Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Density in Pathological Node Positive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder -Upfront Surgery and Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cohorts

AIM

To validate the role of lymph node density as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing primary surgery and postneoadjuvant therapy in pathological node-positive urothelial bladder carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 503 patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2006 to 2019 for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma, of which 152 patients with pathological node-positive disease were analyzed. Demographic details, pathological findings, treatment details, disease-free, and overall survival were documented. X tile program analysis was used to divide patients with positive lymph nodes into 3 groups: LD1: <= 7, LD2 :>7 to <15, LD3: >15, and the optimal cut-off value obtained was 15%. To evaluate the impact of lymph node ratio, patients with positive lymph nodes into 3 categories for each cut-off point estimation method, the application generates the histogram, Kaplan-Meier plot and calculates hazard ratio, confidence intervals and P-values. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis was done with a P-value of <.05, considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two patients (30.2%) had pathological nodal metastasis, with 87 of them having perinodal extension. Ninety-six underwent primary surgery, and 56 were postneoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 55.42 months. 68 of the 152 node-positive patients died of the disease. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 17.11. Lymph node density divided into tertiles were LD1 <7%, LD2 7-<15%, LD3 >15% showed 5-year RFS 40.5%,29.3%, 22.6% and 5 year OS was 55.5%, 42.4%,32.1% respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that age less than 55 years ,higher tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, and higher lymph node ratio were significant in univariate and multivariate analysis. The lymph node density cut-off value of 15% was substantial among node-positive patients (P = .027), and subgroup analysis in upfront surgery with the adjuvant treatment group and postneoadjuvant chemotherapy group was also significant (P =.021).

CONCLUSION

Pathological higher T stage, Age <55 years, Lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy , adjuvant radiation treatment and lymph node density had prognostic significance in both cohorts of patients who underwent upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Lymph node density cut-off value of <15% was prognostically significant.

Refining gastric cancer staging: examining the interplay between number and anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes - a retrospective multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

The current gastric cancer staging system relies on the number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for nodal stage determination. However, incorporating additional information such as topographic status may help address uncertainties. This study evaluated the appropriateness of the current staging system and relative significance of MLNs based on their anatomical location.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2000 and 2019 at six Catholic Medical Center-affiliated hospitals were included. Lymph node-positive patients were classified into the perigastric (stations 1-6, group P) or extragastric (stations 7-12) groups. The extragastric group was further subdivided into the near-extragastric (stations 7-9, group NE) and far-extragastric (stations 10-12, group FE) groups.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 3,591 patients with positive lymph node metastases. No significant survival differences were found between group P and the extragastric group in each N stage. However, in N1 and N2, group FE showed significantly worse survival than the other groups (p = 0.013 for N1, p < 0.001 for N2), but not in N3. In the subgroup analysis, group FE had a significantly lower overall survival in N2, regardless of the cancer location.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large-scale multi-institutional big data analysis confirmed the superiority of the current numerical nodal staging system for gastric cancer. Nonetheless, in N1 and N2 in which there is an upper limit on metastatic nodes, attention should be paid to the potential significance of topographic information for specific nodal stations.

Higher risk tumor features are not associated with higher nodal stage in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Studies support omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with sentinel node-positive disease, with ALND recommended for patients who present with clinically positive nodes. Here, we evaluate patient and tumor characteristics and pathologic nodal stage of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer who undergo ALND to determine if differences exist based on nodal presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2019 defined three groups of patients with ER + breast cancer who underwent ALND for positive nodes: SLN + (positive node identified at SLN biopsy), cNUS (abnormal preoperative US and biopsy), and cNpalp (palpable adenopathy). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or presented with axillary recurrence were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients, 94 were SLN + , 40 were cNUS, and 57 were cNpalp. Patients with SLN + compared with cNpalp were younger (56 vs 64 years, p < 0.01), more often pre-menopausal (41% vs 14%, p < 0.01), and White (65% vs 39%, p = 0.01) with more tumors that were low-grade (36% vs 8%, p < 0.01). Rates of PR + (p = 0.16), levels of Ki67 expression (p = 0.07) and LVI (p = 0.06) did not differ significantly among groups. Of patients with SLN + disease, 64% had pN1 disease compared to 38% of cNUS (p = 0.1) and 40% of cNpalp (p = 0.01). On univariable analysis, tumor size (p = 0.01) and histology (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with pN1 disease, with size remaining an independent predictor on multivariable analysis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Historically, higher risk features have been attributed to patients with clinically positive nodes precluding omission of ALND, but when restricting evaluation to patients with ER + breast cancer, only tumor size is associated with higher nodal stage.

Nodal status in luminal A invasive breast cancer: relationships with cytotoxic CD8 + and regulatory FOXP3 + cells tumor-associated infiltrate and other prognostic factors

Luminal A breast cancers are generally associated with low metastatic potential and good prognosis. However, there is a proportion of patients, who present with metastases in lymph nodes. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the number of positive lymph nodes and infiltrates of tumor-associated cytotoxic CD8 + (CTLs), regulatory FOXP3 + T cells (Tregs), as well as other prognostic factors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD8 + and FOXP3 + was performed in 87 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary breast cancer tissues, and cell infiltrate was assessed under light microscope. We observed that node-positive cases were associated with higher numbers of Treg cells and lower CTL/Treg ratio. There was also an inverse correlation between the CTL/Treg ratio and the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Similar relationships were found between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and Treg density or CTL/Treg ratio in pT1 BC. An elevated intratumoral CTL/Treg ratio was associated with pN0 stage. The relationship between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and Treg density was also noted in node-negative tumors. In addition, more advanced nodal stage was related to LVI, higher pT, and lower PR expression. The numbers of CD8 + and FOXP3 + were also associated with tumor size, histologic grade, PR expression, and mitotic index. The results of our study suggested that the levels of tumor-infiltrating regulatory and cytotoxic cells as well as the balance between them play a role in lymphovascular spread of luminal A breast cancers.

What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging

PURPOSE

We sought to discuss the updates in the 8th edition (8E) of The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for penile cancer and to provide relevant evidence associated with the major changes that occurred.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed^® and Web of Science^® was performed for relevant English language articles from 2004 through 2019. Literature resulting from this search were reviewed and articles pertinent to penile cancer staging changes were included.

RESULTS

Modifications were observed in the tumor and nodal staging. In the 8E AJCC, Ta disease indicates noninvasive localized squamous cell carcinoma, which allows for inclusion of other historical variants. T1 is subcategorized into T1a and T1b according to existence of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and high-grade tumor. This subcategorization demonstrates different risks for lymph node (LN) metastases and will affect decision strategy when opting for inguinal lymphadenectomy. Urethral invasion is no longer a differentiator between T2 and T3 disease, as T2 includes invasion of the corpus spongiosum and T3 involves invasion of the corpus cavernosum. For nodal staging, pN1 has been increased from a single LN metastases to two unilateral inguinal LN metastases, while pN2 has been modified to three or more inguinal LN metastases. This change was evidenced by demonstrating no significant difference in disease specific mortality between the previous edition's pN1 and pN2.

CONCLUSIONS

The 8E penile cancer staging provides several modifications that have relevant clinical implications in the management of penile cancer. Nevertheless, it requires refinements that allow for better staging of penile tumors.

Comparison the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system for T1 gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study of 2124 patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to establish an appropriate TNM staging system for early gastric cancer.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluated 2124 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for early gastric cancer between 1989 and 2001.

RESULTS

Using the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, we found no significant differences in tumor recurrence and survival between N1 and N2 cancers or between N3a and N3b cancers, whereas the survival curves for N2 and N3 cancers were quite different. Similarly, using the classification in the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system, we found no significant difference in survival between the N2 and N3 cancer groups, whereas the survival curves for N1 versus N2 or N3 cancers were quite different.

CONCLUSIONS

The classifications in the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system have a limitation for T1 gastric cancer (early gastric cancer).

Prognostic factors and outcomes in primary urethral cancer: results from the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for survival in a large international cohort of patients with primary urethral cancer (PUC).

METHODS

A series of 154 patients (109 men, 45 women) were diagnosed with PUC in ten referral centers between 1993 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to investigate various potential prognostic factors for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate models were constructed to evaluate independent risk factors for recurrence and death.

RESULTS

Median age at definitive treatment was 66 years (IQR 58-76). Histology was urothelial carcinoma in 72 (47 %), squamous cell carcinoma in 46 (30 %), adenocarcinoma in 17 (11 %), and mixed and other histology in 11 (7 %) and nine (6 %), respectively. A high degree of concordance between clinical and pathologic nodal staging (cN+/cN0 vs. pN+/pN0; p < 0.001) was noted. For clinical nodal staging, the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for predicting pathologic nodal stage were 92.8, 92.3, and 92.4 %, respectively. In multivariable Cox-regression analysis for patients staged cM0 at initial diagnosis, RFS was significantly associated with clinical nodal stage (p < 0.001), tumor location (p < 0.001), and age (p = 0.001), whereas clinical nodal stage was the only independent predictor for OS (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that clinical nodal stage is a critical parameter for outcomes in PUC.