Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: A Targeting Challenge-Comparison of Radio-Guided vs. Wire-Guided Localization Techniques

Background: The incidence of non-palpable breast cancer is increasing due to widespread screening and neo-adjuvant therapies. Among the available tumor localization techniques, radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) has largely replaced wire-guided localization (WGL). The aim of this study was to compare the ROLL and WGL techniques in terms of the effectiveness of isotopic marking of axillary sentinel lymph nodes and to assess patient perspectives along with surgeon and radiologist preferences. Methods: A single-center, prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 patients with non-palpable breast lesions (56 ROLL, 54 WGL). Breast type, tumor volume, location, histological and radiological features, and localization/surgical duration were evaluated in the context of sentinel lymph node marking using isotope (technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin) and blue dye. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at p < 0.05 and strong significance at p < 0.01. Results: A single-center, prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 patients with non-palpable breast lesions (56 ROLL, 54 WGL). Breast type, tumor volume, location, histological and radiological features, and localization/surgical duration were evaluated in the context of sentinel lymph node marking using isotope (technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin) and blue dye. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at p < 0.05 and strong significance at p < 0.01. Conclusions: While ROLL provided advantages in terms of patient comfort and logistical simplicity, WGL was superior for axillary sentinel lymph node marking, particularly in inner quadrant tumors, suggesting that WGL may be preferred in these cases.

Radiofrequency as a method of localizing impalpable breast lesions

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early stage breast cancer has risen as a result of increased detection of non-palpable tumors through the implementation of screening programs and greater public awareness. Performing breast-conserving surgery can be challenging due to the need for accurate localization of non-palpable breast lesions, particularly given the logistical difficulties associated with wire localization. After implementing a new technique for localizing non-palpable breast lesions (LOCalizerTM Radiofrequency identification TAG-Hologic®), a radiofrequency identification tag localization device manufactured by Hologic, Inc. in Marlborough, MA, was launched in 2017, our objective was to investigate its impact on surgical outcomes, whether there was an increase in re-excision rates for positive margins and whether the attainment of clear margins was dependent on the exact positioning of the RFID device.

METHOD

A single-center single-arm interventional study, data were gathered both in a forward-looking manner for 1 year (prospectively) and by looking back at past records for 1 year (retrospectively) for a total period of two years. Individuals who were diagnosed with non-palpable breast lesions, as confirmed by histological analysis, or invasive breast cancer and who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery were eligible for inclusion in the study. The RFID (Radiofrequency Identification) method was used to localize the lesions prior to surgery. Either with a mammogram or ultrasound scan position of the Tag was recorded, including the distance of the lesion from the center of the lesion and the lesion depth from the skin in millimeters. The rate of re-excision was documented and examined in relation to the parameters mentioned above.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty RFID Tags were inserted in two hundred and seventeen (three patient had bilateral tags insertion), patients aged between 30 and 85 had a localizer Tag inserted between Oct 2020 and Oct 2022. Three patients had non-palpable breast lesions in both breasts. Fourteen were inserted under stereotactic guidance and two hundred and six under ultrasound guidance. Ten patients subsequently had wire insertion also due to Tag position. Of 210 procedures, RFIF Tags within the lesion was seen in hundred and sixty patients (76.19 %). An additional 50 procedures were performed using the RFID Tag system, which were not directly related to the lesion but were deemed appropriate to proceed with. Out of a total of 220 procedures, positive margins were observed in 38 cases (17.27 %). Among these cases, eleven (28.94 %) involved the use of the RFID Tag system, not within the lesion but adjacent to it (within 15 mm surrounding the lesion).

CONCLUSION

RFID is a good alternative to wire localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Re-excision rates are higher in patients with Tag outside the lesion compared to those with Tag within the lesion.

Resection Ratios and Tumor Eccentricity in Breast-Conserving Surgery Specimens for Surgical Accuracy Assessment

This study aims to evaluate several defined specimen parameters that would allow to determine the surgical accuracy of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) in a representative population of patients. These specimen parameters could be used to compare surgical accuracy when using novel technologies for intra-operative BCS guidance in the future. Different specimen parameters were determined among 100 BCS patients, including the ratio of specimen volume to tumor volume (resection ratio) with different optimal margin widths (0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, and 10 mm). Furthermore, the tumor eccentricity [maximum tumor-margin distance - minimum tumor-margin distance] and the relative tumor eccentricity [tumor eccentricity ÷ pathological tumor diameter] were determined. Different patient subgroups were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. When using a surgical margin width of 0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, and 10 mm, on average, 19.16 (IQR 44.36), 9.94 (IQR 18.09), 6.06 (IQR 9.69) and 1.35 (IQR 1.78) times the ideal resection volume was excised, respectively. The median tumor eccentricity among the entire patient population was 11.29 mm (SD = 3.99) and the median relative tumor eccentricity was 0.66 (SD = 2.22). Resection ratios based on different optimal margin widths (0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, and 10 mm) and the (relative) tumor eccentricity could be valuable outcome measures to evaluate the surgical accuracy of novel technologies for intra-operative BCS guidance.

Application of carbon nanostructures in biomedicine: realities, difficulties, prospects

The review systematizes data on the wide possibilities of practical application of carbon nanostructures. Much attention is paid to the use of carbon nanomaterials in medicine for the visualization of tumors during surgical interventions, in the creation of cosmetics, as well as in agriculture in the creation of fertilizers. Additionally, we demonstrate trends in research in the field of carbon nanomaterials with a view to elaborating targeted drug delivery systems. We also show the creation of nanosized medicinal substances and diagnostic systems, and the production of new biomaterials. A separate section is devoted to the difficulties in studying carbon nanomaterials. The review is intended for a wide range of readers, as well as for experts in the field of nanotechnology and nanomedicine.

Radioactive seed localization is a safe and effective tool for breast cancer surgery: an evaluation of over 25,000 cases

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) provides a precise and efficient method for removing non-palpable breast lesions. It has proven to be a valuable addition to breast surgery, improving perioperative logistics and patient satisfaction. This retrospective review examines the lessons learned from a high-volume cancer center's RSL program after 10 years of practice and over 25 000 cases. We provide an updated model for assessing the patient's radiation dose from RSL seed implantation and demonstrate the safety of RSL to staff members. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of various aspects of presurgical evaluation, surgical techniques, post-surgical management, and regulatory compliance for a successful RSL program. Notably, the program has reduced radiation exposure for patients and medical staff.

Surgeon and Radiologist Evaluation of Electromagnetic Chip Localization for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

BACKGROUND

SmartClipTM is a food and drug administration-approved, electromagnetic chip (EMC) localization system that provides three-dimensional navigation for the excision of soft tissue lesions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy and feasibility of EMC radiologic and surgical localization for benign and malignant breast lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, single institution, prospective study from October 2020 to September 2022 of 38 women undergoing breast conserving surgery with EMC localization of a single lesion > 5 mm on mammogram (MMG) or ultrasound (US) imaging. Surveys from performing breast radiologists and breast surgeons were collected after image-guided localization and surgical excision.

RESULTS

Seventy-six survey responses from nine radiologists and four surgeons were received. The deployment needle and EMC were highly visible in 86.8% and 76.3% of procedures, respectively. There was no difficulty in deployment for 92.1% of procedures. The EMC was in the correct location on postdeployment MMG in 97.4% of cases. Three instances of EMC migration occurred, one 1 cm from target lesion. The targeted mass and EMC were within the surgical specimen in 97.4% of cases. On specimen radiograph, 39.5% of the EMCs were 0-1 mm from the center of the target lesion, 18.4% were within 2-4 mm, and 23.7% were within 5-10 mm. Mean operating room time for all cases was 65 min. One case required US to localize the target due to console malfunction.

CONCLUSION

There was successful EMC deployment by radiologists with accurate visualization and successful surgical excision in most cases. The EnVisioTM SmartClipTM system is a reproducible and accurate localization method for benign and malignant breast lesions.

Localisation accuracy with iodine-125 seed versus wire guidance for breast cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Impalpable breast lesions generally require image-guided localisation for breast-conserving surgery. A standard technique is to place a hook wire (HW) within the lesion. Radioguided occult lesion localisation using iodine seeds (ROLLIS) involves inserting a 4.5 mm iodine-125 seed (seed) into the lesion. We hypothesised that a seed could be more precisely positioned in relation to the lesion than a HW and that this may be associated with a lower re-excision rate.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive participant data from three ROLLIS RCT (ACTRN12613000655741) sites. Participants underwent preoperative lesion localisation (PLL) with seed or HW between September 2013 and December 2017. Lesion and procedural characteristics were recorded. Distances between (1) any part of the seed or thickened segment of the HW ('TSHW') and the lesion/clip ('distance to device' DTD) and (2) centre of the TSHW/seed and centre of the lesion/clip (device centre to target centre 'DCTC') were measured on immediate postinsertion mammograms. Pathological margin involvement and re-excision rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 390 lesions (190 ROLLIS and 200 HWL) were analysed. Lesion characteristics and guidance modality used were similar between groups. Ultrasound-guided DTD and DCTC for seed were smaller than for HW (77.1% and 60.6%, respectively, P-value < 0.001). Stereotactic-guided DCTC for seeds was 41.6% smaller than for HW (P-value = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the re-excision rates was found.

CONCLUSION

Iodine-125 seeds can be more precisely positioned for preoperative lesion localisation than HW, however, no statistically significant difference in re-excision rates was detected.

Application value of digital tungsten-molybdenum dual target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire excision biopsy in diagnosis of breast microcalcification

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application value of digital tungsten-molybdenum double target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire and guided surgical resection biopsy in the diagnosis of breast microcalcification.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 168 patients with negative clinical palpation and molybdenum target X-ray examination found breast abnormalities were equally divided into two groups according to different surgical positioning methods. The control and observation group underwent gross positioning biopsy and digital tungsten-molybdenum dual-target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire to guide surgical resection biopsy, respectively. The results of molybdenum target X-ray examination and the success rate of one-time complete resection of the lesions were compared between the two groups, and the corresponding relationship between the pathological diagnosis results of the lesions after surgical resection and the performance of mammography in the observation group was compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age and molybdenum target X-ray examination results between the two groups (P > 0.05). General information is comparable; the success rate of one-time complete resection of lesions in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.2% vs 78.6%, P = 0.024). There were 34 cases of malignant lesions in the observation group, accounting for 40.5% (34/84), including 11 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (64.7%), 50 cases of benign lesions, accounting for 59.5% (50/84), including 16 cases of breast lobular hyperplasia (32%), 18 cases of breast cystic hyperplasia (36%).

CONCLUSION

In diagnosis of breast microcalcifications, surgical resection biopsy guided using digital tungsten-molybdenum double target three-dimensional positioning indwelling guide wire achieves high success rate and has advantages of high safety and accurate diagnosis. Thus, it has potential to play a greater role in early diagnosis of breast cancer and is worthy of clinical application.

Iodine-125 seed versus hook-wire guided breast conserving surgery: do post operative complication rates differ?

BACKGROUND

Radio-guided occult lesion localisation using iodine 125 seeds (ROLLIS) is used to localize impalpable breast cancers for breast conserving surgery (BCS). Previous studies have suggested improved efficiency and patient outcomes with ROLLIS compared with hook-wire localisation (HWL). The aim of this report is to compare the post-operative complication rates and safety profiles of ROLLIS versus hook-wire guided surgery.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 690 women with non-palpable breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to either pre-operative localisation with 125 I seed or hook-wire as part of the ROLLIS clinical trial. Medical record review of 170 women (30% of the total participants) from three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia was performed. Post-operative complications were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) grade I to V.

RESULTS

Total of 170 surgeries were performed: 82 by ROLLIS and 88 by hook-wire. The overall complication rate in the ROLLIS group was 19.5%, with 15.9% being grade II and 3.66% grade III. In the HWL group, the complication rate was 22.7% with 20.5% being grade II and 2.27% grade III. There was no statistically significant difference in complication grades between the 2 groups. No grade IV or grade V complications were reported. Complications observed included drainable seroma, drainable haematoma and surgical site infection.

CONCLUSION

ROLLIS is a safe method of localisation for surgical resection with similar complication rates as hookwires. We encourage its use as an alternative localisation technique as it has demonstrable superiority and efficacy.

Transitioning From the Traditional Wire Localization to the Wireless Technology for Surgical Guidance at Lumpectomies: Part A. Radioseed Localization

Iodine-125 (I-125) labelled radioactive seeds were the first published wireless pre-operative image-guided breast localization technique. Radioseeds offer benefit to radiologists as a relatively intuitive procedure with precise mammographic or sonographic-guided localization and improved patient experience. Localization and surgical dates can be uncoupled, which facilitates efficient scheduling for radiologists and surgeons. Surgeons can better tailor their surgery with intra-operative localization using a special probe to detect the emitted gamma energy. Due to radioactivity, implementation of a radioseed program requires compliance with the National Regulatory Commission and therefore multidisciplinary involvement. Seeds have a high placement success rate, and comparable surgical success and re-excision rate to wires.

ROLLIS roll‐out: Pitfalls, errors, lessons learned and recommendations from Australian and New Zealand experience during the randomised controlled trial, implementing a novel localisation method for impalpable malignant breast lesions, radio‐guided occult lesion localisation with iodine‐125 ( 125 I) seed ( ROLLIS )

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer surgery aims to excise lesions with clear margins and provide optimal cosmesis with a low re-excision rates. These aims are aided by accurate lesion localisation and a surgical choice of incision site with minimal removal of healthy tissue. Problems associated with hookwires have led to adoption of non-wire methods including radioguided occult lesion localisation using iodine-125 (ROLLIS). This paper outlines the problems encountered and lessons learnt during the largest RCT involving 659 participants, conducted at eight sites (seven Australian, one New Zealand centres) between September 2013 and April 2018.* METHODS: Data, along with substantive comments, regarding each ROLLIS procedure, documenting each step from the seed insertion, ease of operative retrieval, to return of the seed to medical physics, from a shared on-line secure database and a separate site email survey, were synthesised and categorised.

RESULTS

The Australian and New Zealand ROLLIS RCT experience highlights several important issues. Lessons learned were related to licencing the seed and tracking protocols. A Designated Team Lead, who is a good communicator, ensuring the Tracking Protocols were accurately followed and updated, subspecialty leads and a Co-ordinator, responsible for training, logbook maintenance and seed ordering, enhanced the success and acceptance of the programme. Addressing radiation issues, fears, education of staff and seed loss was imperative.

CONCLUSION

The Australian and New Zealand ROLLIS RCT experience highlights the need for adherence to local licencing laws and protocols, appointing a dedicated ROLLIS Designated Team Lead with good communication and a ROLLIS Co-ordinator. These facilitate the adoption of a successful ROLLIS programme.

Evaluation of Carbon Nanoparticle Suspension and Methylene Blue Localization for Preoperative Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study

Background: The resection of nonpalpable breast lesions (NPBLs) largely depends on the preoperative localization technology. Although several techniques have been used for the guidance of NPBL resection, more comfortable and effective methods are needed. This aim of this study was to evaluate the use and feasibility of carbon nanoparticle suspension (CNS) and methylene blue (MB)-guided resection of NPBL, to introduce alternative techniques.

Methods: A total of 105 patients with 172 NPBLs detected by breast ultrasound were randomized to CNS localization (CNSL) group and MB localization (MBL) group. The injection times of the two groups were divided into 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, and 20 h before surgery. In this study, localization time, stained area, operation time, total resection volume (TRV), calculated resection ratio (CRR), and pathological diagnosis were assessed.

Results: All of the 172 lesions were finally confirmed benign. Dye persisted in all cases in the CNSL group (109/109, 100%), while that persisted in only 53 cases in the MBL group (53/63, 84.1%) (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between dyeing time and dyeing area in the MBL group (r = −0.767, P < 0.001); however, there was no significant correlation in the CNSL group (r = −0.154, P = 0.110). The operation time was 11.05 ± 3.40 min in the CNSL group and 13.48 ± 6.22 min in the MBL group (P < 0.001). The TRV was 2.51 ± 2.42 cm3 in the CNSL group and 3.69 ± 3.24 cm3 in the MBL group (P = 0.016). For CRR, the CNSL group was lower than the MBL group (7.62 ± 0.49 vs. 21.93 ± 78.00, P = 0.018). There is no dye remained on the skin in the MBL group; however, dye persisted in 12 patients (19.4%) in the CNSL group (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Carbon nanoparticle suspension localization and MBL are technically applicable and clinically acceptable procedures for intraoperatively localizing NPBL. Moreover, given the advantages of CNSL compared to MBL, including the ability to perform this technique 5 days before operation and smaller resection volume, it seems to be a more attractive alternative to be used in intraoperative localization of NPBL.

Nationwide registry study on trends in localization techniques and reoperation rates in non-palpable ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a transition from wire-guided localization (WGL) of non-palpable breast cancer to other localization techniques. Multiple prospective studies have sought to establish superior clinical outcomes for radioactive-seed localization (RSL), but consistent and congruent evidence is missing.

METHODS

In this study, female patients with breast cancer operated with breast-conserving surgery after tumour localization of a non-palpable breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were included. The cohort was identified from the nationwide Netherlands Breast Cancer Audit conducted between 2013 and 2018. Trends in localization techniques were analysed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between the localization technique and the probability of a reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 28 370 patients were included in the study cohort. The use of RSL increased from 15.7 to 61.1 per cent during the study years, while WGL decreased from 75.4 to 31.6 per cent. The localization technique used (RSL versus WGL) was not significantly associated with the odds of a reoperation, regardless of whether the lesion was DCIS (odds ratio 0.96 (95 per cent c.i. 0.89 to 1.03; P = 0.281)) or invasive breast cancer (OR 1.02 (95 per cent c.i. 0.96 to 1.10; P = 0.518)).

CONCLUSION

RSL is rapidly replacing WGL as the preoperative localization technique in breast surgery. This large nationwide registry study found no association between the type of localization technique and the odds of having a reoperation, thus confirming the results of previous prospective cohort studies.

Image-guided Localization Techniques for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: An Opportunity for Multidisciplinary Patient-centered Care

Selection of a localization method for nonpalpable breast lesions offers an opportunity for institutions to seek multidisciplinary input to promote value-based, patient-centered care. The diverse range of nonpalpable breast and axillary pathologies identified through increased utilization of screening mammography often necessitates image-guided preoperative localization for accurate lesion identification and excision. Preoperative localization techniques for breast and axillary lesions have evolved to include both wire and nonwire methods, the latter of which include radioactive seeds, radar reflectors, magnetic seeds, and radiofrequency identification tag localizers. There are no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes when comparing wire and nonwire localization devices. Factors to consider during selection and adoption of image-guided localization systems include physician preference and ease of use, workflow efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

Magnetic Seed (Magseed) Localisation in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Multicentre Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Magseed magnetic marker in breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with 41 implanted Magseeds undergoing surgical treatment in 3 surgical oncology departments were included in the retrospective trial to study pilot use of the Magseed magnetic marker in the Czech Republic for localisation of breast tumours or pathological axillary nodes in breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-four breast cancer and 7 pathological lymph node localisations were performed by Magseed implantation. No placement failures, or perioperative detection failures of Magseeds were observed (0/41, 0.0%), but one case of Magseed migration was present (1/41, 2.4%). All magnetic seeds were successfully retrieved (41/41, 100.0%). Negative margins were achieved in 29 of 34 (85.3%) breast tumour localisations by Magseed.

CONCLUSION

Magseed is a reliable marker for breast tumour and pathological axillary node localisation in breast cancer patients. Magseed is comparable to conventional localisation methods in terms of oncosurgical radicality and safety.

Combined LOCalizer™ and Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization: First Experience in Localization of Non-palpable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Wire-guided localization is the gold-standard for the detection of non-palpable breast lesions, although with acknowledged limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined use of LOCalizerr™ (Hologic, Santa Carla, CA, USA), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for localization and surgery of non-palpable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with non-palpable breast lesions underwent localization procedure with LOCalizer™ and IOUS. After the placement of the marker, eight measures were made to guide the excision. LOCalizerr™ Pencil and IOUS were performed to obtain the distance between the dissection plane and the margins of lesions.

RESULTS

The procedure was feasible in the five enrolled patients and associated with clear oncological margins in all cases. Moreover, a high satisfaction according to Likert scale for surgeons, radiologists and patients, performing limited and tailored resections, was reported.

CONCLUSION

Combining LOCalizerr™ and IOUS is an effective method for locating non-palpable breast cancer, guarantying excellent oncological and cosmetic results.

Randomized controlled trial comparing magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) with wire-guided localization in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer

Wire-guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in the surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast tumors. In this study, we compare the use of a new magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) technique to WGL in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. Open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing MaMaLoc (intervention) to WGL (control) in women with early-stage breast cancer. Primary outcome was surgical usability measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 score). Secondary outcomes were patient reported, clinical, and pathological outcomes such as retrieval rate, operative time, resected specimen weight, margin status, and reoperation rate. Thirty-two patients were analyzed in the MaMaLoc group and 35 in the WGL group. Patient and tumor characteristics were comparable between groups. No in situ complications occurred. Retrieval rate was 100% in both groups. Surgical usability was higher for MaMaLoc: 70.2 ± 8.9 vs. 58.1 ± 9.1, p < 0.001. Patients reported higher overall satisfaction with MaMaLoc (median score 5/5) versus WGL (score 4/5), p < 0.001. The use of magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) for early-stage breast cancer is effective and has higher surgical usability than standard WGL.

Therapeutic applications of radioactive sources: from image-guided brachytherapy to radio-guided surgical resection

It is well known nowadays that radioactivity can destroy the living cells it interacts with. It is therefore unsurprising that radioactive sources, such as iodine-125, were historically developed for treatment purposes within radiation oncology with the goal of damaging malignant cells. However, since then, new techniques have been invented that make creative use of the same radioactivity properties of these sources for medical applications. Here, we review two distinct kinds of therapeutic uses of radioactive sources with applications to prostate, cervical, and breast cancer: brachytherapy and radioactive seed localization. In brachytherapy (BT), the radioactive sources are used for internal radiation treatment. Current approaches make use of real-time image guidance, for instance by means of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, and sometimes positron emission tomography, depending on clinical availability and cancer type. Such image-guided BT for prostate and cervical cancer presents a promising alternative and/or addition to external beam radiation treatments or surgical resections. Radioactive sources can also be used for radio-guided tumor localization during surgery, for which the example of iodine-125 seed use in breast cancer is given. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is increasingly popular as an alternative tumor localization technique during breast cancer surgery. Advantages of applying RSL include added flexibility in the clinical scheduling logistics, an increase in tumor localization accuracy, and higher patient satisfaction; safety measures do however have to be employed. We exemplify the implementation of RSL in a clinic through experiences at the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effects of Magtrace® for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Regarding Care Process Optimization, Reimbursement, Surgical Time, and Patient Comfort Compared With Standard Technetium99

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after technetium-99 (Tc99) localization is a mainstay of oncologic breast surgery. The timing of Tc99 injection can complicate operating room schedules, which can cause increasing overall costs of care and patient discomfort.

METHODS

This study compared 59 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery including sentinel lymph node biopsy. Based on the surgeon's choice, 29 patients were treated with Tc99, and 30 patients received the iron-based tracer, Magtrace. The primary outcomes were time spent on the care pathway and operating time from commissioning of the probe to removal of the sentinel node. The secondary outcomes were patient pain levels and reimbursement.

RESULTS

The mean time spent on the preoperative breast cancer care pathway was significantly shorter for the Magtrace group (5.4 ± 1.3 min) than for the Tc99 group (82 ± 20 min) (p < 0.0001). The median time from probe usage to sentinel node extirpation was slightly but not significantly shorter in the Magtrace group (5 min; interquartile range [IQR], 3-15 min vs 10 min; IQR, 7-15 min; p = 0.151). Reimbursement and pain levels remained unchanged, and the hospital length of stay was similar in the two groups (Magtrace: 5.1 ± 2.3 days vs Tc99: 4.5 ± 3.2 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Magtrace localization shortened the preoperative care pathway and did not affect surgical time or reimbursement. Once established, it could allow for cost reduction and improve patient comfort.

Breast-conserving surgery with 3D-printed surgical guide: a single-center, prospective clinical study

To facilitate precise tumor resection at the time of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), we developed and implemented a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional-printed (3DP) breast surgical guide (BSG). This prospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution from July 2017 to February 2019 on women with breast cancer who underwent partial breast resection using patient-specific 3DP BSGs. Eighty-eight patients with invasive cancer were enrolled, of whom 1 patient had bilateral breast cancer. The mean size of the tumor long-axis on MRI before surgery was 2.8 ± 0.9 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 34 patients. In 16 cases (18.0%), the resection margin was tumor-positive according to intraoperative frozen biopsy; all of these tumors were ductal carcinoma in situ and were re-excised intraoperatively. In 93.3% of the cases, the resection margin was tumor-free in the permanent pathology. The mean pathological tumor size was 1.7 ± 1.0 cm, and the mean distance from the tumor to the border was 1.5 ± 1.0 cm. This exploratory study showed that the tumor area on the MRI could be directly displayed on the breast when using a 3DP BSG for BCS, thereby allowing precise surgery and safe tumor removal.

Trial Registration Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) Identifier (No. KCT0002375, KCT0003043).

Pre-operative localization of impalpable breast lesions using iodine 125 seeds: Placement accuracy and multidisciplinary challenges

INTRODUCTION

The number of impalpable breast lesions requiring pre-operative lesion localization (PLL) continues to increase. The use of Radio-guided Occult Lesion Localization with Iodine 125 Seeds (ROLLIS) offers multiple benefits for the multidisciplinary team (MDT), but is not without challenges.

AIMS

The aims of this audit were to review our multidisciplinary team's experience following introduction of ROLLIS as standard of care for PLL, identify challenges and evaluate seed placement accuracy (SPA).

RESULTS/OUTCOMES

Over a nineteen month period, 327 seeds were inserted: 96% of single seed localizations were within 10 mm, 91% within 5 mm and 42% within or in contact with the lesion (or marker clip surrogate) on post-insertion two view mammography. Each component of the MDT reported on benefits of the ROLLIS program and challenges faced. Examples included: an undetectable seed in the operating room, a seed damaged in pathology during specimen processing, suboptimal seed position requiring hook-wire localization (HWL) and delayed seed removal in a patient who initially refused to return for surgery.

CONCLUSION

ROLLIS results in high seed placement accuracy. Despite clear advantages, use of ROLLIS presents some multidisciplinary challenges. Robust patient information, training of new staff and adherence to strict policies and protocols are required to ensure safe delivery of a ROLLIS program.

Retrospective Review of Preoperative Radiofrequency Tag Localization of Breast Lesions in 848 Patients

BACKGROUND. Advantages of radiofrequency tags for preoperative breast lesion localization include decoupling of tag placement from surgical schedules and improved patient comfort. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a preoperative localization radiofrequency tag system for breast lesions requiring surgical excision. METHODS. The cohort for this retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent image-guided needle localization with radiofrequency tags before surgical excision from July 12, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Images and medical records were reviewed to evaluate the pathologic diagnoses serving as indications for tag placement, imaging guidance for tag placement, number of tags placed, and target lesion type. Tag placement technical accuracy rate (defined as deployment of the tag within 1 cm of the edge of the target), success (defined as technical accuracy without complication), and surgical margin and reexcision status were evaluated. RESULTS. A total of 1013 tags were placed under imaging guidance in 848 patients (mean age, 60 years; range, 23-96 years) and 847 subsequently underwent surgical excision. Tags were most commonly placed for invasive carcinoma (537/1013, 53.0%), ductal carcinoma in situ (138/1013, 13.6%), and high-risk lesions (289/1013, 28.5%). A total of 673 (66.4%) tags were deployed under mammographic guidance, whereas 340 (33.6%) were placed under sonographic guidance. Two or more tags were placed in 149 of 848 patients (17.6%). Targeted lesion types primarily included masses (448/1013, 44.2%), biopsy clip markers (331/1013, 32.7%), and calcifications (155/1013, 15.3%). Technical accuracy of placement was achieved in 1004 (99.1%) tags. Of the nine inaccurate tag placements, seven (77.8%) required an additional tag or wire placement. Seven (0.7%) biopsy clip markers were displaced within the breast or removed by the tag device during placement. No complications were reported intraoperatively. Therefore, success was achieved in 997 (98.4%) tags. Tags were successfully retrieved in all 847 patients who underwent surgery. Of the 568 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma, 86 (15.1%) had positive or close surgical margins requiring surgical reexcision. CONCLUSION. Preoperative image-guided localization with radiofrequency tags is a safe and feasible technique for breast lesions requiring surgery. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiofrequency tag localization is an acceptable alternative to needle or wire localization, offering the potential for improved patient workflow and experience.

A decade of intraoperative ultrasound guided breast conservation for margin negative resection - Radioactive, and magnetic, and Infrared Oh My…

BACKGROUND

The oncologic goal of margin-negative breast conservation requires adequate localization of tumor. Intraoperative ultrasound remains most feasible but under-utilized method to localize the tumor and assess margins.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained breast cancer database over a decade was queried for margin status in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conservation. Techniques of tumor localization, margin re-excision and closest margins were analyzed. Rate of conversion to mastectomy was determined.

RESULTS

Of the 945 breast cancer patients treated at a university-based Breast Center of Excellence between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018, 149(15.8%) had ductal carcinoma in situ; 712(75.3%) had invasive ductal carcinoma, and 63(6.7%) had invasive lobular carcinoma. Clinical stage distribution was: T1 = 372(39.4%); T2 = 257(27.2%); T3 = 87(9.2%). Five hundred and eighty three (61.7%) patients underwent breast conservation. The median (25th -75th centile) closest margin was 6(2.5, 10.0) mm. Thirty five (6.0%) patients underwent margin re-excision, of which 9(25%) were converted to mastectomy. Tumor localization was achieved with ultrasound in 521(89.4%) patients and with wire localization in 62(10.6%) patients. The median (25th-75th centile) closest margin with wire localization was 5.0(2.0, 8.5) mm versus 5.0 (2.0, 8.0) mm with ultrasound guidance [p = 0.6635]. The re-excision rate with wire localization was 14.5% versus 4.9% with ultrasound guidance [p = 0.0073]. The unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) for margin revision in wire localized group compared with ultrasound was 3.2 (7.14, 1.42) [p = 0.0045]; multivariate adjusted OR (95%) was 4(9.09, 1.7) [p = 0.0013].

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound guidance for localization of breast cancer remains the most effective option for margin negative breast conservation.

Influence of preoperative breast cancer localization techniques on rates of sentinel lymph node visualization with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy

OBJECTIVES

The use of preoperative image-guided lesion localization for impalpable breast cancer may interfere with lymphatic drainage and cause delayed or reduced visualization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The goal of this audit was to compare rates of SLN visualization in patients undergoing preoperative breast cancer localization with either Iodine 125 seeds (radio-guided occult lesion localization using Iodine 125 seeds, ROLLIS) or hook wire and those with palpable lesions where no localization was required.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 482 patients, who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with hook wire, ROLLIS, or no localization, at three major tertiary hospitals from January 2013 to December 2017. Static lymphoscintigraphy images are performed post administration of subcutaneous periareolar Tc antimony colloid injection. The rate of SLN visualization in the three groups and time to node visualization were analyzed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and eighty-two patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy: 102 after no localization, 211 in hook wire, and 169 following ROLLIS. Very high overall rates of SLN visualization on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were noted in all three groups; no localization group: 99% [95% confidence interval (CI), 94.7-99.8%], hook wire: 98.6% (95% CI, 95.9-99.7%) and ROLLIS: 98.8% (95% CI, 95.8-99.9%). For time to node visualization, a statistically significant difference was found between the no localization versus hook-wire group (P = 0.0015) and no localization versus ROLLIS group (P = 0.00011) but no statistically significant difference between the hook-wire and ROLLIS groups (P = 0.16) was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

High rates of SLN visualization on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were noted in all groups, with no significant reduction when breast lesion localization techniques were used. There was; however, an increased rate of delayed imaging required for SLN visualization in women who had undergone either type of preoperative localization compared with those who had not.

Radioactive Seed Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in an Academic Comprehensive Cancer Program Community Hospital Setting

Wire localized excision (WLE) has been a long-standing method for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Disadvantages of this method include difficulty locating the wire tip in relation to borders of the lesion, imprecise placement of the wire, and the need to place the wire shortly before scheduled surgery. These shortcomings may lead to a high positive margin rate requiring re-excision to obtain clear margins for breast cancer. Radioactive seed localized excision (RSLE) of nonpalpable breast lesions has been advocated as a safe and effective alternative to WLE. The primary endpoints of the study were to compare re-excision rates between WLE and RSLE of nonpalpable breast lesions and to determine if there were any differences in volume of tissue removed. One hundred three patients were included in a retrospective review of localized breast excisions done by a single surgeon. Forty-four patients underwent WLE between April 2007 and February 2009. Fifty-nine patients underwent RSLE between September 2009 and January 2012. Margins were considered to be clear if at least 1 mm of normal tissue was obtained from the circumferential periphery of the lesion in question. RSLE resulted in a re-excision rate of 17 versus 55 per cent re-excision rate for wire localization ( P < 0.001). Excision volume was greater for patients having wire localization ( P = 0.074). RSLE is an effective technique for excision of non-palpable breast lesions in the community setting. This technique allows for accurate localization and appears to allow for smaller volume of tissue to be excised.

Preoperative Wire Localization of the Breast on the Day Before Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of preoperative wire localization performed one day prior to surgery and the relationship between the time interval following wire placement with migration distance within the time-window examined.

METHODS

Two trials were performed with next-day mammography to assess migration. Trial 1 used a standard hooked wire (50 patients, 61 wires). Trial 2 employed a looped wire (50 patients, 59 wires). A third trial was subsequently performed (16 patients, 18 wires) using the looped wire without repeat mammograms. Complications were recorded. Comparative statistical analyses were performed between patients in Trial 1 and Trial 2.

RESULTS

In Trials 1 and 2, no wires required readjustment on the day of surgery. Mean and maximum migration were less with the looped wire (range: 0-7 mm) compared to the hooked wire (range: 0-18 mm), allowing for the elimination of next-day mammograms in Trial 3. A Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant difference between the migration distances for the first two trials (P = 0.11). A Chi-square test showed no significant difference in the direction of the migration between the two trials (P = 0.15). There was no correlation between the time interval of localization and needle migration in the first two trials (r = -0.16, P = 0.22 and -0.12, P = 0.36). Specimen radiographs demonstrated the lesion/biopsy marker clip in all cases in all three trials. No infections or bleeding occurred. Two patients developed an allergic reaction to adhesive.

CONCLUSION

Wire localization performed on the day before surgery is feasible, inexpensive, did not compromise accuracy, and successfully unlinked the radiologic and surgical procedures.

A comparison of two non-radioactive alternatives to wire for the localization of non-palpable breast cancers

PURPOSE

Multiple wire-free technologies for localization of non-palpable breast cancers have emerged as satisfactory alternatives to wire. However, no study has compared two non-radioactive wire-free approaches to one another. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among LOCalizer™ radiofrequency identification (RFID), SAVI Scout® (SAVI), and wire localization (WL).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study of patients undergoing lumpectomy for non-palpable breast cancer at a single institution between August 2017 and February 2019. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on localization technique: RFID, SAVI or WL. Operative times and average tumor volumes were compared using one-way analysis of variance. Positive margin and re-excision rates were compared with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients who underwent lumpectomy for non-palpable breast cancer, 33 patients (31.7%) had RFID, 21 (20.2%) had SAVI, and 50 (48.0%) had WL. Operative times were 79 min for RFID, 81 min for SAVI, and 78 min for WL (p = 0.91). Volume of tissue resected was 36.3 cm³, 31.7 cm³, and 35.3 cm³ for RFID, SAVI, and WL, respectively (p = 0.84). Positive margin rates (RFID 3.0% vs SAVI 9.5% vs WL 8.0%, p = 0.67) and re-excision rates (RFID 6.1% vs SAVI 9.5% vs WL 10.0%, p = 0.82) were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Wire-free localization technologies have been compared to WL demonstrating similar efficacy. Our study suggests that RFID and SAVI Scout also perform similarly to one another. Physicians and institutions may consider more nuanced features of each localization system rather than performance alone when choosing a wire-free alternative.

Use of Reduced Activity Seeds in Breast Radioactive Seed Localization

Radioactive seed localization procedures, using I seeds of typical activity 3.7 MBq and higher, are performed to localize nonpalpable lesions in the breast for surgical excision and pathology analysis. This study evaluated the use and dosimetry of I seeds of activity <3.7 MBq in radioactive seed localization procedures through retrospective health record review, Monte Carlo simulation, and experimental detection. An average seed strength at the time of specimen excision of 2.48 ± 0.629 MBq was used in 295 radioactive seed localization procedures at Gundersen Health System in La Crosse, Wisconsin, US. The average explanted seed activity served as a basis for Monte Carlo simulation of an I IsoAid Advantage seed embedded in soft tissue, which scored the dose deposited to soft tissue. Tabulated values of the dose to postsurgical residual tissue as a function of explanted tumor radius were shown and compared with previously published results. Use of seeds of activity from 1.44 to 3.7 MBq at the time of excision did not adversely affect seed detection and excision. The absorbed dose to residual tissue calculated using Monte Carlo was an average of 1.4 times larger than previously published results when scaled to identical seed strengths. This study demonstrates that seeds of activity <3.7 MBq can be used for radioactive seed localization procedures with no loss in efficacy and a benefit of reduced radiation dose to patients. This is important because the estimated radiation dose to residual tissue is approximately 1.4 times higher than previously indicated.

A Single-Institute Experience With Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions-A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits associated with radioactive seed localization (RSL) in comparison to conventional wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions.

METHODS

Radioactive seed localization was initiated at our institution in July 2013. Retrospective review of all WL performed between June 2012 and July 2013 (2013) and all RSL performed during June 2015 and July 2016 (2016). Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or did not undergo their planned surgeries and WL performed in 2016 were excluded. The following data were collected: final pathology, resection margins for malignant lesions, time to surgery, seed migration, and number of localized lumpectomies performed by each surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 292 WL procedures (288 women) in 2013 and 194 RSL procedures (186 women) in 2016 were eligible for the study. All WLs were inserted the day of surgery. Mean time from RSL insertion to surgery was 4.0 ± 2.8 days (range: 1-17 days). There was no difference in specimen size for malignant lesions (6.8 ± 2.8 cm for WL and 6.9 ± 2.9 cm for RSL; P = .5). Specimen radiographs were obtained in 233 (80%) of 292 WL compared to 194 (100%) of 194 RSL (P < .001). For malignant lesions, positive margins were present in 34 (17.2%) of 198 with WL compared to 15 (10.3%) of 146 with RSL (P < .001). Close margins (≤1 mm) were present in 31 (15.6%) of 198 with WL compared to 1 (0.6%) of 146 with RSL (P < .001). The seed fell out of the specimen during surgery in 6 (3.1%) of 194. No seed loss was recorded. The surgeons (n = 4) who transitioned to RSL increased the number of surgeries per month from a mean of 4.4 ± 2.6 in 2013 to 6.9 ± 3.5 in 2016, equivalent to a 41% increase (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RSL, as compared to conventional WL, resulted in a reduction in the number of pathologically involved surgical margins and was associated with an increased number of surgeries. Furthermore, RSL can be performed up to 14 days prior to surgery, which may improve scheduling flexibility in the radiology department.

Results of a phase I, non-randomized study evaluating a Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization Instrument (MOLLI) for excision of non-palpable breast lesions

PURPOSE

Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization Instrument (MOLLI) is a wireless, non-radioactive alternative for non-palpable breast lesion localization. The primary objective of this first-in-human study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of using MOLLI for intraoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions.

METHODS

Twenty women with non-palpable breast lesions at a single institution received a lumpectomy using the MOLLI guidance system. Patients were co-localized with magnetic and radioactive markers up to 7 days before excision by a dedicated breast radiologist under sonographic guidance. Both markers were localized intraoperatively using dedicated hand-held probes. The primary outcome was successful excision of the magnetic marker, confirmed radiographically and pathologically. Demographic data, margin positivity, and re-excision rates were collected. Surgical oncologists, radiologists, and pathology staff were surveyed for user satisfaction.

RESULTS

Post-radiological analysis: Post-implant mammograms verified that 17/20 markers were placed directly in the lesion center. Radiologists reported that all marker implantations procedures were "easy" or "very easy" following a single training session. Post-surgical analysis: All MOLLI markers were successfully removed with the specimen during surgical excision. In all cases, surgeons ranked the MOLLI guidance system as "very easy" for lesion localization. Pathologic analysis: All patients had negative margins. All anatomic pathology staff ranked the MOLLI system as "very easy" to localize markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The MOLLI guidance system is a reliable and accurate method for intraoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Further evaluation of the MOLLI system in studies against current standards of care is required to demonstrate system cost-effectiveness and improved patient-reported outcomes.

The Wire and Beyond: Recent Advances in Breast Imaging Preoperative Needle Localization

Many patients with breast cancer are candidates for breast conservation therapy. This group includes individuals with small nonpalpable tumors detected at screening mammography and those with sufficient tumor shrinkage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast conservation surgery often requires the use of an imaging-guided preoperative localization procedure, during which a device is placed within or adjacent to the target lesion to guide the surgeon intraoperatively. For decades, wire localization has been the standard for preoperative localization in breast imaging. With this method, a wire is placed in the breast percutaneously, with the distal wire segment positioned adjacent to the abnormality and the proximal wire segment remaining outside the breast. Because of the external component of the wire, the patient must be compliant, and care must be taken to not disturb the wire's position before surgery. Scheduling flexibility is also limited because the wire localization must be performed on the same day as the subsequent surgery. More recently, the available options for performing preoperative localization have expanded greatly and now include the use of nonwire devices such as radioactive and magnetic seeds, radar reflectors, and radiofrequency identification tags. Nonwire localization devices can be placed days in advance of the surgery, at the patient's convenience, to avoid wire-related challenges and complications. They are placed percutaneously within or adjacent to the target breast lesion and detected intraoperatively by using a probe outside the breast.^©RSNA, 2019.

Is the future magnetic? Magseed localisation for non palpable breast cancer. A multi-centre non randomised control study

INTRODUCTION

Magseed is an alternative method of localising non-palpable breast lesions that has addressed many of the limitations of wire guided localisation (WGL). It consists of a paramagnetic seed that can be visualised on mammography and ultrasound. Intraoperative localisation of the seed is achieved with the use of the Sentimag probe. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare localisation in patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE) for non-palpable lesions between Magseed and WGL.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing image-guided WLE between October 2017 and September 2018 in two academic breast units with a planned accrual of 100 consecutive patients undergoing Magseed localisation. Data was also collected on a cohort of 100 consecutive patients undergoing WGL in the same time period.

RESULTS

Demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. 4/104 patients were converted preoperatively from Magseed to WGL (2 misplaced Magseeds; 2 undetected Magseeds). Intraoperative identification and excision of the localised lesion was successful in all patients as confirmed with specimen radiography. Overall no significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients requiring re-excision between the two groups (Magseed 16% vs. WGL 14% p = 0.692). Specimens size by weight and volume was similar for both groups (Magseed 39.6 g vs. WGL 44.5 g p = 0.206 and 90.1 cm³ for Magseed vs. 95.6 cm³ for WGL p = 0.579).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series Magseed localisation proved to be as reliable and effective as WGL in terms of lesion identification, excision with tumour free margins and specimen weight.

A Review of Options for Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer

Invasive breast cancer is a common disease, and the most common initial site of metastatic disease are the axillary lymph nodes. As the standard of care shifts towards less invasive surgery in the axilla for patients with invasive breast cancer, techniques have been developed for axillary node localization that allow targeted dissection of specific lymph nodes without requiring full axillary lymph node dissection. Many of these techniques have been adapted from technologies developed for localization of lesions within the breast and include marker clip placement with intraoperative ultrasound, carbon-suspension liquids, localization wires, radioactive seeds, magnetic seeds, radar reflectors, and radiofrequency identification devices.The purpose of this article is to summarize these methods and describe benefits and drawbacks of each method for performing localization of lymph nodes in the axilla.

Evaluation of a Ferromagnetic Marker Technology for Intraoperative Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the magnetic occult lesion localization instrument (MOLLI) system that involves implantation of a small, ferromagnetic marker to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. Characterization of the system was undertaken as part of what is, to our knowledge, the first study to assess the MOLLI system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MOLLI system consists of a handheld probe that can detect the position and distance of an implanted magnetic marker. The system presents the surgeon with an accurate assessment of lesion location and depth measurement for precise 3D localization. The marker is implanted under ultrasound or mammographic guidance at any time before the surgical procedure and requires no special precautions. Experimental analysis focused on characterization of the following aspects of the MOLLI system: visualization of the marker under imaging, 3D detection of the magnetic marker, spatial resolution of the probe to detect markers placed in close proximity, and the effect of signal interference on system performance.

RESULTS

The MOLLI system can reliably detect mean (± SD) marker depths up to 53 ± 8.56 mm from the probe. Bracketing large lesions or localizing multiple lesions can be accomplished by placing markers as close as 10 mm apart, at depths of up to 42 mm. The biologically inert MOLLI marker is readily visible under ultrasound and mammographic guidance, and it is differentiable from radiologic clips. The effect of surgical instruments on MOLLI functioning is minimal and does not impact system accuracy or reliability.

CONCLUSION

The MOLLI system offers an accurate and efficient alternative lesion localization method for nonpalpable breast lesions.

Clinical utility of radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer: A retrospective single institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

With advances in mammographic screening techniques, it has become easier to detect nonpalpable breast lesions at an early stage. Pre-surgical localization of lesions by radioactive seed localization (RSL) has several benefits over conventional wire localization (WL) in guiding breast conserving surgery. In this study, we compared WL and RSL, focusing on the relationship between the techniques and in-breast recurrence or margin positivity.

METHODS

This study included 1083 patients with nonpalpable breast lesions who underwent breast conserving surgery between 2010 and 2015. The patients were classified into WL and RSL groups.

RESULTS

Margin positivity and in-breast recurrence rates did not differ significantly between the WL and RSL groups (P = 0.368 and P = 0.167, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade (OR: 5.016; 95% CI: 1.53-23.059) was significantly associated with margin positivity in patients undergoing RSL. Tumor size was significantly associated with in-breast recurrence in both the WL group (OR: 2.299; 95% CI: 1.561-3.411) and RSL group (OR: 2.998; 95% CI: 1.128-8.043).

CONCLUSION

As the method of tumor localization did not influence margin positivity or in-breast recurrence, either WL or RSL appear to be appropriate for breast conserving surgery. Given the advantages of RSL, including the ability to perform this technique days to weeks before surgery, we propose that high-volume breast centers consider adopting this localization method.

Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization

Screening mammography increases detection of non-palpable breast lesions requiring image-guided localization prior to surgery. Accurate preoperative localization is crucial for successful surgical outcomes. Wire-guided localization is currently the most widely used localization method for non-palpable breast lesions; however, this technique has multiple disadvantages including patient discomfort, possible wire transection and migration, suboptimal surgical incision placement due to wire location and limited scheduling flexibility decreasing operating room efficiency. As a result, promising new techniques including radioactive seed localization, non-radioactive radar localization and magnetic seed localization have been developed as alternatives. In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques and discuss their advantages, drawbacks and currently available outcome data.

A fiber optoacoustic guide with augmented reality for precision breast-conserving surgery

Lumpectomy, also called breast-conserving surgery, has become the standard surgical treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, accurately locating the tumor during a lumpectomy, especially when the lesion is small and nonpalpable, is a challenge. Such difficulty can lead to either incomplete tumor removal or prolonged surgical time, which result in high re-operation rates (~25%) and increased surgical costs. Here, we report a fiber optoacoustic guide (FOG) with augmented reality (AR) for sub-millimeter tumor localization and intuitive surgical guidance with minimal interference. The FOG is preoperatively implanted in the tumor. Under external pulsed light excitation, the FOG omnidirectionally broadcasts acoustic waves through the optoacoustic effect by a specially designed nano-composite layer at its tip. By capturing the acoustic wave, three ultrasound sensors on the breast skin triangulate the FOG tip's position with 0.25-mm accuracy. An AR system with a tablet measures the coordinates of the ultrasound sensors and transforms the FOG tip's position into visual feedback with <1-mm accuracy, thus aiding surgeons in directly visualizing the tumor location and performing fast and accurate tumor removal. We further show the use of a head-mounted display to visualize the same information in the surgeons' first-person view and achieve hands-free guidance. Towards clinical application, a surgeon successfully deployed the FOG to excise a "pseudo tumor" in a female human cadaver. With the high-accuracy tumor localization by FOG and the intuitive surgical guidance by AR, the surgeon performed accurate and fast tumor removal, which will significantly reduce re-operation rates and shorten the surgery time.

Radioactive seed localization compared with wire-guided localization of non-palpable breast carcinoma in breast conservation surgery- the first experience in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

In the UK, guidewires have traditionally been used for localization of non-palpable breast lesions in patients undergoing breast conservation surgery (BCS). Radioactive seed localization (RSL) using Iodine-125 seeds is an alternative localization method and involves inserting a titanium capsule, containing radioactive Iodine-125, into the breast lesion. We aim to demonstrate feasibility of RSL compared with guidewire-localization (GWL) for BCS in the UK.

METHODS

Data were collected on 100 patients with non-palpable unifocal invasive carcinoma of the breast undergoing GWL WLE prior to the introduction of RSL and the first 100 patients treated with RSL WLE. Statistical comparisons were made using Χ²-squared analysis or unpaired two-sample t-test. Significance was determined to be at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Mean total tumour size was 19.44 mm (range: 5-55) in the GWL group and 18.61 mm (range: 3.8-59) in the RSL group (p = 0.548), while mean total specimen excision weight was significantly lower in the RSL group; 31.55 g (range: 4.5-112) vs 37.42 g (range: 7.8-157.1) (p = 0.018). Although 15 patients had inadequate surgical resection margins in the GWL group compared the 13 in the RSL group (15 vs 13%, respectively, p = 0.684), 10 of the patients in the GWL group had invasive carcinoma present resulting in at least one positive margin compared with only 3 patients in the RSL group (10 vs 3%, respectively, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

In this study, RSL is shown to be non-inferior to the use of GWL for non-palpable carcinoma in patients undergoing BCS and we suggest that it could be introduced successfully in other breast units. Advances in knowledge: Here we have demonstrated the use of RSL localization results in significant lower weight resection specimens of breast carcinoma when compared with a matched group using GWL, without any significant differences in oncological outcome between the groups.

Comparative Evaluation of Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Localization and Wire Localization for Resection of Breast Lesions

Purpose

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) uses a titanium seed labeled with iodine-125 energy for surgery of nonpalpable breast lesions. RSL facilitates radiology–surgery scheduling and allows for improved oncoplasty compared with wire localization (WL). The purpose of this work was to compare the 2 techniques.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of all breast lesions operated with RSL between February 2013 and March 2015 at our university institution, and compared with an equivalent number of surgeries performed with a single WL. Imaging and pathology reports were reviewed for information on guidance mode, accuracy of targeting, nature of excised lesion, size and volume of surgical specimen, status of margins, and reinterventions.

Results

A total of 254 lesions (247 women) were excised with RSL and compared with 257 lesions (244 women) whose surgery was guided by WL. Both groups were comparable in lesion pathology, guidance mode for RSL or WL positioning, and accuracy of targeting (98% correct). Mean delay between biopsy and surgery was 84 days for RSL versus 103 after WL ( P = .04). No differences were noted after RSL or WL for surgical specimen mean weight, largest diameter, and volume excised. For malignancies, the rate of positive margins was comparable (2.8%-3%), with 5 of 10 women in the RSL group who underwent a second surgery displaying residual malignancy compared with 3 of 9 women in the WL group.

Conclusions

RSL is safe and accurate, and has comparable surgical endpoints to WL. Because RSL offers flexible scheduling and facilitated oncoplasty, RSL may replace WL for resection of nonpalpable single breast lesions.

Radioactive seed localization for breast conservation surgery: Low positive margin rate with no learning curve

BACKGROUND

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative to wire localization. We compared the rate of positive margins for evidence of a learning curve in implementing RSL.

METHODS

A retrospective review of RSL by three surgeons at a single institution from 2002 to 2016. Positive margins were defined as ink on tumor.

RESULTS

Surgeon experience with RSL for ranged from 142 to >500 cases. The positive margin rate among the first 100 of each surgeons' experience (n = 300) was 2.3% and the rate during the most recent up to 100 cases after experience with at least 100 RSL procedures (n = 242) was 4.1% (p = 0.32). Individual surgeon's positive margin rates ranged from 2 to 5% in the early experience and 2-7% in the later experience (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

RSL for breast conservation surgery has a low rate of positive margins even early in a surgeon's experience. Implementation of RSL can be done with no evidence of a learning curve.

Physician preference and patient satisfaction with radioactive seed versus wire localization

BACKGROUND

Nonpalpable breast lesions require localization before excision. This is most commonly performed with a wire (WL) or a radioactive seed (SL), which is placed into the breast under radiographic guidance. Although there are advantages of each modality, there are no guidelines to address which patients should undergo WL versus SL. We investigated factors influencing the selection of SL versus WL at our institution and assessed patient satisfaction with each procedure.

METHODS

Patients undergoing preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions from May 2014 through August 2015 were included. Physicians were surveyed on surgical scheduling to evaluate factors influencing the decision to perform SL or WL. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a survey at the first postoperative visit. Retrospective chart review was performed.

RESULTS

341 patients were included: 104 (30%) patients underwent SL and 237 (70%) underwent WL. There was no difference in patient age, benign versus malignant disease, or need for concomitant axillary surgery comparing the SL versus WL groups. Physician survey indicated that 18% of patients were candidates for WL only. Of the patients who were eligible for both, 88 (41%) ultimately underwent SL and 126 (59%) had WL. The most commonly cited reason for selection of one localization method or the other was physician preference, followed by patient preference or avoiding additional visit. There was no significant difference in self-reported preoperative anxiety level, convenience of the localization procedure, pain of the localization procedure, operative experience, postoperative pain level or medication requirement, or overall patient satisfaction comparing patients who underwent SL and WL.

CONCLUSIONS

SL and WL offer patients similar comfort and satisfaction. Factors influencing selection of one modality over the other include both logistic and clinical considerations.

Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery

Importance

New techniques for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions may decrease the reoperation rate in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with rates after surgery with the standard wire-guided localization. However, a valid reoperation rate for this procedure needs to be established for comparison, as previous studies on this procedure include a variety of malignant and benign breast lesions.

Objectives

To determine the reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS in patients with histologically verified nonpalpable invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to examine whether the risk of reoperation is associated with DCIS or histologic type of the IBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide study including women with histologically verified IBC or DCIS having wire-guided BCS performed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, used data from the Danish National Patient Registry that were cross-checked with the Danish Breast Cancer Group database and the Danish Pathology Register.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS in patients with IBC or DCIS.

Results

Wire-guided BCS was performed in 4118 women (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [8.7] years). A total of 725 patients (17.6%) underwent a reoperation: 593 were reexcisions (14.4%) and 132 were mastectomies (3.2%). Significantly more patients with DCIS (271 of 727 [37.3%]) than with IBC (454 of 3391 [13.4%]) underwent a reoperation (adjusted odds ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.19-4.58; P < .001). After the first reexcision, positive margins were still present in 97 patients (16.4%). The risk of repeated positive margins was significantly higher in patients with DCIS vs those with IBC (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.42-3.43; P < .001). The risk of reoperation was significantly increased in patients with lobular carcinoma vs those with ductal carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI 1.06-1.95; P = .02). A total of 202 patients (4.9%) had a subsequent completion mastectomy, but no difference was found in the type of reoperation between patients with DCIS and those with IBC.

Conclusions and Relevance

A lower reoperation rate after wire-guided BCS was found in this study than those shown in previous studies. However, the risk of reoperation in patients with DCIS was 3 times higher than in those with IBC. The widespread use of mammographic screening will increase the number of patients diagnosed with DCIS, making a precise localization of nonpalpable DCIS lesions even more important.