Analgesic Doses of Intrathecal but Not Intravenous Clonidine Increase Acetylcholine in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Humans

High-sensitivity quantification of acetylcholine and choline in human cerebrospinal fluid with a validated LC-MS/MS method

Acetylcholine is the neurotransmitter of the parasympathetic nervous system, synthesized from choline and involved in several neurodegenerative diseases. Exploration of cholinergic neurotransmission in the human central nervous system is limited by the lack of a sensitive and specific method for the determination of acetylcholine and choline expression. We developed an hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry method for the quantification of both molecules in human cerebrospinal fluid samples. An extensive selectivity study towards endogenous interfering compounds, in particular γ-butyrobetain, was performed and the method was validated according to the European Medicine Agency and Food and Drug Administration guidelines for the validation of bioanalytical methods. The performance of the method was excellent with a lower limit of quantification at 5 ng/L (34.2 pmol/L) for acetylcholine and 5 μg/L for choline, a precision in the range 1.3-11.9% and an accuracy between 85.2 and 113.1%. This suitability of the method for the quantification of acetylcholine and choline in clinical samples was demonstrated with the analysis of patient cerebrospinal fluid samples. Altogether, this validated method allows the simultaneous quantitative analysis of acetylcholine and choline in human cerebrospinal fluid with high sensitivity and selectivity. It will allow to better characterize the cholinergic neurotransmission in human pathologies and to study the effects of drugs acting on this system.

The impact of neuraxial clonidine on postoperative analgesia and perioperative adverse effects in women having elective Caesarean section-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuraxial clonidine improves postoperative analgesia in the general surgical population. The efficacy and safety of neuraxial clonidine as a postoperative analgesic adjunct in the Caesarean section population still remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of perioperative neuraxial clonidine on postoperative analgesia in women having Caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of the perioperative administration of neuraxial clonidine alone or in combination with a local anaesthetic and/or opioids in women having elective Caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia when compared with placebo. PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE were searched until February 2017. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Neuraxial clonidine reduced 24 h morphine consumption [mean difference (MD): -7.2 mg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.4, -3.0 mg; seven studies] and prolonged time to first analgesic request (MD: 135 min; 95% CI: 102, 168 min; 16 studies) when compared with the control group. Neuraxial clonidine increased intraoperative hypotension [odds ratio (OR): 2.849; 95% CI: 1.363, 5.957], intraoperative sedation (OR: 2.355; 95% CI: 1.016, 5.459), but reduced the need for intraoperative analgesic supplementation (OR: 0.224; 95% CI: 0.076, 0.663). The effect of clonidine on intraoperative bradycardia, intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative sedation, and pruritus were inconclusive. Neuraxial clonidine did not negatively impact neonatal umbilical artery pH or Apgar scores. This review demonstrates that neuraxial clonidine enhances postoperative analgesia in women having Caesarean section with neuraxial anaesthesia, but this has to be balanced against increased maternal adverse effects.

Intrathecal clonidine and baclofen enhance the pain-relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation: a comparative placebo-controlled, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for neuropathic pain; nevertheless, 40% of patients fail to obtain satisfactory pain relief and in many patients, the effect tends to diminish with time. Based on animal experiments, intrathecal baclofen was previously introduced clinically to enhance suboptimal SCS effects. Later animal experiments demonstrated similar data for clonidine. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether intrathecal clonidine or baclofen enhances the effect of SCS in neuropathic pain patients in whom the pain relieving-effect of SCS is inadequate.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 10 patients experiencing neuropathic pain with insufficient pain relief with SCS alone. Clonidine, baclofen, and saline (control) were intrathecally administered by bolus injections in combination with SCS.

RESULTS

Seven of 10 patients reported significant pain reduction when SCS was combined with active drugs. The mean visual analog scale ratings were reduced by more than 50% with either drug combined with SCS. Four patients previously treated with SCS alone later underwent implantation of a pump for long-term administration of clonidine or baclofen. In the 2 patients with clonidine pumps with a mean follow-up of 15 months, the combined therapy produced pain reduction of 55% and 45%, respectively. The corresponding effect with baclofen was 32% and 82%, respectively, at 7 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A trial with clonidine and baclofen combined with SCS may be warranted in patients who do not obtain satisfactory pain relief with SCS alone or experienced a decreasing therapeutic effect.

Relation between pro-inflammatory cytokines and acetylcholine levels in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disorder. Since acetylcholine (ACh) is known to participate in the inflammatory response, we investigated the possible relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines and acetylcholine levels in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) patients. Levels of ACh and pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1-β and IL-17 were measured both in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and sera of 22 RR-MS patients in the relapsing phase and in 17 control subjects affected by other non-neurological diseases (OND). We observed higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-17 in both CSF and serum of RR-MS patients compared to control subjects. Moreover, ACh levels were lower in CSF and serum of RR-MS patients compared to levels of control subjects. Although the relationship between high inflammatory cytokine levels and low ACh levels need to be further investigated in the future, our data suggest that IL-1β, and cytokines induced by it, such as IL-17 and ACh, may be involved in the pathogenesis of MS.

Monoamine-dependent, opioid-independent antihypersensitivity effects of intrathecally administered milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a postoperative pain model in rats

The neurotransmitters serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) have important roles in suppressing nociceptive transmission in the spinal cord. In the present study, we determined the efficacy and nature of the antihypersensitivity effects of milnacipran, a 5-HT and NA reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in the spinal cord in a rat model of postoperative pain. Sprague-Dawley rats were used in all experiments. An incision was made on the plantar aspect of the hind paw. Mechanical hypersensitivity was measured by determining the withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments applied to the paw. Drugs were administered intrathecally 24 h after paw incision. Microdialysis studies of the dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord were also performed to measure 5-HT and NA levels after systemic injection of milnacipran. Milnacipran (1-30 microg) produced dose-dependent antihypersensitivity effects. The effect lasted 6 h after the 30-microg injection. Doses of 30 microg or less produced no abnormal behavior. The peak antihypersensitivity effect of 10 microg of milnacipran was blocked by intrathecal pretreatment with antagonists of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor (idazoxan; 30 microg) or 5-HT receptors (methysergide; 30 microg). Intrathecal pretreatment with 30 microg of naloxone, a mu-opioid receptor antagonist, did not reverse the effect of milnacipran. Isobolographic analysis indicated antinociceptive synergism between milnacipran and morphine. Microdialysis studies revealed that milnacipran increased both 5-HT and NA levels in the spinal dorsal horn. These findings suggest that the antihypersensitivity effect of intrathecal milnacipran in the postoperative pain model is monoamine-mediated. Combined administration of an SNRI with morphine might be a promising treatment to suppress postoperative hypersensitivity.

Adjunctive analgesic therapy in veterinary medicine

Adjunctive analgesic therapies are interventions for pain that involve agents or techniques other than the traditional analgesics (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and local anesthetics). Adjunctive therapies may be pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic in nature. The focus of this article is on pharmacologic interventions with potential utility as adjunctive analgesics in veterinary medicine. Pharmacology of selected agents, including medetomidine, ketamine, amantadine, gabapentin, systemic lidocaine, and pamidronate, is discussed in addition to evidence for their safety and efficacy and guidelines for their use in veterinary patients.

Clonidine reduces the excitability of spinal dorsal horn neurones

BACKGROUND

Clonidine has often been applied in combination with local anaesthetics for spinal or epidural anaesthesia. This study was designed to investigate the local anaesthetic-like action of clonidine in superficial dorsal horn neurones. The superficial laminae of the dorsal horn contain three groups of neurones: tonic-, adapting-, and single-spike-firing neurones which are important neuronal structures for pain transmission, receiving most of their primary sensory input from Adelta and C fibres.

METHODS

Whole cell patch clamp recordings from spinal cord slices of Wistar rats were used to study the action of clonidine on the generation of single and series of action potentials. Voltage clamp recordings in isolated somata were performed to study the effect of clonidine on voltage-gated Na(+) and different types of K(+) currents.

RESULTS

Firing frequencies of trains of action potentials in tonic-firing neurones are reduced at low concentrations (10 microM) of clonidine, but not in adapting- or single-spike-firing neurones. High concentrations of clonidine (700 microM) are necessary to modify the shape of single action potentials. Low concentrations of clonidine shift the steady-state inactivation curve of Na(+) currents to more negative potentials. At clinical concentrations (6-100 microM) clonidine partially inhibits voltage-gated Na(+) and K(+) channels.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine suppresses the generation of action potentials in tonic-firing spinal dorsal horn neurones. This may be explained, in part, by an interaction with voltage-gated Na(+) and K(+) currents. Clonidine could therefore contribute to analgesia during local anaesthesia.

Spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors and the NO release cascade mediate supraspinally produced effectiveness of gabapentin at decreasing mechanical hypersensitivity in mice after partial nerve injury

After partial nerve injury, the central analgesic effect of systemically administered gabapentin is mediated by both supraspinal and spinal actions. We further evaluate the mechanisms related to the supraspinally mediated analgesic actions of gabapentin involving the descending noradrenergic system. Intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) administered gabapentin (100 microg) decreased thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity in a murine chronic pain model that was prepared by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. These effects were abolished by intrathecal (i.t.) injection of either yohimbine (3 microg) or idazoxan (3 microg), alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Pretreatment with atropine (0.3 mg kg(-1), i.p. or 0.1 microg, i.t.), a muscarinic receptor antagonist, completely suppressed the effect of i.c.v.-injected gabapentin on mechanical hypersensitivity, whereas its effect on thermal hypersensitivity remained unchanged. Similar effects were obtained with pirenzepine (0.1 microg, i.t.), a selective M(1)-muscarinic receptor antagonist, but not with methoctramine (0.1 and 0.3 microg, i.t.), a selective M(2)-muscarinic receptor antagonist. The cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine (0.3 ng, i.t.) potentiated only the analgesic effect of i.c.v. gabapentin on mechanical hypersensitivity, confirming spinal acetylcholine release downstream of the supraspinal action of gabapentin. Moreover, the effect of i.c.v. gabapentin on mechanical but not thermal hypersensitivity was reduced by i.t. injection of L-NAME (3 microg) or L-NMMA (10 microg), both of which are nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors. Systemically administered naloxone (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.), an opioid receptor antagonist, failed to suppress the analgesic actions of i.c.v. gabapentin, indicating that opioid receptors are not involved in activation of the descending noradrenergic system by gabapentin. Thus, the supraspinally mediated effect of gabapentin on mechanical hypersensitivity involves activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors followed by muscarinic receptors (most likely M(1)) and the NO cascade. In contrast, the effect of supraspinal gabapentin on thermal hypersensitivity is independent of the spinal cholinergic-NO system.

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase is upregulated in a subset of primary sensory afferents after nerve injury which are necessary for analgesia from alpha2-adrenoceptor stimulation

alpha2-Adrenoceptor (AR) agonists increase in analgesic potency and efficacy after peripheral nerve injury, and their effects are blocked by neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitors and M4 muscarinic receptor antagonists only after injury. We tested whether nNOS and M4 muscarinic receptors are co-expressed in the spinal cord, and whether destruction of a subset of sensory afferents which are essential to alpha2-AR analgesia would also destroy nNOS and M4 receptor expression. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent left L5 and L6 spinal nerve ligation. Lumbar spinal cord was removed and immunostained for M4 muscarinic receptors and nNOS alone and for co-expression. Others received intrathecal injection of saporin linked to an antibody to the neurotrophin receptor p75(NTR), which eliminates cells expressing this receptor and the analgesic effects of alpha2-AR agonists. nNOS staining of fibers in the superficial dorsal horn was dramatically increased after spinal nerve ligation, and this was abolished by saporin linked anti-p75(NTR) treatment. In contrast, nNOS staining in dorsal horn neurons was unaltered by these manipulations. M4 receptors were present on neurons in the dorsal horn, some of which co-expressed nNOS, but their pattern of expression was not altered by these manipulations. Peripheral nerve injury increases nNOS expression in fibers in the superficial dorsal horn, some of which likely express p75(NTR), and alpha2-AR agonists may reduce injury-induced sensitization by activation of nNOS in these fibers In contrast, changes in nNOS and M4 receptor location on spinal cord neurons are not responsible for increased analgesic potency of alpha2-AR agonists after nerve injury.

The combination of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine did not enhance analgesic efficacy beyond that for each individual drug in adult orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefit of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine combination through the epidural route in adult orthopedic surgery.

DESIGN

Randomized double-blinded study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Scheduled to undergo knee surgery, 56 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 adult patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups to receive the combined epidural-intrathecal technique. A 10-mL epidural injection of either study drug or normal saline was first administered to all patients. Intrathecal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of bupivacaine. The control group (CG) received epidural saline. The 0.1-mg/kg S(+)-ketamine epidural group received 0.1 mg/kg epidural S(+)-ketamine. The 0.5-microg/kg clonidine epidural group received 0.5 microg/kg epidural clonidine. The S(+)-ketamine/clonidine group received 0.1 mg/kg epidural S(+)-ketamine plus 0.5 microg/kg epidural clonidine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pain and adverse effects were evaluated by visual analog scale. Rescue analgesics were available to patients. The groups were demographically similar. Sensory level to pinprick, surgical and anesthetic time, and visual analog scale scores for pain at first rescue medication were similar among the groups. The time to first rescue analgesic (minute) was lowest in CG (P < .005). The CG required more rescue analgesics in 24 hours than any of the other groups (P < .0005). Patients who received either epidural clonidine, S(+)-ketamine, or both displayed similar analgesia. The frequency of adverse effects was similar among groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of epidural clonidine or S(+)-ketamine did not result in a greater analgesic effect in the model of acute postoperative pain studied, although the interaction of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine is not attributable to sharing of a common second messenger system.

Antinociceptive properties of acetylenic thiophene and furan derivatives: Evidence for the mechanism of action

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antinociceptive potential of the acetylenic thiophene and furan derivatives: 3-(furan-2-il) prop-2-yn-1-ol 1, 1-(thiofen-2-il) pent-1yn-3-ol 2 and 4-(thiofen-2-il)-2-metilbut-3-yn-2-ol 3 on three different pain models in mice. The pain models evaluated were the acetic acid-induced writhing, capsaicin-induced pain and the tail immersion test. The possible mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive effect of these compounds were also investigated. Thus, the acetylenic thiophene and furan derivatives presented antinociceptive effect in the pain tests caused by chemical agents. Statistical analysis showed that compounds 1 and 3 increased the latency for tail withdrawal in the tail immersion test (phasic pain). Besides, the role of the opioidergic, muscarinic cholinergic and dopaminergic systems in the acetic acid-induced writhing was examined. The antinociceptive effect of compounds 2 and 3 was prevented by pretreatment with naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c), but not by atropine (5 mg/kg, s.c) or metoclopramide (1 mg/kg, s.c). Neither naloxone nor metoclopramide prevented the antinociceptive effect caused by compound 1, while the pretreatment with atropine antagonized the antinociceptive action of this compound. The compounds 1-3 used in this study did not reveal any motor impairment to mice in the open field. The results suggest that compounds 2 and 3 induced antinociception in the abdominal writhing test and that their effects are mediated by opiodergic receptors, while the antinociceptive effect of compound 1 may involve muscarinic cholinergic receptors.

Spinal noradrenaline transporter inhibition by reboxetine and Xen2174 reduces tactile hypersensitivity after surgery in rats

Spinal noradrenaline (NA) released in response to noxious stimuli may play an important role in suppression of nociceptive transmission. Here, we investigated the efficacy of a competitive NA transporter inhibitor (reboxetine) and a noncompetitive NA transporter inhibitor peptide, Xen2174, isolated from the Pacific cone snail, to treat tactile hypersensitivity following paw incisional surgery. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, an incision of the plantar aspect of the hind paw was performed, and withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments near the surgical site determined. Reboxetine (0.5-5 microg) and Xen2174 (0.3-100 microg) increased withdrawal threshold when injected 24h after paw incision, with a peak effect at 15-60 min, for Xen2174, an ED50 value of 0.64 microg. Administration of Xen2174 (3-30 microg) 15 min before incision also reduced hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. Withdrawal threshold after the single 30 microg dose was greater than vehicle control even at 2, 3, and 5 days after incision. Doses <or=30 microg did not alter spontaneous behavior. The anti-hypersensitivity effect of 10 microg of Xen2174 was totally blocked by the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan, and partially blocked by the muscarinic antagonist, atropine. These data suggest that selective NA transporter inhibition suppresses post-incisional hypersensitivity through a different mechanism from that of neuropathic pain, since we previously reported that reversal of hypersensitivity by intrathecal clonidine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, following spinal nerve ligation is completely blocked by intrathecal atropine. Finally, these data suggest that intrathecal administration of Xen2174 at the time of spinal anesthesia might produce postoperative analgesia in humans.

On the mechanisms involved in antinociception induced by diphenyl diselenide

In this study, we described the local peripheral antinociceptive activity produced by diphenyl diselenide in the formalin test as compared to ebselen, an amply studied organoselenium compound. A second objective was to evaluate, the possible mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effect caused by diphenyl diselenide. Administration of diphenyl diselenide or ebselen produced a significant antinociceptive local effect on the late phase (15-30min) of the formalin test. As well, diphenyl diselenide and ebselen injected in the contra lateral paw produced a significant decrease in licking time on the late phase (15-30min). The mechanisms underlying the analgesic action of diphenyl diselenide seem to be unlike the activation of opioid, dopaminergic D2, muscarinic cholinergic receptors or the interaction with α(1) and α(2) adrenoceptors. Furthermore, the effect of a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist in abolishing the antinociception induced by diphenyl diselenide suggests the involvement of serotonergic pathways.

Atropine reverses the antinociception of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the tail-flick test of mice

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) clonixin, diclofenac, piroxicam, ketoprofen, meloxicam, and paracetamol induced antinociception after intraperitoneal or intrathecal administration in mice submitted to an acute thermal algesiometric test without inflammation (tail-flick). Antinociception was evaluated by the increase in reaction time difference (Delta latency), between readings obtained before and after the administration of drugs. The antinociception induced by doses of NSAIDs producing between 20% and 30% of the maximum possible effect (MPE) 30 min after intraperitoneal and 15 min after intrathecal injections was compared with the antinociception obtained after pretreatment with 1 mg/kg atropine ip, 30 min before. Systemic atropine (1 mg/kg) significantly antagonized NSAID-induced antinociception in all cases, both after intraperitoneal and intrathecal administration. Cholinergic depletion by intracerebroventricular hemicholinium-3 (HC-3, 5 microg) 5 h before prevented the antinociceptive effect of all NSAIDs. These observations suggest that intrinsic muscarinic cholinergic facilitatory pathways represent an important modulating system in pain perception in this animal model of acute thermal pain. The results of the present work support the increasingly accepted notion that NSAIDs are effective analgesics even when inflammation is not present, acting by mechanisms that involve actions on spinal and supraspinal nociceptive transmission. It is suggested that, similar to morphine and clonidine, the active mechanism of NSAIDs may involve the release of acetylcholine (ACh) in the spinal cord.

Epidural and intrathecal analgesia for cancer pain

The three-step analgesic ladder approach developed by the World Health Organization works well in treating the vast majority (70-90%) of patients suffering from pain related to cancer. In those patients who do not get pain relief by this three-step approach, intraspinal agents can be a fourth step in managing pain of malignant origin. Although morphine is the only opioid approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for intraspinal use, many different opioid analgesics are used intraspinally, including hydromorphone, fentanyl, sufentanil, meperidine and methadone in the treatment of cancer pain. Many non-opioid agents have also been used intraspinally either alone or in combination with opioids in the treatment of intractable cancer pain. This chapter summarizes the clinical use of these agents with some practical points.

Spinal alpha(2)-adrenoceptors are involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine in rats

We evaluated the central or spinal mechanism involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine by using intrathecal alpha-adrenergic antagonist administration. The minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane that blocks cardiovascular response to a noxious stimulus (MACbar(sevo)) was determined in rats after treatment with IV saline, IV clonidine 10 micro g/kg, intrathecal (IT) or IV phentolamine 50 micro g, IT or IV yohimbine 200 micro g, IT or IV prazosin 30 micro g, or the combination of IV clonidine and the different IT or IV alpha-adrenergic antagonists. In the studied model, the MACbar(sevo) of saline-treated controls was 2.10 +/- 0.8. After clonidine administration, it decreased to 1.07 +/- 0.4. The IT administration of phentolamine and yohimbine did not modify the MACbar(sevo) of naïve rats, whereas in IV clonidine-treated animals, it totally suppressed the MAC-sparing effect of this drug (phentolamine) or even significantly increased (yohimbine) the MACbar(sevo) (2.78 +/- 1) when compared with controls (P < 0.05). IT prazosin alone significantly reduced the MACbar(sevo) (0.35 +/- 0.3; P< 0.05) and suppressed any hemodynamic reaction when combined with IV clonidine. The IV administration of the different alpha-adrenergic antagonists had no significant effect on the MACbar(sevo) of controls or IV clonidine-treated animals. These results argue for a spinal mechanism of action involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine. Moreover, the spinally administered alpha-antagonists displayed different effects in rats under sevoflurane anesthesia than those reported in awake animals.

IMPLICATIONS

Using intrathecal alpha-adrenergic antagonist administration, we demonstrated that a spinal mechanism is involved in the MACbar-sparing effect of systemic clonidine in rats.

Postoperative pain relief following intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or oral clonidine

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic and adverse effects of equal doses of oral or intrathecal clonidine in spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine plain.

METHODS

Forty-five ASA I-III orthopaedic patients scheduled for osteosynthesis of a traumatic femur fracture were randomised in a double-blind fashion to one of 3 groups. Patients received 15 mg of plain bupivacaine intrathecally (group B) or an intrathecal mixture of bupivacaine 15 mg and clonidine 150 mg (group CIT). In group CPO oral clonidine 150 mg was administered 60 min before intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 15 mg.

RESULTS

Oral and intrathecal clonidine prolonged the time until the first request for analgesics, 313 +/- 29 and 337 +/- 29 min, respectively, vs. 236 +/- 27 min in group B (P < 0.01). The total 24- h PCA morphine dose was significantly lower in group CIT(19.3 +/- 1.3 mg) compared to groups B and CPO(33.4 +/- 2.0 and 31.2 +/- 3.1 mg). MAP was decreased significantly during the first hour after intrathecal clonidine(14%) and during the first 5 h after oral clonidine(14-19%). HR decreased in CIT during the 5th and 6th postoperative hours(7-9%) and during the first 2 h(9%) in CPO (P < 0.01). The degree of sedation was more pronounced in group CPO during the first 3 h. Four patients had pruritus in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of intrathecal clonidine prolonged analgesia and decreased morphine consumption postoperatively more than oral clonidine. Hypotension was more pronounced after oral than after intrathecal clonidine. Intrathecal clonidine is therefore recommended.

Regional analgesia in the intensive care unit. Principles and practice

Nociception is a complicated process, and only in recent years have the neural pathways and mediators of pain transmission been unraveled. Several regional anesthetic interventions, most notably epidural drug delivery, can interrupt nociception and provide safe and effective pain control in critically ill patients while substantially reducing the need for systemic medications. This article discusses the possibilities for regional control of the neurobiology of nociception and describes the arsenal of regional anesthetic techniques available to the intensivist. Used wisely, regional techniques can provide excellent pain control and may have a significant role in improving overall patient outcome. Regional analgesia offers the best opportunity to provide substantial analgesia without significant central opioid effects. Well-conducted regional analgesia can reduce many of the unpleasant or potentially problematic side effects observed when traditional intravenous medications are used exclusively for pain control.

Formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine from nitric oxide and norepinephrine in the spinal cord and its role in spinal analgesia

Spinally released norepinephrine is thought to produce analgesia in part by stimulating alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, which in turn leads to nitric oxide synthesis. Also, nitric oxide is known to react with norepinephrine in vivo in the brain to form 6-nitro-norepinephrine, which inhibits neuronal norepinephrine reuptake. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine occurs in the spinal cord and that intrathecal administration of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produces analgesia by stimulating norepinephrine release. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine was present in rat spinal cord tissue and microdialysates of the dorsal horn and intrathecal space. Intrathecal norepinephrine injection increased 6-nitro-norepinephrine. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine also stimulated norepinephrine release in dorsal spinal cord in vitro. Intrathecal injection of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produced antinociception and interacted additively with norepinephrine for antinociception. Spinal noradrenergic nerve destruction increased antinociception from intrathecally injected norepinephrine, but decreased antinociception from 6-nitro-norepinephrine. These results suggest a functional interaction between spinal nitric oxide and norepinephrine in analgesia, mediated in part by formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine. Stimulation of auto-inhibitory alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors at noradrenergic synapses decreases norepinephrine release. Paradoxically, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist injection increases and alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist injection decreases norepinephrine release in the spinal cord. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine may be an important regulator of spinal norepinephrine release and could explain the positive feedback on norepinephrine release after activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors.

The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal administration of epibatidine with clonidine or neostigmine in the formalin test in rats

The analgesic effect of intrathecal injection of epibatidine, clonidine and neostigmine, compounds that elevate ACh, was examined in the formalin test, a model of post-injury central sensitization in the rat. The compounds were injected alone and in combination. Intrathecal injection of epibatidine alone did not alter pain behaviors, compared to vehicle-treated rats. Intrathecal injection of clonidine dose-dependently reduced tonic pain behaviors (ED(50)+/-95% confidence limits=6.7+/-4.8 microg). The combination of clonidine and epibatidine (C:E), in the ratio of 26:1, dose-dependently reduced tonic pain behaviors; and the ED(50) of C:E was 1.1+/-0.98 microg a significant 6-fold leftward shift of the dose response curve, compared with clonidine alone. The antinociceptive effect of C:E (26:1) was attenuated by pre-treatment with the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine. Neostigmine dose-dependently reduced tonic pain behaviors (ED(50)=1.5+/-1.3 microg). The combination of neostigmine and epibatidine, in a ratio of 8:1, significantly shifted the dose response curve 4-fold to the left (ED(50)=0.4+/-0.3 microg). The effect is mediated in part by the activation of the nAChR and possibly by the enhanced release of ACh. These data demonstrate significant enhancement of the antinociceptive effects of spinally delivered analgesics by a nAChR agonist, suggesting that this class of compounds may have utility as adjuvants when combined with conventional therapeutics.

Evidence-based review of the literature on intrathecal delivery of pain medication

Evidence-based medicine depends on the existence of controlled clinical trials that establish the safety and efficacy of specific therapeutic techniques. Many interventions in clinical practice have achieved widespread acceptance despite little evidence to support them in the scientific literature; the critical appraisal of these interventions based on accumulating experience is a goal of medicine. To clarify the current state of knowledge concerning the use of various drugs for intraspinal infusion in pain management, an expert panel conducted a thorough review of the published literature. The exhaustive review included 5 different groups of compounds, with morphine and bupivacaine yielding the most citations in the literature. The need for additional large published controlled studies was highlighted by this review, especially for promising agents that have been shown to be safe and efficacious in recent clinical studies.

Low-dose intrathecal clonidine combined with sufentanil as analgesic drugs in abdominal gynecological surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a low dose of spinal clonidine either alone or combined with sufentanil would provide effective analgesia following abdominal surgery, as a supplement to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

DESIGN

Randomized double-blind study.

SETTING

Gynecological surgery, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

73 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing gynecological abdominal surgery with spinal anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups and prospectively studied to examine anesthesia, analgesia, and adverse effects. The control group received saline as the test drug; the sufentanil group received 10 microg of sufentanil; the clonidine group received 30 microg of clonidine; and the sufentanil/clonidine group received 5 microg of sufentanil plus 15 microg of clonidine. All groups received intrathecal 15 mg of bupivacaine (3 mL) plus the intrathecal test drug (2 mL). The concept of visual analog scale (VAS) was introduced. All patients were premedicated with intravenous midazolam. Rescue analgesics were available.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The groups were demographically the same. Sensory block to pinprick at 10 min was higher for clonidine and sufentanil/clonidine groups compared to the control group (p < 0.02). Anesthetic time (Bromage score 2) was also longer for clonidine and sufentanil/clonidine groups compared to the control and sufentanil groups (p < 0.05). Time to first rescue analgesics was shorter in the control group compared to the other groups (p < 0.02). The number of IM diclofenac dose injections in 24 hours was higher in the control group compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects and ephedrine consumption were similar among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal 15- and 30-microg clonidine doses expanded the anesthesia sensory block and duration of motor block, and provided analgesia.

Role of spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in clonidine-induced nitric oxide release in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Intrathecal administration of alpha(2) adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine, is capable of alleviating neuropathic pain. Recent studies suggest that spinal nitric oxide (NO) mediates the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine. Furthermore, compared to nicotinic receptors, spinal muscarinic receptors play a greater role in the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine. In the present study, we tested a hypothesis that clonidine-evoked NO release is dependent primarily on muscarinic receptors in the spinal cord after nerve injury. A rat model of neuropathic pain was induced by ligation of the left L(5)/L(6) spinal nerves. Using an in vitro spinal cord perfusion preparation, the effect of muscarinic and nicotinic receptor antagonists on clonidine-evoked nitrite (a stable product of NO) release was determined. Both muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists dose-dependently attenuated clonidine-elicited nitrite release. In spinal cords from the neuropathic rats, the inhibitory effect of muscarinic receptor antagonists (atropine and scopolamine) on clonidine-elicited nitrite release was more potent than that of nicotinic receptor antagonists (mecamylamine and hexamethonium). However, in spinal cords obtained from sham animals, the inhibitory effect of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists did not differ significantly. These results indicate that muscarinic, as well as nicotinic, receptors mediate clonidine-induced NO release in the spinal cord. These data also suggest that after nerve injury, the cascade of activation of alpha(2) adrenergic receptors-muscarinic receptors-NO in the spinal cord likely plays a predominant role in the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine on neuropathic pain.

Muscarinic-mediated analgesia

Systemic administration of cholinesterase inhibitors which cross the blood brain barrier have long been known to produce analgesia and enhance analgesia from opiates. A major site of analgesic action of cholinergic agents is the spinal cord. Muscarinic receptors are concentrated in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, an area of noxious sensory processing, and these reflect innervation primarily from cholinergic neurons with cell bodies deep in the neck of the dorsal horn. Spinal injection of cholinergic agonists results in analgesia which primarily reflects muscarinic receptor activation. Analgesia occurs in animal models of acute noxious stimulation and of chronic hypersensitivity pain. Although no cholinergic agonists have been tested for safety in humans, the cholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine, has undergone such testing, and produces analgesia to experimental, acute postoperative, and chronic pain. Thus, muscarinic cholinergic agonists and cholinesterase inhibitors hold promise as non-opiate agents for the treatment of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain.

Intrathecal, but not intravenous, clonidine reduces experimental thermal or capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia in normal volunteers

Clonidine is approved for intraspinal administration in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain. Some studies have suggested an analgesic effect after systemic clonidine administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal and IV clonidine with acute noxious stimulation and with hyperalgesia from intradermal capsaicin injection in volunteers. Sixteen healthy volunteers received intradermal injections of capsaicin (100 microg) before and after the IV or intrathecal injection of clonidine 50 or 150 microg in a randomized, double-blind manner. Pain and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were determined at specified intervals. In addition, pain to noxious heat stimulation was determined. The capsaicin injection produced pain, followed by hyperalgesia and allodynia. The intrathecal, but not IV, injection of 150 microg of clonidine reduced capsaicin-induced pain and area of hyperalgesia. Intrathecal clonidine (150 microg) reduced pain to heat stimulation, whereas IV clonidine did not. The groups did not differ in hemodynamic or sedative effects from clonidine. These data support the value of intraspinal administration of clonidine for the treatment of acute pain and of pain states associated with hyperalgesia. Similarly, they suggest that analgesia from the systemic administration of this alpha2-adrenergic agonist, if any, is weak in doses that produce sedation and reduce blood pressure.

IMPLICATIONS

To the extent that the experimental pain conditions used in this study reflect those in patients with acute and chronic pain, these data support the spinal rather than IV injection of clonidine for analgesia.