the phase 3 safety study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Vossler
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sean Stern
- SK Life Science Inc., Paramus, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | - Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert Wechsler
- Consultants in Epilepsy & Neurology and Idaho Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mesraoua B, Brigo F, Lattanzi S, Abou-Khalil B, Al Hail H, Asadi-Pooya AA. Drug-resistant epilepsy: Definition, pathophysiology, and management. J Neurol Sci 2023; 452:120766. [PMID: 37597343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
There are currently >51 million people with epilepsy (PWE) in the world and every year >4.9 million people develop new-onset epilepsy. The cornerstone of treatment in PWE is drug therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, about one-third of PWE do not achieve seizure control and do not respond well to drug therapy despite the use of appropriate ASMs [drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE)]. The aims of the current narrative review are to discuss the definition of DRE, explain the biological underpinnings and clinical biomarkers of this condition, and finally to suggest practical management strategies to tackle this issue appropriately, in a concise manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boulenouar Mesraoua
- Neurosciences Department, Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Francesco Brigo
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Hassan Al Hail
- Neurosciences Department, Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Ali A Asadi-Pooya
- Epilepsy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ghosh S, Sinha JK, Ghosh S, Sharma H, Bhaskar R, Narayanan KB. A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends and Innovative Therapies in Epilepsy Management. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1305. [PMID: 37759906 PMCID: PMC10527076 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is a complex neurological disorder affecting millions worldwide, with a substantial number of patients facing drug-resistant epilepsy. This comprehensive review explores innovative therapies for epilepsy management, focusing on their principles, clinical evidence, and potential applications. Traditional antiseizure medications (ASMs) form the cornerstone of epilepsy treatment, but their limitations necessitate alternative approaches. The review delves into cutting-edge therapies such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), highlighting their mechanisms of action and promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, the potential of gene therapies and optogenetics in epilepsy research is discussed, revealing groundbreaking findings that shed light on seizure mechanisms. Insights into cannabidiol (CBD) and the ketogenic diet as adjunctive therapies further broaden the spectrum of epilepsy management. Challenges in achieving seizure control with traditional therapies, including treatment resistance and individual variability, are addressed. The importance of staying updated with emerging trends in epilepsy management is emphasized, along with the hope for improved therapeutic options. Future research directions, such as combining therapies, AI applications, and non-invasive optogenetics, hold promise for personalized and effective epilepsy treatment. As the field advances, collaboration among researchers of natural and synthetic biochemistry, clinicians from different streams and various forms of medicine, and patients will drive progress toward better seizure control and a higher quality of life for individuals living with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shampa Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
- ICMR—National Institute of Nutrition, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500007, India
| | | | - Soumya Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
| | | | - Rakesh Bhaskar
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| | - Kannan Badri Narayanan
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Cell Culture, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Villanueva V, Santos‐Carrasco D, Cabezudo‐García P, Gómez‐Ibáñez A, Garcés M, Serrano‐Castro P, Castro‐Vilanova MD, Sayas D, Lopez‐Gonzalez FJ, Rodríguez‐Osorio X, Torres‐Gaona G, Saiz‐Diaz RA, Hampel KG, Martinez‐Ferri M, Aguilar‐Amat MJ, Mercedes‐Alvarez B, García‐Morales V, del Villar‐Igea A, Massot‐Tarrús A, Rodríguez‐Uranga JJ. Real-world safety and effectiveness of cenobamate in patients with focal onset seizures: Outcomes from an Expanded Access Program. Epilepsia Open 2023; 8:918-929. [PMID: 37149853 PMCID: PMC10472366 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated early, real-world outcomes with cenobamate (CNB) in a large series of patients with highly drug-resistant epilepsy within a Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP). METHOD This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study in 14 hospitals. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, focal seizures, and EAP authorization. Data were sourced from patient clinical records. Primary effectiveness endpoints included reductions (100%, ≥90%, ≥75%, and ≥50%) or worsening in seizure frequency at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits and at the last visit. Safety endpoints included rates of adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation. RESULTS The study included 170 patients. At baseline, median epilepsy duration was 26 years and median number of seizures/month was 11.3. The median number of prior antiseizure medications (ASMs) and concomitant ASMs were 12 and 3, respectively. Mean CNB dosages/day were 176 mg, 200 mg, and 250 mg at 3, 6, and 12 months. Retention rates were 98.2%, 94.5%, and 87% at 3, 6, and 12 months. At last available visit, the rate of seizure freedom was 13.3%; ≥90%, ≥75%, and ≥50% responder rates were 27.9%, 45.5%, and 63%, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the number of seizures per month (mean: 44.6%; median: 66.7%) between baseline and the last visit (P < 0.001). Responses were maintained regardless of the number of prior or concomitant ASMs. The number of concomitant ASMs was reduced in 44.7% of patients. The cumulative percentage of patients with AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were 68.2% and 3.5% at 3 months, 74.1% and 4.1% at 6 months, and 74.1% and 4.1% at 12 months. The most frequent AEs were somnolence and dizziness. SIGNIFICANCE In this highly refractory population, CNB showed a high response regardless of prior and concomitant ASMs. AEs were frequent but mostly mild-to-moderate, and few led to discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Villanueva
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Member of EPICAREValenciaSpain
| | - Daniel Santos‐Carrasco
- Centro Neurología AvanzadaSevillaSpain
- Departamento de Psicología ExperimentalUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
| | | | | | - Mercedes Garcés
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Member of EPICAREValenciaSpain
| | | | | | - Débora Sayas
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Member of EPICAREValenciaSpain
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin G. Hampel
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Member of EPICAREValenciaSpain
| | | | - Maria J. Aguilar‐Amat
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz—IdiPAZMadridSpain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Perucca E, Bialer M, White HS. New GABA-Targeting Therapies for the Treatment of Seizures and Epilepsy: I. Role of GABA as a Modulator of Seizure Activity and Recently Approved Medications Acting on the GABA System. CNS Drugs 2023; 37:755-779. [PMID: 37603262 PMCID: PMC10501955 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01027-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the most prevalent inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain and has been found to play an important role in the pathogenesis or the expression of many neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Although GABA can act on different receptor subtypes, the component of the GABA system that is most critical to modulation of seizure activity is the GABAA-receptor-chloride (Cl-) channel complex, which controls the movement of Cl- ions across the neuronal membrane. In the mature brain, binding of GABA to GABAA receptors evokes a hyperpolarising (anticonvulsant) response, which is mediated by influx of Cl- into the cell driven by its concentration gradient between extracellular and intracellular fluid. However, in the immature brain and under certain pathological conditions, GABA can exert a paradoxical depolarising (proconvulsant) effect as a result of an efflux of chloride from high intracellular to lower extracellular Cl- levels. Extensive preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that alterations in GABAergic inhibition caused by drugs, toxins, gene defects or other disease states (including seizures themselves) play a causative or contributing role in facilitating or maintaning seizure activity. Conversely, enhancement of GABAergic transmission through pharmacological modulation of the GABA system is a major mechanism by which different antiseizure medications exert their therapeutic effect. In this article, we review the pharmacology and function of the GABA system and its perturbation in seizure disorders, and highlight how improved understanding of this system offers opportunities to develop more efficacious and better tolerated antiseizure medications. We also review the available data for the two most recently approved antiseizure medications that act, at least in part, through GABAergic mechanisms, namely cenobamate and ganaxolone. Differences in the mode of drug discovery, pharmacological profile, pharmacokinetic properties, drug-drug interaction potential, and clinical efficacy and tolerability of these agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Perucca
- Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Melbourne Brain Centre, 245 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
| | - Meir Bialer
- Institute of Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- David R. Bloom Center for Pharmacy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - H Steve White
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vashi V, Rosenfeld WE, Ferrari L, Kamin M. Pharmacokinetics of cenobamate as monotherapy compared with adjunctive therapy. Epilepsy Res 2023; 195:107185. [PMID: 37429218 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cenobamate was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on studies of adjunctive therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. To support the use of cenobamate monotherapy, this pharmacokinetic (PK)-based simulation analysis evaluated the predicted PK exposure of cenobamate when used as monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy. METHODS A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of cenobamate was developed using pooled human data from eight phase 1 studies in healthy subjects or special populations, and three phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with focal seizures (N = 960). Concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) with a statistically significant effect on the apparent systemic clearance (CL/F) of cenobamate in the PopPK model were used to compare simulated patient plasma exposures (area under the plasma concentration vs time curve [AUC]) following monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy. Treatment equivalence between monotherapy and adjunctive therapy was concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean AUC ratio was within 0.8-1.25. RESULTS In the PopPK model, statistically significant effects on cenobamate CL/F were shown for clobazam (decreased cenobamate CL/F by 19%) and carbamazepine (increased cenobamate CL/F by 15%); these differences were not considered clinically meaningful. Other ASMs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproate) when coadministered with cenobamate did not have significant effects on the disposition (ie, PK or efficacy) of cenobamate. The geometric mean ratio (90% CIs) of cenobamate AUC for adjunctive therapy/monotherapy was 0.87 (0.816-0.925) for adjunctive carbamazepine and 1.24 (1.147-1.339) for adjunctive clobazam. The 90% CI was within the no-effect limits (90% CIs 0.8-1.25) for adjunctive carbamazepine and partially exceeding no-effect limits for adjunctive clobazam. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results from this PopPK analysis, cenobamate monotherapy can be expected to result in comparable exposures to those that have been demonstrated to be safe and effective when used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures, supporting the use of cenobamate as monotherapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rissardo JP, Vora N, Mathew B, Kashyap V, Muhammad S, Fornari Caprara AL. Overview of Movement Disorders Secondary to Drugs. Clin Pract 2023; 13:959-976. [PMID: 37623268 PMCID: PMC10453030 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13040087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug-induced movement disorders affect a significant percentage of individuals, and they are commonly overlooked and underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Many comorbidities can affect these individuals, making the diagnosis even more challenging. Several variables, including genetics, environmental factors, and aging, can play a role in the pathophysiology of these conditions. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) are the most commonly used classification systems in categorizing drug-induced movement disorders. This literature review aims to describe the abnormal movements associated with some medications and illicit drugs. Myoclonus is probably the most poorly described movement disorder, in which most of the reports do not describe electrodiagnostic studies. Therefore, the information available is insufficient for the diagnosis of the neuroanatomical source of myoclonus. Drug-induced parkinsonism is rarely adequately evaluated but should be assessed with radiotracers when these techniques are available. Tardive dyskinesias and dyskinesias encompass various abnormal movements, including chorea, athetosis, and ballism. Some authors include a temporal relationship to define tardive syndromes for other movement disorders, such as dystonia, tremor, and ataxia. Antiseizure medications and antipsychotics are among the most thoroughly described drug classes associated with movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nilofar Vora
- Medicine Department, Terna Speciality Hospital and Research Centre, Navi Mumbai 400706, India;
| | - Bejoi Mathew
- Medicine Department, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar Karnataka 563101, India;
| | - Vikas Kashyap
- Medicine Department, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi 110029, India;
| | - Sara Muhammad
- Neurology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55906, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Melnick SM, Shin Y, Glenn KJ. Anticonvulsant effects of cenobamate in chemically and electrically induced seizure models in rodents. Heliyon 2023; 9:e18920. [PMID: 37636350 PMCID: PMC10457417 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication used to treat partial-onset (focal) seizures. It is a molecule with one chiral center and a unique dual mechanism of action: enhancement of fast and slow inactivation of sodium channels with preferential inhibition of the persistent current and positive allosteric modulation of GABAA receptor-mediated ion channels. Aims/Methods Anticonvulsant effects of cenobamate (YKP3089; R-enantiomer), YKP3090 (S-enantiomer), and YKP1983 (racemate) were evaluated in chemically and electrically induced focal and generalized seizure models in rodents. The Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rat from Strasbourg (GAERS) model examined the effect of cenobamate on spike-wave seizures. Motor coordination was assessed with rotarod tests and minimal motor impairment exams. Results Early in development, cenobamate was found to have activity in focal and generalized seizure models in animals and was selected for continued development. Cenobamate prevented seizures in a dose-dependent manner, prevented seizure spread, and increased seizure threshold without potentiating seizure initiation or the development of tolerance to its anticonvulsant effects. In contrast, YKP3090 and YKP1983 were only effective against generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Cenobamate also protected mice from 6 Hz psychomotor-induced seizures. Cenobamate showed significant dose-dependent reductions in the number and cumulative duration of spike-and-wave discharges in the GAERS model. Discussion Cenobamate showed efficacy or efficacy signals in all animal models of epilepsy tested with a favorable risk-versus-benefit ratio, supporting its clinical use in the treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures in adults and warranting further clinical research in generalized seizures and absence seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yujin Shin
- SK Biopharmaceuticals, Co., Ltd., Seongnam, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rosenfeld WE, Ferrari L, Kerr WT, Sperling MR. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy during cenobamate clinical development. Epilepsia 2023; 64:2108-2115. [PMID: 37219391 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed mortality, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) among adults treated with cenobamate during the cenobamate clinical development program. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed deaths among all adults with uncontrolled focal (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic [FBTC], focal impaired awareness, focal aware) or primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures who received ≥1 dose of adjunctive cenobamate in completed and ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical studies. In patients with focal seizures from completed studies, median baseline seizure frequencies ranged from 2.8 to 11 seizures per 28 days and median epilepsy duration ranged from 20 to 24 years. Total person-years included all days that a patient received cenobamate during completed studies or up to June 1, 2022, for ongoing studies. All deaths were evaluated by two epileptologists. All-cause mortality and SUDEP rates were expressed per 1000 person-years. RESULTS A total of 2132 patients (n = 2018 focal epilepsy; n = 114 idiopathic generalized epilepsy) were exposed to cenobamate for 5693 person-years. Approximately 60% of patients with focal seizures and all patients in the PGTC study had tonic-clonic seizures. A total of 23 deaths occurred (all in patients with focal epilepsy), for an all-cause mortality rate of 4.0 per 1000 person-years. Five cases of definite or probable SUDEP were identified, for a rate of .88 per 1000 person-years. Of the 23 overall deaths, 22 patients (96%) had FBTC seizures, and all 5 of the SUDEP patients had a history of FBTC seizures. The duration of exposure to cenobamate for patients with SUDEP ranged from 130 to 620 days. The SMR among cenobamate-treated patients in completed studies (5515 person-years of follow-up) was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] .84-2.0), which was not significantly different from the general population. SIGNIFICANCE These data suggest that effective long-term medical treatment with cenobamate may reduce excess mortality associated with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Rosenfeld
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Wesley T Kerr
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael R Sperling
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rissardo JP, Fornari Caprara AL. Cenobamate (YKP3089) and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1389. [PMID: 37629678 PMCID: PMC10456719 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Cenobamate (CNB), ([(R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl], is a novel tetrazole alkyl carbamate derivative. In November 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved Xcopri®, marketed by SK Life Science Inc., (Paramus, NJ, USA) for adult focal seizures. The European Medicines Agency approved Ontozry® by Arvelle Therapeutics Netherlands B.V.(Amsterdam, The Neatherlands) in March 2021. Cenobamate is a medication that could potentially change the perspectives regarding the management and prognosis of refractory epilepsy. In this way, this study aims to review the literature on CNB's pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. CNB is a highly effective drug in managing focal onset seizures, with more than twenty percent of individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy achieving seizure freedom. This finding is remarkable in the antiseizure medication literature. The mechanism of action of CNB is still poorly understood, but it is associated with transient and persistent sodium currents and GABAergic neurotransmission. In animal studies, CNB showed sustained efficacy and potency in the 6 Hz test regardless of the stimulus intensity. CNB was revealed to be the most cost-effective drug among different third-generation antiseizure medications. Also, CNB could have neuroprotective effects. However, there are still concerns regarding its potential for abuse and suicidality risk, which future studies should clearly assess, after which protocols should be changed. The major drawback of CNB therapy is the slow and complex titration and maintenance phases preventing the wide use of this new agent in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamir Pitton Rissardo
- Medicine Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil;
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Falip M, López González FJ, Martín-Herranz I, Merino-Bohórquez V, Montoya J, Rey Gómez-Serranillos I, Rodriguez Uranga JJ, Ruiz E, Sancho-López A, Trillo Mata JL, Antoni Vallès J, Álvarez-Barón E, Sabaniego J, Subías-Labazuy S, Gil A. Value contribution of cenobamate for the treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in Spain through reflective Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Epilepsy Behav 2023; 145:109350. [PMID: 37480633 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological conditions worldwide. The main goal of its treatment is to achieve seizure freedom without intolerable adverse effects. However, despite the availability of many anti-seizure medications, including the latest options, called third-generation anti-seizure medications (ASMs), approximately 40% of people with epilepsy present drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Cenobamate is the first ASM approved in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in adult patients with DRE. In a chronic disease with a portfolio of available ASMs, the decision to introduce a new therapeutic alternative must follow a holistic evaluation of value provided. Reflective Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology allows to determine the value contribution of a treatment in a given indication considering all relevant criteria for healthcare decision-making in a transparent and systematic manner from the perspective of relevant stakeholders. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine the relative value contribution of cenobamate in the treatment of FOS in patients with DRE compared with third-generation ASMs using reflective MCDA-based methodology. METHODS A systematic literature review (combining biomedical databases and grey literature sources) was performed to populate the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking (EVIDEM) MCDA framework adapted to determine what represents value in the management of FOS in patients with DRE in Spain. The study was conducted in two phases. The first took place in 2021 with a multi-stakeholder group of eight participants. The second phase was conducted in 2022 with a multi-stakeholder group of 32 participants. Participants were trained in MCDA methodology and scored four evidence matrices (cenobamate vs. brivaracetam, vs. perampanel, vs. lacosamide and vs. eslicarbazepine acetate). Results were analyzed and discussed in a group meeting through reflective MCDA discussion methodology. RESULTS DRE is considered a very severe condition associated with many important unmet needs, mainly with regard to the lack of more effective treatments to achieve the ultimate goal of treatment. Compared to third-generation ASMs, cenobamate is perceived to have a better efficacy profile based on improvements in responder rate and seizure freedom. Regarding safety, it is considered to have a similar profile to alternatives and a positive quality-of-life profile. Cenobamate results in lower direct medical costs (excluding pharmacological) and indirect costs. Overall, cenobamate is regarded as providing a high therapeutic impact and supported by high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS Based on reflective MCDA methodology and stakeholders' experience in clinical management of epilepsy in Spain, cenobamate is perceived as a value-added option for the treatment of patients with DRE when compared with third-generation ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Javier Montoya
- Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
| | | | | | - Elías Ruiz
- Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alicia Gil
- Omakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Friedo AL, Greshake B, Makridis KL, Straub HB. Cenobamate significantly improves seizure control in intellectually disabled patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and allows drug load reduction. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1209487. [PMID: 37528853 PMCID: PMC10390252 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1209487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Epilepsy patients with intellectual disability often suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), which severely affects patients' quality of life. Cenobamate (CNB) is a recently approved novel and effective ASM that can achieve high rates of seizure freedom in previously drug-resistant patients. Methods We performed a retrospective data analysis of the first patients treated with CNB at a single center. Outcome and treatment response were assessed at two different time points, and ASM burden was calculated. Results A 12 patients (7 males and 5 females) began treatment at a median age of 43 years, six of whom had developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Prior to treatment with CNB, patients had tried a median of 13 different ASM. At the start of CNB therapy, patients were taking a median of 3 ASM. Treatment outcomes were available for 11 patients. After the first follow-up period (median 9 months), 55% of patients showed a significant seizure reduction of more than 50%, with three patients showing a reduction of more than 75% (27%). One patient achieved complete seizure freedom, while one patient did not respond to treatment. These response rates were consistently maintained at second follow-up after a median of 22 months. Ten patients (83%) reported adverse events (AE), the most common of which were dizziness and fatigue. No cases of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) were observed. The majority of AEs were mild and resolved over time. In addition, most patients were able to reduce their concomitant ASM. Discussion Cenobamate has been shown to be an effective ASM in patients with DRE and in patients with intellectual disabilities. After more than 1 year of treatment with CNB, close monitoring and management of drug-drug interactions may reduce enzyme-inducing ASMs and lead to better long-term outcomes. With CNB treatment, many patients can achieve a reduced overall drug burden while maintaining a reduction in seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Konstantin L. Makridis
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Chronically Sick Children, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Epilepsy Center for Children and Adolescents, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kerr WT, Auvin S, Van der Geyten S, Kenney C, Novak G, Fountain NB, Grzeskowiak C, French JA. Time-to-event clinical trial designs: Existing evidence and remaining concerns. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1699-1708. [PMID: 37073881 PMCID: PMC10524279 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials are critical to the development of novel treatments for epilepsy, but their design has not changed for decades. Patients, clinicians, regulators, and innovators all have concerns that recruiting for trials is challenging, in part, due to the static design of maintaining participants for long periods on add-on placebo when there are an increasing number of options for therapy. A traditional trial maintains participants on blinded treatment for a static period (e.g., 12 weeks of maintenance), during which participants on placebo have an elevated risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy compared to patients on an active treatment. Time-to-event trials observe participants on blinded treatment until a key event occurs (e.g., post-randomization seizure count matches pre-randomization monthly seizure count). In this article, we review the evidence for these designs based on re-analysis of prior trials, one published trial that used a time-to-second seizure design, and experience from an ongoing blinded trial. We also discuss remaining concerns regarding time-to-event trials. We conclude that, despite potential limitations, time-to-event trials are a potential promising mechanism to make trials more patient friendly and reduce placebo exposure, which are urgent needs to improve safety and increase recruitment to trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley T. Kerr
- Department of Neurology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stéphane Auvin
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
- Université Paris-Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale NeuroDiderot, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
| | - Serge Van der Geyten
- Janssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Gerald Novak
- Janssen Research & Development, a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Nathan B. Fountain
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Caitlin Grzeskowiak
- Research and New Therapies Program, Epilepsy Foundation of America, Maryland, USA
| | - Jacqueline A. French
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Munteanu T, Doyle M, Colleran N, Liggan B, Breen A, Murphy S, El-Naggar H, Widdess-Walsh P, Delanty N. Adjunctive cenobamate in highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy: A "real-world" retrospective study. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1225-1235. [PMID: 36790345 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent clinical trials have shown that cenobamate substantially improves seizure control in focal-onset drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, little is known about cenobamate's performance in highly active (≥20 seizures/month) and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy (≥6 failed epilepsy treatments, including antiseizure medications [ASMs], epilepsy surgery, and vagus nerve stimulation). Here, we studied cenobamate's efficacy and tolerability in a "real-world" severe DRE cohort. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adults treated with cenobamate between October 2020 and September 2022. All patients received cenobamate through an Early Access Program. Cenobamate retention, seizure outcomes, treatment-emergent adverse events, and adjustments to concomitant ASMs were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients received cenobamate for at least 3 months (median duration, 11 months). The median cenobamate dose was 250 mg/day (range 75-350 mg). Baseline demographics were consistent with highly active (median seizure frequency, 60/month) and ultra-refractory epilepsy (median previously failed ASMs, nine). Most (87.8%) had prior epilepsy surgery and/or vagus nerve stimulation. Six patients stopped cenobamate due to lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. One patient died from factors unrelated to cenobamate. Among patients who continued cenobamate, three achieved seizure freedom (5.3% of cohort), 24 had a 75%-99% reduction in seizures (42.1% of cohort), and 16 had a 50%-74% reduction (28.1% of cohort). Cenobamate led to abolition of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in 55.6% (20/36) of patients. Among treatment responders, 67.4% (29/43) were treated with cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Three-fourths of patients reported at least one side-effect, most commonly fatigue and somnolence. Adverse events most commonly emerged at cenobamate doses of ≥250 mg/day. Side-effects were partially manageable by reducing the overall ASM burden, most often clobazam, eslicarbazepine, and perampanel. SIGNIFICANCE Patients with highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy experienced meaningful seizure outcomes on cenobamate. Emergence of adverse events at doses above 250 mg/day may limit the potential for further improvements in seizure control at higher cenobamate doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick B Moloney
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tudor Munteanu
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Doyle
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niamh Colleran
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brenda Liggan
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Annette Breen
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead Murphy
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hany El-Naggar
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Norman Delanty
- Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Löscher W, White HS. Animal Models of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy as Tools for Deciphering the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacoresistance and Discovering More Effective Treatments. Cells 2023; 12:cells12091233. [PMID: 37174633 PMCID: PMC10177106 DOI: 10.3390/cells12091233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last 30 years, over 20 new anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) have been introduced into the market for the treatment of epilepsy using well-established preclinical seizure and epilepsy models. Despite this success, approximately 20-30% of patients with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The current approach to ASM discovery for DRE relies largely on drug testing in various preclinical model systems that display varying degrees of ASM drug resistance. In recent years, attempts have been made to include more etiologically relevant models in the preclinical evaluation of a new investigational drug. Such models have played an important role in advancing a greater understanding of DRE at a mechanistic level and for hypothesis testing as new experimental evidence becomes available. This review provides a critical discussion of the pharmacology of models of adult focal epilepsy that allow for the selection of ASM responders and nonresponders and those models that display a pharmacoresistance per se to two or more ASMs. In addition, the pharmacology of animal models of major genetic epilepsies is discussed. Importantly, in addition to testing chemical compounds, several of the models discussed here can be used to evaluate other potential therapies for epilepsy such as neurostimulation, dietary treatments, gene therapy, or cell transplantation. This review also discusses the challenges associated with identifying novel therapies in the absence of a greater understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to DRE. Finally, this review discusses the lessons learned from the profile of the recently approved highly efficacious and broad-spectrum ASM cenobamate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Löscher
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, 30559 Hannover, Germany
| | - H Steve White
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Agashe S, Worrell G, Britton J, Noe K, Ritaccio A, Wirrell EC, Nickels KC, Cascino GD, Burkholder D. Cenobamate in Generalized Epilepsy and Combined Generalized and Focal Epilepsy. Neurol Clin Pract 2023; 13:e200133. [PMID: 37064578 PMCID: PMC10103690 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Background and ObjectivesCenobamate (CNB) is a United States Food and Drug Administration–approved antiseizure medication (ASM) for focal-onset seizures; however, its potential clinical effectiveness as a broad-spectrum ASM is not established. CNB has a proposed dual mechanism of action with preferential blockade of persistent sodium currents and positive allosteric modulation of the γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA-A) receptor. We evaluated the efficacy of CNB in drug refractory patients with genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE) or combined generalized and focal epilepsies (CGFE), including developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review and identified the following: cohort 1 (n = 4) with GGE, of which 2 patients had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and cohort 2 with CGFE (n = 9), of which 4 patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and 1 had Dravet syndrome.ResultsIn cohort 1, all 3 patients with frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs) had a greater than 50% reduction in GTCs. In cohort 2, reduction in both generalized and focal-onset seizures was noted. In these groups together, the mean reduction of all seizure types was 58%, and ≥50% responder rate was 70% (SD = ±34.16, median = 50%). No worsening of generalized-onset seizures occurred in either cohort. Seventy-seven percent of patients experienced side effects, warranting a modification of treatment managed by slower titration, dose reduction of CNB, or discontinuing other ASMs.DiscussionIn our retrospective case series, CNB seems to be an effective ASM for patients with drug-resistant GGE and CGFE. The ongoing CNB trial assessing effectiveness for primary GTCs will provide more data on generalized-onset seizures.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that CNB in generalized epilepsy and combined generalized and focal epilepsy reduces seizure frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Agashe
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Gregory Worrell
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Jeffrey Britton
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Katherine Noe
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Anthony Ritaccio
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Elaine C Wirrell
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Katherine C Nickels
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Gregory D Cascino
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - David Burkholder
- Department of Neurology (SA, GW, JB, ECW, KCN, GDC, DB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (KN), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; and Department of Neurology (AR), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Carlson JM, Molyneaux BJ, Lee JW. Safe Use of Cenobamate in Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Series. Neurohospitalist 2023; 13:169-172. [PMID: 37064924 PMCID: PMC10091428 DOI: 10.1177/19418744221147083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Cenobamate is an effective new adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM) for treatment resistant focal epilepsy. It has broad spectrum anticonvulsant activity and may be a useful medication for super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), but has not yet been studied in generalized seizures or an inpatient setting. Here we describe 2 SRSE cases where cenobamate was added safely to other treatments. It was uptitrated slowly to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions which have been observed previously with rapid increasing dosages. Both patients achieved seizure control and liberation from intensive care. They have remained seizure free with continued treatment and have not experienced any side effects attributable to cenobamate. Cenobamate warrants further examination in patients with refractory status epilepticus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M. Carlson
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jong Woo Lee
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Epilepsy affects 70 million people worldwide and is a significant cause of morbidity and early mortality. The mainstay of therapy is oral medications. Epilepsy drug development is escalating, driven by continued drug resistance in up to a third of epilepsy patients. Treatment development now focuses on discovery of novel mechanisms of action and syndrome-specific therapies. RECENT FINDINGS Difficult-to-treat epilepsy related to conditions including tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) have been the target of recent developments. Disease-modifying therapy for epilepsy related to TSC with vigabatrin at onset of first electroencephalographic epileptiform changes, rather than after first clinical seizure, has demonstrated strongly positive seizure and developmental outcomes. Fenfluramine, approved for DS and, more recently, LGS, has robust data supporting efficacy, safety/tolerability, as well as mortality, quality of life and cognitive function. Rescue therapy has expanded to include better tolerated benzodiazepines in the form of nasal midazolam and valium. Cenobamate, a first-in-class inactivator of the persistent voltage-gated sodium channel and approved for adult partial onset epilepsy, has exceptional efficacy and tolerability and will be expanded to children and to generalized onset epilepsy in adults. SUMMARY The repertoire of available and developmental therapies for epilepsy is rapidly expanding, and now includes disease-modifying vigabatrin in TSC and agents with extraordinary efficacy, fenfluramine and cenobamate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda W Pong
- Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Mid-Atlantic Neurological Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bryson A, Reid C, Petrou S. Fundamental Neurochemistry Review: GABA A receptor neurotransmission and epilepsy: Principles, disease mechanisms and pharmacotherapy. J Neurochem 2023; 165:6-28. [PMID: 36681890 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with alterations of excitation-inhibition balance within brain neuronal networks. GABAA receptor neurotransmission is the most prevalent form of inhibitory neurotransmission and is strongly implicated in both the pathophysiology and treatment of epilepsy, serving as a primary target for antiseizure medications for over a century. It is now established that GABA exerts a multifaceted influence through an array of GABAA receptor subtypes that extends far beyond simply negating excitatory activity. As the role of GABAA neurotransmission within inhibitory circuits is elaborated, this will enable the development of precision therapies that correct the network dysfunction underlying epileptic pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bryson
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Reid
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Petrou
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|