A systematic review of third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) in resuscitation: safety not adequately addressed

Perioperative Fluid Management

The medical complexity of the geriatric patients has been steadily rising. Still, as outcomes of surgical procedures in the older adults are improving, centers are pushing boundaries. There is also a growing appreciation of the importance of perioperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes, especially in the older adults. Optimal fluid management in this cohort is challenging due to the combination of age-related physiological changes in organ function, increased comorbid burden, and larger fluid shifts during more complex surgical procedures. The current state-of-the-art approach to fluid management in the perioperative period is outlined.

Perioperative Fluid Management

The medical complexity of the geriatric patients has been steadily rising. Still, as outcomes of surgical procedures in the elderly are improving, centers are pushing boundaries. There is also a growing appreciation of the importance of perioperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes, especially in the elderly. Optimal fluid management in this cohort is challenging due to the combination of age-related physiological changes in organ function, increased comorbid burden, and larger fluid shifts during more complex surgical procedures. The current state-of-the-art approach to fluid management in the perioperative period is outlined.

Utility of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in oral cancer surgeries with a duration of over 6 hours: A retrospective case-control study

To evaluate the utility of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 in oral cancer surgeries with durations over 6 hours. Using a case-control study design, the investigators enrolled patients who underwent oral cancer surgery involving osteotomy or manipulation near the major blood vessels at the Department of Orofacial Surgery in our hospital between 2017 and 2020. The predictor variable was 6% HES130/0.4. Outcomes included in-out balance and other postoperative parameters pertaining to circulatory maintenance (blood loss, urine volume, infusion volume, blood transfusion volume, albumin dose, hemoglobin levels, blood albumin levels, and doses of vasopressors used to maintain blood pressure), as well as pre- and postoperative renal function, pH, bicarbonate levels, and base excess. Changes in renal function were evaluated by assessing blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels before surgery and at 1 and 7 days postoperatively. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for between-group comparisons, and Student t test was used for intragroup comparisons. The statistical significance was set at P < .05. A total of 65 patients underwent oral cancer surgery with a duration over 6 hours during the study period. The administration of 6% HES130/0.4 at 22.1 ± 7.5 mL/kg/day did not increase blood loss or the blood transfusion volume. Moreover, patients who were administered 6% HES130/0.4 had a significantly larger mean urine volume and infusion volume than those who were not administered 6% HES130/0.4. The infusion therapy could maintain the urine volume and did not worsen renal function. The results of this study showed that administration of 6% HES130/0.4 at a dose lower than 25 mL/kg in patients undergoing oral cancer surgery over 6 hours was effective for circulation maintenance but did not increase the intraoperative blood loss or transfusion volume. This treatment did not cause any dilutional metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction.

Low-Fouling Zwitterionic Polymeric Colloids as Resuscitation Fluids for Hemorrhagic Shock

Colloids, known as volume expanders, have been used as resuscitation fluids for hypovolemic shock for decades, as they increase plasma oncotic pressure and expand intravascular volume. However, recent studies show that commonly used synthetic colloids have adverse interactions with human biological systems. In this work, a low-fouling amine(N)-oxide-based zwitterionic polymer as an alternative volume expander with improved biocompatibility and efficacy is designed. It is demonstrated that the polymer possesses antifouling ability, resisting cell interaction and deposition in major organs, and is rapidly cleared via renal filtration and hepatic circulation, reducing the risk of long-term side effects. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies show an absence of adverse effects on hemostasis or any acute safety risks. Finally, it is shown that, in a head-to-head comparison with existing colloids and plasma, the zwitterionic polymer serves as a more potent oncotic agent for restoring intravascular volume in a hemorrhagic shock model. The design of N-oxide-based zwitterionic polymers may lead to the development of alternative fluid therapies to treat hypovolemic shock and to improve fluid management in general.

Effect and safety of 4% albumin in the treatment of cardiac surgery patients: study protocol for the randomized, double-blind, clinical ALBICS (ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery) trial

Background

In cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), large amounts of fluids are administered. CPB priming with crystalloid solution causes marked hemodilution and fluid extravasation. Colloid solutions may reduce fluid overload because they have a better volume expansion effect than crystalloids. The European Medicines Agency does not recommend the use of hydroxyethyl starch solutions (HES) due to harmful renal effects. Albumin solution does not impair blood coagulation but the findings on kidney function are conflicting. On the other hand, albumin may reduce endothelial glycocalyx destruction and decrease platelet count during CPB. No large randomized, double-blind, clinical trials have compared albumin solution to crystalloid solution in cardiac surgery.

Methods/design

In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comprising 1386 adult cardiac surgery patients, 4% albumin solution will be compared to Ringer’s acetate solution in CPB priming and volume replacement up to 3200 mL during surgery and the first 24 h of intensive care unit stay. The primary efficacy outcome is the number of patients with at least one major adverse event (MAE) during 90 postoperative days (all-cause death, acute myocardial injury, acute heart failure or low output syndrome, resternotomy, stroke, major arrhythmia, major bleeding, infection compromising post-procedural rehabilitation, acute kidney injury). Secondary outcomes are total number of MAEs, incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, acute myocardial injury, acute heart failure, arrhythmia), amount of each type of blood product transfused (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets), total fluid balance at the end of the intervention period, total measured blood loss, development of acute kidney injury, days alive without mechanical ventilation in 90 days, days alive outside intensive care unit at 90 days, days alive at home at 90 days, and 90-day mortality.

Discussion

The findings of this study will provide new evidence regarding efficacy and safety of albumin solution in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Trial registration

EudraCT (clinicaltrialsregister.eu) 2015–002556-27 Registered 11 Nov 2016 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02560519. Registered 25 Sept 2015.

Perioperative Fluid Management in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

Fluid management is an essential component of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. Optimal management begins in the preoperative period and continues through the intraoperative and postoperative phases. In this review, we outline current evidence-based practices for fluid management through each phase of the perioperative period. Preoperatively, patients should be encouraged to hydrate until 2 hours prior to the induction of anesthesia with a carbohydrate-containing clear liquid. When mechanical bowel preparation is necessary, with modern isoosmotic solutions, fluid repletion is not necessary. Intraoperatively, fluid therapy should aim to maintain euvolemia with an individualized approach. While some patients may benefit from goal-directed fluid therapy, a restrictive, zero-balance approach to intraoperative fluid management may be reasonable. Postoperatively, early initiation of oral intake and cessation of intravenous therapy are recommended.

Effects of crystalloids and colloids on microcirculation, central venous oxygen saturation, and central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gap in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock

OBJECTIVE

The effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on microcirculation, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), and the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gap (dCO2) are studied in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock for elucidating the advantages and drawbacks of resuscitation with HES compared with crystalloids.

METHODS

An ear chamber and sublingual mucosa were used to examine blood vessels by intravital microscopy. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by removing nearly half of the blood volume. Twenty-two rabbits received 20 mL of HES by intravenous infusion immediately after bloodletting. Additional HES was then administered intravenously to a total volume of 100 mL. The other 22 rabbits (control) were intravenously given 40 mL of normal saline solution (NSS), followed by additional NSS to a total volume of 200 mL, administered under the same conditions as HES.

RESULTS

After the infusion, the vessel density and perfusion rate of the sublingual microcirculation recovered in the HES group. The arteriolar diameter, blood flow velocity, and blood flow rate of the ear microcirculation were maintained in this group, and microcirculatory failure did not develop. In the NSS group, however, all 5 of the aforementioned measured variables were significantly smaller than those in the HES group after the completion of infusion. The recovery of ScvO2 and dCO2 to the respective baseline values was significantly better in the HES group than in the NSS group.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous infusion of HES effectively maintains adequate tissue oxygenation and perfusion in hemorrhagic shock.

Starch Wars-New Episodes of the Saga. Changes in Regulations on Hydroxyethyl Starch in the European Union

After a safety review of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions in 2013, restrictions on the use of HES were introduced in the European Union (EU) to reduce the risk of kidney injury and death in certain patient populations. Similar restrictions were introduced by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States and other countries. In October 2017, a second safety review of HES solutions was triggered by the European pharmacovigilance authorities based on a request by the Swedish Medical Products Agency to completely suspend HES. After several meetings and repeated evaluations, the recommendation to ban HES was ultimately not endorsed by the responsible committee; however, there was a vote for more restricted access to the drug and rigorous monitoring of policy adherence. This review delineates developments in the European pharmacovigilance risk assessment of HES solutions between 2013 and 2018. In addition, the divergent experts' opinions and the controversy surrounding this official assessment are described. As the new decisions might influence the availability of HES products for veterinary patients, potential alternatives to HES solutions, such as albumin solutions and gelatin, are briefly discussed.

Acute kidney injury in postoperative shock: is hyperoncotic albumin administration an unrecognized resuscitation risk factor?

BACKGROUND

The use of hyperoncotic albumin (HA) for shock resuscitation is controversial given concerns about its cost, effectiveness, and potential for nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the association between early exposure to hyperoncotic albumin (within the first 48 h of onset of shock) and acute organ dysfunction in post-surgical patients with shock.

METHODS

This retrospective, cohort study included 11,512 perioperative patients with shock from 2009 to 2012. Shock was defined as requirement for vasopressors to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure and/or elevated lactate (> 2.2 mmol/L). Subsets of 3600 were selected after propensity score and exact matching on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment variables (> 30). There was a preponderance of cardiac surgery patients. Proportional odds logistic regression, multivariable logistic regression or Cox proportional hazard regression models measured association between hyperoncotic albumin and acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic injury, ICU days, and mortality.

RESULTS

Hyperoncotic albumin-exposed patients showed greater risk of acute kidney injury compared to controls (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17. P = 0.002), after adjusting for imbalanced co-variables. Within matched patients, 20.3%, 2.9%, and 4.4% of HA patients experienced KDIGO stages 1-3 AKI, versus 19.6%, 2.5%, and 3.0% of controls. There was no difference in hepatic injury (OR 1.16; 98.3% CI 0.85, 1.58); ICU days, (HR 1.05; 98.3% CI 1.00, 1.11); or mortality, (OR 0.88; 98.3% CI 0.64, 1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Early exposure to hyperoncotic albumin in postoperative shock appeared to be associated with acute kidney injury. There did not appear to be any association with hepatic injury, mortality, or ICU days. The clinical and economic implications of this finding warrant further investigation.

Albumin mass balance and kinetics in liver transplantation

Background

In major abdominal surgery albumin is shifted from the circulation, presumably leaking into the interstitial space, contributing to a 30–40% decrease in plasma albumin concentration. During and after liver transplantation exogenous albumin is infused for volume substitution and to maintain plasma albumin concentration. Here we used liver transplantation as a model procedure for the study of albumin mass balance and kinetics during major abdominal surgery with albumin substitution.

Methods

Patients were studied during liver transplantation (n = 16), and until postoperative day 3 (POD 3) (n = 11). Cumulative perioperative albumin shift was assessed by mass balance of albumin and hemoglobin. Synthesis rates of albumin and fibrinogen were estimated by the flooding technique using deuterium-labeled phenylalanine. Albumin distribution was assessed by radioiodinated human serum albumin.

Results

At the end of surgery, 37 ± 17 g of albumin (p < 0.0001) had shifted from plasma, and this amount was stable until POD 3 (48 ± 33 g, p = 0.0017 versus baseline). There was 91 ± 37 g exogenous albumin infused peroperatively and another 47 ± 35 g was infused postoperatively until POD 3. Absolute synthesis rates of albumin and fibrinogen on POD 3 were 239 ± 84 mg/kg body weight/day and 33 mg/kg body weight/day (range 5–161), respectively.

Conclusions

Albumin net leakage from plasma progressed until the end of surgery, and was then unaltered until POD 3. This is in contrast with the normalization of the cumulative albumin shift identified at day 3 after non-transplant major abdominal surgery. Liver synthesis of export proteins was high compared to reference values at the third postoperative day, suggesting rapid recovery of synthesis capacity.

Trial registration

Swedish Medical Product Agency, EudraCT 2015-002568-18. Registered on 15 July 2015.

Predictors of major complications after elective abdominal surgery in cancer patients

Background

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery for solid tumours frequently develop major postoperative complications, which negatively affect quality of life, costs of care and survival. Few studies have identified the determinants of perioperative complications in this group.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study including all patients (age > 18) undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer at a single institution between June 2011 and August 2013. Patients undergoing emergency surgery, palliative procedures, or participating in other studies were excluded. Primary outcome was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and infectious, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, renal and surgical complications. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for major perioperative adverse events.

Results

Of a total 308 included patients, 106 (34.4%) developed a major complication during the 30-day follow-up period. Independent predictors of postoperative major complications were: age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 [95% CI 1.01–1.06], p = 0.012 per year), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status greater than or equal to 3 (OR 2.61 [95% CI 1.33–5.17], p = 0.003), a preoperative haemoglobin level lower than 12 g/dL (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.21–4.07], p = 0.014), intraoperative use of colloids (OR 1.89, [95% CI 1.03–4.07], p = 0.047), total amount of intravenous fluids (OR 1.22 [95% CI 0.98–1.59], p = 0.106 per litre), intraoperative blood losses greater than 500 mL (2.07 [95% CI 1.00–4.31], p = 0.043), and hypotension needing vasopressor support (OR 4.68 [95% CI 1.55–27.72], p = 0.004). The model had good discrimination with the area under the ROC curve being 0.80 (95% CI 0.75–0.84, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that a perioperative strategy aimed at reducing perioperative complications in cancer surgery should include treatment of preoperative anaemia and an optimal fluid strategy, avoiding fluid overload and intraoperative use of colloids.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0516-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of intraoperative basal fluid requirements in distal pancreatectomy: Laparotomy vs. laparoscopy: A retrospective cohort study

There has been recent progress in intraoperative fluid therapy. However, little is known about intraoperative fluid therapy in laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are differences in the basal fluid requirements during surgery between laparotomy and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.This retrospective cohort study analyzed the electronic medical records of 253 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy via either laparotomy (73 patients) or laparoscopy (180 patients) between June 2006 and March 2016. The volume of intraoperative fluid administered, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate were evaluated. The total volume of fluids was calculated as the sum of the volume of crystalloid plus the volume of colloid multiplied by 1.5 or 2.0.Patients who had laparotomy were older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classes. Anesthesia time was longer and estimated blood loss was larger in laparotomy. More colloid (1.8 mL/kg per h vs. 1.2 mL/kg per h, P < .001) and more total calculated fluid (1.5 times: 11.7 mL/kg per h vs. 10.6 mL/kg per h, P = .002; 2.0 times: 12.6 mL/kg per h vs. 11.2 mL/kg per h, P = .001) were infused in laparotomy. Crystalloid (9.0 mL/kg per h vs. 8.9 mL/kg per h, P = .203) did not show significant difference. Postoperative complications were more frequent (63% vs. 45%, P = .008), the hospital stay was longer (18 days vs. 13.4 days, P < .001), and readmission rate was higher (15% vs. 5.6%, P = .02) in laparotomy. By logistic regression analysis, we could find that operation type (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy, odds ratio 1.900, 95% confidence interval 1.072-3.368) and operation time (P = .004) had effect on complications.In patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy, basal fluid requirements were larger in laparotomy compared with laparoscopy. Operation time and estimated blood loss had effects on fluid administration. Postoperative complications were more frequent in laparotomy but we could not find relationships with infused colloid or total calculated fluid volumes. Operation type (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy) and operation time were the only related factors to postoperative complications.

Hemoglobin extravasation in the brain of rats exchange-transfused with hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers

Haemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers are under consideration as oxygen therapeutics. Their effect on apoptosis is critical, because the onset of pro-apoptotic pathways may lead to tissue damage. MP4OX, a polyethylene glycol-conjugated human Hb preserves the baseline level of neuron apoptosis with respect to sham. Here we develop a method for measuring Hb extravasation in brain. We exchange transfused rats by haemorrhaging 50% of their blood with simultaneous, isovolemic replacement with Hextend (negative control), MP4OX, or αα-cross-linked Hb. Animals were sacrificed 2 h after transfusion, brain tissue was harvested and processed for double-staining immunofluorescence, whereby Hb ? chain and NeuN (a neuron protein) were stained and quantitated. Whereas Hextend did not induce Hb extravasation, in both MP4OX and ??Hb brains Hb molecules were detected outside neurons. The level of extravasated Hb chains was > 3-fold higher in Hb compared to MP4OX. Western blot analysis revealed that the expression levels of protein related to redox imbalance (e.g., Nrf2, iNOS and ERK phosphorylation) were higher in ααHb than MP4OX. In conclusions, higher Hb extravasation in ααHb than MP4OX induces redox imbalance, which causes higher anti-oxidant response. Whereas Nrf2 response may be considered protective, iNOS response appears damaging.

Retrospective evaluation of the effects of administration of tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4) on plasma creatinine concentration in dogs (2010-2013): 201 dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine changes in creatinine concentrations following the administration of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4) compared to crystalloids (CRYSs) in critically ill dogs.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series (2010-2013).

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Two hundred and one dogs admitted to the intensive care unit with initial plasma creatinine concentrations not exceeding laboratory reference intervals (52-117 μmol/L [0.6-1.3 mg/dL]) and receiving either CRYSs alone (CRYS group, n = 115) or HES with or without CRYSs (HES group, n = 86) for at least 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Creatinine concentrations at admission to the intensive care unit (T0), and 2-13 days (T1) and 2-12 weeks (T2) after initiation of fluid therapy were analyzed. Creatinine concentrations were analyzed as absolute values and as the maximum percentage change from T0 to T1 (T1max%) and from T0 to T2 (T2max%), respectively. Creatinine concentrations were available for 192 dogs during T1 and 37 dogs during T2. The median cumulative dose of HES was 86 mL/kg (range, 12-336 mL/kg). No difference was detected between the groups for age, gender, body weight, and length of hospitalization. Outcome was significantly different between the HES (66% survived) and the CRYS (87% survived) groups (P = 0.014). No significant difference was detected between groups for creatinine concentrations at T0, T1, T2, T1max%, or T2max%. No significant difference was detected between the groups for T1max% creatinine in dogs subclassified as having systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

HES administration in this canine population did not result in increased creatinine concentrations compared to administration of CRYSs. Further studies are needed to establish the safety of HES in critically ill dogs.

Clinical practice guide for the choice of perioperative volume-restoring fluid in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

The present Clinical practice guide responds to the clinical questions about security in the choice of fluid (crystalloid, colloid or hydroxyethyl starch 130) in patients who require volume replacement during perioperative period of non-cardiac surgeries. From the evidence summary, recommendations were made following the GRADE methodology. In this population fluid therapy based on crystalloids is suggested (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). In the events where volume replacement is not reached with crystalloids, the use of synthetic colloids (hydroxyethyl starch 130 or modified fluid gelatin) is suggested instead of 5% albumin (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). The choice and dosage of the colloid should be based in the product characteristics, patient comorbidity and anesthesiologist's experience.

Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch and 5% albumin for volume replacement therapy in patients undergoing cystectomy (CHART): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

The use of artificial colloids is currently controversial, especially in Central Europe Several studies demonstrated a worse outcome in intensive care unit patients with the use of hydroxyethyl starch. This recently even led to a drug warning about use of hydroxyethyl starch products in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The data on hydroxyethyl starch in non–critically ill patients are insufficient to support perioperative use.

Methods/Design

We are conducting a single-center, open-label, randomized, comparative trial with two parallel patient groups to compare human albumin 5 % (test drug) with hydroxyethyl starch 6 % 130/0.4 (comparator). The primary endpoint is cystatin C ratio, calculated as the ratio of the cystatin value at day 90 after surgery relative to the preoperative value. Secondary objectives are inter alia the evaluation of the influence of human albumin and hydroxyethyl starch on further laboratory chemical and clinical parameters, glycocalyx shedding, intensive care unit and hospital stay and acute kidney injury as defined by RIFLE criteria (risk of renal dysfunction, injury to the kidney, failure of kidney function, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease) criteria.

Discussion

There is a general lack of evidence on the relative safety and effects of hydroxyethyl starch compared with human albumin for volume replacement in a perioperative setting. Previously conducted studies of surgical patients in which researchers have compared different hydroxyethyl starch products included too few patients to properly evaluate clinical important outcomes such as renal function. In the present study in a high-risk patient population undergoing a major surgical intervention, we will determine if perioperative fluid replacement with human albumin 5 % will have a long-term advantage over a third-generation hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on the progression of renal dysfunction until 90 days after surgery.

Trial registration

EudraCT number 2010-018343-34. Registered on 11 January 2010.

Albumin Kinetics in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery

Background

The drop in plasma albumin concentration following surgical trauma is well known, but the temporal pattern of the detailed mechanisms behind are less well described. The aim of this explorative study was to assess changes in albumin synthesis and transcapillary escape rate (TER) following major surgical trauma, at the time of peak elevations in two well-recognized markers of inflammation.

Methods

This was a clinical trial of radiolabeled human serum albumin for the study of TER and plasma volume. Ten patients were studied immediately preoperatively and on the 2nd postoperative day after major pancreatic surgery. Albumin synthesis rate was measured by the flooding dose technique employing incorporation of isotopically labelled phenylalanine.

Results

Fractional synthesis rate of albumin increased from 11.7 (95% CI: 8.9, 14.5) to 15.0 (11.7, 18.4) %/day (p = 0.027), whereas the corresponding absolute synthesis rate was unchanged, 175 (138, 212) versus 150 (107, 192) mg/kg/day (p = 0.21). TER was unchanged, 4.9 (3.1, 6.8) %/hour versus 5.5 (3.9, 7.2) (p = 0.63). Plasma volume was unchanged but plasma albumin decreased from 33.5 (30.9, 36.2) to 22.1 (19.8, 24.3) g/L. (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Two days after major abdominal surgery, at the time-point when two biomarkers of generalised inflammation were at their peak and the plasma albumin concentration had decreased by 33%, we were unable to show any difference in the absolute synthesis rate of albumin, TER and plasma volume as compared with values obtained immediately pre-operatively. This suggests that capillary leakage, if elevated postoperatively, had ceased at that time-point. The temporal relations between albumin kinetics, capillary leakage and generalised inflammation need to be further explored.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrialsregister.eu: EudraCT 2010-08529-21 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01194492

Fluid therapy for septic shock resuscitation: which fluid should be used?

Early resuscitation of septic shock patients reduces the sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. The main goals of septic shock resuscitation include volemic expansion, maintenance of adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery, guided by central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed or central venous oxygen saturation and arterial lactate levels. An aggressive fluid resuscitation, possibly in association with vasopressors, inotropes and red blood cell concentrate transfusion may be necessary to achieve those hemodynamic goals. Nonetheless, even though fluid administration is one of the most common interventions offered to critically ill patients, the most appropriate type of fluid to be used remains controversial. According to recently published clinical trials, crystalloid solutions seem to be the most appropriate type of fluids for initial resuscitation of septic shock patients. Balanced crystalloids have theoretical advantages over the classic solutions, but there is not enough evidence to indicate it as first-line treatment. Additionally, when large amounts of fluids are necessary to restore the hemodynamic stability, albumin solutions may be a safe and effective alternative. Hydroxyethyl starches solutions must be avoided in septic patients due to the increased risk of acute renal failure, increased need for renal replacement therapy and increased mortality. Our objective was to present a narrative review of the literature regarding the major types of fluids and their main drawbacks in the initial resuscitation of the septic shock patients.

The use of balanced HES 130/0.42 during complex cardiac surgery; effect on blood coagulation and fluid balance: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction:

Colloids and crystalloid are used during cardiac surgery for priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. Colloids may decrease postoperative fluid balance because of their high oncotic pressure and low risk of fluid extravasation. On the other hand, colloids have been shown to impair blood coagulation.

Materials and methods:

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 50 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting or a valve procedure were planned to be randomized to receive either balanced 6% HES130/0.42 or Ringer-acetate solution for CPB priming. Randomization was stopped prematurely after 35 randomized patients (19 in the HES and 16 in the Ringer groups) because of the published report where HES130/0.42 was associated with impaired renal function. Effects on haemostasis and fluid balance were investigated.

Results:

The rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) parameters and chest tube drainage on the first postoperative morning (1POM) were comparable between the groups (p>0.05). However, patients in the HES group needed more blood and blood product transfusions. The total volume administered into the CPB circuit was lower in the HES than in the Ringer (RIN) group, 2905±1049 mL versus 3973±1207 mL (p=0.011), but there was no statistically significant difference in total fluid balance on the 1POM (5086±1660 mL in the HES group versus 5850±1514 mL in the RIN group, respectively).

Conclusions:

After complex cardiac surgery, the use of balanced 6% HES130/0.42 solution for CPB circuit priming did not impair haemostasis measured by ROTEM®, but it increased the need for transfusions. Fluid balance after CPB was less positive in the HES group, but, on the 1POM, it was comparable between the groups.

Albumin—Beyond Fluid Replacement in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

Maintaining vascular barrier competence, preventing interstitial edema, and keeping microcirculation intact is crucial to achieve an optimal outcome in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB). Blood contact with roller pumps and foreign surfaces during CPB induces shear stress and a pressure drop across the pump boot that leads to transient systemic activation of the inflammatory and hemostatic systems. Moreover, patients after CPB often need volume resuscitation using the smallest possible amount of colloid solution because of fluid overload. For this purpose, human-derived albumin may be preferred over synthetic colloids because CPB priming with albumin preserves oncotic pressure, prevents platelet adhesion, and likely induces less consumption of coagulation factors. In patients with increased bleeding or renal failure, albumin is a safe alternative because of its minimal side effects. Large, randomized clinical trials comparing the benefit of albumin versus other fluids are warranted in the future to define albumin’s distinct role in select high-risk surgical populations.

Impact of acellular hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers on brain apoptosis in rats

BACKGROUND

Extracellular hemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) are under extensive consideration as oxygen therapeutics. Their effects on cellular mechanisms related to apoptosis are of particular interest, because the onset of proapoptotic pathways may give rise to tissue damage.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The objective was to assess whether the properties of the Hb that replaces blood during an isovolemic hemodilution would modulate apoptotic-response mechanisms in rat brain and whether such signaling favors cytoprotection or damage. We exposed rats to exchange transfusion (ET; 50% blood volume and isovolemic replacement with Hextend [negative colloid control], MP4OX [PEGylated HBOC with high oxygen affinity], and ααHb [αα-cross-linked HBOC with low oxygen affinity; n=4-6/group]). Sham rats acted as control. Animals were euthanized at 2, 6, and 12 hours after ET; brain tissue was harvested and processed for analysis.

RESULTS

In MP4OX animals, the number of neurons that overexpressed the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α was higher than in ααHb, particularly at the early time points. In addition, MP4OX was associated with greater phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt), a well-known cytoprotective factor. Indeed, the degree of apoptosis, measured as terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-positive neurons and caspase-3 cleavage, ranked in order of MP4OX < Hextend < ααHb.

CONCLUSION

Even though both HBOCs showed increased levels of HIF-1α compared to shams or Hextend-treated animals, differences in signaling events resulted in very different outcomes for the two HBOCs. ααHb-treated brain tissue showed significant neuronal damage, measured as apoptosis. This was in stark contrast to the protection seen with MP4OX, apparently due to recruitment of Akt and neuronal specific HIF-1α pathways.

Risk factors of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify perioperative risk factors for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected medical data.

SETTING

A tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive adult patients (n=595) who underwent elective esophageal surgery for cancer between January 2005 and April 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

AKI was defined by the AKI Network criteria based on serum creatinine changes within the first 48 hours after esophageal cancer surgery. The relationship between perioperative variables and AKI was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Postoperative AKI developed in 210 (35.3%) patients. Risk factors for AKI were body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14), preoperative serum albumin level (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.84), use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.05-1.75), colloid infusion during surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06-1.18), and postoperative 2-day C-reactive protein (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09). Postoperative AKI was associated with prolonged length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AKI is common in patients undergoing esophageal surgery for cancer. Closer evaluation and monitoring in patients with risk factors for AKI may be warranted.

Reporting bias in trials of volume resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch

The possibility of renal damage by hydroxyethyl starch has become the focus of intensive dispute based on the findings of published large trials. The aim of this narrative review is to analyze outcome reporting bias in the literature on volume resuscitation, focusing on selective outcome reporting in published randomized and observational trials with “modern” hydroxyethyl starch as therapeutic intervention. Three recent publications claimed to confirm renal safety of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 for indications in severe sepsis, trauma, and critical illness, respectively. Selective outcome reporting was identified in these studies including underreporting of side effects and change of primary study outcomes. In conclusion, selective outcome reporting bias is identified in recent publications of clinical trials on volume resuscitation with HES.

Fluid administration and the kidney

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent studies and information on the relationship between fluid administration and kidney function in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is little evidence from large multicenter trials to direct fluid therapy in patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Evidence of benefit for fluid administration from single center studies of fluid resuscitation to hemodynamic goals needs to be weighed against evidence of harm associated with fluid overload in large observational studies. The composition of intravenous fluid may affect the risk of AKI. Even latest-generation hydroxyethyl starches increase the risk of severe AKI in general and septic ICU patients. Isotonic saline has been associated with greater incidence of AKI in comparison to buffered crystalloids. Experimentally, infusion of saline results in reduction in renal perfusion in comparison to buffered solutions.

SUMMARY

Clinicians need to weigh the balance between adequate resuscitation of cardiac output and avoidance of fluid overload. Protocolized resuscitation to hemodynamic goals may help achieve these conflicting goals at least in the early phases of critical illness. In critically ill patients with, or at risk of, AKI, clinicians should avoid starch and, possibly, saline solutions.

Hydroxyethyl starch for resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is controversial. In this review, we will present the current evidence for the use of HES solutions including data from recent high-quality randomized clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meta-analyses of HES vs. control fluids show clear signals of harm including adverse effects on kidney and haemostatic function, and trends towards increased mortality. These results are mainly based on recent large randomized clinical trials comparing tetrastarch (HES 130/0.4 and HES 130/0.42) vs. crystalloid in patients in the ICU. Trials in trauma and surgical patients cannot adequately assess safety issues and do not show clear benefit with the use of HES. There is currently no firm evidence that tetrastarch has better safety profile than the former HES solutions.

SUMMARY

There is no evidence for an overall beneficial effect of HES in any subgroup of critically ill patients, but there are clear signs of harm. As safer alternatives exist, we recommend that HES is no longer used in critically ill patients.

Traumatic coagulopathy--part 1: Pathophysiology and diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature in reference to the pathophysiology and diagnostic modalities available for acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC) in relationship to traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

ETIOLOGY

Posttraumatic hemorrhage is responsible for one of the leading causes of preventable human deaths worldwide. Acute traumatic coagulopathy is an endogenous hypocoagulable condition that has been observed during the immediate (< 1 hour) posttraumatic period. Phenotypically, ATC manifests as a state of systemic hypocoagulability and hyperfibrinolysis. Although different functional mechanisms have been proposed for causing ATC, it is universally thought to be a manifestation of severe tissue injury, shock-induced hypoperfusion, systemic inflammation, and endothelial damage. Excessive activation of the thrombin-thrombomodulin activated Protein C pathway, catecholamine-induced endothelial damage as well as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with a fibrinolytic phenotype are all hypotheses that have been proposed in attempts to explain the functional mechanism of ATC.

DIAGNOSIS

An accurate and reliable test remains to be validated for ATC. Traditional coagulation assays (activated partial thromboplastin times and prothrombin times) along with platelet count and fibrinogen concentrations have been used more commonly. Viscoelastic tests (thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry) are currently being investigated as a more predictive modality for identifying and guiding therapy for ATC.

THERAPY

Damage control resuscitation and hemostatic resuscitation are gaining favor as the optimal resuscitative strategies for hemorrhagic shock and ATC. Antifibrinolytics may also play a role when hyperfibrinolysis is present.

PROGNOSIS

Massive hemorrhage accounts for 30-56% of prehospital posttraumatic deaths in people, with coagulopathic hemorrhage remaining one of the major causes of preventable deaths within the first 24 hours posttrauma. Ten to twenty-five percent of human trauma patients experience ATC, which has been shown to prolong hemorrhage, deter resuscitative efforts, promote sepsis, and increase mortality by at least 4-fold. Prognosis in veterinary patients is not currently known.

Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial

Introduction

There are limited data on the efficacy of early fluid resuscitation with third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130) in burn injury. Adverse effects of HES on survival and organ function have been reported.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 48 patients with severe burn injury were assigned to receive either lactated Ringer’s solution plus 6% HES 130/0.4 in a ratio of 2:1 or lactated Ringer’s solution with no colloid supplement for the first 72 hours. Primary outcome parameter was the group difference of administered total fluid from intensive care unit (ICU) admission up to day 3. Secondary outcomes included kidney and lung injury and failure, length of stay, and mortality.

Results

Three-day totals of administered resuscitation fluid (medians) were 21,190 mL in the lactated Ringer’s group and 19,535 mL in the HES group (HES: −1,213 mL; P = 0.39). Creatinine levels from day 1 to 3 (HES: +0.4 μmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI) −18.7 to 19.5; P = 0.97) and urinary outputs from day 1 to 3 (HES: −58 mL; 95% CI −400 to 283; P = 0.90) were not different. Six patients in each group developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.35 to 2.64; P = 0.95). Length of ICU stay (HES vs. lactated Ringer’s: 28 vs. 24 days; P = 0.80) and length of hospital stay (31 vs. 29 days; P = 0.57) were similar. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 4 patients in each group (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.27 to 4.45; P = 0.95), and in-hospital mortality was 8 in the HES group vs. 5 patients in the lactated Ringer’s group (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% CI 0.56 to 6.19; P = 0.31).

Conclusions

There was no evidence that early fluid resuscitation with balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) in addition to lactated Ringer’s solution would lead to a volume-sparing effect in severe burn injury. Together with the findings that early renal function, incidence of ARDS, length of stay, and mortality were not negatively influenced by HES in this setting, balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) plus lactated Ringer’s solution could not be considered superior to lactated Ringer’s solution alone.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01012648

The Bellamy challenge: it's about time

In 1984, Col. Ronald Bellamy launched a worldwide challenge to develop a new resuscitation fluid to aid survival after catastrophic blood loss on the battlefield. In 1996, after careful compromise among need, cube weight and efficacy, the US military and later coalition forces adopted 6% hetastarch (HES) fluids for early resuscitation. In the intervening years, evidence has amassed indicating that the HES fluids may not be safe, and in June 2013 the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning that HES solutions should not be used to treat patients with hypovolaemia or the critically ill. We review the unique challenges of early battlefield resuscitation, why the 'Bellamy challenge' remains open and discuss a number of forward-looking strategies that may help to solve the problem. The first two pillars of resuscitation that we believe have not been adequately addressed are rescuing and stabilising the heart (and brain) and the vascular system. The 'ideal' resuscitation fluid needs to nurture the heart and body slowly back to health, and not 'shock' it a second time with unnatural colloids or large volumes of unphysiological saline-based solutions.

Kidney function after the intraoperative use of 6% tetrastarches (HES 130/0.4 and 0.42)

Concerns about the nephrotoxicity of tetrastarches have recently increased with the accumulation of new evidence, particularly in relationship to septic patients. Two meta-analyses in 2011 and early 2012 also raised concerns about nephrotoxicity in surgical patients and prompted the present review of the nephrotoxicity of tetrastarches solely in the surgical setting. Seven reports consisting of two review articles and five single-trial papers published between 2012 and August 2013 were examined. Six of the seven studies did not show any adverse renal outcomes following the intraoperative use of tetrastarch, although their data are not robust enough to confirm definitive safety. Moreover, balanced electrolyte solutions are strongly recommended as a carrier solution for tetrastarches to reduce adverse outcomes.

Colloids in sepsis: evenly distributed molecules surrounded by uneven questions

Colloids are frequently used for fluid expansion in the intensive care unit, although its use on several clinical scenarios remains unproven of any relevant clinical benefit. The purpose of this article was to carry out a narrative review regarding the safety and efficacy of colloids in patients with sepsis and septic shock, with emphasis on the most commonly used colloids, albumin and starches. Colloids are effective fluid expanders and are able to restore the hemodynamic profile with less total volume than crystalloids. These properties appear to be preserved even in patients with sepsis with increased capillary permeability. However, some colloids are associated with renal impairment and coagulation abnormalities. Starch use was associated with increased mortality in two large clinical trials. Also, starches probably have significant renal adverse effects and may be related to more need for renal replacement therapy in severe sepsis. Albumin is the only colloid that has been shown safe in patients with sepsis and that may be associated with improved outcomes on specific subpopulations. No trial so far found any robust clinical end point favoring colloid use in patients with sepsis. Because there is no proven benefit of the use of most colloids in patients with sepsis, its use should not be encouraged outside clinical trials. Albumin is the only colloid solution that has proven to be safe, and its use may be considered on hypoalbuminemic patients with sepsis. Nevertheless, there are no robust data to recommend routine albumin administration in sepsis. Starch use should be avoided in patients with sepsis because of the recent findings of a multicenter randomized study until further evidence is available.

Effects of hydroxyethyl starch in subgroups of patients with severe sepsis: exploratory post-hoc analyses of a randomised trial

PURPOSE

It has been speculated that certain subgroups of sepsis patients may benefit from treatment with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.42, specifically in the earlier resuscitation of patients with more severely impaired circulation.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc, subgroup analysis of all 798 patients with severe sepsis randomised in the 6S trial according to time from ICU admission to randomisation, surgery and fluids given prior to randomisation and markers of shock at randomisation. Intervention effects estimated as risk ratios were analysed between the HES versus Ringer's acetate groups to detect subgroup heterogeneity of the effects on 90-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for risk factors.

RESULTS

Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the HES and Ringer's acetate groups in the different subgroups. There was no heterogeneity in the intervention effect on 90-day mortality in the following subgroups: randomisation earlier than 4 h after ICU admission versus later (test of interaction P = 0.85), surgery versus no surgery (P = 0.42), colloids given versus not given (P = 0.57), <2 l of crystalloids given prior to randomisation vs. >2 l (P = 0.88) or plasma lactate >4 mmol/l versus <4 mmol/l (P = 0.54), hypotension versus no hypotension (P = 0.32) or use of vasopressor or inotropic agents at randomisation versus no use (P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased 90-day mortality observed in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with HES 130/0.42 did not appear to depend on time course, surgery or fluids given prior to randomisation or on markers of shock at randomisation. As the analyses were planned post hoc and their power is reduced, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Low molecular weight pentastarch is more effective than crystalloid solution in goal-directed fluid management in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

This prospective observational study compared the volume effect between hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and crystalloid solution and its context dependency in intraoperative goal-directed fluid management.

METHODS

With institutional review board (IRB) approval, 35 patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled. Fluid challenge consisting of 250 ml of either bicarbonate Ringer solution (BRS) or low molecular weight pentastarch (HES 70/0.5) was given to maintain stroke volume index >35 ml/m2. The context of fluid challenge was classified as related to either epidural block (EB) or blood loss (BL) or as nonspecific. The primary end point was the interval between index fluid challenge and the next fluid challenge, and the secondary end point was the hemodynamic parameter at the end of fluid challenge. Differences in these parameters in each clinical context were compared between BRS and HES 70/0.5. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight, 77, and 127 fluid challenges were classified as related to EB and BL and as nonspecific, respectively. In the nonspecific condition, the median (range) interval after fluid challenge with HES 70/0.5 and BRS was 45 (11-162) min and 18 (8-44) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. Also, mean arterial pressure and stroke volume index significantly increased, whereas stroke volume variation significantly decreased after fluid challenge with HES 70/0.5 compared with BRS. Such differences were not observed in the other situations.

CONCLUSIONS

HES 70/0.5 exerted larger volume effects than did crystalloid under nonspecific conditions. However, similar volume effects were observed during volume loss and extensive sympathetic blockade.

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) are synthetic colloids commonly used for fluid resuscitation to replace intravascular volume, yet they have been increasingly associated with adverse effects on kidney function. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of HES on kidney function compared to other fluid resuscitation therapies in different patient populations.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, MetaRegister and reference lists of articles. The most recent search was completed on November 19, 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which HES was compared to an alternate fluid therapy for the prevention or treatment of effective intravascular volume depletion. Primary outcomes were renal replacement therapy (RRT), author-defined kidney failure and acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the RIFLE criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessments for each retrieved article were carried out by two authors using standardised forms. All outcomes were analysed using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Authors were contacted when published data were incomplete. Preplanned sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed after data were analysed with a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 42 studies (11,399 patients) including 19 studies from the original review (2010), as well as 23 new studies. Fifteen studies were excluded from the original review (nine retracted from publication due to concerns about integrity of data and six lacking individual patient creatinine data for the calculation of RIFLE criteria). Overall, there was a significant increase in the need for RRT in the HES treated individuals compared to individuals treated with other fluid therapies (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.49; 19 studies, 9857 patients) and the number with author-defined kidney failure (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.00; 15 studies, 1361 patients). The RR of AKI based on RIFLE-F (failure) criteria also showed an increased risk of AKI in individuals treated with HES products (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30; 15 studies, 8402 participants). The risk of meeting urine output and creatinine based RIFLE-R (risk) criteria for AKI was in contrast in favour of HES therapies (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99; 20 studies, 8769 patients). However, when RIFLE-R urine output based outcomes were excluded as per study protocol, the direction of AKI risk again favoured the other fluid type, with a non-significant RR of AKI in HES treated patients (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14; 8445 patients). A more robust effect was seen for the RIFLE-I (injury) outcome, with a RR of AKI of 1.22 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.37; 8338 patients). No differences between subgroups for the RRT and RIFLE-F based outcomes were seen between sepsis versus non-sepsis patients, high molecular weight (MW) and degree of substitution (DS) versus low MW and DS (≥ 200 kDa and > 0.4 DS versus 130 kDa and 0.4 DS) HES solutions, or high versus low dose treatments (i.e. ≥ 2 L versus < 2 L). There were differences identified between sepsis versus non-sepsis subgroups for the RIFLE-R and RIFLE-I based outcomes only, which may reflect the differing renal response to fluid resuscitation in pre-renal versus sepsis-associated AKI. Overall, methodological quality of the studies was good.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that all HES products increase the risk in AKI and RRT in all patient populations and a safe volume of any HES solution has yet to be determined. In most clinical situations it is likely that these risks outweigh any benefits, and alternate volume replacement therapies should be used in place of HES products.

Comparisons of lactated Ringer's and Hextend resuscitation on hemodynamics and coagulation following femur injury and severe hemorrhage in pigs

BACKGROUND

This study compared coagulation function after resuscitation with Hextend and lactated Ringer's (LR) solution in pigs with tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

Pigs were randomized into control (n = 7 each), LR, and Hextend groups. Femur fracture was induced using the captive bolt stunner at midshaft of the pigs' left legs, followed by hemorrhage of 60% total blood volume and resuscitation with either Hextend (equal to bled volume) or LR to reach the same mean arterial pressure. Pigs in the control group were not bled or resuscitated. Hemodynamics was monitored hourly for 6 hours. Blood samples were taken at baseline (BL), after hemorrhage, 15 minutes, 3 hours, and 6 hours after resuscitation for blood and coagulation measurements.

RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure decreased to 50% of BL by the 60% hemorrhage but returned to near BL within 1 hour after LR or Hextend resuscitation. Heart rate was increased (from 91 ± 4 beats per minute to 214 ± 20 beats per minute) by hemorrhage and decreased after resuscitation but remained elevated above BL in both groups. Resuscitation with Hextend (42 mL/kg) or LR (118 ± 3 mL/kg) reduced hematocrit, total protein, fibrinogen, and platelet counts, with greater decreases shown in the Hextend group. Clot strength was lower but returned to BL by 3 hours in the LR group, whereas it remained reduced for the 6-hour period after Hextend. The overall clotting capacity after LR was decreased after hemorrhage and resuscitation but returned to BL by 3 hours, whereas it remained low after Hextend for the 6-hour experiment period.

CONCLUSION

After traumatic hemorrhage, coagulation function was restored within 6 hours with LR resuscitation but not with Hextend. The lack of recovery after Hextend is likely caused by greater hemodilution and possible effects of starches on coagulation substrates and further documents the need to restrict the use of high-molecular-weight starch in resuscitation fluids for bleeding casualties.