Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial

Consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 revision of the MENACTRIMS guidelines

With evolving diagnostic criteria and the advent of new oral and parenteral therapies for Multiple Sclerosis (MS), most current diagnostic and treatment algorithms need revision and updating. The diagnosis of MS relies on incorporating clinical and paraclinical findings to prove dissemination in space and time and exclude alternative diseases that can explain the findings at hand. The differential diagnostic workup should be guided by clinical and laboratory red flags to avoid unnecessary tests. Appropriate selection of MS therapies is critical to maximize patient benefit. The current guidelines review the current diagnostic criteria for MS and the scientific evidence supporting treatment of acute relapses, radiologically isolated syndrome, clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, progressive MS, pediatric cases and pregnant women. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide practical recommendations and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of MS based on current scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to synthesize all available observational studies and clinical trials of rituximab to estimate the safety and efficacy of this monoclonal antibody in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

The four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in April 2022. We defined PICO as follows. Problem or study population (P): patients with MS; intervention (I): Rituximab; comparison (C): none; outcome (O): efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

After two-step screening, a total of 27 studies entered into our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Our analysis showed a significant decrease in EDSS score in all patients with MS after treatment (SMD: - 0.44, 95% CI - 0.85, - 0.03). In addition, the ARR was reduced after using rituximab compared to the pre-treatment period (SMD: - 0.65, 95% CI - 1.55, 0.24) but it was not significant. The most common side effect after rituximab with a pooled prevalence of 28.63% (95% CI 16.61%, 42.33%). Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of infection was 24% in patients with MS (95% CI 13%, 36%). In the end, the pooled prevalence of malignancies after rituximab treatment was 0.39% (95% CI 0.02%, 1.03%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrated an acceptable safety for this treatment. However, further studies with randomized design, long follow-up, and large sample sizes are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with MS.

Disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: A focused review of rituximab

BACKGROUND

Treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, has changed drastically in the last 30 years. Several different disease-modifying therapies are now available, with off-label use of the B-cell-depleting antibody rituximab becoming an increasingly popular choice, as more and more studies report on its effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to summarize the current state of evidence for rituximab as a treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

METHODS

A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed studies of adult populations with RRMS. Ongoing trials with rituximab in MS were identified through Clinicaltrials.gov and additional references were identified through review articles.

FINDINGS

Despite promising results for rituximab as a treatment of MS, the market-authorization holder switched focus from rituximab and discontinued the industry-sponsored trials programme. However, several observational studies, smaller clinical trials and one large investigator-initiated randomized-controlled trial have continued to report fewer clinical relapses, fewer contrast-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and better drug survival with rituximab, compared with MS-approved alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab should be considered as both a first- and second-line therapy option for most MS patients with active, non-progressive disease. However, as an off-label therapy for MS, regulatory approval remains a barrier for wider adoption in many countries.

Meningeal inflammation as a driver of cortical grey matter pathology and clinical progression in multiple sclerosis

Growing evidence from cerebrospinal fluid samples and post-mortem brain tissue from individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and rodent models indicates that the meninges have a key role in the inflammatory and neurodegenerative mechanisms underlying progressive MS pathology. The subarachnoid space and associated perivascular spaces between the membranes of the meninges are the access points for entry of lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages into the brain parenchyma, and the main route for diffusion of inflammatory and cytotoxic molecules from the cerebrospinal fluid into the brain tissue. In addition, the meningeal spaces act as an exit route for CNS-derived antigens, immune cells and metabolites. A number of studies have demonstrated an association between chronic meningeal inflammation and a more severe clinical course of MS, suggesting that the build-up of immune cell aggregates in the meninges represents a rational target for therapeutic intervention. Therefore, understanding the precise cell and molecular mechanisms, timing and anatomical features involved in the compartmentalization of inflammation within the meningeal spaces in MS is vital. Here, we present a detailed review and discussion of the cellular, molecular and radiological evidence for a role of meningeal inflammation in MS, alongside the clinical and therapeutic implications.

A safety review of current monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown efficacy in reducing MS relapse rates, disease progression, and brain lesion activity.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature on the use of mAbs for the treatment of MS, including their mechanisms of action, clinical trial data, safety profiles, and long-term outcomes. The review focuses on the three main categories of mAbs used in MS: alemtuzumab, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 drugs. A literature search was conducted using relevant keywords and guidelines and reports from regulatory agencies were reviewed. The search covered studies published from inception to 31 December 202231 December 2022. The article also discusses the potential risks and benefits of these therapies, including their effects on infection rates, malignancies, and vaccination efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

Monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized the treatment of MS, but safety concerns must be considered, particularly with regards to infection rates, malignancy risk, and vaccination efficacy. Clinicians must weigh the potential benefits and risks of mAbs on an individual patient basis, taking into account factors such as age, disease severity, and comorbidities. Ongoing monitoring and surveillance are essential to ensure the long-term safety and effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapies in MS.

Current evidence of rituximab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. The immunopathology of MS involves both T and B lymphocytes. Rituximab is one of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies which deplete B-cells. Although some anti-CD20 therapies have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of MS, rituximab is used off-label. Several studies have shown that rituximab has a good efficacy and safety in MS, including certain specific patient conditions such as treatment-naïve patients, treatment-switching patients, and the Asian population. However, there are still questions about the optimal dose and duration of rituximab in MS due to the different dosing regimens used in each study. Moreover, many biosimilars have become available at a lower cost with comparable physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Thus, rituximab may be considered as a potential therapeutic option for patients without access to standard treatment. This narrative review summarized the evidence of both original and biosimilars of rituximab in MS treatment including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and dosing regimen.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis with rituximab: A Spanish multicenter experience

Introduction

Rituximab (RTX) is considered a potential therapeutic option for relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and progressive forms (PMS) of multiple sclerosis (MS). The main objective of this work was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in MS.

Patients and methods

Observational multicenter study of clinical and radiological effectiveness and safety of rituximab in RRMS and PMS.

Results

A total of 479 rituximab-treated patients were included in 12 Spanish centers, 188 RRMS (39.3%) and 291 (60.7%) PMS. Despite standard treatment, the annualized relapse rate (ARR) the year before RTX was 0.63 (SD: 0.8) and 156 patients (41%) had at least one gadolinium-enhanced lesion (GEL) on baseline MRI. Mean EDSS had increased from 4.3 (SD: 1.9) to 4.8 (SD: 1.7) and almost half of the patients (41%) had worsened at least one point. After a median follow-up of 14.2 months (IQR: 6.5-27.2), ARR decreased by 85.7% (p < 0.001) and GEL by 82.9%, from 0.41 to 0.07 (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in EDSS to 4.7 (p = 0.046) was observed after 1 year of treatment and this variable remained stable during the second year of therapy. There was no evidence of disease activity in 68% of patients. Infusion-related symptoms were the most frequent side effect (19.6%) and most were mild. Relevant infections were reported only in 18 patients (including one case of probable progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy).

Conclusion

Rituximab could be an effective and safe treatment in RRMS, including aggressive forms of the disease. Some selected PMS patients could also benefit from this treatment.

Optic Neuritis in Multiple Sclerosis—A Review of Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the Degenerative Process

Multiple sclerosis is a central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease with a wide range of clinical symptoms, ocular involvement being frequently marked by the presence of optic neuritis (ON). The emergence and progression of ON in multiple sclerosis is based on various pathophysiological mechanisms, disease progression being secondary to inflammation, demyelination, or axonal degeneration. Early identification of changes associated with axonal degeneration or further investigation of the molecular processes underlying remyelination are current concerns of researchers in the field in view of the associated therapeutic potential. This article aims to review and summarize the scientific literature related to the main molecular mechanisms involved in defining ON as well as to analyze existing data in the literature on remyelination strategies in ON and their impact on long-term prognosis.

Strong T-cell activation in response to COVID-19 vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients receiving B-cell depleting therapies

Immunocompromised individuals, including multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on certain immunotherapy treatments, are considered susceptible to complications from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and specific vaccination regimens have been recommended for suitable protection. MS patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy (aCD20-MS) are considered especially vulnerable due to acquired B-cell depletion and impaired antibody production in response to virus infection and COVID-19 vaccination. Here, the humoral and cellular responses are analyzed in a group of aCD20-MS patients (n=43) compared to a healthy control cohort (n=34) during the first 6 months after a 2-dose cycle mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. Both IgG antibodies recognizing receptor binding domain (RBD) from CoV-2 spike protein and their blocking activity against RBD-hACE2 binding were significantly reduced in aCD20-MS patients, with a seroconversion rate of only 23.8%. Interestingly, even under conditions of severe B-cell depletion and failed seroconversion, a significantly higher polyfunctional IFNγ⁺ and IL-2⁺ T-cell response and strong T-cell proliferation capacity were detected compared to controls. Moreover, no difference in T-cell response was observed between forms of disease (relapsing remitting- vs progressive-MS), anti-CD20 therapy (Rituximab vs Ocrelizumab) and type of mRNA-based vaccine received (mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2). These results suggest the generation of a partial adaptive immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in B-cell depleted MS individuals driven by a functionally competent T-cell arm. Investigation into the role of the cellular immune response is important to identifying the level of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in aCD20-MS patients and could have potential implications for future vaccine design and application.

Targeted Delivery Platforms for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative condition of the central nervous system (CNS) that presents with varying levels of disability in patients, displaying the significance of timely and effective management of this complication. Though several treatments have been developed to protect nerves, comprehensive improvement of MS is still considered an essential bottleneck. Therefore, the development of innovative treatment methods for MS is one of the core research areas. In this regard, nanoscale platforms can offer practical and ideal approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases, especially immunological disorders such as MS, to improve the effectiveness of conventional therapies. It should be noted that there is significant progress in the development of neuroprotective strategies through the implementation of various nanoparticles, monoclonal antibodies, peptides, and aptamers. In this study, we summarize different particle systems as well as targeted therapies, such as antibodies, peptides, nucleic acids, and engineered cells for the treatment of MS, and discuss their potential in the treatment of MS in the preclinical and clinical stages. Future advances in targeted delivery of medical supplies may offer new strategies for complete recovery as well as practical treatment of progressive forms of MS.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with multiple sclerosis: An observational study at a tertiary center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment in terms of reduction in clinical relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and adverse events.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdullah Medical City, from January 2017 to August 2021, involving patients with MS given rituximab, with 1-year follow-up. Clinical parameters were noted pre- and post-treatment to determine efficacy; adverse events were noted to analyze safety. A paired samples t-test was used to compare responses pre- and post-treatment. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Among 31 patients, 6 (19.4%) had progressive MS, and 25 (80.6%) had relapsing-remitting MS (mean disease duration=8.12±5.65 years). The annual relapse rate reduced from 1.67±0.97 to 0.06±0.25 (p<0.001), the EDSS score from 3.16±2.14 to 2.80±2.28 (p=0.141) and the MRI activity score from 1.84±1.03 to 1.03±0.18 (p<0.001). Only one patient had enhancing lesion activity post-treatment. The commonest side effect was urinary tract infection (25.8%). Only 2 patients discontinued the drug.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab is an efficient drug in reducing the annual relapse rate and MRI activity of patients with MS, with few tolerable side effects not leading to drug discontinuation or any lethal outcome.

What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?

In the past two decades, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, a remarkable number of mAbs failed due to negative study results were withdrawn because of unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs) or due to studies being halted for other reasons. While trials with positive outcomes are usually published in prestigious journals, negative trials are merely published as abstracts or not at all. This review summarizes MS mAbs that have either failed in phase II-III trials, have been interrupted for various reasons, or withdrawn from the market since 2015. The main conclusions that can be drawn from these 'negative' experiences are as follows. mAbs that have been proven to be safe in other autoimmune conditions, will not have the same safety profile in MS due to immunopathogenetic differences in these diseases (e.g., daclizumab). Identification of SAEs in clinical trials is difficult highlighting the importance of phase IV studies. Memory B cells are central players in MS immunopathogenesis (e.g., tabalumab). The pathophysiological mechanisms of disease progression are independent of leukocyte 'outside-in' traffic which drives relapses in MS. Therefore, therapies for progressive MS must be able to sufficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. Sufficiently long trial duration and multicomponent outcome measures are important for clinical studies in progressive MS. The success of trials on remyelination-promoting therapies mainly depends on the sufficient high dose of mAb, the optimal readout for 'proof of concept', time of treatment initiation, and appropriate selection of patients. Failed strategies are highly important to better understand assumed immunopathophysiological mechanisms and optimizing future trial designs.

Emerging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Blood and the CSF: A Focus on Neurofilaments and Therapeutic Considerations

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common immune-mediated chronic neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) affecting young people. This is due to the permanent disability, cognitive impairment, and the enormous detrimental impact MS can exert on a patient's health-related quality of life. It is of great importance to recognise it in time and commence adequate treatment at an early stage. The currently used disease-modifying therapies (DMT) aim to reduce disease activity and thus halt disability development, which in current clinical practice are monitored by clinical and imaging parameters but not by biomarkers found in blood and/or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Both clinical and radiological measures routinely used to monitor disease activity lack information on the fundamental pathophysiological features and mechanisms of MS. Furthermore, they lag behind the disease process itself. By the time a clinical relapse becomes evident or a new lesion appears on the MRI scan, potentially irreversible damage has already occurred in the CNS. In recent years, several biomarkers that previously have been linked to other neurological and immunological diseases have received increased attention in MS. Additionally, other novel, potential biomarkers with prognostic and diagnostic properties have been detected in the CSF and blood of MS patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarise the most up-to-date knowledge and research conducted on the already known and most promising new biomarker candidates found in the CSF and blood of MS patients.

DISCUSSION

the current diagnostic criteria of MS relies on three pillars: MRI imaging, clinical events, and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF (which was reinstated into the diagnostic criteria by the most recent revision). Even though the most recent McDonald criteria made the diagnosis of MS faster than the prior iteration, it is still not an infallible diagnostic toolset, especially at the very early stage of the clinically isolated syndrome. Together with the gold standard MRI and clinical measures, ancillary blood and CSF biomarkers may not just improve diagnostic accuracy and speed but very well may become agents to monitor therapeutic efficacy and make even more personalised treatment in MS a reality in the near future. The major disadvantage of these biomarkers in the past has been the need to obtain CSF to measure them. However, the recent advances in extremely sensitive immunoassays made their measurement possible from peripheral blood even when present only in minuscule concentrations. This should mark the beginning of a new biomarker research and utilisation era in MS.

Experimental laboratory biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system; the cause of this condition remains unknown. Researchers have analyzed different biomarkers related to MS. Here, experimental laboratory biomarkers for MS are identified and analyzed.

METHODS

The current study examined articles investigating biomarkers for MS. Records were obtained from the PubMed, LILACS, and EBSCO databases using an identical search strategy and terms that included "multiple sclerosis," "MS," and "biomarkers." In the current review, we also focus on lesser known biomarkers that have not yet been established for use in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Previous studies have explored molecular substances that may help diagnose MS and manage its adverse effects. Commonly studied factors include neurofilaments, sCD163, CXCL13, NEO, NF‑L, OPN, B cells, T cells, and integrin-binding proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Interactions between environmental and genetic factors have been implicated in the development of MS. Previous investigations have identified a wide range of biomarkers that can be used for diagnosis and disease management. These molecules and their associated studies provide vital insight and data to help primary physicians improve clinical and health outcomes for MS patients.

Effectiveness of rituximab vs. ocrelizumab for the treatment of primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a real-world observational study

INTRODUCTION

Ocrelizumab, an antiCD-20 antibody, is the only drug approved to treat patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPPMS). Not all candidates receive this treatment due to prescription limitations. Rituximab, another antiCD-20 antibody, has been used off-label in pwPPMS before and after ocrelizumab approval. However, studies comparing effectiveness of both drugs are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effectiveness of rituximab and ocrelizumab in pwPPMS under real-life conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric observational study of pwPPMS that started ocrelizumab or rituximab according to clinical practice, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data was collected prospectively and retrospectively. Primary outcome was time to confirmed disability progression at 3 months (CDW). Secondary outcome was serum neurofilament light chain levels (sNFL) at the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

95 out 111 pwPPMS fulfilled inclusion criteria and follow-up data availability: 49 (51.6%) received rituximab and 46 (48.4%) ocrelizumab. Rituximab-treated patients had significantly higher baseline EDSS, disease duration and history of previous disease-modifying treatment (DMT) than ocrelizumab-treated patients. After a mean follow-up of 18.3 months (SD 5.9), 26 patients experienced CDW (21.4%); 15 (30.6%) in the rituximab group; and 11 (23.9%) in the ocrelizumab group. Survival analysis revealed no differences in time to CDW. sNFL were measured in 60 patients and no differences between groups were found.

INTERPRETATION

We provide real-world evidence of effectiveness of ocrelizumab and rituximab in pwPPMS. No differences in time to CDW were found between treatments. However, this study cannot establish equivalence of treatments and warrant clinical trial to confirm our findings.

Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, different studies have highlighted the importance of B cells in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS): they secrete cytokines to modulate the inflammatory environment, present antigens for the activation of T lymphocytes, and they secrete antibodies contributing to the destruction of the myelin sheath. Combined, these findings have lead to new possible means for treating MS.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the characteristics of ofatumumab (aka Kesimpta), and the differences between this drug and the other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies used to treat MS.

EXPERT OPINION

The evolution of disease-modifying treatment algorithms in MS underlines the importance of starting treatment as soon as the diagnosis is defined, and with adequate "treatment intensity". Monoclonal antibodies and other aggressive treatments are now considered as an option at the clinical presentation of the disease, based to the prognostic profile emerging through clinical and paraclinical investigations. The recent adoption of new diagnostic criteria allows for the early diagnosis of MS. This, together with the availability of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as ofatumumab, with a good efficacy/safety profile and which are easy to administer, could contribute to significant improvements in the long-term prognosis of MS.

Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review

In the last decades, evidence suggesting the direct or indirect involvement of B cells on multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis has accumulated. The increased amount of data on the efficacy and safety of B-cell-depleting therapies from several studies has suggested the addition of these drugs as treatment options to the current armamentarium of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS. Particularly, rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed at CD20 positive B lymphocytes resulting in cell-mediated apoptosis, has been demonstrated to reduce inflammatory activity, incidence of relapses and new brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Additional evidence also demonstrated that patients with progressive MS (PMS) may benefit from RTX, which also showed to be well tolerated, with acceptable safety risks and favorable cost-effectiveness profile.Despite these encouraging results, RTX is currently approved for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, several forms of vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis, while it can only be administered off-label for MS treatment. Between Northern European countries exist different rules for using not licensed drug for treating MS. The Sweden MS register reports a high rate (53.5%) of off-label RTX prescriptions in relation to other annually started DMTs to treat MS patients, while Danish and Norwegian neurologists have to use other anti-CD20 drugs, as ocrelizumab, in most of the cases.In this paper, we review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety profile and cost effectiveness aspects of RTX for the treatment of MS. Particularly, with the approval of new anti-CD20 DMTs, the recent worldwide COVID-19 emergency and the possible increased risk of infection with this class of drugs, this review sheds light on the use of RTX as an alternative treatment option for MS management, while commenting the gaps of knowledge regarding this drug.

Extended dosing of monoclonal antibodies in multiple sclerosis

Over the past two decades, treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have increased exponentially. In the current therapeutic landscape, "no evidence of MS disease activity" is within reach in many of our patients. Minimizing risks of complications, improving treatment convenience, and decreasing health care costs are goals that are yet to be reached. One way to optimize MS therapy is to implement personalized or extended interval dosing. Monoclonal antibodies are suitable candidates for personalized dosing (by therapeutic drug monitoring) or extended interval dosing. An increasing number of studies are performed and underway reporting on altered dosing intervals of anti-α₄β₁-integrin treatment (natalizumab) and anti-CD20 treatment (ocrelizumab, rituximab, and ofatumumab) in MS. In this review, current available evidence regarding personalized and extended interval dosing of monoclonal antibodies in MS is discussed with recommendations for future research and clinical practice.

The comparative efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis

With the recent successful targeting of B lymphocytes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may represent a promising managemental approach, particularly for those with relapsing/remitting MS (RRMS). A network meta-analysis was conducted based on a comprehensive search in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of currently available anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab, versus a common comparator (interferon beta-1a [INFβ-1a]) in RRMS patients recruited in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In a frequentist network meta-analytical model, annualized relapse rates (ARRs) and safety outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs), whereas relapse-free events were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Treatment ranking was performed using P-scores. The certainty of evidence was appraised using the GRADE approach. Five publications reported the outcomes of seven RCTs (3938 patients, 67.09% females). Compared to INFβ-1a, ocrelizumab reduced the risk of ARR (RR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.50-0.64), serious adverse events (RR = 0.17, 95% CI, 0.09-0.30), and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (SAEs, RR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.93), and it was associated with higher odds of no relapses (OR = 2.47, 95% CI, 2.00-3.05). Ocrelizumab ranked best among all other treatments in terms of reducing ARR and SAEs. The quality of evidence was low for ocrelizumab, low to moderate for rituximab, and high for ofatumumab. Further large-sized, well-designed RCTs are needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab and other anti-CD20 mAbs in RRMS.

Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological cause of disability in young adults. Off-label rituximab for MS is used in most countries surveyed by the International Federation of MS, including high-income countries where on-label disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are available.  OBJECTIVES: To assess beneficial and adverse effects of rituximab as 'first choice' and as 'switching' for adults with MS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and trial registers for completed and ongoing studies on 31 January 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) comparing rituximab with placebo or another DMT for adults with MS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. We rated the certainty of evidence using GRADE for: disability worsening, relapse, serious adverse events (SAEs), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), common infections, cancer, and mortality. We conducted separate analyses for rituximab as 'first choice' or as 'switching', relapsing or progressive MS, comparison versus placebo or another DMT, and RCTs or NRSIs.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 studies (5 RCTs, 10 NRSIs) with 16,429 participants of whom 13,143 were relapsing MS and 3286 progressive MS. The studies were one to two years long and compared rituximab as 'first choice' with placebo (1 RCT) or other DMTs (1 NRSI), rituximab as 'switching' against placebo (2 RCTs) or other DMTs (2 RCTs, 9 NRSIs). The studies were conducted worldwide; most originated from high-income countries, six from the Swedish MS register. Pharmaceutical companies funded two studies. We identified 14 ongoing studies. Rituximab as 'first choice' for relapsing MS Rituximab versus placebo: no studies met eligibility criteria for this comparison. Rituximab versus other DMTs: one NRSI compared rituximab with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in active relapsing MS at 24 months' follow-up. Rituximab likely results in a large reduction in relapses compared with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.39; 335 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Rituximab may reduce relapses compared with dimethyl fumarate (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.00; 206 participants; low-certainty evidence) and natalizumab (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.00; 170 participants; low-certainty evidence). It may make little or no difference on relapse compared with fingolimod (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.69; 137 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported no deaths over 24 months. The study did not measure disability worsening, SAEs, HRQoL, and common infections. Rituximab as 'first choice' for progressive MS One RCT compared rituximab with placebo in primary progressive MS at 24 months' follow-up. Rituximab likely results in little to no difference in the number of participants who have disability worsening compared with placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.71, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.11; 439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Rituximab may result in little to no difference in recurrence of relapses (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.99; 439 participants; low-certainty evidence), SAEs (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.20; 439 participants; low-certainty evidence), common infections (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.73; 439 participants; low-certainty evidence), cancer (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.59; 439 participants; low-certainty evidence), and mortality (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.77; 439 participants; low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure HRQoL. Rituximab versus other DMTs: no studies met eligibility criteria for this comparison. Rituximab as 'switching' for relapsing MS  One RCT compared rituximab with placebo in relapsing MS at 12 months' follow-up. Rituximab may decrease recurrence of relapses compared with placebo (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.93; 104 participants; low-certainty evidence). The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of rituximab relative to placebo on SAEs (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.92; 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence), common infections (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.24; 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence), cancer (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.06 to 39.15; 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and mortality (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.06 to 39.15; 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure disability worsening and HRQoL.  Five NRSIs compared rituximab with other DMTs in relapsing MS at 24 months' follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of rituximab relative to interferon beta or glatiramer acetate on disability worsening (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.42; 1 NRSI, 853 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Rituximab likely results in a large reduction in relapses compared with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 NRSI, 1383 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and fingolimod (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.32; 1 NRSI, 256 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of rituximab relative to natalizumab on relapses (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.2 to 5.0; 1 NRSI, 153 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Rituximab likely increases slightly common infections compared with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.62; 1 NRSI, 5477 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and compared with natalizumab (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.32; 2 NRSIs, 5001 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Rituximab may increase slightly common infections compared with fingolimod (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.77; 3 NRSIs, 5187 participants; low-certainty evidence). It may make little or no difference compared with ocrelizumab (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.40; 1 NRSI, 472 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of rituximab on mortality compared with fingolimod (OR 5.59, 95% CI 0.22 to 139.89; 1 NRSI, 136 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and natalizumab (OR 6.66, 95% CI 0.27 to 166.58; 1 NRSI, 153 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The included studies did not measure SAEs, HRQoL, and cancer.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For preventing relapses in relapsing MS, rituximab as 'first choice' and as 'switching' may compare favourably with a wide range of approved DMTs. A protective effect of rituximab against disability worsening is uncertain. There is limited information to determine the effect of rituximab for progressive MS.  The evidence is uncertain about the effect of rituximab on SAEs. They are relatively rare in people with MS, thus difficult to study, and they were not well reported in studies. There is an increased risk of common infections with rituximab, but absolute risk is small.  Rituximab is widely used as off-label treatment in people with MS; however, randomised evidence is weak. In the absence of randomised evidence, remaining uncertainties on beneficial and adverse effects of rituximab for MS might be clarified by making real-world data available.

Anti-CD20 therapies for multiple sclerosis: current status and future perspectives

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS), often characterized by the accumulation of irreversible clinical disability over time. During last years, there has been a dramatic evolution in several key concepts of immune pathophysiology of MS and in the treatment of this disease. The demonstration of the strong efficacy and good safety profile of selective B-cell-depleting therapies (such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies) has significantly expanded the therapeutic scenario for both relapsing and progressive MS patients with the identification of a new therapeutic target. The key role of B cells in triggering MS disease has been also pointed out, determining a shift from the traditional view of MS activity as largely being ‘T-cell mediated’ to the notion that MS-related pathological processes involve bi-directional interactions between several immune cell types, including B cells, both in the periphery and in the CNS. This review provides an updated overview of the involvement of B cells in the immune pathophysiology and pathology of MS. We summarize the rationale regarding the use of anti-CD20 therapies and the results of the main randomized controlled trials and observational studies investigating the efficacy and safety profile of rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab. Suggestions regarding vaccinations and management of MS patients during COVID-19 pandemic with anti-CD20 therapies are also discussed. Finally, therapies under investigation and future perspectives of anti-CD20 therapies are taken into consideration.

Anti-drug antibodies to antibody-based therapeutics in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is the major demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Relapsing MS can be treated by a number of approved monoclonal antibodies that currently target: CD20, CD25 (withdrawn), CD49d and CD52. These all target potentially pathogenic memory B cell subsets and perhaps functionally inhibit pathogenic T cell function. These consist of chimeric, humanized and fully human antibodies. However, despite humanization it is evident that all of these monoclonal antibodies can induce binding and neutralizing antibodies ranging from < 1% to over 80% within a year of treatment. Importantly, it is evident that monitoring these allow prediction of future treatment-failure in some individuals and treatment cessation and switching therefore potentially limiting disease breakthrough and disability accumulation. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to avoid hospitals, shortened infusion times and extended dose intervals have been implemented, importantly, subcutaneous delivery of alternative treatments or formulations have been developed to allow for home treatment. Therefore, hospital-based and remote monitoring of ADA could therefore be advantageous to optimize patient responses in the future.

B cell depletion changes the immune cell profile in multiple sclerosis patients: One-year report

B cell depletion therapy has been shown to be beneficial in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the mechanism by which B cell depletion mediates its beneficial effects in MS is still unclear. To better understand how B cell depletion may benefit patients with a disease previously thought to be primarily mediated by CD4 T cells, immune profiles were monitored in 48 patients in a phase II trial of ublituximab, a glycoengineered CD20 monoclonal antibody, at 18 time points over a year. As we previously described there was a significant shift in the percentages of T cells, NK cells, and myeloid cells following the initial dose of ublituximab, but this shift normalized within a week and these populations remained stable for the duration of the study. However, T cell subsets changed with an increase in the percentage of naïve CD4 and CD8 T cells and a decline in memory T cells. Importantly, the percentage of Th1 and CD4⁺GM-CSF⁺ T cells decreased, while the percentage of Tregs continued to increase over the year. Ublituximab not only depleted CD20⁺ B cells, but also CD20⁺ T cells. The favorable changes in the T cell subsets may contribute to the beneficial effects of B cell depletion therapy.

Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?

Despite the availability of a lot of effective disease-modifying drugs, multiple sclerosis (MS) (in particular the progressive forms) still represents an important unmet medical need, because of issues in terms of effectiveness, duration of response, safety, and patient compliance. An increasing body of evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world data suggest that rituximab is a highly effective alternative in both relapsing and progressive MS, with a low discontinuation rate, related to a good benefit/risk profile, and a good compliance. To date, the use of rituximab in patients with multiple sclerosis is not in accordance with the authorized product information (off-label use). However, the use of this medicine is widespread in several countries, and in some cases, it is the most commonly used disease-modifying drug for MS subtypes. This use could be officially recognized by national regulatory authorities, according to specific procedures, to ensure equal access for patients to a safe and effective option.

Risk of invasive fungal infections among patients treated with disease modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: a comprehensive review

Introduction: Disease modifying treatments are commonly used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. As different opportunistic infections have been reported, concerns are also raised regarding the risk of invasive fungal infections.Areas covered: Both clinical trials and observational studies on safety and efficacy of diseases modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis were reviewed and data regarding the occurrence of invasive fungal infections were reported. Papers evaluating the following drugs were reviewed: rituximab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab, fingolimod, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, interferon, glatiramer acetate, cladribine, teriflunomide.Expert opinion: Overall, the occurrence of invasive fungal infections was low, with most infective events reported among patients treated with monoclonal antibodies and fingolimod. Aspergillosis and cryptococcal meningitidis were the most representative fungal infections. Although not common, these infections may be difficult to diagnose and their fatality rate is often high. For this reason, screening protocols for fungal infections must be implemented in the clinical practice when managing patients with MS.

Identification of posterior visual pathway lesions and MRI burden in people with Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

This review systematically identifies posterior visual pathway lesions and MRI burden in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

The articles were searched through Web of Science, Medline, and Embase databases on January 2020, for English language articles from 2000 to 2019.

RESULTS

This review presents summary measures if related to MRI assessment to an overall measure of MS and visual pathway lesions. A total of 44 articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria, covering the period 2000-2019. Different atypical outcomes reveal a low risk for subsequent clinically predefined MS development, specifically in the presence of normal brain MRI. Several impairments related to quality of life have been identified as a result of the effect of retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, and inner plexiform layer.

CONCLUSION

The afferent visual system in MS offers unique accessibility and structure-related functions with further understanding offered by electrophysiology, considering vision as a useful framework for examining new multiple sclerosis therapies.

Modulation of Retinal Atrophy With Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of rituximab on retinal atrophy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), we performed serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans among a cohort of patients with RRMS on rituximab and compared rates of ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) atrophy to those observed among age- and sex-matched glatiramer acetate (GA)-and natalizumab-treated patients with RRMS and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

In this observational study, patients with RRMS treated with a single disease-modifying therapy and HCs were followed with serial OCT for a median duration of 2.8 years. Participants with uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or glaucoma, and eyes with optic neuritis ≤6 months prior to baseline OCT, or during follow-up, were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

During the overall follow-up period, rates of GCIPL atrophy were -0.28 ± 0.11 µm/y among rituximab-treated patients with RRMS (n = 35). This was similar to GA-treated (n = 49; -0.33 ± 0.05 µm/y; p = 0.69) and natalizumab-treated patients (n = 88; -0.17 ± 0.10 µm/y; p = 0.13) and faster than HCs (n = 78; -0.15 ± 0.03 µm/y; p = 0.006). Rituximab-treated patients exhibited 0.55 ± 0.23 µm/y faster rates of GCIPL atrophy during the first 12 months of treatment, relative to afterwards (n = 25; p = 0.02), during which period GCIPL atrophy rates were -0.14 ± 0.13 µm/y.

CONCLUSIONS

Retinal atrophy in RRMS is modulated by rituximab. Greater attenuation of retinal atrophy may occur after 12 months of rituximab treatment, following which time GCIPL atrophy rates are similar to those observed among natalizumab-treated patients with RRMS and HCs. Our findings raise the possibility that the neuroprotective therapeutic response with rituximab in RRMS may take up to 12 months, which should be confirmed by larger studies.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence on the difference in rate of change of the GCIPL thickness in patients with RRMS comparing rituximab to other disease-modifying therapies.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD20 B Cells Depleting Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis

Rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab are disease modifying therapies (DMT) currently used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) or are in advanced stages of clinical trials. These monoclonal antibodies deplete B cells by targeting the cell surface protein CD20. This review highlights the similarities and major differences between the four agents. We summarize data from various clinical trials of each of these therapeutics and discuss their efficacy and safety. Additional considerations regarding the route of administration and cost are presented. Among the four therapeutics, only ocrelizumab is approved for primary progressive (PP) MS. Infusion/injection related reactions (IRRs) are the most common adverse events associated with all four therapeutics. In phase III trials of ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, the incidence of IRRs was lower with ofatumumab. Ofatumumab is unique among the four therapeutics due to its availability as a subcutaneous injection (SQ). Although SQ administration may be appealing for some patients it may raise concerns regarding medication compliance among physicians. Phase II trials studying ublituximab for the treatment of RMS yielded promising results. Phase III trials are currently comparing the efficacy of ublituximab to teriflunomide.

Anti-CD20 B Cell Treatment for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of lytic therapies targeting B cells in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). More modest efficacy has been noted in the primary progressive subtype of MS. Clinical success has increased interest in the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS and in ways to potentially improve upon current B cell therapies. In this mini review, we will critically review previous and ongoing clinical trials of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in MS, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. Side effects and adverse event profiles will be discussed. Studies examining the proposed mechanisms of action of B cell depleting therapies will also be reviewed.

CD4+ T cells promote delayed B cell responses in the ischemic brain after experimental stroke

CD4⁺ T lymphocytes are key mediators of tissue damage after ischemic stroke. However, their infiltration kinetics and interactions with other immune cells in the delayed phase of ischemia remain elusive. We hypothesized that CD4⁺ T cells facilitate delayed autoreactive B cell responses in the brain, which have been previously linked to post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Therefore, we treated myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein T cell receptor transgenic 2D2 mice of both sexes with anti-CD4 antibody following 60-minute middle cerebral artery occlusion and assessed lymphocyte infiltration for up to 72 days. Anti-CD4-treatment eliminated CD4⁺ T cells from the circulation and ischemic brain for 28 days and inhibited B cell infiltration into the brain, particularly in animals with large infarcts. Absence of CD4⁺ T cells did not influence infarct maturation or survival. Once the CD4⁺ population recovered in the periphery, both CD4⁺ T and B lymphocytes entered the infarct site forming follicle-like structures. Additionally, we provide further evidence for PSCI that could be attenuated by CD4 depletion. Our findings demonstrate that CD4⁺ T cells are essential in delayed B cell infiltration into the ischemic brain after stroke. Importantly, lymphocyte infiltration after stroke is a long-lasting process. As CD4 depletion improved cognitive functions in an experimental set-up, these findings set the stage to elaborate more specific immune modulating therapies in treating PSCI.

Mitigating alemtuzumab-associated autoimmunity in MS: A "whack-a-mole" B-cell depletion strategy

Objective

To determine whether the punctuated administration of low-dose rituximab, temporally linked to B-cell hyperrepopulation (defined when the return of CD19⁺ B cells approximates 40%–50% of baseline levels as measured before alemtuzumab treatment inception), can mitigate alemtuzumab-associated secondary autoimmunity.

Methods

In this hypothesis-driven pilot study, 10 patients received low-dose rituximab (50–150 mg/m²), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, after either their first or second cycles of alemtuzumab. These patients were then routinely assessed for the development of autoimmune disorders and safety signals related to the use of dual monoclonal antibody therapy.

Results

Five patients received at least 1 IV infusion of low-dose rituximab, following alemtuzumab therapy, with a mean follow-up of 41 months. None of the 5 patients developed secondary autoimmune disorders. An additional 5 patients with follow-up over less than 24 months received at least 1 infusion of low-dose rituximab treatment following alemtuzumab treatment. No secondary autoimmune diseases were observed.

Conclusions

An anti-CD20 “whack-a-mole” B-cell depletion strategy may serve to mitigate alemtuzumab-associated secondary autoimmunity in MS by reducing the imbalance in B- and T-cell regulatory networks during immune reconstitution. We believe that these observations warrant further investigation.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class IV evidence that for people with MS, low-dose rituximab following alemtuzumab treatment decreases the risk of alemtuzumab-associated secondary autoimmune diseases.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantitatively review and summarize the effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX) treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched, and studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted with Stata. Primary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) change from baseline and relapse-free rate (RFR) at week 24, 48, 72, and 96. Secondary outcomes included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change from baseline, the proportion of patients with infusion-related events (IRE) after treatment, and the proportion of patients with infections after treatment. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in this article and 13 of them were under quantitative synthesis. The 20 studies included 2020 patients suffering from RRMS. The overall absolute reduction in ARR of rituximab treatment in RRMS patients was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.17). And the overall RFRs at week 24, 48, 72, and 96 were 90.4%, 88.5%, 86.4% and 86.2%, respectively. The estimated reduction in EDSS score was 0.62 (95% CI 0.20-1.04). The overall proportion of IRE and infections were 31% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab can improve relapse and disability conditions in patients with RRMS and has the potential for RRMS treatment. Additional evaluations on the safety of RTX is required.

Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a top-selling biologic that was first approved by the FDA in 1997 for a non-Hodgkin lymphoma orphan indication. It has since been approved for additional orphan indications, with rheumatoid arthritis as the only FDA-approved, nonorphan indication. Evidence suggests that rituximab is frequently used off-label, but information on its use over time and indications for use in the United States is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess incident rituximab use over time in an integrated health care delivery system.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Data were collected from administrative databases and manual chart reviews. Patients who received their first rituximab infusion between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, and who were not a part of a clinical trial were included. Indication for use (FDA-approved orphan/nonorphan, off-label) was determined. Proportions of use were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with receiving rituximab for an FDA-approved indication.

RESULTS

A total of 1,674 patients were included. The majority (66.4%) of patients had an FDA-approved indication, with lymphoma being the most common approved indication (66.4%). The most common indication for off-label use was neurologic conditions (72.7%), predominantly demyelinating diseases. Off-label indication use increased from 1.2% in 2009 to 55.6% in 2017. Factors associated with rituximab use for an FDA-approved indication included increased age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07) and increased burden of chronic disease (chronic disease score: AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12; Charlson Comorbidity Index score: AOR = 3.52, 95% CI = 3.03-4.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of rituximab grew dramatically over the course of the study. With the recent FDA approval of the rituximab biosimilar and its expected lower price, off-label use will likely continue to rise. Opportunities for cost savings and to ensure appropriate use of these medications should be evaluated.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. All authors except Hansen are employed by Kaiser Permanente. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors in May 2019 in Salt Lake City, UT, and at an encore presentation October 2019 at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York, NY.

Clinical and radiologic manifestation B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases of central nervous system

B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases of central nervous system (CNS) put a heavy burden on different aspects of society and economy. Taken together, there are different types of autoimmune diseases in which B-cells play an important role and affect CNS in a pattern of inflammation. These diseases have some similarities in clinical presentations and radiological findings and some similarities with other diseases in different aspects such as treatments with each disease having its own characteristics. In this review article, we had a survey on some different types of B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases of CNS and explained how they can be distinguished from each other and how distinct they are according to radiological findings. The aim of this study is to distinguish B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases of CNS from other non-B-cell diseases in order to choose the best anti-B-cell treatments. At the end of this article we briefly explain different types of treatments being utilized and the role of corticosteroids in acute phases of different diseases.

Molecular Interventions towards Multiple Sclerosis Treatment

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune life-threatening disease, afflicting millions of people worldwide. Although the disease is non-curable, considerable therapeutic advances have been achieved through molecular immunotherapeutic approaches, such as peptides vaccination, administration of monoclonal antibodies, and immunogenic copolymers. The main aims of these therapeutic strategies are to shift the MS-related autoimmune response towards a non-inflammatory T helper 2 (Th2) cells response, inactivate or ameliorate cytotoxic autoreactive T cells, induce secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and inhibit recruitment of autoreactive lymphocytes to the central nervous system (CNS). These approaches can efficiently treat autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an essential system to study MS in animals, but they can only partially inhibit disease progress in humans. Nevertheless, modern immunotherapeutic techniques remain the most promising tools for the development of safe MS treatments, specifically targeting the cellular factors that trigger the initiation of the disease.

Experience with rituximab therapy in a real-life sample of multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, neuroinflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. B cells have recently emerged as a promising target to significantly reduce inflammatory disease activity in MS, with successful trial studies using antiCD20 therapies. However, real-life data about safety and efficacy are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical and radiological inflammatory activity, adherence to therapy, and safety of rituximab (RTX) in an MS patients' sample, treated from 2015 to 2018 in our center PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on prospectively collected data about relapses, disability progression, and radiological activity (new T2 lesions and Gd-enhancing lesions) were recorded and used to assess no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12 months. RTX-related adverse events were recorded. RTX was administered intravenously at a dosage of 1000 mg twice 2 weeks apart, then every 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included. Fifty-three (76.8%) had a relapsing-remitting, two a primary progressive course, and 14 a secondary progressive course. The mean follow-up period was 16 ± 9.7 months. Thirty-five (50.7%) patients had relapses in the year prior to RTX therapy, with a mean annualized relapse rate of 0.75, significantly reduced to 0.36 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Among the 36 patients included in the study who had an MRI available at 12 months, MRI activity was reduced from 88% (n = 32) to 8.3% (n = 3) at follow-up (p < 0.001). Twelve (17.4%) patients suspended RTX during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-life experience confirms that off-label therapy with RTX may represent a valid, cost-effective therapeutic option in MS.

Effect of Rituximab on Expanded Disability Status Scale and Relapse Rate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that depletes circulating CD20+ B lymphocytes, in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with inadequate response to disease-modifying therapies. This single group quasi-experimental study recruited RRMS patients who were referred to Sina Farshchian Hospital, Hamadan, Iran, from March 2018 until August 2019. After getting informed consent from the patients, demographic data and duration of disease were recorded. Patients received 500 to 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab every 6 months until 18 months. Relapse rate per year and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were obtained at baseline and throughout the post treatment follow-up. A total of 70 RRMS patients with the mean age 40.25 ± 8.17 were studied. At baseline, the mean of EDSS and relapse rate was 5.3 ± 1.08 and 0.95 ± 0.64, respectively. After 18 months treatment with rituximab, the relapse rates were significantly reduced (p < 0.000), but the mean EDSS almost remained unchanged (5.7 ± 1.4). Infusion-related adverse effects occurred in 60% of patients in first infusion, and most of them were mild. This study has indicated that rituximab can markedly reduce relapse rates in RRMS patients. The effect of rituximab on EDSS appears to be inappreciable. Also according to our results, administration of rituximab is safe and well tolerated.

Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsing and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) was previously thought to be a T-cell-mediated, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Disease-modifying therapies targeting T cells have, indeed, shown remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. However, these therapies do also target B cells, and a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody (ocrelizumab) has recently been approved for MS therapy and is efficacious not only in relapsing forms of MS but also in some patients with primary progressive MS. This suggests that B cells may play a more important role in the pathogenesis of MS than previously appreciated. We review the potential roles of B cells, which are the precursors of antibody-secreting plasma cells in the pathogenesis of MS. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the characteristics and clinical data for the four monoclonal antibodies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, and ublituximab) that have been approved, are currently been used off-label or are being investigated as treatments for MS. These antibodies all target the cluster of differentiation (CD)-20 molecule and bind to distinct or overlapping epitopes on B cells and a subset of T cells that express CD20. This leads to B-cell depletion and, possibly, to depletion of CD20-positive T cells. The net result is strong suppression of clinical and radiological disease activity as well as slowing of the development of persisting neurological impairment.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Considerable progress has been made in treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) over the last several decades. However, the present treatments do not show satisfactory efficacy or safety in a considerable proportion of patients, who experience relapse or disability progression despite receiving treatment and suffer from side effects, which can be severe. Improvements in the understanding of the pathophysiologies of MS and NMOSD have led to numerous therapeutic approaches being proposed and developed. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are receiving increasing attention because of their specificity of action and likelihood of high efficacy with fewer side effects. Many mAbs have been evaluated, and some have been approved for MS or NMOSD treatment. This article reviews the use of mAbs for treating MS and NMOSD, including summarizing their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety profiles.

Treatment with Rituximab in the Acute Phase of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

There have been a few reports on the administration of rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the acute phase. We report the case of a 62-year-old woman with an acute lesion of RRMS. Although corticosteroid therapy and plasmapheresis were not effective, the lesion improved with the administration of rituximab. We believe that the B cells were promptly depleted after the infusion of rituximab, and that the inflammatory reactions related to the B cells were suppressed. We suggest that the administration of rituximab can be considered as a treatment option for acute-phase RRMS when conventional therapies are not effective.

Neutrophils promote VLA-4-dependent B cell antigen presentation and accumulation within the meninges during neuroinflammation

The success of B cell depletion therapies and identification of leptomeningeal ectopic lymphoid tissue (ELT) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has renewed interest in the antibody-independent pathogenic functions of B cells during neuroinflammation. The timing and location of B cell antigen presentation during MS and its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) remain undefined. Using a new EAE system that incorporates temporal regulation of MHCII expression by myelin-specific B cells, we observed the rapid formation of large B cell clusters in the spinal cord subarachnoid space. Neutrophils preceded the accumulation of meningeal B cell clusters, and inhibition of CXCR2-mediated granulocyte trafficking to the central nervous system reduced pathogenic B cell clusters and disease severity. Further, B cell-restricted very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) deficiency abrogated EAE dependent on B cell antigen presentation. Together, our findings demonstrate that neutrophils coordinate VLA-4-dependent B cell accumulation within the meninges during neuroinflammation, a key early step in the formation of ELT observed in MS.

Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: 2019 revisions to the MENACTRIMS guidelines

With evolving diagnostic criteria and the advent of new oral and parenteral therapies for MS, most current diagnostic and treatment algorithms need revision and updating. The diagnosis of MS relies on incorporating clinical and paraclinical findings to prove dissemination in space and in time, and exclude alternative diseases that can explain the findings at hand. The differential diagnostic workup should be guided by clinical and laboratory red flags to avoid unnecessary tests. Appropriate selection of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies is critical to maximize patient benefit. The current guidelines review the scientific evidence supporting treatment of acute relapses, radiologically isolated syndrome, clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, and progressive MS. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide practical recommendations and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of MS based on current scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis with rituximab: A multicentric Italian-Swiss experience

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose.

CONCLUSION

Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.

Newer Treatment Approaches in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the recognition that pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by more prominent disease activity, earlier age at onset of disability milestones, and more prominent cognitive impairment compared with physical disability earlier in the disease course compared with adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS), there has been increasing interest in identifying optimal and safe treatment approaches to achieve better disease control in this group. Injectable therapies have been traditionally used as first line in this population, although not formally approved. This review focuses on current treatment and monitoring approaches in POMS.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past few years, and despite the paucity of FDA-approved medications for use in POMS, an increasing trend toward using newer disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in this group is observed. However, escalation (as opposed to induction) remains the most frequent approach, and many children continue to be untreated before age 18, particularly before age 12. The only FDA- and EMA-approved disease-modifying therapy in POMS is fingolimod; however, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and alemtuzumab either have been evaluated in observational studies or are being currently investigated in formal randomized controlled trials for use in POMS and appear to be safe in this group. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has also been evaluated in a small series. Clinical outcome measures and MS biomarkers have been poorly studied in POMS; however, the use of composite functional scores, neurofilament light chain, optical coherence tomography, and imaging findings is being increasingly investigated to improve early diagnosis and efficient monitoring of POMS. Off-label use of newer DMTs in POMS is increasing, and based on retrospective data, and phase 2 trials, this approach appears to be safe in children. Results from ongoing trials will help clarify the safety and efficacy of these therapies in the future. Fingolimod is the only FDA-approved medication for use in POMS. Outcome measures and biomarkers used in AOMS are being studied in POMS and are greatly needed to quantify treatment response in this group.

Potential role of regulatory B cells in immunological diseases

Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are immune-modulating cells that affect the immune system by producing cytokines or cellular interactions. These cells have immunomodulatory effects on the immune system by cytokine production. The abnormalities in Bregs could be involved in various disorders such as autoimmunity, chronic infectious disease, malignancies, allergies, and primary immunodeficiencies are immune-related scenarios. Ongoing investigation could disclose the biology and the exact phenotype of these cells and also the assigned mechanisms of action of each subset, as a result, potential therapeutic strategies for treating immune-related anomalies. In this review, we collect the findings of human and mouse Bregs and the therapeutic efforts to change the pathogenicity of these cells in diverse disease.

Rituximab as Rescue Therapy for Aggressive Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, debilitating disease. Almost one in ten patients with MS has a history of disease onset during childhood. Although numerous therapeutic options exist for adult MS, the available treatments for pediatric patients are still limited. One of the emerging therapies is rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 chimeric antibody that can deplete the CD20+ lymphocyte populations. A 12-year-old boy presented with ataxia, paresthesias, and headache while his brain MRI showed numerous T2 contrast-enhancing lesions. Gamma globulin, steroids, and cyclophosphamide failed to intercept his disease, and he progressed to a rapid clinical and radiological deterioration. Treatment with rituximab reversed the disease course in a dramatic fashion, leading to complete remission.

B Cell-based Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis

The traditional view of multiple sclerosis (MS) as a T cell mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) has evolved into a concept of an immune-mediated disease where complex bi-directional interactions between T cells, B cells and myeloid cells underlie and shape CNS-directed autoimmunity. B cells are now recognized as major contributors to the pathogenesis of MS, largely due to increased understanding of their biology and the profound anti-inflammatory effects demonstrated by B cell depletion in MS. In this chapter we discuss the fundamental roles B cells play in the pathogenesis of MS and review current and future therapeutic strategies targeting B cells in MS, including B cell depletion with various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the B cell surface markers CD20 and CD19, anti-B cell cytokine therapies, blocking Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) in B cells, and various immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive effects exerted on B cells by virtually all other approved therapies for MS.