Positive Ultrasound-guided Lymph Node Needle Biopsy in Breast Cancer may not Mandate Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Are Clinically Node-Negative Patients with a Positive Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy Appropriate Candidates for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

BACKGROUND

Whether cN0 patients with image-detected nodal metastases are appropriate for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or should proceed directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We sought to determine how often ALND is needed with upfront surgery and to identify factors associated with ≥ 3 positive SLNs after a positive preoperative lymph node (LN) biopsy.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and a positive LN biopsy treated from 2014 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Patients who received NAC were excluded. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between women with 1-2 positive SLNs and ≥ 3 positive SLNs.

RESULTS

Of 90 eligible patients, 66 (73%) had 1-2 positive SLNs and 24 (27%) had ≥ 3 positive SLNs. The median patient age was 62 years, median tumor size was 2.2 cm, and 16 women (18%) received a mastectomy. There was no difference in body mass index, tumor size, histology, grade, multifocality, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and receptor status between groups. On multivariable analysis, having ≥ 3 positive SLNs was associated with > 1 abnormal LN on preoperative imaging (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-14.0; p = 0.01), microscopic extracapsular extension in the SLNs (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.25-13.7; p = 0.025), and a higher median number of SLNs removed (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.88; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70% of women with cT1-2 breast cancer with image-detected nodal metastases had < 3 positive SLNs and did not require ALND. To avoid multiple trips to the operating room, frozen section can be considered in women with multiple abnormal LNs on imaging.

Modern management of the axilla

Surgical management of the axilla has evolved considerably in recent years, with a strong focus on de-escalation to minimise morbidity whilst maintaining oncological outcomes. Current trials will focus on the omission of Sentinel node biopsy in select groups of patients, while axillary lymph node dissection will be reserved for those with more aggressive disease.

Recent Advances in the Upfront Surgical Management of the Axilla in Patients with Breast Cancer

Nodal status is an important prognostic indicator. Upfront axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer has historically been both diagnostic and therapeutic-serving to determine nodal status and inform adjuvant therapies, and to remove clinically significant disease. However, trials of de-escalation or omission of axillary surgery altogether consistently demonstrate noninferior oncologic outcomes in a wide variety of patient subsets. These strategies also reduce the morbidity associated with either sentinel lymphadenectomy or axillary lymph node dissection. Here we will briefly review landmark trials that have shaped upfront axillary surgery as well as recent advances, and discuss areas of ongoing investigation and future needs.

Can Axillary Ultrasound Identify Node Positive Patients Who can Avoid an Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended for patients with invasive breast cancer with axillary metastasis treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who do not have a nodal pathologic complete response (n-pCR). We hypothesized that patients with a single, ultrasound-suspicious, nonpalpable lymph node (LN) at diagnosis, who do not achieve an n-pCR, will have ypN1 disease on surgical pathology.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified breast cancer patients in our institution from 2012 to 2020 with axillary metastasis treated with NAC who did not achieve an n-pCR and had an ALND. Patient's tumor characteristics, axillary ultrasound, and lymph node disease burden at the time of surgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty five patients met the criteria and 36% had one suspicious LN on ultrasound, 25% had 2, and 38% had >3. After chemotherapy, 64% had ypN1 disease, 29% had ypN2 disease, and 7% had ypN3 disease. Of the 20 patients with one abnormal LN on initial ultrasound, 17 (85%, 95% CI 61-96%) had ypN1 disease. Eleven patients with one abnormal LN on initial ultrasound also had no suspicious LNs on prechemotherapy physical exam; among these patients, 100% had ypN1 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

For breast cancer patients who do not achieve an n-pCR after NAC, pretreatment normal clinical axillary exam and prechemotherapy ultrasound showing only one abnormal LN is associated with ypN1 disease. It may be reasonable to consider omitting completion ALND in this subset of patients while awaiting the results of the Alliance A011202 trial.

Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer

This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.

Predicting the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features and the use of nomograms: a prospective single-center observational study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to establish two preoperative nomograms to evaluate the risk for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in early breast cancer patients based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 593 consecutive female participants who were diagnosed with cT_1-3N_0-1M₀ breast cancer between March 2018 and May 2019 at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. The participants were randomly classified into training and validation sets in a 4:1 ratio for the development and validation of the nomograms, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of ALN status. We developed Nomogram A and Nomogram B to predict ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence) and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 528 participants were evaluated in the final analyses. Multivariable analysis revealed that the number of suspicious lymph nodes, long axis, short-to-long axis ratio, cortical thickness, tumor location, and histological grade were independent predictors of ALN status. The AUCs of nomogram A in the training and validation groups were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. The AUCs of nomogram B in the training and validation groups were 0.87 and 0.87, respectively. Both nomograms were well-calibrated.

CONCLUSION

We developed two preoperative nomograms that can be used to predict ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence) and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2) in early breast cancer patients. Both nomograms are useful tools that will help clinicians predict the risk of ALN metastasis and facilitate therapy decision-making about axillary surgery.

KEY POINTS

• We developed two preoperative nomograms to predict axillary lymph node status based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features. • Nomogram A was used to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (presence vs. absence). The AUCs in the training and validation groups were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. Nomogram B was used to estimate the number of metastatic lymph nodes ( ≤ 2 vs. > 2). The AUCs in the training and validation group were 0.87 and 0.87, respectively. • Our nomograms may help clinicians weigh the risks and benefits of axillary surgery more appropriately.

Development and validation of a pre- and intra-operative scoring system that distinguishes between non-advanced and advanced axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study

Background

There are currently no scoring-type predictive models using only easily available pre- and intraoperative data developed for assessment of the risk of advanced axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast cancer with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). We aimed to develop and validate a scoring system using only pre- and intraoperative data to distinguish between non-advanced (≤ 3 lymph nodes) and advanced (> 3 lymph nodes) ALNM in patients with breast cancer with metastatic SLNs.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 804 patients with breast cancer (cT1-3cN0) who had metastatic SLNs and had undergone axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We evaluated the risk factors for advanced ALNM using logistic regression analysis and developed and validated a scoring system for the prediction of ALNM using training (n = 501) and validation (n = 303) cohorts, respectively. The predictive performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), and calibration plots.

Results

Ultrasound findings of multiple suspicious lymph nodes, SLN macrometastasis, the ratio of metastatic SLNs to the total number of SLNs removed, and the number of metastatic SLNs were significant risk factors for advanced ALNM. Clinical tumor size and invasive lobular carcinoma were of borderline significance. The scoring system based on these six variables yielded high AUCs (0.90 [training] and 0.89 [validation]). The calibration plots of frequency compared to the predicted probability showed slopes of 1.00 (training) and 0.85 (validation), with goodness-of-fit for the model. When the cutoff score was set at 4, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of excluding patients with advanced ALNM were 96.8% (training) and 96.9% (validation). The AUC for predicting advanced ALNM using our scoring system was significantly higher than that predicted by a single independent predictor, such as the number of positive SLNs or the proportion of positive SLNs. Similarly, our scoring system also showed good discrimination and calibration ability when the analysis was restricted to patients with one or two SLN metastases.

Conclusion

Our easy-to-use scoring system can exclude advanced ALNM with high NPVs. It may contribute to reducing the risk of undertreatment with adjuvant therapies in patients with metastatic SLNs, even if ALND is omitted.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02779-9.

The role of pre-operative axillary ultrasound in assessment of axillary tumor burden in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that a significant proportion of patients with axillary nodal metastases diagnosed by pre-operative axillary ultrasound (AUS)-guided needle biopsy were over-treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The role of routine AUS and needle biopsy in early breast cancer was questioned. This review aims to determine if pre-operative AUS could predict the extent of axillary tumor burden and need of ALND.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase literature databases were searched systematically for abnormal AUS characteristics and axillary nodal burden. Studies were eligible if they correlated the sonographic abnormalities in AUS with the resultant axillary nodal burden in ALND according to the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective studies and one prospective study with 1658 patients were included. Sixty-five percent of patients with one abnormal lymph node in AUS and 56% of those with two had low axillary nodal burden. Using one abnormal lymph node as the cut-off, the pooled sensitivity and specificity in prediction of axillary nodal burden were 66% (95%CI 63-69%) and 73% (95% CI 70-76%), respectively. Across the six studies that evaluated suspicious nodal characteristics, increased nodal cortical thickness may be associated with high axillary nodal burden.

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients with pre-operative positive AUS and biopsy proven axillary nodal metastases were over-treated by ALND. Quantification of suspicious nodes and extent of cortical morphological changes in AUS may help identify suitable patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Rates of pathologic nodal disease among cN0 and cN1 patients undergoing routine axillary ultrasound and neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Routine axillary ultrasound (AxUS) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. Here, we report rates of AxUS-detected nodal disease among patients with normal clinical exams, and rates of pathologic nodal disease after NAC based on method of nodal disease detection.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic findings were prospectively collected for stage I-III breast cancer patients selected for NAC. All patients had pre-treatment AxUS, suspicious nodes were biopsied. The following four patient cohorts were examined: patients with suspicious exam or AxUS but negative biopsy (Suspicious cN0); those with normal exam and normal AxUS (Not Suspicious cN0); those with normal exam but suspicious AxUS and positive biopsy (AxUS-detected cN1); and those with abnormal exam and positive biopsy (exam-detected cN1). Sentinel (SLN) and non-sentinel lymph nodes (non-SLN) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry; nodal metastases of any size were considered positive.

RESULTS

500 patients were included. Of 310 patients with normal axillary exams, 160 had suspicious AxUS, 65 were biopsy-negative (Suspicious cN0) and 95/310 (30.6%) were biopsy-positive (AxUS-detected cN1). Of 190 with abnormal axillary exams, 166 were biopsy-proven node-positive (exam-detected cN1) and 24 were AxUS or biopsy-negative (Suspicious cN0). Rates of pathologic nodal disease were 20/150 (13.3%) among Not Suspicious cN0 patients, 12/89 (13.5%) among Suspicious cN0 (p = 0.97). Rates of residual nodal disease were 55/95 (57.9%) among AxUS-detected cN1 patients, 102/166 (61.4%) among exam-detected cN1 (p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

AxUS detected nodal disease in 30.6% of patients with normal clinical exams selected for NAC. Rates of pathologic nodal disease were similar among AxUS-detected and exam-detected cN1 patients.

Preoperative Sonographic Prediction of Limited Axillary Disease in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Meeting the Z0011 Criteria: an Alternative to Sentinel Node Biopsy?

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of preoperative sonographic staging for prediction of limited axillary disease (LAD, one or two metastatic lymph nodes) and to identify factors associated with high prediction-pathology concordance in patients with early-stage breast cancer meeting the Z0011 criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in this retrospective, multicentric analysis of prospectively acquired service databases. The accuracy of LAD prediction was assessed separately for patients with one and two suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative sonography. Test validity outcomes for LAD prediction were calculated for both groups, and a multivariate model was used to identify factors associated with high accuracy of LAD prediction.

RESULTS

Of 2059 enrolled patients, 1513 underwent sentinel node biopsy, 436 primary and 110 secondary axillary dissection. For LAD prediction in patients with one suspicious lymph node on preoperative ultrasound, sensitivity was 92% (95% CI 87-95%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 92% (95% CI 87-95%), and the false-negative rate (FNR) was 8% (95% CI 5-13%). For patients with two preoperatively suspicious nodes, the sensitivity, NPV, and FNR were 89% (95% CI 84-93%), 73% (62-83%), and 11% (95% CI 7-16%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the number of suspicious lymph nodes was associated inversely with correct LAD prediction ([OR 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.93), p ≤ 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic axillary staging in patients with one metastatic lymph node predicted by preoperative ultrasound showed high accuracy and a false-negative rate comparable to sentinel node biopsy for prediction of limited axillary disease.

Higher risk tumor features are not associated with higher nodal stage in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Studies support omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with sentinel node-positive disease, with ALND recommended for patients who present with clinically positive nodes. Here, we evaluate patient and tumor characteristics and pathologic nodal stage of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer who undergo ALND to determine if differences exist based on nodal presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2019 defined three groups of patients with ER + breast cancer who underwent ALND for positive nodes: SLN + (positive node identified at SLN biopsy), cNUS (abnormal preoperative US and biopsy), and cNpalp (palpable adenopathy). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or presented with axillary recurrence were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients, 94 were SLN + , 40 were cNUS, and 57 were cNpalp. Patients with SLN + compared with cNpalp were younger (56 vs 64 years, p < 0.01), more often pre-menopausal (41% vs 14%, p < 0.01), and White (65% vs 39%, p = 0.01) with more tumors that were low-grade (36% vs 8%, p < 0.01). Rates of PR + (p = 0.16), levels of Ki67 expression (p = 0.07) and LVI (p = 0.06) did not differ significantly among groups. Of patients with SLN + disease, 64% had pN1 disease compared to 38% of cNUS (p = 0.1) and 40% of cNpalp (p = 0.01). On univariable analysis, tumor size (p = 0.01) and histology (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with pN1 disease, with size remaining an independent predictor on multivariable analysis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Historically, higher risk features have been attributed to patients with clinically positive nodes precluding omission of ALND, but when restricting evaluation to patients with ER + breast cancer, only tumor size is associated with higher nodal stage.

Does ultrasound evaluation of the axilla increase the rate of axillary lymph node dissection in early stage clinically node negative breast cancer patients?

Background

Management and axillary staging of breast cancer has become less invasive and more conservative, over the decades. Considering Z011, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in T1-2 N0-1 breast cancers with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), if they are candidates for breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to recognize if pre-operative axillary US evaluation in early-stage breast cancer could lead to more ALND in post Z011 era.

Method

463 breast cancer patients were evaluated. 368 early-stage breast cancer patients (T1-2 N0) were included. We did not perform axillary US in early stage clinically node negative patients; however, 97 patients had axillary US prior to our visit. If axillary US could detect more than two suspicious LNs, US guided biopsy was performed. The remaining clinically node negative patients underwent upfront SLNB. ALND was performed if more than two SLNs were metastatic, or US-guided ALN biopsy proved metastatic involvement.

Results

97 patients had axillary US evaluation before the surgery. 67 patients (69.2%) did not have any suspicious US detected axillary LNs, 17 patients (17.5%) had one, 7 patients (7.2%) had two, and 6 patients (6.2%) had more than two suspicious LNs according to their axillary US evaluation. Those with more than two suspicious LNs underwent ALN US-guided biopsy. Metastatic involvement of the LNs was proved in all of them and they underwent upfront ALND. ALND revealed more than 2 metastatic LNs in 2/6 patients (33.3%). 91 patients who were evaluated by axillary US, had less than two US detected suspicious LNs and underwent SLNB. Amongst 24 patients with one or two US detected suspicious LNs, 1/24 patient had more than two positive SLNs and underwent ALND. In this group 15.6% underwent ALND and 5.2% of them were unnecessary according to the recent guidelines. Axillary US had a false positive rate of 36.6%. The sensitivity of axillary US in distinguishing patients with more than two suspicious LNs in clinically node negative patients was 25%. In the second group (without pre-operative axillary US evaluation), SLNB was performed. 204/272 patients (75%) did not have LN metastasis. 54/272 patients (19.9%) had one or two metastatic SLNs and according to Z011, ALND was omitted. 5.1% had more than two metastatic SLNs and underwent ALND.

Conclusion

US evaluation of the axilla in early stage, clinically node negative breast cancer patients, is not sensitive enough to recognize more than two metastatic ALNs. It leads to more unnecessary ALND. Despite the small number of patients in this study, these results question the rationale of axillary US guided biopsy in low burden (less than two) suspicious LNs. looking for an imaging modality with a higher sensitivity in detecting the Burdon of axillary metastatic involvement is mandatory.

Stratification of axillary lymph node metastasis risk with breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer

Aims: To develop a model based on breast MRI to stratify axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer. Patients & methods: A total of 134 eligible patients were used to build a predicting model, which was validated with an independent group of 57 patients and evaluated for accuracy and sensitivity. Results: A model based on breast MRI was developed and yielded total accuracy of 82.5% and sensitivities of 94.3, 64.3 and 62.5% to predict patients with no, low and heavy ALNM burden, respectively, in the validation group. Conclusion: A noninvasive model based on breast MRI was developed to preoperatively stratify ALNM in breast cancer; its performance needs to be validated and improved in future research.

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer with Cytology-Proven Axillary Metastasis Safe? A Prospective Single-Arm Study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate pathologic lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with cytology-proven axillary metastasis. This study was designed prospectively. We performed axillary lymph node dissections (ALND) after lymphatic mapping by near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG). We evaluated 72 breast cancer patients with cytology-proven axillary metastasis by curative surgery at the Samsung Medical Center between May of 2016 and December of 2017. Among the 72 patients with cytology-proven axillary metastasis, 14 of 39 patients (35.9%) with one or two sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases were metastasized to post-sentinel lymph node. Thirteen of fourteen patients had additional non-sentinel lymph node metastases, seven of thirteen patients also had additional level II lymph node metastases, and one patient had only one additional level II lymph node metastasis. Of T1 or T2 stage patients, 10 of 33 patients (30.3%) with one or two sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases were metastasized to post-sentinel lymph node. Even in patients without SLN metastasis, 50% of the patients had at least three LN metastases, and 40% in the T1 or T2 stage patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without ALND might be not safe for patients with cytology-proven axillary metastasis.

The Attitudes of Brazilian Breast Surgeons on Axillary Management in Early Breast Cancer-10 Years after the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial First Publication

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial on axillary breast cancer surgery management in Brazil following publication of that study (2010) and again in 2020.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A survey of members of the Brazilian Society of Mastology.

RESULTS

Of 1627 breast surgeons, 799 (49.1%) completed and returned the questionnaire. For patients with the Z11 inclusion criteria, following detection of a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), axillary dissection (AD) was recommended by 99.2% of respondents before publication of the study, 47.5% in 2010 and 18.5% in 2020 (p < 0.001). In breast-conserving surgery, if there were micro-metastases, 2.6% would perform AD, 30.3% axillary radiotherapy, and 67.1% no additional axillary treatment, while with macro-metastases, these proportions were 21.3%, 52.2%, and 26.5%, respectively. In cases of mastectomy and of nodal extracapsular extension, 43.4% and 36% of surgeons, respectively, recommended AD. For clinically negative axilla and suspicious findings at ultrasonography, 69% of the surgeons would apply the Z11 approach. Most applied the Z11 criteria in cases of younger patients (83.6%) and triple-negative and/or HER2 positive tumors (74%). AD was significantly more likely to be recommended by surgeons who did not work in academic institutes, who worked in locations other than capital cities, who were not board-certified, and who were ≥ 50 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey revealed substantial changes in axillary surgery management in cN0/pathologically positive SLN, particularly following publication of the updated Z11 results and other similar studies. A better education environment and long-term follow-up were factors associated with the incorporation of Z11-related changes in practice.

Can preoperative axillary ultrasound and biopsy of suspicious lymph nodes be an alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinical node negative early breast cancer?

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of preoperative axillary ultrasonography (AUS) and preoperative axillary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) from suspicious lymph nodes in clinically node-negative breast cancer to compare with radiologically positive and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positive involvement.

METHOD

Clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer patients were included in the study. These patients underwent preoperative AUS examination, suspicious lymph nodes were evaluated with FNAB. AUS-FNAB results were compared with those of SLNB or axillary dissection.

RESULTS

Of 181 patients undergoing AUS, 32 were reported to have axillary metastasis, 25 suspicious, and 124 benign nodes. The suspicious group underwent FNAB examination and metastasis was found in 9 of them. The sensitivity of AUS-FNAB was found to be 64.06%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 83.5%. The false negativity rate (FN) of this method was 16,4%. Lymphovascular invasion and tumour size were found statistically significant factors for false negativity.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that axillary AUS-FNAB with its high NPV, low FN rate, may be a clinical alternative to SLNB for early-stage breast cancer patients.

Is image-guided core needle biopsy of borderline axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients clinically helpful?

BACKGROUND

When borderline axillary lymph nodes (bALN) are identified on ultrasound (US) for breast cancer (BC) patients, preoperative management is unclear. We aimed to evaluate if core needle biopsy (CNB) for bALN is clinically helpful or disruptive.

METHODS

Retrospective review of BC patients with bALN from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Clinicopathologic data were compared for those who did and did not have CNB.

RESULTS

CNB (n = 34) and no CNB (n = 31) were similar with respect to clinicopathologic factors. Surgical LN-positive rate was the same between cohorts (p = 0.26). CNB was disruptive in 58.8 %; all had CNB for pN0 disease. CNB was helpful in 34.2 %: 14.7 % proceeded directly to axillary dissection; 17.6 % had positive LN localized after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CNB for bALN is more likely clinically disruptive and did not impact surgical LN positive rate. BC patients with bALN should undergo CNB only if it will change clinical management.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy with one-step nucleic acid assay relegates the need for preoperative ultrasound-guided biopsy staging of the axilla in patients with early stage breast cancer

Avoiding axillary node clearance in patients with early stage breast cancer and low-burden node-positive axillary disease is an emerging practice. Informing the decision to adopt axillary conservation is examined by comparing routine preoperative axillary staging using ultrasound (AUS) ± AUS biopsy (AUSB) with intraoperative staging using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and a one-step nucleic acid cytokeratin-19 amplification assay (OSNA). A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of 1,315 consecutive new diagnoses of breast cancer in 1,306 patients was undertaken in the present study. An AUS ± AUSB was performed on all patients as part of their initial assessment. Patients who had a normal ultrasound (AUS-) or negative biopsy (AUSB-) followed by SLNB with OSNA ± axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and those with a positive AUSB (AUSB+), were assessed. Tests for association were determined using a χ² and Fisher's Exact test. A total of 266 (20.4%) patients with cT1-3 cN0 staging received 271 AUSBs. Of these, 205 biopsies were positive and 66 were negative. The 684 patients with an AUS-/AUSB-assessment proceeded to SLNB with OSNA. AUS sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 0.53 [0.44-0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI)] and 0.58 (0.53-0.64, 95% CI), respectively. Using a total tumour load cut-off of 15,000 copies/µl to predict ≥2 macro-metastases, the sensitivity and NPV for OSNA were 0.82 (0.71-0.92, 95% CI) and 0.98 (0.97-0.99, 95% CI) (OSNA vs. AUS P<0.0001). Of the AUSB+ patients, 51% had ≤2 positive nodes following ALND and were potentially over-treated. Where available, SLNB with OSNA should replace AUSB for axillary assessment in cT1-2 cN0 patients with ≤2 indeterminate nodes seen on AUS.

Prediction of axillary nodal burden in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma using MRI

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical and imaging features associated with a high nodal burden (≥ 3 metastatic lymph nodes [LNs]) and compare diagnostic performance of US and MRI in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

METHODS

Retrospective search revealed 239 patients with ILC and 999 with IDC who underwent preoperative US and MRI between January 2016 and June 2019. Patients with ILC were propensity-score-matched with patients with IDC. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with ≥ 3 metastatic LNs.

RESULTS

412 patients (206 ILC and 206 IDC) were evaluated. Of all patients with ILC, 27.2% (56/206) were node-positive and 7.8% (16/206) showed a high nodal burden. In multivariate analysis, the clinical N stage was the only independent factor associated with a high nodal burden in patients with IDC (odds ratio [OR] 6.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-24.73; P = 0.009), but not in patients with ILC. Increased cortical thickness with loss of fatty hilum on US was associated with a high nodal burden in patients with ILC (OR 58.40; 95% CI 5.09-669.71; P = 0.001) and IDC (OR 24.14; 95% CI 3.52-165.37; P = 0.001), while suspicious LN findings at MRI were independently associated with a high nodal burden in ILC only (OR 13.94; 95% CI 2.61-74.39; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ILC, MRI findings of suspicious LNs were helpful to predict a high nodal disease burden.

Assessing the Burden of Nodal Disease for Breast Cancer Patients with Clinically Positive Nodes: Hope for More Limited Axillary Surgery

BACKGROUND

Omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is accepted for patients with one or two positive sentinel nodes, and studies are focusing on clinically node-positive patients who have been downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Evidence is lacking for patients with positive nodes who undergo surgery upfront. These patients are assumed to have a higher burden of nodal disease such that ALND remains the standard of care.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ALND for breast cancer between 2010 and 2019 at the authors' institution were retrospectively identified. Those with clinical N1 disease were included in the study. Patients who received NAC and those who had surgery for sentinel node positive disease or axillary recurrence were excluded. Clinical and pathologic factors associated with nodal stage were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 61.3% had a palpable node on exam, and 41.4% ultimately had pN1 disease. Most of the tumors were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.5%), and 21.7% of the tumors were invasive lobular cancers. Lobular histology, tumor size, and metastasis size were associated with higher nodal stage. In the multivariable analysis, the patients with nodal metastasis larger than 10 mm had significantly lower odds of having pN1 disease (odds ratio 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.69; p = 0.02). In a subset analysis of patients with palpable nodes, tumor size and histology remained significantly associated with nodal stage.

CONCLUSION

More than 40% of breast cancer patients with clinically positive nodes had minimal nodal disease (pN1) at surgery. Additionally, palpable nodes on exam did not predict higher nodal stage. A subset of patients with clinically positive nodes may be identified who can potentially be spared the morbidity of ALND.

Interobserver variability between experienced radiologists in evaluating the number of abnormal lymph nodes seen on preoperative axillary ultrasound

AIM

To determine the interobserver variability of experienced radiologists in evaluating the number of suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) seen on axillary ultrasound (AUS) examination, and to evaluate the effects of clinicopathological features on the discordance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective non-randomised triple-blind study was conducted from July 2016 to December 2017 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital. Three experienced radiologists performed AUS on 462 patients (469 axillae) with invasive breast cancer independently and assessed the number of abnormal LNs during the real-time AUS examination. Interobserver agreement was determined according to the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The mean numbers of metastatic LNs on final histology study were 0.35, 0.98, 3.05 and 4.70 for patients with 0, 1, 2 and >2 abnormal nodes on preoperative AUS. When the cut-off (the number of abnormal LNs seen on AUS was >1) at which the maximal sum of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of ≥3 tumour-involved LNs was achieved was applied, the Az values ranged from 0.776 to 0.811. When the number of abnormal LNs was grouped into two-category classification (0-1 versus ≥2 abnormal LNs detected by AUS), good interobserver agreement (kappa: 0.601-0.687) was found, and disagreement between the radiologists was more frequently found in patients with T2-stage tumour and in those with one or two tumour-involved nodes.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal LN count according to two-category classification (0-1 versus ≥2 abnormal LNs detected by AUS) was a feasible method with good accuracy and high repeatability to select patients with heavy nodal disease in the post-Z0011 trial era.

Axillary nodal metastatic burden in patients with breast cancer with clinically positive axillary nodes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine preoperative factors and tumour characteristics related to a high nodal tumour burden in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer. These findings were used to construct a predictive tool to evaluate the patient-specific risk of having more than two axillary lymph node metastases.

METHODS

Altogether, 507 consecutive patients with breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis diagnosed by preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy were reviewed. These patients underwent breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection at Helsinki University Hospital between 2010 and 2014. Patients were grouped into those with one or two, and those with more than two lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

There were 153 patients (30·2 per cent) with one or two lymph node metastases and 354 (69·8 per cent) with more than two metastases. Five-year disease-free survival was poorer for the latter group (P = 0·032). Five-year overall survival estimates for patients with one or two and those with more than two lymph node metastases were 87·0 and 81·4 per cent respectively (P = 0·215). In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with more than two lymph node metastases were: age, tumour size, lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumour, extracapsular extension of metastasis in lymph nodes, and morphology of lymph nodes. These factors were included in a multivariable predictive model, which had an area under the curve of 0·828 (95 per cent c.i. 0·787 to 0·869).

CONCLUSION

The present study provides a patient-specific prediction model for evaluating nodal tumour burden in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer.

Diagnostic performance of standard breast MR imaging compared to dedicated axillary MR imaging in the evaluation of axillary lymph node

BACKGROUND

Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging does not usually assess axillary lymph nodes -using dedicated axillary sequence. The additional utility of dedicated axillary sequence is poorly understood. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of dedicated axillary imaging sequence for evaluation of axillary lymph node.

METHODS

In this retrospective study from January 2018 to March 2018, 750 consecutive women underwent breast MR imaging. 263 patients were excluded, due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 235), incomplete histopathological information (n = 14) and follow-up loss (n = 14), 487 women were included. Two radiologists scored lymph node on confidence level scale from 0 (definitely benign) to 4 (definitely malignant), -using standard MR and dedicated axillary imaging sequences. Diagnostic performance parameters were compared and calculated correlation coefficient of quantitative features (largest dimension, cortical thickness, and the ratio of cortical thickness to largest dimension of lymph node).

RESULTS

68 (14.0%) were node-positive and 419 (86.0%) were node-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive values and accuracy were respectively, 66.2, 93.3, 61.6, 94.4, and 89.5% for dedicated axillary sequence and 64.7, 94.0, 63.8, 94.3, 89.9% for standard MR sequence The dedicated axillary and standard sequences s did not exhibit significant differences in detection of positive lymph nodes (AUC, 0.794 for standard and 0.798 for dedicated axillary sequence, P = 0.825). The cortical thickness appeared to be the most discriminative quantitative measurement using both axillary (AUC, 0.846) and standard sequences (AUC, 0.823), with high correlation coefficient (0.947).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of axillary nodal status using standard breast MR imaging is comparable to dedicated axillary MR imaging.

Axillary lymph node dissection is not obligatory in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

The ACOSOG Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is unnecessary in select patients with cT1-2N0 tumors undergoing breast-conserving therapy with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, patients with preoperatively confirmed ALN metastasis were not included and may be subjected to unnecessary ALND. The aim of this study is to identify patients who can be considered for ALND omission when the preoperative ALN biopsy results are positive.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative ALN biopsy and primary surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Among patients with positive ALN biopsy results, clinicopathological and imaging characteristics were compared according to LN disease burden (1-2 positive LNs vs. ≥ 3 positive LNs).

RESULTS

A total of 542 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 225 (41.5%) patients had a preoperative positive ALN biopsy. More than 40% of the patients (n = 99, 44.0%) with a positive biopsy had only 1-2 positive ALNs. The association between nodal burden and imaging factors was strongest when ≥ 2 suspicious LNs were identified on PET/CT images (HR 8.795, 95% CI 4.756 to 13.262). More than one imaging modality showing ≥ 2 suspicious LNs was also strongly correlated with ≥ 3 positive ALNs (HR 5.148, 95% CI 2.881 to 9.200).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients with a preoperative biopsy-proven ALN metastasis had only 1-2 positive LNs on ALND. Patients meeting ACOSOG Z0011 criteria with only one suspicious LN on PET/CT or those presenting with few abnormal ALNs on only one imaging modality appear appropriate for SLNB and consideration of ALND omission.

Axillary Nodal Evaluation in Breast Cancer: State of the Art

Axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most important predictor of overall recurrence and survival in patients with breast cancer, and accurate assessment of axillary LN involvement is an essential component in staging breast cancer. Axillary management in patients with breast cancer has become much less invasive and individualized with the introduction of sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB). Emerging evidence indicates that axillary LN dissection may be avoided in selected patients with node-positive as well as node-negative cancer. Thus, assessment of nodal disease burden to guide multidisciplinary treatment decision making is now considered to be a critical role of axillary imaging and can be achieved with axillary US, MRI, and US-guided biopsy. For the node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, restaging of the axilla with US and MRI and targeted axillary dissection in addition to SLNB is highly recommended to minimize the false-negative rate of SLNB. Efforts continue to develop prediction models that incorporate imaging features to predict nodal disease burden and to select proper candidates for SLNB. As methods of axillary nodal evaluation evolve, breast radiologists and surgeons must work closely to maximize the potential role of imaging and to provide the most optimized treatment for patients.

Clinical relevance of total choline (tCho) quantification in suspicious lesions on multiparametric breast MRI

Purpose

To assess the additional value of quantitative tCho evaluation to diagnose malignancy and lymph node metastases in suspicious lesions on multiparametric breast MRI (mpMRI, BI-RADS 4, and BI-RADS 5).

Methods

One hundred twenty-one patients that demonstrated suspicious multiparametric breast MRI lesions using DCE, T2w, and diffusion-weighted (DW) images were prospectively enrolled in this IRB-approved study. All underwent single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (¹H-MRS, point-resolved spectroscopy sequence, TR 2000 ms, TE 272 ms) with and without water suppression. The total choline (tCho) amplitude was measured and normalized to millimoles/liter according to established methodology by two independent readers (R1, R2). ROC-analysis was employed to predict malignancy and lymph node status by tCho results.

Results

One hundred three patients with 74 malignant and 29 benign lesions had full ¹H-MRS data. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for prediction of malignancy was 0.816 (R1) and 0.809 (R2). A cutoff of 0.8 mmol/l tCho could diagnose malignancy with a sensitivity of > 95%. For prediction of lymph node metastases, tCho measurements achieved an AUC of 0.760 (R1) and 0.788 (R2). At tCho levels < 2.4 mmol/l, no metastatic lymph nodes were found.

Conclusion

Quantitative tCho evaluation from ¹H-MRS allowed diagnose malignancy and lymph node status in breast lesions suspicious on multiparametric breast MRI. tCho therefore demonstrated the potential to downgrade suspicious mpMRI lesions and stratify the risk of lymph node metastases for improved patient management.

Key Points

• Quantitative tCho evaluation can distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions suspicious after multiparametric MRI assessment.

• Quantitative tCho levels are associated with lymph node status in breast cancer.

• Quantitative tCho levels are higher in hormonal receptor positive compared to hormonal receptor negative lesions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-06678-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Can We Identify or Exclude Extensive Axillary Nodal Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients Preoperatively?

Background

Breast cancer treatment has rapidly changed in the last few years. Particularly, treatment of patients with axillary nodal involvement has evolved after publication of several randomized clinical trials. Omitting axillary lymph node dissection in selected early breast cancer patients with one or two positive sentinel nodes did not compromise overall survival nor regional disease control in these trials. Hence, either excluding or identifying extensive axillary nodal involvement becomes increasingly important.

Purpose

To evaluate whether the current diagnostic modalities can accurately identify or exclude extensive axillary nodal involvement. Evaluated modalities were axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, MRI, and PET/CT.

Methods

A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases up to June 2019. The search strategy included terms for breast cancer, lymph nodes, and the different imaging modalities. Only articles that reported pathological N-stage or the total number of positive axillary lymph nodes were considered for inclusion. Studies with patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy were excluded.

Conclusion

There is no evidence that any of the current preoperative axillary imaging modalities can accurately exclude or identify breast cancer patients with extensive nodal involvement. Both negative PET/CT and negative MRI scans (with gadolinium-based contrast agents) are promising in excluding extensive nodal involvement. Larger studies should be performed to strengthen this conclusion. False-negative rates of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided needle biopsy are too high to rely on negative results of these modalities in excluding extensive nodal involvement.

Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary for positive preoperative aspiration cytology lymph node results?

INTRODUCTION

Based on international guidelines, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended in cases of breast cancer if preoperative examinations confirm axillary metastasis. We examined which set of preoperative parameters might render ALND unnecessary.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative examinations (axillary ultrasound and aspiration cytology) confirmed axillary metastasis in 190 cases out of 2671 patients with breast cancer; primary ALN dissection was performed on these patients with or without prior neoadjuvant therapy. The clinicopathological results were analysed to determine which parameter might predict the presence of no more than 2 or 3 metastatic ALNs.

RESULTS

The final histological examination confirmed 1-3 metastatic lymph nodes in ALND samples in 116 cases and over 3 metastatic lymph nodes in 74 cases. For patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (59 out of the 190 cases), if the size of the primary tumour was 2 cm or smaller and/or the metastatic ALN was 15 mm or smaller, then the patient was likely to have no more than 3 positive ALNs (stage N0-1 disease) (p < 0.001). If the patient did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, stage N2 or N3 disease was very likely. No correlation was found between other clinicopathological characteristics of the tumour and involvement of the ALNs.

CONCLUSION

Axillary lymph node dissection is not necessary for selected breast cancer patients with axillary metastasis receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without radiation therapy and close follow-up may serve as adequate therapy.

Patterns of Axillary Management in Stages 2 and 3 Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer by Initial Treatment Approach

BACKGROUND

Data regarding axillary management after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) are lacking. This study examined axillary management of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients based on initial treatment with NET, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), or upfront surgery.

METHODS

Patients with stage 2 or 3 HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated between 2012 and 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database. The study examined axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or upfront ALND] by initial treatment stratified by cN0/N1 using pairwise comparisons and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 92,204 eligible patients, 2138 (2.3%) received NET, 11,014 (12%) received NAC, and 79,052 (85.7%) received surgery. Among 60,998 cN0 patients, attempted SLNB was more likely for surgery patients (86.2%, 47,159/54,684) and NET patients (85.8%, 1342/1564) than for NAC patients (79.9%, 3793/4750) (both p < 0.001). Among 31,206 cN1 patients, attempted SLNB was more likely for the surgery patients (46.0%, 11,201/24,368) than for the NET patients (41.8%, 240/574; p = 0.05) or the NAC patients (39.8%, 2491/6264; p < 0.0001). The differences between surgery and NET did not persist in the adjusted analyses. Among both the cN0 patients (n = 13,856) and the cN1 patients (n = 8688) with pN1 disease shown by SLNB, the NET patients were treated with ALND less frequently than those receiving NAC or surgery (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). In the multivariate analysis, for the patients with pN1 disease shown by SLNB, NET use was associated with increased odds of undergoing SLNB alone [cN0 patients: odds ratio (OR), 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.64; cN1 patients: OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.00-2.10].

CONCLUSIONS

For stages 2 and 3 HR+/HER2- patients, SLNB use after NET was similar to that for upfront surgery. Among those with pN1 disease, the NET patients were less likely to undergo ALND. Additional outcomes data are needed to guide axillary management after NET.

Axillary ultrasound-guided core biopsy in breast cancer: identifying higher nodal burden and more aggressive clinicopathological characteristics

BACKGROUND

Patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) but it remains unclear if patients with a positive ultrasound-guided axillary core biopsy (ACB) would satisfy such criteria.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess if breast cancer patients with a positive pre-operative ACB have more aggressive tumour characteristics/higher axillary nodal burden compared to those with a positive SLN.

METHODS

Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained breast cancer database between 2012 and 2015. Patients who underwent ALND after either positive ACB or SLN were included and tumour characteristics/nodal burden were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty patients underwent ALND, 125/180 after positive ACB and 55/180 after positive SLNB. Patients with positive ACB were more likely to undergo mastectomy (chi-square test; p = 0.03) and have higher tumour grades (Mann-Whitney test; p < 0.01) compared to the SLNB group. Median positive nodes excised during ALND were 2 (1-22) and 1 (1-11) for ACB and SLNB groups respectively (p < 0.001). Fifty-six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Of 72/125 patients in the ACB group not receiving NCT, the median number of positive nodes was 4 (range, 1-22). Ten patients within the ACB group satisfied ACOSOG Z011 criteria.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients with a positive ACB are more likely to have aggressive tumour characteristics and higher nodal burden compared to those identified as having axillary nodal disease on SLNB, which may affect surgical decision making.

Specialized Second Opinion Interpretations of Breast Imaging: Impact on Additional Workup and Management

BACKGROUND

Women with breast imaging often seek second opinions at tertiary care centers. Our study measures the frequency of discrepancy between initial and second opinion breast imaging recommendations and evaluates the impact on patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 504 consecutive patients with second opinion breast radiology interpretations performed by 6 sub-specialized breast radiologists at a dedicated cancer center from January 1, 2014 through September 1, 2014. Outside imaging reports were compared with second opinion reports to categorize discrepancies. Interpretations were considered discrepant in cases with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category changes, recommendation for additional imaging, or identification of previously undiagnosed additional extent of disease greater than 5 cm. The frequencies of discrepancy, alterations in surgical management, and incremental cancer detection were measured. Statistical analysis of associated factors was performed with the Fisher exact test, with a P-value < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Second opinion evaluation discrepancies were seen in 287 (57%) patients and resulted in percutaneous image-guided biopsies in 92 (18%). Forty-five additional sites of cancer were biopsy-detected in 41 (8%) patients, including 20 breast malignancies and 25 axillary metastases. Another 9 biopsies yielded high-risk pathology. Second opinion interpretations altered surgical management in 66 (13%) patients. Factors associated with increased discrepancy frequency were cancer diagnosis at presentation (P = .004), dense breasts (P = .005), and the absence of prior studies for comparison (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Although additional imaging and resources are required, second opinion radiology review by subspecialized breast radiologists increases cancer detection and results in clinically relevant changes in patient management.