Practice parameter: anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

Antiepileptic drug-loaded and multifunctional iron oxide@silica@gelatin nanoparticles for acid-triggered drug delivery

The current study developed an innovative design for the production of smart multifunctional core-double shell superparamagnetic nanoparticles (NPs) with a focus on the development of a pH-responsive drug delivery system tailored for the controlled release of Phenytoin, accompanied by real-time monitoring capabilities. In this regard, the ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide@silica NPs (IO@Si MNPs) were synthesized and then coated with a layer of gelatin containing Phenytoin as an antiepileptic drug. The precise saturation magnetization value for the resultant NPs was established at 26 emu g-1. The polymeric shell showed a pH-sensitive behavior with the capacity to regulate the release of encapsulated drug under neutral pH conditions, simultaneously, releasing more amount of the drug in a simulated tumorous-epileptic acidic condition. The NPs showed an average size of 41.04 nm, which is in the desired size range facilitating entry through the blood-brain barrier. The values of drug loading and encapsulation efficiency were determined to be 2.01 and 10.05%, respectively. Moreover, kinetic studies revealed a Fickian diffusion process of Phenytoin release, and diffusional exponent values based on the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation were achieved at pH 7.4 and pH 6.3. The synthesized NPs did not show any cytotoxicity. Consequently, this new design offers a faster release of PHT at the site of a tumor in response to a change in pH, which is essential to prevent epileptic attacks.

Status epilepticus in patients with brain tumors and metastases: A multicenter cohort study of 208 patients and literature review

OBJECTIVE

Brain tumors and metastases account for approximately 10% of all status epilepticus (SE) cases. This study described the clinical characteristics, treatment, and short- and long-term outcomes of this population.

METHODS

This retrospective, multi-center cohort study analyzed all brain tumor patients treated for SE at the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg between 2011 and 2017.

RESULTS

The 208 patients (mean 61.5 ± 14.7 years of age; 51% male) presented with adult-type diffuse gliomas (55.8%), metastatic entities (25.5%), intracranial extradural tumors (14.4%), or other tumors (4.3%). The radiological criteria for tumor progression were evidenced in 128 (61.5%) patients, while 57 (27.4%) were newly diagnosed with tumor at admission and 113 (54.3%) had refractory SE. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 14.8 days (median 12.0, range 1-57), 171 (82.2%) patients required intensive care (mean LOS 8.9 days, median 5, range 1-46), and 44 (21.2%) were administered mechanical ventilation. All patients exhibited significant functional status decline (modified Rankin Scale) post-SE at discharge (p < 0.001). Mortality at discharge was 17.3% (n = 36), with the greatest occurring in patients with metastatic disease (26.4%, p = 0.031) and those that met the radiological criteria for tumor progression (25%, p < 0.001). Long-term mortality at one year (65.9%) was highest in those diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas (68.1%) and metastatic disease (79.2%). Refractory status epilepticus cases showed lower survival rates than non-refractory SE patients (log-rank p = 0.02) and those with signs of tumor progression (log-rank p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SE occurrence contributed to a decline in functional status in all cases, regardless of tumor type, tumor progression status, and SE refractoriness, while long-term mortality was increased in those with malignant tumor entities, tumor progressions, and refractory SE. SE prevention may preserve functional status and improve survival in individuals with brain tumors.

Anti-epileptic drug use during adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is associated with poorer survival in patients with glioblastoma: A nationwide population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There are emerging but inconsistent evidences about anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) as radio- or chemo-sensitizers to improve survival in glioblastoma patients. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to evaluate the impact of concurrent AED during post-operative chemo-radiotherapy on outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1057 glioblastoma patients were identified by National Health Insurance Research Database and Cancer Registry in 2008-2015. Eligible criteria included those receiving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and without other cancer diagnoses. Survival between patients taking concurrent AED for 14 days or more during chemo-radiotherapy (AED group) and those who did not (non-AED group) were compared, and subgroup analyses for those with valproic acid (VPA), levetiracetam (LEV), or phenytoin were performed. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

There were 642 patients in the AED group, whereas 415 in the non-AED group. The demographic data was balanced except trend of more patients in the AED group had previous drug history of AEDs (22.6% vs. 18%, P 0.078). Overall, the AED group had significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.18, P 0.016) compared to the non-AED group. Besides, an adverse dose-dependent relationship on survival was also demonstrated in the AED group (HR = 1.118, P 0.0003). In subgroup analyses, the significant detrimental effect was demonstrated in VPA group (HR = 1.29,P 0.0002), but not in LEV (HR = 1.18, P 0.079) and phenytoin (HR = 0.98, P 0.862).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved survival was not observed in patients with concurrent AEDs during chemo-radiotherapy. Our real-world data did not support prophylactic use of AEDs for glioblastoma patients.

Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors

Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management

Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.

Novel Therapies in Glioblastoma Treatment: Review of Glioblastoma; Current Treatment Options; and Novel Oncolytic Viral Therapies

One of the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumors is glioblastoma (GB). About 6 incidents per 100,000 people are reported annually. Most frequently, these tumors are linked to a poor prognosis and poor quality of life. There has been little advancement in the treatment of GB. In recent years, some innovative medicines have been tested for the treatment of newly diagnosed cases of GB and recurrent cases of GB. Surgery, radiotherapy, and alkylating chemotherapy are all common treatments for GB. A few of the potential alternatives include immunotherapy, tumor-treating fields (TTFs), and medications that target specific cellular receptors. To provide new multimodal therapies that focus on the molecular pathways implicated in tumor initiation and progression in GB, novel medications, delivery technologies, and immunotherapy approaches are being researched. Of these, oncolytic viruses (OVs) are among the most recent. Coupling OVs with certain modern treatment approaches may have significant benefits for GB patients. Here, we discuss several OVs and how they work in conjunction with other therapies, as well as virotherapy for GB. The study was based on the PRISMA guidelines. Systematic retrieval of information was performed on PubMed. A total of 307 articles were found in a search on oncolytic viral therapies for glioblastoma. Out of these 83 articles were meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, reviews, and systematic reviews. A total of 42 articles were from the years 2018 to 2023. Appropriate studies were isolated, and important information from each of them was understood and entered into a database from which the information was used in this article. One of the most prevalent malignant brain tumors is still GB. Significant promise and opportunity exist for oncolytic viruses in the treatment of GB and in boosting immune response. Making the most of OVs in the treatment of GB requires careful consideration and evaluation of a number of its application factors.

The surgical management of diffuse gliomas: Current state of neurosurgical management and future directions

After recent updates to the World Health Organization pathological criteria for diagnosing and grading diffuse gliomas, all major North American and European neuro-oncology societies recommend a maximal safe resection as the initial management of a diffuse glioma. For neurosurgeons to achieve this goal, the surgical plan for both low- and high-grade gliomas should be to perform a supramaximal resection when feasible based on preoperative imaging and the patient's performance status, utilizing every intraoperative adjunct to minimize postoperative neurological deficits. While the surgical approach and technique can vary, every effort must be taken to identify and preserve functional cortical and subcortical regions. In this summary statement on the current state of the field, we describe the tools and technologies that facilitate the safe removal of diffuse gliomas and highlight intraoperative and postoperative management strategies to minimize complications for these patients. Moreover, we discuss how surgical resections can go beyond cytoreduction by facilitating biological discoveries and improving the local delivery of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapies.

Management of Complications in Neuro-oncology Patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with the spectrum of neurologic and medical complications relevant to the care of patients with neurologic cancer while highlighting best practices to prevent morbidity and mortality. Topics include tumor-related epilepsy, vasogenic edema, complications of corticosteroid use, disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, venous thromboembolism, and opportunistic infection.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

In 2021, a joint guideline from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology reaffirmed recommendations first established in 2000 that patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors should not be prescribed an antiseizure medication prophylactically. For those with tumor-related epilepsy, monotherapy with a non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant is the preferred initial treatment, and levetiracetam remains the preferred first choice. Surveys of physician practice continue to demonstrate excessive use of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with both primary and metastatic central nervous system malignancy. This is particularly concerning among patients who require checkpoint inhibitors as the efficacy of these agents is blunted by concomitant glucocorticoid use, resulting in a reduction in overall survival. Finally, direct oral anticoagulants have been shown to be safe in patients with brain tumors and are now favored as first-line treatment among those who require treatment for venous thromboembolism.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Medical care for patients impacted by primary and secondary central nervous system malignancy is complex and requires a committed team-based approach that routinely calls upon the expertise of physicians across multiple fields. Neurologists have an important role to play and should be familiar with the spectrum of complications impacting these patients as well as the latest recommendations for management.

The role of neurotransmitters in glioblastoma multiforme-associated seizures

GBM, or glioblastoma multiforme, is a brain tumor that poses a great threat to both children and adults, being the primary cause of death related to brain tumors. GBM is often associated with epilepsy, which can be debilitating. Seizures and the development of epilepsy are the primary symptoms that have a severe impact on the quality of life for GBM patients. It is increasingly apparent that the nervous system plays an essential role in the tumor microenvironment for all cancer types, including GBM. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of how neurotransmitters control the progression of gliomas. Evidence suggests that neurotransmitters and neuromodulators found in the tumor microenvironment play crucial roles in the excitability, proliferation, quiescence, and differentiation of neurons, glial cells, and neural stem cells. The involvement of neurotransmitters appears to play a significant role in various stages of GBM. In this review, the focus is on presenting updated knowledge and emerging ideas regarding the interplay between neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as glutamate, GABA, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, adenosine, and their relationship with GBM and the seizures induced by this condition. The review aims to explore the current understanding and provide new insights into the complex interactions between these neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the context of GBM-related seizures.

Clinical, radiological and pathological features of temporomesial tumors in the adult. A single center experience from 15 years

Introduction

The mesial temporal lobe plays a distinct role in epileptogenesis, and tumors in this part of the brain potentially have specific clinical and radiological features. Differentiating high-grade from lower-grade tumors or non-neoplastic lesions can be challenging, preventing the decision for early resection that can be critical in high-grade tumors.

Methods

A brain tumor database was analyzed retrospectively to identify patients with temporomesial tumors. We determined clinical features (age, sex, symptoms leading to clinical presentation) as well as neuroradiological (tumor location and the presence of contrast enhancement on initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and neuropathological findings.

Results

We identified 324 temporal tumors. 39 involved the mesial temporal lobe. 77% of temporomesial tumors occured in males, and 77% presented with seizures, regardless of tumor type or grade. In patients 50 years or older, 90% were male and 80% had glioblastoma (GBM); there was no GBM in patients younger than 50 years. 50% of GBMs lacked contrast enhancement. Male sex was significantly associated with GBM. In both contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, age of 50 years or older was also significantly associated with GBM.

Conclusion

In middle-aged and older patients with a mesial temporal lobe tumor, GBM is the most likely diagnosis even when there is no MRI contrast enhancement. Prolonged diagnostic workup or surveillance strategies should be avoided and early resection may be justified in these patients.

Perioperative perampanel administration for early seizure prophylaxis in brain tumor patients

Background

The efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy in "seizure-naïve" patients with brain tumor, including glioblastoma (GBM), remains controversial. This study investigated whether perampanel (PER) is effective and safe for preventing perioperative onset of epileptic seizures, so-called early seizure, in patients with brain tumors.

Methods

Forty-five patients underwent tumor resection through craniotomy for a primary supratentorial brain tumor at Ehime University Hospital between April 2021 and July 2022. PER was administered from the 1st to the 6th day after surgery for seizure prophylaxis. Occurrence of early seizure, hematological toxicities, and various side effects were recorded on postoperative days 7 and 14. In addition, the clinical course of these patients was compared with 42 brain tumor patients under the same treatment protocol who received levetiracetam (LEV) for seizure prophylaxis between April 2017 and October 2018.

Results

In 45 patients with brain tumor, including GBM, who received PER administration, no early seizures were identified within 7 days postoperatively. No adverse drug reactions such as hematological toxicity, liver or kidney dysfunction, or exanthematous drug eruption were observed in any cases. As side effects, somnolence was reported in 14 patients (31.1%), vertigo in 3 patients (6.7%), and headache in 3 patients (6.7%). Although somnolence and vertigo were difficult to assess in the case of intraparenchymal tumors, particularly GBM, these side effects were not identified in patients with extraparenchymal tumors such as meningiomas, epidermoid cysts, and pituitary adenomas. In addition, no significant differences were identified compared to patients who received LEV.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of PER in preventing early seizures among patients with brain tumors were retrospectively evaluated. Perioperative administration of PER to patients with brain tumors may reduce the risk of early seizures without incurring serious side effects, showing no significant differences compared to patients who received LEV.

Meningioma-Related Epilepsy: A Happy Ending?

(1) Background: More than one-third of patients with meningiomas experience at least one seizure during the course of their disease, and in the 20-50% of cases, seizure represents the onset symptom. After surgery, up to 30% of patients continue to have seizures, while others may experience them later; (2) Methods: The study analyzed retrospectively the risk factors for pre-operative seizures in a large cohort of 358 patients who underwent surgery for newly diagnosed brain meningioma; (3) Results: We identified age, peritumor edema, and location as risk factors for seizure at the onset. Patients with seizures differed from patients without seizures for the following characteristics: younger average age, lower pre-operative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), location on the convexity, lower Simpson Grade, lower incidence of pre-operative neurological deficits, and higher incidence of pre-operative peritumor edema. After 24 months, 88.2% of patients were classified as Engel class Ia, and no correlation with disease progression was observed; (4) Conclusions: Meningioma-related epilepsy has generally a positive outcome following surgery and it seems not to be linked to disease progression, even if further studies are needed.

What neurologists can do for neuro-oncology patients

Neuro-oncology is a branch of medical science concerned with managing central nervous system tumours and neurological complications of cancer. Patients with brain tumours need a multidisciplinary approach to their care and neurologists can play a key part within that team. This review shows how neurologists can contribute to the care of patients with neuro-oncological disease at various points during the illness, including at initial diagnosis, during symptom management and at end of life assisting with palliative seizure management. The review focuses on brain tumour-related epilepsy, the complications of brain tumour treatments and the neurological complications of systemic cancer treatments including immunotherapies.

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Frontal lobe low-grade tumors seizure outcome: a pooled analysis of clinical predictors

OBJECTIVE

Seizures present in 50-90 % of cases with low-grade brain tumors. Frontal lobe epilepsy is associated with dismal seizure outcomes compared to temporal lobe epilepsy. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review, report our case series, and perform a pooled analysis of clinical predictors of seizure outcomes in frontal lobe low-grade brain tumors.

METHODS

Searches of five electronic databases from January 1990 to June 2022 were reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. Individual patient data was extracted from 22 articles that fit the inclusion criteria. A single-surgeon case series from our institution was also retrospectively reviewed and analyzed through a pooled cohort of 127 surgically treated patients with frontal lobe low-grade brain tumors.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 30.8 years, with 50.4 % of patients diagnosed as oligodendrogliomas. The majority of patients (81.1 %) were seizure-free after surgery (Engel I). On the multivariate analysis, gross total resection (GTR) (OR = 8.77, 95 % CI: 1.99-47.91, p = 0.006) and awake resection (OR = 9.94, 95 % CI: 1.93-87.81, p = 0.015) were associated with seizure-free outcome. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the probability of seizure freedom fell to 92.6 % at 3 months, and to 85.5 % at 27.3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy from tumor origin demands a balance between oncological management and epilepsy cure. Our pooled analysis suggests that GTR and awake resections are positive predictive factors for an Engel I at more than 6 months follow-up. To validate these findings, a longer-term follow-up and larger cohorts are needed.

Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations

Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment, and social activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of drug resistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Neurologists, neurosurgeons, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current literature and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both Primary Brain Tumours (PBT) and Brain Metastases (BM). A comprehensive search of the literature since 1995 on BTRE was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used, and the evidence evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seizure frequency varies between 10 and 40% in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) in patients with PBT. In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology. In patients with PBT, BTRE is more common in patients with lower grade histology, frontal and temporal tumours, presence of an IDH mutation and cortical infiltration. All patients with BTRE should be treated with ASMs. Non-enzyme inducing ASMs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic ASMs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Surgical and oncological treatments i.e. radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve BTRE. Vagus Nerve Stimulation has been used with partial success. The review highlights the relative dearth of high-quality evidence for the management of BTRE and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for ASMs.KEY POINTSOffer levetiracetam or lamotrigine to all patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours who have seizure(s), irrespective of whether these are partial or generalised.ASM withdrawal for patients in remission is not recommended due to high rates of seizure recurrence.ASM prophylaxis is not generally recommended in the management of seizure-naïve patients.Both levetiracetam and lamotrigine are safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Bonaventura C, Marras CE, Palestini C, Ferlazzo E, Venturelli E, Dainese F, Martella F, Paladin F, Villani F, Capizzi G, Napoleoni L, Stanzani L, Stragapede L, Zummo L, Balducci M, Eoli M, Rizzi M, Vernaleone M, Messina R, Vittorini R, Gasparini S, Ius T, Cianci V, Manfioli V, Mariani V, Capovilla G. First-line levetiracetam versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication in glioma patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to directly compare the effectiveness of first-line monotherapy levetiracetam (LEV) versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) in glioma patients.

METHODS

In this nationwide retrospective observational cohort study, Grade 2-4 glioma patients were included, with a maximum duration of follow-up of 36 months. Primary outcome was antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment failure for any reason, and secondary outcomes were treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures and due to adverse effects. For estimation of the association between ASM treatment and ASM treatment failure, multivariate cause-specific cox proportional hazard models were estimated, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In the original cohort, a total of 808 brain tumor patients with epilepsy were included, of whom 109 glioma patients were prescribed first-line LEV and 183 glioma patients first-line EIASMs. The EIASM group had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure for any reason compared to LEV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-2.75, p = .005). Treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures did not differ significantly between EIASMs and LEV (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI = .78-2.25, p = .300), but treatment failure due to adverse effects differed significantly (aHR = 4.87, 95% CI = 1.89-12.55, p = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, it was demonstrated that LEV had a significantly better effectiveness (i.e., less ASM treatment failure for any reason or due to adverse effects) compared to EIASMs, supporting the current neuro-oncology guideline recommendations to avoid EIASMs in glioma patients.

Palliative care in brain tumors

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and families. High-grade gliomas (especially glioblastomas) are incurable, and long-term survival is limited. Metastatic brain lesions comprise the majority of intracranial neoplasms and are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic cancer. Response to treatment, prognosis, and survival depends not only on the underlying pathology, but more importantly on recently defined molecular features. Other crucial predictors of survival include age and performance status. Among patients with primary brain tumors, neurologic decline and psychological distress contribute to a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life (QoL) throughout the disease trajectory. While many symptoms in central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS cancers overlap, others predominate in the brain tumor population, including seizures, headaches, depression, fatigue, and treatment-induced toxicity, all of which can be addressed with palliative interventions. Patients, families, and caregivers also report disproportionately high supportive care needs, which frequently differ from those of other systemic cancers. In addition, progressive neurologic decline often results in impaired communication and decision-making capacity at the end of life. Early palliative care (PC) integration has become more common in systemic cancers, but remains limited in neuro-oncology. These factors combined contribute to a uniquely challenging disease course that may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach with early involvement of specialized (PC) to address tumor-related symptoms and improve QoL. We review how to approach patients with brain tumors and address prognosis, symptom management, and advance care planning with the goal of improving QoL for patients, families, and caregivers.

[Status epilepticus after brain tumor surgery]

ABTRACT

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is characterized by continuous course of clinical and/or electrographic epileptic seizures. There are little data on the course and outcomes of SE after resection of brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze clinical and electrographic manifestations of SE, its course and outcomes in short-term period after resection of brain tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed medical records of 18 patients over 18 years old between 2012 and 2019. All patients underwent resection of brain tumor and developed SE after surgery. Clinical criteria were repeated epileptic seizures without interictal recovery of consciousness, stereotypical motor phenomena, impaired consciousness with continued epileptic activity according to video-EEG data. We analyzed EEG data, neurological status, CT and laboratory data.

RESULTS

Metastases (33%) and meningiomas (16%) prevailed. Supratentorial tumors were observed in 61% of patients. Two patients had preoperative seizures. Non-convulsive SE was diagnosed in 62% of patients. SE was successfully treated in 77% of cases. Mortality rate in patients with SE was 44%.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative SE is rare after brain tumor surgery (about 0.09%). Nevertheless, this complication is associated with high mortality. Non-convulsive SE is common (62%) that should be considered in postoperative management.

Duration of Prophylactic Levetiracetam After Surgery for Brain Tumor: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam is commonly used as a prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To quantitate side effects experienced in patients treated with 1 week vs 6 weeks of prophylactic levetiracetam using validated measures for neurotoxicity and depression.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical resection of a supratentorial tumor with no seizure history were randomized within 48 hours of surgery to receive prophylactic levetiracetam for the duration of either 1 or 6 weeks. Patients were given oral levetiracetam extended release 1000 mg during the first part of this study. Owing to drug backorder, patients enrolled later in this study received levetiracetam 500 mg BID. The primary outcome was the change in the neurotoxicity score 6 weeks after drug initiation. The secondary outcome was seizure incidence.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were enrolled and randomized to 1 week (40 patients) or 6 weeks (41 patients) of prophylactic levetiracetam treatment. The neurotoxicity score slightly improved in the overall cohort between baseline and reassessment. There was no significant difference between groups in neurotoxicity or depression scores. Seizure incidence was low in the entire cohort of patients with 1 patient in each arm experiencing a seizure during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The use of prophylactic levetiracetam did not result in significant neurotoxicity or depression when given for either 1 week or 6 weeks. The incidence of seizure after craniotomy for tumor resection is low regardless of duration of therapy.

Treatment of Adult Gliomas: A Current Update

Gliomas are the most common type of primary brain tumor in adults. Glioma treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach involving surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Multiple trials have been conducted to establish the appropriate choice of treatment to achieve long-term survival and better quality of life. This review provides up-to-date evidence regarding treatment strategies for gliomas.

Management of epilepsy in brain tumor patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A concise review of recent findings in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), with focus on the effect of antitumor treatment on seizure control and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and its active metabolite d -2-hydroxyglutarate seem important contributing factors to epileptogenesis in BTRE. A beneficial effect of antitumor treatment (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) on seizure control has mainly been demonstrated in low-grade glioma. AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve BTRE patients is not recommended, but AED treatment should be initiated after a first seizure has occurred. Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently lacking, but second-generation AED levetiracetam seems the preferred choice in BTRE. Levetiracetam lacks significant drug-drug interactions, has shown favorable efficacy compared to valproic acid in BTRE, generally causes no hematological or neurocognitive functioning adverse effects, but caution should be exercised with regard to psychiatric adverse effects. Potential add-on AEDs in case of uncontrolled seizures include lacosamide, perampanel, and valproic acid. Ultimately, in the end-of-life phase when oral intake of medication is hampered, benzodiazepines via nonoral administration routes are potential alternatives.

SUMMARY

Management of seizures in BTRE is complex and with currently available evidence levetiracetam seems the preferred choice. Comparative efficacy RCTs in BTRE are warranted.

Therapeutic Options for Brain Metastases in Gynecologic Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastases (BM) are rare in gynecologic cancers. Overall BM confers a poor prognosis but other factors such as number of brain lesions, patient age, the presence of extracranial metastasis, the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, and the type of primary cancer also impact prognosis. Taking a patient's whole picture into perspective is crucial in deciding the appropriate management strategy. The management of BM requires an interdisciplinary approach that frequently includes oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology and palliative care. Treatment includes both direct targeted therapies to the lesion(s) as well as management of the neurologic side effects caused by mass effect. There is limited evidence of when screening for BM in the gynecology oncology patient is warranted but it is recommended that any cancer patient with new focal neurologic deficit or increasing headaches should be evaluated. The primary imaging modality for detection of BM is MRI, but other imaging modalities such as CT and PET scan can be used for certain scenarios. New advances in radiation techniques, improved imaging modalities, and systemic therapies are helping to discover BM earlier and provide treatments with less detrimental side effects.

Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios

Epilepsy represents a challenge in the management of patients with brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are one of the most frequent comorbidities in neuro-oncology and may be the debut symptom of a brain tumor or a complication during its evolution. Epileptogenic mechanisms of brain tumors are not yet fully elucidated, although new factors related to the underlying pathophysiological process with possible treatment implications have been described. In recent years, the development of new anti-seizure medications (ASM), with better pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer side effects, has become a paradigm shift in many clinical scenarios in neuro-oncology, being able, for instance, to adapt epilepsy treatment to specific features of each patient. This is crucial in several situations, such as patients with cognitive/psychiatric comorbidity, pregnancy, or advanced age, among others. In this narrative review, we provide a rationale for decision-making in ASM choice for neuro-oncologic patients, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each drug. In addition, according to current literature evidence, we try to answer some of the most frequent questions that arise in daily clinical practice in patients with epilepsy related to brain tumors, such as, which patients are the best candidates for ASM and when to start it, what is the best treatment option for each patient, and what are the major pitfalls to be aware of during follow-up.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Neural excitatory rebound induced by valproic acid may predict its inadequate control of seizures

Background

Valproic acid (VPA) represents one of the most efficient antiseizure medications (ASMs) for both general and focal seizures, but some patients may have inadequate control by VPA monotherapy. In this study, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that excitatory dynamic rebound induced by inhibitory power may contribute to the ineffectiveness of VPA therapy and become a predictor of post-operative inadequate control of seizures.

Methods

Awake craniotomy surgeries were performed in 16 patients with intro-operative high-density electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording. The relationship between seizure control and the excitatory rebound was further determined by diagnostic test and univariate analysis. Thereafter, kanic acid (KA)-induced epileptic mouse model was used to confirm that its behavior and neural activity would be controlled by VPA. Finally, a computational simulation model was established to verify the hypothesis.

Findings

Inadequate control of seizures by VPA monotherapy and post-operative status epilepticus are closely related to a significant excitatory rebound after VPA injection (rebound electrodes≧5/64, p = 0.008), together with increased synchronization of the local field potential (LFP). In addition, the neural activity in the model mice showed a significant rebound on spike firing (53/77 units, 68.83%). The LFP increased the power spectral density in multiple wavebands after VPA injection in animal experiments (p < 0.001). Computational simulation experiments revealed that inhibitory power-induced excitatory rebound is an intrinsic feature in the neural network.

Interpretation

Despite the limitations, we provide evidence that inadequate control of seizures by VPA monotherapy could be associated with neural excitatory rebounds, which were predicted by intraoperative ECoG analysis. Combined with the evidence from computational models and animal experiments, our findings suggested that ineffective ASMs may be because of the excitatory rebound, which is mediated by increased inhibitory power.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62127810, 81970418), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2018SHZDZX03) and ZJLab; Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18JC1410403, 19411969000, 19ZR1477700, 20Z11900100); MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Health Identification and Assessment (21DZ2271000); Shanghai Shenkang (SHDC2020CR3073B).

Chinese guideline on the application of anti-seizure medications in the perioperative period of supratentorial craniocerebral surgery

Seizures are a common symptom of craniocerebral diseases, and epilepsy is one of the comorbidities of craniocerebral diseases. However, how to rationally use anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in the perioperative period of craniocerebral surgery to control or avoid seizures and reduce their associated harm is a problem. The China Association Against Epilepsy (CAAE) united with the Trauma Group of the Chinese Neurosurgery Society, Glioma Professional Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Neuro-Oncology Branch of the Chinese Neuroscience Society, and Neurotraumatic Group of Chinese Trauma Society, and selected experts for consultancy regarding outcomes from evidence-based medicine in domestic and foreign literature. These experts referred to the existing research evidence, drug characteristics, Chinese FDA-approved indications, and expert experience, and finished the current guideline on the application of ASMs during the perioperative period of craniocerebral surgery, aiming to guide relevant clinical practice. This guideline consists of six sections: application scope of guideline, concepts of craniocerebral surgery-related seizures and epilepsy, postoperative application of ASMs in patients without seizures before surgery, application of ASMs in patients with seizures associated with lesions before surgery, emergency treatment of postoperative seizures, and 16 recommendations.

Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning

Introduction

In seizure-naive brain tumor patients, the efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment remains controversial. In case of administration, the common preferred drug is levetiracetam (LEV) because of its favorable pharmacological profile. Research to date has not sufficiently determined how LEV affects cognition in the short term, as is the case in the perioperative period. The objective of this prospective study was to examine the neurocognitive functioning of seizure-naive brain tumor patients after receiving LEV perioperatively.

Methods

Fortythree patients with supratentorial brain tumor scheduled for surgery received LEV three days before until six days after surgery as seizure prophylaxis. Cognitive functioning (NeuroCogFX), LEV plasma-levels, hematotoxicity, side-effects, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Qolie31), were recorded preoperatively before (Baseline) and after onset of LEV (Pre-Op), 4–6 days postoperatively (Post-Op) and 21 days postoperatively (Follow-Up).

Results

No significant changes in cognitive functioning and HRQoL were seen after onset of preoperative LEV. There was a significant improvement of NeuroCogFX total-score at Follow-Up (p = 0.004) compared to Baseline. The overall-score Qolie31 showed simultaneous improvement patterns as cognitive functioning (p < 0.001). The most frequent side effect related to study drug was somnolence (in 28.6% of patients).

Conclusions

A significant improvement of cognitive functioning, as well as an improvement in HRQoL, were detected postoperatively. This is presumably due to the debulking effect of the surgery. Nevertheless, LEV has no detrimental effect on cognitive functioning in the perioperative phase in seizure-naive brain tumor patients.

Trial registration

This study was registered prospectively (Date: 25/11/2015; EudraCT: 2015–003,916-19).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02762-7.

Meningioma Related Epilepsy- Pathophysiology, Pre/postoperative Seizures Predicators and Treatment

Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors accounting for about 30% of all brain tumors. The vast majority of meningiomas are slow-growing and of benign histopathology rendering them curable by surgery alone. Symptomatic lesions depend on the location with signs of mass effect or neurological deficits. Seizures are the presenting symptoms in approximately 30% of cases, which negatively affect quality of life, limit independence, impair cognitive functioning, as well as increase the risk for psychiatric comorbidities including depression. Although surgical resection may offer seizure freedom in 60-90% of meningiomas, seizures persist after surgical resection in approximately 12-19% of patients. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are employed in management, however, are limited by adverse neurocognitive side-effects and inefficacy in some patients. The potential predictors of pre- and post-operative seizures in meningioma patients have been identified in the literature. Understanding various factors associated with seizure likelihood in meningioma patients can help guide more effective seizure control and allow for better determination of risk before and after surgery.

Seizure prophylaxis in meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

No formal indication currently exists for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgical oncology patients. Neither have specific recommendations been made on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in seizure-free patients with meningiomas scheduled for surgery. AEDs are generally prescribed on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration a range of clinical and radiological risk factors. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Of a total of 4368 studies initially identified, 12 were selected for extraction of data and qualitative analysis. Based on the clinical data presented, we were only able to include 6 studies in the meta-analysis. We performed heterogeneity studies, calculated a combined odds ratio, evaluated publication bias, and conducted a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

AED prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures did not significantly reduce the incidence of post-operative seizures in comparison to controls (Mantel-Haenszel combined odds ratio, random effects model: 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.78]; 2041 patients). However, we are unable to establish a robust recommendation against this treatment due to the lack of prospective studies, the presence of selection bias in the studies reviewed, the likelihood of underestimation of seizure frequency during follow-up, and the strong influence of one study on the overall effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of this review, the results of the meta-analysis do not support the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.

The Occurrence and Relationship of Postoperative Seizure and de novo Epilepsy after Craniotomy Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Objective

Postoperative seizures and epilepsy are common complications of craniotomy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of seizures and epilepsy after craniotomy.

Methods

A total of 293 consecutive craniotomy surgeries were analyzed. Infratentorial surgeries, epilepsy surgeries, surgeries using the same approach conducted for the same patients, and the cases with incomplete clinical data were excluded. A total of 211 surgeries were included in this study. We evaluated the following clinical characteristics in all patients: sex, age, preoperative epilepsy, use of preoperative antiseizure medication (ASM), indication for operation, early postoperative seizure (EPS), delayed postoperative seizure (DPS), and postoperative de novo epilepsy. The day of onset of EPSs was defined as within 7 days post-surgery, and the day of onset of DPSs was defined as later than 7 days and less than 60 days post-surgery.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were previously diagnosed with epilepsy. Nine patients had EPSs (4.3%), and 10 patients had DPSs (4.7%). Seven cases of EPSs and six cases of DPSs were observed in 183 patients without previous epilepsy (3.8% and 3.3%, respectively). Three of the seven patients with EPSs (42.9%) and all six patients with DPSs (100%) developed de novo epilepsy. Postoperative de novo epilepsy was observed in 9 (4.9%) of the 183 patients without epilepsy. EPSs and DPSs were significant risk factors for epilepsy (p &lt; 0.01). The odds ratios of EPSs and DPSs for the development of epilepsy were 12.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.94–112.80; p &lt; 0.01) and 22.88 (95% CI: 5.38–55.72; p &lt; 0.01), respectively. ASM was administered prophylactically to 51 patients. The prophylactic use of ASMs did not prevent EPSs or postoperative de novo epilepsy.

Conclusion

EPSs and DPSs occurred in 4.3% and 4.7% of the patients, respectively, after craniotomy. Postoperative de novo epilepsy occurred in 4.9% of patients. This study revealed that EPSs and DPSs were risk factors for de novo epilepsy. Previous epilepsy was not a significant risk factor for EPSs. The prophylactic use of ASMs did not prevent EPSs or de novo epilepsy.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cranial Tumor Resection: A Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols describe a standardized method of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks surrounding elective surgical intervention. A growing body of evidence is being generated as we learn to apply principles of ERAS standardization to neurosurgical patients. First applied in spinal surgery, ERAS protocols have been extended to cranial neuro-oncological procedures. This review synthesizes recent findings to generate evidence-based guidelines to manage neurosurgical oncology patients with standardized systems and assess ability of these systems to coordinate multidisciplinary, patient-centric care efforts. Furthermore, we highlight the potential utility of multimedia, app-based communication platforms to facilitate patient education, autonomy, and team communication within each of the three settings.

An integrated risk model stratifying seizure risk following brain tumor resection among seizure-naive patients without antiepileptic prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

The natural history of seizure risk after brain tumor resection is not well understood. Identifying seizure-naive patients at highest risk for postoperative seizure events remains a clinical need. In this study, the authors sought to develop a predictive modeling strategy for anticipating postcraniotomy seizures after brain tumor resection.

METHODS

The IBM Watson Health MarketScan Claims Database was canvassed for antiepileptic drug (AED)– and seizure-naive patients who underwent brain tumor resection (2007–2016). The primary event of interest was short-term seizure risk (within 90 days postdischarge). The secondary event of interest was long-term seizure risk during the follow-up period. To model early-onset and long-term postdischarge seizure risk, a penalized logistic regression classifier and multivariable Cox regression model, respectively, were built, which integrated patient-, tumor-, and hospitalization-specific features. To compare empirical seizure rates, equally sized cohort tertiles were created and labeled as low risk, medium risk, and high risk.

RESULTS

Of 5470 patients, 983 (18.0%) had a postdischarge-coded seizure event. The integrated binary classification approach for predicting early-onset seizures outperformed models using feature subsets (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.751, hospitalization features only AUC = 0.667, patient features only AUC = 0.603, and tumor features only AUC = 0.694). Held-out validation patient cases that were predicted by the integrated model to have elevated short-term risk more frequently developed seizures within 90 days of discharge (24.1% high risk vs 3.8% low risk, p < 0.001). Compared with those in the low-risk tertile by the long-term seizure risk model, patients in the medium-risk and high-risk tertiles had 2.13 (95% CI 1.45–3.11) and 6.24 (95% CI 4.40–8.84) times higher long-term risk for postdischarge seizures. Only patients predicted as high risk developed status epilepticus within 90 days of discharge (1.7% high risk vs 0% low risk, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have presented a risk-stratified model that accurately predicted short- and long-term seizure risk in patients who underwent brain tumor resection, which may be used to stratify future study of postoperative AED prophylaxis in highest-risk patient subpopulations.

Relevant pharmacologic interactions in the concurrent management of brain tumor-related epilepsy and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Co-administration of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is increasingly common in brain tumor patients. We therefore performed a systematic review of the current evidence for potential drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs in this patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature via PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines (last accessed December 15, 2021). Included were clinical studies and case reports, written in English language and published between 2010 and 2021, that investigated concurrent clinical use of AEDs with DOACs for any indication. Non-English articles, articles not related to our research question, review articles and commentaries were excluded. Full-text articles were evaluated for possible confounding factors and results were summarized using a data table highlighting the key characteristics of each article.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 122 unique articles, of which 27 were deemed relevant to our research question. Of these, 8 articles were clinical studies (n = 295,415 patients) and 19 were case reports (n = 25 patients). Only 3 clinical studies and 2 case reports reported interactions between AEDs and DOACs in patients with active cancer and none reported interactions in patients with brain tumors.

CONCLUSION

We have identified low (class IV) level evidence of potential drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs. Even though there is no current report of interactions in brain tumor patients, neuro-oncology providers should be aware of the emerging evidence regarding drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs and take this into consideration when concurrently prescribing these to patients.

Easing the Journey-an Updated Review of Palliative Care for the Patient with High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are rare brain tumors that cause disproportionate suffering and mortality. Palliative care, whose aim is to relieve the symptoms and stressors of serious illness, may benefit patients with HGG and their families. In this review, we summarize the extant literature and provide recommendations for addressing the symptom management and communication needs of brain tumor patients and their caregivers at key points in the illness trajectory: initial diagnosis; during upfront treatment; disease recurrence; end-of-life period; and after death during bereavement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with HGG experience highly intrusive symptoms, cognitive and functional decline, and emotional and existential distress throughout the disease course. The caregiver burden is also substantial during the patient's illness and after death. There is limited evidence to guide the palliative management of these issues. Palliative care is likely to benefit patients with HGG, yet further research is needed to optimize the delivery of palliative care in neuro-oncology.

Postoperative epilepsy and survival in glioma patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study from 2009 to 2018

PURPOSE

Postoperative epilepsy is common in glioma patients and has been suggested to indicate disease progression, yet knowledge of its role as a prognostic factor is limited. This study investigates the association between postoperative epilepsy and survival amongst patients with gliomas.

METHODS

We included 3763 patients with histopathologically diagnosed grade II, III, and IV gliomas from 2009 to 2018 according to the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. Information on epilepsy diagnosis was redeemed from the Danish National Patient Registry, the National Prescription Registry and the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. We used Cox proportional hazards models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between postoperative epilepsy and risk of death. We examined the role of the timing of epilepsy in three different samples: Firstly, in all glioma patients with postoperative epilepsy; secondly, in patients with postoperative de novo epilepsy; thirdly, exclusively in a homogeneous sub-group of grade IV patients with postoperative de novo epilepsy.

RESULTS

Glioma patients with postoperative epilepsy had an increased risk of death, regardless of prior epilepsy status (HR = 4.03; CI 2.69-6.03). A similar increase in the risk of death was also seen in patients with postoperative de novo epilepsy (HR = 2.08; CI 1.26-3.44) and in the sub-group of grade IV patients with postoperative de novo epilepsy (HR = 1.83; CI 1.05-3.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative epilepsy may negatively impact survival after glioma diagnosis, regardless of preoperative epilepsy status. Postoperative epilepsy may be an expression of a more invasive growth pattern of the gliomas following primary tumor treatment.

Antiepileptic drug management in pediatric patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) are at a higher risk of significant morbidity, lower quality of life, and increased risk of mortality. We surveyed providers regarding anti-seizure medication (ASM) management in pediatric BTRE to determine if practices are standard or markedly variable.

METHODS

An anonymous voluntary online survey was sent to members of the Child Neurology Society. Providers were asked specific questions regarding initiation and wean of ASMs and if this was dependent on multiple factors. Demographic information was collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-one providers responded to the survey. Ninety-four percent of providers would start an ASM after a second seizure. Eighty-four percent chose levetiracetam as the preferred ASM. Management was variable when based on tumor location, extent of surgical resection, pathology, and tumor prognosis. Statistically significant differences in responses regarding management were identified when comparing neurologists and epileptologists, providers with formal neuro-oncology or epilepsy training, providers at large institutions, and years of experience. For patients who underwent a gross total resection of the tumor, neuro-oncology and epilepsy-trained providers were more likely to wean off ASMs (p < 0.049). Providers without formal training in neuro-oncology or epilepsy were more likely to get an EEG prior to making a decision about weaning off ASMs (p < 0.016).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ASM management in BTRE varies greatly according to sub-specialty and experience. Further studies and potential development of guidelines are needed to identify the most appropriate management of ASMs for BTRE.

IDH Wild-type Glioblastoma Presenting with Seizure: Clinical Specificity, and Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain neoplasia in adults. Seizure is a common manifestation in GBM. Up to 25 to 60% of patients with GBM have seizures. We aim to summarize all the relevant clinical, surgical, radiologic, and molecular features of a cohort of patients suffering from GBM-related epilepsy and measure the outcome, to understand the possible existence of a clinical/phenotypical specificity of this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

 We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 177 patients affected by isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type (IDH-WT) GBM; 49 patients presented seizure at onset (SaO) and 128 were seizure free (SF). We investigated the relationship between seizures and other prognostic factors of GBMs.

RESULTS

 A statistically significant association between the location of the lesions in the parietal lobe and seizures was observed. The left side was more commonly affected. Interestingly, there was a statistical relationship between tumors involving the subventricular zone (SVZ) and SaO patients. The tumors were also smaller on average at diagnosis, and generalized SaOs were associated with longer overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

 The typical patient with IDH-WT GBM with SaO is a young (<55 year) male without a history of headache. The lesion is typically small to medium in size and located in the temporoparietal dominant lobe, with a high tendency to involve the SVZ.

Prescription preferences of antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients: An international survey among EANO members

Background

This study aimed at investigating antiepileptic drug (AED) prescription preferences in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) among the European neuro-oncology community, the considerations that play a role when initiating AED treatment, the organization of care, and practices with regard to AED withdrawal.

Methods

A digital survey containing 31 questions about prescription preferences of AEDs was set out among members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO).

Results

A total of 198 respondents treating patients with BTRE participated of whom 179 completed the entire survey. Levetiracetam was the first choice in patients with BTRE for almost all respondents (90% [162/181]). Levetiracetam was considered the most effective AED in reducing seizure frequency (72% [131/181]) and having the least adverse effects (48% [87/181]). Common alternatives for levetiracetam as equivalent first choice included lacosamide (33% [59/181]), lamotrigine (22% [40/181]), and valproic acid (21% [38/181]). Most crucial factors to choose a specific AED were potential adverse effects (82% [148/181]) and interactions with antitumor treatments (76% [137/181]). In the majority of patients, neuro-oncologists were involved in the treatment of seizures (73% [132/181])). Other relevant findings were that a minority of respondents ever prescribe AEDs in brain tumor patients without epilepsy solely as prophylaxis (29% [53/181]), but a majority routinely considers complete AED withdrawal in BTRE patients who are seizure-free after antitumor treatment (79% [141/179]).

Conclusions

Our results show that among European professionals treating patients with BTRE levetiracetam is considered the first choice AED, with the presumed highest efficacy and least adverse effects.

Effect of Levetiracetam Use Duration on Overall Survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wildtype Glioblastoma in Adults: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

The association between Levetiracetam and survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastomas is controversial. We investigated whether the duration of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol impacts overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients.

METHODS

Observational single-institution cohort study (2010-2018). Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥18 years old; 2) newly diagnosed supratentorial tumor; 3) histomolecular diagnosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma; 4) standard chemoradiation protocol. To assess the survival benefit of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol (whole duration, part time, and never subgroups), a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed. We performed a case-matched analysis (1:1) between patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol and patients with Levetiracetam use part time or never according to the following criteria: sex, age, epileptic seizures at diagnosis, RTOG-RPA class, tumor location, preoperative volume, extent of resection, and O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status. Patients with unavailable O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status (48.5%) were excluded.

RESULTS

460 patients were included. The median overall survival was longer in the 116 patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (21.0 months; 95%CI, 17.2-24.0) than in the 126 patients with part time Levetiracetam use (16.8 months; 95%CI, 12.4-19.0], and in the 218 patients who never received Levetiracetam (16.0 months; 95%CI, 15.5-19.4; p=0.027). Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.69; 95%CI, 0.52-0.93; p=0.014), O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (aHR 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.71; p<0.001), and gross total tumor resection (aHR 0.57; 95%CI, 0.44-0.74; p<0.001) were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. After case matching (n=54 per group), a longer overall survival was found for Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (HR=0.63; 95%CI, 0.42-0.94, p=0.023).

DISCUSSION

Levetiracetam use during the whole standard chemoradiation protocol possibly improves overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. It should be considered in the anti-tumor strategy of future multicentric trials.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that in individuals with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, levetiracetam use throughout the duration of standard chemotherapy is associated with longer median overall survival.

Radiomic features as a risk factor for early postoperative seizure in patients with meningioma

PURPOSE

This study aim to identify the clinical risk factors of and to develop a radiomics-based predictive model for early postoperative seizure.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 322 operative patients with meningioma who met the inclusion criteria from January 2014 to December 2016 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive value of clinical variables. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to obtain the radiomic score (Rscore) for early postoperative seizure. Radiological features were evaluated using the AK software. The minimal redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) methods were used to assess for radiomic features, and the Rscore was obtained based on radiomic characteristics using a specific formula.

RESULTS

In total, 260 patients who met the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled in this study. Among them, 20 experienced early postoperative seizure. Logistic regression analysis showed that Rscore was associated with a significantly high risk of seizure (p<0.000). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve of the Rscore was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.853-0.987). The model had a high accuracy for predicting early postoperative seizure.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rscore was found to be associated with a high risk of early postoperative seizures. Thus, a higher Rscore (>-1.644) can identify high-risk patients requiring intensive care.

Neurologic Complications in Patients with Cancer

Neurologic symptoms are commonly seen in patients with cancer and can be among the most challenging to diagnose and manage. It is often difficult to determine if new neurologic symptoms are secondary to direct effects of a malignant lesion, systemic complications of disease, paraneoplastic disorders, or side effects of cancer treatment itself. However, early diagnosis and treatment of each of these conditions can improve patients' quality of life and long-term functional outcomes. In this review, we describe a systematic approach to the diagnosis of new neurologic symptoms in patients with known malignancy. We have categorized the neurologic complications of cancer through a mechanistic approach, with an emphasis on ascertaining underlying pathophysiology to guide treatment choice. This review focuses on the acute neurologic complications of cancer that require hospital admission.

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in glioma patients with epilepsy: a systematic review

Background

Comprehensive data on the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AED) treatment in glioma patients with epilepsy are currently lacking. In this systematic review, we specifically assessed the efficacy of AEDs in patients with a grade II-IV glioma.

Methods

Electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2020. Three different outcomes for both mono- and polytherapy were extracted from all eligible articles: (i) seizure freedom; (ii) ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency; and (iii) treatment failure. Weighted averages (WA) were calculated for outcomes at 6 and 12 months.

Results

A total of 66 studies were included. Regarding the individual outcomes on the efficacy of monotherapy, the highest seizure freedom rate at 6 months was with phenytoin (WA = 72%) while at 12-month pregabalin (WA = 75%) and levetiracetam (WA = 74%) showed highest efficacy. Concerning ≥50% seizure reduction rates, levetiracetam showed highest efficacy at 6 and 12 months (WAs of 82% and 97%, respectively). However, treatment failure rates at 12 months were highest for phenytoin (WA = 34%) and pregabalin (41%). When comparing the described polytherapy combinations with follow-up of ≥6 months, levetiracetam combined with phenytoin was most effective followed by levetiracetam combined with valproic acid.

Conclusion

Given the heterogeneous patient populations and the low scientific quality across the different studies, seizure rates need to be interpreted with caution. Based on the current limited evidence, with the ranking of AEDs being confined to the AEDs studied, levetiracetam, phenytoin, and pregabalin seem to be most effective as AED monotherapy in glioma patients with epilepsy, with levetiracetam showing the lowest treatment failure rate, compared to the other AEDs studied.

New strategies for managing adult gliomas

Gliomas are hard to treat. Their prognosis has improved little over the past few decades. Fundamental therapeutic challenges such as treatment resistance, malignant progression, and tumour recurrence persist. New strategies are needed to advance the management and treatment of gliomas. Here, we focus on where those new strategies could emerge. We consider how recent advances in our understanding of the biology of adult gliomas are informing new approaches to their treatment.

Medical and Neurological Management of Brain Tumor Complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of brain tumors often leads to complications that are either related to the tumor itself or the tumor-directed and supportive therapies, increasing the burden on the patients' quality of life and even survival. This article reviews the medical and neurological conditions that commonly complicate the disease course of brain tumors patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various mechanisms have been newly identified to be involved in the pathophysiology of seizures and brain edema and can help advance the treatment of such complications. There have also been new developments in the management of thromboembolic disease and cognitive impairment. Medical and neurological complications are being identified more often in brain tumor patients with the improved survival provided by therapeutic advances. Early and proper identification and management of such complications are crucial for a better survival and quality of life.

Seizure Outcome After Surgery for Insular High-Grade Glioma

BACKGROUND

The insular cortex is an eloquent island of mesocortex surrounded by vital structures making this region relatively challenging to neurosurgeons. Historically, lesions in this region were considered too high risk to approach given the strong chance of poor surgical outcome. Advances in recent decades have meant that surgeons can more safely access this eloquent region. Seizure outcome after excision of insular low-grade gliomas is well reported, but little is known about seizure outcomes after excision of insular high-grade gliomas.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients presenting with new-onset seizures during 2015-2019 who underwent excision of an insular high-grade glioma at 3 regional neurosurgical centers in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

We identified 38 patients with a mean (SD) age of 45.7 (15.3) years with median follow-up of 21 months. At long-term follow-up, of 38 patients, 23 were seizure-free (Engel class I), 2 had improved seizures (Engel class II), 6 had poor seizure control (Engel class III/IV), and 7 died.

CONCLUSIONS

Excision of insular high-grade gliomas is safe and results in excellent postoperative seizure control.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy and risk factors for metastatic brain tumors: analysis of 601 consecutive cases providing real-world data

OBJECTIVE

It is necessary to accurately characterize the epidemiology and trends of brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTE) in patients with metastatic brain tumors. This study aimed to determine the incidence of BTE associated with metastatic brain tumors and retrospectively investigate the risk factors for BTE.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 601 of 631 consecutive patients with metastatic brain tumors who received treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and/or other treatments. BTE and the clinical course were examined retrospectively. Logistic regression multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for BTE.

RESULTS

BTE was reported in 148 (24.6%) of 601 patients during the entire course. Of these 148 patients, 81 (54.7%) had first-onset epilepsy (13.5% of all patients). Of the 520 cases of nonepileptic onset, 53 were in the prophylactic antiepileptic drug (AED) group. However, 12 of these patients and 55 of the no-prophylactic AED group developed epilepsy during the course of the study. Including these 67 patients, 148 patients were examined as the group of all epilepsy cases during the entire course. In 3 patients, the seizure progressed to status epilepticus. In most patients, the BTE (n = 83, 56.1%) manifested as focal aware seizures. Logistic regression analysis identified young age (p = 0.037), male sex (p = 0.026), breast cancer (p = 0.001), eloquent area (p < 0.001), peritumoral edema (p < 0.001), dissemination (p = 0.013), and maximum tumor volume (p = 0.021) as significant risk factors for BTE. BTE was more common with tumor volumes greater than the cutoff value of 1.92 ml.

CONCLUSIONS

BTE appears to be more likely to occur in cases with young age, male sex, breast cancer, tumors involving eloquent areas, brain edema, dissemination, and giant tumors.