Arf6 negatively controls the rapid recycling of the β2 adrenergic receptor

EFA6A, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Arf6, Regulates Developmental Stage-Dependent Spine Morphogenesis, Synaptic Plasticity, and Long-Term Memory in the Hippocampus

EFA6A is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ADP ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6), a small GTPase involved in membrane trafficking and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. While EFA6A-Arf6 signaling has been shown to regulate dendritic spine formation and maintenance in cultured neurons, its role in higher brain functions remains unclear in vivo. Here, we generated mice lacking two EFA6A splicing isoforms, EFA6A and EFA6As, to examine their role in regulating spine morphology and hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. The loss of EFA6A and EFA6As caused reduced dendritic spine density in developing CA1 pyramidal neurons, whereas dendritic spines aberrantly increased in adults. Furthermore, the mutant mice also showed impaired maintenance of long-term potentiation (LTP) at Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus and memory retention in the passive avoidance test. These findings provide the first in vivo evidence that the EFA6A isoforms, EFA6A and EFA6As, collectively regulate spine formation bidirectionally in a developmental stage-dependent manner, which is likely to underlie hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory formation.

Retromer Opposes Opioid-Induced Downregulation of the Mu Opioid Receptor

The mu opioid receptor (MOR) is protected from opioid-induced trafficking to lysosomes and proteolytic downregulation by its ability to access the endosomal recycling pathway through its C-terminal recycling motif, LENL. MOR sorting towards the lysosome results in downregulation of opioid signaling while recycling of MOR to the plasma membrane preserves signaling function. However, the mechanisms by which LENL promotes MOR recycling are unknown, and this sequence does not match any known consensus recycling motif. Here we took a functional genomics approach with a comparative genome-wide screen design to identify genes which control opioid receptor expression and downregulation. We identified 146 hits including all three subunits of the endosomal Retromer complex. We show that the LENL motif in MOR is a novel Retromer recycling motif and that LENL is a necessary, sufficient, and conserved mechanism to give MOR access to the Retromer recycling pathway and protect MOR from agonist-induced downregulation to multiple clinically relevant opioids including fentanyl and methadone.

Constitutive activity of an atypical chemokine receptor revealed by inverse agonistic nanobodies

Chemokine stimulation of atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) does not activate G proteins but recruits arrestins. It is a chemokine scavenger that indirectly influences responses by restricting the availability of CXCL12, an agonist shared with the canonical receptor CXCR4. ACKR3 is upregulated in numerous disorders. Due to limited insights in chemokine-activated ACKR3 signaling, it is unclear how ACKR3 contributes to pathological phenotypes. One explanation may be that high constitutive activity of ACKR3 drives non-canonical signaling through a basal receptor state. Here we characterize the constitutive action of ACKR3 using novel inverse agonistic nanobodies to suppress basal activity. These new tools promote an inactive receptor conformation which decreased arrestin engagement and inhibited constitutive internalization. Basal, non-chemotactic, breast cancer cell motility was also suppressed, suggesting a role for ACKR3 in this process. The basal receptor activity in pathophysiology may provide a new therapeutic approach for targeting ACKR3.

Does coupling to ADP ribosylation factor 6 explain differences between muscarinic and other receptors in interaction with β-adrenoceptor-mediated smooth muscle relaxation?

Numerous studies in airways, ileum, and urinary bladder have demonstrated that relaxation by β-adrenoceptor agonists has lower potency and/or efficacy when contraction was elicited by muscarinic receptor agonists as compared to other G-protein-coupled receptors, KCl, or basal tone, but the molecular mechanisms behind this relative resistance remain unclear. A paper by Huang et al. in this issue demonstrates that NAV2729, an inhibitor of ADP ribosylation factor 6, inhibits contraction of isolated blood vessels elicited by muscarinic receptor agonists, but not by α₁-adrenoceptor agonists or KCl. Against this background, we discuss the role of ADP ribosylation factor 6 in cellular responses to G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation. While ADP ribosylation factor 6 apparently is the only promising molecular explanation for the relative resistance of smooth muscle contraction elicited by muscarinic agonists, the existing data are insufficient for a robust conclusion.

EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis

Ciliogenesis is a coordinated process initiated by the recruitment and fusion of pre-ciliary vesicles at the distal appendages of the mother centriole through mechanisms that remain unclear. Here, we report that EFA6A (also known as PSD), an exchange factor for the small G protein Arf6, is involved in early stage of ciliogenesis by promoting the fusion of distal appendage vesicles forming the ciliary vesicle. EFA6A is present in the vicinity of the mother centriole before primary cilium assembly and prior to the arrival of Arl13B-containing vesicles. During ciliogenesis, EFA6A initially accumulates at the mother centriole and later colocalizes with Arl13B along the ciliary membrane. EFA6A depletion leads to the inhibition of ciliogenesis, the absence of centrosomal Rab8-positive structures and the accumulation of Arl13B-positive vesicles around the distal appendages. Our results uncover a novel fusion machinery, comprising EFA6A, Arf6 and Arl13B, that controls the coordinated fusion of ciliary vesicles docked at the distal appendages of the mother centriole.

BRAG2a Mediates mGluR-Dependent AMPA Receptor Internalization at Excitatory Postsynapses through the Interaction with PSD-95 and Endophilin 3

Brefeldin A-resistant ArfGEF 2 (BRAG2) [or Iqsec1 (IQ motif and Sec7 domain-containing protein 1)] is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ADP ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6), a small GTPase implicated in the membrane trafficking between the plasma membrane and endosomes. BRAG2 regulates Arf6-dependent endocytosis of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) through the direct interaction during the hippocampal long-term depression. However, the molecular mechanism by which the BRAG2-Arf6 pathway links AMPARs to the endocytic machinery remains elusive. Herein, using mouse brains of both sexes, we demonstrated that BRAG2a, an alternative isoform with a long C-terminal insert containing a proline-rich domain and type I PDZ-binding motif, was selectively localized to the excitatory postsynaptic density (PSD). Using yeast two-hybrid screening, we identified PSD-95 and endophilin 1/3 as BRAG2a-binding partners in the brain. The interaction with PSD-95 was required for synaptic targeting of BRAG2a. In cultured hippocampal neurons, stimulation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) increased the interaction of BRAG2a with endophilin 3 and concomitant Arf6 activation in a time-dependent manner. Knockdown of BRAG2 in cultured hippocampal neurons blocked the mGluR-dependent decrease in surface AMPAR levels, which was rescued by introducing wild-type BRAG2a, but not wild-type BRAG2b or BRAG2a mutants lacking the ability to activate Arf6 or to interact with endophilin 3 or PSD-95. Further postembedding immunoelectron microscopic analysis revealed the preorganized lateral distribution of BRAG2a, Arf6, and endophilin 3 for efficient endocytosis at the postsynaptic membrane. Together, the present findings unveiled a novel molecular mechanism by which BRAG2a links AMPARs to the clathrin-dependent endocytic pathway through its interaction with PSD-95 and endophilin 3.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT BRAG2/Iqsec1 is a GDP/GTP exchange factor for ADP ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6), a small GTPase implicated in the membrane trafficking between the plasma membrane and endosomes, and regulates Arf6-dependent endocytosis of AMPARs through direct interaction during hippocampal long-term depression, one of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity related to learning and memory. However, the molecular mechanism by which the BRAG2-Arf6 pathway links AMPARs to the endocytic machinery remains elusive. Here, we identified isoform-specific mechanisms of BRAG2-mediated AMPAR internalization. We demonstrated that the interaction of BRAG2a isoform with PSD-95 and endophilin 3 was required for the mGluR-dependent decrease in surface AMPARs in hippocampal neurons. These results unveiled a novel molecular mechanism by which BRAG2 links AMPARs to the clathrin-mediated endocytic machinery at postsynaptic sites.

The C-terminal domain of EFA6A interacts directly with F-actin and assembles F-actin bundles

The Arf6-specific exchange factor EFA6 is involved in the endocytic/recycling pathway for different cargos. In addition EFA6 acts as a powerful actin cytoskeleton organizer, a function required for its role in the establishment of the epithelial cell polarity and in neuronal morphogenesis. We previously showed that the C-terminus of EFA6 (EFA6-Ct) is the main domain which contributes to actin reorganization. Here, by in vitro and in vivo experiments, we sought to decipher, at the molecular level, how EFA6 controls the dynamic and structuring of actin filaments. We showed that EFA6-Ct interferes with actin polymerization by interacting with and capping actin filament barbed ends. Further, in the presence of actin mono-filaments, the addition of EFA6-Ct triggered the formation of actin bundles. In cells, when the EFA6-Ct was directed to the plasma membrane, as is the case for the full-length protein, its expression induced the formation of membrane protrusions enriched in actin cables. Collectively our data explain, at least in part, how EFA6 plays an essential role in actin organization by interacting with and bundling F-actin.

Methods to Characterize Protein Interactions with β-Arrestin In Cellulo

β-Arrestins 1 and 2 (β-arr1 and β-arr2) are ubiquitous proteins with common and distinct functions. They were initially identified as proteins recruited to stimulated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), regulating their desensitization and internalization. The discovery that β-arrs could also interact with more than 400 non-GPCR protein partners brought to light their central roles as multifunctional scaffold proteins regulating multiple signalling pathways from the plasma membrane to the nucleus, downstream of GPCRs or independently from these receptors. Through the regulation of the activities and subcellular localization of their binding partners, β-arrs control various cell processes such as proliferation, cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell motility, and apoptosis. Thus, the identification of β-arrs binding partners and the characterization of their mode of interaction in cells are central to the understanding of their function. Here we provide methods to explore the molecular interaction of β-arrs with other proteins in cellulo.

β-Arrestins: Multitask Scaffolds Orchestrating the Where and When in Cell Signalling

The β-arrestins (β-arrs) were initially appreciated for the roles they play in the desensitization and endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are now also known to act as multifunctional adaptor proteins binding many non-receptor protein partners to control multiple signalling pathways. β-arrs therefore act as key regulatory hubs at the crossroads of external cell inputs and functional outputs in cellular processes ranging from gene transcription to cell growth, survival, cytoskeletal regulation, polarity, and migration. An increasing number of studies have also highlighted the scaffolding roles β-arrs play in vivo in both physiological and pathological conditions, which opens up therapeutic avenues to explore. In this introductory review chapter, we discuss the functional roles that β-arrs exert to control GPCR function, their dynamic scaffolding roles and how this impacts signal transduction events, compartmentalization of β-arrs, how β-arrs are regulated themselves, and how the combination of these events culminates in cellular regulation.

Cellular and subcellular localization of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 in mouse peripheral tissues

ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) is a small GTPase that regulates endosomal trafficking and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. In the present study, we comprehensively examined the cellular and subcellular localization of Arf6 in adult mouse peripheral tissues by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy using the heat-induced antigen retrieval method with Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0). Marked immunolabeling of Arf6 was observed particularly in epithelial cells of several tissues including the esophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, trachea, kidney, epididymis, oviduct, and uterus. In most epithelial cells of simple or pseudostratified epithelia, Arf6 exhibited predominant localization to the basolateral membrane and a subpopulation of endosomes. At an electron microscopic level, Arf6 was localized along the basolateral membrane, with dense accumulation at interdigitating processes and infoldings. Arf6 was present in a ring-like appearance at intercellular bridges in spermatogonia and spermatocytes in the testis and at the Flemming body of cytokinetic somatic cells in the ovarian follicle, thymus, and spleen. The present study provides anatomical clues to help understand the physiological roles of Arf6 at the whole animal level.

The Diverse Roles of Arrestin Scaffolds in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling

The visual/β-arrestins, a small family of proteins originally described for their role in the desensitization and intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), have emerged as key regulators of multiple signaling pathways. Evolutionarily related to a larger group of regulatory scaffolds that share a common arrestin fold, the visual/β-arrestins acquired the capacity to detect and bind activated GPCRs on the plasma membrane, which enables them to control GPCR desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking. By acting as scaffolds that bind key pathway intermediates, visual/β-arrestins both influence the tonic level of pathway activity in cells and, in some cases, serve as ligand-regulated scaffolds for GPCR-mediated signaling. Growing evidence supports the physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of arrestins and underscores their potential as therapeutic targets. Circumventing arrestin-dependent GPCR desensitization may alleviate the problem of tachyphylaxis to drugs that target GPCRs, and find application in the management of chronic pain, asthma, and psychiatric illness. As signaling scaffolds, arrestins are also central regulators of pathways controlling cell growth, migration, and survival, suggesting that manipulating their scaffolding functions may be beneficial in inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, and cancer. In this review we examine the structure-function relationships that enable arrestins to perform their diverse roles, addressing arrestin structure at the molecular level, the relationship between arrestin conformation and function, and sites of interaction between arrestins, GPCRs, and nonreceptor-binding partners. We conclude with a discussion of arrestins as therapeutic targets and the settings in which manipulating arrestin function might be of clinical benefit.

Co-localization of endogenous Arf6 and its activator EFA6D in the granular convoluted tubule cells of mouse submandibular glands under normal conditions and when stimulated by isoproterenol, noradrenaline and carbachol

OBJECTIVE

This study proposed to investigate the localization at light and electron microscopic levels of Arf6 and its activator EFA6D in the mouse submandibular gland (SMG) under normal conditions and when stimulated by adrenergic or cholinergic agonists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SMGs of male adult mice were utilized for immunoblotting and immuno-light and -electron microscopic analyses. Isoproterenol and noradrenalin were used as adrenergics, while carbachol was used for the cholinergic stimulant. SMGs were examined at 15, 30, 60 and 120min after intraperitoneal injection of these agents.

RESULTS

Immunoreactivities for both Arf6 and its activator EFA6D were similarly intense in the basolateral domain of GCTs, but no significant immunoreactivities were seen in the apical domain of GCT cells or any domain of acinar cells under normal conditions. In immuno-electron microscopy, the immunoreactive materials were mainly deposited on the basolateral plasma membranes and subjacent cytoplasm. Shortly after injection of isoproterenol and noradrenaline, but not carbachol, the immunoreactivities for both molecules were additionally seen on the apical plasmalemma of most, if not all, GCT cells, but not acinar cells.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that the direct involvement of Arf6/EFA6D in regulatory exocytosis at the apical plasma membrane of acinar and GCT cells is apparently to be smaller, if present, than that of endocytosis at the basolateral membranes of GCT cells under normal conditions. This also suggests that the two molecules function additionally at the apical membrane of GCT cells for modulation of saliva secretion under β-adrenoceptor stimulation.

New insights into mechanisms of nuclear translocation of G-protein coupled receptors

The G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling was long believed to involve activation of receptor exclusively at the cell surface, followed by its binding to heterotrimeric G-proteins and arrestins to trigger various intracellular signaling cascades, and termination of signaling by internalization of the receptor. It is now accepted that many GPCRs continue to signal after internalization in the endosomes. Since the breakthrough discoveries of nuclear binding sites for their ligands in 1980s, several GPCRs have been detected at cell nuclei. But mechanisms of nuclear localization of GPCRs, many of whom contain putative nuclear localization signals, remain poorly understood to date. Nevertheless, it is known that subcellular trafficking of GPCRs is regulated by members of Ras superfamily of small GTPases, most notably by Rab and Arf GTPases. In this commentary, we highlight several recent studies which suggest novel roles of small GTPases, importins and sorting nexin proteins in the nuclear translocation of GPCRs via vesicular transport pathways. Taken together with increasing evidence for in vivo functionality of the nuclear GPCRs, better understanding of their trafficking will provide valuable clues in cell biology.

EFA6 regulates lumen formation through alpha-actinin 1

A key step of epithelial morphogenesis is the creation of the lumen. Luminogenesis by hollowing proceeds through the fusion of apical vesicles at cell-cell contact. The small nascent lumens grow through extension, coalescence and enlargement coordinated with cell division to give rise to a single central lumen. Here, using MDCK cells grown in 3D-culture, we show that EFA6A participates in luminogenesis. EFA6A recruits α-actinin 1 (ACTN1) through direct binding. In polarized cells, ACTN1 was found to be enriched at the tight junction where it acts as a primary effector of EFA6A for normal luminogenesis. Both proteins are essential for the lumen extension and enlargement, where they mediate their effect by regulating the cortical acto-myosin contractility. Finally, ACTN1 was also found to act as an effector for the isoform EFA6B in the human mammary tumoral MCF7 cell line. EFA6B restored the glandular morphology of this tumoral cell line in an ACTN1-dependent manner. Thus, we identified new regulators of cyst luminogenesis essential for the proper maturation of a newly-formed lumen into a single central lumen.

The small GTPase ARF6 regulates protein trafficking to control cellular function during development and in disease

The activation of the small GTPase ARF6 has been implicated in promoting several pathological processes related to vascular instability and tumor formation, growth, and metastasis. ARF6 also plays a vital role during embryonic development. Recent studies have suggested that ARF6 carries out these disparate functions primarily by controlling protein trafficking within the cell. ARF6 helps direct proteins to intracellular or extracellular locations where they function in normal cellular responses during development and in pathological processes later in life. This transport of proteins is accomplished through a variety of mechanisms, including endocytosis and recycling, microvesicle release, and as yet uncharacterized processes. This Commentary will explore the functions of ARF6, while focusing on the role of this small GTPase in development and postnatal physiology, regulating barrier function and diseases associated with its loss, and tumor formation, growth, and metastasis.

ADP Ribosylation Factor 6 Regulates Neuronal Migration in the Developing Cerebral Cortex through FIP3/Arfophilin-1-dependent Endosomal Trafficking of N-cadherin

During neural development, endosomal trafficking controls cell shape and motility through the polarized transport of membrane proteins related to cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions. ADP ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) is a critical small GTPase that regulates membrane trafficking between the plasma membrane and endosomes. We herein demonstrated that the knockdown of endogenous Arf6 in mouse cerebral cortices led to impaired neuronal migration in the intermediate zone and cytoplasmic retention of N-cadherin and syntaxin12 in migrating neurons. Rescue experiments with separation-of-function Arf6 mutants identified Rab11 family-interacting protein 3 (FIP3)/Arfophilin-1, a dual effector for Arf6 and Rab11, as a downstream effector of Arf6 in migrating neurons. The knockdown of FIP3 led to impaired neuronal migration in the intermediate zone and cytoplasmic retention of N-cadherin in migrating neurons, similar to that of Arf6, which could be rescued by the coexpression of wild-type FIP3 but not FIP3 mutants lacking the binding site for Arf6 or Rab11. These results suggest that Arf6 regulates cortical neuronal migration in the intermediate zone through the FIP3-dependent endosomal trafficking.

Distinct subcellular localization of alternative splicing variants of EFA6D, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Arf6, in the mouse brain

EFA6D (guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ADP-ribosylation factor 6 [Arf6]D) is also known as EFA6R, Psd3, and HCA67. It is the fourth member of the EFA6 family with guanine nucleotide exchange activity for Arf6, a small guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) that regulates endosomal trafficking and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. We propose a classification and nomenclature of 10 EFA6D variants deposited in the GenBank database as EFA6D1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1s, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, and 2s based on the combination of N-terminal and C-terminal insertions. Polymerase chain reaction analysis showed the expression of all EFA6D variants except for variants a and d in the adult mouse brain. Immunoblotting analysis with novel variant-specific antibodies showed the endogenous expression of EFA6D1b, EFA6D1c, and EFA6D1s at the protein level, with the highest expression being EFA6D1s, in the brain. Immunoblotting analysis of forebrain subcellular fractions showed the distinct subcellular distribution of EFA6D1b/c and EFA6D1s. The immunohistochemical analysis revealed distinct but overlapping immunoreactive patterns between EFA6D1b/c and EFA6D1s in the mouse brain. In immunoelectron microscopic analyses of the hippocampal CA3 region, EFA6D1b/c was present predominantly in the mossy fiber axons of dentate granule cells, whereas EFA6D1s was present abundantly in the cell bodies, dendritic shafts, and spines of hippocampal pyramidal cells. These results provide the first anatomical evidence suggesting the functional diversity of EFA6D variants, particularly EFA6D1b/c and EFA6D1s, in neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:2531-2552, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

β-Arrestin-mediated Angiotensin II Signaling Controls the Activation of ARF6 Protein and Endocytosis in Migration of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is a vasopressive hormone but is also a potent activator of cellular migration. We have previously shown that it can promote the activation of the GTPase ARF6 in a heterologous overexpressing system. The molecular mechanisms by which receptors control the activation of this small G protein remain, however, largely unknown. Furthermore, how ARF6 coordinates the activation of complex cellular responses needs to be further elucidated. In this study, we demonstrate that Ang II receptors engage β-arrestin, but not Gq, to mediate ARF6 activation in HEK 293 cells. To further confirm the key role of β-arrestin proteins, we overexpressed β-arrestin2-(1-320), a dominant negative mutant known to block receptor endocytosis. We show that expression of this truncated construct does not support the activation of the GTPase nor cell migration. Interestingly, β-arrestin2 can interact with the ARF guanine nucleotide exchange factor ARNO, although the C-terminally lacking mutant does not. We finally examined whether receptor endocytosis controlled ARF6 activation and cell migration. Although the clathrin inhibitor PitStop2 did not impact the ability of Ang II to activate ARF6, cell migration was markedly impaired. To further show that ARF activation regulates key signaling events leading to migration, we also examined MAPK activation. We demonstrate that this signaling axis is relevant in smooth muscle cells of the vasculature. Altogether, our findings show for the first time that Ang II receptor signaling to β-arrestin regulates ARF6 activation. These proteins together control receptor endocytosis and ultimately cell migration.

Structural and functional interactions between six-transmembrane μ-opioid receptors and β2-adrenoreceptors modulate opioid signaling

The primary molecular target for clinically used opioids is the μ-opioid receptor (MOR). Besides the major seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, the MOR gene codes for alternatively spliced six-transmembrane (6TM) isoforms, the biological and clinical significance of which remains unclear. Here, we show that the otherwise exclusively intracellular localized 6TM-MOR translocates to the plasma membrane upon coexpression with β₂-adrenergic receptors (β₂-ARs) through an interaction with the fifth and sixth helices of β₂-AR. Coexpression of the two receptors in BE(2)-C neuroblastoma cells potentiates calcium responses to a 6TM-MOR ligand, and this calcium response is completely blocked by a selective β₂-antagonist in BE(2)-C cells, and in trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia. Co-administration of 6TM-MOR and β₂-AR ligands leads to substantial analgesic synergy and completely reverses opioid-induced hyperalgesia in rodent behavioral models. Together, our results provide evidence that the heterodimerization of 6TM-MOR with β₂-AR underlies a molecular mechanism for 6TM cellular signaling, presenting a unique functional responses to opioids. This signaling pathway may contribute to the hyperalgesic effects of opioids that can be efficiently blocked by β₂-AR antagonists, providing a new avenue for opioid therapy.

Regulators and Effectors of Arf GTPases in Neutrophils

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) are key innate immune cells that represent the first line of defence against infection. They are the first leukocytes to migrate from the blood to injured or infected sites. This process involves molecular mechanisms that coordinate cell polarization, delivery of receptors, and activation of integrins at the leading edge of migrating PMNs. These phagocytes actively engulf microorganisms or form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) to trap and kill pathogens with bactericidal compounds. Association of the NADPH oxidase complex at the phagosomal membrane for production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and delivery of proteolytic enzymes into the phagosome initiate pathogen killing and removal. G protein-dependent signalling pathways tightly control PMN functions. In this review, we will focus on the small monomeric GTPases of the Arf family and their guanine exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) as components of signalling cascades regulating PMN responses. GEFs and GAPs are multidomain proteins that control cellular events in time and space through interaction with other proteins and lipids inside the cells. The number of Arf GAPs identified in PMNs is expanding, and dissecting their functions will provide important insights into the role of these proteins in PMN physiology.

The Molecular Mechanism Underlying Continuous Exercise Training-Induced Adaptive Changes of Lipolysis in White Adipose Cells

Physical exercise accelerates the mobilization of free fatty acids from white adipocytes to provide fuel for energy. This happens in several tissues and helps to regulate a whole-body state of metabolism. Under these conditions, the hydrolysis of triacylglycerol (TG) that is found in white adipocytes is known to be augmented via the activation of these lipolytic events, which is referred to as the "lipolytic cascade." Indeed, evidence has shown that the lipolytic responses in white adipocytes are upregulated by continuous exercise training (ET) through the adaptive changes in molecules that constitute the lipolytic cascade. During the past few decades, many lipolysis-related molecules have been identified. Of note, the discovery of a new lipase, known as adipose triglyceride lipase, has redefined the existing concepts of the hormone-sensitive lipase-dependent hydrolysis of TG in white adipocytes. This review outlines the alterations in the lipolytic molecules of white adipocytes that result from ET, which includes the molecular regulation of TG lipases through the lipolytic cascade.

Silent but not dumb: how cellular trafficking and pore gating modulate expression of TWIK1 and THIK2

Among K2P channels, a few of them turned out to be difficult to express in heterologous systems and were coined "silent subunits". Recent studies have shed light on the mechanisms behind this apparent lack of channel activity at the plasma membrane. For TWIK1 and THIK2 channels, silence is related to a combination of intracellular retention and low intrinsic activity. TWIK1 is constitutively endocytosed from the plasma membrane before being transported to recycling endosomes, whereas THIK2 is restricted to endoplasmic reticulum. These intracellular localizations are related to trafficking signals located in the cytoplasmic parts of the channels. When these motifs are mutated or masked, channels are redistributed at the plasma membrane and produce measurable currents. However, these currents are of modest amplitude. This weak basal activity is due to a hydrophobic barrier in the deep pore that limits water and ions in the conduction pathway. Other silent channels KCNK7, TWIK2, and TASK5 are still under study. Expression and characterization of these K2P channels pave the way for a better understanding of the mechanisms controlling intracellular trafficking of membrane proteins, ion conduction, and channel gating.

EFA6 controls Arf1 and Arf6 activation through a negative feedback loop

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) of the exchange factor for Arf6 (EFA6), brefeldin A-resistant Arf guanine nucleotide exchange factor (BRAG), and cytohesin subfamilies activate small GTPases of the Arf family in endocytic events. These ArfGEFs carry a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain in tandem with their catalytic Sec7 domain, which is autoinhibitory and supports a positive feedback loop in cytohesins but not in BRAGs, and has an as-yet unknown role in EFA6 regulation. In this study, we analyzed how EFA6A is regulated by its PH and C terminus (Ct) domains by reconstituting its GDP/GTP exchange activity on membranes. We found that EFA6 has a previously unappreciated high efficiency toward Arf1 on membranes and that, similar to BRAGs, its PH domain is not autoinhibitory and strongly potentiates nucleotide exchange on anionic liposomes. However, in striking contrast to both cytohesins and BRAGs, EFA6 is regulated by a negative feedback loop, which is mediated by an allosteric interaction of Arf6-GTP with the PH-Ct domain of EFA6 and monitors the activation of Arf1 and Arf6 differentially. These observations reveal that EFA6, BRAG, and cytohesins have unanticipated commonalities associated with divergent regulatory regimes. An important implication is that EFA6 and cytohesins may combine in a mixed negative-positive feedback loop. By allowing EFA6 to sustain a pool of dormant Arf6-GTP, such a circuit would fulfill the absolute requirement of cytohesins for activation by Arf-GTP before amplification of their GEF activity by their positive feedback loop.

Arf6 exchange factor EFA6 and endophilin directly interact at the plasma membrane to control clathrin-mediated endocytosis

Members of the Arf family of small G proteins are involved in membrane traffic and organelle structure. They control the recruitment of coat proteins, and modulate the structure of actin filaments and the lipid composition of membranes. The ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) isoform and the exchange factor for Arf6 (EFA6) are known to regulate the endocytic pathway of many different receptors. To determine the molecular mechanism of the EFA6/Arf6 function in vesicular transport, we searched for new EFA6 partners. In a two-hybrid screening using the catalytic Sec7 domain as a bait, we identified endophilin as a new partner of EFA6. Endophilin contains a Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain responsible for membrane bending, and an SH3 domain responsible for the recruitment of dynamin and synaptojanin, two proteins involved, respectively, in the fission and uncoating of clathrin-coated vesicles. By using purified proteins, we confirmed the direct interaction, and identified the N-BAR domain as the binding motif to EFA6A. We showed that endophilin stimulates the catalytic activity of EFA6A on Arf6. In addition, we observed that the Sec7 domain competes with flat but not with highly curved lipid membranes to bind the N-BAR. In cells, expression of EFA6A recruits endophilin to EFA6A-positive plasma membrane ruffles, whereas expression of endophilin rescues the EFA6A-mediated inhibition of transferrin internalization. Overall, our results support a model whereby EFA6 recruits endophilin on flat areas of the plasma membrane to control Arf6 activation and clathrin-mediated endocytosis.

β-arrestins and G protein-coupled receptor trafficking

Nonvisual arrestins (β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2) are adaptor proteins that function to regulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling and trafficking. β-arrestins are ubiquitously expressed and function to inhibit GPCR/G protein coupling, a process called desensitization, and promote GPCR trafficking and arrestin-mediated signaling. β-arrestin-mediated endocytosis of GPCRs requires the coordinated interaction of β-arrestins with clathrin, adaptor protein 2 (AP2), and phosphoinositides. These interactions are facilitated by a conformational change in β-arrestin that is thought to occur upon binding to a phosphorylated activated GPCR. In this review, we provide an overview of the key interactions involved in β-arrestin-mediated trafficking of GPCRs.

Role of β-arrestins and arrestin domain-containing proteins in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking

The arrestin clan can now be broadly divided into three structurally similar subgroups: the originally identified arrestins (visual and β-arrestins), the α-arrestins and a group of Vps26-related proteins. The visual and β-arrestins selectively bind to agonist-occupied phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and inhibit GPCR coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins while the β-arrestins also function as adaptor proteins to regulate GPCR trafficking and G protein-independent signaling. The α-arrestins have also recently been implicated in regulating GPCR trafficking while Vps26 regulates retrograde trafficking. In this review, we provide an overview of the α-arrestins and β-arrestins with a focus on our current understanding of how these adaptor proteins regulate GPCR trafficking.

EFA6A, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Arf6, interacts with sorting nexin-1 and regulates neurite outgrowth

The membrane trafficking and actin cytoskeleton remodeling mediated by ADP ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) are functionally linked to various neuronal processes including neurite formation and maintenance, neurotransmitter release, and receptor internalization. EFA6A is an Arf6-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor that is abundantly expressed in the brain. In this study, we identified sorting nexin-1 (SNX1), a retromer component that is implicated in endosomal sorting and trafficking, as a novel interacting partner for EFA6A by yeast two-hybrid screening. The interaction was mediated by the C-terminal region of EFA6A and a BAR domain of SNX1, and further confirmed by pull-down assay and immunoprecipitation from mouse brain lysates. In situ hybridization analysis demonstrated the widespread expression of SNX1 in the mouse brain, which overlapped with the expression of EFA6A in the forebrain. Immunofluorescent analysis revealed the partial colocalization of EFA6A and SNX1 in the dendritic fields of the hippocampus. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis revealed the overlapping subcellular localization of EFA6A and SNX1 at the post-synaptic density and endosomes in dendritic spines. In Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells, expression of either EFA6A or SNX1 induced neurite outgrowth, which was further enhanced by co-expression of EFA6A and SNX1. The present findings suggest a novel mechanism by which EFA6A regulates Arf6-mediated neurite formation through the interaction with SNX1.

The Arf GAP AGAP2 interacts with β-arrestin2 and regulates β2-adrenergic receptor recycling and ERK activation

AGAP2 [Arf (ADP-ribosylation factor) GAP (GTPase-activating protein) with GTP-binding-protein-like, ankyrin repeat and PH (pleckstrin homology) domains] is a multidomain Arf GAP that was shown to promote the fast recycling of transferrin receptors. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that AGAP2 regulates the trafficking of β2-adrenergic receptors. We found that AGAP2 formed a complex with β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2, proteins that are known to regulate β2-adrenergic receptor signalling and trafficking. AGAP2 co-localized with β-arrestin2 on the plasma membrane, and knockdown of AGAP2 expression reduced plasma membrane association of β-arrestin2 upon β2-adrenergic receptor activation. AGAP2 also co-localized with internalized β2-adrenergic receptors on endosomes, and overexpression of AGAP2 slowed accumulation of β2-adrenergic receptor in the perinuclear recycling endosomes. In contrast, knockdown of AGAP2 expression prevented the recycling of the β2-adrenergic receptor back to the plasma membrane. In addition, AGAP2 formed a complex with endogenous ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) and overexpression of AGAP2 potentiated ERK phosphorylation induced by β2-adrenergic receptors. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that AGAP2 plays a role in the signalling and recycling of β2-adrenergic receptors.

Rab family proteins regulate the endosomal trafficking and function of RGS4

RGS4, a heterotrimeric G-protein inhibitor, localizes to plasma membrane (PM) and endosomal compartments. Here, we examined Rab-mediated control of RGS4 internalization and recycling. Wild type and constitutively active Rab5 decreased RGS4 PM levels while increasing its endosomal targeting. Rab5, however, did not appreciably affect the PM localization or function of the M1 muscarinic receptor (M1R)/Gq signaling cascade. RGS4-containing endosomes co-localized with subsets of Rab5-, transferrin receptor-, and Lamp1/Lysotracker-marked compartments suggesting RGS4 traffics through PM recycling or acidified endosome pathways. Rab7 activity promoted TGN association, whereas Rab7(dominant negative) trapped RGS4 in late endosomes. Furthermore, RGS4 was found to co-localize with an endosomal pool marked by Rab11, the protein that mediates recycling/sorting of proteins to the PM. The Cys-12 residue in RGS4 appeared important for its Rab11-mediated trafficking to the PM. Rab11(dominant negative) decreased RGS4 PM levels and increased the number of RGS4-containing endosomes. Inhibition of Rab11 activity decreased RGS4 function as an inhibitor of M1R activity without affecting localization and function of the M1R/Gq signaling complex. Thus, both Rab5 activation and Rab11 inhibition decreased RGS4 function in a manner that is independent from their effects on the localization and function of the M1R/Gq signaling complex. This is the first study to implicate Rab GTPases in the intracellular trafficking of an RGS protein. Thus, Rab GTPases may be novel molecular targets for the selective regulation of M1R-mediated signaling via their specific effects on RGS4 trafficking and function.

From atomic structures to neuronal functions of g protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are essential mediators of signal transduction, neurotransmission, ion channel regulation, and other cellular events. GPCRs are activated by diverse stimuli, including light, enzymatic processing of their N-termini, and binding of proteins, peptides, or small molecules such as neurotransmitters. GPCR dysfunction caused by receptor mutations and environmental challenges contributes to many neurological diseases. Moreover, modern genetic technology has helped identify a rich array of mono- and multigenic defects in humans and animal models that connect such receptor dysfunction with disease affecting neuronal function. The visual system is especially suited to investigate GPCR structure and function because advanced imaging techniques permit structural studies of photoreceptor neurons at both macro and molecular levels that, together with biochemical and physiological assessment in animal models, provide a more complete understanding of GPCR signaling.

β-Arrestins: modulators of small GTPase activation and function

Most cellular events responsible for accurate G protein-coupled receptor trafficking involve small GTP-binding proteins. For example, trafficking of receptors via the endocytic and exocytic pathways requires activation of ADP-ribosylation factors and Rab proteins, while receptor-mediated complex responses such as migration are well characterized to be dependent upon Rho family members. Because β-arrestin proteins are recruited to activated receptors and now considered as key signaling molecules, whether they act to control small GTPase activity remains a subject of great interest. Over the years, considerable evidence has suggested that β-arrestins and GTPases might be effectors of the same signaling pathways. One example is the roles of both β-arrestin and Ras, the prototypical GTPase, in coordinating activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Recently developed tools effective in suppressing the expression of β-arrestins will help define whether they are essential for small G protein activation. Furthermore, novel approaches to identify protein complexes will greatly advance our understanding of the possible cross talk between β-arrestin and small GTPases.