Effect of Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Value on Waitlist Outcomes for Lung Transplant Candidates

Increased delay to lung transplantation for women candidates: gender-based disparity matters in the lung transplant trajectory

Background

Lung transplantation is a highly dynamic segment of solid organ transplantation in which gender plays a central role. Our objective was to investigate the causes of outcome differences between women and men all along the lung transplantation pathway.

Methods

We used data from the French COhort in Lung Transplantation (COLT) study (12 participating lung transplantation centres). Analyses were performed in three phases: baseline clinical characteristics, peri-transplantation period and post-transplantation follow-up.

Results

Overall, 1710 participants (802 women and 908 men) were included in this study. Women were less likely than men to undergo transplantation (91.6% versus 95.6%; p=0.001) and waited longer before transplantation (115 versus 73 days; p<0.001). Female gender and pre-transplantation class I anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were identified as independent factors associated with longer waiting time duration. Female transplant recipients commonly received lungs from height- and sex-matched donors, despite higher female waiting list mortality and a higher proportion of male donors. Importantly, women with oversized lung transplantation (defined by predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) ratio and weight mismatch) did not have worse survival. The overall post-transplantation survival of female recipients was significantly higher than that of male recipients (65.6% versus 57.3%; p<0.001), although the prevalence of specific major lung transplantation outcomes did not differ according to gender.

Conclusion

Women waited longer and were less likely to undergo transplantation. Women transplanted with an oversized lung did not have worse survival after transplantation, suggesting that size matching criteria based on pTLC ratio and weight mismatch may be less stringent in this context.

Perioperative C1-esterase inhibitor therapy to allow transplantation in a highly sensitized lung transplant candidate: Three case reports

Lung transplant candidates who are highly sensitized against human leucocyte antigen have a lower likelihood of graft allocation and a higher risk of dying while on the waiting list. C1-esterase inhibitor, an inhibitor of the classical and lectin pathways of complement activation, has been used successfully to prevent and treat acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney and heart transplantation. Here, we report 3 cases of C1-esterase inhibitors used perioperatively in highly sensitized lung transplant candidates, with successful bilateral lung transplants despite severe primary graft dysfunction and/or hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Armamentarium in a 21st Century Perspective

Humoral immunity is a major waypoint towards chronic allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. Though allo-immunization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are well-known entities, some diagnostic gaps need to be addressed. Morphological analysis could be enhanced by digital pathology and artificial intelligence-based companion tools. Graft transcriptomics can help to identify graft failure phenotypes or endotypes. Donor-derived cell free DNA is being evaluated for graft-loss risk stratification and tailored surveillance. Preventative therapies should be tailored according to risk. The donor pool can be enlarged for candidates with HLA sensitization, with strategies combining plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and immune cell depletion, or with emerging or innovative therapies such as imlifidase or immunoadsorption. In cases of insufficient pre-transplant desensitization, the effects of antibodies on the allograft can be prevented by targeting the complement cascade, although evidence for this strategy in LT is limited. In LT recipients with a humoral response, strategies are combined, including depletion of immune cells (plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption), inhibition of immune pathways, or modulation of the inflammatory cascade, which can be achieved with photopheresis. Altogether, these innovative techniques offer promising perspectives for LT recipients and shape the 21st century's armamentarium against AMR.

Impact of intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange on bleeding in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Our program uses a desensitization protocol that includes intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange (iTPE) for crossmatch-positive lung transplants, which improves access to lung transplant for sensitized candidates while mitigating immunologic risk. Although we have reported excellent outcomes for sensitized patients with the use of this protocol, concern for perioperative bleeding appears to have hindered broader adoption of it at other programs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify the impact of iTPE on perioperative bleeding in lung transplantation.

METHODS

All first-time lung transplant recipients from 2014 to 2019 who received iTPE were compared to those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between iTPE and large-volume perioperative transfusion requirements (≥5 packed red blood cell units within 24 hours of transplant start), adjusted for disease type, transplant type, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass use. The incidence of hemothorax (requiring reoperation within 7 days of lung transplant) and 30-day posttransplant mortality were compared between the 2 groups using chi-square test.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients (16%) received iTPE, and 755 patients (84%) did not. The mean number of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 4.2 among patients who received iTPE and 2.9 among patients who did not. iTPE was associated with increased odds of requiring large-volume perioperative transfusion (odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.9, p-value = 0.007) but was not associated with an increased incidence of hemothorax (5% in both groups, p = 0.99) or 30-day posttransplant mortality (3.5% among patients who received iTPE vs 2.1% among patients who did not, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the use of iTPE in lung transplantation may increase perioperative bleeding but not to a degree that impacts important posttransplant outcomes.

Outcomes after flow cytometry crossmatch-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization

Our program previously reported successful outcomes following virtual crossmatch (VXM)-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization, but our ability to stratify their immunologic risk was limited without flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) data before 2014. The aim of this study was to determine allograft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival following VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants, which are performed at a minority of programs due to the high immunologic risk and lack of data on outcomes. All first-time lung transplant recipients between January 2014 and December 2019 were divided into 3 cohorts: VXM-negative (n = 764), VXM-positive/FCXM-negative (n = 64), and VXM-positive/FCXM-positive (n = 74). Allograft and CLAD-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Five-year allograft survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 64% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 57% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .7171). Five-year CLAD-free survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 60% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 63% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .8509). This study confirms that allograft and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol does not differ from those of other lung transplant recipients. Our protocol for VXM-positive lung transplants improves access to transplant for sensitized candidates and mitigates even high immunologic risk.

Social and biologic determinants in lung transplant allocation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplant is a life-saving intervention for many with end-stage lung disease. As usable donor lungs are a limited resource and the risk of death on the waitlist is not uniform among candidates, organ allocation must consider many variables in order to be equitable.

RECENT FINDINGS

The lung allocation score (LAS) system, implemented in 2005, accounted for disease severity, risk of death without transplant, and 1-year survival estimates; however, recipient size, allosensitization, and blood type, biologic features that influence donor pool for a given recipient, do not impact allocation priority. Additionally, social determinants such as geography, socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity can impact the likelihood of receiving a transplant. This has resulted in certain groups being transplanted at lower rates and at higher risk of dying on the waitlist. In order to address these disparities, lung organ allocation in the United States transitioned to a continuous distribution system using the composite allocation score (CAS) on 9 March 2023.

SUMMARY

In this article, we will review some of the data demonstrating the impact that biologic and social determinants have had on lung allocation in order to provide background as to why these have been incorporated into the CAS.

Development of New Donor-Specific and Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies After Transfusion in Adult Lung Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The development of new human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in patients are associated with worse outcomes following lung transplantation. The authors aimed to examine the relationship between blood product transfusion in the first 72 hours after lung transplantation and the development of HLA antibodies, including DSAs.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

At a single academic tertiary center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult lung transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between September 2014 and June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were included in this study, and 87 (23%) developed de novo donor-specific antibodies in the first year after transplantation. Eighty-five patients (22%) developed new HLA antibodies that were not donor-specific, and 208 patients (55%) did not develop new HLA antibodies in the first year after transplantation. Factors associated with increased HLA and DSA development included donor pulmonary infection, non-infectious indication for transplant, increased recipient body mass index, and a preoperative calculated panel reactive antibody value above 0. Multivariate analysis identified platelet transfusion associated with an increased risk of de novo HLA antibody development compared to the negative group (odds ratio [OR; 95% CI] 1.18 [1.02-1.36]; p = 0.025). Cryoprecipitate transfusion was associated with de novo DSA development compared to the negative group (OR [95% CI] 2.21 [1.32-3.69] for 1 v 0 units; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased perioperative transfusion of platelets and cryoprecipitate are associated with de novo HLA and DSA development, respectively, in lung transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation.

The Highly Sensitized Recipient: Pretransplant and Posttransplant Considerations

Highly sensitized patients, who are often black and Hispanic women, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant and are at higher risk for prolonged waitlist time and waitlist death. In this review, the authors discuss strategies for improving access to transplant in this population, including risk stratification of crossing pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, based on antibody characteristics. The authors also review institutional protocols, such as perioperative desensitization, for tailoring transplant immunosuppression in the highly sensitized population. The authors conclude with suggestions for future research, including development of novel donor-specific antibody-directed therapeutics.

Human leukocyte antigen antibody sensitization, lung transplantation, and health equity

Women with advanced lung disease, particularly Black and Hispanic women, are more likely than other patients to have anti-human leukocyte (HLA) antibodies against potential donors. Sensitized patients, especially those who are highly sensitized, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant or to be considered candidates for mechanical circulatory support. They are also at higher risk for waitlist death. Institutional variability in approach to HLA antibody screening and pre-transplant management creates barriers to transplant that disproportionately impact Black and Hispanic women. At the same time, our understanding of the clinical significance of pre-transplant antibodies lags behind the sophistication of our screening assays. The lack of national data on pre- and post-transplant HLA antibody characteristics hinders research into strategies to mitigate concerns about these antibodies and to improve access to lung transplant among sensitized patients. Ongoing work should be done to identify clinically higher risk antibodies, to develop better strategies for safely crossing antibodies at the time of transplant, and to model changes in lung allocation to give priority to sensitized patients for a HLA antibody-antigen compatible donors. These priorities mandate a commitment to collaborative, multicenter research and to real time translation of results to clinical practice and allocation policy.

Approaching the sensitized lung patient: risk assessment for donor acceptance

The presence of HLA antibodies is widely recognized as a barrier to solid organ transplantation, and for lung transplant candidates, it has a significant negative impact on both waiting time and waiting list mortality. Although HLA antibodies have been associated with a broad spectrum of allograft damage, precise characterization of these antibodies in allosensitized candidates may enhance their accessibility to transplant. The introduction of Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays has significantly improved antibody detection sensitivity and specificity, but SAB alone is not sufficient for risk-stratification. Functional characterization of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is paramount to increase donor accessibility for allosensitized lung candidates. We describe here our approach to evaluate sensitized lung transplant candidates. By employing state-of-the-art technologies to assess histocompatibility and determine physiological properties of circulating HLA antibodies, we can provide our Clinical Team a better risk assessment for lung transplant candidates and facilitate a "road map" to transplant. The cases presented in this paper illustrate the "individualized steps" taken to determine calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA), titer and complement-fixing properties of each HLA antibody present in circulation. When a donor is considered, we can better predict the risk associated with potentially crossing HLA antibodies, thereby allowing the Clinical Team to approach allosensitized lung patients with an individualized medicine approach. To facilitate safe access of sensitized lung transplant candidates to potential donors, a synergy between the histocompatibility laboratory and the Clinical Team is essential. Ultimately, donor acceptance is a decision based on several parameters, leading to a risk-stratification unique for each patient.

Long-term outcomes of sensitized lung transplant recipients after peri-operative desensitization

The Toronto Lung Transplant Program has been using a peri-operative desensitization regimen of plasma exchange, intravenous immune globulin, and antithymocyte globulin in order to accept donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive lung transplants safely since 2008. There are no long-term data on the impact of this practice on allograft survival or the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We extended our prior study to include long-term follow-up of 340 patients who received lung transplants between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011. We compared allograft survival and CLAD-free survival among patients in three cohorts: DSA-positive, panel reactive antibody (PRA)-positive/DSA-negative, and unsensitized at the time of transplant. The median follow-up time in this extension study was 6.7 years. Among DSA-positive, PRA-positive/DSA-negative, and unsensitized patients, the median allograft survival was 8.4, 7.9, and 5.8 years, respectively (p = .5908), and the median CLAD-free survival was 6.8, 7.3, and 5.7 years, respectively (p = .5448). This follow-up study confirms that long-term allograft survival and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo DSA-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol do not differ from other lung transplant recipients. Use of protocols such as ours, therefore, may improve access to transplant for sensitized candidates.

The fraction of sensitization among lung transplant recipients in a transplant center in Japan

Background

Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing was approved by the Japanese government in 2018. As such, there was no longitudinal data regarding the HLA-sensitization of lung transplant (LTX) patients in Japan. We therefore set out to measure anti-HLA antibodies from all our LTX patients during their annual follow-up to characterize the sensitization status in the Japanese population.

Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted for consecutive LTX recipients who underwent transplantation from January 2000 to January 2020 at Tohoku University Hospital (TUH). The serum from the recipients was screened for anti-HLA antibody with the panel-reactive assay (PRA) and the donor-specific antibodies (DSA).

Results

Sensitization was reviewed in 93 LTX recipients, showing 23 positive (24.7%) and 70 negative (75.3%) PRA. More sensitized recipients were found in recent transplantations (60.9% (14/23), ≤5 years post LTX) than in older transplantations (17.4% (4/23), 5–10 years or 21.7% (5/23), ≥10 years post LTX) (p = 0.04). Even fewer recipients had DSA (5.4%, 5/93), among whom 4/5 (80%) were recently transplanted.

Conclusion

The rate of PRA positive LTX recipients in our population was lower compared with those in previous reports from US and Europe. More sensitized LTRs were found in recent transplantations than the older cohort, and DSA was identified primarily in the recent recipients. Due to several limitations, it is still unclear whether the sensitization would be related the development of CLAD or survival, yet this study would be fundamental to the future anti-HLA body study in Japanese population.

Lung transplant waitlist outcomes in the United States and patient travel distance

There is a broad range of patient travel distances to reach a lung transplant hospital in the United States. Whether patient travel distance is associated with waitlist outcomes is unknown. We present a cohort study of patients listed between January 1, 2006 and May 31, 2017 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Travel distance was measured from the patient's permanent zip code to the transplant hospital using shared access signature URL access to Google Maps, and assessed using multivariable competing risk regression models. There were 22 958 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median travel distance was 69.7 miles. Among patients who traveled > 60 miles, 41.2% bypassed a closer hospital and sought listing at a more distant hospital. In the adjusted models, when compared to patients who traveled ≤60 miles, patients who traveled >360 miles had a 27% lower subhazard ratio (SHR) for waitlist removal (SHR 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.89, P = .002), 16% lower subhazard for waitlist death (SHR 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.95, P = .07), and 13% increased likelihood for transplant (SHR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.20, P < .001). Many patients bypassed the nearest transplant hospital, and longer patient travel distance was associated with favorable waitlist outcomes.

Perspectives on donor lung allocation from both sides of the Atlantic: The United States

Donor lung allocation in the United States focuses on decreasing waitlist mortality and improving recipient outcomes. The implementation of allocation policy to match deceased donor lungs to waitlisted patients occurs through a unique partnership between government and private organizations, namely the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network under the Department of Health and Human Services and the United Network for Organ Sharing. In 2005, the donor lung allocation algorithm shifted toward the prioritization of medical urgency of waitlisted patients instead of time accrued on the waitlist. This led to the Lung Allocation Score, which weighs over a dozen clinical variables to predict a 1-year estimate of survival benefit, and is used to prioritize waitlisted patients. In 2017, the use of local allocation boundaries was eliminated in favor of a 250 nautical mile radius from the donor hospital as the first unit of distance used in allocation. The next upcoming iteration of donor allocation policy is expected to use a continuous distribution algorithm where all geographic boundaries are eliminated. There are additional opportunities to improve donor lung allocation, such as for patients with high antibody titers with access to a limited number of donors.