Left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: an exercise-echocardiographic study

Morphological and functional differences in cardiac parameters between power and endurance athletes: a magnetic resonance imaging study

The present study compared morphological and functional parameters of the left ventricle by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in competitive athletes engaged in endurance and power activities and sedentary control subjects. Twenty male subjects, 7 endurance-trained athletes (ETA) (age 23.8+/-3.5 yr), 7 strength-trained athletes (STA) (age 22.8+/-4.0 yr), and 6 sedentary controls (age 24.1+/-2.2 yr) were studied by MRI. In the ETA group body size related left ventricular mass (rel.LVM) was significantly higher than that in the STA group (71.0+/-9.2 vs 57.4+/-15.7 g/m3). The difference between their size related left ventricular wall thickness (rel.LVWT) values (9.37+/-1.0 vs 8.37+/-1.8 mm/m) was near to the level of significance (p=0.057). Relative left ventricular internal diameter (rel.LVID) was significantly higher in the ETA group compared to the STA group (42.3+/-1.0 vs 40.1+/-2.5 mm/m, p<0.05). The muscular quotient (MQ=LVWT/LVID) of the ETA group was not significantly higher compared to the strength athletes. Relative left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was also higher in the ETA group than in the STA group (69.5+/-6.7 vs 59.9+/-8.2 ml/m3, p<0.05) and the controls (53.6+/-3.7, p<0.001). Significantly higher relative stroke volume (SV) was measured in the ETA group compared to the STA group and the controls (41.0+/-5.7; 32.6+/-6.9; 32.0+/-3.2 ml/m3). According to the present data, the strongest impact on LV cavity size and wall thickness is caused by long-term high intensity endurance training. Intense strength training does not necessarily induce wall thickening.

Characteristics Associated with 10-km Running Performance among a Group of Highly Trained Male Endurance Runners Age 21–63 Years

This study assessed physiological and cardiac factors associated with 10-km running performance in a group of highly trained endurance runners age 21–63 years. Participants (N= 37) underwent a resting echocardiograph and incremental treadmill running test. They also provided information on their recent 10-km races. Data were analyzed using “best subsets” multiple regression. Declines with age were found for 10-km running speed (0.26 m · s−1· decade−1), maximum heart rate (4 beats/decade), VO2peak(6 ml · kg−1· min−1· decade−1), velocity at lactate threshold (1 m · s−1· decade−1), and VO2at lactate threshold (4 ml · kg−1· min−1· decade−1). The percentage of VO2peakat which lactate threshold occurred increased with age by 1.5% per decade. The rate of change of displacement of the atrioventricular plane at the left free wall and septum both declined by 1 cm · s−1· decade−1. The best single predictor of 10-km running speed was velocity at lactate threshold.

Left ventricular response to dynamic exercise in young cyclists

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare cardiac physiological and dimensional responses to exercise in highly trained young male cyclists (mean age 13.7 +/- 1.0 yr) with those of nontrained boys.

METHODS

Ventricular systolic and diastolic dimensions were measured by two-dimensional echocardiography, and stroke volume was estimated by Doppler echocardiography during a progressive maximal upright cycle test.

RESULTS

At rest, the cyclists demonstrated larger left ventricular dimensions relative to body size than the nonathletes. Maximal stroke index and cardiac index were significantly greater in the cyclists. The pattern of stroke volume response to exercise was similar in the two groups, with an early rise and then plateau to exhaustion. Left ventricular diastolic dimension increased slightly at onset of exercise and then gradually declined as workload increased in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Factors responsible for the greater maximal stroke volume in young endurance athletes involve those variables that contribute to resting left ventricular diastolic filling (preload).

The athlete's heart. A meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function

BACKGROUND

It has been postulated that depending on the type of exercise performed, 2 different morphological forms of athlete's heart may be distinguished: a strength-trained heart and an endurance-trained heart. Individual studies have not tested this hypothesis satisfactorily.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The hypothesis of divergent cardiac adaptations in endurance-trained and strength-trained athletes was tested by applying meta-analytical techniques with the assumption of a random study effects model incorporating all published echocardiographic data on structure and function of male athletes engaged in purely dynamic (running) or static (weight lifting, power lifting, bodybuilding, throwing, wrestling) sports and combined dynamic and static sports (cycling and rowing). The analysis encompassed 59 studies and 1451 athletes. The overall mean relative left ventricular wall thickness of control subjects (0.36 mm) was significantly smaller than that of endurance-trained athletes (0.39 mm, P=0.001), combined endurance- and strength-trained athletes (0.40 mm, P=0.001), or strength-trained athletes (0.44 mm, P<0.001). There was a significant difference between the 3 groups of athletes and control subjects with respect to left ventricular internal diameter (P<0. 001), posterior wall thickness (P<0.001), and interventricular septum thickness (P<0.001). In addition, endurance-trained athletes and strength-trained athletes differed significantly with respect to mean relative wall thickness (0.39 versus 0.44, P=0.006) and interventricular septum thickness (10.5 versus 11.8 mm, P=0.005) and showed a trend toward a difference with respect to posterior wall thickness (10.3 versus 11.0 mm, P=0.078) and left ventricular internal diameter (53.7 versus 52.1 mm, P=0.055). With respect to cardiac function, there were no significant differences between athletes and control subjects in left ventricular ejection fraction, fractional shortening, and E/A ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this meta-analysis regarding athlete's heart confirm the hypothesis of divergent cardiac adaptations in dynamic and static sports. Overall, athlete's heart demonstrated normal systolic and diastolic cardiac functions.

Pathological versus physiological left ventricular hypertrophy: a review

Left ventricular hypertrophy is recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbid events. The primary mechanisms responsible for stimulating it are unknown. Epidemiological theories suggest that left ventricular hypertrophy is a continuous variable with no threshold, while morphological studies argue that it is the structure, or quality, and function of the myocardium (and therefore non-continuous), not the quantity of the myocardial mass, that poses the cardiovascular risk. Although left ventricular hypertrophy has been classically viewed as an adaptive response of the cardiovascular system to an imposed load, it has been demonstrated that haemodynamic overloading in selected hypertensive patients is not the sole determinant of left ventricular structure and function. Pathological and physiological states of left ventricular hypertrophy have been described primarily using criteria focusing on normal chamber performance and oxygen delivery as well as the reversibility of the hypertrophy once the overload is removed. Both states are also defined by the nature of the imposed load and the resulting myocardial adaptations. This review addresses the pathological and physiological states of left ventricular hypertrophy, the hypertrophy patterns, and the corresponding structural and functional characteristics, together with some of the biochemical factors thought to influence remodelling.

Mechanics of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in physiologic hypertrophy of the athlete's heart

As a result of a number of factors, there is tremendous diversity in the pattern of cardiac mechanics encountered in athletes. Nevertheless, several trends can be identified, and several conclusions are possible. Hypertrophy of a mild to moderate degree and out of proportion to body size is a common finding. Some athletes experience ventricular dilation with appropriate hypertrophy and preservation of the ventricular mass-to-volume ratio, whereas others manifest concentric hypertrophy with an increased mass-to-volume ratio. The functional changes that are encountered appear to be secondary to the structural alterations, and there is no evidence of altered myocardial systolic or diastolic properties. Some athletes with hypertrophy have reduced wall stress when they are evaluated at rest, and velocity of shortening is augmented because of the reduced afterload. As a result of adaptation to a high-output state, some athletes appear preload reduced when evaluated at rest. Although velocity of shortening is not affected by preload status, fractional shortening is inversely related to preload. The magnitude of systolic shortening is therefore the net result of altered preload and afterload and cannot be understood without assessing both of these parameters. When the various determinants of systolic shortening are included, contractility appears to be normal. There have been several reports of depressed contractility immediately after extreme exertion. Although the mechanism remains uncertain, several intriguing possibilities have been proposed.

Impact of different sports and training on cardiac structure and function

There is overwhelming evidence, particularly from echocardiography, that the heart of competitive athletes may differ from that of nonathletes, matched for age, gender, and body size. A larger left ventricular mass has been shown in athletes performing predominantly dynamic aerobic and anaerobic sports, in athletes engaged in static training, and in players of ball sports. Enlargement of the left ventricular internal diameter was most pronounced and reached about 10% in athletes performing predominantly dynamic sports; mainly strength training athletes had a lesser increase of the internal dimension, which was limited to 2.5%. Also the left ventricular wall appeared to be thickened in all types of athletes compared with controls. In sports with high dynamic and low static demands, wall thickness was proportionate or slightly disproportionate to the size of the internal diameter so that relative wall thickness was not different from controls or slightly increased (predominantly eccentric hypertrophy). In strength athletes, the disproportionate increase of wall thickness averaged about 12% (predominantly concentric hypertrophy). In sports with high dynamic and high static demands and requiring prolonged training, such as cycling, the increases of absolute and relative wall thickness reached 29% and 19% and were more pronounced than in runners (mixed hypertrophy). A plausible interpretation of these results is that the development of so-called eccentric or concentric left ventricular hypertrophy according to the type of sports cannot be regarded as an absolute or dichotomous concept because training regimens and sports activities are not exclusively dynamic or static and because the load on the heart is not purely of the volume or the pressure type. Most studies agree that left ventricular systolic and diastolic function is normal in the athlete at rest, whereas diastolic function seems to be enhanced in the exercising endurance athlete. The consistency of the results of studies on athletes in the competitive and the resting season, of training of sedentary subjects, and of spinal cord-injured patients suggests that variations in physical activity can alter left ventricular structure; genetic factors do not seem to be involved in the size of the left ventricular internal diameter but have to be taken into account to interpret wall thickness.

Left ventricular performance during prolonged exercise and early recovery in healthy subjects

The effect of semi-supine long lasting exercise to exhaustion [61 (SD 10) min] on left ventricular systolic performance was studied by echocardiography in 16 young healthy volunteers. During the incremental phase of exercise, the ejection fraction increased from 65.2 (SD 4.1)% to 80.1 (SD 4.8)% (P < 0.0001), then it levelled off up to the end of exercise [81.7 (SD 4.4)%, P < 0.0001 vs rest]. During recovery, the ejection fraction rapidly and steadily decreased to a value similar to that at rest [66.1 (SD 5.0)%, n.s.). A similar pattern was shown by the systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume coefficient, which rose from 3.2 (SD 0.8) mmHg.ml-1 to 7.5 (SD 2.7) mmHg.ml-1 (P < 0.0001) in the initial phase and subsequently did not change until the end of exercise [7.0 (SD 2.2) mmHg.ml-1, P < 0.0001 vs rest], to fall sharply after the cessation of exercise [2.9 (SD 1.1) mmHg.ml-1 at the 10th min, n.s. vs rest]. Exercise and recovery indices of left ventricular performance were not correlated with exercise duration, maximal heart rate and increase in free fatty acids. The present results indicated that, after the initial increase, left ventricular performance remained elevated during prolonged high intensity exercise and that conclusions on exercise cardiac performance drawn from postexercise data can be misleading.

How to Recognize 'Athlete's Heart'

In brief Chronic endurance exercise inbrief duces various cardiac adapta- JHHHM tions, including an enlarged left ventricular cavity and an appropriate increase in wall thickness (eccentric hypertrophy), greater ability to increase stroke volume during exercise, and bradycardia at rest. Strength athletes have thicker left ventricular walls with no increase in cavity size (concentric hypertrophy). In the past, chest x-rays and ECG have suggested some of these changes, however, echocardiograms have clearly established the syndrome of the athlete's heart. In addition, these adaptations seldom exceed the range of normal variation seen in the general population. Understanding these alterations helps distinguish healthy adaptations to exercise from signs of disease.

Left ventricular dynamics during exercise in elite marathon runners

To assess left ventricular structure and function at rest and during exercise in endurance athletes, 10 elite marathon runners, aged 28 to 37 years, and 10 matched nonathletes were studied by echocardiography and supine bicycle ergometry. Each athlete's best marathon time was less than 2 h 16 min. Echocardiography was performed at rest, at a 60 W work load and at an individually adjusted work load, at which heart rate was 110 beats/min (physical working capacity 110 [PWC110]). Oxygen uptake at PWC110 averaged (+/- SD) 1.14 +/- 0.2 liters/min in the nonathletes and 2.0 +/- 0.2 liters/min in the runners (p less than 0.001). The left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole was similar at the three activity levels in the control subjects but increased significantly from rest to exercise in the runners (p less than 0.001). Left ventricular systolic meridional wall stress remained unchanged during exercise in the nonathletes but was significantly higher at PWC110 in the athletes (p less than 0.05). Both the systolic peak velocity of posterior wall endocardial displacement and fractional shortening of the left ventricular internal diameter increased with exercise; at PWC110 the endocardial peak velocity was higher in the runners than in the control subjects (p less than 0.01). The endocardial peak velocity during relaxation was comparable in athletes and control subjects at rest, increased similarly at a 60 W work load, but was higher in the runners at PWC110 (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

One- and two-dimensional echocardiography in bodybuilders using anabolic steroids

The object of this study was to investigate the possible concentric increase in the left ventricular (LV) wall thickness by intensive strength training and to differentiate between the specific effect of the strength training itself and the influence of anabolic drugs. In this study 21 top-level bodybuilders [users of anabolic steroids (A): n = 14; non-users (N): n = 7] underwent one-dimensional and two-dimensional echocardiography as well as a cycle ergometer test. In both groups blood pressure at rest and during ergometric exercise was within the normal range. In spite of the same amount of time being spent on training, A showed significantly better power results than N. Total heart volume (A = 11.3 +/- 0.9 ml.kg-1; N = 11.9 +/- 0.9 ml.kg-1) and LV muscle mass were almost identical in A and N and correlated significantly with body weight and lean body mass respectively. The body dimension-related diastolic LV diameter was significantly lower in A (0.567 +/- 0.062 mm.kg-1) than in N (0.639 +/- 0.040 mm.kg-1). An increase in the LV posterior wall (p less than 0.01) and septum thickness (ns) resulted in increased LV wall thickness:diameter (p less than 0.01) and LV muscle mass:volume (p less than 0.05) ratios in A (0.458 +/- 0.590; 1.38 +/- 0.25 g.ml-1) in comparison to N (0.356 +/- 0.077; 1.16 +/- 0.17 g.ml-1). The septal:posterior wall thickness ratio was similar for both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Left ventricular mass as determined by magnetic resonance imaging in male endurance athletes

Although many studies of the effect of dynamic exercise training on left ventricular (LV) mass have been reported, controversy continues to exist. Previous work has been criticized because of the techniques used for measuring LV mass, the variable level of training of the subjects recruited and the methods used to normalize the data. In an attempt to resolve this controversy, LV mass was determined using the very accurate and reproducible technique of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Highly trained competitive athletes including cross-country skiers, endurance cyclists and long distance runners (VO2max = 77 +/- 1, 72 +/- 2 and 75 +/- 2 ml (kg X min)-1, respectively) were examined. The data were normalized for body weight, body surface area and lean body mass. LV mass was significantly greater in skiers (239 +/- 9 g), runners (244 +/- 10 g) and cyclists (258 +/- 11 g) when compared with nonathletic control subjects (189 +/- 6 g) (p less than 0.001), which represents percent differences of 26, 29 and 37%, respectively. LV mass remained greater in the athletes, regardless of the method used to normalize the data. In addition, there was a good correlation between LV mass and VO2max (r = 0.80, p less than 0.001). It was concluded that LV mass is significantly greater in highly trained competitive endurance athletes and that normalizing LV mass with respect to body weight, body surface area or lean body mass does not alter this relation.