Capsaicin-induced pain and sensitisation in the postpartum period

BACKGROUND

Recovery from Caesarean delivery in women and surgical nerve injury in animals after delivery is more rapid than expected, an effect reversed in animals by spinal injection of an oxytocin receptor antagonist. We hypothesised that endogenous modulation of acute pain is altered postpartum.

METHODS

Endogenous inhibition of acute pain in a conditioned pain modulation paradigm or endogenous sensitisation by topical capsaicin was tested in women who were breastfeeding 10-14 days after Caesarean delivery and age-matched controls (n=80 total: 20 per group and 20 per test). The study was powered to detect a difference in area of hyperalgesia after capsaicin of 33%. Capsaicin-evoked pain was recorded in women, and capsaicin-evoked mechanical hypersensitivity was measured in rats 48 h after delivery and in age-matched female and male animals.

RESULTS

There was no effect of the postpartum period in the endogenous sensitisation assay in women, and the conditioned pain modulation assay failed to produce analgesia in either group. Postpartum women, however, reported less intense pain than controls at the end of topical capsaicin exposure (1.3 [1.4] vs 2.0 [2.0] on 0-10 verbal scale), and acute hypersensitivity after capsaicin was less in postpartum than control rats (withdrawal threshold 25 [15] vs 3.6 [1] g).

CONCLUSIONS

These results agree with a recent report that oxytocin may desensitise the transient receptor potential for vanilloid-1 channel, although other explanations, including hormone effects, are possible. These results do not, however, support the inhibition of capsaicin-evoked spinal sensitisation in the postpartum period.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01843517.

The puerperium alters spinal cord plasticity following peripheral nerve injury

Tissue and nerve damage can result in chronic pain. Yet, chronic pain after cesarean delivery is remarkably rare in women and hypersensitivity from peripheral nerve injury in rats resolves rapidly if the injury occurs in the puerperium. Little is known regarding the mechanisms of this protection except for a reliance on central nervous system oxytocin signaling. Here we show that the density of inhibitory noradrenergic fibers in the spinal cord is greater when nerve injury is performed in rats during the puerperium, whereas the expression of the excitatory regulators dynorphin A and neuregulin-1 in the spinal cord is reduced. The puerperium did not alter spinal cord microgial and astrocyte activation. Astrocyte activation, as measured by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression, was not evident in female rats with injury, regardless of delivery status suggesting sex differences in spinal astrocyte activation after injury. These results suggest a change in the descending inhibitory/facilitating balance on spinal nociception neurotransmission during the puerperium, as mechanisms for its protective effect against injury-induced hypersensitivity.

Inhibitory M2 muscarinic receptors are upregulated in both axotomized and intact small diameter dorsal root ganglion cells after peripheral nerve injury

Acetylcholine reduces nociceptive input in part by activating inhibitory M2 muscarinic receptors on primary sensory neurons, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and muscarinic agonists produce analgesia in humans and animals. M2 muscarinic receptors are upregulated in animals with diabetic neuropathy, but their level of expression and function after peripheral nerve injury has not been previously examined. This study tested, using intracellular Ca(2+) response to membrane depolarization, the effect of the M2 muscarinic receptor agonist bethanechol on individual dorsal root ganglion cells from normal and L5-6 spinal nerve-ligated rats, followed by M2 muscarinic receptor immunostaining. We also examined functional transient receptor potential for vanilloids-1 activity by determining intracellular Ca(2+) response evoked by capsaicin in M2 muscarinic receptor immunoreactive cells. In normal dorsal root ganglion cells, bethanechol inhibited the Ca(2+) response in a concentration-related fashion, and this inhibition was blocked by the M2 muscarinic receptor antagonist gallamine. Cells expressing M2 muscarinic receptors by immunostaining were significantly inhibited by bethanechol, whereas those lacking positive staining were not. The proportion of studied dorsal root ganglion neurons with positive M2 muscarinic receptor staining increased significantly in the injured ipsilateral L5-6 and the uninjured ipsilateral L4 ganglia, but not in the contralateral dorsal root ganglion neurons compared with normals. In contrast, the proportion of neurons responding to capsaicin significantly decreased in the injured ipsilateral L5-6 dorsal root ganglion cells. These results suggest that inhibitory M2 muscarinic receptors are upregulated in small- and medium-sized axotomized dorsal root ganglion neurons and their uninjured neighbors following nerve injury, and may represent an appropriate target for analgesia in this setting.

alpha2-adrenoceptors inhibit the intracellular Ca2+ response to electrical stimulation in normal and injured sensory neurons, with increased inhibition of calcitonin gene-related peptide expressing neurons after injury

Nerve injury resulting in chronic pain is associated with novel excitatory effects of norepinephrine on injured peripheral nerve terminals and their cell bodies, due to actions on alpha2-adrenoceptors. Paradoxically, alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists administered near peripheral terminals or their cell bodies results in analgesia, not pain. This study tested, using intracellular Ca2+ response to stimulation, the effects of alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists on injured sensory neurons and classified their neuronal phenotype. Dorsal root ganglion cells from normal and spinal nerve-ligated rats were dissociated and activated twice with electrical field stimulation, while measuring Fura-2 fluorescence. Cells were perfused between stimulations with vehicle or alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists alone or with antagonists. Cells were considered inhibited if the ratio of their peak Ca2+ response to the second stimulus divided by the first was less than the 2.5th percentile for vehicle controls. alpha2-, But not alpha1-adrenoceptor agonists inhibited the Ca2+ response in a concentration related fashion, and this inhibition was blocked by alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clonidine inhibited a similar percentage of cells in the normal and spinal nerve-ligated group. In both groups, the large majority of clonidine-inhibited cells stained for isolectin B4. Spinal nerve ligation resulted in a 4-10-fold increase in the percentage of clonidine inhibited cells which immunostained for calcitonin gene-related peptide. These data are consistent with the known inhibition of Ca2+ currents by alpha2-adrenoceptors and suggest that, at the level of intracellular Ca2+, the key determinant of neurotransmitter release, alpha2-adrenoceptors are inhibitory after nerve injury, not excitatory. There is a shift in phenotype of sensory neurons which are inhibited by clonidine after nerve injury, which may explain clonidine's increased potency in the treatment of neuropathic compared with acute pain.

Cyclooxygenase 2 in infiltrating inflammatory cells in injured nerve is universally up-regulated following various types of peripheral nerve injury

We previously reported the up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) in injured sciatic nerve of rats with partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) and the reversal of PSNL-elicited tactile allodynia by local injection of the COX inhibitor ketorolac [Eur J Neurosci 15 (2002) 1037]. We further asked whether COX2 up-regulation in injured nerve is a universal phenomenon following various types of nerve injury. In the current study, we observed that abundant COX2 immunoreactive (IR) cell profiles appeared in injured nerves of rats following spinal nerve ligation (SNL), chronic constriction injury (CCI) and complete sciatic nerve transection. Most COX2-IR cells were identified as infiltrating macrophages. Partial injury induced greater COX2 up-regulation than complete injury. COX2 up-regulation reached a peak at 2-4 weeks, evidently declined by 3 months and disappeared by 7 months postlesion. These findings suggest that up-regulation of COX2 in injured nerve is a common event during the initial several months after nerve injury. We observed that local ketorolac-elicited anti-allodynia was closely associated with the abundance of COX2-IR cells in injured nerve, varying with the type of injury and time after injury. The anti-allodynia lasted the longest when local ketorolac was given 2-4 weeks after PSNL, CCI and SNL. The duration of local ketorolac's anti-allodynia was the longest in CCI rats, which also exhibited the most abundant COX2 up-regulation. Local ketorolac's anti-allodynia lasted much shorter when given 2-3 months after lesion. Local ketorolac failed to induce anti-allodynia 7 months after lesion, a time when COX2-IR cells completely disappeared from the injured nerve except a few cells at the injury site. Our data strongly suggest that during the initial several months after nerve injury, peripherally over-produced prostaglandins play an important role in the maintenance of neuropathic pain.

Intraplantar injection of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor ketorolac reduces immunoreactivities of substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and dynorphin in the dorsal horn of rats with nerve injury or inflammation

We previously reported that partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) dramatically up-regulates cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) in injured sciatic nerve, and local injection of the COX inhibitor, ketorolac, reverses tactile allodynia and suppresses increased phosphorylation of the transcription factor cAMP responsive element binding protein [Eur J Neurosci 15 (2002) 1037]. These findings suggest that peripheral prostaglandins (PGs) are over-produced and contribute to the central plasticity and the maintenance of neuropathic pain after nerve injury. PGs, particularly PGE2, are well known to facilitate the release of the pro-nociceptive neuropeptide substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from primary sensory afferents. Thus, suppressing peripheral PG over-production may inhibit the release of these two neuropeptides from primary afferents and thereby increase the content of these neuropeptides remaining in afferent terminals in the dorsal horn. In this study we tested this hypothesis by examining the immunoreactivities of SP and CGRP in the dorsal horn of PSNL rats intraplantarly injected with saline and ketorolac. Four weeks after PSNL, SP- and CGRP-immunoreactivities (IR) in the ipsilateral dorsal horn were not significantly different from the contralateral side. Five days following intraplantar injection of ketorolac, CGRP- and SP-IR in the ipsilateral and contralateral dorsal horn were dramatically reduced compared with saline-injected PSNL rats. Local ketorolac also suppressed PSNL-induced increase in dynorphin-IR in dorsal horn neurons. Since abundant production of PGs during inflammation is well documented, we further examined the effect of intraplantar ketorolac on neuropeptide expression in the dorsal horn following carrageenan inflammation. We observed that co-administration of ketorolac with carrageenan in the hindpaw also reduced SP- and dynorphin-IR in the ipsilateral and contralateral dorsal horn. These findings are in contrast to our hypothesis, suggesting that peripherally over-produced PGs following nerve injury and inflammation possibly contribute to the production of SP and CGRP in primary sensory neurons, to the up-regulation of dynorphin in the dorsal horn neurons, and finally to the mechanisms of neuropathic and inflammation pain.

Perioperative administration of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine at the site of nerve injury reduces the development of mechanical hypersensitivity and modulates local cytokine expression

The development of chronic pain after surgery is not rare. Nerve injury from complete or partial nerve section during surgery leads to macrophage recruitment and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading in turn to sensitization. Macrophages also express alpha2-adrenoceptors, and we previously demonstrated a prolonged reduction in hypersensitivity following peri-neural injection of the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, in rats with chronic nerve injury. The current study tested whether peri-neural clonidine at the time of injury could also prevent development of hypersensitivity. Rats underwent partial ligation of one sciatic nerve, and peri-neural saline, clonidine or a combination of clonidine and the alpha2A-adrenceptor-preferring antagonist, BRL44408, were administered before wound closure and, in some animals, also 24 and 48 h later. The single clonidine injection reduced hypersensitivity for only 5 h, whereas repeated injection for three days reduced hypersensitivity for 28 days. Peri-neural clonidine reduced the increase in tissue content of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1beta and particularly TNFalpha in sciatic nerve, DRG and spinal cord while increasing concentrations of the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-beta1. Clonidine's effects on behavior and TNFalpha content were blocked by BRL44408. We conclude that peri-neural administration of clonidine at the site and time of injury reduces the degree of hypersensitivity in part by altering the balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines through activation of alpha2A-adrenoceptors. These results support testing of whether clonidine, as an adjuvant in continuous peripheral nerve blocks in settings of known major nerve injury, such as limb amputation, might prevent the development of chronic pain.

Morphine-induced spinal release of adenosine is reduced in neuropathic rats

BACKGROUND

Spinally administered opioids show decreased potency and efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain. As reported previously, morphine stimulates spinal opioid receptors to effect adenosine release, which acts at adenosine receptors to produce analgesia. The authors hypothesized that morphine induces less adenosine release in neuropathic compared with normal rats, explaining its reduced potency and efficacy.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) were divided into three groups: no surgery (n = 52), sham surgery (n = 20), or left L5 and L6 spinal nerve ligation (n = 64). Two weeks after surgery, mechanical hypersensitivity of the left hind paw was verified. For each experiment, a crude synaptosomal P2 suspension was prepared by homogenizing cervical and lumbar dorsal spinal cord halves from four rats, followed by differential centrifugation, and aliquots incubated with morphine sulfate from 10(-8) to 10(-4) m alone or in presence of 10(-5) m dipyridamole. Extrasynaptosomal concentrations of adenosine were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Synaptosomal release of adenosine in the absence of morphine was similar between groups. Morphine produced a concentration-dependent adenosine release, which was less in synaptosomes from dorsal lumbar spinal cord in spinal nerve ligation compared with normal or sham animals. This reduction was removed by adding dipyridamole.

CONCLUSION

Morphine normally stimulates spinal release of adenosine, a potent antihypersensitivity compound. Because this effect of morphine is diminished in spinal nerve ligation animals, one explanation for decreased efficacy and potency of opioids in the treatment of neuropathic pain may be a dipyridamole-sensitive disruption in the opioid-adenosine link in the spinal cord.

Pharmacology of opioid and nonopioid analgesics in chronic pain states

Chronic pain represents a mixture of pathophysiologic mechanisms, a complex assortment of spontaneous and elicited pain states, and a somewhat unpredictable response to analgesics. Opioids remain the mainstay of treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain, although there is little systematic examination to guide drug selection. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors play primarily an adjunctive role in chronic pain treatment. Agents with little activity in the treatment of acute pain, such as antidepressants, antiepileptics, and i.v. administered local anesthetics, are initiated in many patients and have significant long-term efficacy in some patients with chronic pain. The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist ketamine and the alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist clonidine exhibit activity in patients with acute or chronic pain and reduce opioid consumption, but are often poorly tolerated due to side effects. Topical treatment with capsaicin or lidocaine exhibits efficacy in a subset of patients, and invasive intrathecal treatment with opioids as well as clonidine, neostigmine, and adenosine may have advantages in some patients. Several laboratory models have been developed to mimic chronic pain states found in humans. Nerve injury has been induced in rats by a variety of means, resulting in mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. A number of arthritic states have also been produced by means of chronic joint inflammation in rats. The pharmacology of these neuropathic and arthritic pain models generally resembles that found in the respective human conditions. Additional models of chronic pain, particularly visceral pain, have been developed; however, the pharmacology of these models is not well established at this time.

alpha2A-adrenoceptor stimulation reduces capsaicin-induced glutamate release from spinal cord synaptosomes

Glutamate (Glu) is involved in excitatory neurotransmission and nociception and plays an essential role in relaying noxious stimuli in the spinal cord. Intrathecal or epidural injection of alpha2-adrenergic agonists produces potent antinociceptive effects, alters spinal neurotransmitter release, and effectively treats acute nociceptive and chronic neuropathic pain. Although it is generally believed that alpha2-adrenergic receptor stimulation reduces excitatory neurotransmitter release from peripheral afferents, the subtype of receptor causing this effect and its specificity to nociceptive neurotransmission have been inadequately studied. We therefore examined the pharmacology of adrenergic agents to inhibit Glu release in spinal cord from stimulation with capsaicin, a specific agonist for receptors on nociceptive afferents. Capsaicin evoked Glu release in synaptosomes from normal rat dorsal spinal cord in a concentration-dependent manner. Glu release from 30 microM capsaicin was inhibited by adrenergic agonists with a relative potency of clonidine = dexmedetomidine > norepinephrine > ST91 >> phenylephrine = 0, consistent with an action on alpha2A/D subtype receptors. Also consistent with this interpretation was the observation that inhibition of capsaicin-induced Glu release by clonidine or dexmedetomidine was blocked by the alpha2A/D antagonist BRL44408 but not by the alpha2B/C-preferring antagonist ARC239. Similar results were obtained in perfused spinal cord slices. These data suggest that capsaicin-evoked Glu release, likely reflecting stimulation of C fiber terminals, can be inhibited by activation of the alpha2A/D subtype, and this action of adrenergic agonists may reflect in part their efficacy in the treatment of acute pain.

Allosteric adenosine modulation to reduce allodynia

BACKGROUND

Adenosine and adenosine agonists reduce hypersensitivity following inflammation and peripheral nerve injury models of chronic pain. Because inhibitors of adenosine reuptake or metabolism are also effective at reducing hypersensitivity, it is likely that there is a tonic release of spinal adenosine in these models. One approach to avoid adverse effects from direct agonists is to enhance the effect of the endogenous ligand by administering a positive allosteric modulator of its receptor.

METHODS

Rats with mechanical hypersensitivity after spinal nerve ligation received intrathecal injections of adenosine, the allosteric adenosine receptor modulator T62, or their combination, or received systemic T62 alone or with intrathecal injection of a specific A1 adenosine antagonist.

RESULTS

Both adenosine and T62 reduced hypersensitivity alone, with 50% maximal doses (ED50) of 14+/-5.9 and 3.7+/-0.8 microg, respectively. They interacted in an additive manner as determined by isobolography. T62 also reduced mechanical hypersensitivity after systemic administration (15 mg/kg), and this effect was blocked by intrathecal injection of 9 microg of the A1-specific adenosine receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results add to previous studies that suggest ongoing spinal release of adenosine, which is antiallodynic, in this animal model of neuropathic pain. Positive allosteric modulation of the adenosine receptor reduces hypersensitivity by a spinal mechanism involving A1 adenosine receptor stimulation. Although obvious adverse effects were not observed in this investigation, further study is required to determine the feasibility of the use of such modulators in the treatment of chronic pain associated with hyperalgesia and allodynia.

An obligatory role for spinal cholinergic neurons in the antiallodynic effects of clonidine after peripheral nerve injury

BACKGROUND

Indirect evidence supports a role of spinal cholinergic neurons in tonically reducing response to noxious mechanical stimulation and in effecting analgesia from alpha2-adrenergic agonists. This study directly assessed the role of cholinergic neurons in regulating the level of mechanical allodynia and in participating in the antiallodynic effect of the clinically used alpha2-adrenergic agonist, clonidine, in an animal model of neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Allodynia was produced in rats by ligation of the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves. Rats received a single intrathecal injection of saline or one of three different doses of the cholinergic neurotoxin, ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion (AF64-A; 2, 5, and 15 nmol). Seven days later, allodynia was assessed before and after intrathecal injection of 15 microg clonidine. The spinal cord was removed, and spinal cord acetylcholine content, cholinergic neuron number and distribution, and alpha2-adrenergic receptor expression were determined.

RESULTS

AF64-A administration reduced both the number of cholinergic cells and the acetylcholine content of the lumbar dorsal spinal cord by 20-50% but did not affect level of mechanical allodynia. AF64-A did, however, completely block the anti-allodynic effect of clonidine. AF64-A did not reduce alpha2-adrenergic ligand binding in dorsal lumbar cord.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that spinal cholinergic tone does not affect the level of mechanical allodynia after peripheral nerve injury. There is a quantitative reliance on spinal cholinergic neurons in the allodynia relieving properties of intrathecal clonidine, and this reliance does not depend on alpha2-adrenergic receptors colocalized on spinal cholinergic interneurons.

P75-expressing elements are necessary for anti-allodynic effects of spinal clonidine and neostigmine

Cells expressing nerve growth factor are implicated in development of hypersensitivity following nerve injury and cholinergic neurons are implicated in reduction of such hypersensitivity by alpha2-adrenergic agonists. Intrathecal injection of the cell toxin, saporin, linked to an antibody to the low-affinity nerve growth factor, p75 (192-IgG saporin), an agent which destroys cholinergic neurons in the brain, was used in the current study to further elucidate these mechanisms. Mechanical hypersensitivity was established in rats by ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves. Animals were pretreated with intrathecal saline or 192-IgG saporin, and one week later received intrathecal clonidine or neostigmine. Spinal cords were removed for acetylcholine and norepinephrine analysis and for cholinergic and p75 immunohistochemistry. Treatment with 192-IgG saporin had no effect on mechanical hypersensitivity following spinal nerve ligation, but blocked the anti-hypersensitivity effects of intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine. Destruction of p75-expressing fibers in the superficial dorsal horn by 192-IgG saporin was not accompanied by changes in acetylcholine or norepinephrine content or by reduction in cholinergic neuronal number in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Unlike in the brain, 192-IgG saporin does not destroy cholinergic neurons in the spinal cord dorsal horn and cannot be used as a tool for this purpose. P75-expressing elements are not necessary for the maintenance of mechanical hyperalgesia in this model of neuropathic pain, but their destruction disrupts the targets or circuitry activated by alpha2-adrenergic and cholinergic agents to reduce hypersensitivity.

Chronic intrathecal morphine administration produces homologous mu receptor/G-protein desensitization specifically in spinal cord

Previous studies have shown that chronic i.v. treatment with morphine or heroin decreased mu opioid receptor activation of G-proteins in specific brain regions. The present study examined the effect of intrathecal (i.t.) morphine administration on receptor/G-protein coupling in the spinal cord. In spinal cord membranes, [35S]GTP gamma S binding was stimulated by agonists of several G-protein-coupled receptors, including mu opioid (DAMGO), delta opioid (DPDPE), GABA(B) (baclofen), cannabinoid CB(1) (WIN 55,212-2), muscarinic cholinergic (carbachol) and adenosine A(1) (PIA). [35S]GTP gamma S autoradiography revealed that most of this agonist activation of G-proteins was localized to laminae I and II of dorsal horn. To determine the effects of chronic morphine on these receptor activities, rats were treated for 7 days with 0.11 mg/kg/day i.t. morphine, and receptor activation of G-proteins was determined by [35S]GTP gamma S autoradiography of brain and spinal cord. In spinal cord sections, chronic morphine treatment decreased DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in laminae I and II at all levels of spinal cord examined. There were no effects of morphine treatment on [35S]GTP gamma S stimulation in spinal cord by other receptor systems examined (Adenosine A(1) and GABA(B)), and no significant effects of chronic i.t. morphine treatment were observed in brain sections. These data show that homologous desensitization of mu receptor/G-protein coupling occurs specifically in spinal cord following chronic morphine administration.

Intrathecal S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and L-cysteine attenuate nerve injury-induced allodynia through noradrenergic activation in rats

Spinal norepinephrine release and activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors represent important components of descending control of nociception. Recent studies have shown that nitric oxide is capable of stimulating neuronal norepinephrine release in the presence of thiol-containing compounds such as L-cysteine. In the present study, we tested a hypothesis in a rodent model of neuropathic pain that intrathecal injection of the nitric oxide donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and L-cysteine produces an antiallodynic action mediated by the spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors. Allodynia was induced in rats by ligation of the left lumbar L5/L6 spinal nerves. Mechanical allodynia was quantified by application of von Frey filaments to the left hindpaw. Intrathecal injection of 20-100microg of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine in the presence of 200microg of L-cysteine, but not D-cysteine, dose-dependently attenuated the allodynia. Intrathecal injection of a combination of 100microg of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and 50-200microg of L-cysteine also inhibited the allodynia in a dose-dependent manner. Pretreatment with a nitric oxide scavenger, carboxy-PTIO, or depletion of norepinephrine with a specific neurotoxin, N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine, prevented the antiallodynic action of intrathecal S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and L-cysteine. Furthermore, the antiallodynic effect produced by intrathecal injection of a combination of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and L-cysteine was abolished by pretreatment with intrathecal injection of a non-specific alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist, phentolamine, or an alpha(2) receptor antagonist, idazoxan. This study provides the first functional evidence that spinal nitric oxide interacts with the thiol-containing compounds to produce an antiallodynic effect in neuropathic pain. We propose that such an action is mediated by endogenous norepinephrine and spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors.

Formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine from nitric oxide and norepinephrine in the spinal cord and its role in spinal analgesia

Spinally released norepinephrine is thought to produce analgesia in part by stimulating alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, which in turn leads to nitric oxide synthesis. Also, nitric oxide is known to react with norepinephrine in vivo in the brain to form 6-nitro-norepinephrine, which inhibits neuronal norepinephrine reuptake. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine occurs in the spinal cord and that intrathecal administration of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produces analgesia by stimulating norepinephrine release. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine was present in rat spinal cord tissue and microdialysates of the dorsal horn and intrathecal space. Intrathecal norepinephrine injection increased 6-nitro-norepinephrine. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine also stimulated norepinephrine release in dorsal spinal cord in vitro. Intrathecal injection of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produced antinociception and interacted additively with norepinephrine for antinociception. Spinal noradrenergic nerve destruction increased antinociception from intrathecally injected norepinephrine, but decreased antinociception from 6-nitro-norepinephrine. These results suggest a functional interaction between spinal nitric oxide and norepinephrine in analgesia, mediated in part by formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine. Stimulation of auto-inhibitory alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors at noradrenergic synapses decreases norepinephrine release. Paradoxically, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist injection increases and alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist injection decreases norepinephrine release in the spinal cord. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine may be an important regulator of spinal norepinephrine release and could explain the positive feedback on norepinephrine release after activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors.

Morphine-induced spinal cholinergic activation: in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of spinal cord in monkeys with a cholinergic tracer demonstrates increased spinal cholinergic activity in response to an analgesic dose of morphine, and this PET result correlates with measurement of acetylcholine spillover into spinal cord extracellular space induced by morphine, as measured by microdialysis. Previous studies in rats, mice, and sheep demonstrate activation of spinal cholinergic neurons by systemic opioid administration, and participation of this cholinergic activity in opioid-induced analgesia. Testing the relevance of this observation in humans has been limited to measurement of acetylcholine spillover into lumbar cerebrospinal fluid. The purpose of this study was to apply a recently developed method to image spinal cholinergic terminals non-invasively via PET and to test the hypothesis that the tracer utilized would reflect changes in local cholinergic activity. Following Animal Care and Use Committee approval, seven adult male rhesus monkeys were anesthetized on three separate occasions. On two of the occasions PET scans were performed using [(18)F] (+)-4-fluorobenzyltrozamicol ([(18)F]FBT), which selectively binds to the vesicular acetylcholine (ACh) transporter in the presynaptic cholinergic terminals. PET scans were preceded by injection of either saline or an analgesic dose of IV morphine (10 mg/kg). On the third occasion, microdialysis catheters were inserted in the spinal cord dorsal horn and acetylcholine concentrations in dialysates determined before and after IV morphine injection. Morphine increased cholinergic activity in the spinal cord, as determined by blood flow corrected distribution volume of [(18)F]FBT in the cervical cord compared to the cerebellum. Morphine also increased acetylcholine concentrations in microdialysates from the cervical cord dorsal horn. The one animal which did not show increased spinal cholinergic activity by PET from this dose of morphine also did not show increased acetylcholine from this morphine dose in the microdialysis experiment. These data confirm the ability to use PET to image spinal cholinergic terminals in the monkey spinal cord and suggest that acute changes in cholinergic activity can be imaged with this non-invasive technique. Following preclinical screening, PET scanning with [(18)F]FBT may be useful to investigate mechanisms of analgesic action in normal humans and in those with pain.

Spinal cyclooxygenase-2 is involved in development of allodynia after nerve injury in rats

Increased spinal cyclooxygenase activity is associated with nociception induced by tissue inflammation. In the present study, we examined the changes of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression in several regions of the CNS associated with pain perception, and the role of spinal cyclooxygenase activity in the development of allodynia following nerve injury. Allodynia was induced by ligation of the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves in rats. Using western blot analysis, we found that the cyclooxygenase-2 protein levels in the dorsal spinal cord and thalamus (but not in the ventral spinal cord, cingulate cortex and locus coeruleus) increased significantly one day after nerve ligation, compared with those in the sham animals. The cyclooxygenase-2 protein levels in the above tissues were similar in nerve-injured and sham animals three and 14 days after surgery. In contrast, cyclooxygenase-1 protein was not detectable in any of the neural tissues examined one, three, and 14 days after nerve injury. In the behavioral experiments, we observed that intrathecal injection of 100microg of indomethacin immediately or one day after nerve ligation attenuated the development of tactile allodynia. However, intrathecal injection of indomethacin had no effect on established allodynia two weeks after nerve injury.Collectively, our results suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 is preferentially up-regulated in the dorsal spinal cord and thalamus in response to nerve injury in rats. Spinal cyclooxygenase-2 probably plays an important role in the early development, but not in the maintenance, of tactile allodynia caused by the nerve injury in this rat model of neuropathic pain.

S-nitroso-l-cysteine releases norepinephrine in rat spinal synaptosomes

Although nitric oxide (NO) participates in development of hypersensitivity states in the spinal cord thought to underlie chronic pain, it also participates in analgesia produced by various drugs. In rats with a hypersensitivity state following peripheral nerve injury, spinal administration of an NO donor or l-cysteine alone produced no effect, whereas their combination, which yields s-nitroso-l-cysteine (SNC) powerfully reduced hypersensitivity. In the current study, we examined the ability of SNC to stimulate release of a known spinal analgesic neurotransmitter, norepinephrine (NE), as a possible mechanism of analgesic action of NO in the spinal cord. SNC (but not the NO donor alone or decomposed SNC) produced a concentration-dependent release of NE from rat spinal cord synaptosomes. The d-isomer of SNC was less potent than the l-isomer, and the effect of SNC was partially blocked by l-, but not d-leucine, implicating an interaction with the l-amino acid transporter. SNC-induced NE release was partially Na(+) dependent, but largely Ca(2+) independent. NE uptake inhibitors partially antagonized the effect of SNC, but guanylate cyclase inhibitors were without effect. These data are therefore consistent with NO stimulating NE release in the spinal cord via reaction with thiol containing compounds, such as cysteine, entry into NE terminals via active transport, and production of both exocytotic and carrier mediated release.

Norepinephrine release from spinal synaptosomes: auto-alpha2 -adrenergic receptor modulation

BACKGROUND

Clonidine produces analgesia after spinal injection by activating alpha2-adrenergic receptors. Recently, clonidine has been demonstrated to increase spinal release of norepinephrine (NE) in vivo, in contrast to that anticipated by classic presynaptic autoinhibition. The purpose of the current study was to determine if clonidine could inhibit release of NE in a preparation of spinal cord tissue lacking synaptic circuits.

METHODS

Crude synaptosomes were prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rat spinal cord, loaded with [3H]NE, and stimulated by potassium chloride to release [3H]NE. Samples were incubated with clonidine in the absence or presence of various inhibitors. To study the effect of alpha2a-adrenergic receptor subtypes, some animals were pretreated with an oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) composed of a sense or antisense sequence to a portion of this receptor.

RESULTS

Potassium chloride produced a concentration-dependent increase in [3H]NE release, and this release was inhibited by clonidine with a concentration producing 50% maximal inhibition (IC50) of 1.3 microm. The effect of clonidine was inhibited by the alpha2-adrenergic antagonists, yohimbine and idazoxan, but not by alpha1-adrenergic, muscarinic, or opioid antagonists. Intrathecal pretreatment with antisense ODN to alpha2A-adrenergic receptors reduced alpha2A-adrenergic receptor protein expression compared with sense ODN control and also reduced clonidine-induced inhibition of [3H]NE release.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the existence of classic autoinhibitory alpha2-adrenergic receptors in the spinal cord, probably of the alpha2Asubtype. They further suggest that clonidine-induced stimulation of spinal NE release must occur from indirect actions, presumably due to activation of a spinal circuit.

Antiallodynic effect of intrathecal gabapentin and its interaction with clonidine in a rat model of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Systemic administration of gabapentin was shown previously to attenuate mechanical allodynia in a rat model of postoperative pain. Because intrathecal administration of gabapentin is effective in other hypersensitivity states, the authors tested its effect in the postoperative model, its interaction with another antiallodynic agent (clonidine), and a possible mechanism of gabapentin action (entry into sites of action via an L-amino acid transporter).

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with halothane, and an incision of the plantaris muscle of right hind paw induced punctate mechanical allodynia. Withdrawal threshold to von Frey filament application near the incision site was determined before and 2 h after surgery. Then, an intrathecal injection was performed and thresholds were determined every 30 min for 3 h thereafter.

RESULTS

Paw incision induced a mechanical hypersensitivity (mechanical threshold > 25 g before incision and < 5 g after). Intrathecal gabapentin dose-dependently (10-100 microg) reduced mechanical allodynia. Intrathecal injection of an inhibitor of L-amino acid transporters or a competitor for this transporter, L-leucine, did not reverse the intrathecal effect of gabapentin. The ED50 of intrathecal gabapentin, clonidine, and their combination were 51, 31, and 9 microg, respectively, and isobolographic analysis showed synergy between gabapentin and clonidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal gabapentin is effective against tactile allodynia that occurs after paw incision, and interacts synergistically with clonidine. Unlike results in vitro, gabapentin does not obligatorily need to enter cells via the L-amino acid transporter mechanism to achieve its effects in vivo.

6-NO(2)-norepinephrine increases norepinephrine release and inhibits norepinephrine uptake in rat spinal synaptosomes

Nitric oxide has been shown to react under physiologic conditions with norepinephrine (NE) to produce 6-nitro-norepinephrine (6-NO(2)-NE), a compound that enhances NE release in the brain. Previous studies suggest that 6-NO(2)-NE is formed in the spinal cord and stimulates spinal NE release to produce analgesia. The purpose of the current studies was to examine the mechanisms by which 6-NO(2)-NE stimulates NE release in the spinal cord. Crude synaptosomes were prepared from spinal cords of male Sprague-Dawley rats and loaded with [(3)H]NE. Incubation of synaptosomes with 6-NO(2)-NE resulted in a release of NE, with a threshold of 1 microM 6-NO(2)-NE and a maximum effect of 30% fractional release. NE transporter inhibitors desipramine and nomifensine blocked NE release from 6-NO(2)-NE, and desipramine exhibited an IC(50) of 9.6 microM. NE release from 6-NO(2)-NE was dependent on external Na(+), but not Ca(2+) or the activity of guanylate cyclase. 6-NO(2)-NE also blocked uptake of [(3)H]NE into synaptosomes, with an IC(50) of 8.3 microM. These data are consistent with a direct action of 6-NO(2)-NE on noradrenergic terminals in the spinal cord to release NE. This action is independent of guanylate cyclase activation, and most likely shares a common mechanism with classic monoamine releasers such as amphetamine that cause direct release of NE from vesicles into the nerve terminal cytoplasm, leading to extracellular release by reverse transport.

Synergistic effect between intrathecal non-NMDA antagonist and gabapentin on allodynia induced by spinal nerve ligation in rats

BACKGROUND

Glutamate and non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have been implicated in the development of neuroplasticity in the spinal cord in neuropathic pain. The spinal cord has been identified as one of the sites of the analgesic action of gabapentin. In the current study, the authors determined the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Also tested was a hypothesis that intrathecal injection of CNQX and gabapentin produces a synergistic effect on allodynia in neuropathic rats.

METHODS

Allodynia was produced in rats by ligation of the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves. Allodynia was determined by application of von Frey filaments to the left hind paw. Through an implanted intrathecal catheter, 10-100 microg gabapentin or 0.5-8 microg CNQX disodium (a water-soluble formulation of CNQX) was injected in conscious rats. Isobolographic analysis was performed comparing the interaction of intrathecal gabapentin and CNQX using the ED50 dose ratio of 15:1.

RESULTS

Intrathecal treatment with gabapentin or CNQX produced a dose-dependent increase in the withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation. The ED50 for gabapentin and CNQX was 45.9+/-4.65 and 3.4+/-0.22 microg, respectively. Intrathecal injection of a combination of CNQX and gabapentin produced a strong synergistic antiallodynic effect in neuropathic rats.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that intrathecal administration of CNQX exhibits an antiallodynic effect in this rat model of neuropathic pain. Furthermore, CNQX and gabapentin, when combined intrathecally, produce a potent synergistic antiallodynic effect on neuropathic pain in spinal nerve-ligated rats.

Sex differences in cholinergic analgesia I: a supplemental nicotinic mechanism in normal females

BACKGROUND

Cholinergic agents produce analgesia after systemic and intrathecal administration. A retrospective review showed that intrathecal neostigmine was more potent in women than in men, suggesting a sex difference in this response. The purpose of this study was to determine whether such a sex difference exists in normal rats and to examine the pharmacologic mechanisms that underlie this difference.

METHODS

Male and female rats with indwelling intrathecal catheters received injections of neostigmine, bethanechol (muscarinic agonist), or RJR-2403 (neuronal nicotinic agonist) alone or with atropine (muscarinic antagonist), mecamylamine (nicotinic antagonist), or phentolamine alpha-adrenergic antagonist) with antinociception determined to a noxious heat stimulus to the hind paw. Time versus subcutaneous paw temperature relationships were defined for males and females.

RESULTS

Neostigmine produced dose-dependent antinociception with five times greater potency in female than in male rats. Neostigmine-induced antinociception was reversed in male rats by atropine and unaffected by mecamylamine, whereas it was partially reduced by each antagonist alone in females and completely reversed after injection of both. RJR-2403 was more potent in females than in males, whereas there was no sex difference to bethanechol. Phentolamine partially reversed antinociception from RJR-2403 in females. Paw temperature increased more rapidly in females than in males for the same lamp intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate a large sex difference in antinociception to intrathecal neostigmine that is primarily the result of a nicotinic component in females. Phentolamine reversal suggests that part of this nicotinic component may rely on spinal norepinephrine release. A better understanding of this sex difference could lead to development of novel pain therapy for women.

Antinociceptive and hemodynamic effects of a novel alpha2-adrenergic agonist, MPV-2426, in sheep

BACKGROUND

alpha2-Adrenergic agonists produce analgesia primarily by a spinal action and hypotension and bradycardia by actions at several sites. Clonidine is approved for epidural use in the treatment of neuropathic pain, but its wider application is limited by hemodynamic side effects. This study determined the antinociceptive and hemodynamic effects of a novel alpha2-adrenergic agonist, MPV-2426, in sheep.

METHODS

Forty sheep of mixed Western breeds with indwelling catheters were studied. In separate studies, antinociception to a mechanical stimulus, hemodynamic effects, arterial blood gas tensions, cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics, and spinal cord blood flow was determined after epidural, intrathecal, and intravenous injection of MPV-2426.

RESULTS

MPV-2426 produced antinociception with greater potency intrathecally (ED50 = 49 microg) than epidurally (ED50 = 202 microg), whereas intravenous administration had no effect. Intrathecal injection, in doses up to three times the ED95, failed to decrease systemic or central arterial blood pressures or heart rate, whereas larger doses, regardless of route, increased systemic arterial pressure. Bioavailability in cerebrospinal fluid was 7% after epidural administration and 0.17% after intravenous administration. Intrathecal MPV-2426, in an ED95 dose and three times this dose, produced a dose-independent reduction in thoracic and lumbar spinal cord blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

MPV-2426 shares many characteristics of other alpha2-adrenergic agonists examined in sheep, but differs from clonidine and dexmedetomidine by lack of antinociception and minimal reduction in oxygen partial pressure after large intravenous and epidural injections. No hemodynamic depression was observed after intrathecal injection at antinociceptive doses. These results suggest this compound may be an effective spinal analgesic in humans with less hypotension than clonidine, although its relative potency to cause sedation was not tested in this study.

Intrathecal neostigmine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia

BACKGROUND

Recent efforts to improve the combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique have focused on adding opioids to other classes of analgesics. In this study, the authors used intrathecal neostigmine in combination with intrathecal sufentanil to investigate the usefulness of neostigmine for reducing side effects and prolonging the duration of sufentanil.

METHODS

One hundred six healthy pregnant women in labor were enrolled in this study, which was divided into four phases. In all phases, patients received a CSE anesthetic while in the lateral position. In phase I, three groups of six women each received intrathecal neostigmine, 5, 10, or 20 microg, in an open-label, dose-escalating safety assessment. In phase II, 24 women received intrathecal sufentanil alone to establish an ED50 (dose that produces > 60 min of labor analgesia in 50% of patients). In phase III, an ED50 was established for sufentanil combined with a fixed dose of neostigmine (10 microg). In phase IV, 40 women received either twice the ED50 of sufentanil alone or twice the ED50 of sufentanil plus neostigmine, 10 microg.

RESULTS

Neostigmine alone had no adverse effects on maternal vital signs, fetal heart rate, or Apgar scores. Neostigmine, 20 microg, produced analgesia in one patient and severe nausea and vomiting in another. The ED50 for intrathecal sufentanil alone was 4.1 +/- 0.31 microg, and the ED50 for intrathecal sufentanil combined with neostigmine, 10 microg, was 3.0 +/- 0.28 microg. The duration of analgesia and side effects from double these ED50s (sufentanil, 9 microg, or sufentanil, 6 microg, plus neostigmine, 10 microg) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-microg intrathecal neostigmine dose alone produced no analgesia or side effects, but reduced the ED50 of intrathecal sufentanil by approximately 25%. Additionally, doses approximately double these ED50s each produced a similar duration of analgesia and side effects, indicating intrathecal neostigmine shifts the dose-response curve for intrathecal sufentanil to the left.

Sex differences in cholinergic analgesia II: differing mechanisms in two models of allodynia

BACKGROUND

Cholinergic agents reduce allodynia after nerve injury in animals and may be useful in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Intrathecally administered neostigmine and neuronal nicotinic agonists are more potent in female than in male rats against acute thermal noxious stimuli. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is also a sex difference in the antiallodynic effects of intrathecal cholinomimetic agents in two models of allodynia and to test their pharmacologic mechanisms.

METHODS

Male and female rats with indwelling intrathecal catheters received injections of neostigmine, bethanechol (muscarinic agonist), RJR-2403 (neuronal nicotinic agonist) alone or with atropine (muscarinic antagonist), mecamylamine (nicotinic antagonist), phentolamine (alpha-adrenergic antagonist), or saline control. The effect of these agents was determined on mechanical allodynia produced by either intraplantar injection of capsaicin or ligation of spinal nerves.

RESULTS

Neostigmine and RJR-2403 but not bethanechol were more potent in female than in male rats in reducing allodynia after nerve injury, and antagonist studies were also consistent with a nicotinic component to explain this sex difference. Phentolamine did not reverse neostigmine's effect. In contrast, for capsaicin-induced allodynia, neostigmine plus mecamylamine but not neostigmine or RJR-2403 was more potent in female than in male rats.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate a sex difference of intrathecal neostigmine after nerve injury-induced allodynia similar to that observed in normal animals that received acute noxious thermal stimulation. However, this sex difference is not universal to all pain models because it was not present after intradermal capsaicin injection, nor is its interaction with spinal noradrenergic mechanisms consistent in all models.

Intrathecal adenosine interacts with a spinal noradrenergic system to produce antinociception in nerve-injured rats

BACKGROUND

Adenosine analogs produce antinociception in animal models of acute pain, reduce hypersensitivity in models of inflammatory and nerve-injury pain, and stimulate neurotransmitter release in the brain. Adenosine itself is entering clinical trials for analgesia, and the current study examined the effect, mechanisms of action, and interaction with noradrenergic systems of intrathecal adenosine in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

METHODS

The left L5 and L6 spinal nerve roots were ligated and, 1 week later, an intrathecal catheter was inserted in male rats. Withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation of the left hind paw was determined before and after surgery, confirming mechanical hypersensitivity. The effects of intrathecal adenosine, clonidine, and their combination on withdrawal threshold were determined, and reversal of the effects of adenosine by adenosine and alpha2-adrenergic antagonists and by destruction of noradrenergic nerve terminals was tested. Finally, spinal cord slices were perfused in vitro with the adenosine agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine, and norepinephrine release was measured.

RESULTS

Intrathecal adenosine and clonidine reduced hypersensitivity and interacted in an additive manner. The effects of adenosine were blocked by intrathecal injection of A1 but not A2 adenosine receptor antagonists, by an alpha2-adrenergic antagonist, and by destruction of spinal noradrenergic nerve terminals. Perfusion of spinal cord slices with 5'-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in norepinephrine release.

CONCLUSION

These data support clinical examination of intrathecal adenosine alone and with clonidine in the treatment of chronic pain states that include a component of mechanical hypersensitivity and suggest that, after nerve injury, adenosine acts to reduce hypersensitivity through spinal norepinephrine release.

Preclinical toxicity screening of intrathecal adenosine in rats and dogs

BACKGROUND

Intrathecally administered adenosine receptor agonists have antinociceptive effects in animals, suggesting that intrathecal adenosine might provide analgesia in humans. The authors performed preclinical neurotoxicity studies to define the safety of intrathecally administered adenosine in rats and dogs.

METHODS

Eighteen rats with long-term intrathecal catheters received daily injections of saline or 100 microg adenosine for 4 days and were observed for general behavior and thermal nociception before being killed on day 6. Nine beagle dogs were prepared with long-term, lumbar intrathecal catheters and infused continuously with saline or adenosine, 2.4 mg/day for 48 h, then 7.2 mg/day for 26 days. Animals were then anesthetized and perfused with preservative and their spinal cords were examined systematically.

RESULTS

No disturbances in neurologic function were detected in either animal species. intrathecal adenosine caused transient sedation in rats and increased muscle tone in dogs, resolving with continued exposure to drug. Neither adenosine-nor saline-treated rats or dogs showed acute thermal analgesia. Adenosine groups did not differ from saline groups regarding histopathology, although a moderate fibrotic and inflammatory reaction was noted in both, and protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid were increased in both.

CONCLUSION

The current study in rats and dogs failed to provide behavioral or histologic evidence of neurotoxicity from intrathecal administration of adenosine. This provides evidence for the presumption of safety of adenosine in this dose range, and supports phase I safety trials of acute intrathecal adenosine administration in humans.

Role of protons in activation of cardiac sympathetic C-fibre afferents during ischaemia in cats

1. Chest pain caused by myocardial ischaemia is mediated by cardiac sympathetic afferents. The mechanisms of activation of cardiac afferents during ischaemia remain poorly understood. Increased lactic acid production is associated closely with myocardial ischaemia. The present study examined the role of protons generated during ischaemia in activation of cardiac sympathetic C-fibre afferents. 2. Single-unit activity of cardiac afferents innervating both ventricles was recorded from the left sympathetic chain in anaesthetized cats. Epicardial tissue pH was measured within 1-1.5 mm of the surface by a pH-sensitive needle electrode. Responses of cardiac afferents to myocardial ischaemia, lactic acid, sodium lactate, acidic phosphate buffer and hypercapnia were determined. 3. Occlusion of the coronary artery for 5 min decreased epicardial tissue pH from 7.35 +/- 0.21 to 6.98 +/- 0.22 (P < 0.05). Epicardial placement of isotonic neutral phosphate buffer, but not saline, prevented the ischaemia-induced decrease in epicardial pH. This manoeuvre significantly attenuated the response of 16 afferents to 5 min of ischaemia (1.56 +/- 0.23 pre-treatment vs. 0.67 +/- 0.18 impulses s-1). Topical application of 10-100 microg ml-1 of lactic acid, but not sodium lactate, concentration-dependently stimulated 18 cardiac afferents. Inhalation with high-CO2 gas failed to activate 12 separate cardiac afferents. Furthermore, lactic acid stimulated cardiac afferents to a greater extent than acidic phosphate buffer solution, applied at a similar pH to the same afferents. 4. Collectively, this study provides important in vivo evidence that protons contribute to activation/sensitization of cardiac sympathetic C-fibre afferents during myocardial ischaemia.

Analgesic and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal clonidine as the sole analgesic agent during first stage of labor: a dose-response study

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal clonidine produces dose-dependent postoperative analgesia and enhances labor analgesia from intrathecal sufentanil. The authors evaluated the dose-response potency of intrathecally administered clonidine by itself during first stage of labor with respect to analgesia and maternal and fetal side effects.

METHODS

Thirty-six parturients requesting labor analgesia were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Parturients with < 6 cm cervical dilatation received either 50, 100, or 200 microg intrathecal clonidine. The authors recorded visual analog pain score (VAPS), maternal blood pressure and heart rate, ephedrine requirements, and sedation at regular intervals and fetal heart rate tracings continuously. Duration of analgesia was defined as time from intrathecal clonidine administration until request for additional analgesia.

RESULTS

Clonidine produced a reduction in VAPS with all three doses. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in patients receiving 200 microg (median, 143; range, 75-210 min) and 100 microg (median, 118; range, 60-180 min) than 50 microg (median, 45; range, 25-150 min), and VAPS was lower in the 200-microg than in the 50-microg group. In the 200-microg group, hypotension required significantly more often treatment with ephedrine than in the other groups. No adverse events or fetal heart rate abnormalities occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty to 200 microg intrathecal clonidine produces dose-dependent analgesia during first stage of labor. Although duration and quality of analgesia were more pronounced with 100 and 200 microg than with 50 microg, the high incidence of hypotension requires caution with the use of 200 microg for labor analgesia.

Intrathecal adenosine: interactions with spinal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Spinal adenosine receptor agonists exert antinociception in animal models of acute and chronic pain, but adenosine itself has not been examined. The authors tested the antinociceptive and antihypersensitivity interactions of intrathecal adenosine and its interactions with intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute thermal nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity.

METHODS

Rats were prepared with lumbar intrathecal catheters. Responses to acute noxious stimulation were evaluated by latency to paw withdrawal from a radiant heat source focused on the hind paw. Postoperative hypersensitivity was measured after an incision in the rat hind paw by application of von Frey filaments to the heel adjacent to the wound. An isobolographic design was used to distinguish between additive and synergistic drug interactions.

RESULTS

Spinal administration of clonidine and neostigmine, but not adenosine, produced dose-dependent antinociception to noxious thermal stimulation. Addition of adenosine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not neostigmine. In contrast, each of these three agents alone reversed postoperative hypersensitivity. Pretreatment with the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine completely reversed adenosine's antihypersensitivity action. Adenosine interacted synergistically with neostigmine and additively with clonidine in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that intrathecal adenosine by itself has no antinociceptive properties to acute noxious thermal stimulation in rats, but enhances clonidine's antinociception. In contrast, intrathecal adenosine is active against postoperative hypersensitivity by an adrenergic mechanism. Different interactions between adenosine, clonidine, and neostigmine in acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity models are consistent with altered central processing of sensory information after peripheral injury.

Muscarinic-mediated analgesia

Systemic administration of cholinesterase inhibitors which cross the blood brain barrier have long been known to produce analgesia and enhance analgesia from opiates. A major site of analgesic action of cholinergic agents is the spinal cord. Muscarinic receptors are concentrated in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, an area of noxious sensory processing, and these reflect innervation primarily from cholinergic neurons with cell bodies deep in the neck of the dorsal horn. Spinal injection of cholinergic agonists results in analgesia which primarily reflects muscarinic receptor activation. Analgesia occurs in animal models of acute noxious stimulation and of chronic hypersensitivity pain. Although no cholinergic agonists have been tested for safety in humans, the cholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine, has undergone such testing, and produces analgesia to experimental, acute postoperative, and chronic pain. Thus, muscarinic cholinergic agonists and cholinesterase inhibitors hold promise as non-opiate agents for the treatment of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain.

Spinal clonidine prolongs labor analgesia from spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine

We sought to determine whether spinal clonidine 50 microg prolongs the analgesia from the spinal administration of sufentanil 7.5 microg and bupivacaine 2.5 mg early in the first stage of labor. Thirty patients were randomized to receive a 2-mL spinal injection of sufentanil 7.5 microg + bupivacaine 2.5 mg with or without clonidine 50 microg using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique. Pain, nausea, pruritus, sedation, motor block, blood pressure, and heart rate were assessed until the patient requested additional analgesia. Analgesia was significantly prolonged in patients who received spinal sufentanil + bupivacaine + clonidine (197 +/- 70 vs 132 +/- 39 min; P = 0.004). Pain scores and side effects, including motor block, sedation, and hypotension, were similar between groups. Spinal clonidine significantly prolongs labor analgesia from spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine without producing serious adverse side effects.

IMPLICATIONS

We studied the effects of spinal clonidine administered with spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine on labor analgesia using a combined spinal-epidural technique and conclude that spinal clonidine significantly prolongs labor analgesia from spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine without producing serious adverse effects.

Exogenous and endogenous adenosine enhance the spinal antiallodynic effects of morphine in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Adenosine analogs produce antinociception in normal animals and reduce allodynia and hyperalgesia following inflammation and nerve injury following spinal injection, yet none have been tested for clinical safety. While adenosine itself is in clinical trials for spinal administration, there is little data on the spinal effects of adenosine in animal models. In this study, we determined that the spinal administration of adenosine produced a dose-dependent reduction in tactile allodynia in rats following spinal nerve ligation without producing motor blockade. Although the maximal effect of adenosine was less than 50% reversal of allodynia, its duration of action was >24 h after a single spinal injection. In contrast, injection of a synthetic adenosine analog which produced an anti-allodynic action to a similar degree of effect resulted in a pronounced motor blockade. Spinal opioid action has been suggested to result in part from spinal adenosine release. We hypothesized that the reduced efficacy of spinal morphine in nerve injury-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia might reflect a disruption in this spinal opioid-adenosine mechanism. Spinal morphine itself produced a minimal reduction in allodynia in rats following spinal nerve ligation and this was enhanced in an additive manner by spinal adenosine. The maximal effect of this combination resulted in less than 60% reversal of allodynia. In contrast, spinal injection of adenosine deaminase or reuptake inhibitors greatly enhanced the effect of spinal morphine, resulting in over 80% reversal of allodynia. These results support the clinical testing of spinal adenosine alone and with morphine in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and further testing of the proposed opioid-adenosine link in normal and hyperesthetic conditions.

Gabapentin suppresses ectopic nerve discharges and reverses allodynia in neuropathic rats

Repetitive ectopic discharges from injured afferent nerves play an important role in initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Gabapentin is effective for treatment of neuropathic pain but the sites and mechanisms of its antinociceptive actions remain uncertain. In the present study, we tested a hypothesis that therapeutic doses of gabapentin suppress ectopic afferent discharge activity generated from injured peripheral nerves. Mechanical allodynia, induced by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve in rats, was determined by application of von Frey filaments to the hindpaw. Single-unit afferent nerve activity was recorded proximal to the ligated sciatic nerve site. Intravenous gabapentin, in a range of 30 to 90 mg/kg, significantly attenuated allodynia in nerve-injured rats. Furthermore, gabapentin, in the same therapeutic dose range, dose-dependently inhibited the ectopic discharge activity of 15 injured sciatic afferent nerve fibers through an action on impulse generation. However, the conduction velocity and responses of 12 normal afferent fibers to mechanical stimulation were not affected by gabapentin. Therefore, this study provides electrophysiological evidence that gabapentin is capable of suppressing the ectopic discharge activity from injured peripheral nerves. This action may contribute, at least in part, to the antiallodynic effect of gabapentin on neuropathic pain.

Intrathecal clonidine alleviates allodynia in neuropathic rats: interaction with spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors

BACKGROUND

Intrathecally administered clonidine increases release of spinal acetylcholine, which may be related to its analgesic action in neuropathic pain. The current study determined the role of spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in the antiallodynic effect of intrathecally administered clonidine in spinal nerve-ligated rats.

METHODS

Allodynia was produced in rats by ligation of the left L5-L6 spinal nerves. Mechanical allodynia was determined by application of von Frey filaments to the left hindpaw. The effect of intrathecal injection of saline, two muscarinic receptor antagonists (atropine and scopolamine), and two nicotinic receptor antagonists (mecamylamine and hexamethonium) on the antiallodynic action produced by intrathecal administration of 20 microg clonidine was assessed in six groups of animals. Each group consisted of six to eight rats.

RESULTS

Intrathecal injection of saline or muscarinic or nicotinic receptor antagonists did not alter the withdrawal thresholds. The antiallodynic effect produced by intrathecally administered clonidine was attenuated in a dose-dependent manner by intrathecal treatment with muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists. Although nicotinic receptor antagonists only partially attenuated the effect of clonidine, blockade of spinal muscarinic receptors almost abolished the antiallodynic effect of clonidine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that the analgesic effect of intrathecally administered clonidine on neuropathic pain is mediated by spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Therefore, this study provides functional evidence that spinally released acetylcholine plays a role in the antiallodynic effect of intrathecally administered clonidine in neuropathic pain.

In vivo imaging of the spinal cord cholinergic system with PET

PURPOSE

Our goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of an in vivo noninvasive method for imaging spinal cord cholinergic terminals using (+)-4-[18F]fluorobenzyltrozamicol ([18F]FBT) and PET.

METHOD

In vitro and in vivo experiments in rats were conducted to demonstrate the specific binding characteristics, localization, and time course of [3H]FBT binding in the spinal cord. PET imaging was then performed on seven rhesus monkeys.

RESULTS

The rat studies demonstrate high specific binding in the spinal cord with a distribution coinciding with the known distribution of cholinergic terminals. In vivo tracer concentrations in the spinal cord and basal ganglia were of the same magnitude. With use of [18F]FBT and PET in the rhesus monkey, the spinal cord was clearly visualized, with tracer concentration in the spinal cord being approximately one-fourth of that seen in the basal ganglia.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the feasibility of imaging cholinergic terminals in vivo in the spinal cord using [18F]FBT and PET.

Role of spinal NO in antiallodynic effect of intrathecal clonidine in neuropathic rats

BACKGROUND

The role of spinal nitric oxide (NO) in neuropathic pain remains uncertain. Although intrathecal clonidine causes NO release in the spinal cord, the functional role of spinal NO in clonidine-produced analgesia has not been examined. The objectives of this study were to assess the role of spinal NO in maintenance of allodynia and to determine the role of spinal NO in the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal clonidine.

METHODS

Allodynia was produced in rats by tight ligation of the left L5-L6 spinal nerves. Intrathecal catheters were inserted with tips in the lumbar intrathecal space. Mechanical allodynia was determined by application of von Frey filaments to the left hindpaw. In the first series of experiments, allodynia was assessed before and after intrathecal injection of saline, L-arginine, an NO donor (SNAP), two NO synthase inhibitors (TRIM and NMMA), or an NO scavenger (PTIO). In the second series of experiments, 20 microg of clonidine was injected intrathecally 15 min after intrathecal injection of saline, TRIM, NMMA, or PTIO.

RESULTS

Allodynia was not affected significantly by intrathecal injection of L-arginine, SNAP, TRIM, NMMA, or PTIO. The antiallodynic effect produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine was attenuated significantly by pretreatment with TRIM, NMMA, or PTIO.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that spinal NO neither contributes significantly to maintenance of allodynia nor produces detectable antiallodynic effect in this neuropathic pain model. Furthermore, this study provides functional evidence that spinal NO plays an important role in the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal clonidine in neuropathic pain.

Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intrathecal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans

BACKGROUND

This study defines the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of neostigmine after intrathecal injection in humans and its effect on CSF acetylcholine, and it correlates physiologic effects with neostigmine dose and CSF acetylcholine concentrations.

METHODS

The CSF was sampled via an indwelling spinal catheter in 12 volunteers receiving intrathecal neostigmine (50-750 microg) and analyzed for neostigmine and acetylcholine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed with NONMEM. Effect-site models linked the time course of the neostigmine concentration with the time course of analgesia.

RESULTS

Acetylcholine concentrations increased from <20 pmol/ml at baseline to >100 pmol/ml within 15 min of neostigmine injection. The pharmacokinetics of intrathecal neostigmine were best described by a triexponential function with an absorption phase. Individual predicted concentrations varied 100-fold. Post hoc Bayesian estimates described the observed neostigmine concentrations with a median error of 22% and did not show systematic model misspecification. Individual estimates of effect site concentration producing a 50% maximal effect for foot visual analog scale analgesia correlated with the magnitude of individual CSF neostigmine concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal neostigmine concentrations can be well described by a triexponential disposition function, but the intersubject variability is large. The correlation between intersubject variability in concentration and intersubject variability in 50% maximal effect for foot analgesia suggests that both are offset by a common scalar, possibly the distance from the site of injection to the sampling and effect sites. These data provide the basis for the hypothesis of "observation at a distance" to describe the pharmacodynamics of intrathecally administered drugs.

A multi-center study of intrathecal neostigmine for analgesia following vaginal hysterectomy

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals. Initial clinical trials with neostigmine studied doses of more than 100 microg, but animal studies suggest that smaller doses may be effective. In addition, all controlled clinical trials of neostigmine have come from one Brazilian university. This multicenter, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effects of 25-75 microg intrathecal neostigmine on analgesia and blood pressure in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval was obtained at the three university centers, and after patients gave informed consent, 92 women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of 2 ml bupivacaine, 0.75%, in dextrose plus either 1 ml saline or 25, 50, or 75 microg neostigmine. Blood pressure, heart rate, pain and nausea (both assessed by visual analog scale), and intravenous morphine use were recorded during surgery and at specified intervals afterward.

RESULTS

Morphine use was reduced similarly by all doses of neostigmine. Only the 75-microg dose of neostigmine increased the nausea score in the recovery room. The incidence of treatment for nausea was greater in patients receiving neostigmine (61%) than in those receiving saline placebo (29%) and was unaffected by neostigmine dose. Neostigmine did not reduce the incidence of hypotension from bupivacaine.

CONCLUSION

These data in patients after vaginal hysterectomy suggest that analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine may occur at doses less than 50 microg. In these doses, neostigmine does not reduce spinal bupivacaine-induced hypotension but may increase the need for treatment of nausea.