Culprit-Lesion Drug-Coated-Balloon Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Background/Objectives: Drug-eluting stents (DESs) remain the standard of treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, complications such as stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis still pose significant risks. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative, but data for this clinical scenario are still scarce. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB culprit-lesion primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients presenting with STEMI and to evaluate its impact on the microcirculatory territory. Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted across six European centers. Results: In total, 118 patients were included. Of these, 82.2% were male, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 36-92); 28% patients presented with stent thrombosis and most of them (94%) underwent paclitaxel-DCB-pPCI. The median follow-up was 23.2 months (IQR 6.7-77.3). Target lesion failure (TLF) rates were low (3.4%), with no differences between patients presenting with native coronary vessel and stent thrombosis (4.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.205). Overall mortality rates at follow-up were 7%, with only 1.8% attributed to cardiac causes. A target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate of 1.8% was observed, with no target vessel myocardial infarction reported. A subgroup of patients (42; 35.6%) underwent an adenosine-free angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) analysis. The median AMR was 4.7 (3.9-5.5) and was greater in the stent thrombosis group than in the native coronary group (5.1 vs. 4.6; p = 0.038) with no clinical differences between patients based on the AMR. Conclusions: DCB-pPCI has emerged as an alternative potential treatment for patients presenting with STEMI, with few long-term adverse cardiac events. Despite the encouraging outcomes, these findings underscore the need for a large randomized clinical trial powered by a relevant clinical outcome in order to elucidate the role of DCB-PCI in patients presenting with STEMI.

Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of myocardial ischemia in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and possible microvascular dysfunction (MVD) is challenging because fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) have not been validated in this clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study in patients with AS and CAD were: 1) to describe the relationship between hyperemic and resting indexes; 2) to investigate the acute and long-term effects of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on epicardial indexes and microvascular function; 3) to assess the impact of these changes on clinical decision making; and 4) to determine FFR/RFR ischemia cutoff points in AS.

METHODS

In this prospective multicentric study, we performed serial measurements of FFR and RFR and evaluated MVD by means of coronary flow reserve, the index of microvascular resistance, and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with severe AS and intermediate to severe CAD before and 6 months after AVR. Patients underwent myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography before AVR.

RESULTS

In total, 146 coronary lesions in 116 patients were included. Before AVR, we observed high FFR/RFR discordance according to standard cutoff values (FFR negative [>0.80]/RFR positive [≤0.89] in 42.3% [68/137] of these lesions). Acutely after AVR, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0120 ± 0.0192; P = 0.0045), whereas RFR remained stable (0.0140 ± 0.0673; P = 0.3089). Six months after AVR, FFR decreased (-0.0279 ± 0.0368), whereas RFR increased significantly (+0.0410 ± 0.0487) (P < 0.0001 for both), resulting in 21.5% (21/98) and 39.8% (39/98) of lesions crossing traditional FFR and RFR cutoff lines, respectively. Left ventricular mass decreased significantly (153.68 ± 44.22 g before vs 134.66 ± 37.26 g after; P < 0.0001). MVD was frequently observed at baseline (32.1% abnormal index of microvascular resistance and 68.6% abnormal microvascular resistance reserve) with all microvascular parameters improving after AVR. The most accurate cutoffs to predict ischemia were FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 with comparable accuracy (75%-80%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS and CAD, FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 appear to predict myocardial ischemia more accurately. Six months after AVR, FFR decreases, whereas RFR increases significantly with a simultaneous decrease of left ventricular mass and an improvement of microvascular function.

Feasibility and Improved Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Adenosine to Assess Microvascular Dysfunction With Bolus Thermodilution

BACKGROUND

Bolus thermodilution and intravenous adenosine are established methods for coronary microcirculatory assessment. Yet, its adoption remains low, partly due to procedural time and patient discomfort associated with intravenous adenosine. We investigated differences between intracoronary and intravenous adenosine using bolus thermodilution in terms of microcirculatory indices, procedural time, and side effects associated with adenosine in patients with myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, observational study, 102 patients with suspected myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent measurements of mean transit time, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, procedure time and patient tolerability with low-dose intracoronary adenosine, high-dose intracoronary adenosine (HDIC), and intravenous adenosine. HDIC induced greater hyperemia compared with low-dose intracoronary IC adenosine and intravenous adenosine with a shorter hyperemic mean transit time, P<0.0001. Coronary flow reserve was higher and index of microcirculatory resistance lowest with HDIC, compared with low-dose intracoronary IC adenosine and intravenous adenosine, P<0.05. Low coronary flow reserve was downgraded from 21% with intravenous adenosine to 10% with HDIC adenosine (P=0.031); high index of microcirculatory resistance was downgraded from 23% with intravenous adenosine to 14% with HDIC (P=0.098). Intracoronary adenosine was associated with lower procedural times (P<0.0001). More patients experienced chest pain with intravenous adenosine (P<0.01) and the chest pain intensity was higher compared with intracoronary adenosine (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with suspected myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries undergoing coronary microcirculatory assessment with bolus thermodilution, the use of HDIC compared with intravenous adenosine was associated with enhanced induction of hyperemia. The use of intracoronary adenosine allowed for a shorter procedure time and was better tolerated.

REGISTRATION+

URL: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04827498.

Impact of the use of plaque modification techniques on coronary microcirculation using an angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance

Many lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exhibit significant calcification. Several techniques have been developed to improve outcomes in this setting. However, their impact on coronary microcirculation remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of plaque modification techniques on coronary microcirculation across patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease. In this multicenter retrospective study, consecutive patients undergoing PCI with either Rotablation (RA) or Shockwave-intravascular-lithotripsy (IVL) were included. Primary endpoint was the impairment of coronary microvascular resistances assessed by Δ angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (ΔIMRangio) which was defined as the difference in IMRangio value post- and pre-PCI. Secondary endpoints included the development of peri procedural PCI complications (flow-limiting coronary dissection, slow-flow/no reflow during PCI, coronary perforation, branch occlusion, failed PCI, stroke and shock developed during PCI) and 12-month follow-up adverse events. 162 patients were included in the analysis. Almost 80% of patients were male and the left descending anterior artery was the most common treated vessel. Both RA and IVL led to an increase in ΔIMRangio (22.3 and 10.3; p = 0.038, respectively). A significantly higher rate of PCI complications was observed in patients with ΔIMRangio above the median of the cohort (21.0% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.006). PCI with RA was independently associated with higher ΔIMRangio values (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.01-4.03; p = 0.048). Plaque modification with IVL and RA during PCI increases microvascular resistance. Evaluating the microcirculatory status in this setting might help to predict clinical and procedural outcomes and to optimize clinical results.

Optimization of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow Measurements to Assess Microvascular Function: In Vivo Validation of Hyperemia and Higher Infusion Speeds

BACKGROUND

Reliable assessment of coronary microvascular function is essential. Techniques to measure absolute coronary blood flow are promising but need validation. The objectives of this study were: first, to validate the potential of saline infusion to generate maximum hyperemia in vivo. Second, to validate absolute coronary blood flow measured with continuous coronary thermodilution at high (40-50 mL/min) infusion speeds and asses its safety.

METHODS

Fourteen closed-chest sheep underwent absolute coronary blood flow measurements with increasing saline infusion speeds at different dosages under general anesthesia. An additional 7 open-chest sheep underwent these measurements with epicardial Doppler flow probes. Coronary flows were compared with reactive hyperemia after 45 s of coronary occlusion.

RESULTS

Twenty milliliters per minute of saline infusion induced a significantly lower hyperemic coronary flow (140 versus 191 mL/min; P=0.0165), lower coronary flow reserve (1.82 versus 3.21; P≤0.0001), and higher coronary resistance (655 versus 422 woods units; P=0.0053) than coronary occlusion. On the other hand, 30 mL/min of saline infusion resulted in hyperemic coronary flow (196 versus 192 mL/min; P=0.8292), coronary flow reserve (2.77 versus 3.21; P=0.1107), and coronary resistance (415 versus 422 woods units; P=0.9181) that were not different from coronary occlusion. Hyperemic coronary flow was 40.7% with 5 mL/min, 40.8% with 10 mL/min, 73.1% with 20 mL/min, 102.3% with 30 mL/min, 99.0% with 40 mL/min, and 98.0% with 50 mL/min of saline infusion when compared with postocclusive hyperemic flow. There was a significant bias toward flow overestimation (Bland-Altman: bias±SD, -73.09±30.52; 95% limits of agreement, -132.9 to -13.27) with 40 to 50 mL/min of saline. Occasionally, ischemic changes resulted in ventricular fibrillation (9.5% with 50 mL/min) at higher infusion rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous saline infusion of 30 mL/min but not 20 mL/min induced maximal hyperemia. Absolute coronary blood flow measured with saline infusion speeds of 40 to 50 mL/min was not accurate and not safe.

ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions: Design and rationale of the SONAR trial

BACKGROUND

The percutaneous treatment of calcified coronary lesions remains challenging and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. In addition, coronary artery calcification is associated with more frequent peri-procedural myocardial infarction.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

The ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions (SONAR) study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, international, multicenter, open label trial (NCT05208749) comparing a lesion preparation strategy with either shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or rotational atherectomy (RA) before drug-eluting stent implantation in 170 patients with moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions. The primary endpoint is difference in the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction. Key secondary endpoints include rate of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction, peri-procedural myocardial injury, descriptive study of IMR measurements in calcified lesions, technical and procedural success, interaction between OCT calcium score and primary endpoint, 30-day and 1-year major adverse clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

The SONAR trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction between 2 contemporary calcium modification strategies (Shockwave IVL and RA) in patients with calcified coronary artery lesions. Furthermore, for the first time, the incidence of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction after Shockwave IVL and RA will be evaluated and compared.

Implementation of Microcirculation Examination in Clinical Practice-Insights from the Nationwide POL-MKW Registry

Background and Objectives: The assessment of coronary microcirculation may facilitate risk stratification and treatment adjustment. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' clinical presentation and treatment following coronary microcirculation assessment, as well as factors associated with an abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) values. Materials and Results: This retrospective analysis included 223 patients gathered from the national registry of invasive coronary microvascular testing collected between 2018 and 2023. Results: The frequency of coronary microcirculatory assessments in Poland has steadily increased since 2018. Patients with impaired IMR (≥25) were less burdened with comorbidities. Patients with normal IMR underwent revascularisation attempts more frequently (11.9% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.003). After microcirculation testing, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were added more often for patients with IMR and CFR abnormalities, respectively, as compared to control groups. Moreover, patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD, defined as CFR and/or IMR abnormality), regardless of treatment choice following microcirculation assessment, were provided with trimetazidine (23.2%) and dihydropyridine CCBs (26.4%) more frequently than those without CMD who were treated conservatively (6.8%) and by revascularisation (4.2% with p = 0.002 and 0% with p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed no association between angina symptoms and IMR or CFR impairment. Conclusions: The frequency of coronary microcirculatory assessments in Poland has steadily increased. Angina symptoms were not associated with either IMR or CFR impairment. After microcirculation assessment, patients with impaired microcirculation, expressed as either low CFR, high IMR or both, received additional pharmacotherapy treatment more often.

Impact of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction on Coronary Physiological Assessment

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which is known to occasionally have coronary artery disease as concomitant disease may require coronary physiological assessment (Okayama et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2019 [1,2]). However, no study clarified the impact of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on coronary physiological assessment. Herein, a case of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy concomitant with moderate coronary lesion was reported, in which dynamic change of physiological values was observed during pharmacological intervention. Specifically, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) changed in an opposite fashion when the left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient was decreased by intravenous propranolol and cibenzoline: in FFR from 0.83 to 0.79 and in RFR from 0.73 to 0.91. Cardiologists should pay attention to the presence of concomitant cardiovascular disorders in interpreting coronary physiological data.

Microcirculatory Disease in Patients after Heart Transplantation

Although the treatment and prognosis of patients after heart transplantation have significantly improved, late graft dysfunction remains a critical problem. Two main subtypes of late graft dysfunction are currently described: acute allograft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and microvascular dysfunction appears to be the first stage of both. Studies revealed that coronary microcirculation dysfunction, assessed by invasive methods in the early post-transplant period, correlates with a higher risk of late graft dysfunction and death during long-term follow-up. The index of microcirculatory resistance, measured early after heart transplantation, might identify the patients at higher risk of acute cellular rejection and major adverse cardiovascular events. It may also allow optimization and enhancement of post-transplantation management. Moreover, cardiac allograft vasculopathy is an independent prognostic factor for transplant rejection and survival rate. The studies showed that the index of microcirculatory resistance correlates with anatomic changes and reflects the deteriorating physiology of the epicardial arteries. In conclusion, invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation, including the measurement of the microcirculatory resistance index, is a promising approach to predict graft dysfunction, especially the acute allograft rejection subtype, during the first year after heart transplantation. However, further advanced studies are needed to fully grasp the importance of microcirculatory dysfunction in patients after heart transplantation.

Evolocumab for prevention of microvascular dysfunction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomised, open-label EVOCATION trial

BACKGROUND

Statins have been shown to prevent microvascular dysfunction that may cause periprocedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Evolocumab has more potent lipid-lowering properties than statins.  Aims: The aims of this study were to investigate whether evolocumab pretreatment on top of statin therapy could prevent periprocedural microvascular dysfunction.  Methods: This study included 100 patients with stable coronary artery disease who were scheduled to undergo PCI and had high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) under statin therapy. Patients were randomised to receive evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks for 2 to 6 weeks before PCI (evolocumab group: N=54) or not (control group: N=46). The primary endpoint was the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) after PCI. Troponin T was measured before and 24 hours after PCI.  Results: Geometric mean LDL-C was 94.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8-102.1) mg/dl and 89.4 (95% CI: 83.5-95.7) mg/dl at baseline, and 25.6 (95% CI: 21.9-30.0) mg/dl and 79.8 (95% CI: 73.9-86.3) mg/dl before PCI, in the evolocumab group and in the control group, respectively. PCI was performed 22.1±8.5 days after allocation. Geometric mean IMR was 20.6 (95% CI: 17.2-24.6) in the evolocumab group and 20.6 (95% CI: 17.0-25.0) in the control group (p=0.98). There was no significant difference in the geometric mean of post-PCI troponin T (0.054, 95% CI: 0.041-0.071 ng/ml vs 0.054, 95% CI: 0.038-0.077 ng/ml; p=0.99) and in the incidence of major periprocedural myocardial infarction between the 2 groups (44.4% vs 44.2%; p=1.00).  Conclusions: Evolocumab pretreatment did not prevent periprocedural microvascular dysfunction in patients on modern medical management with statins.

The Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Left Ventricular Performance Recovery in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVES

The present study is designed to investigate the impact of coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) on left ventricular performance recovery.

BACKGROUND

IMR has been established as a gold standard for coronary microvascular assessment and a predictor of left ventricular recovery after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). CaIMR is a novel and accurate alternative of IMR.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively included 80 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We offline performed the post-PCI caIMR analysis of the culprit vessel. Echocardiography was performed within the first 24 hours and at 3 months after the index procedure. Left ventricular recovery was defined as the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) more than zero.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 58.0 years with 80.0% male. The average post-PCI caIMR was 43.2. Overall left ventricular recovery was seen in 41 patients. Post-PCI caIMR (OR: 0.948, 95% CI: 0.916-0.981, p = 0.002), left anterior descending as the culprit vessel (OR: 3.605, 95% CI: 1.23-10.567, p = 0.019), and male (OR: 0.254, 95% CI: 0.066-0.979, p = 0.047) were independent predictors of left ventricular recovery at 3 months follow-up. A predictive model was established with the best cutoff value for the prediction of left ventricular recovery 2.33 (sensitivity 0.610, specificity 0.897, and area under the curve 0.765). In patients with a predictive model score less than 2.33, the LVEF increased significantly at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-PCI caIMR can accurately predict left ventricular functional recovery at 3 months follow-up in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, supporting its use in clinical practice.

The application of myocardial contrast echocardiography in assessing microcirculation perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the myocardial microcirculation perfusion of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with a different index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and analyse the value of MCE in predicting myocardial perfusion after PCI.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with acute STEMI who underwent an emergency PCI were selected from October 2018 to October 2019 in our hospital. According to the IMR values measured during PCI treatment, the patients were divided into three groups. Traditional ultrasound and MCE were performed one week after PCI. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular wall motion score index (WMSI), A value, β value and A × β value (which refers to the patient's myocardial blood flow) were measured. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to evaluate the effectiveness of the MCE parameters in the diagnosis of myocardial microcirculation perfusion disorders.

RESULTS

The results showed that there was no significant difference in the LVEF among the groups. The WMSI in Group 3 was statistically different from that in Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the WMSI between Groups 1 and 2. Among the three groups, the A value, β value and A × β value were significantly different (P < 0.05). According to Spearman's correlation analysis, the MCE quantitative parameters (i.e. the A value, β value and A × β value) were negatively correlated with the IMR value (r = -0.523, -0.471, -0.577, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The A value, β value and A × β value were negatively correlated with the IMR value. Furthermore, MCE could be used to observe the myocardial perfusion in patients with acute STEMI after PCI and may be one of the indicators used to accurately evaluate myocardial microcirculation.

Angiography-derived versus invasively-determined index of microcirculatory resistance in the assessment of coronary microcirculation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is an established tool to assess the status of coronary microcirculation. However, the need for a pressure wire and hyperemic agents have limited its routine use and have led to the development of angiography-derived pressure-wire-free methods (angiography-derived IMR [IMRAngio]). In this review and meta-analysis, we aim to assess the global diagnosis accuracy of IMRAngio versus IMR.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed. Studies directly evaluating IMRAngio versus IMR were considered eligible. Pooled values of diagnostic test and summary receiver operator curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies directly comparing IMRAngio versus IMR were included (687 patients; 807 vessels). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, +likelihood ratio (LR), and -LR were 82%, 83%, 4.5, and 0.26 respectively. Pooled accuracy was 83% while pooled positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 76% and 85%, respectively. Comparable results were obtained when analyzing by clinical scenario (acute and nonacute coronary syndromes).

CONCLUSION

IMRAngio shows a good diagnostic performance for the prediction of abnormal IMR.

Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pathophysiology, Assessment, Prevalence and Prognosis

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently accounts for approximately half of all new heart failure cases in the community. HFpEF is closely associated with chronic lifestyle-related diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, and clinical outcomes are worse in those with than without comorbidities. HFpEF is pathophysiologically distinct from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which may explain, in part, the disparity of treatment options available between the two heart failure phenotypes. The mechanisms underlying HFpEF are complex, with coronary microvascular dysfunction (MVD) being proposed as a potential key driver in its pathophysiology. In this review, the authors highlight the evidence implicating MVD in HFpEF pathophysiology, the diagnostic approaches for identifying MVD (both invasive and non-invasive) and the prevalence and prognostic significance of MVD.

Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function

The critical role of the coronary microvascular compartment and its invasive functional assessment has become apparent in light of the significant proportion of patients presenting signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia, despite the absence of epicardial disease, or after the adequate treatment of it. However, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) represents a diagnostic challenge because of the small dimensions of the coronary microvasculature, which prevents direct angiographic visualization. Several diagnostic tools are now available for the invasive assessment of the coronary microvascular function, which, in association with the physiological indices used to investigate the epicardial department, may provide a comprehensive evaluation of the coronary circulation as a whole. Recent evidence suggests that the physiology-guided management of CMD, although apparently costly and time-consuming, may offer a net clinical benefit in terms of symptom improvement among patients with angina and ischemic heart disease. However, despite the results of several observational studies, the prognostic effect of the physiology-driven management of CMD within this population is currently a matter of debate, and therefore represents an unmet clinical need that urgently deserves further investigation.

The coronary and microcirculatory measurements in patients with aortic valve stenosis study: rationale and design

Although concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), hemodynamic assessment of CAD severity in patients undergoing valve replacement for severe AS is challenging. Myocardial hypertrophic remodeling interferes with coronary blood flow and may influence the values of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of the AS and its treatment on current indices used for evaluation of CAD. We will compare intracoronary hemodynamics before, immediately after, and 6 mo after aortic valve replacement (AVR) when it is expected that microvascular function has improved. Furthermore, we will compare FFR and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) as indicators of myocardial ischemia in patients with AS and CAD. One-hundred consecutive patients with AS and intermediate CAD will be prospectively included. Patients will undergo pre-AVR SPECT and intracoronary hemodynamic assessment at baseline, immediately after valve replacement [if transcatheter AVR (TAVR) is chosen], and 6 mo after AVR. The primary end point is the change in FFR 6 mo after AVR. Secondary end points include the acute change of FFR after TAVR, the diagnostic accuracy of FFR versus RFR compared with SPECT for the assessment of ischemia, changes in microvascular function as assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and the effect of these changes on FFR. The present study will evaluate intracoronary hemodynamic parameters before, immediately after, and 6 mo after AVR in patients with AS and intermediate coronary stenosis. The understanding of the impact of AVR on the assessment of FFR, NHPR, and microvascular function may help guide the need for revascularization in patients with AS and CAD planned for AVR.

Coronary physiologic assessment based on angiography and intracoronary imaging

Despite the current evidence supporting clinical benefits of fractional flow reserve (FFR), its uptake in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been slow due to procedural cost and increased time with the need for maximum hyperemia. Recently, novel physiological indices derived from coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging have emerged to overcome issues with a wire-based FFR. Angiography-based FFR can be measured without vessel instrumentation and has shown excellent diagnostic performance using wire-based FFR as the reference standard. Thus, angiography-based FFR may facilitate coronary functional assessment before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is another new computational index for assessing the coronary microcirculation. Although angiography-derived IMR remains in an early phase of development and requires further validation, its less-invasive nature may help broaden the adoption of microvascular functional assessment in various conditions such as myocardial infarction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Lastly, computational FFR based on intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography allows detailed lesion assessment from both morphological and functional standpoints. Given a growing interest in physiology-guided PCI optimization strategies, intravascular imaging-based FFR may become the main assessment tool to confirm successful PCI.

Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with coronary tortuosity and without atherosclerosis

Objective

Coronary tortuosity may affect epicardial coronary arterial blood flow. This study aimed to investigate the effect of coronary tortuosity on coronary flow reserve and the coronary microcirculation in patients without apparent coronary atherosclerosis.

Methods

Prospective patients (n = 8, 3 men, mean age: 58 ± 6.0 years) with coronary tortuosity and without apparent coronary atherosclerosis were enrolled. Coronary tortuosity was defined by the finding of ≥three bends (defined as a ≥45° change in vessel direction) along the main trunk of the left anterior descending artery or left circumflex artery. Coronary flow reserve and the index of microcirculatory resistance were measured by the thermodilution technique.

Results

A total of eight coronary arteries with coronary tortuosity were analyzed. The mean fractional flow reserve was 0.98 ± 0.007. The mean coronary flow reserve was 1.5 ± 0.3, which is much lower than that in the normal coronary artery as reported in the literature. The mean index of microcirculatory resistance was 26.7 ± 2.3, which is much higher than that in the normal coronary artery.

Conclusions

Coronary tortuosity is associated with decreased coronary flow reserve and an increased index of microcirculatory resistance.

Trial registration: This study is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, NCT No: ChiCTR2000033671

Decreased resting coronary flow and impaired endothelial function in patients with vasospastic angina

OBJECTIVES

Coronary endothelial and circulatory dysfunction plays important roles in the pathogenesis of vasospastic angina (VSA). However, a complete understanding of the entire coronary circulation including microvasculature in patients with VSA is lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients without obstructive coronary artery disease in the left descending coronary artery, who underwent an intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test for diagnosis of VSA, were enrolled prospectively. A positive diagnosis of the ACh test was defined as total/subtotal coronary artery narrowing accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic ECG changes. Angina frequency and severity at baseline, and 1 and 3 months were recorded. Coronary circulation was evaluated invasively using a thermodilution method by obtaining the mean transit time (Tmn) at rest and hyperemia, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance. Systemic endothelial function was assessed by the reactive hyperemia index.

RESULTS

There were 14 (44%) and 18 (56%) patients with and without a positive ACh provocation test. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients with VSA had a significantly lower reactive hyperemia index compared with those without VSA (1.70±0.33 vs. 2.12±0.53, P=0.02). Coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and hyperemic Tmn were not different between the two groups, whereas resting Tmn was significantly longer in patients with VSA (1.20±0.44 vs. 0.71±0.37, P=0.002). Although the frequency and severity of angina improved from baseline to 1 and 3 months in patients with both positive and negative ACh tests, there was no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with VSA had decreased resting coronary flow and impaired endothelial function.

Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Measured during Intracoronary Adenosine-Induced Hyperemia

Background

The index of microcirculatory resistance is an invasive measure of coronary microvascular function that has to be calculated during maximal hyperemia, classically achieved with intravenous adenosine (IV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of intracoronary (IC) adenosine for the calculation of IMR.

Methods and Results

31 patients with stable coronary artery disease were included in the study. Coronary pressure and thermodilution measurements were obtained at rest and during maximal hyperemia using a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary guidewire. Duplicate measurements were performed using first IC and then IV adenosine. Dispersion of transit times was comparable for IC and IV adenosine. IMR values based on IC vs IV adenosine showed a high level of agreement and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90. Applying an upper normal limit of 25, misclassification of IMR using IC adenosine was seen in just one patient in whom IC adenosine resulted in a lower value. A simplified procedure based on a single bolus dose of saline did not change the level of agreement or the rate of misclassification.

Conclusions

We found an excellent agreement between IMR values measured during hyperemia induced by IC as compared to IV adenosine. The use of IC adenosine may facilitate invasive assessment of microvascular function and is potentially time- and cost-saving with less patient discomfort as compared to IV infusion. The trail is registered with NCT03369184.

Changes in Index of Microcirculatory Resistance during PCI in the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery in Relation to Total Length of Implanted Stents

Aim

To investigate the relationship between stent length and changes in microvascular resistance during PCI in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and Results

We measured fractional flow reserve (FFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) before and after stenting in 42 consecutive subjects with stable coronary artery undergoing PCI with stent in the LAD. Patients that had very long stent length (38–78 mm) had lower FFR before stenting than patients that had long (23–37 mm) and moderate (12–22 mm) stent length (0.59 (±0.16), 0.70 (±0.12), and 0.75 (±0.07); p=0.002). FFR improved after stenting and more so in subjects with very long stent length compared to long and moderate stent length (0.27 (s.d ± 16), 0.15 (s.d ± 0.12), and 0.12 (s.d ± 0.07); p for interaction = 0.013). Corrected IMR (IMR_corr) increased after stenting in subjects who had very long stent length, whereas IMR_corr was lower after stenting in subjects who had long or moderate stent length (4.6 (s.d. ± 10.7), −1.4 (s.d. ± 9,9), and −4.2 (s.d. ± 7.8); p for interaction = 0.009).

Conclusions

Changes in IMR during PCI in the LAD in stable CAD seem to be related to total length of stents implanted, possibly influencing post-PCI FFR. Larger studies are needed to confirm the relationship.

Lipid-Core Plaque Assessed by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Procedure Related Microvascular Injury

Background and Objectives

Microvascular damage due to distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important cause of periprocedural myocardial infarction. We assessed the lipid-core plaque using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and microvascular dysfunction invasively with the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and evaluated their relationship.

Methods

This study is pilot retrospective observational study. We analyzed 39 patients who performed NIRS before and after PCI, while fractional flow reserve, thermo-dilution coronary flow reserve (CFR) and IMR were measured after PCI. The maximum value of lipid core burden index (LCBI) for any of the 4-mm segments at the culprit lesion (culprit LCBI_4mm) was calculated at the culprit lesion. We divided the patients into 2 groups using a cutoff of culprit LCBI_4mm ≥500.

Results

Mean pre-PCI LCBI was 333±196 and mean post-PCI IMR was 20±14 U. Post-PCI IMR was higher (15.6±7.3 vs. 42.6±17.6 U, p<0.001) and post-PCI CFR was lower (3.7±2.2 vs. 2.1±1.0, p=0.029) in the high LCBI group. Pre-PCI LCBI was positively correlated with post-PCI IMR (ρ=0.358, p=0.025) and negatively correlated with post-PCI CFR (ρ=−0.494, p=0.001). The incidence of microvascular dysfunction (IMR ≥25 U) was higher in the high LCBI group (9.4% vs. 85.7%, p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the incidences of creatine Kinase-MB (9.4% vs. 14.3%, p=0.563) and troponin-I elevation (12.5% vs. 14.3%, p=1.000).

Conclusions

A large lipid-core plaque at the ‘culprit’ lesion is observed higher incidence of post-PCI microvascular dysfunction after PCI. Prospective study with adequate subject numbers will be needed.

Combined Primary PCI with Multiple Thrombus Burden Reduction Therapy Improved Cardiac Function in Patients with Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction

High thrombus burden induced slow-flow and no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether a combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI, could improve microcirculation and enhance cardiac function in the long-term.Anterior wall STEMI patients with high thrombus burden were randomly assigned to receive a combined thrombus burden reduction therapy or thrombus aspiration alone. The primary end points included the percentage of patients with TMPG (TIMI myocardial perfusion grade) 3, STR (ST-segment resolution) above 70%, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) difference.Twenty-two patients in the combined interventional group and 24 in the control group completed 1-year follow-up. The percentages of patients with TMPG 3 (68.2% versus 33.3%, P = 0.006) and STR above 70% (63.6% versus 25%, P = 0.016) were significantly higher in the combined group. IMR was significantly lower in the combined interventional group (31.50 ± 13.39 U versus 62.72 ± 22.80 U, P = 0.002). At 3 months and 1 year, the overall LVEF value was better in the combined interventional group (42.1% versus 40.0%, P = 0.049; 41.9% versus 39.8%, P = 0.042), respectively. The IMR value was negatively correlated with the EF value at 3 months (r = -0.145, P = 0.013) and 1 year (r = -0.333, P = 0.031).A combined thrombus burden reduction therapy during primary PCI can safely reduce thrombus burden, improve myocardial tissue perfusion, and improve cardiac function among STEMI patients with high thrombus burden. IMR might be a good predictor for post-myocardial infarction cardiac function.

Long-term prognostic value of invasive and non-invasive measures early after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Invasively assessed coronary microvascular resistance early after heart transplantation predicts worse long-term outcome; however, little is known about the relationship between microvascular resistance, left ventricular function and outcomes in this setting.

METHODS

A total of 100 cardiac transplant recipients had fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measured in the left anterior descending artery and echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) at 1 year after heart transplantation. The primary endpoint was the composite of death and retransplantation occurring beyond the first post-operative year.

RESULTS

The mean FFR, IMR, LVEF, and GLS values at 1 year were 0.87 ± 0.06, 21.3 ± 17.3, 60.4 ± 5.4%, and 14.2 ± 2.4%, respectively. FFR and IMR had no significant correlation with LVEF and GLS. During a mean follow-up of 6.7 ± 4.2 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 24 patients (24.0%). By ROC curve analysis, IMR = 19.3 and GLS = 13.3% were the best cutoff values for predicting death or retransplantation. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly lower in patients with higher IMR (log-rank p = 0.02) and lower GLS (log-rank p < 0.001). Cumulative event-free survival can be further stratified by the combination of IMR and GLS (long-rank p < 0.001). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, higher IMR and lower GLS were independently associated with long-term death or retransplantation (elevated IMR, hazard ratio = 2.50, p = 0.04 and reduced GLS, hazard ratio = 3.79, p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Invasively assessed IMR does not correlate with GLS at 1 year after heart transplantation. IMR and GLS determined at 1 year may be used as independent predictors of late death or retransplantation.

Postoperative Assessment of Myocardial Function and Microcirculation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

BACKGROUND Postoperative myocardial function and microcirculation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty-nine ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were detected by MCE and two-dimensional ultrasonography before and a month later after PCI respectively. Their myocardial perfusion was evaluated by myocardial contrast score (MSC) and contrast score index (CSI); cross-sectional area of microvessel (A), average myocardial microvascular impairment (β), and myocardial blood flow (MBF) were analyzed by cardiac ultrasound quantitative analysis (CUSQ), and fractional flow reserve (FFR) change was observed. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) were observed; the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), FFR, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were detected to evaluate coronary microcirculation. RESULTS None of the 89 patients experienced no-reflow. Patients with normal myocardial perfusion mostly had normal or slightly decreased ventricular wall motion after PCI. A month after the operation, there was an increase in A, β, MBF, LVEF, E/A, IMR, FFR, and CFR (all P<0.05), while LVEDD, LVESD, diastolic gallop A peak, E/Ea, E/Ea×S, and Tei decreased (all P<0.05). LVEF and IMR were in positive correlations with A. LVEF, IMR, FFR and CFR were positively correlated with b and MBF (both r>0, P<0.05), while E/Ea×Sa and Tei were negatively correlated with b and MBF (r<0, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS MCE can safely assess post-PCI myocardial function and microcirculation of ASC.

Feasibility of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Myocardial Revascularization Therapy for Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients and Refractory Angina Pectoris Patients

Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) is one of the new treatment options for refractory angina pectoris (RAP), and some studies have indicated its effectiveness. A single-arm prospective trial to assess the feasibility of ESMR using Cardiospec for patients with post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and RAP was designed and performed. The patients were treated with 9 sessions of ESMR to the ischemic areas for 9 weeks. The feasibility measures included echocardiography; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; troponin T, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and brain natriuretic peptide testing; and a Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) survey. Three post-AMI patients and 3 RAP patients were enrolled. The post-AMI patients had already undergone revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the acute phase. In two patients, adverse events requiring admission occurred: one a lumbar disc hernia in a post-AMI patient and the other congestive heart failure resulting in death in an RAP patient. No apparent elevations in CK-MB and troponin T levels during the trial were observed. Echocardiography revealed no remarkable changes of ejection fraction; however, septal E/E' tended to decrease after treatments (11.6 ± 4.8 versus 9.2 ± 2.8, P = 0.08). Concerning the available SAQ scores for two RAP patients, one patient reported improvements in angina frequency and treatment satisfaction and the other reported improvements in physical limitations and angina stability. In this feasibility study, ESMR seems to be a safe treatment for both post-AMI patients and RAP patients. The efficacy of ESMR for post-AMI patients remains to be evaluated with additional studies.

Cognitive function after heart transplantation: Comparing everolimus-based and calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown conflicting results concerning the occurrence of cognitive impairment after successful heart transplantation (HTx). Another unresolved issue is the possible differential impact of immunosuppressants on cognitive function. In this study, we describe cognitive function in a cohort of HTx recipients and subsequently compare cognitive function between subjects on either everolimus- or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

Cognitive function, covering attention, processing speed, executive functions, memory, and language functions, was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery. Thirty-seven subjects were included (everolimus group: n=20; CNI group: n=17). The extent of cerebrovascular pathology was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

About 40% of subjects had cognitive impairment, defined as performance at least 1.5 standard deviations below normative mean in one or several cognitive domains. Cerebrovascular pathology was present in 33.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups across cognitive domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in the sample, plus the known negative impact of cognitive impairment on clinical outcome, our results indicate that cognitive assessment should be an integrated part of routine clinical follow-up after HTx. However, everolimus- and CNI-based immunosuppressive regimens did not show differential impacts on cognitive function.

Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13 N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography

Background—

Recent evidence suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging is improved by quantifying stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) in absolute terms. We evaluated a comprehensive quantitative 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography ( 13 NH 3 -PET) diagnostic panel, including stress MBF, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and relative flow reserve (RFR) in conjunction with relative perfusion defect (PD) assessments to better detect functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.

Methods and Results—

A total of 130 patients (307 vessels) with coronary artery disease underwent both 13 NH 3 -PET and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Diagnostic accuracy, optimal cut points, and discrimination indices of respective 13 NH 3 -PET quantitative measures were compared, with FFR as standard reference. The capacity to discern disease with stepwise addition of stress MBF, CFR, and RFR to qualitatively assessed relative PD was also gauged, using the category-free net reclassification index. All quantitative measures showed significant correlation with FFR (PET-derived CFR, r =0.388; stress MBF, r =0.496; and RFR, r =0.780; all P <0.001). Optimal respective cut points for FFR ≤0.8 and ≤0.75 were 1.99 and 1.84 mL/min per g for stress MBF and 2.12 and 2.00 for PET-derived CFR. Discrimination indices of quantitative measures that correlated with FFR ≤0.8 were all significantly higher than that of relative PD (area under the curve: 0.626, 0.730, 0.806, and 0.897 for relative PD, CFR, stress MBF, and RFR, respectively; overall comparison P <0.001). The capacity for functionally significant coronary stenosis was incrementally improved by the successive addition of CFR (net reclassification index=0.629), stress MBF (net reclassification index=0.950), and RFR (net reclassification index=1.253; all P <0.001) to relative PD.

Conclusions—

Integrating quantitative 13 NH 3 -PET measures with qualitative myocardial perfusion assessment provides superior diagnostic accuracy and improves the capacity to detect functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01621438 and NCT01366404.

Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real-world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: insights from the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry

BACKGROUND

The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a quantitative and specific index for coronary microcirculation. However, the distribution and determinants of IMR have not been fully investigated in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients who underwent elective measurement of both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and IMR were enrolled from 8 centers in 5 countries. Patients with acute myocardial infarction were excluded. To adjust for the influence of collateral flow, IMR values were corrected with Yong's formula (IMRcorr). High IMR was defined as greater than the 75th percentile in each of the major coronary arteries. FFR≤0.80 was defined as an ischemic value. 1096 patients with 1452 coronary arteries were analyzed (mean age 61.1, male 71.2%). Mean FFR was 0.84 and median IMRcorr was 16.6 U (Q1, Q3 12.4 U, 23.0 U). There was no correlation between IMRcorr and FFR values (r=0.01, P=0.62), and the categorical agreement of FFR and IMRcorr was low (kappa value=-0.04, P=0.10). There was no correlation between IMRcorr and angiographic % diameter stenosis (r=-0.03, P=0.25). Determinants of high IMR were previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-3.74, P=0.01), right coronary artery (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.54-2.84, P<0.01), female (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.38, P<0.01), and obesity (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31-2.49, P<0.01). Determinants of FFR ≤0.80 were left anterior descending coronary artery (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.92-6.36, P<0.01), angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% (OR 5.16, 95% CI 3.66-7.28, P<0.01), male (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.38-3.35, P<0.01), and age (per 10 years, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.46, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IMR showed no correlation with FFR and angiographic lesion severity, and the predictors of high IMR value were different from those for ischemic FFR value. Therefore, integration of IMR into FFR measurement may provide additional insights regarding the relative contribution of macro- and microvascular disease in patients with ischemic heart disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02186093.

Effect of Sex Differences on Invasive Measures of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Angina in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated sex differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in women. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are 2 methods of assessing the coronary microcirculation.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 117 women and 40 men with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We performed CFR, IMR, fractional flow reserve, and quantitative coronary angiography in the left anterior descending artery. Coronary flow was assessed with a thermodilution method by obtaining mean transit time (Tmn) (an inverse correlate to absolute flow) at rest and hyperemia.

RESULTS

All patients had minimal atherosclerosis by quantitative coronary angiography (% diameter stenosis: 23.2 ± 12.3%), and epicardial disease was milder in women (fractional flow reserve: 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.87 ± 0.04; p = 0.04). IMR was similar between the sexes (20.7 ± 9.8 vs. 19.1 ± 8.0; p = 0.45), but CFR was lower in women (3.8 ± 1.6 vs. 4.8 ± 1.9; p = 0.004). This was primarily due to a shorter resting Tmn in women (p = 0.005), suggesting increased resting coronary flow, whereas hyperemic Tmn was identical (p = 0.79). In multivariable analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of lower CFR and shorter resting Tmn.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar microvascular function in women and men by IMR, CFR is lower in women. This discrepancy appears to be due to differences in resting coronary flow between the sexes. The effect of sex differences should be considered in interpretation of physiological indexes using resting coronary flow.

Fractional flow reserve-guided management in stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction: recent developments

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, and improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of CAD can reduce the health and economic burden of this condition. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an evidence-based diagnostic test of the physiological significance of a coronary artery stenosis. Fractional flow reserve is a pressure-derived index of the maximal achievable myocardial blood flow in the presence of an epicardial coronary stenosis as a ratio to maximum achievable flow if that artery were normal. When compared with standard angiography-guided management, FFR disclosure is impactful on the decision for revascularization and clinical outcomes. In this article, we review recent developments with FFR in patients with stable CAD and recent myocardial infarction. Specifically, we review novel developments in our understanding of CAD pathophysiology, diagnostic applications, prognostic studies, clinical trials, and clinical guidelines.

Assessment of coronary hemodynamics and vascular function

Coronary blood flow closely matches to metabolic demands of heart and myocardial oxygen consumption and is conditioned by function of coronary resistance vessels. The microvascular endothelium of coronary resistance vessels is exposed to a spatially and temporally regulated input from cardiomyocytes and the haemodynamic forces of the cardiac cycle. Functional measurements of coronary pressure and flow are important approaches that provide complementary information on the function of coronary vessel function that could not be assessed by the methods utilized for the anatomic characterization of coronary disease, such as coronary angiography. The goal of this paper is to review the methodologies for assessment of coronary vascular function and haemodynamics which are utilized in research and to discuss their potential applicability in the clinical settings.