Surgical management and outcome in primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel

Intestinal obstruction caused by early stage primary ileum adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Ileum adenocarcinoma (IA), a type of small bowel adenocarcinoma, is a rather uncommon factor associated with obstruction in small bowel. Owing to its location and indefinite clinical symptoms, the diagnosis of IA is difficult, and survival is usually poor. With respect to the rarity of this disease, very few studies have reported such cases to provide a reference for treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

In this manuscript, a case of a 48-year-old man presented with chronic right lower abdominal pain and distention, queasiness and emesis. A computed tomography scan revealed intestinal wall thickening and an intestinal obstruction in the terminal ileum. He was diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. However, his symptoms were not relieved after conservative treatment. The patient subsequently underwent exploratory laparotomy, and a tumour in the ileum measuring approximately 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm that was located 20 cm from the ileocolic valve was discovered incidentally and was operatively resected along with the enlarged lymph nodes. Pathological examination revealed a stage IIA (T3N0M0) ulcerative IA. Along with imaging examinations, a diagnosis of primary IA with no lymph or distant metastases was considered. The patient was discharged and recovered well as of the writing of this manuscript.

CONCLUSION

IA should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases of intestinal obstruction, and the recommended method for local disease treatment is surgery.

Association between tumor size and prognosis in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma-a SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

The association between small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) tumor size and prognosis is unclear, and we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to assess the prognostic value of SBA tumor size.

METHODS

Patients with postoperative SBA were selected from the SEER database, and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were used as outcome variables. Tumor size was used as a categorical and continuous variable, respectively, to adjust for confounders and analyze the association between SBA tumor size and prognosis using Cox proportional hazard regression, and the results were visualized using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the statistical correlation between tumor size and tumor invasion depth (T-stage). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate OS at different T stages.

RESULTS

When the tumor size was analyzed as a quantitative variable, the adjusted covariate model showed that the HR was 1.008 (P = 0.04) for OS and 1.021 (P = 0.03) for CSS. And regardless of OS or CSS, when the tumor size < 3-4 cm, there was a close linear relationship between tumor size and HR. What's more, in the SEER database, the 5-year survival rates of T1, T2, T3 and T4 patients were 81.8 %, 81.1 %, 66.0 % and 50.9 % (P < 0.001) according to AJCC T-stage. However, in the modified T-stage (mT), these rates were 82.8 %, 70.6 %, 60.7 % and 39.8 % (P < 0.001). When patients within each of the AJCC T stages were stratified by mT stages, significant survival heterogeneity was observed within each of the AJCC T1 to T4 stages(P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When tumor size is used in a quantitative way, tumor size is an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with SBA. Furthermore, we established a modified T-stage based on tumor size and depth of invasion.

Bibliometrics analysis on the research status and trends of small bowel adenocarcinoma: 1923-2023

Objectives

The aim of this research is to discuss the research status, hotspots, frontiers, and development trends in the field of small bowel adenocarcinoma based on bibliometrics and visual analysis by CiteSpace software.

Methods

The relevant research articles on SBA from 1923 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace software was used to form a visual knowledge map and conduct analysis for the countries/regions, journals, authors, keywords, clusters, research hotspots and frontiers of the included articles.

Results

There were 921 articles included, and the number of articles published during 1923-2023 is increasing. The country with the highest number of articles published was the United States (443, 38.76%), followed by Japan (84, 9.12%) and France (72, 7.82%). The author with the highest number of publications is Ansell, Overman MJ (33, 3.58%), and the author with the highest co-citation frequency is Overman MJ (218). Journal of Clinical Oncology is the journal with the highest publication frequency. The top five cluster groups were "chemotherapy", "inflammatory bowel disease", "celiac disease", "tumor" and "small intestine". The related disease, chemotherapy drugs, and treatment regimens of SBA form the main research fields, and prognosis and diagnosis are the research hotspots and trends.

Conclusion

The global research field in SBA has expanded in the past 100 years. The prognosis and new diagnosis of SBA are hotspots in this field and require further study in the future.

Small bowel adenocarcinomas with favorable prognoses by radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a case series of five cases

BACKGROUND

Small bowel cancer is very rare, accounting for less than 5% of all gastrointestinal cancers, and small bowel adenocarcinoma accounts for approximately 40% of all small bowel cancers. Small bowel adenocarcinoma is often found in advanced stages, with only 40-65% of cases being curatively resectable. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 14-33% for all patients and 40-60% for those who are curatively resectable. In Japan, practice guidelines for duodenal cancer were instituted in 2021. However, evidence-based standard treatments have not been established for jejunal and ileal cancers. In particular, chemotherapeutic options are limited, and there are only a few reports on multidisciplinary treatments, including adjuvant chemotherapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report five cases of jejunal or ileal lesions that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection. Three patients were male and two were female, with a median age of 67 years. Tumor localization was observed in the jejunum in all cases. Clinical staging was as follows: stage IIIA in two cases and stage IIIB in three cases. Laparotomy was then performed in all cases, employing partial resection with lymph node dissection. Pathological staging in all cases was as follows: stage IIB in two cases, stage IIIA in one case, and stage IIIB in two cases. In all cases, the regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy was selected based on the colorectal cancer guidelines. No serious complications arose from adjuvant therapy; however, adverse events occurred in patients receiving multi-agent chemotherapy. No recurrence was observed in any of the cases, and all the patients survived, with a median survival time of 32 months. As a representative case, we present a case of adjuvant chemotherapy for jejunal adenocarcinoma staged as pT3N2M0, pStage IIIB, with no recurrence at 32 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, favorable outcomes were achieved with adjuvant therapy applied in accordance with the criteria for colorectal cancer. These favorable outcomes suggest that it is necessary to identify the risk factors and indications for adjuvant therapy, specifically for small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit according to T and N stage in small bowel adenocarcinoma: a large retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized disease is still debated.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included all consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for localized small bowel adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2019 from 3 French cohort studies. Prognostic and predictive factors of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy were analyzed for disease-free survival and overall survival. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was applied in the Cox regression model using the propensity score derived from multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 354 patients were included: median age, 63.5 years; duodenum location, 53.5%; and tumor stage I, II, and III in 31 (8.7%), 144 (40.7%), and 179 (50.6%) patients, respectively. The adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 0 (0%), 66 (48.5%), and 143 (80.3%) patients with stage I, II, and III, respectively (P < .0001). In the subgroup analysis by inverse probability of treatment weighting method, a statistically significant disease-free survival and overall survival benefit in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in high-risk stage II (T4 and/or <8 lymph nodes examined) and III (T4 and/or N2) but not for low-risk stage II (T3 and ≥8 lymph nodes examined) and III (T1-3/N1) tumors (Pinteraction < .05). Furthermore, tumor location in jejunum and ileum was also a statistically significant predictive factor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III tumors (Pinteraction < .05).

CONCLUSION

In localized small bowel adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to provide a statistically significant survival benefit for high-risk stage II and III tumors and for jejunum and ileum tumor locations.

Robotic low anterior resection of rectal metastasis from small bowel adenocarcinoma: A case report

A 69-year-old female underwent laparoscopic ileal partial resection for ileal adenocarcinoma. Pathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (UICC 8th; T4N0M0 StageIIB). The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin. Fourteen months after surgery, computed tomography revealed a mass in the upper rectum. Colonoscopy detected a submucosal protruding mass and a biopsy specimen showed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Robotic low anterior resection was performed. The tumor was located in the upper rectum and there was no macroscopic invasion or peritoneal dissemination. Pathologically, the tumor was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma located within the rectal wall with little evidence of a carcinoma component in the mucosal lining. Immunohistochemistry showed the same pattern as the previous ileal adenocarcinoma: negativity for cytokeratin 7 and positivity for cytokeratin 20 and caudal-type homeobox 2. In combination with the rectum showing no abnormalities in colonoscopy performed 15 mo previously, the mass was considered hematogenous metastasis from small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Jejunal Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction

Jejunal adenocarcinoma (JA) is both a rare type of gastrointestinal malignancy and an uncommon cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO). It typically presents with vague symptoms, such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and, in some cases, weight loss. Due to this vague presentation as well as lack of definitive imaging techniques, diagnosis tends to be delayed and patients typically present at later stages. We present a case of a patient who presented with acute onset abdominal pain. Imaging revealed the presence of an SBO with the presence of a suspicious small bowel stricture. He eventually underwent upper endoscopy to find the mass, with subsequent biopsy indicating JA. We hope to bring greater awareness to jejunal carcinoma as a potent cause of SBO in adults.

Prognostic implication of SOX2 expression in small intestinal adenocarcinoma

The presence of KRAS mutation enhances the stem cell features of colorectal carcinoma cells containing mutant adenomatous polyposis coli (APC). However, their potential role in small intestinal adenocarcinoma remains elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical significance of cancer stem cell markers expression in the context of small intestinal adenocarcinoma with the KRAS genotype. SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis, and their potential association with KRAS was further examined in 185 Korean patients with small intestinal adenocarcinomas, which were collected from 22 institutions in South Korea. Positive expression of SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4 was detected in 65 (35.1%), 94 (50.8%), and 82 (44.3%) of patients, respectively. Patients with high SOX2 (SOX2+) expression displayed worse overall survival compared to those with low SOX2 (SOX2-) expression (P < 0.001). Patients with SOX2+/mutant KRAS (KRAS^MT) (11.1 months) had significantly shorter overall survival than those with SOX2-/KRAS^WT (53.6 months) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, SOX2+, distal location, high pT and pN categories, microsatellite stable, and absence of predisposing diseases were independent prognostic factors for worse overall survival. These results suggest that SOX2 expression has the potential to predict clinical outcomes in patients with small intestinal adenocarcinomas.

Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of different histological types of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database

PURPOSE

This aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), mucinous small bowel adenocarcinoma (MSBA), and signet ring cell carcinoma of the small bowel (SRCSB).

METHODS

Information on patients with SBA, MSBA, and SRCSB (2004-2015) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the survival analyses. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was implemented to determine the differences among these tumors.

RESULTS

In all, 3697 patients with SBA (n = 3196), MSBA (n = 325) and SRCSB (n = 176) were ultimately eligible for this study. Poor differentiation, local invasion, and lymph node metastasis were more likely to be observed in SRCSB than in SBA and MSBA. Surgery was the most common treatment modality in all groups. The prognosis of SBA was similar to that of MSBA, but better than that of SRCSB in both unmatched and matched cohorts. M stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors of survival in all patients. Surgery and chemotherapy could significantly improve outcomes in all groups before and after PSM. Radiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with SBA, but this trend was not maintained after PSM. Survival advantages of SBA and MSBA were remarkable in the stratified analysis of surgery after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SRCSB had the worst prognosis among all histological types examined. However, surgery and chemotherapy could improve patients survival, regardless of histological type.

Laparoscopic segmental resection for tumours of the Angle of Treitz: a challenging but feasible surgical option. Results from a retrospective case-series analysis

Tumours of the small intestine are rare and account for about 5% of gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. The angle of Treitz (AT) could be defined as the intestinal loop comprised between the third duodenal portion and the first 10 cm of jejunum. A gold standard surgical treatment for AT neoplasm has not yet been well defined. This paper is focused on a very rare disease and at the best of our knowledge this is the largest case series in the literature about the Laparoscopic Segmental Resection (LSR) of AT tumours. Using a prospectively collected database, all data of consecutive patients, from January 2007 to May 2019, who underwent LSR for AT tumours at two different institutions were analysed. Patients' demographics, intra and post-operative data, 30-day mortality and overall survival were collected. A total of 16 patients were retrieved from our database. The mean operative time was 206,5 ± 79 min. Conversion to open surgery was needed in two cases due to tumor size and, respectively, invasion of the transverse colon which required a multivisceral resection. The mean distal and proximal resection margins were 7.4 ± 2.2 and 3.9 ± 1.2 cm. The median number of harvested nodes was 9 ± 3. Pathological diagnosis was GIST in 11 cases, adenocarcinoma in 4 and sarcoma in 1 case. In conclusion, in experienced hands, LSR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for tumours of the AT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with Crohn's disease

Introduction

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is an unusual complication of Crohn’s disease (CD).

Aim

To describe the incidence rate, clinical features, and outcomes of SBA in a group of subsequent patients with CD.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analysed outpatient and hospital records and identified a group of patients with diagnosed CD. Then we reviewed all medical records of patients who reported for follow-up visits in a 14-year period. We identified a group of 103 patients, whose medical records were evaluated for the presence of SBA.

Results

Long-term follow-up carried out in the group of consecutively treated patients with CD revealed an 0.97% incidence rate of SBA. Cancer was located in the ileum and the clinical presentation was subileus and anaemia. The patient underwent ileocaecal resection, and the postoperative period was uneventful.

Conclusions

SBA is a rare complication of CD. Although the authors are aware that the number of patients enrolled in the study is insufficient to draw far-reaching conclusions, the results obtained are significant for determination of the incidence rate of SBA in the Caucasian population of patients with CD. The key issue of effective treatment of patients with SBA was early detection of the lesion and R0 resection with proper lymphadenectomy. However, it is worth noting that in more advanced stages of SBA the future belongs to, and outcome improvement depends on, new regimes of adjuvant personalised chemotherapies. Further studies on the mechanisms of carcinogenesis in patients with CD are essential.

Jejunal Adenocarcinoma as a Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction: A Case Report

Jejunal adenocarcinoma, a small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), is a rare cause of small bowel obstruction. Jejunal adenocarcinoma classically presents with vague clinical symptoms, i.e., abdominal pain, discomfort, and weight loss, making timely diagnosis challenging. Owing to its diagnosis at a late stage, the prognosis of jejunal adenocarcinoma is poor. Curative resection of the tumor at the early stages remains a treatment of choice. Here, we report a case of a 55-year-old man presenting with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and relative constipation. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed dilated small bowel loops. Exploratory laparotomy was performed, which revealed a jejunal stricture and dilated small bowel loops proximal to it. Suspicious stricture, along with the diseased portion of the intestine, was removed through en-bloc resection. Histopathology and metastatic workup revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with stage IIB (T4aN0M0). We conclude that, although rare, jejunal adenocarcinoma should be kept in mind when dealing with a patient presenting with symptoms indicating small bowel obstruction. Our purpose is to emphasize laparotomy as both a diagnostic and surgical modality for SBAs in early stages, especially in setups of low economic countries where advanced imaging techniques are relatively inaccessible.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinomas: Impact of Location on Survival

BACKGROUND

Proximal (duodenal) small bowel adenocarcinomas have a worse prognosis than distal (jejuno-ileal) tumors, but differences in patient, tumor, and treatment factors between locations remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients in the National Cancer Database with surgically resected pathologic stage I-IV small bowel adenocarcinomas between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed. Clinical stage IV patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Proximal tumors (n = 3767) were more likely to be higher grade (OR 1.52, CI 1.22-1.85 for moderately; OR 1.83, CI 1.49-2.33 for poorly differentiated, P < 0.01 for both) and have positive lymph nodes (OR 2.04, CI 1.30-3.23, P < 0.01), while distal tumors (n = 3252) were likely to be larger (OR 1.31, CI 1.07-1.60 for size > 5 cm, P < 0.01). Proximal tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) and stage-specific survival compared with distal tumors (all P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort showed worse survival with community versus academic cancer programs, higher comorbidity scores, pathologic stage IV, poorly differentiated histology, positive nodal or margin status, and proximal location, while female gender, larger tumor size, and chemotherapy predicted better survival. On separate Cox regression analyses of each location, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS in the proximal cohort (HR 0.70, CI 0.55-0.88, P < 0.01), while adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS for both proximal (HR 0.49, CI 0.42-0.57, P < 0.01) and distal tumors (HR 0.68, CI 0.57-0.81, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal small bowel adenocarcinomas are associated with worse overall and stage-specific survival. This may be due to tumor biologic differences as proximal tumors were more likely to have higher grade. Future studies should further investigate differences between proximal and distal tumors to guide targeted treatment algorithms.

Clinical outcomes of patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma and intestinal-type papilla of Vater adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intestinal-type papilla of Vater adenocarcinoma (it-PVA) are rare malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract. Current therapeutic options are translated nowadays from treatment strategies for patients with colorectal cancer due to histopathological similarities.

AIM

To retrospectively investigate the clinical outcome of patients with DA and it-PVA.

METHODS

All patients with DA and it-PVA diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were included at two academic centers in the Netherlands. All patients with histopathologically-confirmed DA or it-PVA were eligible for inclusion. Clinical outcome was compared between DA and it-PVA per disease stage. In the subgroup of stage IV disease, survival after local treatment of oligometastases was compared with systemic therapy or supportive care.

RESULTS

In total, 155 patients with DA and it-PVA were included. Patients with it-PVA more often presented with stage I disease, while DA was more often diagnosed at stage IV (P < 0.001). Of all patients, 79% were treated with curative intent. The median survival was 39 mo, and no difference in survival was found for patients with DA and it-PVA after stratification for disease stage. Seven (23%) of 31 patients with synchronous stage IV disease underwent resection of the primary tumor, combined with local treatment of oligometastases. Local treatment of metastases was associated with an overall survival of 37 mo, compared to 14 and 6 mo for systemic therapy and supportive care, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with DA and it-PVA is comparable per disease stage. These results suggest a potential benefit for local treatment strategies in selected patients with oligometastases, although additional prospective studies are needed.

Novel Prognostic Factors in Resected Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy affecting approximately 3000 patients per year in the United States, and there is limited evidence prognosticating patients with resected SBA. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors and the role of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected SBA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-one patients who had resected stage I-III SBA were retrospectively identified at a single tertiary referral institution. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed to identify significant variables by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median OS for the entire group was 54.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.2-81.2 months), with 5- and 10-year OS of 48% and 35%. Median follow-up was 113.7 months (95% CI, 97.9-126.6 months). For patients with stage III disease who received adjuvant therapy, the median OS was 33.8 months (95% CI, 27.8-78.8) compared to 24.7 months (95% CI, 11.5-37.8) for patients with no adjuvant therapy (P < .01). Male sex, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, increased positive lymph node ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56, presence of residual disease, and earlier date of diagnosis predicted worse survival on univariate analysis. Age > 60 years, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56, and advanced T stage were identified as independent negative predictors of OS for all patients by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age, advanced T stage, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56 independently predicted survival in resected SBA. Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with resected stage III SBA.

Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in patients with non-ampullary small bowel adenocarcinoma: Long-term analysis

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a relatively rare malignancy in gastrointestinal tumors. In addition, the difficulty of early diagnosis, its poor prognosis compared to large bowel adenocarcinoma, and inadequate treatment experiences due to lack of prospective randomized trials make it necessary to explore the characteristics of the disease for early diagnosis and treatment.Patients diagnosed with primary malignant tumor of small intestine in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2001 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 208 patients with SBA were selected and 160 patients with duodenal periampullary tumor were excluded. Forty-two cases of patients were finally enrolled for statistical analysis as 6 patients were lost of follow-up. The clinical characteristics, the response to treatment and their overall survival (OS) time were reviewed and analyzed.Of the 42 patients, 11 (26.2%) primary tumors were originated from duodenum, 29 (69.0%) from jejunum, and 2 (4.8%) from ileum. All patients (64.3% male; median age, 54.7 years) included in this study underwent primary resection of the tumor to confirm final diagnosis. Three-year survival rate is 21% and 5-year survival rate is 9%. Median OS were 24.2 months (95% CI: 4.0-72.0). The univariate predictors for prognosis of SBA were as follows: age (P = .021), severe intestinal symptoms at first diagnosis (P < .001), T4 of tumor stage (P = .011), tumor size (P = .004), relatively late clinical stage (P < .001), peritoneal metastasis (P < .001), and no chemotherapy (P = .011). The multivariate predictors for poor prognosis were age of more than 60 years old (P = .035), intestinal obstruction or perforation at first diagnosis (P = .026), relatively late clinical stage (P = .000), and no chemotherapy (P = .027).SBA was a relatively rare malignancy that was difficult for early diagnosis and treatment. Intestinal obstruction was the common clinical manifestation at first diagnosis, with a tendency of early peritoneal metastasis. Precaution of the disease in early phase, radical resection of the primary tumor while resectable, followed with in-time chemotherapy might improve prognosis and survival of patients with SBA.

Randomized phase III trial of post-operative chemotherapy for patients with stage I/II/III small bowel adenocarcinoma (JCOG1502C, J-BALLAD)

A randomized phase III trial was initiated in May 2017 to confirm the superiority of post-operative therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin over observation in terms of relapse-free survival in patients with curatively resected small bowel adenocarcinoma. Total 150 patients will be enrolled from 20 Japanese institutions over a period of 6.5 years. Relapse-free survival is the primary endpoint, while the secondary endpoints are overall survival, disease-free survival as defined by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG), disease-free survival as defined by the International Rare Cancer Initiative (IRCI), and adverse events. Global phase III trial of IRCI to confirm the superiority of post-operative chemotherapy for small bowel adenocarcinoma was started in the UK in August 2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02502370). An integrated analysis of the IRCI trial and our study are planned. Our trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000027280 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Primary Jejunal Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Bilateral Ovarian Metastasis

Small intestinal tumors are rare with adenocarcinoma of the small intestine accounting for less than 2% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Primary jejunal adenocarcinoma constitutes a minute portion of small intestine adenocarcinomas. Clinically, this cancer presents at latter stages of its progression, mainly due to vague and non-specific symptoms, and the difficulty encountered in accessing the jejunum on upper endoscopy. Diagnosis of jejunal adenocarcinoma is usually inconclusive with the use of computed tomography (CT) scan, small bowel series, or upper endoscopy. Laparoscopy followed by frozen section biopsy provides a definitive diagnosis. In the past decade, balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) and capsule endoscopy have become popular as useful modalities for diagnosing small bowel diseases. Wide excisional jejunectomy is the only treatment option with an estimated 5-year survival of 40-65%. Physicians are advised to suspect jejunal adenocarcinoma as a differential diagnosis in patients who present with non-specific symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding or signs of small bowel obstruction. We present a rare case of a 37-year-old woman with suspected bilateral ovarian masses, which was immunohistochemically confirmed as primary jejunal adenocarcinoma with bilateral ovarian metastasis.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO)

BACKGROUND

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of small bowel adenocarcinoma published in October 2016.

METHOD

This collaborative work, co-directed by most French Medical Societies, summarizes clinical practice recommendations (guidelines) on the management of small bowel adenocarcinoma. Given the lack of specific data in the literature, all references are given by analogy with colon cancer. The classification used is the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) pTNM classification (7th edition 2009).

RESULTS

Small bowel adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis; less than 30% of patients survive for 5 years after the (first) diagnosis (5-year survival of less than 30%). Due to the rarity of the disease and the retrospective data, most recommendations are based on expert agreement. The initial evaluation is based on chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scan, CEA assay, GI endoscopy and colonoscopy in order detect lesions associated with a predisposing disease. Surgical treatment is currently the only curative option for stage I and II. Adjuvant chemotherapy can be discussed for Stage III and Stage II with T4 (expert agreement). With regard to metastatic tumors, treatment with fluoropyrimidine combined with platinum salts should be considered (expert agreement).

CONCLUSION

Few specific data exist in the literature on this type of tumor; most of the recommendations come from expert agreements or by analogy with colon cancer. Thus, each case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary team.

The characteristics and outcomes of small bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy that accounts for 1-2% of gastrointestinal tumours. We investigated the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of primary SBA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the characteristics and clinical courses of 205 SBA patients from 11 institutions in Japan between June 2002 and August 2013.

RESULTS

The primary tumour was in the duodenum and jejunum/ileum in 149 (72.7%) and 56 (27.3%) patients, respectively. Sixty-four patients (43.0%) with duodenal adenocarcinoma were asymptomatic and most cases were detected by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which was not specifically performed for the detection or surveillance of duodenal tumours. In contrast, 47 patients (83.9%) with jejunoileal carcinoma were symptomatic. The 3-year survival rate for stage 0/I, II, III, and IV cancers was 93.4%, 73.1%, 50.9%, and 15.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed performance status 3-4, high carcinoembryonic antigen, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low albumin, symptomatic at diagnosis, and stage III/IV disease were independent factors for overall survival (OS). Ten patients (18.5%) with stage IV disease were treated with a combination of resection of primary tumour, local treatment of metastasis, and chemotherapy; this group had a median OS of 36.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most SBA patients were diagnosed with symptomatic, advanced stage disease, some patients with duodenal carcinoma were detected in early stage by EGD. High LDH and symptomatic at diagnosis were identified as novel independent prognostic factors for OS. The prognosis of advanced SBA was poor, but combined modality therapy with local treatment of metastasis might prolong patient survival.

Primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: current view on clinical features, risk and prognostic factors, treatment and outcome

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare but increasing cause of gastrointestinal malignancy, being both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The goal of treatment is margin negative resection of a lesion and local lymphadenectomy, followed by modern adjuvant chemotherapy combinations in selected cases. Improved outcomes in patients with SBA are encouraging, but elucidation of mechanisms of carcinogenesis and risk factors as well as improved treatment for this malignancy is very needed.

Adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in the management of patients with surgically resected duodenal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide clinical oncology database

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, optimal adjuvant approaches for resected duodenal adenocarcinoma are not well established. Given the significant risk of locoregional disease recurrence, there may be a subset of patients who demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS) from the addition of radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy [CRT]) to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

METHODS

Patients with resected, nonmetastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma who received chemotherapy (694 patients) or CRT (550 patients) were identified in the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2012). Cox regression identified covariates associated with OS. The chemotherapy and CRT cohorts were matched (1:1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of receiving CRT or the survival hazard from Cox modeling. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

CRT was more frequently used for patients who underwent positive-margin surgical resection (15.9% vs 9.1%; P<.001). At a median follow-up of 79.2 months (interquartile range, 52.9-114.9 months), the median OS of the propensity score-matched cohort was 46.7 months (interquartile range, 18.9 months to not reached). No survival advantage was observed for patients who were treated with adjuvant CRT compared with those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (median OS: 48.9 months vs 43.5 months [HR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.22 (P = .669)]). CRT was not found to be associated with a significant improvement in the median OS after positive-margin surgical resection (133 patients; 27.6 months vs 18.5 months [P = .210]) or in the presence of T4 classification (461 patients; 30.6 months vs 30.4 months [P = .844]) inadequate lymph node staging (584 patients; 40.5 months vs 43.2 months [P = .707]), lymph node positivity (647 patients; 38.3 months vs 34.1 months [P = .622]), or poorly differentiated histology (429 patients; 46.6 months vs 35.7 months [P = .434]).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of radiation to adjuvant therapy does not appear to significantly improve survival, even in high-risk cases. Cancer 2017;123:967-76. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in the treatment of small bowel adenocarcinoma is poorly defined. Previous analyses have been limited by small sample sizes and have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage.

METHODS

Patients with resected small bowel adenocarcinoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] pathologic stage I-III) who were receiving AC (n = 1674) or surgery alone (SA; n = 3072) were identified in the NCDB (1998-2011). Cox regression identified covariates associated with overall survival (OS). AC and SA cohorts were matched (1:1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of receiving AC or the survival hazard from Cox modeling. OS was compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

The omission of AC conferred an increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.50; P < .001). After propensity score matching, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS with AC in AJCC stage I patients (158.8 vs 110.7 months; P = .226) and AJCC stage II patients (104.0 vs 79.6 months; P = .185), including the subset with a T4 tumor classification (64.0 vs 47.4 months; P = .130) or a positive resection margin (44.4 vs 31.0 months; P = .333). Median OS was superior for patients with AJCC stage III disease who were receiving AC versus SA (42.4 vs 26.1 months; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of AC for resected stage III small bowel adenocarcinoma. The trend toward improved OS for patients without nodal metastasis, including those who have T4 tumors or have undergone positive-margin resection, may justify the use of AC in select patients with earlier stage disease. Cancer 2016;122:693-701. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and total lymph node count for small bowel adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nodal metastasis is a known prognostic factor for small bowel adenocarcinoma. The goals of this study were to evaluate the number of lymph nodes (LNs) that should be retrieved and the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results was queried to identify patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma who underwent resection from 1988 to 2010. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 2,772 patients underwent resection with at least one node retrieved, and this sample included equal numbers of duodenal (n = 1,387) and jejunoileal (n = 1,386) adenocarcinomas. There were 1,371 patients with no nodal metastasis (N0, 49.4%), 928 N1 (33.5%), and 474 N2 (17.1%). The median numbers of LNs examined for duodenal and jejunoileal cancers were 9 and 8, respectively. Cut-point analysis demonstrated that harvesting at least 9 for jejunoileal and 5 LN for duodenal cancers resulted in the greatest survival difference. Increasing LNR at both sites was associated with decreased overall median survival (LNR = 0, 71 months; LNR 0-0.02, 35 months; LNR 0.21-0.4, 25 months; and LNR >0.4, 16 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed number of LNs examined, T-stage, LN positivity, and LNR were independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSION

LNR has a profound impact on survival in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. To achieve adequate staging, we recommend retrieving a minimum of 5 LN for duodenal and 9 LN for jejunoileal adenocarcinomas.

Adenocarcinoma of the ileum: A rare and challenging entity

Introduction

Primary small bowel malignancy is unusual and accounts for 1–3% of all gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Adenocarcinoma is one of the most common histologic types, but its frequency decreases with more distal locations. Its clinical presentation is nonspecific and is usually associated with advanced disease, which contributes to delayed diagnosis.

Presentation of case

A 66-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with a 6-day history of progressively worsening abdominal pain localized in the right lower quadrant, nausea, and vomiting. Investigation revealed an inflammatory appendiceal tumor. The patient underwent surgery and an unexpected tumor involving the distal ileal segment and ileocecal appendix was found. Right radical hemicolectomy with en bloc resection of the distal ileum was performed. Histopathological examination revealed adenocarcinoma of the ileum.

Discussion

This rare entity is associated with a nonspecific clinical presentation that contributes to delayed diagnosis and treatment, and consequently to a worse prognosis. Approximately half of the cases are only diagnosed at surgery. Primary treatment consists of wide resection with locoregional lymphadenectomy. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be determined.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates an unusual condition characterized by late and challenging diagnosis. We highlight the importance of an earlier diagnosis and optimal treatment for improved patient outcomes.

•

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor with a late and challenging diagnosis.

•

Primary treatment consists in wide resection with locoregional lymphadenectomy.

•

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be determined.

•

It is crucial an earlier diagnosis and optimal treatment to improve the outcome.

Segmental duodenal resection: indications, surgical techniques and postoperative outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Segmental duodenal resections (DR) have been increasingly performed for the treatment of primary duodenal tumours. The aim of the study is to review the indications for, clinical and operative details, and outcomes of patients undergoing elective DR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent elective segmental DR for the treatment of primary duodenal tumours, at a single institution between January 2007 and December 2013. Demographic data, clinical presentation, preoperative investigations, operative details, postoperative complications/mortality and histopathological results were recorded.

RESULTS

In the study period, 11 duodenal resections were performed (7 male, median age 61 years). Thirty-six percent of the patients presented with anaemia. Surgical resection included two or more segments in seven patients. The most frequently resected part of the duodenum was segment 3 (n = 7). Median operative time was 191 min and blood loss was 675 ml. End-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses were performed in equal numbers. The pathology of resected specimens included adenocarcinoma (n = 4), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) (n = 1), adenoma (n = 5) and lymphoma (n = 1). Median hospital stay was 14 days. Overall, 30-day morbidity rate was 82% (78% Clavien 2 or less).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental duodenal resection is a safe and effective surgical technique for the resection of primary duodenal tumours.

Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma (SBA): the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) experience

Background

SBA is a rare tumour which carries a poor prognosis. Very few data on prognostic factors and treatment outcomes are available. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated for SBA at our institution.

Methods

Clinico-pathological characteristics, treatments and outcomes of all the SBA patients treated consecutively from 1996 to 2011 were retrospectively collected. The prognostic value of baseline factors was assessed using the Cox regression model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival outcomes.

Results

Eighty-four patients with SBA were treated during the study period. Of these, 48 presented with early stage SBA, while 36 had unresectable disease. All early stage SBA patients (58.3% males; median age, 59 years) underwent resection (R0 in 44/48) and 27 (56%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 31.1 months (95% CI: 8.0-54.3) and 42.9 (95% CI: 0–94.9), respectively. In univariate analyses, poor histological differentiation (p = 0.025) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.003) were prognostic for OS. In the group of patients with relapsed, unresectable or metastatic disease (n = 59), systemic chemotherapy was administered in 46 cases (78%). The response rate to first line chemotherapy was 50%. Median progression-free survival and OS were 8.8 (95% CI: 5.5-12.3) and 12.8 months (95% CI: 8.4-17.2), respectively. In univariate analyses, low albumin (p = 0.041) and high platelet count (p = 0.007) were prognostic for OS.

Conclusion

Prospective clinical trials are needed to inform the management of SBA patients. Prognostic factors evaluated in our series may be useful for patient stratification and treatment selection in future studies.

Primary small-bowel malignancy: update in tumor biology, markers, and management strategies

PURPOSE

Primary small-bowel malignancies (SBM) are rare tumors but their incidence is rising. An estimated 9160 new cases and 1210 deaths due to SBM may occur in the USA in 2014. We review advances made in tumor biology, immunohistochemistry, and discuss treatment strategies for these malignancies.

METHODS

Relevant articles from PubMed/Medline and Embase searches were collected using the phrases "small-bowel adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal carcinoids, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, small-bowel leiomyosarcoma, and small-bowel lymphoma".

RESULTS

Advances in imaging techniques such as wireless capsule endoscopy, CT and MRI enterography, and endoscopy (balloon enteroscopy) along with discovery of molecular markers such as c-kit and PDGFRA for GIST tumors have improved our ability to diagnose, localize, and treat these patients. Early detection and surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival in all tumors except bowel lymphoma where chemotherapy plays the main role. Adjuvant therapy with imatinib has improved overall survival for GIST tumors, somatostatin analogs have improved symptoms and also inhibited tumor growth and stabilized metastatic disease in carcinoid disease, but chemotherapy has not improved survival for adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances in molecular characterization holds promise in novel targeted therapies. Currently ongoing trials are exploring efficacy of targeted therapies and role of adjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma and results are awaited. Early detection and aggressive surgical therapy for all localized tumors and lymph node sampling particularly for adenocarcinoma remains the main treatment modality.

The management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal (LGI) bleeding is generally less severe than upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding with spontaneous cessation of bleeding in 80% of cases and a mortality of 2-4%. However, unlike UGI bleeding, there is no consensual agreement about management. Once the patient has been stabilized, the main objective and greatest difficulty is to identify the location of bleeding in order to provide specific appropriate treatment. While upper endoscopy and colonoscopy remain the essential first-line examinations, the development and availability of angiography have made this an important imaging modality for cases of active bleeding; they allow diagnostic localization of bleeding and guide subsequent therapy, whether therapeutic embolization, interventional colonoscopy or, if other techniques fail or are unavailable, surgery directed at the precise site of bleeding. Furthermore, newly developed endoscopic techniques, particularly video capsule enteroscopy, now allow minimally invasive exploration of the small intestine; if this is positive, it will guide subsequent assisted enteroscopy or surgery. Other small bowel imaging techniques include enteroclysis by CT or magnetic resonance imaging. At the present time, exploratory surgery is no longer a first-line approach. In view of the lesser gravity of LGI bleeding, it is most reasonable to simply stabilize the patient initially for subsequent transfer to a specialized center, if minimally invasive techniques are not available at the local hospital. In all cases, the complexity and diversity of LGI bleeding require a multidisciplinary collaboration involving the gastroenterologist, radiologist, intensivist and surgeon to optimize diagnosis and treatment of the patient.

Pathobiological implications of mucin (MUC) expression in the outcome of small bowel cancer

Mucins have been associated with survival in various cancer patients, but there have been no studies of mucins in small bowel carcinoma (SBC). In this study, we investigated the relationships between mucin expression and clinicopathologic factors in 60 SBC cases, in which expression profiles of MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6 and MUC16 in cancer and normal tissues were examined by immunohistochemistry. MUC1, MUC5AC and MUC16 expression was increased in SBC lesions compared to the normal epithelium, and expression of these mucins was related to clinicopathologic factors, as follows: MUC1 [tumor location (p = 0.019), depth (p = 0.017) and curability (p = 0.007)], MUC5AC [tumor location (p = 0.063) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.059)], and MUC16 [venous invasion (p = 0.016) and curability (p = 0.016)]. Analysis of 58 cases with survival data revealed five factors associated with a poor prognosis: poorly-differentiated or neuroendocrine histological type (p<0.001), lymph node metastasis (p<0.001), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.026), venous invasion (p<0.001) and curative resection (p<0.001), in addition to expression of MUC1 (p = 0.042), MUC5AC (p = 0.007) and MUC16 (p<0.001). In subsequent multivariate analysis with curability as the covariate, lymph node metastasis, venous invasion, and MUC5AC and/or MUC16 expression were significantly related to the prognosis. Multivariate analysis in curative cases (n = 45) showed that SBC with MUC5AC and/or MUC16 expression had a significantly independent high hazard risk after adjusting for the effects of venous invasion (hazard ratio: 5.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-17). In conclusion, the study shows that a MUC5AC-positive and/or MUC16-positive status is useful as a predictor of a poor outcome in patients with SBC.

Tumors of the angle of Treitz: a single-center experience

AIM

To explore the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of segmental jejunal resection on the left side of the mesenteric vessels in patients with tumors of the angle of Treitz using data from a single center.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with tumors of the angle of Treitz who underwent surgery at our institution were prospectively followed. A segmental jejunal resection on the left side of the mesenteric vessels was performed in all patients. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples were examined. The primary end point of this analysis was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

In this study, there were 8 males and 5 females (mean age, 50.1 years; range, 36-74 years). The mean tumor size was 8.1 cm (range, 3.2-15 cm). Histologic examination showed 11 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 2 adenocarcinomas. Five of the GIST patients presented with potential low risk, and 6 presented with intermediate and high risk, according to the National Institutes of Health criteria. One potentially high-risk patient showed tumor progression at 46 mo and died 52 mo after surgery. One patient with locally advanced adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy, but the disease progressed, and the patient died 9 mo after surgery. One GIST patient without progression died 16 mo after surgery because of a postoperative intestinal obstruction. The median overall survival rate was 84.6 mo, and the median disease-free survival rate was 94.5 mo.

CONCLUSION

The overall survival of patients with tumors of the angle of Treitz was encouraging even when the tumor size was relatively large. A segmental resection on the left side of the mesenteric vessels is considered to be a reliable and curative option for tumors of the angle of Treitz.

Defining the role of adjuvant therapy: ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinomas of the ampulla of Vater and duodenum are more rare than pancreatic cancer and have a better prognosis. However, studies conducted on the management of these cancers, such as adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, are limited by small sample sizes and series that are retrospective. This review evaluates ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinomas with regard to incidence, anatomy, prognostic features, patterns of failure, and the available literature studying adjuvant therapy.

Retrospective analysis of 119 small bowel adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare occurrence and few studies have addressed it adequately, especially in China.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features, survival and prognostic analysis were retrospectively done in SBA patients admitted between 2001 and 2011 in the People's Liberation Army General Hospital.

RESULTS

The study included 68 men and 51 women with a median age of 56.5 year. Tumors mainly occurred in duodenum (93.3%). Abdominal pain was the most frequent symptom (36.8%). Patients (30.3%) who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy had an increased, but not significant, median overall survival (MOS) rate compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy (37 vs 35 months, p = .324). One year disease free survival rate was higher in patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy (83.3% vs 71.1%). Patients survived longer in the curative surgery group (median survival time of 49.0 months) than those in the palliative group (7.0 months) (p < .001). Node-negative patients survived longer than node-positive patients (median OS: 49.0 vs 21.0 months, p = .004). Depth (95% CI: 1.013-1.517, p = .037), node involvement (95% CI: 1.234-3.890, p = .007), palliative surgery (95% CI, 2.998-10.555, p = .0005), and the site of tumor (95% CI: 0.052-0.970, p = .045) were independent predictors of OS in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

SBA is rare and there is lack of obvious clinical manifestations. Depth, node involvement, palliative surgery, and the site of tumor are associated with a poor prognosis. Our analysis highlights the need for further studies to find out the exact role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.

Malignant tumours of the small intestine

Adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumours, sarcomas and lymphomas are the four most common malignant tumours arising in the small intestine, although over forty different histological subtypes are described. Collectively these account for only 2% of cancers of the digestive system. The incidence of small bowel cancer has increased in recent decades with a four-fold increase in carcinoid tumours. Risk factors for small bowel tumours include coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease and a number of genetic abnormalities. The non-specific nature of their symptoms and the difficulty in visualising these tumours with normal endoscopic techniques often results in late diagnosis. Furthermore the paucity of literature on this topic has made it difficult to standardise management. There has however been marked improvement in imaging methods resulting in earlier diagnosis in many cases. As expected, early detection of localised, well differentiated tumours followed by surgical resection with negative margins offers the best chance of long term survival. Better adjuvant treatment, notably for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, has improved 5-year survival rates significantly. Development of surveillance guidelines for at risk populations may be a valuable way of improving early diagnosis of this challenging group of conditions.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment

Small bowel adenocarcinomas are rare tumours, but their incidence is increasing. Their most common primary location is the duodenum. The few studies that have collected data regarding small bowel adenocarcinoma are not homogeneous and are widely spread over time. Even though these tumours are most often sporadic, some predisposing diseases have been identified, among which Crohn's disease and genetic syndromes. Early diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma remains difficult despite significant radiological and endoscopic progress. After surgical resection the main prognostic factor is node invasion; in this case, adjuvant chemotherapy can be expected to be beneficial, although this has not been established by randomised trials. For metastatic disease, platinum-based chemotherapy seems to be the most effective treatment. Targeted therapies have not yet been evaluated in this type of cancer.

Non-colorectal intestinal tract carcinomas in inflammatory bowel disease: results of the 3rd ECCO Pathogenesis Scientific Workshop (II)

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have an excess risk of certain gastrointestinal cancers. Much work has focused on colon cancer in IBD patients, but comparatively less is known about other more rare cancers. The European Crohn's and Colitis Organization established a pathogenesis workshop to review what is known about these cancers and formulate proposals for future studies to address the most important knowledge gaps. This article reviews the current state of knowledge about small bowel adenocarcinoma, ileo-anal pouch and rectal cuff cancer, and anal/perianal fistula cancers in IBD patients.

KRAS G>A mutation favors poor tumor differentiation but may not be associated with prognosis in patients with curatively resected duodenal adenocarcinoma

KRAS mutations have been found in duodenal adenocarcinomas and may have prognostic significance. The purpose of this study was to classify clinicopathological characteristics, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations and identify possible prognostic role of KRAS mutations in duodenal adenocarcinomas. Demographics, tumor characteristics and survival were recorded for 78 patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas (Stages I-III). KRAS mutations were detected in 27 (34.6%) cases, of which the majority (74.1%) were G>A transitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KRAS G>A mutation was significantly associated with late stage (p = 0.025) and poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.035), when compared with wild-type and other than G>A mutations. KRAS G>A mutation carriers were at increased risk for distant relapse (p = 0.022) and had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; log-rank p = 0.045) and a trend toward shorter relapse-free survival (RFS; log-rank p = 0.062) when compared with those who did not carry the KRAS G>A mutation. In multivariate analyses, there was a significant correlation between ≥ 3 positive lymph nodes and poor OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.001) and KRAS G>A mutation carriers demonstrated no effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion, KRAS G>A mutation correlates significantly with late stage and poor tumor differentiation in duodenal adenocarcinoma. Among patients who undergo a curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma, KRAS G>A mutation carriers will more likely experience distant relapse but may not exhibit a poor prognosis. The number of positive lymph nodes should be incorporated in future staging systems.

Jejunal adenocarcinoma-a case report with review

Primary Small bowel tumours are rare accounting for only 3-6% of GI neoplasm; 1-2% of these are malignant. Their presentation is usually with nonspecific symptoms that causes delay in diagnosis and consequently a worse outcome for the patient. We report a case of Jejunal adenocarcinoma where early diagnosis and treatment lead to good outcome.

Jejunal adenocarcinoma: an elusive diagnosis

Tubercular stricture of small bowel is a common cause of subacute intestinal obstruction in India. In a small subset of patients the cause of the intestinal obstruction could be adenocarcinoma of jejunum. It is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The point of concern is compared to tubercular stricture, the treatment of jejunal adenocarcinoma is always surgical in the form of cancer directed surgery. The operating surgeon needs to have a very high suspicion for jejunal adenocarcinoma because the timely treatment offers the best survival in otherwise an aggressive disease with bleak prognosis.

Small bowel endoscopy and coeliac disease

Coeliac disease (CD) is a gluten-responsive, chronic inflammatory enteropathy that shares many features with classical autoimmune diseases. Coeliac disease affects about 1-2% of Caucasians, North Africans and Asians who possess the necessary susceptibility genes encoding HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8. It is not only unique among the autoimmune diseases in that the precise trigger (gluten from wheat, rye and barley) has been identified, but also in that it has lent itself well to advancements in endoscopic imaging. Since its introduction, flexible endoscopy has allowed tissue to be collected from the small bowel with relative ease and safety, and recently has facilitated direct imaging and sampling of the entire small intestine. It is now fifty years since the Crosby capsule first allowed clinicians the ability to non-surgically biopsy the small bowel leading to an enhanced diagnosis of coeliac disease. The introduction of wireless video capsule endoscopy (VCE), small bowel enteroscopy and in particular double balloon enteroscopy (DBE), have expedited the accurate diagnosis of coeliac disease and its more serious complications such as small bowel adenocarcinoma, refractory coeliac disease type II (RCDII) and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma (EATL).

A population-based comparison of adenocarcinoma of the large and small intestine: insights into a rare disease

BACKGROUND

Because of its rarity, adenocarcinoma of the small intestine is frequently compared to adenocarcinoma of the colon, although the validity of this comparison is not known.

METHODS

Patients with small and large bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA and LBA) diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were determined. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by stage and by number of assessed lymph nodes was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 4518 and 261,521 patients with SBA and LBA, respectively, were identified. In comparison to LBA, patients with SBA were younger and presented with disease of higher stage and histologic grade. The age-standardized incidence rates decreased for LBA (-1.24% per year) but increased for SBA (+1.47% per year). Although age-standardized mortality rates decreased for both LBA and SBA, the decreases were more pronounced for LBA. Five-year CSS was worse for resected SBA compared with resected LBA, although this difference diminished when comparing cases having eight or more lymph nodes assessed. The relative reduction in CSS when selecting eight or more lymph nodes was much greater for duodenal as opposed to jejunal/ileal subsite of the small bowel. With nodal selection the absolute difference in CSS between LBA and SBA for stages I, II, and III was 13, 15.9, and 18.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate nodal assessment is much less common in SBA than LBA; and it appears that SBA, in particular duodenal adenocarcinoma, is understaged. Even after corrections to minimize the effect of stage migration and inadequate lymph node evaluation, SBA demonstrated distinctly worse CSS than LBA.

Duodenal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis and implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer usually studied as a group with periampullary or small bowel adenocarcinoma; therefore, its natural history is poorly understood.

METHODS

Patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were identified from a single-institution pancreaticoduodenectomy database. Patients with adenocarcinoma arising from the ampulla of Vater were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with survival and recurrence after resection.

RESULTS

From 1984 to 2006, a total of 122 patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Overall survival after resection was 48% at 5 years and 41% at 10 years. Five-year survival decreased as the number of lymph nodes involved by metastasis increased from 0 to 1-3 to ≥ 4 (68%, 58%, 17%, respectively, P < 0.01) and as the lymph node ratio increased from 0 to >0-0.2 to >0.2-0.4 to >0.4 (68%, 57%, 14%, 14%, respectively, P < 0.01). Lymph node metastasis was the only independent predictor of decreased survival in multivariate analysis. Recurrence after resection was predominantly distant (81%). Adjuvant chemoradiation did not decrease local recurrence or prolong overall survival; however, patients who received chemoradiation more commonly had nodal metastasis (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic significance of both the absolute number and ratio of involved lymph nodes emphasizes the need for adequate lymphadenectomy to accurately stage duodenal adenocarcinoma. The mostly distant pattern of recurrence underscores the need for the development of effective systemic therapies.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma presenting with refractory iron deficiency anemia - case report and review of literature

Cancers of the small bowel are relatively rare and account for approximately 1–2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. The most common histologic subtype – adenocarcinoma – constitutes 40% of all cases. These cancers generally present with vague abdominal discomfort and are often diagnosed at a late stage and carry a poor prognosis. The treatment of choice of early-stage small bowel adenocarcinoma is surgical resection. No standard treatment protocol has been defined for unresectable or metastatic disease. Here, we report a case of a 56-year-old woman who presented with unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Extensive initial studies with serial CT scans of the abdomen, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, small bowel capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy were noncontributory. She was later found to have a metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma and treated with palliative chemotherapy. She achieved a modest response to the treatment. Interestingly, in our case, the sole presentation was unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Physician's awareness regarding the possibility of small bowel cancer especially in the setting of iron deficiency and its workup has been emphasized. This enhances the chance of early detection and hence better survival.

Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with primary duodenal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The prognostic factors in primary duodenal adenocarcinoma remain controversial. This study evaluated the prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

From March 1996 to June 2008, the medical records of 30 patients with a final diagnosis of primary duodenal epithelial malignancy seen at two referral centers were reviewed retrospectively. The prognostic factors for survival were evaluated 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The median survival was 5.7 months. The survival rate was 46.7% (14/30), 16.7% (5/30), 10% (3/30), and 6.7% (2/30) at 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that cancer-directed treatment, including curative surgery or chemotherapy, was a common independent risk factor at all follow-up times. Total bilirubin, cytology, and TNM stage were independent risk factors for survival at 1, 2, and 5 years. The white blood cell count was an independent risk factor at 1 year only. The actuarial probability of survival in patients undergoing cancer-directed treatment was significantly higher than in those without treatment at 6 months (71.4 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01), 1 year (28.6 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01), 2 years (21.4 vs. 0%, p < 0.01), and 5 years (14.3 vs. 0%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic factors in patients with primary duodenal adenocarcinoma were total bilirubin, TNM stage, cytology, and cancer-directed treatments until the 5-year follow-up. Especially, cancer-directed treatments improved patient survival.