Pulmonary Dysfunction Function and Poor Nutritional Status are Risk Factors for Remote Infections Following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Predictive value of Controlling Nutritional Status score and Prognostic Nutritional Index for systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

Our aim was to investigate the predictive value of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data of 422 patients who underwent PNL were evaluated. The CONUT score was calculated from lymphocyte count, serum albumin, and cholesterol, while the PNI was calculated using lymphocyte count and serum albumin. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between nutritional scores and systemic inflammation markers. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for SIRS/sepsis development after PNL.

RESULTS

Patients with SIRS/sepsis had a significantly higher preoperative CONUT score and lower PNI compared with the SIRS/sepsis (-) group. A positive significant correlation between CONUT score and CRP (rho = 0.75), CONUT score and procalcitonin (rho = 0.36), and CONUT score and WBC (rho = 0.23) were determined. Additionally, a negative significant correlation was shown between PNI and procalcitonin (rho = - 0.30) and PNI and CRP (rho = - 0.64). The ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off values for the CONUT score and PNI were 4 (AUC = 0.827) and 42 (AUC = 0.734), respectively. Age, stone size, history of pyelonephritis, residual stone, presence of infection stone, CONUT score ≥ 4, and PNI ≤ 42 were found to be independent predictors for postoperative SIRS/sepsis in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that preoperative CONUT score and PNI are potential predictive factors for SIRS/sepsis development after PNL. Therefore, patients with CONUT score ≥ 4 and PNI ≤ 42 are suggested to be closely monitoring due to the risk of post-PNL SIRS/sepsis.

Maximal voluntary ventilation and forced vital capacity of pulmonary function are independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective study of 2323 cases in a single-center of China

Preoperative pulmonary function assessment is applied to select surgical candidates and predict the occurrence of postoperative complications. This present study enrolled 2323 colorectal cancer patients. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were measured as predicted values. Associations between patient pulmonary function and both prognosis and postoperative complications was analyzed. The value of FVC and MVV optimal cutoff was 98.1 (P < .001) and 92.5 (P < .001), respectively. Low FVC and low MVV were associated with higher rates of postoperative fever (23.8% vs 13.9%, P < .001; 17.8% vs 13.3%, P = .049, respectively) and with higher rates of pneumonia (3.75% vs 1.73%, P = .002; 3.00% vs 1.71%, P = .009, respectively), pleural effusion (3.00% vs 1.57%, P = .033; 3.18% vs 1.42%, P = .006, respectively), and poor patient prognosis (5-year overall survival: 80.0% vs 90.3%, P < .001; 71.7% vs 91.9%, P < .001, respectively). In addition, low FVC was closely related to the higher rate of anastomosis leak (4.31% vs 2.29%, P = .013), low MVV was correlated with the higher rate of uroschesis (2.38% vs 0.65%, P < .001). In subgroup analyses, the predictive value of FVC and MVV in patients with different tumor stage was analyzed. Both low FVC and MVV were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in stage II and III, indicating that low FVC and MVV are predictive of poorer prognosis and higher risk of postoperative complications in colorectal cancer patients.

Cancer cachexia and treatment toxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer cachexia is a metabolic disturbance resulting in a loss of skeletal muscle mass that is generally not reversed through traditional nutritional interventions. We review on both the impact of nutritional status on cancer treatment side effects, as well as cancer- specific outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cancer-specific cachexia and sarcopenia are associated with increased treatment-associated toxicity, and overall worse cancer-specific outcomes across all cancer types in surgical, chemotherapeutic, and radiotherapeutic populations. Despite the fact that cancer cachexia is generally thought to be irreversible, there is some evidence that nutritional intervention can be helpful.

SUMMARY

Nutritional status is an important factor to consider in determining cancer therapy. Patients with poor nutritional status should be identified prior to the initiation of therapy and be monitored judiciously.

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical evidence of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for outcomes has increased in gastroenterological surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the CONUT score on outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

A literature review was systematically conducted to evaluate the significance of the CONUT score in CRC patients. Meta-analyses of survival were performed to investigate the effects of the CONUT score in CRC patients.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, and six studies with 2601 patients were included in the present meta-analyses. High CONUT score was associated with poor overall survival (HR 1.97, 95%CI = 1.40-2.77, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (HR 3.64, 95%CI = 1.96-6.75, P < 0.001), and recurrence/relapse-free survival (HR 1.68, 95%CI = 1.23-2.29, P = 0.001) after CRC surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The CONUT score is a practical prognostic factor associated with prognosis of CRC. Further studies are needed to clarify the significance of the CONUT score in CRC patients.

Postoperative Infection after Colorectal Surgery: Subanalysis of Data from the 2015 Japan Postoperative Infectious Complications Survey

BACKGROUND

Most surveillance programs for postoperative infection focus on surgical site infections (SSI). However, postoperative remote infections are of emerging clinical importance. Using data from a multicenter survey administered to patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery, we investigated the incidence of SSI and remote infection after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

From September 2015 through March 2016, 1,724 patients underwent colorectal surgery in 28 affiliated centers in Japan. We retrospectively recorded patient age, sex, surgical site, surgical approach, wound classification, performance status at discharge, and postoperative infection status.

RESULTS

Postoperative infection was noted in 236 (13.7%) patients; 150 and 86 patients underwent colon and rectal surgeries, respectively (incidence of postoperative infection: 13.7% and 14.8%). The incidence of postoperative infection was significantly lower after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery, in colon and rectal surgery (p < 0.001). Among patients with postoperative infections, 211 (89.4%) had a single infection and 25 (10.6%) had multiple infections. Among patients with a single postoperative infection, SSI and remote infection occurred in 143 (60.6%) and 68 (28.8%) patients, respectively. The most common multiple postoperative infections were "incisional and organ/space SSIs" and "organ/space SSI and bacteremia of unknown origin" (n = 3 each).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the prevalence distributions for postoperative SSI and remote infections. Because of the substantial effect of remote infections on patient quality of life and the associated social burden, prospective periodic surveillance for SSI and remote infection is necessary for careful evaluation and prevention.

Clinical importance of preoperative and postoperative prognostic nutritional index in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Backgrounds/Aims

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is based on the albumin concentration and absolute lymphocyte count and is designed to assess the nutritional and immunological status of patients. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic importance of the preoperative and postoperative PNI in patients who underwent curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

From 2006 to 2017, 50 patients with PDAC underwent curative resection at our hospital. We performed distal pancreatectomy (DP) with splenectomy in 15 patients, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 27 patients, PD combined with portal vein partial resection in 6 patients, and total pancreatectomy with splenectomy in 2 patients. We compared the preoperative PNI and postoperative PNI (1 and 2 months postoperatively) and analyzed the prognostic importance for these patients.

Results

The mean PNI significantly decreased from 45.5 preoperatively to 39.8 at 1 month postoperatively (p<0.001), but recovered to 42.7 at 2 months postoperatively. In 23 patients, the PNI at 2 months postoperatively recovered to the preoperative level (recovered group), but in the remaining 27 patients, the PNI at 2 months postoperatively did not reach the preoperative level (non-recovered group). The overall median survival time in the recovered group (29 months) was significantly longer than that in the non-recovered group (12 months, p=0.003). The multivariate overall analysis demonstrated that good recovery of the postoperative PNI was strongly correlated with a better prognosis.

Conclusions

Effective postoperative nutrition may have a prognostic benefit for patients with operable PDAC.