Quantifying Treatment-Related Fluctuations in CIDP: Results of the GRIPPER Study

Validation of the Korean version of inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale in patients with inflammatory neuropathy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) is an effective activity measure for use in inflammatory peripheral neuropathy. The aim of this study was to validate the Korean version of the I-RODS in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy, and autoimmune nodopathy.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients underwent clinical evaluations, which included the I-RODS, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) assessment, and Jamar grip strength (kg) measurement. Follow-up assessments were performed for 83 patients during their regular clinic visits. To estimate the test-retest reliability of the I-RODS, the scale was reapplied to a subset of 16 patients within 2-7 days of the initial test. Overall, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the I-RODS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was good, as indicated by a person separation index of 0.966. The raw and standardized Cronbach's alpha values were both 0.974. The test-retest reliability analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also high (ICC = 0.972). The I-RODS showed a strong correlation with INCAT scores (ρ = -0.81, p < .001) and a moderate correlation with grip strength (ρ = 0.61, p < .001). Furthermore, the sensitivity for detecting clinically meaningful improvement was highest for grip strength (60.4%) followed by I-RODS (52.1%), while for capturing deterioration, it was highest for I-RODS (80.0%).

INTERPRETATION

The Korean version of the I-RODS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring disability in patients with inflammatory neuropathy. The I-RODS is useful for both clinical practice and research applications.

Feasibility and Reliability of a Monitoring App for Chronic Inflammatory Neuropathies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are immune-mediated neuropathies characterized by muscle weakness and/or sensory deficits. Identifying treatment response, relapse, and stability can be challenging in these chronic, sometimes unpredictable, conditions. This study explores the potential of a monitoring app designed to address these challenges.

METHODS

Patients were monitored weekly or monthly, based on stability and patient preference, using grip strength, modified timed-up-and go (mTUG), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User experience was evaluated via a questionnaire addressing content and ease of use (scale 0-10). Adherence was measured as the percentage of completed mandatory assessments. We investigated reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of the mean (SEM) of repeated measurements. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

We included 38 patients, with a mean follow-up of 11 months (IQR 4.6-19.5). The mean user experience score was 8.35/10 (range 7-10). Adherence was 93% (95% CI: 91.9%-94.1%). Reported remote measurements for grip strength were 1358/1468 (93%), and 1343/1430 (94%) for mTUG. Grip strength and mTUG ICCs were both 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98 and 0.92-0.99, respectively). The average SEM was 8.46% (95% CI: 6.58-10.28) for grip strength and 8.18% (95% CI: 6.12-10.41) for mTUG. Only grip strength changed significantly, increasing by 3.1 pounds per 6 months (95% CI: 0.61-5.83; p = 0.016).

INTERPRETATION

Our study demonstrates that tele-neuromonitoring is feasible and reliable, showing high adherence, positive user experience and high ICCs. We anticipate tele-neuromonitoring could complement routine follow-up, enabling clinicians to make better-informed treatment decisions.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Narrative Review of a Systematic Diagnostic Approach to Avoid Misdiagnosis

Chronic inflammatory demyelination polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune neuropathy generated by cellular and humoral immune responses. Its course can be chronic, progressive, monophasic, or relapsing-remitting. Misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy are common in CIDP. Given the scarcity of integrative information, we aimed to briefly summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, diagnostic tools, and diagnostic criteria and provide a systematic diagnostic approach. We reviewed articles on Medline (PubMed) from 2018 to 2023, using Google Scholar to summarize the topics. The results are presented as a narrative review, in accordance with recommendations of the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines. The included evidence showed that CIDP is a challenging neuropathy to diagnose and treat. Pathologic factors initiating typical CIDP and atypical CIDP are still clearly unknown. CIDP is diagnosed using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria, which combine clinical features with electrophysiological evidence of demyelination. However, some patients need to fulfill the requirements. Another challenge is monitoring the disease progression and recognizing patients who do not respond to evidence-based first-line therapy to individualize their treatment. Based on the evidence, we conclude that 2021 EFNS/PNS guidelines allow for a more accurate diagnosis and treatment of CIDP and its variants. New diagnostic tools and molecular approaches are helpful in the diagnosis process but cannot replace clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ADHERE): a multicentre, randomised-withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system that can lead to severe disability from muscle weakness and sensory disturbances. Around a third of patients do not respond to currently available treatments, and many patients with a partial response have residual neurological impairment, highlighting the need for effective alternatives. Efgartigimod alfa, a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in adults with CIDP.

METHODS

ADHERE, a multistage, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolled participants with CIDP from 146 clinical sites from Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America. Participants with evidence of clinically meaningful deterioration entered an open-label phase of weekly 1000 mg subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 for no longer than 12 weeks (stage A). Those with confirmed evidence of clinical improvement (ECI; treatment responders) entered a randomised-withdrawal phase of 1000 mg subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 weekly treatment versus placebo for a maximum of 48 weeks (stage B). Participants were randomised (1:1) through interactive response technology and stratified by their adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (aINCAT) score change during stage A and their most recent CIDP medication within 6 months before screening. Investigators, the clinical research organisation, and participants were masked to the treatment. The primary endpoint in stage A, evaluated in the stage A safety population, was confirmed ECI (≥1 points aINCAT decrease, ≥4 points [centile metric] Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale increase, or ≥8 kPa grip strength increase after four injections and two consecutive visits). The primary endpoint in stage B, evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat population, was the risk of relapse (time to first aINCAT increase of ≥1 points). ADHERE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04281472) and EudraCT (2019-003076-39) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between April 15, 2020, and May 11, 2023, 629 participants were screened; 322 (114 female, 208 male) entered stage A, of whom 214 (66%, 95% CI 61·0-71·6) had confirmed ECI. In stage B, 221 participants were randomised (79 female, 142 male; 111 to subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20, 110 to placebo). Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 significantly reduced the risk of relapse versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·25-0·61]; p<0·0001). 31 (27·9% [19·6-36·3]) participants given subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 had a relapse versus 59 (53·6% [44·3-63·0]) given placebo. In stage A, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 204 (63%) participants and serious TEAEs in 21 (7%). In stage B, TEAEs occurred in 71 (64%) participants on subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and 62 (56%) participants on placebo, and serious TEAEs in six (5%) on subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and six (5%) on placebo. Three deaths occurred: two in stage A (one non-related and one unlikely related to treatment) and one in stage B (placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

ADHERE showed the efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in reducing the risk of relapse versus placebo in people with CIDP who responded to treatment. Further studies are needed to provide data on the longer-term effects of efgartigimod alfa and how it compares with currently available treatment options.

FUNDING

argenx.

[Digital medicine in neurological research-Between hype and evidence]

BACKGROUND

The rapid advancement of digital medicine and health technologies in neurology offers both significant potential and challenges. This article outlines fundamental aspects of digital medicine related to neurological research and highlights application examples of digital technologies in neurological research.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive overview of current digital developments in neurology and their impact on neurological research.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this narrative review articles from various sources and references related to digital medicine and health technologies in neurology were compiled and analyzed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The data presented indicate that digital health technologies and digital therapeutics have the potential to decisively shape neurological care and research; however, it is emphasized that a critical evaluation and evidence-based approach to these technologies are essential to determine their actual value in neurology.

Serum neurofilament light chain does not detect self-reported treatment-related fluctuations in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a marker for axonal degeneration. Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) often report a fluctuation of symptoms throughout one treatment cycle with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). The aim of this study was to determine whether sNfL is suitable to quantify patient-reported symptom fluctuations.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with the diagnosis of CIDP or a CIDP-variant under treatment with IVIG were recruited in this study and underwent examination before IVIG infusion, in the middle of the treatment interval, and before their next IVIG infusion. Patients were surveyed regarding symptom fluctuations at the last visit and divided into two groups: those with and without fluctuations of symptoms. At the first visit, sociodemographic and disease-specific data were collected. Clinical scores were assessed at every examination. sNfL values were compared between both groups at the different time points after conversion into Z-scores-adjusted for age and body mass index.

RESULTS

Patients with CIDP show elevated sNfL Z-scores (median at baseline: 2.14, IQR: 1.0). There was no significant change in sNfL Z-scores or questionnaire scores within the treatment cycle in either group. There was no significant difference in sNfL levels between the patients with and without symptom fluctuations.

CONCLUSIONS

CIDP patients show elevated sNfL levels. However, sNfL is not suitable to reflect patient-reported fluctuations of symptoms. This indicates that symptom fluctuations during treatment with IVIG in patients with CIDP are not caused by a neuroaxonal injury. Furthermore, repeated sNfL measurements within one treatment cycle with IVIG seem to have no benefit for symptom monitoring.

Introducing electronic monitoring of disease activity in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (EMDA CIDP): trial protocol of a proof of concept study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is one of the most common immune neuropathies leading to severe impairments in daily life. Current treatment options include intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), which are administered at intervals of 4-12 weeks. Determination of individual treatment intervals is challenging since existing clinical scores lack sensitivity to objectify small, partially fluctuating deficits in patients. End-of-dose phenomena described by patients, manifested by increased fatigue and worsening of (motor) symptoms, are currently difficult to detect. From a medical and socio-economic point of view, it is necessary to identify and validate new, more sensitive outcome measures for accurate mapping of disease progression and, thus, for interval finding. Digital health technologies such as wearables may be particularly useful for this purpose, as they record real-life data and consequently, in contrast to classic clinical 'snapshots', can continuously depict the disease course.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, non-interventional, single-center, investigator-initiated study, CIDP patients treated with IVIG will be continuously monitored over a period of 6 months. Clinical scores and blood analyses will be assessed and collected during three visits (V1, V2, V3). Additionally, activity, sleep, and cardiac parameters will be recorded over the entire period using a wearable device. Further, patients' subjective disease development and quality of life will be recorded at various visits (read-outs). The usability of the smartwatch will be assessed at the end of the study.

PERSPECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate different digital measurements obtained with the smartwatch and blood-based analyses for monitoring disease activity and progress in CIDP patients. In conjunction, both means of monitoring might offer detailed insights into behavioral and biological patterns associated with treatment-related fluctuations such as end-of-dose phenomena.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05723848. Initially, the protocol was submitted prospectively on January 10, 2023. The trial was publicly released after formal improvements on February 13, 2023, after first patients were included according to the original protocol.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are concerns on the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The aim of this study was to determine the risk of recurrence of GBS and exacerbations of CIDP or MMN after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study from January 2021 to August 2021. Patients known in 1 of 3 Dutch University Medical Centers with research focus on immune-mediated neuropathy and members of the Dutch Patient Association for Neuromuscular Diseases were invited to participate if they were 18 years or older and diagnosed with GBS, CIDP, or MMN. Participants completed a series of questionnaires at 4 different time points: study baseline (1), within 48 hours before any SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (2 and 3, if applicable), and 6 weeks after their last vaccination (4). Participants unwilling to get vaccinated completed the last questionnaire (4) 4 months after study baseline. We assessed recurrences of GBS, any worsening of CIDP or MMN-related symptoms, treatment alterations, and hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of 1,152 individuals to whom we sent the questionnaires, 674 (59%) signed informed consent. We excluded 153 individuals, most often because they had already received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or had had the infection (84%) before study baseline. Of 521 participants included in analyses, 403 (81%) completed the last questionnaire (time point 4). None of 162 participants with a history of GBS had a recurrence after vaccination. Of 188 participants with CIDP, 10 participants (5%) reported a worsening of symptoms within 6 weeks after vaccination. In 5 (3%) of these patients, maintenance treatment was modified. Two of 53 participants with MMN (4%) reported a worsening of symptoms, and treatment modification was reported by 1 participant.

DISCUSSION

We found no increased risk of GBS recurrence and a low to negligible risk of worsening of CIDP or MMN-related symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Based on our data, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with these immune-mediated neuropathies seems to be safe.

CIDP prognosis in patients with IVIG treatment-related fluctuations

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated peripheral nerve disorder with variable prognosis and long-term dependence on immunotherapy. Frequent assessment of grip strength can be a useful tool to identify intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment-related fluctuations (TRFs) and optimize IVIG treatment in real-time, but the long-term implications of TRFs are unknown. We aimed to explore the impact that real-time TRFs had on long-term CIDP prognosis, strength impairment, and disability.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed standard of care clinical and treatment outcomes in patients who participated in a published prospective study of intra-IVIG-cycle grip strength quantification. Patients were analyzed based upon the presence or absence of TRFs, as determined in the initial prospective study.

RESULTS

Data were available for 23 CIDP patients with a mean follow-up period of 44.7 mo. There were no differences in baseline or follow-up strength, disability, or IVIG usage in patients with a low number of fluctuations compared to those with a high number of fluctuations. In both groups, drug-free remission was achieved in about one-third of patients.

DISCUSSION

TRFs are important to identify in order to optimize treatment in real time, but poorly predict long-term disease activity status. The presence of minor TRFs are unlikely to result in substantial accumulation of disability over time. Periodic IVIG optimization trials using objective outcomes are encouraged in all CIDP patients receiving chronic IVIG treatment as a means to identify the lowest effective IVIG dose and frequency.

On the path to evidence-based therapy in neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of acquired and genetic diseases characterized by loss of motor functionality. Although cure is the goal, many therapeutic strategies have been envisioned and are being studied in randomized clinical trials and entered clinical practice. As in all scientific endeavors, the successful clinical translation depends on the quality and translatability of preclinical findings and on the predictive value and feasibility of the clinical models. This chapter focuses on five exemplary diseases: childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disorders, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to illustrate the progress made on the path to evidenced-based therapy.

Tips in navigating the diagnostic complexities of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) includes important revisions to the previous 2010 guideline. This article highlights the new criteria and recommendations for the differential diagnosis of CIDP. In the revised guideline, the CIDP spectrum has been modified to include typical CIDP and four well-characterized CIDP variants, namely distal, multifocal/focal, motor and sensory CIDP, replacing the term 'atypical' CIDP. To improve the diagnosis of CIDP, the revised guideline attempts to improve the specificity of the diagnostic criteria for typical CIDP and the four CIDP variants. Specific clinical and electrodiagnostic (including both motor and sensory conduction) criteria are provided for typical CIDP and each of the CIDP variants. The levels of diagnostic certainty have been changed to CIDP and possible CIDP, with the removal of probable CIDP (due to the lack of difference in the accuracy of the electrodiagnostic criteria for probable CIDP) and definite CIDP (due to the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis). If the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria allow only for a diagnosis of possible CIDP, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound, nerve magnetic resonance imaging, objective treatment response, and nerve biopsy can be used as supportive criteria to upgrade the diagnosis to CIDP. Although the revised guideline needs to be validated and its strengths and weaknesses assessed, using the guideline will likely improve the accuracy of diagnosis of CIDP and variants of CIDP, and aid in distinguishing CIDP from conditions with similar features.

Assessment timing and choice of outcome measure in determining treatment response in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A post hoc analysis of the PRISM trial

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Treatment response and its timing are variable in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In this study we assessed the variability using multiple outcome measures.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the PRISM trial, a 24-week prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase III study of a 10% intravenous immunoglobulin preparation for CIDP. We ascertained timing of response with primary/secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks after treatment initiation, 13 of 40 subjects (32.5%) were defined as responders on the primary outcome measure, the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause And Treatment (INCAT) scale. This increased to 20 of 41 (48.8%) at 12 weeks and to 32 of 42 (76.2%) at 24 weeks. Use of minimal important difference (MID)-determined amelioration of the inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS), or of the Medical Research Council sum score (MRCSS), or of dominant hand-grip strength, in addition to the adjusted INCAT, indicated a sensitivity of 41.7% in identifying adjusted INCAT nonresponders at week 12 who subsequently responded at week 24. Specificity was 60% vs INCAT nonresponders at week 24. Consideration of amelioration of any amplitude on any secondary outcome measure indicated a 75% sensitivity, but only 30% specificity vs adjusted INCAT nonresponders at week 24.

DISCUSSION

Immunoglobulin treatment continuation may be justified for up to 24 weeks in CIDP. Additional outcome measures may help in the early treatment stages to predict delayed response on the adjusted INCAT. However, their use is limited by high false-positive rates. More robust, reliable, and relevant outcome measures are needed to detect early improvement in immunoglobulin-treated CIDP.

Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic peripheral polyneuropathy that results in disability through immune mediated nerve injury, but which not uncommonly has residual and irreversible neurologic deficits after the active inflammatory component of the disorder has been treated. Management of the condition entails addressing both the abnormal immune activity that drives ongoing or active deficits while also managing residual symptoms through supportive interventions. Immune based treatments are grounded in several important principles. First, early treatment is guided by evidence-based proven effective therapies that sequentially escalate depending on the response. Second, optimization or personalization of first line treatments is needed in order to understand the ideal dose for any given patient, and whether long term treatment is needed at all. Third, although many immunosuppressive agents may be utilized in non-responding patients or when intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)/corticosteroid sparing intervention is desired, all are unproven and require a delicate balance between risk, cost, and unknown likelihood of benefit that is tailored to each individual patient's unique circumstances. There is no reliable disease activity biomarker that can be used to guide treatment - a reality that makes it very challenging to optimize treatment to individual patient needs. Serial clinical assessments are key to understanding the value of continued immunotherapy or if long-term therapy is needed at all. Regardless of the immunotherapy status of a patient, equally important is addressing residual deficits through supportive interventions including physical therapy, adaptive equipment, pain management, and emotional support. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Assessing deterioration using impairment and functional outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a post-hoc analysis of the IOC trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is unclear whether frequently used cut-off values for outcome measures defining minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) can accurately identify meaningful deterioration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

We used data from the IOC trial, in which sixty clinically stable CIDP patients were randomized to IVIg withdrawal or continuation. We calculated change scores of the Inflammatory Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS), grip strength, and MRC sum score (MRC-SS) and classified visits based on a treatment anchor (i.e. decision to restart/increase treatment after reaching a predefined early endpoint of deterioration). The variability of scores in patients without deterioration was calculated using the limits of agreement. We defined optimized MCIDs for deterioration and specific combinations of MCIDs from different outcome measures, and subsequently calculated the accuracies of the (combined) MCIDs.

RESULTS

Substantial variability was found in scores of the I-RODS, grip strength and MRC-SS in patients without deterioration over time, and most MCIDs were within the limits of the variability observed in patients without deterioration. Some MCID cut-offs were insensitive but highly specific for detecting deterioration, e.g. the MCID-SE of -1.96 of the I-RODS and -2 point on the MRC-SS. Others were sensitive, but less specific, e.g. -4 centiles of the I-RODS. Some combined MCIDs resulted in high specificities and moderate sensitivities.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that clinically important deterioration cannot be distinguished from variability over time with currently used MCIDs on the individual level. Combinations of MCIDs might improve the accuracy of determining deterioration, but this needs validation.

Contemporary challenges in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research, multiple inter-related diagnostic and management challenges remain for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed on diagnosis and treatment in CIDP. The clinical features and disease course were evaluated. Investigative techniques, including electrophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuropathology, imaging and neuroimmunology, were considered in relation to technical aspects, sensitivity, specificity, availability and cost. Available evidenced-based treatments and those with possible efficacy despite lack of evidence, were considered, as well as current methods for evaluation of treatment effects.

EXPERT OPINION

CIDP remains a clinical diagnosis, supported first and foremost by electrophysiology. Other investigative techniques have limited impact. Most patients with CIDP respond to available first-line treatments and immunosuppression may be efficacious in those who do not. Consideration of the natural history and of the high reported remission rate, of under-recognised associated disabling features, of treatment administration modalities and assessment methods, require enhanced attention.

Predicting long-term trends in inflammatory neuropathy outcome measures using latent class modelling

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin (Ig) is used to treat chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB). Regular infusions may be used for symptom control. Disease activity is monitored with clinical outcome measurements. We examined outcome measure variation during clinically stable periods in Ig-treated CIDP and MMNCB patients. We explored utility of serial outcome measurement in long-term outcome prediction.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of a single neuroscience centre's Ig-treated CIDP and MMNCB patients, 2009-2020, was performed. Mean and percentage change for grip strength, Rasch-built overall disability scales (RODS) and MRC sum scores (MRC-SS) during periods of clinical stability were compared to score-specific minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Latent class mixed modelling (LCMM) was used to identify longitudinal trends and factors influencing long-term outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 85 CIDP and 23 MMNCB patients (1,423 datapoints; 5635 treatment-months). Group-averaged outcome measures varied little over time. Intra-individual variation exceeded MCID for RODS in 44.2% CIDP and 16.7% MMNCB datapoints, grip strength in 10.6% (CIDP) and 8.8%/27.2% (MMNCB right/left hand) and MRC-SS in 43.5% (CIDP) and 20% (MMNCB). Multivariate LCMM identified subclinical trends toward improvement (32 patients) and deterioration (73 patients) in both cohorts. At baseline, CIDP 'deteriorators' were older than 'improvers' (66.2 versus 57 years, p=0.025). No other individual factors predicted categorisation. The best model for 'deteriorator' identification was contiguous sub-MCID decline in more than one outcome measure (CIDP: sensitivity 74%, specificity 59%; MMNCB: sensitivity 73%, specificity 88%).

DISCUSSION

Outcome measure interpretation determines therapeutic decision-making in Ig-dependent neuropathy patients, but intra-individual variation is common, often exceeding MCID. Here we show sub-MCID contiguous changes in more than one outcome measurement are a better predictor of long-term outcome. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision

OBJECTIVE

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs).

RESULTS

Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).

Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice

Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice.Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms.Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).