Against Medical Advice Discharges

Discharge Against Medical Advice From the Emergency Department: Results From a Private Hospital in Beirut

INTRODUCTION

Discharge against medical advice (AMA) is a common problem worldwide. These patients experience higher mortality rates in the following month and higher Emergency Department (ED) revisit rates. This study examines the characteristics, reasons, and clinical outcomes of the patients leaving the ED AMA.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the ED of the Lebanese American University Medical Center from 2019 to 2022.

RESULTS

Over the four years, 42,672 patients have presented to the ED. Among them, 2,767 have left AMA (6.4%). The numbers varied among the years, from 477 (3.6%) in 2019, going up to 751 (7%) in 2020, then to 907 (10%) in 2021, and 632 (5.8%) in 2022. Many reasons were found. The most common reason for leaving AMA was the financial coverage, which accounted for 1442 cases (52%). Other common causes were the COVID-19 isolation cost (started in 2020) with 677 cases (24.5%), cold cases referred to clinics (301 cases; 10.9%), and the long waiting time for a bed being available (284 cases; 10.3%). Other causes were only 63 (2.3%).

CONCLUSION

Discharge AMA varies from one ED to another but is mainly linked to the economic situation in the country, the financial coverage of the population, and the system within the hospital. Interventions at a larger scale shall be conducted to reduce the rate of its occurrence.

"Against Medical Advice" Discharges After Respiratory-Related Hospitalizations: Strategies for Respectful Care

Against medical advice (AMA) discharges are practically and emotionally challenging for both patients and clinicians. Moreover, they are common after admissions for respiratory conditions such as COPD and asthma, and they are associated with poor outcomes. Despite the challenges presented by AMA discharges, clinicians rarely receive formal education and have limited guidance on how to approach these discharges. Often, the approach to AMA discharges prioritizes designating the discharge as "AMA," whereas effective coordination of discharge care receives less attention. Such an approach can lead to stigmatization of patients and low-quality care. Although evidence for best practices in AMA discharges remains lacking, we propose a set of strategies to improve care in AMA discharges by focusing on respect, in which clinicians treat patients as equals and honor differing values. We describe five strategies, including (1) preventing an AMA discharge; (2) conducting a patient-centered and truthful discussion of risk; (3) providing harm-reducing discharge care; (4) minimizing stigma and bias; and (5) educating trainees. Through a case of a patient discharging AMA after a COPD exacerbation, we highlight how these strategies can be applied to common issues in respiratory-related hospitalizations, such as prescribing inhalers and managing oxygen requirements. We argue that, by using these strategies, clinicians can deliver more respectful and higher quality care to an often-marginalized population of patients with respiratory disease.

Predictors of Patient-Initiated Discharge From an Inpatient Withdrawal Management Service: A Sex-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine sex-stratified independent predictors of patient-initiated discharge from an inpatient withdrawal management service and to determine whether those predictors differed by sex.

METHODS

This study compared people who had self-initiated versus planned discharges and used sex-stratified generalized estimating equations models to identify independent predictors of patient-initiated discharge. Predictors examined included age, ethnicity, substance of concern, tobacco use, mental health comorbidities, day of discharge, referral source, children, and social assistance funds.

RESULTS

Among females, there were 722 discharges, 116 of which were patient initiated. Among females, increasing age was associated with lower odds of patient-initiated discharge ( OR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.95, 0.98]). Racialized females were nearly 2 times more likely to experience patient-initiated discharge compared with White females ( OR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.09, 3.00]). Compared with weekdays, weekends were associated with over 4 times the odds of patient-initiated discharge ( OR = 4.77, 95% CI [2.66, 8.56]). Having one or more mental health comorbidities was associated with lower odds of patient-initiated discharge compared with having no mental health comorbidities ( OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.32, 0.82]). Among males, there were 1,244 discharges, 185 of which were patient initiated. Among males, increasing age was associated with decreased odds of patient-initiated discharge ( OR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.95, 0.98]). Compared with weekdays, weekends were associated with nearly 15 times the odds of patient-initiated discharge ( OR = 14.9, 95% CI [9.11, 24.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Males and females have shared and unique predictors of patient-initiated discharge. Future studies should continue to examine the influence of sex and gender on engagement with addictions care.

The last word: An analysis of power dynamics in clinical notes documenting against-medical-advice discharges

Against Medical Advice (AMA) discharges pose significant challenges to the healthcare system, straining patient-clinician relationships while contributing to avoidable morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, though these discharges culminate in patients' departure from hospitals, their effects reverberate long after, propagated by clinician notes stored in patients' medical records. These notes capture exceptionally fraught interactions between patients and providers, describing the circumstances surrounding breakdowns in clinical relationships. Additionally, they represent just one side of complex, contentious social interactions, for in describing AMA discharges, clinician notewriters quite literally have the last word. For these reasons, notes documenting AMA discharges provide insight into the ways in which clinicians conceptualize, characterize, and propagate power differentials in the contemporary healthcare system. Here, we present a qualitative thematic analysis of 185 notes documenting AMA discharges from a large urban US medical center, interpreting note dynamics through three sociological models of power analysis: (i) the distributive model of power promulgated by Max Weber, (ii) the collectivist power model characterized by Talcott Parsons and Hannah Arendt, and (iii) structural interpretations of power developed by Michel Foucault. We argue that in documenting AMA discharges, clinicians appear to conceive of their relationship with patients in almost exclusively distributive terms, which in turn contributes to an adversarial dynamic whereby both patients and clinicians ultimately suffer disempowerment. We furthermore argue that by facilitating clinicians' recognition of power's collectivist and structural dimensions, we may help transform breakdowns in patient-clinician relationships into opportunities for collaboration.

A 15-year review of characteristics and outcomes of patients leaving against medical advice

PURPOSE

Discharging against medical advice can have significant, detrimental effects on burn patient outcomes as well as higher hospital readmission rates and healthcare expenditures. The goal of this study is to identify characteristics of patients who left against medical advice and suggest solutions to mitigate these factors. Data were collected at our American Burn Association verified Burn Unit over a 15-year period.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2022, 37 patients were identified as having left against medical advice from the burn unit. The average patient age was 37 years old with 64.9% being male, and 70.2% were identified as having a substance abuse history. The majority (51.4%) had Medicaid or State health insurance, 29.7% had no insurance, and 18.9% had private insurance. The mechanism of injury was most commonly frostbite (43.2%). The majority sustained < 1% total body surface area injuries. Most (83.7%) had social work and/or case management involved during their admission, and all (100%) had their involvement if the length of admission was greater than one day. Over half (59.5%) returned to the ED within 2 weeks with complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that patients discharging against medical advice from the burn unit suffered from smaller injuries, often due to cold related injuries. These patients had comorbid substance abuse or psychiatric histories, and the majority had Medicaid or state health insurance. Recruiting interdisciplinary care members, including social work, psychiatry, and addiction medicine, early may help these patients by encouraging completion of their hospital care and setting up crucial follow-up care.

Analysis of 30-day hospital readmissions and related risk factors for COVID-19 patients with myocarditis hospitalized in the United States during 2020

Background

Despite extensive research on COVID-19 and its association with myocarditis, limited data are available on readmission rates for this subset of patients. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate is an established quality metric that is associated with increased mortality and cost.

Methods

This retrospective analysis utilized the Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2020 to evaluate 30-day hospital readmission rates, risk factors, and clinical outcomes among COVID-19 patients who presented with myocarditis at their index hospitalization.

Results

Our analysis revealed that 1) the 30-day all-cause hospital readmission rate for patients initially hospitalized with COVID-19 and myocarditis was 11.7%; 2) after multivariate adjustment, the primary predictor of readmission for COVID-19 patients with myocarditis was discharge against medical advice; 3) COVID-19 patients with myocarditis who required readmission had a higher proportion of older patients and Medicare beneficiaries; 4) the most common diagnoses at readmission were COVID-19, sepsis, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia; and 5) readmitted patients were more likely to require renal replacement therapy during their index hospitalization.

Conclusion

This study underscores the importance of optimizing discharge plans, preventing irregular discharges through shared decision-making, and ensuring robust post-hospital follow-up for patients with COVID-19 and myocarditis at index admission.

The Impact of Discharge Against Medical Advice on Readmission After Opioid Use Disorder-Associated Infective Endocarditis: a National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations for infective endocarditis (IE) associated with opioid use disorder (O-IE) have increased in the USA and have been linked to high rates of discharge against medical advice (DAMA). DAMA represents a truncation of care for a severe infection, yet patient outcomes after DAMA are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess readmissions following O-IE and quantify the impact of DAMA on outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of a nationally representative dataset of persons' inpatient discharges in the USA in 2016 PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6018 weighted persons were discharged for O-IE, stratified by DAMA vs. other discharge statuses. Of these, 1331 (22%) were DAMA.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was 30-day readmission rates, stratified by discharge type. We also examined the total number of hospitalizations during the year and estimated the effect of DAMA on readmission.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with non-DAMA, those experiencing DAMA were more commonly female, resided in metropolitan areas, lower income, and uninsured. Crude 30-day readmission following DAMA was 50%, compared with 21% for other discharge types. DAMA was strongly associated with readmission in an adjusted logistic regression model (OR 3.72, CI 3.02-4.60). Persons experiencing DAMA more commonly had ≥2 more hospitalizations during the period (31% vs. 18%, p<0.01), and were less frequently readmitted at the same hospital (49% vs 64%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DAMA occurs in nearly a quarter of patients hospitalized for O-IE and is strongly associated with short-term readmission. Interventions to address the root causes of premature discharges will enhance O-IE care, reduce hospitalizations and improve outcomes.

A step-by-step approach to patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) can be distressing for emergency physicians trying to navigate the medical, social, psychological, and legal ramifications of the situation in a fast-paced and chaotic environment. To guide physicians in fulfilling their obligation of care, we aimed to synthesize the best approaches to patients leaving AMA.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review across various fields of work, research context and methodology to synthesize the most relevant strategies for emergency physicians attending patients leaving AMA. We searched Medline, CINAHL, PSYCHO Legal Source, PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences collection, SocIndex and Scopus. Search strategies included controlled vocabulary (i.e., MESH) and keywords relevant to the subject chosen by a team of four people, including two specialized librarians.

RESULTS

The literature review included 34 relevant papers about approaches to patients leaving AMA: 8 case presentations, 4 ethical case analyses, 10 legal letters, 4 reviews and 8 original studies. The main identified strategies were prioritizing a patient-centered approach, proposing alternative discharge and reducing harm while properly documenting the encounter.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach to patients leaving AMA could help improve patient care, support physicians and decrease stigmatization of this population. We advocate that emergency physicians should receive training on how to approach patients leaving AMA to limit the impact on this vulnerable population.

Leave events among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Leave events are a public health concern resulting in poorer health outcomes. In Australia, leave events disproportionally impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. A systematic review was conducted to explore the causes of leave events among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and strategies to reduce them.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Web of Science, Embase and Informit, a database with a strong focus on relevant Australian content. Additionally, we examined the references of the records included, and performed a manual search using Google, Google scholar and the Australia's National Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Two independent reviewers screened the records. One author extracted the data and a second author reviewed it. To appraise the quality of the studies the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used as well as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was used to report quantitative findings and an inductive thematic analysis for qualitative studies and reports.

RESULTS

We located 421 records. Ten records met eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. From those, four were quantitative studies, three were qualitative studies and three reports. Five records studied data from the Northern Territory, two from Western Australia, two from New South Whales and one from Queensland. The quantitative studies focused on the characteristics of the patients and found associations between leave events and male gender, age younger than 45 years and town camp residency. Qualitative findings yielded more in depth causes of leave events evidencing that they are associated with health care quality gaps. There were multiple strategies suggested to reduce leave events through adapting health care service delivery. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representation is needed in a variety of roles within health care provision and during decision-making.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review found that multiple gaps within Australian health care delivery are associated with leave events among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The findings suggest that reducing leave events requires better representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people within the health workforce. In addition, partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is needed during the decision-making process in providing health services that meet Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural needs.

Methadone treatment and patient-directed hospital discharges among patients with opioid use disorder: Observations from general medicine services at an urban, safety-net hospital

Introduction

People with opioid use disorder (OUD) have high rates of discharge against medical advice from the hospital. Interventions for addressing these patient-directed discharges (PDDs) are lacking. We sought to explore the impact of methadone treatment for OUD on PDD.

Methods

Using electronic record and billing data from an urban safety-net hospital, we retrospectively examined the first hospitalization on a general medicine service for adults with OUD from January 2016 through June 2018. Associations with PDD compared to planned discharge were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Administration patterns of maintenance therapy versus new in-hospital initiation of methadone were examined using bivariate tests.

Results

During the study time period, 1,195 patients with OUD were hospitalized. 60.6% of patients received medication for OUD, of which 92.8% was methadone. Patients who received no treatment for OUD had a 19.1% PDD rate while patients initiated on methadone in-hospital had a 20.5% PDD rate and patients on maintenance methadone during the hospitalization had a 8.6% PDD rate. In multivariable logistic regression, methadone maintenance was associated with lower odds of PDD compared to no treatment (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.81), while methadone initiation was not (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.39). About 60% of patients initiated on methadone received 30 mg or less per day.

Conclusions

In this study sample, maintenance methadone was associated with nearly a 50% reduction in the odds of PDD. More research is needed to assess the impact of higher hospital methadone initiation dosing on PDD and if there is an optimal protective dose.

Pediatric Discharge From the Emergency Department Against Medical Advice

In this Ethics Rounds we present a conflict regarding discharge planning for a febrile infant in the emergency department. The physician believes discharge would be unsafe and would constitute a discharge against medical advice. The child's mother believes her son has been through an already extensive and painful evaluation and would prefer to monitor her well-appearing son closely at home with a safety plan and a next-day outpatient visit. Commentators assess this case from the perspective of best interest, harm-benefit, conflict management, and nondiscriminatory care principles and prioritize a high-quality informed consent process. They characterize the formalization of discharge against medical advice as problematic. Pediatricians, a pediatric resident, ethicists, an attorney, and mediator provide a range of perspectives to inform ethically justifiable options and conflict resolution practices.

An observational study on the use of long acting buprenorphine (ublocade) and a amper resistant PICC for utpatient IV antibiotic administration in atients with serious infections and pioid se isorder; The project

What is STOP OUD?

The STOP OUD project is an observational study on the use of long-acting buprenorphine (Sublocade) and a Tamper resistant PICC clamp for Outpatient IV antibiotic administration in Patients with serious infections and Opioid Use Disorder (STOP OUD).

Background

The US opioid crisis is driving up serious infections related to intravenous drug use. These infections require prolonged courses of antibiotics, often resulting in lengthy hospital stays. Extended hospitalizations for monitored parenteral antibiotics for patients with opioid use disorder are challenging for patients, reduce bed capacity, and are associated with significant cost. This observational study reviews the administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics in a monitored outpatient setting using long-acting injectable buprenorphine (Sublocade, Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA) and a tamper resistant clamp in patients with opioid use disorder .

Methods

Long-acting buprenorphine and a tamper resistant clamp were used to treat patients with serious infections and opioid use disorder as outpatients.

Results

Hospital days avoided were 30-days per STOP OUD project participant. Eleven of thirteen STOP OUD project participants completed their antibiotic courses as prescribed, there was no evidence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tampering, and they rated their care as a mean of 4.9/5 (SD 0.4). Institutional savings per STOP OUD patient was $33,000. Outpatient infusion costs were $9,300 for a net savings of $23,700 per STOP OUD project participant. Infections resolved in all participants.

Conclusions

The STOP OUD project reduced hospital length of stay for patients with opioid use disorder and serious infections, and had a favorable financial impact.

Implementation of a Patient-Provider Agreement to Improve Healthcare Delivery for Patients With Substance Use Disorder in the Inpatient Setting

OBJECTIVES

Inpatient healthcare delivery to people who use drugs is an opportunity to provide acute medical stabilization and offer treatment for underlying substance use disorder (SUD). The process of delivering quality healthcare to people with SUD can present challenges.

METHODS

We convened a group of stakeholders to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving healthcare safety and employee satisfaction when providing inpatient care to people with SUD.

RESULTS

We developed, implemented, and evaluated a "Pain and Addiction Agreement" tool, a document to guide discussions between providers and patients about expectations and policies for inpatient care.

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, we share our experience of working closely with stakeholders. We hope that our project can serve as a blueprint motivating other centers to pursue quality improvement initiatives to improve healthcare for people with SUD and support the people who take care of them in the hospital.

Why Do Patients Leave against Medical Advice? Reasons, Consequences, Prevention, and Interventions

Background: A patient decides to leave the hospital against medical advice. Is this an erratic eccentric behavior of the patient, or a gap in the quality of care provided by the hospital? With a significant and increasing prevalence of up to 1–2% of all hospital admissions, leaving against medical advice affects both the patient and the healthcare provider. We hereby explore this persistent problem in the healthcare system. We searched Medline and PubMed within the last 10 years, using the keywords “discharge against medical advice,” “DAMA,” “leave against medical advice,” and “AMA.” We retrospectively reviewed 49 articles in our project. Ishikawa fishbone root cause analysis (RCA) was employed to explore reasons for leaving against medical advice (AMA). This report presents the results of the RCA and highlights the consequences of discharge against medical advice (DAMA). In addition, the article explores preventive strategies, as well as interventions to ameliorate leaving AMA.

Association of Medicaid Expansion Policy with Outcomes in Homeless Patients Requiring Emergency General Surgery

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion has reduced obstacles faced in receiving care. Emergency general surgery (EGS) is a clinical event where delays in appropriate care impact outcomes. Therefore, we assessed the association between non-Medicaid expansion policy and multiple outcomes in homeless patients requiring EGS.

METHODS

We used 2014 State Inpatient Database to identify homeless individuals admitted with a primary EGS diagnosis who underwent an EGS procedure. States were divided into those that did and did not implement Medicaid expansion. Multivariable quantile regression was used to examine associations between non-Medicaid expansion states and (1) length of stay and (2) total index hospital charges within the homeless population. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the associations between non-Medicaid expansion and (1) mortality, (2) surgical complications, (3) discharge against medical advice, and (4) home healthcare.

RESULTS

A total of 6930 homeless patients were identified. Of these, 435 (6.2%) were in non-expansion states. Non-Medicaid expansion was associated with higher charges (coef: $46,264, 95% CI 40,388-52,139). There were non-significant differences in mortality (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.79-2.62; p = 0.2) or surgical complications (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.7-1.8; p = 0.4). However, homeless individuals living in non-expansion states did have higher odds of being discharged against medical advice (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.08-4.05; p = 0.02), and lower odds of receiving home healthcare (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Homeless patients living in Medicaid expansion states had lower odds of being discharged against medical advice, higher likelihood of receiving home healthcare and overall lower total index hospital charges.

Physician Practices in Against Medical Advice Discharges

BACKGROUND

Patients discharged against medical advice (AMA) have disproportionately high health care costs and increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions. Although patient risk factors for discharge AMA are known, there are little data regarding physician discharge practices surrounding AMA discharges.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients discharged AMA from a large, urban, academic medical center. Our study predictors included patient demographics and admission characteristics: primary service team, time of discharge, documentation of anticipated AMA discharge, and length of stay. The primary outcomes were physician discharge practices including a scheduled follow-up appointment, documentation of informed consent, documentation of a risk/benefit discussion, and notification of the attending physician. Our coprimary outcome was the incidence of 30-day hospital readmission.

RESULTS

Among AMA discharges, 33% had follow-up appointments scheduled upon discharge. There was documentation of a risk/benefit discussion (69%), informed consent (63%), and notification of the attending physician (72%) in most discharges. Physician discharge practices were not associated with 30-day hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to discharge best practices in AMA discharges was inconsistent and suboptimal, particularly for scheduling follow-up appointments, but was not associated with hospital readmission. Our results highlight the difficulty in facilitating safe transitions of care for patients discharged AMA.

Who Leaves Early? Factors Associated With Against Medical Advice Discharge During Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To determine if certain patient, clinical, and disease factors are associated with against medical advice (AMA) discharge among patients admitted for treatment of alcohol withdrawal.

METHODS

Data from admissions to a dedicated unit for treatment of substance withdrawal were collected over a 6-month period. Patients with AMA and planned discharge were compared with regard to demographics, clinical data, and substance use disorder disease characteristics. A stepwise logistic regression was used to find the best model.

RESULTS

The study population included 655 patient encounters. A total of 93 (14%) discharges were AMA. Bivariate analysis showed patients with AMA discharge were younger (mean age 43 vs 46 years; P < 0.05), more likely to leave on a Tuesday to Thursday, and to have an initial withdrawal score at or above the median (AMA 69% vs planned 56%; P = 0.02). Emergency department (ED) admissions had an AMA discharge rate of 21% compared with 10% of community admissions (P < 0.05). Regression analysis found AMA discharge was significantly associated with admission from the ED (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, confidence interval [CI] 1.27-3.25) and younger age (OR 0.97, CI 0.95-0.99). There was no significant difference in discharge disposition among patients with concurrent opioid use disorder who were on opioid agonist therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

AMA discharges occurred in 1 of every 7 admissions. Being admitted from the ED and younger age was associated with AMA discharge. No other patient or clinical factors were found to be associated with AMA discharge.

Understanding why patients with substance use disorders leave the hospital against medical advice: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Hospital discharges against medical advice (AMA) is associated with negative health outcomes and re-admissions. Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) are up to three times more likely to be discharged AMA as compared to those without SUD. Studies suggest that undertreated withdrawal and a perception of stigma may increase the risk, however, to date, there are no published qualitative studies exploring the specific reasons why patients with SUD leave prematurely. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 15) with SUD with documented AMA discharges from our hospital between 9/2017 and 9/2018. Maximum variation sampling was employed to display diversity across gender, race, age, and type of substance use disorder (alcohol vs opioids). Patients were interviewed until no new concepts emerged from additional interviews. Two coders separately coded all transcripts and reconciled code assignments. Results: Four core issues were identified as patients' reasons for leaving the hospital prematurely: undertreated withdrawal and ongoing craving to use drugs, uncontrolled acute and chronic pain, stigma and discrimination by hospital staff about their SUD, and hospital restrictions, including not being allowed to intermittently leave the hospital floor. For patients with histories of criminal involvement, being hospitalized reminded them of being incarcerated. Conclusion: These findings shed light on the reasons patients with SUD are discharged from the hospital AMA, an event that is associated with increased thirty-day mortality and hospital re-admission. AMA discharges represent missed opportunities for the health care system to engage with patients struggling with a SUD. Our findings support the need for inpatient addiction treatment, particularly for management of withdrawal and co-occurring pain, and the need to address health care provider associated stigma surrounding addiction.

Treatment Delays for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in an Iranian Emergency Department: A Retrospective Chart Review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the extent and nature of treatment delays and the contributing factors influencing them for patients with acute ischemic stroke, as well as main barriers to stroke care in an Iranian emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 394 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were referred to the ED of a tertiary academic medical center in northwest Iran from March 21 to June 21, 2017. The steps of this review process included instrument development, medical records retrieval, data extraction, and data verification. Primary outcomes were identified treatment delays and causes of loss of eligibility for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA).

RESULTS

Of patients with acute ischemic stroke, 80.2% did not meet intravenous r-tPA eligibility; the most common cause was delayed (>4.5 hours) ED arrival after symptom onset (71.82%; n=283). Of 19.8% of subjects for whom the stroke code was activated, intravenous r-tPA was administered in only 5.3%. The average time from patients' arrival to first emergency medicine resident visit, notification of acute stroke team, presence of neurology resident, and computed tomography scan interpretation was lower for patients who met criteria of intravenous r-tPA than for those who lost eligibility for fibrinolytic therapy. The average door-to-needle time was 69 minutes (interquartile range 46 to 91 minutes).

CONCLUSION

Our ED and acute stroke team had a favorable clinical performance meeting established critical time goals of inhospital care for potentially eligible patients, but a poor clinical performance for the majority of patients who were not candidates for fibrinolytic therapy.