The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis

Therapeutic consequences in patients with both inflammatory rheumatic diseases and multiple sclerosis

Dealing with patients with both multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory rheumatic disorders (IRDs) is not uncommon for a rheumatologist, as there is a statistical association between SpA and MS. As several CNS demyelinating events have been reported in patients treated with TNF inhibitor (TNFi), the pre-existing demyelinating disease was considered a contraindication for TNFi. However, this contraindication is mainly based on a randomized controlled trial in MS and not on large epidemiological studies. According to the last epidemiological studies, TNFi might not be an inducer of MS. Moreover, there are no clear recommendations on the use of the other DMARDs in patients suffering from an IRD and MS. In this review, we summarize the link between MS and IRDs and the impact of DMARDs on MS, especially TNFi. We also look at the impact of disease-modifying drugs for adults with MS and IRDs.

Updates and advances in multiple sclerosis neurotherapeutics

The multiple sclerosis (MS) neurotherapeutic landscape is rapidly evolving. New disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with improved efficacy and safety, in addition to an expanding pipeline of agents with novel mechanisms, provide more options for patients with MS. While treatment of MS neuroinflammation is well tailored in the existing DMT armamentarium, concerted efforts are currently underway for identifying neuropathological targets and drug discovery for progressive MS. There is also ongoing research to develop agents for remyelination and neuroprotection. Further insights are needed to guide DMT initiation and sequencing as well as to determine the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsing and progressive MS. This review provides a summary of these updates.

Treatment approaches to patients with multiple sclerosis and coexisting autoimmune disorders

The past decades have yielded major therapeutic advances in many autoimmune conditions - such as multiple sclerosis (MS) - and thus ushered in a new era of more targeted and increasingly potent immunotherapies. Yet this growing arsenal of therapeutic immune interventions has also rendered therapy much more challenging for the attending physician, especially when treating patients with more than one autoimmune condition. Importantly, some therapeutic strategies are either approved for several autoimmune disorders or may be repurposed for other conditions, therefore opening new curative possibilities in related fields. In this article, we especially focus on frequent and therapeutically relevant concomitant autoimmune conditions faced by neurologists when treating patients with MS, namely psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases. We provide an overview of the available disease-modifying therapies, highlight possible contraindications, show pathophysiological overlaps and finally present which therapeutics can be utilized as a combinatory treatment, in order to 'kill two birds with one stone'.

Chronic Sulfasalazine Treatment in Mice Induces System xc - - Independent Adverse Effects

Despite ample evidence for the therapeutic potential of inhibition of the cystine/glutamate antiporter system x_c⁻ in neurological disorders and in cancer, none of the proposed inhibitors is selective. In this context, a lot of research has been performed using the EMA- and FDA-approved drug sulfasalazine (SAS). Even though this molecule is already on the market for decades as an anti-inflammatory drug, serious side effects due to its use have been reported. Whereas for the treatment of the main indications, SAS needs to be cleaved in the intestine into the anti-inflammatory compound mesalazine, it needs to reach the systemic circulation in its intact form to allow inhibition of system x_c⁻. The higher plasma levels of intact SAS (or its metabolites) might induce adverse effects, independent of its action on system x_c⁻. Some of these effects have however been attributed to system x_c⁻ inhibition, calling into question the safety of targeting system x_c⁻. In this study we chronically treated system x_c⁻ - deficient mice and their wildtype littermates with two different doses of SAS (160 mg/kg twice daily or 320 mg/kg once daily, i.p.) and studied some of the adverse effects that were previously reported. SAS had a negative impact on the survival rate, the body weight, the thermoregulation and/or stress reaction of mice of both genotypes, and thus independent of its inhibitory action on system x_c⁻. While SAS decreased the total distance travelled in the open-field test the first time the mice encountered the test, it did not influence this parameter on the long-term and it did not induce other behavioral changes such as anxiety- or depressive-like behavior. Finally, no major histological abnormalities were observed in the spinal cord. To conclude, we were unable to identify any undesirable system x_c⁻-dependent effect of chronic administration of SAS.

Sulfasalazine alters microglia phenotype by competing endogenous RNA effect of miR-136-5p and long non-coding RNA HOTAIR in cuprizone-induced demyelination

Sulfasalazine (SF) promotes remyelination and improves the outcome of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, the underlining mechanism remains elusive. Here, we examined whether SF blocks microglia switching to a pro-inflammatory M1-like phenotype through a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) effects in cuprizone-induced demyelination. The microglia reprogramming effects of SF in the mice model of cuprizone-induced demyelination was measured by histological, immunohistochemical and molecular biological methods. We also measured the effects of the condition media from SF-treated microglia on the differentiation of OLN-93 cells. Insights of the mechanism of ceRNAs of miR-136-5p and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) HOTAIR were gained from bioinformatic analysis, luciferase assays and RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation. Microglia switched to a pro-inflammatory M1-like phenotype in cuprizone induced-demyelination. Conversely, SF inhibited the M1-like polarization with the increased remyelination which was attenuated by microglia depletion. SF inhibited production of M1-like factors TNF-α and INF-γ in microglia, and thereby promoted the differentiation of OLN-93 oligodendrocytes. SF down-regulated lncRNA HOTAIR but up-regulated miR-136-5p, and thus inactivated AKT2-NF-κB in cuprizone-treated microglia. Importantly, lncRNA HOTAIR overexpression reversed the increased miR-136-5p expression by SF and thereby attenuated the inhibition of AKT2-mediated NF-κB activation. Mimic of miR-136-5p inhibited cuprizone-induced activation of AKT2-NF-κB in the microglia. In summary, SF blocks microglia switching to a pro-inflammatory M1-like phenotype by ceRNA effect of miR-136-5p and lncRNA HOTAIR in cuprizone-induced demyelination. Our findings show the therapeutic potential of SF for human MS probably by targeting epigenetic regulation in microglia.

Pharmacotherapy in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: An Overview

Multiple sclerosis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterised by demyelination, neuroaxonal loss and a heterogeneous clinical course. Multiple sclerosis presents with different phenotypes, most commonly a relapsing-remitting course and, less frequently, a progressive accumulation of disability from disease onset (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). The majority of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, after a variable time, switch to a stage characterised by gradual neurological worsening known as secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We have a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying multiple sclerosis, and it is believed that multiple genetic, environmental and endogenous factors are elements driving inflammation and ultimately neurodegeneration. Axonal loss and grey matter damage have been regarded as amongst the leading causes of irreversible neurological disability in the progressive stages. There are over a dozen disease-modifying therapies currently licenced for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but none of these has provided evidence of effectiveness in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Recently, there has been some early modest success with siponimod in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Finding treatments to delay or prevent the courses of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is an unmet and essential goal of the research in multiple sclerosis. In this review, we discuss new findings regarding drugs with immunomodulatory, neuroprotective or regenerative properties and possible treatment strategies for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We examine the field broadly to include trials where participants have progressive or relapsing phenotypes. We summarise the most relevant results from newer investigations from phase II and III randomised controlled trials over the past decade, with particular attention to the last 5 years.

Disability Outcome Measures in Phase III Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis

Accumulating neurological disability has a substantial impact on the lives of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). As well as the established Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), several other outcome measures are now available for assessing disability progression in MS. This review extends the findings of a previous analysis of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) trials published up to 2012, to determine whether there has been a shift in outcome measures used to assess disability in phase III clinical trials in RRMS and progressive MS. Forty relevant trials were identified (RRMS, n = 16; progressive MS, n = 18; other/mixed phenotypes, n = 6). Sustained EDSS worsening, particularly over 3 months, was included as an endpoint in almost all identified trials. Other disability-related endpoints included the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite z-score and scores for the physical component summary of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (36-item) Health Survey. Tests assessing manual dexterity, ambulation, vision and cognition were also employed, and in some trials, composite endpoints were used. However, there was no obvious trend in choice of disability outcome measures over time. Sustained EDSS worsening over short time periods continues to be the most widely used measure of disability progression in pivotal MS trials, despite its well-recognised limitations. A new tool set is needed for use in MS clinical trials that detects the benefit of potential treatments that slow (or reverse) progressive disability.

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis: current therapeutic strategies and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the central nervous system with heterogeneous features. Primary progressive (PP) MS is a rare disease subtype characterized by continuous disability worsening from onset. No disease-modifying therapy is currently approved for PP MS due to the negative or inconsistent results of clinical trials conducted on a wide range of interventions, which are reviewed in the present paper. Areas covered: The features and results of randomized trials of disease-modifying treatments for PP MS are discussed, including immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and putative neuroprotective agents. Expert commentary: The recent encouraging results of the ocrelizumab trial in PP MS, the first to reach the primary disability endpoint, indicate B cells as a promising therapeutic target to prevent disease progression. Other emerging treatment strategies include cell metabolism modulation and inflammatory pathways inhibition, which are being investigated in several ongoing phase II and III placebo-controlled trials. Future PP MS trials will need to systematically include efficacy endpoints other than physical disability alone, such as cognition, quality of life, advanced MRI measures and molecular biomarkers.

The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Three oral disease-modifying drugs-fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate (DMF)-are available for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). All three agents were approved in the last decade, primarily on the basis of a moderate to substantial reduction in the occurrence of MS relapses and central nervous system lesion formation detected by MRI. In the trials leading to approval, the first oral disease-modifying drug, fingolimod, reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) from 0.40 in placebo-treated patients to 0.18 (FREEDOMS) and from 0.33 in patients treated with interferon β1a intramuscularly to 0.16 (TRANSFORMS). Teriflunomide, approved on the basis of the two placebo-controlled trials TEMSO and TOWER, demonstrated a reduction in the ARR from 0.54 to 0.37 and from 0.50 to 0.32 respectively. The latest oral MS medication, approved in 2014, is DMF, which had been used in a different formulation for treatment of psoriasis for decades. In the 2-year DEFINE study, the proportion of patients with a relapse was reduced to 27 %, compared with 46 % in placebo arm, whereas in the CONFIRM trial, the ARR was reduced from 0.40 (placebo) to 0.22 in the DMF-treated group of patients. In this review, we will elucidate the mechanisms of action of these three medications and compare their efficacy, safety, and tolerability as a practical guideline for their use. We will further discuss effects other than relapse reduction these small molecules may exert, including potential activities within the central nervous system, and briefly summarize emerging data on new oral MS drugs in clinical development.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MD1003 (high-dose biotin) in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, potentially highly disabling neurological disorder. No disease-modifying treatments are approved in the progressive and not active forms of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

High doses of biotin were tested in an open-label pilot study involving 23 patients with progressive MS and reported positive results. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 154 progressive MS patients confirmed the beneficial effect of MD1003 (high-dose biotin) on reversing or stabilizing disability progression, with a good safety profile. It is proposed that MD1003 in progressive MS 1) increases energy production in demyelinated axons and/or 2) enhances myelin synthesis in oligodendrocytes. Biotin is highly bioavailable; absorption and excretion are rapid. The major route of elimination is urinary excretion.

EXPERT OPINION

A high oral dose of biotin seems generally well tolerated but a few important safety concerns were identified: 1) teratogenicity in one species and 2) interference with some biotin-based laboratory immunoassays. The animal toxicity data are limited at such high doses. Further preclinical studies would be useful to address the mechanism of action of MD1003. Assessment of clinical benefit duration in responders will be also very important to set. Results of randomized, placebo-controlled trial are reassuring and provide hope for the treatment of progressive MS.

Therapeutic Advances and Future Prospects in Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis

Identifying effective therapies for the treatment of progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly relevant priority and one of the greatest challenges for the global MS community. Better understanding of the mechanisms involved in progression of the disease, novel trial designs, drug repurposing strategies, and new models of collaboration may assist in identifying effective therapies. In this review, we discuss various therapies under study in phase II or III trials, including antioxidants (idebenone); tyrosine kinase inhibitors (masitinib); sphingosine receptor modulators (siponimod); monoclonal antibodies (anti-leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin-like domain containing neurite outgrowth inhibitor receptor-interacting protein-1, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, intrathecal rituximab); hematopoetic stem cell therapy; statins and other possible neuroprotective agents (amiloride, riluzole, fluoxetine, oxcarbazepine); lithium; phosphodiesterase inhibitors (ibudilast); hormone-based therapies (adrenocorticotrophic hormone and erythropoietin); T-cell receptor peptide vaccine (NeuroVax); autologous T-cell immunotherapy (Tcelna); MIS416 (a microparticulate immune response modifier); dopamine antagonists (domperidone); and nutritional supplements, including lipoic acid, biotin, and sunphenon epigallocatechin-3-gallate (green tea extract). Given ongoing and planned clinical trial initiatives, and the largest ever focus of the global research community on progressive MS, future prospects for developing targeted therapeutics aimed at reducing disability in progressive forms of MS appear promising.

Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Background

So far, clinical studies in primary progressive MS (PPMS) have failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. To some extent this might be attributable to the choice of assessments or to the selection of the study population.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify outcome influencing factors by analyzing the design and methods of previous randomized studies in PPMS patients without restriction to intervention or comparator.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and the COCHRANE Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to February 2015). Keywords included PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Randomized, controlled trials of at least one year’s duration were selected if they included only patients with PPMS or if they reported sufficient PPMS subgroup data. No restrictions with respect to intervention or comparator were applied. Study quality was assessed by a biometrics expert. Relevant baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted and compared.

Results

Of 52 PPMS studies identified, four were selected. Inclusion criteria were notably different among studies with respect to both the definition of PPMS and the requirements for the presence of disability progression at enrolment. Differences between the study populations included the baseline lesion load, pretreatment status and disease duration. The rate of disease progression may also be an important factor, as all but one of the studies included a large proportion of patients with a low progression rate. In addition, the endpoints specified could not detect progression adequately.

Conclusion

Optimal PPMS study methods involve appropriate patient selection, especially regarding the PPMS phenotype and progression rate. Functional composite endpoints might be more sensitive than single endpoints in capturing progression.

Inhibition of System Xc(-) Transporter Attenuates Autoimmune Inflammatory Demyelination

T cell infiltration into the CNS is a significant underlying pathogenesis in autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Several lines of evidence suggest that glutamate dysregulation in the CNS is an important consequence of immune cell infiltration in neuroinflammatory demyelinating diseases; yet, the causal link between inflammation and glutamate dysregulation is not well understood. A major source of glutamate release during oxidative stress is the system Xc(-) transporter; however, this mechanism has not been tested in animal models of autoimmune inflammatory demyelination. We find that pharmacological and genetic inhibition of system Xc(-) attenuates chronic and relapsing-remitting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Remarkably, pharmacological blockade of system Xc(-) 7 d after induction of EAE attenuated T cell infiltration into the CNS, but not T cell activation in the periphery. Mice harboring a Slc7a11 (xCT) mutation that inactivated system Xc(-) were resistant to EAE, corroborating a central role for system Xc(-) in mediating immune cell infiltration. We next examined the role of the system Xc(-) transporter in the CNS after immune cell infiltration. Pharmacological inhibitors of the system Xc(-) transporter administered during the first relapse in a SJL animal model of relapsing-remitting EAE abrogated clinical disease, inflammation, and myelin loss. Primary coculture studies demonstrate that myelin-specific CD4(+) Th1 cells provoke microglia to release glutamate via the system Xc(-) transporter, causing excitotoxic death to mature myelin-producing oligodendrocytes. Taken together, these studies support a novel role for the system Xc(-) transporter in mediating T cell infiltration into the CNS as well as promoting myelin destruction after immune cell infiltration in EAE.

Predictors of disability worsening in clinically isolated syndrome

Objective

To assess demographic, clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and treatment exposure predictors of time to 3 or 12-month confirmed disability worsening in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and early multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

We utilized the MSBase Incident Study (MSBasis), a prospective cohort study of outcome after CIS. Predictors of time to first 3 and 12-month confirmed expanded disability status scale worsening were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

About 1989 patients were analyzed, the largest seen-from-onset cohort reported to-date. A total of 391 patients had a first 3-month confirmed disability worsening event, of which 307 were sustained for 12 months. Older age at CIS onset (adjusted hazard ratio: aHR 1.17, 95% 1.06, 1.30), pyramidal (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.13, 1.89) and ambulation (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.09, 2.34) system dysfunction, annualized relapse rate (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.18, 1.22), and lower proportion of observation time on treatment were associated with 3-month confirmed worsening. Predictors of time to 12-month sustained worsening included pyramidal system dysfunction (Hazard ratio: aHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05, 1.83), and older age at CIS onset (aHR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04, 1.31). Greater proportion of follow-up time exposed to treatment was associated with greater reductions in the rate of worsening.

Interpretation

This study provides class IV evidence for a strong protective effect of disease-modifying treatment to reduce disability worsening events in patients with CIS and early MS, and confirms age and pyramidal dysfunction at onset as risk factors.

Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives

Progressive multiple sclerosis is characterised clinically by the gradual accrual of disability independent of relapses and can occur with disease onset (primary progressive) or can be preceded by a relapsing disease course (secondary progressive). An effective disease-modifying treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis has not yet been identified, and so far the results of clinical trials have generally been disappointing. Ongoing advances in the knowledge of pathogenesis, in the identification of novel targets for neuroprotection, and in improved outcome measures could lead to effective treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. In this Series paper, we summarise the lessons learned from completed clinical trials and perspectives from trials in progress in progressive multiple sclerosis. We review promising clinical, imaging, and biological markers, along with novel designs, for clinical trials. The use of more refined outcomes and truly neuroprotective drugs, coupled with more efficient trial design, has the capacity to deliver a new era of therapeutic discovery in this challenging area.

Therapeutic approaches to disease modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in adults: an Australian and New Zealand perspective: part 1 historical and established therapies. MS Neurology Group of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a potentially life-changing immune mediated disease of the central nervous system. Until recently, treatment has been largely confined to acute treatment of relapses, symptomatic therapies and rehabilitation. Through persistent efforts of dedicated physicians and scientists around the globe for 160 years, a number of therapies that have an impact on the long term outcome of the disease have emerged over the past 20 years. In this three part series we review the practicalities, benefits and potential hazards of each of the currently available and emerging treatment options for MS. We pay particular attention to ways of abrogating the risks of these therapies and provide advice on the most appropriate indications for using individual therapies. In Part 1 we review the history of the development of MS therapies and its connection with the underlying immunobiology of the disease. The established therapies for MS are reviewed in detail and their current availability and indications in Australia and New Zealand are summarised. We examine the evidence to support their use in the treatment of MS.

Challenges and opportunities: what we are learning from the clinical natalizumab experience

The approval of natalizumab for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, and the subsequent voluntary suspension of its use due to an unexpected viral infection, is a cautionary tale of how much we have to learn about how to prioritize and perform the necessary research and development of novel therapeutics for human diseases, the ethics of placebo-controlled trials and the relationships between researchers, regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry.

Animal models of multiple sclerosis--potentials and limitations

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is still the most widely accepted animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Different types of EAE have been developed in order to investigate pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic aspects of the heterogenic human disease. Generally, investigations in EAE are more suitable for the analysis of immunogenetic elements (major histocompatibility complex restriction and candidate risk genes) and for the study of histopathological features (inflammation, demyelination and degeneration) of the disease than for screening of new treatments. Recent studies in new EAE models, especially in transgenic ones, have in connection with new analytical techniques such as microarray assays provided a deeper insight into the pathogenic cellular and molecular mechanisms of EAE and potentially of MS. For example, it was possible to better delineate the role of soluble pro-inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ and interleukins 1, 12 and 23), anti-inflammatory (transforming growth factor-β and interleukins 4, 10, 27 and 35) and neurotrophic factors (ciliary neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Also, the regulatory and effector functions of distinct immune cell subpopulations such as CD4+ Th1, Th2, Th3 and Th17 cells, CD4+FoxP3+ Treg cells, CD8+ Tc1 and Tc2, B cells and γδ+ T cells have been disclosed in more detail. The new insights may help to identify novel targets for the treatment of MS. However, translation of the experimental results into the clinical practice requires prudence and great caution.

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: what is the potential for combination therapy?

Multiple sclerosis is now a treatable disease and several immunomodulating therapies exist, but their clinical efficacy is moderate and treatment failure during the course of the disease is an increasing problem. As agents with different targets are available, the question was raised whether combination of these therapies would: be safe;result in reduction of adverse effects; andprovide synergistic benefit by additive or complementary modes of action. The areas under clinical investigation are general immunosuppression as well as more targeted approaches that interfere with antigen presentation, immune cell transmigration, release of myelinotoxic factors or even axonal damage. Combination of these immunomodulatory drugs seems to be rational and promising. Nevertheless, combination therapies need to be studied in carefully designed clinical trials in selected patient populations in order to demonstrate additive or synergistic effects. This article will summarise current drug combination strategies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and provide an overview of the initial clinical trials.

Alemtuzumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD52, an antigen found on lymphocytes and monocytes. Pulsed administration causes prolonged T-cell depletion and has been shown to be effective in early relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, reducing relapse rate and risk of acquiring disability in comparison with the standard therapy IFN-β. Alemtuzumab is currently approved for the treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia but not for multiple sclerosis. The most significant complication of treatment is the late development of autoimmunity, which occurs in 30% of patients. Serious infections are rare. Phase III trials are ongoing and it is possible that alemtuzumab will have a place among the range of emerging disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Sulfasalazine inhibits the growth of primary brain tumors independent of nuclear factor-kappaB

Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) is a pleiotropic transcription factor that generally enhances cellular resistance to apoptotic cell death. It has been shown to be constitutively active in some cancers and is being pursued as potential anticancer target. Sulfasalazine which is used clinically to treat Crohn's disease has emerged as a potential inhibitor of NF-kappaB and has shown promising results in two pre-clinical studies to target primary brain tumors, gliomas. Once digested, sulfasalazine is cleaved into sulfapyridine and 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA; mesalamine) by colonic bacteria, and the latter, too, is reported to suppress NF-kappaB activity. We now show that glioma cells obtained from patient biopsies or glioma cell lines do not show significant constitutive NF-kappaB activation, unless exposed to inflammatory cytokines. This does not change when gliomas are implanted into the cerebrum of severe combined immun-deficient mice. Nevertheless, sulfasalazine but not its cleaved form 5-ASA caused a dose-dependent inhibition of glioma growth. This effect was entirely attributable to the inhibition of cystine uptake via the system x(c)(-) cystine-glutamate transporter. It could be mimicked by S-4-carboxy-phenylglycine (S-4-CPG) a more specific system x(c)(-) inhibitor, and lentiviral expression of a constitutively active form of IkappaB kinase b was unable to overcome the growth retarding effects of sulfasalazine or S-4-CPG. Both drugs inhibited cystine uptake causing a chronic depletion of intracellular GSH and consequently compromised cellular redox defense which stymied tumor growth. This data suggests that system x(c)(-) is a promising therapeutic target in gliomas and possibly other cancers and that it can be pharmacologically inhibited by Sulfasalazine, an FDA-approved drug.

Animal models of multiple sclerosis for the development and validation of novel therapies - potential and limitations

Various types of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) reflect some of the pathogenetic, clinical, and therapeutic features of the different forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), thereby, providing some, albeit limited, insight into the molecular and cellular basis of the human disease. Specific questions of MS therapy including the search for new therapeutic targets and strategies and their validation require investigations in different available EAE models. A survey is given of experimental therapeutic approaches that are currently under study with the most promising examples of monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy, stem cell transplantation and orally applied small molecular weight disease-modifying drugs. Reasons for therapy failure and adverse side-effects of some experimental trials are discussed. Precaution is advised, if results of new experimental approaches are translated into clinical practice.

The search for a balance between short and long-term treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a lifelong, immune-mediated progressive disorder. The early age of onset and the chronic nature of the disease with accumulation of physical disability, demand a long-term ("lifelong") management, including disease-modifying immunomodulatory therapies and symptomatic treatments. The ultimate goal in the long-term management of multiple sclerosis is to prevent or delay the appearance of permanent neurological disability. Due to improvements in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, it is now possible to initiate treatment early in the disease process. To this end, first-line immunomodulatory treatments such as glatiramer acetate and beta-interferons are available that reduce the rate of relapses and disease activity as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. However, the short duration of clinical trials provides little information about long-term changes in disability over time. In the case of glatiramer acetate, a long-term, openlabel extension of the pivotal trial has provided prospective data on systematic regular follow-up of all patients who had ever received the drug during the original trial or its extension. Of 232 patients analysed, 108 were still participating in the study an average of ten years after treatment was initiated. Despite the limitations of open-label trials, this study has provided some evidence for a sustained reduction in frequency and severity of relapses and in the rate of accrual of disability. Such long-term data, which demonstrate safety, tolerability and sustained clinical benefit, help improve patient care and may contribute to patients taking a more positive view of treatment. Effective immunomodulatory treatment needs comprehensive information and education of the patient to establish long-term adherence, a critical determinant of long-term outcome. A multidisciplinary approach through a health care team is the optimal strategy, with encouragement to continue the therapy.

MS treatment: postmarketing studies

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory chronic demyelinating disease. Nowadays, there are several registered drugs aimed to control the disease activity. Because these drugs are given parenterally for years, it is of utmost importance to attain maximum adherence to treatment through close and permanent care of patients. The efficacy of the different registered drugs has been compared against placebo. Observational and head-to-head studies have shown controverted results in the degree of efficacy between the products. Despite the efficacy reported, a high proportion of patients will have a lack of response to treatment. Early identification of these patients is therefore essential in order to attempt other therapeutic approaches.

Regression to the mean in multiple sclerosis

In order to ensure sufficient disease activity, patients with relapsing remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) are often included in randomized placebo-controlled trials, only if they have a high baseline activity. These patients, whose evolution is unusual in the pre-study period, will tend to show a more usual behavior when followed up over a period of time. This phenomenon is known as regression to the mean. Regression to the mean should be taken into account in correctly interpreting long-term studies of cohorts treated without a placebo control group, which use the baseline period as control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this phenomenon in a non-treated cohort of RRMS patients, selected with similar criteria to those used in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Forty-four patients with definite RRMS, with two or more relapses in the previous two years, and a baseline EDSS < or = 5.5 were prospectively followed. The mean number of relapses spontaneously decreased from 1.72 (SD: 1.4) in the year prior to enrolment, to 1.0 (SD: 1.3) during the first year of follow-up (P < 0.05). Regression to the mean may explain as much as 40% of the reduction in the relapse rate from the baseline period to the period on-study.

Multiple sclerosis trial designs for the 21st century: building on recent lessons

Starting with the first positive pilot study of glatiramer acetate, trial design in multiple sclerosis has advanced considerably over the past two decades, successively building and improving on previous successes in the implementation and analysis of new clinical trials. Most of these trials have been successful and this has led to the regulatory approval and commercial availability of six agents for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. During this period, outcome measures have been validated to determine the efficacy and safety of such agents, notably those useful in reducing the inflammatory aspects of disease. These include measurements of relapse reduction (annualized relapse rate, time to first relapse, proportion of subjects relapse free), disability (change in EDSS score, change in MSFC score) and MRI metrics (measurements of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, T1 and T2 lesion load). Recent trial design has shown that one can answer some clinical questions after one year on study and that these results may be predictive of more robust two-year trial data. The other important recent lesson involves emergence of rare complications of immunomodulatory therapy, namely progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy with natalizumab that blocks the access of immune cells to the nervous system. In addition to the increased need for enhanced safety assessment, this issue will have an impact both on the study of combination therapies and on the use of combinations in clinical practice.

Diagnosis and disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) refers to scattered areas of hardening found on sectioning central nervous system tissue of affected people, usually after many years of illness. It rarely causes early death but is the commonest cause of neurological disability among young people. Overall results from controlled trials over the past 50 years have been rather disappointing but the comparatively recent licensing of drugs such as interferon beta and glatiramer acetate has led to a reappraisal of many aspects of MS. There are now new diagnostic criteria, which encompass developments in magnetic resonance imaging. Older clinical methods of measuring disease impact are now being re-evaluated to facilitate clinical trials of the approximate 150 new products currently being developed as potential disease modifying agents. The success and failure of agents that should be effective on theoretical grounds, together with advances in neuropathology, have led to fundamental questions regarding our basic understanding of disease pathogenesis being re-addressed.

Inhibition of cystine uptake disrupts the growth of primary brain tumors

Glial cells play an important role in sequestering neuronally released glutamate via Na+-dependent transporters. Surprisingly, these transporters are not operational in glial-derived tumors (gliomas). Instead, gliomas release glutamate, causing excitotoxic death of neurons in the vicinity of the tumor. We now show that glutamate release from glioma cells is an obligatory by-product of cellular cystine uptake via system xc-, an electroneutral cystine-glutamate exchanger. Cystine is an essential precursor for the biosynthesis of glutathione, a major redox regulatory molecule that protects cells from endogenously produced reactive oxygen species (ROS). Glioma cells, but not neurons or astrocytes, rely primarily on cystine uptake via system xc- for their glutathione synthesis. Inhibition of system xc- causes a rapid depletion of glutathione, and the resulting loss of ROS defense causes caspase-mediated apoptosis. Glioma cells can be rescued if glutathione status is experimentally restored or if glutathione is substituted by alternate cellular antioxidants, confirming that ROS are indeed mediators of cell death. We describe two potent drugs that permit pharmacological inhibition of system xc-. One of these drugs, sulfasalazine, is clinically used to treat inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Sulfasalazine was able to reduce glutathione levels in tumor tissue and slow tumor growth in vivo in a commonly used intracranial xenograft animal model for human gliomas when administered by intraperitoneal injection. These data suggest that inhibition of cystine uptake into glioma cells through the pharmacological inhibition of system xc- may be a viable therapeutic strategy with a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug already in hand.

The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: observations on the progressive phase of the disease

The clinical features of relapses and progression largely define multiple sclerosis phenotypes. A relapsing course is followed by chronic progression in some 80% of cases within 2 decades. The relationship between these phases and long-term outcome remains uncertain. We have analysed these clinical features within a well-studied natural history cohort with mean follow-up of 25 years. For the entire cohort, median times to reach Disability Status Scale (DSS) 6, 8 and 10 were 12.7, 20.6 and 43.9 years, respectively. Among 824 attack-onset patients, the great majority entered a progressive phase with a mean time to progression of 10.4 years. The effects of relapses often cloud the clinical onset of progression. However, there are circumstances where onset of progression is early, relatively discrete and identifiable at DSS of 2 or less. Three subgroups allow for clarity of outcome comparison and they are (i) cases of primary progressive (PP) disease, (ii) attack-onset disease where only a single attack has occurred before onset of progression (SAP) and (iii) secondary progressive (SP) disease where recovery from relapses allows recognition of the earliest clinical stages when progression begins. Here we compare survival curves in these three groups. Among cohorts of SAP (n = 140), PP (n = 219) and SP (n = 146) where progression was stratified by DSS at its onset, there was no difference in time to DSS 6, 8 and 10. These findings demonstrate that the progressive course is independent of relapses either preceding the onset of relapse-free progression or subsequent to it. Among SAP patients, the degree of recovery from the single defining exacerbation had no significant effect on outcome. The site of the original attack was not usually where progression began. The relatively stereotyped nature of the progressive phase seen in all progressive phenotypes suggests regional and/or functional differential susceptibility to a process that appears degenerative in nature. The highly prevalent distal corticospinal tract dysfunction in progressive disease and the pathologically demonstrated selective axonal loss seen in this tract raises the possibility of a dying back central axonopathy, at least in part independent of plaque location or burden. Despite considerable individual variation, the progressive course of disability seen in groups of PP, SAP and SP-DSS2 is similarly stereotyped in quality and pace and may entail mechanisms common to all forms of progressive multiple sclerosis. The possibility that this is the primary process in some cases must be considered.

History of modern multiple sclerosis therapy

Although the earliest recorded description of multiple sclerosis (MS) dates back to the 14(th) century, it was not until the latter years of the 20(th) that treatments for this disabling condition were found. However, the "road to success" has not been without hurdles. Trials with both interferon alpha and gamma proved unsuccessful, as did treatment with oral myelin, cladribine, sulfasalazine and inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor. In 1993, interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) became the first therapy proven to be effective in altering the natural history of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). This was followed by successful trials with IFNbeta-1a and glatiramer acetate. In 1998, a European trial showed IFNbeta-1b to be also beneficial in the treatment of secondary progressive MS (SPMS). A similar trial in North America failed to reach its primary endpoint but was effective across secondary endpoints, highlighting how different methodology and patient populations can lead to inconsistent results and, thus, making comparisons across trials difficult. The trend for early intervention in MS with IFNbeta was recently supported by the CHAMPS (Controlled High-risk Avonex MultiPle Sclerosis) and ETOMS (Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis) studies using once-weekly IFNbeta-1a. Both trials demonstrated delayed conversion to clinically definite MS in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings suggestive of MS. Two directly comparative trials of high- (250 microg IFNbeta-1b or 44 microg IFNbeta-1a) and low-dose (30 microg IFNbeta-1a) IFNbeta (INCOMIN [INdependent COMparison of INterferons] and EVIDENCE [EVidence of Interferon Dose-response: European North American Comparative Efficacy]) support the superior efficacy of the higher dose and/or more frequent administration for treating RRMS. Since MS entered the treatment era in 1993, therapies for RRMS, SPMS and, more recently, progressive- relapsing MS have been developed. There is now a much better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease, but new and improved therapeutic approaches are still needed.

Combination therapy in multiple sclerosis

Over the past decade, multiple sclerosis (MS) has become a treatable neurologic illness. However, given the rather modest benefit of the currently available disease-modifying agents, as well as the challenges associated with performing placebo-controlled, equivalence, and superiority trials, the logic of combining therapies in MS has considerable appeal. Selecting agents for combination requires careful consideration, as the immunomodulating activity of one drug could potentially interfere with the therapeutic effect of another, and certain combinations may be associated with unforeseen adverse effects. Rigorously controlled studies are needed to determine the safest and most effective use of new and existing MS therapies.

Interferon beta in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Long-term observational studies may provide additional information about the behaviour of different drugs in the post-marketing period. We present the data of our cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with interferon beta (IFNbeta).

METHODS

We analysed RRMS patients followed for at least 2 years. From 1995, we initiated therapy with IFNbeta. As they became available, patients were allocated to one of the IFNs at standard doses (IFNbeta-1b, IFNbeta-1a i.m. or IFNbeta-1a s.c.). Each patient was included in a follow-up protocol containing demographic and baseline clinical data.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2004, 382 patients have completed at least 2 years of follow-up. Significant differences at entry were observed. Patients on IFNbeta-1b had a higher disease activity and disability at baseline than those on IFNbeta-1a i.m. or IFNbeta-1a s.c. A significant reduction in the relapse rate was observed for the three drugs (70% for IFNbeta-1b, 64% for IFNbeta-1a i.m. and 74% for IFNbeta-1a s.c.). We observed a sustained progression of disability in 11% of patients on IFNbeta-1b, 17% on IFNbeta-1a i.m. and 19% on IFNbeta-1a s.c.; and at four years of follow-up in 24% of patients on IFNbeta-1b, 23% on IFNbeta-1a i.m. and 35% on IFNbeta-1a s.c. No unexpected major adverse events were observed with any of the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon beta is safe and well tolerated. The various registered interferon beta drugs provide a comparable efficacy in a large non-selected cohort of RRMS patients.

Management of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis

The majority of patients with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) will go on to develop secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) disease, with approximately 50% developing SPMS after 10 years. It remains unknown whether the relapsing and progressive phases of MS differ qualitatively. The pathogenesis of SPMS is poorly understood. The specific role that inflammation plays in disease progression is not well defined. Immunosuppressive therapies, which are capable of reducing or stopping clinical relapses and suppressing MRI activity, generally do not stop disease progression. Recent natural history studies suggest that disease progression occurs regardless of the presence of superimposed relapses. However, poor recovery from clinical relapses does account for the acquisition of disability. Therefore, stopping relapses with appropriate therapy delays the acquisition of disability but does not necessarily delay or prevent the development of SPMS. At present, the only disease-modifying therapies licensed for use in SPMS are interferon-beta-1b in Europe and the US, and mitoxantrone in the US. These agents can only be recommended for patients who continue to have relapses. Symptomatic therapies remain the cornerstone of treatment for patients with SPMS. Delivering high-quality, effective symptomatic therapies requires a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of symptomatic therapies should not only be to reduce neurological impairments but also to decrease disability and handicap and to improve the emotional well-being and health-related quality of life of patients with SPMS.

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone): comparison of continuous versus delayed therapy in a six-year organized multiple sclerosis trial

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of glatiramer acetate (GA) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who received active treatment versus those on placebo for approximately 30 months (24-35 months) before receiving GA during a six-year organized, prospective open label study. Entry required two relapses in the previous two years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5. Patients (251) were equally randomized to daily subcutaneous GA, 20 mg, or to placebo. After approximately 30 months, 208 patients continued in an open label study: 101 continued on GA and 107 switched from placebo to active drug. Groups were well matched at randomization and entry to the open label study. Patients always on GA showed a steady decline in relapses: a mean of 1.5 per year at entry, a mean of 0.42 over the entire six years (95% CI = 0.34-0.51), a 72% reduction (P = 0.0001). They averaged a relapse every four + years (yearly rate 0.23 in year six) and 26/101 remain relapse free. Patients did less well if on placebo for 30 months, but relapses then declined, and by year six the rates were similar. Of patients always on GA, 69% showed neurological improvement of > or = 1 EDSS steps or remained stable compared with 57% if GA treatment was delayed. Of relapse-free patients always on GA over six years, only three of 26 (11%) were worse by > or = 1 EDSS steps, whereas nine of 21 (43%) in the placebo/active group were worse (P < 0.03). Disability, measured every six months, showed that the group of patients always on GA was relatively stable over the six years, while the group who received placebo for the first two-and-a-half years did significantly less well. Daily injections of GA were well tolerated. This longest ever organized MS treatment trial shows that delaying therapy with GA increases the risk of neurologic disability, reinforcing the rationale for using GA as a first-line treatment early in the course of relapsing-remitting MS.

New and emerging treatment options for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The use of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has, to some extent, changed the course of the disease. The annual relapse rate of patients treated with these drugs is lower than that in placebo-treated patients, and more treated patients remain relapse-free compared with untreated patients. In addition, these compounds reduce the development of new lesions, as detected by MRI.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The limited effectiveness of approved treatments for MS, as well as reports of adverse events and toxicity, emphasise the need for the development of new therapies with improved efficacy and fewer side-effects. Clinical observations, increased understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of the disease, and advances in biotechnology have led to several new therapeutic approaches to the treatment of MS that are currently under investigation. WHERE NEXT? Mitoxantrone has recently been shown to produce benefit when used to treat patients with progressive MS; it may also be an effective second-line treatment for patients who do not respond to interferon beta or glatiramer acetate. Over the past few years, several studies have drawn attention to the potential of natalizumab, alemtuzumab, statins, and oestrogens as effective treatments for MS. These drugs are at different stages of clinical development and additional clinical data are needed to support their use and devise dosage regimens. However, they are important and attractive candidates for several reasons: they counteract a fundamental and well-defined pathophysiological process; they have a less cumbersome route of administration than interferon beta and glatiramer acetate; or they have a remarkable safety record.

Disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: an update on recent and ongoing trials and future strategies

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the prototype inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system and the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults exhibiting considerable clinical, radiological and pathological heterogeneity. Novel insights in the immunopathological processes, advances in biotechnology, development of powerful magnetic resonance imaging technologies together with improvements in clinical trial design led to a variety of evaluable therapeutic approaches. Therapy has changed dramatically over the past decade, yielding significant progress for the treatment of relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive MS. A substantial number of pivotal and preliminary reports continue to demonstrate encouraging new evidence that advances are being made in the care of MS patients. This review summarises recent progress with currently available disease-modifying therapies and - on the basis of present immunopathogenetic concepts - outlines ongoing studies as well as future treatment strategies.

Therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis: lessons from failed and interrupted treatment trials

The therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) has changed dramatically over the past decade. Recent immunobiological findings and current pathophysiological concepts together with advances in biotechnology, improvements in clinical trial design and development of magnetic resonance imaging have led to a variety of evaluable therapeutic approaches in MS. However, in contrast to the successfully introduced and established immunomodulatory therapies (e.g. interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate), there have been a remarkable number of therapeutic failures as well. Despite convincing immunological concepts, impressive data from animal models and promising results from phase I/II studies, the drugs and strategies investigated showed no benefit or even turned out to have unexpectedly severe adverse effects. Although to date there is no uniformly accepted model for MS, there is agreement on the significance of inflammatory events mediated by autoreactive T cells in the CNS. These can be modified therapeutically at the individual steps of a hypothetical pathogenetic cascade. Crucial corners like: the prevalence and peripheral activation of CNS-autoreactive T cells in the periphery;adhesion and penetration of T cells into the CNS;local activation and proliferation and;de- and remyelination processes can be targeted through their putative mediators. Like a 'specificity pyramid', therapeutic approaches therefore cover from general immunosuppression up to specific targeting of T-cell receptor peptide major histocompatibility (MHC) complex. We discuss in detail clinical MS trials that failed or were discontinued for other reasons. These trials include cytokine modulators [tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists, interleukin-10, interleukin-4, transforming growth factor-beta2], immunosuppressive agents (roquinimex, gusperimus, sulfasalazine, cladribine), inducers of remyelination [intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg)], antigen-derived therapies [oral tolerance, altered peptide ligands (APL), MHC-Peptide blockade], T cell and T-cell receptor directed therapies (T cell vaccination, T-cell receptor peptide vaccination), monoclonal antibodies against leucocyte differentiation molecules (anti-CD3, anti-CD4), and inactivation of circulating T cells (extracorporeal photopheresis). The main conclusions that can be drawn from these 'negative' experiences are as follows. Theoretically promising agents may paradoxically increase disease activity (lenercept, infliximab), be associated with unforeseen adverse effects (e.g. roquinimex) or short-term favourable trends may reverse with prolonged follow-up (e.g. sulfasalzine). One should not be too enthusiastic about successful trials in animal models (TNFalpha blockers; oral tolerance; remyelinating effect of IVIg) nor be irritated by non-scientific media hype (deoxyspergualine; bone marrow transplantation). More selectivity can imply less efficacy (APL, superselective interventions like T-cell receptor vaccination) and antigen-related therapies can stimulate rather than inhibit encephalitogenic cells. Failed strategies are of high importance for a critical revision of assumed immunopathological mechanisms, their neuroimaging correlates, and for future trial design. Since failed trials add to our growing understanding of multiple sclerosis, 'misses' are nearly as important to the scientific process as the 'hits'.

Comparative assessment of immunomodulating therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

The past decade has seen unprecedented advances in the development of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a disease that has a worldwide prevalence of two million patients. Four agents with the ability to modulate the immune system are now being widely used for RRMS. Of these, three are forms of interferon (IFN)-beta [IFNbeta-1b and two preparations of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex and Rebif], and one is a polypeptide of four amino acids (glatiramer acetate) with a unique mechanism of action. The administration regimens for the IFNbeta-1a products differ, with Avonex being given as 30 microg intramuscularly once a week and Rebif being given as 22 or 44 microg subcutaneously three times a week. It appears safe to predict that both forms of IFNbeta and glatiramer acetate will remain standard treatments for MS for years to come. However, with four therapeutic options available for RRMS, selecting a single therapy is often difficult and necessitates comparisons of the agents, which can be contentious. All four agents have shown superiority over placebo in pivotal phase III trials. Three recent prospective comparative studies have indicated that IFNbeta-1b, Rebif and glatiramer acetate may be more optimal choices than Avonex for patients with RRMS. In a pharmaceutical environment with an estimated worldwide market of $US2.5 billion annually for RRMS, comparative studies are understandably provocative, but at the same time provide meaningful information to clinicians and patients.

Assessment of different treatment failure criteria in a cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta: implications for clinical trials

Clinical trials with interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have shown a modest effect on disability using fixed definitions of treatment failure to measure disease progression. However, in the course of the disease, treatment failure may be influenced by interrater variability and frequent remissions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of different treatment failure criteria in a cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta. We studied 252 patients with a follow-up of more than 2 years. We used four different criteria of treatment failure with increasing stringency (1 Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] point increase confirmed at 3 months, 1 EDSS point increase confirmed at 6 months, 1.5 EDSS points increase confirmed at 3 months, and 1.5 EDSS points increase confirmed at 6 months). We divided treatment failure into permanent treatment failure and transient treatment failure. We considered permanent treatment failure when treatment failure was confirmed on the last two scheduled visits and transient treatment failure when treatment failure was not confirmed on these visits at different time points (9, 12, 18, and 24 months). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the different criteria of treatment failure to identify patients who achieved a high degree of disability after 4 years of follow-up. Regardless of the stringency of treatment failure definitions, a variable proportion of patients with treatment failure had transient treatment failure depending on the criterion applied. Patients with transient treatment failure had a significantly lower EDSS at entry compared with those with permanent treatment failure or no treatment failure. The number of relapses in patients with transient treatment failure did not differ from that of patients with permanent treatment failure. The criterion of confirmed 1 EDSS point increase at 6 months showed the best sensitivity (76.5%), with satisfactory specificity (89%). Our study shows that a large proportion of patients treated with interferon experience transient treatment failure that may affect outcome interpretation in clinical trials. Using a more strict criterion, as extending time to confirmation of EDSS deterioration, and longer follow-up may reduce this proportion of patients with transient treatment failure and improve the validity of the results attained in clinical trials.

Treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid with sulfasalazine

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) treated with sulfasalazine as an alternative to dapsone.

DESIGN

Retrospective noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine patients with biopsy-proven OCP and previous dapsone-related adverse effects (hemolysis and gastrointestinal disturbances) treated with oral sulfasalazine.

METHODS

Clinical data were abstracted from patients' medical records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' symptoms, ocular inflammation, conjunctival scarring, complete blood cell count (including reticulocyte count).

RESULTS

At the initiation of sulfasalazine therapy, ocular inflammation was controlled in all patients but one. Mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 2-35 months). Median oral sulfasalazine dosage was 3 g (range, 1-4 g). The disease remained controlled with sulfasalazine alone in four patients (45%). Two patients (22%) required adjunctive oral cyclophosphamide. Adverse effects necessitating drug withdrawal occurred in three patients (33%): hemolysis in two and gastrointestinal disturbances in one.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfasalazine may be useful in OCP patients with previous dapsone-related adverse effects.

Long term azathioprine fails to prevent onset of multiple sclerosis: report of two cases

Azathioprine is an immunosuppressive drug widely used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We report two patients who developed the first manifestations of clinically definite multiple sclerosis while on long term (3.5 and 10 years, respectively) treatment with azathioprine for Crohn's disease. Both patients developed the first MS symptoms during a quiescent phase of their inflammatory bowel disease. These cases show that long term azathioprine, while possibly maintaining inflammatory bowel disease under control, could not prevent the onset of MS. Multiple Sclerosis (2000) 6 362 - 363

Sustained clinical benefits of glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients observed for 6 years. Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) reduced the relapse rate and slowed accumulation of disability for patients with relapsing - remitting multiple sclerosis. Of the original 251 patients randomized to receive glatiramer acetate or placebo, 208 chose to continue in an open-label study with all patients receiving active drug. The majority of the original double-blind cohort continues to receive glatiramer acetate by daily subcutaneous injection and are evaluated at 6-month intervals and during suspected relapse. The data reported here are from approximately 6 years of organized evaluation, including the double-blind phase of up to 35 months and the open-label phase of over 36 months. Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mg glatiramer acetate were well tolerated. The mean annual relapse rate of the patients who received glatiramer acetate since randomization and continued into the open-label study was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI), CI=0.34 - 0.51). The rate per year has continued to drop and for the sixth year is 0.23. Of the group who have received glatiramer acetate without interruption for 5 or more years, 69.3% were neurologically unchanged or have improved from baseline by at least one step on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Patients who left the open-label phase were surveyed by questionnaire. The majority responded, providing information about their current status and reasons for dropping out. This study demonstrates the sustained efficacy of glatiramer acetate in reducing the relapse rate and in slowing the accumulation of disability in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (2000) 6 255 - 266