Somatuline Autogel: an extended release lanreotide formulation

Long-acting somatostatin analogs and well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a 20-year-old story

PURPOSE

The specific indications of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) emerged over the time. The objective of this review is to summarize and discuss the most relevant data concerning long-acting SSAs in NET.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed including publications focusing on therapy with the long-acting octreotide, lanreotide, and pasireotide in patients with NET.

RESULTS

Long-acting SSAs confirm to be a manageable and widely used tool in patients with NET. Both long-acting octreotide and lanreotide are safe as the short-acting formulations, while patient compliance and adherence is further improved. Together with some randomized phase-3 trials, many retrospective and prospective studies have been performed in the last 20 years revealing a variable but substantial impact on progression free survival, not only in gastroenteropancreatic but also in lung and unknown primary NETs. The most frequent tumor response to SSAs is stable disease, but an objective response can be observed, more frequently by using high-dose schedules and in MEN1-related pancreatic NETs. Low tumor burden, low tumor grade (G1 and low G2), good performance status and use as first-line therapy are the main predictive factors to SSAs in NET patients. Pasireotide has been evaluated in few studies. This compound remains a promising SSA and would deserve to be further evaluated as a potential additional indication in NET therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting SSAs are an effective and safe initial therapy of patients with well differentiated NET, allowing tumor growth as well as symptoms control for long-time in selected patients.

Preparation of Long-acting Somatostatin and GnRH Analogues and their Applications in Tumor Therapy

Hormonal drugs are essential treatment options for some hormone-dependent or hormone-sensitive tumors. The common dosage forms of hormonal drugs have a short half-life. Hence, frequent administration is needed, which results in poor patient compliance. Nevertheless, using drug delivery technology, somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are prepared into long-acting formulations that can significantly prolong the action time of these drugs, reducing medication frequency and increasing patient compliance. Such drugs are advantageous when treating acromegaly, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other diseases having a relatively long course. SSAs and GnRH analogues are two typical hormonal drugs, the long-acting formulations of which are essential in clinical practice. This review summarized the preparation methods and clinical application of long-acting formulations in cancer. Further, the action mechanism and new research of SSAs and GnRH analogues were discussed, and suggestions related to the development of long-acting SSAs and GnRH analogues were provided.

Octreotide and lanreotide decrease ovarian ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by improving oxidative and nitrosative stress

AIM

To investigate the protective effect of octreotide and lanreotide on ovarian damage in experimental ovarian ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Fifty-six rats were separated into seven groups; group 1: sham group, group 2: surgical control group with 3-h torsion and detorsion, group 3: 0.02 mg/kg s.c. octreotide 30 min before 3-h torsion, group 4; octreotide just after detorsion for 7 days, group 5: octreotide 30 min before torsion and just after detorsion for 7 days, group 6: single time 20 mg/kg s.c. lanreotide before torsion, group 7: single time lanreotide just after detorsion.

RESULTS

All histopathological scores except congestion were significantly lower in group 1 than other groups. In addition, hemorrhage (group 2 vs 4: P < 0.05), degeneration (group 2 vs 4: P < 0.05, group 2 vs 5: P < 0.01 and group 2 vs 6: P < 0.05) and total damage score (group 2 vs 4: P < 0.05, group 2 vs 5: P < 0.05, group 2 vs 6: P < 0.05 and group 2 vs 7: P < 0.05) were significantly lower than other groups. Moreover, ovarian tissue total oxidant status and oxidative stress index levels were significantly decreased in groups 5 (both P < 0.05) and 7 (both P < 0.05) when compared to group 2. Furthermore, tissue levels of peroxynitrite were significantly higher in group 2 than groups 1, 3 and 5 (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide and lanreotide have a protective role against ischemia-reperfusion damage in rat torsion detorsion model by improving histopathological and biochemical findings including tissue levels of total oxidant status, oxidative stress index and peroxynitrite.

Somatostatin Analogs in Clinical Practice: a Review

Somatostatin analogs are an invaluable therapeutic option in the diagnosis and treatment of somatotropinomas, thyrotropinomas, and functioning and non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. They should also be considered an effective and safe therapeutic alternative to corticotropinomas, gonadotropinomas, and prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists. Somatostatin analogs have also shown to be useful in the treatment of other endocrine diseases (congenital hyperinsulinism, Graves’ orbitopathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema), non-endocrine tumors (breast, colon, prostate, lung, and hepatocellular), and digestive diseases (chronic refractory diarrhea, hepatorenal polycystosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, dumping syndrome, and intestinal fistula).

The safety of lanreotide for neuroendocrine tumor

INTRODUCTION

Lanreotide autogel is a synthetic somatostatin analogue which has been FDA and EMA approved for unresectable, well to moderately differentiated, locally advanced or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Its action is mediated by its affinity to somatostatin receptors, especially sst2 and sst5 receptors. Its longer half-life offers the convenience of 4-week dosing over the need for frequent injections of short-acting somatostatin analogues. Areas covered: Lanreotide ATG offers progression-free survival benefit in locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) compared to placebo, reflecting a strong antiproliferative signal. As lanreotide is commonly used for management of NET, it is imperative to recognize and appropriately manage any drug-related toxicities. In this review, we will provide an overview of the toxicity with lanreotide and its management. Expert opinion: Lanreotide is highly effective in managing carcinoid symptoms and has a robust anti-tumor effect in NET. Overall, it is well tolerated with low rates of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity. It's toxicity profile is mostly predictable, and patients should be informed of the transient nature of some of the upfront toxicities.

New therapeutic approaches to metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A glimpse into the future

Neuroendocrine (NE) gastroenteropancreatic tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasias arising from neuroendocrine cells of the embryological gut. Their incidence have increased significantly over the past 3 decades probably due to the improvements in imaging and diagnosis. The recent advances in molecular biology have translated into an expansion of therapeutic approaches to these patients. Somatostatin analogs, which initially were approved for control of hormonal syndromes, have recently been proven to inhibit tumor growth. Several new drugs such as antiangiogenics and others targeting mammalian target of rapamycin pathways have been approved to treat progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) although their role in non-pancreatic is still controversial. The treatment of NETs requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach. The management of localized NETs primarily involves surgical resection followed by surveillance. However, the treatment of unresectable and/or metastatic disease may involve a combination of surgical resection, systemic therapy, and liver-directed therapies with the goal of alleviating symptoms of peptide release and controlling tumor growth. This article will review the current therapeutic strategies for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs and will take a glimpse into the future approaches.

Injectable formulations of poly(lactic acid) and its copolymers in clinical use

Poly(lactic acid) and its copolymers have revolutionized the field of drug delivery due to their excellent biocompatibility and tunable physico-chemical properties. These copolymers have served the healthcare sector by contributing many products to combat various diseases and for biomedical applications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of clinically used products of poly(lactic acid) and its copolymers. Multi-dimension information covering product approval, formulation aspects and clinical status is described to provide a panoramic overview of each product. Moreover, leading patented technologies and various clinical trials on these products for different applications are included. This review focuses on marketed injectable formulations of PLA and its copolymers.

Octreotide and Lanreotide in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous, rare malignancies that arise most commonly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. They often secrete vasoactive substances resulting in carcinoid syndrome and the tumor cells exclusively express somatostatin receptors. Octreotide and lanreotide are the two synthetic somatostatin analogs used for the control of carcinoid symptoms and tumor progression in advanced inoperable disease. Recent pivotal trials (PROMID and CLARINET studies) established their antitumor activity. We discuss the available data to support their use as symptom controlling and antiproliferative agents. This article also reviews the guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network and North American Neuro Endocrine Tumor Society), cost-analysis (suggesting the cost-effectiveness of lanreotide autogel compared to higher doses of octreotide long acting release formulation in refractory patients), and future directions of somatostatin analogs in the management of patients refractory to conventional doses of octreotide and lanreotide.

Antitumor effects of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

For decades, somatostatin analogs (including octreotide and lanreotide) have been indicated for relief of the symptoms of flushing, diarrhea, and wheezing associated with secretory neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, it has been suggested that somatostatin analogs may provide direct and indirect antitumor effects in secretory and nonsecretory NETs in addition to symptom control in secretory NETs.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to identify studies that investigated the antitumor effects of octreotide or lanreotide for patients with NETs. Additional studies not published in the peer-reviewed literature were identified by searching online abstracts. Results. In all, 17 octreotide trials and 11 lanreotide trials that included antitumor effects were identified. Partial response rates were between 0% and 31%, and stable disease rates were between 15% and 89%. Octreotide was the only somatostatin analog for which results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that investigated antitumor effects were published. After 6 months of treatment in this randomized phase III trial, stable disease was observed in 67% of patients (hazard ratio for time to disease progression: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.59; p = .000072).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to symptom control for NETs, the data support an antitumor effect of somatostatin analogs and suggest that they may slow tumor growth. Long-acting repeatable octreotide has been shown to have an antitumor effect in a randomized phase III trial in midgut NETs, whereas results are pending in a corresponding controlled trial with lanreotide for patients with intestinal and pancreatic primary NETs.

Somatostatin and somatostatin receptors: implications for neoplastic growth and cancer biology

Somatostatin agonists (SM-As) are capable of achieving durable symptomatic relief and significant clinical responses in certain tumours. Herein, we review the diverse direct and indirect mechanisms of antineoplastic activity elicited by SM-As as well as the hurdles that complicate their use as monotherapies in a broader range of malignancies. Emphasis is placed on recent clinical attempts to neutralise the IGF-mediated survival factor effects in the bone metastasis microenvironment in advanced prostate cancer. The first clinical trials of this 'anti-survival factor manipulation' strategy utilised the ability of SM-As to suppress the growth hormone-dependent liver-derived IGF-I bioavailability in combination with other drugs, such as dexamethasone, zolendronate and oestrogens, acting systemically and at the bone metastasis microenvironment. These regimens restored androgen ablation responsiveness in stage D3 prostate cancer patients and successfully produced objective clinical responses while only mild toxicities were observed. Furthermore, we focus on the preclinical experimental data of a targeted SM-A coupled to the super-potent doxorubicin derivative AN-201. The resulting conjugate (AN-238) has shown increased antitumour potency with a favourable toxicity profile. The potential use of novel SM-As as anticancer drugs is discussed in relation to data suggesting other direct and indirect treatment approaches pertaining to the somatostatin system.

Somatostatin analog lanreotide in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

Prostate cancer is a common disease affecting males. Despite initial sensitivity to hormone treatment, prostate cancer eventually progresses to a castration-resistant stage (CRPC), which carries an ominous prognosis. Lanreotide is a long-acting somatostatin analog with the same properties with the native peptide. It has been shown to be highly efficacious in treating various hypersecretoty disorders and tumors. Lanreotide has been administered to patients with CRPC within a novel treatment concept, with the aim of targeting not only cancer cells but also various factors secreted in the tumor cell milieu that confer protection from apoptosis. Within this concept, lanreotide has been administered as part of the "antisurvival factor therapy" in combination with dexamethasone and a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analog. It has also been given combined with oestrogens in patients with CRPC. The so far published series have documented a clinical response in many patients treated along with significant improvement in parameters related to quality of life. In view of these promising results, large-scale, randomized, controlled trials are warranted to clearly define the exact role of lanreotide and other somatostatin analogs in the treatment of patients with CRPC.

Management of acromegaly: is there a role for primary medical therapy?

Acromegaly is a chronic, debilitating disease caused by chronic growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion which results in chronic medical comorbidities, poor quality of life and high mortality rates. Successful treatment can improve clinical signs and symptoms and normalize mortality rates. Over 95% of acromegaly is caused by a somatotroph adenoma of the pituitary, and the first-line treatment is generally transsphenoidal surgery, which can be curative in 50-60% of patients. Nonetheless, high rates of persistent acromegaly following surgery and the limited efficacy of radiation therapy necessitate chronic medical treatment for many patients. Somatostatin analogues have become the preferred first-line medical therapy for many practitioners, as they achieve better biochemical and direct tumor control than the dopamine agonists, and long-acting preparations make once monthly administration possible. Cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, offers a lower-cost option and may be effective in patients with a pituitary tumor that co-secretes GH and prolactin. Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist that produces exceptional biochemical response rates but lacks any direct effects on the tumor, which may limit its effectiveness as life-long monotherapy. Combinations of these three drug classes have not been rigorously studied, and preliminary trials do not suggest improved clinical outcomes. While medical treatment options for acromegaly have significantly improved over the last 30 years, limitations remain, and a multi-specialty team approach is necessary for the effective long-term management of patients with acromegaly.

Efficacy of lanreotide Autogel administered every 4-8 weeks in patients with acromegaly previously responsive to lanreotide microparticles 30 mg: a phase III trial

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

Depot somatostatin analogues are well accepted as either adjuvant or primary therapy for acromegaly, and their long dosage intervals facilitate adherence to treatment. Our objective was to evaluate whether lanreotide Autogel 120 mg, every 4-8 weeks, was as effective in controlling acromegaly as lanreotide microparticles 30 mg, every 1-2 weeks. PATIENTS DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients who had used lanreotide microparticles 30 mg, >or= 2 months prestudy, and had responded to treatment were recruited to this open, prospective, multicentre phase III trial. Three to five injections of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg were administered. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg was injected every 4, 6 or 8 weeks in patients previously receiving lanreotide microparticles every 7, 10 or 14 days, respectively. GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels were assessed one dosing interval after the final injections.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were enrolled and 93 completed. Steady-state GH concentrations demonstrated similar efficacy between the formulations (upper 95% confidence interval of the quotient, 77.7%). Mean (SE) GH levels were lower with lanreotide Autogel than with lanreotide microparticles (3.8 (0.5) vs 4.3 (0.5) ng/ml; P < 0.001). GH levels < 2.5 ng/ml were observed in 54% and 46% of patients; 40% and 35% having GH < 2.5 ng/ml and normalized IGF-1 with lanreotide Autogel and microparticles, respectively. Symptoms were controlled better with lanreotide Autogel and treatment was well accepted.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 4-8 weeks, is at least as effective and as well tolerated in acromegaly as lanreotide microparticles 30 mg injected every 7-14 days.

Pharmacokinetic profile of lanreotide Autogel in patients with acromegaly after four deep subcutaneous injections of 60, 90 or 120 mg every 28 days

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of a prolonged release, aqueous Autogel formulation of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide (Lan-ATG).

DESIGN

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study, during which patients received 60, 90 or 120 mg Lan-ATG for four fixed administrations at 28-day intervals.

PATIENTS

A total of 18 patients with acromegaly were recruited; six patients were randomized to each treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Lanreotide minimum concentration (C(min)), maximum serum concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve during a dosing interval (AUC(tau)) were assessed after a single dose and at steady state (ss). Serum GH and IGF-1 levels were assessed before each administration and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

After a single administration, dose proportionality for C(min,1), C(max) and AUC(tau) was demonstrated statistically. After repeated administrations, Lan-ATG exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range and ss values of C(min), C(max) and AUC(tau) increased in a dose-dependent, linear manner. Mean C(max,ss) values were only two- to fourfold greater than C(min,ss) values, and there was good control over the entire release profile. Serum levels of GH and IGF-1 declined over the course of the study and acromegaly symptoms improved. The treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Lan-ATG showed linear pharmacokinetic profiles over the three dose levels after both single and repeated dosing, no initial burst effect and good control over the entire release profile. Despite the absence of dose adaptation, four injections of Lan-ATG were effective in lowering serum levels of GH and IGF-1.

Pharmacokinetics and population pharmacodynamic analysis of lanreotide Autogel

Somatostatin analogs are the first-line medical therapy for acromegaly, and the treatment of this disease has been simplified by the development of extended-release formulations of these analogs. Lanreotide is a somatostatin analog that is available either as the microparticle formulation, requiring 7- to 14-day dosing, or as the aqueous Autogel formulation, requiring 28-day dosing. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lanreotide. Patients with acromegaly were given 5 injections of lanreotide microparticles, 30 mg, followed by 3 injections of lanreotide Autogel, at doses of 60, 90, or 120 mg every 28 days. The study was extended to a further 12 injections of lanreotide Autogel with dose titration. A total of 144 patients were recruited; 130 received 3 injections of lanreotide Autogel, and 130 completed the extension phase. Average minimum lanreotide concentrations (Cmin) at steady state were 1.949 +/- 0.619, 2.685 +/- 0.783, and 3.575 +/- 1.271 ng/mL for 60, 90, and 120 mg of lanreotide Autogel, respectively, showing a dose-proportional increase. Population pharmacodynamic analysis showed that the relationship between either formulation of lanreotide and serum growth hormone (GH) concentrations was best described using an inhibitory maximum response (Emax) model that allowed for the possibility of an incomplete inhibition of GH. Lanreotide elicited a maximum reduction in GH of 82%. Because patients were already being treated, baseline GH (E0) was estimated, and the value of 8.63 ng/mL was in agreement with the inclusion criteria of GH 10 ng/mL or less. The effectiveness of treatment was demonstrated by the median serum concentration of lanreotide, 1.13 ng/mL, required to lower GH to 2.5 ng/mL or less. The serum concentration that elicited half of the Emax (EC50) was estimated as 0.206 ng/mL, showing a high sensitivity to lanreotide, with a predictably high interpatient variability of 200.75% reflecting the range of dosing regimens needed to control GH.

Update on the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors represent a group of neoplasias characterized by significant histopathological and biological heterogeneity. The basic study of the biological features of neuroendocrine tumors should allow the oncologist to identify those tumor subsets more sensitive to a particular medical treatment. For example, in metastatic or advanced disease, locoregional treatments, as well as radionuclide therapies, should be suggested only in selected cases. Although it has no significant effect on tumor growth, biotherapy with somatostatin analogs and/or interferon-alpha is recommended for either well-differentiated or functioning tumors. On the other hand, chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of those tumors characterized by a poor differentiation grade and a high proliferation rate. Novel therapies, new pharmacological formulations and more selective somatostatin analogs are now under clinical investigation for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.