Pair-rule expression of the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene: a nuclear receptor response element mediates the opposing regulatory effects of runt and hairy

Different modes of enhancer-specific regulation by Runt and Even-skipped during Drosophila segmentation

Expression of the Drosophila slp1 gene depends on nonadditive interactions between two cis-regulatory enhancers. These enhancers are repressed by preventing either Pol II recruitment or release of promoter-proximal paused Pol II in a manner that is both enhancer and transcription factor specific and can account for their nonadditive interaction.

The initial metameric expression of the Drosophila sloppy paired 1 (slp1) gene is controlled by two distinct cis-regulatory DNA elements that interact in a nonadditive manner to integrate inputs from transcription factors encoded by the pair-rule segmentation genes. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation on reporter genes containing these elements in different embryonic genotypes to investigate the mechanism of their regulation. The distal early stripe element (DESE) mediates both activation and repression by Runt. We find that the differential response of DESE to Runt is due to an inhibitory effect of Fushi tarazu (Ftz) on P-TEFb recruitment and the regulation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pausing. The proximal early stripe element (PESE) is also repressed by Runt, but in this case, Runt prevents PESE-dependent Pol II recruitment and preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly. PESE is also repressed by Even-skipped (Eve), but, of interest, this repression involves regulation of P-TEFb recruitment and promoter-proximal Pol II pausing. These results demonstrate that the mode of slp1 repression by Runt is enhancer specific, whereas the mode of repression of the slp1 PESE enhancer is transcription factor specific. We propose a model based on these differential regulatory interactions that accounts for the nonadditive interactions between the PESE and DESE enhancers during Drosophila segmentation.

Using evolutionary computations to understand the design and evolution of gene and cell regulatory networks

This paper surveys modeling approaches for studying the evolution of gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Modeling of the design or 'wiring' of GRNs has become increasingly common in developmental and medical biology, as a means of quantifying gene-gene interactions, the response to perturbations, and the overall dynamic motifs of networks. Drawing from developments in GRN 'design' modeling, a number of groups are now using simulations to study how GRNs evolve, both for comparative genomics and to uncover general principles of evolutionary processes. Such work can generally be termed evolution in silico. Complementary to these biologically-focused approaches, a now well-established field of computer science is Evolutionary Computations (ECs), in which highly efficient optimization techniques are inspired from evolutionary principles. In surveying biological simulation approaches, we discuss the considerations that must be taken with respect to: (a) the precision and completeness of the data (e.g. are the simulations for very close matches to anatomical data, or are they for more general exploration of evolutionary principles); (b) the level of detail to model (we proceed from 'coarse-grained' evolution of simple gene-gene interactions to 'fine-grained' evolution at the DNA sequence level); (c) to what degree is it important to include the genome's cellular context; and (d) the efficiency of computation. With respect to the latter, we argue that developments in computer science EC offer the means to perform more complete simulation searches, and will lead to more comprehensive biological predictions.

Gut pathology and responses to the microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the honey bee Apis mellifera

The microsporidium Nosema ceranae is a newly prevalent parasite of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera). Although this parasite is presently spreading across the world into its novel host, the mechanisms by it which affects the bees and how bees respond are not well understood. We therefore performed an extensive characterization of the parasite effects at the molecular level by using genetic and biochemical tools. The transcriptome modifications at the midgut level were characterized seven days post-infection with tiling microarrays. Then we tested the bee midgut response to infection by measuring activity of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (superoxide dismutases, glutathione peroxidases, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase). At the gene-expression level, the bee midgut responded to N. ceranae infection by an increase in oxidative stress concurrent with the generation of antioxidant enzymes, defense and protective response specifically observed in the gut of mammals and insects. However, at the enzymatic level, the protective response was not confirmed, with only glutathione-S-transferase exhibiting a higher activity in infected bees. The oxidative stress was associated with a higher transcription of sugar transporter in the gut. Finally, a dramatic effect of the microsporidia infection was the inhibition of genes involved in the homeostasis and renewal of intestinal tissues (Wnt signaling pathway), a phenomenon that was confirmed at the histological level. This tissue degeneration and prevention of gut epithelium renewal may explain early bee death. In conclusion, our integrated approach not only gives new insights into the pathological effects of N. ceranae and the bee gut response, but also demonstrate that the honey bee gut is an interesting model system for studying host defense responses.

Modelling the Drosophila embryo

I provide a historical overview on the use of mathematical models to gain insight into pattern formation during early development of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. It is my intention to illustrate how the aims and methodology of modelling have changed from the early beginnings of a theoretical developmental biology in the 1960s to modern-day systems biology. I show that even early modelling attempts addressed interesting and relevant questions, which were not tractable by experimental approaches. Unfortunately, their validation was severely hampered by a lack of specificity and appropriate experimental evidence. There is a simple lesson to be learned from this: we cannot deduce general rules for pattern formation from first principles or spurious reproduction of developmental phenomena. Instead, we must infer such rules (if any) from detailed and accurate studies of specific developmental systems. To achieve this, mathematical modelling must be closely integrated with experimental approaches. I report on progress that has been made in this direction in the past few years and illustrate the kind of novel insights that can be gained from such combined approaches. These insights demonstrate the great potential (and some pitfalls) of an integrative, systems-level investigation of pattern formation.

The role of the segmentation gene hairy in Tribolium

Hairy stripes in Tribolium are generated during blastoderm and germ band extension, but a direct role for Tc-h in trunk segmentation was not found. We have studied here several aspects of hairy function and expression in Tribolium, to further elucidate its role. First, we show that there is no functional redundancy with other hairy paralogues in Tribolium. Second, we cloned the hairy orthologue from Tribolium confusum and show that its expression mimics that of Tribolium castaneum, implying that stripe expression should be functional in some way. Third, we show that the dynamics of stripe formation in the growth zone is not compatible with an oscillatory mechanism comparable to the one driving the expression of hairy homologues in vertebrates. Fourth, we use parental RNAi experiments to study Tc-h function and we find that mandible and labium are particularly sensitive to loss of Tc-h, reminiscent of a pair-rule function in the head region. In addition, lack of Tc-h leads to cell death in the gnathal region at later embryonic stages, resulting in a detachment of the head. Cell death patterns are also altered in the midline. Finally, we have analysed the effect of Tc-h knockdown on two of the target genes of hairy in Drosophila, namely fushi tarazu and paired. We find that the trunk expression of Tc-h is required to regulate Tc-ftz, although Tc-ftz is itself also not required for trunk segmentation in Tribolium. Our results imply that there is considerable divergence in hairy function between Tribolium and Drosophila.

The HMG-box protein Lilliputian is required for Runt-dependent activation of the pair-rule gene fushi-tarazu

lilliputian (lilli), the sole Drosophila member of the FMR2/AF4 (Fragile X Mental Retardation/Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia) family of transcription factors, is widely expressed with roles in segmentation, cellularization, and gastrulation during early embryogenesis with additional distinct roles at later stages of embryonic and postembryonic development. We identified lilli in a genetic screen based on the suppression of a lethal phenotype that is associated with ectopic expression of the transcription factor encoded by the segmentation gene runt in the blastoderm embryo. In contrast to other factors identified by this screen, lilli appears to have no role in mediating either the establishment or maintenance of engrailed (en) repression by Runt. Instead, we find that Lilli plays a critical role in the Runt-dependent activation of the pair-rule segmentation gene fushi-tarazu (ftz). The requirement for lilli is distinct from and temporally precedes the Runt-dependent activation of ftz that is mediated by the orphan nuclear receptor protein Ftz-F1. We further describe a role for lilli in the activation of Sex-lethal (Sxl), an early target of Runt in the sex determination pathway. However, lilli is not required for all targets that are activated by Runt and appears to have no role in activation of sloppy paired (slp1). Based on these results we suggest that Lilli plays an architectural role in facilitating transcriptional activation that depends both on the target gene and the developmental context.

RUNX3: A new player in myeloid gene expression and immune response

RUNX transcription factors function as scaffolds for interaction with various coregulatory proteins during developmental processes such as hematopoiesis, neurogenesis, and osteogenesis. The current view places RUNX proteins within the TGF-beta signaling pathway, although each one exhibits cell- and tissue-specific functions. In the case of RUNX3, recent data have suggested its function as a tumor suppressor factor and highlighted its involvement in immune cell differentiation and activation. The molecular mechanisms for the pleiotropic effects of Runx3 deficiency are not completely understood. The present article will summarize the known functional activities of RUNX3, emphasizing its role in myeloid cell gene expression and its potential contribution to the migratory and adhesive capabilities of this cell lineage.

The vitamin D receptor, Runx2, and the Notch signaling pathway cooperate in the transcriptional regulation of osteopontin

Osteopontin (OPN), a glycosylated phosphoprotein that binds calcium, is present in bone extracellular matrix and has been reported to modulate both mineralization and bone resorption. Targeted disruption in mice of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) or Runx2 results in marked inhibition of OPN expression in osteoblasts. In this study, we addressed possible cross-talk between VDR and Runx2 in regulating OPN transcription. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) or Runx2 stimulated OPN transcription (mouse OPN promoter -777/+79) 2-3-fold. However, coexpression of Runx2 and VDR in COS-7 cells and treatment with 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) resulted in an 8-fold induction of OPN transcription, indicating for the first time functional cooperation between Runx2 and VDR in the regulation of OPN transcription. In ROS 17/2.8 and MC3T3-E1 cells that contain endogenous Runx2, AML-1/ETO, which acts as a repressor of Runx2, significantly inhibited 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) induction of OPN transcription, OPN mRNA, and protein expression. Both a Runx2 site (-136/-130) and the vitamin D response element (-757/-743) in the OPN promoter are needed for cooperative activation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses showed that 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) can enhance VDR and Runx2 recruitment on the OPN promoter, further indicating cooperation between these two factors in the regulation of OPN. In osteoblastic cells, Hes-1, a downstream factor of the Notch signaling pathway, was found to enhance basal and 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)-induced OPN transcription. This enhancement was inhibited by AML-1/ETO, an inhibitor of Runx2. Immunoprecipitation assays indicated that Hes-1 and Runx2 interact and that 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) can enhance this interaction. Taken together, these findings define novel mechanisms involving the intersection of three pathways, Runx2, 1,25(OH)(2)D(3), and Notch signaling, that play a major role in the regulation of OPN in osteoblastic cells and therefore in the process of bone remodeling.

A DNA-binding-independent pathway of repression by the Drosophila Runt protein

DNA-binding proteins are important for regulating gene expression during development. It is widely assumed that this regulation involves sequence-specific DNA binding by these transcription factors to cognate cis-regulatory sequences of their downstream target genes. However, studies in both the Drosophila and the mouse model systems have provided examples in which the DNA-binding activity of a transcription factor is not essential for in vivo function. Using a system that allows for quantitative analysis of gene function in the Drosophila embryo, we have discovered a DNA-binding-independent activity of Runt, the founding member of the RUNX family of transcriptional regulators. Examination of the in vivo potency of a DNA-binding-defective form of Runt reveals differential requirements for DNA binding in the regulation of different downstream target genes. DNA binding is not required for establishing repression of the odd-numbered stripes of the segment polarity gene engrailed, but does contribute to Runt's role as a regulator of sloppy-paired, another downstream target gene in the pathway of segmentation. We investigate this DNA-binding-independent pathway using a genetic screen for dose-dependent modifiers of runt activity. These studies reveal that DNA-binding proteins encoded by the tramtrack locus cooperate with Runt to repress engrailed. These results provide new insights into the context-dependent regulatory functions of Runt domain proteins and provide a paradigm for understanding DNA-binding-independent regulation by developmentally important transcription factors.

Thoracic patterning by the Drosophila gap gene hunchback

Localized gene expression patterns are critical for establishing body plans in all multicellular animals. In Drosophila, the gap gene hunchback (hb) is expressed in a dynamic pattern in anterior regions of the embryo. Hb protein is first detected as a shallow maternal gradient that prevents expression of posterior gap genes in anterior regions. hb mRNA is also expressed zygotically, first as a broad anterior domain controlled by the Bicoid (Bcd) morphogen, and then in a stripe at the position of parasegment 4 (PS4). Here, we show that the PS4-hb stripe changes the profile of the anterior Hb gradient by generating a localized peak of protein that persists until after the broad domain has started to decline. This peak is required specifically for the formation of the mesothoracic (T2) segment. At the molecular level, the PS4-hb stripe is critical for activation of the homeotic gene Antennapedia, but does not affect a gradient of Hb repressive activity formed by the combination of maternal and Bcd-dependent Hb. The repressive gradient is critical for establishing the positions of several target genes, including the gap genes Kruppel (Kr), knirps (kni), and giant (gt), and the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx). Different Hb concentrations are sufficient for repression of gt, kni, and Ubx, but a very high level of Hb, or a combinatorial mechanism, is required for repression of Kr. These results suggest that the individual phases of hb transcription, which overlap temporally and spatially, contribute specific patterning functions in early embryogenesis.

Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by Runt domain proteins

Runt domain proteins have vital roles in regulating transcription in developmental pathways extending from sex determination and segmentation in fruit fly embryos to the development of blood and bone in mammals. Many of the insights into the mechanisms by which these proteins act to regulate transcription originate either from studies on the Drosophila runt gene, the founding member of this family, or from work on the mammalian PEBP2/CBF transcription factor. Genetic experiments in the Drosophila system reveal that runt functions both to activate and to repress transcription of different downstream target genes and indicate that different mechanisms are used in the regulation of different specific downstream target genes. These studies have also identified other nuclear factors that work with Runt in some of these pathways. Studies in mammalian systems have provided additional evidence for the complexity of transcriptional regulation by Runt domain proteins and have identified other transcription factors that cooperate with Runt domain proteins to regulate the activity of different specific cis-regulatory enhancers. The emerging view from studies in both systems is that these proteins act as context-dependent regulators of transcription, activating or repressing gene expression dependent upon the constititution of a particular promoter/enhancer in a particular cell type. These results have yielded new insights into the molecular mechanisms that control animal development and provide a framework for investigating fundamental issues in eukaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Runt and Lozenge function in Drosophila development

Runt and Lozenge (LZ) are members of the Runt domain family of transcriptional regulators and control a large number of developmental processes in Drosophila. Runt is a pair-rule gene, and is part of the network of genes that control pattern formation in the embryo. In the central nervous system, Runt function is necessary for the development of a subset of neurons. Runt is also a key regulator of sex determination, and directly controls Sex-lethal, a master gene that determines sex of the animal and controls dosage compensation. The LZ protein also participates in several key processes. LZ controls pre-patterning and cell-fate choices in the development of the visual system by regulating the expression of several fate-specifying transcription factors, and works in conjunction with general signaling pathways. LZ function is also required in hematopoiesis for the specification of a Drosophila blood cell lineage.

Pair-rule gene runt restricts orthodenticle expression to the presumptive head of the Drosophila embryo

Ectopic expression of the pair-rule gene runt in the anterior end of the Drosophila embryo antagonizes transcriptional activation of the head gap gene orthodenticle (otd) by the anterior morphogen bicoid. Here we investigate the relevance of runt's activity as a repressor of otd in normal Drosophila embryogenesis otd expression is activated in the posterior region of embryos that are mutant for runt. This posterior expression domain of otd depends on the activity of the orphan nuclear receptor protein Tailless. Repression of otd by runt does not require the conserved VVVRPY motif that mediates interaction between Runt and the co-repressor protein Groucho. The observed functional interactions between runt and tailless on otd expression may indicate there are other contexts where members of these two families of transcriptional regulators interact to regulate gene expression during development.

Role of the transcription factor AML-1 in acute leukemia and hematopoietic differentiation

Chromosomal translocations affecting the AML-1 gene are among the most frequent aberrations found in acute leukemia. Because the AML-1 transcription factor is a critical regulator of hematopoeitic cell development, normal homeostasis is disrupted in cells containing these translocations. In this review we describe the mechanisms of transcriptional activation and repression by AML-1 and how this transcriptional control is disrupted by the chromosomal translocations that affect AML-1. Finally, we discuss how the mechanism of transcriptional repression by these chromosomal translocation fusion proteins is a possible target of therapeutic intervention in acute leukemia.

The mammalian basic helix loop helix protein HES-1 binds to and modulates the transactivating function of the runt-related factor Cbfa1

Drosophila Runt is the founding member of a family of related transcription factors involved in the regulation of a variety of cell-differentiation events in invertebrates and vertebrates. Runt-related proteins act as both transactivators and transcriptional repressors, suggesting that context-dependent mechanisms modulate their transcriptional properties. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the regulation of the functions of the mammalian Runt-related protein, Cbfa1. Here we provide the first demonstration that Cbfa1 (as well as the related protein, Cbfa2/AML1) physically interacts with the basic helix loop helix transcription factor, HES-1, a mammalian counterpart of the Drosophila Hairy and Enhancer of split proteins. This interaction is mediated by the carboxyl-terminal domains of Cbfa1 and HES-1, but does not require their respective tetrapeptide motifs, WRPY and WRPW. Our studies also show that HES-1 can antagonize the binding of Cbfa1 to mammalian transcriptional corepressors of the Groucho family. Moreover, HES-1 can potentiate Cbfa1-mediated transactivation in transfected cells. Taken together, these findings implicate HES-1 in the transcriptional functions of Cbfa1 and suggest that the concerted activities of Groucho and HES proteins modulate the functions of mammalian Runt-related proteins.

Quantitative analysis of gene function in the Drosophila embryo

The specific functions of gene products frequently depend on the developmental context in which they are expressed. Thus, studies on gene function will benefit from systems that allow for manipulation of gene expression within model systems where the developmental context is well defined. Here we describe a system that allows for genetically controlled overexpression of any gene of interest under normal physiological conditions in the early Drosophila embryo. This regulated expression is achieved through the use of Drosophila lines that express a maternal mRNA for the yeast transcription factor GAL4. Embryos derived from females that express GAL4 maternally activate GAL4-dependent UAS transgenes at uniform levels throughout the embryo during the blastoderm stage of embryogenesis. The expression levels can be quantitatively manipulated through the use of lines that have different levels of maternal GAL4 activity. Specific phenotypes are produced by expression of a number of different developmental regulators with this system, including genes that normally do not function during Drosophila embryogenesis. Analysis of the response to overexpression of runt provides evidence that this pair-rule segmentation gene has a direct role in repressing transcription of the segment-polarity gene engrailed. The maternal GAL4 system will have applications both for the measurement of gene activity in reverse genetic experiments as well as for the identification of genetic factors that have quantitative effects on gene function in vivo.

Comparison of sequences of a transcriptional coactivator MBF2 from three Lepidopteran species Bombyx mori, Bombyx mandarina and Samia cynthia

MBF2 was first isolated from the silkworm Bombyx mori as a positive cofactor that activates transcription through its interaction with TFIIA. To identify conserved domain(s) within the MBF2 molecule, we isolated cDNAs encoding MBF2 homologues from other silkworms Bombyx mandarina and Samia cynthia. Bacterially expressed and purified MBF2 of B. mandarina and S. cynthia activated transcription in vitro. The predicted amino acid sequences of MBF2 from two Bombyx species share 97% homology. When we compared between B. mori and S. cynthia factors, the homology reduced to 50%. Four regions in MBF2 are conserved among these three species. Two of them are present in the middle region of MBF2 that is essential for the transcriptional activation.

Multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) is an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional coactivator that connects a regulatory factor and TATA element-binding protein

Multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) is a transcriptional cofactor that bridges between the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and the Drosophila melanogaster nuclear hormone receptor FTZ-F1 or its silkworm counterpart BmFTZ-F1. A cDNA clone encoding MBF1 was isolated from the silkworm Bombyx mori whose sequence predicts a basic protein consisting of 146 amino acids. Bacterially expressed recombinant MBF1 is functional in interactions with TBP and a positive cofactor MBF2. The recombinant MBF1 also makes a direct contact with FTZ-F1 through the C-terminal region of the FTZ-F1 DNA-binding domain and stimulates the FTZ-F1 binding to its recognition site. The central region of MBF1 (residues 35-113) is essential for the binding of FTZ-F1, MBF2, and TBP. When the recombinant MBF1 was added to a HeLa cell nuclear extract in the presence of MBF2 and FTZ622 bearing the FTZ-F1 DNA-binding domain, it supported selective transcriptional activation of the fushi tarazu gene as natural MBF1 did. Mutations disrupting the binding of FTZ622 to DNA or MBF1, or a MBF2 mutation disrupting the binding to MBF1, all abolished the selective activation of transcription. These results suggest that tethering of the positive cofactor MBF2 to a FTZ-F1-binding site through FTZ-F1 and MBF1 is essential for the binding site-dependent activation of transcription. A homology search in the databases revealed that the deduced amino acid sequence of MBF1 is conserved across species from yeast to human.

Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps

The asymmetric distribution of the gap gene knirps (kni) in discrete expression domains is critical for striped patterns of pair-rule gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. To test whether these domains function as sources of morphogenetic activity, the stripe 2 enhancer of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) was used to express kni in an ectopic position. Manipulating the stripe 2-kni expression constructs and examining transgenic lines with different insertion sites led to the establishment of a series of independent lines that displayed consistently different levels and developmental profiles of expression. Individual lines showed specific disruptions in pair-rule patterning that were correlated with the level and timing of ectopic expression. These results suggest that the ectopic domain acts as a source for morphogenetic activity that specifies regions in the embryo where pair-rule genes can be activated or repressed. Evidence is presented that the level and timing of expression, as well as protein diffusion, are important for determining the specific responses of target genes.

Ftz-F1 is a cofactor in Ftz activation of the Drosophila engrailed gene

The fushi tarazu pair-rule gene is required for the formation of alternating parasegmental boundaries in the Drosophila embryo. fushi tarazu encodes a homeodomain protein necessary for transcription of the engrailed gene in even-numbered parasegments. Here we report that, within an engrailed enhancer, adjacent and conserved binding sites for the Fushi tarazu protein and a cofactor are each necessary, and together sufficient, for transcriptional activation. Footprinting shows that the cofactor site can be bound specifically by Ftz-F1, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Ftz-F1 and the Fushi tarazu homeodomain bind the sites with 4- to 8-fold cooperativity, suggesting that direct contact between the two proteins may contribute to target recognition. Even parasegmental reporter expression is dependent on Fushi tarazu and maternal Ftz-F1, suggesting that these two proteins are indeed the factors that act upon the two sites in embryos. The two adjacent binding sites are also required for continued activity of the engrailed enhancer after Fushi tarazu protein is no longer detectable, including the period when engrailed, and the enhancer, become dependent upon wingless. We also report the existence of a separate negative regulatory element that apparently responds to odd-skipped.

The nuclear receptor homologue Ftz-F1 and the homeodomain protein Ftz are mutually dependent cofactors

Nuclear hormone receptors and homeodomain proteins are two classes of transcription factor that regulate major developmental processes. Both depend on interactions with other proteins for specificity and activity. The Drosophila gene fushi tarazu (ftz), which encodes a homeodomain protein (Ftz), is required zygotically for the formation of alternate segments in the developing embryo. Here we show that the orphan nuclear receptor alphaFtz-F1 (ref. 3), which is deposited in the egg during oogenesis, is an obligatory cofactor for Ftz. The two proteins interact specifically and directly, both in vitro and in vivo, through a conserved domain in the Ftz polypeptide. This interaction suggests that other nuclear receptor/homeodomain protein interactions maybe important and common in developing organisms.

Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila

Evolutionary, developmental and insect biologists are currently using a three-pronged approach to study the evolution and development of the insect head. First, genetic manipulation of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has led to the identification of many genes, including the segmentation and homeotic genes, that are important for embryonic pattern formation and development. Second, a comparison of orthologous gene expression patterns in other insects reveals that these regulatory genes are deployed in similar, yet distinct, patterns in different insects. Third, comparisons of embryonic morphology with gene expression patterns suggest that in general these genes promote a common insect body plan, but that variations in gene expression can often be correlated to variations in morphology. Here, we present a detailed review of the development of the cephalic ectoderm of Drosophila and extrapolate to development of a generalized insect head. Our analysis of the variations among insect species, in both morphology and gene expression patterns, conducted within an evolutionary framework supported by traditional phylogenies and paleontology provides the basis for hypotheses about the genetic factors governing morphologic and developmental evolution.

Drosophila homologs of the proto-oncogene product PEBP2/CBF beta regulate the DNA-binding properties of Runt

The Drosophila runt gene is the founding member of the Runt domain family of transcriptional regulators. Mammalian Runt domain genes encode the alpha subunit of the heterometric DNA-binding factor PEBP2/CBF. The unrelated PEBP2/CBF beta protein interacts with the Runt domain to increase its affinity for DNA. The conserved ability of the Drosophila Runt protein to respond to the stimulating effect of mammalian PEBP2/CBF beta indicated that flies were likely to have a homologous beta protein. Using the yeast two-hybrid system to isolate cDNAs for Runt-interacting proteins, we identified two Drosophila genes, referred to as Brother and Big-brother, that have substantial sequence homology with PEBP2/CBF beta. Yeast two-hybrid experiments as well as in vitro DNA-binding studies confirmed the functional homology of the Brother, Big-brother, and PEBP2/CBF beta proteins and demonstrated that the conserved regions of the Runt and Brother proteins are required for their heterodimeric interaction. The DNA-bending properties of Runt domain proteins in the presence and absence of their partners were also examined. Our results show that Runt domain proteins bend DNA and that this bending is influenced by Brother protein family members, supporting the idea that heterodimerization is associated with a conformational change in the Runt domain. Analysis of expression patterns in Drosophila embryos revealed that Brother and Big-brother are likely to interact with runt in vivo and further suggested that the activity of these proteins is not restricted to their interaction with Runt.