Association of Tirofiban With Functional Outcomes After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Tirofiban on First-Pass Recanalization in Acute Stroke Endovascular Thrombectomy: The OPTIMISTIC Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Tirofiban is a nonpeptide antagonist of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor that inhibits platelet aggregation selectively. Despite widespread use in acute ischemic stroke in conjunction with endovascular treatment, the role of tirofiban is uncertain.

Objective

To assess whether intravenous tirofiban initiated before endovascular thrombectomy improves thrombectomy outcomes by achieving first-pass recanalization without intracranial hemorrhagic risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, blinded, end point phase 2 randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients from 7 Chinese hospital stroke centers between April 30, 2021, and July 16, 2023. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 85 years with large vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery or M1 or M2 segment of middle cerebral artery) and were considered for endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of ischemic stroke onset or last known well time. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation or treated with intravenous thrombolysis were excluded.

Intervention

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous tirofiban (10 μg/kg bolus plus 0.1 μg/kg per minute infusion for 24 hours) or standard care before endovascular thrombectomy using a web-based, computer-generated randomization procedure.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving first-pass recanalization without symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. First-pass recanalization was assessed by reviewers blinded to treatment allocation and predefined as successful recanalization of a targeted vessel after a single pass of thrombectomy. The primary outcome was analyzed by modified Poisson regression with robust error estimation, adjusting for time from onset or last known well time to randomization and vessel occlusion site.

Results

Among 200 patients randomized (median age, 66 years [IQR, 58-72 years]; 146 male [73%]), 102 were allocated to receive intravenous tirofiban, and 98 were allocated to receive standard care before endovascular thrombectomy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 64 of 99 patients receiving tirofiban (65%) and 46 of 95 control patients (48%) achieved the primary outcome of first-pass recanalization without symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted risk ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.04-1.73]; P = .03). Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0% (0 of 101 patients) in the tirofiban group vs 6% (6 of 98 patients) in the control group (unadjusted risk difference, -0.06 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of patients who had acute ischemic stroke with no history of atrial fibrillation and no prior intravenous thrombolysis, intravenous tirofiban administered before endovascular thrombectomy increased the likelihood of first-pass recanalization without symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. These findings suggest that neurointerventionalists may consider this pre-procedure antiplatelet treatment to facilitate endovascular thrombectomy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04851457.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous tirofiban (IT) is shown to be potentially effective in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients submitted to mechanical thrombectomy, despite its safety and efficacy are not well established. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of IT on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with AIS due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of IT in AIS patients due to LAA submitted to EVT.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that involved patients enrolled to take IT in AIS caused by LAA. The statistical analysis was performed using Risk Ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals and the Mantel-Haenszel method of random-effects model to evaluate both efficacy and safety. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and Cochran Q test. This meta-analysis evaluated a modified Rankin scale (mRS) between 0 and 2, successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality in 90 days. The statistical analyses for this study were performed using R software (version 4.4.1.) RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were analyzed, and a total of 2607 patients were included. In the meta-analysis, the IT group was associated with a higher proportion of patients in mRS 0-2 (RR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.04-1.29; I² = 0 %). There was no difference between the groups regarding successful reperfusion (RR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.98-1.09; I² = 64.2 %) and sICH (RR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.55-1.26; I² = 22.9 %), although tirofiban was associated with a lower mortality in 90 days (RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.60-0.82; I² = 0 %).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights the positive effects of adjuvant IT for AIS patients due to LAA submitted to EVT. It has been shown to improve functional outcomes and lower mortality rates in this population and to be a reliable medication in this setting.

Current gaps in acute reperfusion therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy have significantly reduced disability and improved outcomes associated with acute ischemic stroke.

RECENT FINDINGS

An expansion of indications for reperfusion therapies in select groups of patients to permit treatment in an extended time window, with large ischemic core, and with simplified imaging protocols have enabled a broader group of patients access to disability-sparing therapy. Cerebroprotection has had renewed development in the era of acute reperfusion.

SUMMARY

In this review, we highlight recent developments in stroke reperfusion research and related questions that are under study or remain unanswered.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Tirofiban plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) shows good efficacy and safety in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, but there is a lack of comprehensive assessment. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rtPA plus tirofiban with rtPA alone in AIS patients.

METHODS

This meta-analysis retrieved studies comparing rtPA intravenous thrombolysis followed by tirofiban (rtPA+T group) versus rtPA intravenous thrombolysis alone (rtPA group) for AIS patients in Excerpt Medica Database, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and SinoMed until March 2024.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with 2048 AIS patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score after treatment was lower in the rtPA+T group than the rtPA group [standardized mean differences (SMD)=-1.41; 95 % confidence interval (CI)=-1.83, -0.98; P<0.001]. The proportion of AIS patients achieving a favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) was increased in the rtPA+T group versus the rtPA group [relative risk (RR)=1.13; 95 % CI=1.05, 1.21; P=0.001]. The incidence of re-occlusion was lower in the rtPA+T group than in the rtPA group (RR=0.24; 95 % CI=0.10, 0.59; P=0.002), but the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (RR=0.85; 95 % CI=0.51, 1.43), symptomatic ICH (RR=1.10; 95 % CI=0.43, 2.84), and mortality (RR=1.39; 95 % CI=0.53, 3.65) was not different between the two groups (all P>0.05). The stability assessed by sensitivity analysis was good, and no publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

rtPA plus tirofiban achieves superior efficacy with comparable safety profiles compared to rtPA alone in AIS patients.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with ideal reperfusion: A cohort study of LAA and CE subgroups

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite achieving ideal reperfusion (eTICI = 3) through endovascular treatment (EVT), some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients still experience poor outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in AIS patients with ideal reperfusion, focusing on its effects in large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolic (CE) stroke.

METHODS

A total of 474 AIS patients from the RESCUE-BT database were included. Patients were assigned to either the tirofiban or placebo group based on the treatment received. The primary outcome was favorable functional recovery at 90 days (mRS ≤2), and safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders, and subgroup and interaction analyses assessed tirofiban's efficacy in LAA and CE populations.

RESULTS

In the overall population that achieved ideal reperfusion, Tirofiban did not improve clinical outcomes and did not increase the risk of mortality or incidence of sICH (p > 0.05). However, subgroup analysis indicated potential clinical benefits for patients with higher NIHSS scores in the LAA group, especially in the subgroup with NIHSS scores >13 (adjusted OR 4.671, 95% CI [1.545, 14.122]). No significant differences were found in the CE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban showed potential benefits for LAA patients with ideal reperfusion, especially those with NIHSS scores above 13. Careful patient selection is recommended.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease for patients undergoing endovascular treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Tirofiban has emerged as an adjunct therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). However, its benefits for AIS patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety in ICAD-related AIS patients undergoing EVT.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to September, 2024, for studies comparing tirofiban to placebo or no intervention in ICAD-related AIS. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS 0-1, mRS score at 90 days, successful reperfusion, 90-day mortality, postprocedural reocclusion, and symptomatic/non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Subgroup analyses evaluated tirofiban administration routes (intravenous, intra-arterial, or combined).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 3,572 patients were included. Intravenous tirofiban significantly increased mRS 0-2 (RR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13; 1.42]; p < 0.0001, I²= 0%), mRS 0-1(RR 1.24 [95% CI 1.05; 1.45]; p = 0.0098, I² = 0%), reduced mRS score by 0.58 points ([95% CI -0.99; -0.17]; p = 0.006, I²= 66%) and decreased mortality (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57; 0.80]; p < 0.0001, I²= 8%) at 90 days compared to control. Tirofiban overall reduced postprocedural reocclusion relative to control (RR 0.36 [95% CI 0.14; 0.94]; p = 0.036, I²= 73%). No significant differences were observed in successful reperfusion or ICH.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous tirofiban demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile, improving functional recovery and reducing mortality. Tirofiban overall reduced postprocedural reocclusion compared to control. No significant differences were found between groups in successful reperfusion or ICH. These findings support tirofiban as a safe and effective EVT adjunct.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42024606522).

Intra-arterial tenecteplase following endovascular therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion: study protocol and rationale

BACKGROUND

Recently, a randomized controlled trial showed a beneficial effect of intra-arterial thrombolysis following successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. Due to differences in response to thrombolytics in occlusion of the posterior circulation, the purpose of ATTENTION IA is to explore the adjunct benefit of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful recanalization in patients presenting with large and medium vessel occlusion of the posterior circulation.

METHODS

ATTENTION-IA is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment and blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE). After achieving successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b-3) of an occlusion of the vertebral, basilar, or posterior cerebral artery, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive intra-arterial tenecteplase or standard of care. The primary effect parameter is a modified Rankin Score of 0-1 at day 90.

RESULTS

The trial recently completed enrollment, and data collection/verification is ongoing. The final results will be made available on completion of enrollment and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ATTENTION-IA will provide definitive evidence for the efficacy and safety of adjunct intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful EVT in patients with an acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion stroke presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172.

Intra-arterial cocktail therapy for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who achieved endovascular reperfusion

Background

Clinically ineffective reperfusion (CIR) refers to the discrepancy between successful reperfusion and a favorable functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke after endovascular treatment (EVT). The Improving Neuroprotective Strategy for Ischemic Stroke with Sufficient Recanalization after Thrombectomy by Intra-arterial Cocktail Therapy (INSIST-CT) trial aimed to explore the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of intra-arterial cocktail therapy using argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone in patients who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT.

Methods

In this prospective, single-arm, pilot study, eligible patients with anterior circulation LVO who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT were enrolled in the INSIST-CT trial. Consecutive patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the control group retrospectively. In the INSIST-CT group, argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone were continuously administered for 30 min into the culprit artery after sufficient recanalization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were performed to account for multiple confounders.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included in the INSIST-CT group, and 261 patients were included in the control group. The proportion of the patients with the primary endpoint was 60% in the INSIST-CT group and 55.9% in the control group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.55-2.61, p = 0.67; adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.62-3.26, p = 0.41). No significant difference in sICH at 48 h after treatment was observed between the two groups (unadjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.15-3.56, p = 0.96; adjusted OR 0.82 95% CI 0.17-3.97, p = 0.809). Similar results were observed after the PSM and IPTW analyses.

Conclusion

In anterior circulation, LVO patients who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT, bridging intra-arterial cocktail therapy with argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone may be safe and feasible. However, it did not improve the 90-day functional outcomes. A numerically higher probability of a favorable outcome in the INSIST-CT group suggests the potential promise of this cocktail therapy in reducing clinically ineffective reperfusion.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04202549.

Clinical efficacy of tirofiban in the endovascular therapy of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease: A meta-analysis

OBJECT

The treatment results of combination of arterial injection of tirofiban with endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) were inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of ICAD-LVO treatment by intra-arterial injection of tirofiban combined with EVT.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a systematic literature search in Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, covering articles published from January 2010 to July 2024. The efficacy outcomes assessed in the meta-analysis included favorable functional outcome and recanalization rates. Safety outcomes included mortality and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis consisted of data from 11 studies, which included 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 5 prospective cohort studies, and 5 retrospective cohort studies, encompassing a total of 2869 patients. The findings showed that tirofiban+EVT for ICAD-LVO was associated with significant improvements in favorable functional outcomes (RR, 1.12; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.21; P=0.005) and reductions in mortality rates (RR, 0.72; 95 %CI, 0.62-0.83; P<0.0001), despite no significant differences in the incidence of sICH (RR, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.55-1.02; P=0.07) and recanalization rates (RR, 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.99-1.05; P=0.15). Subgroup analysis showed that the application of tirofiban significantly increased favorable functional outcomes in patients with anterior circulation stroke (RR, 1.23; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.42; P=0.005), but there was no significant difference in posterior circulation stroke (RR, 1.08; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.41; P=0.55). In addition, the use of tirofiban in patients with posterior circulation stroke might reduce the incidence of sICH (RR, 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.26-0.96; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Tirofiban combined with EVT may be an effective treatment strategy for the treatment of ICAD-LVO, but only for patients with anterior circulation and remains unclear for patients with posterior circulation.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease mechanism indicates poor outcomes of thrombectomy in acute cerebral infarction with large vessel occlusion: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thrombectomy is a standard treatment for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO); however, its effectiveness in treating LVO related to intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare thrombectomy outcomes in ICAD-related and embolic LVO, focusing on patients with similar symptom severities upon hospital admission.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at Jikei University Hospital and Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital between October 2017 and March 2023. Ischemic stroke patients with LVO who underwent thrombectomy were categorized into ICAD and embolism groups based on the occlusion mechanism. Groups were matched using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at the time of admission. A modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 at 90 days after symptom onset was defined as a devastating outcome. The procedural outcomes and frequency of devastating outcomes were compared between the ICAD and embolism groups.

RESULTS

The study included 33 matched pairs were included. The ICAD group showed lower rates of successful reperfusion (43 % vs. 82 %, p = 0.001), and longer procedural times (median 88 min vs. 50 min, p < 0.001) than the embolism group. The ICAD group had a significantly higher frequency of devastating outcomes than the non-ICAD group (39 % vs. 15 %, p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified ICAD as an independent factor associated with devastating outcomes (OR, 3.804; 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI), 1.148-12.603; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

In thrombectomy therapy, reperfusion rates and outcomes are significantly worse in patients with ICAD-LVO than in patients with embolic LVO.

Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative versus intraoperative tirofiban in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study based on the RESCUE-RE (Registration Study for Critical Care of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Recanalization) trial enrolling patients with anterior circulation LVO classified as LAA within 24 h of onset. Patients were divided into three groups: preoperative tirofiban (PT), intraoperative tirofiban (IT), and no tirofiban (NT). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The efficacy outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score = 0-2) and early partial recanalization (EPR; defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score = 1-2a). The safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

A total of 104 matched triplets were obtained through PSM. Compared with NT, PT increased 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.008) and EPR (42.7% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001) rate, with a tendency to increase the asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) proportion (28.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.072). Compared with IT, PT had a higher 90-day functional independence (60.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.025) and EPR (42.7% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.001) rate, with no significant difference in sICH (14.4% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.122) and aICH (28.8% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.200). Compared with NT, IT had a lower 90-day mortality rate (9.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban shows good adjuvant therapy potential in acute ischemic stroke-LVO due to LAA patients. PT is associated with higher rates of EPR and better therapeutic efficacy. In addition, EPR may be a potential way to improve prognosis.

Endovascular management of acute stroke

Stroke related to large vessel occlusion is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide. Advances in endovascular therapy to reopen occluded arteries have been shown to reduce patient disability and mortality. Expanded indications to treat patients with large vessel occlusion in the late window (>6 h from symptom onset), with basilar artery occlusion, and with large ischaemic core at presentation have enabled treatment of more patients with simplified imaging methods. Ongoing knowledge gaps include an understanding of which patients with large ischaemic infarct are more likely to benefit from endovascular therapy, the role of endovascular therapy in patients who present with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores or medium or distal vessel occlusion, and optimal management of patients with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease. As reperfusion can now be facilitated by intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both, the development of cytoprotective or adjunctive drugs to slow infarct growth, enhance reperfusion, or decrease haemorrhagic risk has gained renewed interest with the hope to improve patient outcomes.

Radiomics of intrathrombus and perithrombus regions for Post-EVT intracranial hemorrhage risk Prediction: A multicenter CT study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the predictive performance of radiomics derived from computed tomography (CT) images of thrombus regions in predicting the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 336 patients who underwent admission CT and EVT for acute anterior-circulation large vessel occlusion between December 2018 and December 2023. Follow-up imaging was performed 24 h post-procedure to evaluate the occurrence of ICH. 230 patients from centers A and B were randomly allocated into training and test groups in a 7:3 ratio, while the remaining 106 patients from center C comprised the validation cohort. Radiologists manually segmenting the thrombus on CT images, and the perithrombus region was defined by expanding the initial region of interest (ROI). A total of 428 radiomics features were extracted from both intrathrombus and perithrombus regions on CT images. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for feature selection, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed for model development, followed by validation using a 5-fold cross-validation approach. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

RESULTS

Among the eligible patients, 128 (38.1 %) experienced ICH after EVT. The combined model exhibited superior performance in the training cohort (AUC: 0.913, 95 % CI: 0.861-0.965), test cohort (AUC: 0.868, 95 % CI: 0.775-0.962), and validation cohort (AUC: 0.850, 95 % CI: 0.768-0.912). Notably, in the validation group, both the perithrombus and combined models demonstrated higher predictive accuracy compared to the intrathrombus model (0.837 vs. 0.684, p = 0.02; AUC: 0.850 vs. 0.684, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features derived from the perithrombus region significantly enhance the prediction of ICH after EVT, providing valuable insights for optimizing post-procedural clinical decisions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study highlights the importance of radiomics extracted from intrathrombus and perithrombus region in predicting intracranial hemorrhagefollowing endovascular thrombectomy, which can aid in improving patient outcomes.

Bailout intracranial angioplasty or stenting following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in China (ANGEL-REBOOT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Unsuccessful recanalisation or reocclusion after thrombectomy is associated with poor outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischaemic stroke (LVO-AIS). Bailout angioplasty or stenting (BAOS) could represent a promising treatment for these patients. We conducted a randomised controlled trial with the aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of BAOS following thrombectomy in patients with LVO.

METHODS

ANGEL-REBOOT was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial conducted at 36 tertiary hospitals in 19 provinces in China. Participants with LVO-AIS 24 h after symptom onset were eligible if they had unsuccessful recanalisation (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a) or risk of reocclusion (residual stenosis >70%) after thrombectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned by the minimisation method in a 1:1 ratio to undergo BAOS as the intervention treatment, or to receive standard therapy (continue or terminate the thrombectomy procedure) as a control group, both open-label. In both treatment groups, tirofiban could be recommended for use during and after the procedure. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were compared between groups. This trial was completed and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05122286).

FINDINGS

From Dec 19, 2021, to March 17, 2023, 706 patients were screened, and 348 were enrolled, with 176 assigned to the intervention group and 172 to the control group. No patients withdrew from the trial or were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome. The median age of patients was 63 years (IQR 55-69), 258 patients (74%) were male, and 90 patients (26%) were female; all participants were Chinese. After random allocation, tirofiban was administered either intra-arterially, intravenously, or both in 334 [96%] of 348 participants. No between-group differences were observed in the primary outcome (common odds ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·59-1·24], p=0·41). Mortality was similar between the two groups (19 [11%] of 176 vs 17 [10%] of 172), but the intervention group showed a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (eight [5%] of 175 vs one [1%] of 169), parenchymal haemorrhage type 2 (six [3%] of 175 vs none in the control group), and procedure-related arterial dissection (24 [14%] of 176 vs five [3%] of 172).

INTERPRETATION

Among Chinese patients with unsuccessful recanalisation or who are at risk of reocclusion after thrombectomy, BAOS did not improve clinical outcome at 90 days, and incurred more complications compared with standard therapy. The off-label use of tirofiban might have affected our results and their generalisability, but our findings do not support the addition of BAOS for such patients with LVO-AIS.

FUNDING

Beijing Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program, Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology, HeMo (China) Bioengineering, Sino Medical Sciences Technology.

Endovascular Treatment for Basilar Artery Occlusion

Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a neurological emergency associated with a high risk for adverse outcomes. This review provides evidence on the therapeutic efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT) in the treatment of BAO. Historically considered the primary intervention for acute ischemic stroke, IVT has been progressively combined with EVT, which has emerged from recent studies demonstrating clinical benefits, notably in patients presenting with severe stroke. Several randomised controlled trials have shown that EVT improves patient outcomes in select clinical contexts. Future research directions could address therapeutic treatment thresholds, combination strategies, and long-term outcomes.

Predictors of outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke patients with intravenous tirofiban treatment: a post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing good outcomes in patients receiving only intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.

METHODS

Post hoc exploratory analysis using the RESCUE BT trial identified consecutive patients who received intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke in 55 comprehensive stroke centers from October 2018 to January 2022 in China.

RESULTS

A total of 521 patients received intravenous tirofiban, 253 of whom achieved a good 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2). Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.947-0.982; p < 0.001), lower serum glucose (aOR: 0.865, 95%CI: 0.807-0.928; p < 0.001), lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (aOR: 0.907, 95%CI: 0.869-0.947; p < 0.001), fewer total passes (aOR: 0.791, 95%CI: 0.665-0.939; p = 0.008), shorter punctures to recanalization time (aOR: 0.995, 95%CI:0.991-0.999; p = 0.017), and modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score 2b to 3 (aOR: 8.330, 95%CI: 2.705-25.653; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, lower serum glucose level, lower baseline NIHSS score, fewer total passes, shorter punctures to recanalization time, and mTICI scores of 2b to 3 were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY IDENTIFIER

ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.

CT perfusion for predicting intracranial atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery occlusion

Backgrounds and purpose

Identifying the underlying cause of acute middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) as intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) or embolism is essential for determining the optimal treatment strategy before endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline computed tomography perfusion (CTP) characteristics could differentiate ICAS-related MCAO from embolic MCAO.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical and baseline CTP data from patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for acute MCAO between January 2018 and December 2022. Core volume growth rate was defined as core volume on CTP divided by onset to CTP time. Multivariate logistic analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors for ICAS-related acute MCAO, and the diagnostic performance of these predictors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Among the 97 patients included (median age, 71 years; 60% male), 31 (32%) were diagnosed with ICAS-related MCAO, and 66 (68%) had embolism-related MCAO. The ICAS group was younger (p = 0.002), had a higher proportion of males (p = 0.04) and smokers (p = 0.001), a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (p < 0.001), lower NIHSS score at admission (p = 0.04), smaller core volume (p < 0.001), slower core volume growth rate (p < 0.001), and more frequent core located deep in the brain (p < 0.001) compared to the embolism group. Multivariate logistic analysis identified core volume growth rate (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.83, p = 0.01) as an independent predictor of ICAS-related MCAO. A cutoff value of 2.5 mL/h for core volume growth rate in predicting ICAS-related MCAO was determined from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 66%, and negative predictive value of 90%.

Conclusion

Slow core volume growth rate identified on baseline CTP can predict ICAS-related MCAO. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm and validate these findings.

Unsuccessful Recanalization versus Medical Management of Patients with Large Ischemic Core : Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The outcomes of patients with large ischemic core who fail to recanalize with endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) are uncertain. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who underwent EVT in patients with large ischemic core and unsuccessful recanalization.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial. Unsuccessful recanalization was defined as patients who underwent EVT with eTICI 0-2a. The primary endpoint was 90-day very poor outcome (mRS 5-6). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted controlling for ASPECTS, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and time to treatment.

RESULTS

Of 455 patients 225 were treated with MM. Of 230 treated with EVT, 43 (19%) patients had unsuccessful recanalization. There was no difference in 90-day very poor outcomes (39.5% vs. 40%, aOR 0.93, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.47-1.85, p = 0.95), sICH (7.0% vs. 2.7%, aOR 2.81, 95% CI 0.6-13.29, p = 0.19), or mortality (30% vs. 20%, aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.89-3.06, p = 0.11) between the unsuccessful EVT and MM groups, respectively. There were higher rates of ICH (55.8% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), infarct core volume growth (142.7 ml vs. 90.5 ml, β = 47.77, 95% CI 20.97-74.57 ml, p < 0.001), and decompressive craniectomy (18.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the unsuccessful EVT versus MM groups.

CONCLUSION

In a randomized trial of patients with large ischemic core undergoing EVT with unsuccessful recanalization, there was no difference in very poor outcomes, sICH or death versus medically managed patients. In the unsuccessful EVT group, there were higher rates of any ICH, volume of infarct core growth, and decompressive craniectomy.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent

Optimal platelet inhibition is critical in patients with carotid and intracranial artery stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and intracranial artery stenting (ICS). Many reports have highlighted the importance of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing adverse neurological outcomes without a significant increase in bleeding complications during CAS. DAPT has commonly used CAS and ICS, typically with aspirin and clopidogrel, but clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately 20% of Japanese and other Asian populations. One solution to clopidogrel resistance is using adjunctive cilostazol to suppress the frequency of stroke events and in-stent restenosis after CAS. Other antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under investigation. The duration of DAPT after CAS remains controversial, as a longer duration of DAPT after CAS is associated with lower rates of readmission for stroke, but increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Regarding antithrombotic therapy in CAS with concomitant atrial fibrillation, the use of direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor may be suggested for the optimal safety and efficacy of antithrombotic management. For emergent CAS in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intraprocedural DAPT loading and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as necessary, may improve stent patency without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In ICS, aggressive antiplatelet therapy based on an assessment of platelet aggregation is also important to improve clinical outcomes. In addition, rescue stenting for AIS caused by intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion is gaining attention. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown promise, but are not approved in Japan. In conclusion, DAPT is essential for the perioperative management of CAS and ICS. Specific perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear, but the potential benefits of antithrombotic agents must be weighed against the corresponding increased risk of bleeding complications.

Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the DEVT and RESCUE BT Trials

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis using data from 2 multicenter, randomized trials: the DEVT trial (Direct Endovascular Treatment for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) from May 2018 to May 2020 and the RESCUE BT trial (Intravenous Tirofiban Before Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke) from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours from last known well were dichotomized into 2 groups: tirofiban plus EVT versus alteplase bridging with EVT. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality. Multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure, occlusion site, onset-to-puncture time, anesthesia, and first choice of EVT) and propensity score overlap weighting (balance in demographic covariates, stroke characteristics, and initial management between groups) were performed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eighteen alteplase-treated patients in the DEVT trial and 98 tirofiban-treated patients in the RESCUE BT trial were included (median age, 70 years; 115 [53.2%] men). The rate of functional independence was 60.2% in the tirofiban group compared with 46.6% in the alteplase group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.60-2.63]). Compared with alteplase, tirofiban was not associated with increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.8% versus 9.2%; P=0.51) and mortality (17.8% versus 19.4%; P=0.76). The propensity score overlap weighting analyses showed consistent outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset, tirofiban plus EVT was comparable to alteplase bridging with EVT regarding the efficacy and safety outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require confirmation in a randomized trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 and ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Adjunct Intraarterial or Intravenous Tirofiban Versus No Tirofiban After Successful Recanalization of Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke: The BASILAR Registry

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of patients who achieve successful reperfusion do not achieve functional independence. The present study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of intraarterial or intravenous tirofiban as adjunct therapy in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion who had achieved successful recanalization with endovascular treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the national, prospective BASILAR (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study) registry, 458 patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into 3 groups based on tirofiban administration (no tirofiban, n=262; intravenous tirofiban, n=101; intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban, n=95). Their clinical outcomes were compared with 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were obtained by logistic regression models and propensity score matching. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, and mortality. Among 458 included patients, 184 (40.2%) achieved a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3). There were no differences between the intravenous tirofiban group and the no tirofiban group in terms of safety and clinical outcomes (all P>0.05). Compared with the no tirofiban group, the intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban group had higher odds of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 3 (aOR, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.30-4.64], P=0.006) and lower 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19-0.71], P=0.002) without an increase in any ICH (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.09-1.01], P=0.07) or symptomatic ICH (aOR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.03-0.90], P=0.05). Similar results of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban on improving clinical outcomes were detected in novel cohorts constructed by propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraarterial+intravenous rather than intravenous tirofiban improved clinical outcomes without increasing the frequency of symptomatic ICH among patients with basilar artery occlusion after successful endovascular treatment. Further studies are needed to delineate the roles of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban in patients with basilar artery occlusion receiving endovascular treatment.

Effects of tirofiban on large vessel occlusion stroke are modified by etiology and renal function

OBJECTIVE

Renal function can modify the outcomes of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke across stroke etiologies in disparate degrees. The presence of renal function deficit can also impair the pharmacokinetics of tirofiban. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the roles of renal function in determining efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO).

METHODS

This study was a post hoc exploratory analysis of the RESCUE-BT trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Among 908 individuals with available serum creatinine, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) status was noted more commonly in patients with cardioembolic stroke (CE), while large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) was predominant in patients with normal renal function. In LAA with normal renal function, tirofiban was associated with higher rates of functional independence at 90 days (41.67% vs 59.80%, p = 0.003). However, for LVO patients with renal dysfunction, tirofiban did not improve functional outcomes for any of the etiologies (LAA, p = 0.876; CE, p = 0.662; others, p = 0.894) and significantly increased the risk of sICH among non-LAA patients (p = 0.020). Mediation analysis showed tirofiban reduced thrombectomy passes (12.27%) and drug/placebo to recanalization time (14.25%) mediated its effects on functional independence.

CONCLUSION

This present study demonstrated the importance of evaluating renal function before administering intravenous tirofiban among patients with LVO who are planned to undergo EVT.

The impact of intraarterial, intravenous, and combined tirofiban on endovascular treatment for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion

Background and purpose

Adjunctive tirofiban administration in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been investigated in several studies. However, the findings are conflict. This study aimed to compare the effect of different administration pathways of tirofiban on patients undergoing EVT for acute LVO with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD).

Methods

Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) and divided into four groups: intra-arterial (IA), intravenous (IV), and intra-arterial plus intravenous (IA+IV) and non-tirofiban. The primary outcome was 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3 at 90-day, successful recanalization. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and other safety endpoints. The multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential baseline confounders were performed to compare the outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1:1:1 ratio was conducted among four groups, and the outcomes were then compared in the post-matched population.

Results

A total of 502 patients were included, 80 of which were in the IA-tirofiban group, 73 in IV-tirofiban, 181 in (IA+IV)-tirofiban group, and 168 in the non-tirofiban group. The median (IQR) 90-day mRS score in the four groups of IA, IV, IA+IV, and non-tirofiban was, respectively 3(0-5) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 3(0-5). The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30, P = 0.330), with IV-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78-2.36, P = 0.276), and with (IA+IV)-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.64-1.64, P = 0.912). The adjusted OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.98, P = 0.042) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.26-0.94, P = 0.033). The other outcomes of each group were similar with non-tirofiban group, all P was >0.05. After PSM, the common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18-0.94, P = 0.036), and the OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.74, P = 0.011) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Intra-arterial administration of tirofiban was associated with worse outcome than non-tirofiban, which suggested that intra-arterial tirofiban had a harmful effect on patients undergoing EVT for ICAD-LVO.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban combined with endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant tirofiban in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion due to large-artery atherosclerotic (LAA) receiving endovascular therapy (EVT).

METHODS

This was a non-randomized, multicenter study using data from the Endovascular Treatment for Acute BASILAR Artery Occlusion (BASILAR) registry. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion due to LAA within 24h of symptom onset who underwent EVT were included. Patients were divided into tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups according to whether tirofiban was used. The primary outcome was the ordinal modified Rankin scale score at 90 days. Safety outcomes were mortality within 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were included, of whom 275 patients were in the tirofiban group and 142 patients in the non-tirofiban group. Compared with patients in the non-tirofiban group, patients in the tirofiban group were associated with a favorable shift in functional outcome at 90 days (6[4-6] vs 5 [2-6]; adjusted common OR, 2.51; 95 % CI, 1.64-3.83). The mortality was lower in the tirofiban group than the non-tirofiban group (40.7 % vs 58.5 %; adjusted OR, 0.35; 95 % CI, 0.21-0.56). The rate of sICH was 12.2 % in the non-tirofiban group and 5.2 % in the tirofiban group (adjusted OR, 0.37; 95 % CI, 0.17-0.80; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Tirofiban plus EVT might improve functional outcomes with a good safety for patients with acute basilar artery occlusion due to LAA. The results need to be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion due to Intracranial Stenosis: Identification, Management, Challenges, and Future Directions

This comprehensive literature review focuses on acute stroke related to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), with an emphasis on ICAS-large vessel occlusion. ICAS is the leading cause of stroke globally, with high recurrence risk, especially in Asian, Black, and Hispanic populations. Various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and advanced age lead to ICAS, which in turn results in stroke through different mechanisms. Recurrent stroke risk in patients with ICAS with hemodynamic failure is particularly high, even with aggressive medical management. Developments in advanced imaging have improved our understanding of ICAS and ability to identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intervention. Herein, we focus on current management strategies for ICAS-large vessel occlusion discussed, including the use of perfusion imaging, endovascular therapy, and stenting. In addition, we focus on strategies that aim at identifying subjects at higher risk for early recurrent risk who could benefit from early endovascular intervention The review underscores the need for further research to optimize ICAS-large vessel occlusion treatment strategies, a traditionally understudied topic.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Use in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Intravenous Thrombolysis Applicable Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-a Post Hoc Analysis from the Direct-MT Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban use in endovascular thrombectomy for intravenous thrombolysis applicable patients of large vessel occlusion stroke with data from Direct-MT trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Direct-MT was the first randomized controlled trial to prove the non-inferiority of thrombectomy alone to bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy) for large vessel occlusion stroke. Patients who underwent endovascular procedure were included and divided into thrombectomy-alone group and bridging therapy group. The effect of tirofiban use on 90 days MRS distribution, MRS 0-2 and mortality, successful reperfusion, the ASPECTS and outcome lesion volume of index stroke, re-occlusion of the treated vessel, futile recanalization and safety outcomes were further evaluated in both groups after adjustment for relevant confounding factors. The interaction between tirofiban and rt-PA was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 639 patients included in this analysis, 180 patients underwent thrombectomy with tirofiban use (28.2%). Patients with tirofiban use had lower percentage of bridging therapy (41.1% vs 54.3%, P = 0.003), higher proportion of large artery atherosclerosis (P < 0.001) and more emergent stenting (30.56% vs 6.97%, P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, the 90-day modified Rankin Scale distribution, successful final recanalization rate, outcome lesion volume of index stroke on CT and intracranial hemorrhage risk showed no difference after tirofiban use in thrombectomy-alone group and in bridging therapy group. No interaction effect between tirofiban and rt-PA was detected.

CONCLUSION

Based on data from Direct-MT trial, tirofiban is a safe medication for intravenous thrombolysis applicable patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing thrombectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, cohort study of randomized trial.

Glycoprotein inhibitors as a first line rescue treatment after unsuccessful recanalization of endovascular thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of stroke with a high rate of re-occlusion following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Among the available rescue options, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) have shown promise as a potential therapeutic strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine studies exploring the use of glycoprotein inhibitors as a first-line treatment for refractory occlusion or high-grade stenosis following EVT in the setting of ICAD.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies using GPI as the first-line rescue treatment (GPI-rt) after failed thrombectomy or in the setting with high-grade stenosis (>50%) were included. The primary outcome of interest was good clinical outcomes (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes of interest were successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality by 90 days.

RESULTS

Our study processed 2111 articles, which yielded eight relevant studies for review, four single and four double arm. These studies comprised 763 patients, divided into GPI-rt (535 patients) and non-GPI-rt (228 patients) cohorts. The GPI-rt group had higher rates of mRS ≤ 2 at 90 days (58.5% vs 38.9%, p = 0.002) and lower mortality rates (7.8% vs 17.5%, p = 0.04) compared to the non-GPI-rt cohort. mTICI 2b-3 rates and rates of sICH were not significantly different between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

First line GPI-rt demonstrates significant clinical benefit and significantly lower mortality without a rise in rates of sICH. GPI are a potential first line rescue treatment of ICAD.

Emergent use of ticagrelor during endovascular reperfusion in large arterial occlusions

OBJECTIVE

Given many emerging indications for endovascular interventions in ischemic strokes, a safe and effective adjuvant antiplatelet regimen for acute revascularization has become a subject of interest. Ticagrelor is a direct oral P2Y12 inhibitor that may achieve rapid platelet suppression than standard oral therapies. We report our experience of Ticagrelor use in revascularization of acute large arterial steno-occlusive disease, describing procedural post-procedure thrombotic events, major hemorrhages, and other clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective case series of large steno-occlusive disease requiring endovascular reperfusion with emergent adjuvant Ticagrelor, defined as 30 min of the procedure from skin puncture to closure of the arteriotomy. Major outcomes investigated were thromboembolism in the target artery, and symptomatic intracranial or extracranial major hemorrhages. Additional analyses were performed with respect to timing of the administration and use of rescue GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors if any.

RESULTS

73 consecutive patients were identified, presenting with severe ischemic stroke (median NIHSS 16) of large artery origin. 67% required stent placement (45% cervical carotid, 22% intracranial artery), 9.5% angioplasty and 23% mechanical thrombectomy only. Two experienced symptomatic in-stent occlusion, and 7 experienced major hemorrhages (9.5%) including 3 fatal symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (4.1%). Among 19 subjects (26%) who received pretreatment with Ticagrelor, there were fewer GPIIb/IIIa administration, angioplasty and stenting, without yielding benefit in functional outcome or mortality. GPIIb/IIIa was administered as rescue therapy in 45 subjects (62%), which was found associated with increased bleeding compared to patients receiving Ticagrelor only, in whom no bleeding complications were recorded (16% vs. 0%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

We report our findings on Ticagrelor as an adjuvant antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke of large arterial origin requiring emergent revascularization. Effectiveness, safety, need for additional rescue treatment, and comparison to other commonly used oral antiplatelets should be investigated in future prospective studies.

Postoperative fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio acting as an indicator of futile recanalization in patients with successful thrombectomy

BACKGROUND

Timely recognition of futile recanalization might enable a prompter response and thus improve outcomes in patients receiving successful thrombectomy. This study aims to evaluate whether postoperative fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) could act as an indicator of futile recanalization.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion and successful thrombectomy between May 2019 and June 2022. FAR was defined as postoperative blood levels of fibrinogen divided by those of albumin, and dichotomized into high and low levels based on the Youden index. Futile recanalization was defined as patients achieving a successful recanalization with a modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of FAR with futile recanalization.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients were enrolled, amongst which 87 patients (34.1%) had high postoperative FAR. Futile recanalization was more prevalent among patients with high FAR compared to those with low FAR (74.7% vs. 53.0%, p = .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, high postoperative FAR was found to independently correspond with the occurrence of futile recanalization (adjusted OR 2.40, 95%CI 1.18-4.87, p = .015). This association was consistently observed regardless of prior antithrombotic therapy, treatment of intravenous thrombolysis, occlusion site, time from symptom onset to groin puncture, and reperfusion status.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support high postoperative FAR serving as an indicator of futile recanalization in patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion and successful thrombectomy.

Most Promising Approaches to Improve Stroke Outcomes: The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable XII Workshop

The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable XII included a workshop to discuss the most promising approaches to improve outcome from acute stroke. The workshop brought together representatives from academia, industry, and government representatives. The discussion examined approaches in 4 epochs: pre-reperfusion, reperfusion, post-reperfusion, and access to acute stroke interventions. The participants identified areas of priority for developing new and existing treatments and approaches to improve stroke outcomes. Although many advances in acute stroke therapy have been achieved, more work is necessary for reperfusion therapies to benefit the most possible patients. Prioritization of promising approaches should help guide the use of resources and investigator efforts.

Low dose intravenous cangrelor versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in endovascular treatment of tandem lesions

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous (IV) periprocedural antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients undergoing acute carotid stenting during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not fully investigated. We aimed to compare the safety profile of IV low dose cangrelor versus IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP-IIb/IIIa) inhibitors in patients with acute tandem lesions (TLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all cases of periprocedural administration of IV cangrelor or GP-IIb/IIIa inhibitors during acute TLs intervention from a multicenter collaboration. Patients were divided in two groups according to the IV APT regimen at the time of MT procedure: 1) cangrelor and 2) GP-IIb/IIIa inhibitors (tirofiban and eptifibatide). Safety outcomes included rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), parenchymal hematoma type 1 and 2 (PH1-PH2), and hemorrhagic infarction type 1 and 2 (HI1-HI2).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients received IV APT during MT, 30 were in the cangrelor group, and 33 were in the GP-IIb/IIIa inhibitors group. There were no significant differences in the rates of sICH (3.3% vs. 12.1%, aOR=0.21, 95%CI 0.02-2.18, p=0.229), HI1-HI2 (21.4% vs 42.4%, aOR=0.21, 95%CI 0.02-2.18, p=0.229), and PH1-PH2 (17.9% vs. 12.1%, aOR=1.63, 95%CI 0.29-9.83, p=0.577) between both treatment groups. However, there was a trend toward reduced hemorrhage rates with cangrelor. Cangrelor was associated with increased odds of complete reperfusion (aOR=5.86; 95%CI 1.57-26.62;p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective non-randomized cohort study, our findings suggest that low dose cangrelor has similar safety and increased rate of complete reperfusion compared to IV GP-IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm this association.

Association of tirofiban treatment with outcomes following endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke: insights from the RESCUE BT randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of tirofiban in endovascular therapy for cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis utilized data from the RESCUE BT (Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) trial, which was an investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive either tirofiban or a placebo in a 1:1 ratio before undergoing endovascular therapy. The study included patients aged 18 years or older, presenting with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1/M2 within 24 h of the last known well time, and with a stroke etiology of cardioembolism. The primary efficacy outcome was global disability at 90 days, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcome included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h and mortality within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 406 cardioembolic stroke patients were included in this study, with 212 assigned to the tirofiban group and 194 assigned to the placebo group. Tirofiban treatment did not correlate with a favorable shift towards a lower 90-day mRS score (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI 0.64-1.3; p = 0.617). However, the tirofiban group had a significantly higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h (adjusted OR, 3.26; 95% CI 1.4-7.57; p = 0.006) compared to the placebo group. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for mortality within 90 days was 1.48 (95% CI 0.88-2.52; p = 0.143).

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban treatment was not associated with a lower level of disability and increased the incidence of sICH after endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke patients.

Sex disparity in stroke outcomes in a multicenter prospective stroke registry in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Although men have a higher rate of stroke than women, it is not clear whether women have a worse outcome after adjusting for confounders such as vascular risk factors, age, stroke severity, and reperfusion therapy. We evaluated sex differences on 90-day functional outcomes after stroke in a multicenter study in Vietnam.

METHODS

We recruited patients presenting with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at 10 stroke centers in Vietnam for a period of 1 month from 1 August 2022 to 31 August 2022. We reviewed the patient's clinical demographics, time from symptom onset to hospital admission, stroke classification, stroke subtype, stroke severity, characteristics of reperfusion therapy, and 90-day clinical outcome. We compared functional outcomes and predisposing factors at day 90 between men and women after an ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Poor outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 3-6.

RESULTS

There were 2300 stroke patients included. Men accounted for 61.3% (1410) of participants. Compared to men, women were older (67.7 ± 13.9 vs 63.7 ± 13.3, P < 0.001), had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (21.1% vs 15.3%, P < 0.001), a lower rate of tobacco use (1.0 % vs 23.6%, P < 0.001), and a lower body mass index (21.4 ± 2.70 vs 22.0 ± 2.72, P < 0.001). There was a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in men (21.3% vs 15.6%, P = 0.001), whereas the rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage was higher in women (6.2% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001). For ischemic stroke, door-to-needle time (36.9 ± 17.6 vs 47.8 ± 35.2 min, P = 0.04) and door-to-recanalization time (113.6 ± 51.1 vs 134.2 ± 48.2, P = 0.03) were shorter in women. There was no difference in 90-day functional outcomes between sexes. Factors associated with poor outcomes included age ⩾50 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-2.66), history of stroke (aOR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.96), large artery atherosclerosis (aOR: 5.19; 95% CI: 3.90-6.90), and cardioembolism (aOR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.68-6.16). Factors associated with mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke included a history of coronary artery disease (aOR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.03-8.92), large artery atherosclerosis (aOR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.11-5.37), and cardioembolism (aOR: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.20-8.27).

CONCLUSION

There were no sex differences in the clinical outcome of stroke and ischemic stroke in this prospective cohort of hospitalized Vietnamese patients.

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: New Evidence and Indications

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. In the past few years, endovascular treatment indications have expanded to include patients being treated in the extended window, with large ischemic core infarction, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy, as demonstrated by several randomized clinical trials. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy has also been studied via several randomized clinical trials, with the overall results indicating that IVT should not be skipped in patients who are candidates for both IVT and EVT. Simplification of neuroimaging protocols in the extended window to permit non-contrast CT, CTA collaterals have also expanded access to mechanical thrombectomy, particularly in regions across the world where access to advanced imaging may not be available. Ongoing study of areas to develop include rescue stenting in patients with failed thrombectomy, medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, and carotid tandem occlusions. In this narrative review, we summarize recent trials and key data in the treatment of patients with large ischemic core infarct, simplification of neuroimaging protocols for the treatment of patients presenting in the late window, bridging thrombolysis, and BAO EVT evidence. We also summarize areas of ongoing study including medium and distal vessel occlusion.

Factors related to unfavorable outcome in minor ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke recurrence and disability are important challenges to overcome in patients with minor ischemic stroke. The aim of our study was to determine the factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with minor ischemic stroke.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study including patients with minor ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤ 4 who were treated at the Bach Mai Hospital stroke center from June 15, 2021, to September 15, 2022. Unfavorable outcome was defined as mRS 2-6 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess risk factors related to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 678 patients presenting with minor ischemic stroke, there were 90 (13.3%, 90/678) patients with no intracranial artery imaging. Hence, 588 were patients analyzed, of whom 6.0% received thrombolytic therapy, 8.5% developed NIHSS > 4 in 24 hours, and 30.4% had intracranial stenosis > 50%. Compared with the group of unfavorable outcomes, the favorable outcome group had more NIHSS 0-1 (29.9% vs.8.7%, P<0.001), lower cardioembolic (3.2% vs.7.9%, P=0.021), low IV-tPA ratio (4.8% vs.10.3%, P=0.019), lower NIHSS progression > 4 in the first 24 hours (3.9% vs.25.4%, P<0.001), and lower ICAS rate (28.1% vs.38.9%, P=0.02). Multivariable regression analysis of factors affecting unfavorable outcomes included baseline NIHSS 2-4 (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.97-7.52), NIHSS progression > 4 (OR, 7.57; 95% CI, 3.80-15.10), and ICAS (OR 1.68; 95%CI, 1.07-2.64).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with minor ischemic stroke, unfavorable outcomes were associated with baseline NIHSS 2-4, NIHSS progression > 4 points in 24 hours, and ICAS. These factors may identify a patient population in need of close monitoring and at higher risk of adverse outcomes.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion.

History of Neurointervention

In this review article, we aim to provide a summary of the discoveries and developments that were instrumental in the evolution of the Neurointerventional field. We begin with developments in the advent of Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and progress to cerebral aneurysm treatment, embolization in AVMs and ischemic stroke treatment. In the process we discuss many persons who were key in the development and maturation of the field. A pivotal aspect to rapid growth in the field has been the multidisciplinary involvement of the different neuroscience specialties and therefore we close out our discussion with excitement about ongoing and future developments in the field with a focus on treatments in the non-cerebrovascular disease realm.